15.08.2013 Views

Asia–Pacific tropical sea cucumber aquaculture - ACIAR

Asia–Pacific tropical sea cucumber aquaculture - ACIAR

Asia–Pacific tropical sea cucumber aquaculture - ACIAR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong><br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

<strong>ACIAR</strong> PROCEEDINGS 136


<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong><br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

Proceedings of an international symposium held in<br />

Noumea, New Caledonia, 15–17 February 2011<br />

Editors: Cathy A. Hair, Timothy D. Pickering and David J. Mills<br />

2012


The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>) was established in<br />

June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. <strong>ACIAR</strong> operates as part of Australia’s<br />

international development cooperation program, with a mission to achieve more productive<br />

and sustainable agricultural systems, for the benefit of developing countries and Australia.<br />

It commissions collaborative re<strong>sea</strong>rch between Australian and developing-country<br />

re<strong>sea</strong>rchers in areas where Australia has special re<strong>sea</strong>rch competence. It also administers<br />

Australia’s contribution to the International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Centres.<br />

Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination<br />

against any product by <strong>ACIAR</strong>.<br />

© Australian Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>) 2012<br />

This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act<br />

1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission<br />

from <strong>ACIAR</strong>, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia, aciar@aciar.gov.au<br />

Hair C.A., Pickering T.D. and Mills D.J. (eds) 2012. <strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong>. Proceedings of an international symposium held in Noumea, New<br />

Caledonia, 15–17 February 2011. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings No. 136. Australian Centre for<br />

International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. 209 pp.<br />

<strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings - ISSN 1038-6920 (print), ISSN 1447-0837 (online)<br />

ISBN 978 1 921962 34 9 (print)<br />

ISBN 978 1 921962 35 6 (online)<br />

<strong>ACIAR</strong> PROCEEDINGS SERIES<br />

This series of publications includes the full proceedings of re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

workshops or symposia organised or supported by <strong>ACIAR</strong>. Numbers<br />

in this series are distributed internationally to selected individuals<br />

and scientific institutions, and are also available from <strong>ACIAR</strong>’s<br />

website at . The papers in <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings<br />

are peer reviewed.<br />

Technical editing by Mason Edit, Adelaide, Australia<br />

Design by Clarus Design Pty Ltd, Canberra, Australia<br />

Printing by Canprint Communications Pty Ltd, Canberra, Australia<br />

Cover: Adult sandfish, Goulburn Island, Northern Territory, Australia.<br />

(Photo: Wayne Tupper)


Foreword<br />

Stocks of high-value <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> species have been overexploited throughout the<br />

<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> region. Their high value as a food and medicine in China and other<br />

parts of Asia, the ease of capture, the apparently insatiable demand for them and<br />

the lack of effective management indicate that this situation is unlikely to change<br />

any time soon. Better fisheries governance must be a priority; however, in many<br />

cases, the situation is beyond the point where improved management alone can<br />

restore populations.<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> is a recurring priority in development aspirations for<br />

Asian and Pacific island nations, driven by the depletion of stocks from overfishing<br />

and the subsequent loss of livelihoods and export dollars. Fortunately, for a small<br />

number of species, <strong>aquaculture</strong> and farming activities can assist in conserving wild<br />

stocks, while also generating income and boosting natural recovery. Consequently,<br />

there has been considerable re<strong>sea</strong>rch on the culture of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in<br />

the past two decades.<br />

In 2003 the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) held a<br />

large workshop on the advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management in<br />

Dalian, China—the first of its kind for re<strong>sea</strong>rch in this field. Today, there is still<br />

enormous interest in the topic, and the re<strong>sea</strong>rch has reached a critical juncture.<br />

In the <strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> region, most studies have concentrated on the ‘sandfish’<br />

(Holothuria scabra). Large numbers of juveniles can be reliably produced in<br />

hatcheries using relatively simple techniques, and these can be on-grown and<br />

transferred to ponds or suitable inshore marine habitats where they can reach<br />

commercial size in 1–3 years. The Australian Centre for International Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>) has provided significant, long-term re<strong>sea</strong>rch investment into<br />

sandfish culture in the region (primarily through the WorldFish Center). Projects<br />

have investigated large-scale hatchery culture of sandfish (Solomon Islands),<br />

techniques for releasing cultured juveniles into the wild (New Caledonia), and<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching and pond culture (the Philippines, Vietnam and Australia).<br />

It is timely to review this work, together with recent re<strong>sea</strong>rch from other parts<br />

of the world, in order to encourage collaboration and technology transfer, and<br />

to develop an effective way to ensure that the technology can deliver real benefits<br />

to poor rural communities. To this end, <strong>ACIAR</strong>, in collaboration with the<br />

Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC), organised a symposium on <strong>tropical</strong><br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> at SPC Headquarters in Noumea, New Caledonia, in<br />

February 2011. Although the principal focus was on <strong>ACIAR</strong> work, particularly<br />

in the <strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> region, re<strong>sea</strong>rchers from other parts of the world were invited<br />

to provide additional expertise.<br />

3


The symposium identified knowledge gaps and highlighted re<strong>sea</strong>rchable topics<br />

for future developments in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>. These proceedings will be<br />

a valuable resource for all practitioners in this field.<br />

Nick Austin<br />

Chief Executive Officer<br />

<strong>ACIAR</strong><br />

4


Contents<br />

Foreword 3<br />

Abbreviations 9<br />

Acknowledgments 10<br />

Regional overviews 11<br />

Overview of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and stocking re<strong>sea</strong>rch in the Western<br />

Pacific region 12<br />

Robert A. Jimmy, Timothy D. Pickering and Cathy A. Hair<br />

Overview of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and <strong>sea</strong>-ranching re<strong>sea</strong>rch in the<br />

South-East Asian region 22<br />

David J. Mills, Nguyen D.Q. Duy, Marie Antonette Juinio-Meñez,<br />

Christina M. Raison and Jacques M. Zarate<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> hatchery production 33<br />

Large-scale sandfish production from pond culture in Vietnam 34<br />

Nguyen D.Q. Duy<br />

In-vitro fertilisation: a simple, efficient method for obtaining <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

larvae year round 40<br />

Igor Eeckhaut, Thierry Lavitra, Aline Léonet,<br />

Michel Jangoux and Richard Rasolofonirina<br />

Evaluation of nutritional condition of juvenile sandfish (Holothuria scabra) 50<br />

Satoshi Watanabe, Jacques M. Zarate, Maria J.H. Lebata-Ramos<br />

and Marie F.J. Nievales<br />

Ocean nursery systems for scaling up juvenile sandfish (Holothuria scabra)<br />

production: ensuring opportunities for small fishers 57<br />

Marie Antonette Juinio-Meñez, Glycinea M. de Peralta, Rafael Junnar<br />

P. Dumalan, Christine Mae A. Edullantes and Tirso O. Catbagan<br />

Small-scale hatcheries and simple technologies for sandfish (Holothuria scabra)<br />

production 63<br />

Ruth U. Gamboa, Remie M. Aurelio, Daisy A. Ganad,<br />

Lance B. Concepcion and Neil Angelo S. Abreo<br />

5


Sandfish production and development of <strong>sea</strong> ranching in northern Australia 75<br />

William M. Bowman<br />

Hatchery experience and useful lessons from Isostichopus fuscus in Ecuador<br />

and Mexico 79<br />

Annie Mercier, Roberto H. Ycaza, Ramon Espinoza,<br />

Victor M. Arriaga Haro and Jean-François Hamel<br />

Sandfish <strong>sea</strong> ranching and farming 91<br />

Principles and science of stocking marine areas with <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s 92<br />

Steven W. Purcell<br />

Pond grow-out trials for sandfish (Holothuria scabra) in New Caledonia 104<br />

Natacha S. Agudo<br />

Ability of sandfish (Holothuria scabra) to utilise organic matter in black tiger<br />

shrimp ponds 113<br />

Satoshi Watanabe, Masashi Kodama, Jacques M. Zarate,<br />

Maria J.H. Lebata-Ramos and Marie F.J. Nievales<br />

Establishment and management of communal sandfish (Holothuria scabra)<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching in the Philippines 121<br />

Marie Antonette Juinio-Meñez, Marie Antonette S. Paña, Glycinea M. de Peralta,<br />

Tirso O. Catbagan, Ronald Dionnie D. Olavides, Christine Mae A. Edullantes<br />

and Bryan Dave D. Rodriguez<br />

Maldives <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> farming experience [Abstract only] 128<br />

Beni G.D. Azari and Grisilda Ivy Walsalam<br />

Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) production and <strong>sea</strong>-ranching trial in Fiji 129<br />

Cathy A. Hair<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> farming experiences in south-western Madagascar 142<br />

Georgina Robinson and Benjamin Pascal<br />

Sea ranching of sandfish in an Indigenous community within a well-regulated<br />

fishery (Northern Territory, Australia) 156<br />

Ann E. Fleming<br />

Resource tenure issues 161<br />

Marine tenure and the role of marine protected areas for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

grow-out in the Pacific region 162<br />

Semisi V. Meo<br />

Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) fisheries in the Pacific region: present status,<br />

management overview and outlook for rehabilitation 168<br />

Kalo M. Pakoa, Ian Bertram, Kim J. Friedman and Emmanuel Tardy<br />

6


Market potential and challenges for expanding the production of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

in South-East Asia 177<br />

Maripaz L. Perez and Ernesto O. Brown<br />

Understanding the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> (beche-de-mer) value chain<br />

in Fiji and Tonga 189<br />

Theo A. Simos<br />

Processing cultured <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s into export product:<br />

issues and opportunities [Abstract only] 195<br />

Steven W. Purcell and Nguyen D.Q. Duy<br />

Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) farming in a social–ecological context:<br />

conclusions from Zanzibar 196<br />

Hampus Eriksson<br />

World <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> markets: Hong Kong, Guangzhou and New York 203<br />

Jun Akamine<br />

Applying economic decision tools to improve management and profitability<br />

of sandfish industries in the <strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> region 205<br />

Bill L. Johnston<br />

7


1-MeA 1-methyladenine<br />

<strong>ACIAR</strong> Australian Centre for<br />

International Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

Aj-GSSL Apostichopus japonicus<br />

gonad-stimulating substancelike<br />

(molecule)<br />

AVS acid-volatile sulfur<br />

BL body length<br />

BML Bolinao Marine Laboratory<br />

BV body volume<br />

BW body weight<br />

CFD coelomic fluid density<br />

CFV coelomic fluid volume<br />

CFW coelomic fluid weight<br />

CMT customary marine tenure<br />

DMP dimercaptopropanol<br />

DO dissolved oxygen<br />

DTT dithiothreitol<br />

EDTA ethylenediaminetetraacetic<br />

acid<br />

FSM Federated States of<br />

Micronesia<br />

GMP good management practice<br />

GSS gonad-stimulating substance<br />

GSSL gonad-stimulating<br />

substance-like<br />

GSSL-IVF gonad-stimulating substancelike<br />

in-vitro fertilisation<br />

(technique)<br />

GVBD germinal vesicle breakdown<br />

HACCP hazard analysis critical<br />

control point<br />

ind individuals<br />

IVF in-vitro fertilisation<br />

LMMA locally managed marine area<br />

Abbreviations<br />

9<br />

MPA marine protected area<br />

MH-IVF IVF technique developed at<br />

Madagascar Holothurie S.A.<br />

MH.SA Madagascar Holothurie<br />

Société Anonyme<br />

MIS maturation inducing<br />

substance<br />

NGO non-government organisation<br />

NPV net present value<br />

NT Northern Territory<br />

OFCF Over<strong>sea</strong>s Fishery Cooperation<br />

Foundation (Japan)<br />

OMI oocyte maturation inductor<br />

PCF perivisceral coelomic fluid<br />

PICs Pacific island countries<br />

PICTs Pacific island countries and<br />

territories<br />

PNG Papua New Guinea<br />

RIA3 (Vietnamese) Re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

Institute for Aquaculture No. 3<br />

SD standard deviation<br />

SE standard error<br />

SEAFDEC–AQD Southeast Asian Fisheries<br />

Development Center –<br />

Aquaculture Department<br />

SPC Secretariat of the Pacific<br />

Community<br />

TMD Trans’Mad-Développement<br />

UPMin University of the Philippines<br />

Mindanao<br />

UPMSI University of the Philippines<br />

Marine Science Institute<br />

USP University of the South<br />

Pacific<br />

UVSW UV-treated <strong>sea</strong> water<br />

WorldFish WorldFish Center


Acknowledgments<br />

The symposium was made possible through funding from the Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>) and the Secretariat of<br />

the Pacific Community (SPC). Particular thanks to Dr Chris Barlow, <strong>ACIAR</strong><br />

Fisheries Program Leader, who originally suggested convening a group of experts<br />

to review the status and future of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> re<strong>sea</strong>rch.<br />

We also wish to acknowledge Mike Batty and Robert Jimmy of SPC for their<br />

invaluable support and in-kind assistance, including providing the venue for the<br />

symposium (the Jacques Iekawé Conference Centre at the SPC headquarters in<br />

New Caledonia) and use of the secretariat. Various SPC staff members assisted<br />

with other important tasks—thanks go to the translation team, the travel desk and<br />

the information section. In particular, we thank Genevieve Mirc, who worked tirelessly<br />

to smooth the way for international participants and coordinate the logistics<br />

associated with holding the symposium. We extend our gratitude to Aymeric<br />

Desurmont for preparing the symposium website and Mrs Helena Heasman for<br />

producing the book of abstracts. The symposium was chaired by Dr Geoff Allan<br />

(of <strong>ACIAR</strong> at that time) and Dr Tim Pickering (SPC). We appreciate the efforts of<br />

several colleagues who also provided support and advice before, during and after<br />

the symposium, especially Dr Steven Purcell of the Southern Cross University’s<br />

National Marine Science Centre.<br />

We thank all the participants for their enthusiasm, and for freely sharing their<br />

expertise and ideas to make the symposium a success. Their combined efforts<br />

show the way forward for the next decade of re<strong>sea</strong>rch into the dynamic and<br />

promising field of culture and grow-out of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s for improved livelihoods<br />

of coastal communities.<br />

Photographs are by the author(s) of papers unless otherwise stated.<br />

10


Regional overviews<br />

Farmers gutting cultured sandfish after harvesting from ponds in<br />

Van Ninh, central Vietnam (Photo: David Mills)<br />

11


Overview of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and<br />

stocking re<strong>sea</strong>rch in the Western Pacific region<br />

Robert A. Jimmy 1*, Timothy D. Pickering 1 and Cathy A. Hair 2<br />

Abstract<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s represent an important income source to coastal communities in many Pacific islands, but<br />

is now worth only a fraction of historical values. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s have been harvested for hundreds of years<br />

for trade with Asia and were probably one of the first real ‘exports’ from the Pacific islands. Unfortunately,<br />

the increase in demand and price, combined with the development of cash economies and growing coastal<br />

populations in many islands, has led to widespread overfishing of the resource across much of this region.<br />

There is a high level of interest in adoption of <strong>aquaculture</strong> techniques to restore production levels, but<br />

different capacity levels require implementation of different techniques. Some Pacific island countries and<br />

territories have completed successful re<strong>sea</strong>rch trials of hatchery and release techniques, and now have<br />

capacity to scale up this activity. Factors that work in favour of successful <strong>aquaculture</strong> include pristine marine<br />

environments, long familiarity with <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s as a commodity, and traditional marine tenure systems<br />

that in some places can provide a basis for management of released <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. Challenges include lack<br />

of technical capacity, unproven effectiveness of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> releases and poaching.<br />

Introduction<br />

On 14 February 2011, prior to the <strong>Asia–Pacific</strong><br />

Tropical Sea Cucumber Symposium, Noumea, official<br />

representatives of Pacific island countries and territories<br />

(PICTs) that are members of the Secretariat of the<br />

Pacific Community (SPC) met to discuss <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

resources and <strong>aquaculture</strong>. This paper represents a<br />

synthesis of their status, and was presented on the first<br />

day of the symposium. When participants’ experiences<br />

were compared and discussed, a number of common<br />

themes emerged:<br />

• Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> represents an important income<br />

source to coastal communities in many Pacific<br />

islands. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s have been harvested for hundreds<br />

of years for trade with Asia and were probably<br />

one of the first real ‘exports’ from the Pacific islands.<br />

1 Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Noumea Cedex,<br />

New Caledonia<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

2 James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia<br />

12<br />

• This is mainly an export market commodity, but it is<br />

also a subsistence food fishery in some Pacific island<br />

countries and communities; for example, as a whole<br />

cooked <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, as ‘sashimi’ (sliced raw meat),<br />

or as marinated guts and gonads in salt and lime.<br />

• Catches from the Asian and Pacific regions are<br />

known to be the highest, with about 36 species<br />

being harvested in the Pacific region.<br />

• Stocks are under heavy pressure with increases in<br />

demand and price, combined with the development<br />

of cash economies and growing coastal populations<br />

in many islands. This has led to widespread overfishing<br />

of the resource across much of this region.<br />

Through time, smaller individuals and lower valued<br />

species are forming a steadily increasing proportion<br />

of the total catch.<br />

• Management of the fishery has essentially failed,<br />

for a number of reasons. PICTs are resorting to<br />

the extreme measure, and ‘blunt instrument’<br />

management, of imposing fishing moratoria for<br />

extended periods (years at a time) to bring about<br />

stock recovery.


• Concern about overexploitation has led to initiatives<br />

to promote <strong>sea</strong> ranching and restocking as an<br />

income-generating activity and a means to increase<br />

the production of wild stocks.<br />

PICT status reports<br />

Although there are similarities, differences also exist<br />

between PICTs—both in the species of interest for<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and in the level of capacity<br />

to implement <strong>aquaculture</strong> techniques to increase production.<br />

A number of PICTs have made progress on<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> on a few key species. Key<br />

points about the main PICTs involved or interested in<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> are summarised in Table 1.<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch in PICTs<br />

Despite the majority of PICTs having limited capacity<br />

for re<strong>sea</strong>rch and development of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong>, it is worth highlighting the notable<br />

exceptions where targeted re<strong>sea</strong>rch effort has been<br />

made. The countries with some history or current<br />

activity in the area are Kiribati, Federated States of<br />

13<br />

Micronesia (FSM), Palau, Fiji, Solomon Islands and<br />

New Caledonia. Sandfish continues to be the focus<br />

of re<strong>sea</strong>rch and development activity in FSM, Fiji<br />

and New Caledonia. Substantial re<strong>sea</strong>rch was done in<br />

the late 1990s in Solomon Islands on sandfish culture<br />

(e.g. Battaglene et al. 1999), but Japan is now funding<br />

re<strong>sea</strong>rch into peanutfish or dragonfish (Stichopus<br />

horrens) production. Kiribati is the first (and only)<br />

country to consistently produce high-value white<br />

teatfish (Holothuria fuscogilva) juveniles (Friedman<br />

and Tekanene 2005; Purcell and Tekanene 2006)<br />

(Figure 1). Since 2009, Palau has produced surf<br />

redfish and hairy blackfish (Actinopyga mauritiana<br />

and A. miliaris) both medium-value <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

species. In all the PICTs active in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

production, the emphasis is currently on production<br />

technology that has been provided either by private<br />

investment (e.g. Palau and FSM, Yap) or through the<br />

efforts of over<strong>sea</strong>s aid assistance and government<br />

support (e.g. Kiribati, Fiji, Solomon Islands, FSM,<br />

New Caledonia). Hatcheries are being built, and staff<br />

are being trained or technicians imported in some<br />

cases to boost capacity.<br />

Figure 1. Cultured white teatfish juveniles produced at Tanaea hatchery, Kiribati (Photo: Antoine Teitelbaum)


Table 1. Summary of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> in Pacific island countries<br />

Country Availability of high-interest<br />

species<br />

Fiji White teatfish<br />

Sandfish<br />

Federated States of<br />

Micronesia (FSM)<br />

White teatfish<br />

Sandfish<br />

Actinopyga spp.<br />

Lollyfish<br />

Black teatfish<br />

14<br />

History of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

<strong>ACIAR</strong> sandfish hatchery<br />

mini-projects at Savusavu<br />

(Vanua Levu island) and<br />

Galoa (Viti Levu island)<br />

First spawning started in<br />

2009, training also provided<br />

to community wardens<br />

Hatchery-based releasing<br />

project for sandfish and<br />

black teatfish, College of<br />

Micronesia, Land Grant<br />

Program, Pohnpei<br />

Private hatchery and<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching in Yap for<br />

Actinopyga spp.<br />

1 staff was trained in Fiji<br />

in 2008 (<strong>ACIAR</strong>), and has<br />

transferred their knowledge<br />

to other staff<br />

Kiribati White teatfish Over<strong>sea</strong>s Fishery<br />

Cooperation Foundation<br />

of Japan (OFCF) hatchery<br />

projects, initiated in 1995,<br />

started production in 1997,<br />

and released about 10,000<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s per year<br />

from 1999–2004 and again<br />

in 2008–09<br />

<strong>ACIAR</strong> re<strong>sea</strong>rch on release<br />

strategies<br />

New Caledonia White teatfish<br />

Sandfish<br />

Black teatfish<br />

Large WorldFish–<strong>ACIAR</strong><br />

St. Vincent Project on<br />

juvenile grow-out, release<br />

techniques and pond trials<br />

(2001–07)<br />

National strategy<br />

Fisheries Department<br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> priority<br />

included in work plan from<br />

2011<br />

A regulation on <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> is in place.<br />

Sandfish are reserved for<br />

subsistence fishery and<br />

prohibited from export<br />

National Aquaculture<br />

Strategy (2002) identified<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> as a priority<br />

for development<br />

Yap: there is a regulation on<br />

licensing system in place<br />

Pohnpei: all harvests<br />

banned since 1995<br />

Kosrae: all exports banned<br />

Chuuk: intensive fishing<br />

activity, and no <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries<br />

management systems are<br />

in place<br />

Government wishes to<br />

develop white teatfish<br />

further<br />

No specific legislation for<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery<br />

management plan currently<br />

formulated<br />

Wish to introduce sandfish<br />

because it is more suitable<br />

than white teatfish for<br />

culture in ponds<br />

Government is supporting<br />

development with pilot<br />

projects and re<strong>sea</strong>rch for<br />

sandfish


Hatchery capacity Community-based<br />

management capacity<br />

Private blacklip pearl oyster<br />

hatchery (Savusavu) with<br />

micro-algae culture facility<br />

Government shrimp<br />

hatchery (Galoa) with<br />

micro-algae culture facility<br />

Seawater laboratory at the<br />

University of the South<br />

Pacific in Suva, with<br />

micro-algae culture facility<br />

Government and privatesector<br />

staff trained on<br />

sandfish under <strong>ACIAR</strong><br />

project, and on micro-algae<br />

Functional hatchery at<br />

College of Micronesia in<br />

Pohnpei<br />

There has been a hatchery<br />

facility in Yap since 2007<br />

(Actinopyga spp.)<br />

There is a private hatchery<br />

in Chuuk<br />

Kosrae National<br />

Aquaculture Centre has a<br />

micro-algae culture facility<br />

White teatfish hatchery<br />

Government pearl oyster<br />

hatchery<br />

One private <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> hatchery under<br />

construction, and another<br />

being proposed<br />

Have six shrimp hatcheries<br />

and two for finfish<br />

Fiji Locally-Managed<br />

Marine Area Network<br />

projects in Fiji: 259<br />

registered marine protected<br />

areas (MPAs)<br />

Natuvu village in<br />

Cakaudrove province<br />

created an MPA especially<br />

for sandfish restocking<br />

(2008)<br />

MPAs are getting support,<br />

and communities are<br />

now requesting that those<br />

MPAs be stocked with <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong><br />

No community-based MPA<br />

in Gilbert and Line groups,<br />

only the Phoenix Islands<br />

Protected Area<br />

A few community-based<br />

fisheries management<br />

(CBFM) plans<br />

23 MPAs in Province Sud<br />

and 4 in Province Nord<br />

CBFM in one community<br />

Broodstock<br />

availability<br />

Sandfish are<br />

available, although<br />

there is localised<br />

scarcity<br />

White teatfish<br />

availability is<br />

unknown but<br />

probable<br />

15<br />

Availability in Yap<br />

and Pohnpei, with<br />

sufficient sandfish in<br />

the wild. Often used<br />

100–200 adults for<br />

spawning<br />

Kosrae and Chuuk<br />

not surveyed but<br />

likely to be the same<br />

White teatfish<br />

becoming difficult<br />

to find<br />

Sandfish are not<br />

present in Kiribati,<br />

so for <strong>aquaculture</strong> to<br />

become possible it<br />

would first need to be<br />

introduced<br />

Still have good<br />

stocks, both in and<br />

out of MPAs, but high<br />

variability between<br />

sites<br />

Genetic survey of<br />

broodstock has been<br />

conducted<br />

Constraints<br />

Government micro-algae<br />

production facility and expertise<br />

needs upgrading<br />

Need for more people to be<br />

trained on seed production and<br />

grow-out<br />

Lack of local investors<br />

Lack of skills and local<br />

technicians, so there is reliance<br />

on foreign technicians<br />

Need for better communication<br />

between national and local<br />

governments, private sector and<br />

traditional tenure holders<br />

Scarcity of broodstock, so they<br />

are kept in captivity<br />

White teatfish are not suitable for<br />

pond culture<br />

High mortality rate during<br />

juvenile stage<br />

Release effectiveness unknown<br />

Very difficult to monitor<br />

post-release juveniles<br />

High staff turnover, so a<br />

continual need for training<br />

Spawning <strong>sea</strong>son may be limited<br />

by cold temperature<br />

Production and grow-out<br />

economic assessment needed<br />

Expert advice sought on<br />

protocols, especially grow-out<br />

Need to develop tagging methods<br />

for monitoring (<strong>sea</strong> ranching and<br />

restocking)<br />

Availability of juveniles for<br />

restocking and enhancement may<br />

be limited by hatchery capacity<br />

continued …


Table 1. (continued)<br />

Country Availability of highinterest<br />

species<br />

Palau White teatfish<br />

Sandfish<br />

Surf redfish<br />

Blackfish<br />

Papua New Guinea White teatfish<br />

Sandfish<br />

Samoa White teatfish<br />

Dragonfish (Stichopus<br />

horrens) are targeted by the<br />

fishery<br />

Sandfish not present in<br />

Samoa<br />

Solomon Islands White teatfish<br />

Sandfish<br />

Peanutfish (dragonfish (S.<br />

horrens)) to be targeted in<br />

a new project developed by<br />

Japan (OFCF)<br />

Tonga White teatfish<br />

Golden sandfish<br />

Vanuatu White teatfish<br />

Sandfish<br />

16<br />

History of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

Has had a project<br />

since 2009 producing<br />

Actinopyga mauritiana<br />

and A. miliaris<br />

National strategy<br />

Government aims to develop<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

None Priority species, especially<br />

since <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> harvest<br />

moratorium imposed<br />

None Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> restocking is<br />

in the Aquaculture Section<br />

Workplan for 2011–15<br />

(subject to hatchery)<br />

Government’s current main<br />

priority is management of<br />

the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery<br />

A private-sector initiative<br />

to introduce sandfish for<br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> is now underway<br />

Ban on commercial harvest<br />

for export of any <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> species, ban on<br />

harvest within reserves<br />

Large WorldFish–<strong>ACIAR</strong><br />

project on hatchery<br />

techniques (1996–2000)<br />

One of four priorities<br />

government wishes to<br />

develop, according to<br />

2009 National Aquaculture<br />

Development Plan<br />

None Aquaculture Plan identifies<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> species as<br />

highest priority.<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> plan (2009) in<br />

place for the fishery<br />

Two imports of hatchery<br />

juveniles of sandfish from<br />

Australia (2006–07), but<br />

have not been effective<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

identified as a priority in<br />

the National Aquaculture<br />

Strategy<br />

Draft <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery<br />

management plan in place<br />

Moratorium on export in<br />

place for 5 years since 2008


Hatchery capacity Community-based<br />

management capacity<br />

Palau has expertise in<br />

producing surf redfish and<br />

blackfish<br />

Palau Community College<br />

has a hatchery under the<br />

Land Grant System<br />

Private pearl and shrimp<br />

hatcheries<br />

New government<br />

multispecies hatchery at<br />

Kavieng<br />

Clam hatchery has been<br />

decommissioned. Does not<br />

have a mariculture hatchery<br />

facility at the moment.<br />

Proposed new hatchery not<br />

built yet<br />

WorldFish Center Nusa<br />

Tupe clam hatchery<br />

OFCF–government <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> (peanutfish)<br />

hatchery has four local<br />

technical staff, but they<br />

need training on <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Trained on sandfish in<br />

2008 under <strong>ACIAR</strong> at<br />

Department of Primary<br />

Industries in Cairns<br />

Clam and pearl oysters<br />

produced at Sopu<br />

government hatchery<br />

New micro-algae facility in<br />

place but not yet operating<br />

Private shrimp hatchery<br />

Government clam/trochus<br />

hatchery<br />

There is active support for<br />

MPAs (e.g. HOPE Network)<br />

PNG Centre for Locally<br />

Managed Areas is active in<br />

New Britain and New Ireland<br />

Current moratorium on<br />

fishing will benefit release<br />

activities<br />

History of community-based<br />

management since 1995<br />

(fisheries by-laws)<br />

Good success with trochus<br />

introduction and stocking<br />

onto reefs<br />

54 village-level reserves, 2<br />

district-level MPAs and 84<br />

village CBFMs currently<br />

effective<br />

Three main active MPAs in<br />

place<br />

Solomon Islands Locally<br />

Managed Marine Areas<br />

Network and World Wildlife<br />

Fund both active in engaging<br />

with communities<br />

History of community-based<br />

management<br />

Special Management<br />

Areas in place since 2002,<br />

regulation in 2008<br />

Traditional community-based<br />

tabu areas (closed to fishing<br />

or harvesting) and MPAs are<br />

in place (e.g. Village Based<br />

Resource Managed Areas<br />

Network)<br />

Customary Marine Tenure<br />

very active but commercial<br />

pressures intense<br />

17<br />

Broodstock<br />

availability<br />

Unknown but<br />

probably available, as<br />

for Pohnpei and Yap<br />

Available, although<br />

overfishing will have<br />

reduced numbers of<br />

large animals<br />

Sandfish not present<br />

in Samoa<br />

White teatfish and<br />

other high-value<br />

species in good sizes<br />

very scarce<br />

Sandfish available.<br />

Severe overfishing<br />

has probably<br />

limited broodstock<br />

availability, but this<br />

needs a survey<br />

Broodstock for<br />

peanutfish readily<br />

available and will be<br />

collected from the<br />

three MPA sites<br />

Constraints<br />

No specific technical skills base<br />

for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>. Project run<br />

by Korean technicians<br />

Lack of micro-algae production<br />

facility and expertise<br />

No specific expertise for <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong><br />

No specific expertise for<br />

micro-algae production<br />

No specific expertise for <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Lack of micro-algae production<br />

facility and expertise<br />

Low biomass of high-valued<br />

species based on previous<br />

surveys<br />

Lack of micro-algae production<br />

facility and expertise<br />

Peanutfish is a new species<br />

for <strong>aquaculture</strong>, so not much<br />

information about it yet<br />

Sandfish available MPAs are not very effective due<br />

to enforcement problems<br />

Micro-algal unit not yet<br />

operating due to lack of funds.<br />

Probably okay<br />

Will conduct a<br />

survey in 2011–12 to<br />

determine stock status<br />

No specific expertise for <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Lack of micro-algae production<br />

facility and expertise<br />

Lack of hatchery space


Fiji, Palau, Kiribati and New Caledonia have<br />

released locally cultured juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s into<br />

the wild, and cultured juveniles from Australia have<br />

been released in Vanuatu. Although Kiribati has had<br />

success in the spawning and rearing of white teatfish,<br />

there has been high mortality of juveniles in the<br />

hatchery. For those that reach release stage, it has been<br />

established that fluorochrome marking can successfully<br />

distinguish them from wild animals (Purcell and<br />

Blockmans 2009). However, their highly cryptic nature<br />

and the lack of appropriate release strategies have constrained<br />

efforts in that area. Despite the release of tens<br />

of thousands of juveniles of approximately 10 mm<br />

length on numerous occasions, monitoring for survival<br />

and growth has been unsuccessful. Recent attempts<br />

to release into enclosures failed due to storms that<br />

destroyed the pens (Teitelbaum and Aram 2010). In<br />

another project, over three million juvenile A. mauritiana<br />

and A. miliaris were produced and released into<br />

the wild in three states in Palau. However, the success<br />

of this release program is unknown. The results of a<br />

small pilot release of juvenile sandfish in Fiji were<br />

promising (average 28% survival after 6 months and<br />

18<br />

166 g size at 8 months: Hair et al. 2011; Hair 2012),<br />

but the project needs to be scaled up to gain commercial<br />

confidence in the activity.<br />

FSM has not released any juveniles yet but the<br />

College of Micronesia in Pohnpei has developed a<br />

land-based system (‘habitat simulator’) for long-term<br />

holding of broodstock and juveniles, which uses a<br />

combination of flow-through and closed recirculating<br />

water techniques (Figure 2). Hatchery-produced<br />

juveniles were used for tagging trials (M. Ito, pers.<br />

comm., March 2011). In the habitat simulator, tag<br />

retention rates for larger individuals (ind) were<br />

70–87% at 2 months (stocking density ~20 ind/m 2<br />

or ~3,000 g/m 2), while for smaller sandfish it was<br />

80% at 2 weeks (~8 ind/m 2 or 210 g/m 2). Numbers<br />

of juveniles were released into enclosures in the wild<br />

2 months after tagging; retention rates on these are<br />

to be monitored for a period of 2 years. Batches of<br />

hatchery-produced juveniles (5,000 × 6 weeks old and<br />

30,000 × 4 weeks old) are being maintained for largescale<br />

tagging trials. The project will soon move to a<br />

restocking program, which will involve mass hatchery<br />

production of juveniles.<br />

Figure 2. Habitat simulator system and hatchery technician tagging a cultured sandfish (College of Micronesia,<br />

Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia) (Photo: Masahiro Ito)


Much of our current knowledge regarding sandfish<br />

grow-out and release strategies was generated from<br />

re<strong>sea</strong>rch carried out between 2000 and 2006 in New<br />

Caledonia (e.g. Purcell 2004; Purcell and Simutoga<br />

2008; Agudo 2012). Private-sector production in<br />

New Caledonia’s northern and southern provinces<br />

is currently underway and, once available, cultured<br />

juveniles will be released into MPAs and grown in<br />

ponds. The experience from Vanuatu of importing<br />

juvenile sandfish and releasing them into the wild<br />

was perhaps unsuccessful because of poor release<br />

strategies, but information is lacking because postrelease<br />

monitoring was not undertaken.<br />

The problems associated with sourcing and holding<br />

broodstock have been identified as a bottleneck to<br />

developing <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> in a number of<br />

PICTs. In particular, the scarcity of white teatfish in<br />

Kiribati continues to constrain their hatchery efforts.<br />

The high cost of obtaining them and subsequent difficulty<br />

of keeping them in good spawning condition<br />

means that new broodstock have to be obtained for<br />

each hatchery run. This has led them to consider<br />

importing sandfish, which can be maintained more<br />

easily in secure pond facilities and which have wellestablished<br />

release strategies. In Fiji, FSM and New<br />

Caledonia, there are generally sandfish broodstock<br />

available, but stock status can be variable between<br />

locations. This is problematic if responsible release<br />

practices are being followed, since progeny should<br />

be released into the area where parent stock originated<br />

(Uthicke and Purcell 2004; SPC 2009). FSM<br />

is sourcing broodstock of black teatfish (Holothuria<br />

whitmaei) with the intention of culturing this species<br />

in the near future.<br />

Discussion<br />

There is universal interest among PICTs in the<br />

application of <strong>aquaculture</strong> techniques to increase<br />

production from <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> resources. The main<br />

species of interest is sandfish, except in Kiribati<br />

(white teatfish) and Solomon Islands (peanutfish).<br />

Two countries that lie outside the natural geographical<br />

distribution of sandfish (Kiribati and Samoa) have<br />

expressed interest in introducing it for <strong>aquaculture</strong>.<br />

The range of experiences with, and capacities<br />

in, <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> re<strong>sea</strong>rch vary greatly.<br />

Some PICTs have no capacity or experience at all.<br />

In others there has been successful completion<br />

of re<strong>sea</strong>rch projects, from which the capacity to<br />

produce juveniles in hatcheries for restocking trials<br />

19<br />

on a pilot-commercial scale is now established. The<br />

leading PICTs in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> re<strong>sea</strong>rch activity to<br />

date are New Caledonia, FSM and Palau, followed<br />

by Kiribati, Fiji and Solomon Islands.<br />

Technical capacity in-country is a vital prerequisite<br />

for successful <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>, but by itself<br />

it is not enough to guarantee success. The capacity for<br />

marine tenure systems in PICTs to deliver sufficient<br />

protection to investment in restocked or ranched <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s is another important consideration. There<br />

have been some positive experiences with management<br />

systems based on custom and traditional marine<br />

tenure, to achieve better conservation of inshore fishery<br />

resources. Community-based management provides<br />

one possible basis for protection of released <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s until ready for harvest. However, some<br />

PICTs have attempted <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> for a<br />

variety of other reasons, often with misguided intentions:<br />

for example, past experiences include projects<br />

that were very much investor-driven, with inadequate<br />

feasibility studies undertaken prior to development.<br />

The term ‘<strong>aquaculture</strong>’ can be used misleadingly by<br />

unscrupulous investors to lead PICT decision-makers<br />

into accepting an unsustainable development where<br />

wild stocks can be harvested at the same time as the<br />

so-called <strong>aquaculture</strong> is taking place. Policy advice<br />

and technical assistance are currently being provided<br />

by the SPC to member countries so that they can<br />

recognise and assess development proposals that are<br />

genuine and distinguish those that are purely to lure<br />

PICTs into allowing access to their wild stock (see<br />

Pakoa et al. 2012).<br />

Taking these technical and institutional issues into<br />

account, the attributes of the Pacific islands region<br />

that lend themselves to <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> can<br />

be summarised as follows:<br />

• Pristine marine environments and suitable marine<br />

habitat are available for restocking and <strong>sea</strong> ranching<br />

of priority species of interest.<br />

• Community-based management systems are in<br />

place in many areas.<br />

• Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> is an ideal commodity for rural and<br />

maritime community engagement because the<br />

harvesting techniques are simple, and because <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s do not require large investment capital<br />

for processing.<br />

• The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> industry in this region has a<br />

history stretching over more than two centuries, so<br />

it does not require large investment in familiarisation<br />

or retraining, and it is already well-integrated<br />

within traditional lifestyles and practices.


• Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> hatchery requirements are similar<br />

to those of other species already being cultured in<br />

the region (e.g. shrimp, pearl, giant clam, trochus),<br />

so infrastructure can be shared with these other<br />

commodities.<br />

The experiences shared by PICTs in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> reveal some common challenges, however,<br />

including the following:<br />

• In some places it is difficult to find sufficient numbers<br />

of broodstock-size animals for <strong>aquaculture</strong>.<br />

• Expertise in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> is limited.<br />

• The effectiveness of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> releases is not<br />

yet proven: optimal release techniques are still<br />

being finetuned for some species (e.g. sandfish)<br />

and are unknown for others (e.g. white teatfish).<br />

• Land-based nursery areas can be limiting.<br />

• Land disputes can affect released juveniles and<br />

broodstock if release sites are open access or under<br />

dispute.<br />

• Control and enforcement of restocked or <strong>sea</strong>ranched<br />

populations to prevent poaching can be<br />

difficult to achieve.<br />

• The consequences of translocation of juveniles are<br />

not yet known and could cause irreversible genetic<br />

problems, so care must be taken to preserve genetic<br />

integrity wherever possible.<br />

• There needs to be more re<strong>sea</strong>rch into the economic<br />

feasibility of restocking.<br />

Pacific regional priorities for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong>, to address these challenges and thereby<br />

enable PICTs to capitalise upon their favourable<br />

attributes, include:<br />

• demonstration of the effectiveness of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

restocking and <strong>sea</strong> ranching through larger scale<br />

experimental releases and post-release monitoring<br />

• re<strong>sea</strong>rch to develop optimal release strategies for<br />

improved survival and growth<br />

• capacity-building and technology transfer among<br />

PICTs for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

• economic analysis of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

and restocking scenarios<br />

• social analysis of traditional marine tenure systems<br />

and of the effectiveness of community-based management,<br />

to identify the best governance and/or<br />

business models for protection of investment in<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>.<br />

20<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

The authors wish to thank the following PICT scientists<br />

and managers, who contributed the information<br />

provided in this report: Gerald Billings (Fiji Fisheries<br />

Department); Masahiro Ito (Land Grant, FSM);<br />

Karibanang Aram (Kiribati Ministry of Fisheries<br />

and Marine Resources); Claire Marty, Bernard Fao,<br />

Thomas Requillart and Nathaniel Cornuet (Province<br />

Nord and Province Sud, New Caledonia); Percy<br />

Rechelluul (Palau); Jacob Wani (Papua New Guinea<br />

National Fisheries Authority); Joyce Samuela Ah<br />

Leong (Samoa); Sylvester Diake Jr (Solomon<br />

Islands Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources);<br />

Poasi Ngaluafe (Tonga Fisheries) and Jayven Ham<br />

(Vanuatu Fisheries Department).<br />

References<br />

Agudo N.S. 2012. Pond grow-out trials for sandfish<br />

(Holothuria scabra) in New Caledonia. In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong><br />

<strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A.<br />

Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings<br />

No. 136, 104–112. Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]<br />

Battaglene S.C., Seymour J.E. and Ramofafia C. 1999.<br />

Survival and growth of cultured <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s,<br />

Holothuria scabra. Aquaculture 178, 293–322.<br />

Friedman K. and Tekanene M. 2005. White teatfish at<br />

Kiribati <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> hatchery: ‘Local technicians getting<br />

them out again’. SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin 21, 32–33.<br />

Hair C.A. 2012. Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) production<br />

and <strong>sea</strong>-ranching trial in Fiji. In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A. Hair, T.D. Pickering<br />

and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings No. 136, 129–141.<br />

Australian Centre for International Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]<br />

Hair C., Pickering T., Meo S., Vereivalu T., Hunter J. and<br />

Cavakiqali L. 2011. Sandfish culture in Fiji Islands. SPC<br />

Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 31, 3–11.<br />

Pakoa K., Bertram I., Friedman K. and Tardy E. 2012.<br />

Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) fisheries in the Pacific<br />

region: present status, management overview and<br />

outlook for rehabilitation. In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A. Hair, T.D. Pickering<br />

and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings No. 136, 168–176.<br />

Australian Centre for International Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]


Purcell S.W. 2004. Criteria for release strategies and evaluating<br />

the restocking of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. In ‘Advances in<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’, ed. by A.<br />

Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel<br />

and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 463,<br />

181–191. Food and Agriculture Organization of the<br />

United Nations: Rome.<br />

Purcell S.W. and Blockmans B.F. 2009. Effective fluorochrome<br />

marking of juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s for <strong>sea</strong><br />

ranching and restocking. Aquaculture 296, 263–270.<br />

Purcell S.W. and Simutoga M. 2008. Spatio-temporal and<br />

size-dependent variation in the success of releasing<br />

cultured <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in the wild. Reviews in Fisheries<br />

Science 16, 204–214.<br />

21<br />

Purcell S. and Tekanene M. 2006. Ontogenetic changes in<br />

colouration and morphology of white teatfish, Holothuria<br />

fuscogilva, juveniles in Kiribati. SPC Beche-de-mer<br />

Information Bulletin 23, 29–31.<br />

SPC (Secretariat of the Pacific Community) 2009. Use<br />

of hatcheries to increase production of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s.<br />

Background Paper 4, Sixth SPC Heads of Fisheries<br />

Meeting, February 2009. Secretariat of the Pacific<br />

Community.<br />

Teitelbaum A. and Aram K. 2010. White teatfish <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

project in Kiribati. SPC Fisheries Newsletter 131, 6–7.<br />

Uthicke S. and Purcell S. 2004. Preservation of genetic<br />

diversity in restocking of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria<br />

scabra planned through allozyme electrophoresis.<br />

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 61,<br />

519–528.<br />

Natuvu (Fiji) community <strong>sea</strong> ranch warden with sandfish after a cyclone<br />

(note broken pen in background) (Photo: Cathy Hair)


Overview of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

and <strong>sea</strong>-ranching re<strong>sea</strong>rch in the<br />

South-East Asian region<br />

David J. Mills 1, Nguyen D.Q. Duy 2, Marie Antonette Juinio-Meñez 3,<br />

Christina M. Raison 4 and Jacques M. Zarate 5<br />

Abstract<br />

South-East Asia has traditionally been the global centre of production of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s for Chinese<br />

markets. Early re<strong>sea</strong>rch into culture methods took place outside this region, notably in India, the Pacific region<br />

and China. However, recent investment in Holothuria scabra (sandfish) culture has led to some significant<br />

advances within this region. The Philippines and Vietnam have been at the forefront of recent efforts, with<br />

involvement from substantial national programs and local institutions as well as international donors and<br />

scientific organisations. Smaller programs are ongoing in Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia. Recent advances<br />

and simplifications in hatchery techniques are a major step forward, having promoted the development of<br />

experimental-scale <strong>sea</strong>-ranching ventures, and given rise to a small, commercial pond-based culture industry<br />

in Vietnam. Technology developments in nursery systems are likely to provide opportunities for culture<br />

enterprises in a broader range of environments than is now possible. A major re<strong>sea</strong>rch thrust in the Philippines<br />

towards developing cooperative <strong>sea</strong>-ranching enterprises has demonstrated good potential, and institutional/<br />

legislative arrangements to ensure adequate property rights have been tested. Rotational culture with shrimp<br />

is proving successful in Vietnam, while the possibility of proximate co-culture of sandfish and shrimp has<br />

largely been ruled out. Small-scale experiments in the Philippines raise the possibility of co-culture in ponds<br />

with a number of finfish species. Current re<strong>sea</strong>rch directions are looking at diversifying technology to increase<br />

success in a range of coastal conditions, better understanding the social and biophysical conditions required<br />

for success, and finding ways of effectively scaling-out developed systems and technology.<br />

Introduction<br />

Globally, the husbandry of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

appears ‘on the cusp’ of success—we are starting to see<br />

the construction of commercial-scale hatcheries and<br />

farms and, at the other end of the spectrum, sustained<br />

1 WorldFish Center, Penang, Malaysia<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

2 Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Institute for Aquaculture No. 3, Nha Trang,<br />

Khanh Hoa province, Vietnam<br />

3 Marine Science Institute, University of the Philippines,<br />

Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines<br />

4 University of Stirling, Scotland, United Kingdom<br />

5 Aquaculture Department, South East Asian Fisheries<br />

Development Center, Iloilo, Philippines<br />

22<br />

forays into community-based culture and <strong>sea</strong>-ranching<br />

systems (e.g. see papers in these proceedings).<br />

However, most have yet to demonstrate commercial<br />

viability, and many stakeholders are interested to see<br />

the outcomes of current pilot ventures. This situation<br />

is a product of both the considerable advances that<br />

have occurred over the past decade in hatchery and<br />

grow-out technology, and the resistance of bottlenecks<br />

to unconstrained success. The widespread and growing<br />

interest in this commodity is indicative of strong<br />

market-based drivers to increase production of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> (Brown et al. 2010). This has a dual impact<br />

of increasing pressure on wild stocks already in crisis,<br />

yet also opening the door to opportunities for new<br />

coastal livelihoods based on sustainable approaches to


culture and <strong>sea</strong> ranching. This symposium is therefore<br />

very timely, and allows re<strong>sea</strong>rchers to take stock of current<br />

benchmarks for various stages of production, and<br />

gain a shared understanding of bottlenecks, constraints<br />

and critical areas for further re<strong>sea</strong>rch.<br />

As the historical global centre of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> harvest (e.g. Gamboa et al. 2004;<br />

Schwerdtner Máñez and Ferse 2010), countries<br />

throughout South-East Asia retain a keen interest<br />

in developments in culture and sustainable resource<br />

management, and, in many instances, sit at the forefront<br />

of industry and technology development. The<br />

precipitous decline in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> stocks throughout<br />

the region (Conand 2004; Bell et al. 2008) has had<br />

dire implications for coastal livelihoods in some areas.<br />

While not well documented (but see Shiell and Knott<br />

2010; Wolkenhauer et al. 2010), it is likely that the<br />

wholesale removal of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s has contributed<br />

to reduced resilience among coastal ecosystems.<br />

Social impacts of this decline go beyond lost<br />

income. Traditionally, a significant part of the <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> resource in South-east Asia has been<br />

obtained by ‘gleaning’ in the shallows (Choo 2008).<br />

Such fisheries provide a disproportionate social<br />

benefit, as they have no capital entry requirements<br />

(i.e. they are accessible to those without the means<br />

to invest) and are accessible to women and children.<br />

These highly vulnerable shallow resources are<br />

invariably, however, the first to disappear under<br />

conditions of uncontrolled harvesting. Harvesting<br />

deeper resources becomes more capital intensive<br />

(requiring a boat and diving gear) and is generally<br />

the exclusive domain of men. A more insidious effect<br />

of overharvesting is seen as sustained pressure drives<br />

fishers deeper in <strong>sea</strong>rch of viable stocks; divingrelated<br />

accidents leading to permanent disability or<br />

even death are all too common in villages where <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> harvesting plays an important role in livelihoods.<br />

Clearly, the restoration of livelihoods based<br />

on near-shore <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> harvest and improved<br />

governance of the resource have great potential to<br />

benefit coastal communities throughout the region.<br />

In addition to <strong>sea</strong> ranching or enhancing/restocking<br />

wild stocks, <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> culture can play a critical<br />

role in restoring resilient livelihoods among coastal<br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> farmers. Shrimp production dominates<br />

this sector in much of South-East Asia. The di<strong>sea</strong>serelated<br />

serial boom-and-bust cycle that has characterised<br />

shrimp production globally (Dierberg and<br />

Kiattisimkul 1996) is strongly evident in this region.<br />

Such cycles leave casualties, and prominent among<br />

23<br />

them are small-scale producers who typically have<br />

limited reserve capital and struggle to recover from<br />

losing entire crops to di<strong>sea</strong>se (Mills et al. 2011). Sea<br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s show substantial promise as a sustainable<br />

alternative species that can be grown instead of, or<br />

with, shrimp, and should provide a more tenable risk<br />

profile. Currently, up to 12 farmers are involved in<br />

sandfish pond farming in Vietnam.<br />

Recent developments in <strong>sea</strong> ranching and pond<br />

farming in the South-East Asian region are explored<br />

here, concentrating on Holothuria scabra (sandfish),<br />

as this is the focus of current development efforts.<br />

The paper does not seek to provide a comprehensive<br />

review of all activities in the region, but rather is a<br />

‘selective highlights’ package that may be somewhat<br />

biased towards the lead author’s experience. It is<br />

intentionally biased towards re<strong>sea</strong>rch that does not<br />

appear elsewhere in this volume; much of the current<br />

re<strong>sea</strong>rch being undertaken in the region is covered in<br />

some depth by others in this symposium. The paper<br />

is organised by ontogenic staging rather than geography,<br />

considering hatchery, nursery, growing-out and<br />

postharvest issues separately.<br />

Hatchery and nursery production<br />

Simplified hatchery systems<br />

The earliest reports of hatchery re<strong>sea</strong>rch on <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s date back as far as the 1930s (see Yellow<br />

Seas Fisheries Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Institute 1991). Today, the<br />

culture of temperate species (notably Apostichopus<br />

japonicus) is in full-swing in China and Japan (Chen<br />

2004), but commercial-scale hatchery production of<br />

<strong>tropical</strong> species is only now becoming a possibility.<br />

Considerable re<strong>sea</strong>rch effort in India (James et al.<br />

1994) and the Pacific region (Battaglene et al. 1999)<br />

laid the foundations for culture of H. scabra on a<br />

commercial scale. These techniques were further<br />

refined through the work of the WorldFish Center and<br />

partners in New Caledonia, and published in a comprehensive<br />

hatchery manual for H. scabra (Agudo<br />

2006). Recent advances have seen these techniques<br />

further refined, simplified and customised for lowinvestment<br />

systems suitable for developing countries<br />

(Duy 2010, 2012; Gamboa et al. 2012). Among key<br />

modifications and simplifications that have improved<br />

success rates are:<br />

• a reduction in requirements for live feed production,<br />

to a point where a single species (Chaetoceros<br />

muelleri) can be used


• low-density culture of larvae (around 0.3 larvae/mL)<br />

• the use of settlement plates coated with a dried<br />

algal (Spirulina) paste rather than previous<br />

techniques of natural conditioning of plates with<br />

benthic diatoms.<br />

These techniques reduce the complexity of culture<br />

systems and the incidence of infestations by parasites<br />

or copepods, and have led to substantially increased<br />

survival rates. Experience from Vietnam and the<br />

Philippines suggests that a current ‘benchmark’ for<br />

survival from egg to 5-mm juveniles is around 2.5%.<br />

Experience from the increasing number of pilot-scale<br />

hatcheries developed in various locations indicates<br />

that, almost invariably, ‘off-the-shelf’ hatchery systems<br />

will not be adequate, and a degree of customising<br />

is required (e.g. Gamboa et al. 2012) to achieve<br />

acceptable production.<br />

A ‘state-of-the-art’ hatchery system has recently<br />

been constructed at the Southeast Asian Fisheries<br />

Development Center – Aquaculture Department a<br />

(SEAFDEC–AQD) in the Philippines (Figure 1), and<br />

several training courses on hatchery techniques have<br />

now been conducted. The facility is set to play an<br />

important role in further training and the provision of<br />

juveniles for further <strong>sea</strong>-ranching and pond-culture<br />

trials in the Philippines.<br />

Nursery systems<br />

Typically, some 35 days after settling, at a length<br />

of around 5 mm, sandfish juveniles are moved<br />

from settlement tanks to a nursery system. While<br />

hatchery-based raceway systems have proven successful<br />

at an experimental scale, it is difficult to see<br />

how such systems could be workable at a commercial<br />

scale—the costs of the tank area and the water supply<br />

required are high. A range of nursery systems has<br />

been trialled in Vietnam and the Philippines under<br />

Australian Centre for International and Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>) and national funding. Fine-mesh<br />

nets (referred to as ‘hapas’) are now routinely used<br />

(Pitt and Duy 2004) and have been extremely successful<br />

in ponds in Vietnam (Figure 2, left), resulting<br />

in high survival and growth rates. Juvenile sandfish<br />

in hapas feed on algal fouling that grows on the hapa<br />

mesh. In the Philippines it has proven difficult to<br />

find ponds with adequate <strong>sea</strong>water exchange rates to<br />

maintain the salinities required for nursery stages. In<br />

a Funding provided by <strong>ACIAR</strong> and Japan International<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS),<br />

and designed in collaboration with RIA3<br />

24<br />

response, effort has been directed at developing floating<br />

hapa systems that can be deployed in sheltered<br />

marine embayments (Figure 2, right). These systems<br />

have great potential for community <strong>sea</strong>-ranching<br />

operations—they allow the transport of juveniles<br />

from hatcheries at an early stage, resulting in low<br />

mortality; and engage communities in the production<br />

cycle at the earliest opportunity, maximising potential<br />

financial benefits (Juinio-Meñez et al. 2012a).<br />

Hapa-based nursery systems are commonly used<br />

until juveniles reach a weight of 2–5 g. In previous<br />

pilot trials of both <strong>sea</strong> ranching (Juinio-Meñez et al.<br />

2012a) and pond culture (e.g. Pitt and Duy 2004),<br />

and in commercial culture in Vietnam until recently,<br />

juveniles have been released to their grow-out environment<br />

at this size. An ‘advanced nursery’ stage<br />

has now been introduced in Vietnam. Ponds with an<br />

optimal <strong>sea</strong>water supply and muddy-sand, organically<br />

rich sediment are seeded with 2–5-g juveniles from<br />

hapas at a high density of up to 50,000 juveniles/ha<br />

(compared with 10,000 juveniles/ha for grow-out).<br />

These are grown to up to 50 g and farmers have<br />

the choice of purchasing either small juveniles or<br />

advanced juveniles for around twice the price. There<br />

are two major drivers behind the development of this<br />

system. First, the typical grow-out time from a 2–5-g<br />

juvenile to a 350–400-g saleable product in central<br />

Vietnam is around 12 months. However, in many<br />

ponds there remains some risk associated with growing<br />

sandfish through the wet <strong>sea</strong>son—pond stratification<br />

and low salinities may cause reduced growth<br />

rates or mortalities if not well handled (see ‘Pond<br />

culture’ below). By seeding ponds with advanced<br />

juveniles, the grow-out period can be reduced to<br />

7–9 months, so that the wet <strong>sea</strong>son can be avoided.<br />

Second, the survival rate of larger juveniles is invariably<br />

greater following release (Purcell and Simutoga<br />

2008), partially offsetting the additional cost of larger<br />

juveniles. This advanced nursery system allows for<br />

the ponds with the best <strong>sea</strong>water supply to be used<br />

productively for advanced nursery culture throughout<br />

the wet <strong>sea</strong>son, with a larger number of lower quality<br />

ponds used for grow-out in the dry <strong>sea</strong>son.<br />

Pond culture<br />

Grow-out<br />

Pond culture of sandfish is an attractive proposition<br />

for several reasons. The high but often transient<br />

profitability of shrimp culture, combined with the


Figure 1. Purpose-built <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> hatchery at the Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center – Aquaculture<br />

Department, Iloilo, the Philippines (Photos: J. Zarate)<br />

Figure 2. Nursery hapas in a pond at the Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Institute for Aquaculture No. 3 National Seed Production Center,<br />

Vietnam (left); and floating hapas in an enclosed marine embayment established by the University of<br />

the Philippines Marine Science Institute (right) (Photos: D. Mills (left) and C. Hair (right))<br />

extreme risk profile associated with this activity,<br />

have resulted in a situation where smallholders have<br />

tended to lose out to large corporate interests with<br />

the financial backing to recover from stock crashes.<br />

Intensification of culture methods has also led to<br />

severe fouling in ponds, resulting in anoxic sediments<br />

and the ultimate abandonment of ponds. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

potentially represent a lower-risk investment for<br />

smallholders. As a species that is low on the food<br />

chain, they provide better environmental outcomes<br />

than shrimp farming, and do not require feeding if<br />

stocked in ponds previously used for shrimp culture.<br />

25<br />

There are, however, biophysical issues that<br />

ultimately restrict the number of shrimp ponds<br />

suitable for sandfish culture. Most critically, the<br />

vast majority of ponds were established for growing<br />

Penaeus monodon (tiger shrimp); to maximise<br />

yield of this species, brackish water is required. As<br />

a result, ponds were generally located with good<br />

access to a freshwater source, and it may be difficult<br />

to maintain the salinities required to optimise <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> growth. Holothuria scabra, while somewhat<br />

tolerant of reduced salinity (Pitt et al. 2001;<br />

Mills et al. 2008), grows best in marine conditions


(30–34 ppt as a general rule). In many culture trials,<br />

sudden salinity drops due to storm action and <strong>tropical</strong><br />

downpours have resulted in high mortality (Pitt et al.<br />

2001; Lavitra et al. 2009; and personal experience<br />

of two of the authors—N. Duy, Vietnam; C. Raison,<br />

Thailand). Notably, these issues have largely been<br />

circumvented in Vietnam, where several farmers<br />

are producing H. scabra in commercial quantities.<br />

Mills et al. (2008) assessed survival and growth of<br />

sandfish through the wet <strong>sea</strong>son by direct monitoring<br />

of commercial ponds and through farmer interviews.<br />

Although growth rates declined rapidly, survival of<br />

sandfish enclosed in nine pens within three operating<br />

commercial ponds was 100% through the 2007–08<br />

wet <strong>sea</strong>son, which included nine consecutive days of<br />

exceptionally heavy rains. Interviews with farmers<br />

revealed that, while most lost sandfish due to freshwater<br />

ingress during their first year of production,<br />

simple management protocols such as ensuring<br />

regular tidal water changes or, in some instances,<br />

using paddlewheels to ‘de-stratify’ b pond water<br />

resulted in very high survival rates. It should be<br />

noted, however, that ponds used for sandfish culture<br />

in central Vietnam have very good canal systems, and<br />

tidal regimes mean that substantial water changes are<br />

possible on most tides. Ponds with similar characteristics<br />

have proven difficult to find in other countries.<br />

Without a doubt, one of the greatest restrictions on<br />

profitable pond-based <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> culture is density<br />

limitation of growth rates. Past re<strong>sea</strong>rch (Battaglene<br />

et al. 1999) suggests that growth rates decline when<br />

densities exceed 225 g/m 2, while empirical evidence<br />

from Vietnam suggests that a density of around<br />

1 animal/m 2 in coastal ponds (without adding feed)<br />

provides an optimal balance between growth rates<br />

and total production for a target harvest size of<br />

300–400 g (Pitt and Duy 2004).<br />

Recent experiments at the Shrimp Genetic<br />

Improvement Center in Thailand (C.M. Raison,<br />

unpublished data) looked at the relationship<br />

between stocking density, feed rates, growth and<br />

survival. An orthogonal experiment compared<br />

growth and survival over 36 days among treatments<br />

b Stratification occurs when low salinity water sits on top<br />

of higher salinity water in the ponds, isolating the higher<br />

salinity water from the atmosphere. This may lead to<br />

reduced oxygen levels in the saline water, and a so-called<br />

‘lens effect’ caused by the upper layer of less saline<br />

water. This is said to result in increased temperature in<br />

the saline water, which further increases oxygen demand<br />

and compounds depletion.<br />

26<br />

comprising two densities of early juvenile sandfish<br />

(average individual weight 1.74 g at densities<br />

of about 50 and 85 g/m 2), and five feeding rates<br />

(0.05–0.25 g/treatment/day of commercial shrimp<br />

starter feed). Preliminary results indicate a strong<br />

positive relationship between feed rate and growth<br />

rate, and a weaker negative relationship between<br />

stocking density and growth rate. While by far the<br />

highest growth rates were seen among animals held<br />

at low density with high feed rates (average 234%<br />

weight gain per individual, compared with 39% for<br />

high density, low feed rate), the greatest overall gain<br />

in biomass was seen in the treatment with high density<br />

of sandfish and moderately high feeding rate. It<br />

was also clear from results that overfeeding can be an<br />

issue—survival was reduced at the highest feed rates.<br />

Where ponds already have rich organic sediments,<br />

the addition of feed may cause higher mortality rates.<br />

In addition, where nutrient conditions indicate that<br />

higher production rates might be achieved through<br />

feeding, these need to be offset against additional<br />

labour and feed costs. Results also show that organic<br />

loading in sediments can be too high for sandfish<br />

survival, so there is a limit to the effectiveness of<br />

sandfish for bioremediation in these situations.<br />

Co-culture: Pond-based co-culture systems involving<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s are conceptually very attractive. A<br />

pond containing only <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s for the duration<br />

of a grow-out cycle ‘wastes’ the space available in the<br />

water column, while the pond sediment bioremediation<br />

potential of sandfish has the potential to improve<br />

pond conditions for co-cultured species. Similarly,<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s grown under <strong>sea</strong> farms are seen as<br />

having the potential to alleviate fouling problems,<br />

while enriched deposits from faeces and food waste<br />

may increase the growth rates of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

(Slater et al. 2009). Unsurprisingly, interest in coculture<br />

in ponds has centered on shrimp, as most<br />

coastal ponds have been constructed for shrimp<br />

culture, and shrimp are a high-value commodity.<br />

Unfortunately, this match gives way on the reality of<br />

agonistic interactions, and <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s invariably<br />

come off second best. Trials with Penaeus monodon<br />

(tiger shrimp; Pitt et al. 2004) and Litopenaeus stylirostris<br />

(Pacific blue shrimp; Purcell et al. 2006; Bell<br />

et al. 2007) showed some initial promise; however,<br />

larger scale trials proved unsuccessful.<br />

Recent trials in Vietnam by Mills and Duy<br />

(unpublished data) on Litopenaeus vannamei (white<br />

leg shrimp) perhaps ended the shrimp proximate coculture<br />

ideal. This trial was set up under parameters


that should have greatly favoured <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s.<br />

In previous trials, postsettlement juvenile sandfish<br />

were tested with shrimp post-larvae. In the recent<br />

trials in Vietnam, larger juveniles (approx. 50 g)<br />

from ‘advanced nursery’ systems were tested with<br />

shrimp post-larvae, giving the sandfish a ‘head<br />

start’. This system would have the advantage that<br />

both shrimp and sandfish would reach market size<br />

at around the same time, simplifying the harvest<br />

process. Small-scale tank trials again showed some<br />

promise—if shrimp were stocked at fairly low density<br />

(15 post-larvae/m 2), survival and growth of sandfish<br />

were acceptable (although lower than controls).<br />

Interestingly, survival of shrimp was higher in all<br />

treatments with sandfish than in the shrimp-only<br />

controls. These trials were scaled up in 15 × 500 m 2<br />

ponds. The primary objective of the trial was to compare<br />

productivity and financial return from co-culture<br />

systems with that of rotational culture systems. The<br />

results were clear-cut—while growth rates were<br />

initially fastest in the co-culture treatments, after 6<br />

weeks in ponds the shrimp had reached a size where<br />

they could prey on the sandfish, and total mortality<br />

of sandfish in co-culture ponds followed shortly<br />

thereafter. It seems that either temporal or physical<br />

separation of shrimp and <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s is required<br />

for successful production of both species in a single<br />

pond. The former (rotational culture) is already practised<br />

by a number of producers in Vietnam, and our<br />

trials have shown high sandfish growth rates in ponds<br />

recently used for shrimp culture (Mills and Duy,<br />

unpublished data). Physical separation of shrimp and<br />

sandfish grown at the same time in ponds has yet to<br />

receive attention. This is a potentially fertile area for<br />

re<strong>sea</strong>rch that has yet to be tackled at any level.<br />

Average growth rate (g/day)<br />

0.25<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

0.05<br />

0<br />

27<br />

Co-culture with finfish is also a possibility.<br />

Farmers in Vietnam have successfully grown sandfish<br />

with <strong>sea</strong> bass (Lates calcarifer or barramundi);<br />

however, the market for this species in Vietnam is not<br />

strong, and this combination has not persisted in the<br />

industry. Recent trials at the SEAFDEC–AQD in the<br />

Philippines have highlighted several finfish species<br />

that may be compatible with sandfish. Species for the<br />

trials were selected based on commercial importance<br />

within South-East Asia. Species selected were milkfish<br />

(Chanos chanos), <strong>sea</strong> bass (Lates calcarifer),<br />

rabbitfish (Siganus guttatus), grouper (Epinephelus<br />

coioides), pompano (Trachinotus blochii) and<br />

mangrove red snapper (Lutjanus argentimaculatus).<br />

Initial trials involved tank-testing the compatibility<br />

of juvenile fish with juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. Results<br />

were most positive for pompano, milkfish and <strong>sea</strong><br />

bass—in all cases survival was close to 100%,<br />

although the growth rate of the sandfish was notably<br />

low (Figure 3). Rabbitfish and grouper were not<br />

compatible with sandfish. Current activities see trials<br />

with these more successful species being scaled up in<br />

experimental pond environments.<br />

Sea ranching<br />

Sea ranching is essentially a ‘put and take’ activity,<br />

where cultured juveniles are released into an area<br />

of natural habitat and harvested when they reach a<br />

commercially optimal size. Compared with pond<br />

culture, inputs are nominally lower, as the processes<br />

between release and harvest are largely left to nature.<br />

The trade-off here is that, as the level of care that can<br />

be offered to sandfish throughout the growth process<br />

is reduced, survival will be considerably lower than<br />

that seen in pond culture. In addition, property rights<br />

Sandfish Finfish<br />

w/ pompano w/ <strong>sea</strong> bass w/ milkfish<br />

Figure 3. Average growth rates of sandfish and finfish species held in co-culture


issues are less straightforward and the social dimension<br />

of culture systems becomes as critical as the biophysical<br />

dimensions. Re<strong>sea</strong>rchers in the Philippines<br />

(see Juinio-Meñez et al. 2012b) have been at the<br />

forefront of developing strategies for community<br />

engagement and equitable property rights, as well as<br />

developing, adopting or adapting techniques necessary<br />

to build viable <strong>sea</strong>-ranching systems (Figure<br />

4). Specific challenges for <strong>sea</strong>-ranching systems<br />

include minimising poaching, sustaining engagement,<br />

matching environmental and social requirements, and<br />

managing severe weather events<br />

Minimising poaching: The high value of sandfish<br />

has meant that protecting <strong>sea</strong>-ranch areas has<br />

proven difficult. Permanently manned guardhouses<br />

have been established at pilot sites in the Philippines<br />

28<br />

(Figure 4) to overcome this issue. Clearly, this<br />

represents a considerable investment on the part of<br />

the group owners. However, <strong>sea</strong> ranching is being<br />

promoted as a supplemental income for small-scale<br />

fishers, and discussions with participants reveal that<br />

the opportunity cost of being one of several <strong>sea</strong>-ranch<br />

owners involved in site guarding is not high. The<br />

platform becomes a social meeting point, and fishers<br />

can just as well sit on the platform and mend nets or<br />

build gear as they could onshore.<br />

Sustaining engagement: The time from establishing<br />

a <strong>sea</strong> ranch to the first fiscal returns in the<br />

Philippines will likely be at least 12 months and possibly<br />

closer to 18 months. Once the first batches of<br />

released sandfish have reached harvest size, regular<br />

harvests will be possible; however, the lack of any<br />

Figure 4. Sea ranching in the Philippines: mature animals from the ranch (left), the guardhouse to counteract<br />

poaching (top right) and the leader of the <strong>sea</strong>-ranching group illustrating the principles of the ranch design.<br />

All photos from the Victory <strong>sea</strong> ranch, northern Luzon, the Philippines (Photos: D. Mills and C. Hair)


eturn on time or money invested during the early<br />

stages has been an issue. Pressure from participants<br />

to harvest at smaller sizes needs to be resisted in<br />

order to optimise returns from the <strong>sea</strong> ranch.<br />

Matching environmental and social requirements:<br />

Both the engagement of strong and respected<br />

local institutions and the presence of appropriate<br />

habitat are essential preconditions for successful<br />

<strong>sea</strong>-ranching operations. Imposed on this, appropriate<br />

mechanisms for site governance must be developed.<br />

In the Philippines we have encountered a lot of enthusiasm<br />

to engage in <strong>sea</strong>-ranching activities, but a lot of<br />

energy and goodwill can be wasted if the appropriate<br />

conditions are not present. Managing expectations is<br />

a crucial part of establishing <strong>sea</strong>-ranching systems.<br />

Managing severe weather events: Of the countries<br />

engaged in active re<strong>sea</strong>rch, the Philippines is particularly<br />

prone to the impact of typhoons and flooding.<br />

The shallow inshore areas generally used for <strong>sea</strong><br />

ranching are susceptible to physical damage and acute<br />

salinity drops from these events. In addition to damage<br />

to ranching infrastructure and possible mortality<br />

of stock, at a pilot site in the Philippines it appears<br />

that stripping of rich organic surface layers from the<br />

sediment resulted in substantial negative growth of<br />

standing stock (A. Juinio-Meñez, pers. comm.).<br />

Restocking / stock enhancement<br />

The biological case for active restocking of overexploited<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> populations is a strong one (Bell<br />

et al. 2008). Due to the low dispersal ability and the<br />

need to be close to mates for successful reproduction,<br />

recovery from heavy overfishing will be protracted<br />

(‘allee effect’), if indeed at all possible (Friedman<br />

et al. 2011). Restocking provides a plausible route<br />

back to viable populations where no other may exist.<br />

The social case is just as strong—the potential for<br />

well-organised communities to create sustainable,<br />

supplemental livelihoods through restocking or stock<br />

enhancement appears promising. A clear risk with this<br />

approach is that it can be seen as a panacea where no<br />

other management systems have succeeded. In reality,<br />

strong and effective governance reform is an essential<br />

prerequisite for the establishment of effective restocking<br />

programs.<br />

A lot of recent re<strong>sea</strong>rch undertaken in the development<br />

of <strong>sea</strong>-ranching systems provides essential<br />

background information on pathways to establishing<br />

restocking or enhancement programs. This includes<br />

all work on hatchery and nursery systems, tagging<br />

methods, transportation systems, release methods<br />

29<br />

and monitoring. However, while the re<strong>sea</strong>rch area<br />

of restocking and enhancement remains one of keen<br />

interest, the realities to date of legitimate scientific<br />

investigation that can identify unambiguous impact<br />

mean that these areas are yet to be tackled. Unlike <strong>sea</strong><br />

ranching, restocking is a ‘whole-of-life-cycle’ process,<br />

in which reproductive and recruitment dynamics need<br />

to be understood and accounted for in program design.<br />

Success requires that enhanced populations occupy<br />

‘source’ areas where coastal currents carry larvae into<br />

areas of good habitat for recruitment and growth. If<br />

the choice of location is poor, larval mortality may be<br />

too high to provide any detectable enhancement effect.<br />

Future re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

The authors are aware of active re<strong>sea</strong>rch programs<br />

in the Philippines (hatchery, nursery systems, <strong>sea</strong><br />

ranching, co-culture, pond culture), Vietnam (hatchery,<br />

pond culture, co-culture, <strong>sea</strong> ranching), Thailand<br />

(pond culture, <strong>sea</strong> ranching) and Malaysia (hatchery,<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching). Strong institutional support, as well<br />

as donor-funded programs in the Philippines and<br />

Vietnam, in particular, will ensure continued development<br />

of <strong>sea</strong>-ranching and pond-culture systems.<br />

Current re<strong>sea</strong>rch in these countries is focusing on<br />

technology and system development to diversify<br />

options for producers, and on further understanding<br />

the optimal socioeconomic and biophysical preconditions<br />

for successful enterprises. Models for scaling<br />

out technology and catalysing uptake by small-scale<br />

producers are being tested across broad geographic<br />

regions. The pond-culture industry in Vietnam is<br />

currently growing ‘organically’, with around a dozen<br />

farmers involved. This provides good opportunities<br />

for future re<strong>sea</strong>rch in partnership with industry. In the<br />

Philippines, a major focus in the near future will be<br />

capacity building among local institutions to support<br />

early entrants into the <strong>sea</strong>-ranching industry. The<br />

establishment of model enterprises is expected to<br />

provide a strong basis for technology uptake.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch in Vietnam has been supported by <strong>ACIAR</strong>,<br />

the WorldFish Center and the Government of Vietnam.<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch in the Philippines has been supported by a<br />

multistakeholder government program and <strong>ACIAR</strong>.<br />

The re<strong>sea</strong>rch reported from Thailand was funded by<br />

the Thailand Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Fund and the UK Department<br />

for Innovation, Universities and Skills.


References<br />

Agudo N.S. 2006. Sandfish hatchery techniques. Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch,<br />

Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish<br />

Center: Noumea, New Caledonia.<br />

Battaglene S.C., Seymour J.E. and Ramofafia C. 1999.<br />

Survival and growth of cultured juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s,<br />

Holothuria scabra. Aquaculture 178, 293–322.<br />

Bell J.D., Agudo N.N., Purcell S.W., Blazer P., Simutoga M.,<br />

Pham D. et al. 2007. Grow-out of sandfish Holothuria<br />

scabra in ponds shows that co-culture with shrimp<br />

Litopenaeus stylirostris is not viable. Aquaculture 273,<br />

509–519.<br />

Bell J.D., Purcell S.W. and Nash W.J. 2008. Restoring<br />

small-scale fisheries for <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. Ocean<br />

and Coastal Management 51, 589–593.<br />

Brown E., Perez M., Garces R., Ragaza R., Bassig R. and<br />

Zaragoza E. 2010. Value chain analysis for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

in the Philippines. WorldFish Center: Penang, Malaysia.<br />

Chen J. 2004. Present status and prospects of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

industry in China. In ‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

and management’, ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand,<br />

S. Purcell, S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO<br />

Fisheries Technical Paper No. 463, 39–47. Food and<br />

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Choo P.S. 2008. Population status, fisheries and trade of<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in Asia. In ‘Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s. A global<br />

review of fisheries and trade’, ed. by V. Toral-Granda,<br />

A. Lovatelli and M. Vasconcellos. FAO Fisheries and<br />

Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 516, 81–118. Food and<br />

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Conand C. 2004. Present status of world <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

resources and utilization: an international overview. In<br />

‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’,<br />

ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S.<br />

Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No. 463, 13–23. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Dierberg F.E. and Kiattisimkul W. 1996. Issues, impacts,<br />

and implications of shrimp <strong>aquaculture</strong> in Thailand.<br />

Environmental Management 20, 649–666.<br />

Duy N.D.Q. 2010. Seed production of sandfish (Holothuria<br />

scabra) in Vietnam. Southeast Asian Fisheries<br />

Development Center (SEAFDEC): Iloilo, Philippines.<br />

Duy N.D.Q. 2012. Large-scale sandfish production from<br />

pond culture in Vietnam. In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong><br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A. Hair, T.D.<br />

Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings No. 136,<br />

34–39. Australian Centre for International Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]<br />

Friedman K., Eriksson H., Tardy E. and Pakoa K. 2011.<br />

Management of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> stocks: patterns of vulnerability<br />

and recovery of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> stocks impacted by<br />

fishing. Fish and Fisheries 12(1), 75–93.<br />

30<br />

Gamboa R.U., Aurelio R.A., Ganad D.A., Concepcion L.B.<br />

and Abreo N.A.S. 2012. Small-scale hatcheries and<br />

simple technologies for sandfish (Holothuria scabra)<br />

production. In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A. Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J.<br />

Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings No. 136, 63–74. Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra.<br />

[These proceedings]<br />

Gamboa R., Gomez A.L. and Nievales M.F. 2004. The<br />

status of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery and mariculture in the<br />

Philippines. In ‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

and management’, ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S.<br />

Purcell, S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO<br />

Fisheries Technical Paper No. 463, 69–78. Food and<br />

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

James D.B., Rajapandian M.E., Gopinathan C.P. and Baskar<br />

B.K. 1994. Breakthrough in induced breeding and rearing<br />

of the larvae and juveniles of Holothuria (Metriatyla)<br />

scabra Jaeger at Tuticorn. Bulletin of the Central Marine<br />

Fisheries Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Institute 46, 66–70.<br />

Juinio-Meñez M.A., de Peralta G., Dumalan R.J.P., Edullantes<br />

C.M. and Catbagan T. 2012a. Ocean nursery systems for<br />

scaling up juvenile sandfish (Holothuria scabra) production:<br />

ensuring opportunities for small fishers. In ‘Asia–<br />

Pacific <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A.<br />

Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings<br />

No. 136, 57–62. Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]<br />

Juinio-Meñez M.A., Paña M.A., de Peralta G., Olavides R.,<br />

Catbagan T., Edullantes C.M. and Rodriguez B.D. 2012b.<br />

Establishment and management of communal sandfish<br />

(Holothuria scabra) <strong>sea</strong> ranching in the Philippines. In<br />

‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed.<br />

by C.A. Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong><br />

Proceedings No. 136, 121–127. Australian Centre for<br />

International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These<br />

proceedings]<br />

Lavitra T., Rasolofonirina R., Jangoux M., Eeckhaut I. 2009.<br />

Problems related to the farming of Holothuria scabra<br />

(Jaeger 1833). SPC Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin<br />

29, 20–30.<br />

Mills D., Duy N.D.Q. and Johnson W. 2008. Review of<br />

sandfish pond-culture progress in Vietnam. Project no.<br />

FIS/2007/117, <strong>ACIAR</strong> Final Project Report.<br />

Mills D.J., Adhuri D., Phillips M., Ravikumar B. and Padiyar<br />

A.P. 2011. Shocks, recovery trajectories and resilience<br />

among <strong>aquaculture</strong>-dependent households in post-tsunami<br />

Aceh, Indonesia. Local Environment: the International<br />

Journal of Justice and Sustainability 16(5), 425–444.<br />

Pitt R. and Duy N.D.Q. 2004. Breeding and rearing of<br />

the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra in Vietnam. In<br />

‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’,<br />

ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S.<br />

Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No. 463, 333–346. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.


