searchable PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintThis extra copy of the table of contents has been placed on the first page of the PDFdocument to make it easier to navigate. It contains links to the individual articles.Though you will be viewing bit-map scans of the pages, Adobe Acrobat has OCRedthe text, so it is searchable to the extent that the software's "reading" succeeded.Those who print copies from this file may want to discard this page.TABLE OF CONTENTSHOLSINGER, J.R., Two New Species of the Subterranean Amphipod Genus Mexiweckelia (Gammaridae)from Mexico and Texas, with Notes on the Origin and Distribution of the Genus .BOWMAN, T.E., Two New American Species of Spelaeomysis (Crustacea: Mysidacea) from a MexicanCave and Land Crab Burrows. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13GATES, G.E., On More Earthworms from Mexican Caves 21HOBBS, H.H.,JR.,Three New Troglobitic Decapod Crustaceans from Oaxaca, Mexico 25HOBBS, H.H., JR., H.H. HOBBS III, The Genus Sphaeromicola (Ostracoda, Entocytheridae) in Mexico .. 39SHEAR, W.A., Jarmilka alba, n.gen., n.sp. (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Cambalidae), a New Milliped froma Cave in Belize . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43MUCHMORE, W.B., New and Little Known Pseudoscorpions, Mainly from Caves in Mexico (Arachnida,Pseudoscorpionida) 47MUCHMORE, W.B., The Pseudoscorpion Genus Mexobisium in Middle America (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpionida). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 63HOBBS, H.H., JR., Two New Troglobitic Shrimps (Decapoda: Alpheidae and Palaemonidae) from Oaxaca,Mexico 73MUCHMORE, W.B., A Second Troglobitic Tyrannochthonius from Mexico (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpionida,Chthoniidae) 81GOODNIGHT, C.J., M.L. GOODNIGHT, Opilionids (Phalangida) from Mexican Caves 83PECK, S.B., A Review of the Cavernicolous Catopinae (Coleoptera; Leiodidae) of Mexico, Belize, andGuatemala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97CAUSEY, N.B., Millipedes in the Collection of the Association for Mexican Cave Studies. II. Keys andAdditional Records and Descriptions (Diplopoda) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 107ROWLAND, J.M., Two New Troglobitic Amblypygida of the Genus Tarantula from Mexican Caves(Arachnida) 123CHRISTIANSEN, K., The Genus Pseudosinella in Mesoamerican Caves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 129ROWLAND, J.M., Three New Schizomida of the Genus Schizomus from Mexican Caves (Arachnida) 135GERTSCH, W.J., A Report on Cave Spiders from Mexico and Central America 141MITCHELL, R.W., M. KAWAKATSU, A New Cave-Adapted Planarian (Tricladida, Paludicola, Planariidae)from Chiapas, Mexico. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 165REDDELL, J.R., W.R. ELLIOTT, A Checklist of the Cave Fauna of Mexico. IV. Additional Records fromthe Sierra de EI Abra, Tamaulipas and San Luis Potos( . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 171REDDELL, J.R., W.R. ELLIOTT, A Checklist of the Cave Fauna of Mexico. V. Additional Records fromthe Sierra de Guatemala, Tamaulipas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 181ELLIOTT, W.R., J.R. REDDELL, A Checklist of the Cave Fauna of Mexico. VI. Valle de los FantasmasRegion, San Luis Potos( . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..... 191

ASSOCIATION FOR MEXICAN CAVE STUDIESBULLETIN 5STUDIES ON THECAVERNICOLE FAUNA OFMEXICO AND ADJACENT REGIONSROBERT W. MITCHELLDEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGYTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITYLUBBOCK, TEXASEDITED BYand JAMES R. REDDELLASSOCIATION FOR MEXICANCAVE STUDIESAUSTI N, TEXASThe Speleo Press • AustinJuly 1973

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintThe Association for Mexican Cave Studies is a non-profit, volunteerorganization whose goals are the collection and dissemination ofinformation concerning Mexican caves. The AMCS publishes a Newsletter,Bulletin, and Cave Report Series which are available to anysincerely interested, conservation-minded person. Prices are availableby writing.Some of the persons responsible for the continued success of theAssociation's endeavours are the following.Publications Editor .Coeditor .Cave Files .Secretary-Treasurer .Coordinating Biologist .Production Manager .Terry W. RainesJames R. ReddellWilliam H. RussellJan E. lewisJames R. ReddellDon L. BroussardPhotographs by Robert W. MitchellCover: Hoplobunus inops Goodnight and Goodnight, Cueva de la Capilla, Tamaulipas, MexicoFrontispiece: Paracophus caecus Hubbell, Cueva de la Mina, Tamaulipas, MexicoCopyright © 1973 by the Association for Mexican Cave StudiesPrinted in the United States of AmericaThe Speleo Press • P.O. Box 7037 • Austin, Texas 78712ASSOCIATION FOR MEXICAN CAVE STUDIESPO Box 7672Austin, Texas 78713INININ. ames-pubs. org(updated 2005)

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintThis volume is dedicated toTHE PEOPLE OF MEXICOwho have guided us to caves,helped us collect many animals, andgiven us their friendship

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintTABLE OF CONTENTSHOLSINGER, J.R., Two New Species of the Subterranean Amphipod Genus Mexiweckelia (Gammaridae)from Mexico and Texas, with Notes on the Origin and Distribution of the Genus .BOWMAN, T.E., Two New American Species of Spelaeomysis (Crustacea: Mysidacea) from a MexicanCave and Land Crab Burrows. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13GATES, G.E., On More Earthworms from Mexican Caves 21HOBBS, H.H.,JR.,Three New Troglobitic Decapod Crustaceans from Oaxaca, Mexico 25HOBBS, H.H., JR., H.H. HOBBS III, The Genus Sphaeromicola (Ostracoda, Entocytheridae) in Mexico .. 39SHEAR, W.A., Jarmilka alba, n.gen., n.sp. (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Cambalidae), a New Milliped froma Cave in Belize . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43MUCHMORE, W.B., New and Little Known Pseudoscorpions, Mainly from Caves in Mexico (Arachnida,Pseudoscorpionida) 47MUCHMORE, W.B., The Pseudoscorpion Genus Mexobisium in Middle America (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpionida). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 63HOBBS, H.H., JR., Two New Troglobitic Shrimps (Decapoda: Alpheidae and Palaemonidae) from Oaxaca,Mexico 73MUCHMORE, W.B., A Second Troglobitic Tyrannochthonius from Mexico (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpionida,Chthoniidae) 81GOODNIGHT, C.J., M.L. GOODNIGHT, Opilionids (Phalangida) from Mexican Caves 83PECK, S.B., A Review of the Cavernicolous Catopinae (Coleoptera; Leiodidae) of Mexico, Belize, andGuatemala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97CAUSEY, N.B., Millipedes in the Collection of the Association for Mexican Cave Studies. II. Keys andAdditional Records and Descriptions (Diplopoda) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 107ROWLAND, J.M., Two New Troglobitic Amblypygida of the Genus Tarantula from Mexican Caves(Arachnida) 123CHRISTIANSEN, K., The Genus Pseudosinella in Mesoamerican Caves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 129ROWLAND, J.M., Three New Schizomida of the Genus Schizomus from Mexican Caves (Arachnida) 135GERTSCH, W.J., A Report on Cave Spiders from Mexico and Central America 141MITCHELL, R.W., M. KAWAKATSU, A New Cave-Adapted Planarian (Tricladida, Paludicola, Planariidae)from Chiapas, Mexico. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 165REDDELL, J.R., W.R. ELLIOTT, A Checklist of the Cave Fauna of Mexico. IV. Additional Records fromthe Sierra de EI Abra, Tamaulipas and San Luis Potos( . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 171REDDELL, J.R., W.R. ELLIOTT, A Checklist of the Cave Fauna of Mexico. V. Additional Records fromthe Sierra de Guatemala, Tamaulipas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 181ELLIOTT, W.R., J.R. REDDELL, A Checklist of the Cave Fauna of Mexico. VI. Valle de los FantasmasRegion, San Luis Potos( . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..... 191

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintTWO NEW SPECIES OF THE SUBTERRANEAN AMPHIPOD GENUS MEXIWECKELIA(GAMMARIDAE) FROM MEXICO AND TEXAS,WITH NOTES ON THE ORIGIN AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE GENUSJohn R. Holsinger 1Department of Invertebrate ZoologyNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian InstitutionWashington, D. C. 20560INTRODUCTIONThe genus Mexiweckelia was recently described byHolsinger and Minckley (1971) on the basis of twospecies (M. colei and M. particeps) discovered ingroundwater habitats of the Bolson de Cuatro Cienegasin central Coahuila, northern Mexico. Previous tothis description, only one other species of subterraneanamphipod crustacean (Bogidiel/a tabascensis Villalobos)had been reported from Mexic0 2 • The latterwas described from Grutas del Cocona in Tabasco byVillalobos (1960).During June of 1972, members of the Associationfor Mexican Cave Studies collected blind, white amphipodsfrom two pools in Cueva de la Siquita inDurango, Mexico. Upon examination these specimensproved to represent an undescribed species of MexilperlTlanentaddress: Department of Biology, Old DominionUniversity, Norfolk, Virginia 23508.2The genus Bogidiella was previously referred to the familyBogidiellidae by a number of workers, including myself(Holsinger and Minckley, 1971). After careful study, however,I now regard this family as invalid and this genus as amember of the family Gammaridae.3Descriptions of three new species of Bogidiella from subterraneanwaters in Mexico (2 spp.l and Guatemala (1 sp.)were recently prepared by Dr. Augusto Vigna-Taglianti(Rome) and Professor Dr. Sandro Ruffo (Verona) and willbe published in the near future (Vigna-Taglianti, in litt.,24 Nov. 1972).weckelia. The following description of this new speciesbrings the total number of subterranean amphipodspecies recorded from Mexico to four 3 and thenumber of cavernicolous species to two. The twospecies from Cuatro Cienegas, while of subterraneanfacies (i.e., blind and depigmented), were collectedfrom groundwater outlets (seeps, springs and springfedpools) and not from true cave habitats.During my continuing investigation of NorthAmerican subterranean amphipods of the familyGammaridae, I had the opportunity to study fourspecimens collected by Leslie Hubricht in 1940 fromthe artesian well at the fish hatchery in San Marcos,Texas. Although these specimens were in poor condition(many of the pereopods were broken off andthe third uropods were missing), they represented anew species assignable to Mexiweckelia. The followingdescription of this species brings the total number ofspecies in Mexiweckelia to four and marks a significantextension of the genus into the southern UnitedStates.Mexiweckelia mitchelli, new speciesFigs. 1-3Material Examined-Cueva de la Siquita, 45 kmNW Mapiml: Durango, MEXICO: Holotype femaleand 84 paratypes collected 13 June 1972 by JamesReddell, William Elliott and Edward Alexander. Theholotype (USNM 142355) and 6 paratypes (USNM

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintdekFig. 1. Mexiweckelia mitchelli, new species. Female paratype (4.5 mm): a, b, uropods 1, 2; c, telson; d, abdominal side plates;e, upper region of uronites (lateral view); f, uropod 3; g, maxilliped; h, apices of inner and outer plates of maxilliped; i, leftmandible; j, upper lip; k, lower lip; I, m'lxilla 1; m, maxilla 2.2

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintIII\. \,'>--;J ,IIIIeFig. 2. Mexiweckelia mitchelli, new species. Female paratype (4.5 mm): a, upper part of pereopod 3; b, upper part of pereopod4; c. pereopod 7; d, antenna 2; e, antenna 1.3

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint142356) are deposited in the National Museum ofNatural History (Smithsonian Institution) and 78paratypes are deposited in the collection of theauthor.Diagnosis-A small, eyeless, depigmented cavernicolousspecies distinguished from Mexiweckelia colei,to which it is closely allied morphologically, by havingmore setae on the inner plates of maxillae 1 and 2;by the bases of pereopods 5, 6, and 7 which are morenarrow and lack defined distoposterior lobes; and byhaving fewer spines on the apical lobes of the telsonand on the lateral margins of the rami of uropod 3.Largest females, 4.5 mm; largest males, 3.5 mm.Female-Antenna 1 about 45 percent as long asbody, about 30 percent longer than antenna 2; primaryflagenum with 14 to 15 segments; accessoryflagellum absent; slender (tiny) calceoli on some primaryflagellar segments. Antenna 2, flagellum with 7to 8 segments. Left and right mandibles about equal;palp absent; spine row with 3 long, plumose spines;molar without a seta. Maxilla 1, palps of left and rightabout equal; inner plate with 12 plumose setae apically;outer plate with 7 serrate spines apically; palpwith 3 stiff setae (or slender spines?) apically. Maxilla2, inner plate with oblique row of 17 to 18 long, slendersetae. Maxilliped, inner plate with 4 blade-likespines and about 10 coarse setae apically; outer platewith 4 blade-like spines and several setae on innermargin subapically. Lower lip with outer lobes narrowingdistally to slender processes, inner lobes absent.Gnathopod 1: propod a little smaller than segment5; palm short and with a few stiff setae and smallspines, rounding into a rather long posterior marginwhich lacks setae but is partially pubescent; medialsetae few, dactyl short and thick, nail short. Segment5 of gnathopod 1 with 5 long, comb-like setae onmedial surface; posterior margin pubescent. Coxalplate 1 about as broad as long, with 2 short, marginalsetae. Gnathopod 2: propod slightly larger than thatof gnathopod 1, rather long and narrow, longer thansegment 5; palm short, convex, armed with a doublerow of distally un-notched spine teeth; defining anglewith 2 long setae and 1 spine; superior medial setaesingly inserted; posterior margin rather long, with 2groups of long setae; dactyl with 3 blade-like spineson inner margin, nail moderately long. Segment 5 ofgnathopod 2, posterior mar.gin convex, pubescent,with 4 groups of long setae. Coxal plates 2, 3, and 4rather shallow, margins with 2 setae each. Pereopod 7about 55 percent as long as body, 20 percent longerthan pereopod 6, 40 percent longer than pereopod 5.Bases of pereopods 5-7 rather narrow, about as broadproximally as distally, distoposterior lobes indistinct;dactyls about 1/3 lengths of corresponding propods.Coxal gills rather large, present on pereopods 2-6, absentfrom 7. Sternal processes absent. Brood platestiny, narrow.Abdominal side plates generally similar; posteriormargins convex, corners rounded, indistinct, each with1 stiff seta; ventral margins slightly convex withoutspines. Uronites each with 2 dorsal spines. Uropod 1:peduncle longer than rami, armed with 7 spines; innerramus longer than outer, armed with 4 unequal distalspines; inner ramus armed with 5 unequal distalspines. Uropod 2: peduncle about equal in length toinner ramus, armed with 3 spines distally, inner ramuslonger than outer, armed with 4 distal spines;outer ramus with 3 distal spines. Uropod 3, 20 to 25percent as long as body; peduncle with 6 spines; innerramus slightly longer than outer ramus, withseveral plumose setae laterally and 4 unequal spinesapically; outer ramus with several plumose setae andspines laterally and 3 spines and 2 setae apically. Telsonrather small, about as long as broad, cleft slightlymore than 1/2 the length to base; apical lobes with 1long spine and 1 or 2 fine setae each.Male-Differing from the female as follows: Antenna1, 35 to 40 percent longer than antenna 2; primaryflagellum with 12 segments. Propod of gnathopod1 slightly larger in proportion. Gnathopod 2:propod proportionately larger, about twice as largeas propod of gnathopod 1; palm rather long, oblique,armed with a double row of 7 to 8 distally un-notchedspine teeth; defining angle with 2 long setae; posteriormargin with 1 set of 2 long setae; superior medial se·tae few in number, singly inserted; dactyl rather longand curved, with a row of blade-like spines on innermargin, nail rather short. Segment 5 of gnathopod 2about 1/2 as long as propod; posterior margin pubescent,with 3 sets of long setae. Uropod 3, 15 to 20percent as long as body. Telson proportionatelysmaller.Distribution and Ecology-This species is at presentknown only from its type-locality, Cueva de la Siquitain the state of Durango, Mexico. According to JamesR. Reddell (pers. comm.), the type-series was collectedfrom two apparently interconnected, probablyspring-fed, pools. The pools ranged in depth from 0.3to 1.5 m and the water temperature was 24.5°C. Theamphipods were quite abundant and were associatedwith many, small, aquatic microdrile oligochaetes.Although the larger females (4.5 mm) appeared to bemature, none had brood plates fringed with setae.Etymology-It is a pleasure to name this species inhonor of Dr. Robert W. Mitchell of Texas Tech University,who has made many important contributionsto the study of Mexican and Texas cave biology.5

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintbdg~ ~. :.... \:{\Fig. 4. Mexiweckelia texens;s, new species. Syntype (4.0 mm): a, b, antennae 1, 2; c, d, left and right mandibles; e, maxilla 2,f, upper lip; g, lower lip; h, maxilliped; i, maxilla 1.7

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintcFig. 5. Mexiweckelia texensis, new species. Syntype (4.0 mm): a, b, gnathopods 1, 2; c, upper region of uronites (lateralview; d, e, uropods 1, 2.8

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintb~.'.-.";"(r\-gFig. 6. Mexiweckelia texensis, new species. Syntype (4.0 mm): a, upper part of pereopod 5 or 6; b, coxal gill of pereopod 5;c, peduncle of pleopod 2; d, telson; e, pereopod 6 or 7; f, segments 6 and 7 of pereopod 5 or 6; g, abdominal side plates.9

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintthe telson.Distribution and Ecology-This species is at presentknown only from its type-locality, the artesian well atSan Marcos, Texas. The related groundwaters of nearbyEzell's Cave and Johnson's Well have been searchedon several occasions by James R. Reddell and otherbiospeleologists, but to date M. texensis has not beenfound outside of the type-locality. Judging from itslong, slender appendages, attenuated body, small size,and apparent absence from nearby Ezell's Cave, thisspecies is almost certainly an interstitial form, presumablyan inhabitant of minute spaces beneath thegroundwater table. Its appearance in the artesian wellwas probably fortuitous.DISCUSSIONThe known distributions of the four species ofMexiweckelia are shown on the map in Figure 7. Theranges are highly insular and quite disjunct. While M.colei and M. particeps occur sympatrically (and syntopically)in the Cuatro Cienegas Basin, the otherspecies are geograph ically and ecologically well isolated.M. mitchelli occupies a cave habitat located240 km southwest of the ranges of M. colei and M.particeps. In contrast, M. texensis occurs in a groundwaterhabitat at San Marcos, Texas which is situated550 km northeast of Cuatro Cienegas and 790 kmnortheast of Cueva de la Siquita. In addition to distancebarriers, the ranges of these species are physicallyseparated by rugged mountainous terrain. TheCuatro Cienegas basin is isolated from the regionaround Cueva de la Siquita by the Sierra del Tlahualiloand other less prominent mountains. San Marcos,located along the Balcones fault zone at the edge ofthe Edwards Plateau, is separated from the CuatroCienegas basin by the entire width of the Sierra MadreOriental and a part of the coastal plain of southernTexas.The ecology of these species is also apparently different.M. mitchelli is an inhabitant of cave pools withtemperatures of 24 to 25°C. M. colei and M. particepsinhabit groundwater outlets (presumably fed by waterwhich percolates through shallow interstices) withelevated temperatures of 30 to 33°C. M. texensis, onthe other hand, is probably the inhabitant of a deep,interstitial groundwater habitat with an approximatE'temperature of 20°C.The possible origin of the genus Mexiweckelia andits zoogeographic affinities with other genera of theHadzia group of Gammaridae were discussed by Holsingerand Minckley (1971). The Hadzia group, aspresently defined, is composed of eight genera ofpredominately interstitial-subterranean forms whichinhabit marine, brackish and fresh waters. The grouphas a curious circumtropical distribution, extendingmore than two-thirds the distance around the World,but the majority of species are found in the periMediterranean and greater Caribbean regions. Five ofthe eight genera are known only from freshwaterhabitats. Mexiweckelia shares rather close morphologicalaffinities with the Caribbean, Hadzia groupgenera Weckelia (Cuba), Paraweckelia (Cuba) andAlloweckelia (Puerto Rico), but is more distantly relatedto Hadzia (synonym=Metaniphargus) which occursin mostly brackish water, interstitial habitats ofsome of the Lesser Antillean islands of the Caribbeanand in brackish and freshwater, subterranean habitats(mostly caves) of the Adriatic region of southernEurope (Yugoslavia and Italy). The origin of the freshwater,subterranean genera of Cuba, Puerto Rico andMexico (and now Texas!) is believed to have resultedfrom the invasion of newly opened, freshwater nichesby brackish water, Hadzia-Iike ancestors during thelate Cretaceous or the early Tertiary (Mexiweckelia)and the middle to late Tertiary (Weckelia, Paraweckeliaand Alloweckelia) (Holsinger and Peck,1968; Holsinger and Minckley, 1971).The ancestral stock of Mexiweckelia might havebeen relicted in the continental freshwaters of Mexicoand Texas at the end of the Cretaceous or at the beginningof the Tertiary, following the regression of amarine embayment which covered most of central andeastern Mexico and southern Texas during the middleto late Mesozoic. The transition of a shallow sea intoa continental land mass would have been accompaniedby the formation of new habitats, thus effectivelycreating "open niches", theretofore unavailable. Subsequentmountain building in Mexico (for instance,the laramide Revolution) and other extensive geologicalchanges which have-served to shape the presentland forms of this area, would have resulted in theisolation of populations followed by speciation, leadingto the distributional patterns of contemporaryspecies.Mexiweckelia is one of several groups of subterraneancrustaceans of the greater Caribbean regionbelieved to have evolved from marine relicts and alsoto show zoogeographic affinities with related groupsinhabiting similar biotopes in the peri-Mediterraneanregion of southern Europe, western Asia and northernAfrica (ct., the old Tethyan sea area). Aside fromam phipods of the Hadzia group, there are a numberof other striking parallels between the subterraneancrustacean faunas of these two regions (Holsinger andMinckley, 1971; Cole and Minckley, 1972). Some of10

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintthe groups which demonstrate these relationshipswere discussed in detail by Cole and Minckley (1972)and include sphaeromatid and cirolanid isopods andthermosbaenaceans. Additional parallelisms also occurin amphipods of the genus Bogidiella (species in theCaribbean region, South America, southern Europe,Africa and western Asia; see Ruffo, 1963,1970) andasellid isopods of the subfamily Stenasellinae (Coleand Minckley, 1972). This subfamily is representedby several genera and occurs in the subterraneanwaters of Europe, western Asia, tropical Africa, andnorthern Mexico. Mexistenasellus coahuila is one ofonly three representatives of this group in the WesternHemisphere and was described by Cole and Minckley(1972) from the same thermal spring basin that is inhabitedby Mexiweckelia colei and M. particeps (seeFig.7).It is also interesting that the sole representativeof the primitive crustacean order Thermosbaenacea inthe Western Hemisphere is known only from Ezell'sCave which presumably contains the same undergroundwater as that of the nearby artesian well 10-cality of Mexiweckelia texensis. This order is representedby five SUbterranean, brackish and fresh waterspecies of the genera Monodella (4 spp.) and Thermosbaena(1 sp.) in southern Europe and North Africaand one species (Monodella texana) in Texas (Rouch,1964; Maguire, 1965). The North American species,while showing a definite relationship to the Europeanforms, is probably different enough, however, to warranta separate generic status (Rouch, pers. comm.,1968).Continued biological investigations of the subterraneanbiotopes of the greater Caribbean region willundoubtedly lead to additional discoveries of marinerelict crustaceans and shed further light on the zoogeographicrelationship between the invertebrate faunaof this region and the peri-Mediterranean area.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSI am grateful to Edward Alexander, William R.Elliott, Leslie Hubricht and James R. Reddell formaking available specimens of the new species forTEXASFig. 7. Distribution of the genus Mexiwecke/ia: 1, 2, M. co/ei and M. particeps; 3, M. mitchelli; 4, M. texensis.11

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintstudy. I also thank Dr. Thomas E. Bowman for readingthe manuscript and making helpful commentsand Dr. Robert W. Mitchell and Mr. Reddell for theirenthusiastic support of this and other projects dealingwith the biospeleology of Texas and Mexico.LITERATURE CITEDCole, G.A., and W.L. Minckley. 1972. Stenasellid isopodcrustaceans in the Western Hemisphere-A new genus andspecies from Mexico-with a review of other North Americanfreshwater isopod genera. Proc. BioI. Soc. Washington,84(39) :313-326.Holsinger, J.R., and S.B. Peck. 1968. A new genus and speciesof subterranean amphipod (Gammaridael from PuertoRico, with notes on its ecology, evolution and relationshipto other Caribbean amphipods. Crustaceana, 15(3):249-262.Holsinger, J.R., and W.L. Minckley. 1971. A new genus andtwo new species of subterranean amphipod crustaceans(Gammaridae) from northern Mexico. Proc. BioI. Soc.Washington, 83(37):425-444.Maguire, Bassett, Jr. 1965. Monodella texana n.sp., an extensionof the crustacean order Thermosbaenacea to theWestern Hemisphere. Crustaceana, 9(2):149-154.Rouch, R. 1964. Contribution a la connaissance du genreMonodella (Thermosbaenacesl. Ann. Speleol., 19(4):717727.Ruffo, Sandro. 1963. Una nuova specie di Bogidiella (Crust.Amphipoda) della depressione del Mar Marto. Bull.Council Israel, Sect. B. Zool., 11 B(4): 188-195.Ruffo, Sandro. 1970. Bogidiella somala n.sp. delle acque sotterraneedella Somalia (Crustacea Amphipodal. MonitoreZool. Italiano, (N.S.) Supp., 3: 159-171.Villalobos F., Alejandro. 1960. Un anfipodo cavernlcolanuevo de Mexico Bogidiella tabascensis n.sp. Anal. Inst.BioI., Mexico, 31(1&2):317-334.12

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintTWO NEW AMERICAN SPECIES OF SPELAEOMYSIS (CRUSTACEA: MYSIDACEA)FROM A MEXICAN CAVE AND LAND CRAB BURROWSThomas E, BowmanDivision of Crustacea, Smithsonian InstitutionFive species of mysids belonging to the familyLepidomysidae are known from underground habitatsin Zanzibar (Fage, 1925), Italy (Caroli, 1924),India (Pillai and Mariamma, 1964), Mexico (Villalobos,1951), and Cuba (Bacescu and Orghidan, 1971).All are blind, except the Zanzibar species, which, likeone of the new American species described below, hasa few ommatidia situated at the distolateral corner ofthe eyestalk. The 2 new species described below bringthe known forms to 7, 4 of which inhabit Central andSouth America.FAMILY LEPIDOMYSIDAE CLARKELepidophthalmidae Fage, 1924Lepidopidae Stammer, 1936Lepidopsidae Villalobos, 1951Lepidomysidae Clarke, 1961Type-genus-Lepidomysis Clarke, 1961.Genus Spelaeomysis Caroli, 1924Lepidophthalmus Fage, 1924 [Type-species, by monotypy,Lepidophthalmus servatus Fage. Preoccupiedby Lepidophthalmus Holmes, 1904, Callianassidael.Spelaeomysis Caroli, 1924.Lepidops Zimmer, 1927 [Replacement name forLepidophthalmus,' preoccupied by Lepidops Miers,1878, Albuneidael.Typhlolepidomysis Villalobos, 1951. [Type-species,by monotypy, Typhlolepidomysis quinterensisVillalobosl .Lepidomysis Clarke, 1961 [Replacement name forLepidops] .Keralomysis Pillai and Mariamma, 1963. [Typespecies,by monotypy, Keralomysis longipes Pillaiand Mariamma] .Type-species, by monotypy-Spelaeomysis bottazziiCaroli,1924.Diagnosis (modified from Gordon, 1960, and Pillaiand Mariamma, 1964)-Body somewhat depressed.Carapace relatively long; anterolateral lobes rounded,reaching beyond rostrum; posterolateral lobes reachingpereonite 7 or beyond; cervical groove absent.Pereonites 6 and 7 exposed dorsally; pleonite 6 produceddorsally into rounded triangular flap extendinganteriorly to overlap concave posterior margin ofcarapace. Pleon relatively long; pleonite 6 slightlylonger than pleonite 5. Telson subtriangular or linguiform,spinose on distal half or on entire margin. Eyestalkstruncate, without visual elements or with afew ommatidia on distolateral corner. Antenna 1,2nd segment of peduncle not shortened. Antennalscale with rounded apex, margin setose. Mandiblewith well developed incisor and molar; 2nd and 3rdsegments of palp each with row of strong spines.First maxilla with 2-merous reflexed palp ending inlong seta. Maxilliped quite setose; penultimate segmentof endopod with broad medial lobe; exopod anunsegmented oval plate; epipod rather long and narrow.Pereopod 1 with exopod longer than endopod;endopod prehensile. Pereopods 2-7 with slender ambulatoryendopods; penultimate segments of endopodsnot subdivided; pereopod 7 of male with internal13

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintcoxal lamina. Pleopods biramous, increasing in sizeposteriorly; endopods l-merous; exopods 3-merousexcept 4-merous female pleopod 2; male pleopod 2with 2nd exopod segment broadened and curved.Pleonites 3-5 with thin transverse lamella extendingback from sternum between pieopod bases, not incorporatingprotopods of pleopods. Protopod of uropodproduced on ventral surface into posteriorly projectingmedial lobe armed with marginal spines andalso usually into lateral tooth underlying base of exopod;exopod 2-merous, with undulate suture betweensegments, except in S. bottazzii. Statocyst absent.Seven pairs of oostegites.Gordon (1960) placed Typhlolepidomysis in synonymywith Spelaeomysis. Pillai and Mariamma(1964) suggested the possibility that Spelaeomysisand Lepidomysis might be synonyms, but felt thatfurther study was needed to justify combining them.While an adequate description of Spelaeomysis bottazziiis not yet available, its known characters agreewith those in the diagnosis given above, except thatit is said by Caroli (1924) to lack the suture on theexopod of the uropod. This suture may be difficultto see; Gordon (1960) states that in Lepidomysis it"only shows up well in reflected light", and S.bottazzii needs to be reexamined for this character.The absence of this suture, even if confirmed, wouldnot in itself justify separating S. bottazzii genericallyfrom the other described species and the new oneproposed herein. Consequently I am assigning themall to the genus Spelaeomysis.Lepidophthalmus and Spelaeomysis were both proposedin 1924, but Caroli indicated clearly that Fage'swork appeared earlier, hence Lepidophthalmus hasprecedence over Spelaeomysis. In the edition of theInternational Code of Zoological Nomenclature adoptedby the XV International Congress of Zoology in1958, Article 39 specified that when the type-genusof a family was found to be a junior homonym andreplacement names were therefore required for thetype-genus and family, the replacement names wereto take the date of the name replaced. The effect ofthis regulation would have been to make Lepidomysisa senior synonym of Spelaeomysis, but this part ofArticle 39 was removed from the code by the XVIInternational Congress, and Spelaeomysis thereforehas seniority.A discussion of the rather complex history of thenomenclature of the genus is given by Clarke (1961).Spelaeomysis olivae, new speciesFigs. 1-11, 13-19Material Examined-Male holotype, about 8 mm(USNM 143339) and female paratype, 8.2 mm(USNM 143340) from Cueva del Nacimiento del R(oSan Antonio, 10 km SSW Acatlcfn, Oaxaca, Mt!xico.Collected 26 December 1972 by J. Reddell, D.McKenzie, M. McKenzie, and S. Murphy.Etymology-Named after Dr. Olive S. Tattersall,in recognition of her many notable contributions tothe systematics of the Mysidacea.Diagnosis-Body form very similar to that of S.quinterensis (Villalobos, 1951). Carapace with broadlytriangular rostrum reaching about halfway alongeyestalks; anterolateral lobes reaching slightly beyondrostrum. Eyestalks separate, quadrate, widerthan long, without ommatidia. Pleuron of pereonite7 reaching well ventrad of pleuron of pleonite 1.Sternal lamella of pleonite 3 with slightly concaveposterior margin; lamellae of pleonites 4 and 5 withnearly straight margins. Telson linguiform, 1.1-1.2times as long as width at base; margin of distal halfspinose, armed with about 40 spines; median distalspine and 1 or 2 pairs of corner spines longer thanothers; 1 or 2 pairs of slender spines situated betweendistal and corner spines.Antenna 1 peduncle, segment 2 about as long asbut distinctly narrower than segment 1; segment 3with distolateral scaliform process bearing 3 setae;flagellum broken, hence length unknown. Antenna 2scale about twice as long as wide, reaching nearly1/3 along last peduncle segment; flagellum broken.Mandible with usual structure for genus; palp wellarmed with setae of several types (Fig. 7). Labiumwith inner lobes broadening distally. Maxilla 1 armedas in Figure 13; outer lobe with 15 terminal spines;inner lobe with 4 long, robust and 2 shorter, moreslender terminal setae; palp ending in very long slenderseta. Maxilla 2 very similar to that of S. quinterensisillustrated by Villalobos (1951), but apparentlywith a few more setae on most parts. Maxillipedsimilar to that of S. quinterensis, but with shorterinner lobe of basi pod and shorter setose margin ofpropus.Pereopod 1 similar to that of S. quinterensis, butwith many setae on posterior margins of endopod segments2 and 3. Pereopods 2-7 similar to those of S.quinterensis.Figs. 1-11. Spelaeomysis olivae. 1. Male, lateral. 2. Female head and antenna 1, dorsal. 3. Antenna 2, dorsal. 4-7. Male leftmandible: 4. Gnathal surface. 5. Incisor. 6. Lacinia. 7. Palp. B. Male labium, posterior. 9. Male maxilla 1, palp. 10. Male telson.11. Female telson.Fig. 12. Spelaeomysis quinterensis, telson.14

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint15

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFigs. 13-19. Spelaeomysis olivae. 13. Male left maxilla 1.14. Male left maxilliped. 15. Male pereopod 1 endopod. 16. Malepereopod 7.17. Male pleopod 2.18. Male pleopod 3.19. Male uropod, ventral.Fig. 20. Spelaeomysis quinterensis, apex of protopod of uropod, ventral.16

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintPleopods resembling those of S. quinterensis. Malepleopod 2, segment 3 of exopod short, only about1/5 length of segment 2 (nearly 1/2 length in S.quinterensis).Uropod protopod, medial lobe not reaching posteriorto lateral tooth; margins with few spines. Endopodreaching transverse suture of exopod. Exopodproximal segment with 22 spines on lateral margin,distal spine not more robust than others; distal seg·ment about 0.4 length of proximal segment.Color. Without pigmentation except black pig.ment dorsally on distal part of telson, most of uro·podal endopod, and lateral part of exopod.Relationships-Of the known species of Spelaeomysis,only S. bottazzii, S. quinterensis, and S.nuniezi agree with S. olivae in having the eyestalksseparate and without ommatidia. Among other differences,S. quinterensis has a narrower telson withfewer marginal spines (24 in Villalobos' figure 3, 27in the topotype illustrated herein-Figure 12). In theuropod the medial lobe of the uropod has no long apicalspine (Fig. 20), and the endopod reaches beyondthe suture of the exopod. The sternal lamellae ofpleonites 3-5 all have slightly concave posterior margins.S. bottazzii is described in terms having genericrather than specific value, but appears to lack thesuture on the exopod of the uropod.Spelaeomysis cardisomae, new speciesFigs. 21-31,33-38Material Examined-(AII collected by Donald B.Bright, California State University, Fullerton): LCBA(Land Crab Biological Associate) 356: Margin of mangrove,Hooker Bay, Isla San Andres, Columbia (Caribbean,east of Nicaragua), 1 foot above mangrove HHTline, burrow temperature 30°C; dominant plants,Avicennia and Caesalpinia; water in burrow brown,high sulfide odor. 8 July 1968. Burrow occupied bycrab, Cardisoma guanhumi and mosquitoes, adultDeinocerites pseudes. 6 males, 1 female.LCBA 363: Margin of mangrove, Southwest Bay,Isla Providencia, Columbia (Caribbean, east of Nicaragua).1.2 feet above MHT line, burrow occupied byCardisoma guanhumi and larval and adult Deinoceritespseudes. Mud with "rusty" color, numerous burrowscovered by high tide during day. 20 July 1968. 1 female.LCBA 505: Eastern margin of Estero Rojos, Bocadel RIO Tumbes, Peru. Margin of Estero covered withsome Avicennia and Prosopis; Salicornia common.Cardisoma crassum burrows approximately 125 feetfrom central area of Estero in soft alluvial mud. Burrowsflooded approximately 8 hours per day; watertable very high, hence burrows do not become dry.Burrow water pH 6.4, salinity 31.6 0/00. 31 January1969.6 males, 4 females, 1 juvenile.LCBA 508. Same data as 505. 1 male, 1 juvenile.LCBA 509. Same data as 505. 3 males, 1 juvenile.LCBA 510. Same data as 505. 2 juveniles.Holotype-A 6.2 mm male from LCBA 505(USNM 143332). The remaining specimens in 505and those in 508, 509, and 510 are paratypes.Etymology-Named after the land crab genus inwhose burrows the mysids were collected.Diagnosis-Length 4.5-6.5 mm. Carapace withrounded rostrum covering only bases of eyestalks;anterolateral lobes reaching al most to distal end ofeyestalks. Eyestalks separate, about as wide as long,broader distally, with a few distolateral ommatidia.Pleuron of pereonite 7 not reaching ventrad beyondpleuron of pereonite 1. Sternal lamellae of pleonites3-5 slightly concave on free margins. Telson spatulate,about 1.3 times as long as width at base; marginof distal 1/2·2/3 armed with spines, the number in·creasing with size-20 in a 3.7 mm male, 31 in a 6.7mm male; largest spine at apex, flanked by a pair ofshort spines, followed by a pair of large spines andthen a pair of spines larger than all except apicalspine.Antenna 1 peduncle, segment 2 slightly shorterand distinctly narrower than segment 1; dorsal surfaceof segment 2 and distomedial part of segment 1covered with small shingle-like scales; segment 3 withdistolateral process bearing 3 setae; inner flagellumreaching nearly to posterior end of pleon; outer flagellumslightly shorter. Antenna 2 scale about 2.5 timesas long as wide, reaching more than 1/3 along lastpeduncle segment; flagellum reaching anterior part ofpleon. Mandible similar to that of S. olivae but withminor differences in setation of palp. Maxilliped withslender epipodite; carpus with 4 spines on lateralmargin. Pereopods similar to those of S. olivae, butnot so long and slender.Male pleopod 2, exopod segment 2 broad; medialmargin armed with close-set curved spines.Uropod protopod, medial lobe well developed;margins with numerous curved spines. Endopod reachingwell beyond transverse suture of exopod. Exopodproximal segment with about 23 spines on lateralmargin; distal spine distinctly more robust thanothers; distal segment about half length of proximalsegment.Color. Preserved specimens have mottled darkbrown pigment on eyestalks, peduncles of antennae 1and 2, carapace, exposed pereonites, pleon and telson.The uropodal rami are very sparsely pigmented.Ventrally the pereon and pleon are very lightly and17

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFigs. 21-31. Spelaeomys;s card;somae. 21. Male, lateral (509). 22. Male, dorsal (509). 23. Male left antenna 1, dorsal (356).24. Male left antenna 2 (356). 25. Labrum and mandible, in situ (356). 26. Incisor of male left mandible (356).27. Lacinia ofmale left mandible (356), 28. Pleonites 3-5, ventral (3561. 29. Male telson (505). 30. Telson of 6.7 mm male (356), 31. Telsonof 3.7 mm male (356). Numbers in parentheses are LeBA collection numbers. For explanation see text.Fig. 32. Spelaeomys;s servatus, telson (copied from Fage, 1925, Fig. 7).18

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFigs. 33-38. Spelaeomysis cardisomae (3561. 33. Maxilliped, proximal part. 34. Male pereopod 1 endopod. 35. Male pereopod7 endopod. 36. Male pleopod 2. 37. Male pleopod 3. 38. Male uropod, ventral.the oral region more heavily pigmented.Relationships-S. servatus (Fage), the only otherspecies with ommatidia, is also most similar to S.cardisomae in other characters. The 2 species can bedistinguished readily by the armature of the apex ofthe telson. In S. servatus the pattern of the apicalspines is similar to that of S. cardisomae, but thespines are relatively shorter (Fig. 32).Distribution-The occurrence of S. cardisomae inboth Atlantic and Pacific localities is rather surprising,but I have not found any c1earcut differences betweenspecimens of the 2 populations. The specimens fromthe Columbian islands were in poor condition, and itwas not possible to compare them fully with thePeruvian specimens. When adequate material becomesavailable, such a study should be made. If the occurrenceof S. cardisomae in Cardisoma burrows is notfortuitous, it is possible that its range will be found tocoincide with those of the crabs. C. guanhumi occursin Bermuda, Andros Island (Bahamas), the centraleast coast of Florida, Louisiana, and Texas south toFlorianapolis, Brazil, including the West Indies (Chaceand Hobbs, 1969; Bright and Hogue, 1972). The geminatespecies C. crassum, is known from Todos Santos,Baja California, to the RIo Chira, Peru (Bright andHogue, 1972).Remarks-The presence of ommatidia in S. servatusand S. cardisomae is related to their occurrence inhabitats where light is not completely excluded as itis in the caves occupied by other species of Spelaeomysisexcept S. longipes. The latter inhabits subterraneanwaters in southern India and was collectedfrom a well nearly 15 min depth penetrating tothese waters (Pillai and Mariamma, 1964). An analogoussituation is found in the genus Antromysis. A.cenotensis, which lives in caves in Yucat~n, M~xico,has medially fused eyestalks without visual elements,whereas A. anophelinae, which lives. in the burrowsof Cardisoma guanhumi in Costa Rica, has a narrowband of ommatidia (Tattersall, 1951).LITERATURE CITEDBacescu, Mihai, and Traian Orghidan. 1971. Antromysiscubanica n.sp. et Spelaeomysis nuniezi n.sp., mysis cavernicolesnouvelles de Cuba. Rev. Roumaine BioI., ser.Zool.,16(4):225-231.Bright, Donald B., and Charles L. Hogue. 1972. A synopsisof the burrowing land crabs of the world and list of theirarthropod symbionts and burrow associates. Contrib. Sci.Los Angeles Co. Nat. Hist. Mus., 220: 1-58.Caroli, E. 1924. Su di un Misidaceo Cavernicolo fSpelaeomysisbottazzii n.g., n.sp.l di Terra d'Otranto. Atti Accad.19

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintNaz. Lincei Rend. Classe Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur., 33(2):512-513.Chace, Fenner A., Jr., and Horton H. Hobbs, Jr. 1969. Thefreshwater and terrestrial decapod crustaceans of the WestIndies with special reference to Dominica. Bull. U. S. Nat.Mus., 292: 1-258.Clarke, William D. 1961. Proposal of a new name, Lepidomysis,for the preoccupied mysidacean generic nameLepidops Zimmer, 1927. Crustaceana, 2(3):251-252.Fage, Louis. 1924. Sur un type nouveau de Mysidace deseaux souterraines de ,'ne de Zanzibar. Comptes RendusAcad. Sci. Paris, 178(25):2127-2129.Fage, Louis. 1925. Lepidophthalmus servatus Fage. Typenouveau de Misidace des eaux souterraines de I'isle deZanzibar. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen., 63:525-532.Gordon, Isabella. 1960. On a Stygiomysis from the WestIndies, with a note on Spelaeogriphus (Crustacea, Peracarida).Bull. British Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Zool., 6(5):285324, pis. 3-4.Pillai, N. Krishna, and T. Mariamma. 1963. On the discoveryof the primitive mysidacean family Lepidomysidae inIndia. Curro Sci. Bangalore, 32:219-220.Pillai, N. Krishna, and T. Mariamma. 1964. On a newlepidomysid from India. Crustaceana, 7(2): 113-124.Stammer, Hans-Jurgen. 1936. Ein neuer Hohlenschizopode,Troglomysis vjetrenicensis n.g. n.sp.. Zugleich eine OOOrsichtder bisher aus dem Brack- und Susswasser bekanntenSchizopoden, ihrer geographischen Verbreitung und ihrerokologischen Einteilung- - sowie eine Zusammenstellungder blinden Schizopoden. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Syst. akol.Geogr. Tiere, 68( 1):53-1 04.Tattersall, Walter M. 1951. A review of the Mysidacea of theUnited States National Museum. Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,201:1-292.Villalobos, Alejandro. 1951. Un nuevo Misidaceo de las grutasde Quintero en el Estado de Tamaulipas. Anal. Inst. BioI.,Mexico, 22(1):191-218.Zimmer, Carl. 1927. Mysidacea. In: W. Kukenthal and T.Krumbach, Handbuch der Zoologie, 3:607-650 (W. deGruyter, Berlin, Leipzig).20

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintON MORE EARTHWORMS FROM MEXICAN CAVESG. E. Gates251 Silver Road, Bangor, Maine 04401The proportion of autochthonous, Mexican, megadrilespecies known only from types secured in caveshas been mentioned at least once in previous publications(Gates, 1971). The number of types for eachspecies has been small. A dedicated band of spelunkersnow has turned up another new species and in anice series of 20 well preserved specimens. It is especiallyfortunate that the series is long enough to enablea description of neural components in the circulatorysystem, a set of blood vessels different from anyhitherto recorded for earthworms.ACANTHODRILIDAEEodrilus albidus, nom. nov.P. O. Ljungstrom has kindly informed me thatEodri/us a/bus Gates 1970, was preoccupied byAcanthodri/us a/bus Beddard 1895, later transferredto Notiodri/us Michaelsen 1899, thence to Eodri/usMichaelsen 1907, in 1913 back into Acanthodri/usagain, with a relapse into a reconstituted Eodri/us in1937, presently, according to one author, in Dip/otremaas a subgenus of Notiodri/us! The Americanendemic has belonged in none of those classical andneoclassical congeries but until such information asis necessary to enable rational assignment of thespecies to a properly defined genus, the former genericname is retained though it perhaps should be enclosedin quotation marks. There does seem to be a need fora convention about use of generic names strictly nolonger available that cannot be replaced until muchadditional information (that often cannot be expectedfor an indefinite period, perhaps of years) is finallyavailable. Further "orphaned species" are to be expectedas inadequately characterized type species arereexamined in conditions that will allow genera to beproperly defined rather than as in the classical system(and suggested revisions) by relatively unimportantpairs of simple key characters along with derogationof much conservative somatic anatomy.Eodri/us sp.Cueva de la Capilla, 13.5 km NW Gomez Farias,Tamaulipas, 11 January 1971, 0-5-0. J. Reddell, S.Wiley, J. Cooke, W. Elliott.Last hearts, in xii. Holandric, with seminal vesiclesin xi,xii. Spermathecae, each with two diverticula, onright and left sides or the two may be united into adumbell-shaped body transversely placed across entalend of the spermathecal duct.Nematodes were secured from coelomic cavities oftwo worms but have not yet been identified.Immaturity and unsatisfactory preservation contraindicatedidentification to species.LUMBRICIDAEDendrobaena rubida (Savigny) 1826Rancho del Cielo, 5 km NW Gomez Farias,Tamaulipas, 12 January 1971,0-5-0. J. Reddell.Harrison Sinkhole, Rancho del Cielo, 5 km NWGomez Farias, Tamaulipas, 12 January 1971, 2-1-8(and some fragments). J. Cooke, W. Elliott.Cueva de la Puente, ca. 3000 m, 20 km S SanFrancisco and 40 km E San Luis POtOSI: San LuisPotosI, 15 May 1972, 0-0-1, 16 May 1972, 0-0-1. W.21

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintElliott, R. Ralph, M. McEachern.Octo/asian tyrtaeum (Savigny) 1826Sotano del Buque, 20 km N Pinal de Amoles,Queretaro, 2 June 1972,0-0-2. T. Raines, R. Ralph.Sotano de la Golondrina, 3000 m elevation, PuertoAltamira, 40 km E San Luis POtOSI: San Luis POtOSI:0-0-1. W. Elliottetal.Cueva de los Otates, 15 km NW Pinal de Amoles,Queretaro, 19 November 1972, 0-0-1. R. Jameson,P. Strickland, C. Bittinger, S. Lozo.OCTOCHAETIDAETrigaster albida, new speciesSotano del Anticlino, Nuevo Leon, Mexico, September1971, 1-9-9. Terry Raines per J. Reddell.External Characteristics-Length, to 130 mm. Diameter,to 7 mm (in c1itellum). Segments, 162, 176,179, 180. Body, circular to transversely and shortlyelliptical in cross section. Anal segment, with rugositieslike those of the buccal segment, the anus representedby a vertical slit more or less widely open andwithout visible semi-lunar valves. Prostomium, whenclearly defined, shortly epilobous, tongue open orclosed. First dorsal pore, at 11/12 (4 specimens),?12/13 (2), 12/13 (10), ?13/14 (1), 13/14 (3).Clitellum, annular, red, in xiv-xviii but reachingslightly into xiii, lacking in AA of xviii, the postsetalhalf of xvii, the presetal half of xiv, and in xiii. Seminalgrooves (so wide as to be called gu tters as byMurchie), straight or nearly so, but with marginsmore or less irregular, in AB/xviii-xx. Three minutepores are just lateral to each end of each groove, thelateral of which is a prostate pore just median towhich tiny, black dots (tips of penial setae) are barelyvisible in the other two openings. The ventrum intoBe of the postsetal half of vii, all of 'viii and the presetalhalf of ix is swollen but without obliteratingintersegments which are even deeper in the regioninvolved. Three pairs of genital markings are faintlyforeshadowed in Be/xviii-xx just lateral to the seminalgrooves (one specimen only). Each of such areasis transversely and shortly elliptical, with barely distinguishableindications of demarcation into a centralarea of greyish translucence and an opaque, ratherwide marginal band. Similar but smaller areas arepresent in the same segments just median to the seminalgrooves of two specimens (not recognized in thefirst examination of the externalia). Locations; ateq/xviii, 18/19, eq/xix, eq/xx. Adumbrations of othermarkings might possibly be brought out by propertreatments. Several specimens seemed to have a slight,unpaired tumescence in BB/xxi, perhaps with an additionalsmaller one in AA/xxii. When the areas just indicatedseemed not to be tumescent they sometimesseemed to be very slightly discolored, brownish.Internal Anatomy-Segments ix and xii, on pinningout the opened worm are readily recognized as each islarge and filled by acinous seminal vesicles. Segmentsx and xi are not at first visible, as all that can be seenis a band of opaque tissue between ix and xii. Fromthat band, septum 9/10 easily can be pulled forwardto display the coelom of segment x. Septa 10/11 and11/12 are closely apposed peripherally and are somewhatadherent even if not united_ After their separationcoelomic cavities of x-xi (like that of xiii) arerecognized as much smaller than those of ix and xii.The special longitudinal muscle band at mD is presentbut its borders usually are not readily distinguishable.Brain in ii or iii, anteriorly in each case.Gizzards, in v-vi (12). Esophagus, widened andmoniliform through X-Xiii, narrower and of uniformwidth through xiv-xvii, valvular posteriorly in xvii orin region of 17/18. Intestine, beginning abruptly inxviii (8+?) and for several segments deeply, regularlyand symmetrically saCCUlated, followed by a region inwhich sacculations in the dorsal half of the gut aremuch more irregular and varied. In the region xxixXXXi, sacculations may assume (3 specimens) an appearanceof a pair of small, dorsally directed andsymmetrical caeca. Ingesta, in the first 18-37 or sointestinal segments, enclosed in a transparent (mucus?)sheath like the peritrophic membrane of insects.The sheath is so strong that it can be Iifted out by oneend intact. The sheath was replaced by a solid columnof the same material in a worm with no ingesta in thatpart of the gut. Typhlosole, none.Dorsal blood vessel, without chloragogue, singlethroughout, complete, bifurcating under the brain,the branches reuniting over the subpharyngeal ganglionto become the ventral trunk which also is complete,in a dissected worm often resting on the nervecord. Supraesophageal, single in xiii-ix. Lateroesophageals,insofar as visible, median to the hearts.Posterior lateroparietals, passing up to dorsal trunkon anterior face of 14/15. Lateroneural trunks, oneon each thin lateral face of the nerve cord with numeroustransverse connectives between each other, seeminglyat regular intervals (one for each segment?) onventral face of the cord. The two trunks of one wormunited in the c1itellar region to become a single, ratherirregularly looped but still median vessel that disappearedinto a plexus on the subpharyngeal ganglion.The trunks of another worm did not unite mesiallybut continued through the plexus that surrounded the22

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintsubpharyngeal ganglion and passed dorsally (to thebrain?) adherent to the circumpharyngeal nervouscommissures. The trunks passed posteriorly (in a juvenile)into a plexus investing the nerve cord in the lastfive segments. Hearts, of ix seemingly lateral, of x-xiiilatero-esophageal.A large vertical mass, presumably of nephridialtubules is present on each side of the body in frontof the gizzard (presumably in iv though there is nocertainty as to location as they always seemed to bein v). Removal of the gut shows that the body wallbehind the c1itellum is covered by specks of whitetissue none of which could be proved to be associatedwith a nephrostome, preseptal or otherwise.Testes, seminal vesicles, male gonoducts and maleterminalia much as in T. reddelli Gates 1971. Prostates,ca. 3-4 mm long, about half as wide and stillthinner, with slightly convex but never flat upper andlower surfaces that have a pebbled appearance as ifcomposed of numerous quite small and closely crowdedlobules. Structure obviously is not of the simplytubular type but further characterization must awaitstudy of microtome sections and of development.Penial setae, with most of the shaft straight, graduallynarrowing to a point ectally and with a short ectalportion gently curved (apparently naturally) over toone side and not softened. Ornamentation, not recognized.Spermathecae, of the juvenile and a slightly olderworm, in viii-ix, but in the other specimens reachingforward into vii-viii (forced into those positions bygrowth of the seminal vesicles?). Duct, much shorterthan the ampulla and rather narrow. Diverticulum,single, sessile, covering anterior and lateral faces ofthe duct, containing several seminal chambers. Thediverticulum perhaps should be regarded as nothingmore than a rather berry-shaped group of distendedintramural seminal chambers bulging out the anteriorwall of the spermathecal duct. Ovaries, fan-shaped,with several egg strings.Reproduction-Spermatozoal iridescence in seminalchambers of the spermathecae and on male funnels,along with the absence of contra-indications,allow an assumption that reproduction is amphimictic.Growth Stages-Seminal grooves of the (supposedly)youngest worm were represented by an almostlinear greyish translucence between equators of xviiiand xx exactly at the B level. Apertures of the a setalfollicles of those segments were still at the A levelbut those of the b follicles of xviii and xx alreadywere slightly displaced mesially. The a apertures inxviii and xx of some presumably older worms stillwere at the A level but had been approximated by theb apertures. In other specimens the a apertures hadmoved laterally to approximate those of the Brank.A single seta was recognized in xviii and then in oneof the older worms. Male pores never were certainlyidentified though once suspected of being at eq/xixand on another worm of being nearer 18/19 thoughequally doubtfully.Parasites-Nematodes were present in coelomiccavities of one worm all the way back to the hindend. They have been sent to a nematologist for identification.Cysts (protozoan) present in the coelomof several worms were ellipsoidal to spindle-shapedand about 1 mm long. Several cysts contained twohemispheroidal white bodies each. More rarely threewere crowded into a single cyst.Remarks-Supposed intestinal caeca easily couldhave been dismissed as merely fortuitous sacculationswere it not for the symmetrical pairing in three differentspecimens. Absence in other dissections suggeststhat caecal development has not yet become invariantin the species. Different segments of intestinalorigin were recorded for the first specimens. Then aworm was opened that had coelomic cavities ofxiv-xvii completely filled with a translucent coagulum.Removal, which was easy, disclosed septal insertionson the gut in almost diagrammatic clarity as well asthe equisized coelomic cavities.The blood of any worm, to emphasize the obvious,never fills all blood-vessel spaces. Almost anyvessel, with the possible exception of the dorsal andventral trunks, may, after preservation, be completelyempty and then may be unrecognizable and of coursenot traceable. Even parts of the two major trunksoccasionally may be empty and perhaps also unrecognizable.In fact only rarely do the bifurcations thatconnect the two major trunks anteriorly containenough blood so that they can be traced. Considerablevariation as to presence or absence of blood in anyvessel or part thereof must be expected not only fromone worm to another but evpn from one region toanother of a single specimen. Furthermore, experiencehas shown that certain vessels very often, if notnearly always, may be without blood. Caution accordinglymay be advisable regarding acceptance of statementsas to absence of a particular vessel, especiallyif in a description of a single worm or even if basedon several consecutive dissections.One example. Records of the first dissections ofT. albidus indicated absence of any neural vessels.Then, the nerve cord of the next dissection unexpectedlyrevealed the most completely blood filledset of neural vessels seen in the more than fifty yearsof the author's resear..:h. Those same vessels werecompletely invisible in the next two or three dissectionsbut subsequently blood filled vessels occasional-23

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintIy were recognized in one or more limited regions ofseveral nerve cords.Systematics-I n a recent key to species of Trigaster(Gates, 1971), the present worms run down to T.reddelli, known only from three types (O-2-1). Differencesfrom that species are as follows: fewer segments,more posterior intestinal origin, presence of the twolarge and paired masses of nephridial tubules in frontof the first gizzard, presence of a spermathecal diverticulumor perhaps more accurately, location of thespermathecal seminal chambers in a transverse bandacross anterior face of the duct rather than in twolongitudinal rows. Presence of definite neural trunksin the new taxon at present cannot be regarded as ofsystematic significance especially in view of the limitedinformation available about the other species aswell as about all of the congeners.Lumbricids long have been known to have threevascular neural trunks, a subneural and two lateroneurals.A subneural vessel has been recorded fromvarious other megadriles but often has been on thebody wall rather than on the nerve cord and notassociated with lateroneurals (perhaps often overlooked?).Paired lateroneurals, in absence of the muchmore commonly recorded subneural, hitherto hasbeen unknown.The neural components of the Trigaster vascularsystem, according to the little information now available,may not yet have acquired an invariant stabilityof organization.LITERATURE CITEDGates, G.E. 1971. On some earthworms from Mexican caves.Assoc. Mexican Cave Stud. Bull., 4:3-8.24

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintTHREE NEW TROGLOBITIC DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS FROM OAXACA, MEXICOHorton H. Hobbs, Jr.Smithsonian InstitutionAmong the discoveries made during a recent collectingtrip into Oaxaca, Mexico, by James R. Reddell,David McKenzie, Martha Helen McKenzie, and StuartMurphy were the three albinistic decapod crustaceansdescribed below. One of them is a shrimp, a memberof the family Palaemonidae, that is assigned to a newgenus. Its affinities with members of other Americanpalaemonid genera, although somewhat obscure, arediscussed immediately following the diagnosis of thegenus. The other two decapods are crayfishes that areclosely allied to the troglobitic Procambarus (Austrocambarus)rodriguezi Hobbs (1943:203) which isknown from a single locality in Veracruz, Mexico.Prior to the discovery of these crayfishes, onlytwo others have been described from Mexico sinceVillalobos (1955) published his "Cambarinos de laFauna Mexicana": Procambarus (Ortmannicus) gonopodocristatusVillalobos (1958:279) from Veracruz,and Procambarus (0.) villalobosi Hobbs (1969:41)from San Luis PotoSI:I am most grateful to Mr. Reddell for permittingme to describe these new troglobites and to FennerA. Chace, Jr., and Isabel Perez Farfante for theircounsel and criticisms of the manuscript. Appreciationis also extended to William R. Elliott for thephotographs in Figures 4-7.FAMI LY PALAEMONIDAESubfamily PalaemoninaeNeopalaemon, new genusDiagnosis-Rostrum well developed, compressed,and provided with teeth, ventral margin sometimesunarmed. Carapace with antennal and hepatic s!,>ines,latter situated some distance posterior to anteriormargin of carapace. Branchiostegal groove present.Telson with two pairs each of dorsal and posteriorspines; plumose setae present between posteromesialpair of spines. Eye without pigment or faceted cornea.Mandible with two-jointed palp. All maxillipedswith exopods. Pleurobranchs present on somites bearingpereiopods, and two arthrobranchs on that supportingthird maxilliped. Last three pereiopods withdactyl simple; posterodistal surface of propodus offifth pereiopod lacking transverse rows of short setae.First pleopod of male without appendix interna.Type-species-Neopalaemon nahuatlus, new species.Gender-Masculine.Remarks-Like all except one (Brachycarpus, seebelow) of the genera of the American Palaemoninae,the monotypic genus Neopalaemon appears to haveno single conspicuous character that distinguishes itfrom others that are currently recognized. The combinationof antennal and hepatic spines on the carapaceis shared only with Brachycarpus, Macrobrachium,and Pseudopalaemon. A two-jointed mandibularpalp is also typical of members of the genera Creaseria,and Leander, and occasionally occurs in Palaemon.Reduced eyes without pigment is a feature of Creaseria,Troglocubanus, and some Palaemonetes. Theabsence of one or more transverse rows of setae onthe posterodistal surface of the propodus of the fifthpair of pereiopods is a feature shared only with Leander.None of the characteristics just mentioned arefound in the only other American genus, Cryphiops.In spite of the similarities cited, Neopalaemon may25

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintbe distinguished from the other American genera ofthe Palaemoninae as follows: Brachycarpus and Leanderhave an appendix interna on the first pleopod ofthe male, and Brachycarpus is unique in possessingbiunguiculate dactyls on the third through fifth pereiopods;in Macrobrachium, the mandibular palp isthree-jointed, and in Palaemonetes, Pseudopalaemon,and Troglocubanus, the palp is lacking; in the latterfour genera, the propodus of the fifth pereiopodbears transverse rows of setae posterodistally; Creaseriaalso exhibits the latter characteristic and possessesa branchiostegal spine on the anterior marginof the carapace, lacking a hepatic spine.Neopalaemon may be included in the generic keypresented by Holthuis (1952: 1) in his revision of theAmerican Palaemonidae by altering couplet 3 asfollows:3. Mandible with two-jointed palp. Propodus offifth leg lacking transverse rows of setae posterodistally, Neopalaemon3' . Mandible without or with three-jointedpalp. Propodus of fifth leg with manytransverse rows of setae posterodistally .. 3A3A. "Mandible with three-jointed palp .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Macrobrachium"3A' . "Mandible without pal p ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Pseudopalaemon"Neopalaemon nahuatlus, new speciesFigs. 1,2Description-Rostrum (Fig. If-k) variable in lengthand height, its tip reaching between midlengths ofpenultimate and ultimate podomeres of antennularpeduncle; dorsal margin slightly arched or almoststraight, bearing four to six teeth, and with or withoutfine setae in intervals between them; ventral marginwith one, two, or no teeth but always with finesetae. Carapace armed with prominent antennal andhepatic spines, latter far removed from cephalic margin;branchiostegal groove distinct.Abdomen (Fig. 11) with pleura of first two somitesrounded, third and fourth somites subangular posteroventrally,and fifth with acute posteroventral spine.Sixth somite about 1.5 times as long as fifth and withprominent acute dorsolateral lobes extending posteriorlyover lateral bases of telson and with acuteposteroventral extensions at ventrolateral base of uropod;posterior margin of sternum entire. Telson (Fig.lm,n) not including marginal spines, approximately1.4 times length of sixth somite, bearing two pairs ofdorsolateral spines in caudal half; posterior margintapering toward subacute median apex and bearingtwo or three pairs of small dorsal setae, pair of smalllateral spines, latter flanked mesially by pair of muchheavier longer spines, and five pairs of plumose setaebetween longer spines.Eyes rounded distally, lacking faceted cornea andpigment Antennular peduncle (Fig. la) not reachingdistal extremity of antennal scale. Stylocerite sub·spiculiform, extending distally to about midlength ofbasal segment of peduncle. Distolateral spine of basalsegment not reaching beyond mid length of penultimatesegment of peduncle. Antennular flagella unequalin length: mesial flagellum approximately threetimes length of carapace; long ramus of lateral flagellumapproximately four times length of carapace, andshort ramus about 0.5 as long as carapace; latter tworami fused through five to eight articles.Antennal peduncle (Fig. lf) reaching midlength ofpenultimate segment of antennular peduncle andslightly beyond midlength of antennal scale; basalsegment with prominent distolateral spine; flagellum5.2 times length of carapace and extending posteriorlybeyond telson by little less than 0.33 of itslength. Antennal scale (Fig. lb) with lamella dis·tinctly overreaching distolateral spine.Gnathal appendages as figured (Figs. lc-e, 2a-cl.Mandible with incisor process bearing three teeth;palp two-jointed with proximal segment distinctlylonger than distal, both bearing fine setae. Firstmaxilla with proximal endite arched, its distal enddirected toward apex of distal endite; palp withslender distal lobe. Second maxilla with scaphognathitenarrowing anteriorly. First maxilliped withexite lobe inflated, rounded, and somewhat taperedapically; lash arising distinctly proximal to distal extremityof endopodite. Second maxilliped in no wayremarkable. Third maxilliped reaching base of distalthird of antennal scale; exopodite almost attainingdistal end of ischium.First pereiopod (Fig. 2d) overreaching antennalscale by 0.5 length of dactyl; dactyl 1.3 times lengthof palm; carpus about 1.5 times as long as chela(propodus); and merus only slightly shorter thancarpus. Second pereiopod (Fig. 2e-g) overreaching antennalscale by slightly more than length of propodus;dactyl approximately 1.5 times length of palm; chela1.6 times as long as carpus; length of carpus 0.94 thatof merus. Third pereiopod (Fig. 2h) overreaching an·tennal scale by length of dactyl and 0.25 that ofpropodus; length of dactyl approximately 0.42 thatof propodus; propodus 1.7 ti mes as long as merus.Fourth pereiopod (Fig. 2i) overreaching antennalscale by length of dactyl and 0.5 that of propodus;length of dactyl approximately 0.28 that of propodus;26

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintcg.j~akenb(a, /)) (c-e,n) (m)Fig. 1. Neopalaemon nahuatlus, new species. a-I, I-n, holotype. a, Left antennule; b, Left antennal scale; c, Left mandible;d, Left first maxilla; e, Left second maxilla; f, Lateral view of cephalic region;g-k, Lateral view of cephalic region of paratypes;I, Lateral view of abdomen; m, Dorsal view of telson and uropods; n, Dorsal view of posterior part of telson. (Scales in millimeters.lpropodus 1.6 times longer than carpus and 0.91length of merus. Fifth pereiopod (Fig. 2j) overreachingantennal scale by length of dactyl and about0.5 that of propodus; length of dactyl about 0.22that of propodus; propodus 1.1 times longer thancarpus and 0.83 length of merus.Endopod of first pleopod of male (Fig. 2k,/1 almost0.5 as long as exopod, moderately slender, itsleast width 0.2 of its total length. Endopod of secondpleopod of male (Fig. 2m,n) almost reaching base ofdistal 0.2 of exopodite; appendix interna only slightlylonger than 0.5 length of appendix masculina; latterextending distally to base of distal two-fifths of endopoditeand armed with approximately 20 long spines.Lateral ramus of uropod (Fig. 1m) with conspicuousmovable spine situated immediately mesial to spineon lateral margin.Branchial complement consisting of one pleurobranchon pereiopodial somites, two arthrobranchs atdorsal base of third maxilliped, and one podobranchon second maxilliped; epipodite present on first, second,and third maxillipeds.27

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint!(d-j)J~a'1~~" .'1- ~~}'-"-7 ,{J!(a-c, g)f(k,m)28

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintSize-Carapace length of males, 8.4 to 10.1 mm(holotype, 9.2 mm); of females, 7.6 to 10.8 mm, andof juvenile males or females, 5.2 to 5.7 mm. No femalesovigerous.Color-Lacking pigment.Type-locality-Cueva del Guano, 10 km NE ValleNacional, Oaxaca, Mexico. Five males and 11 femaleswere collected in this cave by James R. Reddell, DavidMcKenzie, Martha Helen McKenzie, and Stuart Murphyon 28 December 1972.Disposition of Types-The holotypic male (no.143120), two paratypic males, four females, and threejuvenile males or females (no. 143121) are depositedin the National Museum of Natural History, SmithsonianInstitution. One paratypic male and two paratypicfemales are deposited in each the Instituto deBiologl1l, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico,and The Museum, Texas Tech University, LUbbock,Texas.Relationships-See the remarks following the diagnosisof the genus Neopalaemon.FAMILY ASTACIDAEProcambarus (Austrocambarus) oaxacae oaxacae,new speciesFigs. 3-5Diagnosis-Body with markedly reduced pigmentation,virtually albinistic but often with slight tansuffusion on abdomen; eyes reduced in size, withor without traces of facets, frequently with few omatidiabearing reddish purple pigment but with pigmentedarea not sharply margined. Rostrum withmarginal spines. Areola 3.6 to 4.9 times longer thanwide, constituting 35.8 to 37.8 percent of totallength of carapace (43.7 to 46.1 percent of postorbitallength), and with six to eight punctationsacross narrowest part. Cervical spine and suborbitalangle obsolete. Hepatic region lacking spine on cephalicmargin. Postorbital ridge provided with small spineor acute tubercle. Antennal scale approximately 2.2times longer than wide, broadest distinctly distal tomidlength. Mesial surface of palm of chela with irregularrow of approximately 20 tubercles, and bothfingers with longitudinal ridges on dorsal and ventralsurfaces. First pleopod with shoulder on cephalicsurface convex distally; distal extremity of appendagebearing slender mesial process directed distolaterally,vestigial cephalic process consisting of very smallscalelike lobe at cephalomesial base of mesial process,and corneous acute almost bladelike central projectionextending cephalodistally from near distal extremityof cephalomesial surface of slender distal lobeof shaft. Annulus ventralis as figured (Fig. 31).Holotypic Male, Form I-Body subovate (Fig.3:l,k), compressed laterally. Abdomen narrower thanthorax (12.9 and 13.8 mm). Width of carapace subequalto height at caudodorsal margin of cervicalgroove. Areola approximately 4.3 times longer thanwide with seven or eight punctations across narrowestpart. Cephalic section of carapace 1.8 times as long asareola; latter 4.3 times longer than wide and constituting36.1 percent of total length of carapace and 43.7percent of postorbital length. Rostrum excavate dorsally,bearing setiferous punctations; convergent marginsnot thickened and bearing small spines at base ofshort acumen, latter not quite reaching proximal endof ultimate podomere of antennular peduncle. Subrostralridge weak and evident in dorsal aspect only incaudal orbital region. Postorbital ridge prominent,grooved dorsolaterally, and with short acute spinescephalically. Suborbital angle obsolete, branchiostegalspine moderately well-developed. Carapace with setiferouspunctations except in ventral portion ofbranchiostegites and in parts of hepatic areas wherereplaced by small tubercles; cervical spine, or enlargedtubercle replacing it, lacking.Abdomen longer than carapace (33.5 and 30.8mm). Cephalic section of telson with two spines ineach caudolateral corner, mesial one movable. Proximalpodomere of uropod with both lobes bearingdistally directed spine, and mesial ramus with distomedianspine not nearly reaching distal margin oframus.Cephalic portion of epistome (Fig. 3i) broadly andevenly rounded cephalically, and with short cephalomedianextension; surface subplanp; fovea of mainbody of epistome represented by median longitudinaltrough. Antennule of usual form with prominentventral spine slightly distal to midlength of basalpodomere. Antenna extending caudally slightly beyondcaudal margin of telson. Antennal scale (Fig. 30)about 2.2 times longer than wide, greatest width distalto midlength, and with lamellar area distinctlybroader than thickened lateral portion; latter terminatingin moderately strong acute spine. Third maxillipedwith mesial half of ventral surface of ischium-+Fig. 2. Neopalaemon nahuatlus, new species. (All appendages from left side of hOlotype excepti which is from right.) a, Firstmaxilliped; b, Second maxilliped; c, Third maxilliped; d, First pereiopod; e-g, Second pereiopod; h, Third pereiopod; i, Fourthpereiopod; i, Fifth pereiopod; k, First pleopod; I, Endopod of first pleopod; m, Second pleopod; n, Appendices masculina andinterna. (Scales in millimeters.>29

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintkFig. 3. Procambarus (Austrocambarus) oaxacae oaxacae, new species. a, Lateral view of carapace of holotype; b, Lateral viewof first pleopod of holotype; c, Lateral view of first pleopod of morphotype; d, Lateral view of distal portion of first pleopod ofholotype; e, Mesial view of same; f, Caudal view of same; g, Mesial view of first pleopod of morphotype;h, Mesial view of firstpleopod of holotype; i, Cephalic lobe of epistome of holotype;j, Basal podomeres of third through fifth pereiopods of holotype;k, Dorsal view of carapace of holotype; I, Annulus ventralis and adjacent sternites of allotype; m, Distal podomeres of chelipedof holotype; n, Caudal view of first pleopods of holotype; 0, Antennal scale of holotype.30

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFig. 4. Procambarus (Austrocambarus) oaxacae oaxacae, new species. Female from type-locality (William R. Elliott).Fig. 5. Procambarus (Austrocambarus) oaxacae oaxacae, new species. Female from type-locality (William R. Elliott).31

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintbearing tufts of stiff setae, and lateral half with finesetae.Right chela (Fig. 3m) elongate, slender, subovatein cross-section, moderately depressed. Entire surfaceof palm studded with thickly set small tubercles;mesial surface with sublinear arrangement of 20 tubercles,lateral surface with tubercles extending almostfrom base to about midlength of finger; ventralsurface with only one tubercle, situated opposite baseof dactyl, larger than others. Dorsal and ventral surfacesof both fingers with rounded, submedian, longitudinalridges flanked along proximal half by tuberclesand distally by setiferous punctations. Opposablemargin of fixed finger with dorsal row of 24 tubercles,third from base largest, extending from basal seventhto base of distal seventh, and ventral row of 6,proximalmost largest, along middle third; minute denticlesstudding surface between and distal to tubercles.Opposable margin of dactyl with slightly irregularrow of 24 tubercles, seventh from base largest, alongproximal three-fourths; tubercles interspersed withminute denticles continuing to corneous tip of finger;mesial surface with tubercles, decreasing in size distally,to base of distal fifth of finger.Carpus of right cheliped entirely tuberculate withonly three conspicuously larger than others: one subspiniformwith corneous tip situated on distoventralmedian margin, another forming ventrolateral articularcondyle, and third, smallest of three, on dorsalmesiodistal margin.Merus of right cheliped entirely tuberculate; dorsalsurface with single subacute subdistal tubercle slightlylarger than others; those on mesial and lateral surfacesprogressively smaller proximally; tubercles on ventralsurface somewhat irregularly arranged with approximately25 in both mesial and lateral most rows, twodistal most tubercles in lateral row spikelike with sharpcorneous tips; ventrolateral margin of podomere lackingspine. Ischium with dorsal and ventral surfacestuberculate; five larger, subspiniform tubercles in linearseries ventromesially.Hook on ischium of third pereiopod only (Fig. 3j);hook simple, extending proximally over distal extremityof basis but not opposed by tubercle on latter.Coxa of fourth pereiopod, as in other members ofsubgenus, lacking boss on caudomesial surface, thatof fifth with small tuberculiform prominence.Sternum between second, third, and fourth pereiopodsmoderately shallow, and, while bearing setae,latter fringelike only on ventrolateral margin betweencoxae of fourth pereiopods.First pleopods (Fig. 3b, d-f, h,n) as described in diagnosis.Allotypic Female-Differing from holotype in followingrespects: postcervical groove much more prominentthan in holotype; palm of chela with mesial rowof only 16 tubercles; opposable margin of fixed fingerwith dorsal row of 14 tubercles and ventral one rep-Table 1. Measurements (mm) of Procambarus fA.) oaxacae oaxacaeHolotype Allotype MorphotypeCarapace:Height 13.9 11.3 10.6Width 13.8 11.8 10.7Length 30.8 26.6 24.6Postorbital length 25.4 21.4 19.7Areola:Width 2.6 2.6 2.5Length 11.1 9.6 9.0Rostrum:Width 4.8 4.7 4.0Length 7.3 6.9 6.1Right Chela:Length of mesial margin of palm 13.0 8.1 8.7Width of palm 6.5 4.9 4.9Length of lateral margin of propodus 31.8 20.3 21.0(app.)Length of dactyl 16.9 10.9 11.1Abdomen:Width 12.9 11.1 10.2Length 33.5 29.5 27.732

