Comparative Parasitology 67(1) 2000 - Peru State College
Comparative Parasitology 67(1) 2000 - Peru State College
Comparative Parasitology 67(1) 2000 - Peru State College
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
January <strong>2000</strong> Number 1<br />
<strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
Formerly the<br />
Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
A semiannual journal of research devoted to<br />
Helminthology and all branches of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
•><br />
,<br />
BROOKS, D. R., AND"£. P. HOBERG. Triage for the Biosphere: Hie Need and Rationale<br />
for Taxonomic Inventories and Phylogenetic Studies of Parasites/<br />
MARCOGLIESE, D. J., J. RODRIGUE, M. OUELLET, AND L. CHAMPOUX. Natural<br />
Occurrence of Diplostomum sp. (Digenea: Diplostomatidae) in Adult Mudpiippiesand<br />
Bullfrog Tadpoles from the St. Lawrence River, Quebec __<br />
COADY, N. R., AND B. B. NICKOL. Assessment of Parenteral P/agior/iync^us cylindraceus<br />
(Acatithocephala) Infections in Shrews „ . . ___.<br />
AMIN, O. M., R. A. HECKMANN, V H. NGUYEN, V L. PHAM, AND N. D. PHAM. Revision of<br />
the Genus Pallisedtis (Acanthocephala: Quadrigyridae) with the Erection of Three<br />
New Subgenera, the Description of Pallisentis (Brevitritospinus) ^vietnamensis<br />
subgen. et sp. n., a Key to Species of Pallisentis, and the Description of ,a'New<br />
QuadrigyridGenus,Pararaosentis gen. n. . , ..... '. _. ... ,-<br />
SMALES, L. R.^ Two New Species of Popovastrongylns Mawson, 1977 (Nematoda:<br />
Gloacinidae) from Macropodid Marsupials in Australia ."_ ^.1 . .<br />
BURSEY, C.,R., AND S. R. GOLDBERG. Angiostoma onychodactyla sp. n. (Nematoda:<br />
Angiostomatidae) and'Other Intestinal Hehninths of the Japanese Clawed Salamander,^<br />
Onychodactylns japonicus (Caudata: Hynobiidae), from Japan „„ „..„.<br />
DURETTE-DESSET, M-CL., AND A. SANTOS HI. Carolinensis tuffi sp. n. (Nematoda: TrichostrongyUna:<br />
Heligmosomoidea) from the White-Ankled Mouse, Peromyscuspectaralis<br />
Osgood (Rodentia:1 Cricetidae) from Texas, U.S.A. .<br />
AMIN, O. M., W. S. EIDELMAN, W. DOMKE, J. BAILEY, AND G. PFEIFER. An Unusual<br />
^ Case of Anisakiasis in California, U.S.A. 1<br />
KRITSKY, D. C., E. F. MENDOZA-FRANCO, AND T. SCHOLZ. Neotropical Mpnogenoidea.<br />
36. Dactylogyrids from the Gills of Rhamdia guatemalensis (Siluriformes:<br />
Pimelodidae) from Cenotes of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, with Proposal of<br />
Ameloblastella gen. n. and Aphanoblastella gen. ,n. (Dactylogyridae:<br />
Ancyrocephalinae) , : __. • • •"' . . • ' - . ; • . ' ,-.'<br />
MENDOZA-FRANCO, p., V. VIDAL-MARTINEZ, L.'AGUIRRE-MACEDO, R. RODR!GUEZ-<br />
CANUL, AND T. SCHOLZ. Species of Sciadicleithrum (Dactylogyridae:<br />
.Ancyrocephalinae) of Cichlid Fishes from Southeastern Mexico and Guatemala:<br />
New Morphological Data and Host and Geographical Records _^ ;: . ;/. • -~ ___^<br />
(Continued on Outside Back Cover)<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
32<br />
40-<br />
51<br />
60<br />
66<br />
71<br />
76<br />
85
THE SOCIETY meets approximately five times per year for the presentation and discussion of papers<br />
in any and all branches of parasitology or related sciences. All interested persons are invited to attend.<br />
Persons interested in membership in the Helminthological Society of Washington may obtain application<br />
blanks in recent issues of COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY. A year's subscription to<br />
-COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY is included in the annual dues of $25100 domestic and $28.00<br />
foreign. Institutional subscriptions are $50.00 per year. Applications for membership, accompanied by<br />
payments, may be sent to the Corresponding Secretary-Treasurer, Nancy D. Pacheco, 9708 DePaul<br />
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, U.S.A.<br />
The HelmSoc internet home page is located at>http://www.gettysburg.edu/~shendrix/helmsoc.html<br />
OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY FOR <strong>2000</strong><br />
President: - DENNIS J. RICHARDSON<br />
Vice President-. LYNN K. CARTA<br />
Corresponding Secretary-Treasurer'. NANCY D. PACHECO<br />
Recording Secretary: W. PATRICK CARNEY<br />
Archivist/Librarian: PATRICIA A. PILOT<br />
Custodian of Back Issues: J.RALPH LICHTENFELS<br />
Representative to the American Society of Parasitologists: ERIC P. HOBERG<br />
Executive Committee Members-at-Large: RALPH P. ECKERLIN, <strong>2000</strong><br />
WILLIAM E. MOSER, <strong>2000</strong><br />
ALLEN L. RICHARDS, 2001<br />
BENJAMIN M." ROSENTHAL; 2001<br />
Immediate Past President: ERIC P, HOBERG , - _<br />
COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY is published semiannually at Lawrence, Kansas by the<br />
Helminthological Society of Washington. Papers need not be; presented at a meeting to be published in<br />
the journal. Publication of COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOCjY is supported in part by the Brayton H.<br />