Pitt R., Duy N.D.Q., Duy T.V. and Long H.T.C. 2004.<br />

Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) with shrimp (Penaeus<br />

monodon) co-culture tank trials. SPC Beche-de-mer<br />

Information Bulletin 20, 12–22.<br />

Pitt R., Thu N.T.X., Minh M.D. and Phuc H.N. 2001.<br />

Preliminary sandfish growth trials in tanks, ponds<br />

and pens in Vietnam. SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin 15, 17–27.<br />

Purcell S.W., Patrois J. and Fraisse N. 2006. Experimental<br />

evaluation of co-culture of juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s,<br />

Holothuria scabra (Jaeger), with juvenile blue shrimp,<br />

Litopenaeus stylirostris (Stimpson). Aquaculture<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 37, 515–522.<br />

Purcell S.W. and Simutoga M. 2008. Spatio-temporal and<br />

size-dependent variation in the success of releasing<br />

cultured <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in the wild. Reviews in Fisheries<br />

Science 16, 204–214.<br />

Schwerdtner Máñez K. and Ferse S.C.A. 2010. The history<br />

of Makassan trepang fishing and trade. PLoS ONE 5(6):<br />

e11346. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011346.<br />

31<br />

Shiell G.R. and Knott B. 2010. Aggregations and temporal<br />

changes in the activity and bioturbation contribution of<br />

the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria whitmaei (Echinodermata:<br />

Holothuroidea). Marine Ecology Progress Series 415,<br />

127–139.<br />

Slater M.J., Jeffs A.G. and Carton A.G. 2009. The use of<br />

the waste from green-lipped mussels as a food source<br />

for juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, Australostichopus mollis.<br />

Aquaculture 292, 219–224.<br />

Yellow Seas Fisheries Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Institute 1991. Training<br />

manual on breeding and culture of scallop and <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> in China. Training Manual 9. At , accessed 1 April 2011.<br />

Wolkenhauer S.M., Uthicke S., Burridge C., Skewes T. and<br />

Pitcher R. 2010. The ecological role of Holothuria scabra<br />

(Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) within sub<strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong>grass<br />

beds. Journal of the Marine Biological Association<br />

of the United Kingdom 90, 215–223.<br />

Grace Abdala (hatchery manager) at sandfish nursery hapa in a pond at the National Integrated Fisheries<br />

Technology and Development Center, the Philippines (Photo: Cathy Hair)


Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> hatchery production<br />

Egg release from a female Holothuria scabra during spawning induction in a<br />

hatchery (Photo: Cathy Hair)<br />

33


Large-scale sandfish production from<br />

pond culture in Vietnam<br />

Nguyen D.Q. Duy 1<br />

Abstract<br />

In recent years the farming of sandfish (Holothuria scabra) has been adopted by a number of farmers in<br />

south-central Vietnam. Hundreds of thousands of hatchery-produced juvenile sandfish have been stocked into<br />

ponds in the region. Broodstock were collected from the wild in Khanh Hoa province and from commercial<br />

culture ponds at 40–500 g weight. The broodstock were stored in a holding pond at a low density without<br />

adding feed. Animals of average weight (~350 g) were then transferred to conditioning tanks about 1 month<br />

prior to spawning. Indoor conditioning tanks were prepared with a sandy substrate and sand-filtered water<br />

supply. The animals were fed with fine shrimp feed. Simplified hatchery methods using cheap and basic<br />

equipment have been refined over the past decade, and consistent batches of juveniles can now be produced<br />

at will, with around 50,000 competent juveniles produced from batches of 2 million eggs.<br />

Sandfish were cultivated in ponds with muddy-sand or coral-sand substrates using simplified techniques<br />

and locally developed management methods. The results of model sandfish culture ponds in three provinces<br />

proved that these methods can be profitable for farmers in these coastal areas. The constraints to commercial<br />

sandfish pond culture in Vietnam are no longer pond management or the price paid by the dealers, but density<br />

limits and culture duration.<br />

Introduction<br />

High demand for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> (e.g. sandfish<br />

(Holothuria scabra)) in China has resulted in overfishing<br />

in many countries in the <strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> region<br />

(Lovatelli et al. 2004). While restocking offers a<br />

plausible fast-track recovery of sandfish fisheries<br />

(Bell et al. 2007), pond culture provides livelihood<br />

options and a source of income for coastal communities<br />

engaged with faltering shrimp-farming<br />

enterprises (Mills et al. 2008).<br />

Hatchery and juvenile production techniques have<br />

been developed, documented and carried out with a<br />

minimum of advanced infrastructure (Battaglene<br />

1999; Pitt and Duy 2004; Duy 2005, 2010; Agudo<br />

2006). Over the past decade, many studies on breeding<br />

and rearing sandfish have been conducted by<br />

1 Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Institute for Aquaculture No. 3, Nha Trang,<br />

Khanh Hoa province, Vietnam<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

34<br />

the Vietnamese Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Institute for Aquaculture<br />

No. 3 (RIA3) sandfish hatchery in Van Ninh district,<br />

Khanh Hoa province, and the WorldFish Center<br />

(WorldFish). Other sandfish projects in Vietnam<br />

have been supported by the Australian Centre for<br />

International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>), the<br />

Danish International Development Agency, the<br />

Vietnamese Government, the South East Asian<br />

Fisheries Development Center (SEAFDEC) and so<br />

on. The hatchery and juvenile production techniques<br />

developed to date have been disseminated to the<br />

project partners and other private sector operators in<br />

the <strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> region.<br />

The large-scale production of sandfish for pond<br />

culture has been conducted in Vietnam based on<br />

knowledge developed from re<strong>sea</strong>rch collaborations<br />

between RIA3 and <strong>ACIAR</strong>–WorldFish (Pitt and<br />

Duy 2004; Bell et al. 2007; Mills et al. 2008). This<br />

paper describes the simplified techniques used in<br />

this re<strong>sea</strong>rch for seed production of sandfish and<br />

large-scale sandfish production for pond culture in


Vietnam. The progress of re<strong>sea</strong>rch on seed production<br />

and grow-out of sandfish will support the industry’s<br />

expansion in Vietnam and elsewhere in the region.<br />

Simplified techniques for seed<br />

production of sandfish<br />

Sandfish broodstock management<br />

A few years ago, sandfish broodstock were collected<br />

from the wild or holding ponds and pens, and immediately<br />

induced to spawn. Various methods of spawning<br />

stimulation were trialled but proved unreliable.<br />

In recent years, however, the broodstock have been<br />

conditioned in tanks in the hatchery for a period of<br />

about 1 month to allow gonads to reach full maturity.<br />

In the simplified techniques, concrete or fibreglass<br />

tanks placed indoors for shade were prepared with a<br />

10–15-cm layer of cleaned dried sand, and supplied<br />

with sand-filtered <strong>sea</strong> water to a depth of 0.5 m.<br />

Adult sandfish weighing more than 350 g were<br />

transferred from holding ponds to conditioning tanks.<br />

The <strong>sea</strong>water temperature in the conditioning tanks<br />

was stable, maintained below 30 °C. The density of<br />

broodstock should be less than 2 animals/m 2. Water<br />

exchange was carried out in the morning to avoid<br />

broodstock being induced to spawn from thermal<br />

shock. Fine shrimp starter feed at 1 g/m 3 was fed<br />

twice a day. In addition, broodstock were co-cultured<br />

with the carnivorous Babylon snail (Babylonia<br />

areolata), providing extra protein-rich feed that contributed<br />

to sandfish growth and condition. Even when<br />

kept in good health, broodstock might lose weight<br />

in 1 month of conditioning; weight loss of less than<br />

20% is acceptable.<br />

After conditioning in tanks, broodstock were<br />

reliably induced to spawn, being more sensitive to<br />

thermal shock stimulation (Agudo 2006; Duy 2010).<br />

This allowed the year-round production of sandfish<br />

juveniles. Pond-held broodstock are maintained close<br />

to the hatchery for convenience of transfer to conditioning<br />

tanks. There should be sufficient animals in<br />

holding ponds to substitute a group of 50 animals<br />

after each breeding cycle in the hatchery.<br />

Larval rearing<br />

Optimal larval density and feed were the two<br />

main factors in maximising growth and survival. The<br />

micro-algae Chaetoceros muelleri was used for the<br />

swimming and settled stages in the hatchery. Using<br />

a single species of algae represented a significant<br />

35<br />

simplification of the technical and infrastructure<br />

requirements for larval production, and meant that<br />

techniques could be more easily adopted by smallscale<br />

hatcheries such as former shrimp hatcheries.<br />

The feeding rate was increased gradually during<br />

larval rearing. The optimal rearing density was at<br />

200–300 larvae/L. At high densities of larval rearing,<br />

growth rates can decrease and high malformation<br />

rates are observed. As a result, it is better to get 10%<br />

survival (to 2–5-mm juveniles) from a starting point<br />

of 200 larvae/L in 4 weeks than 1% survival from<br />

1,000 larvae/L in 6 weeks. In addition, faster growth<br />

of juveniles can prevent predator disasters, such as<br />

copepod infestation. Loss from copepods was also<br />

minimised by preparing settlement plates by coating<br />

them in a slurry made from Spirulina paste (Figure 1)<br />

rather than natural conditioning through immersion<br />

in <strong>sea</strong> water (Duy 2010).<br />

Juvenile production<br />

Simplified hatchery methods using cheap and<br />

basic equipment were refined, and consistent batches<br />

of juveniles can now be produced at will, with around<br />

50,000 competent juveniles produced from batches<br />

of 2 million eggs. Hapa nets were used effectively<br />

for a low-cost nursery in ponds (Figure 2), removing<br />

the need for large raceways at hatchery facilities for<br />

juvenile rearing.<br />

Testing economic return from<br />

large-scale production in model<br />

ponds<br />

Design of model ponds<br />

We used two ponds in each of three provinces<br />

(Khanh Hoa, Phu Yen and Ninh Thuan) in central<br />

Vietnam. The ponds had a coral-sand or muddy-sand<br />

substrate. The ponds in Phu Yen and Ninh Thuan were<br />

used previously to rear shrimp and swimming crab.<br />

There was a collaborating agreement between RIA3<br />

and farmers to operate model ponds in Phu Yen and<br />

Ninh Thuan provinces. The two ponds in Khanh<br />

Hoa province were sediment settlement ponds at the<br />

National Center for Seed Production, belonging to<br />

RIA3, and were operated by project staff.<br />

Pond preparation<br />

All chosen ponds were located in the intertidal<br />

zone for convenient <strong>sea</strong>water exchange. The steps of<br />

pond preparation were as follows:


Figure 1. Preparation of Spirulina-coated settlement plates<br />

Figure 2. Hapa nets used for a first-stage nursery of sandfish in ponds<br />

36


• Dry the pond by draining through sluice-gates and<br />

pumping.<br />

• Remove predators and unwanted <strong>sea</strong>weed.<br />

• Till the sediment to disturb and wash the mud<br />

layer, ensuring that there is a burying layer of<br />

about 5 cm.<br />

• Build a net pen at the sluice-gates to exclude<br />

predators, and prevent escape or massing of sandfish<br />

in this area.<br />

• Apply lime (agriculture or hydrated) at 0.5–1.0 t/ha.<br />

• Fill the pond with <strong>sea</strong> water 1 week prior to stocking<br />

with juvenile sandfish.<br />

Transportation of juveniles<br />

The 2–20-g juveniles were produced at the RIA3<br />

sandfish hatchery from a single spawning in May<br />

2008. They were nursed to a size of 2 g in ponds<br />

using the hapa systems described by Pitt and Duy<br />

(2004), and then grown at high density in earthen<br />

ponds to a larger size (advanced nursery) before<br />

stocking in the model ponds in Phu Yen and Ninh<br />

Thuan. They were selected and placed in bare tanks<br />

to defecate for 1–2 days prior to transferring them<br />

to the ponds. An open transportation method of<br />

juveniles in foam boxes was used effectively, with<br />

survival rates of up to 100%.<br />

Water quality management<br />

The biggest causes of sandfish mortality in ponds<br />

are known to be predators and the stratification of<br />

pond water in the wet <strong>sea</strong>son. Despite this, we did<br />

not use paddle wheels to reduce stratification in<br />

the six model ponds; it was found to be unnecessary<br />

due to the efficiency of mixing during tidal<br />

water changes and wind mixing. During culture,<br />

pond water depths were kept at 0.8–1.5 m, and<br />

the water was changed by opening and closing the<br />

sluice-gates. Water quality parameters (temperature,<br />

37<br />

salinity) were monitored daily (Table 1). We found<br />

that the two model ponds in Khanh Hoa province<br />

experienced less water exchange than other ponds,<br />

which we believe was due to neap tides and hot<br />

weather. This resulted in high temperatures (up to<br />

36 °C) and salinities (up to 41‰) in these two ponds<br />

in the dry <strong>sea</strong>son. Ponds in Ninh Thuan and Phu Yen<br />

provinces had daily water changes, resulting in better<br />

conditions.<br />

Harvest<br />

We found that sandfish in all ponds reached commercial<br />

size (>300 g) in average weight in November<br />

2009, after 9–14 months in ponds (Table 2). The<br />

harvest was brought forward due to a significant<br />

flood event. Ponds in Khanh Hoa had endured the last<br />

wet <strong>sea</strong>son in 2008 without any losses. Final yields<br />

were in the range 2.61–2.80 t/ha (Table 2). Survival<br />

rates were higher for juveniles stocked at larger<br />

sizes (80%, 85% and 87% for 2-g, 10-g and 20-g<br />

juveniles, respectively). The sandfish were sold to<br />

local dealers and buyers in Ho Chi Minh City. Most<br />

of the production of this harvest was processed by a<br />

Singaporean processor using his preferred techniques<br />

to ensure higher quality. Local buyers also bought<br />

some sandfish and degutted them at the pond, then<br />

processed them using traditional methods. The dried,<br />

cultured sandfish were later seen at the market in Ho<br />

Chi Minh City, Vietnam.<br />

Financial return from pond culture<br />

At the harvest in November 2009, cultured sandfish<br />

were sold to processors at the ponds (Figure<br />

3) for 35–40,000 Vietnamese dong (VND)/kg<br />

(US$2.00–2.20) whole wet weight. The profit fluctuated<br />

between 49.5% and 80.1%, and the profit margin<br />

was estimated at 33.1–45%. This is equivalent to<br />

about 30–40 million VND (US$1,700–2,200)/ha/crop.<br />

Table 1. Mean (± SD) temperatures and salinities in model ponds in Khanh<br />

Hoa (KH), Phu Yen (PY) and Ninh Thuan (NT) provinces<br />

Pond Temperature (°C) Salinity (‰)<br />

KH1 27.4 ± 4.8 24.5 ± 8.5<br />

KH2 27.4 ± 5.0 24.5 ± 8.4<br />

PY1 28.2 ± 2.8 25.6 ± 6.5<br />

PY2 28.2 ± 2.7 25.6 ± 6.6<br />

NT1 29.5 ± 3.4 30.0 ± 2.7<br />

NT2 29.5 ± 3.4 30.1 ± 2.7


Table 2. Results of sandfish model pond culture in three provinces, 2008–09<br />

Province Total area<br />

(m 2)<br />

Discussion<br />

Mean<br />

stocking<br />

size (g)<br />

Density<br />

(juv./m 2)<br />

The results from model ponds in Phu Yen, Khanh<br />

Hoa and Ninh Thuan provinces showed that monoculture<br />

of sandfish in ponds can be profitable to<br />

farmers in coastal areas. It was clear that the bigger<br />

the sandfish are when released, the higher the survival<br />

rates obtained. However, there was a slower growth<br />

rate at around 1.0 g/day in these ponds compared<br />

with sandfish growth rates previously reported from<br />

other pond studies. In Van Ninh, Khanh Hoa province,<br />

growth rates were 1–3 g/day or 1.0–1.8 g/day,<br />

38<br />

Mean<br />

weight at<br />

harvest (g)<br />

Mean<br />

survival<br />

rate (%)<br />

Duration<br />

(days)<br />

Yield<br />

(t/ha)<br />

Khanh Hoa 14,000 2 1 350 80 420 2.80<br />

Phu Yen 10,000 10 1 310 85 305 2.63<br />

Ninh Thuan 10,000 20 1 300 87 274 2.61<br />

Figure 3. Processing of pond-cultured sandfish at Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Institute for Aquaculture No. 3<br />

respectively (Pitt and Duy 2004; Mills et al. 2008).<br />

In the hatchery, density affects sandfish growth at<br />

biomass levels greater than 225 g/m 2 (Battaglene<br />

et al. 1999). There may have been limited natural<br />

food and benthic organic matter in the substrates,<br />

thus affecting the growth in our model ponds when<br />

this threshold density was exceeded due to high<br />

survival rates. This led to a long culture period to<br />

attain commercial size for sandfish in the model<br />

ponds in Khanh Hoa province, while sandfish in the<br />

ponds in the two other provinces were at commercial<br />

size because of the bigger size of release. In fact, the


growth of sandfish appears to depend on many factors<br />

including substrate, pond site and supply of natural<br />

feed through water exchange.<br />

During culture, water management in the sandfish<br />

ponds requires attention by the farmers. Mass mortalities<br />

are likely if ponds are not adequately attended<br />

in the wet <strong>sea</strong>son; this has resulted in high mortality<br />

rates in the past. All the evidence gathered so far suggests<br />

that these problems can be cheaply and effectively<br />

overcome, even in uncharacteristically heavy<br />

and prolonged periods of rain (Mills et al. 2008).<br />

However, the relatively long duration of culture<br />

increases the expense of renting ponds and labour<br />

costs due to the high risk over the wet <strong>sea</strong>son. The<br />

prices paid for sandfish are increasing over the years,<br />

which will support a higher profit for the farmers in<br />

the future.<br />

The results of the model pond trials have been<br />

encouraging for industry expansion in the region and<br />

sandfish farming is contributing to viable livelihoods<br />

for the farmers in coastal central Vietnam.<br />

References<br />

Agudo N.S. 2006. Sandfish hatchery techniques. Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch,<br />

Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish<br />

Center: Noumea, New Caledonia.<br />

Battaglene S.C. 1999. Culture of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s for<br />

stock restoration and enhancement. Naga –The ICLARM<br />

Quarterly 22(4), 4–11.<br />

39<br />

Battaglene S.C., Seymour J.E. and Ramofafia C. 1999.<br />

Survival and growth of cultured juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>,<br />

Holothuria scabra. Aquaculture 178, 293–322.<br />

Bell J.D., Agudo N.S., Purcell S.W., Blazer P.M., Pham<br />

D. and Della Patrona L. 2007. Grow-out of sandfish<br />

Holothuria scabra in ponds shows that co-culture with<br />

shrimp Litopanaeus stylirostris is not viable. Aquaculture<br />

273, 509–519.<br />

Duy N.D.Q. 2005. Improving the seed production technique<br />

of sandfish Holothuria scabra in Nha Trang, Khanh<br />

Hoa. Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Institute for Aquaculture No. 3, FSPS<br />

Programme. SUMA Project Final Report.<br />

Duy N.D.Q. 2010. Seed production of sandfish (Holothuria<br />

scabra) in Vietnam. Aquaculture Extension Manual No.<br />

48, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center,<br />

Iloilo, Philippines.<br />

Lovatelli A., Conand C., Purcell S., Uthicke S., Hamel J-F.<br />

and Mercier A. (eds) 2004. Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> and management. FAO Fisheries Technical<br />

Paper No. 463. Food and Agriculture Organization of the<br />

United Nations: Rome.<br />

Mills D., Duy N.D.Q. and Johnson W. 2008. Review of sandfish<br />

pond-culture progress in Vietnam. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Project<br />

no. FIS/2007/117, Final Project Report.<br />

Pitt R. and Duy N.D.Q. 2004. Breeding and rearing of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra in Vietnam. In ‘Advances<br />

in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’, ed.<br />

by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S. Uthicke,<br />

J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries Technical<br />

Paper No. 463, 333–346. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.


In-vitro fertilisation: a simple, efficient<br />

method for obtaining <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

larvae year round<br />

Igor Eeckhaut 1,2*, Thierry Lavitra 2,3, Aline Léonet 1,<br />

Michel Jangoux 4 and Richard Rasolofonirina 3<br />

Abstract<br />

Obtaining eggs and larvae in large quantities is a critical point for the economic viability of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong>. In this paper, spawning induction methods and in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) methods are presented<br />

and compared. The IVF technique developed in Madagascar (MH-IVF) is a simple, cost-efficient method<br />

that enables hatcheries to obtain clean, fertilised eggs of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s year-round. MH-IVF does not<br />

require high-tech equipment and is applicable in small- and large-scale hatcheries. It ensures the best control<br />

at the very beginning of the work on the number and type of genitors (i.e. sex, length, weight, colour); the<br />

quality of the gonads (healthy versus parasitised); and the number, size and quality of spermatozoa and eggs.<br />

MH-IVF involves the sacrifice of very few genitors compared with the individuals obtained and sacrificed<br />

for production. Yet, it does not influence genetic drift any more than spawning induction methods.<br />

Introduction<br />

It is evident today from many surveys that the world’s<br />

wild stocks of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s are depleting fast, and<br />

almost everywhere this is due to the high demand<br />

from the Chinese market. The disappearance of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> wild stocks is not only a problem at the<br />

ecological level (these organisms being among the<br />

best bioturbators of the sediments in many marine<br />

ecosystems), but it is also a huge social problem as the<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> trade ensures a livelihood for millions<br />

of humans in developing countries. One of the best<br />

answers to this worldwide problem is to develop efficient<br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> systems where coastal villagers of<br />

1 Laboratoire de Biologie Marine, Université de Mons,<br />

Mons, Belgique<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

2 Madagascar Holothurie S.A., Toliara, Madagascar<br />

3 Institut Halieutique et des Sciences Marines, Université<br />

de Toliara, Toliara, Madagascar<br />

4 Laboratoire de Biologie Marine, Université Libre de<br />

Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgique<br />

40<br />

developing countries can be involved in some phases<br />

of the farming. However, <strong>aquaculture</strong> is basically a<br />

business where the end product (i.e. the trepang) is<br />

sold into the Chinese market. The private companies<br />

that are involved in this process need benefits: preferably<br />

quickly and with a minimum of investments. It<br />

is thus crucial for the sustainability of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> that the profitability of each step in the<br />

process—obtaining eggs, rearing larvae, pre-growing<br />

juveniles and growing adults—is optimised. Obtaining<br />

eggs and larvae in large quantities is thus a critical<br />

point for the economic viability of the industry.<br />

Over the past 10 years, we have developed a new<br />

method based on in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) for<br />

obtaining <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> larvae throughout the year in<br />

Madagascar. This method is used routinely by the company<br />

Madagascar Holothurie S.A. (MH.SA), which was<br />

created at the end of the re<strong>sea</strong>rch phase. We present here<br />

a description of this method and the various techniques<br />

that allow aquaculturists to obtain fertilised eggs of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s. Some are still in the re<strong>sea</strong>rch phase but<br />

appear to show promise for the near future.


There are basically three types of method: unforced<br />

spawnings, forced spawnings and IVF. The first<br />

method is used only on the East Pacific Isostichopus<br />

fuscus in Ecuador. There, and for that species only,<br />

spawning occurs monthly depending on the lunar<br />

cycle. There is no need to force the spawning but just<br />

to know the right time when genitors spawn (Mercier<br />

et al. 2007). To develop this method, Mercier et al.<br />

(2007) monitored several hundred individuals nearly<br />

every month over 4 years. Isostichopus fuscus displayed<br />

a lunar spawning periodicity: 0.7–34.9% of<br />

individuals consistently spawned 1–4 days after the<br />

new moon. Spawning occurred mostly within one<br />

evening; however, some gamete release was often<br />

recorded over two to four consecutive evenings.<br />

Individuals maintained in captivity for several months<br />

retained their spawning periodicity and timing with<br />

the lunar cycle. The percentage of spawning individuals<br />

was higher and a greater overlap between male and<br />

female peak spawning activity was observed during<br />

clear conditions compared with overcast conditions.<br />

Aside from the I. fuscus case, fertilised eggs are<br />

obtained by either inducing the spawning of genitors<br />

or fertilising oocytes that have been extracted<br />

from gonads. Spawning induction methods are<br />

based mainly on mechanical stress inflicted on adult<br />

individuals, but can also be stimulated by chemical<br />

incubations or injections.<br />

Spawning induction methods<br />

In the very first attempt to artificially obtain viable<br />

gametes from <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s, a Japanese scientist<br />

attempted the stripping technique in the 1930s (Inaba<br />

1937). The rate of fertilisation was only about 20%,<br />

and many of the larvae were malformed. Therefore,<br />

this method is no longer used for larval production.<br />

Today, the efficient mechanical stresses used are<br />

thermal shocks, and stimulation through drying and<br />

water pressure. Often a combination of these methods<br />

is used to force spawning.<br />

Thermal shocks<br />

Thermal shocks are the most widespread <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> spawning induction technique in <strong>aquaculture</strong>.<br />

The method has been successful in Iran<br />

(Dabbagh et al. 2011), Mauritius (Laxminarayana<br />

2005), India (James et al. 1994), Maldives (B. Giraspy,<br />

pers. comm.), the Philippines (R. Gamboa, pers.<br />

comm.), Vietnam (Pitt and Duy 2004), Australia<br />

(Morgan 2000a; Ivy and Giraspy 2006), Solomon<br />

41<br />

Islands (Battaglene et al. 2002), Fiji (Hair et al.<br />

2011), New Caledonia (Agudo 2006), Tanzania<br />

(G. Robinson, pers. comm.), and Japan and China<br />

(Shuxu and Gongehao 1981; Li 1987).<br />

Thermal shocks involve placing genitors into<br />

baths of different temperatures, and the steps of the<br />

method vary from place to place. In Mauritius, for<br />

example, Laxminarayana (2005) induced the spawning<br />

of Bohadschia marmorata and Holothuria atra<br />

by decreasing the <strong>sea</strong>water temperature by 3–5 °C by<br />

the addition of ice. After 5 minutes the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

were introduced into another tank filled with filtered<br />

<strong>sea</strong> water at normal temperature (3–5 °C higher<br />

than the first tank temperature). For H. scabra, the<br />

water temperature is raised by 3–5 °C for 1 hour,<br />

either by adding warmed <strong>sea</strong> water to the spawning<br />

tank or using aquarium heaters (Agudo 2006).<br />

The water temperatures should be kept within the<br />

range 28–32 °C. If the ambient water temperature is<br />

>30 °C, it is recommended to give a cold shock treatment<br />

for 1 hour before the heat shock. Sealed plastic<br />

bags containing ice are added to the tank to quickly<br />

lower the water temperature by 5 °C (Agudo 2006).<br />

Thermal shock is the most commonly used method<br />

to induce spawning of Apostichopus japonicus<br />

in Japan and China. Most spawners release eggs<br />

or sperm when the water temperature is raised by<br />

3–5 °C above the ambient temperature. The induction<br />

of spawning by <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in Japanese and<br />

Chinese hatcheries is usually carried out by regulation<br />

of rearing conditions, such as temperature, water<br />

exchange and light intensity. In A. japonicus cultivation<br />

in Japan, wild-caught broodstock are induced<br />

to spawn in tanks of <strong>sea</strong> water about 5 °C higher<br />

than natural <strong>sea</strong> water and under dark conditions.<br />

However, this method has some drawbacks in that<br />

it is sometimes ineffective and the rate of spawning<br />

is inconsistent.<br />

Water pressure and drying treatments<br />

These methods are often used in combination with<br />

thermal shocks or if thermal shocks were unsuccessful.<br />

The broodstock are left to dry in a tank in<br />

the shade for about half an hour before subjecting<br />

them to a powerful jet of <strong>sea</strong> water for a few minutes<br />

(Agudo 2006). The broodstock are then returned to<br />

the spawning tank at ambient water temperature.<br />

During the drying treatment the broodstock are left<br />

in the shade, completely dry, or in a few centimetres<br />

of <strong>sea</strong> water, for 30–45 minutes. These methods<br />

are commonly used with H. scabra as well as


A. japonicus. For the latter species, the operation<br />

often starts at about 17:00 hours, when the water in<br />

the temporary stocking tank is drained away and the<br />

spawners are exposed to air for 30–60 minutes, after<br />

which they are jetted with water for about 5–10 minutes.<br />

After about 1.5–2.0 hours, the spawners move<br />

upwards, become restless and toss their head from<br />

side to side. The males begin to spawn first, followed<br />

by the females about half an hour later.<br />

Chemical incubations and chemical<br />

injections<br />

The addition of a food stimulant is sometimes<br />

used for inducing spawning in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. Dried<br />

algae (Spirulina at a rate of 30 g per 300–500 L,<br />

or Algamac 2000 at a concentration of 0.1 g/L) is<br />

added to the tank containing broodstock for 1 hour<br />

(Agudo 2006). After 1 hour of incubation, the water<br />

is removed from the tank and replaced with clean<br />

water at ambient temperature.<br />

Mercier and Hamel (2002) demonstrated that<br />

the transfer of perivisceral coelomic fluid (PCF)<br />

can be used as a reliable tool to induce spawning<br />

in mature individuals. PCF collected from holothurians<br />

that had been in the typical spawning posture<br />

without shedding gametes for about 20 minutes<br />

triggered spawning in 71–100% of conspecifics. The<br />

individuals responded to the injection of a 2–3-mL<br />

aliquot by displaying the spawning posture within<br />

30–62 minutes and by massive gamete broadcast.<br />

The inductive substance was found not to be sexspecific<br />

since positive responses were observed in<br />

individuals of the same or opposite sex as the donor.<br />

The PCF of a spawning donor was also active when<br />

added to the surrounding <strong>sea</strong> water, as it induced the<br />

typical posturing in 47–65% of mature individuals,<br />

and subsequent gamete release in 20–31% of them<br />

less than 85 minutes later.<br />

Although most experiments were performed with<br />

Bohadschia argus, similar results were obtained with<br />

B. marmorata, Holothuria leucospilota and H. atra.<br />

Interspecific trials were also successful, implying<br />

that the chemical involved is not species-specific.<br />

Although this method is promising, it is still not<br />

applied in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> as it relies<br />

totally on the observation of genitors in spawning<br />

posture, which is a real challenge in non-natural<br />

conditions. However, if the bioactive molecule present<br />

in PCF is identified, this method should have<br />

a great advantage over the stress-induced methods<br />

described above.<br />

42<br />

Kato et al. (2009) purified one small pentapeptide<br />

from the buccal tissues of A. japonicus that has a<br />

practical value to induce spawning in the hatchery setting<br />

(Fujiwara et al. 2010). Kato et al. (2009) named<br />

the identified native peptide ‘cubifrin’. Mature A.<br />

japonicus injected with cubifrin during the reproductive<br />

<strong>sea</strong>son, from February to May, displayed sequential<br />

reproductive behaviours, which comprised climbing<br />

the side wall of the tank toward the water surface,<br />

waving the head and shedding gametes. Gamete<br />

shedding started about 60 and 80 minutes after the<br />

injection in males and females, respectively, and was<br />

completed almost simultaneously in both sexes about<br />

2 hours after the administration. Repeated injections<br />

of cubifrin at intervals of about 10 days successfully<br />

induced multiple spawns in both males and females.<br />

Induction of spawning by cubifrin in A. japonicus is an<br />

effective, simple and cost-effective method requiring<br />

only the injection of cubifrin solution into the body<br />

cavity. Cubifrin injections, however, were not effective<br />

in other holothurians, and the possibility of using them<br />

on other <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> species remains to be examined.<br />

In-vitro fertilisation<br />

In-vitro fertilisation is a process by which female<br />

germinal cells are fertilised by sperm in non-natural<br />

conditions; that is, outside the female genital tracts in<br />

organisms with internal fertilisation and in laboratory<br />

conditions for organisms with external fertilisation.<br />

The problem with IVF in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

is that the development of oocytes (as is the case for<br />

the female germinal cells of all animals) is stopped<br />

during the meiosis at prophase I.<br />

Oocyte maturation naturally concludes in<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s just before or during spawning,<br />

resulting in mature oocytes ready to be fertilised.<br />

Consequently, oocytes extracted from ovaries by<br />

dissection are not ready to be fertilised—they must<br />

undergo maturation first. In echinoderms the mechanism<br />

of maturation has been reviewed recently by<br />

Mercier and Hamel (2009), and is best understood in<br />

asteroids (<strong>sea</strong> stars). A gonad-stimulating substance<br />

(GSS) produced by the radial nerve cord (Kanatani<br />

1964) acts on the ovarian follicle cells, which, in turn,<br />

produce a secondary substance, the maturation inducing<br />

substance (MIS), identified as 1-methyladenine<br />

(1-MeA) (Kanatani and Shirai 1967; Kanatani 1969).<br />

The 1-MeA acts on an oocyte membrane receptor to<br />

activate an intracellular maturation promoting factor<br />

(MPF) (Stevens 1970; Yamashita et al. 2000), which


induces oocyte maturation involving germinal vesicle<br />

breakdown (GVBD), chromosome condensation and<br />

extrusions of the polar bodies.<br />

This oocyte maturation process is considered<br />

to be universal, with few variations among species<br />

(Kishimoto et al. 1982; Yamashita et al. 2000). It is<br />

also presumed to occur in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s, although<br />

this assertion is untested. Maruyama (1985) demonstrated<br />

that a GSS existed in five <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> species;<br />

comprising a peptide of several thousand daltons<br />

having similar characteristics to the asteroid GSS.<br />

Smiley (1988) suggested that the MIS of Stichopus<br />

californicus is likely to be a 2,8 di-substituted adenine.<br />

It was demonstrated, moreover, that the action<br />

of 1-MeA can be mimicked in <strong>sea</strong> stars (Kishimoto<br />

and Kanatani 1973; Kishimoto et al. 1976) and <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s (Smiley 1990) by various molecules such<br />

as L-cysteine (Kishimoto and Kanatani 1973), dithiothreitol<br />

(DTT) (Kishimoto and Kanatani 1980) or<br />

dimercaptopropanol (DMP) (Kishimoto et al. 1976).<br />

Yet, the endocrine substances involved in natural <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> oocyte maturation remain unknown.<br />

In <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>, two methods of IVF<br />

have proven to be efficient. The first method is still<br />

in the re<strong>sea</strong>rch phase and acts in activating ovarian<br />

cells that themselves induce oocyte maturation during<br />

the spawning period. This recently discovered method<br />

involves the incubation of oocytes in a gonadstimulating<br />

substance-like (GSSL) solution before<br />

fertilisation (GSSL-IVF) (Katow et al. 2009). The<br />

second method acts directly on vitellogenic oocytes<br />

and is efficient both during and outside the spawning<br />

period (Léonet et al. 2009). This technique has been<br />

used routinely at the MH.SA hatchery in Madagascar<br />

for several years and is referred to as MH-IVF.<br />

GSSL-IVF<br />

Recently, Katow et al. (2009) isolated a GSSL<br />

molecule from the radial nerve of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

A. japonicus (Aj-GSSL), and its partial DNA and<br />

protein sequences were characterised. The re<strong>sea</strong>rchers<br />

incubated tubes of ovaries full of vitellogenic<br />

oocytes with various extracts during the spawning<br />

<strong>sea</strong>son of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>. Radial nerve extract at<br />

3 mg/mL induced GVBD in 85% of immature ovarian<br />

oocytes. A synthetic 43-amino acid Aj-GSSL<br />

generated from this sequence induced GVBD in<br />

50% of immature ovarian oocytes, and an N-terminal<br />

21-amino acid peptide of the synthetic partial<br />

Aj-GSSL (Aj-GSSL-P1) induced GVBD in 80% of<br />

immature ovarian oocytes.<br />

43<br />

MH-IVF<br />

Léonet et al. (2009) analysed the effects of a<br />

powerful oocyte maturation inductor (OMI) used routinely<br />

by MH.SA on oocytes of the commercial species<br />

Holothuria scabra and on various other species<br />

of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. The new bioactive molecule was<br />

isolated from echinoderm extracts and identified by<br />

mass spectrometry, and the active site of the biomolecule<br />

was synthesised (international patent number:<br />

WO 2008/003691; patent title: ‘Oocyte maturation<br />

method’). The new OMI induces the maturation and<br />

fertilisation of more than 90% of oocytes, while other<br />

OMIs described in the literature (i.e. 1-MeA, DTT,<br />

DMP and L-cysteine) induce between 28–90% of<br />

oocytes to mature (Figure 1). The use of the other<br />

OMIs result in fertilisation rates that never exceed<br />

40% (Figure 1), and the resultant larvae often present<br />

developmental abnormalities.<br />

One of the advantages of the new OMI compared<br />

with the other methods is that it is effective throughout<br />

the year, even outside the spawning <strong>sea</strong>son of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s. In H. scabra, the difficulty of obtaining<br />

fertilised eggs throughout the year by conventional<br />

methods such as thermal shocks varies according<br />

to the geographic location, seemingly being easier<br />

when H. scabra populations are closer to the equator.<br />

The reproductive cycle of H. scabra has been well<br />

investigated over most of its geographic range—it is<br />

known in the Southern Hemisphere for populations<br />

in Indonesia (05°S; Tuwo 1999), Solomon Islands<br />

(09°S; Ramofafia et al. 2003), New Caledonia (20°S;<br />

Conand 1981) and Australia (27°S; Morgan 2000b);<br />

and in the Northern Hemisphere for populations in<br />

India (09°N; Krishnaswamy and Krishnan 1967) and<br />

the Philippines (13°N; Ong Che and Gomez 1985).<br />

The methods used during these studies were different<br />

but, globally, they strongly suggest that at least a small<br />

proportion of H. scabra in these populations spawn all<br />

year round (Hamel et al. 2002). However, the intensity<br />

of spawning over a year is different from one population<br />

to another: it can be continuous; it can increase<br />

once during a period of 2–3 months (i.e. an annual<br />

reproductive cycle); or it can increase twice with one<br />

of the two peaks of spawning intensity being higher<br />

than the other (i.e. a biannual reproductive cycle).<br />

Figure 2 shows the ovarian maturation in the<br />

H. scabra population around Toliara (Madagascar)<br />

(Rasolofonirina et al. 2005). Each bar represents<br />

30 females whose ovaries have been sectioned and<br />

characterised into five stages of maturity. The ovaries


Percentage<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

a<br />

Figure 1. Comparison of the efficiency of various substances on the oocyte<br />

maturation in Holothuria scabra (from Léonet et al. 2009). Oocytes<br />

have been extracted from the ovaries and incubated with the<br />

following substances: SW = <strong>sea</strong> water; DMP = dimercaptopropanol;<br />

1-MeA = 1-methyladenine; L-cyst = L-cysteine; DTT = dithiothreitol;<br />

MH ind = inductor used in Madagascar. Incubation time was 2 hours.<br />

The blue bars indicate the percentage of oocytes that were mature after<br />

incubation, and the red bars the percentage of oocytes that were fertilised<br />

after addition of spermatozoa. Small a, b, + and – indicate significant<br />

similarities or differences: two adjacent signs that are similar (e.g. b and<br />

b) indicate similarity of the effect.<br />

of two stages, termed ‘post-spawning’ and ‘resting’,<br />

are composed mainly of oogonia and oocytes at the<br />

beginning of the vitellogenesis, and are not ready to<br />

undergo maturation. The ovaries of the three other<br />

stages, termed ‘growing’, ‘mature’ and ‘spawning’,<br />

include mainly oocytes at the end of the vitellogenesis,<br />

and are ready to undergo maturation under<br />

the right stimulation. The graph demonstrates how<br />

MH-IVFs are feasible monthly: it shows that batches<br />

of potentially fertilisable oocytes are present each<br />

month in ovaries of H. scabra. Looking at the survey<br />

results, one can observe that more than 30% of the<br />

females have batches of oocytes in their ovaries waiting<br />

to enter maturation at almost any time of the year.<br />

Table 1 shows that the process is effective on 13 aspidochirote<br />

species tested so far (Léonet et al. 2009). The<br />

species were from the genera Actinopyga, Holothuria,<br />

Thelenota and Pearsonothuria. Interestingly, the<br />

method was successful on H. fuscogilva, a species of<br />

very high value. No Stichopus species were tested.<br />

–<br />

Mature<br />

Fertilised<br />

b<br />

+<br />

b<br />

–<br />

SW DMP 1-MeA L-cys DTT MH ind<br />

44<br />

a<br />

–<br />

b<br />

–<br />

a +<br />

Figure 3 illustrates the hatchery production<br />

obtained in MH.SA from January 2009 to February<br />

2010. During 2009, MH.SA carried out 29 IVFs,<br />

sacrificing 32 females and 24 males. The production<br />

of 4,942,876 embryos transformed into 278,486<br />

6-day-old auricularia, then 164,545 1-day-old<br />

post-metamorphic juveniles and 48,857 1-cm-long<br />

juveniles. These juveniles were transferred into ponds<br />

for pre-growing. The average monthly production<br />

of juveniles via MH-IVF is about 4,000 1-cm-long<br />

individuals up to a maximum of 8,000 (in a hatchery<br />

where the wet room is 70 m 2).<br />

Comparison of the methods<br />

Spawning induction methods are not effective outside<br />

the spawning period (Table 2). The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

spawning period varies from one species to another,<br />

and seems to be extended when the population<br />

is located close to the equator. The farther the


Percentage<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Nov-98<br />

Dec-98<br />

Jan-99<br />

Feb-99<br />

Mar-99<br />

Apr-99<br />

May-99<br />

Jun-99<br />

Jul-99<br />

Aug-99<br />

Sep-99<br />

Oct-99<br />

Nov-99<br />

Dec-99<br />

Jan-00<br />

Feb-00<br />

Mar-00<br />

Apr-00<br />

May-00<br />

Jun-00<br />

Jul-00<br />

Aug-00<br />

Sep-00<br />

Oct-00<br />

Nov-00<br />

Dec-00<br />

Jan-01<br />

Feb-01<br />

Mar-01<br />

Apr-01<br />

Figure 2. Ovarian maturity in the Holothuria scabra population of Toliara (Madagascar) (Rasolofonirina et<br />

al. 2005). At each period of the survey, the ovaries of 30 females were sectioned, analysed and<br />

characterised into five stages (post-spawning, resting, growing, mature and spawning). The ovaries<br />

of the stages post-spawning (black and white striped) and resting (white) include mainly oogonia and<br />

young oocytes. The ovaries of the stages growing (green), mature (spotted red) and spawning (plain<br />

red) include many oocytes that have completed vitellogenesis.<br />

populations are from the equatorial line, the more difficult<br />

the spawning induction methods are to apply. For<br />

example, it is easy to obtain eggs from H. scabra in<br />

the Philippines with thermal shocks (R. Gamboa, pers.<br />

comm.) but hard in Toliara (Madagascar) or Mascat<br />

(Oman) with the same method. It seems also to be<br />

true for I. fuscus, where the spawning <strong>sea</strong>son extends<br />

45<br />

Period<br />

Table 1. Maturation rate (%) of oocytes from various <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> species incubated<br />

with the MH inductor. Control is the rate of oocyte maturation in filtered <strong>sea</strong><br />

water (n = number of individuals tested) (modified from Léonet et al. 2009)<br />

Species Maturation (%) Control (%)<br />

Actinopyga echinites (n=3) 81.00 31.00<br />

Bohadschia subrubra (n=2) 99.00 9.00<br />

Bohadschia vitiensis (n=4) 87.42 9.65<br />

Holothuria cinerascens (n=3) 92.60 12.30<br />

Holothuria edulis (n=2) 92.00 11.00<br />

Holothuria forskali (n=2) 94.50 7.00<br />

Holothuria fuscogilva (n=5) 80.00 10.00<br />

Holothuria leucospilota (n=4) 70.25 6.00<br />

Holothuria maculosa (n=6) 63.35 9.20<br />

Holothuria scabra (n=4) 92.25 15.75<br />

Holothuria tubulosa (n=4) 82.00 24.25<br />

Pearsonothuria graeffei (n=3) 92.00 32.00<br />

Thelenota ananas (n=3) 79.33 32.66<br />

through the year in Galapagos (Torral-Granda and<br />

Martinez 2007) but is restricted to July–September in<br />

Baja California (Herrero-Pérezrul et al. 1999).<br />

The reliability of thermal shocks, even within<br />

the spawning period, is quite random (Table 2). The<br />

use of a substance to inject into the coelom or for<br />

incubation is much more reliable once the appropriate


Number of juveniles<br />

60,000<br />

50,000<br />

40,000<br />

30,000<br />

20,000<br />

10,000<br />

0<br />

J F M A M J J A<br />

Month<br />

Figure 3. Production of 1-cm-long juveniles from the Madagascar Holothurie S.A. hatchery<br />

during 2009: blue line = monthly production; red line = cumulative production<br />

concentration is known. The PCF method is actually<br />

difficult to apply in <strong>aquaculture</strong> as it requires PCF<br />

from animals in spawning posture, and that is not<br />

always easy to find. For this method to be effective in<br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong>, the bioactive molecule in the PCF needs<br />

to be identified.<br />

The three methods of spawning induction involved<br />

genitors that are kept in a large volume of <strong>sea</strong> water<br />

(often tanks with a few hundred litres). The fertilised<br />

eggs are collected at the end of the process through<br />

the use of various filtration procedures. During filtration,<br />

all microbes (bacteria, protozoans and small<br />

metazoans such as copepods) are retained with the<br />

fertilised eggs. Non-fertilised eggs stay in the filtrates<br />

and degrade during the next hours of the process.<br />

Therefore, the risk of infestation is high with spawning<br />

induction methods and very low in IVF methods<br />

because the latter require 1–2 L of 1-µm filtered <strong>sea</strong><br />

water at most (Table 2).<br />

The risk of larval malformation is minimal for<br />

spawning induction methods and for both GSSL-IVF<br />

and MH-IVF. However, it is high for IVF methods<br />

that use chemicals such as DTT, dimercaptopropanol<br />

(BAL), L-cysteine or 1-MeA.<br />

With respect to genetic issues, IVFs are no more<br />

influential on genetic drift than are the spawning<br />

induction methods. Genetic drift is a change in the<br />

frequency of alleles in a population. When populations<br />

are smaller, as is the case in <strong>aquaculture</strong> breedings,<br />

the effect of genetic drift is greater and may<br />

cause alleles to disappear completely, thus reducing<br />

genetic diversity. The reduction of genetic diversity<br />

46<br />

S O N D J F<br />

can be a problem in the production of individuals<br />

less adapted to cope with environmental variation. In<br />

IVFs, as in spawning induction methods, genetic drift<br />

could be a problem in the future, and the only way<br />

to overcome it is to pay attention to not always using<br />

genitors from the same parental lineage. In MH.SA,<br />

IVFs are done with genitors from previous generations,<br />

but gametes are also mixed with those from<br />

wild strains: gonads of wild strains are obtained from<br />

fishermen, who usually discard them as they use only<br />

the body wall of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s to prepare trepang.<br />

In conclusion, IVF methods, especially MH-IVF,<br />

are simple, cost-efficient, allow the collection of<br />

fertilised eggs of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s year round, and<br />

enable control of the basic operations in hatcheries.<br />

MH-IVF does not require high-tech equipment and<br />

is useful in both large- and small-scale hatcheries. It<br />

ensures a high degree of control at the very beginning<br />

of the work on the number and type of genitors (i.e.<br />

sex, length, weight, colour); the quality of the gonads<br />

(healthy versus parasitised); and the number, size and<br />

quality of spermatozoa and eggs. IVF necessitates<br />

the sacrifice of very few genitors compared with the<br />

individuals obtained and sacrificed for production<br />

(in 2009 the IVF sacrifices reached 0.1% of the<br />

production; the body walls of animals sacrificed for<br />

IVF were processed into trepang and entered into the<br />

production).


Table 2. Efficiency of the methods that allow <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> aquaculturists to obtain fertilised eggs<br />

Tested species References<br />

Risk of larval<br />

malform ations<br />

Risk of<br />

infestation<br />

Reliability<br />

inside<br />

spawning<br />

period<br />

Methods Details Useful<br />

outside<br />

spawning<br />

period<br />

– – + – Various species including Hamel et al. (2002)<br />

Apostichopus japonicus,<br />

Holothuria scabra and<br />

Isostichopus fuscus<br />

PCF Injection into<br />

– – + – Bohadschia argus<br />

Mercier and Hamel<br />

coelomic cavity<br />

B. marmorata<br />

(2002)<br />

Holothuria leucospilota<br />

H. atra<br />

Cubifrin Injection into<br />

– + + – A. japonicus Fujiwara et al. (2010)<br />

coelomic cavity<br />

Kato et al. (2009)<br />

In-vitro fertilisation<br />

GSSL-IVF Incubation of gonadal – + – – A. japonicus Katow et al. (2009)<br />

tubules<br />

MH-IVH Incubation of oocytes + + – – 13 species<br />

Léonet et al. (2009)<br />

(see Table 1)<br />

Spawning induction<br />

Thermal shocks Transfer into tanks of<br />

various temperatures<br />

47<br />

DTT-IVF Incubation of oocytes + + – + H. scabra<br />

Léonet et al. (2009)<br />

A. japonicus<br />

Karaseva and<br />

H. leucospilota<br />

Khotimchenko (1995)<br />

H. pardalis<br />

Maruyama (1980)<br />

Other inductors Incubation of oocytes – – – + H. scabra<br />

Léonet et al. (2009)<br />

(BAL,<br />

H. leucospilota<br />

Maruyama (1980)<br />

L-cystéine,<br />

H. pardalis<br />

1-MeA)<br />

PCF = perivisceral coelomic fluid; GSSL-IVF = gonad-stimulating substance-like in-vitro fertilisation; MH-IVH = Madagascar Holothurie S.A. in-vitro fertilisation; DTT-IVF = dithiothreitol in-vitro<br />

fertilisation; BAL = dimercaptopropanol; 1-MeA = 1-methyladenine


Acknowledgments<br />

This work has received the support of the Fonds<br />

National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS) and<br />

Commission Universitaire pour le Développement<br />

(CUD) through various grants and funding.<br />

References<br />

Agudo N.S. 2006. Sandfish hatchery techniques. Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch,<br />

Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish<br />

Center: Noumea, New Caledonia.<br />

Battaglene S.C., Evizel Seymour J., Ramofafia C. and Lane<br />

I. 2002. Spawning induction of three <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

Holothuria scabra, H. fuscogilva and Actinopyga<br />

mauritiana. Aquaculture 207, 29–47.<br />

Conand C. 1981. Sexual cycle of three commercially<br />

important holothurian species (Echinodermata) from the<br />

lagoon of New Calédonie. Bulletin of Marine Science<br />

31, 523–543.<br />

Dabbagh A., Sedaghat M., Rameshi H. and Kamrani E.<br />

2011. Breeding and larval rearing of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Holothuria leucospilota Brandt (Holothuria vegabunda<br />

Selenka) from the northern Persian Gulf, Iran. SPC<br />

Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 31, 35–38.<br />

Fujiwara A., Yamano K., Ohno K. and Yoshikuni M. 2010.<br />

Spawning induced by cubifrin in the Japanese common<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Apostichopus japonicus. Fisheries Science<br />

76, 795–801.<br />

Hair C., Pickering T., Meo S., Vereivalu T., Hunter J. and<br />

Cavakiqali L. 2011. Sandfish culture in Fiji Islands. SPC<br />

Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 31, 3–11.<br />

Hamel J.-F., Conand C., Pawson D.L. and Mercier A. 2002.<br />

The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra (Holothuroidea:<br />

Echinodermata): its biology and exploitation as bechede-mer.<br />

Advances in Marine Biology 41, 129–223.<br />

Herrero-Pérezrul M.D., Reyes Bonilla H., García-<br />

Domínguez F. and Cintra-Buenrostro C.E 1999.<br />

Reproduction and growth of Isostichopus fuscus<br />

(Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) in the southern Gulf<br />

of California, México. Marine Biology 135, 521–532.<br />

Inaba D. 1937. Artificial rearing of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>. Suisen<br />

Kenkyushi 35, 241–246.<br />

Ivy G. and Giraspy D.A.B. 2006. Development of largescale<br />

hatchery production techniques for the commercially<br />

important <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra var.<br />

versicolor (Conand, 1986) in Queensland, Australia. SPC<br />

Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 24, 28–34.<br />

James D.B., Gandhi A.D., Palaniswamy N. and Rodrigo J.X.<br />

1994. Hatchery techniques and culture of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Holothuria scabra. Central Marine Fisheries Re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

Institute Special Publication 57, 1–40.<br />

48<br />

Kanatani H. 1964. Spawning of starfish: action of gameteshedding<br />

substance obtained from radial nerves. Science<br />

146, 1177–1179.<br />

Kanatani H. 1969. Induction of spawning and oocyte maturation<br />

by 1-methyladenine in starfish. Experimental Cell<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 57, 333–337.<br />

Kanatani H. and Shirai H. 1967. In-vitro production of<br />

meiosis inducing substance by nerve extract in ovary of<br />

starfish. Nature 216, 284–286.<br />

Karaseva E.M. and Khotimchenko Yu S. 1995. Effects of<br />

compounds elevating nucleotide levels on dithiotreitolinduced<br />

oocyte maturation in the holothurian Stichopus<br />

japonicus. Comparative Biochemical Physiology 111,<br />

441–444.<br />

Kato S., Tsurumaru S., Taga M., Yamane T., Shibata Y. and<br />

Ohno K. 2009. Neuronal peptides induce oocyte maturation<br />

and gamete spawning of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Apostichopus<br />

japonicus. Developmental Biology 326, 169–176.<br />

Katow H., Katow T. and Moriyama A. 2009. Gonadstimulating<br />

substance-like molecule from the radial<br />

nerve of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>. International Journal of<br />

Developmental Biology 53, 483–491.<br />

Kishimoto T., Cayer M.L. and Kanatani H. 1976. Starfish<br />

oocyte maturation and reduction of disulfide-bond<br />

on oocyte surface. Experimental Cell Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 101,<br />

104–110.<br />

Kishimoto T. and Kanatani H. 1973. Induction of starfish<br />

oocyte maturation by disulfide-reducing agents.<br />

Experimental Cell Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 82, 296–302.<br />

Kishimoto T. and Kanatani H. 1980. Induction of oocyte<br />

maturation by disulfides-reducing agent in the <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> Stichopus japonicus. Development Growth<br />

and Differentiation 22, 163–167.<br />

Kishimoto T., Kuriyama R., Kondo H. and Kanatani H.<br />

1982. Generality of the action of various maturationpromoting<br />

factors. Experimental Cell Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 137,<br />

121–126.<br />

Krishnaswamy S. and Krishnan S. 1967. A report on the<br />

reproductive cycle of the holothurian Holothuria scabra<br />

Jaëger. Current Science 36, 155–156.<br />

Laxminarayana A. 2005. Induced spawning and larval<br />

rearing of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s Bohadschia marmorata<br />

and Holothuria atra in Mauritius. SPC Beche-de-mer<br />

Information Bulletin 22, 48–52.<br />

Léonet A., Rasolofonirina R., Wattiez R., Jangoux M.<br />

and Eeckhaut I. 2009. A new method to induce oocyte<br />

maturation in holothuroids (Echinodermata). Invertebrate<br />

Reproduction and Development 53, 13–21<br />

Li F. 1987. The artificial breeding and cultivation of<br />

Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka). Zoological Marine<br />

Drugs 6, 103–106.<br />

Maruyama Y.K. 1980. Artificial induction of oocyte maturation<br />

and development in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s Holothuria<br />

leucospilota and Holothuria pardalis. Biological Bulletin<br />

158, 339–348.


Maruyama Y.K. 1985. Holothurian oocyte maturation<br />

induced by radial nerve. Biological Bulletin 168,<br />

249–262.<br />

Mercier A. and Hamel J.-F. 2002. Perivisceral coelomic fluid<br />

as a mediator of spawning induction in <strong>tropical</strong> holothurians.<br />

Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 41,<br />

223–234.<br />

Mercier A. and Hamel J.-F. 2009. Endogenous and<br />

exogenous control of gametogenesis and spawning in<br />

echinoderms. Advance in Marine Biology 55, 1–291.<br />

Mercier A., Ycaza R.H. and Hamel J.-F. 2007. Long-term<br />

study of gamete release in a broadcast-spawning holothurian:<br />

predictable lunar and diel periodicities. Marine<br />

Ecology Progress Series 329, 179–189.<br />

Morgan A.D. 2000a. Induction of spawning in the<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra (Echinodermata:<br />

Holothuroidea). Journal of the World Aquaculture<br />

Society 31, 186–194.<br />

Morgan A.D. 2000b. Aspects of the reproductive cycle of<br />

the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra (Echinodermata:<br />

Holothuroidea). Bulletin of Marine Science 66, 47–57.<br />

Ong Che R.G. and Gomez E.D. 1985. Reproductive<br />

periodicity of Holothuria scabra Jaeger at Calatangan,<br />

Batangas, Philippines. Asian Marine Biology 2, 21–29.<br />

Pitt R. and Duy, N.D.Q. 2004. Breeding and rearing of<br />

the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra in Viet Nam. In<br />

‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’,<br />

ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S.<br />

Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No. 463, 333–346. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Ramofafia C., Byrne M. and Battaglene S.C. 2003.<br />

Reproduction of the commercial <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Holothuria scabra (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) in<br />

the Solomon Islands. Marine Biology 142, 281–288.<br />

49<br />

Rasolofonirina R., Vaïtilingon D., Eeckhaut I. and Jangoux<br />

M. 2005. Reproductive cycle of edible echinoderms<br />

from the south-western Indian Ocean. II: the sandfish<br />

Holothuria scabra. Western Indian Ocean Journal Marine<br />

Science 4, 61–75.<br />

Shuxu X. and Gongehao G. 1981, Experiments on<br />

southward transportation and artificial breeding of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> Stichopus japonicus. Journal of Fisheries,<br />

China 5, 147–155.<br />

Smiley S. 1988. Investigation into purification and identification<br />

of the oocyte maturation hormone of Stichopus<br />

californicus (Holothuroidea: Echinodermata). Pp.<br />

541–549 in ‘Echinoderm biology’, ed. by P. Burke,<br />

V. Mladenov, P. Lambert and R.L. Parsley. Balkema:<br />

Rotterdam.<br />

Smiley S. 1990. A review of echinoderm oogenesis. Journal<br />

of Electron Microscopy 16, 96–114.<br />

Stevens M. 1970. Procedures for induction of spawning<br />

and meiotic maturation of starfish oocytes by treatment<br />

with 1-methyladenine. Experimental Cell Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 59,<br />

482–484.<br />

Toral-Granda M.V. and Martínez P.C. 2007. Reproductive<br />

biology and population structure of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Isostichopus fuscus (Ludwig, 1875) (Holothuroidea) in<br />

Caamaño, Galápagos Islands, Ecuador. Marine Biology<br />

151, 2091–2098.<br />

Tuwo A. 1999. Reproductive cycle of the holothurian<br />

Holothuria scabra in Saugi Island, Spermonde<br />

Archipelago, Southwest Sulawesi, Indonesia. SPC<br />

Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 11, 9–12.<br />

Yamashita M., Mita K., Yoshidda N. and Kondo T. 2000.<br />

Molecular mechanisms of the initiation of oocyte maturation:<br />

general and species-specific aspects. Progress in<br />

Cell Cycle Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 4, 115–129.


Evaluation of nutritional condition of<br />

juvenile sandfish (Holothuria scabra)<br />

Satoshi Watanabe 1*, Jacques M. Zarate 1,2,<br />

Maria J.H. Lebata-Ramos 2 and Marie F.J. Nievales 3<br />

Abstract<br />

It is important to accurately evaluate the wellbeing or nutritional condition of organisms when monitoring<br />

the wild stock conditions and improvement in <strong>aquaculture</strong> techniques; however, reliable nutritional condition<br />

indexes have not been established for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. In this study, the effects of starvation on condition factor<br />

(body weight / body volume), coelomic fluid constituent (protein, carbohydrate and cholesterol) concentrations<br />

and coelomic fluid density were analysed in an attempt to establish a method to determine nutritional<br />

condition in juvenile sandfish (Holothuria scabra). Body length, breadth and weight of juveniles produced<br />

at the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> hatchery of the Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development<br />

Center, were measured after anaesthetisation with 2% menthol-ethanol. Coelomic fluid protein level was<br />

analysed by the bicinchoninic acid method. Carbohydrate level was analysed by the phenol – sulfuric acid<br />

method. Cholesterol level was analysed by the Zak method. Coelomic fluid volume and coelomic fluid weight<br />

were measured. Starvation caused a concomitant decrease in body length, breadth and weight, resulting<br />

in no net change in the condition factor. This result indicated that condition factor cannot be used as a<br />

nutritional condition index. Coelomic fluid constituent level could be measured with a small volume of<br />

sample (i.e. 10–20 µL). Although no clear pattern was observed in coelomic fluid protein and cholesterol<br />

levels during the starvation trial, carbohydrate level increased, as did coelomic fluid density. These results<br />

suggest that coelomic fluid density and carbohydrate level may be used as indexes for nutritional condition<br />

of sandfish without sacrificing the animal.<br />

Introduction<br />

Due to overexploitation and increasing demand,<br />

fishery stocks of many <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> species<br />

have declined drastically in the Pacific and Indian<br />

oceans (Carpenter and Niem 1998; Hamel et al. 2001;<br />

Conand 2004). In order to increase the fishery production,<br />

many studies have been done on hatchery,<br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> and stock enhancement methods of <strong>sea</strong><br />

1 Japan International Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Center for Agricultural<br />

Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

2 Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries<br />

Development Center, Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines<br />

3 Division of Biological Sciences College of Arts and<br />

Sciences, University of the Philippines Visayas, Miagao,<br />

Iloilo, Philippines<br />

50<br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s, especially sandfish (Holothuria scabra),<br />

which is the most valued of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

(e.g. Battaglene et al. 1999; Mercier et al. 1999;<br />

Purcell et al. 2006; Bell et al. 2007). Nevertheless,<br />

there is a basic methodological problem: there has<br />

been no standard evaluation method developed for<br />

nutritional condition in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s, including<br />

H. scabra. Hatcheries for H. scabra have been operating<br />

in countries such as New Caledonia, Vietnam,<br />

India and the Philippines (James 1999; Pitt and Duy<br />

2004; Agudo 2006; Duy 2010). Slow growth and high<br />

mortality of the cultured juveniles are problematic in<br />

these hatcheries—the growth of juveniles can sometimes<br />

be faster in an earthen pond where supplemental<br />

feeding is not conducted than in concrete tanks under<br />

controlled conditions (SEAFDEC–AQD, pers. comm.;<br />

Pitt et al. 2001; Agudo 2012). Therefore, hatchery


techniques, particularly feeding methods, should be<br />

improved. It is also crucial to establish a method to<br />

monitor the condition of released juveniles in stock<br />

enhancement programs.<br />

In this study, attempts were made to establish a<br />

method to evaluate nutritional condition of sandfish<br />

based upon body size to weight relationship and<br />

concentration of coelomic fluid constituents.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Measurements of body size, coelomic fluid<br />

volume and coelomic fluid density<br />

In order to acquire basic information about the relationship<br />

between body size and coelomic fluid, data on<br />

H. scabra juveniles obtained from the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

hatchery of the Southeast Asian Fisheries Development<br />

Center – Aquaculture Department (SEAFDEC–AQD)<br />

in Iloilo, the Philippines, were collected. To increase<br />

body measurement accuracy, the juveniles were<br />

anaesthetised using a standard anaesthetic solution:<br />

ethanol saturated with menthol (i.e. 0.56 g menthol<br />

crystal dissolved in 100 mL of 99% ethanol) and<br />

diluted with filtered <strong>sea</strong> water to 2% (Yamana et al.<br />

2005). H. scabra (n = 15) were placed in the solution<br />

at room temperature for 20 minutes. After blotting dry<br />

with paper towels, body length (BL) and body breadth<br />

at the widest point (BB) were measured to the nearest<br />

0.01 mm, and body weight (BW) was measured to the<br />

nearest 0.01 mg. Body volume (BV) was calculated as<br />

a spheroid according to equation (1):<br />

BV = 4/3 × π × BL × (BB/2) 2 (1)<br />

Fulton’s condition factor (K) was calculated<br />

according to equation (2):<br />

K = BW/BV ×104 (2)<br />

Holothuria scabra were then cut longitudinally at the<br />

abdomen, and total coelomic fluid was collected with<br />

a micropipette into a micro centrifuge tube. Coelomic<br />

fluid volume (CFV) was measured to the nearest 10 µL<br />

with micropipettes. Coelomic fluid weight (CFW) was<br />

measured to the nearest 0.001 mg with a microbalance.<br />

Effects of starvation on condition of H. scabra<br />

Holothuria scabra juveniles of similar sizes<br />

obtained at the SEAFDEC–AQD sandfish hatchery<br />

(n = 30) were anaesthetised as described above and<br />

body sizes were measured (i.e. BL, BB and BW). For<br />

the initial data, five individuals were stored at –80 ºC.<br />

51<br />

The rest of the H. scabra were individually placed<br />

in containers made of PVC pipe (10 cm diameter<br />

× 5 cm length) with both ends covered with 5-mm<br />

mesh (Figure 1). The containers were placed in a<br />

60-L fibreglass tank (5 containers in each of 5 tanks)<br />

and kept under flow-through conditions with aeration<br />

but no sediment or supplementary feeding. Tank <strong>sea</strong><br />

water was sand-filtered, further filtered with 10-µm<br />

and 1-µm filters, and UV-treated. Size measurements<br />

were made every 2 days on the same individuals after<br />

anaesthetisation, and five individuals (i.e. one tank)<br />

were stored at –80 ºC every 2 days until day 10.<br />

At the conclusion of the trial, the frozen samples<br />

were thawed in a refrigerator and longitudinally cut at<br />

the abdomen. Coelomic fluid was collected to measure<br />

protein, carbohydrate and cholesterol concentrations:<br />

• Protein concentration of coelomic fluid was measured<br />

by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method (QuantiPro<br />

BCA Assay Kit, SIGMA-ALDRICH). A 10-µL<br />

aliquot of coelomic fluid was diluted 100 times with<br />

distilled water in 1.5-mL microtubes, and absorbance<br />

was read at 562 nm using a microplate reader.<br />

• Carbohydrate concentration of the coelomic fluid<br />

was measured by the modified phenol – sulfuric<br />

acid method (Kushwaha and Kates 1981). A 10-µL<br />

aliquot of the coelomic fluid was mixed with 40 µL<br />

distilled water, 20 µL 5% phenol solution and<br />

100 µL concentrated H 2SO 4 in 2-mL microtubes,<br />

vortexed, and incubated in an 80 °C block heater<br />

for 10 minutes. Absorbance was read at 490 nm<br />

against a blank, using a microplate reader.<br />

• Cholesterol concentration of the coelomic fluid was<br />

measured by the modified Zak method (Zak 1957;<br />

Altescu 1965). A 20-µL aliquot of the coelomic<br />

fluid was mixed with 300 µL 0.2% CuCl 2 •2H 2O<br />

in 99% ethanol and 200 µL concentrated H 2SO 4<br />

in 1.5-mL microtubes, and incubated in an 80 °C<br />

block heater for 10 minutes. Absorbance was read<br />

at 540 nm against a blank, using a microplate reader.<br />

Filters Fibreglass tank Samples<br />

10 µm<br />

1 µm<br />

UV<br />

Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the sandfish rearing<br />

system used in this study


Effects of starvation on coelomic fluid<br />

volume and coelomic fluid density<br />

To determine changes in coelomic fluid density<br />

(CFD) and CFV relative to the body size (CFV '),<br />

another starvation trial was conducted for 20 days.<br />

Body size measurements were made after anaesthetisation<br />

(n = 25) and five individuals were stored<br />

at –80 ºC for the initial data. In each of four 60-L<br />

fibreglass tanks, five individuals were placed (not<br />

individually separated). Every 5 days, five individuals<br />

(i.e. all five individuals from one tank) were<br />

measured and stored at –80 ºC. The frozen samples<br />

were thawed in a refrigerator; total coelomic fluid<br />

was drawn from the body cavity to measure CFV and<br />

CFW. CFD was obtained as CFW/CFV. CFV ' was<br />

calculated as CFV/BV.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

Relationships between the studied parameters were<br />

examined by linear, hyperbolic or exponential regression<br />

analyses. For comparisons of more than three<br />

datasets, ANOVA was performed followed by a Tukey<br />

test for posteriori comparisons. For comparisons of<br />

paired data sets, t-tests were used. Differences were<br />

considered significant if P < 0.05.<br />

Results and discussion<br />

Body size, coelomic fluid volume, coelomic<br />

fluid density and condition factor<br />

CFV of H. scabra had a significant positive correlation<br />

with BL (Figure 2, equation (3)):<br />

CFV = 1.73 × e0.11BL (3)<br />

CFV increased linearly as BW (Figure 2, equation<br />

(4)):<br />

CFV = 123.0 × BW – 93.7 (4)<br />

and BV (equation (5)) increased:<br />

CFV = 0.01 × BV – 60.40 (5)<br />

This is common for many animals since BV and<br />

BW increase exponentially with BL.<br />

There were no significant correlations between<br />

CFD and BL (r2 = 0.13, P = 0.19), BW (r2 = 0.058,<br />

P = 0.39) or BV (r2 =0.068, P = 0.35).<br />

Condition factor (K) had a significant negative<br />

linear correlation with BL (Figure 2), BV and BW,<br />

according to equations (6), (7) and (8), respectively:<br />

52<br />

K = –0.01 × BL + 1.22 (6)<br />

K = –2.8×10 -6 × BV + 1.05 (7)<br />

K = –0.0032 × BW + 1.05 (8)<br />

Since K is correlated with BL, BV and BW, it must be<br />

standardised for size and weight if it is to be used for<br />

condition comparisons of H. scabra of different sizes.<br />

Starvation, condition factor and coelomic<br />

fluid constituent concentrations<br />

BV and BW of individual H. scabra decreased<br />

concomitantly during the 10-day starvation period<br />

(Figure 3). While BW gradually decreased over the<br />

experimental period, the trend in BV was less clear,<br />

perhaps due to limited accuracy of body size measurements<br />

despite anaesthetisation. The plasticity of<br />

the body shape of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s is problematic for<br />

size measurements (Sewell 1990; Battaglene et al.<br />

1999). Nevertheless, both mean BV and BW significantly<br />

decreased in 10 days (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01,<br />

respectively, t-test). Because of this, K stayed constant<br />

during the starvation period (Figure 3), with<br />

no significant difference between day 1 and day<br />

10 (P = 0.16, t-test). K is one of the most widely<br />

used indexes for determination of condition, wellbeing<br />

or ‘plumpness’ of organisms in fisheries and<br />

general fish biology studies (e.g. Nash et al. 2006).<br />

However, unlike vertebrates and invertebrates with<br />

exoskeletons, K is not a useful index for the evaluation<br />

of nutritional condition in H. scabra because of<br />

the concomitant changes in body size and weight.<br />

Protein and cholesterol concentrations in the coelomic<br />

fluid of H. scabra initially increased and then<br />

decreased after day 6 during the 10-day starvation<br />

period (Figure 4), according to equations (9) and<br />

(10):<br />

C p = –0.050 × d 2 + 0.53 × d + 2.70 (9)<br />

Cch = –0.0016 × d2 + 0.021 × d + 0.17 (10)<br />

where Cp is protein concentration and Cch is cholesterol<br />

concentration, and d is day of starvation.<br />

Therefore, it is difficult to use them as indexes of<br />

nutritional condition in H. scabra. On the other hand,<br />

carbohydrate concentration (Cc) increased linearly<br />

(Figure 4) as starvation continued, according to<br />

equation (11):<br />

C c = 0.076 × d + 0.86 (11)


Coelomic fluid volume<br />

(µL)<br />

Coelomic fluid volume<br />

(µL)<br />

Coelomic fluid volume<br />

(µL)<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

r = 0.91<br />

P < 0.0001<br />

20 30 40 50 60 70<br />

Body length (mm)<br />

Body volume (mm3 1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

r = 0.84<br />

P < 0.001<br />

0 50,000<br />

)<br />

100,000<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

r = 0.79<br />

P < 0.001<br />

0 2 4 6 8<br />

Body weight (g)<br />

Therefore, C c may be suitable for determination<br />

of nutritional condition. Reasons for increased C c<br />

despite starvation are not known. In fact, C c in the<br />

coelomic fluid in Japanese <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Stichopus<br />

japonicus is reported to decrease and non-protein<br />

nitrogen level stay constant during starvation (Tanaka<br />

1958). Further studies on the physiological processes<br />

of H. scabra during starvation are needed.<br />

Starvation, coelomic fluid volume and<br />

coelomic fluid density<br />

CFD had a significant positive linear correlation<br />

with the starvation period (Figure 5), according to<br />

equation (12):<br />

CFD = 0.0087× d + 0.92 (12)<br />

CFV ', on the other hand, had a significant negative<br />

linear correlation with the starvation period (Figure<br />

4) according to equation (13):<br />

53<br />

K (g/mm 3 ×10 4 )<br />

K (g/mm 3 ×10 4 )<br />

K (g/mm 3 ×10 4 )<br />

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

r = –0.68<br />

P < 0.01<br />

20 30 40 50 60 70<br />

Body length (mm)<br />

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

Body volume (mm3 r = –0.76<br />

P < 0.001<br />

0 50,000<br />

)<br />

100,000<br />

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

r = –0.69<br />

P < 0.01<br />

0 2 4 6 8<br />

Body weight (g)<br />

Figure 2. Relationships between body size and coelomic fluid volume and condition factor (K) in<br />

Holothuria scabra (n = 15)<br />

CFV ' = –0.0015× d + 0.084 (13)<br />

These relationships may indicate that increased C c<br />

due to starvation may be related to thickening of the<br />

coelomic fluid. In addition, since protein is reported<br />

to be the major energy source for small Apostichopus<br />

japonicus (synonym for S. japonicus) during aestivation<br />

(Yang et al. 2006), the protein concentration may<br />

increase during the initial phase of starvation due to<br />

thickening of the coelomic fluid, and subsequently<br />

decrease due to energy consumption.<br />

Recommended index for nutritional<br />

condition<br />

Although mechanisms of changes in coelomic<br />

fluid constituent concentrations during starvation are<br />

not understood, the Cc seems to be a good indicator of<br />

nutritional condition in H. scabra. Since it requires a<br />

very small amount of coelomic fluid sample (10 µL)<br />

for the colorimetric carbohydrate measurement, it


Body volume (mm 3 )<br />

Body volume (mm 3 )<br />

K (g/mm 3 ×10 4 )<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

2,000<br />

0<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

2 4 6 8 10<br />

Starvation (days)<br />

2 4 6 8 10<br />

Starvation (days)<br />

2 4 6 8 10<br />

Starvation (days)<br />

Figure 3. Changes in body volume, body weight<br />

and condition factor (K) of Holothuria<br />

scabra (n = 5) during a 10-day starvation<br />

trial. Different symbols refer to specific<br />

individuals.<br />

may be possible to monitor the time-course change of<br />

nutritional condition of an individual without sacrificing<br />

it. A method to sample the coelomic fluid using<br />

cannulation from live specimens should be further<br />

investigated. Although CFD may also be a good<br />

indicator of nutritional condition, it requires a larger<br />

amount of sample for the measurement. In this study,<br />

the entire coelomic fluid of each individual was used<br />

for the density measurement to increase accuracy of<br />

the measurements. While the use of more sensitive<br />

devices may increase the measurement accuracy of<br />

CFD, colorimetric methods are recommended.<br />

Studies on improvement of H. scabra production at<br />

hatcheries and <strong>aquaculture</strong> facilities, as well as stock<br />

54<br />

Protein (mg/mL)<br />

Cholesterol (mg/mL)<br />

Carbohydrate (mg/mL)<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0.35<br />

0.30<br />

0.25<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

2<br />

4 6<br />

Starvation (days)<br />

0.10<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Starvation (days)<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

r = 0.62<br />

P < 0.001<br />

r = 0.58<br />

P < 0.001<br />

enhancement technologies, should be carried out with<br />

the methods for monitoring H. scabra conditions<br />

described here.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

8 10<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

r = 0.73<br />

P < 0.0001<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10<br />

Starvation (days)<br />

Figure 4. Relationships between starvation period<br />

and levels of protein, cholesterol and<br />

carbohydrate in the coelomic fluid of<br />

Holothuria scabra<br />

The authors are grateful to Joemel Sumbing, Jesus<br />

Rodriguez, Rema Sibonga, Harold Figurado and Roy<br />

Hipolito at SEAFDEC–AQD for assistance in sandfish<br />

culture and laboratory analysis. This study was<br />

funded by the Japan International Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Center<br />

for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS).


Coelomic fluid density<br />

(mg/mL)<br />

Coelomic fluid volume/<br />

body volume (µL/mm3 )<br />

1.3<br />

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0<br />

0.12<br />

0.08<br />

0.04<br />

r = 0.72<br />

P < 0.0001<br />

5 10 15<br />

Starvation (days)<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Starvation (days)<br />

Figure 5. Relationships between starvation period<br />

and coelomic fluid density and coelomic<br />

fluid volume relative to body volume of<br />

Holothuria scabra<br />

References<br />

r = –0.44<br />

P < 0.05<br />

Agudo N.S. 2006. Sandfish hatchery techniques. Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch,<br />

Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish<br />

Center: Noumea, New Caledonia.<br />

Agudo N.S. 2012. Pond grow-out trials for sandfish<br />

(Holothuria scabra) in New Caledonia. In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong><br />

<strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A.<br />

Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings<br />

No. 136, 104–112. Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]<br />

Altescu E.J. 1965. New reagent for the direct determination of<br />

serum cholesterol. Journal of Clinical Pathology 18, 824.<br />

Battaglene S.C., Seymour J.E. and Ramofafia C. 1999.<br />

Survival and growth of cultured juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

Holothuria scabra. Aquaculture 178, 293–322.<br />

Bell J.D., Agudo N.S., Purcell S.W., Blazer P., Simutoga M.,<br />

Pham D. et al. 2007. Grow-out of sandfish Holothuria<br />

scabra in ponds shows that co-culture with shrimp<br />

Litopenaeus stylirostris is not viable. Aquaculture 273,<br />

509–519.<br />

Carpenter K.E. and Niem V.H. 1998. The living marine<br />

resources of the Western Central Pacific, Volume 2:<br />

Cephalopods, crustaceans, holothurians and sharks. FAO<br />

species identification guide for fishery purposes. Food and<br />

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

20<br />

55<br />

Conand C. 2004. Present status of world <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

resources and utilization: an international overview. In<br />

‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’,<br />

ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S.<br />

Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No. 463, 13–23. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Duy N.D.Q. 2010. Seed production of sandfish (Holothuria<br />

scabra) in Vietnam. Aquaculture Extension Manual 48.<br />

Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center: Iloilo,<br />

Philippines.<br />

Hamel J.-F., Conand C., Pawson D.L. and Mercier A. 2001.<br />

The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra (Holothuroidea:<br />

Echinodermata): its biology and exploitation as bechede-mer.<br />

Advances in Marine Biology 41, 129–202.<br />

James D.B. 1999. Hatchery and culture for the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Holothuria scabra Jaeger in India. Naga, ICLARM<br />

Quarterly 22, 12–16.<br />

Kushwaha S. C. and Kates M. 1981. Modification of<br />

phenol-sulfuric acid method for the estimation of sugars<br />

in lipids. Lipids 16, 372–373.<br />

Mercier A., Battaglene S.C. and Hamel J.-F. 1999. Daily<br />

burrowing cycle and feeding activity of juvenile <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s Holothuria scabra in response to environmental<br />

factors. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology<br />

and Ecology 239, 125–156.<br />

Nash R.D.M., Valencia A.H. and Geffen A.J. 2006. The<br />

origin of Fulton’s condition factor—setting the record<br />

straight. Fisheries 31, 236–238.<br />

Pitt R. and Duy N.D.Q. 2004. Breeding and rearing of<br />

the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra in Viet Nam. In<br />

‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’,<br />

ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S.<br />

Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No. 463, 333–346. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Pitt R., Thu N.T.X., Minh M.D. and Phuc H.N. 2001.<br />

Preliminary sandfish growth trials in tanks, ponds<br />

and pens in Vietnam. SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin 15, 17–27.<br />

Purcell S.W., Patrois J. and Fraisse N. 2006. Experimental<br />

evaluation of co-culture of juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s,<br />

Holothuria scabra (Jaeger), with juvenile blue shrimp,<br />

Litopenaeus stylirostris (Stimpson). Aquaculture<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 37, 515–522.<br />

Sewell M.A. 1990. Aspects of the ecology of Stichopus mollis<br />

(Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) in north-eastern New<br />

Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 24, 97–103.<br />

Tanaka Y. 1958. Feeding and digestion processes of<br />

Stichopus japonicus. Bulletin of Faculty of Fisheries<br />

Hokkaido University 9, 14–28.<br />

Yamana Y., Hamano T. and Yamamoto K. 2005. Anesthetizer<br />

of the adult <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Apostichopus japonicus.<br />

Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 71, 299–306. (in Japanese<br />

with English abstract)


Yang H., Zhou Y., Zhang T., Yuan X., Li X., Liu Y. et<br />

al. 2006. Metabolic characteristics of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka) during aestivation.<br />

Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology<br />

330, 505–510.<br />

Zak E. 1957. Simple rapid microtechnic for serum total<br />

cholesterol. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 27,<br />

583–588.<br />

56


Ocean nursery systems for scaling up juvenile<br />

sandfish (Holothuria scabra) production:<br />

ensuring opportunities for small fishers<br />

Marie Antonette Juinio-Meñez 1*, Glycinea M. de Peralta 1, Rafael Junnar P.<br />

Dumalan 1, Christine Mae A. Edullantes 1 and Tirso O. Catbagan 1<br />

Abstract<br />

Cost-effective production of juveniles to release size (>3 g) is a primary objective in the culture of Holothuria<br />

scabra. Ocean nursery systems were developed to help overcome the space limitations of a small hatchery setup<br />

and shorten the rearing period in the hatchery. The growth and survival of first-stage juveniles (4–10 mm)<br />

in two ocean nursery systems—floating hapas and bottom-set hapa cages—were compared with those reared<br />

in hapa nets in a marine pond. Juveniles reared in these nursery systems were healthy and in good condition.<br />

Survival was not substantially different in hapa nets in marine ponds and floating hapas. However, growth<br />

in pond hapa nets was higher than in the two ocean nursery systems. Nonetheless, the estimated cost of<br />

producing juveniles in the floating hapa system is considerably cheaper compared with those reared in the<br />

other systems. Moreover, local community partners easily maintained the floating hapas and reared the<br />

juveniles to release size. Further, the effects of sand conditioning on juvenile quality were also investigated.<br />

The growth of sand-conditioned juveniles was higher than unconditioned ones in hatchery tanks, and more<br />

conditioned juveniles buried within the first hour of release in the field. From floating hapas, juveniles<br />

can be conditioned in <strong>sea</strong> pens for at least 1 week, or reared to bigger sizes for 1–2 months (>20 g) prior<br />

to release. However, whether this intermediate rearing procedure will be practical with large numbers of<br />

juveniles needs to be considered. Results show that ocean nursery systems are simple and viable alternative<br />

systems for scaling up juvenile sandfish production compared with hapas in marine ponds, which might not<br />

be available and accessible to small fishers.<br />

Introduction<br />

The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery is a source of livelihood<br />

to many coastal dwellers and the basis of a multimillion<br />

dollar trepang industry in the Philippines<br />

(Gamboa et al. 2004). Various coastal towns, cities<br />

and provinces all over the country have been reported<br />

to engage in significant <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> collection<br />

and processing activities (e.g. Trinidad-Roa 1987).<br />

Intense harvesting, unsustainable fishery practices<br />

and increasing demand for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> products<br />

1 Marine Science Institute, University of the Philippines,<br />

Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

57<br />

in international trade have resulted in a progressive<br />

decline in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> stocks and the overexploitation<br />

of high-value species.<br />

With the decline in the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> stocks,<br />

restocking hatchery-produced juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

is seen as a means to rebuild wild stocks<br />

(Battaglene 1999). At present, Holothuria scabra is<br />

the only species of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> that can<br />

be mass cultured in the hatchery (see references in<br />

Lovatelli et al. (2004)).<br />

The culture technology for sandfish was initially<br />

developed in India (James 1999, 2004) and then in<br />

Solomon Islands (Battaglene 1999). Culture protocols<br />

were further refined in New Caledonia (Agudo<br />

2006) and Vietnam (Pitt and Duy 2004; Duy 2010).