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintresented by only two; tufts of setae near distal extremityof finger more conspicuous than in holotype;opposable margin of dactyl with row of 18 tubercles;carpus of cheliped lacking enlarged tubercle on dorsalmesiodistal margin; merus with mesial row of 20 tuberclesmuch larger than those of lateral row. (Seemeasurements, particularly those of chelae).Annulus ventralis (Fig. 31) with median troughcephalically; sinus originating at caudal extremity oftrough, curving sharply dextrally before turning caudosinistrally,and cutting caudal margin of annulusslightly sinistral to median line. Preannular plate withmedian longitudinal trough, lateral swollen areas withmany short stiff setae, comparatively few in trough.Postannular plate almost as wide as annulus and morethan one-half as long; surface not strikingly orna·mented. First pleopod rudimentary.Morphotypic Male, Form II-Differing from holotypein following respects: palm of chela with mesialrow of 15 tubercles; opposable margin of fixed fingerwith 15 tubercles in dorsal row and three in ventral;opposable margin of dactyl with row of 26 tubercles;carpus without enlarged tubercle on dorsal mesiodistalmargin; merus with ventromesial row of 18tubercles conspicuously larger than those in lateralrow of 21; hook on ischium of thirdpereiopod lessacute and shorter than those in holotype, not extendingproximally so far as distal extremity of basis;tuberculiform prominence on coxa of fifth pereiopodalmost as well developed as in holotype.First pleopods (Fig. 3c,g) with cephalodistal extremityof shoulder more truncate than in holotype;mesial process less acute and not bent so stronglylaterally; central projection non-corneous and decidedlymore bulbous.Size-The largest specimen available is a femalewith a carapace length of 30.9 mm (postorbital length25.4 mm). The largest and smallest first form maleshave corresponding lengths of 30.8 (25.4) mm and25.5 (20.8) mm,Type-localitY-Cueva del Guano, 10 km NE ValleNacional, Oax~ca, Mexico. The specimens were collectedon 28 December ,.972 by J. R. Reddell, D.McKenzie, M. M~Kenzie, and S. Murphy.Types-The h~lotypic male, form I, allotypic female,and morphotypic male, form II (Nos. 144341,144342 and 144343, respectively) are deposited togetherwith one paratypic male, form I, and 4 paratypicfemales, in the National Museum of NaturalHistory, Smithsonian Institution. Two series of paratypes,each consisting of 1 male, form I, and 2 females,are deposited in the Instituto de Biologl1l,Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, and inThe Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas.Range and Specimens Examined-Procambarus(Austrocambarus) o. oaxacae is known only from thetype-locality, and the 14 specimens available are allassigned to the type-series. Associated with this crayfishare two entocytherid ostracods: Entocythereclaytonhoffi Rioja and Ankylocythere maya Hobbs.Variations-The variations noted are primarilythose associated with injury and regeneration. Slightdifferences occur in the numbers of tubercles on thevarious podomeres of the chelipeds, but none ismarkedly different from those cited in the abovedescriptions. Variations are rather marked in theamount of pigment and the size of the pigmentedarea in the eye. In one specimen, there is not a traceof any pigment; all of the others, however, have adiffusely pigmented spot with concentrations seeminglylimited to a few omatidia. There are also slightvariations in the sculpture of the annulus ventralisand the pre- and postannular plates with excavationsand prominences more prominent in larger specimens.Relationships-See the discussion of relationshipsof Procambarus (A.) o. reddelli.Procambarus (Austrocambarus) oaxacae reddelli,new subspeciesFigs. 6, 7, 8Diagnosis-Body without pigment or with tan suffusionon abdomen; eyes reduced in size, but withsmall distinct black pigmented faceted area. Rostrumwith marginal spines. Areola 3.4 to 5.3 times longerthan broad, constituting 33.2 to 35.7 percent oftotal length of carapace (42.0 to 44.4 percent ofpostorbital length), and with seven to nine punctationsacross narrowest part. Cervical spine present,often small and occasionally absent on one side.Hepatic region lacking spine on cephalic margin. Suborbitalangle obsolete. Postorbital ridge provided withwell developed spine. Antennal scale approximatelytwice as long as wide, broadest distinctly distal tomidlength. Mesial surface of palm of chela with irregularrow of approximately 20 tubercles, and bothfingers with longitudinal ridges dorsally and ventrally.First pleopod with shoulder on cephalic surface convexdistally; distal extremity of appendage bearingterminal elements markedly similar to those of P. (A.)oaxacae oaxacae. Annulus ventralis and accompanyingsternites as figured (Fig. 8/).Holotypic Male, Form I-Body subovate (Fig. 8a,k)compressed laterally. Abdomen narrower than thorax(14.1 and 16.4 mm). Width of carapace slightly greaterthan height at caudodorsal margin of cervical33

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFig. 6. Procambarus (Austrocambarus) oaxacae reddelli, new subspecies. Female from type-locality (William R. Elliott).Fig. 7. Procambarus (Austrocambarus) oaxacae reddelfi, new subspecies. Female from type-locality (William R. Elliottl.34

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintgroove. Areola 5.8 times longer than wi.de with eightpunctations across narrowest part. Cephalic sectionof carapace approximately 1.8 times as long as areolaand constituting 35.6 percent of total length of carapaceand 43.7 percent of postorbital length. Rostrumexcavate dorsally, bearing setiferous punctations; convergentmargins not thickened and bearing prominentspines at base of acumen, latter almost reaching midlengthof ultimate podomere of antennular peduncle.Postorbital ridge prominent, grooved dorsolaterally,and with acute tubercle cephalically. Suborbital angleobsolete, branchiostegal spine rather well developed.Carapace with setiferous punctations except in ventralportion of branchiostegites and in parts of hepaticareas where replaced by small tubercles; cervical spinepresent.Abdomen subequal in length to carapace (37.3 and37.1 mm). Cephalic section of telson with threeprominent spines in each caudolateral corner, mesialtwo movable. Proximal podomere of uropod withboth lobes bearing distally directed long spine, andmesial ramus with strong distomedian spine not nearlyreaching distal margin of ramus.Cephalic portion of epistome (Fig. 8i) broadlyrounded cephalically, although slightly undulatingsinistrally, with slight cephalomedian concavity andcephalic dorsomedian projection; surface subplanewith weakly elevated cephalic margin; fovea of mainbody of epistome represented by broad shallow longitudinaldepression. Antennule of usual form withprominent ventral spine slightly distal to midlengthof basal podomere. Antenna broken but probably extendingcaudally distinctly beyond midlength of abdomen.Antennal scale (Fig. 80) 2.1 times longer thanwide, greatest width distal to midlength, and withlamellar area distinctly broader than thickened lateralportion; latter terminating in long acute spine. Thirdmaxillipedwith mesial half of ventral surface of ischiumbearing tufts of setae, and lateral half with fineplumose setae.Right chela of paratypic male (Fig. 8m) (bothchelae regenerated in holotype) rather slender, subovatein cross-section, moderately depressed. Entiresurface of palm studded with small subsquamoustubercles; mesial surface with poorly delineated rowof approximately 18 tubercles, lateral surface withtubercles extending from base to about midlength offinger; ventral surface with two tubercles oppositebase of dactyl slightly larger than others. Dorsal andventral surfaces of both fingers with low, rounded,submedian ridges flanked proximally by tuberclesand distally by setiferous punctations; dorsal andventral opposable halves of both fingers with conspicuousplumose setae. Opposable margin of fixedfinger with dorsal row of 12 tubercles, third frombase largest, along proximal two-thirds, and ventralrow of two tubercles near midlength; minute denticlespresent between and distal to tUbercles. Opposablemargin of dactyl with row of 12 tubercles along proximalthree-fourths, third from base only slightly largerthan others nearby, all interspersed with minute dentic1escontinuing to corneous tip of finger; mesial surfacewith tubercles, decreasing in size distally, extendingfrom base slightly beyond midlength of finger.Carpus of right cheliped entirely tuberculate withone large tubercle on mesial surface distal to midlengthand another on dorsodistal mesial angle; ventralsurface with one prominent tubercle on distoventralmedian margin, another immediately proximalto it and third on ventrolateral articular condyle.Merus of right cheliped entirely tuberculate; dorsalsurface with prominent acute subdistal spine; tubercleson mesial and lateral surfaces progressively smallerproximally; ventral surface with lateral row of 106spikelike tubercles, and mesial row of about 20 ofwhich those on distal half much more conspicuousthan more proximal ones; ventrolateral angle of podomerewith strong spine. Ischium with dorsal andventral surfaces tuberculate; sublinear series of sixtubercles ventromesially.Hook on ischium of third pereiopod only (Fig.8i);hook simple, extending proximally over distal extremityof basis but not opposed by tubercle on latter.Coxa of fourth pereiopod lacking boss on caudomesialsurface, that of fifth with slight elevation caudomesially.First pleopods (Fig. Sb,d-f,h,n) differing onlyslightly from those of nominate subspecies.Allotypic Female-Differing from holotype in followingrespects: epistome with both cephalolateralmargins undulating; telson with only two spines incaudosinistral corner of cephalic section. Chelipeddiffering from that of paratypic male, form I, as follows:opposable margin of fixed finger with dorsalrow of 20 tubercles and ventral of five, with third indorsal row and two proximal ones in ventral rowlarger than others on opposable surface; opposablemargin of dactyl with 22 tubercles, second and fourthfrom base largest; tubercles on opposable margins ofboth fingers extending from base almost to corneoustips; merus with ·five corneous-tipped spines on subdistaldorsal surface, ventral surface with mesial rowof 18 tubercles and lateral row of about 23 withspikelike members interspersed with smaller ones.(See measurements.)Annulus ventralis (Fig. 8/) with median troughcephalically; sinus originating at caudal extremity oftrough, curving caudodextrally and making hairpin35

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFig. 8. Procambarus (Austrocambarus) oaxacae reddelli, new subspecies. a, Lateral view of carapace of holotype; b, Lateralview of first pleopod of holotype; c, Lateral view of first pleopod of morphotype; d, Lateral view of distal portion of first pleopodof holotype; e, Mesial view of same; f, Caudal view of same; g, Mesial view of first pleopod of morphotype; h, Mesial view offirst pleopod of holotype; i, Cephalic lobe of epistome of holotype; j, Basal podomeres of third through fifth pereiopods ofholotype; k, Dorsal view of carapace of holotype;/, Annulus ventralis and adjacent sternites of allotype;m, Distal podomeres ofcheliped of paratypic male, form I; n, Caudal view of first pleopods of holotype; 0, Antennal scale of holotype.36

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintturn before bending sharply caudally to submediancaudal margin of annulus. Preannular plate with medianlongitudinal trough, lateral swollen areas withshort stiff setae. Postannular plate almost as wide asannulus and more than half as long; ventral surfacewith distinct concavity in elevated central area. Firstpleopod rudimentary.Morphotypic Male, Form II-Differing from holotypein following respects: postcervical groove somewhatmore clearly defined than in holotype and allotype;epistome without cephalomedian excavation;cephalic section of telson with four spines in dextraland three in sinistral caudolateral corners; hook onischium of third pereiopod much reduced and notnearly reaching distal margin of corresponding basis.Cheliped differing from that of paratypic male, formI, as follows: mesial margin of palm with row of 17tubercles; opposable margin of fixed finger with dorsalrow of six tubercles, second from base largest,along proximal one-third; ventral row of three tubercleson opposable margin of fixed finger situatednear midlength; proximal two-thirds of opposablemargin of dactyl with row of nine tubercles; meruswith ventrolateral row of 14 tubercles and ventromesialrow of 13.First pleopod (Fig. 8c,g) with all elements moreinflated and less sharply defined than in holotype;shoulder on cephalic surface sloping cephalically, andoblique juvenile groove prominent in proximal half.Size-The largest specimen available is the allotypicfemale which has a carapace length of 37.4 mm (postorbitallength of 30.5 mm). The largest and smallestfirst form males have corresponding lengths of 37.3(30.2) mm and 28.6(23.1) mm.Type-locality-Cueva del Nacimiento del RIO SanAntonio, 10 km SSW Acatlan, Oaxaca, Mexico. Thespecimens were collected on 26 December 1972 byJ. Reddell, D. and M. McKenzie, and S. Murphy.Types-The holotypic male, form I, allotypic female,and morphotypic male, form II (Nos. 144346,144347, and 144348, respectively) are deposited inthe National Museum of Natural History, SmithsonianInstitution. Of the paratypes, one male, form II, andone female are in the Instituto de Biologla, UniversidadNacional Autonoma de Mexico, one male, formII, and one female are in The Museum, Texas TechUniversity, LUbbock, Texas, and one male, form I,one male, form II, two females, one juvenile male,and four juvenile females are in the SmithsonianInstitution.Range and Specimens Examined-Procambarus (A.)oaxacae reddelli is known with certainty only fromthe type-locality, and the 16 available specimens fromthis cave constitute the type-series. A collection ofTable 2. Measurements (mm) of Procambarus (A.) oaxacae reddelliHolotype Allotype MorphotypeCarapace:Height 15.5 15.6 10.4Width 16.4 15.8 10.9Length 37.3 37.4 25.8Postorbital length 30.2 30.5 20.0Areola:Width 2.6 3.1 2.2Length 13.2 13.1 8.5Rostrum:Width 5.5 5.3 3.5Length 8.7 8.8 6.5Right Chela:Length of mesial margin of palm 9.2* 13.1 ** 6.0Width of palm 6.1 * 7.5** 3.9Length of lateral margin of propodus 23.3* 32.1 ** 16.3Length of dactyl 12.3* 17.4** 8.5Abdomen:Width 14.1 14.4 10.1Length 37.3 38.0 29.9*Holotype with regenerated chelae, measurements are of paratypic male, form I.**Left chela of allotype; right chela regenerated.37

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintfour first form males, two females, one juvenile male,and two juvenile females from Cueva del Guayabo,12 km NE of Valle Nacional, Oaxaca, taken by thesame collectors on 29 December 1972, is tentativelyassigned to this subspecies. On the basis of the proximityof this and the locality from which the nominatesubspecies was described, one might anticipatethat the crayfish in Cueva del Guayabo would bemore closely allied to P. fA) oaxacae oaxacae, particularlyin as much as both serve as hosts to the sametwo species of ostracods, Entocythere claytonhoffiand Ankylocythere maya. In the type-locality of P.fA) oaxacae reddelli this crayfish harbors E. claytonhoffiand Ankylocythere bidentata (Rioja).Variations-As in the nominate subspecies, themost conspicuous variations among the specimensfrom the type-locality are those associated with injuriesand regeneration. Numbers of tubercles on thepodomeres of the cheliped, except in regeneratedappendages, vary little from the range expressed in theabove descriptions. While the size of the pigmentspot in the eye is slightly variable, the spot is alwayssharply defined. In comparing the specimens comprisingthe type-series with those from Cueva del Guayaboand the type-series of the nominate subspecies, thefollowing were noted. In Cueva del Guano (nominatesubspecies), the areola constitutes from 35.8 to 37.8(Average 36.5) percent of the carapace length and43.7 to 46.1 (Av. 44.8) percent of the postorbitallength. In Cueva del Nacimiento del RIo San AntoniofP. o. reddelli), the corresponding ranges are 32.9 to35.6 (Av. 34.3) and 42.0 to 43.7 (Av. 43.0) percent.In Cueva del Guayabo (Atypical P. o. reddelli), theranges are 34.1 to 35.7 (Av. 35.1) and 42.5 to 44.4(Av. 43.5). In Cueva del Guano, the telson has fromone to three (usually two) spines in the caudolateralcorner of the cephalic section; none of the individualshas cervical spines; and the reddish purple eye pigmentmay be absent to moderately abundant, butnever is the pigmented area sharply delimited. Incontrast, the specimens from Cueva del Nacimientodel RIo San Antonio have three spines in at leastone of the caudolateral corners of the cephalic sectionof the telson, a cervical spine is present on atleast one side, and the black eye-pigment is sharplymargined. Among the specimens from Cueva delGuayabo, only one has three spines in the caudolateralcorner of the cephalic section of the telson(usually there are two); two of the specimens lackcervical spines; in all of them, however, the blackpigment spot in the eye is sharply outlined.In view of the intermediate nature of the charactersexemplified in the specimens from Cueva delGuayabo between those observed in the specimensfrom the other two localities, it seems highly probablethat the populations in the latter two are capable ofinterbreeding, if indeed there does not exist a geneflowbetween them. Because of the characteristics ofthe specimens from Cueva del Guayabo, subspecificrank is assigned to these new troglobites.Relationships-Procambarus fA) oaxacae is moreclosely allied to Procambarus fA) rodriguezi Hobbs(1943) than to any other descri bed species, and asthe troglobitic crayfish fauna in the karst area ofVeracruz and Oaxaca becomes better known, it ispossible, if not probable, that intergradation will bediscovered between all three of the taxa recognizedhere. The characters that serve to separate the twosubspecies of P. fA) oaxacae have been discussedunder variations above, and those that serve to distinguishthese subspecies from P. fA) rodriguezi arethe absence of a prominent corneous caudomesialboss on the fifth pereiopod and the decidedly lessflattened mesial process of the first pleopod in thefirst form male; in the female the annulus ventralisis less protruding, more gently rounded posteroventrally,and the postannular plate does not have asimple transverse row of tubercles. In addition, inthe nominate subspecies, there is no cervical spine,and, in P. fA) oaxacae reddelli, there are several distinguishingcharacteristics: the spines on the chelipedare distinctly more strongly developed, and there isone strong one on the mesial surface of the carpus andanother on the distolateral extremity of the merusthat are absent in P. rodriguezi; furthermore, threespines in the caudolateral corner of the cephalic sectionof the telson have not been observed in the latterspecies.LITERATURE CITEDHobbs, Horton H., Jr. 1943. Two new crayfishes of the genusProcambarus from Mexico (Decapoda, Astacidael. L1oydia,6: 198-206.Hobbs, Horton H., Jr. 1969. Procambarus villalobosi, unnuevo Cambarino de San Luis Potos( Mexico (Decapoda,Astacidael. An. Inst. BioI. Univ. Nal. A. de Mexico, SerieCiencia del Mar y Limnologla, 38( 1) :41-46.Holthuis, L.B. 1952. The subfamily Palaemoninae. In Generalrevision of the Palaemonidae (Crustacea Decapoda Natantialof the Americas, II. Dec. Pap. Allan Hancock Found.,no. 12, pp. 1-396.Villalobos, Alejandro. 1955. Cambarinos de la fauna rnexicana.Tesis, Facultad de Ciencias. Univ. Nal. A. de Mexico,pages 1-290.Villalobos, Alejandro. 1958. Estudios de los cambarinos mexicanosXIII. Descripcion de una nueva especie de cambarinosdel estado de Veracruz. An. Inst. BioI. Univ. Nal. A.de Mexico, 28( 1,2):279-288.38

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintTHE GENUS SPHAEROMICOLA (OSTRACODA, ENTOCYTHERIDAE) IN MEXICOHorton H. Hobbs, Jr., and H. H. Hobbs IIISmithsonian Institution and Indiana UniversityChiefly through the diligence and cooperation ofthose active in surveying the troglobitic fauna ofMexico, the range of the genus Sphaeromicola israpidly becoming more accurately defined. Almostcertainly, the occurrence of ostracods of this genus inMexico is limited by the ranges of their isopod hosts,and collections of these much more conspicuous animalshave resulted in the accumulation of specimensof Sphaeromicola from some 18 localities in thestates of Nuevo Leon, San Luis POtOSI: and Tamaulipas.All of the localities from which these ostracodsare known are reported here together with referencesto earlier records of their occurrence in each cave.One or both of us have examined specimens fromevery locality cited except Cueva de EI Pachon,Tamaulipas.The host of the new species described here is notknown with certainty, for the ostracods were retrievedfrom a container in which there were fourspecies of isopods: Mexistenasellus parzefalli Magniez,M. wilkensi Magniez, an undescribed member of thefamily Cirolanidae, and another belonging to the genusCyathura. These specimens were collected inCueva del Huisache, San Luis POtOSI~We should like to thank all of those collectorscited for permitting us to examine the specimens onwhich this report is based. Special thanks are dueJames R. Reddell, who sorted and transmitted mostof the specimens to the Smithsonian, William R. Elliott,who permitted the removal of specimens fromisopods that were in his collection, and Thomas E.Bowman who kindly identified most of the hosts.We are also grateful to Fenner A. Chace, Jr., MargaretA. Daniel, and James E. Peters for their criticisms ofthe manuscript.Sphaeromicola cirolanae RiojaFig. 1a, bSphaeromicola cirolanae Rioja, 1951:170.Hobbs (1971 :45-47) reviewed the range of thisostracod, including several new locality records, citeda previously unreported host, and called attention tothe two types of clasping apparatus, here designatedthe angular (Fig. 1a) and curved (Fig. 1b) types, thatoccur in the male.Listed below are all of the known locality recordsfor this ostracod together with the host and the typeor types of clasping apparatus represented in eachcave. The species is known only from Mexico.NUEVO LEON:Cueva La Chorrera, 27.3 km SW Linares, on Speocirolanaguerrai Contreras, 13 June 1971, SalvadorContreras-Balderas, coil. - curved type.SAN LUIS POTOSI:Sotano de Yerbaniz, 21 km NNE Ciudad Valles, onSpeocirolana pelaezi (Bolivar), 7 January 1970, R.W.Mitchell et aI., coil. - curved type.Sotano del Tigre, 14 km NNE Ciudad Valles, on S.pelaezi,1 February 1968, R.W. Mitchell, coil. - angularand curved types (Hobbs, 1971 :46).Sotano del Arroyo, 12 km NNE Ciudad Valles, onS. pelaezi, 24 November 1962, M. Tandy and W.Russell, coil. - angular type (Hobbs, 1971 :46).Sotanito de Montecillos, 9 km NE Ciudad Valles,on S. pelaezi, 21 May 1971, C. Bittinger, coil. -39

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintcurved type.Sotano de las Piedras, 8 km NE Ciudad Valles, onS. pelaezi, S.B. Peck and W. Elliott, coil. - curvedtype.Sotano de Pichijumo, 9 km NE Ciudad Valles, onS. pelaezi, 1 June 1968, F. Abernathy, coil. - curvedtype (Hobbs, 1971 :46).Cueva de la Curva, 8 km E Ciudad Valles, on S.pelaezi, 26 May 1971, W. Elliott, M. Brownfield, coil.- curved type.Sotano de Matapalma, 20 km N Ciudad Valles, onS. pelaezi, 29 May 1969, R.W. Mitchell, F. Abernathy,T. Albert, coli. - curved type.Cueva de la Lagunita, 15 km NN E Ciudad de Maiz,on S. pelaezi, 16 April 1965, D. McKenzie, J. Reddell,coli. - angular and curved types (Hobbs, 1971:46).Cueva de Los Sabinos, 13 km NNE Ciudad Valles(Type·locality), on S. pelaezi, date and collector un·known - angular type (Rioja, 1951: 178). The onlyextant part of the type·series are paratypes in theSmithsonian Institution, catalogue number 128952.TAMAULIPAS:Sotano de EI Molino, 1 km NW Gomez Farias, onS. pelaezi, 21·22 October 1971, Terry Raines, coll.angular type.Cueva de EI Pachon, 18 km SSW Ciudad Mante, onS. pelaezi, date and collector unknown - presumablycdFig. la, b. Sphaeromicola cirolanae Rioja. a, Copulatory complex of male with angular type clasping apparatus; b, Copulatorycomplex of male with curved type clasping apparatus.Fig. lc-g. Sphaeromicola coahuiltecae, new species. c, Right valve of male; d, Right valve of female; e, Copulatory complexof holotype; f, Copulatory complex of paratypic male; g, Clasping apparatus of holotype.40

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintangular type (Rioja, 1951:178).Grutas de Quintero, 13 km SW Ciudad Mante, onS. pelaezi and S. bolivari (Rioja). date and collectorunknown - angular type (=Cuevas de Quintero, Rioja,1951 :178).Cueva de la Florida, 16 km SSW Ciudad Mante, onS. pelaezi, 16 February 1970, W. Elliott, coli. - angularand curved types (Hobbs, 1971 :46).Bee Cave (=Satano de las Abejas). 16 km NEOcampo, 10 July 1969, W. Elliott, D. Broussard, J.Mel ntire, coli. - angular and curved types.Satano de EI Venadito, 16 km SE Antiguo Morelos,22 May 1971, S. Bittinger et aI., coil. - angulartype.Variations-Those noted are minor in character andnone seems to be regionally restricted. The length ofthe shell in males ranges from 0.27 mm in specimensfrom Cueva La Chorrera and Satano de Matapalmato 0.32 mm in one specimen from Sotanito de Montecillos;the height of the shell varies from 0.15 mm inone individual from Bee Cave to 0.18 mm in othersfrom Satano del Tigre and Satano de las Piedras. Infemales the corresponding ranges are from 0.27 mmin one specimen from Satano de Matapalma to 0.31mm in one from Satano de EI Molino, and from 0.15mm in specimens from Cueva de la Florida andSotano de EI Venadito to 0.19 mm in one fromSatano de EI Molino.Sphaeromicola coahuiltecae, new speciesFig. 1c-gMale-Eye apparently absent, no pigment spot.Shell (Fig. 1c) elongate oval with ventral marginnearly straight; greatest height near midlength; posteriorend of shell more abruptly vaulted than anterior.Submarginal setae evenly spaced along anterior,ventral, and posterior margins, but absent dorsally.Copulatory complex (Fig. 1e-g) with peniferumshort, suddenly contracted posteriorly at base of ventrallobe; latter with anteroventral extremity formingangle of approximately 90 degrees and prolongedposteriorly in conspicuous acute or subacute prominence;mesial surface of ventral lobe grooved vertically,receiving penis from main body of peniferum;anteroventral margin of main body of peniferum withprominent anteriorly directed spine situated immediatelyproximal to ventral lobe. Penis straight. Muscularelements of peniferum arranged in two bundles;anterior one inserted anteroventrally near base ofclasping apparatus; posterior bundle inserted in ventrallobe adjacent to mesial groove. Clasping apparatus(crochet) L-shaped with vertical ramus distinctlyshorter than horizontal ramus and extending far ven-trally beyond peniferum; external (postaxial) borderof vertical ramus with angular lobe near proximal end;internal (preaxial) border of vertical ramus and externalborder of horizontal ramus entire; internal borderof horizontal ramus lacking teeth but undulating,high near midlength but comparatively low alongdistal third; apex of ramus with five denticles_ Dorsalfinger bifid and slender, ventral finger (flagellum) undulating,always with strong curve at end of proximalthird.Female-Eye, as in male, apparently absent, nopigment spot. Shell (Fig. 1d) markedly similar to thatof male, slightly more highly vaulted and with broad,very gentle concavity on ventral margin. Submarginalsetae as in male.Measurements (in mm) of two males and three females-LengthHeightHolotype d Paratypic d Allotypic Paratypic 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.270.290.15 0.15 0.14 0.140.15Type-locality and Host-Cueva del Huisache, 4 kmNW Micos, San Luis POtOSI: Mexico, the only knownlocality for the species. The specimens on which theabove description is based were collected by WilliamRussell on 28 November 1972. The identity of thehost, as indicated above, is not known; however, inasmuchas all of the American members of the genushave been found only on cirolanids, it is probablethat the undescribed member of the family occurringin this cave serves as the host to S. coahuiltecae.Disposition of Types-The holotypic male andallotypic female are deposited in the National Museumof Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, USNMcatalogue numbers 143122 and 143123, respectively,as are the paratypes, consisting of 1 dissected male,2 females, and 3 juveniles.Relationships-Sphaeromicola coahuiltecae has itsclosest affinities with the Mexican S. cirolanae. Onlymales of the two may be readily distinguished. Theclasping apparatus of the former lacks a distinct toothon the sinuous internal border of the horizontal ramusof the clasping apparatus, and it possesses a subangularlobe on the subproximal postaxial border of thevertical ramus. In S. cirolanae, the horizontal ramusalways bears a tooth on the internal border, and thevertical ramus lacks a subangular lobe.LITERATURE CITEDHobbs, Horton H., Jr. 1971. The Entocytherid Ostracods ofMexico and Cuba. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology,Number 81, 55 pp., 31 figs.41

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintRioja, Enrique. 1951. Estudios carcinolOgicos. XXV. EI hallazgodel genero Sphaeromicola en America (Ostracodos,Citeridos) y descripcion de una nueva especie. Anales delInstituto de Biolog(a, Universidad Nacional Autonoma deMexico, 22(1):169-179,16 figs.42

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintJARMILKA ALBA, N. GEN., N. SP. (DIPLOPODA: SPIROSTREPTIDA: CAMBALlDAE),A NEW MILLIPED FROM A CAVE IN BELIZEWilliam A. ShearDept. of Zoology, University of FloridaGainesville, Fla. 32601A small collection of millipeds forwarded to meby Dr. Stewart Peck, Carleton University, Ottawa,Canada, contained the following remarkable newspecies, a form so unusual that I am departing frommy usual practice and describing a monotypic newgenus for it.Because of differences in the gnathochilarium,Schubart (1946) and other authors have consideredsome genera of American Cambalidae as belonging totheir own family Leioderidae, a group at first includedin the Oriental Cambalopsidae. Leioderids were to bethose species in which the mentum was divided into amentum and promentum. However, this practice ofsplitting up families and genera on the basis of a fewpredetermined characters has rightly fallen out offavor with American diplopodologists. (This branchof arthropod taxonomy now finds itself on the brinkof a complete reorganization along more modernlines.) The original Leioderidae contained forms noteven close to the Spirostreptida: Ergene setosusChamberlin (1943a) previously regarded as either aleioderid or cambalid (see Causey, 1971) has proven,upon examination of the type, to be a typhlobolellinespirobolellid (Hoffman, pers. comm., see also Hoffman,1969). Some of the species reported from theUnited States are probably likewise members of unrelatedgroups. For the time being, more biologicalinformation is imparted by considering the Leioderidaeto be at best a poorly defined subfamily of theCambalidae.Causey (1971) has su mmarized the distributionand relationships of the Mexican species of Cambalaand Mexicambala. She also gave some records ofErgene setosus from Tamaulipas and San Luis PotOSI:but it is not certain that her material is the same asChamberlin's poorly described holotype. Morelenemundus Chamberlin (1943b) was described fromOaxtepec, Morelos, but the description is equivocaland also suggests some typhlobolleline characters.Thus, the distribution of the Cambalidae in CentralAmerica appeared to be limited to northern Mexico,and involved mostly troglobitic forms. In view of allthis, it is more than a little remarkable that the tinycambalid described below has been found as far southas Belize (British Honduras),FAMILY CAMBALIDAECambalidae Bollman, 1893, U. S. Nat. Mus. BulL,46: 157; Loomis, 1938, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 86:27-31. Type genus, Cambala Gray 1832.Leioderidae Schubart, 1946, Rev. Brasi leira, BioL,6(3):404. Type genus, Leiodere Loomis. NEWSUBJECTIVE SYNONYMY.Genus Jarmilka, newType Species-Jarmilka alba, n.sp.Diagnosis-Minute cambalid millipeds, maturemales with as few as 18 segments and as many as 35,eyes lacking, body not pigmented, closely set withshort, fine setae, segments not crested, with meta-43

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintzonites only slightly enlarged. Promentum present.Anterior gonopods two-segmented, coxae bearing relativelyshort flagella, telopodites with mesal process,lateral spur and various setae. Posterior gonopodsbasally fused, slender, with two short distal branches,one bearing apically hooked setae. Differs fromCambala and Mexicambala in the low segment number,minute size, and lack of segmental crests.The generic name is feminine. The genus is namedfor Dr. Jarmila Kukalova-Peck, Ottawa, Canada, oneof the world's foremost authorities on fossil insects.Types deposited in Museum of Comparative Zoology,Cambridge, Mass.Jarmilka alba, new speciesFigs. 1-3Types-Male holotype and male and female paratypesfrom Mountain Cow Cave, Caves Branch, Belize(British Honduras). elevation 152 m, taken from guanoby S. and J. Peck, 5 August 1972. The species namerefers to the lack of pigment.Description of Male Holotype-Length, 10 mm,width 0.59 mm. 35 postcephalic segments (paratypes:24 and 18 segments). Head smooth. Eyes completelyabsent. Antennae clavate (Fig. 1), setose. Gnathochi-larium with promentum. Collum partly covering head,faintly rimmed anteriorly, narrowing vertrolaterally,becoming moderately acute (Fig. 1). Trunk segmentsonly moderately constricted, metazonites finely anddensely set with short setae. Segments behind collumonly a little narrowed, segments 6-7 about the widest.Ozopores not detected. First two pairs of legs enlarged,following legs small and slender (Fig. 1).Gonopods in situ exposed on ventral surface ofbody, hardly at all sunk in socket, socket not rimmed,gonopods reflexed posteriorly. Anterior gonopods(Fig. 3) with subtriangular sternum, globular coxae.Telopodites with a mesal bladelike process, acutelateral spur, and two setae just above and below spurand slightly posterior to it. Coxal flagellum rathershort. Anterior gonopods (Fig. 2) basally fused,narrowed distally, divided at the apex into two shortbranches, posteriormost (coxal process?) slightlyclubbed, bearing short spicules, anteriormost shorter(telopodite?). with two flattened, hooked setae.Pigmentation variable, probably due to preservation.Most specimens translucent, but some opaquechalky White, others medium horn brown.Description of Female Paratype-Size and nonsexualcharacters as in males. First two pairs of legsenlarged.\,.3Figs. 1-3. Jarmilka alba. 1. Anterior end of male, lateral view. 2. Posterior gonopods, posterior view. 3. Gonopods, anteriorview.44

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintDistribution-Known only from the type locality.Notes-This species is remarkable for its smallsize and the low segment number (18!) in somemature males. The best review of related forms, all ofthem from the West Coast of the United States, isgiven by Loomis (1938). Jarmilka alba clearly representsa very distinct phyletic line, but a total reworkingof the American Cambalidae is needed beforeits relationships can be definitively discussed.Despite the lack of eyes and pigment, I doubt ifJ. alba is a troglobite, but probably habitually lives inthe soil, as do many other cambalids. As it occurs inguano, it may perhaps be classed as a facultativetroglophile.LITERATURE CITEDdescriptions of three new species of Mexicambala (Diplopoda,Cambalidal. Proc. BioI. Soc. Washington, 84:271-282.Chamberlin, R.V. 1943a. On some genera and species ofAmerican millipeds. Bull. Univ. Utah, 34(6): 1-20.Chamberlin, R.V. 1943b. On Mexican millipeds. Bull. Univ.Utah,34(7):1·103.Hoffman, R.L. 1969. Studies on spiroboloid millipeds. VII.A remarkable new genus and subfamily of the Spirobolellidaefrom Veracruz, Mexico. Proc. BioI. Soc. Washington,82:177-188.Loomis, H.F. 1938. The cambaloid millipeds of the UnitedStates, including a family new to the fauna and newgenera and species. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 86:27-66.Schubart, O. 1946. Gamba/apsis nordquisti Attems da Asiaoriental, habitante do Distrito Federal do Brasil. Rev.Brasiliera BioI., 6(3) :395-406.Causey, N.B. 1971. The Cambalidae in Mexican caves, with45

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintNEW AND LITTLE KNOWN PSEUDOSCORPIONS, MAINLY FROM CAVES IN MEXICO(ARACHNIDA, PSEUDOSCORPIONI DA)William B. MuchmoreDepartment of Biology, University of RochesterRochester, New York 14627Since the preparation of my recent papers on somepseudoscorpions from Mexican caves (Muchmore,1972a, b) many new specimens have been collectedand sent to me for identification and study. Much ofthis material pertains to the family Chernetidae,which is in serious need of gross reorganization, andwill not be reported on at present. However, many ofthe new forms belonging to the Chthoniidae, Neobisioidea,and Cheliferidae are described and discussedbelow (see also Muchmore, 1973). It is becomingmore and more clear that the pseudoscorpions ofMt!xico and Central America, both cavernicolous andepigean, are an extremely interesting and importantgroup of animals.Types of new species are deposited in the collectionof the American Museum of Natural History inNew York, except as noted otherwise.I am exceedingly grateful to Robert W. Mitchell,James R. Reddell, Stewart B. Peck and their associatesfor sending me their pseudoscorpion materialfor study. Also, I wish to acknowledge the invaluableassistance of Charlotte H. Alteri in the study of thespecimens and preparation of the illustrations forthis paper. The research was supported in part by agrant (GB 17964) from the National Science Foundation.FAMILY CHTHONIIDAE HANSENGenus Aphrastochthonius ChamberlinAphrastochthonius Chamberlin, 1962, p. 307; Muchmore,1972b, p. 433.Type Species-Aphrastochthonius tenax Chamberlin,1962.This genus and the Middle American species assignedto it have been reviewed recently by theauthor (1972bl. Based on knowledge of the newspecies described below, the generic diagnosis mustbe emended in one respect, namely, to include specieswith seven (as well as five or six) setae on thehand of the chelicera.Aphrastochthonius major, new speciesFig. 1Material-Holotype female (WM2733.01 001) fromCueva de la Capilla, 13.5 km NW Gomez Fanas,Tamaulipas, M~xico, on 14 March 1972 (G.D. Campbell).Diagnosis-With the characteristics of the genus asredefined by Muchmore (1972b) and above. In thekey provided by Muchmore (1972b, p. 441) this spe-47

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintcies will run out to A. verapazanus, from which itcan be distinguished by its larger size, the occurrenceof seven setae (rather than six) on the cheliceral hand,and the occurrence of six setae (rather than four) onthe fourth tergite.Description of Female-Carapace with surfacescaly; anterior margin straight but with about 10small denticles near center; no eyes present; chaetotaxym4m-4-4-2-2=16+2m. Coxal chaetotaxy 1+m-21(3m):3m-3-1-CS:3-2-CS:2-5:2-5: maxilla with threemicrosetae (3m) on dorso-Iateral surface; each coxa Iand II with seven spines; small bisetose intercoxaltubercle present. Tergal chaetotaxy 4:4:4:6:6:6:6:6:6:4:T2T:0. Sternal chaetotaxy 8:(4) 10(4): (4) 11 (4):12:11 :11 :11 :10:7:0:2.Chelicera four-fifths as long as carapace. Hand withseven setae, es small; fixed finger with eight tall sharpteeth and two small basal denticles; movable fingerwith 12 similar teeth and two denticles; galea a lowelevation; serrula exterior of 15 blades; serrula interiorof 12 blades; flagellum of nine pinnate setae,the proximal one quite short.Palps typically attenuated; femur 1.8 and chela2.58 times as long as carapace. Proportions of palpalsegments shown in Figure 1. Trochanter 1.6, femur7.6, tibia 2.25, and chela 5.7 times as long as broad;hand 2.3 times as long as deep; movable finger 1.63times as long as hand. Trichobothria of chela as inother species. Movable finger with marginal row of10 spaced, acute teeth; fixed finger with 16 similarteeth, and with one small accessory tooth on externalsurface at distal end. Typical sensory pit just proximalto last marginal tooth and presumed bipolar neuronassociated with terminal tooth of movable finger.Legs of typical facies. Leg IV with entire femur3.8 and tibia 6.1 times as long as deep; tactile setaeon metatarsus 0.58 and on telotarsus 0.45 length ofsegment from proximal end.Male-Unknown.Measurements (in mm)-Body length 1.50. Carapacelength 0.465. Chelicera 0.38 by 0.18. Pal paltrochanter 0.21 by 0.13; femur 0.835 by 0.11; tibia0.29 by 0.13; chela 1.20 by 0.21; hand 0.46 by 0.20;movable finger 0.75 long. Leg IV: entire femur 0.68by 0.18; tibia 0.46 by 0.075; metatarsus 0.21 by 0.06;telotarsus 0.57 by 0.05.Etymology-This species is named for its relativelylarge size.Genus Mundochthonius ChamberlinMundochthonius Chamberlin, 1929, p. 64.Type Species-Mundochthonius erosidens Chamberlin,1929.This genus is represented by a number of species inNorth America, Europe and Asia. They are characterizedby the occurrence on the coxa of each leg IIof a single, flat and deeply incised or divided coxalspine and the possession of a small bisetose intercoxaltubercle. Only rarely are representatives found incaves, most forms living deep in forest litter.Mundochthonius mexicanus, new speciesFigs. 2-5Material-Holotype male (WM1905.01003) andnumerous paratypes from Chipinque Mesa, Monterrey,Nuevo Le6n, M~xico, on 22 June 1969 (S. and J.Peck); berlese separation of 176 liters (166 pounds)of forest soil and litter. Paratype female from CrystalCave, Rancho del Cielo, 5 km NW Gomez Farias,Tamaulipas, M~xico, on 10 January 1971 (J. Reddell,J. Cooke, S. Wiley, and V. Tipton); found in a pileof rat dung.Diagnosis-Generally similar to northern speciesof the genus, but with no discernible eyes and chaetotaxyof anterior tergites 4:6:6:6:6:6.Description-(Based on six mounted specimens,three males and three females.) Males and femalesessentially similar, but females slightly larger andmore robust. Carapace about as long as broad; anteriormargin with numerous denticulations and aprominent serrate epistome (Fig. 2); surface smoothdorsally; no eyes or eyespots visible; chaetotaxy6-4-4-2-2=18. Coxal area typical; chaetotaxy 2-1-2:mmm-2-1:2-4-CS:2-5:1-6; the spine on each coxa IIa broad, flat, deeply incised blade (Fig. 3); a small,bisetose intercoxal tubercle present.Abdomen typical; surfaces of sclerites smooth;pleural membranes longitudinally plicate and coveredwith minute papillae. Tergal chaetotaxy of bothsexes 4:6:6:6:6:6:6:6:6:4:1T2Tl :0. Sternal chaeto-14-13taxy of holotype male 12:[4-4] :(5)10(5) :(3)8(3):11:11 :9:8:8:T1T1T1T:0:2; sternal chaetotaxy of female10: (5) 11(5): (3)8(3): 11: 10:8:9:8:T1T1T1T:0:2.Chelicera distinctly shorter than carapace; handwith six setae; fixed finger with six large and fivesmall teeth; movable finger with an isolated, subterminaltooth and row of nine or ten smaller teeth;spinneret present as a very small elevation in themale, larger in the female; flagellum of ten or elevenpinnate setae; serrula exterior of 12 to 14 blades andserrula interior of 10 or 11 blades.Pal ps generally similar to those of other species ofthe genus. Femur 0.75-0.87 and chela 1.21-1.38 timesas long as carapace. Proportions of segments as shownin Figure 4; trochanter 1.7-1.8, femur 3.3-3.6, tibia48

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint6108Fig. 1. Aphrastochthonius major, new species. Left palp, dorsal view.Figs. 2-5. Mundochthonius mexicanus, new species. 2. Anterior margin of carapace. 3. Coxal spine. 4. Right palp, dorsal view.5. Left chela, lateral view.Figs. 6-14. Lechytia cavicola, new species. 6. Anterior margin of carapace. 7. Setae on apex of palpal coxa. 8. Posteriorgenital operculum of male. 9. Posterior end of abdomen, ventral view. 10. Movable finger of chelicera of male. 11. Cheliceralflagellum. 12. Right palp, dorsal view. 13. Left chela, lateral view. 14. Movable finger of chelicera of female.1.6-1.8 and chela 3.75-4.2 times as long as broad;hand 1.4-1.6 times as long as deep; movable finger1.68-1.81 times as long as hand; female palps slightlylarger and more robust than those of male. Pal palsurfaces smooth, except distinctly granulate on dorsumof chelal hand and base of fixed finger. Trichobothriaof chela as shown in Figure 5. Fixed fingerwith marginal row of 48-56 low, basally contiguous49

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintteeth and a tiny accessory denticle on the internalsurface alongside the fourth marginal tooth; movablefinger with 52-60 similar marginal teeth and with asmall elevated sensillum on external surface just proximalto level of st.Legs typical. Leg IV with entire femur 2.2-2.4 andtibia 3.1-3.3 times as long as deep; with long tactilesetae on metatarsus 0.21-0.28 and on telotarsus 0.230.28 length of segment from proximal end.Measurements (in mm)-(Ranges for the six mountedtypes): Body length 1.10-1.40. Carapace length(including epistome) 0.435-0.48. Chelicera 0.33-0.38by 0.16-0.20. Pal pal trochanter 0.17-0.19 by 0.100.11; femur 0.34-0.38 by 0.095-0.11; tibia 0.20-0.215by 0.11-0.13; chela 0.54-0.60 by 0.135-0.155; hand0.21·0.22 by 0.135-0.155; movable finger 0.3550.385 long. Leg IV: entire femur 0.33-0.38 by 0.150.16; tibia 0.245-0.265 by 0.075-0.08; metatarsus0.11-0.125 by 0.05-0.06; telotarsus 0.21-0.23 by0.04-0.045.Etymology-Thf: species is named mexicanus becauseit is the first Mundochthonius known fromMexico.Remarks-The genus Mundochthonius has representativesover much of the Holarctic Region but hasnot previously been recorded from so far south. Itwill not be surprising to find it represented in othermountain localities in Mexico. The specimen fromCrystal Cave is included among the paratypes of thepresent species because of its general similarity tothe other specimens. However, it is slightly larger andmore slender than the other mounted females andmay later be found to belong to a distinct species.Genus Lechytia BalzanLechytia Balzan, 1891, p. 498; Chamberlin, 1929,p.77.Type Species-Roncus chthoniiformis Balzan, 1890.This genus is characterized by the occurrence offour trichobothria on the dorsum of the chelal handand the complete absence of coxal spines. It is wellrepresented in North and South America, Africa andAsia, but is not well known because of the small sizeand secretive habits of most forms, which live inforest litter.Lechytia cavicola, new speciesFigs. 6-14Material-The holotype male (JC1671.010011.paratype male and paratype female from Grutas deCacahuamilpa, 17 km NE Taxco, Guerrero, Mexico;collected by F. Bonet on 14 December 1939 (BonetCollection No. 69). These specimens are presently inthe J. C. Chamberlin Collection, at Pacific University,Forest Grove,Oregon (Dr. David R. Malcolm, curator).Diagnosis-Typical of the genus, and generallysi mi lar to L. trinitatis Beier (1968) but slightlylarger and more robust and male with a small but distinctspinneret on the movable finger of the chelicera.Description of Male-Carapace slightly longer thanbroad; no epistome, but anterior margin slightly convexat center and with 15-20 distinct denticles (Fig.6); no eyes evident; chaetotaxy 6-4·4-2·2=18. Coxalarea typical; chaetotaxy 2-3-0:1-3-0:2-4:1-6:1-6; medialseta on apex of pal pal coxa bifurcate at tip(Fig. 7); no coxal spines or intercoxal tubercle present.Pleural membranes of abdomen with longitudinalrows of tiny granules. Tergal chaetotaxy 6:6:6:6:6:6:6:6:6:4: 1T2Tl :0. Sternal chaetotaxy 10: [4-4] :11-10(3) 10(3) :(3)8(3):10:8:8:8:8:2TT2:0:2; most setae onposterior operculum flanking the genital opening bifurcatenear tips (Fig. 8); eleventh sternite reduced toa very narrow membranous band and bearing no setae(Fig. 9).Chelicera about three-fourths as long as carapace;hand with five setae; fingers with several distinctteeth; serrula exterior of about 15 blades; spinneretrepresented by a small, but distinct elevation (Fig.10); flagellum of eight denticulate setae, the secondfrom the distal end sharply curved near the base andset out ventrally from the others (Fig. 11).Palps fairly short and stout; femur 0.83 and chela1.25 times as long as carapace. Proportions of palpalsegments as shown in Figure 12; trochanter 1.6-1.7,fem ur 3.15-3.3, tibia 1.65, and chela 3.6-3.65 timesas long as broad; hand 1.55-1.6 times as long as deep;movable finger 1.16-1.19 times as long as hand.Trichobothria of chela as indicated in Figure 13;areoles of st and sb of movable finger separated byabout two-thirds of an areolar diameter; it of fixedfinger very slightly distal to level of est. Fixed fingerwith five small, distal denticles followed by 20-22long, low teeth with posteriorly displaced cusps, andwith a small, internal accessory tooth at level ofsecond marginal tooth; movable finger with 3-4 smalldenticles, followed by about 20 long, low teeth withoutcusps.Legs typical. Leg I V with femur 1.85 and tibia3.3-3.4 times as long as deep; telotarsus with a tactileseta 0.45 length of segment from proximal end.Female-Essentially like male in all features excepta few, which are sex related. Sternal chaetotaxy8:(3)4(3) :(3)6(3) :8:8:8:7:7:2TT2:0:2. Spinneret representedby much larger elevation than in male (Fig.50

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint14). Teeth of both fingers of pal pal chela slightlybetter developed (or better preserved) than in male.Measurements (in mm)-Figures given first for thetwo males followed in parentheses by those for female.Body length 1.33, 1.14(1.35). Carapace length0,40, 0.39(0.395). Chelicera 0.27(0.295) by 0.15,0.14(0.15). Palpal trochanter 0.16, 0.155(0.175) by0.10,0.09(0.105); femur 0.33(0.34) by 0.105, 0.10(0.105); tibia 0.20(0.20) by 0.12(0.12); chela 0.52,0.51(0.51) by 0.14(0.145); hand 0.25, 0.235(0.24)by 0.155, 0.15(0.155); movable finger 0.29, 0.28(0.27) long. Leg IV: entire femur 0.35(0.36) by 0.19(0.19); tibia 0.23, 0.255(0.24) by 0.07, 0.075(0.075);metatarsus 0.13, 0.135(0.14) by 0.055, 0.05(0.06);telotarsus 0.23, 0.22(0.22) by 0.03(0.035).Etymology-The name cavicola refers to its occurrencein a cave.Remarks-Certain morphological features whichare unique to the genus Lechytia, are reported forthe first time, including the bifurcate tip of the medianseta on the apex of the palpal coxa, the denticulatenature of the setae in the cheliceral flagellum,the peculiar form of the second flagellar seta, the bifurcatesetae on the posterior genital operculum ofthe male, and the obsolescence of the eleventh sternite.These features and their implications will be describedand discussed more fully in another paper onthe genus (in preparation).Like L. trinitatis, the present specimens werefound in a cave on bat guano. Because it shows noobvious modifications for cave life, it may be atrogloxene. However, this is presently impossible tojudge for certain, in the absence of any records ofepigean Lechytia from Mexico.SUPERFAMILY NEOBISIOIDEA CHAMBERLINBecause of growing uncertainties about their presenttaxonomic placement, the following neobisioidgenera will not be assigned to families. They deservefurther study, but critical work is hampered by thesmall numbers of specimens available and by the factthat males are still unknown in several of the genera,specifically Apohya, Paravachonium, Troglohya andVachonium. It is confidently expected that as morematerial becomes available, our concepts of familyrelations of these genera will change radically.Genus Leucohya ChamberlinLeucohya Chamberlin, 1946, p. 7; Muchmore, 1972a,p.271.Type Species-Leucohya heteropoda Chamberlin,1946.Study of the two adult specimens of Leucohyaheteropoda described below provides clarification ofsome of the problems which arose when the genuswas based upon a single nymphal individual. It is nowevident that aoults of both L. magnifica Muchmoreand L. heteropoda have all tarsi divided, and that theundivided tarsi I and II of L. heteropoda are characteristiconly of nymphs. Such a situation is now notso remarkable, because similar undivided tarsi areknown to occur in nymphs of another neobisioidgenus, Mexobisium (see Muchmore, 1973). Similarly,it appears that the three flagellar setae reported forthe tritonymph of L. heteropoda is also a nymphalcondition, for the adults have four setae, all finelyserrate, as in L. magnifica. At present, then, it appearsthat adults of the genus Leucohya may becharacteriz~d as having all pedal tarsi divided andfour serrate setae in the cheliceral flagellum, whilenymphs may have at least some of the tarsi undividedand fewer than four (acuminate?) setae in the flagellum.For comparison with other related genera, it seemsimportant to note the positions of certain trichobothriaon the palpal chela-specifically, in the adultit is located proximad of et, ist is far proximad of est,and ib is on the dorsum of the hand proximad of themiddle.Leucohya heteropoda ChamberlinFigs. 15-17Leucohya heteropoda Chamberlin, 1946, p. 8.This species was described from a tritonymph holotypeand until now no other specimens have beenavailable. On 19 February 1972, James Reddell foundtwo adult specimens, a male and a female, at the typelcality, Grutas del Palmito, 7 km SW Bustamante,Nuevo Le6n, Ml!xico.Information provided by the mature specimensallows us to answer some of the questions posedabout the species and the genus (see Muchmore,1972a, pp. 271-2). The following description appliesto both the male and the female unless otherwisespecified.Description-The adults are much like the tritonymphin most respects, but are larger, more darklycolored and have more slender appendages. Carapace1.6 times as long as broad; with small, triangular epistome;no eyes; about 42 vestitural setae, six at anteriorand five or six at posterior margin. Pal pal coxawith two large, subequal setae on the apex, set closetogether, anterior foraminal seta not as long as apicalsetae. Pleural membranes of female distinctly longitudinallygranulo-striate, the granules often conical51


AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintand with sclerotic apices. Tergal chaetotaxy of male8:8:9:9:11:12:11:11:10:7:TT1TT:2; female similar.16 14Sternal chaetotaxy of male 12:[2-2] :(3)8(3):(4)122(4):16: 15:14:13:13:11:1T1T1:2; of female 11:(3)82(3):(4)12(3):15: :16:16:13:10:1T1T1:2; sixth sternitewith two large discal setae medially in addition1 6to those of marginal row.Cheliceral hand with six setae; flagellum of foursubequal setae, each denticulate along outer third;galea long and curved; serrula exterior with about35, and serrula interior with about 30 blades.Palps very long and slender; femur 1.32-1.40 andchela 2.20-2.30 times as long as carapace. Proportionsof segments as shown in Figure 15; trochanter 2.5-2.7,femur 6.7-6.85, tibia 5.1-5.4 and chela (without pedicel)5.4-6.0 times as long as broad; hand (withoutpedicel) 1.9-2.25 times as long as deep; movable finger1.80-1.89 times as long as hand. Trichobothria onchela as shown in Figure 16; ib on dorsum of hand,it proximad of et, and ist far proximad of est. Fixedfinger with 124-140 marginal teeth; movable fingerwith 125-138 teeth, the last 20 or so raised into aconspicuous crest.Legs very slender (Fig. 17); leg IV with entire femur6.75-6.9 and tibia 11.5-13.0 times as long asdeep. All tarsi divided; subterminal tarsal setae denticulate;arolia nearly as long as claws, which are longand slender. Legs III and IV with surfaces of femoradistinctly scaly, and femoral sutures located aboutone-third the length of the femur from the proximalend and slightly oblique to the transverse axis.Measurements (in mm)-Figures are given first forthe male, followed in parentheses by those for thefemale. Body length 5.17(6.341. Carapace length 1.65(1.67). Chelicera 0.77(0.78) by 0.355(0.3551. Palpaltrochanter 0.91 (0.87) by 0.34(0.35); femur 2.315(2.20) by 0.34(0.33); tibia 2.22(2.05) by 0.41 (0.40);chela (without pedicel) 3.82(3.68) by 0.64(0.68);hand (without pedicel) 1.37(1.26) by 0.605(0.665);pedicel 0.16(0.19) long; movable finger 2.47(2.38)long. Leg I: basifemur 1.235(1.19) by 0.21 (0.19);telofemur 0.605(0.55) by 0.17(0.18);tibia 1.26(1.13)by 0.12(0.12); metatarsus 0.41 (0.36) by 0.11 (0.11);telotarsus 0.87(0.83) by 0.11(0.11). Leg IV: entirefemur 1.87(1.79) long; basifemur 0.67(0.66) by 0.27(0.265); telofemur 1.29(1.22) by 0.27(0.265); tibia1.945(1.78) by 0.125(0.12); metatarsus 0.385(0.355)by 0.125(0.12); telotarsus 1.04(0.99) by 0.115(0.11).Apohya, new genusType Species-Apohya campbelli, new species.Diagnosis-(Based upon the single female.)Of fairlytypical neobisioid facies and apparently closely relatedto Leucohya Chamberlin. Carapace longer thanbroad; anterior margin without an epistome; anteroventralcorners each with a small conical protuberance;no eyes or eyespots; surface smooth; with about40 vestitural setae. Pal pal coxa with two large, subequal,apical setae, set close together. Abdominal tergitesand sternites smooth; pleural membranes withlongitudinal rows of small, smoothly rounded elevations.Tergites with 12-16 marginal setae; sterniteswith about same numbers of setae; sternite 6 unusualin having two large discal setae medially. Anteriorgenital operculum of female with only four smallsetae. Cheliceral hand with six setae, es rather short;galea long and slender; flagellum of three terminallydenticulate setae, the middle one being longer thanthe other two. Palps only moderately slender; surfacesnearly smooth. Trichobothria fairly evenlyspaced along chelal fingers, but with ib on dorsum ofhand near base; it distinctly proximad of et, and istfar proximad of est. Chelal fingers with numerouscontiguous marginal teeth, the basal ones on themovable finger raised into a conspicuous crest. Venomapparatus well developed in both fingers, with longducts. Legs relatively stout; femoral suture of leg IVlocated about one-third length of femur from proximalend and slightly oblique; all tarsi divided; aroliaslender and longer than claws, which are moderatelyheavy; subterminal tarsal setae denticulate.Remarks-The genus Apohya is quite similar toLeucohya in many features. However, Apohya differsmarkedly from Leucohya in the following respects:flagellum of three rather than four setae, the middleone being longer than the others; arolia longer thantarsal claws rather than shorter; four small setae onfemale genital operculum rather than ten or more;the lack of an epistome on the anterior margin ofthe carapace; and the presence of a prominent conicalprotuberance on each antero-ventral angle of thecarapace. In many of these features Apohya also re-~Figs. 15-17. Leucohya heteropoda Chamberlin. 15. Right palp, dorsal view. 16. Left chela, lateral view. 17. Leg IV, anteriorview.~Figs. 18-23. Apohya campbell;, new species. 18. Apex of palpal coxa. 19. Sternites 2-7, showing locations of setae. 20. Cheliceralflagellum. 21. Right palp, dorsal view. 22. Left chela, lateral view. 23. Leg IV, anterior view.53

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintsembles Mexobisium Muchmore, but it lacks the tarsalspines characteristic of that genus. These threegenera are certainly closely related to one anotherand in turn are probably related to ParavachoniumBeier, although the latter genus has been considereda member of the family Vachoniidae (Beier, 1956;Muchmore, 1972). The relations of these genera, togetherwith Vachonium and Troglohya, are of greatimportance to an understanding of Mexican cavefaunas and will be considered in detail at a later time.Apohya campbelli, new speciesFigs. 18-23Material-Holotype female (WM2731.01 001) fromEI Tinieblo, Tamaulipas, Mexico, on 12 March 1972(G. D. Campbell); found under a rock.Description-Female: Carapace, chelicerae andpalps reddish-brown, body and legs much lighter.Carapace 1.3 times as long as broad; anterior marginwithout an epistome; a small conical protuberance atantero-ventral corner; no eyes or eyespots present;surface smooth; with about 42 vestitural setae, sevenat anterior and eight at posterior margin. Coxal areawithout special features; palpal coxa with two large,subequal, apical setae, set close together (Fig. 18).Abdomen long ovoid; tergites and sternites smooth;pleural membranes with longitudinal rows of smoothlyrounded elevations. Tergal chaetotaxy 12: 12: 12:13:15:15:16:16:16:12:T2T:2. Sternal chaetotaxy 4:2(3) 7(3): (4) 12(4): 16: 14:15: 16: 14: 11 :T2T4T2T:2;sternite 6 with two large discal setae medially (Fig.19).Chelicera less than half as long as carapace. Handwith six acuminate setae, es rather short; fixed fingerwith about 12 teeth of varied sizes spread along margin;movable finger with about three moderate-sizedteeth and several tiny denticles, all on distal half ofmargin; galea long, slender, unbranched; serrula exteriorwith about 25 blades; serrula interior withabout 23 blades; flagellum of three setae, the middleone longer than the others, all finely serrate on anteriorsides near tips (Fig. 20).Palps only moderately long and slender; femur0.90 and chela 1.46 ti mes as long as carapace. Proportionsof segments as shown in Figure 21; trochanter2.1, femur 3.2, tibia 2.45 and chela (withoutpedicel) 3.0 times as long as broad; hand (withoutpedicel) 1.95 times as long as deep; movable finger0.85 as long as hand. Surfaces smooth, except for afew small granules on trochanter, proximal end offemur, and bases of chelal fingers. Trichobothria ofchela as shown in Figure 22. Fixed finger with 63contiguous, retroconical or rounded teeth; movablefinger with 55 similar teeth, but with the last 15 orso elevated into a conspicuous crest (see Fig. 22).Venom apparatus well developed in both fingers; nodusramosus in fixed finger nearly at level of est,that of movable finger just proximad of st.Legs relatively stout; leg IV (Fig. 23) with entirefemur 2.8 and tibia 4.35 times as long as deep. Alltarsi divided; leg IV with long, tactile setae on metatarsus0.40 and on telotarsus 0.38 length of segmentfrom proximad end. Arolia slender and longer thanclaws, which are moderately heavy. Subterminal tarsalsetae denticulate near tips.Measurements (in mm)-Body length 3.0. Carapace0.78 long, greatest breadth 0.605. Chelicera 0.33 longby 0.17 deep; movable finger 0.22 long. Pal pal trochanter0.39 by 0.185; femur 0.70 by 0.22; tibia0.665 by 0.27; chela (without pedicel) 1.14 by 0.38;hand (without pedicel) 0.605 by 0.31; movable finger0.51 long. Leg I: basifemur 0.33 by 0.11; telofemur0.17 by 0.095; tibia 0.325 by 0.075; metatarsus0.095 by 0.05; telotarsus 0.21 by 0.045. Leg IV: entirefemur 0.56 long; basifemur 0.245 by 0.185; telofemur0.41 by 0.20; tibia 0.48 by 0.11; metatarsus0.125 by 0.075; telotarsus 0.235 by 0.06.Etymology-This species is named for G.D. Campbell,who collected it and other interesting pseudoscorpions.Genus Troglohya BeierTroglohya Beier, 1956, p. 83.Type Species-Troglohya carranzai Beier, 1956.This genus was described on the basis of only onespecimen, a tritonymph, of the species T. carranzaifrom Cueva de Monteflor, 5 km NE Valle Nacional,Oaxaca, Mexico. Until now, no other representativeshave been known. Study of the adult female, describedbelow, makes it possible to expand and improvethe generic diagnosis. The new specimen wascompared directly with the holotype of T. carranzai,borrowed through the courtesy of Dr. C. Bolivar yPieltain and mounted on a microscope slide.Diagnosis (emended)-Of general neobisioid faciesbut modified for cave life by increase in size, elongationof appendages and reduction in color. Carapacelonger than broad; anterior margin without an epistome;no eyes or eyespots; surface smooth; withsmall number of vestitural setae (16-22). Pal pal coxawith two large, subequal setae positioned in tandem,and some distance apart, on the apex; anterior forami-54

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintnal seta very long. Abdominal tergites and sternitessmooth; pleural membranes longitudinally striate,with occasional tiny granules. Tergites with four tosix marginal setae, sternites with about ten. Anteriorgenital operculum of female with 12 small setae.Cheliceral hand with six setae; galea long and slender;flagellum of four or five setae, the distal one shortand acuminate, the others long and finely dentatealong outer half; movable finger with a large, laterallydisplaced, subterminal tooth. Palps very long andslender; surfaces mostly smooth; trichobothria fairlyevenly spaced along fingers but with ib on dorsum ofhand proximal to middle, it slightly distad of et, andist distad of est. Chelal fingers with numerous, con·tiguous marginal teeth, and (in adult female of T.mitchelliJ fixed finger with a prominent accessorytooth on internal surface near distal end. Both chelalfingers with well developed venom apparatus, ductslong. Legs long and slender; all tarsi divided; legs IIIand IV with femoral surfaces scaly and with femoralsutures located one·sixth the length of femur fromproximal end and strongly oblique to transverse axis;subterminal tarsal setae finely pinnate; arolia shorterthan claws, which are long and slender.Remarks-As Beier has pointed out (1956, p. 83),Troglohya bears considerable resemblance to LeucohyaChamberlin. On the other hand, there are somemarked differences between the two genera, and insome respects Troglohya is remarkably like Vachonium,which has been placed in a separate family(see Muchmore, 1972a). The relationships among theneobisioid pseudoscorpions of Mexican and CentralAmerican caves are probably much more complicatedthan anyone has realized before now and deserve intensivestudy. Consideration of these relationshipswill be the subject of a later paper.Troglohya mitchelli, new speciesFigs. 24-31Material-Holotype female (WM2943.01001) fromGrutas de Zapaluta, 6.5 km SE La Trinitaria, Chiapas,Mexico, on 28 August 1972 (J. Cooke, W.H. Russell).Diagnosis-The only other species in the genus isTroglohya carranzai Beier, which is known only fromthe tritonymph holotype. The new species is easilydistinguished from T. carranzai by its much largersize, the greater number of setae on the carapace, andthe occurrence of only four setae in the cheliceralflagellum.Description (based on the holotype female)-Carapace,chelicerae and palps light reddish brown; bodyand legs much paler. Carapace 1.5 times as long asbroad; without epistome; eyeless; surface finely reticulated;vestitural setae 4-4-2-6-5=21, lateral ones inposterior row reduced in size. Coxal chaetotaxy2-2(3)-7:1-3:2-3(4):2-4(3):2-4(5); the two large setaeon the apex of the palpal coxa in tandem and somedistance apart, anterior foraminal seta very long (Fig.24).Abdomen elongate; tergites and sternites nearlysmooth; pleural membranes smoothly longitudinallystriate, with only occasional granulations. Tergal chaetotaxy4:4:6:5:6:5:6:6:6:7:T1T1T1T:2. Sternalchaetotaxy 12: (3) 14(3):(2) 10(3): 11: 10:10: 11: 10:10:T1T:2; genital opercula as in Figure 25.Chelicera slightly less than half as long as carapace.Palm with six setae; flagellum of four setae, the distalone short and simple, the other three subequal inlength and finely dentate along outer half (Fig. 26);serrula exterior with 33 blades; galea a long, slightlycurved stylet; fixed finger with 9·10 irregular teeth,the distal one slightly isolated; movable finger with alarge, laterally displaced, subterminal tooth, which iscontinuous with the dental ridge onto base of finger(Fig. 27).Palps long and very slender; femur 1.80 and chela2.68 times as long as carapace. Proportions of segmentsas shown in Figure 28: trochanter 2.15, femur8.3, tibia 7.4, and chela (without pedicel) 8.2 timesas long as broad; hand (without pedicel) 3.2 times aslong as deep; movable finger 1.52 times as long ashand. Surfaces smooth except for a few small gran·ules on trochanter and on bases of chelal fingers.Trichobothria on chela as shown in Figure 29. Movablechelal finger with 136 contiguous, rectangularteeth, the outer margins being flat or slightly convex.Fixed finger with 161 contiguous, retroconicalteeth having distinct cusps, and with one prominentaccessory tooth on the internal surface at the level ofthe twelfth marginal tooth; the accessory tooth evidentlyacts as a stop for the end of the movablefinger, which overlaps the fixed finger internally up·on closing. Venom apparatus well developed in bothfingers; ducts quite slender and long, but not reachingto level of st in movable finger or to ist in fixed finger.Legs very long and slender; leg IV (Fig. 30) withentire femur 7.75 and tibia 12.8 times as long asdeep. Legs III and IV with surfaces of femora conspicuouslyscaly, and with femoral sutures locatedone-sixth the length of the femur from proximal endand strongly oblique to the transverse axis. All tarsidivided; subterminal tarsal setae finely pinnate on distalhalf (Fig. 31); arolia shorter than claws, which arelong and slender. Leg IV with several large (tactile?)setae on tibia and tarsi.Measurements (in mm)-Body length 4.85. Carapacelength 1.56. Chelicera 0.865 by 0.36. Palpal55

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprinttrochanter 0.95 by 0.445; femur 2.805 by 0.34; tibia2.81 by 0.38; chela (without pedicel) 4.81 by 0.51;hand (without pedicel) 1.665 by 0.52; pedicel 0.22long; movable finger 2.515 long. Leg I: basifemur1.56 by 0.22; telofemur 0.59 by 0.185; tibia 1.26 by0.14; metatarsus 0.35 by 0.11; telotarsus 0.895 by0.10. Leg IV: entire femur 2.40 long; basifemur 0.50by 0.295; telofemur 2.07 by 0.31; tibia 2.05 by 0.16;metatarsus 0.445 by 0.14; telotarsus 1.235 by 0.12.Etymology-This species is named for Robert W.Mitchell, an inspiring leader in the study of Mexicancave creatures.31~Figs. 24-31. Troglohya mitchelli, new species. 24. Anterior end of palpal coxa, showing apical and foraminal setae. 25. Genitalopercula of female. 26. Cheliceral flagellum. 27. Movable finger of chelicera, lateral view. 28. Right palp, dorsal view. 29. Leftchela, lateral view. 30. Leg IV, anterior view. 31. Subterminal tarsal seta.Fig. 32. Paravachonium bolivari, Beier, holotype female. Cheliceral flagellum.56

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintGenus Paravachonium BeierParavachonium Beier, 1956, p. 81; Muchmore, 1972a,p.268.Type Species-Paravachonium bolivari Beier, 1956.No new material pertaining to this genus has beenfound. However, it seems worthwhile to record somefurther data about the type species.Paravachonium bolivari BeierFig. 32Paravachonium bolivari Beier, 1956, p. 82.Contrary to the statements of Beier (1956) andthe author (1972al. the holotype is a female, not amale! Though the internal genitalia are not well preserved,the pattern of setae on the genital opercula isclearly of the female type. The complete chaetotaxyof the sternites is 7:(3)10(3):(4)13(3):18:17:19:18:16:13:T1T:2, which is somewhat different fromBeier's estimate, "Sternite mit je 12 Marginalborste"(p. 82). Also, Beier's statement concerning tergal setae,"Abdominaltergite in der Mehrzahl mit je 6" is inaccurate,actual tergal chaetotaxy being 6:9:9:9: 10: 10:11 :9:9:7:T1T1T1T:2. It is also pertinent to note thatthe pleural membranes are longitudinally granulostriate,the individual granules being pointed but withoutdistinct apical spinules. Further, the four setae ofthe cheliceral flagellum are all strongly serrate alongthe anterior side on the outer half (Fig. 32); and likethe adult, the deutonymph has four setae in the flagellum.Also, it may be noted that in the deutonymphthe marginal teeth of the movable chelal finger arenot elevated to form a crest or lamella, as they are inthe adult.Genus Vachonium ChamberlinVachonium Chamberlin, 1947, p. 4.Type Species-Vachonium boneti Chamberlin,1947.The genus has been well characterized by Chamberlin(1947). The two new species described below addlittle to our understanding of the genus except to extendits known distribution somewhat to the southand to show that the tritonymph is not much differentfrom adults (females).Vachonium kauae, new speciesFigs. 33-35Material-Holotype female (WM2944.01 001) fromCueva de Kaua, 1 km S Kaua, Yucatan, Mexico, on24 August 1972 (W.H. Russell, J.W. Cooke).Diagnosis-Very similar to V. maya Chamberlinbut with fewer setae on carapace, more setae on anteriortergites and genital opercula of female, and allappendages less attenuated.Description of Female-Carapace, chelicerae andpalps light brown, other parts much paler. Carapaceabout one-third longer than broad; without an epistome;surface distinctly reticulated, with no trace ofa transverse furrow; no eyes or eyespots; chaetotaxy6-6-4-2-4=22, the lateral ones in the posterior row reducedin size. Palpal coxa with two stout, but shortsetae on apex, in tandem and some distance apart;anterior foraminal seta very long. Anterior three orfour tergites and sternites slightly reticulated, otherssmooth; pleural membranes longitudinally smoothlystriate, the striae apparently divided into many moresegments than are actually present (pseudosegmented).Tergal chaetotaxy 5:5:6:6:6:6:6:6:6:4:TTTT:3;there is obviously an extra seta on the anal plate ofthis specimen. Sternal chaetotaxy 16: (3) 19(3): (2) 10(3):9:4mrn4:4mm4:4mm4:9:8: 1TT1 :2. Internal genitaliamuch like those figured for V. maya (Chamberlin,1947, figs. 34 and 35) but details difficult tomake out.Cheliceral hand with eight setae, two in positionof es; flagellum of five setae, the distal four subequaland dentate in the outer half, the proximal one shortand only sparsely denticulate; galea a long curvedstylet.Palps long and slender; femur 1.68 and chela 2.69times as long as carapace. All segments completely,but not evenly, covered with heavy granules. Proportionsof segments as shown in Figure 33; trochanter2.35, femur 7.7, tibia 6.55, and chela (withoutpedicel) 6.7 times as long as broad; hand (withoutpedicel) 2.05 times as long as deep; movablefinger 2.03 times as long as hand. Femoral tuberclewell developed, similar in position to that of V. maya,apparently with two separate pores near summit.Trichobothria on chela as shown in Figure 34. Fixedfinger blunt at tip, with no venedens or trace ofvenom duct; end of finger broadened and bearing 12heavily sci erotized denticles in a double row, whichis continuous with the marginal row of 131 sharplyconical teeth; and with a prominent accessory toothon the internal side at level of 19th marginal tooth.Legs slender; leg IV with entire femur 5.6 andtibia 9.6 times as long as deep. All tarsi divided; subterminaltarsal setae denticulate (Fig. 35); aroliashorter than claws, which are rather stout. Legs IIIand IV with surfaces of telofemora distinctly scaly,and femoral sutures located one-fifth the length offemur from proximal end and distinctly oblique tothe transverse ax is.57

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintMale-Unknown.Measurements (in mml-Body length 4.07. Carapacelength 1.37. Chelicera 0.755 by 0.35. Palpaltrochanter 0.805 by 0.34; femur 2.30 by 0.30; tibia2.03 by 0.31; chela (without pedicel) 3.69 by 0.55;hand (without pedicell 1.095 by 0.53; pedicel 0.14long; movable finger 2.22 long. Leg I: basifemur1.035 by 0.185; telofemur 0.46 by 0.16; tibia 1.00by 0.11; metatarsus 0.185 by 0.09; telotarsus 0.88by 0.075. Leg IV: entire femur 1.63 long; basifemur0.34 by 0.25; telofemur 1.375 by 0.29; tibia 1.44 by0.15; metatarsus 0.22 by 0.12; telotarsus 1.185 by0.095.Etymology-This species is named after Cueva deKaua, where it lives.Vachonium belizense, new speciesFigs. 36-38Material-Holotype tritonymph (WM2942.010011from Mountain Cow Cave, Caves Branch, Belize(British Honduras), on 5 August 1972 (S.B. Peck!.Diagnosis-The largest known species of the genus,with palpal chela of tritonymph nearly 4 mm inlength. Other diagnostic features impossible to identifyin the absence of adults of this species and oftritonymphs of other species.Description of Tritonymph-Generally like adultsof other species in the genus, and with the followingnotable features. All sclerotized parts light tan, otherparts nearly white. Carapace longer than broad; withoutepistome or transverse furrow; no eyes; chaetotaxy6-6-2-4-2-4=24. Pleural membranes of abdomenlongitudinally smoothly striate and pseudosegmented.Tergal chaetotaxy 4:4:6:6:7:6:6:6:6:6:TTTT:2. Sternalchaetotaxy 3: (219(2): (2)8( 1) :8:4mm4: 6mm5: 5mm6:11:11:2T1T1:2.Chelicera with seven setae on hand; flagellum ofright chelicera with three setae, that of left chelicerawith four setae, all setae subequal in length and finelydenticulate in the distal third; galea long, slender,curved and partially recumbent on the surface of thefinger.Palps very long and slender; femur 1.73 and chela2.82 times as long as carapace. Surfaces smooth, exceptchelal hands and fingers with small granules.Proportions of pal pal segments as shown in Figure 36;trochanter 2.15, femur 8.0; tibia 6.45, and chela(without pedicel) 5.95 times as long as broad; hand(without pedicel) 1.95 times as long as deep; movablefinger 1.90 times as long as hand. Femoral tuberclewell developed, with a large, reinforced pore at itssummit. Trichobothria of chela as shown in Figure 37;sb apparently missing from movable finger and isbfrom fixed finger. Both chelal fingers more curvedthan in other known species of the genus. Movablefinger with well developed venedens and long venomduct; marginal teeth numbering 89, the distal onesextremely flattened. Fixed finger blunt at tip; withno venedens, but with a long, very slender venomduct; end broadened and bearing 11 heavily sclerotizeddenticles in a double row, continuous withmarginal row of 109 teeth; with a prominent accessorytooth internally at level of 27th marginal tooth.Legs very slender; femur 7.95 and chela 12.3 timesas long as deep. All tarsi divided (Fig. 38); telotarsiswollen basally; subterminal tarsal setae sparsely denticulate;arolia shorter than claws. Femoral suture ofleg IV one-fifth length of femur from proximal endand distinctly oblique to transverse axis.Male and Female-Unknown.Measurements (in mm)-Body length 4.76. Carapacelength 1.43. Chelicera 0.89 by 0.37. Pal pal trochanter0.835 by 0.39; femur 2.40 by 0.30; tibia 2.13by 0.33; chela (without pedicel) 3.93 by 0.66; hand(without pedicel) 1.235 by 0.64; pedicel 0.20 long;movable finger 2.35 long. Leg I: basifemur 1.24 by0.19; telofemur 0.52 by 0.17; tibia 1.17 by 0.12;metatarsus 0.245 by 0.10; telotarsus 1.065 by 0.13;Leg IV: entire femur 1.99 long; basifemur 0.445 by0.245; telofemur 1.70 by 0.25; tibia 1.725 by 0.14;metatarsus 0.30 by 0.125; telotarsus 1.45 by 0.15.Etymology-This species is named for Belize (thenew name for British Honduras), the country in whichit lives.FAMILY CHELIFERIDAE HAGENThis family of pseudoscorpions is characterized bythe following criteria: all legs monotarsate; femora oflegs I and II quite different from those of legs III andIV; both chelal fingers with well developed venedensand venom apparatus; absence of accessory teethfrom chelal fingers, or at most a single, small denticleon internal surface of fixed finger near the tip.Mexichelifer, new genusType Species-Mexichelifer reddelli, new species.Diagnosis-Of fairly general cheliferid facies. Carapacewith numerous (80-100) setiferous tubercles;eyes large, corneate; transverse furrows distinct; noposterolateral keels in male. Tergites and sternites allapparently divided, though halves not widely separated;single discal seta on each half of tergites 5-10, inaddition to marginal row. Most setae of dorsal surfacesclavate to denticulate, those of ventral surfacesmostly acuminate. Coxal area not remarkable, exceptfor prominent patches of long setae on posteromedial58