Ransom Memorial Trust Eund. . .<br />
:MANUSCRIPTS should be sent to the EDITORS,; Drs. Willis
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1). <strong>2000</strong> pp. 1-25<br />
Triage for the Biosphere: The Need and Rationale for Taxoiiomic<br />
Inventories and Phylogeiietic Studies of Parasites<br />
DANIEL R. BROOKS' AND ERIC P. HoBERG2 ^<br />
1 Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G5, Canada<br />
(e-mail: dbrooks@zoo.utoronto.ca) and<br />
2 Biosystematics and National Parasite Collection Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research<br />
Service, BARC East No. 1 180, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20715, U.S.A.<br />
(e-mail: ehoberg@lpsi.barc.usda.gov).<br />
ABSTRACT: A parasitological perspective in biodiversity survey and inventory provides powerful insights into<br />
the history, structure, and maintenance of the biosphere. <strong>Parasitology</strong> contributes a powerful conceptual paradigm<br />
or landscape that links ecology, systematics, evolution, biogeography, behavior, and an array of biological<br />
phenomena from the molecular to the organismal level across the continuum of microparasites to macroparasites<br />
and their vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. Effective survey and inventory can be strategically focused or can<br />
take a synoptic approach, such as that represented by the All Taxa Biodiversity Inventory. We argue that<br />
parasitology should be an integral component of any programs for biodiversity assessment on local, regional, or<br />
global scales. Taxonomists, who constitute the global taxasphere, hold the key to the development of effective<br />
surveys and inventories and eventual linkage to significant environmental and socioeconomic issues. The taxasphere<br />
is like a triage team. The "battlefield" is the biosphere, and the "war" is human activities that degrade<br />
the biosphere. Sadly, at the point in time that we reali/,e we have documented only a tiny portion of the world's<br />
diversity, and want to document more, we find that one of the most rare and declining groups of biologists is<br />
the taxasphere. This taxonomic impediment, or critical lack of global taxonomic expertise recognized by Systematics<br />
Agenda <strong>2000</strong> and DIVERSITAS, prevents initiation and completion of biodiversity research programs<br />
at a critical juncture, where substantial components of global diversity are threatened. The Convention for<br />
Biological Diversity mandates that we document the biosphere more fully, and as a consequence, it is necessary<br />
to revitalize the taxasphere. One foundation for development of laxonomic expertise and knowledge is the Global<br />
Taxonomy Initiative and its 3 structural components: (1) systematic inventory, (2) predictive classifications, and<br />
(3) systematic knowledge bases. We argue that inclusion of parasites is critical to the success of the Global<br />
Taxonomy Initiative. Predictive databases that integrate ecological and phylogenetic knowledge from the study<br />
of parasites are synergistic, adding substantially greater ecological, historical, and biogeographic context for the<br />
study of the biosphere than that derived from data on free-living organisms alone.<br />
KEY WORDS: biodiversity, biosphere. Global Taxonomy Initiative, inventory, parasites, phylogeny, survey,<br />
taxonomy.<br />
A Biodiversity Perspective knowledge. They can (1) focus on local, region-<br />
Biodiversity represents a continuum across a al> or §lobal scales^ (2> emphasize a specific taxvariety<br />
of scales, encompassing numerical, eco- on (e-g- host or parasite) or ecosystem; (3) be<br />
logical, and phylogenetic components within a oriented in strategic or problem-based perspectemporal-spatial<br />
framework or fabric (Ricklefs, tives; or (4) be broadly synoptic, such as the<br />
1987; Barrowclough, 1992; Eldredge, 1992; approaches linked to the concept of the All Taxa<br />
Hoberg, 1997a). Any definition of biodiversity, Biodiversity Inventory (ATBI) (Janzen, 1993).<br />
then, must parallel this continuum across scales Further continua are circumscribed within the<br />
driven by habitats, ecosystems, and communi- sphere of strictly curiosity-based acquisition of<br />
ties, genetic diversity in populations and species, knowledge, with eventual affiliation to economic<br />
genealogy and taxonomy, and history and ge- and societal concerns. The scope of the problem<br />
ography. Different definitions are associated may help determine the appropriate approach,<br />
with an array of research programs for survey but there is little question that the state of the<br />
and inventory that seek different kinds of biosphere should be a profound concern for science<br />
and society (Ehrlich and Wilson, 1991;<br />
1 Corresponding author. Senior authorship designat- Wilson, 1992; Smith et al., 1993; Savage, 1995).<br />
ed arbitrarily. We explore this intricate web to examine the<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