In the Philippines, experimental-scale trials of<br />

sandfish culture were initiated in 2000 (Gamboa and<br />

Juinio-Meñez 2003), and efforts to scale up juvenile<br />

production and expand community-based <strong>sea</strong>ranching<br />

activities are ongoing. Hatchery culture protocols<br />

based on various methods reported from other<br />

hatcheries were modified and adapted to optimise<br />

larval and early juvenile rearing at the University of<br />

the Philippines Marine Science Institute’s (UPMSI)<br />

Bolinao Marine Laboratory (BML). However, the<br />

costs of producing juveniles in the hatchery and<br />

marine ponds were high. Scaling up production was<br />

further constrained by space limitations in a small<br />

hatchery set-up. Given these considerations, ocean<br />

nursery systems designed to shorten the juvenile<br />

rearing period in the hatchery and reduce the cost<br />

of production were investigated. In addition, since<br />

production of juveniles is intended primarily for<br />

community-managed <strong>sea</strong> ranching, mechanisms to<br />

engage local partners in early juvenile rearing were<br />

deemed to be strategic in enhancing ownership of<br />

these initiatives.<br />

Hatchery culture of H. scabra<br />

at the UPMSI Bolinao Marine<br />

Laboratory<br />

The current techniques used for broodstock spawning<br />

and rearing juvenile sandfish are described here. For<br />

each spawning induction, 40–50 wild broodstock<br />

(>200 g) are acquired from fishers, and are maintained<br />

in <strong>sea</strong> pens near the hatchery facility or in<br />

concrete tanks in the hatchery for 2–4 weeks prior<br />

to spawning induction. Broodstock are successfully<br />

induced to spawn within 3–4 days using a combined<br />

treatment of desiccation, thermal shock and food<br />

shock (Spirulina) (Agudo 2006) at any time of the<br />

year.<br />

The developing larvae are reared in larval tanks<br />

with moderate aeration and shading at a stocking density<br />

of 0.3–0.5 fertilised egg/mL. Larvae are cultured<br />

in static conditions with daily partial water change<br />

(30–50%) using UV-treated <strong>sea</strong> water (UVSW). A<br />

mixture of Isochrysis galbana and Chaetoceros calcitrans<br />

at a density of 10,000–15,000 cells/mL is fed to<br />

the larvae twice a day as they develop. Under optimal<br />

conditions (28–30 °C and 32–34 ppt), the auricularia<br />

larvae start to metamorphose to doliolaria stage by<br />

day 10. General cleaning of the tanks is done prior<br />

to introduction of Spirulina-coated settlement plates<br />

58<br />

in the larval rearing tanks. The plates are introduced<br />

when >50% of the larvae have reached the pentactula<br />

stage, usually within 12 days of fertilisation. Both<br />

sides of the corrugated plastic settlement plates are<br />

coated with Spirulina paste (i.e. Spirulina powder<br />

dissolved in a small volume of fresh water) and airdried<br />

for 30–60 minutes (Duy 2010). Before being<br />

placed in the larval-rearing tanks, settlement plates<br />

are soaked in tanks with flow-through UVSW for<br />

30 minutes. The amount of C. calcitrans and I. galbana<br />

provided to the larvae twice a day is adjusted<br />

to 20,000–30,000 cells/mL when most larvae have<br />

settled by day 15. The diatom Navicula ramossissima<br />

and Sargassum extract are also provided as supplemental<br />

food for the post-settled juveniles.<br />

This method resulted in a fivefold increase in survival<br />

from fertilised eggs to second-stage juveniles<br />

from year 1 to year 3 (Table 1). This is attributed<br />

to the low initial stocking density currently being<br />

used in the facility (0.3–0.5 fertilised egg/mL), the<br />

use of Spirulina-coated plates to induce settlement,<br />

and the extended use of C. calcitrans combined with<br />

N. ramossissima to feed the newly settled juveniles.<br />

Periodically, Sargassum extract was also provided<br />

as supplemental food. Survival from first-stage<br />

to second-stage also improved by 95% by year 3.<br />

Increase in the number of second-stage and releasesize<br />

juveniles was largely due to the development of<br />

ocean nursery systems in Bolinao, which addressed<br />

the problem of slow growth and low survival due<br />

to limitation in hatchery space (i.e. high density<br />

stocking in tanks) as described below. As a result,<br />

fewer batches of larvae had to be reared per year,<br />

significantly reducing time and effort in the hatchery<br />

operations.<br />

Ocean nursery systems<br />

In the first year of production, early juveniles were<br />

reared to a release size of >3 g in the land-based<br />

hatchery tanks. Rearing to release size in the hatchery<br />

involved growing post-settled juveniles in settlement<br />

tanks with benthic diatoms and supplementing with<br />

Sargassum extract up to 90 days until the juveniles<br />

reached ~1.0 g. The juveniles were then transferred<br />

to tanks with sediment and sand-filtered <strong>sea</strong> water.<br />

Daily feeding of diatoms and periodic addition of<br />

ground Sargassum enriched the sediment in the<br />

tanks. Both growth rate and survival were low due to<br />

difficulties in producing sufficient benthic diatoms<br />

and maintaining good water quality in the tanks with


Table 1. Juvenile production in the Bolinao outdoor hatchery facility from May 2007 to April 2010<br />

Spawning trial Number<br />

of batches<br />

Fertilised egg<br />

count<br />

(millions)<br />

sediment, even with a flow-through system. After the<br />

study visit at the Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Institute for Aquaculture<br />

No. 3 (RIA3) in Nha Trang, Vietnam, in June 2008,<br />

most of the first-stage juveniles (4–10 mm) were<br />

reared in hapa nets in a marine pond following<br />

Vietnamese methods (Duy 2010). However, a suitable<br />

marine pond was about 100 km away from the BML<br />

hatchery—a travel time of ~2.5 hours. Thus, manpower<br />

resources and costs to transport juveniles were<br />

substantial. In addition, while survival was relatively<br />

high (60–73%), juvenile growth in the ponds was<br />

highly variable. Growth ranged from almost nil up<br />

to 6.1 g over 30 days. This variability was probably<br />

due to high temperatures (27–31 °C) and extreme<br />

fluctuations in salinity (13–29 ppt).<br />

Ocean nursery systems to increase juvenile production<br />

and reduce production costs for first-stage<br />

juveniles were investigated (Juinio-Meñez et al.<br />

2009). Bottom-set hapa cages, which were used<br />

to rear juveniles to >1.0 g during the experimental<br />

phase of sandfish culture in earlier trials, were<br />

modified to rear first-stage juveniles (4–10 mm). In<br />

addition, the use of floating hapas was pilot-tested.<br />

Initial trials conducted in high nutrient areas in<br />

northern Luzon showed that first-stage juveniles can<br />

grow up to ~1.0 g in 49 days in the floating hapas<br />

(Edullantes and Juinio-Meñez 2009). Subsequently,<br />

an experiment was conducted to compare growth and<br />

survival of first-stage juveniles in the three nursery<br />

systems—the hapa nets in ponds and the two ocean<br />

nursery systems (hapa cages and floating hapa nets).<br />

The same type of mesh was used for all set-ups.<br />

Stocking density relative to the estimated potential<br />

grazing area was 150 juveniles/m 2. The experiment<br />

ran for 30 days. Results showed that growth was<br />

higher in the hapa nets (0.6 g) in the pond than in the<br />

% survival<br />

to first stage<br />

(30 mm)<br />

Year 1 (May 2007<br />

– April 2008)<br />

8 22.23 0.76 0.11 16.08 12,468<br />

Year 2 (May 2008<br />

– April 2009)<br />

3 10.74 1.14 0.35 32.32 26,331<br />

Year 3 (May 2009<br />

– April 2010)<br />

3 7.10 2.08 0.67 31.44 32,433<br />

TOTAL 14 71,232<br />

Aside from scaling up juvenile production, improving<br />

the quality of released juveniles is crucial for<br />

successful <strong>sea</strong> ranching. Hatchery production of<br />

environmentally incompetent juveniles jeopardises<br />

restocking success (Battaglene and Bell 2004; Purcell


Table 2. Comparison of the different nursery systems (hapa nets in marine ponds, ocean floating hapas and<br />

bottom-set <strong>sea</strong> cages) using different criteria<br />

Criteria Nursery systems<br />

2004; Oliver et al. 2008). In the hatchery, additional<br />

conditioning regimes introduce extra expense, but<br />

this might be offset by improvements in growth and<br />

survival. To improve the quality of juveniles and<br />

increase survival in the wild, it has been proposed<br />

that hatchery individuals be conditioned to optimise<br />

morphological and behavioural traits (Delgado et<br />

al. 2002; Davis et al. 2005; Brokordt et al. 2006).<br />

While juveniles can be reared to a size of ~3 g in<br />

hapa nets in both ponds and ocean nursery systems,<br />

they are not exposed to sediment, and graze primarily<br />

on biofilm on the nets. Preliminary studies at BML<br />

showed that juveniles that were reared in tanks with<br />

sediment had thicker body walls and grew faster than<br />

those reared in tanks without sediment (Schagerstrom<br />

2003). Subsequent laboratory experiments showed<br />

that mean body weights of juveniles were substantially<br />

higher in the sand-conditioned treatment than<br />

those in treatments without sand. Moreover, up to<br />

60% of juveniles in the sand-conditioned treatment<br />

attained a weight of more than 3 g in 30 days, compared<br />

with only 23% in the treatment without sand<br />

(Dumalan et al. 2009). After 45 days in <strong>sea</strong> cages,<br />

the average weight of sand-conditioned juveniles was<br />

higher but, because of the high variability in growth<br />

among individuals, it was not substantially different<br />

from the average weight of juveniles that were not<br />

sand-conditioned in the laboratory prior to release.<br />

The average survival rates of sand-conditioned and<br />

unconditioned juveniles were also not different.<br />

However, post-released juveniles that were not<br />

sand-conditioned took a longer time to bury into<br />

60<br />

Hapa nets in<br />

marine ponds<br />

Ocean floating<br />

hapas<br />

Ocean bottomset<br />

cages<br />

Growth +++ ++ ++<br />

Survivorship +++ +++ ++<br />

Cost of materials and other inputs + +++ ++<br />

Maintenance + +++ ++<br />

Ease of retrieval +++ ++ +<br />

Adaptability (small-scale fishers)<br />

Other considerations<br />

+ +++ ++<br />

Durability of nursery units ++ + +++<br />

Changes in salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen<br />

Rating: +++ = most desirable<br />

++<br />

+ = least desirable<br />

+ ++ +++<br />

the sediment (R. Dumalan, unpublished data). This<br />

indicates that, even if juveniles can be reared in hapa<br />

nets to a release size of >3 g, sand conditioning prior<br />

to release may be necessary to improve their survival<br />

in the wild.<br />

Proposed production scheme<br />

for juvenile sandfish for<br />

community-based grow-out<br />

Based on the results of different experiments<br />

conducted in the hatchery and the field, as well as<br />

experience with local small fishers, production of<br />

sandfish from a small hatchery can be made costeffective<br />

and accessible to small-scale fishers for<br />

community-based grow-out. The hatchery phase for<br />

larval rearing to post-settled stage (4–10 mm) will<br />

take 30–45 days. Post-settled juveniles can then be<br />

reared in ocean floating hapas (Figure 1) to a size<br />

of 2–3 g (25–30 mm) in 30–60 days. To condition<br />

juveniles with sediment and grow them to a bigger<br />

release size, the juveniles can be reared in bag nets<br />

or <strong>sea</strong> pens and retrieved after 15–30 days at sizes<br />

>20 g. This intermediate stage will substantially<br />

increase the survival of juveniles during the grow-out<br />

phase to marketable size. We recommend the release<br />

of these juveniles in suitable and well-managed<br />

<strong>sea</strong>-ranch areas. Based on experience in the pilot <strong>sea</strong><br />

ranch, sandfish will attain sexual maturity within a<br />

year, and the first harvest of animals >320 g can be<br />

made after 1 year, with a subsequent harvest after


Figure 1. Ocean floating hapas within the communal <strong>sea</strong>-ranching site in Masinloc, Zambales<br />

another 6 months. Programmed releases and selective<br />

harvesting of sandfish >320 g can maintain a<br />

viable reproductive population in the <strong>sea</strong> ranch, thus<br />

optimising both ecological and economic returns (M.<br />

Juinio-Meñez, unpublished data).<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

The authors are grateful for financial and institutional<br />

support for the hatchery operations, and<br />

scaling up of juvenile production and development<br />

of the ocean nursery systems, from the University<br />

of the Philippines Marine Science Institute, the<br />

Australian Centre for International Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>) and the Department of Science<br />

and Technology through the Philippine Council for<br />

Marine and Aquatic Re<strong>sea</strong>rch and Development.<br />

The sand-conditioning studies were supported<br />

with funds from the Department of Agriculture<br />

Bureau of Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch. Ms Elsie Tech<br />

provided invaluable technical assistance in scaling<br />

61<br />

up and maintaining the quality of the algal culture<br />

system for the hatchery phase. The assistance of<br />

Mr Florando Castro Jr and Ms Lyne Suriaga in the<br />

hatchery operations, as well as other members of<br />

the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> re<strong>sea</strong>rch team for field operations,<br />

was invaluable. Travel support for the participation<br />

of M.A. Juinio-Meñez in the symposium was also<br />

provided by <strong>ACIAR</strong>.<br />

References<br />

Agudo N.S. 2006. Sandfish hatchery techniques. The<br />

Australian Centre for International Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch, Secretariat of the Pacific Community and<br />

WorldFish Center: Noumea, New Caledonia.<br />

Battaglene S.C. 1999. Culture of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s for<br />

stock restoration and enhancement. Naga – the ICLARM<br />

Quarterly 22, 4–11.<br />

Battaglene S.C. and Bell J.D. 2004. The restocking of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s in the Pacific Islands. In ‘Case studies in<br />

marine ranching’, ed. by D.M. Bartley and K.M. Leber.


FAO Fishery Technical Paper No. 429, 109–132. Food and<br />

Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Brokordt K.B., Fernandez M. and Gaymer C.F. 2006.<br />

Domestication reduces the capacity to escape from<br />

predators. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and<br />

Ecology 329, 11–19.<br />

Davis J.L.D., Eckert-Mills M.G., Young-Williams A.C., Hines<br />

A.H. and Zohar H. 2005. Morphological conditioning of<br />

hatchery-raised invertebrate Callinectes sapidus to improve<br />

field survivorship after release. Aquaculture 243, 147–158.<br />

Delgado G.A., Glazer R.A. and Stewart N.C. 2002. Predatorinduced<br />

behavioral and morphological plasticity in the<br />

<strong>tropical</strong> marine gastropod Strombus gigas. The Biological<br />

Bulletin 203, 112–120.<br />

Dumalan R.J., Juinio-Meñez M.A. and Casilagan I.L. 2009.<br />

Effects of sand conditioning on the growth, survival and<br />

burying behavior of hatchery-reared juvenile Holothuria<br />

scabra (Jaeger). Paper presented at the 10th National<br />

Symposium in Marine Science, 22–24 October 2009,<br />

Davao City, Philippines.<br />

Duy N.D.Q. 2010. Seed production of sandfish (Holothuria<br />

scabra) in Vietnam. Aquaculture Extension Manual No.<br />

48. Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center:<br />

Iloilo, Philippines.<br />

Edullantes C.M. and Juinio-Meñez M.A. 2009. The effects<br />

of <strong>sea</strong>water nutrient concentration on the growth and<br />

survival of juvenile sandfish Holothuria scabra. Paper<br />

presented at the 10th National Symposium in Marine<br />

Science, 22–24 October 2009, Davao City, Philippines.<br />

Gamboa R., Gomez A.L. and Nievales M.F. 2004. The<br />

status of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery and mariculture in the<br />

Philippines. In ‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

and management’, ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S.<br />

Purcell, S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO<br />

Fisheries Technical Paper No. 463, 69–78. Food and<br />

Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Gamboa R. and Juinio-Meñez M.A. 2003. Pilot-testing the<br />

laboratory production of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria<br />

scabra (Jaeger) in the Philippines. The Philippine<br />

Scientist 40, 111–121.<br />

James B. 1999. Hatchery and culture technology for the <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra Jaeger in India. Naga – the<br />

ICLARM Quarterly 22, 12–16.<br />

62<br />

James B. 2004. Captive breeding of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Holothuria scabra from India. In ‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’, ed. by A.<br />

Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel<br />

and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 463,<br />

385–395. Food and Agricultural Organization of the<br />

United Nations: Rome.<br />

Juinio-Meñez M.A., de Peralta G.M., Catbagan T.O. and<br />

Rodriguez B.D.R. 2009. Nursery production systems for<br />

hatchery-reared sandfish (Holothuria scabra). Poster at<br />

10th National Symposium in Marine Science, 22–24<br />

October 2009, Davao City, Philippines.<br />

Lovatelli A., Conand C., Purcell S., Uthicke S., Hamel<br />

J.-F., Mercier A. (eds) 2004. Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> and management. FAO Fisheries Technical<br />

Paper No. 463. Food and Agricultural Organization of<br />

the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Oliver M.D., MacDiarmid A.B., Stewart R.A. and Gardner<br />

C. 2008. Anti-predator behavior of captive-reared and<br />

wild juvenile spiny lobster (Jasus edwardsii). Reviews<br />

in Fisheries Science 16, 186–194.<br />

Pitt R. and Duy N.D.Q. 2004. Breeding and rearing of<br />

the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra in Viet Nam. In<br />

‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’,<br />

ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S.<br />

Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No. 463, 333–346. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Purcell S. 2004. Criteria for release strategies and evaluating<br />

the restocking of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. In ‘Advances in<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’, ed. by A.<br />

Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel<br />

and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 463,<br />

181–191. Food and Agricultural Organization of the<br />

United Nations: Rome.<br />

Schagerström E. 2003. A study of juvenile Holothuria<br />

scabra (Jaeger) (Echinodermata) on different types of<br />

sediment at Bolinao, Pangasinan, Philippines. Degree<br />

project work, University of Kalmar, Kalmar, Sweden.<br />

Trinidad-Roa M.J. 1987. Beche-de-mer fishery in the<br />

Philippines. Naga – the ICLARM Quarterly, October<br />

1987, 15–17.


Small-scale hatcheries and simple technologies<br />

for sandfish (Holothuria scabra) production<br />

Ruth U. Gamboa 1*, Remie M. Aurelio 1, Daisy A. Ganad 1,<br />

Lance B. Concepcion 1 and Neil Angelo S. Abreo 1<br />

Abstract<br />

Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) hatchery production is currently being done at various scales across several<br />

continents including Australia, Maldives, Vietnam, Pacific island countries, Madagascar and the Philippines.<br />

Work in Mindanao in the southern Philippines, through the University of the Philippines Mindanao (UPMin),<br />

commenced in 2006. UPMin set up experimental hatcheries, ponds and other facilities by establishing<br />

partnerships with two local corporations: Alsons Corporation and JV Ayala Group of Companies. The former<br />

facility also has a <strong>sea</strong>water channel feeding fish ponds, which, through time, has harboured resident populations<br />

of sandfish. This channel became a source of broodstock, as well as a ‘conditioning area’ for sandfish<br />

collected from the wild. It also served as the first-stage nursery for juveniles. This paper describes low-cost<br />

technology for all stages of culturing H. scabra up to production of juveniles ≥10 g for release, and compares<br />

the cost-cutting innovations with those of published protocols. Three local modifications made by the UPMin<br />

project team are described here: the use of a <strong>sea</strong>water channel for broodstock and hapa; mono-algal feeding<br />

using Chaetoceros calcitrans; and the use of recycled or locally made materials. Broodstock can be kept<br />

for weeks in the channel with zero mortality, even without maintenance. In the hapas, juveniles can grow<br />

to 5–10 g in 1–2 months at an average survival of 84%. Chaetoceros calcitrans was bought from Alsons<br />

and scaled up using recycled 250-L PVC barrels. It was used as a feed until the early juvenile stage. These<br />

innovations yielded a best performance average of 2.2% survival to 3–5-mm juveniles. This paper attests to<br />

the progress and innovations made in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> re<strong>sea</strong>rch in the Philippines since H. scabra production<br />

was pilot-tested in the country in 2002.<br />

Introduction<br />

Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) hatchery production is<br />

currently being done at various scales across several<br />

continents: Australia, Maldives and Vietnam are doing<br />

large-scale for commercial production (Bowman<br />

2012; Duy 2012); the Pacific island countries are trialling<br />

small-scale production for community-managed<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching (Hair et al. 2011); Madagascar uses<br />

in-vitro fertilisation to obtain larvae all year round<br />

for their partner communities (Eeckhaut et al. 2008);<br />

and in the Philippines, seeds are primarily used in<br />

1 College of Science and Mathematics, University of the<br />

Philippines Mindanao, Mintal, Davao City, Philippines<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

63<br />

pilot sites for <strong>sea</strong> ranching and grow-out (Olavides<br />

et al. 2011; Juinio-Meñez et al. 2012).<br />

Sandfish production was pilot-tested in the<br />

Philippines as early as 2002 (Gamboa and Menez<br />

2003). Work in Mindanao in the southern Philippines,<br />

through the University of the Philippines Mindanao<br />

(UPMin), commenced in 2006 when UPMin received<br />

funding from the Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>). A year later, financial<br />

support also came from the Philippine Government<br />

through the Department of Science and Technology –<br />

Philippine Council for Aquatic and Marine Resource<br />

Development. Neither project grant, however, provided<br />

any capital outlay, and UPMin did not have a coastal<br />

property. Thus began the quest for a re<strong>sea</strong>rch base and<br />

a low-cost means of adopting the technology locally.


The space and facility problems were overcome by<br />

establishing partnerships with two local corporations:<br />

Alsons Corporation, a large, intensive, commercial<br />

milkfish and tilapia industry with <strong>aquaculture</strong> facilities<br />

in Dumoy (Davao City); and JV Ayala Group of<br />

Companies, which owns High Ponds Resort, in Toril,<br />

Davao City. Alsons’ Dumoy facility accommodates<br />

one of our two experimental hatcheries. Within the<br />

compound is a <strong>sea</strong>water channel feeding the milkfish<br />

and tilapia ponds. This channel became the source<br />

as well as the ‘conditioning area’ for our broodstock,<br />

and served as the first-stage nursery for our juveniles.<br />

The High Ponds facility of the JV Ayala Group houses<br />

our second hatchery and experimental marine pond.<br />

This paper describes a low-cost technology for<br />

producing H. scabra comprising the following<br />

hatchery phases: broodstock collection; broodstock<br />

induction (induced spawning); larval rearing and<br />

early settlement; nursery, which is divided into first<br />

(in the hapa) and second (sand-conditioning) stages;<br />

and harvest of ≥10-g juveniles for release. It also<br />

describes micro-algal culture.<br />

The <strong>sea</strong>water channel<br />

In Dumoy, a 300-m-long man-made canal carries <strong>sea</strong><br />

water from the main pipe to a dyke that feeds all the<br />

ponds. Water is pumped five or six times a week, with<br />

almost 90% daily exchange efficiency and depths of<br />

2–3 m. Through time, the channel has accumulated a<br />

natural sandy–muddy floor with its corresponding flora<br />

and fauna, including a population of H. scabra. The<br />

channel serves two other purposes for our project—as a<br />

natural conditioning area for broodstock collected from<br />

the wild and as a hapa-nursery system for juveniles.<br />

The hatcheries<br />

Two small-scale hatchery facilities were constructed,<br />

one each in Dumoy and High Ponds. The Dumoy<br />

hatchery was a 30-m 2 area located between two big<br />

holding tanks for tilapia fingerlings. It was basically<br />

a nipa-roofed structure with coco-wood posts. Sea<br />

water, electricity and space were all provided free<br />

by Alsons. At High Ponds, the 80-m 2 hatchery was<br />

roofed with corrugated PVC sheets and walled with<br />

chicken wire. In addition, a 6,000-m 2 freshwater<br />

earthen pond was converted to marine water for<br />

experimental use. The space for the hatchery, use of<br />

the pond and other selected amenities at High Ponds<br />

were free, but the project paid for electricity.<br />

64<br />

Hatchery protocols<br />

Broodstock collection and conditioning<br />

For each induction, we would use at least 38 sandfish,<br />

sized 130–250 g. The broodstock came from<br />

either the resident population in the Dumoy channel<br />

or our project sites (Davao del Sur and Davao<br />

Oriental), located 1 and 5 hours, respectively,<br />

from the hatchery. The animals from the sites were<br />

purchased through our local People’s Organisation<br />

groups and were individually packed in oxygenfilled<br />

polyethylene bags containing 1 L of <strong>sea</strong> water<br />

(Agudo 2006). The bags were layered inside a styrofoam<br />

chest box for transport.<br />

Wild broodstock were brought to Dumoy, where<br />

they were acclimatised for 1 hour by allowing the<br />

bags to float in a contained area in the water channel.<br />

Each animal was then taken out and dropped<br />

gently to the bottom. To avoid mixing with the canal<br />

residents, the wild broodstock were released at the<br />

<strong>sea</strong>ward end of the channel. This conditioning setup<br />

eliminated feeding and maintenance, yet yielded<br />

about 99% survival.<br />

We believe that broodstock conditioning played a<br />

role in the success of the larval rearing that followed.<br />

For example, the collapse of a batch of larvae on one<br />

occasion (January 2010) may have been due to short<br />

(i.e. 2 days) broodstock conditioning. The successful<br />

batches came either from those conditioned longer or<br />

from the resident broodstock population.<br />

Induced spawning<br />

In earlier induction attempts, broodstock were<br />

brought up from the channel onto a floating cage,<br />

2 × 2 × 2 m and ~2 cm mesh size, where they were<br />

allowed to defecate for at least 24 hours. It was<br />

observed, however, that smaller individuals could<br />

squeeze out of the mesh holes, often incurring<br />

injury or lesions. An improved practice involves<br />

selecting healthy broodstock from the channel and<br />

holding them in a bare, flat-bottomed tank containing<br />

UV-treated <strong>sea</strong> water provided with mild aeration.<br />

After about 1 day, the gut-empty broodstock were<br />

rinsed with UV-treated <strong>sea</strong> water. They were divided<br />

into two spawning groups (Pitt and Duy 2004) for<br />

induction comprising the following steps (Figure 1):<br />

• Desiccation. The animals were transferred with<br />

care into a dry tank or bin and kept there for<br />

20 minutes.


• Conditioning in ambient water. The ‘dry’ animals<br />

were moved into a 70-L, 45-cm-high bin filled<br />

with 10 cm of filtered <strong>sea</strong> water, and kept there<br />

for 15 minutes.<br />

• Thermal shock. The water temperature in the tank<br />

was raised 3–5 °C above ambient by slowly adding<br />

boiled <strong>sea</strong> water (James et al. 1994). Induction<br />

proceeded for 1 hour.<br />

• Spirulina bath. Fifteen grams of Spirulina were<br />

mixed with 1 L of fresh water then blended well<br />

and added slowly to the tank. Induction proceeded<br />

for 1 hour.<br />

• Complete water change. The Spirulina was flushed<br />

out by using a hose siphon. Ambient <strong>sea</strong> water was<br />

then slowly added up to about 25 cm depth. After<br />

several minutes, one or two individuals would<br />

stand and exhibit swaying behaviour. These are<br />

signs of readiness to spawn—the gonopore on<br />

the dorsal surface of the head begins to swell;<br />

males release a long thread of milky sperm, while<br />

females release yellowish eggs in two to four<br />

bursts that usually shoot out of the water.<br />

65<br />

Gametes were collected using a beaker. Sperm<br />

were scooped out of the water and eggs were collected<br />

from each spawning individual by following<br />

the direction of the swaying female and positioning<br />

the beaker accordingly. Since the released eggs usually<br />

shoot out of the water, collecting them required<br />

some practice. All sperm were mixed together in a<br />

70-L container, and all eggs in a 20-L container.<br />

To estimate the total egg count, the eggs were<br />

pooled in 40 L of <strong>sea</strong> water. Three subsamples of<br />

1 mL each were taken and counted under a microscope.<br />

The average of the three counts was computed.<br />

The total number of eggs was roughly estimated<br />

using equation (1):<br />

Total egg count = average count/mL<br />

(1)<br />

× 40,000 mL<br />

About 0.5 mL of sperm from the mixture was<br />

introduced to the 40-L egg stock. Too much sperm<br />

can lead to polyspermy. Two-cell stage could be<br />

observed within the next few hours.<br />

Figure 1. Induction of Holothuria scabra. Upper row: desiccation (left), thermal shock (centre), Spirulina bath<br />

(right); lower row: spawning male (left) and female (right)


Regardless of the length of conditioning of<br />

the broodstock in the water channel, the thermal-<br />

Spirulina shock (Agudo 2006) proved effective in<br />

9 of our 10 inductions. A summary of the hatchery<br />

performance from those successful inductions is<br />

shown in Table 1. The single instance when the<br />

thermal-Spirulina shock did not work was with<br />

broodstock that came from the project site and were<br />

induced the next day.<br />

Our spawning induction trials were carried out<br />

randomly (during any month) based on the available<br />

free tanks in the hatcheries. The success of induction<br />

alone did not follow any lunar phase, as was also<br />

observed by Pitt and Duy (2004). In all nine trials,<br />

the males spawned first, which was in keeping with<br />

the reports of other authors (Agudo 2006; Duy 2010;<br />

Giraspy and Ivy 2010; Pitt et al. 2001).<br />

Larval rearing<br />

Larval density<br />

We used a low density of 0.3 fertilised eggs/mL,<br />

calculated as (equation (2)):<br />

Number of larvae per tank = desired volume<br />

(2)<br />

of water in tank × 0.3 fertilised eggs/mL<br />

The volume of fertilised eggs to be used (equation<br />

(3)) was:<br />

Volume of<br />

fertilised eggs =<br />

0.3 eggs/mL<br />

× total volume of<br />

fertilised eggs<br />

Average count/mL in<br />

the 40 L concentrate<br />

(3)<br />

Rearing tanks<br />

Our 250-L conical-bottom larval rearing tanks<br />

were made of marine plywood and custom built to<br />

fit the hatchery area. The larval tanks were prepared<br />

for stocking by washing them well with chlorine,<br />

rinsing with fresh water and then air-drying. Next,<br />

each tank was half-filled with 1-µm filtered and<br />

UV-treated <strong>sea</strong> water. The fertilised eggs were then<br />

poured in gently and water was brought to the desired<br />

volume. Moderate aeration was applied on the first<br />

day of rearing.<br />

Rearing tanks were completely covered during the<br />

larval stages using thin white cloth overlain with black<br />

cellophane bags. This kept the larvae in darkness and<br />

also prevented chironomid (bloodworm) infestation.<br />

66<br />

A week after the appearance of pentactula, the black<br />

cellophane was removed to allow light to penetrate<br />

the tank and encourage moderate algal growth for the<br />

juveniles. This differs from Agudo’s (2006) protocol,<br />

where the tank is covered for only the first 2 days of<br />

larval rearing. We noted that algal growth was better<br />

on tank walls that were not very smooth.<br />

Water monitoring and larval sampling<br />

Temperature and salinity were monitored daily.<br />

Temperatures varied in the range 26–29°C, while<br />

salinity was 30–34 ppt. The density of larvae was<br />

estimated by counting in a known volume of test<br />

tube or glass tubing viewed against the light.<br />

Developmental stages of larvae were monitored<br />

under the microscope.<br />

Water treatment and water change<br />

Sea water for the larval tanks went through three<br />

filtrations: UV light, 10-µm and 1-µm tube filters, and<br />

a 1-µm bag filter. Thirty per cent of the water volume<br />

was changed daily. To chelate heavy metal residues,<br />

we added ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)<br />

at 5 g/m 3 per total volume of water changed. When<br />

larvae were no longer present in the column, EDTA<br />

treatment was halted and water change was done<br />

every other day until all juveniles were ready for the<br />

hapas. By 2010 we ceased chelating with EDTA and<br />

yet our survival rates were improving. During the June<br />

and October 2010 batches, the UV light in the Dumoy<br />

hatchery broke. We proceeded with the rearing using<br />

filtered <strong>sea</strong> water only. Since survival of juveniles was<br />

among the highest in these batches, it appears that UV<br />

light and EDTA can be eliminated.<br />

Larval food and feeding regime<br />

Feeding the larvae started on day 2. Our protocol<br />

used just one species, Chaetoceros calcitrans,<br />

throughout—the regime is shown in Table 2.<br />

Chaetoceros spp. are some of the best algae for larval<br />

rearing (Battaglene 1999). We initially adopted a<br />

once-a-day feeding regime with C. calcitrans until<br />

Mr Duy (Vietnam) suggested splitting the ration at<br />

9 am and 3 pm. This strategy improved the survival<br />

rate of our June and October 2010 batches (Table 1).<br />

Feeding was thereafter done twice a day until the<br />

juveniles were moved out into the hapas. In his seed<br />

production manual, Duy (2010) prefers a mixture<br />

of algae for optimal growth, and recommends the<br />

single species only when there is not enough algal<br />

supply. We found single feeding with Chaetoceros


Table 1. Summary of combined production performance of the Dumoy and High Ponds hatcheries<br />

Remarks<br />

Count and<br />

% survival<br />

of 3-mm<br />

juveniles<br />

EDTAb Initial<br />

fertilised<br />

eggs in<br />

tanks<br />

Total<br />

fertilised<br />

eggs<br />

(millions)<br />

Minutes<br />

after the first<br />

spawnera Count of<br />

spawners<br />

Total<br />

broodstock source,<br />

conditioning<br />

Days after moon<br />

phase<br />

Batch date<br />

M F M F<br />

38, Dumoy channel residents 12 14 40 55 2.4 No 240,000 5,400 Hapa by day 38<br />

(2.2%)<br />

38, Dumoy channel residents 9 10 35 53 2.8 No 360,000 6,400 Hapa by day 38<br />

(1.8%)<br />

38, Dumoy channel residents 4 5 20 0 1.28 No 180,000 300 Collapsed by day 34<br />

(0.2%)<br />

42, Dumoy channel residents 12 14 27 1 1.98 No 300,000 4,425 Hapa by day 38<br />

(1.5%)<br />

40 from wild; conditioned in 10 21 30 11 2.6 No 180,000 0 Collapsed by day 6;<br />

Dumoy channel for 2 days<br />

short (2-day)<br />

conditioning period<br />

47 from wild; conditioned in 12 20 29 15 1.9 Yes 400,000 539 Collapsed by day 43;<br />

Dumoy channel for 4 days<br />

(0.13%) heavily infested with<br />

bloodworms<br />

46 from wild; conditioned in 14 23 25 51 6.8 Yes 300,000 71 Collapsed by day 39;<br />

Dumoy channel for 3 days<br />

(0.02%) heavily infested with<br />

bloodworms<br />

40 from wild; conditioned in 12 13 30 12 2.7 No 300,000 0 Collapsed by day 20;<br />

Dumoy channel for 6 days<br />

heavily infested with<br />

bloodworms<br />

43 from wild; conditioned in 15 16 36 12 4.3 No 300,000 2,500 Hapa by day 38<br />

Dumoy channel for more than<br />

(0.83%)<br />

1 week<br />

1 day after F.Q.<br />

15 October 2010<br />

4 days after F.Q.<br />

23 June 2010<br />

2 days after F.Q.<br />

23 February 2010<br />

5 days after L.Q.<br />

11 February 2010<br />

6 days after L.Q.<br />

13 January 2010<br />

(High Ponds only)<br />

2 days after F.M.<br />

4 December 2009<br />

67<br />

6 days after F.Q.<br />

6 October 2009<br />

6 days after F.M.<br />

13 July 2009<br />

4 days after L.Q.<br />

6 May 2009<br />

a Always a male<br />

b EDTA = ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid<br />

F.Q. = first quarter; L.Q. = last quarter; F.M. = full moon


was sufficient, simple and cost-effective. Our best<br />

performance was 2.2% survival from fertilised eggs<br />

to 3-mm juvenile stage.<br />

Settlement plates<br />

Settlement plates were made of corrugated<br />

polyethylene roof materials that were cut into pieces<br />

about 350 × 200 mm. The long sides of each piece<br />

were tied together midway with a nylon string to<br />

assume a partial fold that could be stacked randomly<br />

at the bottom of the tank.<br />

Each piece was washed with detergent and chlorine<br />

and air-dried, making sure to keep off insects<br />

that might lay eggs on the plates. The rough side was<br />

painted with a thin coat of Spirulina paste prepared<br />

by diluting the powder with just enough water to create<br />

a paste-like consistency (Duy 2010). The plates<br />

were added once doliolaria were observed, and were<br />

stacked randomly in the tanks up to 50% of the water<br />

column. The water was changed 3 hours after adding<br />

the plates or until all the Spirulina bubbles were<br />

eliminated. Strong aeration was provided.<br />

68<br />

Rearing problems<br />

Infestation of chironomids and copepods, both in<br />

the tanks and on settlement plates, was the main cause<br />

of low survival or population crashes in our hatcheries.<br />

In four of the five crashes, the white cloth tank<br />

covers were removed at settlement stage. These tanks<br />

showed severe chironomid infestation. We decided to<br />

keep the cover on until harvest time at ≥3 mm, and<br />

this improved the survival rate. Chironomids at the<br />

High Ponds site were more difficult to control, probably<br />

due to the shaded location of the hatchery and the<br />

presence of more trees in the immediate surroundings.<br />

The hatchery in Dumoy, on the other hand, is sandwiched<br />

between two concrete structures (Figure 2).<br />

We found that copepods can survive even in<br />

UV-treated and filtered <strong>sea</strong>water systems, as was also<br />

reported by Pitt and Duy (2004). They can destroy<br />

good batches of settled juveniles within a few days.<br />

To address this, proper aseptic procedures were<br />

observed, such as chlorination of water pipes and<br />

tanks before and after each batch, and covering the<br />

Table 2. Daily feeding concentration of Chaetoceros calcitrans used for Holothuria scabra production in this<br />

protocol<br />

Day from fertilisation Larval stage Chaetoceros cells/mL Aeration<br />

2 Early auricularia 20,000 gentle<br />

4 Mid auricularia 20,000–25,000 moderate<br />

6 Mid and late auricularia 25,000–30,000 moderate<br />

8 Late auricularia 30,000–40,000 moderate<br />

10<br />

(till transfer to hapa)<br />

Doliolaria<br />

(till 0.5-mm juvenile)<br />

30,000–40,000 strong<br />

(once plates are added)<br />

Figure 2. The hatchery at High Ponds, Toril (left) is shaded by trees on one side and at the back, while that in<br />

Alsons, Dumoy (right), is more exposed to sunlight.


tanks immediately after water change. Our staff were<br />

told to be mindful of being carriers of contaminants.<br />

For example, they had to rinse their hands before<br />

doing tank water changes, especially if they had come<br />

directly from monitoring the hapas in the channel.<br />

Agudo (2006) recommends thorough rinsing of all<br />

rearing materials with freshwater before and after use,<br />

and storing them in containers with chlorinated water.<br />

Nursery<br />

First phase: ≥3-mm juveniles into hapas<br />

In our experience, juveniles do not grow uniformly<br />

in the tanks. This is still a difficulty in our optimisation<br />

of a low-cost technology, although significant<br />

improvement in the rate of survival to 3 mm was<br />

obtained when the feeding regime was split into<br />

two, tanks were fully covered to prevent chironomid<br />

infestation, and rough inner surface tanks and rough<br />

settlement plates were used.<br />

By day 38, a good number of juveniles had reached<br />

≥3 mm in size. This group was harvested and moved<br />

into the hapas. Harvesting involved using a fine, soft<br />

watercolor paintbrush to detach the bigger juveniles<br />

Table 3. Survival of juveniles in the hapas inside the <strong>sea</strong>water channel at Dumoy<br />

Batch / date Total count<br />

of 3–5-mm<br />

juveniles<br />

Total hapas (@<br />

400 juveniles per<br />

hapa)<br />

69<br />

from the plates. After harvesting, those plates still<br />

with smaller juveniles were dropped back into the<br />

tanks without repainting with Spirulina. A thin film<br />

of algae could regrow on the plates overnight. With<br />

this thinning-out process, juveniles were harvested at<br />

least three times within a 3–7-day interval.<br />

The hapas, measuring 1 × 2 × 1 m with a mesh size<br />

~1 mm, were made of the same material as that used<br />

by local pond operators. Because the water level in<br />

the channel changes regularly, floating hapas were<br />

designed (Figure 3). The four surface corners of<br />

the hapa were tied to bamboo poles fixed to paddle<br />

wheel buoys; and the bottom corners and the middle<br />

floor were fastened with weights to keep the floor<br />

submerged in the water all the time. The hapas were<br />

conditioned for 3–5 days to allow a substantial mat of<br />

biofilm to grow. Then 400 juveniles (≥3 mm length)<br />

were transferred into them (Figure 4). The algal mat<br />

served as natural food for the growing juveniles and<br />

eliminated the manual task of feeding them. In the<br />

channel, growth of biofilm is fast and periodic thinning<br />

was done by gently scrubbing the outer sides of<br />

the hapa. In Vietnam the hapas are tied to bamboo<br />

poles that are fixed on the substrate of the pond. The<br />

Figure 3. The <strong>sea</strong>water channel at Alsons, Dumoy (left), and the floating hapas (right)<br />

Mean wet weight (g)<br />

after 30 days<br />

Count and % survival<br />

after 30 days<br />

15 October 2010 5,400 14 5.45 3,051 (56.5%)<br />

23 June 2010 6,400 16 2.5 2,717 (42%)<br />

11 February 2010 4,000 10 3.5 3,822 (96%)<br />

6 May 2009 2,000 5 2.1 1,453 (73%)


Figure 4. Harvesting ≥3-mm juveniles from a plate (left); releasing the juveniles onto a hapa (centre); 1-monthold<br />

juveniles in the hapa (right). A synaptid (foreground) and <strong>sea</strong>hare egg case (tip of caliper) are seen<br />

with the juveniles.<br />

water level in their ponds follows the natural high-<br />

and low-tide cycle, but growth of biofilm is not as<br />

thick as that in the Dumoy water channel.<br />

A summary of the survival rates of juveniles in the<br />

hapas is shown in Table 3. Our best record was 96%.<br />

Low survival in June and October 2010 occurred when<br />

juveniles were kept in hapas longer than 35 days. As in<br />

the tanks, juveniles in the hapas do not grow uniformly,<br />

and harvesting was also done two to three times. The<br />

first harvest was conducted at 30–35 days, and juveniles<br />

≥2.0 g were thinned out. One to two more batches<br />

of late shooters would catch up at 2–3-week intervals.<br />

Longer time in the hapa and frequent handling<br />

seemed unfavourable for the juveniles. This staggered<br />

harvesting can be a natural pacing for grow-out or <strong>sea</strong>ranching<br />

releases. It should be well managed in order<br />

to avoid a glut at the nursery and ensure continuous<br />

release and, consequently, continuous harvest.<br />

Predators in ocean nurseries include crabs and<br />

carnivorous fishes (Dance et al. 2003; Lavitra et al.<br />

2009). Surprisingly, they were not a problem in the<br />

water channel. Although synaptids and Dollabella<br />

(Figure 4) were common invaders, we noted no<br />

threats to the growing juveniles. The weights in the<br />

bottom corners of the hapas have to be checked regularly—without<br />

them the floor rises up to the surface<br />

and could expose the juveniles to more direct heat<br />

from the sun and warmer water temperature.<br />

Second phase: sand-conditioning of ≥2.0-g<br />

juveniles<br />

Juveniles ≥2.0 g were conditioned in the substrate<br />

before they were released for grow-out or <strong>sea</strong><br />

70<br />

ranching. We conducted several pond experiments<br />

using various sized juveniles from the hapas. In<br />

one of the trials, three pens (3 × 5 × 0.4 m each,<br />

made of PVC screen, with a mesh size of 15 mm)<br />

were laid out in one portion of the pond. To each<br />

pen, 50 juveniles (3–13 g) were introduced. After<br />

the first month, the average wet weight was 21.3 g<br />

(i.e. growth rate of 0.77 g/day) (Figure 5). After 4<br />

months, the survival rate was 70–100%, with an<br />

average wet weight of 191 g. In another experiment<br />

involving smaller juveniles, survival after a month<br />

was 58–80% and average growth rate was 0.42 g/day.<br />

While growth and survival of juveniles varied, the<br />

marine pond proved, at the very least, to be a reliable<br />

juvenile sand-conditioning area.<br />

In Vietnam H. scabra are commercially grown to<br />

≥500 g in marine ponds. The ponds are converted<br />

shrimp ponds and are irrigated by natural rise and fall<br />

of the tides. In the Philippines there are also many<br />

abandoned shrimp farms, and their potential for<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> grow-out is recommended for further<br />

investigation.<br />

Harvest of ≥10-g juveniles for release<br />

We recommend ≥10 g for release size, as the bigger<br />

the juvenile, the greater the chances of survival,<br />

especially in <strong>sea</strong> ranches. Juveniles were packed in<br />

groups of five in oxygen-filled polyethylene bags<br />

containing 1 L of <strong>sea</strong> water, and transported to the<br />

release site in the same way that broodstock are<br />

transported. On site, the bags were allowed to float<br />

on the water for about 30 minutes to acclimatise the<br />

juveniles to the ambient temperature (Figure 6).


Average wet weight (g)<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

n = 50<br />

juveniles/pen<br />

Initial<br />

Pen 1<br />

Pen 2<br />

Pen 3<br />

Figure 5. Growth of juveniles in pens within a marine pond in High Ponds. Vertical bars represent<br />

standard error while numbers inside bars in month 4 represent the surviving individuals.<br />

Chaetoceros culture<br />

A significant reduction in production cost in terms<br />

of labour and raw materials was achieved by using<br />

a single-species feed, Chaetoceros calcitrans, for<br />

the larvae. This regime was adopted from practices<br />

in Vietnam. Every week, 1 L of stock culture was<br />

brought in by Alsons from their algal laboratory in<br />

another city. Using the formulation of Agudo (2006),<br />

the stock was scaled up to 10 L inside an air-conditioned<br />

algal room (Figure 7; refer also to appendix).<br />

Sea water for culture passed through UV-sterilisation,<br />

microfiltration and chlorination–dechlorination. These<br />

10-L stocks in turn became the seed for outdoor<br />

upscaling in 250-L recycled PVC drums. Another<br />

suspected source of chironomids was the scaled-up<br />

Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4<br />

Figure 6. Transporting the juveniles to site of release—community partners at work<br />

71<br />

Chaetoceros cultures. It was necessary to bring the<br />

drums out in the open for exposure to sunlight, but<br />

they were tightly covered with thin, white cloth to<br />

prevent chironomid infestation.<br />

Conclusions<br />

35 47 50<br />

The cost-cutting innovations in this paper are<br />

compared with those of Agudo’s (2006) protocol<br />

(Figure 8). Protocols to produce sandfish are already<br />

established, and H. scabra has been found to grow in<br />

various systems (James et al. 1994; Battaglene et al.<br />

1999; Gamboa et al. 2004; Pitt and Duy 2004; Agudo<br />

2006; Duy 2010). Three local modifications made by<br />

the Mindanao project team have been described here:<br />

mono-algal feeding using Chaetoceros calcitrans; the


Figure 7. The algal room (left); some Chaetoceros calcitrans jugs inside (centre); outdoor upscaling making use<br />

of recycled glucose syrup barrels (right)<br />

Agudo’s protocol<br />

• Conditioning tanks<br />

• Flow-through system<br />

• Aeration, feeding<br />

• At least two algal food<br />

species during planktonic<br />

stage<br />

• Water change from 30%<br />

daily to 100% every<br />

other day<br />

• EDTA after water change<br />

• Two diatom species and<br />

supplement feeding and<br />

fertiliser at settlement<br />

stage<br />

• 12-hour photoperiod<br />

(tanks uncovered)<br />

• Nursery tanks with<br />

flow-through water<br />

• Hapas made of<br />

expensive material<br />

• Tanks for substrate<br />

conditioning<br />

Broodstock collection<br />

and conditioning<br />

Spawning induction<br />

(thermal and Spirulina shocks)<br />

Fertilisation and stocking of eggs<br />

Rearing of auricularia<br />

Rearing of doliolaria<br />

Settlement of pentactula<br />

Release to hapas<br />

(1st stage nursery)<br />

Substrate conditioning<br />

(2nd stage nursery)<br />

Release to <strong>sea</strong> ranch/pond<br />

Figure 8. Comparison of cost-cutting innovations in this paper with those<br />

of Agudo’s (2006) protocol<br />

72<br />

This paper’s<br />

cost-cutting methods<br />

• Use of the water channel<br />

No tanks, no feeding, no<br />

aeration, no flow through<br />

• One feeding regime with<br />

Chaetoceros calcitrans only;<br />

savings on electricity, water,<br />

reagents, labour<br />

• Feeding twice a day<br />

• Water change, 30% daily<br />

• Tanks covered with black<br />

cloth to keep light and<br />

chironomids out<br />

• One feeding regime with<br />

Chaetoceros calcitrans only<br />

• Water change, 30% every<br />

other day<br />

• Tanks covered with white<br />

cloths<br />

Best record: 2.2% survival to 3 mm<br />

• Hapa made of local material,<br />

set up in a water channel<br />

• Low maintenance: no feeding,<br />

no aeration, no water change<br />

1-month average: 84.5% survival<br />

to 3–5 g<br />

• In pens inside earthen pond<br />

• Low maintenance: no feeding,<br />

no aeration, no water change<br />

1-month average: 66% survival to<br />

21.34 g


use of a <strong>sea</strong>water channel for broodstock conditioning<br />

and hapa nursery; and use of recycled or locally<br />

made materials. These modifications were made in<br />

the context of partnership: the mono-algal feeding<br />

was adopted from the system employed by Mr Duy<br />

in RIA3, Nha Trang, Vietnam; and the water channel,<br />

marine pond and hatchery spaces were provided by<br />

two private partners, Alsons Corporation and the<br />

JV Ayala Group of companies. This paper attests to<br />

the progress and innovations made in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

re<strong>sea</strong>rch in the Philippines since H. scabra production<br />

was pilot-tested in Bolinao in 2002 (Gamboa and<br />

Juinio-Menez 2003).<br />

References<br />

Agudo N.S. 2006. Sandfish hatchery techniques. Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch,<br />

Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish<br />

Center, Noumea, New Caledonia.<br />

Battaglene S.C. 1999. Culture of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s for<br />

the purposes of stock restoration and enhancement. Pp.<br />

11–25 in ‘The conservation of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in Malaysia:<br />

their taxonomy, ecology and trade’, ed. by M. Baine.<br />

Proceedings of an international conference, 25 February<br />

1999, Heriot-Watt University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.<br />

Battaglene S.C., Seymour J.E. and Ramofafia C. 1999.<br />

Survival and growth of cultured juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

Holothuria scabra. Aquaculture 178, 293–322.<br />

Bowman W. 2012. Sandfish production and development<br />

of <strong>sea</strong> ranching in northern Australia. In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong><br />

<strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A.<br />

Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings<br />

No. 136, 75–78. Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]<br />

Dance S.K., Lane I. and Bell J.D. 2003. Variation in shortterm<br />

survival of cultured sandfish (Holothuria scabra)<br />

released in mangrove-<strong>sea</strong>grass and coral reef flat habitats<br />

in Solomon Islands. Aquaculture 220, 495–505.<br />

Duy N.D.Q. 2010. Seed production of sandfish (Holothuria<br />

scabra) in Vietnam. Southeast Asian Fisheries<br />

Development Center Aquaculture Extension Manual<br />

No. 48.<br />

Duy N.D.Q. 2012. Large-scale sandfish production from<br />

pond culture in Vietnam. In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong><br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A. Hair, T.D.<br />

Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings No. 136,<br />

34–39. Australian Centre for International Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]<br />

Eeckhaut I., Lavitra T., Rasolofonirina R., Rabenevanana<br />

M.W., Gildas P. and Jangoux M. 2008. Madagascar<br />

Holothurie SA: the first trade company based on <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> in Madagascar. SPC Beche-demer<br />

Information Bulletin 28, 22–23.<br />

73<br />

Gamboa R., Gomez A.L. and Nievales M.F. 2004. The<br />

status of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery and mariculture in the<br />

Philippines. In ‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

and management’, ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S.<br />

Purcell, S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO<br />

Fisheries Technical Paper No. 463, 69–78. Food and<br />

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Gamboa R. and Juinio-Menez M.A. 2003. Pilot-testing the<br />

laboratory production of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria<br />

scabra (Jaeger) in the Philippines. The Philippine<br />

Scientist 40, 111–121.<br />

Giraspy D.A.B. and Ivy W.G. 2010. Aquaculture potential<br />

of the <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s Holothuria scabra and H.<br />

lessoni in the Indo-Pacific region. SPC Beche-de-mer<br />

Information Bulletin 30, 29–32.<br />

Hair C., Pickering T., Meo S., Vereivalu T., Hunter J. and<br />

Cavakiqali L. 2011. Sandfish culture in Fiji Islands. SPC<br />

Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 31, 3–11.<br />

James D.B., Gandhi A.D., Palaniswamy N. and Rodrigo<br />

J.X. 1994. Hatchery and culture of the <strong>sea</strong>-<strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Holothuria scabra. Central Marine Fisheries Re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

Institute Special Publication No. 57.<br />

Juinio-Meñez M.A., Paña M.A., de Peralta G., Olavides R.,<br />

Catbagan T., Edullantes C.M. and Rodriguez B.D. 2012.<br />

Establishment and management of communal sandfish<br />

(Holothuria scabra) <strong>sea</strong> ranching in the Philippines. In<br />

‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed.<br />

by C.A. Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong><br />

Proceedings No. 136, 121–127. Australian Centre for<br />

International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These<br />

proceedings]<br />

Lavitra T., Rasolofonirina R., Jangoux M. and Eeckhaut<br />

I. 2009. Problems related to the farming of Holothuria<br />

scabra (Jaeger, 1833). SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin 29, 20–30.<br />

Olavides R.D., Rodriguez B.D. and Juinio-Menez M.A.<br />

2011. Simultaneous mass spawning of Holothuria scabra<br />

in <strong>sea</strong> ranching sites in Bolinao and Anda municipalities,<br />

Philippines. SPC Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 31,<br />

23–24.<br />

Pitt R. and Duy N.D.Q. 2004. Breeding and rearing of<br />

the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra in Viet Nam. In<br />

‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’,<br />

ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S.<br />

Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No. 463, 333–346. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Pitt R., Thu N.T.X., Minh M.D. and Phuc H.N. 2001.<br />

Preliminary sandfish growth trials in tanks, ponds,<br />

and pens in Vietnam. SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin 15, 17–27.


Appendix. Modified Chaetoceros upscaling formulation<br />

The technology in this paper does not maintain an<br />

algal culture. Instead, a 4 L stock of Chaetoceros<br />

is purchased from Alsons every other week and<br />

scaled up outdoors in the hatchery using recycled<br />

polyethylene barrels. The formulation we modified<br />

is described here and is not intended for maintaining<br />

pure stock cultures.<br />

Chlorination–dechlorination<br />

12.5% chlorine strength stock solution. Usage:<br />

0.2 mL (stock) per litre of culture volume (Agudo<br />

2006). Although chlorine content is not indicated in<br />

sodium hypochlorite powder, for calculation purposes<br />

we estimated the strength to be around 70%, based on<br />

references on the internet about sodium hypochlorite<br />

available in the Asian market.<br />

74<br />

250 g thiosulphate in 1-L solution to make stock<br />

solution. Usage: 0.2 mL (stock) per litre of culture<br />

volume (Agudo 2006).<br />

Chaetoceros upscaling formulation<br />

(modified from Agudo 2006)<br />

1. Fertiliser—Manusol (30:10:10): for 10-L jug<br />

culture, 0.25 g is needed; for 200-L culture, 5 g<br />

is needed<br />

2. Silicate—sodium metasilicate: for 10-L jug culture,<br />

0.375 g is needed; for 200-L culture, 7.5 g<br />

is needed.


Sandfish production and development of<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching in northern Australia<br />

William M. Bowman 1*<br />

Abstract<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> harvesting has been carried out in the Northern Territory (NT) since 1700 when Macassans<br />

regularly visited the area. Tasmanian Seafoods Pty Ltd currently holds all licences for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> in the NT,<br />

with the main target species being sandfish (Holothuria scabra). Tasmanian Seafoods has successfully trialled<br />

propagation and juvenile production for wild fishery stock enhancement and land-based grow-out in ponds.<br />

Lease of an ex-prawn farm and hatchery facilities at Darwin Aquaculture Centre has progressed its efforts.<br />

Tasmanians Seafoods has established working relationships with remote Indigenous communities situated nearby<br />

on recognised fishing grounds on Groote Eylandt, to develop the <strong>sea</strong>-ranching component of the project and<br />

establish joint ventures for the harvesting of the ‘released’ <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. Appropriate policies and management<br />

arrangements are also being negotiated with the NT Government Department of Resources Fisheries Group.<br />

Introduction<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> harvesting has been carried out in the<br />

Northern Territory (NT) since 1700, when Macassans<br />

from Celeb (Sulawesi island group, Indonesia) visited<br />

annually and set up processing sites adjacent to the<br />

fishing grounds (Macknight 1976). The industry<br />

has evolved and now consists of a series of regulatory<br />

controls to manage the fishery, predominantly<br />

through input controls. Entry to the fishery is limited<br />

to six licences that are restricted by area, species,<br />

minimum size and the number of divers on each<br />

vessel (Shelley and Puig 2003).<br />

Tasmanian Seafoods Pty Ltd is currently the sole<br />

licence owner for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishing in the NT.<br />

The fishery’s principle target species is the sandfish<br />

(Holothuria scabra). Since 2004 Tasmanian Seafoods<br />

has been investigating the potential of propagation<br />

and juvenile production of sandfish, with a view<br />

to enhancing the existing wild fishery through <strong>sea</strong><br />

ranching and exploring land-based grow-out.<br />

1 Tasmanian Seafoods Pty Ltd, Darwin, Australia<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

75<br />

During 2006–08, repeated trials were carried out<br />

to assess the potential of land-based grow-out and<br />

develop pond-management techniques for H. scabra.<br />

Promising results led to the expansion of the project<br />

by leasing a farm that had previously been used to<br />

cultivate prawns. Subsequently, a ‘farming’ component<br />

was added to the <strong>sea</strong>-ranching project, enabling<br />

greater access to, and utilisation of, necessary facilities<br />

(e.g. earthen ponds) for the project.<br />

In developing the <strong>sea</strong>-ranching component of<br />

the project, Tasmanians Seafoods has sought to<br />

create effective working relationships with remote<br />

Indigenous communities situated nearby on recognised<br />

fishing grounds, and establish joint ventures for<br />

the harvesting of the ‘released’ sandfish. The development<br />

of <strong>sea</strong> ranching has also required ongoing<br />

negotiations with the NT Government Department<br />

of Resources Fisheries Group to develop appropriate<br />

policies and management arrangements to conform<br />

with the NT’s Fisheries Act 1998.<br />

The fishery<br />

The fishing grounds occur along the Arnhem<br />

Land coast, with the major harvest areas being the


Cobourg Peninsula and Groote Eylandt (Figure 1)<br />

(Handley 2010). All commercial harvesting of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> in the NT is conducted by hand, either by<br />

walking the shallows, snorkelling or hookah. The<br />

fishery operates in waters up to 3 nautical miles<br />

<strong>sea</strong>ward of the NT and surrounding islands coast.<br />

The hatchery<br />

In 2004 Tasmanian Seafoods set up a pilot hatchery<br />

at the NT Government’s Darwin Aquaculture Centre<br />

(DAC). Initially, the hatchery was dependent on<br />

wild caught broodstock, which proved restrictive<br />

due to the logistics of acquiring broodstock from the<br />

fishing grounds, with the nearest grounds being on<br />

the Cobourg Peninsula about 200 km away with no<br />

road access (Figure 1). This led to the development<br />

of transport techniques using vessels and aircraft to<br />

collect and transfer broodstock to the hatchery with<br />

minimal stress, and the lease of ponds at a local<br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> farm to hold breeding stock.<br />

Successful larval culture of H. scabra led to<br />

expansion of the hatchery at the DAC. The larval<br />

rearing infrastructure is now a recirculating system<br />

comprising a 25,000-L sump, 40,000-L larval rearing<br />

volume, 36,000-L conditioning system and two<br />

1,500-L experimental larval rearing systems.<br />

All <strong>sea</strong> water entering the system has a salinity<br />

of 30‰ and is filtered to 1 µm. Once in the loop,<br />

Cobourg Peninsula<br />

Darwin<br />

Northern Territory<br />

500 km<br />

76<br />

the water is repeatedly treated with UV sterilisation<br />

and foam fractionation. The hatchery is located in a<br />

covered outdoor area, and water temperature in the<br />

larval rearing tanks is in the range 27–31 °C.<br />

During the larval run, the larval tanks are static<br />

with a daily partial water exchange. The larvae are<br />

predominantly fed Chaetoceros muelleri, beginning<br />

at densities of 15,000 cells/mL and increasing to<br />

35,000 cells/mL by the end of the run. Once the<br />

larvae have settled, the tanks are put on flow-through<br />

at 100% water exchange per day.<br />

The conditioning tanks are used to cover settlement<br />

substrates with diatoms, with a good coverage<br />

of periphytic diatoms on our settlement substrates<br />

generally taking around 5–7 days. Settlement<br />

substrates are then put into the larval tanks at the<br />

time of settlement, to help induce the larvae to settle<br />

and provide food for the post-settlement and early<br />

juvenile stages. While larval settlement is consistently<br />

achieved, the settlement rate is highly variable<br />

between tanks, often ranging from 0.4% to over 20%.<br />

The larval tanks are harvested and graded soon after<br />

settlement, generally at around day 30.<br />

The ponds<br />

Tasmanian Seafoods secured the lease on a prawn<br />

farm in 2009. The facility comprises eight 1-ha<br />

ponds, six 0.1-ha ponds, and one 2-ha reservoir. The<br />

Arnhem Land<br />

Groote Eylandt<br />

Figure 1. Major harvest areas of the Northern Territory (Australia) <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery


1-ha ponds are used for production, currently yielding<br />

2.0–2.5 tonnes wet weight per hectare. The 0.1-ha<br />

ponds are more versatile and easily managed, and are<br />

used for broodstock holding and conditioning, and<br />

nursery production.<br />

Water is pumped from Darwin Harbour into the<br />

reservoir, which then gravity-feeds the rest of the<br />

farm. The ponds are on flow-through, and water<br />

quality is regularly monitored. Between February<br />

2010 and January 2011, the salinity in the reservoir<br />

ranged from 24.6‰ to 38.6‰, and the temperature<br />

ranged from 24.7 °C to 35.2 °C. Optimal dissolved<br />

oxygen levels are maintained by using air diffusers<br />

mounted on the bottom of the ponds connected to air<br />

blowers. The diffusers also vertically mix the water<br />

column, preventing stratification.<br />

The pond nursery system currently consists of<br />

30 hapa nets (2.5 × 2.5 m, 1-mm mesh), which are<br />

stocked with newly settled juveniles (>1 mm). The<br />

grow-out ponds are stocked when juveniles reach<br />

25 mm (Figure 2). The growth rates in ponds increase<br />

with animal size, and with suitable conditions can<br />

exceed 2.5 g/day when animals are nearing harvest<br />

(i.e. around 350 g). Freshwater influx into the ponds<br />

through the monsoon <strong>sea</strong>son is managed by adjusting<br />

Figure 2. Nursery production of sandfish<br />

77<br />

flow-through rates; and pond depth is maintained<br />

using boards or internal standpipes, giving the ability<br />

to skim the fresh water off the top.<br />

Sea ranching<br />

In 2006 Tasmanian Seafoods began <strong>sea</strong>rching for<br />

suitable sites to conduct <strong>sea</strong>-ranching trials. Little<br />

Lagoon on Groote Eylandt (Figure 3) was chosen<br />

due to the presence of suitable release habitat for<br />

hatchery-produced juveniles. In addition, the local<br />

community of Umbakumba expressed an interest in<br />

being involved in the project.<br />

Little Lagoon is a shallow basin approximately<br />

2,000 ha in area comprising patches of <strong>sea</strong>grass,<br />

shifting sand bars and mud substrate. The area has<br />

long been recognised as a productive fishery and<br />

natural nursery area for sandfish (R. Hone, pers.<br />

comm., 2009). The lagoon also has favourable geographical<br />

characteristics for monitoring the released<br />

sandfish, including protection from the weather due<br />

to its semi-enclosed nature and a low tidal range,<br />

which helps to maintain good water visibility.<br />

Building a successful relationship with the<br />

Umbakumba community has been critical for the


developmental stage of the <strong>sea</strong>-ranching project.<br />

There are obvious logistical difficulties associated<br />

with this site, which is approximately 700 km from<br />

the hatchery. However, local community involvement<br />

allows for relatively simple management of the project,<br />

while regular barge and plane services facilitate<br />

transport of equipment to and from the site.<br />

Future direction<br />

Groote Eylandt<br />

10 km<br />

Figure 3. Location of <strong>sea</strong>-ranching site, Little Lagoon, Groote Eylandt<br />

The future direction for Tasmanian Seafoods in <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> propagation and <strong>sea</strong>-ranching re<strong>sea</strong>rch is<br />

to increase hatchery and nursery efficiency through<br />

improved hatchery protocols and system design;<br />

improve pond management to reduce variation and<br />

increase yields; and accurately assess the viability of<br />

<strong>sea</strong>-based grow-out of sandfish.<br />

Tasmanian Seafoods aims to promote Indigenous<br />

community involvement in <strong>sea</strong> ranching in the NT,<br />

creating opportunities and economic activity in<br />

remote areas. Information generated in the re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

will assist in determining the potential of stock<br />

enhancement as a management tool for the future<br />

development and sustainable use of the NT’s <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> fishery.<br />

78<br />

Umbakumba<br />

Little<br />

Lagoon<br />

References<br />

Handley A.J. (ed.) 2010. Fishery status reports 2009.<br />

Northern Territory Government Department of<br />

Resources. Fishery Report No. 104, 113–119.<br />

Macknight C.C. 1976. The voyage to Marege: Macassan<br />

trepangers in northern Australia. Melbourne University<br />

Press.<br />

Shelley C.C. and Puig P. 2003. Management of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s in the Northern Territory, Australia, and<br />

current re<strong>sea</strong>rch to further improve understanding of the<br />

fishery. In ‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and<br />

management’, ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell,<br />

S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No. 463, 221–230. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.


Hatchery experience and useful lessons from<br />

Isostichopus fuscus in Ecuador and Mexico<br />

Annie Mercier 1*, Roberto H. Ycaza 2, Ramon Espinoza 3,<br />

Victor M. Arriaga Haro 4 and Jean-François Hamel 5<br />

Abstract<br />

This paper summarises lessons learned from captive breeding of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Isostichopus fuscus in<br />

land-based installations on the coast of Ecuador and Mexico. This species has been intensively fished in<br />

Mexico, along mainland Ecuador and around the Galapagos Islands. Management efforts have traditionally<br />

been challenged by local economic and social conditions. Populations of I. fuscus have thus been severely<br />

depleted over the past decades, generating interest in <strong>aquaculture</strong> and restocking. Spawning, fertilisation,<br />

larval rearing, di<strong>sea</strong>se control and juvenile growth have been documented in two privately owned hatcheries.<br />

Data from trials conducted in Ecuador over several years indicate that, under optimal conditions, juveniles<br />

can be grown to a size of ~8 cm in length in 3.5 months and to commercial size in ~18 months. Preliminary<br />

tests have shown that growing juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in shrimp ponds is feasible. In Mexico, successful<br />

spawnings were restricted to late summer and autumn/fall months, when cultures of larvae and early juveniles<br />

yielded growth rates similar to or greater than those recorded in Ecuador. Grow-out of juveniles in shrimp<br />

ponds was impeded in both countries by skin infections, leading to high mortality rates, whereas juveniles<br />

placed in cages in the ocean (in Mexico) exhibited reasonable growth rates and better survival (to 90%).<br />

Overall, studies demonstrate that, with proper di<strong>sea</strong>se control, millions of juvenile I. fuscus can be reared in<br />

captivity annually, thus providing an alternative to fisheries, or a way to maintain sustainable harvests and<br />

eventually contribute to restoration of the natural populations.<br />

Introduction<br />

Isostichopus fuscus (Figure 1) is a deposit-feeding<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> that is mainly found on reefs and sandy<br />

bottoms along the western coast of the Americas,<br />

from northern Peru to Baja California, Mexico<br />

(Castro 1993; Toral-Granda 1996; Sonnenholzner<br />

1997; Gutierrez-Garcia 1999). Like many other<br />

1 Ocean Sciences Centre (OSC), Memorial University, St<br />

John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

2 Investigaciones Especies Acuaticas (IEA), Santa Elena,<br />

Ecuador<br />

3 Acuacultura dos Mil S.A. de C.V., Mazatlán, Sinaloa, Mexico<br />

4 Organización y Fomento de la Comisión Nacional de<br />

Acuacultura y Pesca, Mazatlán, Mexico<br />

5 Society for the Exploration and Valuing of the Environment<br />

(SEVE), St Philip’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada<br />

79<br />

commercial <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> species, I. fuscus has been<br />

widely fished over past decades to meet the growing<br />

demand for beche-de-mer in the major Asian markets.<br />

As the waters along mainland Ecuador became<br />

depleted, the fisheries shifted to the Galapagos<br />

Islands in the early 1990s, raising international<br />

apprehension over the fate of this unique archipelago,<br />

which has been recognised as a national park and<br />

marine reserve. Since then, attempts by government<br />

at regulating <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> harvests, and banning<br />

them in some areas, have met strong opposition<br />

from local fishers in Ecuador. In fact, illegal fisheries<br />

have always been a concern and still occur along<br />

the mainland coast, around the Galapagos Islands<br />

and elsewhere in the distribution area of I. fuscus.<br />

In 1994 the Government of Mexico imposed a total<br />

closure because this species was considered locally<br />

endangered. However, the closure was not obeyed by


Figure 1. Adults of Isostichopus fuscus photographed (A) in situ (Galapagos Islands)<br />

and (B) in land-based installations (mainland Ecuador) showing the main<br />

colour morphs<br />

fishers, leading to a decrease in the biomass, which is<br />

now only 2% of the original biomass in some regions<br />

(Castro 1995; Aguilar-Ibarra and Martinez-Soberon<br />

2002). Currently, the fishery in Mexico is managed<br />

under concessions and stricter activity controls<br />

(Toral-Granda 2008).<br />

Official information on the fisheries and actual<br />

total catches are difficult to obtain and remain sparse<br />

(Salgado-Castro 1993; Castro 1997; Sonnenholzner<br />

1997; Gutierrez-Garcia 1999; Jenkins and Mulliken<br />

1999). Nevertheless, recent data and reports<br />

on average capture sizes (Sonnenholzner 1997;<br />

Martinez 2001) indicate that I. fuscus populations<br />

have declined substantially and that natural stocks<br />

may irreversibly crash in the near future. Stock<br />

recovery has yet to be observed in any region<br />

(Toral-Granda 2008).<br />

Despite this situation, a very limited number of<br />

studies has been conducted on the reproductive biology,<br />

spatial distribution, population structure, growth<br />

and survival rate of I. fuscus (Herrero-Pérezrul<br />

1994; Fajardo-Leon et al. 1995; Toral-Granda 1996;<br />

Sonnenholzner 1997; Herrero-Pérezrul et al. 1999;<br />

Hamel et al. 2003; Mercier et al. 2004, 2007; Toral-<br />

Granda and Martínez 2007; Becker et al. 2009).<br />

Some authors have mentioned that <strong>aquaculture</strong> and<br />

restocking should be investigated as possible solutions<br />

to the current crisis (Gutierrez-Garcia 1995,<br />

1999; Fajardo-Leon and Velez-Barajas 1996; Jenkins<br />

and Mulliken 1999).<br />

Until recently, <strong>aquaculture</strong> in Ecuador and Mexico<br />

was largely focused on shrimp. The emergence of<br />

white spot di<strong>sea</strong>se in 1999–2000 has severely<br />

affected the industry and resulted in the bankruptcy<br />

and closure of numerous farms. Consequently,<br />

both countries now have abandoned shrimp farm<br />

80<br />

infrastructures that could very well be put to use<br />

for the development of other species, such as <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s.<br />

This paper summarises efforts made to cultivate<br />

I. fuscus, including methods of larval development<br />

and juvenile growth in land-based nursery systems<br />

on the coasts of Ecuador and Mexico. Major findings<br />

from Ecuador have been outlined previously<br />

(Hamel et al. 2003; Mercier et al. 2004, 2007;<br />

Becker et al. 2009), whereas data from Mexico are<br />

presented here for the first time.<br />

Results show that <strong>aquaculture</strong> of this species is<br />

feasible and that it could potentially be developed<br />

as an alternative to fisheries. In addition, it could be<br />

used to maintain sustainable harvests and eventually<br />

contribute to the restoration of natural populations.<br />

Further re<strong>sea</strong>rch to complement the work presented<br />

here is being conducted on the feeding, growth and<br />

reproductive biology of this highly prized <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>,<br />

which is a dominant feature of the Mexican and<br />

Ecuadorian marine ecosystems. In time, hatchery<br />

production and restocking of I. fuscus might provide<br />

part of the solution to the current <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

fishery crisis.<br />

Methods and results<br />

Spawning and fertilisation<br />

Adult <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s were routinely collected<br />

from nearby coastal areas in Ecuador or Mexico to<br />

serve as broodstock. The adults were adapted to captive<br />

conditions in large tanks or raceways for a few<br />

days or weeks prior to spawning. Various methods of<br />

spawning induction were initially tested. However,<br />

close monitoring and spawning experiments later


evealed that the species follows a predictable lunar<br />

spawning periodicity. Patterns of gamete release were<br />

investigated on the coast of Ecuador using several<br />

hundred newly collected individuals monitored nearly<br />

every month for 4 years. Between 1% and 35% of<br />

individuals consistently spawned 1–4 days after the<br />

new moon (Figure 2) (Mercier et al. 2007). Most<br />

81<br />

spawnings occurred on the same evening, although<br />

some gamete release was often recorded over two to<br />

four consecutive evenings. On a spawning night, males<br />

typically initiated gamete release around sunset, and<br />

females spawned just after the peak male broadcast.<br />

The percentage of spawning individuals was higher,<br />

and a greater overlap between male and female peak<br />

Figure 2. Example of the typical spawning periodicity recorded in captive<br />

Isostichopus fuscus in Ecuador (from Mercier et al. 2007)


spawning activity was noticed, during clear conditions<br />

compared with overcast conditions (Mercier et<br />

al. 2007). Preliminary data from Mexico confirmed<br />

the same lunar pattern, although individuals mostly<br />

started to spawn 2–3 days before the new moon, and<br />

continued to do so for 2–4 consecutive days.<br />

In Ecuador, it has thus been possible to obtain<br />

male and female gametes on a monthly basis; only a<br />

limited number of spawning trials have been unsuccessful,<br />

mostly due to poor environmental conditions<br />

(e.g. heavy rain). In Mexico, spawning events were<br />

recorded solely between June and December of each<br />

year, with maximum success in late summer and<br />

autumn/fall (August to December).<br />

The broodstock in Ecuador typically consisted of<br />

300–400 adults maintained in large 30-t tanks. Males<br />

and females were isolated in buckets as soon as they<br />

showed signs of imminent spawning (typical posture<br />

with anterior end rising and moving right to left and<br />

up and down). Clear morphological distinctions<br />

between male and female gonopores at that stage<br />

allowed trained personnel to sort them before the<br />

actual gamete release. Each female was placed separately<br />

in a 300-L spawning tank and maintained there<br />

until it had released its oocytes. Once the female had<br />

been removed from the tank, dry sperm obtained<br />

surgically from three males (sperm extracted from<br />

the gonad without adding any <strong>sea</strong> water until use may<br />

be kept at 4 °C for up to 48 hours) was diluted in <strong>sea</strong><br />

water to allow cell count and prepare the solution<br />

required to achieve the desired final concentration of<br />

spermatozoa in the tanks. The best fertilisation rates<br />

and lowest occurrence of polyspermy were obtained<br />

with a concentration of 500–1,000 spermatozoa/mL.<br />

Spawning of both males and females occasionally<br />

occurred in the broodstock tanks; already fertilised<br />

gametes were then transferred to culture vessels.<br />

Similar techniques were used in Mexico.<br />

Larval development<br />

After fertilisation, the eggs were rinsed to remove<br />

excess sperm. A few hours later, the developing<br />

larvae were transferred to the hatchery tanks,<br />

where their development was closely monitored<br />

(Hamel et al. 2003; Mercier et al. 2004). The routine<br />

protocol included daily cleaning of the tanks during<br />

the first days, followed by installation of a flowthrough<br />

system. In Mexico, the flow-through system<br />

was used from the very beginning of the culture. The<br />

larvae were fed every day using a mix of live microalgae<br />

(dominated by Rhodomonas and Dunaliella<br />

82<br />

in Ecuador, and Chaetoceros and Dunaliella in<br />

Mexico) at a frequency and concentration dictated<br />

by the daily observation of digestive tract contents.<br />

With improvement of the rearing techniques over the<br />

past few years, including the use of running <strong>sea</strong> water<br />

and temperature control (see below), a 30–50% survival<br />

rate has regularly been achieved, although the<br />

average survivorship remains at 8–30% of juveniles<br />

developed from each larval run (Hamel et al. 2003;<br />

Mercier et al. 2004).<br />

Isostichopus fuscus possesses planktotrophic larvae<br />

that need to feed during their pelagic phase and will<br />

undergo a series of transformations to reach the<br />

juvenile stage (Figures 3–5; Table 1). In most trials,<br />

the development, settlement and growth of the juveniles<br />

were asynchronous, and different stages/sizes<br />

occurred simultaneously in the cultures. Extreme<br />

examples were observed in a few tanks where residual<br />

auricularia larvae neighboured 4-mm-long juveniles.<br />

Table 1 provides developmental kinetics for both<br />

countries based on the bulk of the cultures, discarding<br />

extreme asynchronies. Figure 6a shows the different<br />

sizes of juveniles that may occur in a typical cohort.<br />

Ovulation occurs in the gonadal tubule as the<br />

oocytes are released (Figure 3a). Thus, fully mature<br />

oocytes (~120 µm in diameter) are expelled directly<br />

in the water column at the metaphase-I of meiosis,<br />

after the germinal vesicle breakdown. Embryonic<br />

development is initiated with the elevation of the<br />

fertilisation envelope, roughly 4 minutes after fertilisation.<br />

The expulsion of the first polar body occurs<br />

~3 minutes later (Figure 3b). The second polar body<br />

follows rapidly within ~2 minutes. The first cleavage<br />

is equal, radial and holoblastic, and divides the cell<br />

into two equal hemispheric blastomeres (Figure 3c).<br />

The second cleavage again occurs along the animal–<br />

vegetal axis, yielding more spherical blastomeres.<br />

Embryos hatch from the fertilisation envelope as<br />

early gastrulae ~10 hours after fertilisation (Figure<br />

3d). These early gastrulae are ciliated and swim;<br />

they elongate into full-size gastrulae after ~14 hours<br />

(Figure 3e). Auricularia larvae, which constitute the<br />

first feeding stage, begin to appear ~24 hours after<br />

fertilisation. Growing auriculariae can be observed<br />

during the next 2 weeks of culture (Figure 3f; Table<br />

1). At this stage they begin to accumulate hyaline<br />

spheres. The oesophagus, sphincter, intestine, cloaca<br />

anus are clearly visible. After 16–18 days the auricularia<br />

reaches its maximum size of 1.1–1.3 mm; it has<br />

left and right somatocoels, as well as an axohydrocoel<br />

(Figure 3g) (Hamel et al. 2003; Mercier et al. 2004).