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintcorners of coxae III and IV of male. Coxa IV of malewithout a lateral spur; containing a large coxal sacprovided with a prominent atrium. Large ramshornorgans present in male. Statumen convolutum of malegenitalia deeply invaginated anteriorly and with apoorly scierotized median rod. Medial cribriformplates of female indistinct, but certainly paired. CheIiceral hand with four setae, all acuminate, es quiteFe3537Figs. 33-35. Vachonium kauae, new species. 33. Left palp, dorsal view. 34. Right chela, lateral view. 35. Subterminal tarsalseta.Figs. 36-38. Vachonium belizense, new species. 36. Right palp, dorsal view. 37. Left chela, lateral view. 38. Metatarsus andtelotarsus of Ieg IV .59

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintlong. Pal pal trochanter and femur with prominentsetiferous tubercles. Venom apparatus well developedin both chelal fingers, but ducts slender and relativelyshort, not reaching to levels of trichobothria t or istin movable and fixed fingers, respectively. In additionto marginal teeth, fixed finger with one small accessorytooth on inner surface at level of fifth marginaltooth. Pedal claws and subterminal setae simple. Tarsusof leg IV with long, tacti Ie seta near distal end.First tarsus of male modified; outer margin with aconical terminal spine and two or three smaller subterminalprojections; posterior claw smaller than anteriorand with an inconspicuous lateral ridge.Remarks-Like several other cheliferid genera,Mexichelifer is paradoxical in that it possesses theanteriorly invaginated statumen convolutum of themale and paired medial cribriform plates of the female,usually considered peculiar to the Cheliferini,and at the same time has a distinct atrium on thecoxal sac of the male, usually considered peculiar tothe Dactylocheliferini. In these and some other respects,this genus resembles Florichelifer Hoff (1964)from Florida, Kashimachelifer Morikawa (1957) fromJapan, Ancistrochelifer Beier (1951) and MetacheliferRedikortzev (1938) from Indochina, and TyrannocheliferChamberlin (1932) from the West Indies andFlorida. However, Mexichelifer is easily distinguishedfrom these other genera by the presence of only foursetae on the cheliceral hand and the strong modificationof the first tarsus of the male. The relations ofthese genera to typical members of the Cheliferini andDactylocheliferini remain to be determined.Even though it has not been reported prior to thistime, the presence of an internal accessory on thefixed chelal finger is probably not unusual amongthe Cheliferidae. A brief survey of specimens in mycollection has revealed one or more small accessoryteeth or denticles in representatives of Chelifer, Parachelifer,Hysterochelifer, Tyrannochelifer and Dactylochelifer.All of these structures were at the distalends of the fingers and were never of a size comparableto the accessory teeth commonly found in theChernetidae.Mexichelifer reddelli, new speciesFigs. 39-46Material-Holotype male (WM 1075.01 001) andparatype female from Cueva de Carnicerlas, Vallede los Fantasmas, 17 km W Sta. Catarina, San LuisPOtOSI: Mexico, on 4 August 1966 (J.R. Reddell).Description-Male: Typically cheliferid in generalfacies. Body and palps reddish-brown, chelicera andlegs a little lighter. Carapace heavily granulate; withabout 85 clavate setae, each on a prominent tUbercle,four setae at anterior and 14 near posterior margin,no keels present at postero-Iateral corners. Tergitesapparently all divided, but the halves not distinctlyseparated; no keels present laterally; surfaces heavilygranulate anteriorly, changing to scale-like elevationsposteriorly. Tergal chaetotaxy 14:18:16:19:21:20:25:23:21 :23: 18:2; each half of tergites 5 to 10 withone discal seta as well as one or two lateral setae.Sternites divided or nearly so; surfaces finely reticu-45lated; sternal chaetotaxy 54:[4-4] :(0)25(0):(1)17(1):16:19:22:19:20:15:7:2; positions of setae on genitalopercula as shown in Figure 39; most setae missingfrom eleventh tergite and sternite, so that occurrenceof tactile setae is uncertain. Coxal area unremarkable,except for large patches of long setae on medial edgesof coxae III and IV; coxae IV without lateral spurs,but each with large coxal sac provided with a well definedatrium (Fig. 40). Anterior margin of statumenconvolutum with a deep invagination, in which lies apoorly sclerotized rod (Fig. 41). Ramshorn organswell developed.Chelicera about one-third as long as carapace, ofgeneral cheliferid facies. Flagellum of three setae, thedistal one sparsely dentate on anterior side; hand withonly four setae, ;::11 acuminate, es quite long; serrulaexterior of 18 blades; galea long, slender, finely denticulatesubterminally.Palps moderately long and slender; surfaces granulateexcept for chelal fingers; setiferous tubercles conspicuouson trochanter and inner surfaces of femurand tibia. Proportions of segments as shown in Figure42; trochanter 1.8, femur 5.15, tibia 3.65, and chela(without pedicel) 3.35 times as long as broad; hand(without pedicel) 1.8 times as long as deep; movablefinger and hand of equal length. Trichobothria onchela as in Figure 43. Both fingers with well developedvenom apparatus; venom ducts of equal length,relatively short and slender, with nodus ramosus ofmovable finger distad of t and that of fixed fingerjust distad of ist. Movable finger with 66 contiguous,cusped marginal teeth; fixed finger with 58 similarteeth and one small accessory tooth on the internalside at the level of the fifth marginal tooth.Legs heavily sculptured with scale-like elevations.Tarsus of leg I strongly modified (Fig. 44); outermargin with a conical terminal spine and two orthree smaller, subterminal projections; posterior clawdistinctly smaller than anterior claw, and with an inconspicuouslateral ridge. Claws of all other legs ratherstout, simple. Subterminal tarsal setae curved, simple,60

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintTarsus of leg IV only, with a long, tactile seta 0.76length of segment from proximal end.Female-Like the male in most respects, but slightlylarger and with more slender appendages. Carapacewith about 100 setae, four at anterior and 16 nearposterior margin. Tergal chaetotaxy 17:20:18:20:25:26:24:26:26:26:16:2. Sternal chaetotaxy 33:(0)12(0):(ll1211):16:20:22:23:22:18:13:2; setae of geni·40~4645Figs. 39-46. Mexichelifer reddelli, new species. 39. Genital opercula and fourth sternite of male. 40. Coxa of left leg IV ofmale, showing coxal sac. 41. Statumen convolutum of male. 42. Left palp of male. dorsal view. 43. Right chela of male, lateralview. 44. Tarsus of leg I of male, anterior view. 45. Genital opercula of female. 46. Spermathecae of female (after treatment withKOHL61

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprinttal opercula as in Figure 45. Internal genitalia ofspecimen treated with KOH as illustrated in Figure46; medial cribriform plates not well developed, butspermathecae paired.Chelicera like that of male, with only four acuminatesetae on hand, es long. Serrula exterior of 20blades; galea long, with 4-5 small subterminal rami.Palps like those of male, but segments more slender.Trochanter 2.0, femur 5.15, tibia 3.85, and chela(without pedicel) 3.85 times as long as broad; hand(without pedicel) 2.2 times as long as deep; movablefinger 0.92 as long as hand. Venom apparatus as inmale, but venom ducts a little shorter. Movable fingerwith 71 and fixed finger with 60 marginal teeth; fixedfinger with a small internal accessory tooth at level offifth marginal tooth.Legs unmodified. Claws and subterminal tarsal setaeall simple. Leg IV, only, with long tactile seta ontarsus 0.77 length of segment from proximal end.Measurements (in mm)-Figures for male holotypegiven first, those for female in parentheses. Bodylength 3.61(3.991. Carapace length 1.10(1.291. posteriorbreadth 1.22(1.15); diameter of eye 0.15(0.16)Chelicera 0.34(0.39) by 0.18(0.185). Pal pal trochanter0.635(0.72) by 0.355(0.36); femur 1.49(1.64) by0.29(0.32); tibia 1.205(1.345) by 0.33(0.35); chela(without pedicel) 2.07(2.265) by 0.615(0.59); hand(without pedicel) 1.06(1.22) by 0.59(0.55); pedicel0.13(0.14) long; movable finger 1.06(1.12) long. LegI: basifem ur 0.40(0.415) by 0.215(0.22); telofemur0.58(0.68) by 0.18(0.19); tibia 0.585(0.665) by 0.15(0.14); tarsus 0.57(0.63) by 0.155(0.101. Leg IV:entire femur 1.1 O( 1.32) long; basifemur 0.32(0.40)by 0.21(0.22); telofemur 0.925(1.06) by 0.32(0.33);tibia 0.925( 1.05) by 0.155(0.17); tarsus 0.67(0.73)by 0.11 (0.11 ).Etymology-This species is named for James R.Reddell, who collected the specimens, and who hasdone so much to promote an understanding of Mexicancave faunas.LITERATURE CITEDBeier, M. 1951. Die Pseudoscorpione Indochinas. Mem. Mus.Hist. Nat., Paris, Ser. A, Zool., 1:47-123.Beier, M. 1956. Neue troglobionte Pseudoscorpione ausMexico. Ciencia, Mexico, 16:81-85.Beier, M. 1970. Trogloxene Pseudoscorpione aus S~damerika.An. Esc. naco Cienc. bioI., Mex., 17:51-54.Chamberlin, J.C. 1929. A synoptic classification of the falsescorpions or chela-spinners, with a report on a cosmopolitancollection of the same. Part I. The Heterosphyronida(Chthoniidae) (Arachnida, Chelonethidal. Ann.Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 10,4: 50-80.Chamberlin, J.C. 1932. A synoptic revision of the genericclassification of the chelonethid family Cheliferidae Simon.Canadian Ent., 64:35-39.Chamberlin, J.C. 1946. The genera and species of the Hyidae.Bull. Univ. Utah, 37(6):1-16.Chamberlin, J.C. 1947. The Vachoniidae - A new family offalse scorpions represented by two new species fromcaves in Yucatan. Bull. Univ. Utah, 38(7):1-15.Chamberlin, J.C. 1962. New and little-known false scorpions,principally from caves, belonging to the families Chthoniidaeand Neobisiidae (Arachnida, Chelonethidal. Bull.Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 123:303-352.Hoff, C.C. 1963. The pseudoscorpions of Jamaica. Part 2.The genera Pseudochthonius, Paraliochthonius, Lechytiaand Tridenchthonius. Bull. Inst. Jamaica, Sci. Ser., 10,pt. 2:1-35.Hoff, C.C. 1964. A."mnid and cheliferid pseudoscorpions,chiefly from Florida. Amer. Mus. Novitates, 2198: 1-43.Morikawa, K. 1957. Kashimachelifer cinnamomeus, a newgenus and species of cheliferid pseudoscorpion fromJapan. Zool. Mag., Tokyo, 66:399-402.Muchmore, W.B. 1972a. New diplosphyronid pseudoscorpions,mainly cavernicolous, from Mexico (Arachnida,Pseudoscorpionidal. Trans. Amer. Micros. Soc., 91: 261276.Muchmore,W.B. 1972b. The unique cave-restricted genusAphrastochthonius (Pseudoscorpionida, Chthoniidael.Proc. BioI. Soc. Washington, 85:433-444.Muchmore, W.B. 1973. The pseudoscorpion genus Mexobisiumin Middle America. Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull.,5:63-72.Redikortzev, V.1938. Les pseudoscorpions de l'lndochinefrancaise recueillis par M.C. Dawydoff. Mem. Mus. Hist.Nat., Paris, n.s., 10:69-116.62

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintTHE PSEUDOSCORPION GENUS MEXOBISIUM IN MIDDLE AMERICA(ARACHNIDA, PSEUDOSCORPIONIDA)William B. MuchmoreDepartment of Biology, University of RochesterRochester, New York 14627The genus Mexobisium was described recently onthe basis of a single specimen found in a cave in Veracruz,Mexico, in 1967 (Muchmore, 1972). In therelatively short time since then, representatives offive new forms belonging to this group have come tolight, leading to a somewhat better understanding ofthe characteristics and distribution of the genus. It isnow evident that the individual species may be quitevaried in form and that they are widely distributedover Mexico, Central America and the Antilles in bothepigean and hypogean habitats.Types of the new species described below are depositedin the collection of the American Museum ofNatural History, except where noted otherwise.I wish to acknowledge a great debt of gratitude toRobert W. Mitchell, Stewart B. Peck and James R.Reddell for furnishing me with most of the specimensconsidered herein. I also acknowledge the invaluableassistance of Charlotte H. Alteri in studying the materialand preparing the illustrations. The work wassu pported in part by a research grant (G B 17964)from the National Science Foundation.Genus Mexobisium MuchmoreMexobisium Muchmore, 1972, p. 272.Type-Species-Mexobisium paradoxum Muchmore,1972.Based on study of the five new species describedbelow, including both sexes and several nymphs, amore satisfactory definition of the genus is nowpossible.Diagnosis-A neobisioid genus showing strong similaritiesto Leucohya and Paravachonium. Carapacewith or without an epistome; each anteroventralcorner usually with a small, but prominent, conicalprotuberance; a distinct transverse furrow or membranousband near posterior edge in most species; noeyes or eyespots present; vestitural setae of carapacenumbering 28-38; pal pal coxa with two large apicalsetae set close together; pleural mem branes of abdomenlongitudinally granulo-striate, each granule usuallywith an apical spinule; anal operculum with foursetae (dorsal and ventral) or only two setae (dorsal);anterior genital operculum of female usually withonly four small setae, occasionally with more (eight);chelicera about half as long as carapace; cheliceralflagellum of two (or one) short, sparsely denticulate(or simple) setae; seta es of cheliceral hand short;pal pal chela with venedens and venom apparatus welldeveloped in both fingers, venom ducts quite long;chela with 12 trichobothria, ib on dorsu m of handproximad of middle, it proximad of et, and ist farproximad of est; femoral sutures of legs III and IVlocated about one-third length of femur from proximalend and slightly oblique to transverse axis; tarsiof all legs of adults divided into metatarsus and telotarsus,in tritonymphs (three examples) only tarsi IIIand IV so divided, and in deutonymphs (one example)none of the tarsi divided; all tarsi of nymphsdistinctly swollen basally; telotarsi of legs I, II and IIIeach with a heavy, sharp spine at base of posteriorseta on outer distal angle, telotarsus IV with a small,63

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint31\ I7~9Figs. 1-8. Mexobisium pecki, new species. 1. Carapace. 2. Genital opercula of male. 3. Cheliceral flagellum. 4. Right palp,dorsal view. 5. Left chela, lateral view. 6. Leg IV, anterior view. 7. Subterminal tarsal seta. 8. Genital opercula of female.Figs. 9-11. Mexobisium cUbanum, new species. 9. Left palp, dorsal view. 10. Right chela, lateral view. 11. Leg IV, anteriorview.64

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintblunt projection in corresponding position; subterminaltarsal setae finely denticulate laterally and termi·nally (or simple); arolia shorter than claws, which arelong and slender.Remarks-The relations of this genus are still farfrom clear. It is certainly closely allied to LeucohyaChamberlin (1946) and Apohya Muchmore (1973),which belong to the Leucohyinae Chamberlin (thoughthe close relationship of these to the Hyinae is dubioous). On the other hand, Mexobisium also showsmany strong similarities to Paravachonium Beier(1956). which has been considered a member of theVachoniidae Chamberlin (see Beier 1956; Muchmore,1972). A major difference between Mexobisium andParavachonium is the striking modification of the tipof the fixed chelal finger in the latter. with concomi·tant reduction in the venom apparatus. It is conceivablethat this modification in Paravachonium is close·ly cave-related and is not of significance at the familylevel of classification. However, much more study ofthese and other. related genera is necessary beforeany firm conclusions can be drawn.Mexobisium pecki. new speciesFigs. 1-8Material-Holotype male (WM2522.02004) and 18paratypes (16 males. 2 females) from a locality 10 kmS Valle Nacional. Oaxaca. Mexico. 2000 ft elevation.19 May 1971. Specimens obtained by Berlese separa·tion of 42 liters of leaf litter "from ravine. piles ofmoist leaves on rock ledges and in deep rock crevicesand ravine bottoms, moist while surroundings are dry.The region is one of tropical evergreen forest vegeta·tion. A very good rich sample:' (S. Peck). Otherpseudoscorpions present were many specimens of anunidentified species of Tyrannochthonius and six spe·cimens of an unidentified ideoroncid.Diagnosis-The smallest known species in the genus,M. pecki is further characterized by the lack ofan epistome. the lack of setae on the ventral analplate. and the possession of five setae on the cheliceralhand (see key).Because this is the first known epigean species ofthe genus and is represented by relatively abundantmaterial. a complete description is given.Description of Male-(Based on the holotype andnine paratypes. mounted on slides.) Carapace. cheliceraeand palps reddish brown, other parts sligrtlylighter. Carapace about as long as broad; anteriormargin without an epistome and slightly concave atcenter; each anteroventral corner with a small, butprominent. conical protuberance; a distinct transversefurrow or membranous band near posterioredge (see Fig. 1); surface smooth; chaetotaxy 8-6-4-66=30. Coxal chaetotaxy 2-5-2:4-2:4-2:3-2:3-5; palpalcoxa with two large apical setae set close together.Tergites and sternites smooth; pleural membraneslongitudinally granulo-striate. the granules with prominentapical spinules. Tergal chaetotaxy 9:9:9:9:9:29:9:9:9:7:T1T:2. Sternal chaetotaxy '4: [2-2] :(3)19(3):(3)10{3): 14:15:15: 15:14:11 :T1T1T1T:O; thereis some slight variation in numbers of setae on thesternites and on the spiracular plates; genital operculaas in Figure 2.Chelicera with five setae on hand; fingers with8-10 irregular teeth; serrula exterior of 20-21 blades;galea a long straight stylet; flagellum of two shortsetae, apparently denticulate terminally (Fig. 3).Palps moderately long and slender; femur 0.820.93 and chela 1.36-1.50 times as long as carapace.Proportions of segments as in Figure 4; trochanter2.25-2.45, femur 2.7-2.95. tibia 2.25-2.4. and chela(without pedicel) 3.0-3.3 times as long as broad; hand(without pedicel) 1.3-1.45 times as long as deep;movable fi nger 1.38-1.43 times as long as hand; surfacessmooth. Trichobothria on chela as in Figure 5;ib on dorsum of hand proximad of middle. it proximadof et, and ist far proximad of est. Fixed fingerwith 51-52 slightly spaced. retroconical marginalteeth; movable finger with 41-46 low. quadrangularteeth. Each finger with well developed venedens andvenom apparatus. the ducts long; nodus ramosus inmovable finger nearly at level of trichobothrium sb,that in fixed finger between est and ist. but nearer thelatter.Legs relatively stout; leg IV (Fig. 6) with entirefemur 2.8-3.1 and tibia 4.4-4.75 times as long as deep;femoral suture of leg IV located about one-third thelength of femur from proximal end and slightly obliqueto transverse axis. Spines well developed ontelotarsi I. II and III, only a small. blunt projection incorresponding position on leg I V. Subterminal tarsalsetae finely denticulate laterally and terminally (Fig.7). Arolia shorter than claws, which are long andslender. Leg IV with long tacti Ie setae on metatarsus0.33-0.42 and on telotarsus 0.30-0.40 length of segmentfrom proximal end.Female-(Based on the two mounted paratypes.)Generally similar to male but slightly larger. Genitaloperculum as in Figure 8; anterior operculum withfour small setae, posterior operculum with six. includingtwo small ones. Cheliceral galea longer than thatof male and gently curved. Palpal chela larger andstouter than that of male. 2.9 times as long asbroad; movable finger 1.31 times as long as hand.Movable finger with 46-47 and fixed finger with65

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint58-59 marginal teeth.Measurements (in mm)-Male: Body length 1.661.84. Carapace length 0.46-0.49. Cheli'cera 0.2350.25 by 0.12-0.125. Pal pal trochanter 0.235-0.27 by0.10-0.12; femur 0.385-0.445 by 0.135-0.15; tibia0.34-0.39 by 0.15-0.17; chela (without pedicel) 0.640.725 by 0.205-0.23; hand (without pedicel) 0.280.31 by 0.20-0.22; pedicel 0.05-0.06 long; movablefinger 0.385-0.445 long. Leg I: basifemur 0.19-0.22 by0.08-0.09; telofemur 0.13-0.155 by 0.075-0.08; tibia0.23-0.26 by 0.05-0.06; metatarsus 0.065-0.08 by0.04-0.045; telotarsus 0.16-0.20 by 0.04. Leg IV: entirefemur 0.38-0.42 long; basifemur 0.15-0.16 by0.12-0.135; telofemur 0.265-0.30 by 0.13-0.15; tibia0.33-0.37 by 0.075-0.08; metatarsus 0.08-0.10 by0.05-0.055; telotarsus 0.19-0.21 by 0.045-0.05.Female: Body length 1.89, 2.04. Carapace length0.51, 0.52. Chelicera 0.28, 0.29 by 0.14. Pal pal trochanter0.29, 0.30 by 0.125; femur 0.465, 0.47 by0.16-0.17;tibia 0.42, 0.435 by 0.18,0.20; chela (withoutpedicel) 0.78, 0.79 by 0.265,0.27; hand (withoutpedicel) 0.35, 0.355 by 0.26, 0.27; movable finger0.46, 0.47 long. Leg IV: entire femur 0.435, 0.46by 0.15, 0.155.Etymology-This species is named for StewartPeck, who has collected many new and importantpseudoscorpions in Mexico.Mexobisium cubanum, new speciesFigs. 9-11Material-Holotype female (WM1812.01001) fromJatibonico, Cuba, on 22 September 1931 (L.D. Christenson),and two paratype tritonymphs taken at thesame place by the same person on 3 September 1931and 30 October 1931; all found "in sugar cane soiL"(Types in collection of National Museum of NaturalHistory, Washington, D. C.)Diagnosis-A small epigean species distinguishedfrom M. pecki by larger size, the presence of six setaeon the cheliceral hand, and the presence of two setaeon the anal sternite (see key).Description of Female-With the characteristics ofthe genus as defined above and with the followingnoteworthy features. Anterior margin of carapacewith a small triangular epistome; each anteroventralcorner with a small, but prominent conical protuberance;no eyes; 32 vestitural setae with eight atanterior and six at posterior margin.Pleural membranes longitudinally granulo-striate,the granules with apical spinules. Tergal chaetotaxy9:9:9:9:9:11 :11 :9:9:7:T1T:2. Sternal chaetotaxy 4:(3)9(3): (3) 12(2): 12: 12: 11: 10:13:9:T1T1T1T:2.Cheliceral hand with six setae; fingers each withabout five marginal teeth; galea long, curved; serrulaexterior with 22 blades; flagellum of two small, apparentlyacuminate setae, set very close together.Palps moderately slender; femur 0.96 and chela1.55 times as long as carapace. Proportions of segmentsas shown in Figure 9; trochanter 2.3, femur3.3; tibia 2.55, and chela (without pedicel) 3.1 timesas long as broad; hand (without pedicel) about 1.5times as long as deep; movable finger 1.18 times aslong as hand. Trichobothria of chela as shown in Figure10. Fixed finger with 56 contiguous, retroconicalteeth, and movable finger with 47 similar, but lesspointed, teeth. Both fingers with well developed venomapparatus.Legs moderately slender (Fig. 11); leg IV with entirefemur 3.0 and tibia 5.1 times as long as deep.Spines well developed on tarsi I, II and III, only asmall, conical projection in corresponding position ofLeg IV. Subterminal tarsal setae apparently acuminate.Arolia slightly shorter than claws. Leg IV withtactile setae on tibia 0.76, on metatarsus 0.42, and ontelotarsus 0.33 length of segment from proximal end.Male-Unknown.Tritonymph-Generally very similar to female butsmaller and with tarsi of legs I and II not divided.Anterior margin of carapace without an epistome andslightly emarginate; transverse furrow not apparent;32 vestitural setae. Chelicera with six setae on hand;galea long, curved; flagellum of two small, apparentlyacuminate setae. Palps with no unusual features.Fixed finger with 42-44 and movable finger with34-35 marginal teeth; both fingers with well developedvenom apparatus. Legs unusual only in fact thattarsi of legs I and II are undivided, while those of legsIII and IV are divided as in adult, and all tarsi swollenbasally.Measurements (in mm)-Figures given first for femaleholotype, followed in parentheses by those forthe two tritonymphs. Body length 2.18 (1.89-2.06).Carapace length 0.64 (0.48-0.495). Chelicera 0.31(0.25-0.255) by 0.21 (0.155-0.17). Pal pal trochanter0.35 (0.24-0.25) by 0.15 (0.12); femur 0.615 (0.430.44) by 0.185 (0.13-0.14); tibia 0.535 (0.36-0.39)by 0.21 (0.15-0.155); chela (without pedicel) 0.99(0.68-0.72) by 0.32 (0.22-0.23); hand (without pedicel)0.465 (0.31-0.32) by 0.265 (0.175); pedicel 0.075(0.05) long; movable finger 0.55 (0.36-0.395) long.Leg I: tibia 0.315 (0.205-0.22) by 0.07 (0.06); metatarsus0.09 by 0.05; telotarsus 0.20 by 0.04 (tarsus0.19-0.21 by 0.05). Leg IV: entire femur 0.485(0.335-0.35) by 0.16 (0.12); tibia 0.435 (0.28-0.29)by 0.085 (0.07-0.075); metatarsus 0.12 (0.08-0.09)by 0.055 (0.055-0.06); telotarsus 0.225 (0.155-0.17)by 0.055 (0.06-0.071.66

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintEtymology-The species is named for Cuba, thecountry in which it lives.Mexobisium maya, new speciesFigs. 12-17Material-Holotype female (WM2726.01 001) andparatype tritonymph from Grutas de Cocona, 3 kmNE Teapa, Tabasco, Mexico, on 29 December 1971(D. McKenzie).Diagnosis-General conformation similar to thatof M. pecki, but larger and with more attenuatedappendages (see key).Description of Female-Carapace 1.3 times as longas broad; no epistome; surface slightly reticulated;membranous furrow near posterior edge of carapacebroad and distinct; vestitural setae 8-4-4-4-6-6=32.Tergal chaetotaxy 8:8:8:8:9:9:9:9:9:6:T1T:2. Sternalchaetotaxy 4:(3)8(3):(3)11(3):16:14:15:17:12:11 :T1T1T1T:2; genital opercula as shown in Figure12.Chelicera with five setae on hand; flagellum oftwo small, close-set setae, subterminally denticulate;serrula exterior of 27 or 28 blades; serrula interior of22 blades; fingers without distinct teeth, but with"dental" margins irregularly roughened.Palps as in Figure 13. Femur 1.08 and chela 1.75times as long as carapace. Trochanter 2.5, femur 4.2,tibia 3.35 and chela (without pedicel) 3.75 times aslong as broad; hand (without pedicel) 1.75 times aslong as deep; movable finger 1.30 times as long ashand. Trichobothria of chela as in Figure 14. Fixedfinger with 109 retroconical teeth; movable fingerwith 105 retroconical and quadrangular teeth. Venomapparatus well developed in both fingers; nodus ramosusin fixed finger about midway between trichobothriaest and ist, that in movable finger just proximadof st.Legs moderately slender (Fig. 15); leg IV with femur3.9 and tibia 7.2 times as long as deep. Spineswell developed on telotarsi I, II and III, only a small,blunt projection in corresponding position on leg IV.Subterminal tarsal setae laterally and terminally denticulate.Leg IV with tactile setae on tibia 0.52, onmetatarsus 0.39 and on telotarsus 0.49 length of segmentfrom proximal end.Male-Unknown.Tritonymph-Generally similar to female but smallerand lighter and with tarsi of legs I and II notdivided. Carapace without a transverse membranousband or furrow; vestitural setae 8-4-4-4-6-5=31. Tergalchaetotaxy 7:8:8:9:9:9:9:9:9:7:T1T:2. Sternalchaetotaxy 0: (2)4(2): (2)9(2): 13: 13: 13: 11: 11: 10:TlT1T1T:2.Cheliceral hand with five setae; flagellum of twoshort, terminally denticulate setae; galea a long,curved stylet; fingers without distinct teeth, but with"dental" margins irregularly roughened.Palps with trochanter 2.2, femur 3.75, tibia 2.85,and chela (without pedicel) 3.8 times as long as broad;hand (without pedicel) 1.7 times as long as deep;movable finger 1.34 times as long as hand. Fixedfinger without trichobothrium ist, and movable fingerlacking sb (probably). Fixed finger with 82 and movablefinger with 78 marginal teeth. Venom apparatuswell developed in both fingers.Tarsi of legs I and II undivided (Fig. 16); those oflegs III and IV distinctly divided, as in the adult (Fig.17). Tarsi swollen near proximal ends. Spines characteristicallydeveloped on tarsi I, II and III.Measurements (in mm)-Figures given first forholotype female, those of tritonymph in parentheses.Body length 3.61 (2.45). Carapace length 1.09 (0.78).Chelicera 0.49 (0.38) by 0.235 (0.185). Palpal trochanter0.605 (0.41) by 0.245 (0.185); femur 1.175(0.79) by 0.28 (0.21); tibia 1.09 (0.67) by 0.325(0.235); chela (without pedicel) 1.915 (1.29) by 0.51(0.34); hand (without pedicel) 0.86 (0.58) by 0.495(0.34); pedicel 0.12 (0.08) long; movable finger 1.12(0.78) long. Leg IV: entire femur 0.95 (0.665) long;basifemur 0.35 (0.265) by 0.23 (0.16); telofemur0.67 (0.465) by 0.245 (0.17); tibia 0.895 (0.605) by0.125 (0.10); metatarsus 0.19 (0.14) by 0.09 (0.075);telotarsus 0.48 (0.36) by 0.08 (0.09l.Etymology-The narne maya, referring to the earlypeople of the region, is used as a noun in apposition.Mexobisium guatemalense, new speciesFigs. 18-21Material-Holotype female (WM1904.01001) andparatype deutonymph from Cueva Lanquin, AltaVerapaz, Guatemala, on 28 August 1969 (S. and J.Peck).Diagnosis-Moderately large species, with an epistomeand with six setae on the cheliceral hand (seekey).Description of Female-With the characteristics ofthe genus as defined above and with the followingnoteworthy features. Carapace about 1.3 times as longas broad; anterior margin with prominent triangularepistome; each anteroventral corner with a prominentconical protuberance; no eyes or eyespots; 35 vestituralsetae, including eight at anterior and six at posteriormargin; transverse furrow indistinct.Abdominal tergites and sternites smooth; pleuralmembranes longitudinally granulo-striate, the granuleswith long, apical spinules. Tergal chaetotaxy67

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint\, ~ ~ I-- ....~~~+--r ~, ~ \, \-12 .1317 202168

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint8:8:9:9:9:9:9:9:9:7:TT:2. Sternal chaetotaxy 4:(3)10(3): (2)12(2): 16: 17: 18: 16: 14: 11 :T1T1T1T:2.Cheliceral hand with six setae; fingers each withabout eight teeth of various sizes; galea long, slenderand curved; serrula exterior with 33 and serrula in·terior with 27 blades; flagellum of two small, terminallydenticulate setae set close together.Palps long and rather slender; femur 1.08 and chela1.73 times as long as carapace. Proportions of seg·ments as in Figure 18; trochanter 2.3, femur 4.3,tibia 3.0, and chela (without pedicel) 3.7 times aslong as broad; hand 1.55 times as long as deep;movable finger 1.41 times as long as hand. Surfacessmooth. Trichobothria of chela as shown in Figure 19.Fixed finger with 104 contiguous, retroconical teeth;movable finger with 98 rather similar, but lower,teeth; both fingers with well developed venom apparatus.Legs slender; leg IV with entire femur 4.2 andtibia 8.7 times as long as deep. All tarsi divided (Fig.20). Spines well developed on telotarsi I, II and III,only a small, blunt projection in corresponding posi·tion on leg IV. Arolia shorter than claws. Leg IV withtactile setae on tibia 0.74, on metatarsus 0.43 and ontelotarsus 0.43 length of segment from proximal end.Male-Unknown.Deutonymph-Generally similar to the adult, butsmaller, less heavily sclerotized and with tarsi of alllegs undivided. Carapace without epistome; with anteroventralprotuberances; without eyes; 28 vestituralsetae, including 6 at anterior and 4 at posterior margin;no transverse furrow evident.Pleural membranes of abdomen longitudinallygranulate, granules with apical spinules. Tergal chaeto·taxy 6:6:6:6:7:7:7:7:7:7:TT:l. Sternal chaetotaxy0:(1)4(1): (1 )7(1) :9:9:9:9:9:7:TTTT:2.Chel iceral hand with 5 setae; serrula exterior with18, and serrula interior with 16 blades; flagellum of2 small, terminally denticulate setae.Palps not as long or slender as those of female;femur 0.96 and chela 1.68 times as long as carapace;trochanter 2.25, femur 3.5, tibia 2.9, and chela 4.0times as long as broad; hand 1.55 times as long asdeep; movable finger 1.73 times as long as hand.Movable chelaI finger with two and fixed finger withsix trichobothria, as is usual for deutonymphs. Movablefinger with 51 and fixed finger with 61 marginalteeth.Legs generally similar to those of adult, but withno division of tarsi; instead, each tarsus is noticeablyswollen just distal to point where suture would beexpected (Fig. 21). Spines on tarsi as in adult. Leg IVwith tactile setae on tibia 0.64, and on tarsus 0.17 and0.55 length of segment from proximal end.Measurements (in mm)-Figures for female followedin parentheses by those of deutonymph. Bodylength 3.55(2.03). Carapace 1.11 (0.55) long. Chelicera0.54(0.29) by 0.26(0.15). Pal pal trochanter0.605(0.28) by 0.26(0.125); femur 1.205(0.525) by0.28(0.15); tibia 1.07(0.465) by 0.36(0.16); chela(without pedicel) 1.925(0.925) by 0.525(0.23); hand(without pedicel) 0.82(0.34) by 0.525(0.22); pedicel0.11 (0.05) long; movable finger 1.155(0.59) long.Leg I: basifemur 0.58(0.265) by 0.16(0.09); telofemur0.35(0.155) by 0.15(0.08); tibia 0.71(0.295)by 0.095(0.065); metatarsus 0.20 by 0.07; telotarsus0.415 by 0.065 (tarsus 0.30 by 0.06). Leg IV: entirefemur 0.96(0.465) long; basifemur 0.355(0.18) by0.215(0.11); telofemur 0.67(0.30) by 0.23(0.11);tibia 0.955(0.39) by 0.11 (0.065); metatarsus 0.22 by0.085; telotarsus 0.435 by 0.08 (tarsus 0.35 by 0.06).Etymology-This species is named for Guatemala,the country in which it lives.Mexobisium goodnighti, new speciesFigs. 22-25Material-Holotype female (WM2945.01001) froma cave near Augustine, Belize (British Honduras), on20 July 1972 (Charles Goodnight).Diagnosis-A very large species with attenuatedappendages and well colored sclerotic parts; no transversefurrow on carapace, and eight setae on anteriorgenital operculum of female (see key).Description of Female-With the characteristics ofthe genus as defined above and with the followingspecial features. Carapace 1.5 times as long as broad;epistome small, triangular; surface distinctly reticulated;no transverse furrow present; vestitural setae 38,with six at anterior and six at posterior margins. Abdominalpleural membranes longitudinally granulostriate,dorsal most granules with very long apicalspinules. Tergal chaetotaxy 8:8:9:9:9:9:9:9:9:7:TTT2 4T:2. Sternal chaetotaxy 8:(3)10(3):(3)13(3):18:20:4 218:18:17:11 :TT:2; setae of anterior sternites asshown in Figure 22.Chelicera with six setae on hand; flagellum of twosmall, apparently simple, setae, well separated at their~Figs. 12-17. Mexobisium maya, new species. 12. Genital opercula of holotype female. 13. Right palp, dorsal view. 14. Leftchela, lateral view. 15. Leg IV, anterior view. 16. Tarsus of leg I of tritonymph. 17. Metatarsus and telotarsus of leg IV oftritonymph.~Figs. 18-21. Mexobisium guatemalense, new species. 18. Right palp of holotype female. dorsal view. 19. Right chela, lateralview. 20. Metatarsus and telotarsus of leg IV. 21. Tarsus of leg IV of deutonymph. 69

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintbases; serrula exterior with 33 and serrula interiorwith 26 blades.Palps as in Figure 23; femur 1.25 and chela 2.11times as long as carapace. Trochanter 2.6, femur 6.0,tibia 3.85, and chela (without pedicel) 5.1 times aslong as broad; hand (without pedicel) 1.9 times aslong as deep; movable finger 1.83 times as long ashand. Chela with trichobothria as in Figure 24. Chelalfingers strongly curved at distal ends; fixed fingerwith 137 retroconical teeth; movable finger with 1162325._~__ 4 ••••• ~_. 0o0'0'0- '(;'"0'''·0-- --0 ·0'· .• -0".' -~-- _. '0" -;. t1'.'';._.4~ ... ..j. - ~. -.- ~ • ~ • o~ • o' • ~ - '0" • q ~ -~ ".0;. "... '"o• 0 •..Figs. 22-25. Mexobisium goodnighti, new species. 22. Sternites 2-8, showing bases of setae. 23. Right palp, dorsal view.24. Left chela, lateral view. 25. Subterm inal tarsal seta.70

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintteeth, the distal six or seven greatly flattened, theothers similar to those of fixed finger but more depressed;venom apparatus well developed in bothfingers.Legs quite slender; leg IV with entire femur 6.65and tibia 11.7 times as long as deep. Spines well developedon telotarsi of legs I, II and III, only a smallprojection in corresponding position on leg IV. Subterminaltarsal setae laterally and terminally denticulate(Fig. 25). Tibia and both tarsal segments oflegs III and IV with a number of long, heavy setaealong outer margins.Male-Unknown.Measurements (in mm)-Body length 4.40. Carapacelength 1.40. Chelicera 0.68 by 0.31. Pal pal trochanter0.77 by 0.295; femur 1.75 by 0.29; tibia 1.48by 0.385; chela (without pedicel) 2.96 by 0.585;hand (without pedicel) 1.04 by 0.555; pedicel 0.16long; movable finger 1.91 long. Leg IV: entire femur1.46 long; basifemur 0.495 by 0.22; telofemur 1.02by 0.215; tibia 1.52 by 0.13; metatarsus 0.26 by0.10; telotarsus 0.805 by 0.095.Etymology-The species is named for CharlesGoodnight, who collected the type specimen.Remarks-This species is peculiar in several respectswhich distinguish it clearly from other membersof the genus. Though it is large and well sclerotized,it shows no trace of a transverse furrow on thecarapace; there are eight setae on the anterior genitaloperculum of the female rather than four as in otherspecies; there are 38 setae on the carapace, the largestnumber in the genus; and the large number and placementof setae on the abdominal sternites is uniquefor the genus. These features might be consideredsufficient for generic distinction; but in view of thewide variation in a number of characteristics amongother species, it seems best at the moment to placethis species in Mexobisium.Mexobisium paradoxum MuchmoreMexobisium paradoxum Muchmore, 1972, p. 273.Reexamination of the holotype female in comparisonwith the species described above reveal someinteresting facts. This species is unique in several respects:there is only a single seta in the cheliceralflagellum; the pleural granules do not possess apicalspinules, at most a thickening of the apices; thereare no protuberances at the anteroventral corners ofthe carapace. And it shares a couple of peculiar featureswith other species: as in M. goodnighti, there isno transverse furrow on the carapace; and as in M.pecki, there are no setae on the ventral anal plate.It is obvious that there are a considerable numberof morphological differences among the several spe-Key to Species of Mexobisium (adults only)1. Cheliceral flagellum consisting of a single, simple seta; appendages greatly attenuated-palpal femur 7.1 timesas long as broad; from a cave in Veracruz, M~xico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. M. paradoxum MuchmoreCheliceral flagellum consisting of two finely denticulate or acuminate setae; appendages not so slender-palpalfemur not more than 6 times as long as broad. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 22. Very large-palpal chela nearly 3 mm long; carapace without a transverse furrow; anterior genital operculumof female with 8 setae; from cave in BelizeM. goodnighti, new speciesSmaller-palpal chela no more than 2 mm long; carapace with a more or less distinct transverse furrow; anteriorgenital operculum of female with only 4 setae 33. Pal pal chela about 2 mm long, femur about 1.2 mm long; cavernicolous forms 4Pal pal chela 1 mm or less in length, femur less than 0.7 mm long; epigean forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 54. Carapace with prominent triangular epistome; hand of chelicera with 6 setae; cheliceral fingers with about8 distinct teeth; from cave in Guatemala M. guatemalense, new speciesCarapace without epistome; hand of chelicera with 5 setae; cheliceral fingers without distinct teeth; from cavein Tabasco, MexicoM. maya, new species5. Ventral anal plate with 2 small setae; hand of chelicera with 6 setae; pal pal chela about 1 mm long; fromCubaM. cubanum, new speciesVentral anal plate without setae; hand of chelicera with 5 setae; pal pal chela less than 0.8 mm long; fromOaxaca, MexicoM. pecki, new species71

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintcies assigned to the genus Mexobisium. At present itseems best to keep all these species in one genus,although it is recognized that further knowledge ofthem may very well demand separation into two ormore genera.LITERATURE CITEDBeier. M. 1956. Neue troglobionte Pseudoscorpione ausMexico. Ciencia, Mexico. 16:81-85.Chamberlin. J.C. 1946. The genera and species of the Hyidae.Bull. Univ. Utah, 37(6): 1-16.Muchmore, W.B. 1972. New diplosphyronid pseudoscorpions,mainly cavernicolous, from Mexico (Arachnida. Pseudoscorpionida).Trans. Amer. Micros. Soc., 91 :261-276.Muchmore, W.B. 1973. New and little known pseudoscorpions.mainly from caves in Mexico (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpionida).Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull, 5:47-62.72

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintTWO NEW TROGLOBITIC SHRIMPS (DECAPODA: ALPHEIDAE ANDPALAEMONIDAE) FROM OAXACA, MEXICOHorton H. Hobbs, Jr.Smithsonian InstitutionFew caves have a more diverse troglobitic "highercrustacean" fauna than does Cueva del Nacimientodel RIo San Antonio, situated 10 km SSW of Acatlan,Oaxaca, Mexico. In addition to the mysid and crayfishdescribed elsewhere in this Bulletin by Bowmanand Hobbs, respectively, two shrimps belonging todifferent families also frequent this cave; thus, fourmalacostracan families are represented in its waters:Lepidomysidae, Alpheidae, Palaemonidae, and Astacidae.The two shrimps described herein were first collectedby James R. Reddell and others (see below) on26 December 1972 along with specimens of Spelaeomysisolivae Bowman, 1973, and Procambarus oaxacaereddelli Hobbs, 1973. The alpheid was represented bya single specimen, that was regurgitated by an undescribedspecies of albinistic catfish, and the palaemonidby two juvenile specimens. Without additionalmaterial neither of these shrimps could have been described.A return to this locality by the original collectorson 9 March 1973 resulted in their obtaining19 additional alpheids and three adults and one juvenilepalaemonid. Mr. Reddell informed me that duringhis second visit to this cave the temperature of thewater in the "shrimp lake" was 23.5°C and 23°C nearthe entrance. He further indicated that the alpheid"was abundant in the Main Side Passage from 10003000 ft. from the entrance. They were seldom foundin pools with the catfish or crayfish. The palaemonidwas quite rare and seen in the same pools."To my knowledge, previously only two alpheidshrimps have been reported to inhabit fresh-water;Alpheopsis haugi Coutiere, 1906, found in a freshwaterlake in the Ogooue Basin in Gabon, and A.monodi Sollaud, 1932, which was collected in astream in the vicinity of Manoka, Cameroon. No speciesof the family has been reported heretofore froma subterranean habitat. A list of the previously describedspecies of the genus Alpheopsis is appendedto the description of this new congener.Although several species of the genus Macrobr.achiumhave been found in subterranean habitats, thespecies described here is the only member of thegenus in which the eyes are without facets and eitherlack, or have extremely little, pigment.Both shrimps are known only from this Oaxacancave.Acknowledgements-Sincere appreciation is extendedto James R. Reddell, David McKenzie, MarthaHelen McKenzie, and Stuart Murphy for donating tome the first specimens they collected of these twoshrimps and especially for their interest and effortsthat resulted in the acquisition of sufficient materialupon which to base descriptions. I am also deeply indebtedto Fenner A. Chace, Jr., who encouraged andaided me throughout the preparation of this manuscript,including a critical reading of the final draft.Particularly helpful was his list of the describedspecies of the genus Alpheopsis from which the summaryof species included here was adapted.Alpheopsis stygicola, new speciesFigs. 1,2Description-Rostrum (Fig. la, b) triangular withstrongly acute apex not reaching midlength of proxi-73

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint(a) (b) (c,e-i,k)Fig. 1. A/pheopsis stygico/a, new species, holotypic male. (All appendages from left side). a, Lateral view;b, Dorsal view ofanterior region; c, Dorsal view of basal portion of antennule; d, Dorsal view of portion of lateral ramus of same; e, Ventral viewof basal portion of antenna; f, Preaxial view of left mandible; g, Postaxial view of same; h, First pleopod; i, Second pleopod;j,Appendices masculina and interna; k, Dorsal view of telson and uropods. (Scales in mm.l74

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint~ ;:._ b-.IFig. 2. A/pheopsis stygico/a, new species, holotypic male. (All appendages from left side except those in e.) e, Dextral viewof pleurobranchs and coxal epipodites of pereiopods 1-5 and associated pleural region (a, alpha element of epipodite; 13, beta elementof epipodite; cx, coxa; pi, pleurobranch); b. c, First and second maxillae; d-f, First, second, and third maxillipeds; g-k. Firstthrough fifth pereiopods, respectively. (Scale in mm.l75

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintmal segment of antennular peduncle, and flankedlaterally by pair of acute supraorbital spines. Carapacewith pair of incipient carinae diverging posteriorlyfrom lateral bases of supraorbital spines; hepatic regionwith several complexly arranged grooves andconspicuous, deep, sclerotized hepatic·branchiocardiacgroove extending al most entire length of carapace.Pterygostomian margin rounded, lacking spine; posteriormargin with moderately prominent cardiacnotch at base of branchiostegite.Four anterior abdominal somites lacking mediancarina dorsally, all with rounded pleura; pleuron offifth abdominal somite with acute posteroventralangle. Sixth somite slightly longer than fifth andabout three·fourths as long as tel son, its posteroventralangle consisting of acute triangular articulatedplate, margin rounded at base of telson. Telson (Fig.1a, k) about 2.4 times longer than wide with paireddorsal spines situated at midlength and additional pairat base of distal fourth; rounded posterior margin withtwo pairs of lateral spines, more mesial pair longer,flanking row of 18 plumose setae.Eyes (Fig. 1a, b) almost covered by carapace, withpigment greatly reduced, fused stal ks with anteromedianbulge or with paired submedian anteriorbulges.Antennular peduncle (Fig. 1a-c) with acute styloceritealmost reaching distal extremity of proximalpodomere; second podomere about 1.3 times longerthan third; flagella approximately twice length ofcarapace, lateral flagellum with nine or 10 articlesproximal to bifurcation and short branch consistingof only three articles, distal most indistinctly delimitedbasally; sensory setae disposed as illustrated (Fig. 1d).Antenna (Fig. 1a, b, e) with peduncle almost reachingbase of distal third of scale; proximal segmentwith small acute distolateral tooth, and second segmentwith ventrodistal spine; flagellum about threetimes as long as carapace; antennal scale about 2.2times longer than broad, with acute distolateral toothnot reaching so far distally as distal margin of blade.Gnathal appendages as figured (Figs. 1f, g; 2b-f).Mandible with incisor process terminating in fourteeth; two-jointed palp with broadly rounded distalsegment.First pereiopods (Fig. 2g), reaching slightly beyondmidlength of antennal scale, subequal in size, carpusand chela subequal in length and only slightly shorterthan merus; opposable margins of fingers of chelawithout prominent teeth or spines; coxa with epipoditeconsisting of a and (3 components (Couti~re,1899:276) (Fig. 2a). Second pereiopod (Fig. 2h),overreaching antennal scale by slightly more thanlength of dactyl, with chela similar to that of first;76carpus consisting of five articles, proximal-most longerthan combined length of second, third, and fourth,and almost twice as long as distal article; merus distinctlylonger than three proximal articles of carpusand also longer than ischium; coxa with epipodite asin first pereiopod. Third pereiopod (Fig. 2i), over·reaching antennal scale by length of dactyl and halfthat of propodus, with simple dactyJ; propodus 2.7times longer than dactyl and 1.2 times longer thancarpus; merus slightly longer than propodus; ischiumdistinctly shorter than carpus; coxa with epipodite asin first and second pereiopods. Fourth pereiopod(Fig. 2j), overreaching antennal scale by slightly morethan length of dactyl, shorter than third; dactyl simple;propodus 2.2 times length of dactyl, 1.4 timesthat of carpus, and subequal in length to merus; ischiumshorter than carpus; coxa with epipodite as infirst three pereiopods. Fifth pereiopod (Fig. 2k), overreachingantennal scale by about two-thirds length ofdactyl, subequal in length to third; dactyl simple; propodus,bearing transverse rows of setae on distal remotorsurface, 2.9 times longer than dactyl and 1.1times longer than merus; ischium much shorter thancarpus; coxa with epipodite limited to setiferous ((3)element.First pleopod (Fig. 1h) with exopodite 2.8 timeslonger than endopodite. Second pereiopod (Fig. 1;, j)with exopodite approximately 1.2 times longer thanendopodite; appendix masculina naked except for sixapical spinelike setae. Lateral ramus of uropod (Fig.1k) with entire, straight lateral margin terminating inshort acute tooth, and longer movable spine situatedimmediately mesial to tooth.Branchial formula. 5 P1 b + 1 Artb + 8 ep: fivepleurobranchs borne on pereiopod-bearing somites;arthrobranch at base of third maxilliped; usual epipoditeson maxillipeds; and compound epipodites (aand(3) on coxae of first four pereiopods, and setae·bearingone (~type) on that of fifth. See Fig. 2a.Size-Carapace length of holotype 5.7 mm, that ofeight paratypic males ranging from 4.7 to 6.0 mm(average 5.1 mm); range in 11 paratypic females, 4.5to 6.2 mm (average 5.2 mm).Color-Lacking pigment.Type Locality-Cueva del Nacimiento del RIo SanAntonio, 10 km SSW Acatlan, Oaxaca, Mexico. Thespecimens were collected by James R. Reddell, DavidMcKenzie, Martha McKenzie, and Stuart Murphy on26 December 1972 and 9 March 1973.Disposition of Types-The holotypic male (no.143629), six paratypic males and nine paratypic fe·males are deposited in the National Museum of Natu·ral History, Smithsonian Institution. A paratypic maleand female are deposited in both the Instituto de Bio·

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintloglll, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, andThe Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas.Relationships-The relationships of Alpheopsis stygicolato other members of the genus are obscure. Atleast partially responsible for the uncertainty thatexists are the inconsistencies in the descriptions ofthe previously known species. Characters that wereutilized in describing certain of them are neither illustratednor mentioned in the descriptions of others,sometimes even by the same author. Until such timeas a comparative study can be made of all of the describedspecies, little should or could be concludedconcerning their interrelationships.In possessing supraorbital spines, this new Mexicanspecies superficially resembles more than one-half ofthe members of the genus but may be distinguishedfrom all except six of them in possessing nine or 10articles in the lateral ramus of the antennule proximalto the bifurcation. Characters that serve to distinguishit from the six remaining species are as follows: in A.fissipes the dactyls of the third through fifth pereiopodsare bifid instead of simple; in A. idiocarpus thecarpus of the second pereiopod consists of three articlesinstead of five; in A. trispinosus only three, insteadof four, of the pereiopods bear a-type epipodites;in A. chilensis, which attains a length of 48mm, the chelae are asymmetrical and the supraorbital"spines" are broadly rounded instead of being acute;in both A. monodi and A. haugi the blade of thescaphocerite does not reach so far distally as thedistolateral spine instead of exceeding it.The absence or reduction of pigment and facetsfrom the eyes and the presence of the strikingly deeplongitudinal hepatic-branchiocardiac groove on thecarapace are believed to be unique within the genus.It seems highly unlikely that previous authors wouldhave failed to mention these two conspicuous featureswere they present in the specimens they were describing.Etymology-The name stygicola alludes to thetroglobitic habit of this shrimp.Alpheopsis biunguiculata Banner, 1953:18Type-locality: Halape, Kau Coast, Hawaii.Alpheopsis chalciope De Man, 1910:306Type-locality: Malay Archipelago, Siboga Station154, lat. 0°7'.2N, long. 130°25'.5E.Alpheopsis chilensis Coutiere, 1896:382Type-locality: Chile.Alpheopsisconsobrinus De Man, 1910:305Type-locality: Malay Archipelago, Siboga Station282, lat. 8°25'.2S, long. 127°18'.4E. Anchoragebetween Nusa Besi and the N.E.-point ofTimor.Alpheopsis diabilus Banner, 1956:325Type-locality: Saipan.Alpheopsis fissipes Coutiere, 1908:193Type-locality: Indian Ocean, Percy Sladen TrustExpedition, Providence, Station D4.Alpheopsis haugi Coutiere, 1906:378Type-locality: Freshwater lake in the Ogooue Basinmore than 200 km from the ocean, Gabon.Alpheopsis idiocarpus Coutiere, 1908:194Type-locality: Indian Ocean, Percy Sladen TrustExpedition, Providence, Station D4.Alpheopsis labis Chace, 1972:55Type·locality: Antigua Island, Bredin Station 7356.Alpheopsis monodi Sollaud, 1932:377Type-locality: Cameroon, freshwater stream in theregion of the Bay of Monoka.Alpheopsis sibogae De Man, 1910:307Type-locality: Malay Archipelago, Siboga Station0'49a, lat. 8 23.5S, long. 119° 4.6E,,"Sapehstrait."Alpheopsis tetrarthri Banner, 1956:328Type-locality: Saipan, Locality 2, off west coast.Alpheopsis trigona (Rathbun,1901:111)Type-locality: Puerto Rico, off Vieques, Station6096.Alpheopsis trispinosa (Stimpson, 1860:101)Type-locality: Port Jackson, Australia.Alpheopsis vietnamensis Tiwari, 1964:314Type-locality: Vietnam, anchorage of Itu Aba.List of the Members of the Genus AlpheopsisAlpheopsis aequalis Coutiere, 1896:382Type-locality: Red Sea and Indian Ocean.Alpheopsis equalis var. truncata Coutiere, 1903:18Type-locality: Goifufahendu Atoll (in Maldives orLackadives). Treated as a synonym of the nominatesubspecies by Banner, 1953:15.Alpheopsis africana Holthuis, 1952b:45Type-locality: 8°30'S-13°E (20 M. W. Pointa doDande) Africa.Macrobrachium villalobosi, new speciesFig. 3Description-Rostrum (Fig. 3a, b) moderately highand almost straight, only slightly arched immediatelyanterior to posterior margin of orbit, and its tip reachingslightly beyond distal extremity of antennal scale;dorsal margin with nine to 11 teeth (nine in holotype),one or two, rarely three, (epigastric) of whichsituated posterior to orbit, and one to three, usuallytwo, on ventral margin.77

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint(c,i,n) (j-l) (m,o)Fig. 3. Macrobrachium villalobosi, new species, holotypic male. (All appendages from left side.) a, Lateral view; b, Dorsal viewof anterior region; c, Ventral view of basal portion of antenna; d, Mandible; e, f, First,and second maxillae; g-i, First, second, andthird maxillipeds; j, Chela of second pereiopod; k, I, First and second pleopods; m, Appendices masculina and interna; n, Dorsalview of telson and right uropod; 0, Posterior extremity of telson. (Scales in mm,)78

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintCarapace (Fig.3a) with antennal and hepaticspines, latter situated on level slightly posterior tobasal epigastric spine. Branchiocardiac groove prominent.Abdomen (Fig. 3a) smooth; pleura of fourth andfifth somites with angular posteroventral extremities,that of fifth acute. Sixth somite about 1.4 times longerthan fifth, and telson 1.4 times longer than sixth;dorsal surface of telson (Fig. 3n,o}with anterior pairof spines situated at base of penultimate fifth andposterior pair nearer posterior margin of telson thanto anterior pair of spines; posterior margin of telson,contracted to form acute median tip, bearing twopairs of spines arising ventral to margin, more mesialones extending posteriorly slightly beyond tip of telson(third spine present on left side in holotype) androw of about 10 plumose setae between mesial pair ofspines; single pair of fine submarginal setae presentdorsally.Eyes (Fig. 3a, b) moderately large, slightly cleftdistally and without facets; distolateral area withouttrace of pigment or tinted with diffuse reddish purplegranules in degenerate corneal area.Antennule (Fig. 3b) with proximal podomere ofpeduncle longer than combined lengths of distal twopodomeres, latter two subequal in length, and distalpodomere not quite reaching base of lateral spine onantennal scale; anterolateral spine of first podomerereaching about midlength of second podomere ofpeduncle; lateral flagellum about five and mesial oneabout three times longer than carapace. Antenna (Fig.3a, b, c) with peduncle as illustrated, basal segmentwith ventrolateral spine, flagellum about eight timeslonger than carapace. Antennal scale slightly less thanthree times longer than broad with lateral margin almoststraight.Gnathal appendages (Fig. 3d-i) as figured. Thirdmaxilliped reaching midlength of antennal scale.First pereiopod (Fig. 3a) overreaching antennalscale by length of dactyl, latter subequal in length topalm of chela; carpus slightly more than twice lengthof chela, and 1.1 times longer than merus. Secondpereiopod (Fig. 3a, j) overreaching antennal scale bylength of chela and half that of carpus; chela withfingers slightly longer than smooth palm, former withouttubercles or denticles on opposable margins, butboth fingers with scattered fine setae and subapicalclusters of stiff setae; carpus 1.5 times as long as propodusand about 1.5 times longer than merus, andmerus 1.3 times longer than ischium. Third pereiopodoverreaching antennal scale by length of dactyl andone-fourth that of propodus; propodus slightly morethan three times length of dactyl and 1.5 times longerthan carpus; latter about one-half as long as merus,and merus 2.6 times longer than ischium. Fourth pereiopodoverreaching antennal scale by length of dactyland three-fifths that of propodus; propodus about 4.2times as long as dactyl and 1.6 times length of carpus;carpus about one-half as long as merus, and latterslightly more than three times length of ischium. Fifthpereiopod overreaching antennal scale by length ofdactyl and almost entire length of propodus; propodus,subequal in length to merus, 5.5 times length ofdactyl and 1.5 times that of carpus; carpus 3.1 timesas long as ischium.First pleopod (Fig. 3k) with exopodite slightlymore than twice as long as endopodite. Second pleopod(F ig. 31) with exopodite 1.2 ti mes as long as endopodite,and latter with appendix masculina (Fig.3m) reaching distinctly beyond its mid length. Lateralramus of uropod (Fig. 3n) with straight lateral marginbearing fixed spine and also with slightly longermovable spine at mesial base of latter.Branchial formula typical of other members of thegenus: 5 P1 b + 2 Artb + 1 Podb + 2 ep - five pleurobranchscorresponding to pereiopods, two arthrobranchsat base of third maxilliped, podobranch oncoxa of second maxilliped, and epipodites on secondmaxilla and first maxilliped.Size-Carapace length of single male (holotype)8.0 mm; that of three females, 8.1 to 9.0 mm, andthat of five juveniles ranging from 3.8 to 4.0 mm.Single ovigerous female with carapace length 9.2 mm.Color-Lacking pigment.Type·locality-Cueva del Nacimiento del R(o SanAntonio, 10 km SSW Acatlan, Oaxaca, Mexico. Twojuveniles were collected on 26 December 1972, andthe holotypic male, two females, and a juvenile, on 9March 1973.Disposition of Types-The holotypic male (no.143633) and the following paratypes are deposited inthe National Museum of Natural History, SmithsonianInstitution: one female, one ovigerous female, andthree juveniles. Of the remaining paratypes, a femaleand juvenile female are deposited in the Instituto deBiologfa, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico;and a paratypic female and juvenile male are in TheMuseum, Texas Tech University, LUbbock, Texas.Relationships-Macrobrachium villalobosi has noobviously close relatives among the described membersof the genus. The degenerated cornea and thealmost complete, or complete, absence of pigment inthe eye set it apart from all of the others. The slendersecond pereiopods, in which the chelae are subequalin size and lack teeth, spines (excluding apical spines)or conspicuous mats of setae on the fingers, also appearto be unique among the American members ofthe genus. In addition, only a single transverse row of79

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintsetae occurs in the distal region of the propodus ofthe fifth pereiopod. These characteristics serve readilyto separate M. villalobosi from other American Macrobrachium(see Holthuis, 1952a:12).Etymology-This shrimp is named in honor of mygood friend and able carcinologist, Alejandro Villalobos.LITERATURE CITEDBanner, Albert H. 1953. The Crangonidae, or snappingshrimp, of Hawaii. Pacific Sci., 7(1):3-145,147.Banner, Albert H. 1956. Contributions to the knowledge ofthe alpheid shrimp of the Pacific Ocean-Part 1. Collectionsfrom the Mariana Archipelago. Pacific Sci., 10:318373.Bowman, Thomas E. 1973. Two new American species ofSpelaeomysis (Crustacea: Mysidacea) from a Mexicancave and land crab burrows. Assoc. Mexican Cave Stud.Bull., 5: 13-20.Chace, Fenner A., Jr. 1972. The Shrimps of the SmithsonianBredin Caribbean Expeditions with a summary of theWest Indian shallow-water species (Crustacea: Decapoda:Natantial. Smithsonian Contrib. Zool., No. 98:1-179.Coutiere, H. 1896. Note sur quelques genres nouveaux oupeu connus d'Alpheides, formant la sours-famille desAlpheopsides. Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat., Paris, 2:380-386.Coutiere, H. 1899. Les "Alpheidae," morphologie externe etinterne, formes larvaires, bionomie. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool.,8(9): 1-559.Coutiere, H. 1903. Note sur quelques Alpheidae des Maldiveset Laquedives. Bull. Soc. Philomath., Paris, (9), 5(2):72-90.Coutiere, H. 1906. Sur une nouvelle espece d'Alpheopsis, A.Haugi provenant d'un lac d'eau douce du bassin de l'Ogoue(Voyage de M. Haug, 1906l. Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat., Paris,12:376-380.Coutiere, H. 1908. Sur quelques nouvelles especes d'Alpheidae.Bull. Soc. Philomath., Paris, (9), 10:191-216.Hobbs, Horton H., Jr. 1973. Three new troglobitic decapodcrustaceans from Oaxaca, Mexico. Assoc. Mexican CaveStud. Bull., 5:25-38.Holthuis, L.B. 1952a. A general revision of the Palaemonidae(Crustacea Decapoda Natantia) of the Americas, II. Thesubfamily Palaemoninae. Occas. Papers Allan HancockFound., No. 12:1-396.Holthuis, L.B. 1952b. Crustaces Decapodes Macrures. InExpedition Oceanographique Beige dans les eaux cotieresAfricaines de l'Atlantique Sud (1948-1949l. Inst. RoyalSci. Nat. Belgique, 3(2): 1-88.de Man, J.G. 1910. Diagnosis of new species of macrurousdecapod crustacea from the "Siboga-Expedition:' Tijdschr.d. Ned. Dierk. Vereen., (2),11 :287-319.Rathbun, M.J. 1901. The Brachyura and Macrura of PortoRico. [Preprint froml U.S. Fish Commission Bulletin for1900 [19021,20(2):1-127,129*-137* [preprint indexl.Sollaud, E. 1932. Sur un alpheide d'eau douce, Alpheopsismonodi n.sp., recueilli par M. Th. Monod au Cameroun.Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 57:375-386.Stimpson, W. 1860. Prodromus descriptionis animalium evertebratorum,quae in Expeditione ad Oceanum PacificumSeptentionalem, a Republica Federata missa, CadwaladaroRinggold et Johanne Rodgers Ducibus, observavit de descripsit.Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, (1860):22-48.Tiwari, Krishna Kant. 1964. Diagnosis of two new species ofalpheid shrimps from Vietnam (I ndo-Chinal. Crustaceana,7(4):313-315.80

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintA SECOND TROGLOBITIC TYRANNOCHTHONIUS FROM MEXICO(ARACHNIDA, PSEUDOSCORPIONIDA, CHTHONIIDAE)William B. MuchmoreDepartment of Biology, University of RochesterRochester, New York, 14627In America, representatives of the genus TyrannochthoniusChamberlin are widespread in the litterfauna from the southern United States (Chamberlinand Malcolm, 1960; Malcolm, personal communica·tion) south to Peru (see Hoff, 1959). In several cavesin Alabama, a number of forms of this genus havebecome highly modified as troglobites (Chamberlinand Malcolm, 1960). However, in the numerous cavesof M~xico only a single troglobitic species, T. trog/o·bius Muchmore (1969) has been found, though severalother, apparently troglophilic, forms have also beennoted (see Reddell and Mitchell, 1971). Because ofthe paucity of true troglobites in the Mexican caves,it seems important to describe a second species oftroglobitic Tyrannochthonius recently collected byJ. R. Reddell and T. Raines from a cave in southernSan Luis POtOSI: The troglophilic forms will be con·sidered in detail at a later time.This work has been aided by a research grant(GB 17964) from the National Science Foundation.Tyrannochthonius pallidus, new speciesFigs. 1 and 2Material-Holotype male (WM 2962.01001) fromCueva de EI Jobo, 5 km NE Xilitla, San Luis POtOSI:Ml!xico, 28 November 1972 (J. R. Reddell and T.Raines). The type is deposited in the collection ofthe American Museum of Natural History in NewYork.Diagnosis-A troglobitic species, similar in generalfacies to T. trog/obius Muchmore but considerablysmaller, lighter in color, and with less attenuatedappendages.Description of Male-Pale in color, all sclerotizedparts very light brown. Carapace longer than broad;epistome small, irregularly triangular; two corneateeyes present, about one ocular diameter from anteriormargin of carapace; chaetotaxy 2-4-2-4-2-2=16. Coxalarea typical; chaetotaxy 2-2-1 :2·1 :2-2-CS:2-3:2-3;each coxa II with a row of 10-11 incised spines essentiallylike those in T. trog/obius; no intercoxal tuberclepresent. Abdomen elongate; tergites and sternitesonly weakly sclerotized; pleural membranes finelypapillose. Tergal chaetotaxy 4:4:4:4:4:4:5:6:7:4:12·9T2T:0. Sternal chaetotaxy 10: [4-4] :(3) 8(3):(3)6(3) :7:7:8:8:8:T1T1T1T:0:2.Chelicera four-fifths as long as carapace; hand withfive setae; each finger with about 15 teeth; no galeapresent, but silk ducts are evident on movable finger;flagellum of eight or nine pinnate setae.Palps rather long and slender (Fig. 1); femur 1.32and chela 1.90 times as long as carapace; trochanter1.75, femur 5.7, tibia 2.1 and chela 6.85 times as longas broad; hand 2.45 times as long as deep; movablefinger 1.73 times as long as hand. Placement of trichobothriaon chela and of spinelike seta on inner side offixed finger essentially as in T. trog/obius. Fixedfinger with 23 large, acute macrodenticles and 17rounded microdenticles alternating; movable fingerwith 11 similar macrodenticles and 10 similar, alternatingmicrodenticles, followed proximally by 14 verylow rounded teeth. On external surface of movable81

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintfinger, just distal to 10th macrodenticle, is a smallrounded sensillum with a bipolar neuron runningfrom it proximally into finger (Fig. 2).Legs fairly slender; leg IV with entire femur 2.6and tibia 5.2 times as long as deep. Leg IV with tactilesetae on tibia 0.47, on metatarsus 0.37, and on telotarsus0.31 length of segment from proximal end.Female-Unknown.Measurements (in mm)-Body length 1.56. Cara·pace length 0.56; greatest breadth 0.41. Chelicera0.445 by 0.21. Pal pal trochanter 0.22 by 0.125; fe·mur 0.74 by 0.13; tibia 0.295 by 0.14; chela 1.06 by0.155; hand 0.38 by 0.155; movable finger 0.66 long.Leg IV: trochanter 0.22 by 0.14; entire femur 0.69long; basifemur 0.33 by 0.265; telofemur 0.51 by0.26; tibia 0.47 by 0.09; metatarsus 0.20 by 0.075;telotarsus 0.495 by 0.045.Etymology-The name pallidus refers to the unusuallylight coloration of the animal.Remarks-The occurrence of a sensillum on themovable chelal finger of a Tyrannochthonius has notbeen reported previously, though similar structureshave been observed in species of Aphrastochthonius(Muchmore, 1972, 1973) and Mundochthonius (Muchmore,1973). While a sensillum was not noted in theholotype of T. troglobius (Muchmore, 1969), studyof a topotype from Cueva de la Mina reveals itspresence on the external surface just distal to the13th macrodenticle. Such a structure can also befound in most, but not all, other specimens ofTyrannochthonius in my possession. Whether itspresence and placement on the finger will have anytaxonomic significance remains to be seen.REFERENCES CITEDChamberlin, J.C., and D.R. Malcolm. 1960. The occurrenceof false scorpions in caves with special reference tocavernicolous adaptation and to cave species in theNorth American fauna. Amer. MidI. Nat., 64: 105-115.Hoff, C.C. 1959. The pseudoscorpions of Jamaica. Part I.The genus Tyrannochthonius. Bull. I nst. Jamaica, Sci.Ser. No. 10, Pt. 1:1-39.Muchmore, W.B. 1969. A cavernicolous Tyrannochthoniusfrom Mexico (Arachn., Chelon., Chthon.l. Ciencia, Max.,27:31-32.Muchmore, W.B. 1972. The unique, cave-restricted genusAphrastochthonius (Pseudoscorpionida, Chthoniidael.Proc. BioI. Soc. Washington, 85:433-444.Muchmore, W.B. 1973. New and little known pseudoscorpions,mainly from caves in Mexico (Arachnida,Pseudoscorpionidal. Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull.,5:47-62.Reddell, J.R., and R.W. Mitchell. 1971. A checklist of thecave fauna of Mexico. I. Sierra de EI Abra, Tamaulipasand San Luis PotOSI: Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull.,4: 137-180.Reddell, J.R., and R.W. Mitchell. 1971. A checklist of thecave fauna of Mexico. II. Sierra de Guatemala, Tamaulipas.Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 4: 181-215.Figs. 1 and 2. Tyrannochthonius pallidus, new species,holotype male. 1. Left palp, dorsal view. 2. Part of movablefinger of chela (lateral view) showing sensillum near 10thmacrodenticle, trichobothrium sb at left.82

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintOPILIONIDS (PHALANGIDA) FROM MEXICAN CAVESClarence J. and Marie L. GoodnightDepartment of Biology, Western Michigan UniversityKalamazoo, Michigan 49001This study is based on a number of specimens collectedover a period of years by Mr. James Reddelland Dr. Robert Mitchell and their associates. Thesefield studies involved work in many caves over theentire country of Mexico. An earlier paper (Goodnightand Goodnight, 1971) based on these collectionsdescribed new species of the family Phalangodidae.This paper describes species and lists records inboth the families Phalangodidae and Cosmetidae.True cave forms have not been noted among thecosmetids, but because of their tendency to congregatein moist areas, they are often found abundantlyin caves.The holotypes of new species are deposited in thearachnid collections of the American Museum ofNatural History in New York City. Paratypes are depositedin the collections of the American Museumand in the collections of The Museum, Texas TechUniversity, Lubbock, Texas.SUBORDER LANIATORES THORELLPHALANGODIDAE SIMONPhalangodinae RoewerKaros Goodnight and GoodnightKaros Goodnight and Goodnight, 1944, Amer. Mus.Novitates, no. 1249, p. 3. Goodnight and Goodnight,1953, Amer. Mus. Novitates, no. 1610, p.21. Goodnight and Goodnight, 1971, Assoc. Mex.Cave Stud., Bull. 4, p. 33.Montabunus Goodnight and Goodnight, 1945, Amer.Mus. Novitates, no. 1281, p. 2.Monterella Goodnight and Goodnight, 1945, Amer.Mus. Novitates, no. 1281, p. 1.Chapulobunus Goodnight and Goodnight, 1946, Amer.Mus. Novitates, no. 1210, p. 1.Potosa Goodnight and Goodnight, 1947. Fieldiana:Zool., vol. 32, No.1, pp. 8, 9.Members of the family PhaJangodidae with a commoneye tUbercle, with five dorsal areas on the abdominalscute, the first area without a median line.Lateral margins of dorsal scute with enlarged tuberclesin the region of the first or second dorsal areas;similar tubercles mayor may not be present at thelateral-posterior borders of the fifth area and free tergites.Dorsal scute and free tergites may be unarmed,have low tubercles, or at times have somewhat enlargedspines in the median area. Eye tubercle removedfrom the anterior margin of the cephalothorax;it mayor may not have spines above the eyes, and isat times very low.Legs without conspicuous spines or tubercles, tarsiof third and fourth legs without scopulae, and withsimple untoothed double claws; distitarsus of tarsusof first leg with two segments, distitarsus of tarsus ofsecond leg with three segments. Tarsus of first legwith four segments, remaining tarsi somewhat variablein number of segments. The metatarsi of the legs arenot divided into astragali and calcanea. The maxillarylobe of each second coxa without a ventral projection.Palpus normal in size, armed with spines; cheliceranormal in size.Secondary sexual characteristics of males not conspicuous,but may be present in the form of enlarged83