2 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
critical contributions that emanate from an integrative<br />
and comparative approach that emphasizes<br />
a parasitological perspective. <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
is arguably the most integrative of all biological<br />
disciplines. <strong>Parasitology</strong> provides a powerful<br />
conceptual paradigm or landscape that links<br />
ecology, systematics, evolution, biogeography,<br />
behavior, and an array of biological phenomena<br />
from the molecular to the organismal level<br />
across the continuum of microparasites to macroparasites<br />
and their vertebrate and invertebrate<br />
hosts. Information from the study of parasites is<br />
synergistic, adding substantially greater ecological,<br />
historical, and biogeographic context for<br />
the study of the biosphere than information derived<br />
from free-living organisms alone.<br />
Valuing Biodiversity<br />
Humans work hard to preserve what they value<br />
and replace or ignore what they do not. This<br />
is true of furniture and gardens and should be<br />
true of biodiversity. This leads to a deceptively<br />
simple conclusion: the more species we value,<br />
the more species we will preserve. But value is<br />
a difficult concept to apply to biodiversity.<br />
Equating value with market price does not necessarily<br />
lead to sustainable use of resources, although<br />
this equation is a necessary component<br />
of socioeconomic development, especially in the<br />
biodiverse regions of the world. Attempting to<br />
define an intrinsic value for biodiversity underscores<br />
the fact that different groups of humans<br />
have different sets of values about biodiversity<br />
and have different degrees of biophilia (Wilson,<br />
1984, 1988, 1992; Takacs, 1996; Brooks, 1998).<br />
Biodiversity is valued in many different ways,<br />
not all of them mutually reinforcing (Ehrlich and<br />
Wilson, 1991; Pimentel et al., 1997). Concomitant<br />
with recognition of value is the necessity to<br />
develop a basic or baseline understanding of the<br />
components of biodiversity within the framework<br />
of a maximally informative system that focuses<br />
attention on the following: (1) societal,<br />
aesthetic, and intrinsic values (i.e., biophilia);<br />
(2) economic benefits and beneficial components<br />
(both historical and future); (3) ecosystem services<br />
and the value of information; and (4) patterns,<br />
processes, and distribution of pathogens<br />
and disease (Ehrlich and Wilson, 1991).<br />
An appeal to the intrinsic value of biodiversity,<br />
for example, does not necessarily put food<br />
in people's stomachs or decrease infant mortality<br />
rates, the issues of most immediate importance<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
for many people. Some species have value because<br />
they produce direct economic benefit, providing<br />
marketable products such as ecotourism<br />
and the raw materials for research and breeding<br />
stock (sourcing drugs and biocontrol agents<br />
from wildlands is familiar in many sectors, but<br />
the idea of paying wildlands, or the governments<br />
that administer them, for this service is a novel<br />
concept). Other species have value because they<br />
maintain ecosystem services, such as biodegradation<br />
of agricultural wastes and sequestration<br />
of carbon. Still other species have value because<br />
they provide the recreation—intellectual and<br />
physical—that contributes to a happy and adjusted<br />
populace. No one looks forward to living<br />
in a country congested with forest fire smoke or<br />
with oil-coated beaches, but in the absence of<br />
ecological alternatives that are also economical,<br />
people will choose to feed their families even if<br />
it means having to deal with massive local degradation<br />
of the biosphere. Using the resources<br />
provided by biodiversity or the application of a<br />
refined knowledge of the biosphere could provide<br />
these ecological and economically sound<br />
alternatives. Finally, many species have value<br />
because they are essential for the well-being and<br />
persistence of other species that have greater direct<br />
value.<br />
Although economic and societal issues highlight<br />
the necessity to fully define the scope and<br />
depth of biodiversity within urban, agricultural,<br />
and natural ecosystems, elucidation of faunal<br />
structure and processes is also a prerequisite for<br />
understanding significant interactions at the interfaces<br />
of such systems, including the distribution<br />
of pathogens and emergence of disease<br />
(e.g., Davis, 1995, 1996; Epstein, 1997, 1999;<br />
Hoberg, 1997b; Brooks et al., <strong>2000</strong>; Brooks,<br />
Leon-Regagnon, and Perez-Ponce de Leon,<br />
<strong>2000</strong>; Hoberg, Gardner, and Campbell, 1999;<br />
Hoberg et al., 1999). Pathogens and parasites<br />
have direct implications for human health, agriculture,<br />
natural systems, conservation practices,<br />