Figure 3. Early development of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Isostichopus fuscus; the bars represent 200 µm.<br />

A: Oocytes collected surgically from a mature gonad; the germinal vesicle (GV) is<br />

clearly visible. The insert shows a close-up of an ovulating oocyte with the follicular<br />

cells (FC) still attached to it. B: Fully mature, newly fertilised eggs with clear germinal<br />

vesicle breakdown. The insert shows the expulsion of the two polar bodies (PB). C: Twocell<br />

stage. D: Newly hatched gastrula. E: Elongated gastrula with visible blastopores<br />

(BP). F: Early auricularia on which the ciliary bands (CB), hyaline spheres (HS), buccal<br />

cavity (BC), oesophagus (E), intestine (I), cloaca (C) and anus (A) are identifiable;<br />

food items (F) are present in the buccal cavity. G: Ventral view of a fully developed<br />

auricularia showing the left somatocoel (LS), axohydrocoel (A), hyaline spheres (HS),<br />

ciliary bands (CB), buccal cavity (BC), oesophagus (E), sphincter (S), intestine (I)<br />

and right somatocoel (RS). H: Dorsal view of a metamorphosing auricularia. With a<br />

noticeable decrease in size, the buccal cavity disappears and the hyaline spheres (HS)<br />

are pulled closer together. The mouth (M), intestine (I), oesophagus (E), left somatocoel<br />

(LS) and axohydrocoel (A) are clearly visible.<br />

In the following hours, many auriculariae initiate<br />

the transformation that will lead to the doliolaria<br />

stage (Figure 3h). During this process, the larvae<br />

shrink to nearly 50% of their initial size, the buccal<br />

ciliated cavity disappears and the hyaline spheres<br />

are pressed closer together (Figure 4a). The doliolaria<br />

stage is reached ~19–24 days after fertilisation<br />

(Figure 4b; Table 1) as the larvae stop feeding and<br />

83<br />

the cilia are aligned in five distinct crowns along<br />

their cylindrical body. At this time, the movement<br />

of the primary tentacles can be observed through the<br />

translucent body wall. The somatocoel is also visible.<br />

A few days later, the doliolaria transforms into<br />

an early pentactula possessing five buccal tentacles<br />

(Figure 4c). At this stage, the larvae remain close to<br />

the substrate, successively going through swimming


Figure 4. Late development of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Isostichopus fuscus; the bars represent<br />

200 µm. A: Late metamorphosing auricularia, showing the hyaline spheres<br />

(HS), oesophagus (E), intestine (I), somatocoel (S) and axohydrocoel (A).<br />

B: Fully developed doliolaria with hyaline spheres (HS), primary tentacles<br />

(PT), ciliary bands (CB) and somatocoel (S). C: Early pentactula with five<br />

tentacles (T) and the still-visible ciliary bands (CB). D: Dorsal view of newly<br />

settled pentactula with tentacles (T) and hyaline spheres (HS). E: Ventral view<br />

of newly settled pentactula showing the first ambulacral podia (AP) and the<br />

five buccal tentacles (T). F: Early juvenile, measuring 1.5 mm in length, with<br />

tentacles (T), ambulacral podia (AP) and ossicles (O). The hyaline spheres<br />

have disappeared. G: A 2-mm-long juvenile with five tentacles (T) and three<br />

pairs of ambulacral podia (AP). The intestine (I) and ossicles (O) are visible.<br />

H: A 3-mm-long juvenile showing the tentacles (T), papillae (PA), intestine<br />

(I), anus (A) and ring canal and aquapharyngeal bulb (RC + APB)<br />

and settling phases. Definitive settlement, with the<br />

complete loss of cilia, completion of metamorphosis<br />

and emergence of the two first ambulacral podia,<br />

occurs about 22–27 days post-fertilisation in Ecuador<br />

and 17–20 days post-fertilisation in Mexico (Table 1;<br />

84<br />

Figure 4d, e). Further details on the development are<br />

available (Hamel et al. 2003; Mercier et al. 2004).<br />

Hatcheries in Ecuador use corrugated sheets of<br />

Plexiglas covered with a rich biofilm to provide<br />

settlement substrates and food to settled larvae and


early juveniles. In Mexico, conditioned, multilayered<br />

sheets of locally made fabric mesh are used as settlement<br />

substrata and during the early growth phase<br />

of juveniles.<br />

Juvenile growth<br />

Figure 5. Juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Isostichopus fuscus measuring 15 mm in length<br />

and showing the tentacles (T), early body wall pigments (P), intestine (I),<br />

ambulacral podia (AP), anus (A) and papillae (PA)<br />

Although the first settled juveniles can be observed<br />

as early as day 17–22, a majority of juveniles measuring<br />

1.0–1.5 mm in length are generally found in the<br />

tanks after 21–28 days of culture (Figure 4f; Table 1).<br />

They reach ~2–3 mm only a few days later (Figure<br />

4g, h), and 5 mm after ~40–48 days. At this stage,<br />

the juveniles start to accumulate some reddish-brown<br />

pigments. In 8-mm-long juveniles, the tips of the tentacles<br />

become ramified. After 50–65 days of culture,<br />

the juveniles are 15–18 mm long and 4 mm wide<br />

(Figure 5). They possess several papillae and an elongated<br />

intestine that already exhibits strong peristaltic<br />

movements. The body wall becomes more opaque<br />

as the ossicle density and the tegument thickness<br />

increase. When the juveniles reach ~20 mm in length,<br />

the whitish colouration that characterises the early<br />

stages of life is gradually replaced by a brownish<br />

tinge typical of adults (Figure 6a). After 72–85 days<br />

of culture, the juveniles are ~35 mm long and 10 mm<br />

wide (Hamel et al. 2003; Mercier et al. 2004).<br />

The typical growth of I. fuscus larvae and juveniles<br />

in Ecuador is shown in Figure 7. The average growth<br />

85<br />

of larvae and juveniles follows the second-order<br />

polynomial calculation (equation (1)):<br />

f(x) = 1658 – 321(x) + 11(x2) (1)<br />

where f(x) is the size in µm and x is the time in days<br />

(r2 = 0.99)<br />

The latest cultures in Ecuador have yielded significantly<br />

faster growth rates, with juveniles measuring<br />

11 mm after 28 days, 31 mm after 56 days and<br />

56 mm after 77 days. Growth rates are slightly slower<br />

in Mexico (Table 1).<br />

Grow-out experiments<br />

In Ecuador the juveniles are usually transferred<br />

to larger 18-m2 pre-conditioned flow-through tanks,<br />

with or without conditioned plates (the same as<br />

those used for larval settlement), when they reach<br />

0.5–1.0 mm in length. Mexico makes similar use of<br />

settlement plates for juvenile growth in flow-through<br />

tanks. After about 72 days, some of the juveniles have<br />

reached sizes up to 34 mm (Figure 7; Table 1). The<br />

maximum size of I. fuscus grown in <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

facilities is ~240 mm in length or ~490 g (Figure 6b).<br />

Juvenile I. fuscus were also successfully reared in<br />

shrimp ponds in Ecuador. A preliminary experiment<br />

was conducted early in the study to determine if small<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s (~100–150 g) collected from the wild<br />

would grow in ponds in different locations. Enclosures


Table 1. Development of Isostichopus fuscus, from fertilisation to 35-mm-long juvenile<br />

STAGE TIME<br />

Ecuador<br />

of 1 m 2 were used to facilitate recapture. These <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s grew an average of 17 g/week and exhibited<br />

a 98% survival rate, suggesting that shrimp ponds<br />

along the coast can provide a good environment to<br />

grow I. fuscus juveniles to adult size in a reasonable<br />

time frame. However, juveniles grown in tanks and<br />

shrimp ponds may both develop skin di<strong>sea</strong>ses that can<br />

cause massive mortality, especially during months with<br />

warmer temperatures and heavy rains (see below).<br />

In Mexico in 2009, an experimental shrimp pond<br />

was used for the grow-out of hatchery-reared juveniles<br />

(starting with 2-month-old seeds of 3–5 mm<br />

and 4–7 mg). During the monitoring phase they grew<br />

86<br />

TIME<br />

Mexico<br />

Fertilisation 0 0<br />

Elevation of the fertilisation envelope 4 minutes 5 minutes<br />

Expulsion of the first polar body 7 minutes 10–15 minutes<br />

Expulsion of the second polar body 9 minutes 16–20 minutes<br />

2-cell 52 minutes 21 minutes<br />

4-cell 70 minutes 30–40 minutes<br />

8-cell 95 minutes 64 minutes<br />

16-cell 124 minutes 71 minutes<br />

32-cell 140 minutes 80–90 minutes<br />

Blastula 3 hours 2.5–3.0 hours<br />

Early gastrula 6 hours 6 hours<br />

Hatching 10 hours 9 hours<br />

Late gastrula (elongation) 14 hours 11 hours<br />

Early auricularia 1–2 days 20–25 hours<br />

Auricularia 3–15 days 3–10 days<br />

Late auricularia (early metamorphosis) 16–18 days 11–17 days<br />

Doliolaria 19–24 days 13–18 days<br />

Early pentactula 21–26 days 14–19 days<br />

Settlement (metamorphosis completed) 22–27 days 17–20 days<br />

Juvenile, 1 mm 28 days* 21 days<br />

Juvenile, 2 mm 30 days 30 days<br />

Juvenile, 3 mm 32 days 40 days<br />

Juvenile, 4 mm 38 days 45 days<br />

Juvenile, 5 mm 40 days 48 days<br />

Juvenile, 8 mm 44 days 55 days<br />

Juvenile, 10 mm 47 days 61 days<br />

Juvenile, 15 mm 51 days 65 days<br />

Juvenile, 20 mm 56 days 70 days<br />

Juvenile, 25 mm 63 days 74 days<br />

Juvenile, 30 mm 69 days 78 days<br />

Juvenile, 35 mm 72 days 85–90 days<br />

* For the juvenile stages, the time indicated corresponds to the first noteworthy observations of a particular<br />

size in the tanks.<br />

from an average of 1.07 to 42.07 g in 3 months, but<br />

survival was low due to outbreaks of skin di<strong>sea</strong>se.<br />

Using mesh cages at <strong>sea</strong> (1.8 × 1.8 × 1.8 m) stocked<br />

with 3,000 seeds resulted in a more conservative<br />

growth rate (from 2.66 to 26.92 g in 3 months)<br />

but greater survival (40–90%). The presence of<br />

sponges and other fouling organisms on the mesh<br />

(500–1,000 µm), and clogging from accumulated<br />

sediments, might have prevented the entry of fresh<br />

deposits serving as food to the juveniles. The presence<br />

of crabs in the cages was also noted, which<br />

might have caused stress (slowing growth) and possibly<br />

mortalities.


Figure 6. A: Juveniles of different sizes, ranging 3–25 mm in length, obtained in the same cohort.<br />

B: Maximum size of I. fuscus obtained through <strong>aquaculture</strong> (~24 cm long)<br />

Size (mm)<br />

34<br />

32<br />

30<br />

28<br />

26<br />

24<br />

22<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

0 4 8<br />

Figure 7. Average growth of larvae (black bars) and juveniles (grey bars) of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Isostichopus fuscus in Ecuador<br />

Di<strong>sea</strong>ses and other problems<br />

f=1658–321x+11x 2<br />

r 2=0.99<br />

Parasites of the digestive tract in larvae<br />

The most common problem observed during the<br />

culture of I. fuscus was the development of a di<strong>sea</strong>se<br />

in the digestive system of early larvae (Figure 8)<br />

(Becker et al. 2009). Following the appearance of<br />

opaque cells around the digestive tract, the second<br />

visible symptom was contraction of the intestine<br />

and stomach. In the worst cases, the digestive tract<br />

12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72<br />

Time (days)<br />

87<br />

completely shrivelled up and disappeared. Once it<br />

became visible, the condition was usually fatal to the<br />

larvae.<br />

Upon close examination of the affected larvae<br />

under the microscope, the di<strong>sea</strong>se was determined<br />

to be caused by protozoan parasites (Figure 8a, b).<br />

During the first stage of the di<strong>sea</strong>se, the parasites<br />

can be seen entering through the body wall and the<br />

digestive tract, probably inducing the observed contraction.<br />

Later in the development of the di<strong>sea</strong>se, the


A B<br />

Figure 8. Micrographs of di<strong>sea</strong>sed Isostichopus fuscus. A: Auricularia larva (length 1.2 mm) with digestive tract<br />

invaded by parasites (arrows). B: Close-up view of the intestine with parasites (parasite diameter 12 µm)<br />

parasites become larger and are present everywhere<br />

around the intestine, both inside and outside. The<br />

parasites that penetrate the intestine appear to feed<br />

on the intestinal contents or tissues, slowly making<br />

it shrink, sometimes rupturing the intestinal wall<br />

and typically causing the death of the larva within<br />

1–3 days (Becker et al. 2009).<br />

The parasites have never been observed in the larvae<br />

before hatching. However, the condition develops<br />

rapidly shortly thereafter, suggesting that the causal<br />

agents are present in the surrounding environment, and<br />

that they enter the larvae at the first opportunity. They<br />

seem to remain inactive until the larvae start to feed.<br />

Afterwards, they can be seen to develop in different<br />

areas of the mouth and, most commonly, the digestive<br />

tract (stomach and intestine). A form with thin appendixes<br />

can be found attached all over the larvae, but the<br />

amoeboid form is mostly observed around the digestive<br />

organs; it has the ability to move in and out of what<br />

appears to be a trophosoite form (Becker et al. 2009).<br />

We have tried different methods of collecting the<br />

gametes to establish whether the parasites were coming<br />

from the <strong>sea</strong> water itself or from the spawning<br />

adults. It has proven impossible to develop a culture<br />

without the presence of the parasites at one stage or<br />

another, even when using artificial <strong>sea</strong> water from<br />

the onset. It would seem that the parasites are either<br />

present around the gametes and/or develop spontaneously<br />

in the culture (possibly from aerosols).<br />

Close monitoring of the early larval stages allows<br />

detection of the first occurrence of the parasites, and<br />

enables control of the di<strong>sea</strong>se through adjustments<br />

of environmental parameters. If the di<strong>sea</strong>se is not<br />

88<br />

contained in its earliest phase, the whole culture<br />

usually crashes. This problem is especially prevalent<br />

during the hottest and rainiest months of the cycle<br />

in both countries. Decreasing the temperature to<br />

~24–26 °C and increasing aeration in the cultures<br />

mitigates proliferation of this parasite; however, even<br />

lower temperatures may slow or interrupt the development<br />

of the larvae.<br />

Di<strong>sea</strong>se of the body wall (skin) in juveniles and<br />

larger individuals<br />

In Ecuador and Mexico, grow-out trials in shrimp<br />

ponds or large tanks have so far yielded mixed results,<br />

with significant mortality due to a di<strong>sea</strong>se affecting<br />

the body wall (Figure 9). This condition may cause<br />

degeneration, evisceration and eventually death. Some<br />

promising treatments were devised in Mexico with<br />

daily usage of antibiotics for several weeks, but cured<br />

animals could develop the di<strong>sea</strong>se again later on. The<br />

best way to prevent and cure this condition in Mexico<br />

is currently to grow I. fuscus directly in the ocean or<br />

transfer any affected individual to the field as soon as<br />

the skin di<strong>sea</strong>se is detected.<br />

Problems related to quality of food and water<br />

Due to variable and often poor environmental<br />

conditions along the coast where the water was being<br />

pumped, a very complete filtration system, including<br />

UV treatment, had to be installed to provide the best<br />

possible water quality throughout the trials. The conventional<br />

treatment used for prawn culture was not<br />

dependable enough to grow <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> larvae with<br />

optimum success, especially I. fuscus, which requires


Figure 9. A: Juveniles and B: adult individuals of Isostichopus fuscus affected by body wall (skin)<br />

di<strong>sea</strong>se; individuals are ~2–3 cm long in A and ~20 cm in B.<br />

high-quality oceanic water. Strict sanitary measures<br />

were adopted in the handling of gametes and larvae<br />

to maximise survival rates and minimise incidence<br />

of infections and di<strong>sea</strong>ses. Bacterial counts were<br />

routinely made from water samples to monitor the<br />

efficiency of the sanitary and filtration procedures.<br />

Bacterial contamination of algal cultures was<br />

another common problem that had to be overcome.<br />

Growing larvae need large quantities of healthy<br />

live algae to develop steadily, especially during the<br />

auricularia stage. Inability to provide a healthy mix<br />

of algae can significantly delay growth and metamorphosis<br />

for extended periods. Thus, it has proven<br />

crucial to develop a system of algae production that<br />

is reliable and efficient.<br />

As the size of the cultures grew from a few tens<br />

of thousands to over 2–3 million larvae per month,<br />

rearing conditions had to be maintained and eventually<br />

improved to avoid mass mortalities.<br />

Outlook<br />

After 10 years of re<strong>sea</strong>rch and development:<br />

• A good portion of the effort has been placed on<br />

adapting shrimp farm equipment and larval rearing<br />

conditions to fit the needs of I. fuscus.<br />

• The species has been found to follow a predictable<br />

lunar spawning cycle, which facilitates the collection<br />

of mature gametes (oocytes and spermatozoa).<br />

• A larval rearing protocol has been developed using<br />

flow-through systems, an optimal micro-algae diet,<br />

water quality management and di<strong>sea</strong>se control.<br />

89<br />

• In successful trials, survival rates from fertilised<br />

egg to settlement varied from 2–13% in Mexico<br />

to ≥30% in Ecuador.<br />

• Based on the best growth rates, juveniles can reach<br />

8 cm (~25–27 g) in 110 days in shrimp ponds<br />

(Ecuador) and 90 days in cages (Mexico), with<br />

survival rates of up to 90%.<br />

• While grow-out of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in tanks and<br />

shrimp ponds appears to be promising under optimal<br />

conditions, cage culture (<strong>sea</strong> farming) might<br />

be a more reliable and simple option because it is<br />

free of di<strong>sea</strong>se.<br />

Future goals<br />

Future re<strong>sea</strong>rch aims to:<br />

• improve the diets and conditioning of adults to<br />

spawn when maintained in tanks to avoid having<br />

to continuously collect broodstock from the wild<br />

• finetune hatchery and larval rearing protocols to<br />

maximise (scale-up) commercial mass-production<br />

• optimise the control of larval and juvenile parasitic<br />

infestations and infections<br />

• experiment with grow-out techniques to determine<br />

the best diet, substrates and location to grow the<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s to commercial size<br />

• determine the commercial and ecological prospects<br />

for hatchery-produced I. fuscus (e.g. marketing,<br />

restocking)<br />

• explore the possibility of culture away from shrimp<br />

habitat / installations.


Acknowledgments<br />

The authors would like to acknowledge the hard work<br />

and technical assistance of Jorge Jaramillo, Jose<br />

Pico, Pedro Gonsaby and Maricela Garcia during the<br />

course of the laboratory work in Ecuador, as well as<br />

Ramon Cota, Cesar E. Magallanes Raygoza, Cristian<br />

Eden Sagueiro Beltran, Karla Marina Garcia Quiroz,<br />

Juan Jose Beltran Sanchez and Javier Cervantes<br />

Zambrano in Mexico.<br />

References<br />

Aguilar-Ibarra A. and Martinez-Soberon G. 2002. Economic<br />

reasons, ecological actions and social consequences in<br />

the Mexican <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery. SPC Beche-de-mer<br />

Information Bulletin 17, 23–26.<br />

Becker P., Eeckhaut I., Ycaza R.H., Mercier A. and Hamel<br />

J.-F. 2009. Protozoan di<strong>sea</strong>se in larval culture of the<br />

edible <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Isostichopus fuscus. Pp. 571–573<br />

in ‘Echinoderms’, ed. by L.G. Harris, S.A. Bottger, C.W.<br />

Walker and M.P. Lesser. CRC Press, London.<br />

Castro L. 1993. The fisheries of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

Isostichopus fuscus and Parastichopus parvimensis<br />

in Baja California, Mexico. Proceedings of the 8th<br />

International Echinoderm Conference, Dijon, France,<br />

p. 504.<br />

Castro L. 1995. Management options of the commercial<br />

dive fisheries for the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in Baja California,<br />

Mexico. SPC Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 7, 20.<br />

Castro L. 1997. Review of recent developments in the Baja<br />

California, Mexico, Isostichopus fuscus, Holothuria<br />

impatiens and Parastichopus parvimensis fisheries. SPC<br />

Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 9, 26–27.<br />

Fajardo-Leon M. and Velez-Barajas A. 1996. Pesqueneria<br />

de pepino de mar. In ‘Estudia del potencial pesquero y<br />

acuicola de Baja California Sur’, ed. by M. Casas-Valdez<br />

and G. Ponce Diaz, Vol. 2, 151–165. Mexican Ministry<br />

of Fisheries and the Environment (SEMARNAP) and<br />

Centre of Re<strong>sea</strong>rch and Advanced Studies (CICIMAR),<br />

La Paz.<br />

Fajardo-Leon M.,Velez-Barajas A., Marso-Rojas J.A.,<br />

Singh-Cabanillas J. and Michel-Guerrero E. 1995.<br />

Population structure and reproductive cycle of the<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Isostichopus fuscus (Echinodermata:<br />

Holothuroidea) in Santa Rosalia, Southern Baja<br />

California, from September 1992 to September 1993.<br />

National Fisheries Institute, Ministry of Fisheries.<br />

Gutierrez-Garcia A. 1995. Feasability of an on-growing system<br />

for culturing the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Isostichopus fuscus<br />

in the <strong>sea</strong> of Cortez, Mexico. Institute of Aquaculture:<br />

University of Stirling.<br />

Gutierrez-Garcia A. 1999. Potential culture of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

in Mexico. SPC Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 11,<br />

26–29.<br />

90<br />

Hamel J.-F., Ycaza R. and Mercier A. 2003. Larval development<br />

and juvenile growth of the Galapagos <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Isostichopus fuscus. SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin 18, 3–8.<br />

Herrero-Perezrul M.D. 1994. Comparative study of<br />

reproduction of Isostichopus fuscus Ludwig, 1875 and<br />

Neothyone gibbosa Deichman, 1941 (Echinodermata:<br />

Holothuroidea) at La Paz Bay. MSc thesis, Centre of<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch and Advanced Studies (CICIMAR), National<br />

Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.<br />

Herrero-Pérezrul M.D., Reyes Bonilla H., Garcia-<br />

Dominguez F. and Cintra-Buenrostro C.E. 1999.<br />

Reproduction and growth of Isostichopus fuscus<br />

(Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) in the southern Gulf<br />

of California, Mexico. Marine Biology 135, 521–532.<br />

Jenkins M. and Mulliken T.A. 1999. Evolution of exploitation<br />

in the Galapagos Islands: Ecuador’s <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

trade. Traffic Bulletin 17.<br />

Martinez P.C. 2001. The Galapagos <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery:<br />

risk or an opportunity for conservation? SPC Beche-demer<br />

Information Bulletin 14, 22–23.<br />

Mercier A., Ycaza R.H. and Hamel J.-F. 2004. Aquaculture<br />

of the Galapagos <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, Isostichopus fuscus. In<br />

‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’,<br />

ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S.<br />

Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No. 463, 347–358. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Mercier A., Ycaza R.H. and Hamel J.-F. 2007. Long-term<br />

study of gamete release in a broadcast-spawning holothurian:<br />

predictable lunar and diel periodicities. Marine<br />

Ecology Progress Series 329, 179–189.<br />

Salgado-Castro L.R. 1993. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries of the<br />

Pacific coast (Parastichopus parvimensis) and P. californicus<br />

and Isostichopus fuscus, from the Gulf of California.<br />

National Fisheries Institute and Ministry of Fisheries.<br />

Sonnenholzner J. 1997. A brief survey of commercial<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Isostichopus fuscus (Ludwig, 1875) of<br />

the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador. SPC Beche-de-mer<br />

Information Bulletin 9, 12–15.<br />

Toral-Granda M.V. and Martínez P.C. 2007. Reproductive<br />

biology and population structure of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Isostichopus fuscus (Ludwig, 1875) (Holothuroidea) in<br />

Caamaño, Galápagos Islands, Ecuador. Marine Biology<br />

151, 2091–2098.<br />

Toral-Granda V. 1996. Biologia reproductiva del pepino<br />

de mar Isostichopus fuscus en la Isla Caamaño, Santa<br />

Cruz, Galápagos. Honours thesis, Universidad del Azuay,<br />

Cuenca, Ecuador.<br />

Toral-Granda V. 2008. Population status, fisheries and trade<br />

of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in Latin America and the Caribbean. In<br />

‘Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s: a global review of fisheries and trade’,<br />

ed. by V. Toral-Granda, A. Lovatelli and M. Vasconcellos.<br />

FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 516,<br />

211–229. Food and Agriculture Organization of the<br />

United Nations: Rome.


Sandfish <strong>sea</strong> ranching and farming<br />

Brushing <strong>sea</strong>-pen netting to remove biofouling, Ambolimoke,<br />

south-western Madagascar (Photo: Georgina Robinson)<br />

91


Principles and science of stocking<br />

marine areas with <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

Steven W. Purcell 1*<br />

Abstract<br />

Clearly stating the goals of stocking builds an essential platform for success. The scales, methodologies, management<br />

and time frames of the interventions can then be matched to the original goals. Stock enhancement,<br />

restocking and <strong>sea</strong> ranching will involve different stocking strategies. The genetic risks to wild stocks must<br />

be minimised by preventing translocation of juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s to different locations than those where<br />

broodstock were collected, unless studies show broad genetic homogeneity of the stock. Cultured juveniles<br />

are easily marked by immersion in a fluorochrome solution (e.g. tetracycline or calcein), which provides a<br />

long-term, unequivocal means of distinguishing hatchery-produced animals from wild conspecifics. Use of<br />

open <strong>sea</strong> pens is an experimental tool that provides better estimates of early stocking success. Juvenile density<br />

can be assessed by <strong>sea</strong>rching through sand and mud in quadrats by hand, whereas sub-adults and adults can<br />

be surveyed visually in transects with a stratified arrangement. Proponents of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> stocking in the<br />

wild should be conservative and realistic about the expected returns; 1 in 5–10 (10–20%) of released juvenile<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s surviving to market size is a benchmark. Clear goals, use of existing technology, and realistic<br />

expectations in <strong>sea</strong> ranching and restocking of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s will provide the foundation for success.<br />

Background<br />

Stocking of marine invertebrates<br />

While fish have been stocked into the <strong>sea</strong> since<br />

long ago, stocking of cultured marine invertebrates is<br />

mostly fairly recent (Bell et al. 2005). Notable invertebrates<br />

used in marine stocking include scallops and<br />

other bivalves, <strong>sea</strong> urchins, abalone, lobsters, Queen<br />

conch, giant clams and trochus. In the past, most<br />

stocking programs were unsuccessful in biological and<br />

economical terms (Leber et al. 2005; Bell et al. 2006).<br />

Poor survival of the released juveniles can be attributed,<br />

to a large extent, to inept knowledge about how,<br />

when and where to release the animals so that they<br />

may survive in high numbers (Liao et al. 2003; Purcell<br />

2004; Lorenzen et al. 2010). Consequently, stocking<br />

programs started releasing cultured juveniles before<br />

1 National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross<br />

University, Coffs Harbour New South Wales, Australia<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

92<br />

the technology was developed to know how they<br />

should be released. This is unfortunate because stocking<br />

was thus criticised as a questionable management<br />

intervention even before the technology for many species<br />

was given the chance to be developed and proven<br />

(Hilborn 1998; Molony et al. 2003).<br />

In recent times, criticism about stocking success has<br />

fostered a new era for programs to both develop release<br />

strategies through re<strong>sea</strong>rch before large-scale releases<br />

and conduct stocking in a responsible way (Blankenship<br />

and Leber 1995; Lorenzen et al. 2010). Key elements<br />

to responsible stocking are: (1) a requirement to demonstrate<br />

stocking success using marking of juveniles,<br />

(2) precautions to avoid di<strong>sea</strong>se transfer from hatchery<br />

stocks to the wild and (3) making efforts in the hatchery<br />

to produce juvenile cohorts with a wide genetic pool<br />

that closely matches the genetic make-up of the wild<br />

stocks among which the juveniles are released. As a<br />

consequence, greater scientific rigour in stocking<br />

programs is now giving back confidence in restocking,<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching and stock enhancement as potentially costeffective<br />

management tools (Bell et al. 2006, 2008).


Stocking of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

Stocking marine areas with <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s is a<br />

relatively nascent intervention (Battaglene and Bell<br />

2004; Bell et al. 2005). Small-scale trials of stocking<br />

cultured sandfish (Holothuria scabra) in the <strong>sea</strong><br />

appear to have commenced in the early 1990s in India<br />

(James 2004) and the late 1990s in Solomon Islands<br />

(Dance et al. 2003).<br />

The Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>) embarked on<br />

a long-term program to assess the best <strong>tropical</strong><br />

candidate species for restocking, develop hatchery<br />

technology for producing juveniles en masse,<br />

develop optimal release strategies, and apply the<br />

technology on a larger scale to test whether <strong>tropical</strong><br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s could be restocked or grown economically<br />

for village-based <strong>sea</strong> ranching. The first<br />

component, in Solomon Islands, determined that<br />

sandfish (Holothuria scabra) was the best species<br />

for <strong>tropical</strong> stocking, developed enough hatchery<br />

technology to produce them reliably for smallscale<br />

releases (Battaglene 1999; Battaglene et al.<br />

1999) and studied the juvenile ecology (Mercier<br />

et al. 1999, 2000). The second component, in New<br />

Caledonia, adapted the larval culture and grow-out<br />

methods (Agudo 2006), developed methods to<br />

transport the juveniles (Purcell et al. 2006a) and<br />

technology for mark–recapture re<strong>sea</strong>rch (Purcell et<br />

al. 2006b; Purcell and Blockmans 2009), assessed<br />

release density and size-at-release in long-term<br />

release experiments (Purcell and Simutoga 2008),<br />

and evaluated restocking design (Purcell and Kirby<br />

2006). The third component, being conducted<br />

in the Philippines and the Northern Territory,<br />

Australia, aims to determine whether the benefits<br />

of stocking sandfish for village-based <strong>sea</strong> ranching<br />

outweigh the costs of stocking (Juinio-Meñez 2012;<br />

Fleming 2012).<br />

Purposes of stocking<br />

The goals of stocking interventions will govern<br />

the management regulations needed and the spatial<br />

context of the releases. It is easy for agencies to<br />

develop a keen interest in culturing and stocking<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in the wild without a clear description<br />

of the ultimate goals of the intervention. Such<br />

ambiguity can lead to false expectations of the<br />

likely outcomes, ownership or access issues, and the<br />

scale of releases and companion measures needed<br />

93<br />

to achieve success. The path to failure in stocking<br />

programs is therefore often paved with uncertainty<br />

about the ultimate goals.<br />

Stocking is a general term used here to mean<br />

the release of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s into the <strong>sea</strong> with the<br />

expectation that they will then grow to larger sizes.<br />

Bell et al. (2005, 2008) and Bartley and Bell (2008)<br />

defined different types of stocking interventions,<br />

which are paraphrased, respectively, below.<br />

• Sea ranching: the release of cultured juveniles<br />

into open (non-bounded) habitats in the <strong>sea</strong> for<br />

harvesting once they reach market size. This is a<br />

‘put, grow, and take’ strategy relying on sole access<br />

rights (e.g. via lease of an area) to the proponents,<br />

without a main objective of increasing the yield of<br />

the overall fishery.<br />

• Restocking: the release of cultured juveniles into<br />

natural habitats to build nucleus breeding populations<br />

that will subsequently breed and replenish<br />

recruitment to repopulate the broader fishery.<br />

This modality is predicated on protection of the<br />

released animals from fishing, ideally for their<br />

life span.<br />

• Stock enhancement: the release of cultured juveniles<br />

into the broader fishery to grow and later<br />

improve yields to fishers granted access to fishing<br />

grounds. This modality does not have a main<br />

objective of rebuilding egg supply for generational<br />

stock rebuilding, and does not rely on sole access<br />

to stocked areas within the fishery.<br />

Sea farming is another type of stocking, which is<br />

done into impoundments and artificial habitats (e.g.<br />

earthen ponds) supplied with <strong>sea</strong> water, but it is not<br />

examined in this paper.<br />

The pathways to impact in restocking interventions<br />

are rather long compared with <strong>sea</strong> ranching<br />

(Figure 1). The main reason is because restocking<br />

relies not only on the survival of released animals to<br />

maturity, but also that they breed in the wild and that<br />

their offspring repopulate fishing grounds and survive<br />

to maturity (also see Molony et al. (2003)). The<br />

success of this latter, vital step of restocking is most<br />

difficult to demonstrate scientifically (Battaglene and<br />

Bell 2004; Purcell 2004). In contrast, <strong>sea</strong> ranching<br />

requires only that the stocked animals survive in<br />

high numbers to a market size.<br />

Proponents should be explicit about whether the<br />

aim is to release animals that will be harvested by<br />

a particular group of people, or to rebuild depleted<br />

wild populations, or to enhance fishery yields for<br />

all fishers.


Communication and participation with stakeholders<br />

Preserving the integrity of<br />

wild stocks<br />

Risks of translocation<br />

Steps in restocking<br />

Correct the fishery<br />

management problem<br />

Nominate existing reserves or<br />

create no-take zones for restocking<br />

Collect broodstock and<br />

breed them in a hatchery<br />

Release juveniles in ways to<br />

maximise survival to maturity<br />

Protect the released animals in<br />

the reserve for their lifespan<br />

Larval supply from the<br />

restocked breeding population<br />

rejuvenates recruitment in<br />

neighbouring fishing grounds<br />

The offspring from restocked<br />

animals survive in fishing<br />

grounds and grow to adulthood<br />

The offspring from<br />

restocked animals<br />

can be fished<br />

Breeding populations in<br />

local fishery are rebuilt<br />

Figure 1. Important steps in restocking and <strong>sea</strong> ranching. Restocking relies on survival of<br />

the restocked animals to maturity and survival of their offspring to maturity. Also<br />

important through the steps of both interventions is frequent communication and<br />

participation of stakeholders.<br />

The ability to produce juveniles in the hatchery<br />

often spurs the desire to release them at various sites<br />

for various purposes. However, the genetic identity<br />

of local stocks, even those suppressed to low levels<br />

by fishing, should be maintained (Hindar et al. 1991;<br />

Utter and Epifanio 2002; Lorenzen et al. 2010). Some<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s such as black teatfish (Holothuria<br />

whitmaei) have high gene flow among populations,<br />

suggesting that larvae travel long distances and maintain<br />

genetic mixing among populations (Uthicke and<br />

Benzie 2000, 2003). In contrast, species such as the<br />

sandfish (Holothuria scabra) have restricted gene flow,<br />

94<br />

Steps in <strong>sea</strong> ranching<br />

Gain access rights over an area<br />

of optimal habitat for ranching<br />

Collect broodstock and<br />

breed them in a hatchery<br />

Release juveniles in ways to<br />

maximise survival to maturity<br />

Protect the released animals in<br />

the ranching area until they<br />

reach an optimum market size<br />

Improved recruitment to<br />

neighbouring fishing<br />

grounds is a secondary<br />

effect<br />

Harvest all animals<br />

Communication and participation with stakeholders<br />

causing certain populations to be relatively isolated<br />

from others, even within a country, and leading to<br />

unique genetic differences between populations at<br />

scales of less than 100 km (Uthicke and Benzie 2001;<br />

Uthicke and Purcell 2004). Native stocks may have<br />

particular genes that predispose them to cope much<br />

better with local environmental stresses that may occur<br />

periodically (Templeton 1986; Waples 1995).<br />

Stock translocation may lead to reduced fitness of<br />

resident populations through outbreeding depression<br />

and introgression (Utter 1998; Uthicke and Purcell<br />

2004). That is, introduced stock can outcompete with<br />

local stock (both ecologically and reproductively) or<br />

can interbreed with local stocks, leading to a loss<br />

in the genetic differentiation between populations.<br />

It is possible that introgression of foreign stocks<br />

could reduce the fitness of the population to deal


with occasional environmental stresses (Figure 2).<br />

Such effects are not just theoretical; studies show that<br />

translocation of fish can negatively affect local populations,<br />

and the introduction of foreign genes can lead<br />

to long-lasting effects that are usually irreversible<br />

(Hindar et al. 1991; Waples 1995; Utter 1998).<br />

Are there some instances when translocation of<br />

foreign stock could be responsible? In some cases,<br />

populations have been depleted to extinction such<br />

that teams of divers could not find even a small<br />

number to serve as hatchery broodstock for restocking,<br />

and years have passed without successful natural<br />

recruitment (Bell et al. 2005). If proponents can produce<br />

rigorous data to convincingly show this to be the<br />

case, foreign translocation of new stock may be the<br />

only practical solution to restoring populations, but<br />

such interventions should not be swayed by private<br />

economic interests. Additionally, responsible restocking<br />

in such cases would use broodstock of the closest<br />

populations from which broodstock can be collected.<br />

Population viability relies on genetic variability<br />

among individuals (Waples 1995). Using a large<br />

number of spawning animals in each spawning event<br />

in the hatchery, and taking care with using different<br />

sperm from different males to fertilise different<br />

groups of eggs (to avoid sperm dominance), will help<br />

to produce genetically diverse juveniles for stocking<br />

in the wild (see Utter 1998).<br />

A: Native population stocked with native juveniles<br />

Translocation<br />

(foreign stock)<br />

Stocking<br />

(native stock)<br />

B: Native population stocked with foreign juveniles<br />

95<br />

Use of markers<br />

Technology for stocking<br />

In a ‘responsible approach’ to stocking<br />

(Blankenship and Leber 1995; Lorenzen et al. 2010),<br />

cultured animals stocked in the wild are first tagged<br />

or marked. Marking the juveniles allows them to be<br />

distinguished from wild conspecifics, and provides a<br />

means to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention<br />

(Figure 3). The ability of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s to shed<br />

tags inserted in their body wall or coelomic cavity<br />

prevents the retention of most tags used in fisheries<br />

biology, including streamer tags, T-bar tags, codedwire<br />

tags, visible implant elastomer tags and passive<br />

induced transponders (Conand 1990; Kirshenbaum<br />

et al. 2006; Purcell et al. 2006b, 2008).<br />

Genetic ‘fingerprinting’ of individual <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

provides an accurate marking method (Uthicke<br />

and Benzie 2002; Uthicke et al. 2004), but the<br />

method is relatively costly. This method has not been<br />

applied yet to cultured <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. Alternatively,<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s can be marked with fluorochromes,<br />

which fluorescently marks the ossicles (spicules)<br />

in the outer body wall of the animals. This procedure<br />

can be as cheap as 2 cents (US) to mark a 5-g<br />

juvenile (Purcell et al. 2006b). Fluorochromes such<br />

as tetracycline and calcein have been shown to be<br />

Interbreeding<br />

Stress event<br />

Stress event<br />

Figure 2. Illustration of one risk of translocation of foreign stock. A: Hatchery-produced juveniles from local<br />

(native) broodstock are stocked into the local population, the genetic identity of the stock is preserved,<br />

and the population is able to cope well with a stress event. B: Hatchery-produced juveniles from foreign<br />

broodstock (from a genetically different population) are translocated into the local population, the<br />

genetic identity of the stock is greatly reduced through introgression, and the interbred population no<br />

longer has the previous tolerance to cope with certain stress events.


A: Sea ranching or restocking with unmarked juveniles<br />

Unmarked juveniles<br />

stocked<br />

B: Sea ranching or restocking with marked juveniles<br />

Figure 3. Diagrammatic illustration of pitfalls in releasing unmarked <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in the wild. A: Unmarked<br />

cultured juveniles are released into an area that receives some natural recruitment of wild juveniles—it<br />

is impossible to validate how many, or what percentage, of the cultured animals survived over time.<br />

B: Marked cultured juveniles are released into an area that receives some natural recruitment of wild<br />

juveniles—the markers allow the cultured animals to be later distinguished from wild conspecifics mixed<br />

in the population to validate how many, or what percentage, survived over time.<br />

suitable for up to about 2 years (Purcell and Simutoga<br />

2008) (Figure 4), and 2-month trials with calcein blue<br />

and xylenol orange have shown long-term promise<br />

(Purcell and Blockmans 2009).<br />

Cultured juveniles can be immersed in a marker<br />

solution in mass numbers in the hatchery within<br />

completely shaded flat-bottom tanks (Figure 5). The<br />

animals must be in a growth phase for the ossicles in<br />

Ossicles under<br />

normal light<br />

Marked juveniles<br />

stocked<br />

96<br />

Wild recruits<br />

1–2 years<br />

Wild recruits<br />

1–2 years<br />

Survival rate of released<br />

animals is uncertain<br />

their body wall to take up the fluorochromes (Purcell<br />

and Blockmans 2009). Fluorochromes are combined<br />

into the carbonate structure of ossicles during the<br />

process of calcification, and only that portion (e.g.<br />

10–50%) of their ossicles being developed will be<br />

marked (Purcell et al. 2006b; Purcell and Blockmans<br />

2009). Some juveniles may be slightly yellowish for<br />

a short time after immersion, but afterwards they are<br />

??<br />

Survival rate of released<br />

animals can be proven<br />

unequivocally<br />

Same ossicles<br />

under fluorescent<br />

light only<br />

Figure 4. Ossicles (spicules) of Holothuria scabra individuals that had previously been marked sequentially<br />

by tetracycline then calcein (2 weeks later). Left: a field of view of ossicles under the microscope<br />

with normal light; right: the same field of view of the same ossicles under fluorescent light in an<br />

epifluorescence microscope. Note that about half of the ossicles have been marked—some that were<br />

fully formed were not marked during the immersion treatment.


Figure 5. Fluorochrome stock solution is added to a<br />

large tank with aerated <strong>sea</strong> water and a heater<br />

to maintain water conditions. The animals are<br />

left for 12–24 hours in the solution to enable<br />

effective marking of the ossicles within their<br />

outer body wall.<br />

indistinguishable in outer appearance from unmarked<br />

animals. If ossicles are unmarked, or weakly marked,<br />

after an immersion treatment, it may be that (1) the animals<br />

were not growing well before the treatment (i.e.<br />

they were ‘stunted’), so their ossicles were not being<br />

developed; (2) the conditions, such as the temperature<br />

of the immersion solution, were not well maintained;<br />

or (3) the fluorochrome chemicals were inactive—e.g.<br />

tetracycline can be damaged by light and heat.<br />

The materials needed for verification of fluorochrome<br />

markers are surprisingly basic, and the<br />

methods are cheap and simple (Figure 6). Small tissue<br />

samples can be taken from the ventral surface of the<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in the field. Most ossicles are about<br />

50–100 µm long and there are thousands of ossicles<br />

in each cubic millimetre sample of outer body wall of<br />

sandfish (Purcell et al. 2006b). Once in the laboratory,<br />

the samples are simply soaked for 30 minutes in household<br />

bleach to digest the soft tissue, which leaves the<br />

ossicles in the sample container. The ossicles are rinsed<br />

with fresh water to remove the bleach, then dried and<br />

observed under an epifluorescence microscope.<br />

Use of <strong>sea</strong> pens<br />

In some situations, <strong>sea</strong> pens may be used for<br />

farming <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s to market size. For instance,<br />

it may be important to separate <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s from<br />

other animals or to keep them from moving into other<br />

areas where they can be fished (e.g. Robinson and<br />

97<br />

Pascal 2009, 2012). However, <strong>sea</strong> pens can be costly<br />

(materials and set-up), require regular maintenance<br />

and do not allow sufficient space for large numbers of<br />

animals unless the pens are very large. Sea ranching<br />

of large numbers of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s would involve an<br />

area (e.g. a sheltered bay) of good habitat in which<br />

the ranching proponents have exclusive access to the<br />

animals, and where the animals could be released into<br />

that area without <strong>sea</strong> pens. So long as the habitat is<br />

optimal or good for the species, the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

will not be likely to move far in the years before they<br />

are harvested (Mercier et al. 2000; Purcell and Kirby<br />

2006). Sea pens are, therefore, mostly advantageous<br />

as experimental tools to help the re<strong>sea</strong>rcher better estimate<br />

survival and growth of released <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s.<br />

Up to a size of about 50–100 g, juvenile sandfish<br />

can crawl up the walls of <strong>sea</strong> pens made of plastic<br />

mesh. Escape then causes an underestimation in survival<br />

rates. We conducted short trials in a hatchery tank<br />

with sand to test different designs of small (0.1 m 2)<br />

prototype <strong>sea</strong> pens in an attempt to find a design that<br />

would prevent 2–10-g juveniles from escaping. Copper<br />

wire sewn to the upper edge of the mesh deterred<br />

animals from moving over it and escaping, but was<br />

toxic. In a weakly replicated (n = 2) test over 24 hours,<br />

fewer juveniles escaped (climbed over) pens with mesh<br />

skirting (mean = 25% escape) compared with pens<br />

with the upper edges folded inwards (mean = 60%<br />

escape) or pens with simple straight edges (mean =<br />

70% escape). Juveniles were observed to crawl up the<br />

mesh wall, but fell back into pens when they crawled<br />

to the edge of the net skirts. We therefore used small<br />

<strong>sea</strong> pens of 1 m 2 with mesh skirts for small experiments<br />

on release strategies (Figure 7). Later, we tested<br />

escape rates of similar sized juveniles from prototype<br />

pens in the hatchery that had a strip of antifouling<br />

painted on the upper edge, and found that escape rates<br />

over 24 hours were comparable with those using the<br />

mesh skirts. As mesh skirts were difficult to make, we<br />

used an antifouling strip on the upper 10-cm surface<br />

of the pen walls for large pens (e.g. 500 m 2). Note<br />

that the risk of escape is much higher with smaller<br />

pens because the animals are in close proximity to the<br />

pen walls; hence, escape rates from small pens are not<br />

indicative of those from large pens.<br />

Surveys<br />

Surveys for juvenile sandfish


A<br />

C<br />

Figure 6. Steps in collecting and processing tissue samples of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s to distinguish<br />

marked animals from unmarked (wild) ones. A: A tiny sample (a few mm 2) of the<br />

outer body wall is taken from the ventral surface of the animal, which is returned<br />

to the <strong>sea</strong>. B: The tissue sample is placed into a cell of a tray and buffered alcohol<br />

is added to preserve it. C: The alcohol is removed, bleach is added for 30 minutes<br />

to digest the soft tissue, then the bleach is removed and the ossicles are rinsed five<br />

times with freshwater. D: Once dry, the tray is placed under an epifluorescence<br />

microscope to look for fluorescently marked ossicles.<br />

Figure 7. A small <strong>sea</strong> pen of 1 m 2 set into a <strong>sea</strong>grass<br />

bed. A mesh skirt on the upper edge of the<br />

pen mesh helps to prevent juveniles from<br />

escaping by climbing over the <strong>sea</strong> pen wall.<br />

98<br />

B<br />

D<br />

juvenile sandfish. The solution is to assess densities<br />

of juveniles within randomly placed quadrats of<br />

1–2 m 2 by laying the quadrat and manually <strong>sea</strong>rching<br />

through the upper 5 cm of sediment by hand.<br />

It is useful to estimate the survival rate in the initial<br />

months after release, when the animals are still juveniles.<br />

Within <strong>sea</strong> pens, quadrat surveys for sandfish<br />

should be stratified—some should be placed against<br />

the inner wall of the <strong>sea</strong> pen and some in the centre<br />

area of the pen (Figure 8). This is necessary because<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s will tend to gather near the edge of<br />

the <strong>sea</strong> pen through random movements (Jeanson et<br />

al. 2003), so this zone should be surveyed separately<br />

(Purcell and Simutoga 2008).<br />

Once the animals in a <strong>sea</strong> pen are large enough to<br />

count reliably using visual census, the <strong>sea</strong> pen may be<br />

removed to allow the animals to displace over a larger<br />

area and avoid crowding. Conversely, the <strong>sea</strong>-ranching<br />

program may have simply released animals into<br />

the open and waited 6–12 months before doing visual<br />

surveys. In most <strong>sea</strong>-ranching situations, the animals


Quadrats<br />

(1 m 2 )<br />

Quadrats (2 m 2 )<br />

Figure 8. Potential placement of random quadrats within experimental <strong>sea</strong> pens. The number of animals within the<br />

border area—50 cm inside the inner wall of the pen mesh—can be sampled with rectangular 1-m 2 quadrats<br />

(2 × 0.5 m). Animals within the inner area can be sampled with square 2-m 2 quadrats (1.41 × 1.41 m).<br />

would be released near the middle of the managed<br />

area at moderate density (e.g. 1/m 2). Through random<br />

displacement over long time intervals (see Purcell<br />

and Kirby 2006), some of the animals will move<br />

relatively large distances from the release area (e.g.<br />

100 m), many would move short distances from the<br />

release area (e.g. up to 50 m) and many would stay<br />

in the release area. The uneven density of released<br />

animals calls for a stratified survey design (Figure 9).<br />

Zones can be marked out—for example, using buoys<br />

at the corners—to delineate the release zone (central<br />

zone), a middle zone and the outer zone. Transects<br />

can then be laid randomly in each zone, increasing<br />

replication in zones successively further from the<br />

release area to account for greater variability in<br />

counts within the replicate transects from increasing<br />

patchiness and sparseness of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s.<br />

Where to release?<br />

Nature should be a useful guide to choosing good<br />

sites for stocking <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. For example,<br />

sandfish (Holothuria scabra) larvae appear to settle<br />

on <strong>sea</strong>grass blades, and juveniles are known to<br />

inhabit shallow <strong>sea</strong>grass beds (Mercier et al. 2000).<br />

Sites with a current or previous history of hosting<br />

the species should be a sensible start. It may be that<br />

some sites never really were home to the species<br />

99<br />

Pen fence wall<br />

Border area within<br />

pen (imaginary)<br />

Inner area within<br />

pen<br />

of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> but could serve as good stocking<br />

sites; however, this will generally be rare. Avoid sites<br />

with widely varying environmental conditions; for<br />

example, areas periodically subject to freshwater<br />

deluges. Likewise, avoid areas that may be vulnerable<br />

to pollutants (see Purcell and Simutoga 2008).<br />

In an experiment in New Caledonia, we set up 30<br />

replicate 1-m 2 experimental <strong>sea</strong> pens with net skirts<br />

15 cm into sediments within various locations in a<br />

bay such that each pen had a different undisturbed<br />

habitat composition (S.W. Purcell, unpublished data).<br />

A group of 25 juveniles (2–10 g) was weighed and<br />

released into each <strong>sea</strong> pen. After 1 week, the juveniles<br />

surviving in each enclosure were collected by<br />

hand and an air-uplift suction device, and re-weighed.<br />

Preliminary analyses suggest that microhabitats for<br />

optimal growth and survival of the juveniles would<br />

have the following traits to ensure their protection<br />

from predators and allow them to bury easily:<br />

• shallow—0.2 m to about 2–3 m depth<br />

• a low proportion of coral or coral rubble in the<br />

sediments<br />

• moderate penetrability of sediments; muddy-sand<br />

appeared best and should allow a hand to be forced<br />

easily to a few centimetres depth<br />

• moderately high <strong>sea</strong>grass coverage, preferably<br />

in the genera Cymodocea, Thalassia and<br />

Syringodium.


Central zone<br />

(release)<br />

Middle zone<br />

Outer zone<br />

Figure 9. Potential design for transect surveys within a coastal <strong>sea</strong>grass<br />

bed in which cultured <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s (small oval figures) have<br />

been previously released for <strong>sea</strong> ranching, and have moved out<br />

of the central release zone. Bars are belt transects (e.g. 2 × 50 m)<br />

laid randomly within three zones (red dashed lines), which are<br />

defined at the site by buoys or other permanent markers at the<br />

corners of each zone. Stratified sampling is used; that is, the<br />

number of transects increases from the central zone to the outer<br />

zone because the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s are expected to become sparser.<br />

Expected returns<br />

Unfortunately, but quite predictably, most of the<br />

small juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s released in the wild<br />

will not survive. Predation is the biggest hurdle in<br />

stocking a wide variety of invertebrates, and most of<br />

the released juveniles die or are eaten by predators<br />

shortly after being released (Bell et al. 2005). Many<br />

different animals eat <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s, particularly<br />

when they are young. Known predators of <strong>tropical</strong><br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s include a wide variety of crabs,<br />

predatory gastropods, <strong>sea</strong> stars, <strong>sea</strong> birds, and fishes<br />

including pufferfishes (Tetraodontidae), emperor<br />

fishes (Lethrinidae), triggerfishes (Balistidae) and<br />

wrasses (Labridae) (Dance et al. 2003; Francour<br />

1997). Personal experience with various release<br />

experiments in New Caledonia suggests that invertebrate<br />

predators, especially crabs and <strong>sea</strong> stars,<br />

are especially voracious predators of juvenile <strong>sea</strong><br />

Random transects<br />

for visual surveys<br />

100<br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s. These observations correspond closely<br />

with reports of crab predation in Madagascar (Lavitra<br />

et al. 2009; Robinson and Pascal 2012).<br />

Modelling of survival rates of 5-g released juveniles<br />

showed that 7–20% of sandfish released in New<br />

Caledonia could be expected to survive to a good<br />

market size of 700 g 2.6 years after being released for<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching (Purcell and Simutoga 2008). Therefore,<br />

a conservative estimate of survival to this size would<br />

be about 1 in 10 (Figure 10). A survival rate of<br />

around 20% to this size over roughly 3 years could<br />

be achieved if conditions were favourable over the<br />

ranching period. This notion corresponds closely with<br />

shorter durations of some other recent studies. In Fiji,<br />

Hair (2011) determined survival rates of 23–41% for<br />

sandfish in <strong>sea</strong> pens over just 6 months, and the animals<br />

had not reached a market size. Similarly, in the<br />

Philippines, a survival rate of 39% was reported by<br />

Juinio-Menez et al. (2012) for sandfish in a <strong>sea</strong> ranch;


Released juveniles Sub-adults<br />

Adults<br />

however, these comprised juveniles from batches<br />

released at various occasions over a 19-month period,<br />

and many had been recently released.<br />

Overly optimistic predictions of economic returns<br />

from <strong>sea</strong> ranching will give expectations to villagers<br />

that will be difficult to meet, and proponents may benefit<br />

more from conservative expectations and praise at<br />

exceeding them. Estimates of economic viability of<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching can then be made by back-calculating<br />

revenue from the harvested animals to the maximum<br />

cost of producing juveniles in hatcheries to make a<br />

profit (see Leber et al. 2005; Purcell and Simutoga<br />

2008). Two additional points should be considered:<br />

1. As with other mariculture programs, some<br />

patience and investment is needed early on<br />

because it often takes years to reduce the costs<br />

of producing juveniles and to perfect release<br />

methods.<br />

2. Benefits to communities extend beyond the economic<br />

(Lorenzen et al. 2010); <strong>sea</strong> ranching and<br />

restocking can build technical capacity and foster<br />

awareness for better stewardship of the resource<br />

by communities, which should be considered a<br />

valuable outcome for fishery managers.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

For assistance in field and hatchery experiments<br />

presented in this paper, the author thanks N. Agudo,<br />

P. Blazer, B. Blockmans, E. Danty, E. Vigne, A. le<br />

Turc and C. Sanchez. The re<strong>sea</strong>rch components were<br />

conducted through the WorldFish Center, and received<br />

financial support from the Australian Centre for<br />

International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>), the three<br />

provinces of New Caledonia, and the Government of<br />

France via the Délégation Française, Noumea. This is a<br />

2–3 years<br />

Figure 10. Stylised diagram of changes in size and numbers of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s, due to death and predation, from<br />

the time of release in the wild to the time at which they reach a good marketable size<br />

101<br />

contribution of the National Marine Science Centre and<br />

Marine Ecology Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Centre of Southern Cross<br />

University.<br />

References<br />

Agudo N.S. 2006. Sandfish hatchery techniques. Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch,<br />

Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish<br />

Center: Noumea, New Caledonia.<br />

Bartley D. and Bell J.D. 2008. Restocking, stock enhancement<br />

and <strong>sea</strong> ranching: arenas of progress. Reviews in<br />

Fisheries Science 16, 357–364.<br />

Battaglene S.C. 1999. Culture of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s for<br />

stock restoration and enhancement. Naga – the ICLARM<br />

Quarterly 22, 4–11.<br />

Battaglene S.C. and Bell J.D. 2004. The restocking of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s in the Pacific Islands. In ‘Marine ranching’,<br />

ed. by D.M. Bartley and K.M. Leber. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No 429, 109–132. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Battaglene S.C., Seymour J.E. and Ramofafia C. 1999.<br />

Survival and growth of cultured juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

Holothuria scabra. Aquaculture 178, 293–322.<br />

Bell J.D., Bartley D.M., Lorenzen K. and Loneragan N.R.<br />

2006. Restocking and stock enhancement of coastal<br />

fisheries: potential, problems and progress. Fisheries<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 80, 1–8.<br />

Bell J.D., Leber K.M., Blankenship L.H., Loneragan<br />

N.R. and Masuda R. 2008. A new era for restocking,<br />

stock enhancement and <strong>sea</strong> ranching marine fisheries<br />

resources. Reviews in Fisheries Science 16, 1–9.<br />

Bell J.D., Rothlisberg P.C., Munro J.L., Loneragan N.R.,<br />

Nash W.J., Ward R.D. et al. 2005. Restocking and stock<br />

enhancement of marine invertebrate fisheries. Advances<br />

in Marine Biology 49, 1–370.<br />

Blankenship H.L. and Leber K.M. 1995. A responsible<br />

approach to marine stock enhancement. American<br />

Fisheries Society Symposium 15, 167–175.


Conand C. 1990. The fishery resources of Pacific island<br />

countries, Part 2: holothurians. FAO Fisheries Technical<br />

Paper No. 272.2. Food and Agriculture Organization of<br />

the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Dance S.K., Lane I. and Bell J.D. 2003. Variation in shortterm<br />

survival of cultured sandfish (Holothuria scabra)<br />

released in mangrove-<strong>sea</strong>grass and coral reef flat habitats<br />

in Solomon Islands. Aquaculture 220, 495–505.<br />

Fleming A. 2012. Sea ranching of sandfish in an<br />

Indigenous community within a well-regulated fishery<br />

(Northern Territory, Australia). In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong><br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A. Hair, T.D.<br />

Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings No. 136,<br />

156–160. Australian Centre for International Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]<br />

Francour P. 1997. Predation on holothurians: a literature<br />

review. Invertebrate Biology 116, 52–60.<br />

Hair C., Pickering T., Meo S., Vereivalu T., Hunter J. and<br />

Cavakigali L. 2011. Sandfish culture in Fiji Islands. SPC<br />

Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 31, 3–11.<br />

Hilborn R. 1998. The economic performance of marine<br />

stock enhancement programs. Bulletin of Marine Science<br />

62, 661–674.<br />

Hindar K., Ryman, N. and Utter F. 1991. Genetic effects<br />

of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Canadian<br />

Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48, 945–957.<br />

James B.D. 2004. Captive breeding of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>,<br />

Holothuria scabra, from India. In ‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’, ed. by A.<br />

Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel<br />

and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 463,<br />

386–395. Food and Agriculture Organization of the<br />

United Nations: Rome.<br />

Jeanson R., Blanco S., Fournier R., Deneubourg J.-L.,<br />

Fourcassié V. and Theraulaz G. 2003. A model of animal<br />

movements in a bounded space. Journal of Theoretical<br />

Biology 225, 443–451.<br />

Juinio-Meñez M.A., Paña M.A., de Peralta G., Olavides R.,<br />

Catbagan T., Edullantes C.M. et al. 2012. Establishment<br />

and management of communal sandfish (Holothuria<br />

scabra) <strong>sea</strong> ranching in the Philippines. In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong><br />

<strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A. Hair,<br />

T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings<br />

No. 136, 121–127. Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]<br />

Kirshenbaum S., Feindel S. and Chen Y. 2006. A study<br />

of tagging methods for the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Cucumaria<br />

frondosa in the waters off Maine. Fishery Bulletin 104,<br />

299–302.<br />

Lavitra T., Rasolofonirina R., Jangoux M. and Eeckhaut<br />

I. 2009. Problems related to the farming of Holothuria<br />

scabra (Jaeger, 1833). SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin 29, 20–30.<br />

Leber K.M., Cantrell R.N. and Leung P.S. 2005. Optimizing<br />

cost-effectiveness of size at release in stock enhancement<br />

102<br />

programs. North American Journal of Fishery<br />

Management 25, 1596–1608.<br />

Liao I.C., Su M.S. and Leaño E.M. 2003. Status of re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

in stock enhancement and <strong>sea</strong> ranching. Reviews in Fish<br />

Biology and Fisheries 13, 151–163.<br />

Lorenzen K., Leber K.M. and Blankenship H.L. 2010<br />

Responsible approach to marine stock enhancement: an<br />

update. Reviews in Fisheries Science 18(2), 189–210.<br />

Mercier A., Battaglene S.C. and Hamel J.-F. 1999. Daily<br />

burrowing cycle and feeding activity of juvenile <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s Holothuria scabra in response to environmental<br />

factors. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology<br />

and Ecology 239, 125–156.<br />

Mercier A., Battaglene S.C. and Hamel J.-F. 2000. Periodic<br />

movement, recruitment and size-related distribution of<br />

the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra in Solomon Islands.<br />

Hydrobiologia 440, 81–100.<br />

Molony B.W., Lenanton R., Jackson G. and Norriss J.<br />

2003. Stock enhancement as a fisheries management<br />

tool. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 13, 409–432.<br />

Purcell S.W. 2004. Criteria for release strategies and evaluating<br />

the restocking of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. In ‘Advances in<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’, ed. by A.<br />

Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel<br />

and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 463,<br />

181–191. Food and Agriculture Organization of the<br />

United Nations: Rome.<br />

Purcell S.W., Agudo N.S. and Gossuin H. 2008. Poor<br />

retention of passive induced transponder (PIT) tags for<br />

mark-recapture studies on <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. SPC<br />

Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 28, 53–55.<br />

Purcell S.W. and Blockmans B.F. 2009. Effective fluorochrome<br />

marking of juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s for <strong>sea</strong><br />

ranching and restocking. Aquaculture 296, 263–270.<br />

Purcell S.W., Blockmans B.F. and Agudo N.S. 2006a.<br />

Transportation methods for restocking of juvenile<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, Holothuria scabra. Aquaculture 251,<br />

238–244.<br />

Purcell S.W., Blockmans B.F. and Nash W.J. 2006b.<br />

Efficacy of chemical markers and physical tags for<br />

large-scale release of an exploited holothurian. Journal<br />

of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 334,<br />

283–293.<br />

Purcell S.W. and Kirby D.S. 2006. Restocking the <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra: sizing no-take zones<br />

through individual-based movement modelling. Fisheries<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 80, 53–61.<br />

Purcell S.W. and Simutoga M. 2008. Spatio-temporal and<br />

size-dependent variation in the success of releasing<br />

cultured <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in the wild. Reviews in Fisheries<br />

Science, 16, 204–214.<br />

Robinson G. and Pascal B. 2009. From hatchery to community:<br />

Madagascar’s first village-based holothurian<br />

mariculture programme. SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin 29, 38–43.


Robinson G. and Pascal B. 2012. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> farming<br />

experiences in south-western Madagascar. In ‘Asia–<br />

Pacific <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A.<br />

Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings<br />

No. 136 142–155. Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]<br />

Templeton A.R. 1986. Coadaptation and outbreeding<br />

depression. Pp. 105–116 in ‘Conservation biology: the<br />

science of scarcity and diversity’, ed. by M.E. Soule.<br />

Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, Massachusetts.<br />

Uthicke, S. and Benzie J.A.H. 2000. Allozyme electrophoresis<br />

indicates high gene flow between populations of<br />

Holothuria nobilis (Holothuroidea: Aspidochirotida) on<br />

the Great Barrier Reef. Marine Biology 137, 819–825.<br />

Uthicke S. and Benzie J.A.H. 2001. Restricted gene<br />

flow between Holothuria scabra (Echinodermata:<br />

Holothuroidea) populations along the north-east coast<br />

of Australia and the Solomon Islands. Marine Ecology<br />

Progress Series 216, 109–117.<br />

Uthicke S. and Benzie J.A.H. 2002. A genetic fingerprint<br />

recapture technique for measuring growth in ‘unmarkable’<br />

invertebrates: negative growth in commercially<br />

fished holothurians (Holothuria nobilis). Marine Ecology<br />

Progress Series 241, 221–226.<br />

Uthicke S. and Benzie J.A.H. 2003. Gene flow and<br />

population history in high dispersal marine invertebrates:<br />

mitochondrial DNA analysis of Holothuria nobilis<br />

(Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) populations from the<br />

Indo-Pacific. Molecular Ecology 12, 2635–3648.<br />

103<br />

Uthicke S. and Purcell S. 2004. Preservation of genetic<br />

diversity in restocking of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria<br />

scabra planned through allozyme electrophoresis.<br />

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61,<br />

519–528.<br />

Uthicke S., Welch D. and Benzie J.A.H. 2004. Slow growth<br />

and lack of recovery in overfished holothurians on the<br />

Great Barrier Reef: evidence from DNA fingerprints and<br />

repeated large-scale surveys. Conservation Biology 18,<br />

1395–1404.<br />

Utter F. 1998. Genetic problems of hatchery-reared progeny<br />

released into the wild, and how to deal with them.<br />

Bulletin of Marine Science 65, 623–640.<br />

Utter F. and Epifanio J. 2002. Marine <strong>aquaculture</strong>: genetic<br />

potentials and pitfalls. Reviews in Fish Biology and<br />

Fisheries 12, 59–77.<br />

Waples R.S. 1995. Genetic effects of stock transfers of<br />

fish. Pp. 51–69 in ‘Protection of aquatic biodiversity:<br />

proceedings of the World Fisheries Congress, Theme 3’,<br />

ed. by D.P. Philipp. Science Publishers: Lebanon, New<br />

Hampshire.


Pond grow-out trials for sandfish<br />

(Holothuria scabra) in New Caledonia<br />

Natacha S. Agudo 1*<br />

Abstract<br />

Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) is a high-value <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> widely distributed in the shallow waters<br />

of the Indo-Pacific. In New Caledonia, sandfish are locally called ‘gris’ and have been harvested since the<br />

1840s. The WorldFish Center in New Caledonia grew cultured juvenile sandfish in earthen ponds to assess<br />

the potential for farming the species. In this paper, we report on pond culture grow-out of sandfish from small<br />

juveniles to market size in a 21-month trial. Sandfish in two ex-shrimp ponds reached mean weights of 390<br />

and 441 g after 19 and 21 months, respectively. The overall average weight gains were estimated to be 0.60 g<br />

and 0.77 g per animal per day, and overall survival to be 69% and 41%, respectively. Some mortality occurred<br />

in ponds due to high water temperature and salinity. Beche-de-mer produced from the pond-grown sandfish<br />

had a darker skin colour and most was classified as grade-A, although cultured animals lost twice as much<br />

weight as the wild sandfish during processing. Positive features were the homogeneous sizes of pond-grown<br />

animals and the potential for reduced fluctuations in numbers. Recommendations for improving sandfish<br />

farming in ponds centre on the management of animal density and the practice of alternating earthen ponds.<br />

Introduction<br />

Sandfish, Holothuria scabra, is a <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

widely distributed in the shallow waters of the<br />

Indo-Pacific (Conand 1998). This species has a high<br />

commercial value on the international market once<br />

processed by boiling and drying into beche-de-mer<br />

(also called trepang). In New Caledonia, sandfish<br />

are locally called ‘gris’ and have been harvested<br />

since the 1840s (Conand 1990). The current fishery<br />

is composed mainly of Indigenous artisanal fishers<br />

(Purcell et al. 2002). The price for beche-de-mer<br />

exports depends on its quality and size, and in 2007<br />

was in the range US$21–47/kg in New Caledonia.<br />

Over the past 10 years, exports of beche-de-mer from<br />

New Caledonia have ranged from 40 to 80 tonnes<br />

annually according to the Institut de la Statistique<br />

et des Etudes Economiques de Nouvelle-Calédonie<br />

(ISEE).<br />

1 Current address: Aquarium des Lagons, Noumea Cédex,<br />

New Caledonia<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

104<br />

Pioneering work on sandfish spawning and rearing<br />

was done in India in 1988 at the Central Marine<br />

Fisheries Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Institute (James et al. 1994).<br />

Rearing methods were then developed further by the<br />

WorldFish Center (formerly ICLARM) in Solomon<br />

Islands (1996–99), Vietnam (2000–04) and New<br />

Caledonia (2000–06). The main focus of the re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

by the WorldFish Center in New Caledonia was the<br />

release of juveniles into enclosures in the wild to<br />

determine the optimum size and density for restocking<br />

and stock enhancement. Additionally, some of the<br />

cultured juvenile sandfish produced in New Caledonia<br />

were on-grown in earthen ponds to assess the potential<br />

for farming the species. Preliminary results were<br />

reported by Bell et al. (2007). In this paper, we report<br />

more details on pond-culture grow-out of sandfish<br />

from small juveniles to market size (400–600 g).<br />

Methods<br />

The grow-out trials for sandfish were conducted over<br />

21 months between June 2005 and March 2007. Two<br />

0.2-ha earthen ponds (A and B) on a private shrimp


farm at Tontouta, 50 km north of Noumea, were<br />

used (Figure 1). All juveniles used for these trials<br />

were reared in the WorldFish Center’s <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

hatchery at Saint Vincent (Boulouparis, 73 km<br />

north of Noumea) using the methods described by<br />

Pitt (2001) and Agudo (2006). Pond A was stocked<br />

with juveniles that had a mean weight of 0.9 g at<br />

a stocking density of 1.6 individuals/m 2. Pond B<br />

received larger juveniles (mean weight of 11.7 g) at<br />

a density of 0.8 individuals/m 2. The grow-out trials<br />

commenced during winter on 6 June 2005, when the<br />

average water temperature was 22 ºC.<br />

Both ponds had a maximum depth of 1 m and<br />

a muddy substratum. The ponds had previously<br />

been used for maintaining shrimp (Litopenaeus<br />

stylirostris) broodstock, but had been empty since<br />

2002. They were filled with <strong>sea</strong> water 2 weeks<br />

before transferring the sandfish juveniles. No food<br />

or fertiliser was added. Daily water exchange usually<br />

varied between 30% and 60%, but fell to less than<br />

10% on one occasion due to a broken water pump.<br />

Water temperature (ºC), salinity (ppt), dissolved<br />

oxygen (ppm) and secchi disk (cm) measurements<br />

were taken twice a day, in the morning and in the<br />

afternoon.<br />

Figure 1. Earthen pond used for growing out sandfish<br />

105<br />

To estimate the growth of sandfish, the mean<br />

wet weight (g) of 30 individuals from each pond<br />

was measured each month. Animals were collected<br />

at random, dried in the shade for 5 minutes, then<br />

weighed with a digital balance. Survival of sandfish<br />

in each pond was determined by counting all animals<br />

when the ponds were drained at the conclusion of<br />

the trial.<br />

Harvested sandfish were processed by a professional<br />

into beche-de-mer by gutting, boiling, soaking<br />

in <strong>sea</strong> water overnight, cleaning, boiling again and<br />

drying. A local trader evaluated the beche-de-mer<br />

based on skin colour, cleanliness of gut and skin, and<br />

resultant product grade.<br />

Results<br />

Water quality parameters<br />

Water temperature was in the range 16.9–33.3 ºC,<br />

with mean water temperatures between 27.3 ºC and<br />

27.9 ºC in summer and between 17.5 ºC and 24.1 ºC<br />

in winter (Figure 2). Dissolved oxygen variation was<br />

2.9–14.2 ppm, and salinity was mostly between 32<br />

and 36 ppt. Extreme values of salinity such as 25 and<br />

38 ppt were occasionally observed. Secchi measurements<br />

averaged 50 cm.<br />

Growth rate<br />

In pond A, sandfish with an initial mean weight<br />

of 0.9 g reached a mean weight of 325.4 g after<br />

12 months. Their growth then slowed during the<br />

cold <strong>sea</strong>son, when mean water temperatures were<br />

between 20.4 ºC and 22.7 ºC (Figure 2). Sandfish in<br />

pond A reached a final mean weight of 390 g after<br />

21 months (Figure 3). Mean individual growth rate<br />

was correlated with water temperature and reached<br />

a peak of 1.04 g/day in April 2006, when the mean<br />

water temperature was 27.3 ºC (Figure 2).<br />

In pond B, the sandfish with a greater initial<br />

weight of 11.7 g reached a mean weight of 395 g<br />

after 13 months. Their growth also slowed during<br />

the cold <strong>sea</strong>son when mean water temperature was<br />

in the range 20.7–22.7 ºC. Excessive development<br />

of filamentous algae in pond B meant that these<br />

animals had to be transferred to another pond in<br />

December 2005. At the time of transfer, survival<br />

was 73%. The transferred sandfish reached a final<br />

mean weight of 441 g after 19 months (Figure 3),<br />

and maximum growth rate was 1.3 g/day in March<br />

2006 (Figure 2).


Growth rate (g/animal/day)<br />

1.3<br />

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

Jun-05<br />

Jul-05<br />

Aug-05<br />

Sep-05<br />

Oct-05<br />

Nov-05<br />

Dec-05<br />

Jan-06<br />

Feb-06<br />

Mar-06<br />

Apr-06<br />

May-06<br />

Month-year<br />

Figure 2. Growth of sandfish and mean water temperature in ponds A and B<br />

Mean weight (g ±SE)<br />

500<br />

450<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Jun-05<br />

Jul-05<br />

Pond A<br />

Pond B<br />

Aug-05<br />

Sep-05<br />

Oct-05<br />

Nov-05<br />

Dec-05<br />

Jan-06<br />

Feb-06<br />

Figure 3. Mean weight of sandfish in ponds A and B<br />

106<br />

Mar-06<br />

Jun-06<br />

Apr-06<br />

Jul-06<br />

Month-year<br />

May-06<br />

Aug-06<br />

Pond A<br />

Pond B<br />

Mean water temperature<br />

Sep-06<br />

Jun-06<br />

Oct-06<br />

Jul-06<br />

Nov-06<br />

Aug-06<br />

Dec-06<br />

Sep-06<br />

Jan-07<br />

Oct-06<br />

Feb-07<br />

Nov-06<br />

Mar-07<br />

Dec-06<br />

30<br />

29<br />

28<br />

27<br />

26<br />

25<br />

24<br />

23<br />

22<br />

21<br />

20<br />

19<br />

18<br />

17<br />

16<br />

15<br />

14<br />

13<br />

12<br />

11<br />

10<br />

Jan-07<br />

Mean water temperature (ºC±SE)


Maximum growth for sandfish in both ponds during<br />

these trials was reached after 10–11 months during<br />

summer (March–April 2006, Figure 2). Growth then<br />

decreased and ranged from 0.6 to 0.8 g/day for pond A,<br />

and from 0.7 to 0.9 g/day for pond B (Figure 2). The<br />

overall average weight gains were estimated to be 0.60<br />

and 0.77 g/animal/day for ponds A and B, respectively.<br />

The length–weight relationship of the sandfish<br />

stocked into ponds A and B (Figure 4) is a power<br />

curve, as described by Pitt and Duy (2004a).<br />

Survival and stocking density<br />

In pond A, survival after 21 months was 69%.<br />

The final density was 1 animal/m 2 and biomass was<br />

434 g/m 2. This was well above the level of ~225 g/m 2<br />

thought to be the limit of growth rates (Battaglene<br />

1999). Over 3 days in early 2007, 2,222 sandfish were<br />

harvested (45, 280 and 1,897 animals harvested on<br />

24 January, 26 January and 15 March, respectively).<br />

In pond B, final survival was 41% after 19 months;<br />

high mortalities were observed after the first 6–7 months<br />

during the 2005–06 summer due to excessive weed<br />

proliferation (Figure 5), which, in turn, induced high<br />

water temperature and salinity. At the time of transfer of<br />

animals, during that summer, the survival rate reached<br />

73%. The final density was 0.3 animals/m 2 and biomass<br />

was 147 g/m 2. Over 3 days in early 2007, 668 sandfish<br />

were harvested (376, 68 and 224 animals harvested on<br />

10 January, 13 January and 26 January, respectively).<br />

Wet weight (g)<br />

600<br />

540<br />

480<br />

420<br />

360<br />

300<br />

240<br />

180<br />

120<br />

60<br />

107<br />

Behaviour of sandfish in ponds<br />

During the full moon in February 2006, when the<br />

average water temperature was 27.4ºC, an aggregation<br />

of at least 100 sandfish was observed on the edge<br />

of pond A (Figure 6). They formed groups of four or<br />

five individuals (mean weight of 206 g), reaching a<br />

maximum density of 30 animals/m 2. Pre-spawning<br />

behaviour, such as rolling movements, was also<br />

observed. In March 2006, in pond B, an adult male<br />

(>300 g) spawned in the afternoon. This occurred<br />

1 day after the first quarter of the moon, when the<br />

water temperature was 30.7 ºC.<br />

During winter 2006, 70% of the sandfish were<br />

buried with a thick layer of mud covering their dorsal<br />

surface (Figure 7). The average water temperature in<br />

ponds during this period was 20.5 ºC.<br />

Birds and their footprints were often observed<br />

around the ponds. Crabs (e.g. Portunus pelagicus,<br />

Scylla serrata), indigenous shrimps (Penaeus sp.)<br />

and fish (Apogon sp., Siganus sp.) were also seen in<br />

the ponds. During the 21-month grow-out period, 14<br />

sandfish (22–392 g) with skin lesions were observed<br />

(Figure 8). The lesions were always on the dorsal surface<br />

of the animals, and appeared to have been caused<br />

by predators such as large crabs and birds.<br />

Another danger is if the pond water level suddenly<br />

drops. Animals buried near the edge of ponds can be<br />

trapped, and if they remain out of water for more than<br />

a few hours, they will eviscerate and die (Figure 9).<br />

y = 0.1229x 2.6526<br />

0<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30<br />

Length (cm)<br />

R 2 = 0.9867<br />

Figure 4. The length–weight relationship for cultured sandfish reared in ponds


Figure 5. Weed proliferation in a grow-out pond<br />

Figure 6. Aggregation of sandfish near pond edge<br />

108


Figure 7. Buried sandfish<br />

Figure 8. Sandfish with skin lesions<br />

109


Figure 9. Trapped and eviscerated sandfish<br />

Processing into beche-de-mer<br />

During processing (Figure 10A, B), sandfish were<br />

gutted by making a small incision on the ventral<br />

surface to remove the viscera. Initial boiling time was<br />

about 30 minutes. Drying was done outdoors under<br />

the sun for at least 1 week, depending on the weather.<br />

The beche-de-mer from the cultured animals had<br />

a darker skin colour than the product processed from<br />

wild sandfish. Most of the cultured beche-de-mer<br />

was classified as grade A (with some grade Extra-A<br />

and grade B) with a free-on-board export value of<br />

€75–77/kg (2007 prices). A negative aspect was that<br />

cultured animals lost twice as much weight during<br />

processing compared with wild sandfish. Hence, for<br />

the grade A beche-de-mer, there were 25 pieces/kg<br />

instead of 13–15 pieces as found in wild sandfish harvests.<br />

In spite of this disadvantage, the consistently<br />

large specimens and high final grade were encouraging<br />

features for the trader, who normally has to deal<br />

with variable sizes and fluctuations in numbers from<br />

local wild sandfish fisheries.<br />

110<br />

Discussion<br />

Although the sandfish in our trials required minimal<br />

husbandry, some mortality did occur in pond B due to<br />

high water temperature and salinity. Thus, a combination<br />

of extreme conditions, such as sudden variation<br />

of temperature and salinity, handling and transport<br />

may generate harmful stress leading to loss of stock.<br />

A key requirement of management is to observe<br />

some relatively simple measures to minimise the<br />

risks of stress, such as avoiding extreme variations<br />

in water temperature, always keeping the animals in<br />

water in the shade, and not overcrowding the animals<br />

in containers. Nevertheless, the costs of husbandry<br />

should be modest because sandfish do not need<br />

feeding in ponds at medium densities (1.5–3.0 t/ha)<br />

(Pitt and Duy 2003).<br />

Stratification of water in ponds due to heavy<br />

rainfall is to be avoided (Pitt et al. 2001) because it<br />

can lead to extremely high temperature, low salinity<br />

and low dissolved oxygen. Sandfish can survive<br />

salinities as low as 20 ppt, but they are vulnerable<br />

to anoxic conditions in ponds (Pitt and Duy 2004b).<br />

Proliferation of filamentous algae can also cause<br />

similar problems.