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintportions of various segments of the legs or in theshape of the fourth femora.Genotype. Karas barbarikas Goodnight and Goodnight,1951, from Chapulhuacan, Hidalgo, 10 May1942.The complex of species within this genus oftenshow close relationships to one another; but becauseof their relative geographic isolation, it appears wiserto consider them separate species. We are includinghere, descriptions of two previously described species.Karas dybasi (Goodnight and Goodnight)Figs. 1-2Potosa dybasi Goodnight and Goodnight, 1947, Fieldiana:Zool., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 8, 9.Male-Total length of body, 3.5 mm. Cephalothorax,1.2 mm. Width of body at widest portion, 2.8mm.I II III IVTrochanter O.4mm 0.5mm 0.6mm 0.6mmFemur 1.4 2.4 1.7 2.4Patella 0.6 0.8 0.7 1.0Tibia 1.1 1.9 1.5 2.2Metatarsus 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.6Tarsus 0.9 2.0 1.2 1.1Total 6.0mm 9.5mm 7.7mm 9.9mmCephalothorax with scattered tubercles. Eye tubercleremoved from the anterior margin of the cephalothorax,with a single median spine, and four smallhair-tipped spines behind it. First dorsal area withouta median line, boundaries of areas distinct, secondand third areas each with a median spine, all areaswith hair-tipped tubercles. In the region of the firstarea, on either side, is a large lateral tubercle; similar,though smaller ones, are located at the disto-Iateralborder of the fifth area and at the lateral margins ofthe second and third free tergites. The posterior borderof the fifth area and the lateral margins of thedorsal scute are bordered with a row of hair-tippedtubercles. Each free·tergite with a row of hair-tippedtUbercles.Ventrally, all surfaces are covered with hair-tippedtubercles. Third coxae with low teeth on both anteriorand posterior borders. Second coxae with enlargedtubercles at the distal areas. Fourth coxae,slightly visible from above, and thickly covered withhair-tipped tubercles. Spiracles visible.All segments of the legs, but the tarsi, roughly tuberculate.First metatarsi with proximal enlargements.Third and fourth femora somewhat curved; thirdcoxae slightly enlarged. Tarsal segments: 4-5-6-6. Distitarsusof first tarsus with two segments, second withthree.Palpus: trochanter, 0.4 mm long, femur, 0.9, patella,0.6, tibia, 0.7, and tarsus, 0.6. Total length,3.5 mm. Pal pus with spines as illustrated.Entire body yellowish brown, darker mottlings oncephalothorax and on dorsal areas. Lateral borders ofscute somewhat darker, with darker mottlings on thelegs and pal pus.Type Locality-Male holotype from HUichihuayan,San Luis PotOSI: Mexico, 20 June 1941, H.S. Dybascollector. Holotype in the collection of the ChicagoNatural History Museum.Record-Cueva de EI Jobo, 5 km NE Xilitla, SanLuis POtOSI: Mexico, 18 November 1972, collected byJames Reddell and Terry Raines.Karos unispinosus (Goodnight and Goodnight)Fig. 3Chapulobunus unispinasus Goodnight and Goodnight,1946, Amer. Mus. Novitates, no. 1310, pp. 1,2,fig. 6-9.Male-Total length of body, 5 mm. Cephalothorax,1.5. Width of body at widest portion, 4.5 mm.I II III IVTrochanter 0.6mm 0.6mm 0.8mm 0.8mmFemur 2.0 2.8 2.4 3.4Patella 0.7 1.0 2.4 1.1Tibia 1.5 2.4 2.2 3.5Metatarsus 2.8 2.6 2.8 3.8Tarsus 1.1 1.9 1.3 1.4Total 8.7mm 11.3mm 10.5mm 14.0mmEntire surface covered with granulations. The eyetubercle is removed from the anterior surface of thecephalothorax, with dorsal tuberculations and with avery low spine over each eye. Dorsal scute with fiveclearly defined areas, first without a median line, witha low median spine in the center of the second andthird areas. A small lateral tuberculation in the regionof the first dorsal area. Free tergites and anal operculumwith tuberculations.Figs. 1-2. Karas dybasi (Goodnight and Goodnight). 1. Dorsal view of male; 2. Lateral view of male.Fig. 3. Karas unispinosus (Goodnight and Goodnightl. Dorsal view of male.Figs. 4-5. Hopfobunus apoafensis, new species. 4. Male penis; 5. Lateral view of male.Fig. 6. Hopfobunus spino-ocuforum, new species. Lateral view of male.Fig. 7. Hopfobunus inops Goodnight and Goodnight. Dorsal view of female.84


AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintVentral surfaces also covered with low tuberculations.All coxae with tuberculations, third coxae, eachwith anterior and posterior rows of low teeth.All segments of the legs covered with tuberculations;only exceptions to this are the tarsi. Thirdfemora somewhat curved, fourth femora somewhatenlarged. Fourth tibia with four ventral enlarged tubercles.Tarsal segments: 4-6-6-6. Distitarsus of firsttarsus with two segments, second with three.Palpus: trochanter, 0.4 mm long, femur 1.1, patella,0.7, tibia, 0.8, and tarsus, 0.6. Total length, 3.6mm. Palpi armed as in figure, with numerous tuberculations.Chelicerae not enlarged, first segments with dorsaltuberculations.Entire body light yellowish brown in color. Trochantersof legs, chelicerae, and palpi somewhat lighter.All femora with proximal and distal shaded areas,lighter in the center, giving a somewhat annulate appearanceto the legs.Type Locality-Female holotype and paratypesfrom Chapulhuacan, Hidalgo, Mexico, 1100 m, 19May 1944, collected by C. Bolivar and D. Pelaez.Record-Male from Chorras de Agua, east ofRayones, 21 km WSW Montemorelos, Nuevo Leon,Mexico, 19 June 1969, collected by S. and J. Peck.Hoplobunus BanksHoplobunus Banks, 1900, J. New York Ent. Soc.,vol. 8, p. 200. Cambridge, 1904, Biologia CentraliAmericana, Arachnids, vol. 2, p. 585. Roewer,1912, Arch. Naturgesch., vol. 78, sect. A, no. 3,p. 149; 1923, Die Weberknechte der Erde, p. 112.Goodnight and Goodnight, 1942, Amer. Mus. Novitates,no. 1211, p. 1; 1945, Amer. Mus. Novitates,no. 1281, p. 3; 1953, Amer. Mus. Novitates, no.1610, p. 20; 1967, Amer. Mus. Novitates, no.2301, p. 1; 1971, Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 4,p.38.Phalangodids with a common eye tubercle whichis usually slightly removed from the anterior marginof the cephalothorax, variously armed above. Abdominalscute with five areas, the first without a medianline. Tarsi of third and fourth legs with untootheddouble claws. Femur of first leg normal, not unusuallyelongate or heavily spined. Tarsus of first leg withfive or more segments. Distitarsus of first tarsus withtwo segments, second with three. Metatarsi not dividedinto astragali and calcanea. Maxillary lobe ofsecond coxa much reduced without any ventral projection.Robust animal with long heavy legs and withthe spiracle widely expanded. Secondary sexual characteristicsof the male highly variable.Genotype. Hoplobunus barretti, Banks, from Cuernavaca,Morelos, Mexico.Hoplobunus apoalensis, new speciesFigs. 4-5Male-Total length of body, 8.7 mm. Cephalothorax,3 mm. Width of body at widest portion, 5.4 mm.TrochanterFemurPatellaTibiaMetatarsusTarsusTotalI1.0mm5.01.74.16.02.320.6mmII1.2mm7.82.16.613.57.638.8mmIII1.5mm6.72.24.67.83.926.7mmIV0.7mm9.02.46.310.84.633.8mmDorsum quite smooth. Eye tubercle only slightlyremoved from the anterior margin of the cephalothorax,in the form of a rounded cone, eyes very small,seemingly lacking a retina. Five dorsal areas clearlyseparated from one another, very small paired tuberclesin the median area of the first, third, and fourthareas. A row of tooth-like tubercles on the lateralmargins, a few similar tubercles on the posterior lateralmargin of the dorsal scute. Free tergites withonly a few low tubercles at the posterior borders. Dorsalsurfaces of the coxae visible from above, first andsecond with a fewsmall spines, fourth coxa,each withtwo small spines, one on the outer surface, one on theinner. Ventral surface smooth, with a few low tubercleson the coxae. First coxae with a few scatteredlarger ones in addition to the low ones; blunt teethare arranged along the anterior and posterior surfacesof the third coxae. Fourth coxa, each with a midventralrow of low tubercles. Spiracles clearly visible.Each free sternite with a few scattered tuberclesand hairs.Legs relatively smooth. First trochanter with sometubercles, third trochanters somewhat enlarged, fourthtrochanters, each with two small spines. Femora quitestraight. Third femora with a small spine on the proximalportion of each one. Fourth femora with a fewspines at the distal portion; fourth patella with twodistal spines. Tarsal segments 6-15-7-7. Distitarsus offirst tarsus with two segments, second with three.Pal pus: trochanter, 1 mm long, femur, 3.6, patella,2.1, tibia, 3, and tarsus, 2.9. Total length, 12.6 mm.Palpi armed as in figure. Tibia and tarsus armed similarlyon both surfaces.Chelicerae enlarged, with numerous hairs.Dorsum, free tergites and free sternites quite darkbrown, contrasting strongly with the lighter appendagesand venter.86

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintType Locality-Male holotype and male paratypefrom Cueva de Apoala, Santiago Apoala, 20 km NAsuncion Nochixtlan, Oaxaca, Mexico, 2 January1973. Collected by James Reddell, David McKenzie,Martha McKenzie, and Stuart Murphy.The distinctive form of the eye tubercle and thespination of the palpi distinguish this species fromother members of the genus.Hoplobunus boneti (Goodnight and Goodnight)Serrobunus boneti Goodnight and Goodnight, 1942,Amer. Mus. Novitates, no. 1211, p. 2, figs. 7-11.Hoplobunus boneti Goodnight and Goodnight, 1971,Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull. 4, pp. 38-39, figs. 18·19.Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de Coatimundi,36 km NNE Valles, 2 January 1973, collected by RoyJameson; Cueva de Tanchipa, 35 km NNE Valles, 10January 1972, collected by Roy Jameson; Sotano deMatapalma, 20 km N Valles, 30 December 1972, collectedby Ronald Fieseler; Sotano de la Tinaja, 11 kmNE Valles, 16 March 1972, collected by G.D. Campbell;Cueva (=Sotano) de los Monos, 15 km NE Valles,30 December 1971, collected by David Honea andRoy Jameson; Sotano de la Pipa, 35 km NNE Valles,2 January 1973, collected by Frank Binney. Tamaulipas:Cueva del Remolino, 8.5 km W Gomez Farias,19 May 1971, collected by R.W. Mitchell.Hoplobunus inops Goodnight and GoodnightFig. 7Hoplobunus inops Goodnight and Goodnight, 1971,Assoc. Mex. Cave StUd., Bull. 4, pp. 40-41, fig. 17.Records-Tamaulipas: Sumidero de EI Jineo, 1 kmNW Gomez Fan'as, 24 November 1971, collected byT. Raines and L. McNatt; Sotano de Vasquez, 7 kmSE Ocampo, 29 December 1972, collected by RoyJameson and Paul Duncan; Cueva de Tres Manantiales,23 km NW Limon, 26 November 1971, collected bySteve Bittinger; Cueva de la Capilla, 13.5 km NWGomez Farias, 14 January 1971, collected by JamesReddell, William Elliott, Jerry Cooke, R.W. Mitchell,and Suzanne Wiley. Oaxaca: Cueva del Nacimiento delRIO San Antonio, 10 km SSW Acatlan, 26 December1972, collected by James Reddell, David McKenzie,Martha McKenzie, and Stuart Murphy, found on wallabout 1300 m from the entrance. Inasmuch as therewas but a single specimen of this last collection, itappeared wise to place it in this species; possibly additionalcollections will better clarify its identity. Usuallyanimals from Oaxaca are different from those ofnorthern Mexico.HopiobunU5 oaxacensis, new speciesFig. 8Male Holotype-Total length of body, 8.2 mm.Cephalothorax, 1.9 mm. Width of body at widestportion, 4.8 mm.TrochanterFemurPatellaTibiaMetatarsusTarsusTotalI0.9mm4.80.73.76.23.019.4mmII1.2mm7.61.96.79.77.933.0mmIII1.6mm6.11.94.57.23.424.7mmIV1.3mm9.02.26.38.53.931.2Dorsum quite smooth, somewhat elongate, someNhat more elongate than that of other species of thisgenus. The eye tubercle is on the anterior margin ofthe cephalothorax, in the form of a cone with a smallspine dorsally. Areas indicated by shallow grooves;each one with a few low tubercles. A row of low tubercleson the lateral and posterior margins of the dorsum,a similar row on the posterior margin of thethree free tergites. Ventral surface quite smooth. Firstcoxae, each with a few spine-bearing tubercles on theanterior surfaces; second coxae, each with a row oflow spine-bearing tubercles; third coxae, each with arow of low tooth-shaped tubercles on the anteriorand posterior surfaces; 4th coxae quite smooth.Legs relatively smooth, all segments with somehairs. First and second trochanters with a few spine·bearing tubercles on the anterior surfaces. Fourthcoxae visible from above, with a few tubercles and aspine at the postero-Iateral margin. Fourth femur withseveral blunt spines on the ventral distal area. Boththird and fourth tibiae with low blunt spines at thedistal area. Fourth patella with small distal spines atthe distal end. Tarsal segments: 7-17-7-7. Distitarsusof first tarsus with two segments, second with three.Palpus: trochanter, 1.2 mm long, femur, 3, patella,1.8, tibia, 2.4, and tarsus, 1.8. Total length, 10.2 mm.Palpus armed retrolaterally as in figure; prolaterally,femur without an apical-median spine, tibia and tarsusarmed similarly to the retrolateral surface.Chelicerae: distal segments greatly enlarged.Dorsum reddish brown with darker markings borderingthe areas. Some darker mottlings in the medianarea of the fifth area and the free tergites, on thepalpae, and on the cheliceral segments.Female-Total length of body, 8.3 mm; cephalothorax,1.9 mm. Width of body at widest portion, 4.5mm. Similar to male in appearance, though somewhatdarker. Spines of the legs were less pronounced as wasthe enlargement of the chelicerae. The tarsal segments87

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintof the females examined were 6-15-7-7, differing fromthe males, whose first tarsi had 7 segments.Type Locality-Male holotype and female para·types from Cueva de Llano Grande, 12 km N SanSebastian de las Grutas, 55 km SSE Oaxaca, Oaxaca.Mexico, 16 December 1972, collected by James Red·dell, David McKenzie, and Stuart Murphy. Found onwalls in darkness throughout cave.Record-Females from Sotano de los Arboles, 5km S San Vicente Lachixio, 50 km SSE Oaxaca,Oaxaca, Mexico, 1 January 1973. Collected by DavidMcKenzie, Martha McKenzie, and Stuart Murphy.H. oaxacensis differs from other members of thisgenus by the distinctive form of the eye tubercle, itsgeneral lack of spination or tuberculation on the dorsum,and the spination of the pal pus.Hoplobunus spino-oculorum, new speciesFig. 6Male-Total length of body, 3.5 mm. Cephalothorax,2.1 mm. Width of body at widest portion, 1.2mm.I II III IVTrochanter O.4mm O.4mm 0.7mm 0.6mmFemur 2.1 3.3 2.3 3.3Patella 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.8Tibia 1.8 2.9 1.9 2.4Metatarsus 2.4 3.6 2.4 2.7Tarsus 1.3 3.6 1.4 3.3Total 8.7mm 14.7mm 9.4mm 13.1mmCephalothorax with some scattered tuberculations,eye tubercle on the anterior margin, in the form of arounded cone. The height is greater than the diameter,thus appears much taller than the eye tubercle ofother members of this genus. The eyes are at the base,and there are several spines on the surface of the tubercle.The abdominal scute somewhat wider in theregion of the fourth coxa, narrowing, then Wideningagain at the posterior margin. The five areas have lowtuberculation, though the boundaries are without suchtuberculations. First area of dorsal scute without medianline; the posterior margin with low granulations.Free tergites with similar, though somewhat largergranulations. Venter covered with low hair-tipped tubercles,a row of toothlike tubercles on both the anteriorand posterior surfaces of the third coxae. Freesternites each with a row of low tubercles, spiraclesvisible.All segments, but metatarsi and tarsi, of legs withhairs. Fourth coxa visible from above, with some lowhair-bearing tubercles on its dorsal surface. Trochan·ters with some tubercles, most conspicuous on thefourth trochanters. Third trochanters somewhat enlarged.Third and fourth femora, patellae, and tibiaewith low hair-bearing tubercles. Metatarsi not dividedinto astragali and calcanea. Tarsal segments: 5-11·7·6.Distitarsus of first tarsus with 2 segments, of secondwith 3.Palpus: trochanter, 0.6 mm long, femur, 1.9, patella,0.9, tibia, 1.2, and tarsus, 1.2. Total length, 5.8mm. All surfaces of palpi covered with low tubercles,which are most conspicuous on the trochanters, femora,and patellae. All segments armed as in figure.Chelicerae enlarged, first segment, dorsally with lowspine-like tubercles.Entire animal reddish brown, areas slightly darker,some darker mottling on the palpal segments, all segmentsof the legs slightly lighter.Female-Total length of body, 3 mm. Cephalothorax,1.1 mm. Width of body at widest portion,2.1 mm.Similar in appearance to the male, but without theenlarged chelicerae.Type Locality-Male holotype and male and femaleparatypes from Cueva del Guayabo, 12 km NE ValleNacional, Oaxaca, Mexico, 29 December 1972. Collectedby James Reddell, David McKenzie, MarthaMcKenzie, and Stuart Murphy from the floors andwalls of the cave in total darkness.H. spino-oculorum is a very distinctive form withthe high eye tubercle with its unusual spination andthe spination of the pal pal segments.Hoplobunus planus, new speciesFig. 9Female Holotype-Total length of body, 2.4 mm.Cephalothorax, 0.9 mm. Width of body at widestportion, 1.6 mm.+-Fig. 8. Hoplobunus oaxacensis, new species. Lateral view of male.+-Fig. 9. Hoplobunus planus, new species. Dorsal view of female.+- Figs. 10-12. Paramitraceras granulatus Cambridge. 10. Lateral view of eye tubercle of male; 11. Male penis; 12. Dorsal view ofmale.+-Figs. 13·15. Stygnomma tUberculata, new species. 13. Dorsal view of male. 14. Metatarsus of third leg of male. illustratingthe enlargement of the distal portion; 15. Lateral view of male.+-Fig. 16. Cynorta guadalupensis, new species. Dorsal view of male.+-Figs. 17-20. Paecilaema lucifugum, new species. 17. Male penis; 18. Lateral view of male palpus; 19. Free sternites. showingposition of stigmil in relationship to fourth coxa and free sternites; 20. Dorsal view of male.88

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint1119:#.~89

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintI IITrochanter 0.2mm 0.2mm 0.5mm O.4mmFemur 1.8 3.3 2.2 3.3Patella 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.7Tibia 1.4 2.9 1.9 2.2Metatarsus 1.6 2.4 2.0 2.5Tarsus 1.1 4.1 1.9 2.4Total 6.6mm 13.6mm 8.9mm 11.5mmEntire dorsum smooth, with only very fine granulationson the surface. Eye tubercle on the anteriormargin, rounded above, without eyes. Posterior boundariesof the cephalothorax and the dorsal areaspoorly defined. No tubercles or spines on the dorsum,with small lateral enlargements in the region of thefourth coxae. Venter likewise smooth. Free sternitesand anal operculum each with a few scattered tubercles.Spiracles clearly visible.Legs quite smooth, with occasional scattered hairs.First coxae, each with four small tubercles on the anteriorsurface, a row of small tubercles on the anteriormargin of each of the second coxae. First tarsal segmentsof the third and fourth tarsi unusually elongate.Tarsal segments: 5-10-6·6. Distitarsus of first tarsuswith 2 segments, second with three.Pal pus: trochanter, 0.2 mm long, femur 0.9, patella,0.5, tibia, 0.8, and tarsus, 0.7. Total length,3.2 mm. Pal pus armed as in figure. Chel icera with afew hairs and some very low granulations.Entire body and appendages a uniform light yellow.Type Locality-Female holotype from Cueva deSan Nicolas, 10 km SW Aquismon, San Luis POtOSI:Mexico, 16 July 1968, collected by John Fish, DwightDeal, and Duane Faith.H. planus most nearly resembles H. inops Goodnightand Goodnight, but differs in the form of thelateral tubercle on the dorsum and in the number oftarsal segments.Hoplobunus robustus Goodnight and GoodnightHoplobunus robustus Goodnight and Goodnight,1971. Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud., Bull. 4, p. 42, fig.21.Records-Veracruz: Cueva de la Cascada, 1 km SWTequila, 6 August 1967, collected by James Reddell,John Fish, and T.R. Evans. Cueva del Ojo de AguaGrande (=Cueva del Nacimiento Grande), 10 km NPotrero Viejo, 22 August 1965, collected by JamesReddell, John Fish, and T.R. Evans.Paramitraceras CambridgeParamitraceras Cambridge, 1904, Biologia Central iAmericana, Arachnida, vol. 2, p. 575. Roewer,90"''V1912, Arch. Naturgesch., vol. 78, sect. A, no. 3,p. 155 (in part); 1923, Die Weberknechte der Erde,p. 117. Goodnight and Goodnight, 1953, Amer.Mus. Novitates, no. 1610, p. 23.Panzosus Roewer, 1949, Senckenbergiana, vol. 30,nos. 1-3, p. 12.Solola Roewer, 1949, Senckenbergiana, vol. 30, nos.1-3, p. 30.Phalangodids with a common eye tubercle locatedon the anterior margin of the cephalothorax. Eye tuberclein the form of a forward-slanting, pointed cone.Abdominal scute with five areas, the first without amedian line. On each side of the first area there is asmall lateral enlargement. Tarsi of third and fourthlegs without scopulae and with untoothed claws. Femurof first leg not enlarged. Tarsus of first leg withthree or four segments. Distitarsus of first tarsus withtwo segments; second also with two. Metatarsi of legsnot divided into calcanea and astragali. Maxillarylobes of second coxae without ventral projections.Chelicerae enlarged, palpi usually heavy, with littleventral spination. Secondary sexual characters of themale usually seen in the heavier chelicerae.Genotype: Paramitraceras granulatus Cambridge.Paramitraceras granulatus CambridgeFigs. 10-12Paramitraceras granulatus Cambridge, 1904, BiologiaCentrali-Americana, Arachnida, vol. 2, p. 575, pI.54, figs. 3, 3a, 3b. Roewer, 1912, Arch. Naturgesch.,vol. 78, sect. A, no. 3, p. 155; 1923, DieWeberknechte der Erde, P. 117, fig. 117. Goodnightand Goodnight, 1944, Amer. Mus. Novitates,no. 1249, pp. 6, 7, figs. 10-12; 1953, Amer. Mus.Novitates, no. 1610, pp. 23-24, figs. 11, 12.Paramitraceras chichivaca Goodnight and Goodnight,1947, Fieldiana: Zool., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 5-6,fig. 2.Panzosus hispidulus Roewer, 1939, Senckenbergiana,vol. 30, nos. 1-3, p. 12, pI. 1, figs. 3a-f.Solola robusta Roewer, 1939, Senckenbergiana, vol.30, nos. 1-3, p. 30, pi 6, figs. 45a-d.Male-Total length of body, 4.4 mm. Cephalothorax,0.8 mm. Width of body at widest point, 3.1 mm.I II III IVTrochanter O.4mm 0.6mm 0.6mm 0.6mmFemur 2.0 2.9 2.4 3.2Patella 0.7 1.1 0.8 1.0Tibia 1.4 2.7 2.0 2.7Metatarsus 1.7 2.8 2.4 3.2Tarsus 0.7 1.8 1.1 1.3Total 6.9mm 11.9mm 9.3mm 12.0mm

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintCephalothorax quite smooth, eye tubercle slightlyremoved from the anterior margin (see illustration).with many tubercles. The small median spine has tuberclesat the base. Dorsal areas, free tergites, and analoperculum thickly covered with tubercles. Boundariesof dorsal areas parallel, first area without a mediantine. Dorsum strongly arched. All surfaces of the venterwith low tubercles, many of which are hair-tipped_First coxae, each with a row of larger tubercles in themedian area, third coxae, each with anterior and posteriorrows of tooth-like tubercles. Spiracles visibleat junction of fourth coxae and first free sternites,several enlarged tubercles at the posterior border.Legs having all segments but the tarsi with hairtippedtubercles. Third and fourth femora slightlycurved. Tarsal segments: 3-4-5-5. Distitarsi of bothfirst and second tarsi with two segments.Pal pus: trochanter, 0.4 mm long; femur, 1.2; patella,0.7; tibia, 1; and tarsus, 0.7. Total length, 4 mm.Pal pus armed as in illustration. Tibia dorso-ventrallyflattened.Chelicerae with many hairs, otherwise smooth.Median dorsal portion of first segment with a row oftubercles.Entire animal reddish-yellow in color, appendagessomewhat lighter than the dorsum.Record-Cueva del Guayabo, 12 km N Valle Nacional,Oaxaca, Mexico, 29 December 1972, collected byJames Reddell, David McKenzie, Martha McKenzie,and Stuart Murphy.This record represents a new locality for this highlyvariable animal; former collections from Guatemala,Chiapas, and Tabasco have illustrated the wide rangeof variations of this widely distributed form.Pellobunus mexicanus Goodnight and GoodnightPellobunus mexicanus Goodnight and Goodnight,1971, Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud., Bull. 4, p. 44, figs.14-16.Records-Sotano Encantado, 3 km W La Cienega,20 km NNE Pinal de Amoles, Queretaro, Mexico,2 June 1972, collected by Ron Ralph.Stygnomma Roewer Emend. GoodnightPhalangodes Packard, 1888, Mem. Natl. Acad. Sci.Washington, vol. 4, p. 52 (in part).Scotolemon Banks, 1901, Amer. Nat., vol. 35, p. 671(in part).Neoscotolemon Roewer, 1912, Arch. Naturgesch.,vol. 78, sect. A, no. 3, p. 139 (in part); 1923, DieWeberknechte der Erde, pp. 112-113.Stygnomma Roewer, 1912, Mem. Soc. Sci. Nat. Neuchatel,vol. 5, p. 155; 1923, Die Weberknechte derErde, p. 144. Petrunkevitch, 1925, Trans. ConnecticutAcad. Arts Sci., vol. 17, pp. 62-63. Goodnightand Goodnight, 1951, Amer. Mus. Novitates,no. 1491, p. 3; 1953, Amer. Mus. Novitates, no.1610, pp. 30-31.Zygobunus Chamberlin, 1924, Bull. Mus. Compo Zool.,vol. 62, p. 245. Roewer, 1927, Abhandl. Naturwiss.Ver. Bremen, vol. 26, pp. 545-546. Goodnightand Goodnight, 1942, Amer. Mus. Novitates,no. 1198, p. 4.Stygnommatiplus Roewer, 1927, Abhandl. Ver. Naturwiss.Bremen, vol. 26, p. 543.Poascola Roewer, 1922, Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien,vol. 46, p. 281.Antagona Goodnight and Goodnight, 1942, Amer.Mus. Novitates, no. 1184, p. 6.Citranus Goodnight and Goodnight, 1942, Amer. Mus.Novitates, no. 1188, p. 4.Rula Goodnight and Goodnight, 1942, Amer. Mus.Novitates, no. 1188, p. 13; 1945, Ciencia, vol. 6,no. 1, pp. 62-63.Flaccus Goodnight and Goodnight, 1937, Fieldiana:Zool., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 9-10.Stygnommatidae Mello Leitao, 1949, Bol. Mus. Nac.Rio de Janeiro, no. 94, p. 5.Members of the family Phalangodidae without acommon eye tubercle and with five dorsal areas on theabdominal scute, the first without a median line. Tarsiof third and fourth legs without scopulae and withsimple untoothed claws. Femur of first leg normal.Distitarsus of first tarsus with two segments; secondwith two or three. Metatarsi not divided into astragaliand calcanea. Pal pus and chelicera somewhat enlarged,varying with individual species. Maxillary lobe of secondcoxa without a ventral projection. Secondary sexualcharacters of the male appear as increased spinationof the pal pus and chelicera and in the enlargementof some portion of the metatarsus of the thirdleg.Genotype: Stygnomma ·fuhrmanni Roewer fromColombia.Stygnomma tuberculata, new speciesFigs. 13-15Male Holotype-Total length of body 2 mm. Cephalothorax,0.6 mm. Width of body at widest portion,1.1 mm. Width of body, including expanded fourthcoxae, 1.7 mm.91

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintI II III IVTrochanter 0.2mm 0.2mm 0.2mm 0.3mmFemur 0.9 1.4 1.3 1.7Patella 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5Tibia 0.7 1.4 1.1 1.5Metatarsus 1.0 1.6 1.5 2.1Tarsus 0.7 1.3 0.9 1.0Total 3.9mm 6.3mm 5.4mm 7.1mmSmall animals, eyes separated, not on a commoneye tubercle on the cephalothorax. All dorsal surfaces,including that of the fourth coxae, covered with tubercles.Five dorsal areas distinct, boundaries parallel,first four areas with many tubercles, the central pairsof these tubercles are somewhat larger on the firstfour dorsal areas. Free tergites, each, with an enlargedrow of tubercles along the individual posterior borders.All ventral surfaces with tuberculations. Spiracleconcealed by the 4th coxae, which are much widenedlaterally.All segments of the legs, except the metatarsi andtarsi, with low tuberculations. Third metatarsi withdistal portion somewhat enlarged. Tarsal segments:4-6-5-5. Distitarsus of first tarsus with two segments,second with three.Palpus: trochanter, 0.2 mm long; femur, 0.6; patella,0.4; tibia, 0.4; and tarsus, 0.4. Total length, 2.0mm. Palpi armed as in figure. The proximal ventralspines of the femora are median in position. Cheliceraenormal in size.Entire body of animal light yellowish brown, tuberclessomewhat darker. Chelicerae very light in color,palpi dorsally with some darker mottling. Venterlighter, some darker mottlings on the cephalothorax.Type Locality-Male holotype from Cueva de losCuarteles, 10 km SW Aldama, Tamaulipas, Mexico,23 December 1972, collected by James Reddell, DavidMcKenzie, Martha McKenzie, and Stuart Murphy.S. tuberculata is most closely related to S. annulipesGoodnight and Goodnight, but lacks the typicalbanding of the legs and possesses a different numberof tarsal segments.COSMETIDAE SIMONCosmetinae CambridgeCynorta C. L. KochCosmetus Perty, 1833, Delectus animalium articulatorum,fasc. 3, pp. 203-308 (in part). Gervais,1844, in Walckenaer, C.A. and F.L.P. Gervais,Histoire naturelle des insectes, apteres, vol. 3,p. 115 (in part).Cynorta C.L. Koch, 1839, Ubers Arachniden, vol. 2,p. 2; 1839, in Hahn, C.W. and C.L. Koch, DieArachniden, vol. 7, pp. 100-102. Cambridge, 1904,Biologia Centrali-Americana, Arachnida, vol. 2,p. 557. Roewer, 1912, Arch. Naturgesch., vol. 78,sect. A, no. 10, p. 31; 1923, Die Weberknechteder Erde, p. 310: 1926, Abhandl. Naturwiss. Ver.Bremen, vol. 16, p. 555; 1928, Abhandl. Naturwiss.Ver. Bremen, vol. 16, p. 570. Goodnight andGoodnight, 1953, Amer. Mus. Novitates, no. 1610,pp.37-38.The above is a much abbreviated synonymy of thisgenus. In 1953 Goodnight and Goodnight synonymizedmany of the Mexican genera into the singlegenus Cynorta. This lengthy synonymy is in that publication.Members of the genus Cynorta have simple untootheddouble claws on the third and fourth tarsi,with but six segments in the first tarsus. Distitarsi ofboth first and second tarsi with three segments. Dorsumwith five areas, variously armed with tuberclesand spines, without a median large spine on the thirdarea.Genotype: Cynorta conspersa (perty)Cynorta jamesoni, new speciesFigs. 23-24Male-Total length of body, 6 mm. Cephalothorax,1.7 mm. Width of body at widest point, 4.3 mm.TrochanterFemurPatellaTibiaMetatarsusTarsusTotalI0.6mm4.01.12.95.32.516.4mmII0.6mm10.21.78.111.46.338.3mmIII0.7mm6.91.84.06.33.222.9mmIV0.8mm8.81.96.08.83.629.9mmCephalothorax smooth, eye tubercle removed fromthe anterior margin, each eye with a single small tubercleabove it. Dorsal scute smooth, first area withpaired tubercles, third with paired spines. Each freetergite with a row of inconspicuous tubercles alongthe posterior margin. Ventral surface likewise smooth,first coxae, each with two rows of tubercles on theanterior border; third coxae, each with a row oftooth-shaped tubercles on both anterior and posteriormargins, but confined to the lateral areas. Each freesternite with a few small hair-tipped tubercles at theposterior border. Stigma visible between the fourthcoxae and first free sternites.Male penis, a slender chitinized shaft with a slightlyenlarged tip which appears not to be sclerotized, butwith a few bristle-like hairs.Legs quite elongate and slender. Femur, patella,92

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFigs. 21-22. Vonones ornata (Wood). 21. Male from 7 km NW Gomez Farias; 22. Female from Gomez Fanas.Figs. 23-24. Cynorta jamesoni, new species. 23. Male penis; 24. Dorsal view of male.and tibia, all with some tuberculations which are quitesimilar on all legs.Palpus: trochanter, 0.6 mm long; femur, 1.9; patella,0.9; tibia, 1.6; and tarsus, 0.8. Total length, 5.8mm. Chelicerae not enlarged.Entire animal, including legs, reddish brown, withdarker mottlings on lateral borders, central areas, andover and behind the eye tubercle. Legs with somedarker markings, palpi with darker areas on the lateralmargins, particularly conspicuous on the femur andtibia.Type Locality-Male holotype from Sotano de laEstrella, 36 km NNE Valles, San Luis POtOSI: Mexico,3 January 1973, collected by Roy Jameson.Paratypes-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de la Cuesta,36 km NNE Valles, 4 January 1973, collected by RoyJameson; Sotano de Puerto de los Lobos, 2 km S SanFrancisco, 16 km W Sta. Catarina, 14 September 1968,collected by William Elliott; Tamaulipas: Sotano deVasquez, 7 km SE Ocampo, 29 December 1972, collectedby Roy Jameson and Paul Duncan; Grutas deEI Puente, 17 km SE Ocampo, 13 July 1967; Cueva dela Florida, 16 km SSW Mante, 28 May 1968, collectedby James Reddell in the Right Hand Passage; Cueva deEI Pachon, 18 km SSW Mante, collected 8 June 1967by Rick Remington and 6 June 1967 by RW. Mitchell;Cueva de la Mina, 7 km NW Gomez Farias, 14March 1972, collected by G.D. Campbell.This species is not very distinctive in its characteristics,yet differs from other Cynortas in the formof the pal pus, the tarsal numbers, and the generalconfiguration of the body. Further collections mayrequire a reevaluation of this species; but it appears tobe quite widespread and somewhat variable as toshade of brown, degree of tuberculation on the freetergites and dorsum, and in general appearance.Cynorta guadalupensis, new speciesFig. 16Male-Total length of body, 5.9 mm. Cephalothorax,2.1 mm. Width of body at widest portion, 4.8mm.I II III IVTrochanter 0.6mm 0.8mm 1.0mm 1.2mmFemur 3.8 7.9 5.6 7.8Patella 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.9Tibia 1.6 6.1 3.6 4.8Metatarsus 4.4 8.4 3.3 7.5Tarsus 2.7 6.0 3.6 4.2Total 14.3mm 30.6mm 18.8mm 27.4mmDorsum smooth, eye tubercle low, centrally locatedon the cephalothorax. Dorsal areas clearly visible.Median paired tubercles on the first area, medianpaired spines on the third. Free tergites with low tubercleson their posterior margins. Ventral surfacessmooth, with scattered hairs. Free sternites with scatteredhairs.Legs all quite similar in appearance; all segmentsbut the metatarsi and tarsi with hair-bearing tubercles.Pal pus: trochanter, 0.9 mm long; femur, 1.8; patella,1.2; tibia, 1.8; and tarsus, 1.2. Total length, 6.9mm. Palpi typically flattened femur and tibia. Ventralborder of femur with low tooth-like projections. Cheliceraenormal in size.Dorsum dark brownish-red, with white markingsas indicated in drawing. Black net-like markings presenton the lateral border of the dorsal scute. Chelice-93

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintral and pal pal segments also with black mottlings.Cephalothorax with some darker mottlings. Legssomewhat lighter than the dorsum.Type Locality-Male holotype from POlO de Guadalupe,10.5 km WSW Aquismon, San Luis POtOSI:Mexico, 24 November 1972. Collected by James Reddell,Terry Raines, and Eraclio Gonzales from a wallof the overhang above a spring-fed well.Though related to Cynorta triangulata Goodnightand Goodnight, this species has a distinctive dorsalcolor pattern and tarsal number.Paecilaema C.L. KochCosmetus Perty, 1833, Delectus animalium articulatorum,fasc. 3, pp. 303, 304 (in part). C.L. Koch,1839, in Hahn, C.W. and C.L. Koch, Die Arachniden,vol. 7, pp. 109-111.Flirtea (in part) plus Paecilaema C.L. Koch, 1839,Ubers Arachniden, vol. 2, pp. 20, 21; 1839, inHahn, C.W. and C.L. Koch, Die Arachniden, vol. 7,pp. 97, 103. Roewer, 1923, Die Weberknechte derErde, p. 364.Poecilaema L. Agassiz, 1846, Nomenclator zoologicus,Arachnida, p. 11. Plus Cynorta Simon, 1879, Ann.Soc. Ent. Belgique, vol. 22, pp. 191, 200 (in part).Ortonio Wood, 1869, Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc., vol. 13,no. 2, p. 438.Erginus Simon, 1879, Ann. Soc. Ent. Belgique, vol.22, p. 207,208 (in part).Cosmetellus Roewer, 1928, Abhandl. Naturwiss. Ver.Bremen, vol. 26, p. 627.Zarax Sorensen, 1932, K. Danske Vidensk. Selsk, Skr.vol. 29, p. 322 (in part).Parahauculus Roewer, 1933, Ann. Naturhist. Mus.Wien, vol. 46, p. 291.Soaresella Goodnight and Goodnight, 1947, Amer.Mus. Novitates, no. 1340, p. 10.Zaraxes Roewer, 1947, Senckenbergiana, vol. 28, nos.1-3, p. 32.Cosmetiplus Roewer, 1947, Senckenbergiana, vol. 28,nos. 1-3, p. 32.Paecilaema Goodnight and Goodnight, 1953, Amer.Mus. Novitates, no. 1610, p. 55.Because of the length of the synonymy for thisgenus, this represents an abbreviated listing. The entiresynonymy is in Goodnight and Goodnight, 1953.Cosmetids with simple untoothed claws on thethird and fourth legs, with more than six segments inthe tarsus of the first leg. Distitarsi of both first andsecond tarsi with three segments. Dorsum with fiveareas, variously armed with tubercles and spines.Secondary sexual characteristics of the male usuallypresent as increased spination of the femur of thefourth leg.Genotype: Paecilaema U-flavum (Perty).Paecilaema lucifugum, new speciesFigs. 17-20Male-Total length of body, 7.8 mm. Cephalothorax,2.7 mm. Width of body at widest portion, 6.6mm.TrochanterFemurPatellaTibiaMetatarsusTarsusTotalI0.7mm2.71.11.82.61.910.8mmII0.7mm5.71.44.24.83.920.7mmVonones SimonIII0.9mm4.61.42.84.11.315.1mmIV1.6mm5.51.94.56.22.722.4mmDorsum widely flared, fourth coxae clearly visiblefrom above. Eye tubercle located in the median portionof the cephalothorax, without dorsal spines.Areas not clearly defined, but very small tubercles inmedian section of first area; paired spines on fourtharea. Dorsal surface relatively smooth. Venter withsome small granulations and hairs. First and secondfree tergites each with a small lateral extension as illustrated.Legs having all segments with scattered tuberclesand hairs. Fourth legs enlarged, with spines and tubercleson fourth femur, patella, and tibia. These aresmaller on the patella and tibia. Fourth trochanterwith inner heavy spines; fourth coxae with dorsolateralspine. Tarsal segments: 7-11-7-8. Distitarsi ofboth first and second tarsi, three in number.Palpus: trochanter, 0.8 mm long; femur, 1.3; patella,1; tibia, 1.3; and tarsus, 0.8. Total length, 5.2mm. All segments clothed with small hairs and scatteredtuberculations. Chelicerae normal in size.Entire dorsum reddish brown, darker markings onspines and at lateral borders. A complex white patternis present on the cephalothorax and the lateral andposterior borders of the dorsum. Scattered yellowishmarkings also are present in the median area. Thefirst three pairs of legs are somewhat lighter than thedorsum, while the fourth pair are somewhat darker.Type Locality-Male holotype from 8 km NWParaje Nuevo, Veracruz, Mexico, 3 August 1967, collectedby J. Reddell and J. Fish.Gonyleptes Say, 1821, Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia,vol. 2, p. 68. Wood, 1870, Proc. Essex Inst.,94

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintvol. 6, p. 37.Vonones Simon, 1879, Ann. Soc. Ent. Belgique, vol.11, p. 212. Banks, 1909, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci.Philadelphia, vol. 61, p. 228; 1909, Rept. Exp.Sta. Cuba, vol. 1, p. 170. Roewer, 1912, Arch.Naturgesch., vol. 78, sect. A, no. 10, p. 22; 1923,Die Weberknechte der Erde, p. 302. Goodnightand Goodnight, 1953, Amer. Mus. Novitates, no.1610, pp. 59-60.Inasmuch as there is a very long synonymy for thisgenus, only a portion has been used here. For a completesynonymy, please see Goodnight and Goodnight,1953.Cosmetids with simple untoothed double claws onthe third and fourth legs, with five segments in thefirst tarsus. Distitarsi of both first and second tarsiwith three segments. Dorsum with five areas, variouslyarmed with tubercles and spines, without a large medianspine on the third area.Genotype: Vonones octotuberculatus Simon.Vonones ornata (Wood)Figs. 21-22Gonyleptes ornatus Wood, 1870, P. Essex Inst., vol. 6,Comm., p. 37.Cynorta sayi Simon, 1879, Ann. Soc. Ent. Belgique,vol. 22, p. 200.Cosmetus albolineatus Soerensen, 1884, Naturh. Tidsskr.,ser. 3, vol. 13, p. 591.Cynorta sayi Weed, 1893, Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc.,vol. 20, p. 295. Banks, 1900, Proc. Acad. Philadelphia,p. 541; 1901, Amer. Natural., vol. 35, p. 671.Vonones modestus Banks, 1909, Rep. Exp. Sta. Cuba,vol. 2, p. 171.Libitioides ornata Roewer, 1912, Arch. Naturg., vol.78, sect. A, fasc. 10, p. 15; 1923, Die Weberknechteder Erde, p. 196, fig. 317.Vonones ornata Goodnight and Goodnight, 1953,Systematic Zoology, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 179; 1958,Indiana Acad. Sci., vol. 67, p. 322.Male-Total length of body, 3.9 mm. Cephalothorax,1.6 mm. Width of body at widest point, 3.3 mm.I II III IVTrochanter 0.2mm 0.3mm 0.2mm 0.3mmFemur 1.1 2.2 2.2 2.0Patella 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.8Tibia 0.8 1.8 1.8 1.6Metatarsus 1.1 2.2 2.2 2.4Tarsus 0.8 2.0 2.0 1.0Total 4.4mm 9.1mm 9.0mm 8.1mmEntire dorsum covered with fine granulations whichare larger at the posterior portion of the dorsal scute,the free tergites and the free sternites. Eye tubercleremoved from the anterior margin of the cephalothorax.Five areas of the dorsal scute clearly defined;with very low paired tubercles on the first area, lowspine on the third area, and a row of small tuberclesin the median portion of the fourth area. Ventrallythe surfaces are finely granulate. The anterior-lateralsurface of the fourth coxae each bear a group of smalltubercles.All segments of the legs but the tarsi with granulations.Third and fourth femora somewhat curved. Tarsalsegments: 5-10-7-7. Distitarsi of both first andsecond tarsi with three segments.Palpus: trochanter, 0.2 mm long; femur, 0.7; patella,0.4; tibia, 0.7; and tarsus, 0.3. Total length, 2.3mm. Pal pus characteristically flattened; first segmentof chelicera dorsally with tuberculations.General all over coloration of the body is reddishbrown, white markings as in illustrations. Some darkermottling is present along the lateral and posterior margins.Legs somewhat darker at distal ends. Palpi slightlylighter than dorsum.Female-Total length of body, 3.7 mm. Cephalothorax,0.9; width of body at widest portion, 2.5 mm.Similar to male, but with somewhat smaller spineson the third area; and in the specimen illustrated, thefourth femora were somewhat squared off at theiranterior borders.Records-Tamaulipas: 7 km NW Gomez Farias,10 January 1971, collected by J. Reddell and S.Wiley; road cut near Gomez Far(as, 15 March 1972,collected by R.W. Mitchell; 4 km N Joya de Salas,January 1972, collected by W. Russell; Nuevo Leon:6 km SW Bustamante, 20 February 1972, collectedby James Reddell; Redondo, 40 km S Monterrey,September 1971, collected by P. Strickland and D.Honea.Members of this species are found in many localities,from Florida, the gulf states, and Texas, and intoMexico. In this large area, the individuals illustrate awide range of variations, presenting the difficult prob·lem of what constitutes a valid variation or a newspecies! We have preferred a more conservative approachand have included illustrations of the variationswe have recognized. For a more detailed discussionof this problem, please consult Goodnightand Goodnight, 1953a.LITERATURE CITEDGoodnight, Clarence J., and Marie l. Goodnight. 1953. Theopilionid fauna of Chiapas, Mexico and adjacent areas(Arachnoidea, Opiliones). Amer. Mus. Novitates, no. 1610,81 pp.95

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintGoodnight, Clarence J., and Marie L. Goodnight. 1953a. Taxonomicrecognition of variation in Opiliones. SystematicZoology, 1(4):174-180.Goodnight, Clarence J., and Marie L. Goodnight. 1971. Opilionids(Phalangidal of the Family Phalangodidae fromMexican caves. Assoc. Mexican Cave Stud. Bull., 4:33-45.96

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintA REVIEW OF THE CAVERNICOLOUS CATOPINAE (COLEOPTERA; LEIODIDAE)OF MEXICO, BELIZE, AND GUATEMALAStewart B. PeckDepartment of Biology, Carleton UniversityOttawa, Ontario, CanadaINTRODUCTIONThe Leiodid subfamily Catopinae contains a significantpercentage of the cave beetle fauna of theWorld. This is especially true in Eurasia where thetribe Bathysciini, containing 883 species and subspecies(581 species) has 711 of these species andsubspecies as troglobites (Lanyrie, 1967). This tribedoes not occur in North and Central American caves.Rather, the tribes Ptomaphagini and Nemadini arefound in caves in this geographic region, with onlyPtomaphagini containing troglobites; and this beingthe comparatively low number of 16 species.The purpose of this paper is to bring together allpublished and new records of Catopinae from caves inMexico, Belize (British Honduras), and Guatemala.No cave records are known for Catopinae in the restof Central America. Most of these records are basedon my own collections, or materials assembled byvarious AMCS members. In addition to the caverecords I give records for some of the species fromepigean habitats to document this aspect of theirbiology.Without exception in the geographic region underconsideration, the family and subfamily is easilyrecognized by the antennae with segment 8 beingsmaller than segments 7 and 9 (Figs. 1 and 2). Theother large subfamily of Leiodidae, Leiodinae, is notknown from caves in North or Central America, butsince one species, Aglyptinus dimorphicus, makes upan important part of the guano fauna of caves inJamaica (Peck, 1972) it may yet appear with furthercollecting in Mexico or Central America.At present all specimens except the types are beingheld in the author's collection. As additional specimensbecome available through additional collecting,representatives will be placed in the same collectionsthat have received material from me previously. SeePeck (1973) for a Iist of these repositories.METHODSDissections of specimens were made from alcoholor Barber's Fluid preserved material. Drawings wereprepared using an ocular grid and squared paper, withthe genital pieces held immobile in a dish under acover slip under alcohol. The scanning electron microscopephotomicrographs were made from carbon-goldcoated specimens at low Kv (1.5-3.7) (Howden andLing, 1973).ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe following AMCS members and associatedpeople are thanked for efforts in collecting newmaterial: J. Cooke, W. Elliott, P. Lynn, M. McEachern,D. McKenzie, M. McKenzie, R.W. Mitchell, S.Murphy, T. Raines, R. Ralph, J. Reddell, W. Russell,J. White, and S. Wiley. William Elliott and JamesReddell are especially thanked for their collectingefforts. Barbara McLeod of Belmopan, Belize, isgratefully thanked for her aid and assistance in my1972 field work in Belize and Guatemala. L.E.C. Lingis thanked for his assistance on the SEM photo-97

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintgraphs. My wife, Jarmila, helped with the field workand figures. Field work and other support has beenprovided by a Canadian National Research Counciloperating grant for 1971 and 1972 and the President'sResearch Grant of Carleton University for1972-1973.KEY TO GENERAThe following key is designed to work only for thegeographic region under consideration, and has beenadapted from Peck (1973).1a. Apex of hind tibia with two long ventral spursand an outer fringe of many short and equalspinules (Fig. 3). Pronotum with transversestriae. Tribe Ptomaphagini 21b. Apex of hind tibia with two long ventral spursand four (generally) shorter dorsal spurs (Fig.4). Pronotum without transverse striae. TribeNemadiniGenus Dissochaetus2a. Front tibia with distinct comb of short spineson outer margin as well as on apex (Fig. 5).Mesepimeron narrow (Fig. 7) .. . . . . . . . . . . .. Genus Proptomaphaginus2b. Front tibia with comb of short spines only onapex (Fig. 6). Mesepimeron broad (Fig. 8).... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Genus PtomaphagusGenus Proptomaphaginus SzymczakowskiDiagnosis-Mesothoracic epimeron (Fig. 7) clearlytransverse. Male protarsi not expanded. Flattened protibiawith row of short equal spines along outer margin(Fig. 5).These features are illustrated in Szymczakowski(1969a) and Peck (1973). A diagnostic character previouslyused, a bilobed aedeagal apex, with the orificeon the ventral surface (Peck, 1970) no longerholds for the genus with the inclusion of the followingspecies, which has a dorsal orifice cutting the rightside of the aedeagus. This last feature more closelyresembles that of some Ptomaphaginus.Only three described species are known in thisgenus, one from Puerto Rico and two from Cuba(Szymczakowski, 1969a, and Peck, 1970). An undescribedspecies occurs in the Dominican Republic(personal data). One and one half months of intensivefield work in Jamaica has been unable to find thegenus there (personal data). The species described belowis the only known representative of the genusfrom the continental mainland, and is probably a relictof a former mainland distribution of the genus.Proptomaphaginus microps, new speciesHolotype male and allotype female in MuseumComparative Zoology, Harvard University. Type locality:Cueva del Salitre, Xilitla, San Luis PotosI.Mexico, 710 m elev. Type data: 20 July 1969, S. & J.Peck. Paratypes: two males and two females withsame data, and one male, Sotano de Guadalupe,10.5 km WSW Aquismon, San Luis POtOSI: Mexico,24 November 1972, T. Raines; all in author's collection.Diagnosis-The small eyes, long wings, charactersof the aedeagus and spermatheca, and occurrence inMexico clearly separate this species from all others inthe genus.Description-Length 2.2 mm, width 1.0 mm. Colorreddish brown. Shape elongate oval, convex. Pubescenceshort. Eye diameter slightly less than 1/3 of distancebetween antennal socket and edge of head whenmeasured across eye, about eight facets visible, somepigment detectable. Antennae normal, reaching tobase of pronotum when laid back; segment II to VIprogressively shorter; VII and IX equal in Width, VIIlonger; VIII transverse. Pronotum width 0.9 mm atbase, 0.5 mm long, widest at base, transverse striaedistinct and oblique; male and female sutural angle asin Fig. 16. Flight wings fully developed and apparentlyfunctional. Mesosternal carina low. Aedeagus tubular,broad, curved in lateral view (Fig. 15) with dorsalorifice cutting right side, without bllobed lateral projectionsat apex (Fig. 14). Female with thin, highlycoiled duct connecting to spermatheca which iscurved, and graGually expanding to end (Fig. 13).Genital segment normal.Etymology-The specific name is used as a nounin apposition, and refers to the reduced eyes.Discussion-The species should probably be consideredan edaphobite, a soil inhabitant, rather than acave-inhabiting species. The fully developed wings area peculiarity for a soil species, which almost alwayshave functionless wings. The Cueva del Salitre specimenscame from a decaying moist stick at the top ofa clay slope at the base of a cliff in the dark zone ofthe right hand half of the cave. I searched here formore material in 1971 but found none.Genus Ptomaphagus IlligerThe genus contains two subgenera in the NewWorld. The subgenus Tupania has two species describedfrom Brazil and Mexico. The subgenus Adelopscontains 36 described species in North and CentralAmerica. At least seven other undescribed species of98

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint/Figs. 1-6. 1. Elongated segments of antenna of Ptomaphagus troglomexicanus, with smaller segment seven. 2. Antenna ofPtomaphagus reddelli, with smaller segment seven. 3. Dorsal face of apex of hind tibia of Ptomaphagus reddelli, showing combof equal spines. 4. Dorsal face of apex of hind tibia of Dissochaetus aztecus, showing large and small spurs. 5. Dorsal face ofprotibia of Proptomaphaginus puertoricensis, showing comb of spines on outer margin. 6. Dorsal face of protibia of Ptomaphagusconsobrinus, showing absence of comb of spines on outer margin.Adelops are known to occur in Mexico (Peck, 1973).Twelve troglobitic species of Adelops occur in cavesin the southeastern United States and another troglobiteis known from Arizona. The known and newcave-associated species for Mexico and Central Americaare given below.The Adelops have been arranged into three speciesgroups on a basis of complexity of the female spermatheca,as well as general characteristics of distributionand ecology (Peck, 1973). The oldest group, thehirtus group, contains the troglobitic species of thesoutheastern United States, and is found only in theUnited States.99

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFigs. 7-12. 7. Lateral view of thorax of Proptomaphaginus puertoricensis, showing narrow mesothoracic epimeron. 8. Lateralview of thorax of Ptomaphagus consobrinus, showing broad mesothoracic epimeron. 9. Male Ptomaphagus reddelli, Cueva delGuayabo. 10. Female Dissochaetus aztecus, Cueva de la Mina. 11. Head of Ptomaphagus trog!omexicanus, showing faceted andreduced eye. 12. Close up of eye of P. trog!omexicanus, and space between head margin and base of antenna.The consobrinus groupTen species are already known from this group,with a distribution mostly in the United States andCanada. One U. S. species, P. cocytus, is a troglobitein Arizona. P. giaquintoi, a troglobite from Guatemala,is the only previously known member of the100

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintgroup from south of the U. S.-Mexican border. It isviewed as a relict of a previously wider range of thegroup in Mexico and Guatemala (Peck, 1973). Theadditional species described below in this group supportthe hypothesis of the former, if not present,wider range of the group.Ptomaphagus giaquintoi JeannelThis is the only troglobitic species known fromGuatemala. The species is regarded as a troglobite becauseit is known only from caves, is depigmented,and has reduced eyes, and elongated appendages. Thisassignment is arguable, however, because the eyes arepigmented, and functional flight wings are present(Peck, 1973).The species is known from 207 specimens fromthree caves in the Department of Alta Verapaz, Guatemala:Cueva de LanqUln, Cueva de Seamay, and CuevaSepacuite No.2. These caves are at elevations between1000 and 3500 ft. The beetles were found in associationwith moist and dryish insectivorous bat guano(peck, 1973).Ptomaphagus reddelli, new speciesHolotype female and allotype male in MuseumComparative Zoology, Harvard University. Type locality:Cueva del Guayabo, 12 km NE Valle Nacional,Oaxaca, Mexico. Type data: 29 December 1972, J.Reddell, D. McKenzie, M. McKenzie, S. Murphy.Paratypes: 24 with same data, and 4 from Cueva delGuano, 10 km NE Valle Nacional, Oaxaca, Mexico,28 December 1972, J. Reddell, D. McKenzie, M.McKenzie, S. Murphy; all in author's collection.Diagnosis-The species is readily distinguished onlyby the features of the spermatheca, and by the combinationof its geographical and ecological characteristics.Description-Length 2.7 to 3.2 mm. Width 1.1 to1.3 mm. Color light to dark reddish brown. Formelongate oval (Fig. 9). Eyes large, their diameter greaterthan space between eye margin and antennal socket.Antennae normal, reaching slightly beyond pronotalbase when laid back, apical segments as in Fig.2. Pronotum with sides parallel and widest in hindone third, striae distinct. Elytra widest one third frombase, striae distinct. Elytral tip and sutural anglerounded in female and truncate and rounded in male.Flight wings fully formed. Mesosternal carina low.Aedeagus broad at base, and gradually tapering topoint (Fig. 17). blunt at tip in dorsal view (Fig. 18).Genital segment normal, spiculum gastrale slightlyless than half enclosed by genital plates. Spermatheca(Figs. 19, 20) with curved, tubular posterior part andcurved but flattened anterior part.Discussion-The species, a troglophile, is knownonly from the two caves mentioned above. That it isunknown from non-cave habitats is especially significantin light of the several weeks of catopid-seekingfield work in lowland and upland forests around ValleNacional by A. Newton and myself in 1970, 1971,and 1972, using baited pitfall traps and TulgrenBerlese funnels.Etymology-The species is named for Mr. JamesReddell in recognition of his many collections andcontributions to the knowledge of cave-inhabitingcatopid beetles from Texas and Mexico.Ptomaphagus barbarae, new speciesHolotype female and allotype male in MuseumComparative Zoology, Harvard University. Type locality:Mountain Cow Cave, near settlement of CavesBranch, Belize (British Honduras). Type data: 5 August1972, S. & J. Peck. Paratypes: 16 with same data;7 from St. Hermans Cave, Caves Branch, 23 July21 August 1972, S. & J. Peck; 1 from Bucks BypassCave, Caves Branch, 14 August 1972, S. Peck; 7 fromRio Frio Cave B, 1500 ft elevation, St. Augustine,Belize, 30 July and 20 August 1972, S. & J. Peck; allin author's collection.Diagnosis-The species is easily distinguished onlyby the shape of the spermatheca, and by its distributionand ecology.Description-Length 2.5 to 2.8 mm. Width 1.1 to1.3 mm. Color dark reddish brown, antennal baseslighter. Form elongate oval. Head with large eyes,their horizontal diameter occupying about 3/4 of thewidth between head margin and antennal socket.Antennae normal, reaching only base of pronotumwhen laid back, segments medium length. Pronotumwidest at base, sides not parallel in hind one-third,striae distinct. Elytra widest one third from base, apexrounded in male and female. Flight wings fully developed.Mesosternal carina low to medium-low.Aedeagus similar to that of P. reddelli. Spiculumgastrale one half enclosed by genital plates. Spermathecawith posterior end somewhat flattened, andanterior end rounded and flattened (Figs. 21,22).Etymology-The species is named for BarbaraMcLeod of the United States Peace Corps, in recognitionof her invaluable aid and assistance, often inthe face of discouraging governmental rules and regulations,during our one and one half months of caveand forest field work in Belize in 1972.Field Notes-The Mountain Cow Cave populationwas found aggregated in a partly guano-filled moist,101

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintA17::. .:.~.2526~(ql \qdq\Figs. 13-26. 13. Proptomaphaginus microps, spermatheca, scale line 0.1 mm. 14. P. microps, aedeagus, ventral view, scaleline 0.1 mm. 15. P. microps, aedeagus, lateral view. 16. P. microps, male elytral apex. 17. Ptomaphagus reddelli, aedeagus, lateralview, scale line 0.25 mm. 18. P. reddelli, aedeagus, tip, dorsal view, scale line 0.1 mm. 19. P. reddelli, spermatheca, dorsal view,P=posterior, A=anterior, R=right side, L=left side, scale line 0.1 mm. 20. P. reddelli, same spermatehca as Fig. 19, right lateralview. 21. Ptomaphagus barbarae, Mountain Cow Cave, spermatheca, dorsal view, scale line 0.1 mm. 22. P. barbarae, same spermathecaas in Fig. 21, right lateral view. 23. Dissochaetus aztecus, dorsal view aedeagus, Cueva de Chorros de Agua. 24. D.hetschkoi, dorsal view aedeagus, forest at Chorros de Agua. 25. D. aztecus, genital segment, ventral view, Cueva de Chorros deAgua. 26. D. hetschkoi, genital segment, ventral view, forest at Chorros de Agua.102

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintdrip hole in a limestone block in the dark zone at thefoot of the cave entrance slope. The St. Hermans Cavespecimens were taken at dung and carrion bait stationsand traps from 300 to 1000 ft inside the cave.The Rio Frio Cave B specimens were found on dungbait near a moist guano accumulation, 150 ft insidethe cave.Discussion and Additional Records-The speciesshould be categorized as a troglophile. Extensive baittrapping and litter sifting in Belize produced only oneepigean record which may be this species. This is onefemale, from Belmopan, 6 August 1972, S. & J. Peck,from a dung trap in tropical lowland seasonal forestalong Roaring Creek at "The Riviera".Another record which seems to be the above speciesis one male from Cueva Jobitzinaj, 6 km S Flores,EI Peten, Guatemala, 22 January 1972, D. McKenzie.A larger sample, including females, from this populationis needed to confirm this determination.LastlY, two males and a female can be tentativelyassigned to this species, from Grutas de Loltun, Oxkutzcab,Yucatan, Mexico, 1 January 1972, D.McKenzie. This female has a spermatheca with abroader shield-like flattening on the anterior end thandoes the spermatheca of barbarae. A larger collectionis needed to decide if this Yucatan population is conspecificor not. Whichever is the case, this Yucatanpopulation is probably conspecific with the Ptomaphaguspreviously recorded from Spukil Cave (ActunSpukil), 3 km S Calcehtok, and Sabacha Cave,Tekax, Yucatan (Pearse, 1938). I have not been ableto learn of the repository of Pearse's specimens tocheck this however.The significance of the above consobrinus grouprecords is that they represent occupation by Ptomaphagusof cave and forest tropical lowland habitatsto a much wider extent than was previously known.The cavernicola groupTen named and seven recognized but unnamed speciesare known in the group (Peck, 1973). All speciesare limited to Mexico or Guatemala except for thetroglophile P. cavernicola, which is found in much ofthe southeastern one quarter of the Un ited States.Four troglophilic and two troglobitic species areknown from Mexico, and no species in this groupare known to commonly associate with caves elsewhere.Ptomaphagus cavernicola cavernicola SchwarzThis troglophilic subspecies ranges from NuevoLeon, Mexico, up across Texas through the Ozarksand Iowa, with other cave populations in Alabamaand Florida. One epigean collection has been madein South Carolina (Peck, 1973). The only Mexicanlocality is Grutas del Palmito, 7 km SSW Bustamante,Nuevo Leon. A new collection from this cave is herereported of 5 individuals taken on 19 February 1972,by J. Reddell.Ptomaphagus cavernicola aditus PeckThis subspecies is known only from 76 specimenstaken in Cueva de la Boca, 3 km NE Santiago, NuevoLeon, Mexico. It is thought to be a population morecave evolved than the rest of the species populations,with measurably reduced eyes (Peck, 1973).Ptomaphagus gypsum PeckThis troglobitic species, with reduced, unpigmented(but faceted) eyes and reduced wings is knownonly from one female from the Resumidero dePablillo, 33 km S Galeana, Nuevo Leon, Mexico(Peck, 1973). Searching and baiting in the type localityas well as other nearby gypsum caves is highlydesirable.Ptomaphagus troglomexicanus PeckThis is the most cave-specialized Ptomaphagusknown from outside the United States. It is a largespecies with tiny unpigmented eyes (Fig. 11, 12) andvery elongated antennae segments (Fig. 1). It is knownonly from three caves located between 1525 and2135 m in elevation in the Sierra de Guatemala,Tamaulipas, Mexico: Cueva Chica de la Perra, Cuevade la Capilla (=Cueva Capilla de la Perra), and Cuevade la Mina (Peck, 1968, 1973).A new collection is reported here, taken in Cuevade la Capilla, 14 January 1971, J. Reddell, R. Mitchell,W. Elliott, J. Cooke, and S. Wiley.Sbordoni and Argano (1972) also report findingthis species in Cueva de la Capilla.Ptomaphagus elabra PeckThis troglophilic species is known only from lowlandcaves in and near the Sierra del Abra, Tamaulipasand San Luis POtOSI: Mexico. Previously (Peck,1971, 1973), a total of 475 specimens was knownfrom the following caves:San Luis Potos(; Cueva Chica, Cueva de Puentede Dios, Cueva de Los Sabinos, Cueva de Taninul n. 1,Cueva de Valdosa, Sotano de Manuel, Sotano dePichijumo (=Sotano de Montecillos), Sotano del Tigre,Sotano de la Tinaja, Ventana Jabal(103

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintTamaulipas: Bee Cave, Cueva de la Florida, Cuevadel Nacimiento del R(o Frio, Cueva de EI Pachon,Cueva de los Vampiros, Grutas de EI Puente, Grutasde Quintero, Sotano de Gomez Farias, and Sotano deSanta Elena.The following new collections and localities arereported here for Tamaulipas: Cueva de la Paloma,1 km NNE Gomez Farl'as, 18 May 1971, W. Russell,six from vampire guano; and Sotano del Leon, 2 kmS Gomez Farias, 20 May 1971, W. Elliott, nine fromvampire guano.Sbordoni and Argano (1972) collected what islikely this species in Grutas de Quintero, Cueva deLos Sabinos, Sotano de Pichijumo, Cueva de Taninuln. 1, and Cueva Chica.Ptomaphagus leo PeckThis troglophilic species is known from a smallcave (cave number two) at Chipinque Mesa, nearMonterrey, and Cueva de Chorros de Agua, as wellas the forest at Chipinque Mesa. All are in NuevoLeon (Peck, 1973).A new cave record is presented here with one specimentaken from litter in a sinkhole at 5500 ft elevationnear Laguna Colorado, 29 km E of Landa deMatamoros, Queretaro, on 11 June 1971, S. Peck.An additional specimen was taken at carrion in theforest (10-12 June 1971, S. Peck) of the same locality.These two records suggest that the catopid collectedin nearby Cueva de Madrono by Sbordoni andArgano (1972) is P. leo.An additional new epigean record is that of threespecimens taken in a dung baited pitfall trap in a ravineforest 28 km W of Linares, in Santa Rosa (Iturbide)Canyon, Nuevo Leon, 21-22 June 1971, S. Peck.Ptomaphagus spelaeus (Bilimek)This troglophilic species is known only from cavesin the state of Guerrero, and possibly Mexico. Thesecaves are Grutas de Cacahuamilpa, Gruta de Acuitlapan,and Resumidero del RIo San Geronimo (Peck,1971, 1973). The catopids reported by Sbordoni andArgano (1972) from Cueva de Coatepec (Mexico) andGrutas de Cacahuamilpa are probably this species.Genus Dissochaetus ReitterThe genus contains twenty-nine species recognizedas valid, and occurs only in the New World, where it iswidespread from southern Brazil northwards throughCentral America and the United States to southernCanada. However, some of these northern species andrecords are in need of review, because some confusionexists in delimiting this genus from the genus Nemadus,which seems to be limited to the United Statesand Canada in the New World. Secondly, I find thatdeterminations are presently difficult to make for thegenus because of inadequate descriptions, and thecloseness of some of the species. Nevertheless, Dissochaetusis the most commonly collected catopidbeetle in carrion and dung baited pitfall traps throughoutmuch of its range. No cave populations are knownfor the United States, although several Nemadus populationsare known in caves in the southeastern UnitedStates (personal data).The Dissochaetus species treated below should betaken as tentative but likely determinations. Two ofthe species were originally described from SouthAmerica, and either few or no intermediate localitiesare published for the species in Central America orMexico. The problems of determination and the fullrange of the species can only be solved after a comprehensivestudy of large collections from manyadditional localities in South and Central Americaand Mexico. Such large collections have now beenassembled through my field work and that of AINewton, amounting now to over 10,000 specimens.However, it was not judged to be efficient to examineall this material to solve the problem at hand,that of the identity of the cave collections of Dissochaetusfrom the region under consideration.Dissochaetus hetschkoi Reitter 1884The species is described from the state of SantaCatharina in Brazil, and is also known from theBrazilian states of Bahia and Sao Paulo, as well as thestate of Miranda and the Federal District in Venezuela(Jeannel, 1936; Szymczakowski, 1961, 1963,1969b).The specimens listed below do not agree well withthe description in the key of Jeannel (1936), but theydo agree in the characters of the aedeagus (Fig. 24)including the parameres and their hairs. Likewise, thegenital segment agrees well with the figure ofSzymczakowski (1969b) except that my material(Fig. 26) has an emargination on the posterior marginof the dorsal tergite, and has the whole segmentwith a greater width near the apex rather than thebase.The new cave and epigean records are as follows:MEXICO: Nuevo Leon: Chorras de Agua (21 kmWSW Montemorelos), three males and two females104

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintfrom forest outside of cave, in dogfood bait trap,19-25 June 1969, S. & J. Peck. San Luis Potosi: Cuevadel Agua, 5 km NNE Rayon, 8 May 1966, J. Reddell,J. Fish, D. McKenzie, one male. Tamaulipas: GomezFarias, 29 June 1969, S. & J. Peck, dung trap inforest near Nacimiento del Rto Frio, one male. Veracruz:Grutas de Atoyac, 2 km E Atoyac, 6-9 August1969, S. & J. Peck, dung trap at base of cave entranceslope, two males.BELIZE: Rio Frio Cave B, Augustine, 457 m elevation,30 July and 20 August 1972, S. & J. Peck,two males and five females on dung bait near guano.Dissachaetus aztecus SzymczakowskiThe species was described and known only fromthe "Sierra de Durango" in the Mexican state ofDurango. The material (Fig. 10) listed below agreeswell with the description (Szymczakowski, 1971) butsome differences exist. The internal sac of aztecus isdescribed as unarmed, but my material has two pairsof elongated sclerotized pieces (Fig. 23). The genitalsegment shown in Fig. 25 gives the appearance ofbeing more broad towards the apex than the figure ofSzymczakowski (1971), but this is an artifact of mypreparation being somewhat flattened, and the seg·ment having split along the ventral midline.The following cave collections have been seen:MEXICO: Nuevo Leon: Cueva de Chorros de Agua,21 km WSW Montemorelos, 4 October 1966, W.Russell, six males; 19-25 June 1969, S. & J. Peck,one female at guano, four males and five females indogfood bait trap near guano. Tamaulipas: Cueva deEI Pachon, 18 km SSW Ciudad Mante, 10 July 1969,S. & J. Peck, one female at vampire guano; Cueva dela Mina, 7 km NW Gomez Farias, 1527 m elevation,1 July 1969, S. & J. Peck, one male and four femalesat dung bait inside cave entrance. San Luis Patos':'Cueva del Agua, 5 km NNE Rayon, 8 May 1966,J. Reddell, J. Fish, D. McKenzie, one male; Cuevade la Porra, 5 km N Xilitla, 10 July 1969, S. & J.Peck, six males on vampire guano.Dissachaetus curtus PortevinThe species was described from 801 ivia, and is alsoreported from Caracas, Venezuela, and doubtfullyfrom Lucerna, near Malinaltepec, Guerrero, Mexico(Jeannel, 1936; Szymczakowski, 1961, 1968). TheMexican material has been suggested as being distinctenough to represent a potential new species or subspeciesbut was not treated as such (Szymczakowski,1968).The male specimen at hand agrees well with theillustrations of the aedeagus in the above cited papers,including the thinner median lobe with no hairs at itsapex.Material examined: MEXICO: Chiapas: CuevaCerro Hueco, 3 km SE Tuxtla Gutierrez, 18 August1967, J. Reddell, J. Fish, M. Tandy, 1 male.Dissochaetus speciesThis species is probably undescribed. It is similarto aztecus, but with a decidedly broader and shortermedian lobe.Material examined: MEXICO: San Luis Patos':Sotano de las Golondrinas, 10.5 km WSW Aquismon,24 June 1972, J. White, 2 males.Dissachaetus speciesThis species is probably undescribed. It is similarto aztecus and mexicanus, except that the parameresare distinctly different in side view, and the scleratizedpieces of the internal SqC differ in that the apicalpair is much longer, and the basal pair is muchbroader.Material examined: MEXICO: San Luis Patas/Cueva de Potrerillos, 2 km W Ahuacatlan, 27 November1972, J. Reddell, T. Raines, one male andone female.LITERATURE CITEDHatch, M.H. 1933. Studies on the Leptodiridae (Catopidae)with descriptions of new species. J. New York Ent. Soc.,41: 187-239.Howden, H.F., and L.E.C. Ling. 1973. Scanning ElectronMicroscopy: Low-magnification pictures of uncoated zoologicalspecimens. Science, 179:386·388.Jeannel, R. 1936. Monographie des Catopidae. Mem. Mus.Nat. Hist. Natu., Paris, nouv. ser., 1,433 pp.Lanyrie, R. 1967. Nouvelle classification des Bathysciinae(Coleopteres Catopidael. Ann. Speleol., 22(31:587-645.Pearse, A.S. 1938. Insects from Yucatan caves, p. 237-249.In A.S. Pearse, ed., Fauna of the caves of Yucatan.Carnegie Inst. Washington PUb!., 491. 325 pp.Peck, S. 1968. A new cave catopid beetle from Mexico,with a discussion of its evolution. Psyche, 75(2):91-98.Peck, S.B. 1970. The Catopinae (Coleoptera; Leiodidae) ofPuerto Rico. Psyche, 77:237·242.Peck, S.B. 1971. New and poorly known Ptomaphagus fromMexican caves (Coleoptera; Leiodidae; Catopinae). p. 9-12.In J.R. Reddell and R.W. Mitchell, eds., Studies on thecavernicole fauna of Mexico. Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud.Bull., 4,239 pp.Peck, S.B. 1972. Leiodinae and Catopinae (Coleoptera:Leiodidael from Jamaica and Puerto Rico. Psyche, 79:49-57.105

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintPeck, S.B. 1973. A systematic revision and the evolutionarybiology of the Ptomaphagus (Adelops) beetles of NorthAmerica (Coleoptera; Leiodidae; Catopinae) with emphasison cave-inhabiting species. Bull. Mus. Compo Zool.(Harvard University), 145:29-161.Sbordoni, V., and R. Argano. 1972. Introduction: Cavesstudied during the 1st mission to Mexico (1969l. Acc.Naz. Lincei, Problemi Attuali di Scienza e di Cultura,Q. N. 171:1-21.Szyrnczakowski, W. 1961. Especes neotropicales nouvellesou peu connues de la famille Catopidae (Coleopteral.Polski Pismo Ent. (Bull. Ent. Pologne), 31(14): 139-163.Szyrnczakowski, W. 1963. Catopidae (Coleoptera) recoltesau Bresil par J. Mraz. Acta Ent. Mus. Nat. Prague, 35:667-680.Szyrnczakowski, W. 1968. Sur quelques Catopidae (Coleoptera)de la region neotropicale. Acta Zool. Cracoviensia,13(2): 13-27.Szyrnczakowski, W. 1969a. Decouverte d'un representantdes Ptomaphaginini aCuba (avec une equisse de la systematiqueet la geonemie de cette tribu) (Coleoptera,Catopidael. Acta Zool. Cracoviensia, 14(4) :87-97.Szyrnczakowski, W. 1969b. Notes sur quelques Catopidae(Coleoptera) du Venezuela. Bull. Acad. Polonaise Sci.17(6) :407-412.Szyrnczakowski, W. 1971. Un genre nouveau et quelquesespeces nouvelles ou mal connues des Nemadini (Coleoptera,Catopidael. Acta Zool. Cracoviensia, 16(7):397-412.106

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintMILLIPEDES IN THE COLLECTION OF THE ASSOCIATIONFOR MEXICAN CAVE STUDIES.II. KEYS AND ADDITIONAL RECORDS AND DESCRIPTIONS (DIPLOPODA)Nell B. CauseyDepartment of Zoology and PhysiologyLouisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803Most of the millipedes studied in the preparationof this paper were collected by Mr. James Reddell andhis associates in the Association for Mexican CaveStudies. Other taxa in the collection will be reportedon in subsequent papers.ORDER GLOMERIDAFAMILY GLOMERIDAEGenus Glomeroides ChamberlinGlomeroides Chamberlin, 1922, p. 60. Loomis, 1968,p.7.The species described here and one described byShear (in press) from Veracruz bring the knownnumber in this genus to five. They range from Tamaulipasto Guatemala, and with the exception of thetype species, G. centralis Chamb. 1922, all are fromcave collections.Glomeroides addititius, new speciesFigs. 1,2Diagnosis-A depigmented troglobite which resemblesG. caecus Causey, 1971, in lacking ocelli, inthat telopodite of legpair 18 consists of 4 articles, andin having a minute rounded lobe on mesial margin ofarticle 3 of gonopods; differs in smaller size, minutelyhispid dorsal surface, and in that telopodite of legmm,width 3 mm, flesh color. Dorsal surface is shiningand finely but sparsely hispid. On lateral surface ofcollum there are 4 submarginal striae; only 2 extendacross dorsum. Other somatic features are as describedfor G. caecus.pair 17 consists of 3 articles rather than of 2.Description of the Holotype-Male. Length 5.3Telopodite of legpair 17 (Fig. 1) consists of 3 articles,of which last is minute and lacks a claw. Telopoditeof legpair 18 consists of 4 articles, of which distalis about twice the length of the penultimate; coxa isslightly contiguous with homologue. Gonopods (Fig.2) are characterized by shape of apex of lobe of article2 and transparency of lobe of article 3.Female Paratype-Length 6.5 mm, width 3.1 mm.A little blackish pigment is on metatergites and belowbase of antennae.Type Locality and Specimens-Cueva de Ungurria,about 20 km WSW Tezonapa, Veracruz, Mexico. Fivemales, including the holotype, three females, and fourimmatures were collected 25 December 1972 byJames Reddell, David McKenzie, Martha McKenzie,and Stuart Murphy.Deposition-Holotype, United States National Museum(USNM); male and female paratypes, The Museum,Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas; remainingspecimens, author.Etymology-Addititius refers to the additional articleon legpair 17.107