and the global economy through continued<br />
introductions and dissemination and our often<br />
limited knowledge of mechanisms that control<br />
distribution and emergence (Hoberg, 1997b).<br />
Humans are concentrated in the world's most<br />
biodiverse regions, where they often live in conditions<br />
of poverty, poor education, and poor<br />
health. These people currently preserve only<br />
those species and ecosystems that enhance the<br />
immediate quality of their lives or those of their
children. This means, to most of them, domestic<br />
species and the habitats they occupy rather than<br />
wildlands. We are led to a deceptively straightforward<br />
proposition: link economic development<br />
to the preservation of wildlands and the<br />
species they contain, encouraging people to understand<br />
that the plant and animal species in the<br />
wildlands are as valuable as the more familiar<br />
domestic species. In this way, some wildlands<br />
may survive, not as the agroscape, but as another<br />
kind of cropland interdigitated with the agroscape.<br />
This proposition implies developing the<br />
economic and social potential of species living<br />
in wildlands, thus reducing demand for economic<br />
development of wildlands, into still more impoverished<br />
agroscape, which partly sustains yet<br />
more often starves people. Such a proposition<br />
assumes that at least some societies will conserve<br />
biodiversity on some portion of their landscape,<br />
if the wildlands generate intellectual and<br />
economic benefits that pay for their maintenance<br />
and contribute to national economic growth and<br />
sustainability. The preservation of biodiversity is<br />
thus driven, at present, more by social and economic<br />
development than technical expertise<br />
(Janzen, 1992; Brooks, 1998).<br />
People interested in economic and social development<br />
of conserved wildlands can benefit<br />
from forming partnerships with the scientific<br />
community. Such partnerships are required to<br />
meld what scientists have long known and are<br />
still discovering through basic research with the<br />
pragmatic efforts of developing the wildlands as<br />
a third kind of major land use, alongside the<br />
urban and agricultural landscape. Being able to<br />
determine the multiple uses of species and their<br />
combinations requires technical and scientific<br />
expertise and social will (Parma, 1998).<br />
If preservation is to be true and long-lasting,<br />
biodiversity conservation can occur only<br />
through nondestructive use of that biodiversity<br />
by a wide array of social sectors. Effective conservation<br />
efforts will simultaneously encompass<br />
biodiversity development and conservation projects<br />
(Soule, 1991). This occurs by designating<br />
areas for wildland status, finding out what is in<br />
them, and putting that biodiversity to work. In<br />
this regard, a critical element of the scientific<br />
community is the taxasphere (Janzen, 1993), the<br />
global population of taxonomists and systematists.<br />
These issues highlight the critical importance<br />
and rationale for biodiversity survey and inven-<br />
BROOKS AND HOBERG—PARASITE BIODIVERSITY<br />
tory. Although inventory work is fundamentally<br />
important, we must remember that it is only a<br />
means to an end. Names attached to species revealed<br />
through intensive field and laboratory investigations<br />
must represent a significant amount<br />
of natural history, especially ecological, information<br />
for the stakeholders in national socioeconomic<br />
development to be able to assess the value<br />
of each species. The taxasphere may be likened<br />
to a triage team. The "battlefield" is the<br />
biosphere, and the "war" is human activities<br />
that tend to degrade the biosphere. In this war,<br />
every species is affected to a greater or lesser<br />
extent. Some are attacked directly through overexploitation<br />
and others indirectly through neglect.<br />
The triage teams survey parts of the battlefield<br />
as completely as possible, looking for<br />
"wounded" participants. They must be able to<br />
recognize all possible participants and the degree<br />
to which each has been affected (e.g., critical<br />
habitat requirements that are gone or going).<br />
The teams must then pass that information on to<br />
the decision makers, who are responsible for the<br />
optimal deployment of resources to save the<br />
maximum number of participants possible. Taxonomists<br />
communicate such information most<br />
efficiently through predictive classifications and<br />
electronic management of information.<br />
Valuing Taxonomy<br />
We already know much—and are learning<br />
more each day—about the importance of the<br />
documented portions of the biosphere. However,<br />
we have not documented, and thus do not understand,<br />
more than a fraction of that diversity,<br />
with only 1.7 million of an estimated 13 million<br />
to 14 million existing species currently described<br />