A<br />

B<br />

Figure 10. Sandfish processing showing: freshly harvested sandfish (A) and initial boiling (B)<br />

Provided that suitable water conditions can be<br />

maintained in ponds, the growth rates of sandfish are<br />

encouraging for farming. Indeed, from grow-out trials<br />

in shrimp ponds in Vietnam, individual growth rates<br />

of 2 g/day appear to be possible throughout much<br />

111<br />

of the year on a range of substrates (Pitt et al. 2001;<br />

Pitt and Duy 2003, 2004b). Growth rates in New<br />

Caledonia were also favourable—at 0.6–1.3 g/day—<br />

and higher than those in the wild (Hamel et al. 2001).<br />

They were lower than those in Vietnam, presumably


due to cooler water temperature and lower levels of<br />

nutrients in the ponds. It appears that lack of nutrients<br />

in the sediment, high biomass and low water<br />

exchange resulted in environmental conditions that<br />

did not favour growth. Management of density was<br />

not attempted during the grow-out trials because of<br />

the distance to the site and the fact that a technician<br />

was not on site at all times. These results suggest that<br />

survival and growth could be improved substantially<br />

by regular removal of sandfish to another pond.<br />

The duration of grow-out to 400 or 600 g can<br />

possibly be reduced in New Caledonia if juveniles<br />

are released in summer into ponds with enriched substrates.<br />

Another potentially promising way to reduce<br />

the cost of farming sandfish is to find ways to bypass<br />

the second nursery phase in hatcheries by releasing<br />

newly settled juveniles directly into ponds. For this<br />

to succeed, the pond will need to have sediment that<br />

allows the growing juveniles to bury, and predators<br />

will need to be controlled.<br />

This trial showed that sandfish, Holothuria scabra,<br />

could be reared in earthen ponds. In nature, these<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s live mainly on sandy–muddy subtrata.<br />

However, the sediment found in shrimp ponds in New<br />

Caledonia appears to fit the habitat requirements of<br />

sandfish.<br />

In New Caledonia the hot <strong>sea</strong>son lasts from<br />

November to mid April, and the coldest <strong>sea</strong>son from<br />

mid May to mid September. In summer, <strong>tropical</strong><br />

depressions and cyclones can also bring heavy rains<br />

that pose a risk to the farming of sandfish. Without<br />

any management or intervention, long periods of rain<br />

can lead to partial or total loss of animals in earthen<br />

ponds. Future studies should focus on the monitoring<br />

and management of freshwater influx into ponds<br />

during these high-risk periods.<br />

During the hatchery–nursery phase, juveniles of 1 g<br />

may be obtained after 2–3 months of culture. But we<br />

must consider that 19–20 months of rearing in ponds<br />

is necessary for a minimum of 500 g weight, on average,<br />

for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. Further re<strong>sea</strong>rch should focus<br />

on improving farming conditions for better growth<br />

performance and reduced rearing periods.<br />

Finally, the practice and advantages of alternating<br />

pond-culture species could also be considered. This<br />

practice could actually improve sediment quality and<br />

thus the pond environment. Re<strong>sea</strong>rch on the effects<br />

of livestock sandfish quality and the structure of the<br />

sediment basins would be useful.<br />

112<br />

References<br />

Agudo N.S. 2006. Sandfish hatchery techniques. Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch,<br />

Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish<br />

Center: Noumea, New Caledonia.<br />

Battaglene S.C. 1999. Culture of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

for stock restoration and enhancement. NAGA – the<br />

ICLARM Quarterly 22(4), 4–11.<br />

Bell J.D., Agudo N.N., Purcell S.W., Blazer P., Simutoga M.,<br />

Pham D. et al. 2007. Grow-out of sandfish Holothuria<br />

scabra in ponds shows that co-culture with shrimp<br />

Litopenaeus stylirostris is not viable. Aquaculture 273,<br />

509–519.<br />

Conand C. 1990. The fishery resources of the Pacific countries.<br />

Part 2: holothurians. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper<br />

272.2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United<br />

Nations: Rome.<br />

Conand C. 1998. Holothurians. In: K. Carpenter and V.<br />

Niem (eds), ‘FAO species identification guide: the marine<br />

living resources of the western central Pacific’, Vol. 2,<br />

1158–1189. Food and Agriculture Organization of the<br />

United Nations: Rome.<br />

Hamel J.-F., Conand C., Pawson D.L. and Mercier A. 2001.<br />

The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra (Holothuroidae:<br />

Echinodermata): its biology and exploitation as Bechede-mer.<br />

Advances in Marine Biology 41, 131–223.<br />

James D.B., Gandhi A.D., Palaniswamy N. and Rodrigo<br />

J.X. 1994. Hatchery and culture of the <strong>sea</strong>-<strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Holothuria scabra. Central Marine Fisheries Re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

Institute Special Publication No. 57.<br />

Pitt R. 2001. Review of sandfish and rearing methods. SPC<br />

Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 14, 14–21.<br />

Pitt R. and Duy N.D.Q. 2003. To produce 100 tonnes of<br />

sandfish. SPC Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 18,<br />

15–17.<br />

Pitt R. and Duy N.D.Q. 2004a. Length–weight relationship<br />

for sandfish, Holothuria scabra. SPC Beche-de-mer<br />

Information Bulletin 19, 39–40.<br />

Pitt R. and Duy N.D.Q. 2004b. Breeding and rearing of<br />

the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra in Viet Nam. In<br />

‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’,<br />

ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S.<br />

Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No. 463, 333–346. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Pitt R., Thu N.T.X., Minh M.D. and Phuc H.N. 2001.<br />

Preliminary sandfish growth trials in tanks, ponds<br />

and pens in Vietnam. SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin 15, 17–27.<br />

Purcell S., Gardner D. and Bell J. 2002. Developing optimal<br />

strategies for restocking sandfish: a collaborative project<br />

in New Caledonia. SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin 16, 2–4.


Ability of sandfish (Holothuria<br />

scabra) to utilise organic matter in<br />

black tiger shrimp ponds<br />

Satoshi Watanabe 1*, Masashi Kodama 2, Jacques M. Zarate 1,3,<br />

Maria J.H. Lebata-Ramos 3 and Marie F.J. Nievales 4<br />

Abstract<br />

Due to frequent viral di<strong>sea</strong>se outbreaks, a large proportion of shrimp <strong>aquaculture</strong> in South-East Asian<br />

countries has switched from black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) to P. vannamei, an exotic species<br />

originally imported from Latin America. One of the causes of di<strong>sea</strong>se outbreaks is thought to be poor water<br />

and sediment conditions in the shrimp ponds, which may aggravate di<strong>sea</strong>se symptoms. To obtain basic<br />

information for co-culture methods of black tiger shrimp and sandfish (Holothuria scabra) for possible<br />

mitigation of shrimp-pond eutrophication and prevention of di<strong>sea</strong>se outbreaks, basic laboratory experiments<br />

were conducted at the Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center—Aquaculture Department in Iloilo,<br />

the Philippines. A feeding trial of juvenile sandfish showed that they do not grow well with fresh shrimp<br />

feed on hard substrate. Another trial indicated that sand substrate enhances the growth of juvenile sandfish<br />

fed with shrimp feed. A feeding trial using shrimp tank detritus, shrimp faeces and Navicula ramosissima<br />

(a benthic diatom) as food sources showed that sandfish grew fastest with the faeces, followed by detritus<br />

and N. ramosissima. Dissolved oxygen consumption and acid-volatile sulfur levels in the shrimp tank detritus<br />

were reduced by sandfish feeding. This suggests that sandfish are capable of growing with organic matter in<br />

shrimp ponds, and can bioremediate shrimp-pond sediment.<br />

Introduction<br />

The majority of shrimp <strong>aquaculture</strong> in South-East Asian<br />

countries has changed from black tiger shrimp (Penaeus<br />

monodon) to P. vannamei, which is an exotic species<br />

originally imported from Latin America. The change in<br />

target species has occurred due to frequent viral di<strong>sea</strong>se<br />

outbreaks, such as white spot syndrome di<strong>sea</strong>se, yellow<br />

1 Japan International Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Center for Agricultural<br />

Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

2 National Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Institute of Fisheries Science,<br />

Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Japan<br />

3 Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries<br />

Development Center, Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines<br />

4 Division of Biological Sciences College of Arts and<br />

Sciences, University of the Philippines Visayas, Miagao,<br />

Iloilo, Philippines<br />

113<br />

head di<strong>sea</strong>se, hepatopancreatic parvovirus di<strong>sea</strong>se and<br />

monodon baculovirus di<strong>sea</strong>se (Flegel 2006). Effective<br />

measures for the prevention of the di<strong>sea</strong>ses have not<br />

been established. Vaccination against these di<strong>sea</strong>ses is<br />

still under development, and it is extremely difficult<br />

to completely prevent viral intrusion via crustaceans<br />

and birds that enter outdoor shrimp ponds. In order<br />

to avoid risk of economic loss associated with mass<br />

mortality, more farmers culture P. vannamei, which<br />

can be harvested at a smaller size and earlier than P.<br />

monodon. However, there is a possibility that P. vannamei<br />

‘escapees’ may reproduce in the wild and cause<br />

significant problems to the natural environment. With<br />

the introduction of P. vannamei, Taura syndrome virus<br />

and infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis<br />

virus have now become problematic (Flegel 2006).<br />

Thus, it is desirable to establish less risky culture<br />

methods of P. monodon to revive their production.


While extermination of viruses is difficult, it<br />

may be possible to suppress di<strong>sea</strong>se outbreaks by<br />

maintenance of optimal water and sediment conditions.<br />

Anecdotally, it is thought that the di<strong>sea</strong>se<br />

symptoms do not readily manifest in shrimps reared<br />

in good environmental conditions, despite the presence<br />

of viruses (Lightner and Redman 1998). As an<br />

inexpensive technique of environmental control of<br />

shrimp ponds, co-culture with commercially important<br />

organisms that have bioremediation capability<br />

may be a promising approach, and can also provide<br />

additional income to farmers. Mitigation of shrimppond<br />

eutrophication by co-culture may also help<br />

reduce environmental deterioration in areas affected<br />

by intensive shrimp <strong>aquaculture</strong>, which has always<br />

been an issue in South-East Asian countries. To this<br />

end, the feasibility of co-culture of P. monodon and<br />

sandfish (Holothuria scabra), a high-value <strong>tropical</strong><br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, was examined in this study. Since<br />

sandfish stocks have been heavily depleted in many<br />

parts of South-East Asia (Carpenter and Niem 1998;<br />

Hamel et al. 2001; Conand 2004), the co-culture may<br />

also be beneficial for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> conservation.<br />

There are a number of studies on co-culture of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s with other organisms, such as teleost fish<br />

(Ahlgren 1998), bivalves (Zhou et al. 2006; Slater and<br />

Carton 2007, 2009; Paltzat et al. 2008), gastropods<br />

(Kang et al. 2003; Maxwell et al. 2009) and shrimps<br />

(Pitt et al. 2004; Purcell et al. 2006; Bell et al. 2007).<br />

These studies tried to make use of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s’<br />

ability to consume particulate organic matter in the<br />

sediments. Pitt et al. (2004) studied the effects of size,<br />

stocking density and feeding on the feasibility of coculture<br />

of P. monodon with H. scabra, and reported<br />

that co-culture is possible in many situations. However,<br />

they encouraged further, more rigorous studies due to<br />

statistical uncertainty in their study. In the present<br />

study, feeding trials of H. scabra using various types<br />

of organic matter available in shrimp tanks were<br />

conducted in order to ascertain an effective feeding<br />

method for H. scabra in shrimp ponds. The biomitigating<br />

ability of H. scabra in tanks was also studied.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Feeding trial 1: benthic diatoms and shrimp<br />

feed<br />

Juveniles for use in the trials were produced at the<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> hatchery of Southeast Asian Fisheries<br />

Development Center—Aquaculture Department<br />

114<br />

(SEAFDEC–AQD). In order to compare the relative<br />

importance of diatoms and shrimp feed as food<br />

sources for juvenile H. scabra, feeding trials were<br />

conducted using Navicula ramosissima (benthic<br />

diatom monocultured at SEAFDEC–AQD) and<br />

P. monodon powdered feed (SEAFDEC–AQD<br />

formula). For each treatment described below, five<br />

juvenile H. scabra were placed in 60-L fibreglass<br />

tanks filled with filtered and UV-treated <strong>sea</strong> water<br />

with aeration. Sea water was pumped from offshore,<br />

sand filtered, filtered with 10-µm and 1-µm filters,<br />

and UV treated before use in the experiments. No<br />

substrate was added to the tanks. The juveniles were<br />

fed every 2 days with one of the following diets:<br />

(1) 1,000 mL N. ramosissima (~6.2 × 10 5 cells/mL);<br />

(2) a mixture of 500 mL N. ramosissima and 0.5 g<br />

powdered shrimp feed; (3) 1 g powdered shrimp feed;<br />

or (4) no feed (negative control). Three replicate tanks<br />

were used for each treatment, except for the control,<br />

where only one tank was used. In order to prevent<br />

growth of natural food and accumulation of contaminants,<br />

the tanks were cleaned thoroughly and water<br />

changed completely prior to feeding every 2 days. To<br />

compare the growth rates between treatments after<br />

3 weeks, the juveniles’ body length (BL) and weight<br />

(BW) were measured to the nearest 0.01 mm and<br />

0.01 g, respectively. To increase size measurement<br />

accuracy, the juveniles were anaesthetised with 2%<br />

menthol–ethanol solution (Yamana et al. 2005) and<br />

blotted dry with paper towels prior to sampling.<br />

Feeding trial 2: effect of sand on sandfish<br />

growth<br />

The effects of the presence of sand substrate on<br />

the growth of H. scabra were studied. Sand collected<br />

from the beach in front of SEAFDEC–AQD was<br />

sieved through 1-mm mesh, washed with fresh water,<br />

bleached with sodium hypochlorite, washed again and<br />

sun-dried. The prepared sand was placed in a 60-L<br />

fibreglass tank (to approx. 5 cm depth), and filtered<br />

(10-µm and 1-µm) and UV-treated <strong>sea</strong> water was added<br />

to the tank. Five H. scabra juveniles were placed in the<br />

tank and provided with aeration (the with-sand treatment).<br />

The same number of juveniles was also placed<br />

in another 60-L tank under the same conditions except<br />

without sand (the without-sand treatment). The juveniles<br />

were fed with powdered shrimp feed (0.5 g/tank)<br />

every day. Water in the tanks was changed 100% every<br />

2 days but the sand was not washed during the 2-week<br />

trial. Growth in BL and BW over the course of the<br />

experiment was compared between treatments.


Feeding trial 3: organic matter from shrimp<br />

tanks<br />

Further effects of food types on growth of<br />

H. scabra juveniles were studied using organic<br />

matter that should be available in shrimp ponds:<br />

shrimp faeces, shrimp-tank detritus and N. ramosissima<br />

(Navicula species are ubiquitous). Faeces and<br />

detritus were collected from P. monodon tanks at<br />

SEAFDEC–AQD. The tanks were drained to collect<br />

the sedimentary detritus, and fresh faeces were manually<br />

separated from the total detritus using spoons.<br />

Faeces and detritus were stored at –80 °C until used.<br />

Juvenile H. scabra were individually placed in<br />

containers made of PVC pipe (10 cm diameter ×<br />

5 cm length) with both ends covered with 5-mm mesh.<br />

For each treatment described below, 10 containers<br />

were placed in each 60-L fibreglass tank with sand<br />

and aeration. Each container was partially embedded<br />

in the sand. Juveniles were fed every 2 days<br />

with the following: (1) 2 g shrimp-tank detritus;<br />

(2) 2 g shrimp faeces; (3) 430 mL N. ramosissima<br />

(~ 6.2 × 10 5 cells/mL); and no feed (negative control).<br />

Two replicate tanks were used for each treatment<br />

except for the control, where only one tank was used.<br />

Water was changed 100% every 2 days and sand in<br />

the tanks was not cleaned. The trial ran for 10 days.<br />

The BL and BW of all juveniles were measured<br />

after 10 days. The juveniles were anaesthetised before<br />

recording the measurements. Carbohydrate concentration<br />

in the coelomic fluid of the juveniles was measured<br />

after the size measurements. Coelomic fluid was collected<br />

with a micropipette though an incision along<br />

the abdomen, and the carbohydrate concentration was<br />

measured by a modified phenol – sulfuric acid method<br />

(Kushwaha and Kates 1981). A 10-µL aliquot of coelomic<br />

fluid was mixed with 40 µL distilled water, 20 µL<br />

5% phenol solution and 100 µL concentrated H 2SO 4 in<br />

2-mL microtubes; vortexed; and incubated in a block<br />

heater at 80 °C for 10 minutes. Absorbance was read<br />

at 490 nm against a blank, using a microplate reader.<br />

Biomitigation of sediment eutrophication<br />

by sandfish<br />

In order to examine the ability of H. scabra to<br />

mitigate sediment eutrophication, two aspects of sedimentary<br />

organic matter were studied: (1) reduction of<br />

acid-volatile sulfur (AVS) level in detritus after ingestion<br />

and excretion by H. scabra; and (2) reduction of<br />

dissolved oxygen (DO) consumption by detritus after<br />

ingestion and excretion by H. scabra.<br />

115<br />

Holothuria scabra (about 20 cm in BL) were allowed<br />

to defecate in a bare tank for 2 days, then were separately<br />

placed in bare 60-L fibreglass tanks (n = 3) with<br />

aeration, and allowed to feed on shrimp tank detritus<br />

for 2 days. Their faeces were then collected with a<br />

spatula. AVS levels in both the faeces and the detritus<br />

were measured by Hedorotech-S kit (GASTEC Co.)<br />

About 3 g of both the faeces and detritus samples<br />

(n = 3 each) were mixed with 330 g filtered <strong>sea</strong> water,<br />

placed in <strong>sea</strong>led Erlenmeyer flasks, shaded with<br />

aluminum foil, and placed in an incubator at 27 °C.<br />

A control flask containing filtered <strong>sea</strong> water was also<br />

incubated. DO levels were measured every hour with<br />

a DO meter until DO in one of the treatments was<br />

depleted. DO consumption rate (mg O 2/g/hour) was<br />

determined as the largest difference between two<br />

successive readings.<br />

Results and discussion<br />

Feeding trial 1: benthic diatoms and shrimp<br />

feed<br />

Diatoms and epiphytic algae are suggested to<br />

be important food sources for juvenile H. scabra<br />

by Battaglene et al. (1999), who hypothesised that<br />

reduced light decreased growth in H. scabra juveniles<br />

through lower algal production. Shrimp starter<br />

feed is also reported to be good food for H. scabra<br />

(Pitt et al. 2004). Results from these trials confirmed<br />

that there was no mortality of H. scabra in any feed<br />

treatment during the 3-week study. However, unlike<br />

the previous study (Pitt et al. 2004), negative growth<br />

was observed in H. scabra fed with powdered shrimp<br />

feed (Figure 1; –0.026 to –0.022 g/day, –0.27 to<br />

–0.17 mm/day). Positive growth was observed in<br />

H. scabra fed with a mixture of powdered shrimp<br />

feed and N. ramosissima (Figure 1), in which<br />

the growth rates (0.065 to 0.12 g/day, 0.36 to<br />

0.45 mm/day) were comparable to those of those<br />

fed only with N. ramosissima (0.036 to 0.12 g/day,<br />

0.30 to 0.52 mm/day). Thus, powdered shrimp feed<br />

by itself was found to be ineffective for the growth<br />

for H. scabra under the rearing conditions used in<br />

this trial.<br />

Feeding trial 2: effect of sand on sandfish<br />

growth<br />

Battaglene et al. (1999) reported that the growth<br />

rate and survival of H. scabra juveniles reared on<br />

sand was higher than those on a hard substrate when


fed with dried powdered algae and natural biofilm.<br />

Kihara et al. (2009) observed faster growth and<br />

better survival of Japanese <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> juveniles<br />

(Apostichopus japonicus) with the presence of sand,<br />

compared with those provided with no sand, when<br />

fed with dried powdered algae. Although the effect<br />

of sand on the survival of juveniles is not consistent,<br />

sand substrate seems to have a positive effect on the<br />

growth of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s.<br />

In this study, a similar result was observed.<br />

H. scabra juveniles provided with powdered<br />

shrimp feed showed positive growth (0.068 g/day,<br />

0.25 mm/day) in the presence of sand (Figure 2),<br />

whereas juveniles reared without sand showed negative<br />

growth (–0.13 g/day, –0.42 mm/day). The growth<br />

rate observed in the ‘with-sand’ treatment was smaller<br />

than that reported for similar sized individuals by<br />

Pitt et al. (2004), in which shrimp feed and sand<br />

substrate were used. Nevertheless, the presence of<br />

sand substrate seems important for feeding and/or<br />

assimilation of food for H. scabra. Kihara et al. (2009)<br />

Body length (mm ± SD)<br />

Body weight (g ± SD)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

(a)<br />

t = 0<br />

t = 21 days<br />

N N N N+S N+S N+S S S S C<br />

(b)<br />

t = 0<br />

t = 21 days<br />

N N N N+S N+S N+S S S S C<br />

Figure 1. Mean (a) length (mm) and (b) weight (g) of<br />

Holothuria scabra juveniles (n = 5) reared<br />

with: Navicula ramosissima (N); a mixture<br />

of N. ramosissima and powdered shrimp<br />

feed (N+S); powdered shrimp feed (S); and<br />

no feed (C) for 21 days; error bars represent<br />

standard deviation.<br />

116<br />

reported that, although A. japonicus ingested dried<br />

powdered algae, it did not bring about positive growth<br />

in the absence of sand. Since faeces were constantly<br />

observed in the ‘without-sand treatment’ during this<br />

trial, H. scabra seem to ingest powdered shrimp feed<br />

without sand. Therefore, sand may assist digestion<br />

of food particles in the gut of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. It is<br />

also possible that partially decomposed shrimp feed<br />

that could not be removed from the sand was more<br />

readily digestible or assimilable than fresh feed for<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s, which have been shown to have low<br />

digestive enzyme activity (Yingst 1976).<br />

Feeding trial 3: organic matter from shrimp<br />

tanks<br />

H. scabra juveniles showed positive growth<br />

when fed with shrimp tank detritus, shrimp faeces<br />

and N. ramosissima, except in one of the replicates<br />

of the detritus treatment (Figure 3). The<br />

growth rate was fastest with the faeces (0.018 to<br />

0.052 g/day, 0.18 to 0.38 mm/day), followed by<br />

Body length (mm ± SD)<br />

Body weight (g ± SD)<br />

75<br />

70<br />

65<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

25<br />

23<br />

21<br />

19<br />

17<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

t = 0<br />

t = 14 days<br />

With sand Without sand<br />

t = 0<br />

t = 14 days<br />

With sand Without sand<br />

Figure 2. Mean (a) length (mm) and (b) weight (g) of<br />

Holothuria scabra juveniles (n = 5) reared<br />

with and without sand substrate in fibreglass<br />

tanks and fed powdered shrimp feed for<br />

14 days; error bars represent standard<br />

deviation.


detritus (–0.021 to 0.026 g/day, –0.26 to 0.29 mm/day)<br />

and N. ramosissima (0.011 to 0.013 g/day, 0.156 to<br />

0.158 mm/day). This, together with the result of<br />

feeding trial 2, indicates that H. scabra can grow in a<br />

P. monodon pond without additional feeding. Growth<br />

rates obtained in this trial are comparable with those<br />

reported by Battaglene et al. (1999), in which diatoms<br />

and epiphytic algae were fed to H. scabra, but almost<br />

an order of magnitude slower than those reported by<br />

Pitt et al. (2004). Therefore, shrimp feed in the presence<br />

of sand substrate, rather than decomposed leftovers,<br />

shrimp faeces or naturally occurring micro-algae,<br />

seems to be suitable for the growth of H. scabra. Yuan<br />

et al. (2006) reported that the mixed diets of bivalve<br />

faeces and powered algae showed promising results for<br />

cultivation of sub-adult Apostichopus japonicus, while<br />

the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fed with powdered algae or faeces<br />

alone could not obtain the best growth. Holothuria<br />

scabra may be able to consume fresh leftovers by<br />

Body length (mm ± SD)<br />

Body weight (g ± SD)<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

4.5<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

(a)<br />

t = 0<br />

t = 14 days<br />

D D F F N N C<br />

(b)<br />

t = 0<br />

t = 14 days<br />

D D F F N N C<br />

Figure 3. Mean (a) length (mm) and (b) weight (g)<br />

of Holothuria scabra juveniles (n = 10)<br />

reared with detritus collected from Penaeus<br />

monodon rearing tanks (D); P. monodon<br />

faeces (F); Navicula ramosissima (N); and<br />

no feed (C) for 14 days; error bars represent<br />

standard deviation.<br />

117<br />

P. monodon more efficiently, rather than deteriorated<br />

sludge in the shrimp pond.<br />

The carbohydrate concentration in the coelomic<br />

fluid had a significant negative correlation with<br />

growth in BL (Figure 4; r = –0.30, p < 0.05) and<br />

BW (r = –0.29, p < 0.05, n = 70). Watanabe et al.<br />

(2012) found that carbohydrate concentration in the<br />

coelomic fluid is positively correlated with starvation<br />

period. Therefore, carbohydrate concentration may<br />

be correlated with growth rate through nutritional<br />

condition, which presumably affects the growth rate<br />

of H. scabra. However, although the correlations<br />

were significant, the correlation coefficient had small<br />

values, and carbohydrate concentration values were<br />

highly variable, especially at low growth rates. Since<br />

feeding condition or nutritional condition is not the<br />

only factor affecting growth rate, one should be careful<br />

in the interpretation of carbohydrate concentration<br />

when analysing it in relation to growth rate.<br />

Carbohydrate conc.<br />

(mg/mL)<br />

Carbohydrate conc.<br />

(mg/mL)<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

–1.0 –0.5 0 0.5 1.0<br />

Growth rate (g/day)<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

0<br />

–1.0 –0.5 0 0.5 1.0<br />

Growth rate (g/day)<br />

Figure 4. Relationship between growth rate of (a)<br />

length (mm/day, and (b) weight (g/day)<br />

and carbohydrate concentration (mg/mL)<br />

in the coelomic fluid of Holothuria scabra<br />

juveniles (n = 70) reared with detritus<br />

collected from Penaeus monodon rearing<br />

tanks; P. monodon faeces and Navicula<br />

ramosissima. Linear correlations were<br />

significant in both graphs.


Biomitigation of sediment eutrophication<br />

by sandfish<br />

Dissolved oxygen consumption by faeces of<br />

H. scabra fed with shrimp tank detritus was 22%<br />

of that consumed by the shrimp tank detritus alone<br />

(from 1.0 ± 0.1 SD to 4.5 ± 1.0 SD g O 2/g dry<br />

wt/hour, p < 0.001, n = 3, t-test) (Figure 5). This<br />

may be attributable to reduction of organic matter in<br />

the detritus through assimilation by H. scabra (i.e.<br />

less organic matter equals less oxygen consumed by<br />

micro-organisms during decomposition of organic<br />

matter). Grazing of the brown <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

(Australostichopus mollis) reduces total organic<br />

carbon, chlorophyll a and phaeopigment, as well as<br />

the chlorophyll a : phaeopigment ratio of sediments<br />

impacted by green-lipped mussel depositions (Slater<br />

and Carton 2009). Conversely, it is reported that,<br />

while H. scabra bioturbate sediments and eat organic<br />

deposits in tanks with blue shrimp (Litopenaeus stylirostris),<br />

they did not significantly reduce the organic<br />

content of the sand in the tanks (Purcell et al. 2006).<br />

Oxygen consumption<br />

(mgO /g dry wt/hour ± SD)<br />

2<br />

AVS (mg/g dry wt)<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Detritus Faeces<br />

Detritus Faeces<br />

Figure 5. (a) Dissolved oxygen consumption rate<br />

and (b) acid-volatile sulfur (AVS) level of<br />

detritus collected from Penaeus monodon<br />

rearing tanks and faeces of H. scabra<br />

fed with the detritus (n = 3 for oxygen<br />

consumption rate and n = 1 for AVS level);<br />

error bars represent standard deviation.<br />

118<br />

If this also applies to the detritus derived from<br />

P. monodon, H. scabra may somehow change the<br />

nature of organic matter in the detritus so that oxygen<br />

consumption is reduced. Regardless of the actual<br />

mechanism, reduction of oxygen consumption is an<br />

important consequence of H. scabra feeding since<br />

hypoxia in the sediment and bottom water is a major<br />

problem in shrimp ponds (Suplee and Cotner 1996;<br />

Avnimelech and Ritvo 2003).<br />

AVS level (hydrogen sulfide and iron sulfide<br />

≈ total sulfur) in the shrimp tank detritus<br />

(0.67 mg/g dry wt) was reduced by 55% by H. scabra<br />

(0.31 mg/g dry wt) feeding (Figure 5). Dissimilative<br />

sulfate reduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria<br />

(Fenchel and Blackburn 1979) results in the release<br />

of hydrogen sulfide into the environment, which is<br />

very toxic to many aquatic organisms (Bagarinao<br />

and Vetter 1992). Sulfide diffused out of sediments<br />

into bottom water is quickly oxidised biotically and<br />

abiotically (Jorgensen 1977); therefore, high sulfide<br />

levels in the sediment can aggravate hypoxia in the<br />

bottom water. Thus, AVS reduction in shrimp-tank<br />

detritus by H. scabra should bring about positive<br />

effects to the environment of a shrimp pond. Further<br />

quantitative analysis should be carried out to determine<br />

the proper stocking density of H. scabra for<br />

effective biomitigation of a shrimp pond.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The series of experiments conducted in this study<br />

showed that, although more quantitative data are<br />

needed, H. scabra has potential to biomitigate the<br />

eutrophication and improve sediment quality in a<br />

shrimp pond. Studies on the relationship between<br />

stocking density of H. scabra and the extent of<br />

biomitigation, as well as relationships between the<br />

shrimp-pond environment and shrimp di<strong>sea</strong>se manifestation,<br />

should also be carried out.<br />

Agudo (2006) suggested that, although the availability<br />

of cultured juvenile H. scabra provides potential<br />

for farming H. scabra in earthen ponds or <strong>sea</strong><br />

pens, it should not be reared in ponds together with<br />

shrimp because shrimp prey on H. scabra. Bell et<br />

al. (2007) reported that co-culture of H. scabra with<br />

blue shrimp (Litopenaeus stylirostris) is not viable<br />

due to death and morbidity of H. scabra. Therefore,<br />

in co-culture with P. monodon, H. scabra should be<br />

either protected in cages or reared in a separate pond,<br />

to which shrimp-pond effluents are introduced before<br />

the water is returned to the shrimp pond. Rotational


culture is another possible approach. Further studies<br />

to establish practically feasible co-culture methods<br />

should be conducted.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

The authors are grateful to Joemel Sumbing, Jesus<br />

Rodriguez, Harold Figurado and Esteban Garibay at<br />

SEAFDEC–AQD for assistance in sandfish culture<br />

and laboratory analysis. This study was funded by the<br />

Japan International Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Center for Agricultural<br />

Sciences (JIRCAS).<br />

References<br />

Agudo N.S. 2006. Sandfish hatchery techniques. Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch,<br />

Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish<br />

Center: Noumea, New Caledonia.<br />

Ahlgren M.O. 1998. Consumption and assimilation of<br />

salmon net pen fouling debris by the red <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Parastichopus californicus: implications for polyculture.<br />

Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 29, 133–139.<br />

Avnimelech Y. and Ritvo G. 2003. Shrimp and fish pond<br />

soils: processes and management. Aquaculture 220,<br />

549–567.<br />

Bagarinao T. and Vetter R.D. 1992. Sulfide as an environmental<br />

factor and toxicant: tolerance and adaptations in<br />

aquatic organisms. Aquatic Toxicology 24, 21–62.<br />

Battaglene S.C., Seymour J.E. and Ramofafia C. 1999.<br />

Survival and growth of cultured juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

Holothuria scabra. Aquaculture 178, 293–322.<br />

Bell J.D., Agudo N.N., Purcell S.W., Blazer P., Simutoga M.,<br />

Pham D. et al. 2007. Grow-out of sandfish Holothuria<br />

scabra in ponds shows that co-culture with shrimp<br />

Litopenaeus stylirostris is not viable. Aquaculture 273,<br />

509–519.<br />

Carpenter K.E. and Niem V.H. 1998. The living marine<br />

resources of the Western Central Pacific, Vol. 2: cephalopods,<br />

crustaceans, holothurians and sharks. FAO species<br />

identification guide for fishery purposes. Food and<br />

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Conand C. 2004. Present status of world <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

resources and utilization: an international overview. In<br />

‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’,<br />

ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S.<br />

Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No. 463, 13–23. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Fenchel T. and Blackburn T.H. 1979. Bacteria and mineral<br />

cycling. Academic Press: London.<br />

Flegel T.W. 2006. Detection of major penaeid shrimp<br />

viruses in Asia, a historical perspective with emphasis<br />

on Thailand. Aquaculture 258, 1–33.<br />

119<br />

Hamel J.-F., Conand C., Pawson D.L. and Mercier A. 2001.<br />

The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra (Holothuroidea:<br />

Echinodermata): its biology and exploitation as bechede-mer.<br />

Advances in Marine Biology 41, 129–223.<br />

Jorgensen B.B. 1977. The sulfur cycle of a coastal marine<br />

sediment (Limfjorden, Denmark). Limnology and<br />

Oceanography 22, 814–832.<br />

Kang K.H., Kwon J.Y. and Kim Y.M. 2003. A beneficial<br />

coculture: charm abalone Haliotis discus hannai and <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> Stichopus japonicus. Aquaculture 216, 87–93.<br />

Kihara M, Tamoto J. and Hoshi T. 2009. Effects of sand particles<br />

on feeding behavior of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Apostichopus<br />

japonicas reared in tank. Journal of Fisheries Technology<br />

2, 39–43.<br />

Kushwaha S.C. and Kates M. 1981. Modification of<br />

phenol-sulfuric acid method for the estimation of sugars<br />

in lipids. Lipids 16, 372–373.<br />

Lightner D.V. and Redman R.M. 1998. Shrimp di<strong>sea</strong>ses and<br />

current diagnostic methods. Aquaculture 164, 201–220.<br />

Maxwell K.H., Gardner J.P.A. and Heath P.L. 2009. The<br />

effect of diet on the energy budget of the brown <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> Stichopus mollis (Hutton). Journal of the<br />

World Aquaculture Society 40, 157–170.<br />

Paltzat D.L., Pearce C.M., Barnes P.A. and McKinley R.S.<br />

2008. Growth and production of California <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

(Parastichopus californicus Stimpson) co-cultured<br />

with suspended Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas<br />

Thunberg). Aquaculture 275, 124–137.<br />

Pitt R., Duy N.D.Q., Duy T.V. and Long H.T.C. 2004.<br />

Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) with shrimp (Penaeus<br />

monodon) co-culture tank trials. SPC Beche-de-mer<br />

Information Bulletin 20, 12–22.<br />

Purcell S.W., Patrois J. and Fraisse N. 2006. Experimental<br />

evaluation of co-culture of juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

Holothuria scabra (Jaeger) with juvenile blue shrimp<br />

Litopenaeus stylirostris (Stimpson). Aquaculture<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 37, 515–522.<br />

Slater M.J. and Carton A.G. 2007. Survivorship and growth<br />

of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Australostichopus (Stichopus) mollis<br />

(Hutton 1872) in polyculture trials with green-lipped<br />

mussel farms. Aquaculture 272, 389–398.<br />

Slater M.J. and Carton A.G. 2009. Effect of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

(Australostichopus mollis) grazing on coastal sediments<br />

impacted by mussel farm deposition. Marine Pollution<br />

Bulletin 58, 1123–1129.<br />

Suplee M.W. and Cotner J.B. 1996. Temporal changes in<br />

oxygen demand and bacterial sulfate reduction in inland<br />

shrimp ponds. Aquaculture 145, 141–158.<br />

Watanabe S., Zarate J.M., Lebata-Ramos M.J.H. and<br />

Nievales M.F.J. 2012. Evaluation of nutritional condition<br />

of juvenile sandfish (Holothuria scabra). In ‘Asia–<br />

Pacific <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A.<br />

Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings<br />

No. 136, 50–56. Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]


Yamana Y., Hamano T. and Yamamoto K. 2005. Anesthetizer<br />

of the adult <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Apostichopus japonicus.<br />

Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 71, 299–306 (in Japanese with<br />

English abstract).<br />

Yingst J.Y. 1976. The utilization of organic matter in shallow<br />

marine sediments by an epibenthic deposit-feeding<br />

holothurian. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology<br />

and Ecology 23, 55–69.<br />

120<br />

Yuan X., Yang H., Zhou Y., Mao Y., Zhang T. and Liu Y.<br />

2006. The influence of diets containing dried bivalve<br />

feces and/or powdered algae on growth and energy<br />

distribution in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Apostichopus japonicus<br />

(Selenka) (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea). Aquaculture<br />

256, 457–467.<br />

Zhou Y., Yang H., Liu S., Yuan X., Mao Y., Liu Y. et al. 2006.<br />

Feeding and growth on bivalve biodeposits by the deposit<br />

feeder Stichopus japonicus Selenka (Echinodermata:<br />

Holothuroidea) co-cultured in lantern nets. Aquaculture<br />

256, 510–520.


Establishment and management of<br />

communal sandfish (Holothuria scabra)<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching in the Philippines<br />

Marie Antonette Juinio-Meñez 1*, Marie Antonette S. Paña 1,<br />

Glycinea M. de Peralta 1, Tirso O. Catbagan 1, Ronald Dionnie D. Olavides 1,<br />

Christine Mae A. Edullantes 1 and Bryan Dave D. Rodriguez 1<br />

Abstract<br />

Sea ranching of sandfish is being piloted as a means to enhance the recovery of depleted natural stocks<br />

and provide a supplemental source of income for artisanal fishers. Participatory and adaptive approaches<br />

were employed in the establishment and management of <strong>sea</strong> ranches to ensure that benefits accrue to both<br />

the ‘rights-holders’ and other community members. Three pilot <strong>sea</strong>-ranching sites have been established in<br />

north-western Luzon, the Philippines. The sites are managed by members of a local association of small fishers<br />

with the support of the municipal government, which granted limited exclusive-use rights to the <strong>sea</strong>-ranch<br />

managers. Each site was delineated into two major use zones: the 1-ha no-take release and nursery area, and<br />

the 4-ha reserve area. Multiple releases of cultured sandfish juveniles produced from local wild broodstock<br />

were conducted in the sites. Within 7–10 months, effective spawning populations were established in the<br />

<strong>sea</strong>-ranching sites when the density of reproductively mature (>200 g) individuals (ind) exceeded 100 ind/ha.<br />

Growth and survival rates were variable among sites. At the Bolinao <strong>sea</strong> ranch, the maximum estimated overall<br />

density reached 1,119 ind/ha, with an estimated survival rate of 39% after 19 months. Mass spawning of<br />

sandfish in the <strong>sea</strong> ranch further demonstrated that community-based sandfish <strong>sea</strong> ranching can help rebuild<br />

depleted wild populations. Among the major threats to sustainability are periodic poaching and storms, which<br />

reduce harvestable biomass and economic returns to the rights-holders. Sea ranching should be integrated<br />

within a broader fishery management framework to improve the management of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries.<br />

Introduction<br />

Rehabilitation of overexploited and depleted stocks<br />

is essential to securing continued production from<br />

capture fisheries (Bartley and Bell 2008). This has<br />

become imperative for species that are commercially<br />

important and heavily exploited, such as <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s.<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> collection has been an important<br />

part of the multispecies invertebrate fishery in the<br />

Indo-Pacific region for over 1,000 years (Conand<br />

1 Marine Science Institute, University of the Philippines,<br />

Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

121<br />

1990). Production of cultured species from hatcheries<br />

has been undertaken to increase and/or replenish<br />

yields through restocking, stock enhancement and <strong>sea</strong><br />

ranching. However, despite progress in <strong>aquaculture</strong>,<br />

the application of hatchery technologies in fisheries<br />

management has yet to overcome many challenges.<br />

These include cost-effective production of juveniles;<br />

identification of where and when to use such interventions;<br />

integration of these initiatives with institutional<br />

fisheries management regimes; monitoring<br />

the success of interventions; and releasing juveniles<br />

into the wild in such a way that they survive in high<br />

numbers (Blankenship and Leber 1995; Bell et al.<br />

2005, 2006; Lorenzen 2008). Putting these concepts


into practice in a developing-country context to<br />

harmonise socioeconomic and ecological benefits to<br />

small fishers was the primary consideration in the<br />

establishment of communal sandfish <strong>sea</strong> ranching in<br />

the Philippines.<br />

Historical overview of Philippine<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> resources and<br />

fisheries<br />

The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery has been and is still an<br />

important source of livelihood for many of the<br />

coastal communities in the Philippine archipelago<br />

(Domantay 1934; Trinidad-Roa 1987; Akamine<br />

2001). One of the earliest commercial <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

fisheries in South-East Asia, dating back over<br />

200 years, was in Sulu. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s were collected<br />

by the best pearl divers of the coastal Tausug and<br />

vinta-dwelling Samal and Badjao communities for<br />

the Sulu Sultanate. Licence to fish <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s was<br />

given by the sultan, while the datus (the local elites)<br />

commonly led or deployed several hundred fishers in<br />

fishing fleets (an early sign of fishery management)<br />

(Warren 1985).<br />

In the late 18th century, the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery<br />

in the southern Philippines developed rapidly as a<br />

result of trade with Spain, China and Britain (Warren<br />

1985; Akamine 2001). From 1805 to 1830, dried <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s or trepang were shipped from Sulu to<br />

Manila twice a year in varying amounts up to 50 t<br />

(Warren 1985). Manila was also a main trading port<br />

between the South Pacific region and China (Ward<br />

1972, cited in Akamine 2001).<br />

Between 1924 and 1932, the Philippines exported<br />

an average of 272 t/year of dried <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s to<br />

China, British East Indies, Hong Kong and Japan<br />

(Domantay 1934). Post-World War II records show<br />

that the Philippines exported only 0.54 t in 1950<br />

(Montilla and Blanco 1952), 5 t in 1958 (Surtida and<br />

Buendia 2000) and 12 t in 1970 (Akamine 2002).<br />

Export volume rapidly increased to over 600 t in<br />

1978, exceeding pre-war records, and again doubled<br />

in 1983. Since then, the Philippines has maintained<br />

a total annual export of no less than 1,000 t, making<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s a major export commodity.<br />

Although the Philippines is the second-largest<br />

exporter of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in the world<br />

(Conand and Byrne 1993), results of a multisectoral<br />

national forum established that there have been no<br />

significant efforts to effectively regulate and manage<br />

122<br />

the fishery, either at the national- or local-government<br />

level (Casilagan and Juinio-Meñez 2007). The<br />

scarcity of useful fishery baseline information in<br />

most regions is often cited as an obstacle in the<br />

formulation of a management plan (Gamboa et al.<br />

2004). Furthermore, resource managers at the localgovernment<br />

unit level and the national agencies<br />

generally know very little about the value and status<br />

of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> resources.<br />

The status of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> resources and<br />

fishery in the municipalities where the pilot <strong>sea</strong>ranching<br />

sites were established is characteristic of<br />

overexploited fisheries in many parts of the country.<br />

For example, in the Bolinao–Anda reef system,<br />

species diversity is high but population densities<br />

are very low, and the average sizes of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

are below reported sizes at sexual maturity per species<br />

(Olavides et al. 2010). Fishery-dependent and<br />

independent studies in the area found 49 species,<br />

26 of which are being collected and traded (including<br />

the very low-value species). The catch per unit<br />

effort in the 1970s–1980s was reported to be over<br />

100 kg/day, and had declined to less than 1 kg/day in<br />

2008. Several high-value commercial species such<br />

as Thelenota ananas and T. anax have been fished to<br />

local extinction, while the populations of other target<br />

species, particularly Holothuria scabra and Stichopus<br />

horrens, are depleted.<br />

Sandfish <strong>sea</strong> ranch establishment<br />

process and management scheme<br />

One of the highest valued <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> species in the<br />

Philippines is Holothuria scabra, commonly known<br />

as sandfish. With the scaled-up juvenile production of<br />

sandfish (Juinio-Meñez et al. 2012), <strong>sea</strong> ranching was<br />

piloted in three coastal municipalities in north-western<br />

Luzon. The framework, establishment process and<br />

management scheme for communal <strong>sea</strong> ranching of<br />

sandfish were developed to ensure that benefits accrue<br />

to both the ‘rights-holders’ and other community<br />

members (M.A. Juinio-Meñez, unpublished data).<br />

These were also aimed at minimising social conflicts,<br />

which are inherent in the open-access and multipleuse<br />

nature of nearshore fisheries in the Philippines.<br />

The key implementation strategies are: (1) acquisition<br />

of exclusive communal-use rights for a 5-ha <strong>sea</strong> ranch,<br />

(2) increases in the production, and improvement<br />

in the quality, of hatchery-produced juveniles, and<br />

(3) regular monitoring to estimate population growth<br />

and survival in the <strong>sea</strong>-ranching sites.


Biophysical, social and governance criteria were<br />

considered in the selection of three <strong>sea</strong>-ranching<br />

sites in the provinces of Pangasinan and Zambales,<br />

north-western Luzon (Figure 1). The biophysical<br />

requirements included 50–60% <strong>sea</strong>grass cover,<br />

sandy–muddy substrate, minimum exposure to<br />

wave action, and presence of sandfish. Even if the<br />

biophysical prerequisites had been met, the final site<br />

selection was based on the presence of an interested<br />

local fisher association (or a group with experience in<br />

community-based coastal resource management) and<br />

a supportive local government unit willing to grant<br />

preferential-use rights to the <strong>sea</strong>-ranch managers.<br />

Community consultations were conducted in the<br />

potential sites and in neighbouring villages that may<br />

be affected by restricted access in the <strong>sea</strong>-ranch area.<br />

Upon endorsement of the village council, the local<br />

partners applied for preferential-use rights to manage<br />

the <strong>sea</strong> ranch and exclusively harvest all <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

in the site. This was legitimised by an ordinance<br />

passed by the local legislative body, and the issuance<br />

of a gratuitous permit by the mayor. The responsibilities<br />

of the local <strong>sea</strong>-ranch managers were to help in<br />

conducting information and awareness campaigns,<br />

123<br />

provide manpower in developing and maintaining the<br />

site, and guard the <strong>sea</strong> ranch (Figure 2A, B, C, D).<br />

The <strong>sea</strong>-ranch rights-holders initially comprised<br />

12–15 families of fishers per site, with an average<br />

annual income of US$640–5,600 per household. Each<br />

of the 5-ha sites was delineated into two major use and<br />

management zones composed of a 1-ha nursery notake<br />

zone located at the centre of the <strong>sea</strong> ranch, and a<br />

4-ha reserve zone surrounding the nursery zone. Inside<br />

the no-take zone is a core release area (50 × 50 m),<br />

where cultured sandfish juveniles were released.<br />

In addition, 3 × 100 m 2 circular pens were installed<br />

in the core release area and stocked with juveniles<br />

to facilitate monitoring of growth and survival of a<br />

single batch. To minimise disturbance of the released<br />

juveniles, entry into the nursery zone is restricted to<br />

release and monitoring activities. In the reserve area,<br />

boat passage and traditional fishing activities (except<br />

for any species of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s) are allowed with<br />

permission from the <strong>sea</strong>-ranch managers.<br />

Hatchery-produced juveniles (>3 g) were released<br />

in multiple batches, with varying numbers of individuals<br />

(ind) per batch. Juveniles were released individually<br />

by pressing their bodies lightly into the surface<br />

Figure 1. Map of the three <strong>sea</strong>-ranching sites in north-western Luzon, the<br />

Philippines: (1: Barangay Victory, Bolinao, Pangasinan; 2: Barangay<br />

Sablig, Anda, Pangasinan; 3: Panglit Island, Masinloc, Zambales)


Figure 2. Regular activities of <strong>sea</strong>-ranch managers. A: Conducting information<br />

and education activities for local communities and site visitors. B: Site<br />

development (e.g. delineation and pen construction). C: Release of<br />

hatchery-produced sandfish juveniles. D: Guarding the <strong>sea</strong> ranch.<br />

E: Periodic monitoring. F: Mass harvest and processing<br />

of the sediment, partially burying them, to reduce the<br />

risk of predation. Stratified belt transect surveys in<br />

different areas of the <strong>sea</strong> ranch were conducted with<br />

local partners every 3–4 months to estimate survival<br />

and growth. Population densities, abundance and<br />

biomass of sandfish were also estimated. The results<br />

of the surveys were discussed with the <strong>sea</strong>-ranch<br />

managers to assess the status of the sandfish in the<br />

sites and schedule harvests. The managers processed<br />

the harvested sandfish themselves (Figure 2E, F), and<br />

sold their products to <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> wholesalers or<br />

exporters in Manila. A comparison of key information<br />

on the management and monitoring surveys<br />

in the three pilot <strong>sea</strong>-ranching sites is presented in<br />

Table 1.<br />

124<br />

Lessons learned and insights<br />

A viable spawning population can be<br />

established and maintained in a <strong>sea</strong> ranch<br />

Growth and survival of sandfish in the <strong>sea</strong>-ranch<br />

sites were widely variable. From an average release<br />

size of 5–7 g, sandfish reached an initial size of<br />

sexual maturity of about 180 g within 7–10 months.<br />

The density of sandfish in the <strong>sea</strong> ranches increased<br />

rapidly in the first year of operation, with maximum<br />

densities across the three sites in the range<br />

302–1,119 ind/ha (Table 1). The highest estimated<br />

survival was 39% in the Bolinao <strong>sea</strong> ranch after<br />

19 months, with density reaching 1,119 ind/ha. This<br />

is over 400 times the density of the wild population<br />

in the Bolinao–Anda reef system, which is only


about 6 ind/ha (Olavides et al. 2010). This density<br />

approaches that of a relatively unexploited natural<br />

population of 2,900 ind/ha reported from Papua New<br />

Guinea (Shelley 1985). In contrast, the maximum<br />

survival estimate in the two other sites was only 14%<br />

(Table 1).<br />

More importantly, within 10 months after the first<br />

release of juveniles, the density of reproductively<br />

mature (>200 g) individuals exceeded 100 ind/<br />

ha. The highest density of reproductively mature<br />

sandfish was 499 ind/ha after 19 months, comprising<br />

over 40% of the sandfish in the Bolinao <strong>sea</strong><br />

ranch. Synchronous spontaneous spawning was<br />

also observed in the Bolinao and Anda sites on 23<br />

February 2010 (Olavides et al. 2011). Prior to and<br />

after this mass spawning event, the <strong>sea</strong>-ranch managers<br />

observed sandfish exhibiting spawning behaviour,<br />

clearly demonstrating that a viable spawning population<br />

has been established in these sites.<br />

Typhoons and poaching are major threats<br />

to economic viability<br />

The modal size (total weight) of sandfish in<br />

the Bolinao <strong>sea</strong> ranch decreased drastically after<br />

125<br />

protracted periods of heavy rainfall and strong waves<br />

brought about by two consecutive typhoons during<br />

September and October 2009 (Juinio-Meñez, unpublished<br />

data). There was a decrease of about 70% in<br />

the estimated total biomass in the <strong>sea</strong> ranch—from<br />

1,100 kg to 347 kg over a 7-month period—after<br />

the typhoons (6th to 8th monitoring periods). The<br />

estimated harvestable biomass (i.e. sandfish >320 g)<br />

prior to the typhoon in July 2009 was about 188 kg.<br />

Four months after the typhoon, there was no harvestable<br />

biomass. The negative impact of typhoons on<br />

the growth of sandfish may be attributed to drastic<br />

changes in environmental factors and habitat modification.<br />

The heavy rains may have caused significant<br />

exposure to suboptimal salinity levels that stressed<br />

the sandfish—preliminary laboratory experiments<br />

showed that sandfish ceased to feed at around 20 ppt<br />

salinity (J.R. Gorospe, unpublished data). Further,<br />

it was also observed that, after the typhoon, sediment<br />

in the <strong>sea</strong>-ranching area became coarse, with<br />

abundant coral rubble on the surface. The progressive<br />

decrease in weight of individual sandfish months later<br />

indicates that the strong typhoons decreased sediment<br />

quality in the <strong>sea</strong> ranch.<br />

Table 1. Management and sandfish population data in the three pilot <strong>sea</strong>-ranching sites in north-western Luzon<br />

Bolinao,<br />

Pangasinan<br />

Rights-holder Association of small<br />

fishers<br />

Location of <strong>sea</strong>-ranching sites<br />

Anda,<br />

Pangasinan<br />

Co-managed by<br />

representatives of<br />

village council and a<br />

people’s organisation<br />

Masinloc,<br />

Zambales<br />

Members of the<br />

marine protected area<br />

council<br />

Date of first release Dec 2007 Dec 2008 May 2009<br />

Total number of juveniles releaseda 14,300<br />

(10 releases)<br />

Mean weight (g)<br />

(size range 3–20 g)<br />

Maximum weight of sandfish harvested<br />

(g)<br />

Estimated density<br />

(ind/ha) after 16–18 months<br />

Highest estimated density of individuals<br />

>200 g (ind/ha)<br />

Range of estimated survival of released<br />

juveniles (%) during the first six<br />

monitoring periods<br />

Highest estimated biomass (kg) in entire<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranch (5 ha)<br />

a Excluding juveniles released in the pens inside the <strong>sea</strong> ranch during the first year<br />

18,749<br />

(8 releases)<br />

21,272<br />

(6 releases)<br />

7.0 ± 4.7 5.8 ± 2.8 5.5 ± 1.9<br />

630 560 500<br />

1,119 86 90<br />

499 224 116<br />

19–39 2–13 2–14<br />

1,100 419 292


Aside from natural disturbances, poaching reduces<br />

the potential economic returns to the <strong>sea</strong>-ranch<br />

rights-holders. All the sites have a round-the-clock<br />

rotational guarding scheme agreed upon by the<br />

<strong>sea</strong>-ranch managers to minimise opportunity costs<br />

(i.e. 2–3 days a month per household). The income<br />

share from the <strong>sea</strong> ranch was proportional to the<br />

time and effort invested by each member household.<br />

Consistency and commitment of members to adhere<br />

to guarding schedules varied among sites. Even in<br />

Bolinao, where the management has been exemplary,<br />

incidences of successful poaching have occurred. No<br />

major typhoon has affected the two other sites, and<br />

yet estimated survival rates in these sites were lower<br />

(Table 1). This may be due, in part, to poaching incidences<br />

of sandfish within the <strong>sea</strong> ranch. Poaching is a<br />

given socioeconomic constraint in open-access areas<br />

with many poor subsistence fishers. Thus, governance<br />

mechanisms to mitigate and manage social conflicts<br />

are crucial to the success of <strong>sea</strong>-ranching efforts.<br />

Another factor that affects the harvestable biomass<br />

is movement of sandfish outside the <strong>sea</strong>-ranch area.<br />

This is determined by various environmental factors<br />

that affect habitat quality (including incidence of<br />

natural disturbances such as typhoons), and needs to<br />

be investigated more closely in the future.<br />

Sea ranching is part of an integrated<br />

fishery management framework<br />

Communal sandfish <strong>sea</strong> ranching is a model that<br />

could be adopted to harmonise the need to rebuild<br />

depleted populations and, at the same time, provide<br />

economic incentive for rights-holders who invest<br />

in managing the areas. The community-managed<br />

5-ha <strong>sea</strong> ranch demonstrates that release of sandfish<br />

in suitable and well-managed sites can establish<br />

viable spawning populations that should contribute<br />

to rebuilding depleted fishery stocks. An effective<br />

spawning population in the <strong>sea</strong> ranch can be maintained<br />

while optimising economic returns through<br />

programmed releases of juveniles and selective harvesting<br />

of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s (e.g. >320 g). Harvesting<br />

animals larger than the average size at sexual maturity<br />

(~200 g) also increases economic returns since<br />

bigger sandfish fetch a higher price in the market.<br />

However, sandfish <strong>sea</strong> ranching will not be feasible<br />

in many situations; for example, where there is no<br />

supply of cultured juveniles, in habitats that are not<br />

suitable for H. scabra, and where risks from natural<br />

disturbances and poaching are very high. In the<br />

Philippines, where management of nearshore waters<br />

126<br />

is under the jurisdiction of local government units<br />

(LGUs), local-level management systems such as<br />

partnerships between small-scale fishers and LGUs<br />

are important. To promote sustainability of severely<br />

exploited and unmanaged multispecies <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

fisheries in the country, the important components of<br />

an integrated fishery and <strong>sea</strong>-ranching management<br />

system include: implementation of a registry and<br />

permit system for fishers, processors and traders that<br />

is consistent with the provisions of national fisheries<br />

codes; minimum size limits for harvest and trade; and<br />

community-managed reserves such as the communal<br />

sandfish <strong>sea</strong> ranches discussed here.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

The establishment of the pilot <strong>sea</strong>-ranching area for<br />

sandfish was funded by the Australian Centre for<br />

International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>), with<br />

complementary support from the Department of<br />

Science and Technology (DOST) of the Philippines.<br />

This work would not have been possible without<br />

the active engagement and wisdom of our primary<br />

re<strong>sea</strong>rch and development partners—the <strong>sea</strong>-ranch<br />

managers: Samahan ng mga Maliliit na Mangingisda<br />

ng Victory, Inc. (SMMVI); Sablig Barangay Multisectoral<br />

Association (SBMA) and its barangay<br />

council; Marine Protected Area Management<br />

Council of Panglit Island, Re<strong>sea</strong>rch and Development<br />

Committee; and the local government units of<br />

Bolinao and Anda in Pangasinan and Masinloc,<br />

Zambales.<br />

References<br />

Akamine J. 2001. Holothurian exploitation in the<br />

Philippines: continuities and discontinuities. Tropics<br />

10(4), 591–607.<br />

Akamine J. 2002. Trepang exploitation in the Philippines:<br />

updated information. SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin 17, 17–21.<br />

Bartley D.M. and Bell J.D. 2008. Restocking, stock<br />

enhancement, and <strong>sea</strong> ranching: arenas of progress.<br />

Reviews in Fisheries Science 16(103), 357–365.<br />

Bell J.D., Bartley D.M., Lorenzen K. and Loneragan N.R.<br />

2006. Restocking and stock enhancement of coastal<br />

fisheries: potential, problems and progress. Fisheries<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 80, 1–8.<br />

Bell J.D., Rothlisberg P.C., Munro J.L., Loneragan N.R.,<br />

Nash W.J., Ward R.D. et al. 2005. Restocking and stock<br />

enhancement of marine invertebrate fisheries. Advances<br />

in Marine Biology 49, 1–370.


Blankenship L. and Leber K. 1995. A responsible approach<br />

to marine stock enhancement. American Fisheries<br />

Society Symposium. 15, 167–175.<br />

Casilagan I.L. and Juinio-Meñez M.A. 2007.<br />

Documentation report of the National Forum on Sea<br />

Cucumber Fisheries Management, Dagupan, Pangasinan,<br />

Philippines, 6–9 June 2007.<br />

Conand C. 1990. The fishery resources of Pacific island<br />

countries. Part 2: holothurians. FAO Fisheries Technical<br />

Paper No. 272.2. Food and Agriculture Organization of<br />

the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Conand C. and Byrne M. 1993. A review of recent developments<br />

in the world <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries. Marine<br />

Fisheries Review 55(4), 1–13.<br />

Domantay J.S. 1934. Philippine commercial holothurians.<br />

The Philippine Journal of Commerce 10(9), 5–7.<br />

Gamboa R., Gomez A.L. and Nievales M.F. 2004. The<br />

status of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery and mariculture in the<br />

Philippines. In ‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

and management’, ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S.<br />

Purcell, S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO<br />

Fisheries Technical Paper No 463, 69–78. Food and<br />

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Juinio-Meñez M.A., de Peralta G., Dumalan R.J.P.,<br />

Edullantes C.M. and Catbagan T. 2012. Ocean nursery<br />

systems for scaling up juvenile sandfish (Holothuria<br />

scabra) production: ensuring opportunities for small<br />

fishers. In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’,<br />

ed. by C.A. Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills.<br />

<strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings No. 136, 57–62. Australian Centre<br />

for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These<br />

proceedings]<br />

127<br />

Lorenzen K. 2008. Understanding and managing enhancement<br />

fisheries systems. Review of Fisheries Science<br />

16(1-3), 10–23.<br />

Montilla J.R. and Blanco G.S. 1952. Minor commercial<br />

marine products of the Philippines. Commerce 49(13),<br />

54–56.<br />

Olavides R.D., Edullantes C.M. and Juinio-Meñez M.A.<br />

2010. Assessment of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> resource and fishery<br />

in the Bolinao-Anda reef system. Science Diliman 22,<br />

1–12.<br />

Olavides R.D., Rodriguez B.D. and Juinio-Meñez M.A.<br />

2011. Simultaneous mass spawning of Holothuria scabra<br />

in <strong>sea</strong> ranching sites in Bolinao and Anda municipalities,<br />

Philippines. SPC Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 31,<br />

23–24.<br />

Shelley C. 1985. Growth of Actinopyga echinites and<br />

Holothuria scabra (Holothuroidea: Echinodermata) and<br />

their fisheries potential (as beche-de-mer) in Papua New<br />

Guinea. Proceedings of the Fifth International Coral Reef<br />

Congress 5, 297–302.<br />

Surtida M.B. and Buendia R.Y. 2000. A glimpse into some<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in Panay, Philippines. SEAFDEC Asian<br />

Aquaculture 22(3), 20–21.<br />

Trinidad-Roa M.J. 1987. Beche-de-mer fishery in the<br />

Philippines. Naga – the ICLARM Quarterly, October<br />

1987, 15–17.<br />

Warren J.F. 1985. The Sulu zone: the dynamics of external<br />

trade, slavery, and ethnicity in the transformation of a<br />

Southeast Asian maritime state. New Day Publishers:<br />

Quezon City, Philippines. [Originally published by<br />

Singapore University Press, 1981].


Maldives <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> farming experience<br />

Beni G.D. Azari 1* and Grisilda Ivy Walsalam<br />

Abstract<br />

With recent technological developments and the increasingly intensive interest in <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

farming, it is an opportune time to review the existing strategies of the first successful commercial hatchery<br />

in the Republic of Maldives (the Maldives). This may help to understand the success of the hatchery and<br />

grow-out operations. This paper analyses the strategies used in the production and grow-out of the commercially<br />

important <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra, and their effects on the local communities and the<br />

environment in the Maldives. Holothuria scabra has been cultured in the Maldives since 1996. Hatchery<br />

production techniques consistently produce high-quality juveniles. When the juveniles reach 2–3 cm in size,<br />

they are transferred to nearby company-owned atoll lagoons for further growth. The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> grow-out<br />

period varies between 12 and 18 months in these waters. In addition to the company’s own <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

grow-out operation, considerable quantities of juveniles are grown, with similar grow-out periods, by contract<br />

growers and villagers from the nearby islands. When the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s are fully grown (350–425 g), the<br />

local growers sell them back to the company and are paid a management fee according to the duration of<br />

care and quantity of the product. The participation of the local community and village groups is one of the<br />

reasons for the ongoing success of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> culture in the Maldives. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> hatchery production<br />

is a profitable operation in the Maldives, even though the cost of production per juvenile is higher due to the<br />

remote location and associated higher energy and transportation costs.<br />

1 Sea Cucumber Consultancy, Hervey Bay, Queensland,<br />

Australia<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

128


Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) production<br />

and <strong>sea</strong>-ranching trial in Fiji<br />

Cathy A. Hair 1*<br />

Abstract<br />

There is presently enormous interest in the Pacific islands region in restoring depleted <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries<br />

with hatchery-produced juveniles. The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch funded<br />

projects in Fiji to transfer technology for culturing and <strong>sea</strong> ranching of sandfish (Holothuria scabra, known<br />

locally as ‘dairo’). Two hatcheries that respectively produce blacklip pearl oyster and penaeid shrimp were<br />

successfully used to culture sandfish. Government <strong>aquaculture</strong> officers and private-sector hatchery technicians<br />

were trained in sandfish production methods. Successful spawning and rearing to the small juvenile stage<br />

were carried out at both hatcheries but, due to factors such as cyclones and equipment failure, only one of the<br />

hatchery runs produced about 500 large juveniles for a release trial. An extensive <strong>sea</strong>grass bed on a shallow<br />

sand flat in front of Natuvu village, Vanua Levu, met the criteria for suitable habitat for <strong>sea</strong> ranching, and<br />

the community was committed to the re<strong>sea</strong>rch. The juveniles were released into four 100-m 2 <strong>sea</strong> pens (two<br />

pens each of small and large juveniles, 1–3 g and >3–10 g, respectively). Survival after 6 months was around<br />

28% overall (23% for small and 33% for large sandfish).<br />

The Natuvu community ceased harvest of sandfish from the wild prior to the project starting, and also<br />

declared a marine protected area (MPA) around the <strong>sea</strong>-ranching site. An unanticipated benefit of the project<br />

was an increase in other valuable <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> species in their MPA, which were harvested for a one-off<br />

community fundraising event.<br />

Introduction<br />

There is enormous interest in the Pacific islands region<br />

in the potential for restoring depleted <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

fisheries with hatchery-produced juveniles. This<br />

report describes Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>)-funded projects in<br />

Fiji to transfer technology for culturing and <strong>sea</strong> ranching<br />

of sandfish (Holothuria scabra, known locally as<br />

‘dairo’). Sandfish are a traditional food item (Figure<br />

1) and are restricted by legislation to collection for<br />

domestic consumption. However, Fisheries regulations<br />

are ambiguous—on one hand stating that sandfish are<br />

reserved for domestic markets, and on the other setting<br />

export limits for them. Hence, export-driven overfishing<br />

of sandfish has occurred in recent years.<br />

1 James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

129<br />

Sandfish is one of the few high-value <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

species that can be reliably cultured (Battaglene<br />

et al. 1999; Raison 2008). Two hatcheries that<br />

normally produce other invertebrate species in Fiji<br />

were involved in the production of larval and juvenile<br />

sandfish: a private-sector blacklip pearl oyster<br />

(Pinctada margaritifera) hatchery and the government<br />

penaeid shrimp hatchery. One of the uses for<br />

cultured sandfish juveniles is <strong>sea</strong> ranching—the<br />

release of hatchery-produced juveniles into unenclosed<br />

coastal environments where they are allowed<br />

to grow to commercial size and later harvested by<br />

an individual or group in a ‘put-and-take’ operation<br />

(Bell et al. 2008). However, although hatchery<br />

techniques for sandfish are well established, the value<br />

of the final product must be weighed up against the<br />

cost of producing the juveniles, the subsequent<br />

growth rates and the survival of sufficient numbers<br />

to commercial size. Unfortunately, there is limited


Figure 1. Sandfish prepared as a traditional Fijian<br />

meal<br />

information on the economic viability of <strong>sea</strong> ranching<br />

using cultured juveniles.<br />

Fiji had several factors in its favour as the location<br />

for a Pacific-region sandfish <strong>sea</strong>-ranching trial.<br />

Importantly, the national government, the private<br />

sector, non-government organisations (NGOs) and the<br />

University of the South Pacific (USP) agreed to cooperate<br />

in the trial re<strong>sea</strong>rch. Many coastal communities<br />

were also interested in this species. Traditional marine<br />

tenure and control in the form of qoliqolis (traditional<br />

fishing-rights areas) provides good security for cultured<br />

sandfish during trials. In addition to longstanding<br />

customary management practices, there has been<br />

a trend in recent years for the traditional owners of<br />

many qoliqolis in Fiji to develop management plans<br />

in conjunction with the Fiji Fisheries Department and<br />

NGOs. Such plans often include the setting aside of<br />

a marine protected area (MPA) as a ‘no-take’ zone<br />

within the qoliqoli. These managed areas provide the<br />

perfect opportunity for trials on the feasibility of <strong>sea</strong><br />

ranching of sandfish. The village involvement also<br />

improves the chances of development of a management<br />

framework for <strong>sea</strong> ranching.<br />

There were two major goals of the project:<br />

1. to transfer technology for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> production,<br />

release techniques and post-release monitoring<br />

to government and private-sector technicians<br />

2. to conduct trials of <strong>sea</strong> ranching of sandfish in a<br />

Fijian community qoliqoli to obtain information<br />

on juvenile sandfish growth and survival; assess<br />

social, technical and economic feasibility; and<br />

look at the implications for management options<br />

for <strong>sea</strong> ranching as a village livelihood.<br />

130<br />

Methods<br />

Transfer hatchery and juvenile grow-out<br />

technology<br />

Study sites and facilities<br />

The first phase of the technology transfer component<br />

was carried out between May 2008 and April<br />

2010 at Savusavu (Figure 2) on Vanua Levu, the<br />

second largest Fijian island (Hair et al. 2011a). The<br />

second phase was carried out between October 2010<br />

and January 2011 at Galoa on Viti Levu, the largest<br />

island of Fiji (Figure 2). Both sites had hatchery<br />

facilities but neither was set up for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong>, so systems were modified and new gear<br />

provided where necessary.<br />

In Savusavu, the pearl oyster hatchery of J. Hunter<br />

Pearls was used (Figure 3; Table 1). The hatchery had<br />

the essential resources of power, <strong>sea</strong>water supply and<br />

treatment capacity (i.e. UV-sterilisation and filtration<br />

to 1 µm) and aeration. Importantly, it also had a microalgae<br />

production facility, since several species are<br />

routinely cultured to support pearl oyster spat production.<br />

Four 1,600-L conical-based tanks were available<br />

for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> larval rearing. A reliable source of<br />

broodstock was available at Natuvu village, about<br />

2 hours’ drive (by car or boat). In order to support sandfish<br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong>, we used available tanks and hatchery<br />

resources, built temporary raceways, and negotiated the<br />

use of a local <strong>sea</strong>water pond for holding broodstock and<br />

for hapa net trials for juvenile grow-out.<br />

In Viti Levu, the Fiji Fisheries Department shrimp<br />

hatchery at Galoa (Figure 4; Table 1) was used. This<br />

hatchery also had town power with a backup generator,<br />

treated <strong>sea</strong> water and aeration. Five conical-based<br />

300-L tanks and two 1,000-L flat-based tanks were<br />

available for larval rearing. Various raceways and<br />

large tanks were also made available for holding<br />

broodstock, water storage and so on. A spawning<br />

tank was created by cutting down a 1,000-L rainwater<br />

tank and installing a central standpipe. There was no<br />

micro-algae production at the hatchery but carboys of<br />

algae were supplied by USP and stored for 2–3 days<br />

at a time in an air-conditioned room fitted with lights.<br />

There were reports of adult sandfish being available<br />

locally, but we used Natuvu broodstock again because<br />

we planned to release juveniles back at that location.<br />

Galoa also had three saltwater earthen ponds used<br />

for shrimp culture, one of which was allocated for<br />

sandfish juvenile grow-out.


Figure 2. Map of Fiji showing general location of the two study site areas, Savusavu on Vanua Levu (red box) and<br />

Galoa on Viti Levu (black box) (map courtesy of Secretariat of the Pacific Community)<br />

Figure 3. The J. Hunter Pearls blacklip pearl oyster hatchery at Savusavu, Vanua Levu<br />

131


Table 1. Summary of features and resources available at the two hatcheries used to produce sandfish in Fiji<br />

J. Hunter Pearls Fisheries Department<br />

Location Savusavu, Vanua Levu Galoa, Viti Levu<br />

Core production species Blacklip pearl oyster (Pinctada<br />

margaritifera)<br />

Water supply Direct from the <strong>sea</strong>, filtered to 1 µm,<br />

UV-treated<br />

132<br />

Penaeid shrimp (Penaeus monodon)<br />

and freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium<br />

rosenbergii)<br />

Pumped into large, open storage tank from<br />

the <strong>sea</strong>, filtered to 1 µm, UV-treated<br />

Spawning tank Modified fish transport box (1 m 3) Modified circular rainwater tank<br />

(0.7 m 3)<br />

Larval rearing tanks 4 × 1,600-L conical-based fibreglass 5 × 300-L conical-based fibreglass,<br />

2 × 1,000-L flat-based plastic<br />

Live micro-algal feed Chaetoceros muelleri, T. ISO a,<br />

Proteomonas sulcata. Nitzschia<br />

closterium: produced on demand on site<br />

Primarily T. ISO a, with small quantities<br />

of C. muelleri and N. closterium: supplied<br />

from Suva by University of the South<br />

Pacific in carboys when available<br />

Power Town power, no backup Town power, with backup generator<br />

Broodstock source Natuvu, Vanua Levu (2 hours transport by<br />

boat and car)<br />

Natuvu, Vanua Levu (24 hours transport<br />

by car and ferry)<br />

Broodstock maintenance Pond/<strong>sea</strong> Large concrete tank (~6,000 L)<br />

Juvenile rearing<br />

a T.ISO = Tahitian Isochrysis sp.<br />

2 × 2 m improvised raceways (built of<br />

coconut logs and tarpaulins)<br />

Bag nets in earthen pond<br />

Figure 4. Fiji Fisheries Department penaeid shrimp hatchery at Galoa, Viti Levu, showing earthen pond in the<br />

foreground


Broodstock<br />

All broodstock for hatchery production in<br />

both Savusavu and Galoa were collected from the<br />

Savusavu area, predominantly around Natuvu. This<br />

was important to ensure that juveniles released into<br />

the Natuvu qoliqoli were the same genetic stock as<br />

the existing wild stocks (Purcell 2004). Broodstock<br />

were usually collected on a rising tide, the time<br />

when local fishers claimed they were less likely to be<br />

buried. Depending on the time of collection, broodstock<br />

were either left in a holding pen until ready<br />

for packing and transport, or packed directly on the<br />

boat. They were always transported with one large or<br />

two smaller individuals in a plastic bag containing<br />

one-third <strong>sea</strong> water and two-thirds oxygen.<br />

In the initial runs at the J. Hunter Pearls hatchery,<br />

broodstock were held in a pond in Savusavu between<br />

runs. However, due to poor condition of broodstock<br />

and losses of animals, we moved to a system where<br />

sandfish were collected for spawning and returned to<br />

the <strong>sea</strong>. At Galoa, a large, indoor cement tank with<br />

a 10-cm layer of sand in the bottom was used. The<br />

sand was replaced fortnightly, and water exchange<br />

and feeding occurred on alternate days.<br />

Larval and juvenile production<br />

Spawning of sandfish generally followed methods<br />

developed by the WorldFish Center (WorldFish)<br />

(Agudo 2006). Spawning induction employed a combination<br />

of stresses including (in order): (1) drying<br />

out a group of 30–40 broodstock for half an hour;<br />

(2) immersing them in a warm bath for 1 hour (~5 °C<br />

above ambient water temperature); (3) immersing<br />

them in a bath of Spirulina for 1 hour; and (4) placing<br />

them in clean water at ambient temperature until<br />

spawning occurred. Spawning males were removed<br />

from the spawning tank after they had each released<br />

sperm for some minutes. Spawning females were left<br />

until it was obvious that no more egg releases would<br />

occur. After all broodstock were removed, eggs were<br />

left in the tank for at least half an hour and were<br />

monitored to observe cell division. To minimise the<br />

incidence of polyspermy, the spawning tank was put<br />

on flow-through after several males had spawned,<br />

then eggs were siphoned into an 80-µm egg-washing<br />

basket and rinsed further. Larval rearing tanks were<br />

stocked at 0.3 viable eggs/mL.<br />

At Savusavu, from day 2 after fertilisation, early<br />

auricularia larvae were fed daily with live microalgae<br />

(primarily Chaetoceros muelleri and T. ISO (Tahitian<br />

Isochrysis sp.), with small amounts of Proteomonas<br />

133<br />

sulcata). Feeding rates ranged from 20,000 cells/<br />

mL at day 2 up to 40,000 cells/mL by around day<br />

10 (Agudo 2006). Small amounts of Nitzschia<br />

closterium, a benthic diatom used for conditioning<br />

settlement plates and feeding early juveniles (Agudo<br />

2006), were also produced, but this species was difficult<br />

to mass culture and not available routinely.<br />

At Galoa, a varied live micro-algae diet was<br />

difficult to obtain: USP provided carboys of T. ISO<br />

and occasionally small quantities of C. muelleri<br />

and N. closterium. To make up for the shortfall in<br />

live feed, the larvae were fed Reed Mariculture’s<br />

Instant Algae® (Shellfish Diet 1800®) (Figure 5) at<br />

the same ration as for live micro-algae. This commercially<br />

available diet is composed of a mixture of<br />

Isochrysis (30%), Tetraselmis (20%), Pavlova (20%)<br />

and Thalassiosira weissflogii (30%), and was used<br />

successfully as the primary diet for sandfish larvae<br />

for the first time in Fiji (Hair et al. 2011b).<br />

At both hatcheries, one-third of the tank was<br />

exchanged with treated <strong>sea</strong> water daily from day<br />

2 onwards. Larvae were monitored daily through<br />

all larval stages (i.e. length measurement, density<br />

estimates, observations on condition, activity level<br />

and malformation). Once doliolaria larvae were<br />

observed, signalling that settlement was imminent,<br />

conditioned plates were placed in the tanks. Because<br />

we were unable to reliably and consistently condition<br />

plates with live diatoms, we employed the technique<br />

of Duy (2010) and used perspex plates painted with<br />

a Spirulina paste (Figure 6). These plates remained<br />

in the larval tanks until transfer of juveniles to raceways<br />

4–6 weeks after spawning. Live C. muelleri and<br />

Figure 5. Instant Algae—a commercially available<br />

diet used to raise sandfish larvae


Figure 6. Plates coated with Spirulina being placed<br />

in a larval rearing tank at Galoa<br />

T. ISO, with small amounts of Algamac 2000 (Biomarine<br />

Inc.) and Spirulina were added to the tanks<br />

to feed pentactula and early juveniles (Agudo 2006;<br />

Duy 2010). At Galoa, where the live algae supply was<br />

unreliable, instant algae was also used to supplement<br />

the diet of small juveniles (Hair et al. 2011b).<br />

Juveniles at both hatcheries were transferred from<br />

the larval rearing tanks 4–5 weeks after spawning. At<br />

Savusavu, strong tidal flushing caused low productivity<br />

in the only available pond, and juvenile grow-out<br />

was unsuccessful in this environment. Therefore, the<br />

juveniles were transferred to a bare 4-m 2 raceway<br />

inoculated with N. closterium at the J. Hunter Pearls<br />

hatchery. They were moved later to a second 4-m 2<br />

raceway with sand, and fed with shrimp feed. At<br />

Galoa, early juveniles were transferred from larval<br />

rearing tanks directly into 2 × 2 × 1 m bag nets in a<br />

pond (1-mm mesh), as recommended by Duy (2010).<br />

134<br />

Trial <strong>sea</strong> ranching<br />

Study site<br />

The trial <strong>sea</strong> ranching was carried out in the<br />

qoliqoli of Natuvu village (Wailevu district), near<br />

Savusavu (Figure 1). A qoliqoli is a traditionally<br />

managed fishing area under communal ownership<br />

that is fished for subsistence by the owners, and can<br />

also be fished commercially by both owners and nonowners<br />

(with the owners’ permission). Natuvu village<br />

was selected after assessing several potential sites. It<br />

fulfilled a number of key criteria, namely:<br />

• It had good physical microhabitat based on criteria<br />

developed by Purcell (2004) (Figures 7, 9a). There<br />

was an extensive <strong>sea</strong>grass meadow (approx. 750 m<br />

long parallel to shore by 500 m wide), characterised<br />

by a diverse invertebrate fauna (several species<br />

of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, <strong>sea</strong> stars, urchins, sponges,<br />

crabs, ascidians, worms etc.) as well as numerous<br />

sandfish of small to medium size. The substratum<br />

was sandy–muddy sediment of moderate softness<br />

(i.e. it was possible to easily push fingers into the<br />

sediment but not the whole hand). At low tide the<br />

water depth was 0.2–2.5 m. It had 40–70% <strong>sea</strong>grass<br />

cover (primarily Syringodium isoetifolium,<br />

with a small amount of Halodule uninervis), and<br />

we graded the area as good to very good.<br />

• There was minimal freshwater discharge into the<br />

area. There was some flood risk, but only likely<br />

during extreme events (e.g. heavy rain associated<br />

with cyclones). This can be considered a risk<br />

anywhere in the tropics.<br />

• There was strong community interest in the<br />

re<strong>sea</strong>rch—in fact, sandfish collection was banned<br />

in the months leading up to the re<strong>sea</strong>rch team’s<br />

visit to Natuvu in order to ‘attract’ re<strong>sea</strong>rch.<br />

• The village is located on the <strong>sea</strong>shore directly in<br />

front of and in direct line of sight of the <strong>sea</strong>grass<br />

bed. This meant that good security could be provided<br />

for the released juveniles as they grew to<br />

commercial size. The site also allowed convenient<br />

access to the juveniles for monitoring, cage maintenance<br />

and so on.<br />

• There were stocks of adult-sized sandfish in the<br />

surrounding qoliqoli that were available to be<br />

used as broodstock. This meant that any juveniles<br />

produced would be released into the same area as<br />

their parents, which ensured an environmentally<br />

responsible approach resulting in least genetic<br />

modification of the wild stocks at the release site<br />

(Purcell 2004; SPC 2009).