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintORDER POLYDESMIDAFAMI LY RHACHODESMI DAERhachodesmidae, Attems, 1940, pp. 464-481. Loomis,1968, pp. 35-42.Characterized by the red or blue-green body color,the high paranota, and the absence of a calcar on thegonopods.These millipedes are the most conspicuous polydesmoidsin Mexican caves. Next to the Stylodesmidae,no other family is as frequently encountered, eitheras accidentals or as troglobites. Troglobitic rhachodesmidstend to be smaller and brittler than epigeanmembers of the family and to have no or little bodypigment. The small bodied, depigmented condition isalso characteristic of some species known only fromepigean sites.Range-Nicaragua north to Nuevo Leon and Yucatan(Loomis, 1968, 1971).Key to the Genera of the Rhachodesmidae Reportedon in This Paper1. A hook is on mentum of male; paranota ofsegment 19 are reduced to minute spines ..· , Uncu/abes CauseyMentum of male is unmodified; paranota arevaried 22. Paranota of segments 5-19 are degenerateand body is cylindrical; color, unless depigmented,is red or pink .· Acutangu/us AttemsParanota are on all segments 33. Paranota are elongated, spinous, uptilted; penisis much thickened and elongated; color isreddishRhachidomorpha SaussureParanota are varied but mostly squarish andare angular and uptilted only on last few segments;penis is membranous and minute; color,unless depigmented, is blue-green .... 44. Telopodite of gonopods is divided into athickly setose prefemur and a distal, mostlyasetose calyx; sperm canal arises in fundusof calyx 5Telopodite is not divided into two regions;sperm canal arises otherwise 65. Calyx is thick,lightly chitinized; pore formulais either normal or 5, 7-19; lateral marginsof paranota are smooth .· . . . . . . . . . . .. Ceuthauxus ChamberlinCalyx is thinner, well chitinized; pore formulais normal; in male, lateral margins of poriferousparanota bear two strong teeth; lateralmargins in female are uneven but not toothed· . . . . . . . . . . . .. Rhachodesmus Pocock6. Sperm canal arises at apex of either a strongspinous or bladelike solenomerite; metatergitesare either smooth or granular .· . . . . . . . . . . . Strongy/odesmus SaussureSperm canal arises from an open sperm furrow,and there is no separate solenomerite;metatergites are smooth .· Tiphallus ChamberlinUnless stated otherwise, all determinations of rhachodesmidsreported here were based on adult malespecimens. Those based on females should be confirmedby males. In most rhachodesmids, there is ahighly characteristic body facies, but sexual dimorphismis common, with the female tending to beconservative and often undescribed. Immatures alsolack the specific body facies.Genus Acutangu/us AttemsAcutangu/us Attems, 1940, p. 470. Loomis, 1968,p.37.Rhachodesmids characterized especially by depressedparanota of segments 1-4, reduction of paranotabehind segment 4 to minute flanges or ridgesplaced low on body, a thick, conical sternal processadjacent to each leg of segments 5 and 6, and theband across caudal margin of gonopodal opening.Body is small to medium size (13-28 mm long), coloris red, pink, or white, pore formula is normal, metatergitesare smooth, and apex of anal scale is acuteand depressed. Gonopods are slender, have a relativelylong coxa and apodeme, sperm fossa is small andasetose, and telopodite is divided apically into twoor three pieces, of which one is the solenomerite. ResemblesSakophallus in the extreme reduction of theparanota and the cylindrical body; differs in theslenderer gonopods with the divided apex.Type Species-Po/ydesmus coccineus Humbert &Saussure.Range-Veracruz and Oaxaca, Mexico.Species-Five. Two additional undescribed speciesare represented in the epigean collection by femalesfrom Oaxaca. One species, a/ius, is known only froma cave collection and is suspected of being a troglobite.108

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintKey to the Species of Acutangu/us Based on the Male1. Apex of telopodite of gonopods is dividedinto two subequal pieces a/ius n.sp.Apex is divided into thres pieces, which maybe equal or unequal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 22. Apex of solenomerite is acute and simple ...· coccineus H. & S.Apex is blunt and minutely fringed 33. All three apical pieces are short .· neg/ectus CarlOne or two apical pieces are short; solenomeriteis short 44. Longest piece is narrow its entire length ....· sororius n.sp.Longest piece is broad at the base and narroweddistadpictus n.sp.Acutangulus alius, new speciesFigs. 3-6Diagnosis-Gonopods are characterized by twolong, subequal terminal pieces, a mesial gutter, and along, thin marginal piece running from gutter tobase of telopodite; resembles coccineus, in whichtelopodite terminates in three long, subequal terminalpieces.Description of the Holotype-Male. Length 18.5mm, width 1.7 mm. Colorless in preservative andbrittle. Posterior angles of paranota 2-4 are square.Paranota of segments 5-18 are represented by th ick(around pores) or thin longitudinal welts (Fig. 3); onsegment 19 there is only a pore (Fig. 4). Sternal pegsnear legs 4-7 are cylindrical; postgonopodal sterna ofmiddle bOdy segments are bilobed; sterna and pegsare setose. A roughened pleural mound is above alllegs except those of last 3-4 segments.Gonopods are contiguous, slender, and dividedapically into two subequal, slender pieces. The lateral,which is the solenomerite, is spinous, and curvedmesiad, where it intersects the homologue. The bladelikepiece is narrow and straight. These two pieces arehomologous with the two largest pieces in pictus andsororius. A deep gutter is at the base of the solenomerite,and a thin marginal piece parallels the spermcanal to the very base of the telopodite (Figs. 5,6).Female Topoparatype-Length 20 mm, width 2mm.Type Locality and Specimens-Cueva del Ojo deAgua de Tlilapan, Tlilapan, Veracruz, Mexico. 3 males,including the holotype, and 17 females (of whichsome may not be conspecific) were collected 8 August1967 by James Reddell, John Fish, and T. R. EvansDeposition-Male holotype, USNM; female topoparatype,The Museum, Texas Tech University; remainingspecimens, author.Etymology-A/ius, meaning different, refers to thesomatic and sexual characters which distinguish thisspecies from the congeners.Acutangulus pictus, new speciesFig. 7Diagnosis-Gonopods are characterized by threeunequal terminal pieces, of which the longest is broadat the base, narrowed in the middle and distad, andsinuously curved mesiad over the homologue; verynear sororius, in which the long piece is narrow itsentire length and the bladelike piece is much longer.Description of the Holotype-Male. Length 19 mm,width 2.2 mm. Color pinkish, probably reddish inlife. Posterior angles of paranota 3 and 4 are producedas short, acute pieces. Paranota of segments 5-19 arerepresented by narrow flanges ending in minute, acuteangles. Sternal pegs at base of legs 7 are blunt; thosenear legs 4-6 are conical. Pegs and sterna are setose.Gonopods are typical, that is contiguous, slender,with a sperm fossa in base of telopodite, and dividedat apex into three pieces. The most conspicuouspiece is posterior, sinuous, and long; much shorter isthe anterior, thin, bladelike piece; the solenomerite,which arises between the other two pieces, is short,cylindrical, blunt and minutely fringed at the apex(Fig. 7).Variations-Females are larger, about 22 mm longand 2.5 mm wide; the paranota of segments 5-19 arereduced more than in the male. Males from sites otherthan the type locality are smaller, with a length of16-17 mm.Type Locality and Specimens-Satano de BotellaChica, 3 km NW Tequila, Veracruz, Mexico. Fivemales, including the holotype, and 19 females werecollected 4 August 1967 by James Reddell and JohnFish.Other Records-Veracruz: Tequila, 7 August 1967.Rock quarry, 8 km SE Tequila on Tequila-Zongolicaroad, 6 August 1967. Tlilapan, 8 August 1967. Allwere collected by James Reddell, John Fish, and T.R.Evans.Deposition-Male holotype, USNM; topoparatypesof each sex, The Museum, Texas Tech University; remainderof specimens, author.Etymology-Pictus, meaning ornamented, refers tothe enlarged basal region of the posterior piece of thegonopods.109

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint1 2: ("tl~ll!Figs. 1-2. Glomeroidesaddititius n.sp., topoparatype. 1. Leg 17.2. Gonopod.Figs. 3-6. Acutangulus alius n.sp., topoparatype. 3. Right half of 7th metatergite. 4. Last two segments. 5. Submesial view ofleft gonopod. 6. Anterior surface of apical region of left gonopod.Fig. 7. Acutangulus pictus n.sp., topoparatype. Anterior surface of apical region of left gonopod.Fig. 8. Acutangulus sororius n.sp., topoparatype. Anterior surface of apical region of left gonopod.Figs. 9-10. Ceuthauxus constans n.sp., topoparatype. 9. Right half of collum and right paranota of segments 2. 5, 15, 17, and19. 10. Posterior surface of right gonopod.Figures 5 and 10 are drawn to the same scale and 6, 7, and 8 to the same scale.110

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintAcutangulus sororius, new speciesFig.8Diagnosis-Gonopods are characterized by threeunequal terminal pieces, of which the longest is slenderits entire length and curved mesiad over the homologue;very near pictus, in which the long piece isbroad at the base and the bladelike piece is muchshorter.Description of the Holotype-Male. Length 19 mm,width 1.8 mm. Color is faded, probably red in life.Posterior angles of segments 1 and 2 are right and 3and 4 are prolonged in short, acute pieces. Paranotaof segments 5-18 are represented by narrow flangese:1ding in minute acute angles, and 19 by a bluntridge. Sternal processes at base of legs 7 are truncated,and those near 4-6 are conical. Sterna and processesare setose.Gonopods are typical, that is, contiguous, slender,curved a little ventrad, with a small sperm fossa inbase of telopodite, and divided apically into threepieces; the most conspicuous piece arises laterally andis long, sinuous, and narrow at the base; much broader,but shorter, is the bladelike piece arising on theanterior surface; the solenomerite is short, posteriorblunt, and minutely fringed on the apex (Fig. 8).Type Locality and Specimens-Coscamatepec, Veracruz,Mexico. Three males, including the holotype,were collected 25 August 1953 by Harriett Frizzell.Deposition-Male holotype, USNM; 2 male topoparatypes,author and The Museum, Texas Tech University.Etymology-Sororius, meaning sisterly, refers tothe close similarity between this species and pictus.Acutangulus spp.Records-Oaxaca: 17 km Nand 3 km W Oaxaca,one female, width 3.3 mm, nodules on caudal marginof metatergites, depigmented, 16 June 1966, LarryWilson. Dolina, 12 km NNW Ixtlan de Juarez, twofemales, width 1.4 mm, reddish, 30 December 1972,J. Reddell.Genus Ceuthauxus ChamberlinCeuthauxus Chamberlin, 1942, p. 12.Strongylodesmus, Loomis [partim], 1968, p. 40.Moderately large to small green rhachodesmidscharacterized by large, squarish horizontal paranota,dorsal surface of metatergites either smooth or granular,and the pore formula either normal or 5,7-19.Male usually has a process on third coxae. Telopoditeof gonopods, as in Rhachodesmus, has the prefemoralregion thickly setose and sharply set off fromthe calyx, on which there are few setae. Differs fromStrongylodesmus and resembles Rhachodesmus in thatsperm canal does not arise on apex of telopodite or ona solenomerite. Instead, it arises in the fundus of thecalyx and curves down to the large, setose spermfossa. Calyx is thick, lightly chitinized, and open onthe mesial or caudal surface.Range-Nuevo Leon, Coahuila, Tamaulipas, Morelos,Oaxaca, and Guerrero. This is west of and sometimesoverlapping the range of Strongylodesmus andnorth of the range of Rhachodesmus.Type Species-C. neuvus (Chamb. 1941).Other species are mediator Chamb. 1947, morelosChamb. 1943, galeanae Chamb. 1943 new combination,palmitonus Chamb. 1942, and constans, n.sp. Ihave not examined C. cruzanus Chamb., 1941, whichwas based on a female. The troglobitic species arepalmitonus and constans; the other species are frequentin the twilight zone of caves. In the northernpart of the range, species are most numerous andranges are small. C. palmitonus and C. galeanae, inNuevo Leon, represent the northernmost extensionof the Rhachodesmidae.Ceuthauxus constans, new speciesFigs. 9,10Diagnosis-Characterized by the presence of a welton all margins of collum and paranota and by detailsof calyx of gonopods.Description of the Holotype-Male. Length about44 mm, width 5.3 mm, body is loose jointed, exoskeletonis relatively thick, legs are long. Metatergitesare smooth except for a pair of minute setal noduleson anterior half of each one and a transverse series offrom 2 to 8 indistinct nodules near caudal margin of5 through 19. Surface of most paranota and middleof metazonites is slightly convex. Paranota are horizontalexcept on posterior one-third of body, wherethey are uptilted a Iittle. Pores open on upper surfaceof thick lateral welts on segments 5, 7-19. Except forprominent denticle on anterior angle of paranota 2-18,lateral margins of paranota are smooth and eitherstraight or slightly convex. Collum is as wide as segment2; its caudal margin is slightly sinuous andangles are right. Caudal angles of poreless segmentsare right. Paranota of segments 5, 7-14 have caudalmargin prolonged behind caudal angle; paranota ofsegments 15-17 are prolonged more and more behindcaudal margin, and paranota of 18 and 19 are smalland acute (Fig. 9). Sterna are thickly setose. Ananteriorly directed cylindrical lobe is on third coxae.Gonopods (Fig. 10) extend in front of legpair 6.111

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintCoxa is short, angle between coxa and telopodite isalmost straight, and prefemur is long and thickly setose.Calyx has a few setae on apical margin; its funduscontains a sperm receptacle from which spermcanal arises. Sperm fossa is large and setose.Female Topoparatype-Length 47 mm, width 6mm, depigmented.Type Locality and Specimens-Grutas del Mogote,EI Mogote, 15 km NNE Taxco, Guerrero, Mexico, onemale in total darkness, 15 February 1958; many specimens,including the holotype, 27 July 1958, Ray deSaussure (CRA); one male, 25 August 1965, J. Reddell.Other Record-Guerrero: Cueva Chica del Mogote,EI Mogote, 15 km NNE Taxco, many specimens, 25August 1965, J. Reddell, J. Fish, and W. Bell.Deposition-Holotype, USNM; topoparatypes, TheMuseum, Texas Tech University; other specimens,author.Etymology-Constans refers to the close similaritybetween the gonopods of this species and those innorthern Nuevo Leon.Ceuthauxus galeanae (Chamberlin), new combinationPararhachistes galeanae Chamberlin, 1943, p. 52, figs.128,129.Strongylodesmus galeanae, Loomis, 1968, p. 39.Pore formula is normal. A thick, cylindrical peg ison third coxae. Metatergites are smooth. Width is 3.54.3 mm. Color is blue-green. Gonopods are unusual inthat there is a thin, flat, jagged lateral lobe on thecalyx.Chamberlin's drawing of the female holotype,which I have not examined, shows segment 3 as narrowerthan segment 2. I have not seen specimenswhich show this character. Other characters agree withhis description.Type Locality-Laguna de Labradores, Galeana,Nuevo Leon, Mexico.New Records-Nuevo Leon: Surface collection atPuente de Dios, 7 km N Galeana, female, 5 June1966, J. Reddell and A.R. Smith; Cueva Yeso Blanco,10 km W Galeana, 4 June 1965, J. Reddell and A. R.Smith; Pozo de Gavilan, 10 km W Galeana, 4 June1966, Orion Knox, Jr.Genus Rhachodesmus CookRhachodesmus, Pocock, 1910, p. 176. Attems, 1940,p. 465. Loomis, 1968, p. 39.Diagnosis-Large bodied green rhachodesmids characterizedby marked sexual dimorphism in uptiltand margins of paranota. Acropodite of gonopods issharply set off from prefemur and is expanded, mem-112branous, and calyx-like; sperm canal opens in fundusof calyx, and a node bearing strong setae is on its convexsurface. Nearest Ceuthauxus, in which calyx ofgonopods is thicker and sexual dimorphism of paranotais slighter.Body is loose jointed and up to 60 mm long. Paranotaare high and squarish except on last few segments,where they are angular; caudal segment isangular and short. Pore formula is normal; pores opendorsally on a thickening; nonporiferous segments lacksuch thickenings. All paranota have a narrow welt onanterior margin down to lateral denticle. Metatergitesare finely and evenly granular above. Sterna are setose.Legs are long. Sexual dimorphism of paranota ismarked. Male. Collum is about as wide as second segment;most paranota are tilted above dorsum; lateralmargins of poriferous segments through 16 have anacute lobe in front of and another behind pores.Third coxae bear a small, cylindrical process; penesare small, membranous, and contiguous; ovoid gonopodalopening has external lateral thickenings. Gonopodshave a relatively short apodeme and coxa; prefemurof telopodite is thick, evenly covered withshort setae, and the large mesial fossa is setose; acropoditeof telopodite is thin and in the form of ashallow two- or three-lobed calyx. Female. Collum isnarrower than second segment; only last paranota areuptilted; lateral margins of paranota are slightly emarginatebut are not acutely lobed, as in the male.Type Species-Polydesmus (Rachis) viridis Saussure.Range-Veracruz, Oaxaca. Most collections arefrom caves, but none represent troglobitic species.Species-Two.Rhachodesmus digitatus, new speciesFigs. 11-14Diagnosis-Characterized by gonopods; calyx oftelopodite is two-lobed and anterior setae are borneon a minute finger-like lobe. Closely related to R.viridis, in which calyx is three-lobed and setae are ona much shorter lobe.Description of the Holotype-Male. Length 56 mm,width 6 mm. Lateral margins of paranota are yellow;remainder of body, head, and legs are medium green.Lateral margins of paranota of segments 2-4 are even,poriferous segments through 16 have two strong,angular lobes on lateral margins (F ig. 12), nonporiferoussegments 6, 11, and 14 are rounded, 18 is largeand angular, and 19 is small and angular. Coxae oflegs 4-7 are th ickly setose and produced a Iittle ventrad.Gonopods are directed forward and contiguousat apex; calyx of telopodite is in form of a small mesiallobe and a large lateral lobe; a minute fingerlikelobe bearing 11 straight, stout setae is on anterior

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintsurface of larger lobe; sperm canal opens between apair of angular ridges in calyx (Figs. 13, 14).Description of the Female Allotype-Length 65mm, width 6 mm. Collum is clearly narrower thansecond segment. Paranota are either horizontal or alittle depressed. Beginning with segment 5 lateral marginsof poriferous paranota are a little lobed, suggestingthe lobes on the male, but they are never as distinctlylobed and sometimes are not lobed at all (Fig.11 ).Variations-There is some variation in the intensityof the yellow lateral areas on the paranota.Type Locality and Specimens-Milliped Cave, 8km N Huautla, Oaxaca, Mexico, 12 males, includingthe holotype, and five females, including the allotype,were collected in June 1965 by William Russell "indarkness, but about half were within 60 feet of entrance,with remainder found throughout cave."Other Localities-Oaxaca: Cueva Bonita del Presidente,2 km N Huautla, 12 August 1967, J. Reddell,J. Fish, and T.R. Evans; Cueva del Puente de Fierro,8 km N Huautla, 13 August 1967, J. Reddell, J. Fish,and T.R. Evans; Cueva Arriba del Presidente, 2 km NHuautla, immatures, 12 August 1967, J. Reddell andJ. Fish; Cave n. 3, Huautla, female, December 1968,Dave Honea; Cueva Arriba del RIo Iglesia, 6 km EHuautla, 5 June 1966, W. Russell and J. Fish.Deposition-Holotype, USNM; topoparatypes ofboth sexes, The Museum, Texas Tech University: remainingspecimens, author.Etymology-Digitatus, meaning fingerlike, refers tothe setose lobe on the anterior surface of the calyx ofthe telopodite.Rhachodesmus viridis (Saussure)R. viridis, Attems, 1940, p. 466.New Record-Veracruz: Cueva de Ojo de AguaGrande, 8 km NW Paraje Nuevo, 2 August 1967, J.Reddell, J. Fish, and T.R. Evans. Epigean.Rhachodesmus sp.Record-Oaxaca: Cave n. 3, Huautla, female, December1968, Dave Honea. This specimen has thebright blue-green color, large size, and body facies ofR. viridis.Genus Rhachidomorpha SaussureRhachidomorpha, Attems, 1940, p. 471. Loomis,1968, p. 39.Rhachodesmids characterized by elongated caudalangles of metatergites (less so in female than in male),reddish color, and thick, elongated penes. Gonopodshave a large secondary branch arising from base oftelopodite.Type Species-Polydesmus (RhachidomorphaJ tarascaSauss.Rhachidomorpha adunca (Sauss. & Humb.)R. adunca, Attems, 1940, p. 472. Loomis, 1968, p. 39.New Record-Veracruz: Sotano del Relicario,3 kmN Tequila, 7 August 1967, J. Reddell, J. Fish, and T.R. Evans.Genus Strongylodesmus SaussureStrongylodesmus, Attems, 1940, p. 478. Loomis[partim], 1968, p. 40.Ceuthauxus, Loomis, 1966, p. 13; 1968, p. 40.Large to moderate size green (unless troglobitic)rhachodesmids with large, squarish paranota, metatergitesgranular on dorsal surface, and pore formulaeither normal or 5, 7-19. Characterized by telopoditeof gonopods, of which prefemoral region is long andthickly setose and shorter acropodite is sparsely setose,and well chitinized. Sperm canal opens from astout solenomerite which is either spinous or bladelike;sperm fossa is large and setose. Ceuthauxus,which has similar body facies, differs in that maleusually has a process on coxae of third legs and spermcanal arises in fundus of convex, lightly chitinizedapical region of telopodite.Range-Tamaulipas, San Luis POtOSI: Hidalgo, andVeracruz. This is east of but occasionally overlappingthe range of Ceuthauxus.Type Species-So cyaneus Saussure.Other species are geddesi Pocock, cruzanus Chamb.,conspicuus n.sp., granulatus Loomis, harrisoni Causey,potosinus (Chamb., 1943) new combination, and potosianus(Chamb., 1947). S. potosinus, which wasbased upon female specimens, is suspected of being ajunior synonym of S. geddesi.Strongylodesmus conspieuus, new speciesFigs. 15,16Diagnosis-Characterized by the large blue-greenbody, the slightly uneven condition of the lateral marginof some paranota, and the gonopods in which thesperm canal opens from a blade rather than a spine,as in the congeners.Description of the Holotype-Male. Length 67 mm,width 9 mm. Lateral margins and caudal angles ofparanota are pale yellow; all other surfaces are astrong blue-green. Body is close jointed anteriorly andloose jointed at middle and beyond. Except for para-113

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintnota 18 and 19, which are somewhat uptilted, allparanota are more or less horizontal. Pores are on segments5, 7,9,10,11,12,13,15-19; they open onthe dorsal surface of a lateral thickening, which continuesacross the anterior and posterior margins ofthe paranota (Fig. 15). Nonporiferous segments havea narrow thickening on these margins. Dorsal surfaceof metazonites is uniformly and closely granulated,with the exception of the marginal and pore thickenings.Collum is as wide as segment 2; its anterio~ andposterior margins are a little concave. Paranota of segments2 through about 16 tend to be squarish, butposterior paranota are directed more and more backward.Anterior angle of all metatergites is rounded; adenticle is on 2-4; posterior angle of 2-5 is rounded,on 6 and beyond it is right, and on more posterior segmentsit is slightly to moderately acute. Anal tergiteis triangular and relatively short. Anal scale is broadlytriangular. Sterna are setose. Sternum of legs 7 is excavated.Sternum of legs 6 is bilobed. Penes are membranousand small. Gonopods are contiguous at apex;their asetose acropodite bears a thick, flat bladethrough which the seminal canal opens, and a larger,thin mesial lobe (Fig. 16); prefemoral region is thicklysetose, as usual, and the setae, except for a conspicuouslong tuft on the anterior surface, tend to be uniformlyshort; sperm fossa is setose.Description of a Female Topoparatype-Length70 mm, width 9.5 mm. Agrees in general with themale as to somatic characters; differs in that the anteriormargin of the collum is straight rather thanslightly concave, and the lateral margins of the paranotaare a little more uneven. As in the congeners, themiddle piece on the vulvar opening is weak.Variations-Body width varies from 6.5 to 10.5mm. Size and intensity of the yellow areas on theparanota is variable. Specimens from caves are asdeeply pigmented and as large as epigean specimens.Range-Tamaulipas and San Luis POtOSI: from thevicinity of Gomez Fanas south to Xilitla. S. conspicuusis the largest green rhachodesmid in this area.Type Locality and Specimens-Rancho del Cielo,7 km NW Gomez Farias, Tamaulipas, Mexico, 11001200 m elevation. Four males, including the holotype,one female, and one immature, were collected 3-5June 1964 by J. Reddell, D. McKenzie, and L. Manire.Other Localities-Tamaulipas: San Jose, 8 km WGomez Fanas; La Gloria, 9 kmW Gomez Farias; Sierrade Guatemala, 15-20 km NW Gomez Farias, pine-oakforest, 1500-2000 m elevation; Sotano de EI Refugio,21 km SW Gomez Fan'as; Cueva del Rancho del Cielon. 7, 6 km NW Gomez Fan'as; 18 km NW Chamal, female;Sotano de EI Venadito, 17 km SE AntiguoMorelos, female; San Luis Potos(; EI Saito, 11 kmN EI Naranjo, on RIo Naranjo; Cave under EI Saito,11 km N EI Naranjo; Sotano de la Tinaja, 11 km NEValles, in darkness; Sotano del Tigre, 19 km NEValles; Sotano de Yerbaniz, 22 km NNE Valles, female;Miramar, near Xilitla, female; Cueva de PocaVentana, 1 km W Xilitla, female; Sotano de Tlamaya,5 km N Xilitla, female; Los Sabinos, 12 km NNEValles.Deposition-Holotype, USNM; male and femaleparatypes, The Museum, Texas Tech University; remainingspecimens, author.Strongylodesmus geddesi PocockS. geddesi Pocock, 1909, p. 173, pI. 13, fig. 5.Loomis, 1966, p. 13; 1968, p. 41.New Records-San Luis Potosf: Tamazunchale, 10July 1971, R.O. Albert; Veracruz: Tuxpan, 5 July1966, L. Wilson; Hidalgo: About 48 km N Jacala inthinly wooded mountains, 24 June 1954, N. Causey.Strongylodesmus harrisoni CauseyFigs. 17,18S. harrisoni Causey, 1971 a, p. 31.Body is about 45 mm long, relatively narrow,partially depigmented, and metatergites are finelygranular. Pore formula is normal. Pores open onprominent thickenings on posterior angles of paranota.Nonporiferous paranota have similar but smallthickenings (Fig. 17). Posterior thickenings of allparanota behind 5 are prolonged a little behind marginof paranota. On many paranota behind 5, caudalmargins are minutely serrated. Paranota between 3and 11 are tilted upward slightly; between 12 and 18the upward tilt is greater. These characters of theparanota (except the pore formula) vary somewhatfrom one cave to another. They are adequate for determinationof the female.Gonopodal opening is ovoid and margined, exceptacross the front, by a vertical rim. Gonopods are directedforward, and their spinous solenomerites arecontiguous. Gonopods (Fig. 18) are characterized bythe stout, bifid, subapical piece, of which the innerprong serves as the solenomerite. Sperm canal leadsinto the shallow, setose sperm fossa. Distal region oftelopodite is broad, thin, and apically acute. Setae arestraight, of moderate length, and abundant on theectoventral surface from the base almost to the apex.Range-Caves in the Sierra de Guatemala, vicinityof Gomez Fanas, Tamaulipas.Type Locality-Cueva del Rancho del Cielo no. 7,Rancho del Cielo, 6 km NW Gomez Farias, Tamaulipas,Mexico.114

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintr'~"~""~':'~""''''' ..",.." , ,."'"IIIIIIIII1114r·· .... '··~·"··"·'·d.'l~ ..1......IIIIIIIr"""'~""''''''''':;'''''''' .' ..I19 iI18Figs. 11-14. Rhachodesmus digitatus n.sp., topoparatypes. 11. Right half of segment 14, female. 12. Right half of segment14, male. 13. Posterior surface of right gonopod. 14. Anterior surface of apical region of left gonopod.Figs. 15-16. Strongylodesmus conspicuus n.sp., topoparatypes. 15. Paranotum of 9th segment, female. 16. Posterior view ofright gonopod.Figs. 17-18. Strongylodesmus harrisoni Causey, topoparatype. 17. Segments 14 and 15, male. 18. Posterior view of rightgonopod.Figs. 19-21. Tiphallus alberti n.sp., male holotype. 19. Right half of 1st and 2nd metatergites. 20. Segment 12. 21. Mesialview of left gonopod.115

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintNew Records-Caves not previously reported andtheir distance from Gomez Farias: Sumidero de EIJineo, 1 km NW; Cueva de Tres Manantiales, 17 kmSW; Cueva de las Perlas, 13.5 km NW; Sotano delLeon, 2 km S; Sotano de Tres Cerritos, 20 km NNW.A fine photograph of harrisoni from Cueva de laMina was published by Reddell and Mitchell (1971,p.207).Strongylodesmus potosianus (Chamberlin, 1947)Ceuthauxus potosianus Chamberlin, 1947, p. 32, fig.21.S. potosianus, Loomis, 1968, p. 41.Type Locality-Alverez, San Luis POtOSI: Mexico.New Records-San Luis PotosI: Sumidero de Fantasmas,Valle de los Fantasmas, 17 km W Sta. Catarina.This species and at least four other closely relatedspecies, including S. granulatus Loomis 1966 fromnear Tamazunchale, Hidalgo, comprise the potosianussuperspecies. Other collection sites, both epigean andcavernicolous, are in the vicinity of Pinal de Amolesand RIo Blanco, Queretaro.Genus Tiphallus ChamberlinTiphallus, Chamberlin, 1952, p. 566. Loomis, 1968,p.42.Pore arrangement is normal. Poriferous thickeningsare wide. Body is loose-jointed and green. Dorsal surfaceis smooth and horizontal except on the last 2-3segments, where the paranota are uptilted a little.In the gonopods, an open sperm furrow leads fromthe apex of the telopodite to the sperm canal, whichleads to the setose sperm fossa. Setae extend almostto the apex of the telopodite, and there is no sharpdivision between a setose basal region and a distalasetose region, as in Ceuthauxus.Type Species-T. aberrans Chamberlin, 1952.Tiphallus alberti, new speciesFigs. 19-21Diagnosis-A conspicuous lobe is on the caudalmargin of many paranota, arid the apex of the telopoditeof the gonopods is acute.Description of the Holotype-Male. Length about40 mm, width 6 mm. Uniformly colorless in alcohol,but probably blue-green in life. Metatergites aresmooth above. Pores open dorsally through wide marginalthickenings on segments 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13,15-19. Caudal margin of collum and the followingthree segments are weakly sinusoid (Fig. 19). On segments4 through 16 the curve on the caudal margin of116the paranota is strongly developed (Fig. 20). Anteriorangles are rounded and the denticle is obscure, alllatera' margins are smooth, and the lateral thickeningsare prolonged a little behind the caudal margin. Posteriorangles of segments 17-19 are acute. Sterna aresetose. Sterna of legs 6 and 7 are excavated. No pregonopodallegs are lobate. Penes are membranous andthe usual length for the family.Gonopods (Fig. 21) are contiguous at base andmiddle. A sinuous sperm canal connects the spermfurrow and the sperm fossa. Short, thickly spaced setaeextend almost to the thin, angular apex.Type Locality and Specimens-26 km SW Cd. Victoria,Tamaulipas, Mexico, 1128 m elevation, twomales, including the holotype, were collected 18 July1967 by R. O. Albert.Other Record-Nuevo Leon: 4 km N Zaragosa, onemale, 8 September 1965. This specimen is small(width 4 mm) but otherwise agrees with the specimensfrom the type locality.Deposition-Holotype, USNM; male topoparatype,The Museum, Texas Tech University; male paratype,author.Etymology-This species is dedicated to Dr. R.O.Albert, in recognition of his aid to the AMCS.Tiphallus frivolus, new speciesFig. 22Diagnosis-Distal region of telopodite of gonopodsis a squarish, hard lamina with a sperm gutter runningfrom the apex to an open sperm sinus, which connectsby a short sperm canal to the seminal fossa. Differsfrom T. aberrans in the much shorter sperm canal.Description of the Holotype-Male. Length 40 mm,width 4.8 mm. Color is bright blue-green. Shape ofbody is as in T. aberrans. Metatergites are smoothabove. Pores are on segments 5, 7, 9, 10, 11,12,13,15-19. Legs are long and slender. Sterna are setose.Coxae of legs 5-7 are thickly setose and swollen ventrad.Coxae of legs 3 have a small cylindrical lobe directedmesiad. Penes are membranous and wider thanis usual in the family. Gonopodal opening is ovoid,with the thin lateral margins abruptly lengthened.Gonopods (Fig. 22) are parallel, contiguous only atthe base, directed forward. The usual mesial spermfossa is small; just beyond it is a small depressionguarded by two lobes into which the long sperm furrowdrains.Type Locality and Specimens-Cuevacita de Nopales,7 km S San Francisco, 17 km W Sta. Catarina,San Luis POtOSI: Mexico. Male holotype and 2 immatureswere collected 29 November 1968 by J. Jarl.Deposition-Holotype, USNM; immatures, author.

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint26Fig. 22. Tiphallus frivo/us n.sp., holotype. Mesial surface of right gonopod.Fig. 23. Uncu/abes co/umbinus n.sp., paratype. Subcaudal view of right gonopod.Figs. 24-26. Gibberdesmus amp/us n.sp., holotype. 24. Segment 10. 25. Segments 18 and 19. 26. Posterior surface of rightgonopod.Etymology-Frivolous, meaning trifling, refers tothe small sperm fossa.Genus Unculabes CauseyUnculabes Causey, 1971a, p. 31.Small to medium size (16-38 mm long) rhachodesmidscharacterized by a hook on the mentum of themale and by the paranota, which on segments 5-19are progressively smaller, more acute and closer to thebody. Paranota of segment 19 are minute and spinous.On the paranota of segment 18 they are a littlelarger. Caudal angles of middle body paranota are alittle uptilted. Anterior paranota are high, wide, andsquarish. Body is either depigmented or reddish, brittle,and behind the middle is loose jointed. Body surfaceis shining and smooth except for a few minutesetae in a transverse row. Paranota have a denticle onthe anterior angle, a minute setae on the middle of thelateral margin, and the posterior angle of all exceptthe most anterior segments are acutely angular. Poresopen, mostly laterally, on narrow lateral welts on segments5,7,9,10,12,13,15-18. Nonporiferous paranotahave no marginal welts. Anal scale is acute. Sternaare setose and lack lobes. Legs are long. Penes aresmall, slender, and conical.117

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintbears several minute prongs. . . . . . . . . .. 44. Dorsal peg of segment 19 is undivided apically;caudal margin of segment 20 is divided into5 shallow lobes and extends beyond segment19egenus CauseyDorsal peg of segment 19 is bifid apically;caudal margin of segment 20 is divided into6 shallow lobes and is completely covered bytergite of segment 19 . . . . . .. amp/us n.sp.Gibberdesmus amplus, new speciesFigs. 24-26Diagnosis-Similar to egenus and ana/agous in absenceof pore cones and openings; characterized bylarger body size, greater width of the tergite of segment19, and gonopods, which have distal region ofthe lateral branch highly branched.Description of the Holotype-Male. Length 11 mm,width 2.5 mm, 20 segments,loose jointed, moderatelyflattened as usual for the genus. Metatergites aboveand below to legs and head down to antennae aregrayish yellow color because of adhering soil particles.All other parts of body are whitish except apices ofpegs, which are blackish. Honeycombed pattern ofdorsum is largely obscured by soil layer, but manyspicules protrude through soil. Collum has 10 equalmarginal lobes, which are much shallower than marginallobes of typical segments. Segment 2 has 3equal lateral lobes, segments 3 through 18 have 2(Fig. 24, segment 10, a typical segment), 19 (Fig. 25)lacks lateral incisions, and 20, which is minute andcovered entirely by 19, has 6 small marginal lobes.Pegs are slenderer than in congeners. The two componentsof some of the pegs (2, 3, 4, and 15-19) arespread apart slightly at the apex. On typical segments,there are 4- series of 3 small tubercles; some in theouter series are indistinct. No tubercles are visible onparanota or on collum. Article 3 of leg 3 is swollenon all surfaces; the adjacent articles are not swollen.Behind gonopods, legs extend slightly beyond lateralmargin of paranota.Coxa of gonopods is large, and telopodite is contiguouswith homologue along mesial surface. Mesialbranch of telopodite is divided into 2 unequal prongs,of which outer and larger is the solenomerite. Lateralbranch is long, directed down and then mesiad; distallyit has an antler-like aspect, being divided intosome 16 or 17 minute prongs (the homologues areslightly different), somewhat resembling egenus. Unlikeegenus, however, there are 4 thin, longitudinallobes on subapical region of the telopodite (Fig. 26).Variations-Females are up to 13 mm long and 3mm wide. Specimens of the last immature stadiumshow clearly the components of the dorsal pegs, i.e.,the 6 tubercles of the 2 mesial series of tubercles.Younger immatures have the 4 equal series of 3 tubercleswhich are typical of so many stylodesmids.Younger specimens usually lack the clay layer, revealingdeep lateral and caudal invaginations on theparanota.Type Locality and Specimens-Cueva del Guano,10 km NE Valle Nacional, Oaxaca, Mexico. Maleholotype was collected 28 December 1972 by JamesReddell, David McKenzie, Martha McKenzie, and StuartMurphy.Other Records-Oaxaca: Grutas de Monteflor, 6km NE Valle Nacional, two males, five females, manyimmatures, 28 December 1972, James Reddell, DavidMcKenzie, Martha McKenzie, and Stuart Murphy.Cueva del Guayabo, 12 km NE Valle Nacional, manyspecimens, 29 December 1972, James Reddell, DavidMcKenzie, Martha McKenzie, and Stuart Murphy.Deposition-Holotype, USNM; paratypes of bothsexes, The Museum, Texas Tech University; other specimens,author.Etymology-Amp/us, meaning broad, refers to thegreater width and length of the tergite of segment 19,which distinguishes this species from the congeners.FAMI LY TRICHOPOLYDESMIDAECollections of this family made by the AMCS aresmall but varied. In addition to the two species describedhere, there are specimens of several others. Iknow of no epigean collections from Mexico.Genus Tylogoneus newDiagnosis-Troglobitic trichopolydesmids characterizedby the reduction of all paranota behind segment2 to minute angular pieces. Telopodite of gonopodsis divided into three simple branches, each ofthem curved mesiad across its homologue.Depigmented, 20 body segments, 13 mm or less inlength and about one-fifteenth as thick, stronglymoniliform, with the prozonites much exposed. Poreformula is normal, with pores opening on elongated,slightly raised areas which cover the paranota. Fronsand vertex of head are setose. Articles 5 and 6 of antennaeare thickened. Collum is narrower than thehead, semicircular, and the margins are smooth. Metatergiteof segment 2 is almost as wide as the collumwhen viewed from above; its paranota are small, withthe lateral margins smooth except for two strong setae,and the caudal margin is convex. Paranota of theremaining segments are minute and angular; thosebearing pores are raised, and when viewed from be-119

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint29283031 32Figs. 27-31. Tylogoneus rainesi n.gen. & n.sp., holotype. 27. Antenna. 28. Collum and segments 2 and 3; only the lateralsetae 'are shown. 29. Outer profile of caudal surface of segment 7. 30. Hind end of body. 31. Caudal view of gonopods. Figs.27-29 are drawn to the same scale.Fig. 32. Tylogoneus minus n.sp., holotype. Caudal view of gonopods.hind appear slightly fungiform; nonporiferous paranotaare slightly smaller. Caudal margin of preanalscale is broadly rounded and bears several long setae.Similar long setae are on mesial margins of anal valvesand anal apex of tergite. Setae on metatergites areshort, acute, borne on minute nodules, and are eitherabundant or sparse. Legs are thin and long. Sterna aresparsely setose.Coxal segment of gonopods is small for the family.Telopodite consists of a long lateral branch which isminutely setose most of its length and of two shortermesial branches, of which the posterior is slightly120

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintclavate apically and the anterior carries the spermcanal. Gonopodal opening is conspicuously rimmedlaterad and less so caudad.Type Species-T. rainesi n.sp.Range-Caves in the mountains of Tamaulipas andSan Luis PotOSI:Etymology-The Greek noun tylo, meaning knotand referring to the appearance of the poriferousparanota, is combined with the Greek noun goneus,meaning parent. Masculine gender.Tylogoneus rainesi, new speciesFigs. 27-31Diagnosis-Characterized by the abu ndant setaewhich cover the metatergites, and by the acutelynarrowed distal region of the lateral branch of thegonopods.Description of the Holotype-Male. Length 13 mm,width 0.8 mm. Antennae are clavate, as shown in Fig.27; articles 5 and 6 bear a few especially long setae;the remaining setae are shorter; pits on articles 5 and6 are lined with very short, thin sensilla. Collum andsegments 2 and 3 are shown in Fig. 28. On the remainingsegments, the paranota are reduced to high,acute angles (Figs. 29, 30); pores open laterad onthese angular pieces. Setae on metatergites are shorterthan on anal region, numerous, and uniformly distributed.Preanal scale is semicircular, with severallong marginal setae and two in a more central position.Each of the three branches of the gonopods crossesits homologue; the long lateral branch is sparsely setosemost of its length, spinous at the apex, and bearsa subapical process on the mesial surface (Fig. 31).Type Locality and Specimens-Cueva de Poca Ventana,1 km W Xilitla, San Luis PotOSI: Mexico. Onemale, the holotype, was collected January 1968 byT.erry W. Raines, for whom the species is named.Deposition-Male holotype, USNM.Tylogoneus minus, new speciesFig. 32Diagnosis-Characterized by the setae on the metatergites,which are very short, sparse, and arranged inthree transverse rows; also by the distal region of thelateral branch of the gonopods, which is bladelike,wider than in T. rainesi, and lacks a subapical process.Description of the Holotype-Male. Length 11 mm,width 0.7 mm. With the exception of the almost invisiblesetae on the metatergites, the somatic charactersare as described for the genus and for T. rainesi.Gonopods are very close to rainesi, differing in thewider apical region and the absence of a subapicalprocess on the lateral branch, and in the slendereranterior branch.Female Topoparatypes-Gravid. Size of paranotaand other somatic characters of segments 7-20 are asdescribed for the holotype.Type Locality and Specimens-Cueva de Tres Manantiales,Sierra de Guatemala, 17 km SW GomezFarias, Tamaulipas, Mexico. One entire male, theholotype, and a specimen of each sex, both lackingthe first 7 segments, were collected in November 1971by W. Russell and D. McKenzie.Deposition-Male holotype, USNM; fragment offemale topoparatype, The Museum, Texas Tech University;fragment of male topoparatype, author.Etymology-Minus refers to the scantily setosecondition of the dorsum, in contrast to the thicklysetose dorsum of rainesi.ORDER CAMBALIDAFAMILY CAMBALIDAEGenus Mexicambala CauseyMexicambala Causey, 1971b, pp. 273-276.Type Species-M. russelli Causey.Species-Four.Range-Caves in mountains of Tamaulipas, SanLuis POtOSI~ and Oaxaca.Mexicambala blanda CauseyM. blandus Causey, 1971b, pp. 276, 278, figs. 1c, 2b,3.Type Locality-Tamaulipas: Harrison Sinkhole,Rancho del Cielo, 5 km NW Gomez Farias.New Records- Tamaulipas: Sumidero de EI Jineo,1 km NW Gomez Farias; Sotano del Leon, 1 km SGomez Farias; Cueva de la Paloma, 1 km NE GomezFartas; Sotano de EI Molino, 1 km NW Gomez Fartas,Sotano de Tres Cerritos, 20 km NNW Gomez Fartas,female; Cueva de Tres Manantiales, 17 km SW GomezFarias; Sotano de Vasquez, 7 km SE Ocampo.Mexicambala russelli CauseyM. russelli Causey, 1971b, p. 279, figs. 1d, 2c.Type Locality-San Luis Potos/: Cueva de la Porra,3 km N Xilitla.New Record-San Luis PotosI': Cueva de la Laja,2 km N Ahuacatlan.121

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintMexicambala inopis CauseyM. inopis Causey, 1971b, p. 276, fig. lb.Type Locality-Tamaulipas: Sotano de la Joya deSalas, 22 km NW Gomez Fanas.New Record-Tamaulipas: Cueva de la Capilla,13.5 km NW Gomez Fanas.LITERATURE CITEDAttems, Carl. 1940. Das Tierreich, Lief. 70 (PolydesmoideaIII), pp.1-577.Causey, Nell B. 1971a. Millipedes in the cOllection of theAssociation for Mexican Cave Studies (Diplopoda), pp.23-32. In Reddell, James R., and Robert W. Mitchell, eds.,Studies on the Cavernicole Fauna of Mexico. Assoc. Mex.Cave Stud. Bull., 4.Causey, Nell B. 1971b. The Cambalida in Mexican caves,with descriptions of three new species of Mexicambala.Proc. BioI. Soc. Washington, 84(34):271-282.Chamberlin, R.V. 1942. On centipeds and millipeds fromMexican caves. Bull. Univ. Utah, BioI. Ser., 7(2): 1-19.Chamberlin, R.V. 1943. On Mexican millipeds. Bull. Univ.Utah, BioI. Ser., 8(3):1-103.Loomis, H.F. 1966. Descriptions and records of MexicanDiplopoda. Ann. Ent. Soc. America, 59( 1): 11-27.Loomis, H.F. 1968. A checklist of the millipeds of Mexicoand Central America. Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., 266:1-167.Loomis, H.F. 1971. Rectified type locality for two millipedsformerly credited to Panama. Proc. BioI. Soc. Washington,84(21): 175-176.Pocock, R.1. 1903-1910. Diplopoda, in Biologia CentraliAmericana, Zoologia, Chilopoda and Diplopoda, pp. 41217, pis. 4-15.Reddell, James R., and Robert W. Mitchell. 1971. A checklistof the cave fauna of Mexico. II. Sierra de Guatemala,Tamaulipas, pp. 181-216. In Reddell, James R., andRobert W. Mitchell, eds., Studies on the CavernicoleFauna of Mexico. Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 4.122

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintTWO NEW TROGLOBITIC AMBLYPYGIDA OF THE GENUS TARANTULAFROM MEXICAN CAVES (ARACHNIDA)J. Mark RowlandDepartment of Biology, and The Museum, Texas Tech UniversityLubbock, Texas 79409INTRODUCTIONThis paper is concerned with the description of twovery interesting new species of troglobitic Amblypygidafrom southern Mexico, one from Tabasco, anotherfrom Yucatan. These are the first troglobites of thisorder of arachnids reported from the family Tarantulidae,and from the New World. Charinus diblemma(Simon) is the only other known troglobite.Chamberlin and Ivie (1938) report T. fuscimana(C.L. Koch) from a number of caves in Yucatan. It isinteresting to note that they record this species fromthe very caves in which one of the new troglobitesoccurs. It is possible that they collected specimens ofthe troglobitic species, but failed to notice them intheir collections, or passed them off as immature orfreshly molted specimens without thorough examination.In still other collections from the type localityof the new Yucatan species I have seen fully eyed andpigmented amblypygids which are perhaps referableto T. fuscimana.While amblypygids have long excited interest, as ataxonomic unit they remain generally imperfectlyknown, although Weygoldt (1972) has made greatprogress in the genus Charinus. Our poor knowledgeis due largely to their reclusive habits which allowthem to escape the general collector. They are relativelymodestly represented in collections both innumbers of species and specimens. Unfortunatelythere is little hope of accurately identifying immaturespecimens, which further obscures our knowledge ofthis group.The order Amblypygida in Mexico is r,~;)resentedin the literature by only four described species:Tarantulacrassimana (C.L. Koch), T. whitei (Gervais),T. fuscimana and Acanthophrynus coronatu, (Butler).Reddell (1965, 1971) and Reddell and 'VIitchell(1971a, 1971b) gave the most thorough account ofthe records of these species, though they li,t c.averecords only. Other records of amblypygids in ~Mxicoare given by Chamberlin and Ivie (1938) andRyckman (1956). Recent advances in the study ofthis order (Weygoldt and Levi, pers. comm., andQuintero, indirect pers. comm.) show, however, thattraditionally used characters may not be entirely adequateto correctly distinguish species. This informationmight shed doubt on current methods 01 di$tinguishingMexican species and further compli'~dt~sthe problem of identifying the considerable array offorms occurring in Mexico.Once again I must tender my thanks to Dr. andMrs. Clarence Goodnight and Mr. James Reddell forproviding excellent collections, and to Dr. Robert W.Mitchell for his continued support.FAMILY TARANTULIDAETarantula chacmool, new speciesHolotype-An adult male, taken in Actun Kaua,Yucatan, Mexico, on 23 August 1972 by R.W. Mitchelland J.W. Cooke, and deposited in the AmericanMuseum of Natural History, New York, New York.123

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFigs. 1-2. Dorsal view of carapace: 1, Tarantula chacmool, showing reduced eyes; 2, Tarantula sp. of similar size, showingnormally developed eyes. Note also relative pigmentation.124

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintParatypes-One juvenile taken at the same locality,on the same date by the same collectors as the holotype,deposited in The Museum, Texas Tech University,Lubbock, Texas; one specimen of undeterminedage and sex and one juvenile, taken in Grutas deSalankanche (Salaam Canche), Chichen Itza, Yucatan,Mexico, in July 1948, by C. and M. Goodnight,and both deposited in the American Museum of NaturalHistory.Description-Cephalothorax. Carapace with veryfine, widely scattered granulations, 1.3 times widerthan long; epirostrum visible from above, anteriormargin of carapace between the limits of the lateraleye groups nearly straight, with 18 setae mounted onshort, but well defined tubercles, the three outermoston each side pointing diagonally inward, the next internalfour on each side pointing diagonally outward,and the middle two pointing nearly straight ahead,similar setae border remainder of carapace, but not asclosely associated; emarginate posteriorly; eyes reducedin size and completely lacking pigmentation,median eyes separated by more than three times theirdiameter, ocular mound nearly obsolete, with twomedian setae longitudinally in line, all lateral eyesslightly larger than median eyes, none contiguous, noevidence of tapetum; tritosternum about three timeslonger than basal Width, with 12 paired and one mediansetae; tetrasternum and pentasternum nearlyequal in dimensions, with four and two setae respectively;metasternum with four setae.Abdomen more sparsely granular than carapace;dorsoventral muscles and heart visible through cuticle;terga III-VIII with median edges produced anteriorlyand emarginate posteriorly; terga IV-VIII decreasingslightly in width and increasing slightly in length posteriorly;tergum XII (anal plate) not incrassate. SternumII (genital sternum) produced distally; sterna IIIand IV emarginate anteromedially, produced posteromedially;sterna V-VIII decreasing slightly in widthand increasing-slightly in length posteriorly.Pedipalps. Anterodorsal margin of femur with sixspines of the following proportions (numbered fromproximal to distal) 3 >2 > 1,5 >4,6, tubercle follows6 (tubercles have apical setae, spines do not);anteroventral margin of femur with seven spines of thefollowing proportions, 1 >2 >6 >3 >4, 7 >5, tuberclesfollow 6 and 7; anterodorsal margin of patellawith nine spines of the following proportions, 3, 6 >4>5,7>2>8>1,9, tubercle follows 9; anteroventralmargin of patella with 11 spines of the followingproportions 7 >3 >5 >9> 1 >4> 10 >6,8>2> 11; anterodorsal margin of tibia with sevenspines of the following proportions, 2> 1 > 5>4 >3>7 >6; anteroventral margin of tibia with sixoo000oo00000o 00005 o 000Figs. 3-4. Anterior margin of carapace: 3, T. chacmoo/,showing nearly straight margin; 4, T. chiztun, showing lobedmargin.Figs. 5-6. Dorsal view of tibia of right leg IV, showingposition of trichobothria: 5, T. chacmoo/; 6, T. chiztun.spines of the following proportions, 3 >2 >6 >5 >4 > 1, tubercles follow 2 and 3.Legs. Segments elongate, more densely granularthan carapace; patella of all legs somewhat darkerthan other segments; femur of leg I 3.5 times longerthan carapace; length of segments given in Table 1.Comparisons-See under T. chiztun.Measurements-Total length of the holotype is3o46125

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint20.1. The carapacal length and width is 7.3 and 10.1respectively. See also Table 1. All measurements arein millimeters.Variation-Specimens from Grutas de Balankanchediffer most significantly from those of the type localityin retaining some evidence of the tapetum in thelateral eyes. Also, Balankanche paratypes have 15 and16 tritosternal setae and four pentasternal setae, anda few other minor setational differences exist.Distribution-Tarantula chacmool is known onlyfrom Actun Kaua and Grutas de Balankanche, thoughit is undoubtedly distributed through many caves ofthe area.Etymology-The specific name is taken from ChacMool, the reclining Toltec-Itza figure which decoratesseveral edifices at the nearby archeological site ofChichen Itza.Table 1. Tarantula chacmool.Pedipalp I II III IVCoxa 1.4 1.5 2.0 2.3 2.5Trochanter 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.3Femur 2.5 12.8 7.8 9.0 7.5Patella 2.6 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0Tibia 1.6 30.8 11.6 12.9Basitarsus1.0 1.11.9 38.6Tarsus 1.0 1.1Tarantula chiztun, new speciesHolotype-An adult, taken in Las Grutas de Cocona,Teapa, Tabasco, Mexico, on 1 August 1948, byC. and M. Goodnight and deposited in the AmericanMuseum of Natural History.Description-Cephalothorax. Carapace with veryfine, widely scattered granulations, 1.2 times widerthan long; epirostrum not visible from above, anteriormargin of carapace between the limits of the lateraleye groups emarginate medially, forming two laterallobes over the chelicerae, with 14 setae mounted onshort, poorly defined tubercles, the left outermostand right three outermost pointing diagonally inward;the left five next outermost and right four next outermostpointing diagonally inward; the middle twopointing nearly straight ahead, similar setae borderremainder of carapace at about same density; emarginateposteriorly; eyes reduced in size and completelylacking pigment, median eyes separated by more thanthree times their diameter, ocular mound nearly obsolete,with two lateral setae, all lateral eyes slightlylarger than median eyes, none contiguous, the medianmost the smallest, tapetum clearly visible in some;tritosternum slightly less than four times longer thanbasal Width, with 16 paired and one median setae;tetrasternum and pentasternum nearly equal in dimensions,with four and two setae respectively; metasternumwith six setae.Abdomen much more sparsely granular than carapace;dorsoventral muscles and heart visible throughcuticle; terga III-VIII with median edges producedanteriorly and emarginate posteriorly; terga IV-VIIIdecreasing slightly in width and increasing slightly inlength posteriorly; tergum XII (anal plate) incrassate.Sternum II (genital sternum) produced distally; sternumIII and IV emarginate anteromedially, producedposteromedially, sterna V-VIII decreasing slightly inwidth and increasing slightly in length posteriorly.Pedipalps. Anterodorsal margin of femur with sixspines of the following proportions (numbered fromproximal to distal), 3>2>1 >5>4>6, tuberclesfollow 2,5 and 6; anteroventral margin of femur withnine spines of the following proportions, 1 >2 >3 >6 >4,5 >8 > 7 >9, tubercles follow 3 and 5; anterodorsalmargin of patella with nine spines of the followingproportions, 3>6 >4 >5 >2,7 >8 >9 >1,tubercle follows 9; anteroventral margin of patellawith 11 spines of the following proportions, 8>3 >6>10>2,5>11 >4>9>1, tubercles follow 2,5 and 11; anterodorsal margin of tibia with sevenspines of the following proportions, 2 > 1 > 6 > 5 >4>7>3; anteroventral margin of tibia with fivespines of the following proportions, 2> 1 >5 >4 >3.Legs. Segments long and more densely granularthan abdomen, but more sparsely granular than carapace;patella of all legs much darker than other segments,femur of leg I slightly less than 3.5 timeslonger than carapace; length of leg segments given inTable 2.Comparisons-Tarantula chiztun and T. chacmoolare easily distinguished from all other New Worldamblypygids by their extremely reduced eyes, and depigmentation.They are quite small, being about halfthe size of epigean Mexican species of the genusTarantula. The limbs, notably the first walking legs,are also proportionately longer."Figs. 7-18. Spination of left pedipalp: 7, anterodorsal margin of femur of T. chacmoo/; 8, anterodorsal margin of femur ofT. chiztun; 9, anteroventral margin of femur of T. chacmoo/; 10, anteroventral margin of femur of T. chiztun; 11, anterodorsalmargin of patella of T. chacmoo/; 12, anterodorsal margin of patella of T. chiztun; 13, anteroventral margin of patella of T.chacmoo/; 14, anteroventral margin of patella of T. chiztun; 15, anterodorsal margin of tibia of T. chacmoo/; 16, anterodorsalmargin of tibia of T. chiztun; 17, anteroventral margin of tibia of T. chacmoo/; 18, anteroventral margin of tibia of T. chiztun.126


AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintThe most distinctive and probably the most significantdifferences between T. chiztun and T. chacmoolare the structure of the anterior margin of the carapace,and the epirostrum. In T. chacmool the anteriormargin is nearly straight, but in T. chiztun it is characteristicallylobed over the chelicerae and deeply emarginatemedially. The epirostrum is not visible fromabove in T. chiztun, but is in T. chacmool. Othercharacters distinguishing these species are the spinationsof the pedipalps. The anterodorsal and anteroventralspination of most pedipalpal segments are different,however the most obvious differences areapparent in the spination of the anteroventral marginof the femurs.Measurements-Total length of the holotype is22.7. The carapacal length and width is 8.7 and 12.5respectively. See also Table 2.Variation-Only one specimen of this species wasavailable for study.Distribution-Tarantula chiztun is known only fromLas Grutas de Cocona, Teapa, Tabasco, Mexico.Etymology-The specific name is the Mayan wordfor amblypygid, used as a noun in apposition.Remarks-The case of two closely related animals,one a troglophile, the other a troglobite, occuring inthe same cave provides an extremely interesting problemfor study. Tarantula fuscimana and T. chacmoolpresent such a problem. The likely general explanationof this situation may appear relatively simple.The period of original colonization of the cavescould have been followed by a period of unfavorableclimate or topographic change that forced the colonizingspecies out of the area, except for isolatedpockets such as in caves. With amelioration of climatethe original colonizing species then could havereinvaded the area. Enough divergence on the part ofeither or both the original (ancestral) and relict populationswould be necessary to establish reproductiveisolation in order to maintain genetic integrity ofboth populations once they came into contact.Table 2. Tarantula chiztun.Pedipalp I II III IVCoxa 2.0 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.9Trochanter 0.7 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.3Femur 4.2 13.6 9.8 11.1 9.3Patella 4.2 1.0 1.4 1.1 1.2Tibia 2.1 28.6 14.0 16.2 15.4Basitarsus1.0 1.3 1.12.3Tarsus 1.4 1.6 1.4LITERATURE CITEDChamberlin, R.V. and W. Ivie. 1938. Arachnida of the ordersPedipalpida, Scorpionida and Ricinulida. Carnegie I nst.Washington Publ., 491: 101-107.Reddell, J.R. 1965. Biology of the caves of the northern EIAbra range. Assn. Mexican Cave Stud. News., 1121:19-21.Reddell, J.R. 1971. A preliminary bibliography of Mexicancave biology with a checklist of published records. Assn.Mexican Cave Stud. Bull., 3. 184 pp.Reddell, J.R. and R.W. Mitchell. 1971a. A checklist of thecave fauna of Mexico. I. Sierra de EI Abra, Tamaulipasand San Luis Potos( Assn. Mexican Cave Stud. Bull., 4:137-180.Reddell, J.R. and RW. Mitchell. 1971b. A checklist of thecave fauna of Mexico. II. Sierra de Guatemala, Tamaulipas.Assn. Mexican Cave Stud. Bull., 4: 181-215.Ryckman, R.E. 1956. Parasitic and some nonparasitic arthropodsfrom bat caves in Texas and Mexico. Amer. MidI.Nat., 56(1):186-190.Weygoldt, P. 1972. Charontidae (Amblypygi) aus Brasilien.Zool. Jahrb. Syst., 99: 107-132.128

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintTHE GENUS PSEUDOSINELLA IN MESOAMERICAN CAVESKenneth ChristiansenGrinnell College, Grinnell, IowaOver the past eight years, a number of people havebeen sending me collembola from the caves of Mexicoand Guatemala. Most of these have been sent by J.Reddell, P. Strinati, and S. Peck. A number of interestingnew species have turned up. In this and a subsequentpaper (presently in preparation by Dr. Mitra)the new species of the Entomobryinae and Paronellinaewill be described. All of the new Entomobryinaebelong to the genus Pseudosinella and represent aclosely linked series of species.As would be expected the members of this genushave evolved a considerable number of cave forms inMesoamerica. The forms I examined belonged to thewidespread P. violenta (Folsom) and four and probablyfive undescribed species. All the species probablyshare a common ancestry since they all display thesame rather unusual chaetotaxy on the labial triangleand have basically the same second abdominal chaetotaxy.The form herein described as P. reddelli prob·ably is close to the ancestral stock for all species.The table below summarizes some of the majorfeatures of the different species found in Mesoamericaso far. The form indicated as P. sp.? is represented bya single specimen and is thus not being presently described.Pseudosinella bonita, new speciesFig. 1Description-Color: white, without trace of eyesor pigment. Tenent hair short and acuminate. Unguiselongate scoop shaped, without lateral or externalteeth, but with a cluster of three small internal teethnear base. Antennae without scales. Apical sense or·gan of third antennal segment with two apparentlyflattened and ciliate or striate blades, Gisin's chaetotaxyformula as follows: head: R, 1(0),0(1); secondName Inner Ungual Tenent Hair 4th Abdominal Eyes Cephalic LocalitiesTeeth Macrochaetae MacrochaetaeP. violenta 4 clavate 0+2 0 R-O-O Mexico: Durango, Chihuahua,CoahuilaP. reddelli, 3 weakly clavate 1+2 2+2-4+4 R-O-O Mexico: Nuevo Leon,n.sp.Coahuila, San LuisPOtOSI: TamaulipasP. bonita, 2-3 acuminate 1+2 0 R-l-0 Mexico: Oaxacan.sp.P. strinatii, 3-4 truncate to 0+2 0 R-l·l Mexico: Tamaulipas,n.sp. clavate San Luis Potos"P. finca, 3 acuminate 1+2 0 R-l-l Guatemala: Alta Veran.sp.pazP. sp.? 3 clavate 1+2 0 R-O-l Mexico: Veracruz129

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintabdominal segment: p absent, A, q; fourth abdominalsegment: 1=2, S present; labial triangle: m 1, m2, r(minute with no visible setal, e, 1 1 , 1 2 , The cephalicchaetotaxy is quite variable with the typical formulabeing R, 1, 0; howev~r R, 0, 1, and R, 1, 1 also occur.Ml:Jcro bidentate with apical tooth very long. Denswith slender spines in from 1 to 3 rows along basalfourth of dens. Maximum size 3.6 mm (See Table 1.)Remarks-This striking species shows strong convergencewith P. spinosa from the United States butdiffers in the absence of a median inner ungual tooth,the structure of the mucro and the chaetotaxy. It isthe most highly evolved cave species so far seen fromMexico. The extremely elongate antennae allows immediateidentification.localities-MEXICO: Oaxaca: Cueva Bonita delPresidente, 2 km N Huautla (Type Locality).Pseudosinella strinatii, new speciesFig. 2Description-Color: White to yellowish withouttrace of pigment. Eyes and cornea absent. Tenent hairacuminate to strongly clavate. Unguis variable butwith at least three inner teeth and external and lateralteeth. Antennae without scales. Apical sense organ ofthird antennal segment with two slightly swollen setaeand the usual accessory setae. Gisin's chaetotaxy formulaas follows: head: R, 1, 1; second abdominal segment:p absent, A, q; fourth abdominal segment: 0+2,S present; labial triangle: m1, m2, r (minute with novisible seta), e, 1 1, 1 2 , Mucro bidentate with subapicaltooth median in position and basal spine welldeveloped. Dens without spines or spine·like setae.Maximum size 1.6 mm. (See Table 2.)Remarks-The 0+2 macrochaetae on the fourthabdominal segment is shared by very few non-MexicanPseudosinella species. It may be readily separatedfrom all of these by the absence of ciliated setae onthe labial triangle.The specimens of this species fall into three relativelywell-marked forms on the basis of the footcomplex and cephalic chaetotaxy. These are: Form A:Cephalic chaetotaxy R, 1, 1, and with a truncate oracuminate tenent hair and three inner ungual teeth;Form B: Cephalic chaetotaxy R, 1, 1, and with astrongly clavate tenent hair and four inner ungualteeth; and Form C: Cephalic chaetotaxy variable,usually R, 0, 0, but sometimes R, 0, 1, or R, 1, 1 andwith a strongly clavate tenent hair and three innerungual teeth. While it may prove that these are bestconsidered as separate species the existence of someintermediacy in these conditions and the general similarityof the three forms makes me consider them atpresent as a single variable species.130localities-MEXICO: San Luis Potos/: (Form A)Sotano del Tigre, 14 km NNE Valles; Cueva de Taninuln. 1, 13 km SE Valles; (Form B)-Cueva Pinta,12 km NE Valles; Cueva Chica, 16 km SE Valles;Cueva de la Lagunita, 15 km NNE Ciudad de! Malz;Tamaulipas: (Form A)-Cueva de EI Pachon, 18 kmSSW Ciudad Mante; Cueva de la Florida, 16 km SSWCiudad Mante; (Form C)-Crystal Cave, Rancho delCielo, 5 km NW Gomez Fan'as (Type Locality).Pseudosinella reddelli, new speciesFig. 3Description-Color: Background white to pale yellowwith blue pigment. Pigment varies from beingonly lightly scattered over body and on eye patches tomoderately heavy over dorsum except intersegmentalmembranes. Legs and antennae usually darker thanbody. Eyes 2+2 or 4+4 on a single eyepatch. Tenenthair weakly clavate. Unguis with two basal externalteeth and three relatively small inner teeth and twopairs of small clear lateral teeth. A relatively largespecies, the adults range from 2.5 to 3.1 mm. Antennaewithout scales. Gisin's chaetotaxy: m, m, r (minutewith no visible setal, e, 1 1 , 1 2 , Mucro bidentatewith anteapical tooth generally close to apical tooth.Basal spine weakly developed. Dens without spines orspine-like setae. (See Table 3.)Remarks-This species breaks down into two apparentgeographic variations: a smaller form with4+4 or 3+3 eyes from Nuevo leon and Coahuila, anda generally larger 2+2 eyed form from Tamaulipasand San Luis POtOSI: The species can be readily separatedfrom all the well-known reduced eye species bythe total lack of ciliate setae on the labial triangle.Known only from caves, it will probably be found tohave surface specimens.localities-MEXICO: Coahuila: Gruta de la Cuevacillas,18 km E Arteaga; Nuevo Leon: Resumidero dePablillo, Pablillo, 33 km S Galeana; Tamaulipas: Cuevade la Mina, 7 km NW Gomez FarIas; Bee Cave, 16 kmNE Ocampo (Type Locality); Cueva del Infiernillo,8 km W Gomez FarIas; Cueva del Remolino, 8.5 kmW Gomez Fanas; Cueva de la Capilla, 13.5 km NWGomez FarIas; Cueva de Tres Manantiales, 23 km NWLimon; San Luis Potos/: Sotano de Ojo de Agua, 4 kmS San Francisco, 30 km ESE San Luis POtOSI; Sotanode la Golondrina, Valle de los Fantasmas, 30 km ESESan Luis POtOSI~Pseudosinella finca, new speciesFig. 4Description-Color: White, without trace of pigmentor eyes. Apical organ of third antennal segmentwith two clearly swollen oval setae. Tenent hair slen-

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintder and acuminate. Unguis usually with small butclear outer and paired lateral teeth and with threeinner teeth. The basalmost inner tooth is long andwing-like, projecting laterally. Antennae withoutscales. Gisin's chaetotaxy formula: head: R, 1, 1; secondabdominal segment: p absent, A, q; fourth abdominalsegment: 1+2, S present; labial triangle: m, m,r (minute with no visible seta), 1 1 , 1 2 , Mucro bidentatewith apical tooth clearly longer than anteapicaland basal spine not exceeding apex of anteapicaltooth. Maximum size 1.8 mm. (See Table 4.)Remarks-This species is closely related to P. strinatii,but may be readily separated on a basis of thepresence of an anterior macrochaeta on the fourthabdominal segment and the much longer empodialappendage. The localities vary considerably in thestructure of the wing tooth of the unguis. Furtheranalysis may show that a cluster of species is involved.Localities-GUATEMALA: Alta Verapaz: CuevaSepacuite (Type Locality), Cueva Seamay, CuevaLanqu(n.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSMuch of the work of measuring, drawing, andchecking was done by my assistants: Anne Grow,Jane Tomlinson, and Steven Varys. This work wasmade possible by a grant of the Alfred P. SloanFoundation to Grinnell College.Table 1. Measurements (in mm) of Pseudosinella bonita, new species.Locality Antennal Segments Cephalic H. tibio- Hind Claw Furcula2 3 4 Diagonal tarsus Unguis EA Manub. DensOaxaca:Cueva Bonita .46 .675 2.66 .74 .756 .154 .098 .77 .952Cueva Bonita .42 .630 2.65 .658 .70 .105 .07 .67 .84Cueva Bonita .462 .672 .658 .756 .133 .077 .76 .84Cueva Bon ita .39 .60 2.65 .63 .658 .147 .084 .602 .882Cueva Bonita .315 .49 1.68 .518 .546 .140 .06 .504 .588Cueva Bonita .378 .532 .588 .532 .126 .065 .602 .770Cueva Bonita .336 .588 .574 .602 .133 .070 .56 .798Cueva Bonita .476 .700 2.91 .700 .756 .140 .087 .67 .910Cueva Bonita .322 .504 .560 .588 .119 .070 .56 .714Cueva Bonita .364 .546 1.82 .658 .686 .130 .084 .63 .80Cueva Bonita .266 .35 1.44 .504 .546 .105 .070 .504 .672Cueva Bonita .280 .476 .700 2.03 .63 .560 .112 .070 .532 .700Table 2. Measurements {in mm} of Pseudosinella strinatii, new speciesLocality Antennal Segments Cephalic H. tibio- Hind Claw Furcula2 3 4 Diagonal tarsus Unguis EA Manub. DensForm ASan Luis PotOSI:Satano del Tigre .12 .154 .196 .259 .329 .287 .0315 .0175 .257 .274Satano del Tigr~ .098 .175 .186 .259 .378 .315 .280 .330Satano del Tigre .084 .154 .168 .238 .280 .280 .0385 .021 .294 .308Cueva Taninul n.l .077 .161 .168 .259 .350 .266 .0335 .0175 .294 .385Tamaulipas:Cueva del Pachan .042 .084 .084 .147 .224 .168 .0175 .0105 .175 .175Cueva de la Florida .084 .154 .161 .231 .315 .280 .0315 .0175 .273 .301Cueva de la Florida .091 .105 .105 .189 .280 .231 .028 .015 .196 .231131

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintForm BSan Luis POtOSI:Cueva Pinta .105 .21 .224 .301 .420 .357 .035 .015 .322 .385Cueva Chica .049 .119 .126 .196 .259 .252 .0245 .012 .196 .308Cueva Chica .049 .084 .091 .161 .245 .189 .0175 .011 .182 .203Cueva Chica .084 .168 .175 .259 .336Cueva Chica .077 .161 .196 .252 .329 .315 .0315 .021 .308 .350Cueva Chica .056 .147 .161 .259 .329 .294 .035 .0245 .280 .343Cueva Chica .084 .189 .406 .329 .035 .021 .315 .392Cueva Chica .049 .105 .119 .175 .245 .175 .231Cueva Chica .063 .098 .077 .147 .259 .231 .035 .021 .203 .259Cueva Lagunita .126 .259 .217 .273 .392 .371 .0385 .035 .357Cueva Lagunita .063 .133 .133 .182 .301 .259 .028 .011 .196 .252Cueva Lagunita .105 .196 .231 .266 .329 .336 .033 .0175 .308 .413Cueva Lagunita .329 .266 .028 .014 .280 .301Form CTamaulipas:Crystal Cave .049 .084 .105 .175 .217 .224 .028 .014 .224 .245Crystal Cave .049 .098 .105 .189 .259 .224 .0245 .0175 .217 .252Crystal Cave .035 .098 .112 .217 .315 .257 .033 .021 .245 .301Table 3. Measurements (in mm) of Pseudosinella reddelli, new speciesLocality Antennal Segments Cephalic H. tibio- Hind Claw Furcula2 3 4 Diagonal tarsus Unguis EA Manub. DensCoahuila:Gruta Cuevacillas .063 .119 .126 .189 .378 .226 .028 .0175 .294 .287Gruta Cuevacillas .028 .0595 .0595 .105 .192 .140 .019 .0105 .15 .14Gruta Cuevacillas .028 .0525 .0595 .0945 .196 .0145 .0175 .01 .133 .13Gruta Cuevacillas .0385 .0735 .07 .108 .196 .154 .028 .012 .168 .164Gruta Cuevacillas .0455 .084 .0735 .115 .217 .178 .0245 .012 .192 .192Gruta Cuevacillas .0385 .084 .0665 .115 .203 .164 .023 .012 .196 .164Gruta Cuevacillas .038 .077 .066 .112 .21 .112 .019 .0085 .171 .157San Luis Potosi:Cueva Lagunita .098 .175 .112 .224 .413 .294 .0385 .021 .343 .364Cueva Lagunita .077 .182 .189 .245 .336 .259 .0245 .016 .301 .364Sotano Golondrina .084 .203 .196 .301 .406 .434 .0525 .0315 .448 .511Sotano Golondrina .035 .14 .105 .224 .42 .42 .047 .021 .427 .504Sotano Golondrina .084 .168 .154 .259 .399 .399 .0525 .025 .399 .504Sotano Golondrina .056 .105 .098 .182 .312 .245 .259Sotano Golondrina .052 .087 .077 .147 .280 .224 .026 .015 .252 .280Sotano Golondrina .056 .182 .161 .245 .392 .385 .0455 .024 .336 .427Sotano Golondrina .045 .091 .091 .168 .273 .231 .028 .018 .280 .252Sotano ajo de Agua .112 .238 .280 .336 .518 .546 .0525 .0245 .532 .616Sotano ajo de Agua .126 .238 .252 .336 .518 .532 .0595 .035 .630 .630Sotano ajo de Agua .112 .280 .280 .364 .560 .588 .0665 .0385 .588 .630Sotano ajo de Agua .098 .252 .182 .322 .518 .56 .0595 .0385 .49 .658+Fig. 2. P. strinatii, n.sp. a, hind unguis, form B, 1000X; b, hind unguis, form A, 600X; c, hind unguis, form C, 600X; d, mucro,form B, 1000X; e, mucro, form A, 600X; f, chaetotaxy, form A.+Fig. 3. P. reddelli, n.sp. a, mucro, 400X; b, apical organ of third antennal segment, 1000X; c, hind unguis, 400X (abnormalspecimen); d, hind unguis, 400X (normal specimen); e, chaetotaxy; f, eyes, right side, specimen from San Luis POtOSI: 200X;g, eyes, left side, specimen from Coahuila, 400X.+Fig. 4. P. finca, n.sp. a, hind unguis, 1000X, specimen from Cueva Sepacuite; b, fore unguis, 1000X, specimen from CuevaSeamay; c, chaetotaxy.132

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprinte~ a~ 3~deFig. 1. P. bonita, n.sp. a, chaetotaxy; b, anterior of head showing antennal bases, macrochaetae, and antennal setae, 100X;c, apical organ of third antennaI segment, 1000X; d, hind unguis, 200X; e, mucro, 400X; f, base of dens showing distribution ofspines, 200X. 133