(Hawksworth, 1995). Consequently, we<br />
often have no idea what we might be losing and<br />
have only incomplete information on how to<br />
preserve what remains. Faced with our ignorance<br />
and gaps in knowledge, biologists react in<br />
a way that seems paradoxical. They often advocate<br />
extreme caution in development projects,<br />
simply because our ignorance may lead us to<br />
make mistakes and lose habitat and diversity<br />
both in the short- and long-term. At the same<br />
time, biologists understand that caution cannot<br />
impose stasis or inaction. We cannot be satisfied<br />
with slowing the rate at which species are lost<br />
or habitat is destroyed, because extinction is an<br />
irreversible process. We can never bring a species<br />
back once it is lost, and its potential to play<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
4 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
a role in the survival of our species is gone forever.<br />
Moreover, each species that becomes extinct<br />
may represent an irreversible loss of socioeconomic<br />
potential and may restrict our survival<br />
options for the future. Each species lost represents<br />
an irreversible loss of evolutionary potential,<br />
the very potential that has been the source<br />
of biotic recovery from past global ecological<br />
perturbations and environmental disasters (Jablonski,<br />
1991). Many biologists, therefore, advocate<br />
immediate action to document the<br />
world's biodiversity. Sadly, at the point in time<br />
that we have realized that we have documented<br />
only a tiny portion of the world's diversity and<br />
want to document more, we find that one of the<br />
rarest and fastest declining groups of biologists<br />
is the taxasphere.<br />
The fundamental units of biodiversity are genealogical<br />
information systems called species,<br />
which store and transmit information that leads<br />
to the emergence of ecosystems with their complex<br />
interactions. Who is trained to find and distinguish<br />
among those units? Taxonomists.<br />
Where do we find that information? In the descriptions,<br />
surveys, and revisions of taxonomists.<br />
The predictable parts of biological systems<br />
are the stable biological elements, both<br />
form and function, autecological and synecological,<br />
that have persisted through evolutionary<br />
time (Brooks, 1985a; Brooks and McLennan,<br />
1991, 1993a; Brooks et al., 1995). This predictive<br />
power of taxonomy is embodied in the phylogenetic<br />
classifications of taxonomists (Simpson<br />
and Cracraft, 1995). The taxasphere includes<br />
some of the best-trained bioprospectors in the<br />
world, who are often highly skilled at finding<br />
particular species. Taxonomists are also versatile<br />
and opportunistic in the field because of their<br />
ability to recognize novelty. Their ability to determine<br />
evolutionary relationships and add value<br />
by making predictions based on those relationships<br />
can minimize the time and cost in research<br />
and development and planning and prioritization<br />
(Brooks et al., 1992).<br />
Parasites in Biodiversity and Conservation<br />
Biology<br />
In the realm of conservation biology, parasites<br />
have dual and conflicting significances. Pathogenic<br />
parasites can represent threats to the success<br />
of programs for management and recovery<br />
of threatened or endangered species (Dobson<br />
and May, 1986b; Scott, 1988; Lyles and Dobson,<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
1993; Holmes, 1996). Alternatively, parasites<br />
can control host populations, and they can play<br />
a central role in maintenance of genetic diversity<br />
and structuring of vertebrate and invertebrate<br />
communities (Windsor, 1995, 1996); in this latter<br />
role, parasites are significant and vital components<br />
of the biosphere. Additionally, it has<br />
been suggested that under special conditions<br />
(such as on islands) introduction of parasites and<br />
pathogens may be a viable method of controlling<br />
introduced mammals (Dobson, 1988).<br />
The significance of biodiversity surveys and<br />
inventories in a phylogenetic—ecological context<br />
is apparent in documenting the abundance and<br />
species composition of faunas in protected host<br />
species and habitats. For example, in endangered<br />
Attwater's prairie chickens (Tympanchus cupido<br />
attwateri), the potential for interspecific interactions<br />
and sharing of pathogenic parasites with<br />
related species of grouse provided the rationale<br />
for comparative baseline studies of parasite diversity<br />
(Peterson, 1996). Definition of the parasite<br />
fauna, including recognition of new cryptic<br />
species, in Holarctic ruminants was necessary to<br />
identify the potential for impacts from circulation<br />
of endemic and exotic parasites among cervids<br />
and bovids in North America (Hoberg, Kocan,<br />
and Rickard, <strong>2000</strong>). For wild ungulates,<br />