Figure 7. Natuvu sandfish release habitat with resident wild sandfish<br />

• The village was located about 2 hours by car or by<br />

car and boat from the J. Hunter Pearls hatchery.<br />

This proximity made it easy to transport animals<br />

from Natuvu to the hatchery (i.e. broodstock) or<br />

from the hatchery to Natuvu (i.e. broodstock return<br />

or juveniles for release).<br />

Once the preferred site was selected, negotiations<br />

were conducted with the qoliqoli owners on how<br />

the re<strong>sea</strong>rch project would proceed. We also made<br />

an agreement on who would own any sandfish that<br />

reached commercial size during the project.<br />

Pen construction, release and monitoring<br />

Construction of the pens was a community undertaking<br />

(Figure 8) and was completed over 2 days prior<br />

to the release in May 2009. Four circular 100-m 2 pens<br />

were deployed in the <strong>sea</strong>grass bed. The pens were<br />

made of 3-mm black plastic oyster mesh. Each stood<br />

30 cm above and 10–15 cm below the substratum, to<br />

reduce the chance of juveniles burying and escaping<br />

under the sides. The pen sides were reinforced with<br />

metal posts (Figure 8).<br />

Release of juveniles into the <strong>sea</strong>grass bed at<br />

Natuvu was carried out according to the methods<br />

recommended by WorldFish and based on studies<br />

carried out in New Caledonia (Purcell and Eeckhaut<br />

2005; Purcell et al. 2006a; Purcell and Simutoga<br />

2008; Purcell and Blockmans 2009). Juvenile sandfish<br />

were marked by immersing them in a tetracycline<br />

solution (100 mg/L) for 24 hours, 1 week prior to<br />

release. They were then returned to the sand raceway<br />

135<br />

to recover. At the time of marking, however, the juveniles<br />

were stunted, and we suspected that marking<br />

would not be successful because spicules must be<br />

in the growing phase in order to take up the fluorochrome<br />

stain (Purcell et al. 2006b). Prior to packing<br />

and transport, individual animals were examined for<br />

any lesions or obvious health problems (Purcell and<br />

Eeckhaut 2005).<br />

At the hatchery the juveniles were divided into<br />

small (1–3 g) and large (>3–10 g) size classes,<br />

counted and packed into plastic bags with water<br />

and oxygen. Two size classes were used because<br />

half of the available juveniles had not reached the<br />

optimal release size of >3 g (Purcell and Simutoga<br />

2008). Furthermore, we were releasing into quite<br />

different habitat to that used by WorldFish re<strong>sea</strong>rchers,<br />

who determined a 3-g minimum—the Natuvu<br />

Syringodium <strong>sea</strong>grass bed presented an opportunity<br />

to test the recommendation of ideal release size.<br />

At the release site, two 1 × 1 m hapa nets (~1-mm<br />

mesh) were staked out in the <strong>sea</strong>grass beds near the<br />

pens. Small juveniles were placed in one hapa and<br />

large juveniles in the other, and left overnight to<br />

acclimatise. The next day the project staff, wardens<br />

and other community members retrieved the juveniles<br />

and individually ‘planted’ the sandfish inside<br />

the pens by forming a small trench with a finger and<br />

placing the animal inside. Individuals in a subsample<br />

of released juveniles were marked with numbered<br />

pegs and checked at regular intervals in the 24 hours<br />

following release in order to observe behaviour.


Monitoring by project staff and community<br />

wardens was carried out 3 months after the release<br />

(August 2009) and then at approximately 2-monthly<br />

intervals until the conclusion of the study (April<br />

2010) (Figure 9). On each occasion, the number of<br />

animals in each pen was counted, and their length<br />

and width measured. The length–width data were<br />

used to calculate weight using a formula developed<br />

by Purcell and Simutoga (2008). Prior to release and<br />

at the first two monitoring times, skin samples of<br />

released sandfish were taken and preserved to check<br />

if they were marked. The skin samples were checked<br />

using a fluorescent microscope.<br />

Results<br />

Transfer hatchery and juvenile grow-out<br />

technology<br />

Broodstock<br />

Figure 8. Project staff (Fiji Fisheries, University of the South Pacific, James Cook<br />

University) and community helpers constructing one of four <strong>sea</strong> pens<br />

in Natuvu qoliqoli <strong>sea</strong>grass bed in May 2009<br />

Wild broodstock were mostly collected from<br />

Natuvu, although a small number was collected from<br />

other locations near Savusavu (Table 2). Minimum<br />

broodstock size was 250 g.<br />

Between spawning runs at the J. Hunter Pearls<br />

hatchery, sandfish broodstock were held in a pond<br />

near Savusavu, but average size decreased while<br />

they were held there. This may have been due to<br />

sub optimal pond conditions or poaching of large<br />

136<br />

animals. Consequently, broodstock were not kept in<br />

the pond for the last 6 months of the project; instead,<br />

wild broodstock were collected for spawning and<br />

then returned to the <strong>sea</strong> afterwards.<br />

Broodstock were kept in tanks at Galoa hatchery<br />

but became stressed, di<strong>sea</strong>sed and then died after<br />

problems with the <strong>sea</strong>water pump, which meant that<br />

water exchange did not occur for more than a week.<br />

Hatchery production to early juvenile stage<br />

Between November 2008 and March 2010, five<br />

hatchery runs were undertaken at Savusavu. Each run<br />

involved multiple spawning attempts with at least 30<br />

animals. Gamete release from males and females, egg<br />

fertilisation and larval production were achieved on<br />

every run. However, only two of the runs resulted<br />

in settlement, and only one run produced substantial<br />

numbers of juveniles: 1,500 small juveniles (from<br />

640,000 stocked eggs) were transferred to raceways<br />

for further grow-out in February 2009. Of these, 500<br />

progressed to 1–10-g juveniles, to be used for the<br />

<strong>sea</strong>-ranching trial at Natuvu.<br />

Multiple spawning attempts using 30–40 broodstock<br />

individuals were carried out during a single<br />

hatchery run at Galoa in November 2010. Spawning<br />

occurred, fertilised eggs were produced and larvae<br />

were reared successfully to settlement. After 7 weeks,<br />

5,300 small juveniles (from 600,000 stocked eggs)<br />

were transferred to three bag nets in the pond for


Figure 9. Sandfish in a pen (left), and project staff and community warden measuring sandfish (right), Natuvu<br />

further grow-out. They reached a mean individual<br />

weight of ~0.6 g and ~ 2 cm length at 10 weeks of<br />

age. However, breakdown of water pumps, freshwater<br />

influx into the pond and insufficient maintenance of<br />

the bag nets resulted in total mortality of the juveniles<br />

at 11 weeks (4 weeks after transfer to the pond).<br />

Trial <strong>sea</strong> ranching<br />

Survival and growth of <strong>sea</strong>-ranched juveniles<br />

The release was carried out on 18 May 2009: 105<br />

large juvenile sandfish were placed into each of two<br />

pens (A, C), and 143 small sandfish were placed<br />

into each of two pens (B, D). Observations made<br />

during 2–24 hours post-release suggest that most<br />

juveniles buried relatively quickly and did not show<br />

stress behaviour by ‘balling’ up. Many juveniles<br />

commenced feeding within hours, as evidenced by<br />

faeces trails.<br />

Survival after 6 months was around 28% overall<br />

(23% for small and 33% for large sandfish). The<br />

highest overall survival—41%—was recorded from<br />

a pen of large sandfish (Figure 10), and the lowest<br />

survival was also from a pen of large sandfish at 23%.<br />

Losses (due to mortality or escape) were greatest in<br />

the first 3 months, and thereafter remained relatively<br />

steady (Figure 10). Due to bad weather causing damage<br />

to the pens in November 2009, survival is only<br />

reported up to this time.<br />

137<br />

Growth of hatchery-produced sandfish in pens<br />

was measured every 1–2 months throughout the<br />

trial (Figure 11). Measurements from the trial are<br />

considered reliable up until 8 months after release,<br />

immediately prior to cyclone Tomas in March 2010.<br />

At this time, average sandfish size was 165 ± 5 g<br />

and 167 ± 6 g for small and large sandfish, respectively.<br />

Additional measurements were taken after<br />

the cyclone (Figure 11), but may also have included<br />

some wild sandfish because of the damage to pens.<br />

Processed skin samples did not show any fluorescent<br />

spicules, as we had suspected during the marking process.<br />

Therefore, in our case, fluorochrome marking<br />

was not useful in distinguishing hatchery-produced<br />

juveniles from wild individuals. A data logger indicated<br />

that <strong>sea</strong> temperatures were lower than normal<br />

in October–November 2010 and early January 2011,<br />

which may have contributed to the slower growth<br />

observed during those periods. However, cyclones<br />

also occurred around those times.<br />

Community engagement and resource<br />

management<br />

Prior to the start of the study (mid 2008), the Natuvu<br />

chief banned the harvest of sandfish throughout the<br />

entire qoliqoli. During 2009, an MPA of almost half<br />

the qoliqoli area was declared, and this initiative was<br />

supported and ratified by Fiji Fisheries (Figure 12).<br />

The Natuvu community was closely involved with the


Table 2. Broodstock collection time, hatchery where they were used, collection location, number collected and<br />

mean (± SE) weight (g)<br />

Time Location Hatchery Number Mean weight ± SE (g)<br />

November 2008 Natuvu (2 collections)<br />

Nawi Island (Savusavu)<br />

Yaroi (Savusavu)<br />

Savusavu 70 / 30<br />

5<br />

10<br />

138<br />

301 ± 8 / 321 ± 8<br />

857 ± 46<br />

192 ± 8<br />

December 2009 Natuvu Savusavu 33 342 ± 15<br />

March 2010 Natuvu Savusavu 40 453 ± 14<br />

November 2010 Natuvu Galoa 55 395 ± 17<br />

Number sandfish observed<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

May 09 Aug 09 Oct 09 Nov 09<br />

Figure 10. Survival of released sandfish in the four pens after 6 months. Solid lines represent pens<br />

stocked with large juveniles (>3–10 g), and broken lines represent pens stocked with<br />

small juveniles (1–3 g).<br />

Mean (± SE) sandfish weight (g)<br />

200<br />

160<br />

120<br />

80<br />

40<br />

0<br />

Large (A/C)<br />

Small (B/D)<br />

19/05/2009<br />

2/06/2009<br />

16/06/2009<br />

30/06/2009<br />

14/07/2009<br />

28/07/2009<br />

11/08/2009<br />

25/08/2009<br />

8/09/2009<br />

22/09/2009<br />

6/10/2009<br />

20/10/2009<br />

3/11/2009<br />

17/11/2009<br />

1/12/2009<br />

15/12/2009<br />

29/12/2009<br />

12/01/2010<br />

26/01/2010<br />

9/02/2010<br />

23/02/2010<br />

9/03/2010<br />

23/03/2010<br />

6/04/2010<br />

Figure 11. Growth data over 11 months for hatchery-produced sandfish at Natuvu. Solid lines<br />

represent large juveniles (both pens combined) and broken lines represent pens of small<br />

juveniles (both pens combined). March and April 2010 are subsamples of the sandfish<br />

located in pens after cyclone Tomas, and data are to be treated with caution. Cyclones are<br />

denoted by C, and observed spawning in pens is denoted by SP.<br />

SP<br />

C<br />

SP<br />

C


Figure 12. Marine protected area (broken line) within the Natuvu village<br />

qoliqoli (solid line). Sea pens are red circles inside the qoliqoli.<br />

re<strong>sea</strong>rch at all stages of the study. They assisted with<br />

all project work, such as building pens and releasing<br />

the juveniles. Four ‘wardens’ were assigned to ensure<br />

that the hatchery-produced juveniles were protected<br />

and not disturbed. They also performed routine maintenance<br />

on the pens, assisted with monitoring and<br />

carried out other project-related duties.<br />

Observations by the wardens and other project staff<br />

suggested that wild sandfish populations improved<br />

(e.g. increased in size and abundance) following the<br />

introduction of the protective measures This could<br />

benefit the <strong>sea</strong>grass habitat, as <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s are<br />

known to have a beneficial ecological effect on the<br />

substratum through their feeding and burying habits.<br />

In addition, spawning of hatchery-produced sandfish<br />

in pens was observed in November 2009 and March<br />

2010, suggesting that the <strong>sea</strong>-ranched sandfish may<br />

contribute to future stock biomass.<br />

Natuvu locals also stated that other commercial <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> species, such as curryfish (Stichopus hermanni,<br />

a medium-value species), increased in number<br />

and size within the MPA (Figure 13a). In fact,<br />

large-size curryfish were observed to be so abundant<br />

that the community temporarily opened the MPA<br />

to harvest this species in late 2010. The 300 kg of<br />

beche-de-mer they processed (Figure 13b) earned the<br />

community approximately FJ$24,000 (A$15,000)—<br />

enough to fund a community hall (disaster evacuation<br />

centre), contribute to church fundraising, support the<br />

local school and meet other community needs. The<br />

139<br />

MPA was closed to fishing again after the curryfish<br />

harvest. Despite the lack of a large-scale sandfish<br />

release in their qoliqoli, the community continues to<br />

protect sandfish throughout the entire qoliqoli and<br />

is keen to see ongoing re<strong>sea</strong>rch in this area. They<br />

intend to manage their MPA in collaboration with Fiji<br />

Fisheries in ways to ensure continued benefits from<br />

sandfish and other commercial holothurians.<br />

Discussion<br />

A number of positive outcomes resulted from the<br />

<strong>ACIAR</strong> projects. Private-sector and government<br />

staff were trained in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> production techniques,<br />

leaving a core of skilled and experienced<br />

technicians in Fiji. Furthermore, national government<br />

fisheries officers, students and community members<br />

were trained in release and monitoring methods for<br />

hatchery-reared juvenile sandfish. During production<br />

activities, the relative ease of producing <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

in non-<strong>sea</strong>-<strong>cucumber</strong> hatcheries was demonstrated.<br />

This suggests that a multispecies hatchery approach<br />

to <strong>aquaculture</strong> production may be a successful and<br />

sensible option for small Pacific island nations where<br />

there are often shortfalls in resources and trained<br />

staff. Some variations were made to accommodate the<br />

local conditions and the available hatchery facilities:<br />

however, thousands of juveniles were produced with<br />

comparatively little modification. The lack of pond<br />

or raceway facilities was a constraint in Savusavu,


while the availability of earthen ponds at Galoa was<br />

an advantage—production at the latter site may have<br />

been increased substantially if time and resources had<br />

permitted. Equipment breakdown and insufficient staff<br />

were major constraints at Galoa. The failure to produce<br />

juveniles in subsequent production runs was due to a<br />

combination of factors, including unfavourable environmental<br />

conditions, the effects of two cyclones and<br />

human error. It is noteworthy that the December 2009<br />

hatchery run was carried out successfully by the Fijian<br />

hatchery counterparts with no outside assistance, but<br />

was cut short by a cyclone. Disruptions from cyclones<br />

were as minor as a few days of bad water quality and<br />

power loss during larval production, and as severe as<br />

months of hatchery down time to repair facilities and<br />

destroyed <strong>sea</strong> pens, and loss of released animals.<br />

Production methods were adapted during the projects.<br />

Changes were based on new techniques from<br />

Vietnam and the Philippines (e.g. Duy 2010; Gamboa<br />

et al. 2012) as well as variations customised for Fiji.<br />

For example, perspex settlement plates were painted<br />

with a Spirulina paste instead of conditioning with<br />

Nitzschia sp. (Duy 2010). Another major change was<br />

applied in the feeding techniques used at Galoa in<br />

November 2010. The successful rearing of larval and<br />

early juvenile sandfish by feeding predominantly with<br />

instant algae was a major breakthrough in terms of simplifying<br />

techniques for small hatcheries in the Pacific<br />

region (and potentially other developing countries)<br />

(Hair et al. 2011b). More re<strong>sea</strong>rch is needed, but the<br />

use of an off-the-shelf algal diet may prove a huge boost<br />

for small hatcheries with limited resources and staff.<br />

Figure 13. (left) Commercial-size curryfish (Stichopus hermanni) and<br />

(right) Natuvu women with beche-de-mer<br />

140<br />

In terms of the success of the trial <strong>sea</strong> ranching, only<br />

one small trial was carried out, due to the difficulty<br />

in getting sufficient numbers of juveniles through to<br />

release size. However, of those that were released, the<br />

survival and growth results were encouraging. Both<br />

large and small sandfish from the release at Natuvu<br />

grew and survived well. The results compared favourably<br />

with similar studies in the Pacific islands region<br />

(Purcell and Simutoga 2008). As reported from the<br />

Philippines (Olavides et al. 2011), sandfish in pens<br />

were observed to spawn on two occasions (at 6 and<br />

11 months post-release). There was a high level of<br />

community cooperation and commitment in the project,<br />

with community leaders taking the opportunity to<br />

apply other management measures around the project<br />

that led to environmental and financial benefits.<br />

Technical challenges for Fiji (and many similar<br />

small nations) continue to include producing live<br />

feed for larval production, collection and maintenance<br />

of broodstock, producing sufficient numbers<br />

of large-sized juveniles, and risk management of<br />

extreme weather events (in particular, cyclones).<br />

Management, environmental and socioeconomic<br />

challenges will undoubtedly become more important<br />

as the technical issues are overcome. A number<br />

of sandfish <strong>sea</strong>-ranching and farming programs in<br />

more advanced stages may offer solutions or outline<br />

promising approaches to these challenges (e.g.<br />

Robinson and Pascal 2009, 2012; Fleming 2012;<br />

Juinio-Meñez et al. 2012). However, the hatchery<br />

and release activities described here have increased<br />

awareness of and interest in the technology. Fiji in


now a position to pursue further development of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>sea</strong> ranching if desired.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

The author would like to acknowledge the support<br />

and assistance from our stakeholders and partners<br />

throughout this study; in particular, J. Hunter Pearls<br />

staff, officers of the Fiji Fisheries Department<br />

(Savusavu, Labasa, Suva and Galoa), the Natuvu<br />

community, Fiji Locally Managed Marine Area<br />

network, Caukadrove Yabula Management Support<br />

Team and University of the South Pacific.<br />

References<br />

Agudo N.S. 2006. Sandfish hatchery techniques. Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch,<br />

Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish<br />

Center, Noumea.<br />

Battaglene S.C., Seymour J.E. and Ramofafia C. 1999.<br />

Survival and growth of cultured <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s,<br />

Holothuria scabra. Aquaculture 178, 293–322.<br />

Bell J.D., Leber K.M., Blankenship H.L., Loneragan N.R.<br />

and Masuda R. 2008. A new era for restocking, stock<br />

enhancement and <strong>sea</strong> ranching of coastal fisheries<br />

resources. Reviews in Fisheries Science 16, 1–9.<br />

Duy N.D.Q. 2010. Seed production of sandfish (Holothuria<br />

scabra) in Vietnam. SEAFDEC Aquaculture Extension<br />

Manual No. 48.<br />

Fleming A. 2012. Sea ranching of sandfish in an<br />

Indigenous community within a well-regulated fishery<br />

(Northern Territory, Australia). In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong><br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A. Hair, T.D.<br />

Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings No. 136,<br />

156–160. Australian Centre for International Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]<br />

Gamboa R.U., Aurelio R.A., Ganad D.A., Concepcion L.B.<br />

and Abreo N.A.S. 2012. Small-scale hatcheries and<br />

simple technologies for sandfish (Holothuria scabra)<br />

production. In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A. Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J.<br />

Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings No. 136, 63–74. Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra.<br />

[These proceedings]<br />

Hair C., Kaure T., Southgate P. and Pickering T. 2011b.<br />

Potential breakthrough in hatchery culture of sandfish<br />

(Holothuria scabra) by using algal concentrate as food.<br />

SPC Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 31, 60–61.<br />

Hair C., Pickering T., Meo S., Vereivalu T., Hunter J., and<br />

Cavakiqali L. 2011a. Sandfish culture in Fiji Islands. SPC<br />

Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 31, 3–11.<br />

Juinio-Meñez M.A., Paña M.A., de Peralta G., Olavides R.,<br />

Catbagan T., Edullantes C.M. et al. 2012. Establishment<br />

141<br />

and management of communal sandfish (Holothuria<br />

scabra) <strong>sea</strong> ranching in the Philippines. In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong><br />

<strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A.<br />

Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings<br />

No. 136, 121–127. Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings].<br />

Olavides R.D., Rodriguez B.D. and Juinio-Meñez M.A.<br />

2011. Simultaneous mass spawning of Holothuria scabra<br />

in <strong>sea</strong> ranching sites in Bolinao and Anda municipalities,<br />

Philippines. SPC Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 31,<br />

23–24.<br />

Purcell S. W. 2004. Criteria for release strategies and evaluating<br />

the restocking of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. In ‘Advances in<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’ ed. by A.<br />

Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel<br />

and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 463,<br />

181–191. Food and Agriculture Organization of the<br />

United Nations: Rome.<br />

Purcell S.W. and Blockmans B.F. 2009. Effective fluorochrome<br />

marking of juvenile <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s for <strong>sea</strong><br />

ranching and restocking. Aquaculture 296, 263–270.<br />

Purcell S.W., Blockmans B.F. and Agudo N.N.S. 2006a.<br />

Transportation methods for restocking of juvenile<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, Holothuria scabra. Aquaculture 251,<br />

238–244.<br />

Purcell S.W., Blockmans B.F. and Nash W.J. 2006b.<br />

Efficacy of chemical markers and physical tags for<br />

large-scale release of an exploited holothurian. Journal<br />

of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 334,<br />

283–293.<br />

Purcell S. and Eeckhaut I. 2005. An external check for<br />

di<strong>sea</strong>se and health of hatchery-produced <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s.<br />

SPC Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 22, 34–38.<br />

Purcell S.W. and Simutoga M. 2008. Spatio-temporal and<br />

size-dependent variation in the success of releasing<br />

cultured <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in the wild. Reviews in Fisheries<br />

Science 16, 204–214.<br />

Raison C.M. 2008. Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

and prospects for commercial culture of Holothuria<br />

scabra. CAB Review: Perspectives in Agriculture,<br />

Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 3,<br />

1–15.<br />

Robinson G. and Pascal B. 2009. From hatchery to community—Madagascar’s<br />

first village-based holothurian<br />

mariculture programme. SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin 29, 38–43.<br />

Robinson G. and Pascal B. 2012. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> farming<br />

experiences in south-western Madagascar. In ‘Asia–<br />

Pacific <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A.<br />

Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings<br />

No. 136, 142–155. Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]<br />

SPC (Secretariat of the Pacific Community) 2009. Use<br />

of hatcheries to increase production of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s.<br />

Background Paper 4, Sixth SPC Heads of Fisheries<br />

Meeting, February 2009. SPC: Noumea.


Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> farming experiences in<br />

south-western Madagascar<br />

Georgina Robinson 1* and Benjamin Pascal 2<br />

Abstract<br />

In south-western Madagascar, anthropogenic and environmental factors are adversely affecting<br />

marine resources, and alternatives to fishing for the local Vezo community are limited. In an effort to<br />

overcome this problem, a non-government organisation (NGO), Blue Ventures, has been pioneering farming<br />

of sandfish (Holothuria scabra) in pens as a livelihood strategy for communities. Successful preliminary trials<br />

resulted in Blue Ventures and the NGO Trans’Mad-Développement obtaining funding to expand the project<br />

to include 40 families in seven villages. The pens, measuring between 625 and 900 m 2, were constructed in<br />

nearshore <strong>sea</strong>grass beds and stocked with batches of 300–450 hatchery-reared juveniles (15 g) at 3–4-month<br />

intervals. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s reaching a minimum size of 300 g between 4 and 12 months later were harvested<br />

and sold to the commercial partner, Madagascar Holothurie S.A., for processing and export. During the<br />

period of the study, a total of 51,500 juveniles were released at seven sites during 21 release events spread<br />

over 45 months. Although preliminary trials yielded high survival rates (80%), on scaling up the project a<br />

number of factors led to increased mortality rates; these included suboptimal transportation and stocking<br />

conditions, and predation. To meet these problems, methodologies were improved and a number of strategies<br />

were adopted to improve survival of juveniles following release. Socioeconomic issues remained a challenge<br />

throughout the project, as theft of market-size <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s was prevalent.<br />

Introduction<br />

In south-western Madagascar, anthropogenic and<br />

environmental factors, including climate change,<br />

population growth and overfishing, are adversely<br />

affecting marine resources. Coupled with the aridity<br />

of the region, alternatives to fishing for the Vezo<br />

community who inhabit the region are limited. As<br />

a means to address these issues, a <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

mariculture project was launched in Madagascar<br />

in 1999 (Jangoux et al. 2001). In March 2008 the<br />

project evolved from its experimental roots into the<br />

commercial domain with the creation of Madagascar<br />

Holothurie Société Anonyme (MH.SA), the first private<br />

company based on <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

1 Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, Rhodes<br />

University, Grahamstown, South Africa<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

2 Trans’Mad-Développement, Toliara, Madagascar<br />

142<br />

in Madagascar (Eeckhaut et al. 2008; Robinson and<br />

Pascal 2009).<br />

Since January 2007, the local non-government<br />

organisation (NGO) Blue Ventures has been pioneering<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> farming as a livelihood strategy<br />

for communities. After preliminary trials demonstrated<br />

the feasibility of rearing juvenile sandfish<br />

(Holothuria scabra) in <strong>sea</strong> pens, funding was obtained<br />

from the Regional Coastal Management Programme<br />

of the Indian Ocean Countries (ReCoMaP) for Blue<br />

Ventures and the NGO Trans’Mad-Développement<br />

(TMD) to develop community-based holothurian<br />

mariculture in partnership with commercial operator<br />

MH.SA. Between September 2008 and September<br />

2010, the project was scaled up to include 40 families<br />

in seven villages in south-western Madagascar.<br />

A handbook on <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> farming has been<br />

developed that contains detailed methodologies<br />

used in the project ().


This paper describes community efforts to<br />

farm hatchery-reared juvenile sandfish in <strong>sea</strong><br />

pens. It examines a series of 21 releases at seven<br />

sites between January 2007 and September 2010.<br />

Importantly, it discusses a range of technical, biological<br />

and ecological factors that affected the survival<br />

and growth of the farmed sandfish, and outlines adaptations<br />

to farming practices that were implemented in<br />

order to address these factors.<br />

Study sites<br />

Methods<br />

The two NGOs operated in geographically distinct<br />

areas to ensure maximum spatial coverage for the<br />

project (Figure 1). Extensive site surveys were conducted<br />

to identify villages with suitable habitat for<br />

sandfish, comprising shallow, sheltered areas with<br />

high levels of nutrients, such as muddy substrata<br />

and <strong>sea</strong>grass beds (Hamel et al. 2001; Agudo 2006).<br />

Additional selection criteria included adequate<br />

sediment depth (~50 cm) for pen construction and<br />

proximity to the village to facilitate maintenance<br />

and surveillance of the pens. Seven villages in total<br />

were selected: Blue Ventures continued to work in<br />

Andavadoaka, where preliminary trials were conducted<br />

and expanded to the villages of Nosy Be,<br />

Ambolimoke and Tampolove, situated within the<br />

Velondriake Locally Managed Marine Area. TMD<br />

worked in the villages of Fiherenamasay, Andrevo-<br />

Bas and Sarodrano, close to the regional capital of<br />

Toliara (Robinson and Pascal 2009).<br />

Farming methods<br />

Initially, pens were constructed from locally available<br />

materials, using wooden stakes and 10–15 mm<br />

nylon fishing net. The base of the pens was buried<br />

25 cm into the sediment to prevent escape of the<br />

sandfish. Blue Ventures experimented with a variety<br />

of pen models and sizes ranging from 60 to<br />

625 m2. After preliminary trials were completed,<br />

pens were designed in order to maximise growth<br />

rates, by ensuring that the total biomass in the pens<br />

did not exceed the natural carrying capacity of<br />

habitats for Holothuria scabra, believed to be in the<br />

range 225–250 g/m2 (Battaglene 1999; Purcell and<br />

Simutoga 2008). The pens measured 25 × 25 m, with<br />

one-quarter of the pen (12.5 × 12.5 m) sectioned off<br />

to form a 156.25-m2 juvenile pen and the remaining<br />

468.75-m2 as a grow-out pen. The production model<br />

143<br />

was designed to stock batches of 300 juveniles<br />

every 3–4 months, with subsequent transfer to the<br />

grow-out section 5 months after input. However,<br />

problems were experienced after constructing the<br />

grow-out section, as the mesh size used (15-mm<br />

nylon fishing net) led to fish (Lutjanidae, Gerreidae<br />

and Plotosidae) becoming trapped in the nets. This,<br />

in turn, attracted crabs, mainly Thalamita crenata,<br />

which ripped holes in the net, through which <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s could escape (Robinson 2011). The<br />

pens were eventually reconstructed with 6 × 8 mm<br />

HDPE plastic mesh; however, the delay in importing<br />

materials meant that juveniles delivered between<br />

19 August 2009 and 12 May 2010 were overstocked<br />

in the 156-m 2 juvenile section, and it was not possible<br />

to fully test the production model.<br />

TMD constructed large, open 30 × 30 m pens<br />

from the outset, which were stocked with batches<br />

of 450 juveniles every 3–4 months depending on<br />

availability from MH.SA. In an effort to reduce<br />

losses from predation in Sarodrano and Andrevo-<br />

Bas, 25-m 2 protective enclosures were constructed<br />

in the centre of the pens. The nursery pens had a<br />

10 mm top net stitched on to prevent the entrance of<br />

crabs (Figure 2). Juveniles were held in the protective<br />

enclosures for 2–3 months until they reached an average<br />

size of 50 g, at which stage they are better able<br />

to withstand predatory attacks from crabs (Lavitra<br />

2008) and are well acclimatised to the wild.<br />

Juvenile supply<br />

The commercial operator, MH.SA, was responsible<br />

for the supply and transport of large juveniles<br />

(approximately 15 g or 6 cm) from the nursery site at<br />

Belaza, located approximately 20 km south of Toliara<br />

(Figure 1), to the village grow-out sites. MH.SA was<br />

given exclusive rights to buy back all market-sized<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s for processing and export. At the start<br />

of the project, production costs were relatively high<br />

at US$0.54 per juvenile; thus, project funding was<br />

used to subsidise the cost for farmers. Juveniles were<br />

supplied to farmers on credit at a cost of US$0.20<br />

per juvenile, advanced by project funds, and the cost<br />

of juveniles was reimbursed at set rates when the<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s were harvested and sold. NGO staff<br />

were required to relay the number and weights of<br />

market-ready <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s to MH.SA 2 weeks prior<br />

to harvest and sale. In addition, MH.SA imposed a<br />

minimum size limit of 300 g and a minimum quantity<br />

of 300 market-sized animals before they would travel<br />

to the villages for the sale.


Transportation and stocking<br />

Toliara<br />

Figure 1. Sandfish farming sites of Blue Ventures and Trans’Mad-<br />

Développement in south-western Madagascar<br />

Initially, MH.SA used their fishing vessel to<br />

transport juveniles from the nursery in Belaza to<br />

grow-out sites. A number of protocols were put into<br />

place to minimise handling and maintain optimal<br />

water quality, such as defecation of juveniles prior to<br />

transport and regular partial water changes. Juveniles<br />

were loaded into fish transport boxes (100 per box),<br />

which were stacked in insulated plastic fish harvest<br />

bins filled with <strong>sea</strong> water (Figure 3). Transportation<br />

occurred overnight or in the early morning in order to<br />

144<br />

avoid daytime temperature extremes, and to schedule<br />

arrival time for juveniles to be stocked during midmorning<br />

spring low-ebb tides. Transportation times<br />

to Andrevo-Bas and Fiherenamasay ranged from 4 to<br />

10 hours (Tsiresy et al. 2011), and journey times to<br />

reach grow-out sites in Velondriake (200–250 km to<br />

the north), ranged from 14 to 22 hours depending on<br />

weather conditions.<br />

In an effort to reduce the level of mortality due<br />

to boat transportation, more conventional transportation<br />

strategies were adopted later in the project<br />

(Purcell et al. 2006). Juveniles were stocked in 5-L


plastic bags with 2.5 L of <strong>sea</strong> water and oxygen,<br />

packed into insulated containers and transported<br />

directly to the grow-out sites by four-wheel drive<br />

vehicle. Motorised boats were used to relay juveniles<br />

to villages with no road access. Where delivery was<br />

problematic and delayed, contingency plans were<br />

implemented. On two occasions, juveniles were<br />

released by SCUBA divers at high tide during the<br />

day into pens at a water depth of 2.5 m. However,<br />

as methodologies used in the development of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> farming aimed to maximise community<br />

participation, it was preferable to keep juveniles<br />

ashore in open containers, and carry out partial<br />

water changes until they could be stocked at night<br />

during the spring low tide. This allowed the juveniles<br />

a 6–8-hour period to recover from the stress of<br />

transportation and resume normal behaviour. Prior to<br />

release, farmers were trained to gradually acclimatise<br />

juveniles to ambient water temperatures for 30 minutes<br />

before releasing them individually into the pens.<br />

Capacity building and monitoring<br />

The NGOs were responsible for providing training<br />

and technical support to farmers throughout the<br />

project, including training in pen construction and<br />

145<br />

maintenance, husbandry, conflict resolution and<br />

financial management. Log books were issued to each<br />

farming group to record details of all husbandry and<br />

maintenance activities, together with accounts detailing<br />

the number of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s delivered and sold,<br />

the amount of juvenile credit repaid and the profits<br />

generated per group. Participatory monitoring was<br />

carried out on a monthly basis at night during spring<br />

low tides to provide data on growth and mortality.<br />

All <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s found during monitoring were<br />

counted, and a minimum subsample of 25% was<br />

weighed using a top-pan electronic balance.<br />

Predator control<br />

Due to high levels of predation experienced at<br />

some sites, TMD developed a number of targeted<br />

predator control techniques. Two types of traps were<br />

designed—a bucket buried in the sand with bait<br />

suspended across the entrance, and a baited mesh<br />

cage with a circular opening (Figure 4). Traps using<br />

locally harvested arc shell meat (Anadara natalensis)<br />

as bait were deployed around the pens. Farmers were<br />

encouraged to regularly hunt for crabs in and around<br />

the pens, with an intensification occurring in the<br />

month leading up to juvenile deliveries. A variety<br />

Figure 2. Protective nursery enclosures (25 m 2) constructed in the centre of 30 × 30 m <strong>sea</strong> pens in<br />

Sarodrano to protect newly released juveniles from predation


Figure 3. Methods used to transport hatchery-reared juveniles by fishing boat to grow-out sites in<br />

Velondriake using fish boxes stacked inside insulated harvest bins<br />

146<br />

Figure 4. Traps designed by Trans’Mad-<br />

Développement to capture<br />

predatory crabs


of techniques were used—using a spear or gloves to<br />

catch crabs, snorkelling along the sides of the pens to<br />

flush crabs towards the traps, or trapping and killing<br />

them. All species were targeted; edible crabs such<br />

as Lupa sanguinolenta, Scylla serrata, and Lupa<br />

pelagica were sold or used for domestic consumption,<br />

and non-edible species (e.g. Thalamita crenata)<br />

were dried to provide food for pigs and chickens<br />

(Ravoto 2010).<br />

Anti-poaching measures<br />

As theft was considered to be one of the main<br />

risks facing the project (Robinson and Pascal 2009),<br />

a number of proactive measures were put in place,<br />

including nightly surveillance programs and the<br />

creation of marine reserves governed by social conventions<br />

(dinas) to regulate access to the mariculture<br />

zones, and enable villagers to deal with incidents of<br />

theft at a local level. As theft was prevalent throughout<br />

the project, a regional meeting, organised by<br />

MH.SA and chaired by the Minister of Fisheries,<br />

was held in April 2010 in Toliara. The meeting was<br />

attended by a wide range of stakeholders, including<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> farmers, NGOs, Department of<br />

Fisheries, police, army, middlemen and <strong>sea</strong>food traders.<br />

A number of additional strategies were agreed<br />

upon, including establishing a system of traceability<br />

for farmed <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s by issuing certificates of<br />

origin; legalising the village dinas at the district level;<br />

increasing the presence of government officials,<br />

including fisheries surveillance and police; and<br />

constructing guard platforms adjacent to <strong>sea</strong> pens to<br />

facilitate surveillance.<br />

Farming trials<br />

Results<br />

During the period of the study, 51,500 juveniles<br />

were released at seven sites during 21 release events<br />

spread over 45 months (Table 1).<br />

Survival of hatchery-reared sandfish<br />

A number of factors were found to affect the<br />

survival of hatchery-reared sandfish post release,<br />

including transport and handling stress, predation and<br />

human factors (poaching), leading to variable survival<br />

rates between farming sites (Table 2; Figures 5b, 6b).<br />

During preliminary farming trials, where juveniles<br />

were properly transported and acclimatised, survival<br />

rates were high after 11 months, with 79% and 80%,<br />

147<br />

respectively, for the first two releases in Andavadoaka<br />

and Ambolimoke (Table 2). However, the use of the<br />

boat to transport larger quantities of juveniles from<br />

October 2008 increased mortality rates. During<br />

transportation by boat of the first five batches of<br />

juveniles to grow-out sites in Velondriake, a total of<br />

3,061 juveniles (11% of the total number of sandfish<br />

delivered) died (Robinson 2011). The journey by <strong>sea</strong><br />

was frequently complicated and prolonged during<br />

periods of rough weather, leading to evisceration of<br />

juveniles and mortalities on board. In December 2009<br />

the occurrence of a <strong>tropical</strong> storm in the afternoon<br />

caused the direct mortality of 55% of juveniles destined<br />

for Nosy Be (Table 2). During the same month,<br />

the delivery boat was stuck in heavy <strong>sea</strong>s behind<br />

the barrier reef in Fiherenamasay, resulting in direct<br />

mortality of 91% of juveniles. Frequently delayed<br />

or prolonged transportation also led to suboptimal<br />

stocking conditions early on in the project. During the<br />

delivery of 1,200 juveniles to Ambolimoke in October<br />

2008, the late arrival of the boat resulted in releasing<br />

the juveniles into pens on a rising spring tide. The<br />

animals, which were already stressed after a 16-hour<br />

boat journey with no water exchange, were unable to<br />

bury or even maintain their position on the sediment,<br />

and were observed rolling around on the sediment<br />

surface. Some farmers even reported observations of<br />

juveniles floating out of the pens as the strong tidal<br />

current, wind and waves swept through the shallow<br />

area where the pens were located. Survival rates were<br />

35% after 2 months (Table 2; Figure 5b).<br />

During the first releases in Sarodrano and Andrevo-<br />

Bas, there was intense predation from crabs, with<br />

mortality rates of 80% and 81%, respectively, after<br />

2 months (Table 2; Figure 7). Transportation and<br />

acclimatisation of juveniles for Sarodrano was optimal,<br />

as juveniles were transported by canoe from the<br />

nursery (30 minutes) and released at midnight during<br />

the spring low tide. However, within 20 minutes, large<br />

numbers of Thalamita crenata arrived at the pens,<br />

where they succeeded in scaling the pens and ripping<br />

holes in the sides (10-mm nylon net) to prey on the<br />

newly released juveniles. One month after release,<br />

survival estimates between pens varied greatly, ranging<br />

from 0% to 71%, with an average survival rate of<br />

20% for the five pens (Table 2; Figure 6b). In an effort<br />

to protect newly released juveniles from predation by<br />

crabs, nursery enclosures (Figure 2) were constructed<br />

after the first release at Sarodrano and Andrevo-Bas.<br />

With this new system, the observed survival rates were<br />

79% and 70%, respectively, 15 days after release.


Table 1. Summary of all juvenile sandfish releases, January 2007 – September 2010<br />

Other factors of importance<br />

Pen size (m2) No. pens Total<br />

no. of<br />

juveniles<br />

Date Site NGO No. juveniles<br />

released<br />

24 January 2007 ADV BV 200 60 1 200<br />

16 January 2008 ADV BV 200 100 200<br />

1 October 2008 ABM/ADV BV 1,200/200 *156/100 4/1 1400 *Only juvenile section of pen constructed<br />

24 February 2009 ABM/ADV/ BV 1,800/450/ *156/225/ 6/1/4/6 5,250 *Only juvenile section of pen constructed<br />

NSB/ TMP<br />

1,200/1,800 156 /156<br />

31 March 2009 SAR TMD 2,250 900 5 2,250<br />

13 May 2009 FHM TMD 2,250 900 5 2,250<br />

11 June 2009 ADR TMD 3,150 900 7 3,150<br />

19 August 2009 NSB/ TMP BV 1,200/2,400 *625/625 4/9 3,600 *Grow-out section constructed with 15-mm nylon<br />

net<br />

18 September 2009 SAR TMD 2,250 900 5 2,250 Juveniles released into 25-m2 protective enclosures<br />

6 October 2009 ABM/ TMP BV 2,700/300 *156/156 9/1 3,000 *Grow-out section removed due to damage to nets<br />

20 October 2009 ADR TMD 3,150 900 7 3,150 Juveniles released into 25-m2 protective enclosures<br />

2 December 2009 ABM/ NSB/ BV 2,700/1,200/2,700 156/156/ 9/9 6,600 Juveniles released into 25-m<br />

TMP<br />

156<br />

2 protective enclosures<br />

17 December 2009 FHM TMD 2,250 900 5 2,250<br />

3 March 2010 ADR TMD 3,150 900 7 3,150 Juveniles released into 25-m2 protective enclosures<br />

16 April 2010 SAR TMD 1,800 900 4 1,800 Juveniles released into 25-m2 protective enclosures<br />

27 April 2010 TMP BV 2,700 156 9 2,700<br />

12 May 2010 ABM/ NSB/ BV 1,500/1,200 *625/625 5/4 2,700 *Grow-out section reconstructed with HDPE mesh<br />

27 May 2010 FHM TMD *900 900 2 900 *Quantity reduced due to poor farming efforts<br />

15 June 2010 ADR TMD *1,500 900 6 1,500 *Quantity reduced due to poor farming efforts<br />

25 August 2010 SAR TMD *1,200 900 4 1,200 *Quantity reduced due to lack of supply from<br />

MHSA<br />

22 September 2010 TMP BV *2,000 625 9 2,000 *Quantity reduced due to lack of supply from<br />

MHSA<br />

148<br />

Site codes: ADV = Andavadoaka; AMB = Ambolimoke; NSB = Nosy Be; TMP = Tampolove; SAR = Sarodrano; FHM = Fiherenamasay and ADR = Andrevo-Bas<br />

NGOs: BV = Blue Ventures; TMD = Trans’Mad-Développement


SST (°C)<br />

Mean survival (%)<br />

Biomass (g/m 3 )<br />

32<br />

30<br />

28<br />

26<br />

24<br />

0 50100 150 200 250<br />

Days after release<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250<br />

Days after release<br />

(c)<br />

Survival rate<br />

Mean body weight<br />

Biomass<br />

Growth rate<br />

100<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

50<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250<br />

Days after release<br />

Figure 5. Biological responses of sandfish in the second release in Ambolimoke on 1 October 2008 into<br />

four 12.5 ×12.5 m <strong>sea</strong> pens: (a) <strong>sea</strong> surface temperature (SST); (b) mean survival and weight<br />

of released sandfish; (c) biomass and growth rates of released sandfish. NB: There was high<br />

mortaility within 1 month due to poor transport conditions.<br />

149<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

Mean weight (g)<br />

Growth rate (g/day)


Unfortunately, however, these positive results led<br />

farmers to neglect crab culling, both in nurseries<br />

and the rest of the pens, and survival rates decreased<br />

dramatically (Tsiresy et al. 2011) (Table 2; Figure 7).<br />

The effect of protective nursery enclosures on the survival<br />

rate of newly released juveniles in Andrevo-Bas<br />

and Sarodrano is shown in Table 2 and Figure 7. In<br />

Sarodrano, the vigilance of farmers in excluding crabs<br />

from nursery enclosures prior to and after stocking led<br />

to survival rates of 88% (76 days after the third input)<br />

and 83% (60 days after the fourth input) (Figure 7).<br />

Theft of market-size <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> was also an<br />

important factor affecting survival. Over the course<br />

Mean body weight (g)<br />

Mean survival (%)<br />

450<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

150<br />

of the study period, eight incidents of poaching were<br />

reported, amounting to 2,735 sandfish, 5% of the<br />

total number delivered. Seven of the eight reported<br />

incidents were directly linked to planned harvests<br />

and sales to MH.SA, either in the 2 weeks prior to<br />

a sale or following the cancellation of a sale (Table<br />

2). Furthermore, half of the thefts occurred during<br />

periods of celebration, including Christmas and New<br />

Year in 2007 and 2009 (Figure 6b), and Independence<br />

Day in June 2009. Periods of bad weather, which prevented<br />

fishers from going to <strong>sea</strong>, coincided with two<br />

of these celebration periods, providing an additional<br />

driver for poaching.<br />

(a) Sarodrano Fiherenamasay Andrevo-Bas<br />

0<br />

0 50100 150<br />

Days after release<br />

200 250 300<br />

(b) Sarodrano Fiherenamasay Andrevo-Bas<br />

Harvest<br />

Harvest<br />

0<br />

Theft<br />

0 50 100 150<br />

Days after release<br />

200 250<br />

Harvest<br />

Figure 6. Biological responses of sandfish at the Trans’Mad-Développement farming sites during<br />

the first releases of juveniles into five pens in Sarodrano on 1 April 2009 (n = 2,250),<br />

five pens in Fiherenamsay on 13 May 2009 (n = 2,250) and seven pens in Andrevo-Bas<br />

on 11 June 2009 (n = 3,150)<br />

300


Mean survival (%)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

t=67<br />

t=73<br />

t=76 t=60<br />

Figure 7. The effect on mean survival of releasing 15-g juveniles into protected nursery enclosures.<br />

Unshaded bars denote releases into open 30 × 30 m <strong>sea</strong> pens; shaded bars indicate release of<br />

sandfish into 25-m 2 covered nursery enclosures. The number of days post-release is indicated<br />

above each bar.<br />

Growth of hatchery-reared sandfish<br />

t=71<br />

A wide range of growth rates was recorded in<br />

the farming trials throughout the study period, and<br />

time to reach commercial size varied between sites<br />

and individual release events (Table 3). A number<br />

of factors were found to affect growth, including<br />

<strong>sea</strong>sonality (water temperature) and stocking density;<br />

density-dependent factors were linked to site-specific<br />

carrying capacities.<br />

The minimum time to reach market size was<br />

observed in Andrevo-Bas, where 128 animals (16% of<br />

the stock remaining following mortalities from predation)<br />

were harvested after only 128 days at an average<br />

individual weight of 362.4 g. Partial harvests of the<br />

fastest growing animals (the ‘shooters’) were also carried<br />

out in Sarodrano, when 206 animals (29%) with<br />

an average weight of 363.9 g were harvested after 219<br />

days, and the remaining <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s (average weight<br />

410.6 g) were harvested after 290 days (Figure 6b).<br />

Conversely, some sites showed poor growth rates<br />

throughout the study period, most notably Andavadoaka<br />

and Fiherenamasay (Table 3). In Andavadoaka, sandfish<br />

from trials in January 2007 and January 2008 failed<br />

to reach commercial size within 12–15 months.<br />

The carrying capacity for the site was estimated at<br />

approximately 100 g/m 2. As it would not have been<br />

151<br />

t=70<br />

t=75<br />

t=70<br />

t=74<br />

t=44<br />

t=61<br />

Input 1 Input 2 Input 3 Input 4 Input 1 Input 2 Input 3 Input 4 Input 1 Input 2 Input 3<br />

Sarodrano<br />

Andrevo-Bas<br />

Fiherenamasay<br />

economically viable to rear sandfish at such low densities,<br />

the site was subsequently abandoned in 2009. In<br />

Fiherenamasay, poor initial growth rates of 0.23 g/<br />

day after 4 months of farming led to experimentation<br />

by technicians to rework the sediment by either<br />

‘ploughing’ or removing the top 5-cm layer. These<br />

two techniques resulted in increasing the weight gain<br />

of juveniles fivefold and fourfold, respectively, after<br />

38 days, increasing the average growth rate to 1.0 g/day<br />

(Tsiresy et al. 2011). Overall, the average growth rate<br />

for Fiherenamasay was only 0.65 g/day, and the pens<br />

were relocated to a new site prior to the second release.<br />

Growth rates were variable within and between<br />

sites due to effects of stocking density and <strong>sea</strong>sonality,<br />

indicating that spatio-temporal variation is important.<br />

During the first field trial in Ambolimoke (January<br />

2008), 196 juveniles (average weight 14.7 g) were<br />

stocked in a 100-m 2 pen at densities of 1.96 juveniles/<br />

m 2. Survival rates were high (80%); however, the average<br />

growth rate was only 0.55 g/day. When sandfish<br />

were harvested experimentally after 11 months, the<br />

mean weight was only 185.9 g (± 3.0 SE) (Table 3).<br />

During the second release into new pens in October<br />

2008, growth rates were higher and sandfish reached a<br />

market size of 351.8 g (± 3.1 SE) after only 8 months.<br />

The average growth rate of 1.4 g/day was due to a<br />

combination of warm water temperature during the


Table 2. Summary table of mortality and losses recorded from selected releases due to varying factors<br />

Month/year Site Time post<br />

release<br />

Table 3. Summary of growth rates and time to harvest recorded for each farming location. NB: Data presented<br />

is restricted to initial releases where there was no mixing of cohorts.<br />

Site Release date Average<br />

growth rate<br />

(g/day)<br />

Time to<br />

harvest<br />

(days)<br />

152<br />

Size at harvest (g) Other comments<br />

Andavadoaka January 2007 0.5 333—no<br />

harvest<br />

150—not achieved Poor site—abandoned 2009<br />

Ambolimoke January 2008 0.55 340 185.9 Experimental harvest/processing<br />

Ambolimoke October 2008 1.4 248 351.8 New pens constructed, low<br />

stocking density due to high<br />

mortalities<br />

Nosy Be February 2008 0.82 163 Not achieved Periodic internal theft of large<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

Tampolove February 2008 1.19 282 349 (n = 223) Partial harvest, followed by theft<br />

prior to sale in February 2009<br />

Sarodrano March 2009 1.6<br />

1.36<br />

219<br />

290<br />

Fiherenamasay May 2009 0.65 293—no<br />

harvest<br />

Andrevo June 2009 1.45<br />

1.8<br />

Mortality<br />

(%)<br />

128<br />

220<br />

Probable cause or mitigating factors<br />

January 2007 Andavadoaka 11 months 21 Optimal transport (car in bags with oxygen)<br />

January 2008 Andavadoaka 11 months 20 Optimal transport (car in bags with oxygen)<br />

January 2008 Ambolimoke 11 months 20 Optimal transport (car in bags with oxygen)<br />

October 2008 Ambolimoke 2 months 65 Various (long boat journey, no water changes,<br />

weakened juveniles, rising tide, low pen height)<br />

March 2009 Sarodrano 67 days 81 Predation (crabs)<br />

June 2009 Andrevo-Bas 71 days 80 Predation (crabs)<br />

October 2009<br />

and March 2010<br />

Andrevo-Bas 70 and 75<br />

days<br />

85 and 79 Protective enclosures, with lax crab hunting<br />

December 2009 Nosy Be Immediate 55 Physical damage due to boat transport during a<br />

storm<br />

December 2009 Fiherenamasay Immediate 91 Physical damage and prolonged transport stress<br />

due to boat being stuck in rough <strong>sea</strong>s<br />

February 2010 Tampolove 12 months 99 Theft 2 days prior to a sale to MH.SA (n = 929)<br />

March 2010 Fiherenamasay 10 months 42 Theft after cancellation of a sale to MH.SA<br />

(n = 953)<br />

April and<br />

August 2010<br />

Sarodrano 60 and 76<br />

days<br />

11 and 17 Protective enclosures, with vigilant crab hunting,<br />

well-maintained enclosures<br />

June 2010 Andrevo-Bas 70 days 34 Protective enclosures, with vigilant crab hunting,<br />

well-maintained enclosures<br />

363.9 (n = 206)<br />

410.6 (n = 277)<br />

Partial harvests, low stocking<br />

density due to high mortalities<br />

208—not achieved Poor site—abandoned and new<br />

site selected<br />

362.4 (n = 128)<br />

420 (n = 568)<br />

Partial harvests, low stocking<br />

density


summer months and low densities resulting from<br />

post-release mortality. The growth rate increased<br />

from 0.88 g/day to a peak rate of 1.69 g/day during<br />

February and March 2009, when water temperatures<br />

were ~32 °C. The growth rate then decreased as<br />

water temperatures fell to 25.6 °C and as the biomass<br />

approached 220 g/m 2 (Figure 5a, b, c).<br />

In the farming villages of TMD, for the first<br />

releases of 450 juveniles per pen, stocking densities<br />

were low, at 0.5 juveniles/m 2. Medium to high levels<br />

of mortality were experienced at all three villages<br />

during the first month (Figures 5, 7b); thus, stocking<br />

densities were further reduced, and throughout<br />

the production cycle the biomass never exceeded<br />

45 g/m 2. At these sites, average daily growth rates<br />

over the first 5 months for Sarodrano, Andrevo-Bas<br />

and Fiherenamasay were 1.3, 1.8 and 0.23 g/day,<br />

respectively (Tsiresy et al. 2011).<br />

Discussion<br />

Factors affecting survival<br />

The following factors have the potential to affect<br />

the survival of released sandfish: method of transport<br />

to the release site, size at release, type of substrate,<br />

time of release (both within the diurnal cycle and<br />

<strong>sea</strong>sonal), stocking density, abundance of predators<br />

and availability of food (Battaglene and Bell 2004).<br />

The impact that some of these factors can have on<br />

the survival rate of juveniles released into <strong>sea</strong> pens<br />

in the wild was highlighted in the results of the study.<br />

In addition, the effect of techniques developed to<br />

improve survival during various release events in<br />

south-western Madagascar was also demonstrated.<br />

Size at release has a significant effect on survival<br />

of sandfish (Purcell and Simutoga 2008). In comparison<br />

with other studies, the high survival rates (~80%)<br />

obtained when juveniles were properly transported<br />

and acclimatised was largely due to the large size<br />

of juveniles released (15 g). During transport and<br />

release, juvenile sandfish are subjected to a wide<br />

range of stresses, including physical shocks and<br />

prolonged agitation, periods out of water, temperature<br />

shocks, buffeting by tidal currents and wave action,<br />

and predators (Dance et al. 2003; Purcell 2004).<br />

Therefore, optimal transportation and acclimatisation<br />

strategies should be employed to maximise survival<br />

of hatchery-reared sandfish released into the wild.<br />

Predators constitute one of the main risks to be<br />

considered for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> using<br />

153<br />

pens (Lavitra et al. 2009). High mortality due to<br />

predation was a major obstacle to the economic<br />

viability of some of the <strong>aquaculture</strong> ventures<br />

(Tsiresy et al. 2011). Purcell (2010) postulated that<br />

minimal handling of juveniles in transporting them<br />

into the wild should promote longer periods of burial<br />

for the first days after release, which may improve<br />

post-release survival by enhancing their avoidance<br />

of predators. However, our results indicate that,<br />

at some sites that were subject to high predation<br />

pressure, behavioural modifications post release<br />

were not sufficient to prevent predation. The results<br />

of this study demonstrate the positive effect that<br />

providing a physical barrier to predators can have<br />

on increasing survival of hatchery-reared sandfish.<br />

However, a two-pronged approach is needed; the<br />

combination of using protective nursery enclosures<br />

in conjunction with targeted predator control proved<br />

extremely effective in increasing survival rates of<br />

newly released hatchery-reared sandfish, as demonstrated<br />

by the success of farmers in Sarodrano who<br />

remained vigilant in crab hunting and maintaining<br />

enclosures.<br />

After a number of biological and technical hurdles<br />

affecting survival of sandfish were overcome,<br />

and once market-sized <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s started to be<br />

reliably produced in <strong>sea</strong> pens, a new set of socioeconomic<br />

problems came into play as theft became<br />

prevalent. The issue of theft was exacerbated by a<br />

number of weaknesses in the business model. First,<br />

the fact that credit was extended to farmers to obtain<br />

juveniles eliminated any risk on their part, and<br />

therefore did not engender responsibility among<br />

farmers. Second, the low prices paid by MH.SA of<br />

approximately US$1.00–1.39 per piece, from which<br />

juveniles’ costs were also deducted, often meant that<br />

it was more profitable for farmers to sell their <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s to traders in the neighbouring villages.<br />

Finally, the 2-week time delay, enforced by MH.SA,<br />

between NGO staff communicating the number and<br />

weights of market-ready <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s to MH.SA,<br />

and MH.SA staff travelling to Velondriake to buy<br />

them, increased the risk of theft in the interim period,<br />

when the majority of thefts occurred.<br />

Factors affecting growth<br />

Density-dependent factors were not found to<br />

directly affect survival of sandfish, but they were<br />

important in regulating growth rates. During this<br />

study, lower stocking densities appeared to lead<br />

to higher growth rates, and high growth rates were


ecorded in periods of high water temperatures.<br />

Battaglene (1999) observed that growth of Holothuria<br />

scabra ceased when densities reached approximately<br />

225 g/m 2, and that even juveniles held at this density<br />

lost weight. A study by Purcell and Simutoga (2008)<br />

on the long-term growth of sandfish in the wild also<br />

indicated a natural carrying capacity for sandfish of<br />

around 2.5 t/ha for farming programs. Our results also<br />

indicated that carrying capacities for sandfish exist and<br />

affect their growth rate. However, we found there was<br />

considerable variation between sites. In Ambolimoke,<br />

growth rates slowed as the biomass reached ~220 g/m 2<br />

although water temperature was also a contributing<br />

factor. In Andavadoaka, the low carrying capacity of<br />

the site (~100 g/m 2) prevented sandfish from reaching<br />

market size after 12–15 months. In addition, when<br />

sandfish were released temporarily at this site at biomass<br />

of 360 g/m 2, the effects of overcrowding were<br />

evident as sandfish were observed squeezing through<br />

the mesh in an effort to disperse.<br />

Density-dependent effects on growth rate are likely<br />

to be linked to food availability; however, it appears<br />

that some sites are capable of supporting higher<br />

stocking densities than others. For example, the <strong>sea</strong><br />

pens opposite the MH.SA nursery in Belaza are<br />

capable of supporting a biomass of ~700 g/m 2, and it<br />

is therefore possible for sandfish to reach market size<br />

at a density of 2 individuals/m 2 (Lavitra 2008). As<br />

the carrying capacity of the site will strongly affect<br />

the economic viability of farming sandfish, a simple<br />

method was developed during the project to assist<br />

with optimal site selection and to assess the carrying<br />

capacity of potential sites. Small 4-m 2 test plots<br />

were stocked with juveniles, and weekly growth was<br />

monitored until the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s stopped growing<br />

due to density-dependent effects, at which point the<br />

total biomass per unit area was calculated (Pascal and<br />

Robinson 2011).<br />

Highly variable growth rates within specific<br />

cohorts lead to heterogeneous sizes of sandfish<br />

(Purcell and Kirby 2006), which was confirmed by<br />

this study. In some echinoderm species, the presence<br />

of larger individuals can suppress the growth<br />

of smaller ones (Grosjean et al. 1996; Dong et al.<br />

2010); therefore, grading is often used in <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

to produce uniform size classes. In some cases the<br />

removal of ‘shooters’ (fast-growing individuals) can<br />

allow the smaller ones to catch up, as seen in the successful<br />

partial harvests at villages near Toliara. In-situ<br />

partial processing of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s at the community<br />

level is now being investigated. In addition to<br />

154<br />

alleviating incidents of theft, as <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s can<br />

be harvested and processed on a regular basis as they<br />

reach market size, it may also lead to the production<br />

of more uniform batches of sandfish, and reduce the<br />

time to reach harvest size.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Over recent years, re<strong>sea</strong>rch has led to the development<br />

of reliable techniques to produce hatcheryreared<br />

sandfish (James et al. 1994; Battaglene 1999;<br />

Agudo 2006; Duy 2010). Studies on the release of<br />

hatchery-reared juveniles commonly report high<br />

levels of mortality during the first few months after<br />

release into the wild (Dance et al. 2006; Purcell<br />

and Simutoga 2008; Hair et al. 2011), yet the<br />

probable cause of mortality remains unidentified<br />

or unreported. It is perhaps timely then for future<br />

re<strong>sea</strong>rch priorities to focus on improving survival of<br />

hatchery-reared juveniles in the wild. By gaining a<br />

better understanding of the factors that affect their<br />

survival in the natural environment, acclimatisation<br />

and release strategies can be improved. Enclosures<br />

or cages acting as an intermediate ‘halfway home’ to<br />

acclimatise juveniles during the first days or weeks<br />

of release have been suggested (Dance et al. 2003;<br />

Purcell 2004). In Vietnam and the Philippines, new<br />

technologies such as floating and fixed bottom hapa<br />

nets in ponds and the <strong>sea</strong> are currently being used<br />

(Duy 2010; R. Gamboa, pers. comm.) to extend the<br />

nursery phase into the marine environment, in order<br />

to increase production capacity and reduce production<br />

costs. It is likely that such techniques, in addition<br />

to being more cost-effective, will also produce<br />

hardier juveniles more capable of withstanding the<br />

broad range of abiotic and biotic conditions of the<br />

marine environment.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

The authors particularly wish to thank the<br />

Trans’Mad-Développement and Blue Ventures <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

teams for their hard work and commitment to<br />

the project. Funding was provided by the Regional<br />

Coastal Management Programme of the Indian<br />

Ocean Countries (ReCoMaP), which also provided<br />

significant support and input throughout the 2-year<br />

project. Sincere thanks to the Australian Centre<br />

for International and Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch for the<br />

opportunity to attend the <strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> Tropical Sea<br />

Cucumber Symposium in Noumea in February 2011.


References<br />

Agudo N.S. 2006. Sandfish hatchery techniques. The<br />

Australian Centre for International Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch, Secretariat of the Pacific Community and<br />

WorldFish Center: Noumea, New Caledonia.<br />

Battaglene S.C. 1999. Culture of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

for stock restoration and enhancement. Naga – The<br />

ICLARM Quarterly 22, 4–11.<br />

Battaglene S.C. and Bell J.D. 2004. The restocking of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s in the Pacific islands. In ‘Marine ranching’,<br />

ed. by D.M. Bartley and K.M. Leber. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No. 429, 109–132. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Dance S.K., Lane I. and. Bell J.D. 2003. Variation in shortterm<br />

survival of cultured sandfish (Holothuria scabra)<br />

released in mangrove-<strong>sea</strong>grass and coral reef flat habitats<br />

in Solomon Islands. Aquaculture 220, 495–505.<br />

Dong S.L., Liang M., Gao Q.F., Wang F., Dong Y.W. and<br />

Tian X.L. 2010. Intra-specific effects of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

(Apostichopus japonicus) with reference to stocking density<br />

and body size. Aquaculture Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 41, 1170–1178.<br />

Duy N.D.Q. 2010. Seed production of sandfish (Holothuria<br />

scabra) in Vietnam. Southeast Asian Fisheries<br />

Development Center Aquaculture Extension Manual<br />

No. 48.<br />

Eeckhaut I., Lavitra T., Rasolofonirina R., Rabenevanana,<br />

M.W., Gildas P. and Jangoux M. 2008. Madagascar<br />

Holothurie S.A.: the first trade company based on <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> in Madagascar. SPC Beche-demer<br />

Information Bulletin 28, 22–23.<br />

Grosjean P., Spirlet C. and Jangoux, M. 1996. Experimental<br />

study of growth in the echinoid Paracentrotus lividus.<br />

Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology<br />

201, 173–184.<br />

Hamel J-F., Conand C., Pawson D.L. and Mercier A. 2001.<br />

The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra (Holothuroidea:<br />

Echinodermata): its biology and exploitation as bechede-mer.<br />

Advances in Marine Biology 41, 129–223.<br />

Hair C., Pickering T., Meo S., Vereivalu T., Hunter J. and<br />

Cavakiqali L. 2011. Sandfish culture in Fiji Islands. SPC<br />

Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 31, 3–11.<br />

James D.B., Gandhi A.D., Palaniswamy N. and Rodrigo<br />

J.X. 1994. Hatchery techniques and culture of the <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra. Central Marine Fisheries<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Institute Special Publication No. 5.<br />

Jangoux M., Rasoloforinina R., Vaitilingon D., Ouin J.M.,<br />

Seghers G., Mara E. et al. 2001. A <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> hatchery<br />

and mariculture project in Tuléar, Madagascar. SPC<br />

Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 14, 2–5.<br />

Lavitra T. 2008. Caractérisation, contrôle et optimalisation<br />

des processus impliqués dans le développement postmétamorphique<br />

de l’holothurie comestible Holothuria<br />

scabra [dissertation]. University of Mons-Hainaut: Mons,<br />

Belgium.<br />

155<br />

Lavitra T., Rasolofonirina R., Jangoux M. and Eeckhaut<br />

I. 2009. Problems related to the farming of Holothuria<br />

scabra (Jaeger, 1833). SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin, 29, 20–30.<br />

Pascal B. and Robinson G. 2011. Handbook for sandfish<br />

farming. Regional Programme for the Sustainable<br />

Management of the Coastal Zones of the Countries of<br />

the Indian Ocean (ReCoMaP). At: <br />

Purcell S.W. 2004. Criteria for release strategies and<br />

evaluating the restocking of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>. In ‘Advances<br />

in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’, ed.<br />

by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S. Uthicke,<br />

J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. Fisheries Technical Paper<br />

No. 463, 181–192. Food and Agriculture Organization<br />

of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Purcell, S.W. 2010. Diel burying by the <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Holothuria scabra: effects of environmental stimuli,<br />

handling and ontogeny. Marine Biology 157, 663–671.<br />

Purcell S.W., Blockmans B.F. and Agudo N.S. 2006.<br />

Transportation methods for restocking of juvenile<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, Holothuria scabra. Aquaculture 251,<br />

238–244.<br />

Purcell S.W. and Kirby D.S. 2006. Restocking the <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra: sizing no-take zones<br />

through individual-based movement modelling. Fisheries<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 80, 53–61.<br />

Purcell S.W. and Simutoga M. 2008. Spatio-temporal and<br />

size-dependent variation in the success of releasing<br />

cultured <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in the wild. Reviews in Fisheries<br />

Science, 16, 204–214.<br />

Ravoto M. 2010. Eco-éthologie de Thalamita crenata en<br />

contexte d’elevage des holothuries. Memoire license de<br />

la mer et du littoral. Institute Halieutique et des Sciences<br />

Marines, University of Tulear.<br />

Robinson G. 2011. Community-based <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> in Madagascar. In ‘Mariculture in the WIO<br />

region: challenges and prospects’, ed. by M.Troell, T.<br />

Hecht, M. Beveridge, S. Stead, I. Bryceson, N. Kautsky<br />

et al. WIOMSA Book Series No. 11, 47–53. Western<br />

Indian Ocean Marine Science Association: Zanzibar,<br />

Tanzania.<br />

Robinson G. and Pascal B. 2009. From hatchery to community:<br />

Madagascar’s first village-based holothurian<br />

mariculture programme. SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin 29, 38–43.<br />

Tsiresy G., Pascal B. and Plotieau T. 2011. An assessment<br />

of Holothuria scabra growth in marine micro-farms<br />

in southwestern Madagascar. SPC Beche-de-mer<br />

Information Bulletin 31, 17–22.


Sea ranching of sandfish in an Indigenous<br />

community within a well-regulated fishery<br />

(Northern Territory, Australia)<br />

Ann E. Fleming 1*<br />

Abstract<br />

The Northern Territory is in a unique position to support sandfish (Holothuria scabra) ranching as it has an intact<br />

wild fishery and low poaching pressure. Indigenous people own 85% of the coastline, and are keen to develop<br />

economic opportunities through their natural resources. The commercial wild-caught sector has well-established<br />

markets, and has expressed a willingness to partner with Indigenous coastal communities. Re<strong>sea</strong>rch currently underway<br />

is focused on the biological and economic feasibility of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> ranching as well as developing effective<br />

facilitation and evaluation approaches to ensure that Indigenous people drive enterprise development themselves.<br />

Introduction<br />

A wild <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery operates across northern<br />

Australia, extending from the <strong>tropical</strong> regions<br />

of Western Australia, across the Northern Territory<br />

(NT), to <strong>tropical</strong> Queensland in the east. This paper<br />

reports on the fishery within the NT, which comes<br />

under the management and regulation of the Northern<br />

Territory Government (2009).<br />

Compared with countries also working to develop<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> ranching, the NT is in a unique position.<br />

It has an intact and sustainable wild-catch fishery<br />

with well-established supply chains and markets. This<br />

is largely due to a strong management regime and the<br />

efforts of the commercial sector, which consists of a<br />

single operator who owns all six available licences.<br />

In addition, the NT has a large population of coastal<br />

Indigenous Australians who own 85% of the coastline,<br />

and who aspire to pursue economic development<br />

through the use of their natural marine resources.<br />

The recent recognition of Aboriginal people’s legal<br />

ownership of the intertidal zone within the NT offers<br />

1 Aquaculture Branch, Fisheries Group, Department of<br />

Resources, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

156<br />

further opportunities for marine-based economic<br />

activities. The commercial wild-catch operator has<br />

demonstrated a willingness to partner with Indigenous<br />

communities to establish <strong>sea</strong>-ranching enterprises,<br />

and is currently operating a commercial hatchery in<br />

the NT, and conducting pond-based grow-out and<br />

<strong>sea</strong>-ranching trials, the latter with a community on<br />

Groote Eylandt (Bowman 2012).<br />

Another unusual factor that exists within the NT<br />

is the absence of significant <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> poaching<br />

activity. This is largely because local people, both<br />

Indigenous and non-Indigenous, do not eat <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s, and because illegal take by Indonesian<br />

fishers has been drastically curtailed in recent years<br />

due to enhanced surveillance and apprehension<br />

operations.<br />

The implications of this unique set of factors in<br />

the NT will be discussed in this paper in the context<br />

of opportunities for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> by<br />

Indigenous people living in remote communities.<br />

The wild fishery context<br />

A modern wild fishery, targeting the high-value<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, sandfish (Holothuria scabra), has<br />

operated in the NT since the 1980s. It continues


to be sustainable today due to the precautionary<br />

management approach by the NT Government and<br />

a unique set of circumstances around the nature of<br />

the commercial sector and the characteristics of the<br />

operating environment.<br />

The fishery is divided into two zones, three<br />

licences per zone, with six licenses in total. The<br />

government’s conservative approach includes a limit<br />

on the number of licences and the area of the fishery<br />

(within 3 nautical miles of the coast to preserve<br />

deeper <strong>sea</strong> breeding stocks considered important for<br />

recruitment). Collection of sandfish is by diving from<br />

vessels, using hand methods only.<br />

Fishery management aims to ensure intergenerational<br />

equity of stocks, and it does this by having a<br />

range of performance indicators, any one of which<br />

can trigger a management response. The performance<br />

indicators are:<br />

• a breach of a total catch of 300 t/year (wet weight)<br />

• a variation in the rolling 3-year average catch per<br />

unit effort by a factor of 30% from the current<br />

year value<br />

• a decrease in the average weight by more than 20%<br />

• a change in species composition to over 30% of<br />

total catch<br />

• a change in licence ownership.<br />

The government takes this precautionary management<br />

approach due to the limited knowledge of the<br />

biology and ecology of sandfish. Consequently, there is<br />

a push, initiated by the Australian Government, towards<br />

addressing key re<strong>sea</strong>rch priorities to fill the knowledge<br />

gaps and develop meaningful yield estimates.<br />

The second set of factors that contribute to sustainability<br />

are around the nature of the commercial sector<br />

and the characteristics of the operating environment:<br />

• There is only one licencee, so there is no ‘gold<br />

rush’ mentality around fully harvesting the good<br />

stocks.<br />

• The company has the ability to rotate harvests.<br />

• Crocodiles, poor visibility, monsoon <strong>sea</strong>son and<br />

extreme tidal range restrict access to many fishing<br />

grounds, and limit the ability of divers to pick up<br />

all harvestable stocks.<br />

• There is relatively low poaching activity (at least<br />

in recent years).<br />

In the past, the incidence of illegal fishing in<br />

northern Australian waters, predominately by<br />

Indonesian <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> vessels, has been considerable.<br />

However, recently, there has been a significant<br />

increase in the apprehension of illegal vessels, from<br />

60 in 1999 to 210 in 2005.<br />

157<br />

In 2006, the Australian Fisheries Management<br />

Authority (AFMA) set in place an extensive surveillance<br />

and apprehension program within the Australian<br />

Fishing Zone using aircraft and <strong>sea</strong> vessels, together<br />

with extensive data gathering. As a result of this<br />

concerted effort, by 2009 the apprehension rate was<br />

down to nine vessels in the first 5 months (AFMA,<br />

pers. comm.). Clearly, the message had filtered back<br />

to illegal fishermen in Indonesia that surveillance had<br />

increased and apprehension was likely.<br />

It is interesting to consider this illegal activity by<br />

Indonesian fishers in the context of the long history<br />

of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> (or ‘trepang’ as they are traditionally<br />

known) fishing in northern Australian waters by the<br />

Macassans from Sulawesi. They came each year in<br />

the monsoonal months and fished for trepang, often<br />

working in collaboration and mutually beneficial<br />

trade with the coastal Aboriginal people (Macknight<br />

1976). They had been doing this since around the mid<br />

1700s until Europeans put a stop to it in 1907 to allow<br />

local white people to take over the trade. As a result<br />

of this historical sustained contact with Indonesians,<br />

Northern Territory Aboriginal people have a cultural<br />

affiliation with trepang and with the fishing activity,<br />

even though they do not eat <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>.<br />

In addition to the unique factors around the wild<br />

sector, there are also some quite unusual characteristics<br />

around current <strong>sea</strong>-ranching aspirations, by<br />

both Indigenous people and the commercial sector.<br />

In 2008 the High Court of Australia gave legal<br />

recognition to Indigenous Australians’ ownership<br />

of the intertidal zone within the NT (Altman 2008).<br />

Negotiations are currently underway to determine<br />

access to marine resources in that zone. Irrespective<br />

of the final outcome of negotiations, there are<br />

opportunities for Indigenous people to conduct<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching and on-sell to the commercial sector,<br />

which has demonstrated a willingness to partner with<br />

Indigenous people in this enterprise, committing to<br />

buy all postharvest or first-process product.<br />

The <strong>sea</strong>-ranching trials<br />

In 2009 the NT Government began working with the<br />

commercial operator on two trials to assist Indigenous<br />

communities to establish <strong>sea</strong>-ranching enterprises.<br />

One is in partnership with the Warruwi community of<br />

Goulburn Island and the other with the Umbakumba<br />

community on Groote Eylandt. The former is an<br />

Australian Centre for International Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>) project in partnership with a


oader project involving Vietnam and the Philippines<br />

that is led by the WorldFish Center.<br />

On Goulburn Island an 18-ha re<strong>sea</strong>rch site has<br />

been established and four re<strong>sea</strong>rch pens set up to<br />

monitor growth and survival according to the methods<br />

developed by Purcell (2004, 2012) and Purcell<br />

and Simutoga (2008). The site is a perched reef,<br />

accessible only at low tides when water levels are<br />

10–30 cm deep. Suitable daytime low tides occur<br />

only between August and March. The danger of<br />

crocodile attack precludes diving or snorkelling.<br />

Surveys have shown that standing stocks of wild<br />

sandfish are healthy in the trial area. These will be<br />

removed prior to release of juveniles produced by the<br />

private sector in collaboration with government staff.<br />

Releases of approximately 10,000 fluorochromestained<br />

5-g juveniles are planned using a cage release<br />

method developed by the private sector. The release<br />

cages are designed to exclude most predators, and<br />

protect animals from extreme water currents resulting<br />

from the 5-m tide difference. Animals are expected<br />

to move out of the cage as they become acclimatised.<br />

The logistics of working at the site make the re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

very difficult, primarily due to extreme currents,<br />

crocodiles, infrequent daytime low tides and the cost<br />

of flights to these remote areas. Data from the <strong>sea</strong>ranching<br />

trials will be used to assess economic and<br />

biological viability. Assuming the trials demonstrate<br />

that sandfish <strong>sea</strong> ranching is viable, future work is<br />

likely to see expansion of trials to other sites within<br />

the West Arnhem region.<br />

Strategic approach to<br />

Indigenous engagement<br />

The NT Government’s Aquaculture Branch seeks to<br />

identify <strong>aquaculture</strong> enterprises that meet a set of<br />

social and economic criteria that increase the likelihood<br />

of Indigenous enterprise success. The focus is<br />

on selecting species and farming activities that:<br />

• have low capital requirement and low, infrequent<br />

management/operational demands<br />

• meet social and cultural criteria suitable for<br />

Indigenous engagement and job participation (e.g.<br />

culturally relevant species, culturally familiar and<br />

engaging operational activities, flexible weekly<br />

working hours, work that enables people to attend<br />

to cultural activities and obligations for extended<br />

periods of time)<br />

• have high market value and strong to medium<br />

market demand, with existing supply chains and/<br />

158<br />

or clear commercialisation pathways. However, it<br />

is recognised that a staged approach where people<br />

develop familiarisation with farming through first<br />

engaging in more culturally aligned activities and<br />

outcomes is more likely to achieve success. Thus,<br />

target species, and the products and uses of those<br />

products, may be developed for purely social and<br />

cultural outcomes as a staged approach to longer<br />

term economic outcomes<br />

• have a commercial partner and/or project enterprise<br />

champion and facilitator.<br />

Sandfish <strong>sea</strong> ranching meets the criteria for suitable<br />

Indigenous development projects in terms of<br />

these social, technical and economic assessments.<br />

Nevertheless, capacity to engage in western-style<br />

commerce and participate in the mainstream workforce<br />

is low for most communities. To overcome<br />

these barriers, the Aquaculture Branch is partnering<br />

with social scientists and trained Indigenous re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

practitioners to ensure that people define their vision<br />

for their community and their work style aspirations<br />

(in their first language), conduct re<strong>sea</strong>rch to develop<br />

successful engagement and governance models,<br />

gauge effectiveness in meeting community aspirations,<br />

and measure both community and individual<br />

social and economic outcomes. Such evidence is<br />

critical to identifying success and failure points,<br />

thus ensuring that a culture of continual learning is<br />

embedded in current activities to inform future ones.<br />

Community-based organisations and agencies play<br />

an important facilitation role in this ‘bottom-up’,<br />

community-driven approach, particularly in assisting<br />

people to develop appropriate governance arrangements<br />

and capabilities, and providing job-specific<br />

training. However, enterprise facilitators must ensure<br />

that they do not influence enterprise development<br />

choices, but allow the community to decide what<br />

the outcomes for <strong>aquaculture</strong> enterprises will be in<br />

the short term. In this way external non-Indigenous<br />

people are less likely to unwittingly impose culturally<br />

inappropriate development choices on people.<br />

Another important aspect of facilitating community<br />

enterprise development is to work with the<br />

children. The Aquaculture Branch has worked with<br />

the Warruwi school on Goulburn Island to enhance<br />

awareness of the current trepang trials on their lands,<br />

as well as the history of trepanging with Macassans<br />

by their grandparents and distant ancestors on the<br />

island. The education program also seeks to communicate<br />

the potential future opportunities and<br />

benefits of <strong>aquaculture</strong> enterprises if the trials prove


Warruwi community members inspecting sandfish holding pens on Goulburn Island, Northern<br />

Territory, Australia (Photo: Wayne Tupper)<br />

successful. In this way the community’s youth will<br />

foster aspirations to take advantage of such opportunities<br />

when they become young adults. Job-specific<br />

training will be developed for current participants if<br />

the trials prove successful, enabling them to readily<br />

progress to paid work when enterprises become<br />

profitable.<br />

The above approach requires the Aquaculture<br />

Branch to form effective working partnerships between<br />

agencies to facilitate enterprise development. The<br />

Branch is therefore developing a policy on Indigenous<br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> development that identifies the key guiding<br />

partnerships, activities and principles to underpin<br />

Indigenous <strong>aquaculture</strong> development in communities.<br />

This policy will guide the activities of the Aquaculture<br />

Branch and its partners when facilitating <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

enterprises and activities in communities.<br />

Summary<br />

The unique context in the NT—where Indigenous<br />

communities own most of the coastline (now including<br />

the intertidal zone), the commercial sector has<br />

well established markets and is keen to partner with<br />

Indigenous communities, and there is largely no<br />

159<br />

poaching—offers culturally and socially suitable<br />

natural resource-based opportunities for Indigenous<br />

people living in remote coastal communities. In relation<br />

to pursuing <strong>sea</strong>-ranching enterprise development,<br />

facilitators must recognise the following:<br />

• Social disadvantage and cultural differences<br />

require facilitators to take a whole-of-community<br />

perspective of physical and human resource<br />

development. They must commit to a long-term<br />

course of facilitation, and must install processes<br />

to ensure that Indigenous people drive the visioning,<br />

planning and implementation process. Thus,<br />

partnerships between agencies must be formed to<br />

bring together the broad range of skills necessary<br />

to facilitate enterprise development.<br />

• Selection of species and <strong>sea</strong>-ranching methods<br />

must meet social and cultural criteria suitable for<br />

Indigenous engagement and capacity.<br />

• The terms of collaboration between the commercial<br />

sector and Indigenous communities must allow<br />

for a win–win outcome to work in the long term.<br />

• Evidence must be gathered to identify success and<br />

failure points, thus ensuring that a culture of continual<br />

learning is embedded in current activities to<br />

inform future ones.