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintTamaulipas:Cueva Infiernillo .098 .210 .238 .392 .49 .462 .0525 .03 .518 .812Cueva Infiernillo .126 .224 .266 .434 .49 .462 .0525 .03 .504 .798Cueva Infiernillo .126 .238 .252 .448 .56 .49 .063 .035 .462 .756Cueva Infiernillo .42 .441 .0525 .0315 .462 .672Cueva Infiernillo .098 .224 .168 .392 .56 .490 .063 .035 .532 .742Cueva Remolino .504 .476 .06 .035 .518 .728Cueva Remolino .462 .420 .0525 .0315Cueva Capilla .077 .161 .154 .231 .364 .273 .035 .0245 .280 .511Cueva Capilla .336 .301 .0385 .021 .322 .42Cueva Capilla .049 .098 .098 .182 .266 .245 .294Cueva Capilla .049 .119 .126 .238 .315 .252 .0315 .0175 .266 .364Cueva Capilla .056 .126 .140 .231 .315 .266 .035 .018 .273 .434Cueva Capilla .259 .203 .0245 .014 .210 .280Cueva Capilla .042 .112 .119 .205 .266 .231 .0315 .0175 .245 .371Cueva Capilla .084 .182 .189 .315 .427 .378 .0455 .028 .378 .581Cueva Capilla .049 .098 .098 .189 .266 .196 .0245 .014 .189 .294Cueva de la Mina .063 .161 .126 .238 .385 .28 .042 .0245 .315 .609*Cueva de la Mina .056 .112 .119 .273 .329 .266 .0315 .0175 .315 .406Cueva de la Mina .035 .077 .077 .14 .219 .168 .0245 .014 .196 .252Cueva de la Mina .063 .112 .091 .224 .371 .301 .035 .018 .35 .42Cueva de la Mina .105 .196 .161 .245 .399 .315 .0385 .0245 .322 .371Cueva de la Mina .392 .392 .54Bee Cave .098 .217 .168 .259 .392 .350 .0455 .028 .370 .546Bee Cave .063 .175 .175 .266 .350 .329 .0285 .0245 .315 .567Bee Cave .133 .259 .238 .329 .490 .392 .059 .035 .497 .72Bee Cave .105 .217 .238 .350 .448 .378 .056 .035 .462 .714Bee Cave .119 .224 .245 .350 .490 .399 .059 .032 .504 .728Bee Cave .126 .266 .224 .322 .518 .434 .056 .031 .532 .728Cueva Manantiales .077 .161 .147 .273 .441 .227 .0525 .0245 .399 .595Cueva Manantiales .084 .217 .224 .294 .441 .364 .0525 .032 .455 .497*MoltingTable 4. Measurements (in mm) of Pseudosinella tinca, new speciesLocality Antennal Segments Cephalic H. tibio- Hind Claw Furcula2 3 4 Diagonal tarsus Unguis EA Manub. DensGuatemala:Cueva Sepacuite .091 .196 .210 .301 .294 .259 .0385 .0245 .231 .322Cueva Sepacuite .077 .161 .126 .231 .294 .273 .0385 .021 .262Cueva Sepacuite .077 .175 .182 .294 .399 .301 .042 .028 .287 .287Cueva Sepacuite .070 .147 .161 .238 .259 .238 .0385 .0245 .245 .231Cueva Sepacuite .091 .196 .175 .301 .364 .287 .047 .0245 .259 .308Cueva Lanquin .0385 .059 .063 .112 .175 .112 .016 .007 .126 .133Cueva Seamay .077 .161 .175 .266 .336 .289 .028 .014 .287 .329Cueva Seamay .301 .273 .035 .021 .266 .273Cueva Seamay .350 .273 .035 .021 .274 .315Cueva Sea may .084 .154 .175 .259 .378 .287 .0385 .021 .329 .350Cueva Seamay .091 .217 .224 .336 .392 .350 .042 .0245 .364Cueva Seamay .091 .210 .161 .294 .378 .343 .042 .021 .308 .371134

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintTHREE NEW SCHIZOMIDA OF THE GENUS SCHIZOMUSFROM MEXICAN CAVES (ARACHNIDA)J. Mark RowlandDepartment of Biology, and The Museum, Texas Tech UniversityLubbock, Texas 79409INTRODUCTIONSince 1938, when Chamberlin and Ivie describedthe first Mexican schizomid, a new subfamily, twonew genera, and nearly a score of new species havebeen reported from Mexico, mostly from caves. Thedescriptions of these species are fortunately distributedthrough a relatively few titles. These are Chamberlinand Ivie (1938), Gertsch (1940), Rowland (1971a,1971b, 1973) and Brignoli (1973).Descriptions became fairly well standardized withGertsch's work, however, considerable confusion hasrecently been introduced. Brignoli (1973) attemptedto introduce the spermatheca as a new means ofutilizing the normally taxonomically useless females.Borner (1902) first described the spermatheca of aschizomid, but no subsequent taxonomic use wasmade of this character. Some time ago I also becameinterested in using the spermatheca as a taxonomictool. After considerable comparative work, however,I found intraspecific variation in this character relativelygreat and interspecific variation relatively small.I found, for example, that the spermatheca of S.longimanus Rowland and S. floridanus Muma were inseparable.Brignoli showed marked differences betweenS. sbordonii Brignoli and S. arganoi Brignoliwhich are probably significant, however the former'sspermatheca is in my eyes indistinguishable from S.longimanus.It is my belief that upon a thorough study of considerablecomparative material the spermatheca canbe put to some use. At this time, however, I am unableto place Dr. Brignoli's schizomids. I am furtherat a loss to understand how Dr. Brignoli decided thathis new species were different from previously describedspecies, having no males of S. sbordonii andS. arganoi, or females of all the other Mexican speciesfor comparison.Until the males of S. sbordonii and S. arganoi aredescribed I will not certainly know if I am creatingsynonyms. My efforts to describe and relate new speciescoming to my attention will not, however, stop.In my future revisionary work on Mexican schizomidsI will fully deal with the spermatheca and will attemptto place Brignoli's schizomids.The species currently reported from Mexico, includingthe species described herein, are as follows:Family Schizomidae Hansen & Sorensen, 1905Subfamily Schizominae Hansen & Sorenson, 1905Genus Schizomus Cook, 18991. S. cavernicolens Chamberlin & Ivie, 19382. S. davisi Gertsch, 19403. S. mexicanus Rowland, 19714. S. longimanus Rowland, 19715. S. mitchelli Rowland, 19716. S. cookei Rowland, 19717. S. reddelli Rowland, 19718. S. bartolo Rowland, 19739. S. orthoplax Rowland, 1973135

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint10. S. pecki Rowland, 197311. S. firstmani Rowland, 197312. S. sbordonii Brignoli, 197313. S. arganoi Brignoli, 197314. S. lukensi, new species15. S. moisii, new species16. S. stewarti, new speciesGenus Heteroschizomus Rowland, 197317. H. goodnightorum Rowland, 1973Subfamily Megaschizominae Rowland, 1973Genus Agastoschizomus Rowland, 197118. A. lucifer Rowland, 197119. A. pachypalpus Rowland, 1973The main purpose of this paper is to describe threenew species of schizomids of some interest. One is atroglobite from Tamaulipas, the others are probablytroglophiles from caves in Oaxaca, the first schizomidsdescribed from that state.Thanks are due Mr. Gil Ediger, Mrs. Jill Ediger,Mr. David McKenzie, Ms. Martha McKenzie, Mr. StuartMurphy, Mr. James Reddell, and Mr. William Russellfor providing the excellent collections on which thisstudy is based. Appreciation is also expressed to Dr.Robert W. Mitchell for his continued support.Schizomus lukensi, new speciesHolotype-An adult male, taken in Cueva del Agua,50 km SW Soto la Marina, Tamaulipas, Mexico, on31 October 1970 by W. Russell, G. Ediger, and J.Ediger, and deposited in the American Museum ofNatural History, New York City.Allotype-An adult female, taken at the same locality,on the same date, by the same collectors asthe holotype, and also deposited in the AmericanMuseum of Natural History.Paratypes-An adult male and two adult females,taken at the same locality, on the same date, by thesame collectors as the holotype and allotype, and depositedin The Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock,Texas.Description-The following, except for the lastparagraph under this heading, describes the male.Cephalothorax. Carapace (propeltidium, first cephalothoracictergum) with three pair of dorsal and twoapical setae, more than twice as long as wide, extremelyconvex, lateral margins nearly vertical, producedanteromesally as a blunt, conical process; eyespots absent; mesopeltidia (second pair of cephalothoracictergites) acutely triangular, vaguely curved,pointing diagonally toward midline; metapeltidium(third cephalothoracic tergum) undivided, slightlyemarginate posteriorly, not as deep medially as late-rally, anterior margin parallel with posterior marginof mesopeltidium; anterior sternum with nine setae,triangular, apex extending just beyond caudal limitof coxae II, anterolateral margins gently curved; posteriorsternum (metasternum) with six setae, vaguelytriangular.Abdomen. First abdominal tergum located closerto metapeltidium than second abdominal tergum,chevron shaped; terga II to VII with two setae, tergaVIII and IX with four setae; segment X with sevensetae; segment XI with seven setae; segment XII withtwo dorsal, six lateral, five ventral setae; spiraclesoval on second abdominal sternum; terga III to VIIbearing darkened apodemes of dorsoventral muscles;vestigial stigmata appearing as slightly darkened areason sterna V to VII.Flagellum. Spade shaped, horizontally compressed,bearing 16 setae; dorsal surface without relief.Chelicerae. Lateral aspect of basal segment bearingthree setae, vertical group of two long, feathered setaeflanking movable finger (second cheliceral segment),group of three shorter setae arranged basally on fixeddigit, horizontal group of seven setae arising on ornear ventral margin; mesal surface of basal segmentbearing group of four setae arranged horizontally,lower group of two setae arranged vertically, anothertwo short, stout setae below these, arranged in a verticalline, three setae directly below large dorsal seta,movable finger flanked by another vertical group ofthree long, feathered setae as on lateral surface, threelarge, elongate, distally enlarged setae originating justbelow previous group, fixed digit bearing seven closelysituated, feathered setae; movable finger laterally destituteof setae, mesal aspect bearing vertical row of19 long, feathered, distally curled setae near outermargin, another vertical row of 16 short setae or teethnear inner surface.Pedipalps. Trochanter distinctly produced distally;femur and patella narrow proximally, expanded distally;tibia without mesal, subapical spur; tarsusbasitarsuswith two small spurs just above claw;length of segments given in Table 1.Legs. Tarsal segments of leg I of the followingproportions 1 > 7>6 > 3, 4, 5>2; anterolateral spurof coxa of leg II 30 per cent as long as coxa proper;patella of leg III 65 per cent as long as tibia; lengthof segments given in Table 1.Females differ from males in following respects:First legs proportionately shorter than in male; lengthsof segments given in Table 1. Flagellum long, rodshaped,with two annulations, the terminal sectionlonger than the previous two; abdominal sternum IIstrongly emarginate posteriorly.136

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintComparisons-This singular species shows somesimilarities to Schizomus mexicanus Rowland, 1971,and S. bartolo Rowland, 1973. The shape of the maleflagellum is very similar to that of S. mexicanus, butdiffers from the latter in having no dorsal relief. In thelatter respect S. lukensi is more similar to S. bartolo.The latter two species are also similar in their extremereduction in pigmentation. They are probablyboth troglobites.Measurements-The total length of the male holotypeand the female allotype, both from the typelocality, is 4.2, and 4.7, respectively. See Table 1.Variation-No variation disproportionate to variationin body length was noticed.Distribution-S. lukensi is known only from Cuevadel Agua, 50 km SW Soto la Marina, Tamaulipas,Mexico.Remarks-S. lukensi, like S. bartolo shows evidenceof cave adaptation. Adults are very pale, notablypaler than epigean species. The front legs are longerthan most epigean species, though not as long as inS. longimanus Rowland, 1971. Also as in S. bartoloall ventral setae are bifid. See Rowland (1971 b, 1973).On the basis of morphology of the male flagellumS. lukensi seems closest related to S. mexicanus, awidely distributed species.Etymology-The specific name is a patronym, givenin honor of Mr. Loren Lukens, Banning, California.Table 1. Schizomus lukensiMale HolotypePedipalp I II III IVCoxa .49 .53 .40 .34 .29Trochanter .29 .29 .16 .20 .29Femur .28 1.50 .90 .79 1.22Patella .38 1.94 .32 .35 .47Tibia .40 1.49 .57 .53 .90Basitarsus.51 .54 .79.20 .97Tarsus .44 .46 .54Female AllotypePedipalp I II III IVCoxa .56 .58 .43 .38 .35Trochanter .30 .26 .18 .25 .32Femur .31 1.30 .90 .78 1.19Patella .40 1.16 .41 .34 .42Tibia .41 1.25 .62 .53 .81Basitarsus.45 .53 .74.21 1.00Tarsus.42 .45 .48Schizomus moisii, new speciesHolotype-An adult male, taken in Grutas deMonteflor, 6 km NE Valle Nacional, Oaxaca, Mexico,on 28 December 1972 by J. Reddell, D. McKenzie,M. McKenzie, and S. Murphy, and deposited in theAmerican Museum of Natural History.Allotype-An adult female, taken at the same locality,on the same date, by the same collectors as theholotype, and also deposited in the American Museumof Natural History.Paratypes-Five adult males, five adult females andone juvenile, taken at the same locality, on the samedate, by the same collectors as the holotype, and depositedin The Museum, Texas Tech University, Lubbock.Description-The following, except for the lastparagraph under this heading, describes the male.Cephalothorax. Carapace (propeltidium, first cephalothoracictergum) with three pair of dorsal and twoapical setae, one and one half times as long as wide,gently convex, lateral margi ns nearly vertical, producedanteromesally as a blunt, conical process; eyespots distinctly oval, pale areas on anterolateral surfaceof carapace; mesopeltidia (second pair of cephalothoracictergites) acutely triangular, vaguely curved,pointing diagonally toward midline; metapeltidium(third cephalothoracic tergum) undivided, emarginateposteriorly, not as deep medially as laterally, anteriormargin parallel with posterior margin of mesopeltidium;anterior sternum with nine setae, triangular,apex extending just beyond caudal limit of coxaeII, anterolateral margins gently curved; posterior sternum(metasternum) with six setae, vaguely triangular.Abdomen. First abdominal tergum located muchcloser to metapeltidium than second abdominal tergum,triangular; terga II to VII with two setae, tergaVIII and IX with four setae; segment X with sevensetae; segment XI with seven setae; segment XII withtwo dorsal, six lateral, five ventral setae; spiracles ovalon second abdominal sternum; terga III to VII bearingvaguely darkened apodemes of dorsoventral muscles;vestigial stigmata appearing as oval, darkenedareas on sterna V to VII.Flagellum. Diamond shaped, horizontally compressed,bearing 16 setae; dorsal surface with twodeep depressions each with a lateral swelling.Chelicerae. Lateral aspect of basal segment bearingthree setae, vertical group of three long, featheredsetae flanking movable finger (second cheliceral segment),group of three shorter setae arranged basallyon fixed digit, horizontal group of seven setae arising137

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint45Figs. 1-3. Dorsal view of male flagellum: 1, Schizomus lukensi; 2, S. moisii; 3, S. stewarti.Figs. 4-5. Lateral view of basitarsus-tarsus: 4, S. lukensi; 5, S. moisii.on or near ventral margin; mesal surface of basal segmentbearing group of four setae arranged horizontally,lower group of two setae arranged vertically,another two short, stout setae below these, arrangedin a vertical line, two setae directly below large dorsalseta, movable finger flanked by another vertical groupof three long, feathered setae as on lateral surface,three large, elongate, distally enlarged setae OrIgInatingjust below previous group, fixed digit bearingsix closely situated, feathered setae; movable fingerlaterally destitute of setae, mesal aspect bearing verticalrow of 20 long, feathered, distally curled setaenear outer margin, another vertical row of 18 shortsetae or teeth near inner surface.138

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintPedipalps. Trochanter not distinctly produced dis·tally; femur and patella narrow proximally, expandeddistally; tibia without mesal, subapical spur; tarsus·basitarsus with two small spurs just above claw; lengthof segments given in Table 2.Legs. Tarsal segments of leg I of the following pro·portions 1 > 7 >6> 2, 3, 4, 5; anterolateral spur ofcoxa of leg II 35 per cent as long as coxa proper; pa·tella of leg 111 80 per cent as long as tibia; length ofsegments given in Table 2.Females differ from males in the following reospects: First legs proportionately much shorter thanin male; lengths of segments given in Table 2. Flagel·lum long, rod shaped, with two annulations, theterminal section longer than previous two; abdominalsternum II strongly emarginate posteriorly.Comparisons-So moisii superficially resembles S.cookei Rowland, 1971, in having a pair of swellingslateral to the median depressions on the dorsal sur·face of the male flagellum. The general morphologyof the flagellum is similar to S. stewarti, new species,but the latter lacks the deep median depressions ofS. moisii. This species is rather distinct from anyother known Mexican schizomid.Measurements-The total length of the male holo·type and the female allotype, both from the typelocality, is 4.1, and 4.6, respectively. See Table 2.Variation-The apex of the carapace (propeltidium)of the holotype is typical of most other schizomids,however two of the paratypes show variation in thischaracter unlike any I have seen before. Two of themale paratypes have no conical process at the apex ofthe carapace, but merely a truncated margin, whichis nearly straight from the right to the left side. Thetwo setae usually present at the apex are reduced toone, the distal setae probably being lost. I cannotspeculate on the significance of this phenomenon. Noother variation disproportionate to variation in bodylength was noticed.Distribution-S. moisii is known only from Grutasde Monteflor, 6 km NE Valle Nacional, Oaxaca,Mexico.Remarks-This species represents the first of aquite distinct new species group of Mexican Schizomida.It is easily distinguishable from all previouslydescribed Mexican species, but shows some similaritiesto S. stewarti, new species. S. moisii and thelatter species are undoubtedly properly placed in thesame species group, which will probably expand whenmore collections are available from Oaxaca and adja·cent states.Etymology-The specific name is a patronym,given in honor of Mr. Thomas Moisi, Rosemead,California.Table 2. Schizomus moisii.Male HolotypePedipalp I II III IVCoxa .44 .58 .37 .32 .36Trochanter .24 .26 .17 .18 .30Femur .29 1.32 .78 .62 1.18Patella .31 1.78 .42 .28 .51Tibia .30 1.30 .52 .35 .82Basitarsus.50 .40 .67.20 .95Tarsus .38 .33 .53Female AllotypePedipalp I II III IVCoxa .51 .58 .40 .38 .34Trochanter .25 .25 .19 .20 .30Femur .26 1.11 .70 .67 1.06Patella .34 1.42 .37 .31 .43Tibia .33 1.00 .46 .41 .80Basitarsus.44 .42 .65.19 .86Tarsus .32 .34 .40Schizomus stewarti, new speciesHolotype-An adult male, taken in Cueva delGuayabo, 12 km NE Valle Nacional, Oaxaca, Mexico,on 29 December 1972 by J. Reddell, D. McKenzie,M. McKenzie, and S. Murphy, and deposited in theAmerican Museum of Natural History.Paratype-A juvenile, taken at the same locality,on the same date, by the same collectors as the halotype,and also deposited in the American Museum ofNatural History.Description-Cephalothorax. Carapace (propeltidium,first cephalothoracic tergum) with three pair ofdorsal and two apical setae, nearly twice as long aswide, acutely convex, lateral margins nearly vertical,produced anteromesally as a blunt, conical process;eye spots distinct as irregular, pale areas on anterolateralsurface of carapace; mesopeltidia (second pairof cephalothoracic tergites) acutely triangular, vaguelycurved, pointing diagonally toward midline; metapeltidium(third cephalothoracic tergum) undivided, emarginate posteriorly, not as deep medially as laterally,anterior margin parallel with posterior margin ofmesopeltidium; anterior sternum with nine setae, triangular,apex extending just beyond caudal limit ofcoxae II, anterolateral margins gently curved; posteriorsternum (metasternum) with six setae, vaguelytriangular.Abdomen. First abdominal tergum located closerto metapeltidium than second abdominal tergum, triangular;terga II to VII with two setae, terga VIII andIX with four setae; segment X with seven setae; segmentXI with seven setae; segment XII with two dor-139

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintsal, six lateral, five ventral setae; spiracles oval onsecond abdominal sternum; terga III to VII bearingvaguely visible apodemes of dorsoventral muscles;vestigial stigmata appearing as darkened areas onsterna V to VII.Flagellum. Bulbous, horizontally compressed, bearing16 setae; dorsal surface with two, small, lateralswellings.Chelicerae. Lateral aspect of basal segment bearingfour setae, vertical group of three long, featheredsetae flanking movable finger (second cheliceral segment),group of three shorter setae arranged basallyon fixed digit, horizontal group of seven setae arisingon or near ventral margin; mesal surface of basal segmentbearing group of four setae arranged horizontally,lower group of two setae arranged vertically,another two short, stout setae below these, arrangedin a vertical line, two setae directly below large dorsalseta, movable finger flanked by another vertical groupof three long, feathered setae as on lateral surface,three large, elongate, distally enlarged setae originatingjust below previous group, fixed digit bearingsix closely situated, feathered setae; movable fingerlaterally destitute of setae, mesal aspect bearing verticalrow of 19 long, feathered, distally curled setaenear outer margin, another vertical row of 18 shortsetae or teeth near inner surface.Pedipalps. Trochanter distinctly produced distally;femur and patella narrow proximally, expanded distally;tibia without mesal, subapical spur; tarsusbasitarsuswith two small spurs just above claw; lengthof segments given in Table 3.Legs. Tarsal segments of leg I missing; anterolateralspur of coxa of leg II 30 per cent as long as coxaproper; patella of leg III 80 per cent as long as tibia;length of segments given in Table 3.Comparisons-So stewarti is most closely related toS. moisii, but differs in the morphology of the maleflagellum. S. stewarti has no depressions on the dorsalside of the flagellum as in S. moisii, and the lateralswellings are much smaller in the former than in thelatter.Measurements-The total length of the male holotypeis 3.5. See Table 3.Variation-Only one adult specimen of this specieswas available for study.Distribution-S. stewarti is known only from Cuevadel Guayabo, 12 km NE Valle Nacional, Oaxaca,Mexico.Remarks-See remarks under S. moisii.Etymology-The specific name is a patronym, givenin honor of Dr. Glenn Stewart, California State PolytechnicUniversity, Pomona.Table 3. Schizomus stewarti.Male HolotypePedipalp I II III IVCoxa .53 .50 .33 .32 .28Trochanter .22 .29 .18 .17 .25Femur .32 .61 .51 .98Patella .34 .34 .25 .33Tibia .28 .44 .31 .71Basitarsus ..41 .40 .55.17Tarsus .33 .32 .40LITERATURE CITEDBorner, C. 1902. Die Genitalorgane der Pedipalpen. Zool.Anz., 26:81-92.Brignoli, P.M. 1973. Note sulla morfologia del genitali deglischizomidi e diagnosi preliminari di due nuove specie delMessico (Arachnida, Schizomidal. Fragmenta Entomol.,9(11:1-9.Chamberlin, R.V. and W. Ivie. 1938. Arachnida of the ordersPedipalpida, Scorpionida and Ricinulida. Carnegie Inst.Washington Publ., 491: 101-107.Gertsch, W.J. 1940. Two new American whipscorpions ofthe family Schizomidae. Amer. Mus. Novitates, 1077: 1-4.Rowland, J.M. 1971a. Agastoschizomus lucifer, a new genusand species of cavernicole schizomid (Arachnida, Schizomidalfrom Mexico. Assn. Mexican Cave Stud. Bull., 4:13-17.Rowland, J.M. 1971 b. New species of schizomids (Arachnida,Schizomidal from Mexican caves. Assn. Mexican CaveStud. Bull., 4:117-126.Rowland, J.M. 1973. A new genus and several new species ofMexican schizomids (Schizomida: Arachnidal. Dccas.Papers Mus., Texas Tech Univ., 11: 1-23.140

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintA REPORT ON CAVE SPIDERS FROM MEXICO AND CENTRAL AMERICA 1Willis J. Gertsch 2Curator Emeritus, American Museum of Natural History, New YorkAbout one hundred species of spiders have so farbeen reported from cave habitats in Mexico and intensivecollecting surveys will eventually enlarge thislist several times. In an earlier paper Gertsch (1971)cited 86 species, most of them new, and the presentreport further enlarges the Mexican fauna by additionof 20 species of which 16 are herein described for thefirst time. In addition, eight new species are reportedfrom caves in Guatemala, Belize (British Honduras),and Panama of Central America, the larger area consideredin this paper. Additional records with fullcollecting data are presented for some species notedon earlier lists, and I look forward to future considerationof spider families not mentioned here.Spiders are important predators of crawling andflying invertebrates and penetrate into all parts ofcaves where prey is present. The regional cave fauna isderived from local taxa and comprises distinctive elements.Some big-eyed vagrants that depend on sightfor hunting cannot exist very long in caves. Mostcave dwellers have been derived from available cryptictypes of both primitive and specialized groups. Themajority are sedentary and spin webs in crevices oncave walls and under detritus on the floor. Withinthese webs such spiders have no need for sight andsubstitute keen chemotactic senses centered in receptorson their appendages. The few hunting spidersliving exclusively in caves long ago deemphasizedsight as a requirement of life activities. Representativesof all kinds live in Mexican and Central Ameri-I This project has been supported in part by grants GB-3880and GB-6524X 1 of the National Science Foundation.2Home address: P. O. Box 157, Portal, Arizona 85632.can caves.The obligate cavernicoles are always of specialinterest because of deep commitment to cave existence.Six additional species from Mexico and CentralAmerica enlarge this total to 19 from the 13 Mexicantaxa noted in the earlier paper. Two additional families,Telemidae and Ochyroceratidae, are now representedas listed below.Family DipluridaeEuagrus anops, new speciesCueva de la Porra, San Luis POtOSI: Mexico.Family TheraphosidaeSchizopelma reddelli, new speciesCueva del Nacimiento del RIO San Antonio,Oaxaca, Mexico.Family PholcidaeMetagonia martha, new speciesCueva del Nacimiento del RIO San Antonio,Oaxaca, Mexico.Metagonia jarmila, new speciesBucks Bypass Cave, BelizeFamily TelemidaeTelema mayana, new speciesCueva Sepacuita, GuatemalaFamily OchyroceratidaeTheotima pura, new speciesCueva de los Vampiros, Tamaulipas, Mexico.This paper could not have been realized withoutthe aid of colleagues and friends dedicated to biologicaland systematic studies of caves and their faunas.Mr. James Reddell and Professor Robert Mitchell,both of Texas Tech University in Lubbock, Texas,outstanding students of Texas and Mexican caves,are responsible for most of the material of the presentreport. New material from Central American caves141

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintand much also from those in Mexico were made availableto me by Dr. Stewart Peck of Carleton University,Ottawa, Canada. To these students and to their assistantsand to all others who have contributed to theproject, I offer my gratitude. All the material will bedeposited in the collections of the American Museumof Natural History in New York and The Museum,Texas Tech University in Lubbock.SUBORDER MYGAlOMORPHAEFew mygalomorph spiders have become obligatecavernicoles so discovery of two additional ones fromMexican caves is of special interest. A completelyeyeless Euagrus from San Luis Potos(differs strikinglyfrom cavernicola of Tamaulipas caves and presentsseveral derivative features. A pallid, long-legged theraphosidfrom Oaxaca with evanescent eyes is related tostygia of San Luis Potos(and both are herein assignedtentatively to the genus Schizopelma. In Bulletin 4 ofthis journal (Gertsch, 1971, p. 48) I listed the fewthen known troglobite mygalomorphs from the worldbut failed to record a blind diplurid from Australia,described by Dr. Barbara Main (1969, pp. 9-11) onthe basis of fragments from Roaches Rest Cave, oneof the Nullarbor Caves. The four diplurids are allwhitish spiders without eyes and they are presumablyrestricted to cave habitats. The Cuban Troglothelewas based by Fage on a probably young specimenwith all eyes totally absent. The status of the twoMexican theraphosids claimed to be troglobites is discussedbelow. Both have the eye tubercles mostlyobsolete and the eyes reduced to pale spots. The revisedlist of world mygalomorph troglobites follows:Family DipluridaeAccola caeca Simon, 1892, caves, Phi IIi pineIslands.Euagrus cavernicola Gertsch, 1971, caves, Tamaulipas,Mexico.Euagrus anops, new species, Cueva de la Porra,San luis POtOSI: Mexico.Troglodiplura lowryi Main, 1969, Roaches RestCave, Australia.Family BarychelidaeTroglothele coeca Fage, 1929, Gruta Bellamar,Cuba.Family TheraphosidaeSchizopelma stygia (Gertsch), 1971, Cueva delos Potrerillos, San Luis POtOSI: Mexico.Schizopelma reddelli, new species, Cueva delNacimiento del R(o San Antonio, Oaxaca,Mexico.FAMILY THERAPHOSIDAEThe taxon stygia was based on a pale immaturespecimen from Cueva de los Potrerillos with eyetubercle and eyes greatly reduced in size. A maturefemale from the same cave has provided additionalfeatures that make desirable its assignment to thegenus Schizopelma. This is only a tentative placementand cannot be regarded as definite without evidencefrom the male and deeper study of this difficultgroup. In this paper two additional species are describedfrom cave habitats. One is a troglophile witheye tubercle of medium height, black eye rings, andlegs of medium length. The second one, namedSchizopelma reddelli and taken from a mile deepinside a cave in Oaxaca, has paler coloration andlonger legs than those of stygia. Both stygia andreddelli are presumed to be troglobites but more informationand material are necessary before that statuscan be verified. An unusual feature of both speciesis absence of urticating hairs on the dorsum of the abdomen,a distinct patch usually being present inAmerican genera of this family.Schizopelma stygia (Gertsch)Aphonopelma stygia Gertsch, 1971, p. 49.Diagnosis-Probable troglobite with eye tubercleand eyes reduced in size; anterior median eyes pale,much smaller than anterior lateral eyes; scopulae onall tarsi divided below by long row of setae; legs ofmedium length, first leg 3.7 times as long as carapace;only simple hairs present on dorsum of abdomen;receptacles of epigynum (Fig. 2a) separated at baseby about width of one.Female-Total length 22 mm, not including chelicerae.Carapace 9.5 mm long, 8:3 mm wide. Abdomen12 mm long, 6.5 mm wide.Carapace oval, truncated in front and behind,covered thinly with procumbent hairs and weak setaebut frontal margin with row of about forty stoutersetae. Pars cephalica subtriangular, as wide as long,demarked by shallow cephalic grooves; cervical groovedeep transverse depression; pars thoracica with shallowradiating grooves. Eye tubercle obsolete, not fullythird of frontal width. Eight small eyes present, ratioin millimeters: ALE:AME:PLE:PME = 0.30:0.13:0.19:0.15. Front eye row moderately procurved;anterior median eyes separated by diameter, fartherfrom lateral eyes (20/13). Posterior eye row straight;oval median eyes separated by more than three diameters(19/70), diameter from lateral eyes. Front of142

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintcarapace and eyes as shown in Fig. 1. Median ocularquadrangle broader than long (88/18), narrowed infront (88/23). Sternum 4.5 mm long, 3.7 mm wide,clothed with erect black hairs; four pairs of sigillaclearly evident. Labium 1.5 mm long and broad,armed at tip with 16 small cuspules. Endite 3.8 mmlong, 2 mm wide, with cluster of cuspules in basalthird. Chelicerae robust, evenly rounded; promarginwith 15 subequal black teeth; retromargin with thickband of reddish hairs.I II III IVFemur 9.15 8.15 8.00 10.50Patella 5.20 4.75 4.10 4.50Tibia 8.50 8.00 7.50 10.10Metatarsus 7.50 7.15 8.70 12.50Tarsus 5.10 4.90 5.15 6.40Total 35.35 32.95 33.45 44.00Leg formula 4132. First leg 3.7 times, first femur0.96 times as long as carapace. Legs long, relativelyslender, with thin black spines. First tibia with 1-1-2ventral spines; first metatarsus with 0-1-1 ventralspines. First and second tarsi and metatarsi scopulatethroughout their lengths. Pal pal and tarsal clawssmooth, without teeth. All tarsal scopulae dividedby long row of setae most numerous and broadeston fourth tarsi. Promargin of first coxa and retromarginof palpal coxa clothed with fine hairs, onthose faces lacking heavy spines or spinules. Pal pus:femur 7 mm, patella 4.1 mm, tibia 5.5 mm, tarsus4.6 mm, total 21.2 mm.Abdomen suboval, covered evenly with suberectblack hairs, with thin brush of coarse setae at baseabove pedicel but lacking scattered or formal patch ofurticating hairs anywhere on dorsum. Midd Ie spinneret0.75 mm long. Lateral spinneret three-segmented,with measurements from base to apical segments 1.6mm, 1.3 mm, 2 mm, respectively, totalling 4.9 mm.Epigynum (Fig. 2a) broad basal atrium openinginto pair of apically rounded pouches separated atbase by width of one.Type Data-Immature holotype from Cueva de losPotrerillos, 2 km W Ahuacatlan, San Luis POtOSI:Mexico, 12 July 1967 (J. Reddell, J. Fish, W. Russell)in American Museum of Natural History.Distribution-Known only from above cave.Other Record-MEXICO: San Luis Potosf: Cuevade los Potrerillos, same data as above, female; 27 November1972 (J. Reddell, T. Raines), female.Schizopelma reddelli, new speciesDiagnosis-Near relative of stygia, probable troglobitedistinguished by following features; anterior medianeyes dark, much larger than anterior lateral eyes;anterior tarsi lacking conspicuous ventral rows ofsetae; legs proportionately longer, first leg 4.5 timesas long as carapace; receptacles of epigynum widelyseparated at base (F ig. 2al.Etymology-Named for Mr. James Reddell.Female-Total length 18 mm, not including chelicerae.Carapace 10 mm long, 8.3 mm wide. Abdomen12.5 mm long, 6 mm wide.Entire spider orange to light brown; hairs mainlydusky and spines black; chelicerae and fangs dark reddishbrown.Structure like that of stygia unless otherwise noted.Carapace truncated in front and margin with rowof about 24 stout setae. Eye tubercle mostly obsolete;eye group occupying fourth of width of parscephalica. Eight small eyes present, pale except darkanterior median eyes lying on trivial elevation; ratioof eyes in millimeters:ALE:AME:PLE:PME = 0.15:0.20:0.13:0.11. Front eye row moderately recurved;dark anterior median eyes subcontiguous, full diameterfrom lateral eyes. Posterior eye row slightly recurved;subround median eyes separated by aboutfive diameters (60/11), about radius from lateral eyes.Median ocular quadrangle much broader than long(80/11), narrowed in front (80/45). Sternum 4.5 mmlong, 4.2 mm wide, clothed with erect black setae;four pairs of sigilla well marked, suboval first pairlarge, lying in labial furrow. Labium 1.7 mm long,1.4 mm wide, provided at tip with seven small cuspules.Endite 3.6 mm long, 2 mm wide, with clusterof numerous small cuspules in basal half. Chelicerae:promargin of right one with 11 black teeth, threemuch smaller; promargin of left one with nine blackteeth, sixth one from apex fragmented to four dentic1es;retromargin with thick band of reddish hairs.I II III IVFemur 11.40 11.30 10.60 12.75Patella 5.50 5.10 4.50 4.65Tibia 11.00 10.35 9.75 12.80Metatarsus 11.40 10.75 12.00 16.50Tarsus 6.50 6.60 6.60 8.50Total 45.80 44.10 43.45 55.20Leg formula 4123. First leg 4.5 times, first femur1.14 times as long as carapace. Legs quite long, relativelyslender, with thin black spines. First tibia with1 (or 2)-1-2 ventral spines; first right metatarsus withsingle basal spine, first left metatarsus with fourspines, one at apex and three in basal half. First andsecond tarsi and metatarsi scopulate their length; thirdtarsus and apical half of metatarsus scopulate; fourthtarsi scopulate. Palpal and tarsal claws smooth. Ventersof first and second tarsi with few apical setae;143

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintthird tarsi with row in apical half; fourth tarsi withrow of setae whole length. Palpus: femur 8.5 mm,patella 4 mm, tibia 7 mm, tarsus 7.3 mm, total 26.8mm.Abdomen suboval, covered evenly with pale hairsand suberect dusky setae, with thin brush of setaeabove pedicel but completely lacking urticating hairs.Middle spinneret 1 mm long. Lateral spinnerets seeminglydeformed, with measurements of left one frombase to apical segment 1.5 mm, 0.5 mm, 0.75 mm,totalling 2.75 mm.Epigynum (Fig. 2b) presenting pair of subparallelpouches widely separated at base.Type Data-Female ho!otype from Cueva del Nacimientodel RIO San Antonio, Oaxaca, Mexico, 9March 1973 (J. Reddell, S. Murphy, D. McKenzie,M. McKenzie, M. Butterwick), "found wanderingover a clay bank deep in the cave one mile frommouth, probably in search of troglobitic thysanurans,which probably comprise an important part of thediet of this kind of spider."Schizopelma elliotti, new speciesDiagnosis-Troglophile species related to stygiawith eye tubercle and eyes of medium development;dark anterior median eyes separated by diameter,smaller than anterior lateral eyes; scopulae of thirdand fourth tarsi divided by row of setae; legs ofmedium length, first leg about four times as long ascarapace; receptacles of epigynum widely separatedat base, directed laterad (Fig. 2c).Etymology-Named for Mr. William Elliott.Female-Total length 20 mm, not including chelicerae.Carapace 9.5 mm long, 8.5 mm wide. Abdomen12 mm long, 6 mm wide.Carapace and appendages dusky reddish brown;hairs and setae black; chelicerae and fangs dark reddishbrown; abdomen dark brown with large patchof pale silky hairs covering posterior half of dorsum.Structure like that of stygia unless otherwisenoted. Carapace truncated in front and margin withrow of about 30 stout setae. Eye tubercle of mediumdevelopment, prominently raised in center; eye groupoccupying fourth of width of pars cephalica at front.Eyes of medium size; anterior median eyes dark andeyes ringed with black; ratio of eyes in diameters:AME:ALE:PLE:PME = 0.32:0.23:0.30:0.20. Fronteye row essentially straight; round anterior medianeyes separated by diameter, nearer lateral eyes(23/14). Posterior eye row moderately recurved;posterior median eyes separated by four diameters(80/20), about radius from posterior lateral eyes.Median ocular quadrangle twice as broad as long(110/55), narrowed in front (110/63). Sternum 4.10mm long, 3.8 mm wide; all sigilla distinct. Labium1.3 mm long, 1.5 mm Wide, provided at tip with 11cuspules. Endite 3.3 mm long, 1.7 mm wide, withcluster of cuspules mostly confined to basal third ofsegment. Chelicera: promargin with nine subequalteeth; retromargin with band of reddish hairs.I /I 1/1 IVFemur 10.00 9.30 8.75 11.40Patella 5.35 5.00 4.50 4.70Tibia 8.35 7.60 7.15 9.70Metatarsus 8.15 8.00 9.20 12.50Tarsus 5.75 5.55 5.70 6.70Total 37.60 35.45 35.30 45.00Leg formula 4123. First leg about four times, firstfemur only slightly longer than carapace. Legs of mediumlength with thin black spines; first tibia with2-2-2, first metatarsus with 0-1-1 ventral spines. Firstand second tarsi and metatarsi scopulate to base; thirdand fourth tarsi scopulate but their metatarsi scopulateonly beyond middle. Venters of first and secondtarsi with few setae in middle line; third and fourthtarsi with row of setae whole length. Palpus: femur7 mm, patella 4 mm, tibia 5.8 mm, tarsus 5.3 mm,total 22.1 mm.Abdomen suboval, covered thickly with fine hairsand scattered long setae; dorsum with thin brush ofblack setae above pedicel and thick patch of silkyhairs covering two-thirds length (these representinglong, somewhat atypical, Type /I hairs). Middle spinneret0.65 mm long. Lateral spinneret three-segmentedwith measurements from basal to apical segments 1.5mm, 1.5 mm and 2 mm respectively, totalling 5 mm.Epigynum (Fig. 2c) with pair of widely separatedseminal receptacles directed laterad.Type Data-Female holotype and small femalefrom Cueva de la Laguna, 5 km N Valle de los Fantasmas(40 km ESE San Luis Potosli. San Luis Potos(Mexico, 3000 m, 20 May 1972 (W. Elliott, P. Lynn,R.M. McEachern).FAMILY DIPLURIDAEThe discovery of a second eyeless Euagrus from acave in Mexico is an exciting event. Euagrus anops isa derivative type which has modified its features inseveral ways. The typical series of teeth on the promarginof the chelicera is greatly reduced in numbersand distribution of the elements. The complete lackof teeth on the tarsal claws is similarly unusual anddemonstrates that the cave habitat for no obviousreason can profoundly affect characters often givenhigh systematic importance. No males are known for144

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintthe two blind Mexican Euagrus but the expectationis that they likely will exhibit typical features of thegenus.The typical Euagrus is a darkly pigmented animalwith dark brown or banded abdomen and fairly largeeyes on a low transverse tubercle. Abundant in Mexi·co, the various species spread their sheet webs underground objects and in the entrances of caves. A pallidspecies from caves in Queretaro known only from afew females is also described below because it seemsto show some cave adaptation. Other species fromcaves in various parts of Mexico are not considered inthe present paper and are listed in another placemerely under the generic heading.Euagrus anops, new speciesDiagnosis-Pale, eyeless troglobite differing fromEuagrus cavernicola as follows: lateral spinneretsmuch shorter than carapace; promargin of chelicerawith few tiny teeth in basal half instead of formallong series of large teeth; tarsal claws without teeth.Etymology-Specific name from Greek a, without,and ops, eyes, without eyes.Female-Total length 5 mm. Carapace 2.2 mmlong, 1.8 mm wide. Abdomen 2.7 mm long, 2 mmwide.Entire spider whitish to faintly yellow, with sparsecovering of dusky hairs and spines; carapace and che·licerae shiny; abdomen dull white.Carapace elongate oval, evenly rounded on sidesand in front, covered thinly with suberect dusky hairs.Pars cephalica subtriangular, with lateral grooves shal·low, yellowish in color; cervical groove inconspicuouspit situated back three·fifths distance to posteriormargin. Eyes and eye tubercle obsolete, its positionindicated by suboval area of subintegumental spot·ting. Pars thoracica low, with three dark lateral striaeon each side. Pedicel 0.3 mm long, exposed fromabove. Sternum cordate, 1 mm long, 0.95 mm wide,thinly covered with erect dark hairs, without obvioussigilla but usual front pair incorporated into trans·verse labial groove. Labium 0.18 mm long, 0.4 mmwide, with row of about eight dusky hairs along frontedge. Endites set obliquely, 0.7 mm long, 0.5 mmwide, with erect hairs but no cuspules. Chelicera1.7 mm long, projecting forward, as seen from abovemore than half as long as carapace, smooth above,covered thinly with inconspicuous hairs; promarginwith six tiny teeth deep .in furrow toward base, lack·ing close·set row of large brown teeth of genus; innerfurrow with half dozen denticles opposite small teeth;retromargin unarmed, set with row of brown hairs;fang brown, curved, thin at end.I II III IVFemur 2.20 2.15 2.00 2.65Patella 0.95 0.80 0.85 0.95Tibia 2.00 1.95 1.70 2.65Metatarsus 2.10 2.15 2.20 2.85Tarsus 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.60Total 8.60 8.40 9.10 10.70Leg formula 4312. Legs longer and thinner thanthose of epigean species; first leg about four times,fourth leg about five times as long as carapace; fourthtibia longer than carapace. Legs clothed with fine,subprocumbent dusky hairs and few longer bristlesand weak spines; those on posterior pairs more nume·rous; palpal claw with series of fine teeth in basalhalf; paired and unpaired claws of all legs essentiallysmooth. Palpus: femur 1.3 mm, patella 0.5 mm, tibia0.7 mm, tarsus 1.1 mm, total 3.6 mm.Abdomen suboval, covered evenly with fine duskyhairs and few longer setae. Spinnerets four, subapicalin position, leaving short space between them andanal tubercle; median spinnerets one·segmented, 0.28mm long, with six spinules at apex; lateral spinneretthree·segmented, with measurements from basal toapical segments 0.65 mm, 0.65 mm, 0.85 mm respec·tively, totalling 2.15 mm; lateral spinneret$ t~in andflexible, much shorter than abdomen.Epigynum (Fig. 4) consisting of small tube oneach side running into suboval receptacle; openingsmall and lying in shallow atrium.Type Data-Female holotype from Cueva de laPorra, 5 km N Xilitla, San Luis Potosi, Mexico, 19July 1969 (W. Elliott, S. & J. Peck, D. Broussard).Euagrus luteus, new speciesDiagnosis-Golden brown troglophile species rela·ted to ritaensis of southern Arizona, distinguished asfollows: more slender, with thinner legs and muchlonger spinnerets; eye tubercle and eyes small withposterior median eyes smaller and separated by farmore than two diameters.Etymology-Specific name from Latin luteus, yel·low, pallid.Female-Total length 9 mm. Carapace 4 mm long,3 mm wide. Abdomen 5 mm long, 2.7 mm wide.Entire spider golden yellow brown; eyes enclosingblack field; abdomen with grayish tint; spines andhairs dusky.Carapace elongate oval, narrowed and subtruncatedin front and behind, covered thinly with procumbentdark hairs and few inconspicuous bristles; two longbristles in cervical groove. Pars cephalica subtriangular,longer than broad, delimited by fairly conspicuous145

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint34Fig. 1. Schizopelma stygia (Gertsch), female, front of carapace.Figs. 2a-2c. Epigyna of Schizopelma, ventral views. 2a. Schizopelma stygia (Gertsch). 2b. Schizopelma reddelli, new species.2c. Schizopelma elliotti, new species.Fig. 3. Euagrus luteus, new species, epigynum, ventral view.Fig. 4. Euagrus anops, new species, epigynum, ventral view.cephalic grooves; cervical groove deep pit situatedback slightly beyond middle of length. Eye tuberclelow, about third of width of head in front. Front eyerow moderately procurved as seen from in front,nearly straight from above; anterior median eyes dark,fairly large, two-thirds size of lateral eyes (13/20),separated by radius, nearer lateral eyes. Posterior eyerow moderately recurved; posterior median eyes separatedby more than two diameters (11/26). nearlytouching subequal lateral eyes. Median ocular quadranglemuch broader than long (46/24), narrowed infront by about same ratio; anterior median eyes larger(13/11). Sternum subcordate, 1.75 mm long, 1.5 mmwide; three pairs of small sigilla present on side mar·gins and front pair enlarged, lying in lateral groove.Labium 0.3 mm long, 0.7 mm wide, clothed withdark hairs but cuspules lacking. Chelicerae 2 mm long,as visible from above less than third as long as carapace;promargin with 12 to 14 dark teeth of whichfour are larger; retromargin flanked by even row ofhairs.I II III IVFemur 3.10 3.00 3.00 3.60Patella 1.75 1.65 1.60 1.80Tibia 2.45 2.20 2.35 3.30Metatarsus 2.55 2.50 3.10 4.20Tarsus 1.70 1.75 1.75 2.15Total 11.55 11.10 11.80 15.05146

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintLeg formula 4312. Legs of medium stoutness; firstleg 2.88 times, fourth leg 3.76 times as long as carapace;fourth tibia much shorter than carapace. Legsclothed with few subprocumbent dark hairs and erectbristles and few heavier spines most numerous onposterior legs; first tibia with 1-1-2 ventral spines;first metatarsus with 2-2-2 ventral spines. Palpal clawwith row of fine teeth for two-thirds length. Pairedclaws of tarsi with single row of 10 to 20 fine teeth inbasal half; unpaired claw with two to five small teethnear base. Palpus: femur 2.15 mm, patella 0.65 mm,tibia 1.5 mm, tarsus 1.75 mm; total 6.05 mm.Abdomen suboval, covered evenly with fine procumbentdark hairs and with scattered erect bristles;base of abdomen with thin brush of erect bristles.Median spinnerets 0.75 mm long, with few scatteredspinules. Lateral spinneret three-segmented, withmeasurements from base to apical segments, 1.7 mm,2 mm, 2.5 mm, respectively, totalling 6.2 mm; lateralspinneret thin, flexible, longer than abdomen.Epigynum (Fig. 3) with lightly sclerotized, transverseatrium leading to assymmetrically bifid receptacleon each side.Type Data-Female holotype and immature femalefrom iron mine at road, 2 km E Pinal de Amoles,Queretaro, Mexico, 17 July 1969 (S. Peck).Distribution-Caves of Queretaro.Records- MEXICO: Queretaro: Sotano de EI Tigre,12 km SW Jalpan, 11 July 1967 (J. Fish), female,three subadult. Cueva de Tejamanil, Tejamanil, 2 kmSW Pinal de Amoles, 9 August 1969 (D. McKenzie, J.Reddell), female, three immature. Cave n. 29, 200 mS Sotano del Buque, 20 km N Pinal de Amoles, 6June 1972 (W. Russell), three females. Cueva de losRiscos, 5 km SW Jalpan, 10 August 1966 (J. Reddell,J. Fish, D. McKenzie), eight females, immature.SUBORDER ARANEOMORPHAEFAMILY PHOLCIDAEThe cave pholcids of Mexico were shown in anearlier paper (Gertsch, 1971) to be a rich and variedfauna of generalized, lucifugous types especially attractedto cave habitats. Five eyeless species wereclassified as troglobites; a few others with reduced orrudimentary eyes quite likely also may be obligativecavernicoles; most of the· remaining ones show fewdifferences or none at all from epigean relatives andare regarded as troglophiles. In the present papereleven new species are described from Mexico andCentral America and two of these with rudimentaryeyes, Metagonia martha and jarmila, are claimed to betroglobites.The systematics of the family must be largelycentered in study of the genitalia, the special featuresof which were reviewed for each genus in the paperabove,. making repetition here unnecessary. The distinctivespurs on the chelicerae of the males areusually diagnostic for the taxa. Although basically avery generalized organ, the male palpus presents strikingspecializations of tarsus and bulb for each of thespecies. The haplogyne epigynum of the female consistsof weakly sclerotized internal pouches offeringlittle for identification. The most instructive featuresare the shape and modification of the sclerites and thegeneral pattern of the external facies.Coryssocnemis abernathyi GertschCoryssocnemis abernathyi Gertsch, 1971, p. 56.Records-MEXICO: San Luis Potosi: Cueva de losCaballos, 30 km ESE San Luis PotOSI: 18 May 1972(W. Elliott), two immatures. Oaxaca: Cueva de Apoala,Santiago Apoala, 20 km N Asuncion Nochixtlan,2 January 1973 (J. Reddell, D. McKenzie, M. McKenzie,S. Murphy), male probably this species.Coryssocnemis iviei GertschCoryssocnemis iviei Gertsch, 1971, p. 60.Records-MEXICO: Queretaro: Sotano Encantado,3 km W La Cienega, 20 km NNE Pinal de Amoles, 2June 1972 (R. Ralph), two males, female. San LuisPotosi: Cueva de Potrerillos, 2 km W Ahuacatlan, 27November 1972 (J. Reddell, T. Raines), two males,three females.Physocyc!us globosus (Taczanowski)Physocyc!us globosus: F. P.-Cambridge, 1902, p. 368.Records-MEXICO: San Luis Potosi: Sotano de laTinaja, 11 km NE Valles, 1 December 1968(J. HalIan), female.Psilochorus concinnus, new speciesDiagnosis-Small, dusky, long-legged troglophilesimilar to fishi and related species, readily separatedby following genitalic features: femur stout, withsmall ventral process at apex; both embolus and tibialspur bifid at apex; epigynal ridges prominent, withanterior one produced to rounded lobe above genitalgroove.Etymology-Specific name from Latin concinnus,pleasing.Female-Total length 2.7 mm. Carapace 1.1 mmlong, 1 mm wide. Abdomen 1.7 mm long, 1.4 mm147

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintwide.Sides of carapace whitish; pars cephalica and c1ypealextension dusky; eyes ringed with black, sternumdusky and chelicerae brown; legs dusky their wholelengths, without darker annulae or spots. Abdomengray; epigynal ridges brownish.Structure typical of genus (Gertsch, 1971, p. 72).with pars cephalica well elevated and eyes well developed.Clypeus long, inclined, 0.46 mm long. Ratioof eyes: ALE:AME:PLE:PME = 10:4.5:9:8.5. Fronteye row essentially straight; anterior median eyesseparated by about half their radius, about as farfrom anterior lateral eyes. Posterior eye row essentiallystraight to faintly procurved; posterior medianeyes separated by more than diameter (12/8.5), nearlytouching lateral eyes. Sternum 0.61 mm long, 0.8mm wide, subtruncated between and separating posteriorcoxae by length. Abdomen subglobose, moderatelyelevated and produced above spinneretsFirst leg: femur 6.1 mm, patella 0.5 mm, tibia 6.5mm, metatarsus 8 mm, tarsus 1.75 mm; total 22.85mm. First leg 20.7 times, first femur 5.5 times as longas carapace.Epigynum (Fig. 7) with prominent, transverseridges behind and in front of genital groove of whichfront ridge produced behind to bluntly rounded lobe.Male-Total length 2.8 mm. Carapace 1.3 mmlon~, 1 mm wide. Abdomen 1.5 mm long, 1.3 mmwide.Coloration and structure like those of female exceptas noted. Posterior eye row faintly procurved.Chelicera (Fig. 6) with short, sharp spur near base ofsegment differing in details from that of fishi.First leg: femur 6.35 mm, patella 0.50 mm, tibia6.8 mm, metatarsus 8.5 mm, tarsus 1.8 mm; total23.95 mm. First leg 18.5 times, first femur about fivetimes as long as carapace.Male palpus (Fig. 5) distinct from that of fishi asfollows: femur stouter, broader at apex, with shortcurved ventral process; long tarsal process notched atapex; embolus with tiny notch at apex.Type Data-Male holotype, two males, three femalesand immature from Cueva de Cinquenta y Ocho,5 km S San Francisco, 30 km ESE San Luis POtOSI:San Luis POtOSI: Mexico, 18 May 1972 (W. Elliott, R.Ralph, P. Lynn); cave at about 3000 m elevation.Psilochorus murphyi, new speciesDiagnosis-Small, long-legged troglophile related toconcinnus, distinguished by following features: cheliceraof male with small triangular spur in apical half;epigynum with small nodule at middle of transverseridge in front of genital furrow.Etymology-Named for Mr. Stuart Murphy.Female-Total length 2.6 mm. Carapace 1.1 mmlong, 1 mm wide. Abdomen 1.5 mm long, 1.2 mmwide.Coloration and structure like those of concinnus.Clypeus 0.43 mm long. Ratio of eyes: ALE:AME:PLE:PME = 10:4:10:9. Front eye row gently procurved,median eyes lying above centers of lateraleyes; anterior median eyes separated by radius, asfar from lateral eyes. Posterior eye row gently procurved;posterior median eyes separated by long diameter,touching lateral eyes. Sternum 0.75 mm long,0.6 mm wide.First leg: femur 5.2 mm, patella 0.4 mm, tibia0.52 mm, metatarsus 7.3 mm, tarsus 1.7 mm; total19.8 mm. First leg 18 times, first femur 4.8 times aslong as carapace.Epigynum (Fig. 10) with brownish ridges behindand in front of genital groove; front ridge with smallnodule at middle.Male-Total length 2.7 mm. Carapace 1.2 mm long,1.15 mm wide. Abdomen 1.5 mm long, 1.2 mmwide.Coloration and structure like those of female. Chelicera(Fig. 8) with small triangular spur on side in apicalhalf.First leg: femur 7 mm, patella 0.5 mm, tibia 7.2mm, metatarsus 10.6 mm, tarsus 2 mm; total 27.3mm. First leg 23 times, first femur about six timesas long as carapace.Male palpus (Fig. 9) like that of concinnus butdiffering in details of bulbal elements.Type Data-Male holotype, two males, three femalesand immature from Cueva de Apoala, SantiagoApoala, 20 km N Asuncion Nochixtlan, Oaxaca, Mexico,2 January 1973 (J. Reddell, D. McKenzie, M.McKenzie, S. Murphy).Pholcophora quieta, new speciesDiagnosis-Small, dusky troglophile with legs ofmedium length related to mitchel/i, distinguished byshorter legs, more widely spaced eyes and by broadepigynal band in front of genital groove.Etymology-Specific name from Latin quietus,quiet, resting.Female-Total length 1.75 mm. Carapace 0.75 mmlong, 0.65 mm wide. Abdomen 1 mm long, 1 mmwide.Cephalothorax and appendages dusky yellow; eyesnarrowly ringed with black; legs without darker rings;abdomen green.148

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintStructure typical of six-eyed group (Pholcophorina);six eyes in two triads separated by width ofone. Ratio of eyes: ALE:AME:PLE:PME = 7:0:6:6.Anterior lateral eyes separated by more than diameter(11/7). Posterior eye row moderately procurved; posteriormedian eyes separated by more than two diameters(16/6), contiguous with lateral eyes. Sternumas broad as long. Abdomen globose, strongly elevated.First leg: femur 1.7 mm, patella 0.3 mm, tibia 1.8mm, metatarsus 2.1 mm, tarsus 1 mm, total 6.9 mm.First leg eight times, first femur 2.2 times as long ascarapace.Epigynum as shown in Fig. 11.Type Data-Female holotype, four females fromGruta de Silvino, Izabal, 34 km W Puerto Charrios,Guatemala, 20·22 August 1969 (S. & J. Peck).Modisimus iviei, new speciesModisimus inornatus: Chamberlin & Ivie, 1938, p. 133(not inornatus O. P.-Cambridge).Diagnosis-Small troglophile of typical design, lackinganterior median eyes present in inornatus, relatedto that and similar species, separable by details ofgenitalia.Etymology-Named for the late Mr. Wilton Ivie.Female-Total length 2 mm. Carapace 0.65 mmlong, 0.55 mm wide. Abdomen 1.5 mm long, 1.2 mmwide.Cephalothorax and appendages dusky yellow; cephalothoraxand median grooves blackish; eyes ringedwith black; legs without darker rings or spots. Abdomengray, with series of small bluish spots above, unmarkedbelow.Clypeus 0.32 mm long, inclined forward, as highas more than four diameters of anterior lateral eye.Carapace as long as broad, of average height; oculartubercle prominent, with triads of eyes close together;anterior median eyes obsolete and eyes in followingratio: ALE:AME:PLE:PME = 7:0:6:6. Anterior lateraleyes separated by diameter. Posterior eye row straight;posterior median eyes separated by diameter, half asfar from lateral eyes. Abdomen subglobose, about ashigh as broad. .First leg: femur 3.2 mm, patella 0.3 mm, tibia 3.5mm, metatarsus 4.2 mm, tarsus 0.8 mm, total 12 mm.First leg 18 times, first femur 4.9 times as long ascarapace.Epigynum (Fig. 14) medium sized plaque withtruncated posterior margin and sclerotized pattern ofinternal structures most distinct on each corner abovegenital groove.Male-Carapace 0.6 mm long, 0.6 mm wide.Coloration and structure like those of female.Chelicera with small tubercle near base bearing severalspinules and small lateral series on outer margin offace.Male palpus (Figs. 12-13) with slender elements;femoral spur small, sharp process near base; tarsalprocess elongated, apically truncated; embolus rathershort rounded process.Type Data-Female holotype and damaged malefrom Xmahit Cave, Tekax, Yucatan, Mexico, 31 July1936 (A.S. Pearse) from six meters deep in cave.Modisimus propinquus O.P.-CambridgeModisimus propinquus O.P.-Cambridge, 1896, p. 223.Record-MEXICO: Chiapas: Cueva Chica del Camino,17 km E Tuxtla Gutierrez, 19 August 1967 (J.Reddell, J. Fish, T.R. Evans), two males.Modisimus texanus BanksModisimus texanus Banks, 1906, p. 94.Record-MEXICO: San Luis Potosf: Sotano de laTinaja, 11 km NNE Valles, 1 December 1968 (J.Hallan), four females.Modisimus pusil!us GertschModisimus pusil!us Gertsch, 1971, p. 72.Record-MEXICO: Nuevo Le6n: Chevy Sink, 10km W Galeana, 3 June 1969 (J. Reddell), female.Modisimus boneti GertschModisimus boneti Gertsch, 1971, p. 66.Record-MEXICO: San Luis Potosf: Cueva (=Sotano)de los Monos, 15 km NE Valles, 30 December1971 (D. Honea, R. Jameson), female. Cueva de Taninuln. 1, 13 km SE Valles, 29 December 1970 (J.Hallan), female. Cueva de Puente de Dios, 22 kmSSW Valles, 9 April 1968 (T. Raines), immature female.Modisimus mckenziei GertschModisimus mckenziei Gertsch, 1971, p. 71.Records-MEXICO: Tamaulipas: Bee Cave, 17 kmNE Ocampo, 10 April 1966 (J. Fish, E. Alexander, D.McKenzie, R. Felton), female. Cueva de la Paloma, 1km NE Gomez Farias, 18 May 1971 (W. Russell), immaturefemale.149

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint6710Figs. 5-7. Psilochorus concinnus, new species. 5. Left male palpus, retrolateral view. 6. Left male chelicera, retrolateral view.7. Epigynum, ventral view.Figs. 8-10. Psilochorusmurphyi, new species. 8. Left male chelicera, frontal view. 9. Left male palpus, retrolateral view.10. Epigynum, ventral view.Fig. 11. Pholcophora quieta, new species, epigynum, ventral view.Figs. 12-14. Modisimus iviei, new species. 12. Left male pal pus, retrolateral view. 13. Left male palpus, subdorsal view.14. Epigynum, ventral view.Modisimus gracilipes, new speciesDiagnosis-Small troglophile with eyes well developedand long, thin legs, those of male 50 times aslong as carapace, further distinguished from inornatusand relatives by distinctive genitalia.Etymology-Specific name from Latin gracilis, thin,and pes, foot.Female-Total length 1.8 mm. Carapace 0.7 mmlong, 0.7 mm wide. Abdomen 1.1 mm long, 0.93 mm150

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintwide.Cephalothorax and appendages dusky yellow; carapacepale except for narrow median subintegumentaldark band from behind eyes to near posterior margin,broad black rings around eyes and dusky c1ypeus; legsmore dusky apically. Abdomen grayish, covered withmany small bluish flecks above and on sides; epigynalridges brown.Clypeus 0.3 mm high, subvertical, equal to aboutthree diameters of anterior lateral eye. Carapace asbroad as long, of average height; pars cephalica markedby deep linear fissures; ocular tubercle prominentwith triads of eyes close together; anterior medianeyes obsolete and eyes in following ratio: ALE:AME:PLE:PME = 10:0:9:9. Anterior lateral eyes separatedby radius. Posterior eye row moderately recurved;posterior median eyes separated by diameter, thirdas far from lateral eyes. Abdomen subglobose, as highas broad.First leg: femur 3.9 mm, patella 0.3 mm, tibia 3.2mm, metatarsus 4.7 mm, tarsus 1 mm; total 13.1 mm.First leg 18.7 times, first femur 5.6 times as long ascarapace.Epigynum (Fig. 17) large, half width of venter,slightly convex plaque in front of genital groove withtruncate posterior margin and sci erotized angle oneach side; narrower band behind genital groove.Male-Total length 2.4 mm. Carapace 0.6 mm long,0.6 mm wide. Abdomen 1.8 mm long, 0.9 mm wide.Coloration and structure like those of female. Che·licera with small, rounded angle just below base bearingsmall cluster of spinules and front face with about22 scattered spinules over most of surface.First leg: femur 7.3 mm, patella 0.3 mm, tibia 7.8mm, metatarsus 13 mm, tarsus 1.6 mm; total 30 mm.First leg 50 times, first femur 12.1 times as long ascarapace.Male palpus (Figs. 15-16) with segments short andthickened; femoral spur sharp, pointed toward apex;tarsal process thickened at apex; bulb with subapicaltransverse spur and short embolus.Type Data-Male holotype, male and female andimmature from Cueva Lanquin, Lanquin, Alta Verapaz,Guatemala, 28 August 1969 (S. & J. Peck).Modisimus beneficus, new speciesDiagnosis-Small troglophile with dark-ringed legslike those of maculatipes, distinguished byepigynumof different form.Etymology-Specific name from Latin beneficus,kind, generous.Female-Total length 2.2 mm. Carapace 0.8 mmlong, 0.75 mm wide. Abdomen 1.7 mm long, 1.3 mmwide.Carapace with pale base color overlaid by brownmarkings covering most of dorsum and all of c1ypeus;eyes widely ringed with black; sternum dusky brown;legs yellowish with small brown rings at distal ends offemora, at base and near distal ends of tibiae. Abdo·men blackish above and on sides; venter gray.Structure typical, like that of inornatus; parscephalica set off by deep grooves; c1ypeus 0.35 mmhigh, only moderately inclined forward. Ocular tubercleprominent, with triads of eyes close together;anterior median eyes essentially obsolete and eyes infollowing ratio: ALE:AME:PLE:PME = 11 :0:9:9. Anteriorlateral eyes separated by less than diameter(8/11). Posterior eye row weakly recurved; posteriormedian eyes separated by full diameter, half as farfrom lateral eyes. Abdomen subspherical, as high asbroad.First leg: femur 2.65 mm, patella 0.5 mm, tibia 2.2mm, metatarsus 3.2 mm, tarsus 0.75 mm; total 9.3mm. First leg 11.6 times, first femur 8.8 times as longas carapace.Epigynum (Fig. 18) simple rectangular plaque truncatedbehind, similar to that of inornatus.Type Data-Female holotype and female from Sotanode Botella Chica, 3 km NW Tequila, Veracruz,Mexico, 5 August 1967 (J. Reddell, J. Fish).Modisimus chil:keringi, new speciesDiagnosis-Troglophile species related to pulchellusBanks (1929) distinguished by epigynum (Fig. 19)with truncated posterior margin instead of deep emargination.Etymology-Named for Dr. Arthur M. Chickering,specialist on spider fauna of Panama.Female-Total length 3 mm. Carapace 1.5 mmlong, 1.5 mm wide. Abdomen 2 mm long, 1.5 mmwide.Base color of cephalothorax and abdomen duskyorange; pars cephalica in part blackish, with broaddusky band on c1ypeus and eyes broadly ringed withblack; pars thoracica with narrow black line fromcervical groove back to posterior margin; legs withblackish rings at distal ends of femora and tibiae.Abdomen mostly blue above and on sides, with centraland lateral pale streaks; venter whitish.Pars cephalica set off by deep grooves; c1ypeus0.45 mm long. Ocular tubercle massive, prominentlyelevated; anterior median eyes obsolete, other eyeslarge in following ratio: ALE:AME:PLE:PME = 16:0:13: 13. Anterior lateral eyes separated by less thandiameter (11/16). Posterior eye row weakly recurved;posterior median eyes separated by diameter, half as151

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintfar from lateral eyes. Abdomen suboval, about as highas broad; anal portion drawn to short tubercle.First leg: femur 6.3 mm, patella 0.5 mm, tibia 6.4mm, metatarsus 10.3 mm, tarsus 1.7 mm; total 25.2mm. First leg 17 times, first femur 4.2 times as longas carapace.Epigynum (Fig. 19) rounded plaque with posteriormargin truncate and with elongated groove on eachside.Type Data-Female holotype from Chilibrillo Caves,Buenos Aires, Canal Zone, Panama, 8 April 1945 (H.Trapido).Metagonia blanda, new speciesDiagnosis-Troglophile species with eyes of averagesize, similar to tinaja and related species, easily separatedby details of epigynum (Figs. 20-22).Etymology-Specific name from Latin blandus,flattering.Female-Total length 3.3 mm. Carapace 1.25 mmlong, 1.2 mm wide. Abdomen 2.2 mm long, 1.5 mmwide.Carapace white to pale yellow with dusky trianglebeginning at cervical groove and running back to nearmargin; pars cephalica and c1ypeus whitish; eyes narrowlyringed with black; sternum and appendagesslightly dusky; patellae brown and apices of tarsi withbrown rings; abdomen uniform white.Structure typical (Gertsch, 1971, p. 82). Carapacebroad, convex, with c1ypeus 0.22 mm long, roundedin front. Ocular tubercle of average height; triads ofeyes separated by less than width of one; ratio ofeyes: ALE:AME:PLE:PME = 11:0:10:10. Anteriorlateral eyes separated by two diameters. Posterior eyerow procurved; posterior median eyes separated bymore than diameter (13/10), slightly separated fromlateral eye. Abdomen elongate oval, as high as broad.First leg: femur 6.1 mm, patella 0.4 mm, tibia 6.3mm, metatarsus 8 mm, tarsus 3.8 mm; total 24.6 mm.First leg 20 times, first femur about five times as longas carapace.Epigynum (Figs. 20-22) borne on inflated tubularappendage, subspherical, with rounded sclerotized rimbehind bearing median notch.Type Data-Female holotype from Gruta de Silvino,Izabal, 34 km W Puerto Charrios, Guatemala,20-22 August 1969 (S. & J. Peck).Other Records-GUATEMALA: Izabal: Cueva dela Coche, 2 km W Livingston, 21 August 1969 (S. & J.Peck), three females. Alta Verapaz: Cueva Seamay,Finca Seamay, Senahu, 24-26 August 1969 (S. & J.Peck), female. Cueva Lanquin, Lanquin, 28 August1969 (S. & J. Peck), two females.Metagonia tinaja GertschMetagonia tinaja Gertsch, 1971, p. 83.Records-MEXICO: San Luis Potosf: Sotano de laTinaja, 11 km NE Valles, 16 October 1972 (V. Roth,B. Firstman), males, females, immature near pool.Sotano de Matapalma, 20 km N Valles, 30 December1972 (R. Fieseler), four females, immature. Tamaulipas:Sotano de Venadito, 17 km SE Antiguo Morelos,7 April 1971 (D. Honea), female, immature fromnew lower section, about 113 m below surface.Metagonia atoyacae GertschMetagonia atoyacae Gertsch, 1971, p. 87.Records-MEXICO: Veracruz: Grutas de Atoyac,2 km E Atoyac, 24 December 1972 (D. McKenzie),female.Metagonia placida GertschMetagonia placida Gertsch, 1971, p. 91.Record-MEXICO: Nuevo Leon: Cueva de Chorrosde Agua, 21 km WSW Montemorelos, 19 June 1969(S. & J. Peck, R. Norton), male, five females.Metagonia suzanne, new speciesDiagnosis-Troglophile species with eyes of averagesize similar to tinaja and related species, separated bydetails of epigynum (Fig. 23).Etymology-Named for Suzanne Wiley.Female-Total length 3.2 mm. Carapace 1.3 mmlong, 1.15 mm wide. Abdomen 1.75 mm long, 1.3 mmwide.Base color of carapace and appendages dull yellow;carapace with dark maculation behind median groove;eyes ringed with black; patellae dusky brown and apicesof tibiae with narrow brown rings; abdomen whitish,with few scattered, subintegumental bluish spotson dorsum.Structure typical, like that of tinaja. Ocular tubercleof medium height; triads of eyes separated by lessthan width of one; ratio of eyes: ALE:AME:PLE:PME = 13:0:12:13. Anterior lateral eyes separated bytwo diameters (26/13). Posterior eye row moderatelyprocurved; oval median eyes separated by long diameter,slightly separated from lateral eyes by third ofnarrow diameter. Abdomen elongate, as high as broad.First leg: femur 6.5 mm, five times as long as carapace;legs fragmented.Epigynum (Fig. 23) broad convex lobe truncatedbehind, with narrow transverse band defined by inter-152

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint16171921Figs. 15-17. Modisimus gracilipes, new species. 15. Left male palpus, retrolateral view. 16. Left male pal pus, subdorsal view.17. Epigynum, ventral view.Fig. 18. Modisimus beneficus, new species, epigynum, ventral view.Fig. 19. Modisimus chickeringi, new species, epigynum, ventral view.Figs. 20-22. Metagonia blanda, new species, epigynum. 20. Lateral view. 21. Ventral view. 22. Posterior view.Fig. 23. Metagonia suzanne, new species, epigynum, ventral view.nal dark markings.Type Data-Female holotype from Sumidero de EIJineo, 1 km NW Gomez Farias, Tamaulipas, Mexico,24 November 1971 (T. Raines, L. McNatt), from deepcave at 60 to 153 m.Metagonia martha, new speciesDiagnosis-Pale troglobite with rudimentary eyes,similar to tinaja, readily recognized by epigynum(Fig. 27).Etymology-Named for Martha Helen McKenzie.Female-Total length 2.4 mm. Carapace 0.8 mmlong, 0.7 mm wide. Abdomen 1.6 mm long, 1.3 mmwide.Cephalothorax whitish; legs dull yellow; abdomengray.Ocular tubercle convex, transverse ridge of mediumdevelopment; eyes reduced to close-set, well separatedtriads, without pigment.153

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFirst leg: femur 4.2 mm, patella, 0.6 mm, tibia 4.4mm, metatarsus 6.3 mm, tarsus 1.3 mm; total 16.8mm. First leg 21 times, first femur 5.2 times as longas carapace. Tibia and patella of fourth leg 3.7 mmlong.Epigynum (Fig. 27) prominent, sclerotized brownlobe of quadrangular shape as seen in ventral view.Type Data-Female holotype and six females fromCueva del Nacimiento del RIO San Antonio, 10 kmSSW Acatlan, Oaxaca, Mexico, 26 December 1972(J. Reddell, D. & M. McKenzie, S. Murphy).Metagonia candela GertschMetagonia candela Gertsch, 1971, p. 90.Record-MEXICO: Nuevo Leon: Unnamed cave,4 km W Bustamante, 30 September 1972 (P. Duncan).Metagonia punctata GertschMetagonia punctata Gertsch, 1971, p. 86.Record-MEXICO: San Luis PotosI: Cueva de laPuente, 30 km ESE San Luis POtOSI: 16 May 1972(R. Ralph, W. Elliott, M. McEachern). two females.Metagonia jarmila, new speciesDiagnosis-Pale, essentially eyeless troglobite oftinaja group recognized by distinctive genitalia in bothsexes: inner tarsal process of male palpus long blade;epigynum beak-like projection standing at nearly rightangle on venter.Etymology-Named for Mrs. Jarmila Peck.Female-Total length 2.3 mm. Carapace 0.92 mmlong, 0.75 mm wide. Abdomen 1.4 mm long, 1.1 mmwide.Carapace white to pale yellow, with faint brownishbar at middle of pars thoracica; legs pale yellow, withonly faint darker markings at juncture of segments;abdomen white.Structure typical; c1ypeus 0.28 mm long; oculartubercle low, less developed in some specimens; eyesobsolete or of moderate development, without pigment,eyes silvery spots; triads of eyes vestigial insome, in others faintly developed corneal projections;vestiges of triads separated by one and one-half lengthof one.First leg: femur 5 mm, patella 0.4 mm, tibia 6.3mm, metatarsus 11.3 mm, tarsus 1.4 mm; total 24.4mm. First leg 26 times, first femur five times lengthof carapace.Epigynum (Figs. 25-26) conspicuous, triangular,downwardly projecting process, grooved below, andwith atriobursal orifices at base.Male-Total length 2 mm. Carapace 0.8 mm long,0.84 mm wide. Abdomen 1.2 mm long, 0.8 mm wide.Coloration and structure like those of female. Eyetubercle of medium development but eyes mostly obsolete,reduced to faint corneal traces.First leg: femur 7 mm, patella 0.37 mm, tibia 7.3mm, metatarsus 13 mm, tarsus 1.7 mm; total 29.35mm. First leg 38 times, first femur about 9 times aslong as carapace.Male palpus (Fig. 24) typical of tinaja group; tarsalprocess with three terminal spurs and inner processlong, flat, hinged, blade-like spur.Type Data-Male holotype and two females fromBucks Bypass Cave, Caves Branch, Belize (British Honduras).122 m, 14 August 1972 (S. Peck).Distribution-Caves of Belize.Other Record-BELIZE: St. Herman's Cave, CavesBranch, 122 m, 23 July 1972 and 21 August 1972 (S.& J. Peck). six females.FAMILY TELEMIDAEUp to the present time the family Telemidae hasbeen reported only from southern Europe and Africa.The family was based on a tiny eyeless spider, Telematenel/a Simon, known only from caves in the Pyreneesof southern France, and a few other records arenow known from Africa. Years ago it became plain tome that the spiders from the western United Statesassigned to the genus Usophila were representatives ofthe family and likely even of the genus Telema. Thediscovery of a species in Guatemala, based on a singlemature female, represents a further extension of therange of this family of minute spiders, many of whichare cavernicoles. The generic position must remainsomewhat doubtful because of lack of a male.Telema mayana, new speciesDiagnosis-Essentially eyeless troglobite with sixvestigial eyes barely discernible in transverse row, distinctfrom Telema gracilis (Keyserling) in Marx, 1897,p. 37, from Alabaster Cave, in EI Dorado County,California, by lack of eyes and shorter legs.Etymology-Named for the Mayas of Yucatan andCentral America.Female-Total length 1.3 mm. Carapace 0.5 mmlong, 0.42 mm wide. Abdomen 0.4 mm long, 0.35 mmwide.Cephalothorax and appendages yellow; carapacewith faint radial shadings and narrow dusky marginalband; chelicerae, labium and endites faintly brown.Abdomen green above and on sides, paler below.Structure typical of Telema. Carapace longer than154