translocation and either introduction of parasites<br />
or exposure to novel pathogens remain major<br />
considerations in management decisions (Lankester<br />
and Fong, 1989; Samuel et al., 1992;<br />
Woodford and Rossiter, 1994; Hoberg, 1997b).<br />
Parasites must be regarded as integral components<br />
of biodiversity; thus, there should be<br />
concerns about the ramifications of extinction<br />
both locally and globally (Wilson, 1984; Rosza,<br />
1992; Windsor, 1995; Durden and Keirans,<br />
1996). Coming full circle, the importance of accurate<br />
documentation for biodiversity and the<br />
world's parasite faunas is based on the intrinsic<br />
and extrinsic importance of parasites in healthy<br />
ecosystems, as agents of human disease, and at<br />
the nexi of natural and domestic, terrestrial,<br />
aquatic, and marine environments.<br />
Parasites as Contemporary Ecological Indicators.<br />
At a higher level than the communities<br />
of parasites themselves, we recall that parasites<br />
track broadly and predictably through ecosystems.<br />
Parasites inform us of a myriad of interesting<br />
things about host ecology, behavior,<br />
and trophic interactions (Hoberg, 1996; Marcog-
liese, 1995; Marcogliese and Cone, 1997). Complex<br />
life cycles are integrated within intricate<br />
food webs, so parasites can be valuable indicators<br />
of trophic ecology, structure of food webs,<br />
food preferences, and foraging mode of hosts<br />
(Bartoli, 1989; Williams et al., 1992; Hoberg,<br />
1996; Marcogliese and Cone, 1997). Within this<br />
ecological-trophic context, parasites can tell us<br />
the following: (1) trophic positions in food webs<br />
(what hosts eat and what eats them); (2) use of<br />
and time spent in different microhabitats (e.g.,<br />
even though Termpene Carolina is mainly a terrestrial<br />
turtle, it hosts the digenean Telorchis robustus,<br />
which uses tadpoles as second intermediate<br />
hosts); (3) whether hosts are picking up<br />
parasites via host switching, and if so, which<br />
hosts might be in potential competition (e.g.,<br />
guild associations were recognized in the Sea of<br />
Okhotsk based on examining parasites (Belogurov,<br />
1966)); (4) whether any host harbors parasites<br />
that are likely to cause disease problems;<br />
(5) whether the host changes diet during its lifetime,<br />
including seasonally or regionally denned<br />
changes in food habits or prey availability<br />
(Bush, 1990; Hoberg, 1996); and (6) which<br />
hosts are residents and which are colonizers in<br />
the community. Because such a wide range of<br />
information can be gleaned from relatively little<br />
effort, parasites should be highly useful in all<br />
biodiversity studies. Additional special cases for<br />
the application of parasitological data are related<br />
to their use as contemporary biogcographic indicators.<br />
Analysis of parasite biogeography has<br />
been a powerful approach for identification of<br />
stocks or populations in fisheries management<br />
(Williams et al., 1992) and among marine mammals<br />
(Dailey and Vogelbein, 1991; Balbuena and<br />
Raga, 1994; Balbuena et al., 1995).<br />
We can maximize the use of this information<br />
if we begin to think of parasites as biodiversity<br />
probes par excellence and as libraries of natural<br />
and geological history (Brooks et al., 1992;<br />
Gardner and Campbell, 1992; Hoberg, 1996).<br />
Parasites are admirably suited to augment the<br />
development of conservation strategies through<br />
the recognition of regions of critical diversity<br />
and evolutionary significance (Gardner and<br />
Campbell, 1992; Hoberg, 1997a).<br />
The predictive power of parasitology in a<br />
phylogenetic context becomes increasingly important<br />
when attempts are made to elucidate impacts<br />
from natural and anthropogenic perturbations<br />
of faunas and ecosystems. In marine sys-<br />
BROOKS AND HOBHRG—PARASITE BIODIVERSITY<br />
tems, climatological forcing, such as that linked to<br />
the El Nino-Southern Oscillation or to cyclical<br />
changes in atmospheric circulation, dramatically<br />
influences patterns of oceanic upwelling and water<br />
masses, which are reflected in food web<br />
structure and ultimately in parasite faunas. In<br />
such situations, parasites should be well suited<br />
to tracking variation in trophic dynamics and<br />
host distributions on the global scale (Hoberg,<br />
1996). Knowledge of the evolution of a hostparasite<br />
assemblage can provide direct estimates<br />
of the history of ecological associations and can<br />
indicate the continuity of trophic assemblages<br />
through time.<br />
Parasites as Historical Indicators. Manter<br />
(1966) made the most eloquent statement about<br />
the significance of parasites for understanding<br />
evolutionary and ecological phenomena:<br />
Parasites . . . furnish information about present-day<br />
habits and ecology of their individual hosts. These<br />
same parasites also hold promise of telling us something<br />