Further, in relation to <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> ranching,<br />

facilitators must recognise that time frames must be<br />

appropriate (i.e. long) to ensure gradual development,<br />

because:<br />

• technologies are not yet established<br />

• many logistical factors have to be addressed<br />

• the capacity to identify suitable sites is not certain<br />

• economic returns are yet to be determined<br />

• Indigenous engagement for many communities is<br />

not yet adequate for effective participation.<br />

The government is keen to take a cautious<br />

approach to facilitating development so that expectations<br />

can be managed. Indigenous people are<br />

accustomed to waves of failed ventures coming and<br />

going through their community. The government<br />

wants to see this enterprise develop in a way that<br />

maximises the chances of success, both socially and<br />

economically. Past evidence from successful natural<br />

resource based enterprises point to a gradual, measured,<br />

community-controlled approach as the way to<br />

achieve this.<br />

References<br />

Altman J. 2008. Understanding the Blue Mud<br />

Bay decision. Australian National University.<br />

At: <br />

160<br />

Bowman W. 2012. Sandfish production and development<br />

of <strong>sea</strong> ranching in northern Australia. In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong><br />

<strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A.<br />

Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings<br />

No. 136, 75–78. Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]<br />

Macknight C.C. 1976. The voyage to Marege: Macassan<br />

trepangers in Northern Australia. Melbourne University<br />

Press: Carlton, Victoria.<br />

Northern Territory Government 2009. Trepang fishery<br />

status report. Pp. 113–119 in ‘Fisheries Status Report<br />

2009’. Northern Territory Government, Department of<br />

Resources.<br />

Purcell S.W. 2004. Criteria for release strategies and evaluating<br />

the restocking of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>. In ‘Advances in<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’, ed. by A.<br />

Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel<br />

and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 463,<br />

181–192. Food and Agriculture Organization of the<br />

United Nations: Rome.<br />

Purcell S.W. 2012. Principles and science of stocking<br />

marine areas with <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong><br />

<strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’, ed. by C.A.<br />

Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong> Proceedings<br />

No. 136, 92–103. Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These proceedings]<br />

Purcell S.W. and Simutoga M. 2008 Spatio-temporal and<br />

size-dependent variation in the success of releasing<br />

cultured <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in the wild. Reviews in Fisheries<br />

Science 16, 204–214.


Resource tenure issues<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> processing by a Fijian exporter (Photo: Cathy Hair)<br />

161


Marine tenure and the role of marine<br />

protected areas for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

grow-out in the Pacific region<br />

Semisi V. Meo 1*<br />

Abstract<br />

Many Pacific island countries are reviving longstanding customary marine resource management systems and<br />

traditional tenure through the locally managed marine area (LMMA) approach. The customary tenure systems<br />

vary: some are formally recognised in national laws, while for others the recognition is informal. These practices<br />

include <strong>sea</strong>sonal bans on harvesting, temporarily closed (no-take) areas, and restrictions placed on certain times,<br />

places, species or classes of persons. The LMMA demonstrates the shared vision of stakeholders that promotes<br />

the success of adaptive management, as evidenced by healthy ecosystems and communities, abundant marine<br />

and fish stocks, sustainable fisheries utilisation, protected marine biodiversity, sustainable development in coastal<br />

communities, an understanding of what communities are doing and can do in managing marine areas, and an<br />

understanding of ecological and socioeconomic responses to LMMA and coastal management implementation.<br />

The LMMA approach helps to ensure that benefits from marine conservation efforts will accrue to the local<br />

community, generally in an equitable manner, benefiting them spiritually, culturally, communally, socially and<br />

economically. A Fijian site in Verata district revealed that, since 1997, there has been a 20-fold increase in clam<br />

density in the tabu areas, a 200−300% increase in harvest in adjacent areas, a tripling of fish catches, and a<br />

35−45% increase in household income. Similar trends have also been observed in the other tabu areas across<br />

Fiji in a range of potential marine commodities, such as giant clam, <strong>sea</strong>weed and coral transplanting. Currently,<br />

there are more than 200 traditionally imposed LMMAs, including tabu areas, and numbers continue to grow.<br />

In Fiji, application of the LMMA approach at Natuvu village on the island of Vanua Levu has demonstrated<br />

how a customary tenure system can be integrated with <strong>sea</strong> ranching of sandfish in a closed area. The entire process<br />

can be governed by Fijian customary institutions and laws that incorporate local socioeconomic considerations,<br />

and provide more diverse and culturally appropriate approaches to enforcement, compliance, monitoring and<br />

restitution. The effectiveness of traditional practices is a reflection of the strength and viability of the customary<br />

law regime. There may also be issues regarding enforcement, the viability of a closed area in the long term, and the<br />

roles taken by governments, communities and traditional leaders. Traditional practices are generally accompanied<br />

by strategies and resources to support sustainable use, viable livelihoods and equitable sharing of benefits.<br />

Introduction<br />

Customary tenure in the Pacific region has been well<br />

documented by Hickey (2006), and a comprehensive<br />

compilation of the different types of tenure system<br />

and their implications is set out in case studies for<br />

1 Institute of Applied Sciences, University of the South<br />

Pacific, Suva, Fiji<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

162<br />

Pacific island countries by Vierros et al. (2010). In<br />

summary, the tenure systems are diverse and unique<br />

to the traditions and cultures across the island<br />

nations. However, a few of these countries are either<br />

beginning to lose or are phasing out fundamental elements<br />

of their traditions in modern times (Vierros et<br />

al. 2010). Although some of the Pacific island nations<br />

still hold onto strong traditional tenure, there are variations<br />

in management influenced by modern practices<br />

and efficient technology. The locally managed marine


area (LMMA) approach is one that seeks to retain<br />

and revive traditional approaches in marine tenure,<br />

and facilitate their use as a means to provide solutions<br />

for modern-day marine resources management<br />

issues confronting coastal communities.<br />

This paper provides an overview of the tenure systems<br />

across the Pacific region, the associated initiative<br />

of LMMA and the opportunities it presents, and<br />

suggestions for how the grow-out process of cultured<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> could be carried out successfully. The<br />

geographical areas under LMMA across the region<br />

are highlighted. Further, the ability of tabu areas<br />

to protect sedentary marine organisms sharing the<br />

same habitats and ecosystem as <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s is<br />

discussed, based upon qualitative and anecdotal<br />

information collected. Tabu areas are portions of<br />

traditional fishing grounds that have been consensually<br />

approved by the community owners to be closed<br />

to fishing or harvesting. The paper also provides an<br />

account of how the traditional marine tenure system<br />

in one Fijian community could be mobilised, via the<br />

LMMA approach, to integrate the management of<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s.<br />

Customary tenure systems<br />

Customary marine resource management practices<br />

have long been used in some Pacific island communities<br />

in accordance with traditional spiritual<br />

beliefs. These practices include <strong>sea</strong>sonal bans on<br />

harvesting, temporarily closed (no-take) areas, and<br />

restrictions placed on certain times, places, species<br />

or classes of persons. Closed areas include the tabu<br />

areas of Fiji, Vanuatu and Kiribati, the ra’ui in the<br />

Cook Islands, the kapu in Hawaii, the tambu in<br />

Papua New Guinea, the bul in Palau, the mo in the<br />

Marshall Islands, the tapu in Tonga and the rahui<br />

in New Zealand.<br />

In Palau, the bul can be put in place to close an<br />

area of reef to harvesting on a short-term basis, such<br />

as during periods of fish spawning. Vanuatu also<br />

has networks of spatial–temporal refugia created as<br />

part of a range of customary practices, such as the<br />

ordination or death of a traditional leader, the death<br />

of a clan member, grade-taking rituals, and agricultural<br />

and ritualised exchange cycles (Hickey 2006).<br />

Such area closures may be off limits to fishing for as<br />

long as 7 years. Historically, Hawaiians also used a<br />

variety of traditional marine resource management<br />

practices, which included kapu (fishery closures).<br />

These closures were often imposed to ensure catches<br />

163<br />

for special events, or as caches for when resources<br />

in the regular fishing grounds ran low.<br />

In Fiji, traditional marine practices still exist,<br />

even though they have been eroded to some degree<br />

over the years. For example, when a high chief dies,<br />

certain marine areas are restricted for approximately<br />

100 nights. Moratoriums are also put in place for traditional<br />

ceremonies or funerals; once the restriction<br />

period has ended, the area is reopened for public use.<br />

Bans also exist for <strong>sea</strong>sonal harvesting; for example,<br />

the yellowing of the traditional Fijian beach trumpet<br />

tree (Cordia subcordata) indicates the octopus mating<br />

and spawning <strong>sea</strong>son, at which time a temporary<br />

ban on catching octopus is put in place. Recently,<br />

such practices have been strengthened through the<br />

codification of traditional ownership of rights to<br />

harvest fish in coastal areas of Fiji.<br />

During the past decade, many Pacific island<br />

countries have experienced a revitalisation of traditional<br />

management systems and tenure (Johannes<br />

1998; Govan et al. 2008). In some cases, customary<br />

tenure systems are recognised in national law, while<br />

recognition of others is informal. Fiji is one of the<br />

few countries that have demarcated boundaries, to<br />

legally recognise a total of 410 fishing-rights areas<br />

or I qoliqoli—pronounced ‘ng-go-lee, ng-go-lee’—<br />

which are communally owned fishing grounds passed<br />

down through generations (Figure 1). These records of<br />

the ownership of fishing areas are one of the strengths<br />

of the traditional marine management system in Fiji.<br />

The demarcation process took approximately 20 years<br />

(1974–94) and has been applied to the customary<br />

fishing areas, which are generally inshore (from the<br />

high-water mark to the reef outer edges).<br />

Interestingly, in the context of the current debate in<br />

the United Nations relating to governance of the high<br />

<strong>sea</strong>s, the traditional fishing grounds in Fiji extended<br />

as far offshore as one could go, which could be a<br />

considerable distance in a fishing boat. The presentday<br />

I qoliqoli can range from 0.5 to more than 10 km<br />

out to <strong>sea</strong> from the high-water mark. Beyond the<br />

I qoliqoli boundaries are Fiji’s archipelagic waters,<br />

over which the government has legal control. Every<br />

Indigenous Fijian must be registered to a clan to<br />

have the right to fish in the I qoliqoli. As a token of<br />

respect, permission from the chief must be sought to<br />

fish in another I qoliqoli, even if the individual has an<br />

ancestral connection to that area. While demarcation<br />

of boundaries is perceived to be positive, it can also<br />

create conflict: if an area is overfished, people tend to<br />

move out to other I qoliqoli (Aalbersberg et al. 2005).


Land<br />

Fishing boundaries<br />

Figure 1. Map of the I qoliqoli or traditional fishing areas in Fiji<br />

Locally managed marine areas<br />

(LMMA) network<br />

The LMMA network is a group of marine conservation<br />

practitioners who have joined together to<br />

learn more about and increase the success of their<br />

implementation efforts. The network trains practitioners<br />

and community members how to collect<br />

comparable monitoring data from their project sites,<br />

and assists these groups in sharing and systematically<br />

learning from one another about LMMA project<br />

implementation across the region. It is active in eight<br />

<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> countries, including the Philippines,<br />

Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands,<br />

Vanuatu and Fiji. There are more than 400 active conservation<br />

sites and the level of interest in the network<br />

is growing. The LMMA network envisions providing<br />

an enabling environment for its respective membercountry<br />

networks and its various stakeholders to<br />

facilitate community-based adaptive management in<br />

their own countries.<br />

Fiji’s LMMA (FLMMA) network, consisting<br />

of over 200 communities, protects about 30% of<br />

Fiji’s nearshore reefs. The FLMMA network, in<br />

collaboration with other national stakeholders, is<br />

working towards establishing community resource<br />

management action plans in the 410 I qoliqolis<br />

around the country and, at the same time, achieving<br />

national goals of effectively managed areas in its<br />

164<br />

kilometres<br />

0 20 40 80 120 160<br />

jurisdiction’s fishing areas. Noticeable declines in<br />

coastal resources have prompted communities in Fiji<br />

to take action to protect their valuable natural and<br />

cultural coral reef resources, specifically to replenish<br />

fish stocks. The FLMMA network has established<br />

149 LMMAs (I qoliqoli) with about 216 tabu areas<br />

covering 17,726 km 2 of inshore area. The community<br />

benefits of LMMAs and corresponding tabu areas are<br />

far-reaching, and explain why the LMMA community<br />

has expanded across the region. The success of<br />

LMMAs is linked with fisheries, coastal protection,<br />

waste assimilation, re<strong>sea</strong>rch and education, as well as<br />

bequest values (IUCN 2009), and is attributed more<br />

or less to ecological, socioeconomic, political and<br />

traditional culture advancements.<br />

Intertidal sedentary marine species in tabu<br />

areas<br />

Ecological benefits from LMMAs and associated<br />

tabu areas for species associated with inshore<br />

intertidal areas have been described in the literature.<br />

In the Verata district, Tawake (2004) recorded an<br />

approximately 20-fold increase in Anadara clam density<br />

in tabu areas, and about 200−300% increase in<br />

harvest in adjacent fished areas. Other flow-on effects<br />

were attributed to the tripling of fish catches, and a<br />

subsequent 35−45% increase in household income.<br />

Aalbersberg et al. (2005) detail how, in one LMMA,<br />

mangrove lobster (Thalassina anomala) increased by


approximately 250% annually, with a spillover effect<br />

of roughly 120% outside the protected area. Perhaps<br />

more importantly, the study describes how weekly<br />

household income in three Fijian communities with<br />

LMMAs increased by an average 43% from 2000<br />

to 2003. The study authors noted that ’a successful<br />

locally managed marine area is, in effect, an alternative<br />

income source. The increase in fishery resources<br />

not only improves nutrition but also raises household<br />

income through market sales’. Tawake et al. (2001)<br />

noted that results such as these in other places have<br />

led communities to establish no-take areas in the<br />

mangroves and coral reefs to encourage lobsters and<br />

coral fish production. Sedentary marine species such<br />

as trochus, giant clam, <strong>sea</strong>weed and sandfish have<br />

been the focus of other LMMAs and tabu areas in<br />

the Pacific islands region.<br />

Social and economic studies in LMMA communities<br />

reveal that the social cohesion among the<br />

community members, the perceived condition of the<br />

fishery resources, the condition of the terrestrial and<br />

village environment, the community’s understanding<br />

of the values of their marine environment, and<br />

the amount of marine resources have all greatly<br />

improved (Fong 2006). They also conclude that the<br />

average catch per unit of effort and the income level<br />

of fishers have increased significantly compared with<br />

non-LMMA communities.<br />

Monitoring capacity in LMMA sites<br />

LMMA communities, in the process of collecting<br />

data, gain skills and experience in simple underwater<br />

reef monitoring, measuring key indicator species<br />

that indicate the effect of their management actions.<br />

Communities with tabu areas in intertidal zones often<br />

select <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> as an indicator of change, and<br />

carry out monitoring of their abundance. Sandfish<br />

(Holothuria scabra) were monitored twice in a tabu<br />

area and an adjacent harvest area in Navakavu in Fiji<br />

within a 6-month period (Meo and Mosley 2003).<br />

Community monitors took the lead to carry out<br />

surveys, analyse data and present results to be used<br />

for adaptive management (Figure 2).<br />

The tabu area had higher numbers of sandfish<br />

than an adjacent harvested area during both times of<br />

the survey. An LMMA site with its associated tabu<br />

area may provide the enabling environment and the<br />

opportunity for a cultured <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> grow-out<br />

phase; however, there needs to be careful consideration<br />

of the tabu habitat type and characteristics.<br />

It strongly suggests that the criteria for selecting<br />

165<br />

No. sandfish per 500-m 2 transect<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

March 2003<br />

September 2003<br />

Tabu Non-tabu<br />

Figure 2. Survey results of sandfish abundance<br />

(no. individuals/500 m 2) in a tabu locally<br />

managed marine area versus an adjacent<br />

non-tabu harvest area<br />

suitable habitats are extremely important in ensuring<br />

that the environment supports each life-cycle stage.<br />

The community of Natuvu, through the technical and<br />

advisory support of the FLMMA network and the<br />

Australian Centre for International and Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch re<strong>sea</strong>rchers, has taken an advanced step in<br />

applying <strong>aquaculture</strong> techniques combined with the<br />

LMMA approach (Hair et. al. 2011). The initiative<br />

demonstrates how restocked sandfish can be managed,<br />

and how the restocking was, in itself, a trigger<br />

to initiate such management via traditional means.<br />

On the other hand, it also narrows a gap in knowledge<br />

about how the necessary link or partnership can be<br />

established between the community and the investing<br />

partner in producing cultured organisms.<br />

The marine tenure system in the Pacific region is<br />

dynamic and contemporary. It is essential that the<br />

principles of good governance, including a participatory<br />

and inclusive approach, are upheld. The<br />

community-based management system provides<br />

flexibility to integrate traditional and science-based<br />

knowledge systems harmoniously.<br />

Resource governance in LMMA communities is<br />

quite pronounced compared with non-LMMA communities<br />

(Fong and Aalbersberg 2011). Hence, these<br />

communities are able to use existing arrangements<br />

to organise and orientate them to take the lead in<br />

any resource-related project such as grow-out of<br />

hatchery-produced <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> (e.g. restocking<br />

or <strong>sea</strong>-ranching activities). However, input from<br />

technical resource organisations is essential, as most<br />

communities will not have the capacity to undertake<br />

such a project alone.


Natuvu village case study<br />

In Fiji, application of the LMMA approach at<br />

Natuvu village on the island of Vanua Levu has<br />

demonstrated how a customary tenure system can<br />

be integrated with the <strong>sea</strong> ranching of sandfish in a<br />

tabu area (Hair et al. 2011). In this case, a number of<br />

advantageous factors coincided—over<strong>sea</strong>s aid funding<br />

and technical support, the availability of cultured<br />

juvenile sandfish, suitable physical conditions on the<br />

ground and the will of the community—to provide<br />

the trigger to institute such management via traditional<br />

means. The FLMMA network, local Fisheries<br />

officers, Natuvu community leaders, outside technical<br />

experts and local private-sector partners collaborated<br />

to carry out a trial <strong>sea</strong>-ranching project within<br />

the Natuvu tabu area.<br />

The project’s aim was to transfer sandfish-hatchery<br />

technology to local government and private hatcheries,<br />

increase juvenile production, and conduct <strong>sea</strong>ranching<br />

trials within a local coastal community. The<br />

initiative collectively engaged a range of stakeholders<br />

from national and local government, communitybased<br />

resource management advocates, the private<br />

sector and the community. The partnership was<br />

perceived as deliberate and essential in achieving the<br />

goal of the initiative. The juveniles produced in a privately<br />

owned hatchery were <strong>sea</strong> ranched in the tabu<br />

area in Natuvu and the communities were engaged<br />

in various components of the rearing processes from<br />

pen deployment, monitoring and enforcement. The<br />

community had a very strong sense of its ownership<br />

in the use of their I qoliqoli, and felt obliged to be<br />

engaged and to drive the initiative forward. The<br />

community-based adaptive management knowledge<br />

and skills of the FLMMA network engaging the<br />

Natuvu community over the past years was quite fitting,<br />

and prepared them for this <strong>aquaculture</strong> initiative.<br />

Although the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s did not reach commercial<br />

size (due to the destructive effects of a<br />

cyclone), the trial demonstrated that there is potential<br />

for this approach to succeed. The application of the<br />

LMMA approach at Natuvu demonstrated how a<br />

customary tenure system can be integrated with the<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching of sandfish in a closed area.<br />

Discussion and recommendations<br />

Aquaculture skill and technique is still new to most<br />

Pacific island communities; however, a community<br />

in Fiji has been exposed to this activity with positive<br />

166<br />

outcomes. Although it is a relatively new activity,<br />

one important issue in the process is the transfer<br />

of knowledge and technology at different levels.<br />

The <strong>aquaculture</strong> stages of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> culture<br />

are interdependent. One stage that relies on local<br />

knowledge is the location of broodstock animals<br />

(i.e. suitably sized adults) in their fishing ground.<br />

The hatchery phase requires specialised technical<br />

expertise to conduct successful spawning and<br />

larval rearing. All stakeholders should have a sound<br />

understanding about the importance of each stage in<br />

the entire process. In doing so, assessment of any<br />

capacity gaps in acquired skills can be carried out,<br />

and knowledge of different stages can be established.<br />

Appropriate training can then be arranged. Outside<br />

technical assistance must be accessible when needed.<br />

The grow-out (or <strong>sea</strong> ranching) stage requires<br />

the cooperation of community members (and their<br />

neighbours) to allow the animals to survive and grow,<br />

and to resist poaching. This stage has been shown<br />

to be technically feasible in certain suitable areas,<br />

but needs to be proven economically feasible before<br />

proceeding. The tabu LMMA provides suitable habitat<br />

for culture of sandfish and, with other supporting<br />

evidence, these areas would be prioritised for this<br />

purpose. After successful re<strong>sea</strong>rch work at this stage,<br />

a checklist can be prepared of the conditions required<br />

for optimal productivity and maximum benefits for<br />

the sandfish in tabu sites. Technical expertise is<br />

required to further re<strong>sea</strong>rch these conditions.<br />

Community-based initiatives are often unsustainable<br />

in the Pacific region. This is a major issue, as<br />

managers and practitioners unwittingly fail to include<br />

community goals and aspirations in the project.<br />

Communities must be collectively involved, and their<br />

daily lives need to be influenced by the initiative in<br />

order to get their active participation and engagement.<br />

LMMAs become active sites as communities work<br />

their way towards setting their resource management<br />

governance, and establishing new management units<br />

in committees and corresponding provincial networks,<br />

the operation of which ensures the sustainability of<br />

projects at the local level. The main reason that communities<br />

engage in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> culture projects is<br />

for alternatives to secure their livelihood and food<br />

security. The communities’ expectations are raised<br />

once they get involved in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>,<br />

and this imposes a risk if it fails to succeed. These<br />

factors should be studied further.<br />

At the moment, sandfish is commonly used because<br />

it is a well-established culture species (see papers in


these proceedings). However, expanding the list of<br />

culture species would be useful, given that most<br />

tabu areas comprise reefs and lagoon ecosystems.<br />

In Kiribati, the culture of white teatfish (Holothuria<br />

fuscogliva) in the hatchery has been achieved, but it is<br />

not known about its survival rate after release into the<br />

wild, since monitoring has been problematic. Further<br />

re<strong>sea</strong>rch into the culture and grow-out of this and<br />

other <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> species would assist communities<br />

and ecosystems of the Pacific islands region, where<br />

tabu areas could be used to optimise management and<br />

provide maximum benefits.<br />

References<br />

Aalbersberg W., Tawake A. and Parras T. 2005. Village by<br />

village: recovering Fiji’s coastal fisheries. Pp. 144–151<br />

in ‘World resources 2005 – The wealth of the poor:<br />

managing ecosystems to fight poverty’. United Nations<br />

Development Programme, United Nations Environment<br />

Programme, the World Bank, World Resources Institute.<br />

Fong P.S. 2006. Community-based costal resource management<br />

in Fiji islands: case study of Korolevu-i-wai<br />

district LMMA, Nadroga. MA thesis, University of South<br />

Pacific, Suva, Fiji.<br />

Fong P.S. and Aalbersberg W. 2011. The impacts of marine<br />

managed areas in the social, economic and governance of<br />

communities in Fiji. Conservation International Marine<br />

Managed Area Science Program, Fiji.<br />

Govan H., Aalbersberg W., Tawake A. and Parks J. 2008.<br />

Locally managed marine areas: a guide to supporting<br />

community-based adaptive management. Locally-<br />

Managed Marine Area Network, Suva, Fiji.<br />

167<br />

Hair C., Pickering T., Meo S., Vereivalu T., Hunter J. and<br />

Cavakiqali L. 2011. Sandfish culture in Fiji Islands. SPC<br />

Beche-der-mer Information Bulletin 31, 3–11.<br />

Hickey R.F. 2006. Traditional marine resource management<br />

in Vanuatu: acknowledging, supporting and strengthening<br />

indigenous management systems. SPC Traditional<br />

Marine Management and Knowledge Information<br />

Bulletin 20, 9–18.<br />

IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature)<br />

2009. Marine protected areas case study. Navakavu<br />

Locally Managed Marine Area, Viti Levu Island, Fiji.<br />

Johannes R.E. 1998. Government-supported, village-based<br />

management of marine resources in Vanuatu. Ocean and<br />

Coastal Management Journal 40, 165–86.<br />

Meo S. and Mosley L. 2003. Vueti Navukavu community<br />

biological monitoring baseline report. Institute of<br />

Applied Sciences Technical Report. University of the<br />

South Pacific: Fiji.<br />

Tawake A. 2004. Human impacts on coastal fisheries in rural<br />

communities and their conservation approach: a case<br />

study on kaikoso (Anadara spp.) fishery in the coastal<br />

areas of Verata district, Fiji. MSc thesis, University of<br />

the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji.<br />

Tawake A., Parks J., Radikedike P., Aalbersberg W., Vuki<br />

V. and Salasfsky N. 2001. Harvesting clams and data:<br />

involving local communities in implementing and monitoring<br />

a marine protected area—a case study from Fiji.<br />

Conservation Biology in Practice 2, 32–35.<br />

Vierros M., Tawake A., Hickey F., Tiraa A. and Noa R. 2010.<br />

Traditional marine management areas of the Pacific in<br />

the context of national and international law and policy.<br />

United Nations University—Traditional Knowledge<br />

Initiative: Darwin, Australia.


Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) fisheries in the<br />

Pacific region: present status, management<br />

overview and outlook for rehabilitation<br />

Kalo M. Pakoa 1*, Ian Bertram 1, Kim J. Friedman 2<br />

and Emmanuel Tardy 3<br />

Abstract<br />

A regional comparative assessment of reef resources and socioeconomic activities of fisheries in 17 Pacific<br />

island countries and territories (PICTs) conducted by the Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC) over<br />

an 8-year period (2002–09) reveals useful resource status information. Here we review the status of sandfish<br />

(Holothuria scabra) stocks from a range of PICTs, some of which have had a moratorium on commercial<br />

exports for many years. Holothuria scabra was present in 41% of countries and 23% of sites assessed,<br />

although sites with sandfish were mostly at low density, with 81% below the mean density of 1,200 individuals/ha,<br />

and the majority of sandfish were small (


There is also concern by fisheries managers and<br />

governments, because these easily accessible, inshore<br />

resources are often no longer able to return economic<br />

benefits to remote and rural communities that have<br />

few other options for income generation. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s,<br />

which are generally exported in their dried<br />

form (beche-de-mer) to Asian markets, are one of<br />

the oldest commercial export commodities for many<br />

PICTs. Some <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> species are also a local<br />

source of protein for the Pacific island communities.<br />

Where subsistence fishing was important, domestic<br />

commercial activities have often developed to support<br />

demand of this local delicacy. These domestic<br />

sales fit the definition of commercial fisheries, but<br />

are normally not classified in standard recordings<br />

of commercial activity. Instead, they are classed as<br />

subsistence fishing, which is normally exempted from<br />

formal legislation and controls.<br />

Production of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in the region varies<br />

depending on the size and nature of the island and<br />

the coastal systems of each country. The high island<br />

lagoon systems found in Melanesia dominate production,<br />

with Papua New Guinea (PNG) (600 t), Solomon<br />

Islands (400 t), Fiji (200 t) and New Caledonia<br />

(Kinch et al. 2006, 2008) producing the bulk of commercial<br />

products. PNG, the single most important<br />

producer, was supplying approximately 10% of world<br />

production before a moratorium on its fishery was<br />

declared in late 2009. Due to unregulated take and<br />

degradation of stocks, other countries have taken<br />

similar actions: Palau in 1994 (>10 years), Samoa<br />

(1994 to present), Tonga (2007 for 10 years), Vanuatu<br />

(2008) and Solomon Islands (2005). Historical<br />

time-series show that <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries in the<br />

Pacific region have been characterised by boom and<br />

bust cycles (Uthicke 2004). High production since<br />

the 1990s to early 2000 represents the latest fishery<br />

‘boom’ across the Pacific, and now the region is going<br />

through the ‘bust’ cycle, which has resulted in a number<br />

of moratorium declarations in the past few years.<br />

A regional comparative assessment of reef<br />

resources and socioeconomic activities of fisheries<br />

from 17 PICTs conducted by the Secretariat of the<br />

Pacific Community (SPC) over an 8-year period<br />

(2002–09) reveals useful resource status information<br />

not readily available in the past (Friedman et al.<br />

2010). Here we review the stock and management<br />

status of sandfish stocks from a range of PICTs.<br />

We use snapshot data to compare spatial distribution,<br />

abundance and size distribution of sandfish<br />

(Holothuria scabra) stocks across multiple sites in<br />

169<br />

five of the seven countries studied between 2002 and<br />

2009. In addition, we look at the status of golden<br />

sandfish (H. lessoni) in Tonga, where sandfish is<br />

naturally absent and golden sandfish is a species of<br />

potential interest for <strong>aquaculture</strong> development.<br />

Regional, national and state<br />

legislative control<br />

At present there is no regional agreement about the<br />

management of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries in the Pacific<br />

region (Friedman and Chapman 2008). National<br />

regulations control the species harvested, and the<br />

amount and size of sandfish exported (Table 1),<br />

although subsistence fishing and fishing for the local<br />

market are not well monitored or controlled.<br />

Community-based management<br />

Community-based management via customary<br />

marine tenure (CMT) in the Pacific islands region is<br />

an effective framework for sustainable management<br />

of marine resources. Reef invertebrate resources<br />

such as <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s can be managed effectively<br />

by CMT systems; however, progress in communitybased<br />

marine resources management in recent years<br />

has done little to reverse the declining trend in <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries. Customary resource tenure gives<br />

villages, clans or communities the right of ownership<br />

to the land or coastal areas where they live, or over<br />

which they have ancestral claims. These rights were<br />

in place prior to colonisation and are often recognised<br />

in national legislation (Table 2). A lot of attention and<br />

financial support have been given to community-based<br />

management in the past decade to strengthen local<br />

governance of resources (see Meo 2012). The goal is<br />

to delegate and empower some management responsibility<br />

to resource custodians, thereby relieving pressure<br />

on government, especially on the difficult roles<br />

of surveillance and enforcement. Customary management<br />

is promoted also as a means of preserving local<br />

traditions and cultural practices by recognising and<br />

supporting local governance structures.<br />

Survey results<br />

Here we review the survey data for sandfish stocks<br />

from a range of PICTs, some of which have had<br />

moratoriums on exports for up to 10 years. Snapshot<br />

data across sites in 17 SPC member island countries<br />

and territories were used to compare spatial


Table 1. Government regulation of sandfish stocks in Pacific island countries<br />

Country Commercial/subsistence<br />

extraction<br />

distribution (presence), abundance (density) and size<br />

distribution of stocks over an 8-year period, 2002–09.<br />

Sandfish stock status was assessed by shallow water,<br />

soft-benthos transect surveys. General fishery<br />

information was collected through discussions with<br />

fisheries officers, processors, exporters and fishers<br />

during visits. All data were entered into the Reef<br />

Fisheries Integrated Database at SPC in Noumea.<br />

Survey data are analysed and presented as ‘presence’<br />

(percentage of total replicate transects) as a measure<br />

of spatial coverage; density (individuals (ind)/ha) as<br />

a measure of abundance; and total length (cm) as a<br />

measure of size.<br />

Sandfish was present in seven PICTs, where<br />

the species is endemic, and golden sandfish was<br />

Individual<br />

species controls<br />

Palau Subsistence/commercial Commercial<br />

export ban<br />

Fiji Subsistence/commercial Commercial<br />

export ban<br />

170<br />

Size/weight controls Export licence<br />

required<br />

None –<br />

76 mm dry length –<br />

Vanuatu Commercial None None Yes–no limit<br />

New Caledonia Commercial None None Yes–no limit<br />

Tonga Commercial (golden sandfish) Commercial<br />

export ban<br />

70 mm dry length –<br />

Federated States of<br />

Micronesia<br />

Commercial None None Yes–no limit<br />

Solomon Islands Commercial None 100 mm dry length Yes–no limit<br />

Papua New Guinea Subsistence/commercial None 100 mm dry length Yes–no limit<br />

Table 2. Status of customary resource tenure in selected Pacific island countries in relation to sandfish stocks<br />

Country Commercial /<br />

subsistence extraction<br />

Palau Subsistence domestic<br />

sale<br />

Fiji Subsistence domestic<br />

sale<br />

Strength of village<br />

management a<br />

Customary marine<br />

tenure (CMT)<br />

Strong Strong Weak<br />

Moderate Strong Weak<br />

CMT supported in<br />

national legislation<br />

Vanuatu Commercial Variable Strong Weak<br />

New Caledonia Commercial Moderate No ?<br />

Tonga Commercial (golden<br />

sandfish only)<br />

Absent No No<br />

Federated States of<br />

Micronesia<br />

Commercial Low Yap state Yes–Yap state<br />

Solomon Islands Commercial Low Moderate ?<br />

Papua New Guinea Domestic/<br />

commercial<br />

Low Moderate ?<br />

a perception of survey personnel<br />

present only in Tonga. Of all the sites where sandfish<br />

and golden sandfish occurred, 44% had suitable<br />

habitat for sandfish (soft bottom substratum with<br />

<strong>sea</strong>grass, often with mangrove influence). The best<br />

sites where sandfish were present were Ngatpang,<br />

Ngarchelong and Airai (Palau), Maskelynes<br />

(Vanuatu), Riiken (Federated States of Micronesia),<br />

Dromuna, Muaivuso and Lakeba (Fiji), Oundjo<br />

(New Caledonia), Tsoilaunung and Andra (PNG),<br />

and Nggela (Solomon Islands), while golden<br />

sandfish was present in Ha’atafu and Nukunuku<br />

(Tonga). Density results for these sites (Figure 1)<br />

reveal that most sites held densities that were characteristic<br />

of an impacted stock (71% of sites had a<br />

mean density of below 942 ±156 SE ind/ha), and


60% of the sites recorded a mean of 23 cm size) is highly likely to be lost<br />

due to continuous exploitation by the subsistence<br />

and domestic-market sectors, and there is also<br />

significant export of raw <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> to Palauans<br />

living over<strong>sea</strong>s. Distance from the market, presence<br />

of marine protected areas (MPAs) and lower fishing<br />

pressure contributed to the more healthy stocks in<br />

the northern states. However, fishing controls of the<br />

domestic-market sector are still needed to prevent<br />

further depletion of the resource.<br />

Holothuria scabra or ‘dairo’ is a local delicacy in<br />

Fiji. Three sites that had sandfish—Muaivuso, Lakeba<br />

and Dromuna—assessed twice in this study, provided<br />

valuable insight into resource status over two time<br />

FSM = Federated States of Micronesia;<br />

PNG = Papua New Guinea<br />

Mean density at 942 individuals/ha<br />

Palau-Airai<br />

Fiji-Lakeba<br />

PNG-Tsoilaunung<br />

Tonga-Haatafu<br />

Solomon Is.-Nggela<br />

PNG-Andra<br />

Figure 1. Density of sandfish (individuals/ha) in the 14 best sandfish sites in the Pacific region<br />

Fiji-Nukunuku


periods. As in Palau, commercial export of dried H.<br />

scabra is banned in Fiji (since 1988), but harvesting<br />

for subsistence use, which includes domestic sales,<br />

is exempted from this regulation. Two of the three<br />

sites assessed in Fiji that had H. scabra (Lakeba and<br />

Muaivuso) had MPAs established, but they do not<br />

cover sandfish habitats. The density of H. scabra<br />

decreased across all sites between 2003 and 2009<br />

by 54%, 51% and 36% for Dromuna, Muaivuso and<br />

Lakeba, respectively (Figure 2).<br />

In the Northern province of New Caledonia,<br />

sandfish density was high, with a mean density of<br />

1,784 ± 203 SE ind/ha. Interestingly, the area surveyed<br />

was split by the size of individuals recorded<br />

between an area within an MPA and an area that had<br />

more open access. The larger and older individuals<br />

(mean length 22 cm) were found in the MPA, while<br />

the smaller and younger individuals (mean length<br />

14 cm) were recorded in the open access area.<br />

In Vanuatu, customary management is widely used<br />

to protect inshore resources. In the Maskelyne Islands,<br />

South Malekula, H. scabra fishing had been banned for<br />

some years prior to the surveys, and there is no subsistence<br />

use of sandfish. The study revealed the presence<br />

of good stock densities (2,202 ± 296 SE ind/ha) and a<br />

relatively healthy population, with sizes in the range<br />

6–32 cm length. There is no subsistence exploitation<br />

of sandfish, which is an advantage in that the community<br />

have to manage only the commercial aspect of<br />

the fishery. In addition, Maskelyne Islands is remote<br />

to the main island of Efate, where there are greater<br />

commercial pressure and incentives.<br />

In Tonga, sandfish is naturally absent and golden<br />

sandfish is featured strongly as a local delicacy. The<br />

golden sandfish is exploited for subsistence but,<br />

Density (individuals/ha)<br />

700<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

172<br />

more importantly, in domestic commercial sales<br />

of processed meat and guts, which are sold at the<br />

local market. Resource surveys conducted by SPC<br />

(K.J. Friedman, unpublished data; Friedman et al.<br />

2008) revealed the presence of golden sandfish in<br />

the three island groups of Tongatapu, Ha’apai and<br />

Va’vau; however, densities are patchy, suggesting<br />

that stocks may have been overharvested. Anecdotal<br />

reports (Charly Valentine, pers. comm.) indicate that<br />

this species was one of the main products exploited<br />

in the 1990s. The golden sandfish stock of Tonga is<br />

struggling to recover after this exploitation and the<br />

continued additional pressure from subsistence and<br />

domestic commercial fishing activities.<br />

Resource management status<br />

From this stock status information and existing<br />

management measures, we are able to suggest<br />

improvements in current PICT management systems<br />

to ensure that there is sustainable management or<br />

rehabilitation of sandfish resources.<br />

Where sandfish is not important in the local diet,<br />

subsistence and domestic commercial pressures don’t<br />

exist, simplifying the issue of management for legislators.<br />

However, the trend of resource depletion being<br />

experienced at sites surveyed in this study shows that<br />

both subsistence and domestic commercial sales are<br />

depleting sandfish resources across the Pacific region.<br />

Existing national and local management regimes are<br />

not reversing the trend of declining spatial availability,<br />

abundance and size in the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery.<br />

For most island countries, the existing national and<br />

local (province or state) <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> management<br />

regimes are not well aligned to ensure maximum<br />

600 2003<br />

500<br />

2009<br />

Muaivuso Lakeba Dromuna<br />

Figure 2. Density of sandfish (individuals/ha) in three sites assessed in Fiji between<br />

2003 and 2009


protection of resources, the socioeconomic needs of<br />

the population and the customary practices of managing<br />

resources. We believe that having comprehensive<br />

enforceable fishery management plans, and accompanying<br />

regulatory frameworks, for each country<br />

can provide managers and community leaders with a<br />

good basis for management.<br />

The 12-year moratorium on harvest of H. scabra in<br />

Palau has been successful in controlling commercial<br />

export of the species; however, the policy is not working<br />

effectively to improve the status of the resource,<br />

as larger sandfish with greater reproductive capacity<br />

are being removed by the domestic commercial fishery.<br />

Continuous depletion of the population through<br />

fishing could result in stocks of predominantly young<br />

animals (i.e. less breeding capacity), possibly leading<br />

to poor or erratic recruitment. Domestic commercial<br />

sale is proving to be the major contributor to the<br />

depletion of H. scabra in Palau, and development<br />

of regulations and policies are a matter of priority to<br />

control the fishery.<br />

In Fiji, where sandfish is a local delicacy, both subsistence<br />

and domestic commercial activity exist. In a<br />

similar situation to Palau, Fiji has banned commercial<br />

export of sandfish (Fiji Fisheries Act 1991), while<br />

subsistence and domestic commercial sales remain<br />

unregulated. Domestic commercial selling is classed<br />

under subsistence activity and thus is exempted from<br />

fisheries regulations. MPAs established by communities<br />

do not usually include H. scabra habitat<br />

(i.e. shallow, soft-bottom substratum) or, if they do,<br />

community enforcement of the MPAs is not working<br />

effectively in the sites assessed by this study.<br />

It is recommended that the national and provincial<br />

fisheries authorities take action to regulate domestic<br />

commercial exploitation of H. scabra, which is currently<br />

contributing significantly to the pressure on<br />

the resource.<br />

In New Caledonia, national and provincial control<br />

on the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery is working relatively<br />

well, with control systems partially protecting<br />

resources and controlling fishing pressure. Sandfish<br />

continue to be fished commercially for export, and it<br />

is the third-most important species fished in terms of<br />

quantity (Purcell et al. 2009). Putting limits on export<br />

licences is an effective tool to control exploitation<br />

and encourage responsible fishing. Moreover, this<br />

does not stop communities from setting aside parts<br />

of their lagoon area as MPAs. Therefore, as shown in<br />

this study, having an effective national control of the<br />

fishery provides a healthy environment for MPAs to<br />

173<br />

operate. Where an MPA is not effective in improving<br />

recruitment, stricter harvesting conditions on size and<br />

quality may be needed in addition to a national closed<br />

<strong>sea</strong>son.<br />

In Vanuatu, a moratorium was enforced in 2008 as<br />

a result of concerns about unsustainable harvesting.<br />

Community-based management was the principle<br />

form of control used by rural communities, while<br />

the Fisheries Department controlled the exit point<br />

of export. Customary management of tabu areas,<br />

as used in the Maskelyne Islands, was previously<br />

effective in managing the H. scabra resource.<br />

However, the lack of a national <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery<br />

management policy, monitoring protocol and associated<br />

regulations are existing weaknesses that make<br />

it difficult for authorities to control the industry.<br />

In one particular case, a community was lured by<br />

a foreign ‘trader’ into giving up their resource in<br />

exchange for a promise to reseed their reefs with<br />

juvenile cultured H. scabra (imported seed stock).<br />

This venture cost the community most of their wild<br />

stock, and did not result in the successful grow-out<br />

of seeded juvenile sandfish. Customary marine<br />

tenure is an effective management tool, but there are<br />

limitations to the scope of social law in the context<br />

of controlling fishing of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. In the case<br />

of social law, as experienced in the Maskelynes, the<br />

commercial nature of the fishery is changing rapidly,<br />

and is therefore relatively difficult to control. Lack<br />

of knowledge of the fishery, and introductions of<br />

new <strong>aquaculture</strong> opportunities with no proven track<br />

record, combined with weak national and provincial<br />

fishery control systems, were some of the factors<br />

contributing to management failure. A national<br />

fishery policy and additional regulations are needed<br />

to strengthen control and limit exposure of communities<br />

and their management systems to these external<br />

market pressures.<br />

In Tonga, where <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s are a local delicacy,<br />

several species are exploited for subsistence and<br />

domestic sale. Among the locally exploited species<br />

is golden sandfish, a high-value species of great<br />

importance to Tonga. The species was also important<br />

in the commercial export trade in the 1990s, with<br />

Tongatapu yielding most of Tonga’s golden sandfish<br />

production (according to anecdotal reports from<br />

export agents) prior to the 1997 moratorium. While<br />

the moratorium on golden sandfish was extended in<br />

recent harvest <strong>sea</strong>sons, lack of control on domestic<br />

sale activities continue to impede the recovery of its<br />

stocks in Tonga.


Aquaculture and the management<br />

of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> may provide options for<br />

restocking, stock enhancement and <strong>sea</strong> ranching to<br />

restore depleted populations and rebuild stocks to<br />

commercially viable levels (Bell and Nash 2004;<br />

Bell et al. 2008). However, while these technologies<br />

are being developed and refined to determine the best<br />

strategies, wild harvesting continues unabated, and<br />

there is significant anticipation and expectation by<br />

communities that <strong>aquaculture</strong> will save the fishery.<br />

The promise of <strong>aquaculture</strong> development in the<br />

Pacific region has been used as a tool to access and<br />

further exploit wild resources. The effects have been<br />

both direct—through the fishing of broodstock—and<br />

indirect—through ‘trial harvesting and clearing, to<br />

prepare the ground for seed’, which speeds up adult<br />

decline and habitat degradation.<br />

Many fishers and managers in PICTs lack basic<br />

knowledge of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> biology and <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

technology. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> fishers, resource owners<br />

and fisheries managers have been exposed to promises<br />

of huge profits from <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

via restocking of imported hatchery-reared juveniles<br />

(e.g. Vanuatu, Figure 3a); artificial splitting and <strong>sea</strong><br />

ranching of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s (e.g. Marshall Islands,<br />

Figure 3b); hatchery development and reseeding;<br />

and aggregation of broodstock to aid spawning as a<br />

form of stockpiling of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s before the next<br />

harvest <strong>sea</strong>son (Figure 3c).<br />

One main concern is that traders promote such<br />

ideas in order to obtain access to wild stocks<br />

through both the upper levels of management and<br />

the community. Following such experiences, advice<br />

was disseminated by SPC to assist decision-makers<br />

in making the best choices for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

development in their countries (e.g. SPC<br />

2009):<br />

1. Under no circumstance should investors in a<br />

hatchery, and <strong>sea</strong> ranching or restocking, be<br />

permitted to engage in fishing of the wild stock.<br />

2. Sea-ranching projects must be governed by<br />

robust partnership arrangements with resource<br />

owners.<br />

3. Investors must employ qualified hatchery staff to<br />

conduct the breeding and <strong>sea</strong>-ranching activities.<br />

4. Hatchery-reared animals must be released into<br />

defined areas, and harvesting operations must<br />

NOT involve collection from areas outside these<br />

defined areas.<br />

174<br />

5. The harvest size of <strong>sea</strong>-ranched animals should<br />

be above the size at first maturity, to allow spawning<br />

before harvest.<br />

6. Sea-ranched <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> should be clearly<br />

distinguished from wild <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>.<br />

7. Broodstock should be sourced from local stocks.<br />

8. Importation of broodstock and juveniles should<br />

NOT be permitted.<br />

9. Investors for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> hatcheries should bear<br />

the cost of proving the social and commercial<br />

viability of their operations.<br />

10. Investors should provide evidence of their capital<br />

commitment to do the re<strong>sea</strong>rch.<br />

11. Cutting up of animals for <strong>sea</strong> ranching is not<br />

a recommended <strong>aquaculture</strong> technology, and<br />

should never be promoted.<br />

12. Aggregation of broodstock to encourage spawning<br />

should not be used as a means to stockpile<br />

resources for harvest in the next open <strong>sea</strong>son.<br />

Discussion<br />

Although both customary marine tenure and fisheries<br />

regulations seek to manage the sandfish resource,<br />

there are limitations to the scope of both social and<br />

government law in the context of controlling fishing<br />

of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. In the case of social law, the<br />

commercial nature of these fisheries is relatively difficult<br />

to control, as witnessed by the differing range<br />

and level of adherence to social controls across the<br />

Pacific region. Equally, fisheries regulations are only<br />

effective when fisheries agencies have the resources<br />

to implement comprehensive controls. These are<br />

difficult to implement across the scales at which<br />

the fishery operates, and inoperable for subsistence<br />

fishing. To be effective, managers need baseline<br />

information on the status of resources and fishery<br />

levels, coupled with ongoing monitoring.<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> is one of the oldest fisheries in the<br />

<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> region, yet it is one of the least well<br />

managed. Many island countries do not have proper<br />

national, provincial or state <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery<br />

management policies or plans. Where such policies<br />

exist, regulations to enforce them are not developed,<br />

making enforcement difficult. Most PICT legislation<br />

is not reviewed regularly to adjust to changes and new<br />

developments of the fishery; for example, <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

and <strong>sea</strong>-ranching developments are relatively new<br />

initiatives, and are unlikely to be included in legislation.<br />

Aquaculture, restocking and <strong>sea</strong> ranching are<br />

management options that require further refinement


(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

Investor<br />

Wild<br />

stock<br />

Hatchery<br />

produced<br />

baby cucs<br />

$ $<br />

$ $<br />

$<br />

$<br />

Figure 3. SPC educational material warning PICT fisheries and <strong>aquaculture</strong> managers of the risks associated with<br />

(a) restocking of imported hatchery-reared juveniles in exchange for harvest of wild stocks; (b) artificial<br />

splitting and <strong>sea</strong> ranching of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s and (c) aggregation of broodstock to aid spawning as a form<br />

of stockpiling (illustrations by Youngmi Choi, SPC)<br />

before they are given wide-scale promotion in the<br />

region. Additional re<strong>sea</strong>rch is needed to fully test<br />

techniques. Private-sector <strong>aquaculture</strong> activities must<br />

be monitored to ensure environmental and social<br />

responsibility at all times.<br />

References<br />

Local<br />

resource<br />

owner<br />

Al-Rashdi K.M., Claereboudt M.R. and Al-Busaidi S.S.<br />

2007. Density and size distribution of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

Holothuria scabra (Jaeger, 1935) at six exploited sites in<br />

$<br />

$<br />

$<br />

$<br />

$<br />

$<br />

$<br />

$<br />

$<br />

$<br />

$<br />

Investor<br />

Wild<br />

stock<br />

$$$<br />

175<br />

“LOSS”<br />

No wild stock<br />

No baby cucs.<br />

“LOSS”<br />

No wild stock<br />

Mahout Bay, Sultanate of Oman. Agriculture and Marine<br />

Sciences, 12, 43–45.<br />

Bell J. and Nash W. 2004. When should restocking and<br />

stock enhancement be used to manage <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

fisheries. In ‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and<br />

management’, ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell,<br />

S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No. 463, 173–179. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Bell J.D., Purcell S.W. and Nash W.J. 2008. Restoring<br />

small-scale fisheries for <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. Ocean<br />

and Coastal Management 51, 589–593.


Conand C. 2004. Present status of world <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

resources and utilization: an international overview. In<br />

‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’,<br />

ed. by A. Lovatelli, C. Conand, S. Purcell, S.<br />

Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries<br />

Technical Paper No. 463, 13–23. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Friedman, K., and Chapman, L. 2008. A regional approach<br />

to invertebrate export fisheries. Policy brief. Secretariat<br />

of the Pacific Community: Noumea, New Caledonia.<br />

Friedman K., Eriksson H., Tardy E. and Pakoa K. 2010.<br />

Management of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> stocks: patterns of vulnerability<br />

and recovery of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> stocks impacted by<br />

fishing. Fish and Fisheries 12, 75–93.<br />

Friedman K., Purcell S., Bell J. and Hair C. 2008. Sea<br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries: a manager’s toolbox. Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

Monograph No. 135.<br />

Hasan M.H. 2005. Destruction of a Holothuria scabra<br />

population by overfishing at Abu Rhamada Island in the<br />

Red Sea. Marine Environmental Re<strong>sea</strong>rch 60, 489–511.<br />

Kinch J., Mesia P., Kere N., Manioli J. and Bulehite K. 2006.<br />

Socioeconomic baseline study: Eastern Marovo Lagoon,<br />

Solomon Islands. International Waters Project Pacific<br />

Technical Report No. 35.<br />

Kinch J., Purcell S., Uthicke S. and Friedman K. 2008.<br />

Population status, fisheries and trade of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

in the western central Pacific. In ‘Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s a global<br />

review of fisheries and trade’, ed. by V. Toral-Granda,<br />

A. Lovatelli and M. Vasconcellos. FAO Fisheries and<br />

176<br />

Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 516, 7–55. Food and<br />

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Meo S. 2012. Marine tenure and the role of marine protected<br />

areas for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> grow-out in the Pacific region.<br />

In ‘<strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong>’,<br />

ed. by C.A. Hair, T.D. Pickering and D.J. Mills. <strong>ACIAR</strong><br />

Proceedings No. 136, 162–167. Australian Centre for<br />

International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra. [These<br />

proceedings]<br />

Pakoa K., Lasi F., Tardy E. and Friedman K. 2009. The<br />

status of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s exploited by Palau’s subsistence<br />

fishery. Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Noumea,<br />

New Caledonia.<br />

Purcell S.W., Gossuin H. and Agudo N.N. 2009. Status and<br />

management of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery of La Grande<br />

Terre, New Caledonia. WorldFish Center and Secretariat<br />

of the Pacific Community: Noumea, New Caledonia.<br />

SPC (Secretariat of the Pacific Community) 2009. Use<br />

of hatcheries to increase production of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s.<br />

Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish<br />

Center, Background Paper 4, Sixth SPC Heads of<br />

Fisheries Meeting.<br />

Uthicke S. 2004. Overfishing of holothurians: lessons from<br />

the Great Barrier Reef. In ‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’, ed. by A. Lovatelli,<br />

C. Conand, S. Purcell, S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and<br />

A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 463,<br />

163–171. Food and Agriculture Organization of the<br />

United Nations: Rome.


Market potential and challenges for<br />

expanding the production of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

in South-East Asia<br />

Maripaz L. Perez 1* and Ernesto O. Brown 2<br />

Abstract<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s are fished worldwide, with more than 50 species commercially exploited. In South-East<br />

Asia, important sources of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> are Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia,<br />

with Singapore and Hong Kong being major export destinations. The product is popular among oriental<br />

consumers due to its alleged ability to improve vigour and cure a number of ailments. Supply in South-East<br />

Asia is declining due to overfishing. While significant volume is being produced from <strong>sea</strong> ranching and<br />

pond culture, this is not enough to offset rapidly declining collection from the wild. This and the increasing<br />

demand for the product have kept prices at attractive levels. Nevertheless, high prices do not translate to<br />

improved income for coastal households as individual catch size remains small and the cost per unit of<br />

fishing effort high. The market offers high premiums for well-dried, good-quality <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>. However,<br />

primary processing, which is the sole determinant of product quality, remains mostly at the village level,<br />

which employs traditional practices. The nature of the fishery itself, which is characterised by small catch<br />

volumes per day, leads to diseconomies of size, constraining large processing facilities that are compliant<br />

with ‘good manufacturing practice’ (GMP) and ‘hazard analysis critical control point’ (HACCP) standards<br />

from engaging in the business. The market also operates in the absence of officially formulated grades and<br />

standards that would guide transactions along the value chain.<br />

The marketing system for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> in South-East Asia is generally inefficient, and marketing channels<br />

are multilayered. Information asymmetry encourages proliferation of redundant players in the distribution<br />

system, while high transaction costs keep the overall marketing margin high but the price received by<br />

collectors low. Unlocking the full potential of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> industry calls for a set of well-conceived<br />

strategies that would sustain supply from the wild, increase the supply from <strong>aquaculture</strong>, improve primary<br />

processing and remove the inefficiencies in the distribution system. Emerging systems for more-efficient<br />

processing of the product should also be explored to address issues of economies of scale and improve returns<br />

on investment for GMP- and HACCP-compliant facilities, as well as the incomes of fishers and farmers.<br />

Introduction<br />

Marketing systems cover supply, demand and prices.<br />

Simple as it may seem, the complication becomes<br />

apparent when one considers that analysis of supply<br />

includes a range of concerns, from collection of the<br />

1 WorldFish Center, Los Laguna, Philippines<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

2 WorldFish Center / Socio-Economic Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Division,<br />

PCARRD, Los Laguna, Philippines<br />

177<br />

product to processing and distribution. In addition,<br />

supply is not only about quantity, but quality as<br />

well. Similarly, analysis of demand covers a wide<br />

array of interests. Of particular importance are the<br />

geographical characteristics of demand, the nature<br />

of products demanded, specific product requirements<br />

and the trend in volume resulting from changes in<br />

taste and preference. Price may be viewed as the<br />

result of interaction between demand and supply. In<br />

a capitalist economy, the price system determines<br />

what, how and how much of a given commodity to


produce. Price trends provide a snapshot picture of<br />

overall industry trends.<br />

Since the marketing system covers supply, demand<br />

and prices, consideration of attendant issues crucial<br />

to each component is inevitable. In the case of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>, overexploitation is a crucial supply issue,<br />

as are inefficiencies in processing and distribution.<br />

Also important are issues on grades and standards,<br />

such as the application of ‘good manufacturing<br />

practices’ (GMP) and ‘hazard analysis critical<br />

control point’ (HACCP) methods. On the demand<br />

side, globalisation of demand and the increasing<br />

number of new <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> products are interesting<br />

developments. Of course, supply and demand issues<br />

cannot be viewed in isolation. Understanding how<br />

one affects the other is at the core of a good marketing<br />

system analysis.<br />

This paper is limited to establishing the major<br />

features of the marketing system for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

in South-East Asia. The opportunities and challenges<br />

associated with this system, especially in<br />

relation to expanding production in response to a<br />

growing demand, is the primary focus. The potential<br />

for <strong>aquaculture</strong> is also explored. The paper uses<br />

secondary data on production and marketing, as<br />

well as information/data generated from relevant<br />

studies conducted in the Philippines, Vietnam and<br />

Hong Kong. The paper also provides a synthesis of<br />

results and discussion from available literature on<br />

the subject. The first section outlines the marketing<br />

system, particularly in terms of features common<br />

to countries in South-East Asia. The second section<br />

discusses the marketing opportunities and challenges<br />

to expanding <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> production in the region.<br />

The third section provides a synthesis of common<br />

marketing issues, and offers a set of recommendations<br />

on how to explore the opportunities, overcome<br />

the challenges, and deal with the various issues<br />

plaguing the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> industry in the region.<br />

Major characteristics of the<br />

marketing system for <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> in South-East Asia<br />

The marketing system for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> in South-<br />

East Asia can be characterised in terms of the three<br />

fundamental components: supply, demand and price.<br />

Supply includes collection from the wild and production<br />

from ponds, but is not limited to these. All<br />

activities related to processing and distribution of the<br />

178<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> products available to consumers are<br />

also viewed in this paper as part of supply. Demand<br />

is assessed in terms of the utility derived in consumption<br />

as well as in terms of its spatial and temporal<br />

nature. Characterisation of the marketing system in<br />

terms of price is limited to analysis of premium price<br />

for quality, price spreads and price trends.<br />

Supply-related marketing system<br />

characteristics<br />

There are a number of common threads that run<br />

across countries in South-East Asia when it comes to<br />

supply-related marketing system characteristics for<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>. Most countries in the region are major<br />

sources of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> products, and the species<br />

profiles are more or less the same since the countries<br />

have a similar <strong>tropical</strong> environment. Collection<br />

from the wild is generally marginal, and carried out<br />

mostly by low-income households in coastal villages.<br />

Primary processing remains traditional, and processing<br />

techniques are generally the same across the region.<br />

Overexploitation of high-value species is a common<br />

problem, with each country pursuing specific initiatives<br />

to address the problem. Finally, almost all countries<br />

are exploring <strong>aquaculture</strong> as a significant supply<br />

source to improve the incomes of coastal households<br />

and lessen the pressure of overfishing in the wild.<br />

South-East Asia is a major source of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>,<br />

with Indonesia, the Philippines and Malaysia among<br />

the top producers in the region. Despite the increasing<br />

demand and high price for the product, <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

fisheries are mostly artisanal, with <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> just<br />

an incidental catch to finfish. However, fishing activities<br />

where <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> are targeted appear to have<br />

significantly grown during the past few years.<br />

Recent reviews of the state of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries<br />

in South-East Asia showed alarming increases in<br />

fishing pressure. Overexploitation has led to local<br />

extinction of high-value species in some localities,<br />

and prompted closure of many national fisheries to<br />

allow stocks to recover, and to allow more sustainable<br />

management plans to be established (Purcell<br />

2010). In the Philippines, the Bureau of Fisheries and<br />

Aquatic Resources (BFAR) considers <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

to be a heavily exploited resource, and acknowledges<br />

that localised depletion has occurred in many fishing<br />

grounds. But BFAR possesses no quantitative census<br />

to support this claim (Gamboa et al. 2007).<br />

In response to overfishing and declining catches,<br />

and spurred by high international prices, <strong>aquaculture</strong>,<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching and restocking have been attempted


in a number of countries (Macfadyen et al. 2009).<br />

The Australian Centre for International Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>) and the Worldfish Center are<br />

among the international organisations leading<br />

the development of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> in<br />

South-East Asia. Hatchery and nursery protocols for<br />

high-value species, particularly Holothuria scabra<br />

(sandfish) are fairly well developed in the Philippines,<br />

Vietnam, Malaysia and Indonesia. Existing methods<br />

for sandfish grow-out include pond and pen culture<br />

as well as <strong>sea</strong> ranching.<br />

Primary processing<br />

In the Philippines, village assemblers are the ones<br />

who typically carry out primary processing. It is<br />

tedious and time consuming, and generally involves<br />

gutting, boiling, brushing, smoking and sun-drying<br />

(Brown et al. 2010). However, the processing steps<br />

depend on the species being processed, and techniques<br />

vary from place to place. Most collectors sell their<br />

collection fresh to assemblers or processors, while<br />

some process the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s themselves before<br />

selling them to assemblers, processors or other traders.<br />

In southern Thailand, processing of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

involves gutting and boiling the animal in <strong>sea</strong> water<br />

for 1 hour. The fishermen then bury them in the sand<br />

overnight, before removing them and stepping upon<br />

them for 10–20 minutes to squeeze out their colour.<br />

The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s are boiled again in water for<br />

1 hour, then brushed to remove the spicules, before<br />

they are ready for consumption or dried for storage.<br />

Primary processing of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in South-<br />

East Asia will likely remain traditional, small scale<br />

and limited at the village level. The nature of the<br />

fishery, which is widely dispersed and where daily<br />

collection volume from source villages is small,<br />

would not warrant economies of scale in processing.<br />

In Vietnam, a large processing company dropped <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> from its processed product line because<br />

insufficient volume to achieve economies of scale<br />

could be sourced locally. A detailed example of the<br />

processing method employed in the Philippines, as<br />

well as the associated costs, is shown in Table 1. Total<br />

cost is PhP248 (about US$6) for 12 kg of product.<br />

Distribution system<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> production in South-East Asia is for<br />

both domestic consumption and the export market<br />

(SEAFDEC 2009). However, the significance of the<br />

local compared with the export market varies significantly<br />

by country. Countries with small local demand<br />

179<br />

include the Philippines, Indonesia and Cambodia<br />

(see Labe 2009; Sereywath 2009; Wiadnyana 2009),<br />

where the bulk of production is exported and other<br />

consumption is limited to local Chinese residents.<br />

Significant local markets exist only in Vietnam and<br />

Malaysia.<br />

The general product flow for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

involves fishers, village assemblers and processors,<br />

other local traders in the source areas, and exporters<br />

generally located in big cities (Figure 1). Fishermen<br />

sell the product to the collector or buyer either<br />

fresh or dried. Buyers also directly collect dried <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> from fishers who opt to dry the products<br />

themselves. In the Philippines, though, village-level<br />

assemblers and processors do exist. They either wait<br />

at the landing sites to buy fresh <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, or<br />

the fishers themselves bring the catch to them. A village<br />

assembler carries out the primary processing,<br />

and stores the dried product until sufficient volume<br />

is accumulated for sale to exporters in the capital,<br />

Manila, and other big cities (Figure 2).<br />

In Malaysia, <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s are sent to both<br />

domestic and international markets, although a small<br />

portion of fresh product is sold at fish markets for<br />

consumption by the local Chinese population. The<br />

domestic market also includes sales to processors<br />

for producing traditional medicines and other healthrelated<br />

products (Ibrahim 2009). However, a major<br />

proportion of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> in Malaysia is exported.<br />

In Vietnam, <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> markets include dried and<br />

frozen product, although the volume of the latter is<br />

relatively small. Dried <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s are distributed<br />

to either domestic or over<strong>sea</strong>s markets.<br />

There are at least 635 firms involved in supplying<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> products all over the world (Table 2).<br />

Typically, <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> is one line in a variety of<br />

fishery and other agricultural products supplied.<br />

In the Philippines, supplier firms are engaged with<br />

a long list of high-value marine and agricultural<br />

products, including abalone and shark fin. Among<br />

South-East Asian countries, Indonesia has the largest<br />

number of firms (81) supplying <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> products,<br />

followed by Malaysia (61) and the Philippines<br />

(50). There are 21 supplier firms in Vietnam, while<br />

Thailand has 9. Along the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> supply<br />

chain, supplier firms are among the downstream<br />

players responsible for bringing the products to both<br />

local and international consumers.<br />

There are limited studies on the efficiency of the<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> distribution system in South-East Asia.<br />

However, a recent study conducted in the Philippines


Table 1. Steps involved in processing <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, the corresponding resources needed, and the associated<br />

costs (Palawan processors, the Philippines, 2010)<br />

STEPS RESOURCES NEEDED COSTS (PhP/day)<br />

1. Gutting at the mouth Petromax or lamp<br />

Flashlight<br />

Gasoline or kerosene<br />

Knife (good for 3 years)<br />

2. Boiling for 5 minutes<br />

– 2 hours<br />

3. Mixing with papaya leaves<br />

for 1 hour<br />

180<br />

Average Minimum Maximum<br />

2.17<br />

0.28<br />

44.00<br />

0.03<br />

1.85<br />

0.28<br />

33.00<br />

0.06<br />

2.78<br />

0.28<br />

54.00<br />

0.06<br />

Aluminium basin or big pan<br />

(good for 1–3 years)<br />

0.63 0.32 1.11<br />

Scoop made of net (good for 7 months) 0.29 0.29 0.29<br />

Pail (good for 1 year) 0.23 0.19 0.28<br />

Papaya leaves (can ask children to collect) 1.00 1.00 1.00<br />

4. Boiling with salt for 1 hour Match 1.00 1.00 1.00<br />

Salt 7.50 5.00 10.00<br />

Water 5.00 5.00 5.00<br />

5. Brushing to remove outer<br />

layer (spicules)<br />

Used laundry brush or toothbrush - - -<br />

6. Smoking for 1–24 hours Wood (for both boiling and smoking) 7.50 5.00 10.00<br />

Screen 0.33 0.33 0.33<br />

7. Sun-drying for 3–5 days<br />

until ‘stone dry’<br />

Galvanised iron 0.06 0.06 0.06<br />

8. Packing in plastic bag<br />

(holding until desired volume<br />

is attained, 2.5–5.0 kg)<br />

Plastic cellophane<br />

(100 pc × PhP0.5–2.0/pc)<br />

125.00 50.00 200.00<br />

9. Transporting (tricycle) Fare (to buying station and back) 44.00 44.00 44.00<br />

TOTAL<br />

Source: Brown et al. (2010)<br />

239.02 147.39 330.19<br />

Local trader<br />

International market<br />

Local trader<br />

Non-processing<br />

Local consumption<br />

City trader City consumer<br />

Figure 1. Typical product flow of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> in South-East Asian countries. Source: SEAFDEC<br />

(2009)


Commission<br />

agent<br />

1– 3<br />

days<br />

1–7<br />

days<br />

International<br />

market<br />

(direct importer)<br />

Hong Kong,<br />

Singapore, China<br />

(mainland),<br />

South Korea,<br />

Japan, Taiwan,<br />

2–4 months<br />

Figure 2. Product flow of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> in the Philippines. Source: Brown et al. (2010)<br />

(Brown et al. 2010) showed that it appears to be<br />

multilayered and characterised by information<br />

asymmetry. Redundant market players such as agents<br />

proliferate, and are engaged in pure arbitrage (i.e.<br />

taking advantage of a price difference between<br />

multiple markets). Collectors, the most upstream<br />

players in the chain, are generally not aware of the<br />

price of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> at the downstream end, leading<br />

to inefficient pricing mechanisms and inequitable<br />

distribution of profits along the chain.<br />

The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> industry is like an hourglass—<br />

large at each end and narrow in the middle. The<br />

number of upstream players is very large because<br />

collection takes place in so many coastal areas in<br />

the country. In contrast, the number of downstream<br />

players is fairly small. In the Philippines, there are<br />

only 45–50 firms involved in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> trade,<br />

four of which are very large and account for the bulk<br />

of the products moving along the value chain. The<br />

situation in the Philippines is similar to other countries<br />

in South-East Asia, particularly Indonesia and<br />

Vietnam. Interviews with traders in Vietnam indicate<br />

that two or three large buyers typically account for<br />

Diver/collector<br />

Village assembler/processor<br />

Provincial buying station of<br />

exporter<br />

Exporter<br />

181<br />

6–8<br />

hours<br />

6–8 days<br />

4–15 days<br />

1–3<br />

days<br />

Local trader<br />

1–3<br />

days<br />

Domestic market<br />

(Aranque or<br />

Manila China Town<br />

and hypermarts in<br />

provincial cities)<br />

the bulk of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> outputs in districts where<br />

a large volume is collected. However, the number of<br />

key Chinese customers catered to by existing supply<br />

chains is very large.<br />

This suggests that industry control is in the hands<br />

of a few large exporters, who capture much of the<br />

value generated by the industry. In the Philippines,<br />

the net income of an exporter from a kilogram of<br />

H. scabra could reach more than PhP1,000 (Table 3).<br />

This becomes even more significant considering the<br />

volume that passes through each exporter’s business.<br />

Their power and influence along the entire chain<br />

becomes apparent on closer examination. Large<br />

exporters have established a vast network of buying<br />

stations, agents and relational marketing with assemblers<br />

and processors.<br />

Value-chain mapping of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> in the<br />

Philippines showed the specific activities, associated<br />

costs and income received, as well as the opportunities<br />

and constraints faced by the upstream and downstream<br />

players along the chain (Brown et al. 2010)<br />

(Figure 3). Although similar studies are unavailable<br />

for other South-East Asian countries, the situation is


Table 2. Number and percentage of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> supplier firms by country<br />

Country No. of<br />

supplier firms<br />

Table 3. Cost and return, per kg of high-quality H. scabra, to various sectors of the Philippine supply chain<br />

Item Collector<br />

(fresh product)<br />

probably true also for Indonesia, which has a similar<br />

distribution system. A quick survey conducted by the<br />

authors also confirmed similarities with Vietnam,<br />

where a more detailed value-chain analysis is currently<br />

being prepared.<br />

The Philippine study showed that collectors<br />

receive the lowest net income from every kilogram<br />

of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, particularly H. scabra, while the<br />

net incomes of village-level assemblers, processors<br />

% Country No. of<br />

supplier firms<br />

Indonesia 81 12.76 Australia 7 1.10<br />

Malaysia 61 9.61 Cameroon 7 1.10<br />

United States 55 8.66 Taiwan 7 1.10<br />

Philippines 50 7.87 United Arab Emirates 7 1.10<br />

China (Mainland) 42 6.61 Mauritania 5 0.79<br />

Peru 32 5.04 Mauritius 5 0.79<br />

Singapore 32 5.04 Morocco 4 0.63<br />

Vietnam 26 4.09 Pakistan 4 0.63<br />

Japan 25 3.94 Russian Federation 4 0.63<br />

Sri Lanka 21 3.31 Spain 4 0.63<br />

Egypt 19 2.99 New Zealand 3 0.47<br />

Canada 18 2.83 Colombia 1 0.16<br />

Mexico 18 2.83 Fiji 1 0.16<br />

Maldives 17 2.68 Iceland 1 0.16<br />

South Korea 17 2.68 Italy 1 0.16<br />

Turkey 14 2.20 Mozambique 1 0.16<br />

Hong Kong 13 2.05 United Kingdom 1 0.16<br />

India 12 1.89 Uruguay 1 0.16<br />

Thailand<br />

Source: Brown et al. (2010)<br />

9 1.42 Total no. supplier firms 635<br />

Assembler/processor<br />

(dried product)<br />

182<br />

Exporter<br />

(dried product)<br />

Price received 300.00 4,200.00 5,364.00 a<br />

Cost of product 0.00 3,000.00 b 4,200.00<br />

Other costs c 15.07 58.21 61.67d Total costs 15.07 3,058.21 4,261.67<br />

Net return 284.93 1,142.00e 1,102.33<br />

a Based on US$120/kg @ PhP44.7/US$<br />

b Based on PhP300/kg fresh (10% dry-equivalent weight)<br />

c Based on Tables 14, 17 and 18 in Brown et al. (2010) (note: for exporter, Aquamarine cost was used)<br />

d Includes PhP8.47/kg cost (see Table 18 in Brown et al. (2010)) plus PhP0.70/kg shipment cost to Hong Kong (i.e. PhP7,000/10,000 kg)<br />

and opportunity cost of procurement capital of PhP52.50 (i.e. PhP4,200 × 1.25%/month)<br />

e Includes all costs in Table 17 in Brown et al. (2010) plus opportunity cost of procurement capital of PhP37.50 (i.e. PhP3,000 × 1.25%/<br />

month)<br />

and exporters are considerably higher. The study also<br />

confirmed that various players along the distribution<br />

system are already facing the problem of declining<br />

volume and increasingly smaller catch size.<br />

Increasing price and vibrant demand for the product<br />

remain as the most important opportunities available<br />

to these players. Aquaculture appears to be the most<br />

viable solution to halting the declining supply.<br />

%


DIVER/COLLECTOR<br />

Demand-related marketing system<br />

characteristics<br />

PROCESSOR<br />

Figure 3. Value-chain mapping of exported <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, the Philippines. Source: Brown et al. (2010)<br />

Demand for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> comes mainly from the<br />

middle and upper classes in Asia, especially in China<br />

and Japan. International trade is dominated by the<br />

Chinese, whose preference for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> stems<br />

from its high nutritional content and health-giving<br />

properties. Traditional knowledge on <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> as<br />

medicine exists; for example, the Cuvierian tubules<br />

used as crude plaster for minor wounds. Extracts<br />

183<br />

TRADER/EXPORTER<br />

FORWARDER/<br />

SHIPPER<br />

Classifying<br />

Pre-Collection Collection Delivery Receiving Processing Storing Delivery Receiving<br />

/Packing<br />

Storing Shipping<br />

Preparation of:<br />

• banca<br />

• food<br />

• other fishing<br />

implements<br />

COST<br />

(PhP/kg)<br />

BUYING<br />

PRICE<br />

PhP/kg)<br />

SELLING<br />

PRICE<br />

PhP/kg)<br />

NET<br />

INCOME<br />

PhP/kg)<br />

TIME<br />

(days)<br />

• Travel to<br />

fishing site<br />

• Fin-fishing/<br />

Sea<br />

<strong>cucumber</strong><br />

collection<br />

• Travel back<br />

to fish<br />

landing site<br />

DIVER/COLLECTOR<br />

• Bring<br />

collected<br />

<strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong><br />

to<br />

assembler<br />

for<br />

processing<br />

• Count the<br />

number of<br />

<strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

• Pay<br />

gatherer per<br />

piece of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

collected<br />

• Gutting at the<br />

mouth<br />

• Parboiling<br />

• Mixing with<br />

papaya leaves<br />

• Boiling with<br />

salt<br />

• Brushing to<br />

remove outer<br />

layer<br />

• Smoking<br />

• Packaging<br />

in plastic<br />

• Transport to<br />

trader,<br />

buying<br />

station, or<br />

exporter<br />

• Weigh the <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

• Further dry<br />

<strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

that are not<br />

yet stone-dry<br />

• Sort <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

according to<br />

species<br />

• Sort<br />

according<br />

to size<br />

• Pack in<br />

sacks lined<br />

with plastic<br />

cellophane<br />

or as<br />

required by<br />

clients<br />

15 21 9<br />

285<br />

300 4,200<br />

300 4,200 5,364<br />

1,179 1,155<br />

0.3 6 15<br />

PROCESSOR<br />

TRADER/EXPORTER<br />

• Secure minimum<br />

volume of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s for<br />

shipment<br />

• Process required<br />

permits<br />

• Pay necessary<br />

transport/customs<br />

fees<br />

FORWARDER/<br />

SHIPPER<br />

Classifying<br />

Pre-Collection Collection Delivery Receiving Processing Storing Delivery Receiving /Packing Storing Shipping<br />

CONSTRAINTS<br />

• Declining volume<br />

• High fuel cost<br />

• Ban on compressor<br />

• Increasingly smaller<br />

sizes<br />

OPPORTUNITIES<br />

• Increasing price due to<br />

increasing demand<br />

• Increasing number of<br />

alternative uses<br />

• Possibility of <strong>sea</strong>ranching/culture<br />

• Declining volume<br />

• Poor processing/product quality<br />

• Inadequate capital<br />

• Slow turn-over time<br />

• Increasing price due to<br />

increasing demand<br />

• Increasing number of<br />

alternative uses<br />

• Declining volume<br />

• Poor quality<br />

• Increasingly smaller sizes<br />

• Increasing price due to<br />

increasing demand<br />

• Increasing number of<br />

alternative uses<br />

EXPORT<br />

MARKET<br />

• Hong Kong<br />

• Singapore<br />

• China Mainland<br />

• Korea<br />

• Taiwan<br />

• Japan<br />

• etc.<br />

EXPORT<br />

MARKET<br />

from the muscular body are used for tumours, fungal<br />

infections, high blood pressure, arthritis and muscular<br />

disorders (Trinidad-Roa 1987).<br />

Hong Kong is still the major world market, followed<br />

by Singapore. However, Hong Kong generally<br />

re-exports products to mainland China. The product<br />

type, volume and value of global trade in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

are shown Table 4. World trade for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

continues to increase as the price for the product<br />

increases over time, with the Chinese population<br />

remaining the major consumers.