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintbroad, convex, quite high, lacking cephalic suturesbut with tiny linear median groove behind middle;pars cephalica highest behind eyes, with pair of tinybristles beside median groove and one at each side ofeye group; c1ypeus 0.1 mm high, sloping forward belowtransverse elevation of eye tubercle. Eyes six,nearly obsolete, four in transverse row; median eyessmall, well separated from larger lateral eyes; all visibleas trivial corneal elevations. Sternum 0.4 mm long andbroad, set with few weak setae. Labium 0.16 mmlong, 0.12 mm wide, rounded in front and emarginatedbehind into truncature of sternum. Endites twiceas long as wide, rounded on outer side and moderatelyconvergent around labium, but tips well separated.Chelicera with fairly long, curved fang and small rowof curved hairs on each margin; promargin with sharptooth and five small denticles; retromargin with fivesmall denticles opposite the small ones above.I II III IVFemur 0.95 0.85 0.63 0.83Patella 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.16Tibia 0.90 0.75 0.52 0.65Metatarsus 0.58 0.50 0.40 0.45Tarsus 0.42 0.42 0.30 0.35Total 3.02 2.67 1.99 2.44Legs of medium length, very thin; leg formula1342. First leg six times, first femur about twice aslong as carapace. Legs with rows of small hairs; patellaewith thin bristle above at apex and tibiae withsimilar one above near middle. Palp: femur 0.15 mm,patella 0.06 mm, tibia 0.15 mm, tarsus 0.22 mm; total0.58 mm.Abdomen suboval, elevated, slightly overhangingpedicel. Colulus large flat lobe pointed at apex. Pairof minute tracheal spiracles barely visible behind genitalgroove, one-third distance to spinnerets. Tiny zigzagbelt present across front end of abdomen abovelorum and pedicel.Epigynum transverse, slightly curved lip just infront of genital groove; single median genital pouchvisible through integument.Type Data-Female holotype and immature malefrom Cueva Sepacuite n. 2, Finca Sepacuite, Senahu,Alta Verapaz, Guatemala, 26 August 1969 (S. & J.Peck).FAMILY OCHYROCERATIDAEThis family of minute, lucifugous spiders is foundonly in tropical and subtropical regions. Most speciesfive in deep ground detritus and a few have been reportedfrom cave habitats, where they spin tinytangled webs in wall crevices and under ground litter.An essentially blind species occurs on Jamaica andanother is being described from the Hawaiian Islands.A species of Theotima from a cave in Tamaulipas,Mexico, shows no trace of eyes and is classified as atroglobite.Theotima sp.Record-BELIZE: Bucks Bypass Cave, CavesBranch, 122 m, 14 August 1972 (S. Peck), two females.Theotima pura, new speciesDiagnosis-Minute, whitish troglobite distinct inhaving no trace of eyes.Etymology-Specific name from Latin purus, pure.Female-Total length 1 mm. Carapace 0.5 mm long,0.35 mm wide. Abdomen 0.55 mm long, 0.4 mmwide.Cephalothorax and appendages pale yellow; abdomenwhite.Carapace longer than broad, of medium height,with scarcely any traces of cephalic sutures or mediangroove; pars cephalica little elevated, rounded infront; eyes obsolete. Sternum 0.31 mm long, 0.28mm wide, rounded between posterior coxae, separatingthem by length. Labium with trivial emarginationat apex, flanked by tiny setae. Chelicera with shortcurved fang; promargin with series of five small teeth;retromargin smooth.I II III IVFemur 0.60 0.56 0.46 0.64Patella 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.15Tibia 0.62 0.55 0.45 0.67Metatarsus 0.43 0.39 0.36 0.46Tarsus 0.14 0.27 0.25 0.36Total 1.94 1.92 1.66 2.28Leg formula 4123. First leg about four times, firstfemur 1.2 times as long as carapace. Legs thin, withsparse covering of pale hairs. Palpus: femur 0.1 mm,patella 0.04 mm, tibia 0.08 mm, tarsus 0.11 mm; total0.33 mm; tarsus without apical claw.Abdomen suboval, of medium height. Trachealspiracle situated about half way between genital furrowand spinnerets. Colulus small rounded lobe setwith fine hairs.Type Data-Female holotype from Cueva de losVampiros, 20 km NW EI Limon, Tamaulipas, Mexico,27 May 1968 (J. Reddell).155

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintOchyrocera formosa, new speciesDiagnosis-Relative of Ochyrocera quinquevittataSimon (1882) of St. Vincent, Lesser Antilles, readilydistinguished by differences in color pattern and especiallyby details of male palpus with much longertarsus and stouter, more angled embolus.Etymology-Specific name from Latin formosus,beautiful.Female-Total length 1.8 mm. Carapace 0.7 mmlong, 0.6 mm wide. Abdomen 1.1 mm long, 0.9 mmwide.Carapace pale green with three dark stripes, oneon each side margin and middle one running frommiddle to posterior margin; c1ypeus with duskysmudging; eye tubercles black. Sternum purplish onsides, broken by small yellow spots opposite coxaeand narrow central yellow band running to point beforeposterior margin. Legs purplish except for palepatellae and pale rings at ends of apical segments.Structure typical of genus; carapace low, moderatelyconvex, with faint indication of median groove;pars cephalica moderately elevated with conspicuous,rounded, declining c1ypeus 0.16 mm long, equal toabout three diameters of anterior median eye. Eyes(Fig. 29) six, subequal in size; front row essentiallystraight; anterior median eyes slightly separated, littlefarther from lateral eyes. Sternum 0.39 mm long,0.43 mm wide, widely truncated in front, narrowlybehind to separate posterior coxae by length of one.Labium 0.15 mm long and wide, rounded in frontand with small emargination at apex. Endites abouttwice as long as wide, convergent around labium andnearly touching at apices. Chelicera armed as follows:promargin with seven strong teeth and broad innerkeel as long as tooth row; retromargin unarmed.Legs very long, thin, mostly lost or fragmented;second femur 2 mm long, about three times as long ascarapace.Abdomen voluminous, suboval, higher than broad.Tracheal spiracle situated about half way betweengenital groove and spinnerets. Epigynum (Fig. 30)transverse plaque with small subintegumental receptacleon each margin above genital groove.Male-Total length 1.7 mm. Carapace 0.7 mm long,0.6 mm wide. Abdomen 1 mm long, 0.7 mm wide.Coloration and general structure similar to those offemale. Legs uniform dusky yellow to brownish, proportionatelymuch longer than those of female. Firstleg: femur 4.2 mm, patella 0.3 mm, tibia 4.4 mm,metatarsus 1.9 mm, tarsus 1.15 mm; total 11.95 mm.First leg 17 times as long as carapace; first metatarsuswith curve at base; metatarsus and tarsus with numerousfalse sutures.Male palpus (Fig. 28) with following features:tibia 3.5 times as tong as broad; tarsus prolonged forwardinto sharp spur and thus readily distinguishedfrom all species but quinquevittata Simon by presenceof stout straight spine on tarsus overhanging bulb, butthis spine much shorter than tarsus; bulb elongateoval, with embolus strongly bent.Type Data-Male holotype and male and threefemales from Gruta de Silvino, 34 km W PuertoCharrios, Izabal, Guatemala, 20-22 August 1969 (S.& J. Peck).FAMILY SCYTODIDAEGenus Loxosceles Heinecken and LoweThe genus Loxosceles has many species in Mexicoand most of these live in caves when they are available.Except for some loss of pigment, most of thecavernicoles differ little from those found outsideand are classified as troglophiles. All the Mexican speciesbelong to the reclusa group, a series of closelyallied taxa found in North America, in limited numberin Guatemala and Costa Rica of Central America andin the West Indies. The species are separated on thebasis of color differences, the ranges being fromwhitish, yellow, dusky orange or even blackish, lengthand proportion of the legs, and especially by thefeatures of the male and female genitalia. The epigynaof the females have provided very important charactersin spite of variability in some species and oftenare more useful than the male palpi in sorting out theclosely related species. In order to give an adequatenomenclature for the cave representatives, diagnosesof the several new species are presented here in anticipationof a future review of the entire fauna ofcontinental North America.The coloration and structure are similar in bothsexes of each species but males have longer legs. Thechelicerae, often the labium and endites, and thetibiae and tarsi of the palpi are dark mahogany brown.The eyes are always narrowly ringed with black. Thesystematic features are those of the reclusa group(Gertsch, 1958, p. 8) but the typical leg formula,2413, shows some variation in both sexes as shownbelow.Loxosceles valdosa, new speciesLoxosceles bolivari Gertsch, 1958, p. 22 (Female, notmale holotype). Reddell, 1971, p. 32.(Reddell andMitchell, 1971, p. 147.Diagnosis-Pale, long-legged troglophile with firstleg of male longer than fourth; embolus of malepalpus much longer than bulb; epigynal pouches close156

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint293130Figs. 24-26. Meragoniajarmila, new species. 24. Left male palpus, retrolateral view. 25. Epigynum, subdorsal view. 26. Epigynum,subventral view.Fig. 27.Fig. 27. Meragonia martha, new species, epigynum, ventral view.Figs. 28-30. Ochyrocera formosa, new species. 28. Left male palpus, retrolateral view. 29. Eyes of female. 30. Epigynum,ventral view.Fig. 31. Loxosceles lureola, new species, epigynum, ventral view.together on midline.Etymology-Named for Cueva de Valdosa of theSierra de EI Abra.Female from Cueva de Valdosa-Total length 9.6mm. Carapace 3.8 mm long, 3.25 mm wide. Abdomen5.8 mm long, 3 mm wide.Cephalothorax and appendages yellowish to dullorange, with following markings: carapace with duskyorange V-shaped marking and dentated marginal bandaround sides; eyes narrowly ringed with black; abdomenuniform gray.Clypeus 0.4 mm long, sloping, equal to two diametersof anterior median eye; eyes of average size, subequal,all 0.2 mm in longest diameter; median eyessituated about radius in front of line along frontedges of anterior lateral eyes, more than their diameterfrom lateral eyes (24/20).FemurPatellaTibiaMetatarsusTarsusTotalI6.751.257.306.101.,5022.90II7.501.308.008.251.7526.80III6.201.205.656.601.5021.15IV6.601.206.407.351.6023.15Leg formula 2413. First leg six times, first femurabout 1.8 times as long as carapace. Palpus: femur1.35 mm, patella, 0.35 mm, tibia 1 mm, tarsus 1.25mm; total 3.95 mm.Epigynum (Figs. 40-41) with oval pouches close157

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprinttogether at middle of genital furrow; each pouch withrounded angle on outer side and principal fingerlikereceptacle but latter subjected to extreme variabilityby presence of adventitious lobes.Male Holotype-Total length 7.9 mm. Carapace 3.4mm long, 3.1 mm wide. Abdomen 4.5 mm long, 2.5mmwide.Coloration and structure essentially like those offemale. Eyes more closely grouped; median eyes onlydiameter from anterior lateral eyes.I II III IVFemur 7.75 9.00 7.00 7.50Patella 1.25 1.35 1.25 1.15Tibia 9.90 10.65 6.70 7.50Metatarsus 8.90 10.50 7.65 9.35Tarsus 1.75 1.75 1.15 1.70Total 29.55 33.25 23.75 27.20Leg formula 1423. First leg 8.7 times, first femur2.27 times as long as carapace.Male palpus: femur 1.7 mm, patella, 0.6 mm,tibia 1.2 mm, tarsus 0.4 mm; total 3.9 mm. See Fig.39; femur about twice as long as broad; emboluslonger than bulb (0.54 mm/0.30 mm).Type Data-Male holotype and six immature fromCueva de Valdosa, 11 km E Valles, San Luis POtOSI:Mexico, 24 November 1967 (J. Reddell, S. Fowler).Distribution-Caves of San Luis Potos(and Tamaulipas,Mexico.Other Records-San Luis Potosf: Cueva de Valdosa,11 km E Valles, 19 February 1970 (J.A.L. Cooke),two males, five females, immature in webs of twilightzone; 25 November 1967 (M. Collins, T. Evans,M. Meredith), male, immature. Cueva de Los Sabinos,13 km NNE Valles, 3 April 1942, female allotype ofbolivari and immature. Cueva de Taninul n. 4, 12 kmESE Valles, 11 July 1969 (S. & J. Peck), two females,immature. Sotano (=Cueva) Escondido, 12 km NEValles, 31 January 1969 (J. Reddell, W. Russell), twofemales, immature. Cueva de la Libertad, 25 km NWValles, 8 April 1968 (T. Raines), two males, two females.Cuevacita del Sotanito, 9 km NE Valles, 1 June1968 (J. Reddell), female. Tamaulipas: Cueva delAbra, 15 km SSW Mante, 25 November 1963 (J.Reddell), female; 7 December 1945 (C. Bolivar, F.Bonet), two females, immature. Cueva de San Rafaelde los Castros, 12 km ESE Mante, 10 April 1966 (J.Fish, D. McKenzie), female. Grutas de Quintero,13 km SW Mante, 28 November 1964 (J. Reddell),male, female. Sotano de Vasquez, 7 km SE Ocampo,29 December 1972 (R. Jameson, P. Duncan), male,three females.Loxosceles bolivari GertschLoxosceles bolivari Gertsch, 1958, p. 22 (male holotypeonly).Discussion-The name bolivari is herein restrictedto a species from Nuevo Leon and the female allotype,along with much more material now available,now assigned to the new species valdosa describedabove.Type Data-Male holotype from Cueva Garcia(=Grutas de Villa de Garcia), Nuevo Leon, Mexico,19 September 1942 (C. Bolivar).Distribution-Caves of Nuevo Leon, Mexico.Other Record-MEXICO: Nuevo Leon: Cueva delCarrizal, 10 km SW Candela, 2 March 1963 (W. Russell),two females from within 90 m of entrance.Loxosceles devia Gertsch and MulaikLoxosceles devia Gertsch and Mulaik, 1940, p. 316.Gertsch, 1958, p. 11.Record-MEXICO: Tamaulipas: Cueva de los Cuarteles,10 km SW Aldama, 23 December 1972 (J. Reddell,D. & M. McKenzie, S. Murphy), two males, fourfemales.Loxosceles misteca GertschLoxosceles misteca Gertsch, 1958, p. 27.Records-MEXICO: Guerrero: Grutas de Cacahuamilpa,17 km NE Taxco, 4 May 1963 (W.J. Gertsch,W. Ivie), two males, 10 females, immature; 17 August1966 (J. Reddell), female; 2 September 1966 (J.& W. Ivie), female, immature. Grutas de EI Mogote,12 km N Taxco, 25 August 1965 (J. Reddell, W. Bell),male, immature; 22 December 1966 (T. Raines), female.Pozo Melendez, 20 km S Taxco, 9 June 1966(J. Fish), two females, immature. Cueva de CarlosPacheco, near Grutas de Cacahuamilpa, 17 km NETaxco, 27 June 1954 (R. deSaussure), immature fromwall in total darkness. Mexico: Grutas de la Estrella,13 km SSE Ixtapan de la Sal, 17 August 1966 (J. Red·dell, D. McKenzie), male, female, immature.Loxosceles tehuana GertschLoxosceles tehuana Gertsch, 1958, p. 26.Record-MEXICO: Chiapas: Cueva de Tempisque,13 km W Ocozocoautla, 17 August 1967 (J. Reddell,T.R. Evans), female.158

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintLoxosceles deserta, new speciesLoxosceles unicolor: Gertsch, 1958, p. 15.Discussion-In 1958 I used the name unicolor Keyserlingfor a long-legged species widely distributedfrom Arizona, southern Utah and Nevada into adjacentCalifornia. After study of the presumed type ofunicolor, in the collection of the United States NationalMuseum, it is clear that the common westernspecies is distinct so it is renamed above. The exactidentity of unicolor, said to come from Punta deAguas, a small community south of Albuquerque,New Mexico, but possibly with spurious locality data,remains obscure. Since 1958 the name unicolor hasbeen widely and erroneously used for several species,and is part of medical literature because of its venomousbite. The species is well described in the paperabove and there is no need for repetition of the featuressetting it aside from arizonica, its nearest relative.A new holotype and other data are given below.Type Data-Male holotype from Twentynine Palms,California, May 1945 (J. H. Branch).Distribution-Common species of southern Utahand Nevada, Arizona especially in western portion,and central and south California.Loxosceles aurea, new speciesDiagnosis-Pale yellow, largely unmarked troglophilerelated to devia Gertsch and Mulaik, recognizedby following features: legs much longer, first oneabout seven times instead of five times length of carapace;epigynal pouches widely separated by threetimes basal width.Etymology-Specific name from Latin aureus,golden.Female-Total length 7.8 mm. Carapace 3.2 mmlong, 2.85 mm wide. Abdomen 5 mm long, 2.5 mmwide.Base color of entire spider golden yellow to orangeexcept as follows: carapace with or without faint Yshaped brownish marking on dorsum; eyes narrowlyringed with black; abdomen whitish with yellow cast.Clypeus sloping, 0.37 mm long, equal to two diametersof anterior median eye; eyes subequal in size;median eyes lying just in flOnt of line along edges oflateral eyes and separated from them by slightly morethan diameter (21/16).Legformula 2413. Legs thin; first leg 7.3 times,first femur 1.97 times as long as carapace. Palpus:femur 1.2 mm, patella 0.35 mm, tibia 1 mm, tarsus1.2 mm; total 3.75 mm.I II III IVFemur 6.35 7.20 5.70 6.70Patella 1.10 1.20 1.10 1.20Tibia 6.80 7.70 5.75 6.65Metatarsus 6.30 7.65 6.25 7.60Tarsus 1.50 1.60 1.25 1.60Total 22.05 25.35 20.05 23.75Epigynum (Fig. 36) similar to that of devia; basalpouch of seminal receptacle narrower, with longcurved, tubular receptacle and small finger at base;seminal pouches widely separated by three timesbasal width of one.Male-Total length 6.1 mm. Carapace 2.75 mmlong, 2.5 mm wide. Abdomen 3.35 mm long, 1.7 mmwide.I II III IVFemur 5.50 6.15 5.20 5.90Patella 1.00 1.10 0.90 1.00Tibia 6.00 6.50 4,70 5.50Metatarsus 5.70 6.50 5.70 7.20Tarsus 1.50 1.35 1.25 1.50Total 19.70 21.60 17.75 21.10Leg formula 2413. First leg 7.1 times, first femurtwice as long as carapace.Male palpus: femur 1.3 mm, patella 0.5 mm, tibia0.85 mm, tarsus 0.35 mm; total 3 mm. See Fig. 37 ofbelli; same proportions but embolus much longer thanbulb (0.4 mm/0.22 mm).Type Data-Female holotype from Cueva del Guano,23 km S Gomez Palacio, Durango, Mexico, 24February 1966 (J. Reddell, W. Bell).Distribution-Known only from above cave.Other Records-MEXICO: Durango: Cueva delGuano, 24 February 1966 (J. Reddell, W. Bell), female,penultimate males, two immature; 16-17 June1972 (J. Reddell, W. Elliott, E. Alexander, C. Kunath).two females from guano-covered breakdown. Coahuila:epigean station 75 km SW Cuatro Cienegas deCarranza, 18 July 1965 (J. Reddell, J. Fish), male,immature.Loxosceles belli, new speciesDiagnosis-Dusky, short-legged species allied toarizonica, distinguished by following differences: legsof male and embolus of palpus proportionately longer;leg formula of female 4213 and first leg five timesas long as carapace.Etymology-Named for Mr. William Bell.Female-Total length 7.7 mm. Carapace 3.2 mmlong, 2.5 mm wide. Abdomen 4.5 mm long, 2.5 mmwide.Base color of cephalothorax and appendages dull159

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintyellow; carapace with dusky V-shaped marking andfaint duskiness along side margins; eyes narrowlyringed with black; chelicerae and tibia and tarsus ofpalpus reddish brown. Abdomen dirty gray.Clypeus 0.4 mm high, equal to more than twodiameters of anterior median eye; eyes subequal insize, about 0.17 mm in diameter; median eyes onlyslightly forward of line along front edges of anteriorlateral eyes and separated from them by slightly morethan diameter (20/17).I II III IVFemur 4.50 4.75 4.20 4.85Patella 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10Tibia 4.50 4.90 3.70 4.50Metatarsus 4.50 5.00 4.40 5.60Tarsus 1.35 1.30 1.20 1.35Total 15.95 17.05 14.50 17.40Leg formula 4213. First leg five times, first femur1.4 times as long as carapace. Palpus: femur 1.25mm, patella 0.5 mm, tibia 0.8 mm, tarsus 1.2 mm;total 3.75 mm.Epigynum (Fig. 38) with two large pouches subcontiguousat midline, each with single elongated,apically enlarged seminal receptacle arising from middleof pouch.Male-Total length: 6.1 mm. Carapace 3.1 mmlong, 2.7 mm wide. Abdomen 3 mm long, 1.5 mmwide.I II III IVFemur 6.00 6.50 5.50 6.00Patella 1.25 1.25 1.15 1.15Tibia 7.00 7.75 5.35 6.15Metatarsus 6.70 7.85 6.50 7.70Tarsus 1.50 1.60 1.25 1.50Total 22.45 24.95 18.75 22.50Leg formula 2413; first and fourth legs subequal.First leg 7.2 times, first femur 1.9 times as long ascarapace.Male palpus: femur 1.6 mm, patella 0.6 mm, tibia1.1 mm, tarsus 0.45 mm; total 3.75 mm. See Fig. 37,proportions like those of arizonica; tibia twice as longas wide above and on side; embolus longer than bulb(0.23 mm/0.15 mm).Type Data-Male holotype, female and immaturefrom Cueva de las Animas, 56 km E Monclova, Coahuila,Mexico, 21 February 1966 (W. Bell, J. Reddell).Distribution-Caves of Coahuila, Mexico.Other Record-MEXICO: Coahuila: Cueva de losLagos, 25 km NW Villa Acuna, 15 November 1964(J. Reddell, B. Martin), female probably this species.Loxosceles luteola, new speciesDiagnosis-Pale yellow, largely unmarked troglophilerelated to aureus, distinguished by distinctiveepigynum and shorter legs.Etymology-Specific name from Latin luteolus,yellow.Female-Total length 6.2 mm. Carapace 2.7 mmlong, 2.3 mm wide. Abdomen 3.5 mm long, 1.7 mmwide.Base color of cephalothorax and appendages yellowto orange; carapace with faint traces of V-shapedmarking; eyes narrowly ringed with black; abdomenuniform whitish.Clypeus sloping, 0.25 mm long, equal to two diametersof median eyes; eyes subequal in size; middleeyes lying just in front of line along edges of anterioreyes and separated from them by slightly more thanlong diameter (16/13).I II III IVFemur 4.85 5.65 4.65 5.00Patella 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.95Tibia 5.40 6.00 4.25 4.95Metatarsus 5.00 6.10 4.75 5.85Tarsus 1.20 1.25 1.15 1.15Total 17.45 20.00 15.70 17.90Leg formula 2413. Legs thin; first leg 6.4 times,first femur 1.8 times as long as carapace. Pal pus:femur 1 mm, patella 0.3 mm, tibia 0.75 mm, tarsus1 mm; total 3.05 mm.Epigynum (Fig. 31) with basal pouches separatedby twice basal diameter of one, with single curvedfinger with rounded enlargement near end.Type Data-Female holotype from Gruta Sur deSan Bartolo, 11 km SSE Santa Catarina, Nuevo Leon,Mexico,3 December 1966 (T. Raines).Loxosceles aranea, new speciesDiagnosis-Pale troglophile with legs of mediumlength, distinguished by details of epigynum.Etymology-Specific name from Latin araneus,spider, named for Sotano de Dos Aranas Grandes.Female-Total length 7.5 mm. Carapace 3.5 mmlong, 3 mm wide. Abdomen 4 mm long, 2.5 mm wide.Base color of cephalothorax and abdomen yellowto orange; carapace with typical dusky orange Yshaped marking at center and faint dustiness on sidemargins; chelicerae and tibiae and patella of palpusdark reddish brown; abdomen uniform Whitish.Clypeus 0.48 mm, equal to more than two diameters(48/17) of anterior lateral eye; eyes subequal insize, each about 0.17 mm; posterior edges of median160

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprinteyes nearly touching front edges of anterior lateraleyes and separated from each side eye by little morethan diameter (19/17).FemurPatellaTibiaMetatarsusTarsusTotalI5.601.206.005.351.3019.45II5.701.206.356.151.3520.75III5.001.204.855.001.2017.25IV5.501.155.306.001.2020.05Leg formula 2413. First leg 5.5 times, first femur1.3 times as long as carapace. Pal pus: femur 1.25 mm,patella 0.5 mm, tibia 0.85 mm, tarsus 1.1 mm; total3.7 mm.Epigynum (Fig. 35) with large rectangular pouchessubcontiguous at middle, each with curved tubularreceptacle enlarged at end.Type Data-Female holotype and three immaturefrom Sotano de Dos Aranas Grandes, 2 km E RIOBlanco, Queretaro, Mexico, 9 July 1967 (J. Reddell,J. Fish).Loxosceles yucatana Chamberlin and IvieLoxosceles yucatana Chamberlin and Ivie, 1938,p. 126.Records-BELIZE: Rio Frio Cave A, Augustine,458 m, 20 August 1972 (S. Peck), male, five females,immature. GUATEMALA: Cueva Najohnaj Coholtunich,EI Peten, 14 km SW Flores, 25 August 1972(S. & J. Peck), eight subadult.Loxosceles guatemala, new speciesDiagnosis-Troglophile related to yucatana, readilydistinguished by distinctive epigynum (Fig. 34).Etymology-Named for Guatemala, used in apposition.Female-Total length 9.8 mm. Carapace 4.2 mmlong, 3.4 mm wide. Abdomen 5.6 mm long, 3.5 mmwide.Base color of cephalothorax and appendages brightorange, with following markings: carapace with duskybrown V-shaped marking and dusky bands along sides.Abdomen whitish, covered with dusky hairs.Clypeus 0.5 mm long, equal to little more thantwo diameters of anterior median eye; eyes subequal,about 0.22 mm in diameter; median eyes situated justin front of line along front edges of anterior lateraleyes.I II III IVFemur 6.70 7.50 6.50 6.70Patella 1.50 1.60 1.50 1.40Tibia 7.40 7.85 6.00 6.75Metatarsus 7.00 7.85 6.70 7.85Tarsus 1.70 1.70 1.50 1.65Total 24.30 26.50 22.20 24.35Leg formula 2413. First leg 6.6 times, first femur1.6 times as long as carapace. Palpus: femur 1.5 mm,patella 0.62 mm, tibia 1.1 mm, tarsus 1.5 mm; total4.72 mm.Epigynum (Fig. 34) with broad, narrow, separatedpouches, each with principal erect, apically enlargedreceptacle and two short outside fingers.Type Data-Female holotype, three females andimmature from Cueva Lanquin, Lanquin, Alta Vera·paz, Guatemala, 28 August 1969 (S. & J. Peck).Distribution-Caves of Guatemala.Other Record-GUATEMALA: Cemetery Cave,Lanquin, 312 m (N. Sullivan), female, two immature.Loxosceles tenango, new speciesDiagnosis-Long-Iegged troglophile with followingfeatures: male palpus similar to that of arizonica withtibia twice as long as lateral width; pouches of epigynumlarge, suboval, subcontiguous at midline, withsinuous tubular receptacle enlarged at apex.Etymology-Named for Cueva de EI Tenango, usedin apposition.Female-Total length 8.35 mm. Carapace 3.35 mmlong, 3.1 mm wide. Abdomen 5 mm long, 3 mm wide.Cephalothorax and legs dusky orange; carapacewith orange-brown V-shaped marking and marginaldusky stripes on sides leaving paler spot on each sideof median groove; eyes narrowly ringed with black.Abdomen uniform gray.Clypeus 0.5 mm long, equal in length to threediameters of anterior lateral eye (50/18); eyes subequalin size, each about 0.18 mm; median eyes situatedthird of their diameter in front of line along frontedges of anterior lateral eyes, more than diameterfrom lateral eyes (24/18).I II III IVFemur 5.70 6.35 5.50 5.75Patella 1.20 1.20 1.15 1.15Tibia 6.00 6.65 4.75 5.50Metatarsus 5.50 6.25 5.15 6.00Tarsus 1.10 1.40 1.15 1.35Total 19.50 21.85 17.70 19.75161

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint34--------36------ - 4041Figs. 32-33. Loxosceles tenango, new species. 32. Right male pal pus, retrolateral view. 33. Epigynum, ventral view.Fig. 34. Loxosceles guatemala, new species, epigynum, ventral view.Fig. 35. Loxosceles aranea, new species, epigynum, ventral view.Fig. 36. Loxosceles aurea, new species, epigynum, ventral view.Figs. 37-38. Loxosceles belli, new species. 37. Right male palpus, retrolateral view. 38. Epigynum, ventral view.Figs. 39-41. Loxosceles valdosa, new species. 39. Right male palpus, retrolateral view. 40. Epigynum, ventral view. 41. Anotherepigynum, ventral view.Leg formula 2413. First leg 5.8 times, first femur1.6 times as long as carapace. Palpus: femur 1.15 mm,patella 0.46 mm, tibia 0.8 mm, tarsus 1.1 mm; total3.51 mm.Epigynum (Fig. 33) with large suboval pouchessubcontiguous at midline and on each side singlecurved tubular receptacle with apical enlargement.Male-Total length 7 mm. Carapace 3 mm long,2.7 mm wide. Abdomen 4 mm long, 2.3 mm wide.FemurPatellaTibiaMetatarsusTarsusTotalI6.301.157.306.501.3522.60II7.001.158.007.601.4025.15III5.601.105.305.701.2018.90IV5.801.005.706.801.3520.65Leg formula 2143. First leg 7.53 times, first femur162

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint2.1 times as long as carapace.Male palpus: femur 1.4 mm, patella 0.5 mm, tibia1 mm, tarsus 0.35 mm; total 3.25 mm. See Fig. 32;tibia twice as long as lateral width; embolus longerthan bulb (0.42 mm/0.27 mm).Type Data-Male holotype, male, six females, andimmature from Cueva de EI Tenango, 6 km S Chapulhuacan,Hidalgo, Mexico, 18 August 1965 (J.Reddell, J. Fish, W. Bell).FAMILY SYMPHYTOGNATHIDAEMaymena delicata GertschMaymena delicata Gertsch, 1971, p. 94.Records-MEXICO: Oaxaca: Cueva del Nacimientodel RIo San Antonio, 10 km SSW Acatlan, 26 December1972 (J. Reddell, D. & M. McKenzie, S. Murphy),female. Grutas de San Sebastian, 20 km N Sola deVega,31 December 1972 (J. Reddell, D. & M. McKenzie,S. Murphy), female. Cueva de Llano Grande, 25km N Sola de Vega, 31 December 1972 (J. Reddell,D. & M. McKenzie, S. Murphy), female.Maymena mayana (Chamberlin and Ivie)Maymena mayana: Gertsch, 1971, p. 92.Records-MEXICO: Oaxaca: Cueva del Guayabo,12 km NE Valle Nacional, 29 December 1972 (J.Reddell, D. & M. McKenzie, S. Murphy), male. Grutasde Monteflor, 6 km NE Valle Nacional, 28 December1972 (J. Reddell, D. & M. McKenzie, S. Murphy),seven females. GUATEMALA: Alta Verapaz: CuevaLanquin, Lanquin, 28 August 1969 (S. & J. Peck),male, four females; 4 June 1959 (W. L. Varnedoe),three females. Izabal: Cueva de la Coche, 2 km WLivingston,21 August 1969 (S. & J. Peck), two males,four females, immature. £1 Peten: Cueva Jobitzinaj,6 km S Flores, 22 January 1972 (D. McKenzie), female.BELIZE: Rio Frio Cave A, Augustine, 458 m,20 August 1972 (S. Peck), two females.Maymena chica GertschMaymena chica Gertsch, 1971, p. 94.Records-MEXICO: San Luis Potosf: Cueva de losCaballos, 30 km ESE San Luis POtOSI: about 3000 m,18 May 1972 (W. Elliott), immature female. Cueva dela Puente, 30 km ESE San Luis POtOSI: about 3000 m,16 May 1972 (W. Elliott, R. Ralph, M. McEachern),male, female, immature; same data 15 May 1972,male. Cueva de Cinquenta y Ocho, 30 km ESE SanLuis POtOSI: 3000 m, 18 May 1972 (W. Elliott, R.Ralph, P. Lynn), females. Sotano de la Tinaja, 11 kmNE Valles, 16 October 1972 (V. Roth, B. Firstman),male, seven females, immature from near pool insmall orbwebs.LITERATURE CITEDBanks, N. 1906. Descriptions of new American spiders. Proc.Ent. Soc. Washington, 7:94-110.Banks, N. 1929. Spiders from Panama. Bull. Mus. CompoZool.,69:55-96.Chamberlin, R.V., and W. Ivie. 1938. Araneida from Yucatan.Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ., 491: 123-136.Fage, L. 1929. Sur quelques araignees d'Amerique du Nordet de Cuba. Boll. Lab. Zool. Portici, 22: 181-187.Gertsch, W.J. 1958. The spider genus Loxosceles in NorthAmerica, Central America, and the West Indies. Amer.Mus. Novitates, 1907: 1-46.Gertsch, W.J. 1971. A report on some Mexican cave spiders.Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 4:47-111.Gertsch, W.J., and S. Mulaik, 1940. The spiders of Texas.Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 77:307-340.Main, B.Y. 1969. A blind mygalomoprh spider from a NullarborPlain Cave. Journ. Royal Soc. West. Australia,52( 1) :9-11.Marx, G. 1891. A contribution to the knowledge of NorthAmerican spiders. Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington, 2(1):28-37,pI. 1.Pickard-Cambridge, F. 1902. Arachnida. Araneida, 2, pp. 313424, pI. xxxi-xxxix. BioI. Centro Amer., Zool.Pickard-Cambridge, O. 1895. Arachnida. Araneida. 1: 145160. BioI. Centro Amer. Zool.Reddell, J.R. 1971. A preliminary bibliography of Mexicancave biology. Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 3: 1-184.Reddell, J.R., and RW. Mitchell. 1971. A checklist of thecave fauna of Mexico. I. Sierra de EI Abra, Tamaulipasand San Luis POtOSI: Assoc. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 4:137-180.Simon, E. 1882. Etudes arachnologiques. 13e Memoire, XX.Descriptions d'especes et de genres nouveaux de la familledes Dysderidae. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, 2:201-240.Simon, E. 1892. Etude sur les arthropodes cavernicoles deI'ile Luzon. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, 61:35-52.163

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintA NEW CAVE·ADAPTED PLANARIAN (TRICLADIDA, PALUDICOLA, PLANARIIDAE)FROM CHIAPAS, MEXICO lRobert W. MitchellDepartment of Biology and The Museum, Texas Tech UniversityLubbock, Texas, U.S.A.andMasaharu KawakatsuBiological Laboratory, Fuji Women's CollegeSapporo (Hokkaidol, JapanThe purpose of this paper is to present the descriptionof a new species of cavernicole planarian of thegenus Dugesia occurring in caves of Chiapas, Mexico.ORDER TRICLADIDASUBORDER PALUDICOLA (=PROBURSALlA)FAMILY PLANARIIDAEGenus Dugesia Girard, 1850Dugesia mckenziei, new speciesDescription-A small, rather slender, white, verysmall-eyed troglobite (appearance in life shown inFigs. 1, 2, and preserved in Figs. 3,4). In life fullysexually mature specimens measure about 8 mm to10 mm in length and 1 mm in width. The head is triangularwith moderately developed and rather pointedauricles. The anterior end of the head is bluntlypointed (Fig. 2). Behind the head the body begins towiden slightly, reaching its greatest width at aboutmid-body, finally tapering to a bluntly pointed poslSupportedin part with funds provided by the GraduateSchool and the Office of Research and Special Programs,Texas Tech University.terior end. The rather long pharynx is situated somewhatbehind the middle of the body, the mouth atabout the middle of the postpharyngeal region. Thegenital pore opens midway between the mouth andthe posterior end. In living animals the copulatoryapparatus and a pair of spermiducal vesicles are visiblefrom the ventral side as opaque areas.A pair of very small eyes is situated at the anteriorlevel of the auricles; they are scarcely noticeable inliving specimens. Distance between the eyes is slightlymore than one-third the width of the head at the levelof the eyes.Although in gross aspect presenting a milky-whiteappearance, microscopic examination reveals that thespecies is a low pigmented form with pale yellowishbrownpigments (as seen in material preserved in isopropylalcohol). Drop-shaped areas on the basal partsof the auricles are free of pigment as is the submarginaladhesive zone (Fig. 4).The structure of the pharynx is typical of thefamily Planariidae, the muscle fibers of the internalzone forming two separate layers, an inner, thick,circular layer and an outer, thin, longitudinal one.The dorsal epidermis is thicker than the ventral. Theanterior trunk of the intestine bears 13 to 15 lateralbranches; each posterior trunk, 12 to 15 or more short165

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFig. 1. Dugesia mckenziei, holotype in life, dorsal. Notesize and arrangement of testes.Fig. 2. Dugesia mckenziei, holotype in life, ventral. Notesize and shape of auricles and shape of head.lateral branches.The minute eyes (Fig. 5) are embedded in theparenchyma slightly beneath the dorsal subepidermalmuscles. The pigment cell layer is conspicuous butvery small in size, and the photoreceptor cells are butslightly developed (Fig. 6). In one specimen measured(La Cueva de Los Llanos, Specimen Lot No. 1151a)the pigment cup was about 30 Jl in diameter andabout 12 Jl in depth (depth of the body at the levelof the eyes about 290 Jl)'The ovaries are located, as is typical, at a levelbehind the second or third diverticulum of the anteriortrunk of the intestine. The ovaries are large,their diameter being about one-half the depth of thebody at their level. Numerous yolk glands located betweenthe intestinal diverticulae occur throughoutthe body.The testes occur in a band running the length ofthe body (Fig. 3) and are situated in the dorsalparenchyma (Fig. 7). No testes were found in theparenchyma between the two posterior intestinaltrunks. There are apparently somewhat less than 40testes on each side of the body.The copulatory apparatus of D. mckenziei is shownby photomicrographs in Figs. 8, 9, and in semidiagrammaticsagittal view in Fig. 10.The genital pore leads posterodorsally into theterminal part of the bursal canal and anterodorsallyinto the male antrum. A common genital pore islacking. The outer wall of most of the male antrumis clothed with a flattened, glandular, nucleate epitheliumbelow which occurs two muscle layers, anouter one of circular fibers and an inner one of longitudinalfibers. The epithelial cells of the basal andposterior parts of the male antrum are taller and moreglandular than elsewhere.The penis consists of a bulb embedded in theparenchyma and a papilla projecting into the male166

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFig. 3. Dugesia mckenziei, holotype, fixed in Bouin'sfluid, dorsal. Note size and arrangement of testes.Fig. 4. Dugesia mckenziei, paratype, fixed in isopropylalcohol, ventral. Note marginal adhesive zone.Fig. 6. Sagittal section showing eye.Fig. 5. Head of stained whole mount. Note minute eyes.167

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFig. 7. Sagittal section showing dorsal position of testes.Fig. 8. Sagittal section showing parts of the copulatoryapparatus.Fig. 9. Sagittal section showing parts of the copulatoryapparatus.antrum. The bulb is hemispherical in shape and ismoderately muscular. It contains a moderately widebulbar cavity or seminal vesicle. The bulbar cavitycontinues into the papilla as a wide ejaculatory ductand opens at the tip of the papilla. The penis lumen(bulbar cavity + ejaculatory duct) is lined with a tall,glandular epithelium tapering in thickness anteriorly.The sperm ducts form highly developed spermiducalvesicles on each side of the postpharyngeal region betweenthe mouth and the anterior level of the penisbulb. Along the sides of the penis each vesicle narrowsto a slender duct that proceeds posteriorly tothe level of the genital pore, then ascends vertically,curves anteroventrally, and finally opens separatelyinto the posterior part of the bulbar cavity. The penisbulb is pierced by a considerable number of ducts ofthe penis glands.The penis papilla is symmetrical and is of a long,rather pointed, conical shape. It is moderately muscular.The outer wall is covered by an epithelium similarto that lining the male antrum. The nucleate epitheliumis taller at the basal part of the papilla thanin the distal portion. Below the epithelium there is alayer of circular muscle fibers followed by a layer oflongitudinal ones.The copulatory bursa, situated in the usual position,is a medium-sized sac with a wide lumen. It islined with a tall, glandular epithelium. The bursalstalk runs posteriorly over the posterodorsal portionof the penis, and at a point just posterior to the levelof the genital pore it curves ventrally and opens atthe pore. The bursal stalk is lined with a tall, glandular,nucleate epithelium and is covered by a muscularcoat of inner circular and outer longitudinal fibers.The two ovovitelline ducts converge at the level ofthe copulatory apparatus and open separately intothe bursal canal at a point about mid-way betweenthe bursa and the genital pore. At this point the bursalstalk is somewhat wider and the muscular coat thickerthan in the more anterior part of the stalk. Manyeosinophilous cement glands open into the terminalpart of the genital antrum near the genital pore.The egg capsule, or cocoon, of D. mckenziei is notknown.Remarks-Seven species of freshwater triclads arenow known with certainty to occur in Mexico. Theseare Dimarcus villalobosi Mitchell and Kawakatsu,1972; Dugesia dorotocephala (Woodworth, 1897);Dugesia typhlomexicana Mitchell and Kawakatsu,1973; Dugesia barbarae Mitchell and Kawakatsu,1973; Dugesia guatemalensis Mitchell and Kawakatsu,1973; Dugesia mckenziei Mitchell and Kawakatsu,n.sp.; and Cura azteca Benazzi and Giannini, 1971.168

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintod bs sd pb eb pheg gp be ed rna sv500J,lmFig. 10. Semi-diagrammatic sagittal view of copulatory apparatus.Dimarcus villalobosi is a marine relict of uniquemorphology occurring in Las Grutas de Coconei,Teapa, Tabasco (ct. Mitchell and Kawakatsu, 1972).Of the remaining six species, Dugesia dorotocephalaand Cura azteca are eyed, pigmented, epigean forms;while Dugesia typhlomexicana, D. barbarae, D. guatemalensis,and D. mckenziei are cavernicoles. D. guatemalensisis a small-eyed troglophile occurring in LaCueva de las Perlas in the Sierra de Guatemala ofTamaulipas. D. typhlomexicana and D. barbarae areeyeless troglobites occurring in La Cueva de la Minaand La Cueva de Capilla, respectively, caves also locatedin the Sierra de Guatemala. A detailed discussionof the affinities of the three latter Dugesia speciesmay be found in Mitchell and Kawakatsu, 1973.Dugesia mckenziei is easily separable from thedark, eyed epigean species. Its minute eyes separateit from D. typhlomexicana and D. barbarae. It bearsthe closest resemblance to D. guatemalensis, but thecourse of its sperm ducts and the wide ejaculatoryduct separate it from the latter species.We regard Dugesia mckenziei a troglobite. Eventhough it possesses eyes, they are minute, and thebody is scarcely pigmented, appearing white in life.It is surely confined to a subterranean habitat. Thereseems, however, no doubt that it is a young traglobite.Further discussion of this species will awaitfuture publications of ours on the freshwater tricladfauna of Mexico.Differential Diagnosis-Dugesia mckenziei differsfrom the other members of the genus by the followingcombination of characteristics: Troglobitic specieswith slight, microscopic pigment and two minuteeyes. Small, 8 to 10 mm in length in life. Auricles ofmoderate length. Testes moderate in number anddorsal. Penis bulb well-developed, moderately muscular,and with a single bulbar cavity. Sperm ductsopening separately into a bulbar cavity at the basalpart of the penis lumen. Penis papilla symmetrical,conical, long, rather pointed, and wit.h a wide ejaculatoryduct. No common genital antrum. Copulatorybursa medium-sized. Two ovovitelline ducts enteringthe bursal stalk separately.Collection Data-Specimen Lot No. 1150. Twosexually mature specimens from La Cueva de LosLlanos, 15 km ESE San Cristobal de las Casas,Chiapas, Mexico. Taken from slow-moving stream.Altitude about 2,295 m. 5 February 1972. Call. DavidMcKenzie. Specimen Lot No. 1151. Two specimensfrom La Cueva de Los Llanos. One sexually mature,the other a prepharyngeal piece. 27 August 1972.Water temperature, 16.5°C (61.5°F). Coil. Robert W.169

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintMitchell, William H. Russell, Jerry W. Cooke. SpecimenLot No. 1152. One specimen from La Cueva delos Murcielagos, 15 km ESE San Cristobal de lasCasas. This cave is within 100 m of La Cueva de LosLlanos and it is probable that the waters of the twocaves are connected. 29 August 1972. Water temperature24°C (75°FI. (Differences between the watertemperatures of these two caves possibly resultedfrom taking the measurements near the entrancesduring times of differing epigean temperatures.) Coil.Robert W. Mitchell.Type Series-Holotype, a set of serial sagittal sections(No. 1151 a, 3 slides) deposited in the Divisionof Worms, U.S. National Museum. Two paratypesalso deposited in the U.S.N.M., one a set of sagittalsections (No. 1152a, 3 slides), the other a wholemount of a prepharyngeal piece with a pharynx (No.1151b). The other paratypes are sets of sagittal sections(Nos. 1150a and b) and are retained in Kawakatsu'slaboratory in Sapporo and in The Museum,Texas Tech University.Type Locality-La Cueva de Los Llanos, 15 kmESE San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico.Distribution-Known only from the type localityand a nearby cave, La Cueva de los Murcielagos.Etymology-Named for the discoverer of the firstspecimens, Mr. David McKenzie, ardent student ofphysical and biological speleology.Methods-Animals of Specimen Lot Nos. 1151 and1152 were killed and fixed in Bouin's fluid at ambienttemperature. Animals of Specimen Lot No. 1150were killed and fixed in 70% isopropyl alcohol. Allanimals were subsequently stored in 70% ethyl alcohol.Serial sagittal sections were cut at 8 microns.Staining employed Delafield's hemotoxylin and eosin.Sectioning and staining were done in the laboratoryof the junior author. Kawakatsu and Miyazaki (1972)have demonstrated that Bouin's fluid is a superiorkilling and fixing agent for triclad Turbellaria, especiallyfor comparative taxonomic studies. Therefore,the animals killed and fixed in isopropyl alcohol werenot used in construction of Fig. 10, the semidiagrammaticsagittal view of the copulatory apparatus.Abbreviations Used in Figures-bc, bulbar cavity;bs, bursal stalk; cb, copulatory bursa; cg, cementgland; e, eye; ed, ejaculatory duct; gp, genital pore;i, intestine; m, mouth; ma, male antrum; od, ovovitellineduct; pb, penis bulb; pc, pigment cell layer;ph, pharynx; pp, penis papilla; sd, sperm duct; sv,spermiducal vesicle; t, testis; vc, photoreceptor (visual)cells; yg, yolk glands.Acknowledgments-We wish to thank Mr. DavidMcKenzie for giving to us the first specimens of theplanarian described in this paper and for providingthe senior author with directions for locating LaCueva de Los Llanos. We also appreciate the assistanceof Mr. William H. Russell and Mr. Jerry W.Cooke in the collection of additional specimens.LITERATURE CITEDKawakatsu, M., and T. Miyazaki. 1972. Effect of differentfixatives on a common Japanese freshwater planarian,Dugesia japonica Ichikawa et Kawakatsu. Bull. FujiWomen's Coil. 10, ser. 2:81-117.Mitchell, R.W., and M. Kawakatsu. 1972. A new family,genus, and species of cave-adapted planarian from Mexico(Turbellaria, Tricladida, Maricola). Occas. Pap. Mus. TexasTech Univ., 8: 1-16.Mitchell, R.W., and M. Kawakatsu. 1972 (1973). Freshwatercavernicole planarians from Mexico: New troglobitic andtroglophilic Dugesia from caves of the Sierra de Guatemala.Ann. Speleol., 27:639-681.170

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintA CHECKLIST OF THE CAVE FAUNA OF MEXICO. IV. ADDITIONAL RECORDSFROM THE SIERRA DE EL ABRA, TAMAULIPAS AND SAN LUIS POTOSI!James R. Reddell and William R. ElliottDepartment of Biology, Texas Tech UniversityLubbock,Texas79409INTRODUCTIONSince the publication by Reddell and Mitchell(1971) of the first report on the cave fauna of theSierra de EI Abra numerous new records have becomeavailable. These new records are largely the resultof intensive exploration in caves along the virtuallyinacessible crest of the Sierra de EI Abra. In addition,however, previously unstudied taxa (such as theDiptera) have now been identified. There have alsobeen published several papers describing new taxa.Although the previous checklist and this list nowbring to about 265 the total species known from thecaves of the Sierra de EI Abra many species remain tobe added to the list. The terrestrial isopods (understudy by George A. Schultz). the very rich centipedefauna, the beetle fauna, and the mites are amonggroups only very poorly known. Besides these obviousexceptions continued intensive exploration willdoubtless reveal many species of troglobite of thegreatest systematic and zoogeographic interest.The troglobite fauna of the Sierra de EI Abra ismuch less well developed than that of the adjoiningSierra de Guatemala or nearby regions. Mitchell(1969) has discussed the striking differences betweenthe faunas of lowland tropical regions and the highermountain regions. It is not appropriate here to discusshis conclusions, but as the Sierra de EI Abra be-Supported in part by a Grant in Aid of Research from theSociety of Sigma Xi and by research funds from the InternationalCenter for Arid and Semi-Arid Land Studies(ICASALS), Texas Tech University.comes better known its terrestrial troglobite fauna hasalso become expanded to include a total of 12 species,as opposed to 9 species of aquatic troglobite. Thefollowing list includes all of the troglobites nowknown from the Sierra de EI Abra.CopepodsDiaptomus (Microdiaptomus) cokeri Osorio TafallOstracodsSphaeromicola cirolanae RiojaIsopodsSpeocirolana bolivari (R ioja)S. pelaezi (Bolivar)Spherarmadillo cavernicola MulaikBrackenridgia bridgesi (Van Name)Cylindroniscus vallesensis SchultzMysidsSpelaeomysis quinterensis (Villalobos)ShrimpTroglocubanus sp.ScorpionsTyphlochactas elliotti MitchellPseudoscorpionsAphrastochthonius parvus MuchmoreA. russel/i MuchmoreParavachonium bolivari BeierSchizomidsAgastoschizomus lucifer RowlandOpilionidsHoplobunus boneti (Goodnight and Goodnight)171

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintMillipedsMexiterpes sabinus CauseyUndescribed trichopolydesmidThysanuransUndescribed nicoletiidFishAstyanax antrobius (Alvarez)A. hubbsi (Alvarez)A. jordani (Hubbs and Innes)In the following list, with but few exceptions, onlynew records and significant new bibliographic citationsare included. Where recent taxonomic studies(such as that of the spiders of the genus Loxosceles)have resulted in possible confusion over previousidentifications or where specimens previously listedonly by the generic name are now identified to thespecies level the records are repeated. The cave namesused are those standardized in the files of the Associationfor Mexican Cave Studies. All of the caves in theSierra de EI Abra from which collections have beenmade are located on the accompanying map (Fig. 1).Troglobites are indicated by an asterisk preceding thetaxa name.Many people have made significant contributionsto our continuing study of the cave fauna of theSierra de EI Abra. We wish to thank in particularN.B. Causey, W.J. Gertsch, T.H. Hubbell, RW. Mitchell,and W.H. Russell for their interest and support ofthe study of the cave fauna of this region. We alsowish to express our appreciation to the followingindividuals who have aided in collecting or who havecontributed specimens: Miles Abernathy, Craig Bittinger,Steve Bittinger, Don Broussard, Mel Brownfield,Jerry Cooke, John A.L. Cooke, John Fish,Blake Harrison, Roy Jameson, Jimmy Jarl, Jan Lewis,Jim Mcintyre, David McKenzie, R.W. Mitchell, NealMorris, James Peck, Stewart Peck, Terry Raines, W.H.Russell, Jim Shepperd, Pierre Strinati, Ann Sturdivant,Jack White, and Suzanne Wiley.We wish also to thank the following systematistsfor their identification of the indicated taxa: D.M.Anderson, beetles; T.C. Barr, Jr., beetles; T.E. Bowman,isopods; N.B. Causey, millipeds; K. Christiansen,collembolans; W.E. Duellman, frogs; R.C. Froeschner,hemipterans; R.J. Gagne, flies; G.E. Gates, earthworms;W.J. Gertsch, amblypygids, spiders; R. GonzalezR., diplurans; A.B. Gurney, roaches; L.H. Herman,beetles; J.L. Herring, hemipterans; H.H. Hobbs,Jr., ostracods; T.H. Hubbell, crickets; J.M. Kingsolver,beetles; R.W. Mitchell, fish, parrots; W.B. Muchmore,pseudoscorpions; V. Roth, spiders; C.W. Sabrosky,flies; G.A. Schultz, isopods; R.L. Smiley, mites; P.J.Spangler, beetles; T.J. Spilman, beetles; W.R. Suter,beetles; R.E. Warner, beetles; Pedro Wygodzinsky,thysanurans and diplurans.PHYLUM ANNELIDACLASS CLITELLATAOrder OligochaetaFamily OctochaetidaeDichogaster sp. (det. G.E. Gates)Records-San Luis Potosf: Cueva de los Monos;Tamaulipas: Cueva de la Florida and ?Cuevade EI Pachon.Comment-Material from Cueva de EI Pachonwas too poorly preserved to be positivelyplaced in this genus.PHYLUM ARTHROPODACLASS CRUSTACEAOrder PodocopaFamily EntocytheridaeEntocythere claytonhoffi RiojaComment-The record of this species fromCueva de San Nicolas, Tamaulipas, is in errorand refers instead to Cueva de San Nicolas,San Luis POtOSI: a cave in the Aquismonregion.*Sphaeromicola cirolanae Rioja (det. H.H. Hobbs)Records-San Luis Potosf: Cueva de la Curva,Sotano de Matapalma, Sotano de las Piedras,and Sotano de Yerbaniz; Tamaulipas: Cuevade EI Pachon and Sotano de EI Venadito.Bibliography-Hobbs and Hobbs, 1973.Order IsopodaFamily Cirolanidae*Speocirolana bolivari (Rioja)Bibliography-Hobbs and Hobbs, 1973; Sbordoniand Argano, 1972.*Speocirolana pelaezi (Bolivar) (det. T.E. Bowman)Records-San Luis PotosI: Sotano de Coatimundi,Sotano de Matapalma, and Sotano deYerbaniz.Bibliography-Hobbs and Hobbs, 1973; Sbordoniand Argano, 1972.Family Trichoniscidae*Cylindroniscus sp. nr. vallesensis Schultz (det. G.A.Schultz)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de Yerbaniz.172

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintOrder MysidaceaFamily Lepidomysidae*Spelaeomysis quinterensis (Villalobos)Bibliography-Bowman, 1973; Sbordoni andArgano, 1972.Order DecapodaFamily AstacidaeProcambarus (Ortmannicus) toltecae HobbsComment-This species does not occur in theSierra de EI Abra. The record of this speciesfrom Cueva de San Nicolas, Tamaulipas, refersinstead to Cueva de San Nicolas, SanLuis POtOSI: a cave in the Aquismon region.CLASS ARACHNIDAOrder ChelonethidaFamily ChernetidaeUnidentified genus & species (det. W.B. Muchmore)Records-Tamaulipas: Cueva de EI Pachon.Hesperochernes sp. (det. W.B. Muchmore)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano del Tigre andCueva de Valdosa; Tamaulipas: Cueva de EIPachon and Grutas de Quintero.Comment-Specimens listed earlier as an unidentifiedgenus and species of chernetidfrom Grutas de Quintero and Cueva de Valdosahave now been determined to belong tothis genus.? Semeiochernes sp. (det. W.B. Muchmore)Records-San Luis Potosf: Cueva de los Monosand Cueva de Valdosa; Tamaulipas: CuevaGrande del Arroyo Seco, Cueva de la Florida,and Cueva de San Rafael de los Castros.Comment-All previous records of this genusin Mexican caves should be considered questionable.Family Chthoniidae*Aphrastochthonius parvus MuchmoreRecords-Tamaulipas: Cueva de la Florida.Bibliography-Muchmore, 1972a.Comment-This species was previously listed asAphrastochthonius sp.*Aphrastochthonius russel/i MuchmoreRecords-San Luis Potosf: Cueva Pinta.Bibliography-Muchmore, 1972a.Family Vachoniidae*Paravachonium bolivari BeierBibliography-Muchmore, 1972; 1973.Order AmblypygidaFamily TarantulidaeTarantula crassimanus (C.L. Koch) (det. W.J.Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosf: Cueva de Tantobal;Tamaulipas: Grutas de Quintero.Tarantula fuscimana (C.L. Koch) (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosi: Cueva Chica, Cuevade Taninul n. 1, Sotano de la Tinaja, andSotano de Yerbaniz.Comment-The record from Cueva de Taninuln. 1 was previously cited as Tarantula sp.Order AraneaeSuborder MygalomorphaeFamily TheraphosidaeAphonopelma sp. (det. V. Roth)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de la Tinaja.Comment-No adults were collected in thiscave.Schizopelma sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosf: Cueva Chica andSotano de las Piedras; Tamaulipas: Cueva delos pajaros.Comment-These records were previously listedunder Aphonopelma sp.Suborder AraneomorphaeFamily ArgiopidaeMeta sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Tamaulipas: Cueva de San Rafael delos Castros.Comment-Only immature specimens were collected.Family ClubionidaeCorinna sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Tamaulipas: Cueva de San Rafael delos Castros.Family CtenidaeCtenus sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de la Cuesta,Sotano de la Estrella, and Cueva de los Monos;Tamaulipas: Sotano de Santa Elena.Family LinyphiidaeErigone monterreyensis Gertsch (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de la Tinaja.Family NesticidaeNesticus sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Tamaulipas: Cueva de EI Pachon.Comment-This record was previously listed underNesticus pallidus.173

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintNesticus pallidus Emerton (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de las Piedras.Family PholcidaeMetagonia sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-San Luis POtOSI: Sotano de las Piedras;Tamaulipas: Sotano de Santa Elena.Metagonia pasquinii BrignoliRecords-San Luis Potosi: Cueva de Los Sabinos.Bibliography-Brignoli, 1972.Comment-This species was previously cited asMetagonia tinaja Gertsch.Metagonia tinaja Gertsch (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de Matapalma;Tamaulipas: Sotano de EI Venadito.Bibliography-Brignoli, 1972; Gertsch, 1973.Modisimus sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de Yerbaniz.Modisimus boneti Gertsch (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de los Monosand Cueva de Taninul n. 1.Bibliography-Gertsch, 1973.Modisimus texanus Banks (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de la Tinaja.Bibliography-Gertsch, 1973.Pholcophora elliotti GertschBibliography-Brignoli, 1972.Physocyc!us globosus (Taczanowski) (det. W.J.Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de la Tinaja.Bibliography-Gertsch, 1973.Family ScytodidaeLoxosceles sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosi: Cueva del Leon.Loxosceles valdosa Gertsch (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosi: Cueva de Los Sabinos,Cuevacita del Sotanito, Cueva de Taninuln. 1, and Cueva de Valdosa; Tamaulipas:Cueva del Abra, Cueva de San Rafael de losCastros, and Grutas de Quintero.Bibliography-Gertsch, 1973.Comment-The specimens from Cueva de LosSabinos were previously listed under Loxoscelesbolivari Gertsch and the remainder underLoxosceles sp.Family SymphytognathidaeMaymena chica Gertsch (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de la Cuesta,Sotano de la Estrella, Joya de Higueron, andCueva de los Monos.Family TheridiidaeDipoena sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de la Cuesta.Comment-This is apparently a new species.Order OpilionidaFamily CosmetidaeCynorta jamesoni Goodnight and GoodnightRecords-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de la Cuestaand Sotano de la Estrella; Tamaulipas: Cuevade la Florida and Cueva de EI Pachon.Bibliography-Goodnight and Goodnight, 1973.Family Phalangodidae*Hoplobunus boneti (Goodnight and Goodnight)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de Coatimundi,Cueva de los Monos, Sotano de laPipa, and Cueva de Tanchipa.Bibliography-Goodnight and Goodnight, 1973.Order RicinuleiFamily RicinoididaeCryptocellus osorioi BolivarBibliography-Sbordoni and Argano, 1972.Cryptocellus pelaezi CoronadoBibliography-Sbordoni and Argano, 1972.Order AcarinaFamily CheyletidaeCheyletus malaccensis Oud. (det. R.L. Smiley)Records-Tamaulipas: Cueva de EI Pachon.Family ErythraeidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. W. R. Elliott)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de la Tinaja.Bibliography-Elliott and Strandtmann, 1971.Family MyobiidaeJamesonia arganoi VomeroRecords-San Luis Potosi: Cueva de Los Sabi·nos.Bibliography-Vomero, 1972.Comment-This mite was taken from Desmodusrotundus murinus.Family RhagidiidaeRhagidia trisetatus Elliott and StrandtmannRecords-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de la Tinaja.Bibliography-Elliott and Strandtmann, 1971.Comment-This species was previously cited asRhagidia sp.Rhagidia weyerensis (Packard)Bibliography-Elliott and Strandtmann, 1971.Family RosensteinidaeNycteriglyphus sp. (det. R.L. Smiley)Records-San Luis Potosi: Cueva de Los Sabinos.Family TrombiculidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. W.R. Elliott)Records-Tamaulipas: Sotano de Santa Elena.Bibliography-Elliott and Strandtmann, 1971.Microtrombicula boneti (Hoffmann)174

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintComment-This species was previously listed asEltonella (Coecicula) boneti.CLASS DIPLOPODAOrder ChordeumidaFamily Trichopetalidae*Mexiterpes sp. (det. N.B. Causey)Records-San Luis Potosi: Cueva de los Monos.Order JulidaFamily JulidaeDiploiulus latistriatus (Curtis) (det. N.B. Causey)Records-San Luis Potosi: Cueva de las Cuatas.Order PolydesmidaFamily RhachodesmidaeStrongylodesmus conspicuus CauseyRecords-San Luis Potosi: Sotano del Tigre andSotano de la Tinaja; Tamaulipas: Sotano deEI Venadito.Bibliography-Causey, 1973.Family StylodesmidaeUndescribed genus and species (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Tamaulipas: Sotano de Santa Elena.Family Trichopolydesmidae*Undescribed genus and species (det. N.B. Causey)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de Yerbaniz.Family XystodesmidaeRhysodesmus sp. (det. N.B. Causey)Records-San Luis Potos(' Cueva Chica, Cuevade los Monos, and Cueva de Tantobal.Order SpirostreptidaFamily SpirostreptidaeOrthoporus sp. (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Tamaulipas: Sotano de Santa Elena.CLASS INSECTAOrder ThysanuraFamily Nicoletiidae*Unidentified genus & species (det. P. Wygodzinsky)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de la Cuestaand Sotano de Soyate; Tamaulipas: Sotanode Santa Elena.Nicoletia sp. (det. P. Wygodzinsky)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de Matapalmaand Sotano de Yerbaniz; Tamaulipas:Cueva de EI Pachon.*Texoredde/lia texensis (Ulrich)Records-Tamaulipas: Grutas de Quintero.Bibliography-Padt, 1971; Wygodzinsky, 1973.Comment-Thysanurans from this cave doubtlesslybelong to the unidentified and probablyundescribed troglobite genus listed above. This identification is certainly in error.Order DipluraFamily CampodeidaeUnidentified genus & species (det. P. Wygodzinsky)Records-Tamaulipas: Cueva de EI Pachon andSotano de Santa Elena.Family JapygidaeAllojapyx allodontus (Silvestri) (det. R. Gonzalez)Records-San Luis Potos(' Sotano de la Tinaja.Metajapyx sp. (det. R. Gonzalez)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de la Tinaja.Mixojapyx sp. (det. R. Gonzalez)Records-San Luis Potos(' Sotano de Matapalmaand Sotano de la Tinaja.Order CollembolaFamily Entomobryidae*Pseudosinella strinatii Christiansen (det. K. Christiansen)Records-San Luis Potosi: Cueva Chica, Cuevade los Monos, Cueva Pinta, Cueva de Taninuln. 1, S6tano del Tigre, and S6tano de Yerbaniz;Tamaulipas: Cueva de la Florida, Cuevade EI Pachon, and Cueva de San Rafael delos Castros.Bibliography-Christiansen, 1973.Family HypogastruridaeAcherontiella sabina Bonet (det. K. Christiansen)Records-San Luis Potosf: Ventana Jabal( andCueva de los Monos; Tamaulipas: Cueva deSan Rafael de los Castros.Family IsotomidaeProisotoma sp. (det. K. Christiansen)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de Yerbaniz.Family SminthuridaeTemeritas sp. (det. K. Christiansen)Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de la Tinaja.Order BlattariaFamily BlattellidaeNesomylacris redde/li Fisk and GurneyRecords-Tamaulipas: Cueva de EI Pachon.Bibliography-Fisk and Gurney, 1972.Family BlattidaePeriplaneta sp. (det. A.B. Gurney)Records-Tamaulipas: Cueva Grande del ArroyoSeco.Comment-A single nymph of this genus wascollected.175

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFamily PolyphagidaeHomoeogamia mexicana Burmeister (det. A.B.Gurney)Records-San Luis Potosf: Cueva de los Monos.Order SaltatoriaFamily GryllidaeParacophus apterus Chopard (det. T.H. Hubbell)Records-San Luis Potos{' Cueva Escondida,Sotano de Ferrocarril, Ventana Jabali: Cuevade los Monos, Sotano de las Piedras, andCueva de Valdosa; Tamaulipas: Cueva Grandedel Arroyo Seco, Cueva de la Florida, Cuevade los Pajaros, Cueva de San Rafael de losCastros, and Sotano de Santa Elena.Bibliography-Hubbell, 1972.Paracophus placonotus Hubbell (det. T.H. Hubbell)Records-San Luis Potosf: Cueva Chica andCueva de Tantabal.Bibliography-Hubbell, 1972.Order HemipteraFamily LygaeidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. J.L. Herring)Records-San Luis Potos{' Sotano de la Tinaja.Family NaucoridaeAmbrysus melanopterus Stal (det. R.C. Froeschner)Records-San Luis Potosf: Cueva Chica.Family ReduviidaeRepipta sp. (det. R.C. FroeschnerlRecords-San Luis Potosf: Joya de Higueron.Order ColeopteraFamily AlleculidaeHymenorus sp. (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-San Luis Potos{' Cueva de Tanchipa.Comment-Two larvae of this genus were collectedin this cave.Lystronychus sp. (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-Tamaulipas: Grutas de Quintero.Family CarabidaeMasoreine spp. (det. T.C. Barr, Jr.)Records-Tamaulipas: Cueva de la Florida.Amara sp. (det. T.C. Barr, Jr.)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de Yerbaniz.Clivina sp. (det. T.C. Barr, Jr.)Records-San Luis Potos{' Sotano de Yerbaniz.Colpodes sp. (det. T.C. Barr, Jr.)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de Yerbaniz;Tamaulipas: Sotano de EI Venadito.Pachyteles urrutiai Bolivar (det. T.C. Barr, Jr.)Records-San Luis Potos{' Cueva de Taninuln. 1.Schizogenius sp. (det. T.C. Barr, Jr.)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de Yerbaniz.Tachys (s.str.) sp. (det. T.C. Barr, Jr.)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de Matapalmaand Sotano de Yerbaniz; Tamaulipas:Sotano de EI Venadito.Tachys (s.lat.) sp. (det. T.C. Barr, Jr.)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de las Piedrasand Sotano de Yerbaniz; Tamaulipas: Cuevade EI Pachon.Family CurculionidaeDioptrophorus sp. (det. R.E. Warner)Records-Tamaulipas: Cueva de fa Florida.Family DryopidaePelonomus sp. (det. P.J. Spangler)Records-Tamaulipas: Cueva de la Florida.Family HisteridaeEpierus sp. (det. J.M. Kingsolver)Records-San Luis Potosf: Cueva del Nacimientodel RIo Choy and Sotano de Yerbaniz;Tamaulipas: Cueva de EI Pachon.Euspilotus sp. (det. J.M. Kingsolver)Records-San Luis Potosi: Ventana Jabal I;Tamaulipas: Sotano de ScIOta Elena.Family LeiodidaeDissochaetus aztecus SzymczakowskiRecords-Tamaulipas: Cueva de EI Pachon.Bibliography-Peck, 1973.Ptomaphagus (Adelops) sp.Records-San Luis Potosi: Sotano de las Piedras.Bibliography-Walsh, 1972.Ptomaphagus (Adelops) elabra PeckBibliography-Peck, 1973; 1973a.Fig. 1. Map of Sierra de EI Abra, San Luis POtOSI and Tamaulipas, Mexico, showing caves for which biological records areavailable. Key to caves: 1. Grutas de EI Puente; 2. Cueva de San Rafael de los Castros; 3. Cueva del Nacimiento del RIO Mante;4. Grutas de Quintero; 5. Cueva de la Florida; 6. Cueva de los Pajaros; 7. Cueva de EI Pachon; 8. Cueva del Abra; 9. Cueva de SanNicolas; 10. Cueva Grande del Arroyo Seco; 11. Sotano de Santa Elena; 12. Sotano de EI Venadito; 13. Cueva de la Cuesta;14. Cueva de Tanchipa; 15. Cueva de las Cuatas; 16. Sotano de Yerbaniz; 17. Sotano de Matapalma; 18. Sotano de Japones;19. Cueva de la Ceiba; 20. Ventana Jabal!; 21. Sotano del Tigre; 22. Sotano del Arroyo; 23. Cueva de los Sabinos; 24. Cueva delos Monos; 25. Sotano de la Tinaja; 26. Sotano Escondido; 27. Cueva Pinta; 28. Sotano de Soyate; 29. Sotanito de Montecillos;30. Cuevacita del Sotanito; 31. Cueva del leon; 32. Sotano de Pichijumo; 33. Sotano de las Piedras; 34. Sotano de Palma Seca;35. Cueva del Nacimiento del RIo Choy; 36. Cueva de la Curva; 37. Cueva de Valdosa; 38. Cueva de Taninul n. 4; 39. Cueva deTaninul n. 1; 40. Sotano del Toro; 41. Cueva Grande; 42. Sotano de Manuel; 43. Sotano de Fer-de-Lance; 44. Cueva de lasRanas; 45. Cueva Chica; 46. Cueva de EI Nilo; 47. Cueva de Tantobal; 48. Cueva del Nacimiento del RIo Coy.176


AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFamily LimnichidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. P.J. Spangler)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de la Tinajaand Sotano de Yerbaniz.Family PselaphidaeUnidentified genus & species (det. D.M. Anderson)Records-Tamaulipas: Grutas de Quintero.Comment-A larva of this family was collected.Family Scydmaenidae"Gonnophron" sp. nr. humile Casey (det. W.R.Suter)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de Yerbaniz.Comment-This is apparently a new species.Family StaphylinidaeBelonuchus sp. nr. moquinus Casey (det. L.H. Herman)Records-San Luis Potosf: Ventana Jabali: Sotanode los Monos, Sotano de las Piedras;Tamaulipas: Cueva del Abra.Biocrypta sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Tamaulipas: Sotano de EI Venadito.Diochus sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de la Tinaja.Homaeotarsus sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-San Luis Potosf: Cueva Chica, Sotanode Matapalma, and Sotano de Yerbaniz.Megalinus sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de la Tinaja.Orus (Nivorus) sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de la Tinaja.Osorius sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de la Tinaja.Stilicolina condei Jarrige (det. L.H. Herman)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de Yerbaniz.Tachyperus sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Tamaulipas: Sotano de EI Venadito.Family TenebrionidaeEleodes sp. (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-Tamaulipas: Cueva del Abra.Eleodes rugosa Perbosc. (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-Tamaulipas: Grutas de Qu intero.Zophobasatratus (F.) (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-San Luis Potosf: Cueva del Nacimientodel RIo Choy.Order DipteraFamily MilichiidaeMilichia sp. (det. C.W. Sabrosky)Records-San Luis Potosf: Cueva Chica.Comment-Only a single damaged female wasavailable for study.Family PsychodidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Tamaulipas: Cueva de EI Pachon.Family SciaridaeBradysia sp. (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Tamaulipas: Sotano de EI Venadito.PHYLUM CHORDATACLASS TELEOSTEIOrder CypriniformesFamily Characidae*Astyanax sp. (det. R.W. Mitchell)Records-San Luis Potos!" Cueva de la Curva,Las Cuatas (Este), Las Cuatas (Oeste), Sotanodel JapOnElS, Sotano de Jos, Sotano del Mante,Sotanito de Montecillos, Sotano de PalmaSeca, Sotano de las Piedras, Sotano de Soyate,Sotano del Toro, and Sotano de Yerbaniz;Tamaulipas: Sotano de EI Venadito.CLASS AMPHIBIAOrder AnuraFamily HylidaeSmilisca baudinii (Dumeril and Bibron) (det. W.E.Duellman)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotanito de Montecillos.Family RanidaeRana pipiens (Schreber) (det. W.E. Duellman)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de Yerbaniz.CLASS REPTI L1AOrder SquamataFamily CrotalidaeBothrops atrox asper (Garman) (det. R.O. Albert)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de las Piedras.CLASS AVESOrder PsittaciformesFamily PsittacidaeAratinga holochlora (Sclater) (det. RW. Mitchell)Records-Tamaulipas: Cueva de los pajaros.Comment-These parrots were observed roostingin pockets in the ceiling near the lowerentrance.Order StrigiformesFamily TytonidaeTyto alba (Scopoli)Records-San Luis Potosf: Sotano de la Tinaja,Cueva de Taninul n. 1, and Sotano de Yerba-178