about host and geographical connections of<br />
long ago. They are simultaneously the products of<br />
an immediate environment and of a long ancestry<br />
reflecting associations of millions of years. The<br />
messages they carry are thus always bilingual and<br />
usually garbled. As our knowledge grows, studies<br />
based on adequate collections, correctly classified<br />
and correlated with knowledge of the hosts and life<br />
cycles involved should lead to a deciphering of the<br />
message now so obscure. Eventually there may be<br />
enough pieces to form a meaningful language which<br />
could be called parascript—the language of parasites<br />
which tells of themselves and their hosts both<br />
of today and yesteryear. (Manter, 1966)<br />
Phylogenetic systematics provided the Rosetta<br />
stone for what are now called parascript studies<br />
(Brooks and McLennan, 1993a). In the past 2<br />
decades, since formalization of the parascript<br />
concept (Brooks, 1977), the number of such<br />
studies has increased dramatically (see reviews<br />
in Brooks and McLennan, 1993a; Hoberg,<br />
1997a). Today there is virtually no area of modern<br />
comparative evolutionary biology and historical<br />
ecology that has not been enriched by at<br />
least one parascript study.<br />
The concept of parascript was based on the<br />
contention by Manter (1966) that parasites are<br />
powerful biological indicators of recent and ancient<br />
ecological associations and geographic distributions.<br />
Parasites tell stories about themselves<br />
and their hosts that involve evolutionary emergence<br />
of complex ecological associations<br />
throughout immense periods. These ideas dra-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
6 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
matically influenced the development of a research<br />
program for comparative evolutionary biology<br />
of parasites (Brooks and McLennan,<br />
1993a). Extending from the seminal study by<br />
Brooks (1977), this program has led to elaboration<br />
of methods for analyzing cospeciation,<br />
extinction, dispersal, and host switching in the<br />
evolution of parasite biotas (Brooks, 1979, 1981,<br />
1990; Hoberg, Brooks, and Siegel-Causey,<br />
1997), with the emergence of historical ecology<br />
(Brooks, 1985a; Brooks and McLennan, 1991)<br />
as the foundation for parascript investigations<br />
(Brooks and McLennan, 1993a, 1993b, 1993c).<br />
Because their geographic distributions are limited<br />
to those areas in which all obligate hosts are<br />
sympatric and synchronic, parasites are excellent<br />
systems for historical biogeographic studies.<br />
Thus, parasites, particularly those with complex<br />
life cycles, provide the linkage for examining<br />
the interaction of coevolution, colonization, and<br />
extinction on faunal structures and ecological<br />
continuity across deep temporal and broad geographic<br />
scales (Hoberg, 1997a; Hoberg, Gardner,<br />
and Campbell, 1999; Hoberg, Jones, and<br />
Bray, 1999).<br />
The significance of historical reconstruction<br />
for current approaches in the assessment of biodiversity<br />
resides in the concept of the past as the<br />
key to the present (Hoberg, 1997a). Historical<br />
reconstruction allows identification of important<br />
centers for diversification (ancestral areas) and<br />
promotes a predictive framework to assess the<br />
importance of specific habitats, geographic regions,<br />
and biotas and recognition of areas of<br />
critical genealogical and ecological diversity.<br />
These are the realms of historical ecology<br />
(Brooks, 1985a; Brooks and McLennan, 1991)<br />
and historical biogeography. Although we have<br />
much to learn about the biosphere, historical<br />
studies of helminth parasite systems in piscine,<br />
amphibian, mammalian, and avian hosts have<br />
contributed context for understanding faunal<br />
structure across terrestrial (Platt, 1984; Gardner<br />
and Campbell, 1992; Hoberg and Lichtenfels,<br />
1994), aquatic (Brooks et al., 1981; Klassen and<br />
Beverley-Burton, 1987, 1988; Kritsky et al.,<br />
1993), and marine environments (Klassen, 1992;<br />
Hoberg, 1995; Hoberg et al., 1998) (further reviewed<br />
in Brooks and McLennan, 1993a; Hoberg,<br />
1997a). A historical ecological context, in<br />
conjunction with developing understanding of<br />
contemporary systems, is the basis for using par-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
asites to illuminate local, regional, and global<br />
ecological perturbations.<br />
Parasites as Mine Canaries Through Ecological<br />
and Evolutionary Time. Parasites<br />
track broadly and predictably through ecosystems,<br />
highlighting major trophic interactions<br />
among hosts that occupy multiple niches. As<br />
such, parasites may be sensitive indicators of<br />
subtle changes within ecosystems. This is especially<br />
true for parasites with heteroxenous life<br />
cycles. Severe reduction or disappearance of a<br />