Table 4. Global trade in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

PRODUCT FORM YEAR<br />

2005 2006 2007<br />

Live, fresh, chilled<br />

Volume (million t) 56 34 67<br />

Value (US$‘000)<br />

Dried, salted in brine<br />

375 392 424<br />

Volume (million t) 6,463 4,883 5,734<br />

Value (US$‘000)<br />

Source: Brown et al. (2010)<br />

46,342 42,021 55,852<br />

One notable characteristic of the Hong Kong market<br />

is the proliferation of herbs and medicine stores,<br />

which sell <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> displayed in large glass jars<br />

(Figures 4, 5). A number of high-value <strong>tropical</strong> species<br />

can be found in these stores, including H. scabra,<br />

H. fuscogilva, Thelenota ananas, H. whitmaei and<br />

Actinopyga lecanora. Prices vary considerably from<br />

HK$1,200 to HK$1,500/kg, with reported sales of<br />

6–7 kg/day.<br />

In general, the Hong Kong market can be characterised<br />

as having:<br />

• a high preference for particular species.<br />

Apostichopus japonicus is the most popular species<br />

Figure 4. Herb and medicine store in Hong Kong<br />

184<br />

(also called meihua or wuxing), and is sold for up<br />

to HK$8,000 per 600 g in the herb and medicine<br />

stores. Holothuria scabra, H. fuscogilva, T. ananas<br />

and H. whitmaei are also highly valued<br />

• an apparent preference for product origin, with<br />

the general indication that all the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

being sold in the stores are from Japan, hardly<br />

acknowledging the huge importation of produce<br />

from South-East Asia<br />

• a distinct preference for product quality and size,<br />

resulting in a wide price range, even within a<br />

single species (Table 5).


Figure 5. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s on display in a herb and medicine store, Hong Kong<br />

Price-related marketing system<br />

characteristics<br />

As mentioned, price behaviour provides a snapshot<br />

of the overall industry status. Two important characteristics<br />

of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> marketing system<br />

that can be discerned based on price behaviour are<br />

stability and viability. Unlike most other agricultural<br />

or fishery product prices, which exhibit high <strong>sea</strong>sonal<br />

variability, the price of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> has been stable<br />

for the past 5 years. This is remarkable considering<br />

that <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> collection is somewhat <strong>sea</strong>sonal.<br />

However, the product can be stored for very long<br />

periods when properly dried, which probably smooths<br />

out the <strong>sea</strong>sonality effect.<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> is still considered a minor commodity<br />

in official commodity statistics of countries<br />

in South-East Asia, and reliable time-series data on<br />

price by country are not available. In addition, prices<br />

vary by species, size and quality. Time series of average<br />

price data (i.e. average of the various species)<br />

would therefore have practically no analytical value.<br />

Price behaviour over time can be assessed only for<br />

the same species belonging to the same size and<br />

quality classification.<br />

185<br />

A useful set of data on <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> prices covering<br />

the price range of several species traded in the<br />

Philippines during 2000–07 is provided by Labe<br />

(2009). For most commercially exploited species,<br />

the buying price (i.e. received by fishers) was three<br />

to four times higher in 2007 than in 2000. This<br />

phenomenal increase in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> price has<br />

been identified as the primary factor that induced<br />

overfishing, especially of the high-value species,<br />

in many countries. However, it is also possible that<br />

the increase in price was due to overfishing itself, as<br />

this would cause the supply curve to shift upward<br />

with increasing fishing effort (fishing cost) per unit<br />

catch. The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> industry appears to have<br />

been caught in a vicious cycle of high price leading<br />

to overfishing, which, in turn, leads to decrease<br />

in stock and total catch (supply), pushing the price<br />

even higher, and the cycle starts again. The depletion<br />

of wild <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> stock may have the effect<br />

of low-value species becoming medium value, and<br />

medium-value species becoming high value, until<br />

many of the species have become depleted (Pe 2009).<br />

Such high prices reflect the lucrative nature of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> production and trade. More importantly,<br />

high prices almost warrant the profitability of<br />

expanded production through <strong>aquaculture</strong>.


Table 5. Range of retail prices for dominant <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> species in South-East Asia<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> species Value range<br />

(US$)<br />

Stichopus hermanni 62.50<br />

Stichopus chloronotus 21.25–65.00<br />

Holothuria (Microthele) nobilis 20.00–78.95<br />

Bohadschia argus 20.00–30.00<br />

Apostichopus japonicus 17.50–112.50<br />

Holothuria fuscogilva 15.50–95.00<br />

Thelenota ananas 12.50–67.50<br />

Holothuria scabra 9.00–112.50<br />

Actinopyga lecanora 8.00–71.25<br />

Actinopyga miliaris 8.00-–44.00<br />

Holothuria edulis 8.00–22.50<br />

Stichopus variegatus 6.75–62.50<br />

Actinopyga mauritiana 5.00–15.00<br />

Holothuria sp. 4.75–44.00<br />

Actinopyga echinites 4.50–57.50<br />

Thelenota anax 3.68–60.00<br />

Holothuria rigida 3.00–59.00<br />

Holothuria impatiens 2.50<br />

Holothuria atra 1.75–22.50<br />

Pearsonothuria graeffei 1.75–5.00<br />

Bohadschia marmorata 1.40–23.75<br />

Source: SEAFDEC (2009)<br />

Marketing opportunities for<br />

expanding production<br />

The current state of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries completely<br />

discounts any possibility of expanding production<br />

through increased collection from the wild. The<br />

resource is already overfished in South-East Asia.<br />

Regulating harvest and other conservation measures<br />

are being contemplated in various countries to encourage<br />

stock recovery. Obviously, <strong>aquaculture</strong> is the only<br />

means to expand production of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> in the<br />

region. The technical viability of hatchery, nursery<br />

and grow-out (pond, pen and <strong>sea</strong> ranches) has already<br />

been established for certain species such as H. scabra.<br />

186<br />

The financial viability of H. scabra culture seems very<br />

positive considering its high value. However, there<br />

are marketing opportunities and challenges associated<br />

with expanded production, and these must be<br />

clearly understood if South-East Asian countries are<br />

to benefit fully from <strong>aquaculture</strong> programs.<br />

The demand for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> is the most important<br />

opportunity for expanded production. Consumers<br />

use <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> not only as food, but also as medicine.<br />

Demand will probably be limited to Chinese<br />

consumers, at least in the near future; however, considering<br />

the increasing global trend towards health<br />

foods and alternative medicines, its popularity with<br />

other ethnic groups may increase.<br />

Even assuming that demand will be limited<br />

to Chinese markets, the future of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

trade remains vibrant. China is the fastest growing<br />

economy in the world, with increasing gross<br />

domestic product, per-capita income and population<br />

growth—one in every five people in the world is<br />

Chinese. The distribution system for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

is well established in China, with numerous herb<br />

and medicine stores ensuring that consumer access<br />

to these products is very high. Another marketing<br />

opportunity is the increasing Chinese population in<br />

almost all countries in the world. Import demand<br />

from other countries can be expected to rise as<br />

Chinese residents increase.<br />

The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> trade is well established in<br />

South-East Asia. In each country, local traders are<br />

present to move the product from fishers to exporters<br />

or city-based buyers. Additional volume from<br />

expanded production through <strong>aquaculture</strong> can easily<br />

be absorbed by existing market chains. Exporters are<br />

the key players in the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> trade, since most<br />

countries in South-East Asia export the product and<br />

only a small amount is consumed locally. However,<br />

the transaction cost involved in the export business is<br />

high, as coastal villages are widely dispersed. In the<br />

Philippines, exporters have to establish buying stations<br />

in many parts of the country or engage the services of<br />

procurement agents to be able to secure bigger volume.<br />

One opportunity that may be explored is direct<br />

market linkage between the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> farmers and<br />

exporters. Unlike collection from the wild, where daily<br />

volume is small and geographically dispersed, production<br />

from <strong>aquaculture</strong> comes in larger volumes from<br />

identified locations during predetermined periods.<br />

This could lower the <strong>sea</strong>rch cost, and even transport<br />

and other costs normally incurred by exporters, and<br />

may entice them to transact directly with producers.


Marketing challenges<br />

While market prospects are generally bright, there<br />

are a number of challenges that have to be addressed<br />

if countries in South-East Asia are to benefit fully<br />

from expanded <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> production due to<br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong>. The absence of reliable market and trade<br />

information is a huge challenge. Updated price data,<br />

which could serve as the basis for formulating sound<br />

production and marketing decisions, do not exist. In<br />

the Philippines, information asymmetry persists—<br />

certain market players have greater access to information,<br />

giving them undue advantage, especially in<br />

price bargaining. Distribution systems become multilayered,<br />

since those who have the latest information<br />

(especially on prices) can embark on pure arbitrage.<br />

While there are cases where product moves only<br />

along three layers (collector→processor→exporter),<br />

there are also instances where the product moves<br />

along two or three additional layers involving local<br />

traders and commission agents. These appear redundant<br />

and contribute to marketing inefficiency rather<br />

than adding real value to the product.<br />

Another important challenge relates to primary<br />

processing, the single most important determinant of<br />

product quality and one for which the market pays a<br />

very high price. Primary processing methods currently<br />

in use are highly variable; no standard protocol is being<br />

followed, resulting in highly variable product quality.<br />

The methods employed are very traditional, without<br />

knowledge and consideration of existing standards<br />

for processed food products (e.g. GMP and HACCP).<br />

A large processing firm in Vietnam that employs<br />

global standards has ceased to include <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

in its product lines, since the volume of raw material<br />

(i.e. fresh <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>) was too small for the<br />

firm to achieve economies of scale. This problem is<br />

perhaps true for other South-East Asian countries.<br />

As mentioned, <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> collection is widely<br />

dispersed, and the volume from individual locations<br />

is small. Village-level processing, primarily carried<br />

out through traditional methods, will likely remain<br />

as a distinct feature of the industry in the region.<br />

Whether expanded production through <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

can change this is uncertain. Supply from <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

should be large enough and available on a continuous<br />

basis to encourage large processing firms to engage<br />

in processing the product.<br />

The absence of officially formulated and wellimplemented<br />

grades and standards for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> is<br />

another challenge. This is crucial since such measures<br />

187<br />

could guide transactions along the value chain.<br />

Fishers and village-level processors may not find the<br />

incentive to improve primary processing if they know<br />

that exporters would end up classifying good-quality<br />

product as lower grade based on arbitrary standards<br />

developed by the exporters themselves.<br />

Finally, the structure of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> market<br />

may be characterised as oligopsonistic (i.e. a market<br />

condition in which there are few buyers), resulting in<br />

market inefficiencies exacerbated by lack of adequate<br />

information along the chain.<br />

Recommendations<br />

South-East Asia is a major source of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

supplied to the world market. However, the fishery is<br />

mostly artisanal, carried out by low-income households.<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> is generally an incidental catch<br />

in finfish fishing, although fishery activities where<br />

it is targeted are becoming more significant. Given<br />

declining catch from the wild, a number of possibilities<br />

can be explored to meet the ever-increasing<br />

demand. For example:<br />

• promoting <strong>aquaculture</strong> involving technically established<br />

protocols that can be explored to address<br />

demand and supply gaps<br />

• expanding re<strong>sea</strong>rch to develop culture protocols<br />

for other high-value species<br />

• improving support for efforts designed to generate<br />

new products from <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

• exploring new export destinations, especially in<br />

countries with significant Chinese populations<br />

• establishing direct market linkage between producers<br />

and exporters to reduce market inefficiencies<br />

• establishing regularly updated statistics and information<br />

systems for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

• formulating and implementing official grades and<br />

standards<br />

• improving village-level small-scale primary<br />

processing<br />

• exploring strategies that could lead to the achievement<br />

of economies of scale in large-scale modern<br />

processing methods/facilities that observe international<br />

standards for processed food products.<br />

References<br />

Brown E., Perez M., Garces R., Ragaza R., Bassig R. and<br />

Zaragoza E. 2010. Value chain analysis for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

in the Philippines. WorldFish Center: Penang, Malaysia.


Gamboa R., Gomez A. and Nievales M. 2007. The status of<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery and mariculture in the Philippines.<br />

University of the Philippines in Mindanao: Davao City,<br />

Philippines.<br />

Ibrahim K. 2009. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> utilization and trade in<br />

Malaysia. Pp.41–62 in ‘Report of the regional study<br />

on <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries, utilization and trade in<br />

Southeast Asia 2007–2008’. Southeast Asian Fisheries<br />

Development Center: Bangkok, Thailand.<br />

Labe L. 2009. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> utilization and trade in the<br />

Philippines. Pp. 68–94 in ‘Report of the regional study<br />

on <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries, utilization and trade in<br />

Southeast Asia 2007–2008’. Southeast Asian Fisheries<br />

Development Center: Bangkok, Thailand.<br />

Macfadyen G, Ediriweer A.H.S., Perer U.L.K., Rajapakshe<br />

R.P.S.P., Amaralal K.H.M.L. and Mahipala M. 2009.<br />

Value chain analysis of beche de mer in Sri Lanka.<br />

GCP/SRL/054/CAN project report. Funded by Canadian<br />

International Development Agency and executed by Food<br />

and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.<br />

Pe M. 2009. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> utilization and trade in<br />

Myanmar. Pp. 63–67 in ‘Report of the regional study<br />

on <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries, utilization and trade in<br />

Southeast Asia 2007–2008’. Southeast Asian Fisheries<br />

Development Center: Bangkok, Thailand.<br />

188<br />

Purcell S.W. 2010. Managing <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries with<br />

an ecosystem approach. Edited/compiled by A. Lovatelli,<br />

A. M. Vasconcellos and Y. Yimin. FAO Fisheries and<br />

Aquaculture Technical Paper 520. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

SEAFDEC 2009. Report of the regional study on <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries, utilization and trade in Southeast<br />

Asia 2007–2008. Southeast Asian Fisheries Development<br />

Center: Bangkok, Thailand.<br />

Sereywath P. 2009. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> utilization and trade in<br />

Cambodia. Pp. 26–29 in ‘Report of the regional study<br />

on <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries, utilization and trade in<br />

Southeast Asia 2007–2008’. Southeast Asian Fisheries<br />

Development Center: Bangkok, Thailand.<br />

Trinidad-Roa M.J. 1987. Beche-de-mer fishery in the<br />

Philippines. Naga – the ICLARM Quarterly, October<br />

1987, 15–17.<br />

Wiadnyana N. 2009. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> utilization and trade in<br />

Indonesia. Pp. 30–40 in ‘Report of the regional study<br />

on <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries, utilization and trade in<br />

Southeast Asia 2007–2008’. Southeast Asian Fisheries<br />

Development Center: Bangkok, Thailand.


Understanding the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

(beche-de-mer) value chain<br />

in Fiji and Tonga<br />

Theo A. Simos 1*<br />

Abstract<br />

As reported in other Pacific island communities and many countries around the world, wild stocks of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> in Fiji and Tonga are declining because of unsustainable levels of fishing. The Pacific Agribusiness<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch for Development Initiative (PARDI) is a partnership involving the Secretariat of Pacific Community,<br />

the University of the South Pacific and a consortium of Australian universities, funded by the Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch. PARDI seeks to create sustainable livelihoods by identifying<br />

constraints to economic development in the Pacific islands region, and by developing appropriate technologies<br />

or products to resolve these constraints. It is currently evaluating the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> industry and its<br />

contribution to community livelihoods in Tonga and Fiji. This paper presents preliminary literature <strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

findings of the PARDI study into <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> market chains in these two Pacific island countries. Although<br />

an initial literature review revealed a scarcity of reliable information, interim maps of the current supply<br />

chains of both Fiji and Tonga have been developed and are discussed here. Re<strong>sea</strong>rch outcomes may lead to<br />

improvements in processing, value-adding to beche-de-mer and identification of new niche markets, and<br />

may facilitate investment in <strong>sea</strong> ranching and <strong>aquaculture</strong>.<br />

Introduction<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> is a valuable resource for income generation<br />

for many remote coastal dwellers in Fiji and<br />

Tonga, but the fisheries have exhibited boom–bust<br />

cycles since the early 1800s (Kinch et al. 2008).<br />

Fresh harvested <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s undergo a series of<br />

cooking and drying processes to produce a dried,<br />

shelf-stable product (beche-de-mer) that can be<br />

shipped in ambient dry conditions to markets in<br />

Asia, where it is highly prized by Chinese consumers<br />

(Ferdouse 2004). There are many species exploited,<br />

with some commanding high prices, but there is<br />

significant variability in quality and grade of bechede-mer<br />

(Choo 2008; Kinch et al. 2008).<br />

1 Adelaide University / <strong>ACIAR</strong> / Pacific Agribusiness<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch for Development Initiative (PARDI), Adelaide,<br />

South Australia<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

189<br />

As reported in other Pacific island communities<br />

and many countries around the world, wild stocks of<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> in Fiji and Tonga are declining because<br />

of unsustainable levels of fishing (Kinch et al. 2008).<br />

Consequently, <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> (particularly sandfish,<br />

Holothuria scabra) is becoming a priority group for<br />

development in the <strong>aquaculture</strong> plans of a number of<br />

countries, although, in reality, more development is<br />

needed before it can become a commercially viable<br />

alternative.<br />

A new development initiative related to <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> has been funded by the Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

(<strong>ACIAR</strong>): the Pacific Agribusiness Re<strong>sea</strong>rch for<br />

Development Initiative (PARDI). The partnership<br />

includes the Secretariat of the Pacific Community<br />

(SPC); the University of the South Pacific (USP);<br />

a consortium of Australian universities, including<br />

the Adelaide University Value Chain group, James<br />

Cook University and re<strong>sea</strong>rchers from Southern


Cross University; as well as industry representatives<br />

and government agencies in selected Pacific island<br />

countries (PICs).<br />

PARDI seeks to create sustainable livelihoods by<br />

identifying constraints to economic development in<br />

the Pacific islands region, and undertaking re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

to develop appropriate technologies or products to<br />

resolve these constraints. Therefore, it is currently<br />

evaluating the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> industry and its contribution<br />

to community livelihoods in Tonga and Fiji.<br />

This paper presents preliminary literature <strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

findings of the PARDI study into the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

market chains in these two PICs.<br />

Methodology<br />

In order to identify potential constraints to the <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> industry in Fiji and Tonga, PARDI has<br />

adopted the following approach:<br />

1. Review re<strong>sea</strong>rch and literature that have been<br />

undertaken in the <strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> region to identify<br />

gaps in our understanding of the whole value<br />

chain.<br />

2. Analyse and map the existing value chain from<br />

harvesting → processing → export → distribution<br />

→ consumption.<br />

3. Identify key partners and stakeholders (public<br />

and private) willing to co-invest and contribute<br />

to the re<strong>sea</strong>rch process, and who are also willing<br />

to participate in implementing change and<br />

improvements.<br />

4. Conduct re<strong>sea</strong>rch into constraints that limit the<br />

ability of these market chains to be more market<br />

responsive, equitable and, ultimately, more<br />

sustainable.<br />

Results and discussion<br />

Literature review<br />

An examination of existing literature (currently<br />

in progress) has highlighted significant gaps in<br />

knowledge about the current status and long-term<br />

sustainability of the beche-de-mer value chains in<br />

both Fiji and Tonga. It indicates that there is a lack<br />

of coordination between participants dependent on<br />

financial returns from fishing, processing and export,<br />

and that the issue of overfishing will need to be<br />

addressed by participants. There are also some issues<br />

relating to the impacts of harvesting and processing<br />

methods (Ram 2008).<br />

190<br />

Industry structure<br />

There are a large number of operational steps and<br />

participants involved in the industry, particularly<br />

once the beche-de-mer is exported. PARDI investigations<br />

have identified some key knowledge gaps in<br />

both the supply and demand sides of the industry in<br />

both countries, and a picture of the flow of value in<br />

transactions from fishing to consumption is emerging.<br />

Interim maps identifying key components of the<br />

current supply chains in both Fiji and Tonga have<br />

been developed (Figures 1, 2).<br />

While there are purported to be up to 19 buyers<br />

and processors listed in Fiji, the industry appears to<br />

be consolidating, and a number of operators have<br />

left the industry. The estimated harvest volume and<br />

value presented here is based on data provided by Fiji<br />

Fisheries (FITIB 2009). In Tonga, <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> harvest<br />

volume and value are estimated from Fisheries<br />

Department data. However, the economic returns and<br />

importance to the three island regions participating<br />

in this industry require further substantiation. The<br />

amount of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> collected live (fresh:dried<br />

= 12:1) (Skewes et al. 2004; Purcell et al. 2009) has<br />

been used to estimate beche-de-mer export volumes<br />

across all species; however, drying conversion<br />

ratios vary between species and may require further<br />

validation.<br />

Preliminary estimates indicate that the value of the<br />

raw commodity when consumed by restaurant patrons<br />

in China and other markets in Asia is increased in<br />

value many times. Further re<strong>sea</strong>rch interviewing<br />

participants in target markets will be undertaken.<br />

Chain orientation<br />

Both Fiji and Tonga beche-de-mer industries are<br />

very much ‘supply driven’, where fishers, processors<br />

and exporters push product down to the next part of<br />

the chain. There are no industry development plans,<br />

and the literature <strong>sea</strong>rch found little evidence of collaboration<br />

or flow of information between the fishing<br />

community, processors, exporters, customers and<br />

consumers of beche-de-mer in international markets.<br />

Flow of value and information<br />

Well-processed and dried beche-de-mer is an<br />

internationally traded commodity in high demand,<br />

but the flow of commercial value (cash income)<br />

from value-adding and marketing is tightly held by a<br />

few operators, and value returns to fishers from the<br />

resource are limited. Remote communities, whose


HARVESTING BUYING AND DRYING<br />

18+ species<br />

collected live<br />

FIJI ISLAND<br />

Volume distribution<br />

REGIONS<br />

Northern region<br />

Vanua Levu<br />

1,800 tonnes<br />

Central region<br />

Vitu Levu<br />

760 tonnes<br />

Southern region<br />

Lau Group<br />

680 tonnes<br />

Western region<br />

Mamanuca/Yasawa<br />

Group<br />

360 tonnes<br />

ESTIMATES<br />

Harvest value = US$6 m<br />

Harvest volume = 3,600 t<br />

19+ processing drying<br />

and trading companies<br />

operating in central and<br />

northern regions<br />

Buyers /<br />

Processors<br />

Agents<br />

Processors /<br />

Exporters<br />

Exporters<br />

ESTIMATES<br />

Export value = US$9 m<br />

Export volume = 300 t<br />

EXPORT TRADING MARKET CHANNELS<br />

Figure 1. Proposed Fiji beche-de-mer value-chain map based on information gathered by PARDI to date,<br />

and supply-chain information from Brown et al. (2010)<br />

HARVESTING BUYING AND DRYING<br />

20+ species<br />

harvested<br />

TONGA<br />

Volume distribution<br />

ISLAND REGIONS<br />

Nuas Group<br />

40 tonnes<br />

Vava`u Group<br />

960 tonnes<br />

Ha`apai Group<br />

800 tonnes<br />

Tongatapu<br />

400 tonnes<br />

ESTIMATES<br />

Harvest value = US$6 m<br />

Harvest volume = 4,000 t<br />

1 Licence<br />

Holder<br />

Processor<br />

8 Licensees<br />

Processors /<br />

Exporters<br />

8 Licensees<br />

Processors /<br />

Exporters<br />

8 Licensees<br />

Processors /<br />

Exporters<br />

ESTIMATES<br />

Export value =<br />

US$9.5 m<br />

Transport 95% <strong>sea</strong> freight,<br />

5% airfreight<br />

Figure 2. Proposed Tonga beche-de-mer value-chain map based on information gathered by PARDI to<br />

date, and supply-chain information from Brown et al. (2010)<br />

191<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Singapore<br />

SE Asia<br />

USA /<br />

Canada<br />

Taiwan<br />

Korea<br />

ESTIMATES<br />

Import value =<br />

US$11.25 m<br />

Principal consumption market<br />

Mainland China<br />

Importers<br />

Agents<br />

Wholesalers<br />

Retailers<br />

Grading<br />

Transportation<br />

Reconstitution<br />

Distribution<br />

Restaurants<br />

EXPORT TRADING MARKET CHANNELS<br />

Transport 80% <strong>sea</strong> freight,<br />

20% airfreight<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Singapore<br />

SE Asia<br />

USA /<br />

Canada<br />

Taiwan<br />

Korea<br />

ESTIMATES<br />

Import value<br />

US$12 m<br />

Principal consumption market<br />

Mainland China<br />

Importers<br />

Agents<br />

Wholesalers<br />

Retailers<br />

Grading<br />

Transportation<br />

Reconstitution<br />

Distribution<br />

Restaurants<br />

C O N S U M E R S<br />

Consumer value<br />

unknown<br />

C O N S U M E R S<br />

Consumer value<br />

unknown


livelihoods depend on the harvesting and processing<br />

of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, have little understanding of export<br />

customer and consumer requirements, and are at the<br />

mercy of local middlemen and traders.<br />

Beche-de-mer is generally not consumed locally<br />

but exported, mainly to destinations with large<br />

Chinese populations (Akamine 2009). However,<br />

the lack of publicly available knowledge around the<br />

structure of the distribution channels in Asia makes<br />

it difficult to collect information that will encourage<br />

changes to practices, and improvements in returns<br />

to participating communities. There was no public<br />

information available about assessing the economic<br />

impact of the decline in the wild resource, and it is<br />

difficult to determine what livelihood returns are<br />

generated to flow back to communities.<br />

Processing and export<br />

From the supply side, re<strong>sea</strong>rchers have identified<br />

that there is some waste of the resource that occurs<br />

during the harvesting and processing stages of bechede-mer<br />

(Ram et al. 2008). Production losses, due to<br />

undersized product, low-value species, postharvest<br />

damage and poor processing, may require intervention<br />

if deemed significant. PARDI has commissioned<br />

a new scoping study (to commence in 2011) on processing<br />

improvements, which will attempt to address<br />

these issues.<br />

In Fiji, some processors have raised concerns<br />

about the viability of the industry as catches decline,<br />

and they fear that declining stocks in Tonga may lead<br />

to a flood of new traders setting up new harvesting<br />

and processing arrangements in what is already a<br />

diminishing resource. Fiji and Tonga fisheries agencies<br />

have a history of regulating the exploitation of<br />

the fishery (Adams 1993).<br />

There are many markets around the world that<br />

import beche-de-mer, particularly in Asia (Choo<br />

2008). Little is known about the structure and role<br />

of agents, processors, licensees and exporters in these<br />

markets. Export volumes, species, quality and grades,<br />

sizes and value (Figures 1, 2) are estimated, and it<br />

is unclear which destination markets are exploited<br />

when, why and by whom? The market that has the<br />

most influence is mainland China, which traditionally<br />

has used Hong Kong (duty free entrepôt) to access<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> and other dried marine products from<br />

all parts of the world. These markets are principally<br />

located in the southern province of Guangzhou, with<br />

product traded to many markets throughout China.<br />

The growing affluence and opening up of China is<br />

192<br />

changing these trading patterns, and may provide<br />

opportunities to identify new market channels and<br />

consumer segments.<br />

Markets and consumers<br />

No reliable information on beche-de-mer exists<br />

that identifies the current structure and performance<br />

of market channels and participants in the export<br />

trade. Further re<strong>sea</strong>rch is required to identify data<br />

collected on the volume, value and destination of<br />

product exported from Tonga and Fiji. The preliminary<br />

value-chain maps (Figures 1, 2) describe<br />

the elements of each market chain. These are based<br />

on beche-de-mer re<strong>sea</strong>rch from Asia and the trading<br />

structures of other commodities exported to these<br />

markets (Brown et al. 2010).<br />

Consequently, little baseline information about<br />

wholesale and retail market channels, and the purchase<br />

behaviour and consumption of beche-de-mer<br />

by consumers, can be presented. Potential improvements<br />

in returns based on innovative product packaging<br />

or other specifications are therefore difficult<br />

to estimate. However, there is an expectation that,<br />

with growing expansion of the economy, the demand<br />

for beche-de-mer among Chinese consumers will<br />

continue to grow in both volume and value terms<br />

in the future.<br />

Once beche-de-mer is exported from the Pacific<br />

region, it undergoes many changes in handling, and<br />

passes through many destinations before it ends up in<br />

a restaurant on a plate. Further grading and reconstitution<br />

is undertaken and, in some cases, the product<br />

is sold in forms other than for food consumption.<br />

The product’s uses are diverse, and the value of the<br />

resource in these applications may need to be further<br />

understood.<br />

The lack of information on consumer preferences<br />

for the end product means that there are very few<br />

options for resource owners to exploit.<br />

Recommendations for further<br />

re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

In order to better understand the value chain and<br />

complete its mapping, the following re<strong>sea</strong>rch is<br />

recommended:<br />

1. conducting a supply-side study to understand the<br />

collection and harvesting of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> at the<br />

village scale<br />

2. conducting a supply-side study to understand the<br />

economic value and the income to communities,


and to develop ‘what-if’ scenarios where new<br />

options of restructuring the processing distribution<br />

and marketing can be evaluated<br />

3. investigating the collection, purchasing, valueadding<br />

and processing industry status. Operators<br />

in the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> industry need to be involved,<br />

and their role and contribution towards the future<br />

of the industry better defined<br />

4. conducting a demand-side study on market<br />

re<strong>sea</strong>rch to identify and understand current<br />

market destinations, channels, channel players,<br />

tax structures, pricing and profit margins<br />

5. investigating the demand-side of the export<br />

industry as it currently operates, including export<br />

destinations, market values, desirable species<br />

and grades, and packaging. These insights may<br />

help to establish clearer product knowledge, and<br />

enable better industry development plans to be<br />

initiated<br />

6. conducting consumer re<strong>sea</strong>rch in key markets<br />

(e.g. China, Hong Kong, Singapore) to better<br />

understand purchasing and consumption<br />

behaviour, perceived product benefits, and the<br />

many ways the product is presented, prepared<br />

and consumed. Consumer insights can then be<br />

used to improve existing product and packaging<br />

standards, and food safety and product<br />

handling procedures. Aspects such as place of<br />

origin, nutritional aspects, ethical marketing<br />

and sustainable environmental practices can be<br />

leveraged for the development of superior marketing<br />

and selling campaigns. New niche-market<br />

channels may be identified in markets willing to<br />

pay more for elaborately processed or partially<br />

processed products, packaged and labelled in<br />

non-traditional ways that can be unique and<br />

highly differentiated<br />

7. reviewing new technologies to match consumer<br />

requirements (new processing, preservation,<br />

packaging, transportation–distribution channels,<br />

and buying techniques) for the development of<br />

products that are unique and that capture product<br />

benefits.<br />

Other re<strong>sea</strong>rch topics that would be useful include:<br />

1. developing new models to enable fishers and key<br />

stakeholders to work together, create value-driven<br />

organisational structures and develop new market<br />

niches<br />

2. facilitating customs, finance and treasury agencies<br />

in developing new policy settings for investment<br />

attraction<br />

193<br />

3. collecting, analysing and disseminating industry<br />

data that can be used to develop sustainable<br />

industry plans.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Further analysis in unlocking the true state and<br />

economic benefits of the beche-de-mer value chains<br />

in Fiji and Tonga will be important in determining<br />

appropriate future interventions. PARDI will seek to<br />

engage fishing communities, processors, exporters<br />

and other industry stakeholders. They can play an<br />

important role in identifying ways to draw the attention<br />

of different stakeholders to opportunities for<br />

improvement at different stages in the value chain.<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch outcomes may lead to improvements in<br />

processing, value-adding to beche-de-mer and identification<br />

of new niche markets, and may facilitate<br />

investment in <strong>sea</strong> ranching and <strong>aquaculture</strong>.<br />

References<br />

Adams T. 1993. Management of beche-de-mer fisheries.<br />

SPC Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 5, 15–21.<br />

Akamine J. 2009. Challenging ‘boom and bust’ market pressures:<br />

development of self-managed <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> conservation<br />

in Rishiri Island, Hokkaido, Japan. Biosphere<br />

Conservation: for Nature, Wildlife, and Humans 9(2),<br />

1–12.<br />

Brown E.O., Perez M.L., Garces L.R., Ragaza R.J., Bassig<br />

R.A. and Zaragoza E.C. 2010. Value chain analysis for<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> in the Philippines. WorldFish Center:<br />

Penang, Malaysia.<br />

Choo P.S. 2008. Population status, fisheries and trade of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s in Asia. In ‘Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s: a global review of<br />

fisheries and trade’, ed. by V. Toral-Granda, A. Lovatelli<br />

and M. Vasconcellos. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture<br />

Technical Paper No. 516, 81–118. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Ferdouse F. 2004. World markets and trade flows of <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> / beche-de-mer. In ‘Advances in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> and management’, ed. by A. Lovatelli,<br />

C. Conand, S. Purcell, S. Uthicke, J.-F. Hamel and<br />

A. Mercier. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 463,<br />

101–117. Food and Agriculture Organization of the<br />

United Nations: Rome.<br />

FITIB (Fiji Islands Trade and Investment Bureau) 2009.<br />

Fiji islands investment opportunities in the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

industry. FITIB: Suva, Fiji Islands.<br />

Kinch J., Purcell S., Uthicke S. and Friedman K. 2008.<br />

Population status, fisheries and trade of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s in<br />

the Western Central Pacific. In ‘Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s a global<br />

review of fisheries and trade’, ed. by V. Toral-Granda,<br />

A. Lovatelli and M. Vasconcellos. FAO Fisheries and


Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 516, 7–55. Food and<br />

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Purcell S.W., Gossuin H. and Agudo N.S. 2009. Changes in<br />

weight and length of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s during conversion to<br />

processed beche-de-mer: filling gaps for some exploited<br />

<strong>tropical</strong> species. SPC Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin<br />

29, 3–6.<br />

Ram R. 2008. Impacts of harvest and post-harvest processing<br />

methods on the quality and value of beche-de-mer in<br />

Fiji islands. Masters thesis, Division of Marine Studies,<br />

School of Islands and Oceans, Faculty of Science,<br />

Technology and Environment, University of the South<br />

Pacific.<br />

194<br />

Ram R., Friedman K. and Sobey M. 2008. Impacts of<br />

harvesting and post-harvesting processing methods on<br />

the quality and value of beche-de-mer in Fiji Islands. The<br />

11th Pacific Science Inter-Congress in conjunction with<br />

the 2nd Symposium of French Re<strong>sea</strong>rch in the Pacific,<br />

Tahiti.<br />

Skewes T., Dennis D., Donovan A., Ellis N., Smith L. and<br />

Rawlinson N. 2004. Conversion ratios for commercial<br />

beche-de-mer species in Torres Strait. Torres Strait<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Program. AFMA Project Number: R02/1195.<br />

Australian Fisheries Management Authority and CSIRO.


Processing cultured <strong>tropical</strong><br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s into export product:<br />

issues and opportunities<br />

Steven W. Purcell 1* and Nguyen D.Q. Duy 2<br />

Abstract<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong>s cultured in ponds or in the <strong>sea</strong> are potentially lucrative commodities, but their export value can<br />

be gained or lost through the processing used. The gutting, water temperature, cooking times, handling and<br />

drying techniques should all be carefully controlled in order to achieve the highest grade possible for export.<br />

Farmed <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s may have thinner body walls than wild animals, but have the advantage of being of<br />

consistent size, can be processed immediately after being removed from the water, and can be processed in<br />

bulk. Processors must understand the preferences of over<strong>sea</strong>s importers, as desired processing approaches<br />

may vary. The use of fuel for boiling <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> to make beche-de-mer can be an ecological concern. Body<br />

organs and muscle bands may offer new products for value-adding of cultured <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. Likewise,<br />

markets are more open to fresh and canned product. Training and providing guides in the best methodologies<br />

and new market opportunities to processors present fruitful scope for improving the cost-effectiveness of<br />

farming and <strong>sea</strong> ranching <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s.<br />

1 National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross<br />

University, Coffs Harbour NSW, Australia<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

2 Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Institute for Aquaculture, Nha Trang, Khanh<br />

Hoa province, Vietnam<br />

195


Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) farming<br />

in a social–ecological context:<br />

conclusions from Zanzibar<br />

Hampus Eriksson 1*<br />

Abstract<br />

Sandfish (Holothuria scabra) farming is being promoted as a potential economic activity for coastal communities,<br />

and especially for those currently involved in fishing for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s—an unsustainable fishery.<br />

With the collapse of many <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> stocks, and with agendas to find new income alternatives for<br />

coastal populations, the interest in <strong>aquaculture</strong>, particularly in sandfish, will most probably increase. However,<br />

in-depth analysis of the social and ecological consequences from introduction of sandfish farming is lacking.<br />

In Zanzibar, Tanzania, 74 <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishers were asked if they would like to farm <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. About<br />

64% of the respondents were positive to farming. Their comments highlighted that they perceived farming<br />

as an addition, not a replacement, to catch from the fishery, and that they were concerned about the personal<br />

risks involved in an investment. The responses illustrate that <strong>aquaculture</strong> may have a negligible or negative<br />

effect on the fishery. There are also potential ecological impacts, which, of course, will depend on the scale<br />

of the activity, but for which there is currently little knowledge. The risk-awareness poses the question on<br />

what business model a sandfish enterprise should operate to reduce risk for communities with few income<br />

alternatives. The results from the interviews indicate that it is essential to learn from past sandfish farming<br />

initiatives and other <strong>aquaculture</strong> ventures that have resulted in the development of standards. It is also apparent<br />

that it is important to apply a social–ecological systems approach to sandfish farming development.<br />

Introduction<br />

Many <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries around the world are suffering<br />

from overfishing (Purcell 2010). This can generally<br />

be attributed to insufficient capacity to manage the<br />

fishery (Muthiga et al. 2010), lack of ecological knowledge<br />

from which to form management (Uthicke et al.<br />

2004), stochastic recruitment (Uthicke et al. 2009),<br />

strong market demand (Anderson et al. 2011), illegal<br />

fishing (Price et al. 2010) and limited presence<br />

of institutions (Eriksson et al. 2010). While local<br />

fisheries are becoming depleted, resulting in moratoriums<br />

being placed on exports in numerous locations<br />

(Purcell 2010), there is still a need to maintain income<br />

1 Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University,<br />

Stockholm, Sweden<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

196<br />

opportunities in communities and nations. In this context,<br />

<strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> is currently<br />

gaining momentum.<br />

The only suitable <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> varieties<br />

for farming, using hatchery-produced animals, are<br />

those in the sandfish species complex (Agudo 2006;<br />

SPC 2009). There is currently some uncertainty<br />

regarding species nomenclature across the Indo–<br />

Pacific region, where the taxon Holothuria scabra<br />

may contain varieties in need of species recognition<br />

(Massin et al. 2009). This text will therefore use the<br />

common name ‘sandfish’. Sandfish is a high-value<br />

species in strong demand on the international market,<br />

which makes it a promising candidate for <strong>aquaculture</strong>.<br />

Properties indicating its suitability for farming<br />

are, for example, that it feeds low in the food chain<br />

and occurs naturally in dense populations in many<br />

<strong>tropical</strong> coastal waters (Hamel et al. 2001).


A number of scenarios exist for sandfish <strong>aquaculture</strong>.<br />

Commonly, emphasis is on farming hatcheryproduced<br />

animals in enclosures or no-take zones,<br />

with the aims of rebuilding depleted stocks and<br />

enhancing livelihoods for coastal communities in<br />

areas with few income alternatives. The potential of<br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> as a source of income in coastal communities<br />

is illustrated by the prospective suitability of<br />

<strong>sea</strong> ranching, or farming hatchery-produced animals<br />

in pens in coastal waters (Bell et al. 2008; Robinson<br />

and Pascal 2009), in particular where there is a need<br />

to reduce effort in the fishery to prevent stock demise<br />

and maintain income opportunities.<br />

Fishers from poorer households are less likely to<br />

exit a declining fishery (Cinner et al. 2008), emphasising<br />

both how poverty traps communities in declining<br />

fisheries, and how important is the generation<br />

of income opportunities to support communities to<br />

reduce fishing effort. In addition, subsistence or artisanal<br />

fishers often support themselves from a diverse<br />

range of livelihoods (Allison and Ellis 2001), which<br />

raises a paradoxical question of whether profits from<br />

sandfish <strong>aquaculture</strong> will replace those of fishing, or<br />

if it will be perceived as an addition to fishing, with<br />

fishing effort continuing at similar levels. Subsistence<br />

or artisanal fishers are also generally exposed to high<br />

degrees of risk and uncertainty in terms of personal<br />

safety and income (Andersson and Ngazi 1998).<br />

This can prompt an increased emphasis on a cooperative<br />

behaviour to reduce risks, but, in a poverty<br />

situation, also reluctance to engage in activities that<br />

might further increase risk (Barrett et al. 2006).<br />

In Madagascar, where community-based sandfish<br />

farming from hatchery-produced animals has been<br />

introduced, sandfish juveniles are bought by families<br />

on credit and sold when harvestable (Robinson and<br />

Pascal 2009). Risk is thus to some extent borne by<br />

families. This risk raises concern with regard to how<br />

farming should operate to minimise risk in poor<br />

households.<br />

Zanzibar Island, in the western Indian Ocean, has<br />

an active fishery targeting <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s for export<br />

as beche-de-mer (Figure 1). The fishery in Zanzibar<br />

is institutionally marginalised, lacking management<br />

and control; as a result, easy-access stocks are widely<br />

depleted, and exports are maintained with the aid of<br />

sequential exploitation and trade (Eriksson et al.<br />

2010). In this study, information collected through<br />

interviewing fishers participating in the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

fishery in Zanzibar was used to explore how<br />

they perceive the potential activity of farming <strong>sea</strong><br />

197<br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s. The fishers had not been exposed to <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> <strong>aquaculture</strong> previously, and no hatcheries<br />

were operating in Zanzibar. The results were analysed<br />

in the context of how farming would fit into a coastal<br />

setting where the fishery is active and income alternatives<br />

are few. The focus of the analysis was the<br />

potential effect on the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery, and the<br />

potential risks involved for communities.<br />

Methods<br />

As part of a study to map and assess the local <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> fishery in Zanzibar, fishers were interviewed<br />

regarding their perceptions of the fishery<br />

and its management (Eriksson et al. 2010). Here,<br />

answers from the categorised yes-or-no question,<br />

‘Are you interested to farm <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s’, and<br />

the open-ended follow-up question, ‘If so, why/why<br />

not’, were used to analyse perceptions and attitudes.<br />

Interviews were conducted in eight villages (Nungwi,<br />

Mkokotoni, Uroa, Chwaka, Mazizini, Fumba, Unguja<br />

Ukuu and Mtende) (Figure 2), which were chosen<br />

because they had an active <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery. The<br />

interviewees were chosen randomly, and included<br />

men and women gleaning in nearshore areas, and<br />

men that breath-hold and scuba dive in nearshore and<br />

offshore areas. The interviews were semi-structured<br />

(Denscombe 1998) and conducted in Swahili with the<br />

assistance of a translator.<br />

Results<br />

Seventy-four fishers (51 men and 23 women) were<br />

interviewed. There was interest to farm <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

among both men and women; however, men<br />

showed a higher interest than women (69% and 52%<br />

positive answers, respectively) (Figure 3).<br />

Almost one-third of the interviewed fishers indicated<br />

that they perceived farming as an addition to<br />

catch from the fishery, rather than a replacement<br />

(Table 1). For example, fishing was highlighted as<br />

a continuous activity while having to wait for harvest.<br />

Some fishers also expressed concerns about<br />

the personal risks involved in a farming enterprise,<br />

and one fisher highlighted that this could be avoided<br />

through employment. The perceptions of risk were<br />

illustrated by, for example, an emphasis on the current<br />

lack of knowledge, the weak management of the<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery in Zanzibar and the likelihood<br />

of catch being stolen. Ten percent of interviewees<br />

highlighted their reluctance due to the risk of animals


A<br />

B<br />

Figure 1. A: Middleman gutting and boiling recently caught curryfish in Mkokotoni village,<br />

Zanzibar. B: ‘Pentard’ teatfish product held in hand over brown sandfish products at an<br />

exporter’s location in Stone Town, Zanzibar<br />

198


Tanzania<br />

Kenya<br />

Mozambique<br />

Western Indian Ocean<br />

20 km<br />

Mkokotoni<br />

Nungwi<br />

ZANZIBAR<br />

(Unguja Is.)<br />

Mazizini<br />

Fumba<br />

Chwaka<br />

Uroa<br />

Unguja Ukuu<br />

Mtende<br />

Figure 2. Map of Zanzibar (Unguja Island) showing<br />

locations of villages where interviews with<br />

fishers were conducted<br />

Table 1. Perceptions of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> farming among<br />

interviewed fishers in Zanzibar, Tanzania<br />

Issue Comment/concern<br />

Effect on fishery ‘I can still fish while I farm’<br />

‘Can develop more catch’<br />

‘Too long to wait for harvest’<br />

‘More to sell’ / ‘More income’<br />

Risk for<br />

communities<br />

‘Some could steal’<br />

‘Need training on how to do it’<br />

‘Cannot afford to wait for harvest’<br />

‘Only if employed’<br />

being poached. In relation to knowledge, four fishers<br />

(female) said they had no interest because they<br />

did not know how to do it, while three fishers (men)<br />

indicated an interest if taught how to farm. One fisher<br />

highlighted that it might be an activity for the whole<br />

village to get involved in.<br />

N<br />

199<br />

No. of responses<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Men<br />

n = 51<br />

Figure 3. Distribution of answers among men and<br />

women in Zanzibar, Tanzania, regarding<br />

their interest in farming <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s<br />

Discussion<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

69% 31% 52% 48%<br />

Women<br />

n = 23<br />

Effect on fishery<br />

The responses by <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishers in this<br />

study illustrate that there is an interest to farm <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>, but that it cannot be taken for granted that<br />

farming will reduce fishing pressure or improve the<br />

health of wild stocks. In many developing countries,<br />

a diversified palette of livelihoods (e.g. fishing, farming,<br />

trading or casual work) is common (Allison and<br />

Ellis 2001), arguing that it is unlikely that <strong>aquaculture</strong><br />

will replace any one fishing activity; rather,<br />

it will diversify alternatives, thereby providing a<br />

potentially important source of social resilience.<br />

Whether it will alleviate fishing pressure on other<br />

marine resources, however, is a complex question.<br />

As experienced in <strong>sea</strong>weed farming, <strong>aquaculture</strong> can<br />

have a negligible effect, or even a negative effect, on<br />

use of other marine resources, for example through<br />

increased capital required for fishery improvement<br />

(Sievanen et al. 2005). In Zanzibar, a majority of<br />

both fishers and trade middlemen make it clear<br />

that they want access to more capital to invest in<br />

the fishery (Eriksson et al. 2010), and it is therefore<br />

probable that profits from farming may be used for<br />

investing in the already depleted fishery. To what<br />

extent this scenario can be generalised is difficult<br />

to gauge. However, in most <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

fisheries, it is likely that fishing will continue or<br />

increase as long as the trade is profitable and the<br />

governance weak.


There are also potential ecological systems effects<br />

with sandfish farming that have not been properly<br />

evaluated or studied. Seaweed farming, which was<br />

introduced into Zanzibar during the 1990s, is today<br />

widespread, and may perhaps provide some reference<br />

for sandfish farming. It is also a low-intensive<br />

(i.e. does not require additional nutrient input)<br />

cash crop, grown in the same coastal communities<br />

where <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s are fished, and serves the<br />

international market. When <strong>sea</strong>weed farming was<br />

introduced, it was endorsed with minimal environmental<br />

concerns. Today, however, ecological studies<br />

have shown that it reduces the abundance of <strong>sea</strong>grass<br />

and macrofauna (Eklöf et al. 2005), reduces aboveground<br />

biomass up to 40% (Eklöf et al. 2006), and<br />

alters community structure (Bergman et al. 2001).<br />

These effects obviously depend on the scale of<br />

the activity. It is likely that sandfish farming will<br />

have ecological effects not yet studied, which may<br />

compromise ecosystem integrity (e.g. translocation<br />

of broodstock) or deteriorate ecological goods and<br />

services already providing subsistence to coastal<br />

communities. Therefore, it is equally important to set<br />

aside resources for studying the ecological systems<br />

effects of farming as it is to technically develop the<br />

hatchery and marketing aspects.<br />

Risk for communities<br />

Although a majority of fishers that were<br />

interviewed showed an interest in farming, some<br />

were reluctant to engage in the activity due to the<br />

perceived financial risk and lack of knowledge.<br />

This raises the issue of which business model an<br />

enterprise should operate under. In Zanzibar, use<br />

of coastal marine resources is characterised by<br />

cooperative and conflicting institutions that both<br />

cushion and exaggerate resource-use conflicts and<br />

sustainability (de la Torre-Castro and Lindström<br />

2010). This can be attributed to many similar fishing<br />

situations elsewhere, and highlights the institutional<br />

complexity that often affects resource use and ability<br />

to implement management. The risks of farming<br />

will therefore be dependent on the context in which<br />

it is introduced, highlighting the importance of a<br />

proper feasibility study before initiation. There are<br />

no universal blueprints.<br />

Fishers in Zanzibar also expressed concerns<br />

about the risk of poaching, a problem experienced<br />

in Madagascar (Robinson and Pascal 2009). This<br />

highlights a governance issue that is difficult to<br />

circumvent, but certainly compromises the activity<br />

200<br />

and constitutes risk for investors. In Madagascar,<br />

some communities that bought subsidised juveniles<br />

for grow-out in 2008 are still in debt from lost stock<br />

(G. Robinson, pers. comm.). This was obviously<br />

not the objective for any of the participants in this<br />

operation, but it pinpoints that the full production<br />

chain is not foolproof, and that there are monetary<br />

risks involved. In addition to risks of crop losses, it<br />

is costly to operate a hatchery, and profits are ‘far<br />

from certain’ (Hair et al. 2011). Some interviewed<br />

fishers consequently indicated that they would prefer<br />

employment, limiting their personal investment to<br />

labour. That women are being exploited for profits,<br />

as evidenced by an astounding discrepancy in catch<br />

value between fishing men and women (i.e. approximately<br />

US$2.40/kg versus US$0.10/kg paid to men<br />

and women, respectively, for similar catch (Eriksson<br />

et al. 2010)), is probably the reason why they are<br />

more reluctant to engage in farming than men are.<br />

This situation illustrates that fishing communities<br />

are already vulnerable and not resilient to cope with<br />

change. If the ambition is to create independence and<br />

economic opportunities for fishing communities, risk<br />

in farming enterprises should consequently not be<br />

borne at the community level.<br />

Outlook<br />

The reasons for <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> overfishing and<br />

stock degradation are complex. In some cases,<br />

however, weak governance and absence of capacity<br />

to implement control appears to be a central problem<br />

(Muthiga et al. 2010; Eriksson et al. 2010). In<br />

this context it is important to underscore that new<br />

technology cannot replace governance, nor can it<br />

produce the same number of species (sometimes<br />

reaching 35) that are targeted in the fishery (Purcell<br />

2010). Successful introduction of hatchery enterprises<br />

to restock depleted populations or alleviate<br />

pressure from fishing is therefore not guaranteed<br />

with the current level of knowledge, and the level<br />

of management participation in fisheries where<br />

governance is weak. That expectations from sandfish<br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> need to be balanced was illustrated<br />

in a brief questionnaire sent out to five scientists<br />

with leading insight and experience in the topic of<br />

sandfish farming, asking them to rank on a 1–5 scale<br />

how likely some considerations are to be realised<br />

(Eriksson 2009). The highest scoring concern<br />

was that farming would be introduced on inflated<br />

promises. This is very unfortunate—not living up<br />

to unreasonable initial expectations may undermine


the future potential success of sandfish farming.<br />

Moreover, it may lead communities into taking<br />

unnecessary risks.<br />

The future of sandfish farming lies in understanding<br />

and managing the fishery and beche-de-mer trade<br />

(e.g. Friedman et al. 2008), and in the critical evaluation<br />

of experiences and development of re<strong>sea</strong>rch<br />

in relation to successes and failures of farming; for<br />

example, filling the knowledge gap regarding business<br />

models that benefit fishers and communities.<br />

Therefore, it is very important to share knowledge<br />

and experience so that successes are replicated and<br />

mistakes not repeated. In this sense, developing new,<br />

or strengthening existing institutions, requires that<br />

learning mechanisms are implemented, and that a<br />

social–ecological systems perspective is applied. This<br />

whole process would be made easier by adopting a<br />

benchmark approach to developing standards for<br />

responsible sandfish farming, on which managers<br />

and political decision-makers can base decisions, as<br />

has been done for other <strong>aquaculture</strong> organisms (e.g.<br />

WWF 2010).<br />

Conclusion<br />

There is an interest among communities to farm <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong>s. However, the current fishery situation in<br />

Zanzibar is a result of weak governance, in that actors<br />

in the trade operate with minimal ambition to allow<br />

fishers to capture profits, and this raises questions<br />

regarding the feasibility of farming. The lack of<br />

governance mechanisms that would allow for a sustainable<br />

and functioning fishery cannot be substituted<br />

with new technology (hatcheries). Therefore, unless<br />

governance issues are addressed and improved, it is<br />

very likely that a farming enterprise will go down<br />

the same road as the fishery—impoverished and with<br />

marginal social equity.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

Thanks foremost to fishers that participated in this<br />

study, and also to Maricela de la Torre-Castro, Nils<br />

Kautsky, Max Troell, Narriman Jiddawi, Caroline<br />

Raymond, Hanna Nilsson, Chantal Conand, Maria<br />

Byrne and Kim Friedman for support. This work<br />

was funded by the Western Indian Ocean Marine<br />

Science Association Marine and Coastal Science<br />

for Management (WIOMSA/MASMA) regional <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> project, and by the Swedish International<br />

Development Agency (SIDA).<br />

201<br />

References<br />

Agudo N.S. 2006. Sandfish hatchery techniques. Australian<br />

Centre for International Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch, the<br />

Secretariat of the Pacific Community and WorldFish<br />

Center: Noumea, New Caledonia.<br />

Allison E.H. and Ellis F. 2001. The livelihoods approach<br />

and management of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy<br />

25, 377–388.<br />

Anderson S.C., Flemming J.M., Watson R. and<br />

Lotze H.K. 2011. Serial exploitation of global<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries. Fish and Fisheries. DOI:<br />

10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00397.x.<br />

Andersson J. and Ngazi Z. 1998. Coastal communities<br />

production choices, risk diversification and subsistence<br />

behaviour, responses in periods of transition. Ambio<br />

27(8), 686–693.<br />

Barrett C.B., Mareny P.P., McPeak J., Minten B., Murithi F.,<br />

Oluoch-Kosura W. et al. 2006. Welfare dynamics in rural<br />

Kenya and Madagascar. Journal of Development Studies<br />

42(2), 248–277.<br />

Bell J.D., Purcell S.W. and Nash W.J. 2008. Restoring smallscale<br />

fisheries for <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s. Ocean Coastal<br />

Management 51, 589–593.<br />

Bergman K.C., Svensson S. and Ohman S.C. 2001.<br />

Influence of algal farming on fish assemblages. Marine<br />

Pollution Bulletin 42, 1379–1389.<br />

Cinner J.E., Daw T. and McClanahan. 2008. Socioeconomic<br />

factors that affect artisanal fishers readiness to exit a<br />

declining fishery. Conservation Biology 23(1), 124–130.<br />

de la Torre-Castro M. and Lindström L. 2010. Fishing institutions:<br />

addressing regulative, normative and culturalcognitive<br />

elements to enhance fisheries management.<br />

Marine Policy 34, 77–84.<br />

Denscombe M. 1998, The good re<strong>sea</strong>rch guide for smallscale<br />

social re<strong>sea</strong>rch projects, 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill<br />

Education, Open University Press: Berkshire, United<br />

Kingdom.<br />

Eklöf J.S., de la Torre-Castro M., Adelsköld L., Jiddawi N.S.<br />

and Kautsky N. 2005. Differences in macrofaunal and<br />

<strong>sea</strong>grass assemblages in <strong>sea</strong>grass beds with and without<br />

<strong>sea</strong>weed farms. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 63,<br />

385–396.<br />

Eklöf J.S., Henriksson R. and Kautsky N. 2006. Effects on<br />

<strong>tropical</strong> open-water <strong>sea</strong>weed farming on <strong>sea</strong>grass ecosystem<br />

structure and function. Marine Ecology Progress<br />

Series 325, 73–84.<br />

Eriksson H. 2009. Ecological and institutional considerations<br />

for an expanding sandfish farming industry.<br />

Pp 32–33 in ‘Proceedings from the IFS/WIOMSA<br />

Aquaculture Symposium’, 5–12 December, Zanzibar,<br />

Tanzania.<br />

Eriksson H., de la Torre-Castro, Eklöf J.S. and Jiddawi N.<br />

2010. Resource degradation of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fishery<br />

in Zanzibar, Tanzania: a need for management reform.<br />

Aquatic Living Resources 24(4), 387–398.


Friedman K., Purcell S., Bell J. and Hair C. 2008. Sea<br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries: a manager’s toolbox. <strong>ACIAR</strong><br />

Monograph No. 135. Australian Centre for International<br />

Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch: Canberra.<br />

Hair C., Pickering T., Meo S., Vereivalu T., Hunter J. and<br />

Cavakiqali L. 2011. Sandfish culture in Fiji Islands. SPC<br />

Beche-de-mer Information Bulletin 31, 3–11.<br />

Hamel J.-F., Conand C., Pawson D.L. and Mercier A. 2001.<br />

The <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> Holothuria scabra (Holothuroidea:<br />

Echinodermata): its biology and exploitation as bechede-mer.<br />

Advances in Marine Biology 41, 129–223.<br />

Massin C., Uthicke S., Purcell S.W., Rowe F.W.E. and<br />

Samyn Y. 2009. Taxonomy of the heavily exploited<br />

Indo-Pacific sandfish complex (Echinodermata:<br />

Holothuriidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnaean<br />

Society-London 155, 40–59.<br />

Muthiga N., Ochiewo J. and Kawaka J. 2010. Strengthening<br />

the capacity to sustainably manage <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries<br />

in the western Indian Ocean. SPC Beche-de-mer<br />

Information Bulletin 30, 3–9.<br />

Price A.R.G., Harris A., McGowan A., Venkatachalam A.J.<br />

and Sheppard C.R.C. 2010. Chagos feels the pinch:<br />

assessment of holothurian (<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>) abundance,<br />

illegal harvesting and conservations prospects in British<br />

Indian Ocean Territory. Aquatic Conservation Marine and<br />

Freshwater Ecosystems 20, 117–126.<br />

Purcell S.W. 2010. Managing <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> fisheries with<br />

an ecosystem approach. Edited/compiled by A. Lovatelli,<br />

202<br />

A.M. Vasconcellos and Y. Yimin. FAO Fisheries and<br />

Aquaculture Technical Paper 520. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations: Rome.<br />

Robinson G. and Pascal B. 2009. From hatchery to community:<br />

Madagascar’s first village-based holothurian<br />

mariculture programme. SPC Beche-de-mer Information<br />

Bulletin 29, 38–43.<br />

Sievanen L., Crawford B., Pollnac R. and Lowe C. 2005.<br />

Weeding through assumptions of livelihood approaches<br />

in ICM: <strong>sea</strong>weed farming in the Philippines and<br />

Indonesia. Ocean and Coastal Management 48, 297–313.<br />

SPC (Secretariat of the Pacific Community) 2009. Use<br />

of hatcheries to increase production of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s.<br />

Background Paper 4. Secretariat of the Pacific<br />

Community and WorldFish Center. Sixth SPC Heads of<br />

Fisheries Meeting, 9–13 February 2009, Noumea, New<br />

Caledonia.<br />

Uthicke S., Schaffelke B. and Byrne M. 2009. A boombust<br />

phylum? Ecological and evolutionary consequences<br />

of density variations in echinoderms. Ecological<br />

Monographs 79(1), 3–24.<br />

Uthicke S., Welch D. and Benzie J.A.H. 2004. Slow growth<br />

and recovery in overfished holothurians on the Great<br />

Barrier Reef: evidence from DNA fingerprints and<br />

repeated large-scale surveys. Conservation Biology 18,<br />

1395–1404.<br />

WWF (World Wildlife Fund) 2010. Abalone Aquaculture<br />

Dialogue Standards. World Wildlife Fund, Inc. 2010.


World <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> markets: Hong Kong,<br />

Guangzhou and New York<br />

Jun Akamine 1*<br />

Abstract<br />

Hong Kong, Guangzhou and New York are the most important markets in the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> industry. Dried<br />

<strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s are brought from all over the world to be bought and sold in Hong Kong. Traders and<br />

whole salers are located along Nam Pak Hong Street in the Sheung Wan area in the north-west of Hong Kong<br />

Island. Hong Kong and Guangzhou in Guangdong province, China, have been tightly connected since the<br />

birth of Hong Kong in the 19th century. Through this channel, most of the dried marine products imported<br />

into Hong Kong are re-exported to Guangdong, from where they are traded throughout China. Wholesalers<br />

gather along Yat Tak Lou (Yi De Lu) Street in Guangzhou. This paper will explore the historical development<br />

of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> market in China, with special reference to regional differences. A recent development<br />

in the New York market is also explained in relation to trade of the Galapagos <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>, Isostichopus<br />

fuscus. The characteristics of these three intertwined markets indicate that resource management plans should<br />

take market preference into consideration.<br />

Trade in dried <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

In 2007 Hong Kong imported 5,296 tonnes (t) of<br />

dried <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>: Papua New Guinea exported<br />

the most to Hong Kong (704 t of dried <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>),<br />

Indonesia (653 t) second, and Japan (585 t)<br />

third. According to the Monthly Statistics of Hong<br />

Kong, it re-exported 4,149 t of dried <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

to 13 countries and regions in 2007. Among them,<br />

China imported 3,576 t (86% of the total re-export<br />

volume from Hong Kong).<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> species<br />

About 50 species out of a total of 1,200 are currently<br />

commercially traded in the world. Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> can<br />

be classified by its form in two categories: ci-shen<br />

(‘spiky’) and guang-shen (‘shiny). The spikes actually<br />

refer to the parapodia on a <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>’s back<br />

and sides that harden when dried.<br />

1 Nagoya City University, Mizuho-ku, Japan<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

203<br />

The most common ci-shen species is Stichopus<br />

japonicus, which can be found in the Bohai Sea and<br />

along the Korean, Japanese and Russian maritime<br />

coasts. The species shows regional variation in<br />

sharpness of its spikes, with the Hokkaido variety<br />

demonstrating the sharpest spikes. Several of the<br />

internationally traded ci-shen <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> species<br />

have temperate <strong>sea</strong>s as their natural habitat, while<br />

guang-shen <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s, the rest of the commercially<br />

traded species, are typically found in <strong>tropical</strong><br />

marine environments. Some types of <strong>tropical</strong> <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> found in the Pacific Ocean and around<br />

South-East Asia, such as Thelenota ananas and<br />

Stichopus chloronotus, are also classified as ci-shen.<br />

Isostichopus fuscus, a species harvested around the<br />

Galapagos Islands and in other locations, is also<br />

considered ci-shen.<br />

The differences in the form of <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

species also play an important role in <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong><br />

food preparation. Chinese cooking is largely divided<br />

into Beijing, Shanghai, Sichuan and Cantonese cuisine,<br />

and regional differences are most pronounced<br />

between Beijing and Cantonese cuisine. Traditionally,


in Beijing cuisine, ci-shen <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong>s are preferred,<br />

while the Cantonese prefer guang-shen species.<br />

While geographic location plays a part in the<br />

preference for the temperate S. japonicus in the north<br />

and the <strong>tropical</strong> Holothuria fuscogilva or H. scabra in<br />

the south, cooking styles also explain the difference.<br />

Pekinese prefer to serve food in small dishes, while<br />

the Cantonese use a large serving dish placed in the<br />

centre of a round table, which explains the higher<br />

demand for small ci-shen species in Pekinese, and<br />

large guang-shen species in Cantonese, cuisine.<br />

204<br />

Conclusion<br />

To my understanding, the New York market prefers<br />

ci-shen, especially I. fuscus. The species began to<br />

be commercially harvested in the late 1980s, and<br />

became very particular in symbolising globalisation<br />

of the <strong>sea</strong> <strong>cucumber</strong> industry, as well as <strong>sea</strong><br />

<strong>cucumber</strong> conservation (e.g. the Convention on<br />

International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild<br />

Fauna and Flora). This paper presumes that the New<br />

York market would have played an important role<br />

in the exploitation of I. fuscus in Central and South<br />

American countries such as Mexico and Ecuador.<br />

This is another reason why it is necessary to investigate<br />

market preference, and feed the results back into<br />

resource management planning.


Applying economic decision tools to improve<br />

management and profitability of sandfish<br />

industries in the <strong>Asia–Pacific</strong> region<br />

Bill L. Johnston 1<br />

Abstract<br />

A component of the recent Australian Centre for International and Agricultural Re<strong>sea</strong>rch-funded sandfish<br />

project in the Philippines, Vietnam and Australia has been to build and refine economic decision tools for<br />

both <strong>sea</strong> ranching and pond-based culture of sandfish. Presented here is the background to these models and<br />

some basic theory required to understand model outputs. Models take a discounted cash flow approach to<br />

predicting returns over a given life cycle. Output includes the expected annual returns when the farm is paid<br />

off, and the maximum interest rate at which funds can be borrowed to invest in the project. A risk module<br />

allows the user to incorporate anticipated risk to return from a range of sources. Access to these models is<br />

open, and a web address is provided.<br />

Introduction<br />

Sea <strong>cucumber</strong> farming presents a novel economic<br />

proposition as it differs in a number of ways from<br />

other <strong>aquaculture</strong> ventures. When compared with<br />

more traditional culture systems, <strong>sea</strong> ranching presents<br />

a unique set of parameters regarding survival,<br />

transport and release issues; social and management<br />

issues; and exposure to natural system variability.<br />

Similarly, pond-based farming differs markedly from<br />

culture of other species, most notably in the absence<br />

of feeding costs, which is offset in part by low stocking<br />

densities. Developing tools based on empirical<br />

experience gained through pilot-scale <strong>sea</strong> ranching<br />

and pond-culture projects provides a valuable tool to<br />

enable potential industry entrants to assess viability<br />

under their particular circumstances.<br />

Economic decision tools are a conceptual framework<br />

that allows users to make informed decisions<br />

1 Department of Employment, Economic Development<br />

and Innovation, Maroochy Re<strong>sea</strong>rch Station, Nambour,<br />

Queensland, Australia<br />

* Corresponding author: <br />

205<br />

underpinned by sound economic methodology. In<br />

this project, cost–benefit analysis was used as the<br />

conceptual framework for the economic evaluation<br />

of sandfish production. The customised economic<br />

tools (industry- or situation-specific) aim to assist<br />

producers and potential investors understand the<br />

economic requirements, costs and benefits, and risks<br />

involved in production.<br />

More specifically, economic decision tools allow<br />

producers to assess impacts such as di<strong>sea</strong>se, climate<br />

and market prices (known as externalities) that may<br />

influence profitability. They can also assess changes<br />

in profitability caused by changes in the cost of<br />

feed, labour, electricity, packaging and transport.<br />

Additionally, the decision tools can evaluate the economic<br />

effects of improvement in yield, future development<br />

plans or a change in production efficiency.<br />

Without rigorous economic decision frameworks,<br />

the resulting actions can be based on unsound,<br />

incomplete or misleading information. Equipping<br />

clients with decision tools provides improved capacity<br />

for increased profitability and sound economic<br />

development, and reduces the risk of failure.


Developing an effective, sustainable and profitable<br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong> enterprise requires a lot of time and<br />

capital input. Prevailing market conditions make it<br />

very important to thoroughly re<strong>sea</strong>rch and identify<br />

markets for products before venturing into production.<br />

This applies to almost all industries, particularly<br />

<strong>aquaculture</strong>. Little or no information is available to<br />

farmers and interested investors about the establishment<br />

costs or the profitability of operating many<br />

currently existing sandfish enterprises. By making<br />

an economic analysis tool available for farmers, we<br />

aim to provide the knowledge and information necessary<br />

so that they are fully prepared and understand<br />

the capital required, operating costs involved, labour<br />

input and profit margins they might expect to receive<br />

given an identified level of risk (e.g. the likelihood of<br />

losses by cyclones, or fluctuations in market price).<br />

Culture or <strong>sea</strong> ranching of sandfish is a relatively<br />

new income-generating activity (compared with traditional<br />

wild harvest) now being practised in a range<br />

of countries as an alternative to other income sources.<br />

Many people are interested in moving toward more<br />

sustainable methods of sandfish production, but do<br />

not have enough information to decide whether they<br />

are worth doing. They need a way of comparing these<br />

new activities with the other, more-familiar activities.<br />

The income, expenditure and investment levels for<br />

any business will be different from place to place.<br />

Once an economic decision tool framework has<br />

been developed for each income-generating activity,<br />

it can be distributed relatively easily (electronically)<br />

for rural development trainers or extension agents to<br />

use with people in an interactive way. Working with<br />

farmers to develop data inputs for models relevant<br />

to their particular situation will allow comparisons<br />

and decisions to be made regarding different incomegenerating<br />

activities.<br />

Project objectives<br />

The economic tools discussed here were developed<br />

or modified as a component of the current<br />

Australian Centre for International and Agricultural<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch (<strong>ACIAR</strong>) – WorldFish Center project in<br />

the Philippines, Vietnam and Australia. The broad<br />

economic objectives of the project include:<br />

• diversified livelihoods based on <strong>sea</strong> ranching of<br />

sandfish<br />

• improved livelihood resilience for small-scale<br />

pond farmers due to diversification<br />

• increased earnings for fishers from<br />

206<br />

– restored stocks of sandfish<br />

– production of A-grade beche-de-mer through<br />

increased size limits and improved processing<br />

methods.<br />

The tools discussed are specifically targeted at providing<br />

potential industry participants with a window<br />

into the economic realities of this type of enterprise.<br />

The primary focus has been to look at the possibility<br />

of sandfish culture and <strong>sea</strong>-ranching operations as<br />

alternatives to more traditional pursuits. Aquaculture<br />

enterprises are usually capital intensive, requiring<br />

substantial investment with extended payback periods.<br />

The ability of these enterprises to source investment,<br />

establish capital infrastructure and weather<br />

financial and operating expenses during inception<br />

has, in the past, been a major stumbling block for<br />

sustainable <strong>aquaculture</strong> industries. Variability in market<br />

prices and income flows also poses major hazards<br />

to establishing early profits and ensuring viability in<br />

the long term.<br />

The objectives of the modelling component of the<br />

project were to:<br />

1. develop three focused economic decision tools,<br />

based upon cost–benefit analysis, that people<br />

can use to assess the viability of the proposed<br />

sandfish enterprise, as follows<br />

• hatchery–nursery<br />

• pond-based production<br />

• <strong>sea</strong>-ranching production<br />

2. consult with people who are experts in these<br />

income-generating activities, and obtain the<br />

necessary information to develop representative<br />

business frameworks for each enterprise<br />

3. apply and interpret risk analysis profiles for the<br />

associated enterprises.<br />

Explanation of the models<br />

The economic models were developed using the<br />

Microsoft Excel spreadsheet program and based upon<br />

the cost–benefit analysis technique. Cost–benefit<br />

analysis is a conceptual framework for the economic<br />

evaluation of projects, with an aim to assist the user to<br />

make a decision regarding the allocation of resources.<br />

In particular, it helps the user to make decisions about<br />

whether or not to invest in an enterprise.<br />

Discounted cash-flow analysis was used to determine<br />

the annual cost structure and the likely profitability<br />

for each of the commodities. Discounting<br />

reduces future costs or benefits to an equivalent<br />

amount in today’s dollars. People generally prefer to


eceive a given amount of money now rather than the<br />

same amount in the future, because money has an<br />

opportunity cost. For example, if asked an amount<br />

of money they would prefer to receive in 12 months<br />

time in preference to $100 now, most people would<br />

nominate a figure around the $110 mark—to them,<br />

money has an opportunity cost of around 10%. A<br />

dollar tomorrow is not worth the same as a dollar<br />

today. Therefore, the timing and duration of these<br />

projects has an influence on the annualised costs and<br />

revenues of the project. The single amount calculated<br />

using the compound interest method is known as the<br />

‘present value’ (PV) of the future stream of costs and<br />

benefits. The rate used to calculate PV is known as<br />

the discount rate (opportunity cost of funds).<br />

All the models developed assume a project life of<br />

20 years, and use a real discount rate (equivalent to<br />

the current long-term bond rate, which is normally in<br />

the range 4–10%) to calculate the net present value<br />

(NPV). The budgets also incorporate the initial<br />

capital and establishment costs.<br />

Data input into the spreadsheet-based models<br />

is simple, and is guided by two simple rules—red<br />

colour denotes a calculation cell and yellow colour<br />

an input cell. Values (size of ponds, cost of labour<br />

etc.) can be entered into the yellow cells, while the<br />

values in the red cells are calculated from the data<br />

entered by the user. The summary statistics provide<br />

a breakdown of costs on a per unit basis.<br />

Once the data are entered into the model, the user<br />

can apply it to determine the impact of various management<br />

decisions. For example, the farmer may wish<br />

to know how a change in wages will affect his profit,<br />

or how introducing new management techniques will<br />

affect production.<br />

All the statistics are explained in the next section.<br />

The output includes the expected annual returns<br />

when the farm is paid off, and the maximum interest<br />

rate at which funds can be borrowed to invest in the<br />

project. Once an economic analysis has been done,<br />

this maximum interest rate figure should be taken<br />

into consideration when negotiating finance for a<br />

project.<br />

Definition of terms<br />

Net present value (NPV) and equivalent<br />

annual return<br />

The NPV is the difference between the present<br />

value of cash inflows and the present value of cash<br />

207<br />

outflows over the life of the project. If the NPV<br />

is positive, the project is likely to be profitable.<br />

When the NPV is converted to a yearly figure, it<br />

becomes annualised; in this report, it is called the<br />

equivalent annual return. It is a measure of equivalent<br />

annual returns generated over the life of the project<br />

expressed in today’s dollars.<br />

Discount rate<br />

The discount rate is the interest rate used in discounted<br />

cash-flow analysis to determine the present<br />

value of future cash flows. It takes into account the<br />

time value of money (the idea that money available<br />

now is worth more than the same amount of<br />

money available in the future because it could be<br />

earning interest), and the risk or uncertainty of<br />

anticipated future cash flows (which might be less<br />

than expected).<br />

Internal rate of return (IRR)<br />

The discount rate at which the project has an NPV<br />

of zero is called the internal rate of return (IRR). It<br />

represents the maximum rate of interest that could<br />

be paid on all capital invested in the project. In other<br />

words, if all funds were borrowed from a bank, and<br />

interest charged at the IRR, the borrower would<br />

break even; that is, recover the capital invested in the<br />

project at the end.<br />

Payback period<br />

A graph representing the cumulative cash flow<br />

is displayed in the models. The year in which the<br />

cash flow rises above zero is considered the payback<br />

period, and is a measure of the attractiveness of a<br />

project from the viewpoint of financial risk. Other<br />

things being equal, the project with the shortest<br />

payback period would be preferred. It is the period<br />

required for the cumulative NPV to become greater<br />

than zero, and remain greater than zero over the life<br />

of the project.<br />

Benefit:cost ratio<br />

The benefit:cost ratio (b:c) is simply a measure<br />

of the total flow of benefits over the life of the project<br />

compared with the flow of costs. If the ratio is<br />

greater than one, the project is deemed acceptable.<br />

In other words, the ratio describes the return per dollar<br />

invested; for example, if the b:c is 1.6, it can be<br />

said that, for every $1.00 invested in the project or<br />

enterprise a return of $1.60 is made.


Risk analysis<br />

Risk and uncertainty are features of most business<br />

and government activities, and need to be understood<br />

to ensure rational investment decisions are made. The<br />

process involves the following steps:<br />

1. defining the model—modelling the business<br />

operations<br />

2. defining the uncertain variables—price and yield<br />

3. assigning probability distributions for each of our<br />

uncertain variables—allocating probabilities to<br />

the categories of minimum, poor, average, good<br />

and maximum<br />

4. running the simulation and analysing the<br />

results—for this risk analysis, the results<br />

are displayed using a cumulative probability<br />

distribution.<br />

The best way to demonstrate how to input information<br />

for the risk analysis and interpret the results is<br />

with an example (Table 1). The user needs to first<br />

specify the likelihood of various risk factors (cyclone,<br />

theft etc.) affecting production (or yield). In Table 1,<br />

‘Risk factors’ are listed and then the probability of<br />

each of these is stated in the ‘Probability’ column,<br />

with reference to the description in the ‘Occurs’<br />

column.<br />

As seen in Table 1, data are entered in the<br />

‘Probability’ column, resulting in the cumulative<br />

percentages shown in the ‘Cumulative’ column. The<br />

user then enters the expected production or yield (as<br />

Table 1. Expected risks for sandfish farm example<br />

208<br />

in Table 2). It is not necessary to enter the minimum<br />

or maximum probabilities, nor their associated<br />

production.<br />

This example table indicates that there is a:<br />

• 10% chance of producing 0–20,000 kg (minimum<br />

to poor)<br />

• 20% chance of producing 20,000–25,000 kg (poor<br />

to average)<br />

• 40% chance of producing 25,000–27,500 kg (average<br />

to good)<br />

• 30% chance of producing 27,500–30,000 kg (good<br />

to maximum)<br />

The same process is followed for the price risk,<br />

except that the minimum and maximum prices are<br />

entered by the user. The minimum price cannot be<br />

zero; it may be a subsidised price set by the government<br />

or a historical market low.<br />

Once all the data have been entered, the simulation<br />

is run. The simulation produces a set of results that<br />

is graphically shown as a cumulative probability<br />

distribution (Figure 1), indicating the entire range of<br />

outcomes possible, based on the user’s inputs, for the<br />

enterprise.<br />

The annual return is represented along the x-axis<br />

and the probabilities on the y-axis (Figure 1). In this<br />

example, with the costs and prices as specified in the<br />

input (yellow) cells, the cumulative probability curve<br />

crosses the $0 return point at approximately 0.2. This<br />

can be interpreted as meaning that a 20% chance<br />

exists of making an annual return of less than $0<br />

Expected<br />

production<br />

Risk factors Occurs Probability Cumulative<br />

Zero–poor Cyclone, severe di<strong>sea</strong>se and flood 1 in 10 years 0.1 (10%) 0.1<br />

Poor–average Theft, some di<strong>sea</strong>se, lack of stock<br />

supplies<br />

2 in 10 years 0.2 (20%) 0.3<br />

Average–good Good conditions, minimal di<strong>sea</strong>se, good<br />

feed<br />

4 in 10 years 0.4 (40%) 0.7<br />

Good–maximum Excellent growing conditions, no di<strong>sea</strong>se 3 in 10 years 0.3 (30%) 1.0<br />

Table 2. Risk input proforma for sandfish farm example<br />

Expected production Kilograms of sandfish Cumulative probability<br />

Minimum 0 0.00<br />

Poor 20,000 0.10<br />

Average 25,000 0.30<br />

Good 27,500 0.70<br />

Maximum 30,000 1.00


–$15,000 –$10,000 –$5,000<br />

1.00<br />

0.90<br />

0.80<br />

0.70<br />

0.60<br />

0.50<br />

0.40<br />

0.30<br />

0.20<br />

0.10<br />

0<br />

$0<br />

Annual return<br />

$5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000<br />

Cumulative probability<br />

Figure 1. Cumulative probability distribution for sandfish farm example<br />

(i.e. making a loss for the year). Alternatively, a line<br />

drawn vertically from the $10,000 mark on the horizontal<br />

axis meets the curve at about 0.8 (projecting<br />

across to the vertical axis), indicating that there is an<br />

80% chance of earning less than $10,000, and so on.<br />

Should business owners ‘pay’<br />

themselves?<br />

While identifying costs for inclusion in the economic<br />

model framework, there is a tendency for users not to<br />

place any value on the time contributed by the owner<br />

of the business or the owner’s immediate family.<br />

Rather, this time and labour is treated as a non-valued<br />

good. It is generally assumed that the return to owner<br />

labour and management is realised only when the<br />

business generates sufficient profit.<br />

The fundamental problem with this way of thinking<br />

is that it distorts the decision to undertake that<br />

particular enterprise by underestimating the true cost<br />

of labour. If the business is able to generate sufficient<br />

revenues to compensate owner or family labour, plus<br />

all other operating (fixed and variable) and capital<br />

expenses, the enterprise would be deemed profitable.<br />

If the enterprise returns a profit based solely<br />

209<br />

on unpaid labour, the decision to undertake that<br />

enterprise would be based on false economies.<br />

There is a basic requirement to supply food and<br />

shelter (subsistence). If the enterprise selected does<br />

not meet this need, it should not be undertaken unless<br />

it provides a direct food supply to the family.<br />

Consideration must be given to the opportunity<br />

cost of labour. An economic value needs to be<br />

placed upon the time the business owner and his<br />

family devote to the enterprise, so that they can<br />

assess whether they are better off to be engaged in<br />

that business or in some other economic pursuit.<br />

Anybody using these economic models should estimate<br />

the cost of that labour, regardless of whether or<br />

not actual monies are to be drawn from the business<br />

to the owner or their family.<br />

Tool availability and access<br />

These tools have been developed as an open access<br />

utility, and are available for download from: . The tools continue to be<br />

refined based on updated empirical information, and<br />

new versions may be uploaded periodically.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!