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintniz; Tamau/ipas: Cueva de San Rafael de losCastros.CLASS MAMMALIAOrder ChiropteraFamily PhyllostomatidaeArtibeus jamaicensis yucatanicus AllenRecords-San Luis Potosf: Cueva del Nacimientodel R(o Coy.Bibliography-Mollhagen, 1971.Artibeus /ituratus pa/marum J.A. Allen & ChapmanRecords-San Luis Potosf: Cueva del Nacimientodel RIo Coy.Bibliography-Mollhagen, 1971.Desmodus rotundus murinus WagnerRecords-San Luis Potosf: Cueva del Nacimientodel RIo Coy.Bibliography-Mollhagen, 1971.Micronycteris mega/otis mexicana MillerRecords-San Luis Potosf: Cueva de EI Nilo.Bibliography-Mollhagen, 1971.Family MormoopidaeMormoops mega/ophylla mega/ophylla PetersRecords-San Luis Potosf: Cueva del Nacimientodel RIo Coy.Bibliography-Mollhagen, 1971.Pteronotus davyi fu/vus (Thomas)Records-San Luis POtOSI: Cueva del Nacimientodel RIO Coy.Bibliography-Mollhagen, 1971.Pteronotus parne/lii (Gray)Records-San Luis POtOS/~' Cueva del Nacimientodel RIo Coy.Bibliography-Mollhagen, 1971.Pteronotus personatus psi/otis (Dobson)Records-San Luis POtOSI: Cueva del Nacimientodel RIo Coy.Bibliography-Mollhagen, 1971.Family NatalidaeNata/us stramineus saturatus GrayRecords-San Luis PotosI.' Cueva del Nacimientodel RIo Coy.Bibliography-Mollhagen, 1971.LITERATURE CITEDBowman, T.E. 1973. Two new American species of Spelaeomysis(Crustacea: Mysidacea) from a Mexican cave andland crab burrows. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5: 13-20.Brignoli, P.M. 1972. Some cavernicolous spiders from Mexico(Araneael. Ace. Naz. Lincei, Prob. Att. di Sci. e Cultura,171: 129-155.Causey, N.B. 1973. Millipedes in the collection of the Associationfor Mexican Cave Studies. II. Keys and additionalrecords and descriptions (Diplopodal. Assn. Mex. CaveStud. Bull., 5:107-122.Christiansen, K. 1973. The genus Pseudosinella in Mesoamericancaves. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5: 129-134.Elliott, W.R., and RW. Strandtmann. 1971. New locality recordsfor Rhagidia from Mexican and American caves. J.Kansas Entomol. Soc., 44(4) :468-475.Fisk, F.W., and A.B. Gurney. 1972. Synopsis of the neotropicalcockroaches of th'e genus Nesomylacris (Dictyoptera:Blattaria: Blattellidael. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington,74(2): 196-206.Gates, G.E. 1973. On more earthworms from Mexican caves.Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5:21-24.Gertsch, W.J. 1973. A report on cave spiders from Mexicoand Central America. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5:141-163.Goodnight, C.J., and M.L. Goodnight. 1973. Opilionids(Phalangida) from Mexican caves. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud.Bull.,5:83-96.Hobbs, H.H., Jr., and H.H. Hobbs III. 1973. The genusSphaeromicola (Ostracoda, Entocytheridae) in Mexico.Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5:39-42.Hubbell, T.H. 1972. Records of cave Orthoptera from northeasternand central Mexico, with a revision of the gryllidgenus Paracophus and descriptions of three new genera ofRhaphidophoridae. Ace. Naz. Lincei, Prob. Att. Sci. eCultura, 171 :47-115, pI. 1.Mitchell, R.W. 1969. A comparison of temperate and tropicalcave communities. Southwestern Nat., 14(1):73-88.Mitchell, R.W., and M. Kawakatsu. 1973. Freshwater cavern icole planarians from Mexico: New troglobitic and troglophilicDugesia from caves of the Sierra de Guatemala.Ann. Speleol., 27:639-681.Mollhagen, Tony. 1971. Checklist of bats in caves in theregions of the Sierra de Guatemala and Sierra de EI Abranortheastern Mexico. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 4;19-22.Muchmore, W.B. 1972. New diplosphyronid pseudoscorpions,mainly cavernicolous, from Mexico (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpionidal.Trans. Amer. Micros. Soc., 91 (3):261-276.Muchmore, W.B. 1972a. The unique, cave-restricted genusAphrastochthonius (Pseudoscorpionida, Chthoniidael.Proc. Bioi. Soc. Washington, 85:433-444.Muchmore, W.B. 1973. New and little known pseudoscorpions,mainly from caves in Mexico (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpionidal.Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5:47-62.Paclt, J. 1971. Occurrence of a new genus of troglobiticNicoletiidae IIns., Thysanural in Mexico. Internatl. J.Speleol., 3(3-4):423-424, pI. 127.Peck, S.B. 1973. A review of the cavernicolous Catopinae(Coleoptera; Leiodidae) of Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala.Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5:97-106.Reddell, J.R., and R.W. Mitchell. 1971. A checklist of thecave fauna of Mexico. I. Sierra de EI Abra, Tamaulipasand San Luis PotOSI: Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 4:137-180.Sbordoni, V., and R. Argano. 1972. Introduction; Cavesstudied during the 1st Mission to Mexico (19691. Acc.Naz. Lincei, Prob. A tt. Sci. e Cultura, 171 :5-21, pis. 1-8.Shear, W.A. 1972. Studies in the milliped order Chordeumida(Diplopoda): A revision of the family Cleidogonidae anda reclassification of the order Chordeumida in the NewWorld. Bull. Mus. Compo Zool., 144(4): 151-352.Vigna Taglianti, A. 1972. The Trechinae of the ItalianZoological Expedition to Mexico, 1969 (Coleoptera,179

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintCarabidael. Ace. Naz. Lincei, Prob. Att. Sci. e Cultura,171: 117-128.Vomero, V. 1972. A new species of Jamesonia Dusbabek1967 (Acarina, Trombidiformes, Myobiidael parasitic onthe vampire bat Desmodus rotundus, with a descriptionof the nymphal and larval stages. Ace. Naz. Lincei, Prob.Att. di Sci. e Cultura, 171: 157·172, pI. 1.Walsh, M., ed. 1972. Mexican caving of the Southwest TexasGrotto. Southwest Texas Grotto, San Marcos. 146 pp.Wygodzinsky, P. 1973. Description of a new genus of cavethysanuran from Texas (Nicoletiidae, Thysanura, Insecta),Amer. Mus. Novitates. 2518:1-8.180

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintA CHECKLIST OF THE CAVE FAUNA OF MEXICO. V. ADDITIONAL RECORDSFROM THE SIERRA DE GUATEMALA, TAMAULlPAS 1James R. Reddell and William R. ElliottDepartment of Biology, Texas Tech UniversityLubbock, Texas 79409INTRODUCTIONThe Sierra de Guatemala is the best-known highaltitude karst region in Mexico. It is also the richestwith 159 species (27 troglobites) recorded in the firstchecklist of the fauna of this area (Reddell and Mitchell,1971). Since publication of that list several importanttaxonomic papers (Hubbell, 1972; CauseY,1971;Mit~hell and Kawakatsu, 1973; Muchmore, 1972)have been published. Several caves in the immediatevicinity of Gomez Farias have been discovered andstudied since 1971. This has resulted in the additionof many new species for the Sierra de Guatemala,bringing the total known to about 230. Many newrecords for previously published species are also nowavailable.The Sierra de Guatemala contains one of the moreremarkable troglobite assemblages in North America.At the present time 35 species of troglobite areknown. This includes 7 aquatic and 28 terrestrialspecies. The significance of this fauna has been brieflydiscussed by Mitchell and Kawakatsu (1973). Theyalso include maps and descriptions of three of themore significant caves in the area (Cueva de la Mina,Cueva de la Capilla, and Cueva de las Perl as). The followinglist includes all of the troglobites now knownfrom the Sierra de Guatemala.Supported in part by a Grant in Aid of Research from theSociety of Sigma Xi and by research funds from the Inter·national Center for Arid and Semi-Arid Land Studies(ICASALSI, Texas Tech University.FlatwormsDugesia barbarae Mitchell and KawakatsuD. typhlomexicana Mitchell and KawakatsuOstracodsSphaeromicola cirolanae RiojaIsopodsSpeocirolana bolivari (Rioja)S. pelaezi (Bolivar)Spherarmadillo cavernicola MulaikBrackenridgia bridgesi (Van Name)MysidsSpelaeomysis quinterensis (Villalobos)ScorpionsTyphlochactas rhodesi MitchellPseudoscorpionsAphrastochthonius major MuchmoreTyrannochthonius troglobius MuchmoreParavachonium superbum MuchmoreSpidersEuagrus cavernicola GertschCicurina (Cicurusta) mina GertschLeptoneta capilla GertschMetagonia capilla GertschTheotima pura GertschOpilionidsHoplobunus boneti (Goodnight and Goodnight)H. inops Goodnight and GoodnightMillipedsGlomeroides promiscus CauseyStrongylodesmus harrisoni CauseyUnculabes sp.? Speodesmus sp.181

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintSphaeriodesmus sp.Mexicambala blanda CauseyM. inopis CauseyCollembolaPseudosinella strinatii ChristiansenOncopodura prietoi BonetCricketsParacophus caecus HubbellBeetlesAntroforceps bolivari BarrMexaphaenops intermedius BarrMexisphodrus profundus BarrPtomaphagus (Adelops) troglomexicanus PeckStenopholea reddelli HermanFishAstyanax sp.This supplementary checklist includes only thosespecies for which new records or new important bibliographiccitations are available or which have beenthe subject of recent taxonomic study. Previouslypublished records are repeated only where there hasbeen recent taxonomic study. An asterisk indicatesthat the species is an apparent troglobite. The cavenames used follow those standardized by the Associationfor Mexican Cave Studies. All caves in which collectionshave been made are located on the accompanyingmap (Fig. 1).We wish to express our appreciation here to Mr.John Hunter, Dr. Barbara Warburton, and SouthmostColtege in Brownsville, Texas, for their continuedinterest in our studies and for permitting us to use theresearch facilities at the Southmost College ResearchStation at Rancho del Cielo.It is also appropriate here to thank Nell B. Causey,W.J. Gertsch, T.H. Hubbell, R.w. Mitchell, and W.H.Russell for their continued support and assistance inour studies of the fauna of the Sierra de Guatemala.We wish to express our appreciation to the followingpeople for assisting us in collecting or in supplyingus with specimens: Francis Abernethy, Don Broussard,Mel Brownfield, Jerry Cooke, Ronald Fieseler,John George, Russ Harmon, Jimmy Jarl, MasaharuKawakatsu, Jim McI ntyre, David McKenzie, R.w.Mitchell, Neal Morris, Stewart Peck, Terry Raines,W.H. Russell, Pierre Strinati, Ann Sturdivant, VirginiaTipton, and Suzanne Wiley.We are also deeply grateful to the following systematistsfor providing us with identifications of theindicated taxa: D.M. Anderson, beetles; T.C. Barr, Jr.,beetles; T.E. Bowman, isopods; G.W. Byers, flies; O.L.Cartwright, beetles; N.B. Causey, millipeds; K.C.Christiansen, collembolans; D.R. Davis, moths; W.E.Duellman, frogs; O.S. Flint, odonata; R.C. Froeschner,hemipterans; R.J. Gagne, flies; G.E. Gates, earthworms;W.J. Gertsch, uropygids, amblypygids, spiders;C.J. and M.L. Goodnight, opilionids; T.F. Halstead,hemipterans; L.H. Herman, beetles; H.H. Hobbs, Jr.,ostracods; J.R. Holsinger, amphipods; T.H. Hubbell,crickets; Leslie Hubricht, snails; J.M. Kingsolver, beetles;J.P. Kramer, homopterans; P.M. Marsh, hymenopterans;W.B. Muchmore, pseudoscorpions; S.B. Peck,beetles; R.L. Smiley, mites; Paul Spangler, beetles;T.J. Spilman, beetles; G.C. Steyskal, flies; W.R. Suter,beetles; Sigurd Szerlip, hemipterans; P.G. Thompson,snails; W.w. Wirth, flies.PHYLUM PLATYHELMINTHESCLASS TURBELLARIAOrder TricladidaFamily PlanariidaeDugesia sp.Bibliography-Mitchell and Kawakatsu, 1973.*Dugesia barbarae Mitchell and KawakatsuRecords-Cueva de la Capilla.Bibliography-Mitchell and Kawakatsu, 1973.Comment-This species was listed as Dugesia sp.II in the earlier listing.Dugesia guatemalensis Mitchell and KawakatsuRecords-Cueva de las Perlas.Bibliography-Mitchell and Kawakatsu, 1973.Comment-This species was listed as Dugesia sp.til in the earlier list.*Dugesia typhlomexicana Mitchell and KawakatsuRecords-Cueva de la Mina.Bibliography-Mitchell and Kawakatsu, 1973.Comment-This species was listed as Dugesia sp.I in the earlier list.PHYLUM ANNELIDACLASS CLiTELLATAOrder Oligocha'etaFamily LumbricidaeDendrobaena rubida (Savigny) (det. G.E. Gates)Records-Harrison Sinkhole.Bibliography-Gates, 1973.Family OctochaetidaeDichogaster sp. (det. G.E. Gates)Records-?Cueva de Tres Manantiales.Comment-Specimens from this cave were toopoorly preserved for positive identification,but probably belong to this genus.182

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintPHYLUM ARTHROPODACLASS CRUSTACEAOrder PodogonaFamily Entocytheridae*Sphaeromicola cirolanae Rioja (det. H.H. Hobbs)Records-Bee Cave and Sotano de EI Molino.Bibliography-Hobbs and Hobbs, 1973.Comment.-This troglobitic ostracod was foundassociated with Speocirolana pelaezi (Bolivar).Order AmphipodaFamily HyallelidaeHyale/la azteca (Saussure) (det. J.R. Holsinger)Records-Hoya de Nubas.Comment-This wide-spread amphipod was collecteclfrom the spring entrance to this smallcave.Order IsopodaFamily Cirolanidae*Speocirolana bolivari (Rioja)Bibliography-Hobbs and Hobbs, 1973.*Speocirolana pelaezi (Bolivar) (det. T.E. Bowman)Records-Sotano de EI Molino, Cueva de TresManantiales, and Sotano de Vasquez.Bibliography-Hobbs and Hobbs, 1973.Order MysidaceaFamily Lepidomysidae*Spelaeomysis quinterensis (Villalobos)Bibliography-Bowman, 1973.Comment-The generic name was misspelled inthe previous list.CLASS ARACHNIDAOrder ChelonethidaFamily ChernetidaeHesperochernes sp. (det. W.B. Muchmore)Records-Cu!lva de la Mina.Bibliography-Muchmore, 1972.? Semeiochernes sp. (det. W.B. Muchmore)Records-Crystal Cave._Comment-Specimens from Crystal Cave areonly tentatively placed in this genus.Family Chthoniidae*Aphrastochthonius major MuchmoreRecords-Cueva de la Capilla.Bibliography-Muchmore, 1973.Mundochthonius mexicanus MuchmoreRecords-Crystal Cave.Bibliography-Muchmore, 1973.Comment-This species is also known fromcaves on Chipinque Mesa, Nuevo Leon.Family SyarinidaePachychitra similis MuchmoreRecords-Cueva de los Vampiros.Bibliography-Muchmore, 1972.Comment-I n the previous list this species wascited as Pachychitra sp.Family Vachoniidae*Paravachonium superbum MuchmoreRecords-Sotano de Gomez Far(as.Bibliography-Muchmore, 1972.Comment-I n the previous list this species wasrecorded as Paravachonium sp.Order UropygidaFamily ThelyphonidaeMastigoproctus giganteus Lucas (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Sumidero de EI Jineo.Order SchizomidaFamily SchizomidaeSchizomus mexicanus RowlandRecords-Sumidero de EI Jineo and Cueva delNacimiento del RIo Fr(o.Bibliography-Rowland,1973.Order AmblypygidaFamily TarantulidaeTarantula fuscimana (C.L. Koch) (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Resumidero de los Mangos, Sotano deEI Molino, and Sotano de Vasquez.Order AraneaeSuborder MygalomorphaeFamily TheraphosidaeSchizopelma sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Harrison Sinkhole, Cueva de la Mina,and Wet Cave.Comment-Specimens from Cueva de la Minaand Wet Cave were previously listed as Aphonopelmasp.Suborder AraneomorphaeFamily AgelenidaeCicurina (Cicurusta) iviei GertschRecords-Harrison Sinkhole and ?Cueva de laMina.183

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintBibliography-Brignoli, 1972.Comment-Specimens from Cueva de la Minaare only tentatively identified as this species.*Cicurina (Cicurusta) mina GertschBibliography-Brignoli, 1972.Family ArgiopidaeAzilia vagepicta Simon (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Sotano del Caballo Moro and Sotanode los Pinos.Leucauge venusta (Walckenaer) (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Sotano del Caballo Moro.Family ClubionidaePhrurotimpus sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Cueva de la Capilla.Syrisca affinis (Banks) (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Cueva del Nacimiento del RIo Fno.Family CtenidaeCtenus sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Cueva de la Capilla.Comment-These specimens were immature.Family Leptonetidae*Leptoneta capilla Gertsch (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Cueva de la Mina.Bibliography-Brignoli, 1972.Comment-Specimens from Cueva de la Minawere listed as Leptoneta sp. in the previouslist. Brignoli erected the genus Neoleptonetafor all of the Mexican species, but Gertschdoes not consider this to be valid.Leptoneta rainesi Gertsch (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Wet Cave.Bibliography-Brignoli, 1972.Comment-This species was removed to thegenus Neoleptoneta by Brignoli, but Gertschdoes not consider this valid.Family LinyphiidaeLinyphiinae gen. et sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Cueva de las Perlas.Comment-Specimens from this cave were tooimmature for further identification.Eperigone tlaxcalana Gertsch and Davis (det. W.J.Gertsch)Records-Sotano de Vasquez.Family NesticidaeGaucelmus augustinus Keyserling (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Crystal Cave.Nesticus pallidus Emerton (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Cueva de Tres Manantiales and Sotanode Vasquez.Bibliography-Brignoli, 1972.Family Ochyroceratidae*Theotima pura Gertsch (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Cueva de los Vampiros.Bibliography-Gertsch, 1973.Family PholcidaeMetagonia sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Sotano de EI Molino and Cueva de losVampiros.Comment-This genus is represented only byimmature specimens in these caves.Metagonia pura GertschBibliography-Brignoli, 1972.Metagonia suzanne Gertsch (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Sumidero de EI Jineo.Bibliography-Gertsch, 1973.Modisimus sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Sumidero de EI Jineo.Comment-Only immature specimens of thisgenus were collected in this cave.Modisimus mckenziei Gertsch (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Bee Cave and Cueva de la Paloma.Bibliography-Gertsch, 1973.Family SalticidaeLyssomanes sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Cueva de Tres Manantiales.Family ScytodidaeLoxosceles valdosa Gertsch (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Sotano de Vasquez.Family TheridiidaeAnelosimus studiosus (Hentz) (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Sotano del Caballo Moro.Stemmops sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Sumidero de EI Jineo.Comment-Specimens from this cave were immature.Family UloboridaeUloborus sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Cueva de la Capilla.Family ZodariidaeStorena sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Sumidero de EI Jineo.Order OpilionidaFamily CosmetidaeCynorta jamesoni Goodnight and GoodnightRecords-Cueva de la Mina, Grutas de EI Puente,and Sotano de Vasquez.Bibliography-Goodnight and Goodnight, 1973.Family Phalangodidae*Hoplobunus boneti (Goodnight and Goodnight)Records-Cueva del Remolino.Bibliography-Goodnight and Goodnight, 1973.*Hoplobunus inops Goodnight and GoodnightRecords-Sumidero de EI Jineo, Cueva de TresManantiales, and Sotano de Vasquez.Bibliography-Goodnight and Goodnight, 1973.184

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintOrder AcarinaFamily RosensteinidaeNycteriglyphus sp. (det. R.L. Smiley)Records-Cueva de la Mina.CLASS DI PLOPODAOrder GlomeridaFamily Glomeridae*Glomeroides promiscus Causey (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Sotano del Naranjo and Cueva de TresManantiales.Order ChordeumidaFamily CleidogonidaeCleidogona sp. (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Cueva del Remolino.Cleidogona crystal/ina ShearRecords-Cueva de la Capilla, Crystal Cave,Cueva Chica de la Perra, and SalamanderCave (=Cueva del Rancho del Cielo n. 3).Bibliography-Shear, 1972.Comment-All of the above records were previouslylisted as Cleidogona sp.Cleidogona pecki ShearRecords-Cueva de la Mina.Bibliography-Shear, 1972.Comment-This record was previously cited asCleidogona sp.Order PolydesmidaFamily RhachodesmidaeStrongylodesmus conspicuus CauseyRecords-Cueva del Rancho del Cielo n. 7 andSotano de EI Refugio.Bibliography-Causey, 1973.*Strongylodesmus harrisoni CauseyRecords-?"Sinkhole" at Rancho del Cielo, ?Sotanode Gomez Farias, Sumidero de EI Jineo,?Sotano de la Joya de Salas, Sotano del Leon,Resumidero de los Mangos, Sotano de EIMolino, Cueva de las Perlas, ?Cueva del Remolino,?Salamander Cave, Sotano de TresCerritos, Cueva de Tres Manantiales, and?Wet Cave.Bibliography-Causey, 1973.Comment-Records indicated by a questionmark are not known by adult males and soare only tentatively assigned to this species.*Unculabes sp. (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Cueva de la Mina.Bibliography-Causey, 1973.Family Trichopolydesmidae*1 Speodesmus sp. (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Cueva del Remolino.Comment-Trichopolydesmids from this caveare tentatively assigned to this genus, butmay belong to an undescribed genus.Family XystodesmidaeRhysodesmus sp. (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Cueva del Remolino.Order SpirobolidaFamily AtopetholidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Cueva del Remolino.Order SpirostreptidaFamily Cambalidae*Mexicambala blanda Causey (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Bee Cave, Crystal Cave, Sotano de GomezFarIas, Harrison Sinkhole, Sumidero deEI Jineo, Sotano del Leon, Sotano de EI Molino,Cueva del Nacimiento del RIo Frio,Cueva de la Paloma, Grutas de EI Puente,Cueva del Remolino, Sotano de Tres Cerritos,Cueva de Tres Manantiales, and Sotanode Vasquez.Bibliography-Causey, 1971; 1973.Comment-Some of the above records were previouslylisted as Mexicambala sp.*Mexicambala inopis Causey (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Cueva de la Capilla, Sotano de fa Joyade Salas, Cueva de los Leones, and Cueva dela Mina.Bibliography-Causey, 1971; 1973.Comment-Some of the above records were previouslycited as Mexicambala sp.CLASS INSECTAOrder CollembolaFamily EntomobryidaePseudosinella reddel/i ChristiansenRecords-Bee Cave, Cueva de la Capilla, Cuevadel Infiernillo, Cueva de la Mina, Cueva delRemolino, and Cueva de Tres Manantiales.Bibliography-Christiansen, 1973.*Pseudosinel/a strinatii ChristiansenRecords-Crystal Cave and Cueva de la Paloma.Bibliography-Christiansen, 1973.Family HypogastruridaeAcherontiella sabina Bonet (det. K.C. Christiansen)Records-Crystal Cave and Cueva dellnfiernillo.Family Oncopoduridae185

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint*Oncopodura prietoi Bonet (det. K.C. Christiansen)Records-Bee Cave.Comment-This species was previously cited asOncopodura sp.Order OdonataFamily LibellulidaeDythemis sp. prob. multipunctata Kirby (det.O.S.Flint)Records-Sotano de EI Molino.Comment-This species doubtless washed intothe cave.Order SaltatoriaFamily GryllidaeNemobius sp. (det. T.H. Hubbell)Records-?Sotano del Caballo Moro.Comment-Immature specimens from this caveare tentatively placed in this genus.Paracophus apterus Chopard (det. T.H. Hubbell)Records-"Cave" at Rancho del Cielo, Dry Cave,Sotano de Gomez Fanas, Cueva del Nacimientodel R(o Fno, Grutas de EI Puente,Cueva del Rancho del Cielo n. 3, Cueva deTres Manantiales, and Cueva de los Vampiros.Bibliography-Hubbell, 1972.Comment-This species is the common cricketin the caves of the Sierra de EI Abra and thelower elevation caves of the Sierra de Guatemala.*Paracophus caecus Hubbell (det. T.H. Hubbell)Records-"Cave" at Rancho del Cielo, Bee Cave,Cueva de la Capilla, Crystal Cave, Sotano deGomez Fanas, Harrison Sinkhole, Cueva delInfiernillo, Sotano de la Joya de Salas, Cuevade la Mina, Sotano de EI Molino, Cueva delNacimiento del RIo Fn'o, Sotano de los Pinos,Cueva de Tres Manantiales, Cueva de losVampiros, and Wet Cave.Bibliography-Hubbell, 1972.Comment-Many of the above records were previouslylisted as Paracophus sp.Paracophus placonotus Hubbell (det. T.H. Hubbell)Records-Cueva de Tres Manantiales.Paracophus reddelli Hubbell (det. T.H. Hubbell)Records-Bee Cave and Cueva del Nacimientodel RIo Fno.Bibliography-Hubbell, 1972.Family RhaphidophoridaeExochodrilus caelestis HubbellRecords-"Sinkhole" at Rancho del Cielo andDry Cave.Bibliography-Hubbell, 1972.Comment-This species was previously listed asan undescribed genus and species of Rhaphidophoridae.Exochodrilus forcipatus HubbellRecords-Cueva de la Capilla, Cueva de la Mina,and 2,000 Meter Cave.Bibliography-Hubbell, 1972.Comment-This species was previously listed asan undescribed genus and species of Rhaphidophoridae.Order HemipteraFamily BelostomatidaeAbedus signoreti Mayr (det. R.C. Froeschner)Records-Sotano de EI Molino.Family EnicocephalidaeSystelloderes sp. (det. R.C. Froeschner)Records-Harrison Sinkhole.Family PyrrhocoridaeDysdercus sp. (det. T.F. Halstead)Records-Cueva del Nacimiento del RIo Fno.Family TingidaeCeratocombus sp. (det. R.C. Froeschner)Records-Harrison Sinkhole.Family VeliidaeMicrovelia sp. (det Sigurd Szerlip)Records-Sotano del Leon.Order HomopteraFamily CixiidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. J.P. Kramer)Records-Cueva de la Mina.Comment-Nymphs of this family are frequentlyfound in this cave.Order ColeopteraFamily AnthicidaeAnthicus sp. (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-Salamander Cave.Family CarabidaeAgonum (Platynus) sp. (det. T.C. Barr)Records-Resumidero de los Mangos.*Mexaphaenops intermedius BarrRecords-Cueva de la Mina.Bibliography-Vigna Taglianti, 1972.Tachys (s.str.) sp. (det. T.C. Barr)Records-Sumidero de EI Jineo, Resumidero delos Mangos, Cueva de Tres Manantiales andSotano de Vasquez.'Family DytiscidaeHydroporus belfragei Sharp (det. Paul Spangler)186

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintRecords-Cueva de la Capilla.Bibliography-Sbordoni and Argano, 1972.Comment-This species was previously listed asan unidentified genus and species. It is anabundant troglophile in pools in this cave.Family EuglenidaeAriotus sp. (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-Satano de Vasquez.Family LeiodidaeAglyptinus sp. (det. J.M. Kingsolver)Records-Harrison Sinkhole.Dissochaetus aztecus SzymczakowskiRecords-Cueva de la Mina.Bibliography-Peck, 1973.Ptomaphagus (Adelops) sp.Records-Cueva de la Mina.Bibliography-Peck, 1973a.Comment-This is apparantly an undescribedspecies.Ptomaphagus (Adelops) elabra Peck (det. S.B. Peck)Records-Satano del Lean, Cueva de la Paloma,and Grutas de EI Puente.Bibliography-Peck, 1973; 1973a; Sbordoni andArgano, 1972.*Ptomaphagus (Adelops) troglomexicanus PeckBibliography-Peck, 1973; 1973a; Sbordoni andArgano, 1972; Vigna Taglianti, 1972.Family OedemeridaeUnidentified genus & species (det. D.M. Anderson)Records-Cueva de la Mina.Comment-A larva of this family was collectedin this cave.Family PselaphidaeUnidentified genus & species (det. T.C. 8arr)Records-Sumidero de EI Jineo.Family ScaphidiidaeScaphisoma sp. (det. J.M. Kingsolver)Records-Harrison Sinkhole.Family ScarabaeidaeAphodius sp. (det. O.L. Cartwright)Records-Wet Cave.Family Scydmaenidae"Connophron" sp. nr. proximum Casey (det. W.R.Suter)Records-Satano del Lean.Comment-This probable new species will certainlybe located in a different genus oncerevisionary work in this family is completed.Family StaphylinidaeAleocharinae genus and species (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Satano de EI Porvenir.Anorylus sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Harrison Sinkhole.Erchomus sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Satano de EI Molino.Homaeotarsus sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Satano del Caballo Moro, Sumiderode EI Jineo, and Resumidero de los Mangos.Philonthus sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Salamander Cave.Stilicolina condei Jarrige (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Harrison Sinkhole.Family TenebrionidaeZopherus sp. nr. nodulosus Solier (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-Satano de los Pinos.Order LepidopteraFamily TineidaeEpiscardia sp. (det. D.R. Davis)Records-Salamander Cave.Comment-Only alcoholic material was availablefor study.Order DipteraFamily ChironomidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. W.W. Wirth)Records-Satano del Caballo Moro.Family DolichopodidaeChrysotus sp. (det. G.C. Steyskal)Records-Salamander CaveFamily DrosophilidaeDrosophila sp. (det. W.W. Wirth)Records-Cueva de las Perlas.Comment-This species was present in enormousswarms on the ceiling of this cave.Family MuscidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-?Satano del Lean and ?Cueva de laPaloma.Comment-Larvae from these caves are tentativelyidentified as belonging to this family.Fannia canicularis (L.) (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Salamander Cave.Phaonia sp. (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Crystal Cave and Salamander Cave.Family MycetophilidaeMycetophila sp. (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Cueva de las Perlas.Family PhoridaeUnidentified genus and species (det. W.W. Wirth)Records-Salamander Cave.Conicera dauci Meigen (det. W.W. Wirth)Records-Sumidero de EI Jineo.Dohrniphora sp. (det. W.W. Wirth)187

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintRecords-Crystal Cave.Puliciphora sp. (det. W.W. Wirth)Records-Sotano del Leon.Family PsychodidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Sotano del Caballo Moro.Family SciaridaeBradysia sp. (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Crystal Cave, Sotano del Caballo Moro,and Harrison Sinkhole.Bradysia coprophila (Lintner) (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Sotano del Caballo Moro.Sciara sp. (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Sotano del Caballo Moro.Family SphaeroceridaeArchiborborus sp. (det. G.C. Steyskal)Records-Sotano de EI Porvenir.Comment-This apparently represents an undescribedspecies.Leptocera sp. (det. G.C. Steyskal)Records-Sotano del Caballo Moro, Sotano deEI Porvenir, and Salamander Cave.Family TipulidaeTeucholabis sp. (det. G.W. Byers)Records-Sotano del Caballo Moro and Cuevade la Mina.Order HymenopteraFamily ScelionidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. P.M. Marsh)Records-Cueva de la Mina.Records-Sotano de la Joya de Salas.Order MesogastropodaFamily CyclophoridaeAperostoma mexicanum palmeri (Bartsch and Morrison)(det. F.G. Thompson)Records-Harrison Sinkhole.Order GeophilaFamily SpiraxidaeEuglandina sp. (det. F.G. Thompson)Records-Cueva Chica de la Perra.Spiraxis sp. (det. F.G. Thompson)Records-Harrison Sinkhole.Comment-An apparently undescribed specieswas collected in this cave, but the materialis inadequate for description.Streptostyla bartschi (Dall) (det. F.G. Thompson)Records-Crystal Cave and Cueva de la Mina.Comment-This is an abundant species in thesecaves.Family UrocoptidaeCoelocentrum sp. (det. F.G. Thompson)Records-Harrison Sinkhole and Sotano de EIPorvenir.Comment-This apparently undescribed speciesis represented only by juvenile or brokenmaterial.Family XanthonychidaeXanthonyx sp. (det. F.G. Thompson)Records-Cueva de la Capilla.Comment-This is apparently an undescribedspecies.PHYLUM MOLLUSCACLASS GASTROPODAOrder BasommatophoraFamily PhysidaePhysa sp. (det. Leslie Hubricht)Records-Sotano de la Joya de Salas.Family PlanorbidaeHelisoma trivolvis (Say) (det. Leslie Hubricht)PHYLUM CHORDATACLASS TELEOSTEIOrder CypriniformesFamily Characidae*Astyanax sp. (det. R.W. Mitchell)Records-Sotano del Caballo Moro, Sotano Es-Fig. 1. Map of Sierra de Guatemala, Tamaulipas. Mexico, showing caves for which biological records are available. Key tocaves: 1. Sotano de la Joya de Salas; 2. Cueva de los Leones; 3. Cueva de la Escuela; 4. Cueva de los Pinos; 5. 2000 Meter Cave;6. Cueva del RIo Sabinas; 7. Cueva Chica de la Perra; 8. Cueva de las Perl as; 9. Cueva de la Capilla; 10. Sotano de EI Porvenir;11. Agua Linda (cave); 12. Cueva de la Mina; 13. Sotano de Harrison; 14. Cueva del Rancho del Cielo n. 7; 15. Balanced RockCave; 16. Cueva del Rancho del Cielo n. 3; 17. Harrison Sinkhole; 18. Crystal Cave; 19. Wet Cave; 20. Dry Cave; 21. Casa Piedras(cave); 22. Cueva del Remolino; 23. Cueva dellnfiernillo; 24. Sotano EI Fin; 25. Sotano del Camino; 26. Sotano de EI Triunfo;27. Cueva del Plan; 28. Sumidero de EI Jineo; 29. Sotano de EI Molino; 30. Cueva de la Paloma; 31. Sotano del Naranjo; 32. Resumiderode los Mangos; 33. Sotano Escondido; 34. Sotano de Gomez Farias; 35. Cueva del Leon; 36. Sotano del Leon;37. Cueva del Nacimiento del RIo Frio; 38. Sotano de EI Refugio; 39. Cueva de Tres Manantiales; 40. Cueva de los Vampiros;41. Sotano del Caballo Moro; 42. Bee Cave; 43. Sotano de Va5quez.188

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint--~'--_:_~~~---~:::'I~~',--,,~-_...\") -/----~:--.--------\-------'\.H PO/WENIIl \/,' '"'-" ./\-------.- >,,o,------j ."1I~----·1 -~~--.~ 14~~ Il'A.NCHO/' J 17' 18 Oft C'flOL. _II '"c :21.1 0 \..189

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintcondido, Sumidero de EI Jineo, Sotano de EIMolino, and Sotano de Vasquez.CLASS AMPHIBIAOrder AnuraFamily LeptodactylidaeEleutherodacty/us decoratus decoratus Taylor (det.W.E. Duellman)Records-Small cave near EI Refugio sawmill.Syrrhophus /ongipes (Baird) (det. W.E. Duellman)Records-Cueva de la Capilla.CLASS AVESOrder PsittaciformesFamily PsittacidaeAra mi/itaris L.Records-Sotano de EI Refugio.Comment-Several Military Macaws were observedflying in the entrance to this spectacularsotano; they apparently nest in the cave.CLASS MAMMALIAOrder ChiropteraFamily VespertilionidaeMyotis nigricans da/questi Hall and AlvarezRecords-Grutas de EI Puente.Bibliography-Mollhagen, 1971.LITERATURE CITEDBowman, T.E. 1973. Two new American species of Spelaeomysis(Crustacea: Mysidacea) from a Mexican cave andland crab burrows. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5: 13-20.Brignoli, P.M. 1972. Some cavernicolous spiders from Mexico(Araneae). Ace. Naz. Lincei, Prob. Att. di Sci. e Cultura,171: 129-155.Causey, N.B. 1971. The Cambalidae in Mexican caves, withdescriptions of three new species of Mexicambala (Diplopoda:Cambalidae). Proc. Bioi. Soc. Washington, 84:271282.Causey, N.B. 1973. Millipedes in the collection of the Associationfor Mexican Cave Studies. II. Keys and additionalrecords and descriptions (Diplopoda). Assn. Mex. CaveStud. Bull., 5:107-122.Christiansen, K. 1973. The genus Pseudosinella in Meso-american caves. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5:129-134.Gates, G.E. 1973. On more earthworms from Mexican caves.Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5:21-24.Gertsch, W.J. 1973. A report on cave spiders from Mexicoand Central America. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5:141-163.Goodnight, C.J., and M.L. Goodnight. 1973. Opilionids(Phalangida) from Mexican caves. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud.'Bull., 5:83-96.Hobbs, H.H., Jr., and H.H. Hobbs III. 1973. The genusSphaeromicola (Ostracoda, Entocytheridae) in Mexico.Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5:39-42.Hubbell, T.H. 1972. Records of cave Orthoptera from northeasternand central Mexico, with a revision of the gryllidgenus Paracophus and descriptions of three new genera ofRhaphidophoridae. Ace. Naz. Lincei, Prob. Att. Sci. eCultura, 171 :47-115, pI. 1.Mitchell, R.W., and M. Kawakatsu. 1973. Freshwater cavernicoleplanarians from Mexico: New troglobitic and troglophilieDugesia from caves of the Sierra de Guatemala.Ann. Speleol., 27:639-681.Mollhagen, Tony. 1971. Checklist of bats in caves in theregions of the Sierra de Guatemala and Sierra de EI Abra,northeastern Mexico. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 4:19-22.Muchmore, W.B. 1972. New diplosphyronid pseudoscorpions,mainly cavernicolous, from Mexico (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpionida).Trans. Amer. Micros. Soc., 91(3):261-276.Muchmore, W.B. 1973. New and little known pseudoscorpions,mainly from caves in Mexico (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpionida).Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. BUll., 5:47-62.Peck, S.B. 1973. A review of the cavernicolous Catopinae(Coleoptera; Leiodidae) of Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala.Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5:97-106.Peck, S.B. 1973a. A systematic revision and the evolutionarybiology of the Ptomaphagus (Adelops) beetles of NorthAmerica (Coleoptera; Leiodidae; Catopinae), with emphasison cave-inhabiting species. Bull. Mus. Compo Zool.,145(2):29-162.Reddell, J.R., and RW. Mitchell. 1971. A checklist of thecave fauna of Mexico. II. Sierra de Guatemala, Tamaulipas.Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 4: 181-215.Sbordoni, V., and R. Argano. 1972. IntrOduction; Cavesstudied during the 1st Mission to Mexico (1969). Ace.Naz. Lincei, Prob. Att. Sci. e Cultura, 171: 5-21, pis. 1-8.Shear, W.A. 1972. Studies in the milliped order Chordeumida(Diplopoda): A revision of the family Cleidogonidae anda reclassification of the order Chordeumida in the NewWorld. Bull. Mus. Compo Zool., 144(4):151-352.Vigna Taglianti, A. 1972. The Trechinae of the ItalianZoological Expedition to Mexico, 1969 (Coleoptera,Carabidae). Ace. Naz. Lincei, Prob. Att. Sci. e Cultura,171:117-128.190

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintA CHECKLIST OF THE CAVE FAUNA OF MEXICO. VI.VALLE DE LOS FANTASMAS REGION, SAN LUIS POTOSl lWilliam R. Elliottand James R. ReddellDepartment of Biology, Texas Tech UniversityLubbock, Texas 79409This is the first report concerning the cave dwellingfauna of one of the highest altitude karst areas inMexico. The Valle de los Fantasmas Region lies in thewestern part of the Sierra Madre Oriental, specifically,in the Sierra de Alvarez which divides the L1anura deRIo Verde from the Valle de San Luis POtOSI: Theregion, as defined in this report, lies wholly withinthe Munic(pio de Zaragoza and is about 17 km wideand 28 km long (see map, Fig. 1). The largest villagein the region is San Francisco, which may be reachedby Highway 86 from Ciudad Valles, 227 km to theeast, or San Luis POtOSI: 38 km to the west. Elevationsrange from about 2600 m to 2900 m above sealevel.Floristically, the area may be characterized accordingto the scheme of Rzedowski (1965). Most of theregion is "Encinar arbustivo" (oak scrub). a very openwoodland with expanses of savannah and occasionalclusters of Opuntia and Agave. About 15 km south ofSan Francisco the vegetation abruptly changes tojuniper and, on the higher peaks nearby, pine. This ispresumably related to the presence of volcanic soils(Rzedowski, 1965). The climate is temperate (themean annual temperature is probably 15°·16°C) andsemi-humid (an estimated 1000 mm of rainfall yearly).Geologically, the area is complex and has not beenadequately studied. The Cretaceous limestone hasbeen intensely folded and ranges from massive to thinbedded from east to west. Metamorphosis is apparent,especially in the southern and western areas. RedlSupported in part by the Ralph W. Stone Research Awardfrom the National Speleological Society.Earth is common in many areas (good examples maybe seen along Highway 86 between Valle de los Fan·tasmas and Puerto Altamira). Karst development ismore advanced on the eastern side of the area. Massivekarren, lapies, and karst pinnacles have developednear San Francisco and in the Valle de los Fantasmasimmediately to the west. Presumably, the building-sizekarst pinnacles in the Valle de los Fantasmas are thesource of the name Fantasmas (phantoms), as theyappear rather ghostly in the frequent fogs encounteredat these elevations. The development of s6tanos isoften controlled, especially in the western areas, bysteeply dipping or vertical beds. Igneous activity hasfurther complicated the geology, especially to thesouth in the vicinity of Cueva de la Puente. This systemdrains a 1 km diameter dolina which is actually avalley flanked by volcanic ridges and blocked at thesouth end by an igneous bridge (La Puente). Theactual extent of the karst is not presently known, butuninvestigated karst terrain may be seen to the northfrom Puerto Altamira. The area south of Cueva de laVirgen has not been investigated.The area was first visited by AMCS members inAugust 1966. John Fish, David McKenzie, JamesReddell, and Richard M. Smith explored seven smallpits ranging from 10 to 43 m deep. Cueva de Aguacateand Cueva de Carnicenas were also visited and afew collections made. Fish entered the impressive s6tano de San Francisco but was unable to reach thebottom because the rope was not long enough (Fishand Reddell, 1966). The area was again visited inNovember 1966 by Jonathan Davis, John Fish, CharlieJennings, Charlie and Susie Loving, and Mac Mc-191

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintLaughlin (Fish, 1966). This time Fish reached thebottom of Sotano de San Francisco, but found onlywater and no place to get off. Biological collectionswere made from several unspecified pits in the immediatearea, and from Sotano de Carlos. Mexisphodrusbeetles and the first specimens of Mexaphaenops fishiBarr, a troglobite carabid beetle, were collected onthis trip. As interest in the area grew, nine more expeditionsinvolving forty persons were made to theregion in the years 1969, 1971, and 1972. To date,fifty caves and pits have been reported. Forty-eightof these have been explored, eighteen have beenmapped, and twenty-one have been studied biologically.Sixteen of the caves and pits have no namesand at least seven (most in the immediate San Franciscoarea) have not been accurately located on a map.Brief descriptions of the caves that have been studiedbiologically and other important caves are given below.Maps and descriptions of many of these cavesare given by Walsh (1972).Sotano de Abernathy-This small pit (22 m drop)is located in the "Los Sotanos Unidos" area, about2 km west of San Francisco. A hole 6 m above thefloor leads into a parallel dome-pit, the bottom ofwhich is 38 m below the surface. The pit was mappedin January 1969 by Miles Abernathy, William Elliott,and David Honea.Cueva del Agua-Located about 14 km SSE of SanFrancisco in the Canon de Chivos, this cave ends in asiphon and mud fill after 120 m. The cave was mappedin March 1969 by Jimmy Jarl and Brian Peterson,but no biological collections were made.Sotano de las Aranas-This pit is located in theLos Sotanos Unidos area and is developed alongstrongly folded bedding planes. The beds dip 65° atthe entrance and steepen to 90° farther down. Theentrance is 3 m in diameter and drops 46 m to a talusslope, which ends at the 61 m level. Numerous Recentmammal bones were observed in the cave. The cavewas mapped in November 1968 by Joe Cepeda andRussell Harmon.Cueva de los Caballos-This cave is about 400 mNW of Sotano de las Aranas, near the bottom of asmall valley. The 6 m high, 9 m wide entrance leadsinto a 13 m x 15 m room formed under verticallydipping beds. About 30 m of low passage leads fromthe east end of the room in the dark zone, where theair temperature was 17°C. The entrance room issometimes used as a horse corral. The cave wasmapped in January 1969 by Joe Cepeda and RussellHarmon.50tano de Carlos-This pit is about 2 km N of SanFrancisco on the other side of a pass. The 2 m diam·eter entrance is under a boulder and drops 88 m to aroom 8 m wide and 23 m long. The total depth is 99m. The cave was mapped in November 1968 byRussell Harmon and David Honea.Cueva de Carnicerlas-This cave was visited in 1966and is located in the karst valley containing the villageof San Francisco. The cave is a single room formedby collapse and is about 15 m in diameter and 9 mdeep.Cueva de Cinquenta y Ocho-This 105 m long cavelies 1 km W of the village of Cinquenta y Ocho nearthe top, and on the south side of an east-west valley.The cave is about 3 m wide and 5 m high for most ofits length. The air temperature was 14.5°C at the endof the cave. The cave was mapped in May 1972 byWilliam Elliott, Pam Lynn, and Ron Ralph.Cueva de Entrada Chica-This cave is a 35 m deepvertical pit with a 0.5 m in diameter entrance. It islocated in Valle de los Fantasmas and was visited in1966.Sumidero de Fantasmas-This large sink, locatednorth of the highway in Valle de los Fantasmas, wasvisited in 1966. It is a vertical shaft 6 m wide, 10 mlong, and 30 m deep. It receives the flood waters of along flat draw. There is no horizontal extent and thefloor is of deep mud.Sotano de la Golondrina-This pit is about 500 mwest of Highway 86 at the "Agua" sign, which is800 m north of the cobblestone road leading to theLos Sotanos Unidos area. The 3 m diameter entrancedrops 18 m to the top of a muddy talus slope. Theroom at the bottom of the slope is 15 m wide and 12m high. The total depth is 38 m. A 10 m long sidepassage at the 18 m level contains many arthropods.The pit was mapped in November 1968 by MarthaBurk,Sharon Cathey, William Elliott, and Jimmy Jar!.Cueva de la Iglesia-This cave is located 1.6 kmwest of San Francisco in the Valle de los Fantasmas.The 15 m wide, 4 m high entrance slopes down to asingle room which is 30 m wide, 40 m long and 14 mhigh. The total depth is 14 m. The cave was mappedin November 1968 by Keith Heuss, Jimmy Jarl, JimMel ntire, Brian Peterson, and Joe Sumbera, but nobiological collections were made.Cueva de la Laguna-This cave is located on thewest side of a stock tank, about 5 km north of Highway86 in the Valle de los Fantasmas. It may bereached by a dirt road. The 6 m wide, 2 to 3 m highentrance leads into a 12 m long, 5 to 6 m wide room,then under a natural bridge into a 9 m square room.The passage continues for 9 m to a crawlway whichgoes up to the left for 5 or 6 m. The cave wasmapped in May 1972 by William Elliott and Mike192

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintMcEachern, and is about 34 m long. The air temperaturewas 17°C.Cueva de las Moscas-This 12 m long cave wasvisited in 1968. It is located at the base of a cliffabout 2 km south of San Francisco and about 150 mnorthwest of the dirt road to La Puente.Sotano de Nopales-This pit lies about 1 kmsouthwest of the village of Cinquenta y Ocho nearthe top of a ridge. The 14 m long, 4 m wide entrancedrops 26 m to a 40 m long sloping room. The pit wasmapped in November 1968 by Duane Faith andJimmy Jar!.Sotano de Ojo de Agua-This deep pit is locatedapproximately 8 or 9 km ESE of San Francisco inthe Sierra de los Arboles. A two hour hike over confusing,obscure trails is required to reach it. The 8 mdiameter entrance drops 71 m to the top of a talusslope. Short drops of 2, 3, 2, and 5 m lead to thelowest level at 97 m. A 35 m long, muddy passagedoubles back under the entrance at the 93 m level.The mud temperature in this passage was 13.5°C. Thepit was mapped in November 1968 by William Elliottand Jimmy Jarl.Sotano del Pajaro-This pit is located in the LosSotanos Unidos area. It has two entrances, 2 m and0.5 m in diameter, which connect at the 5 m level.The larger entrance drops 27 m into a 2 m wide, 10m long fissure. At the south end of the fissure there isa 6 m drop to a ledge, then a 25 m drop to the mainroom of the cave. This room is about 9 m in diameter.A 20 m long, 5 m wide, 8 m high passage strikesnortheast and ends abruptly. This passage is formedin 70° dipping beds. The lowest point is in the mainroom (61 m). The bottom of the final drop is litteredwith many bones (Peromyscus, weasel, skunk, deer,pig, goat, and horse). The pit was mapped in January1969 by William Elliott and David Honea.Cueva de la Puente-This large cave is located inthe Dolina de la Puente about 17 km SSE of SanFrancisco. The cave is formed in metamorphosedlimestone. It is not uncommon to see cobbles of serpentine,rhyolite, and limestone together on the cavefloor, as well as red and yellow streaks in the cavewalls. The cave has two entrances. The main arroyoentrance is 24 m wide and 8 m high and accepts mostof the run-off from the volcanic ridges that flank thedol ina. The 6 m diameter upper entrance is located100 m inside the main entrance but does not appearto take any run-off. The 5 m high, 12 m wide passagecontinues until a 1 m high crawlway is encountered240 m inside the main entrance. After 100 m thepassage opens up to 12 m wide and 2 to 5 m high.This continues for 180 m, at which point a smallstream enters from a fissure on the right. This high,narrow fissure has been explored for about 300 m towhere it ends in a breakdown room. The main passagecontinues at the same width and with ceiling heightsup to 15 m for 800 m to the Big Room, which is 60m long, 24 m wide, and 25 to 30 m high. A largestream passage enters from the left. This may be followedover cascades and through small lakes forabout 300 m upstream, and roughly southeast, towhere the water spurts out of a small hole in thewall. At the Big Room the two streams merge andcontinue another 240 m to a siphon. The cave meandersfrom northeast to northwest and strikes north.The terminal siphon lies close to a large, sawdust filleddolina near a junction of the La Puente road, 0.5 kmnorth of the Dolina de la Puente. Terraced sandbanks,large cobbles, and large logs attest to the violentflooding which the cave must undergo at times. As aresult, most of the cave fauna is washed in. Accordingto the local inhabitants, the cave has two resurgences,Cueva de la Virgen and Cueva de Salida delAgua de la Puente, which will be discussed below. Theair temperature in the cave was 21° to 21.5°C, andthe water temperature was 18°-19°C. The cave isconsiderably warmer than other caves in the regionand this might be explained by the close proximityof volcanic rock. The cave was mapped in March1969 by Logan McNatt, Brian Peterson, Joe Sumbera,Mike Walsh, and Gail Webster. About 2400 m of passagehave been explored and 2066 m mapped, makingthis the largest cave in the Valle de los FantasmasRegion.Sotano de Puerto de los Lobos-This impressivepit is located 2.7 km south of San Francisco on thesouthern slope of the Sierra de los Arboles. The fullname is Sotano Hondo de la Sierra de los Arboles dePuerto de los Lobos. The 10 m diameter entrance isobscured by a thicket of oaks. It does not appear totake surface run-off. The entrance drops 179 m tothe top of a steep talus slope. At the bottom of theslope is a 5.5 m drop to a mud slope which ends after30 m at the low point, 198 m below the entrance. It ispossible to rig the pit to obtain a 189 m free drop. Atthe top of the talus slope is an 8 m x 12 m, 15 m highroom, the floor of which is covered with 15 cm ofwater. A small seep trickles out of the wall and thewater flows out of the room and sinks in the talUS.At the time of its discovery, the pit was the thirddeepest drop in Mexico. It was mapped in September1968 by William Elliott, Duane Faith, Jim Mcintire,and Joe Sumbera.Cueva de Salida del Agua de la Puente-This caveis located in the Canon de Chivos, 14 km SSE of SanFrancisco, and about 2.6 km northeast of the terminalsiphon in Cueva de la Puente. It is rumored to be193

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprinta wet weather resurgence for Cueva de la Puente.Large trees have been reported to wash out of thecave during heavy rains. The cave is a large passagewhich ends after 122 m in a mud and water siphon.The cave was mapped in March 1969 by Brian Petersonand Jimmy Jarl, but no biological collectionswere made."Cave at San Francisco"-This cave was visited in1966 but it was not mapped and its exact location isunknown.Sotano de San Francisco-This impressive pit islocated in the village of San Francisco. The steepsidedarroyo leading to the cave carries a small, swiftstream during the rainy season. The 3 x 4.5 m entrancedrops 102 m to a 21 m long, 4.5 m wide poolfull of human fecal matter. A 2 m drop is then encountered,and then a 12 m long pool after 7 m ofdry ground. At the end of the second pool is an unenteredpit, estimated to be between 170 and 245 mdeep. This pit could lead to an extensive system. Thecave was first entered by John Fish in August 1966and again in November 1966 at which time he drewa sketch map (Fish, 1966). The pit was mapped tothe top of the second drop in May 1972 by MikeMcEachern and Ron Ralph. The water temperaturewas 14.5°_15°C.Sotano de San Francisco n. 2-This pit is located1 km south of San Francisco in a 12 m diameter dolina.The pit follows a vertical bedding plane down toa water filled passage, 43 m below the surface. Thispassage goes 7 m, turns left, goes another 11 m, andends in a 5 m long, muddy room. The water temperaturewas 12°C. The cave was partially mapped inJanuary 1969 by William Elliott and David Honea.The map was completed in May 1972 by WilliamElliott and Mike McEachern.Cueva de Sierra Blanca-This cave is located 10.5km south of San Francisco, about 1 km up a canyonfrom the La Puente road. The 10 m wide, 5 m highentrance leads into a 24 m long, 10 m wide room,then another room of the same dimensions. Twowalking passages extend from the second room, onefor 46 m to a breakdown choke, the other to a 3 mdiameter room and then to a smaller entrance. Thecave was visited in September 1968 but was notmapped nor investigated biologically.Sotano de Super-Macho-This small, 14 m blindpit was visited in January 1969. It is located in theLos Sotanos Unidos area."Small cave at Valle de los Fantasmas"-This cavewas visited in 1966, but its exact location is unknown."Sink at Valle de los Fantasmas"-This was visitedin 1966, but its exact location is unknown."Sotano at Valle de los Fantasmas"-This pit wasvisited in 1966, but its exact location is unknown.Cueva de la Virgen-This cave is located 2.5 kmsoutheast of Cueva de la Puente. It is reported by thelocal people to flow during wet weather. Presumably,it is a resurgence for Cueva de la Puente. Past the 24m high, 6 m wide entrance, the passage slopes upwardfor about 61 m to a water filled passage whichretains the passage dimensions of 24 m in height and12 m in Width. The cave has not been mapped norstudied biologically. It was explored in November1968 by Duane Faith, Jim Mcintire, Bill Ramsel, andJoe Sumbera.This report is not a complete summary of the taxathat have been collected in this region. Several newspecies await description, particularly among the millipedes,spiders, and crickets. Terrestrial isopods havebeen collected in Cueva de la Puente and Cueva de laLaguna and are being studied by Dr. George A.Schultz.It is most interesting to note that of the 98 specieslisted in this report (93 of them invertebrates), onlytwo may be considered troglobites (one millipede andone carabid beetle). This contrasts sharply with thenature of the cave fauna of the Sierra de Guatemala,which has a rather high number and percentage ofcave-adapted forms (about 18% of the invertebrates)(Mitchell, 1969; Reddell and Mitchell, 1971; Reddelland Elliott, 1973al. The troglobite fauna of the Vallede los Fantasmas region (about 2% of the invertebrates)also contrasts strongly with that of the Sierrade EI Abra (about 9% of the invertebrates) (Reddelland Mitchell, 1971a; Reddell and Elliott, 1973),a lowland,semi-tropical area where one would expect thelowest number and percentage of cave adapted species,according to Mitchell's hypothesis (1969). Inaddition, there are no aquatic troglobites in the Vallede los Fantasmas region, whereas aquatic species makeup 50% and 27% of the invertebrate troglobites in theSierra de EI Abra and Sierra de Guatemala, respectively.Furthermore, the cave fauna of the Valle de losFantasmas region appears to have few affinities withthose of the other two regions, and perhaps has hada much different history of colonization. Althoughlittle is known of the relative ages of cave systems inthese three areas, we find it tempting to speculate thatclimatic changes in such a high altitude area as Vallede los Fantasmas may have been much more drasticthan in the two lower areas we are comparing, especiallyduring the Pleistocene. Severe changes may haveserved not only to wipe out epigean forms but incipientcave forms as well.The cave names given in the following checklist arethose accepted as standard by the Association for194

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintMexican Cave Studies. Troglobites are indicated byan asterisk.We wish to express our appreciation to the followingpeople who have assisted in the collecting ormade specimens available to us: Miles Abernathy,James Baldwin, Sam Billings, Martha Burk, GlennCampbell, Sharon Cathey, Joe Cepeda, John A.L.Cooke, Jonathan Davis, Duane Faith, John Fish,Gordon Graves, Russell Harmon, Keith Heuss, DavidHonea, Jimmy Jarl, Charlie Jennings, Jerry Johnson,Danny Kiser, Charlie Loving, Susie Loving, AnnLucas, Pam Lynn, Mike McEachern, David McKenzie,Jim Mcintire, Mac McLaughlin, Robert Mitchell, BrianPeterson, Ron Ralph, Bill Ramsel, Richard M.Smith, and Joe Sumbera.We wish to thank the following systematists fortheir identifcation of the taxa included in this report:R.K. Allen, mayflies; D.M. Anderson, beetles;T.C. Barr, Jr., beetles; A. Brindle, earwigs; G.W. Byers,crane flies; RW. Carlson, ichneumonid wasps; O.L.Cartwright, beetles; N.B. Causey, millipedes; K.C.Christiansen, collembolans; D.R. Davis, moths; O.S.Flint, caddis flies, damselflies, and dragonflies; R.C.Froeschner, hemipterans; R.J. Gagne, flies; G.E.Gates, earthworms; W.J. Gertsch, spiders; C.J. andM.L. Goodnight, harvestmen; A.B. Gurney, earwigs;L.H. Herman, beetles; H.F. Howden, beetles; T.H.Hubbell, crickets; L.V. Knutson, flies; J.D. Lynch,frogs; T.R. Mollhagen, bats; W.B. Muchmore, pseudoscorpions;R. Newcomer, salamanders; D.R. Smith,ants; P.J. Spangler, beetles; T.J. Spilman, beetles; G.C.Steyskal, flies; S. Szerlip, hemipterans; R.E. White,beetles; W.W. Wirth, flies.PHYLUM ANNELIDACLASS CLITELLATAOrder OligochaetaFamily LumbricidaeDendrobaena rubida (Savigny) (det. G.E. Gates)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Bibliography-Gates, 1973a.Comment-This species is probably of Europeanorigin.Octolasion tyrtaeum (Savigny) (det. G.E. Gates)Records-Sotano de la Golondrina, S6tano deNopales, and 50tano de Ojo de Agua.Bibliography-Gates, 1971; 1973; 1973a.Comment-This species is probably of Europeanorigin.PHYLUM ARTHORPODACLASS ARACHNIDAOrder ScorpionidaFamily VejovidaeVejovis sp. nr. granulatus Pocock (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-S6tano de Carlos.Comment-This probably represents an undescribedspecies.Order ChelonethidaFamily CheliferidaeMexichelifer reddelli MuchmoreRecords-Cueva de Carnicerlas.Bibliography-Muchmore, 1973.Family ChernetidaeUndetermined genus and speciesRecords-Cueva de Cinquenta y Ocho.Comment-A single protonymph was collectedin the dark zone.Order AraneaeSuborder MygalomorphaeFamily BarychelidaeZygopelma sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-S6tano de Puerto de los Lobos.Comment-This apparently represents an undescribedspecies.Family TheraphosidaeSchizopelma elliotti GertschRecords-Cueva de la Laguna.Bibliography-Gertsch, 1973.Suborder AraneomorphaeFamily AgelenidaeTegenaria selva Roth (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-S6tano de Abernathy, Sotano de lasAranas, Cueva de los Caballos, Sotano de laGolondrina, Cueva de la Laguna, Cueva delas Moscas, Sotano de Puerto de los Lobos,and Sotano de Ojo de Agua.Bibliography-Gertsch, 1971.Family CaponiidaeOrthonops lapanus Gertsch and Mulaik (det. W.J.Gertsch)Records-Sotano at Valle de los Fantasmas.Family ClubionidaePhrurotimpus sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Comment-This species is probably an accidental.195

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintFamily LinyphiidaeEperigone sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Sotano de Puerto de los Lobos.Family NesticidaeNesticus pallidus Emerton (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Cueva de la Laguna, Sotano de laGolondrina, Cueva de la Puente, Sotano deSan Francisco, and Sotano at Valle de losFantasmas.Bibliography-Gertsch, 1971.Family PholcidaeCoryssocnemis abernathyi GertschRecords-Sotano de Abernathy, Cueva de losCaballos, Sotano de la Golondrina, and Cuevade las Moscas.Bibliography-Gertsch, 1971; 1973.Metagonia punctata Gertsch (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Cueva de Carnicenas, Cueva de EntradaChica, Cueva de la Puente, and Sotanoat Valle de los Fantasmas.Bibliography-Gertsch, 1971; 1973.Modisimus sp. (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Sotano at Valle de los Fantasmas.Psilochorus concinnus Gertsch (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Cueva de Cinquenta y Ocho.Bibliography-Gertsch, 1973.Family SymphytognathidaeMaymena chica Gertsch (det. W.J. Gertsch)Records-Cueva de los Caballos, Cueva de Cinquentay Ocho, and Cueva de la Puente.Bibliography-Gertsch, 1973.Order OpilionidaFamily CosmetidaeCynorta jamesoni Goodnight and GoodnightRecords-Sotano de Puerto de los Lobos.Bibliography-Goodnight and Goodnight, 1973.Family PhalangodidaeKaras parvus Goodnight and GoodnightRecords-Sotano de Puerto de los Lobos.Bibliography-Goodnight and Goodnight, 1971.CLASS 01 PLOPOOAOrder ChordeumidaFamily Trichopetalidae*Poterpes egeo CauseyRecords-Cueva de la Puente and ?Sotano dePuerto de los Lobos.Bibliography-Causey, 1969; Reddell, 1971.Comment-This troglobite is presently knownonly from these two caves.Order JulidaFamily ParaiulidaeParaiulus sp. (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Cueva de Carnicenas, Sumidero deFantasmas, and Sotano de Puerto de losLobos.Comment-This is apparently an undescribedspecies.Order PolydesmidaFamily RhachodesmidaeStrongylodesmus sp. (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Sotano de Puerto de los Lobos.Strongylodesmus potasianus (Chamberlin) (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Sumidero de Fantasmas.Bibliography-Causey, 1973.Tiphallus frivolus Causey (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Sotano de Nopales.Bibliography-Causey, 1973.Family StylodesmidaeBolivaresmus sp. (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Comment-This is apparently a new species.Ceratesmus sp. (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Cueva de Cinquenta y Ocho.Comment-This is apparently a new species.Family XystodesmidaeRhysodesmus sp. (det. N.B. Causey)Records-Sumidero de Fantasmas.CLASS INSECTAOrder OipluraFamily CampodeidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. W. R. Elliott)Records-Cueva de los Caballos.Comment-A single specimen was taken in thedark zone.Order CollembolaFamily EntomobryidaePseudosinella reddelli Christiansen (det. K. Christiansen)Records-Cueva de Cinquenta y Ocho, Sotanode la Golondrina, Sotano de Ojo de Agua,and Cueva de la Puente.Bibliography-Christiansen, 1973.Family LeptophlebiidaeOrder Ephemeroptera196

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintNeochoroterpes mexicanus Allen (det. R.K. Allen)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Comment-Nymphs were taken in 19°C stagnantwater.Order OdonataFamily CoenagrionidaeArgia sp. (det. O.S. Flint)Records-Cueva de la Puente and S6tano de SanFrancisco.Comment-Nymphs were taken from water inboth caves.Family CordulegasteridaeCordulegaster diadema Selays (det. O.S. Flint)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Comment-One nymph was collected from 19°Cstagnant water.Order DermapteraFamily ForficulidaeAncistrogaster sp. ct. toltecus (Scudder) (det. A.B.Gurney and A. Brindle)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Comment-This is apparently a new species.Ancistrogaster impennis Bormans (det. A.B. Gurney)Records-Cueva de Carnicerlas.Order HemipteraFamily BelostomatidaeAbedus immensus Menke (det. R.C. Froeschner)Records-Cueva de la Laguna and Cueva de laPuente.Comment-A male with eggs on its back wastaken in a stagnant pool in Cueva de laPuente.Family DipsocoridaeUnidentified genus and species (det. S. Szerlip)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Family GerridaeGerris remigis Say (det. R.C. Froeschner)Records-Sotano de San Francisco n. 2.Comment-This common species was abundantin the 12°C water at the bottom of the cave.Family VeliidaeMicrovelia ? beameri McKinstry (det. S. Szerlip)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Rhagovelia varipes Champion (det. S. Szerlip)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Order SaltatoriaFamily RhaphidophoridaeExochodrilus sp. (det. T.H. Hubbell)Records-Sotano de Abernathy, Sotano de lasAraiias, Sotano de Carlos, Cueva de Carnicerlas,Cueva de Entrada Chica, Sumidero deFantasmas, Sotano de la Golondrina, Sotanode Ojo de Agua, Cueva de las Moscas, Sotanodel Pajaro, Sotano de Puerto de los Lobos,Sotano de Super-Macho, and Sotano at Vallede los Fantasmas.Comment-This apparently represents an undescribedspecies. Crickets taken in Cueva delos Caballos, Cueva de Cinquenta y Ocho,and Cueva de la Laguna are probably thisspecies.Order ColeopteraFamily CantharidaeDiscodon sp. (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-Cueva de la PuenteFamily CarabidaeAgonum (Platynus) sp. (det. T.C. Barr)Records-Sotano de la GOlondrina and Cuevade la Puente.Comment-This species may be a troglophile ortrogloxene.Amara sp. (det. T.C. Barr)Records-Sotano de la Golondrina.Comment-This is probably an accidental.Bembidion sp. (det. T.C. Barr)Records-Sotano de San Francisco n. 2.Comment-This is probably an accidental.Colpodes sp. (det. T.C. Barr)Records-Sotano de Puerto de los Lobos.*Mexaphaenops fishi Barr (det. T.C. Barr)Records-Small cave at Valle de los Fantasmasand Sotano de la Golondrina.Bibliography-Barr, 1967; 1971.Comment-This is an apparent troglobite.? Mexisphodrus sp. (det. T.C. Barr)Records-Sumidero de Fantasmas, Sotano de laGolondrina, Sotano del Pajaro, Cueva de laPuente, Sotano de Puerto de los Lobos, Sotanode San Francisco n. 2, and Sink at Vallede los Fantasmas.Comment-This troglophilic species may actuallybelong in the genus Colpodes.Family ChrysomelidaeHeikertingerella sp. (det. R.E. White)197

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintRecords-SOtano de San Francisco n. 2.Comment-This accidental species was taken inthe twilight zone of the entrance pit.Family ElateridaeAeolus sp. (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-Sumidero de Fantasmas.Family ElmidaeCylloepus sp. (det. P.J. Spangler)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Family LampyridaeUnidentified genus & species (det. D.M. Anderson)Records-Sotano de Puerto de los Lobos.Comment-Only larvae of this family were collected.Family PtilodactylidaePtilodactyla sp. (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-Cueva de fa Puente.Family ScarabaeidaeAncognatha manca LeConte (det. H.F. Howden)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Comment-This species is common in Mexicoand is accidental in the cave.Aphodius sp. (det. H.F. Howden)Records-Cueva de los Caballos.Comment-A single specimen was collected inthe entrance area, where it may have beenfeeding on dung.Ataenius cognatus LeConte (det. O.L. Cartwright)Records-Sumidero de Fantasmas.Diplotaxis sp. (det. O.L. Cartwright)Records-Sotano de Puerto de los Lobos.Family SilphidaeSilpha cayennensis Sturm. (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Family StaphylinidaeAleocharinae genus et sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Carpelimus sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Deleaster trimaculata Fall (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Homaeotarsus sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Neomedon sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Staphylinus sp. (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Stilicolina condei Jarrige (det. L.H. Herman)Records-Cueva de la Puente and Cave at SanFrancisco.Comment-This troglophile species ranges northinto Texas.Family TenebrionidaeEleodes sp. (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-Cueva de los Caballos and Cueva deCinquenta y Ocho.Comment-Specimens were collected at the darkedge of the twilight zone in Cueva de losCaballos and in the entrance of Cueva deCinquenta y Ocho.Eleodes sp. nr. rotundicollis Eschscholtz (det. T.J.Spilman)Records-Cueva de Carnicenas.Eleodes sp. nr. solieri Champion (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-Sotano at Valle de los Fantasmas.Eleodes sallei Champion (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-Sotano de Abernathy, Cueva de Cin·quenta y Ocho, Sotano de la Golondrina,Cueva de las Moscas, Sotano de Nopales, Sotanode Ojo de Agua, Sotano del Pajaro, Sotanode Puerto de los Lobos, and Sotano deSuper-Macho.Comment-This species is a trogloxene. Onespecimen was collected in the dark zone ofCueva de Cinquenta y Ocho.Eleodes solieri Champion (det. T.J. Spilman)Records-Sumidero de Fantasmas.Order TrichopteraFamily CalamoceratidaePhylloicus sp. (det. O.S. Flint)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Comment-larvae and their leaf-constructedcases were collected in 19°C stagnant water.Family PhilopotamidaeWormaldia sp. (det. O.S. Flint)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Comment-A single female was collected in thedark zone.Family PsychomyiidaePolycentrepus sp. (det. O.S. Flint)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Comment-One larva was collected in 19°C stagnantwater.Polycentrepus picana Ross (det. O.S. Flint)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Comment-One adult was collected in the darkzone.Order LepidopteraFamily TineidaeTinea sp. (det. D.R. Davis)Records-Cueva de la laguna.Family CalliphoridaeOrder Diptera198

AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintCalliphora vicina R.·D. (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Satano de San Francisco.Comment-One adult was collected at the bot·tom of the entrance pit near a pool ladenwith human fecal matter.Phaenicia sp. (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Satano de San Francisco.Comment-A single larva was taken from a poolladen with fecal matter at the bottom of theentrance pit.Family CecidomyiidaeLestodiplosis sp. (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Family ChironomidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. W.W. Wirth)Records-Satano de Oio de Agua.Family DolichopodidaeChrysotus sp. (det. G.C. Steyskal)Records-Satano de San Francisco n. 2.Peloreopeodes cornutus Van Duzee (det. G.C.Steyskal)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Family DrosophilidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. W.W. Wirth)Records-Satano at Valle de los Fantasmas.Drosophila sp. (det. W.W. Wirth)Records-Sotano de San Francisco n. 2.Family EmpididaeDrapetis sp. (det. G.C. Steyskal)Records-Sotano at Valle de los Fantasmas.Family MycetophilidaeUnidentified genus and species (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Rymosia sp. (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Cueva de los Caballos and Cueva deCinquenta y Ocho.Family ScenopinidaePseudatrichia sp. nr. melanderi Kelsey (det. L.V.Knutson)Records-Cueva de Cinquenta y Ocho.Family SciaridaeBradysia sp. (det. R.J. Gagne)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Family SphaeroceridaeLeptocera sp. (det. G.C. Steyskal)Records-Cueva de Cinquenta y Ocho and Sa·tano de San Francisco n. 2.Family TipulidaeEpiphragma (EpiphragmaJ sp. (det. G.W. Byers)Records-Sotano de San Francisco.Comment-This may be a new species.Limonia (DicranomyiaJ sp. (det. G.W. Byers)Records-Satano de la Golondrina.Order HymenopteraFamily FormicidaePheidole sp. (det. D.R. Smith)Records-Satano de San Francisco n. 2.Comment-Accidental; the head and thorax of aworker were collected at the bottom of theentrance pit.Tapinoma sp. (det. D.R. Smith)Records-Sumidero de Fantasmas.Family IchneumonidaeOrthocentrus sp. (det. R.W. Carlson)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Comment-This is probably a parasite of fungusgnats (Mycetophilidae).PHYLUM CHORDATACLASS AMPHIBIAOrder UrodelaFamily AmbystomidaeAmbystoma tigrinum (Green) (det. R. Newcomer,W. R. Elliott)Records-Satano de Abernathy, Satano de laGolondrina, and Satano de Puerto de losLobos.Family PlethodontidaePseudoeurycea sp. (det. J.R. Reddell)Records-Satano de Abernathy, Sotano de laGolondrina, Sotano de Puerto de los Lobos,and Sotano de Oio de Agua.Bibliography-Walsh, 1972.Comment-This species is frequently found onthe walls of entrance pits.Order AnuraFamily LeptodactylidaeSyrrhophus longipes (Baird) (det. J.D. Lynch)Records-Satano de Puerto de los Lobos.Comment-A single frog collected from Satanode la Golondrina may be this species.CLASS MAMMALIAOrder ChiropteraFamily PhyllostomatidaeArtibeus sp. (det. T.R. Mollhagen)Records-Cueva de la Puente.Comment-A colony of perhaps several hundredLeaf·nose bats roosts near the smaller, upperentrance. Other than one dead bat seen atthe bottom of Satano de Oio de Agua, bats199

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprinthave not been observed in any other cave inthe Valle de los Fantasmas Region.LITERATURE CITEDBarr, T.C., Jr. 1967. Three new cave trechines from Mexico(Col., Carab.l. Ciencia, Mex., 25: 161-166, figs. 1-6.Barr, T.C., Jr. 1971. A new species of Mexaphaenops fromTamaulipas, Mexico (Coleoptera: Carabidael. Assn. Mex.Cave Stud. Bull., 4: 113-116.Causey, N.B. 1969. New trichopetalid (Chordeumidea: Chordeumida)millipedes from caves in North and CentralAmerica. Proc. Louisiana Acad. Sci., 32:43-49.Causey, N.B. 1973. Millipedes in the collection of the Associationfor Mexican Cave Studies. II. Keys and additionalrecords and descriptions (DipIQPoda). Assn. Mex. CaveStud. Bull., 5:Christiansen, K. 1973. The genus Pseudosinella in Mesoamericancaves. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5:Fish, J. 1966. Trip report. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. News.,2(6):137-139.Fish, J., and J.R. Reddell. 1966. Trip report. Assn. Mex. CaveStud. News., 2(4):82-86.Gates, G.E. 1971. On some earthworms from Mexican caves.Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 4:3-8.Gates, G.E. 1973. Contributions to North Americanearthworms(Annelidal. No. 8-The earthworm genus Octo/asianin America. Bull. Tall Timbers Res. Sta., 14:29-50.Gates, G.E. 1973a. On more earthworms from Mexican caves.Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5:21-24.Gertsch, W.J. 1971. A report on some Mexican cave spiders.Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 4:47-111.Gertsch, W.J. 1973. A report on cave spiders from Mexicoand Central America. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5:Goodnight, C.J., and M.L. Goodnight. 1971. Opilionids(Phalangida) of the family Phalangodidae from Mexicancaves. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 4:33-45.Goodnight, C.J., and M.L. Goodnight. 1973. Opilionids(Phalangida) from Mexican caves. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud.Bull.,5:Mitchell, R.W. 1969. A comparison of temperate and tropicalcave communities. Southwestern Nat., 14( 1): 73-88.Muchmore, W.B. 1973. New and little known pseudoscorpiions,mainly from caves in Mexico (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpionidal.Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 5:47-62.Reddell, J.R. 1971. A preliminary bibliography of Mexicancave biology, with a checklist of published records. Assn.Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 3. 184 pp.Reddell, J.R., and R.W. Mitchell. 1971. A checklist of thecave fauna of Mexico. II. Sierra de Guatemala, Tamaulipas.Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 4: 181-215.Reddell, J.R., and R.W. Mitchell. 1971a. A checklist of thecave fauna of Mexico. I. Sierra de EI Abra, Tamaulipasand San Luis POtOSI: Assn. Mex. Cave Stud. Bull., 4:137-180.Reddell, J.R., and W.R. Elliott. 1973. A checklist of the cavefauna of Mexico. IV. Additional records from the Sierrade EI Abra, Tamaulipas and San Luis POtOSI: Assn. Mex.Cave Stud. Bull., 5:Reddell, J.R., and W.R. Elliott. 1973a. A checklist of thecave fauna of Mexico. V. Additional records from theSierra de Guatemala, Tamaulipas. Assn. Mex. Cave Stud.Bull.,5:Rzedowski, J. 1965. Vegetacion del Estado de San LuisPotosi: Contribuciones del Instituto de Investigacion deZonas Deserticas, Universidad Autonoma de San LuisPOtOSI: No. 20, Act. Cien. Potos., 5( 1-2): 1-291.Walsh, M., ed. 1972. Mexican caving of the Southwest TexasGrotto. Southwest Texas Grotto, San Marcos. 146 pp.Fig. 1. Map of Valle de los Fantasmas Region, San Luis POtOSI: Mexico, showing known caves. Dots represent caves for whichbiological records are available, stars represent other caves, and question marks indicate caves for which locations are uncertain.Key to caves: 1. Cueva de la Laguna; 2. Sotano de Carlos; 3. Cueva de los Caballos; 4. Sotano de la Golondrina; 5. Sumidero deFantasmas; 6. Sotano del Pajaro; 7. Unnamed 35 m pit; 8. Sotano de las Aranas; 9. Cueva Delgada; 10. Sotano de Abernathy;11. Sotano de Super-Macho; 12. Unnamed, unentered pit; 13? Cueva de Entrada Chica; 14? Cueva de Aguacate; 15? Cueva deCarnicenas; 16. Cueva de la Iglesia; 17. Sotano de San Francisco; 18. Sotano de Ojo de Agua; 19. Sotano de San Francisco n. 2;20. Cueva de las Moscas; 21. Sotano de Puerto de los Lobos; 22? Sotano de Enero; 23. Cueva de Cinquenta y Ocho; 24. Sotanode Nopales; 25. Cueva de Sierra Blanca; 26. Unnamed cave in sinkhole; 27. Unnamed 15 m pit; 28. Unnamed 10 m pit; 29. Unnamedlarge blind pit; 30. Unnamed small cave; 31? Cueva de Salida de Agua de la Puente; 32? Cueva del Agua; 33. Unnamedsmall pit; 34. Unnamed small cave; 35. Cueva de la Puente; 36? Cueva de la Virgen.200

AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprint----VAllE OE lOS.183WOr~32?CAI'lON DECHIVOSORAFfEO BY WILLIAM R. ElliOTT201

searchable PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?