population of only 1 of several obligate hosts<br />
will cause the parasite to disappear. Environmental<br />
pollution of benthic invertebrate faunas<br />
has resulted in elimination of many digeneans in<br />
fishes in some localities (Caballero y Rodriguez<br />
et al., 1992; Overstreet, 1997; Overstreet et al.,<br />
1996). Conversely, increased and detrimental<br />
levels of parasitism in molluscan intermediate<br />
hosts may result from changes in behavioral patterns<br />
and population density of seabirds, such as<br />
larids, that concentrate near areas of human activity<br />
in coastal zones (Bustnes and Galaktionov,<br />
1999).<br />
At the extreme, parasite extinction may precede<br />
host extinction, i.e., the sudden loss of a<br />
particular species of parasite in a given vertebrate<br />
host may result from degradation of faunal<br />
structure or from changes in host population<br />
density (Dogiel, 1961; Hoberg and McGee,<br />
1982; Bush and Kennedy, 1994). As some hosts<br />
go extinct, some parasites will go extinct as<br />
well. Alternatively, some surviving parasites<br />
may be brought into contact with novel hosts as<br />
a result of ecological release. This new contact<br />
may produce disease, which is maladaptive for<br />
host and parasite, but given the alternative of<br />
extinction, from the parasite's standpoint it may<br />
represent a viable "strategy" to avoid extinction.<br />
From the host's standpoint, the cost of exposure<br />
to novel pathogens may be offset by the<br />
benefit of surviving a major environmental disaster.<br />
In the longer-term, revolutionary dynamics<br />
might ameliorate, if not eliminate, the<br />
negative impacts of these once novel host-parasite<br />
associations, although we understand that<br />
reduction in virulence may not be correlated<br />
with length of association of pathogen and host<br />
(Ewald, 1995).<br />
Thus, parasites can serve as indicators of ecosystem<br />
integrity and can be used to measure<br />
contemporary environmental perturbations. Nat-
ural and human alterations of ecosystems may<br />
be reflected in increases or decreases in abundance<br />
of a certain spectrum of the parasite fauna<br />
(Marcogliese, 1995). A particularly elegant<br />
study showing this was a documentation of the<br />
impact of acidification in riparian habitats on<br />
parasites of eels (Anguilla rostrata) in Nova<br />
Scotia (Cone et al., 1993; Marcogliese and<br />
Cone, 1996).<br />
Aside from the effects of pollution, we predict<br />
substantial impacts on host-parasite systems and<br />
on changes in the distribution and emergence of<br />
pathogens and parasites from global climate<br />
change and global warming (Dobson and Carper,<br />
1992; Epstein, 1997, 1999). Contemporary<br />
changes in distribution caused by global climate<br />
change have already been documented for anisakine<br />
nematodes in seals and fishes (Marcogliese<br />
et al., 1996). Disease outbreaks of elaphostrongyline<br />
nematodes in reindeer have been<br />
correlated with variation in summer temperatures<br />
(Handeland and Slettbakk, 1994). Historical<br />
studies of parasites can illuminate the influence<br />
of past climate variation on the distribution<br />
and diversification of parasites and their hosts<br />
(Hoberg, 1986, 1992, 1995).<br />
Continued surveys and inventories of parasites<br />
become important components in documenting<br />
the impact of environmental change. As<br />
indicated by Marcogliese and Price (1997),<br />
"Parasitism is simply a reflection of the natural<br />
state of ecosystems, and healthy populations of<br />
organisms will play host to healthy populations<br />
of parasites."<br />
Parasites and Assessing the Risk of Emerging<br />
Diseases. Parasites may act as agents of<br />
population control by causing acute or chronic<br />
disease in hosts (Scott, 1988; Gulland, 1995).<br />
Comprehensive inventories permit us to assess<br />
risk, to make predictions (for wildlife and game,<br />
agriculture and livestock, or public health), and<br />
to recognize endemic and introduced faunal elements<br />
(Hoberg, 1997b; Hoberg et al., 1999;<br />
Hoberg, Kocan, and Rickard, <strong>2000</strong>). We are interested<br />
in interfaces between natural, agricultural,<br />
and urban ecosystems and the barriers that<br />
inhibit or the paths that promote introduction<br />
and dissemination of pathogens and parasites.<br />
Inventories within a historical-phylogenetic<br />
context focus the range of questions to be examined.<br />
We can consider whether the same or<br />
related parasites occur only in related hosts or<br />
BROOKS AND HOBERG—PARASITE BIODIVERSITY<br />
whether they occur in distantly related hosts<br />
with similar ecological habits. This is an ecological<br />
and evolutionary question with implications<br />
for emerging diseases. On the ecological side,<br />
we will find out which parasites are limited by<br />
host or geographic associations and which parasites<br />
are likely to disperse or colonize. On the<br />
evolutionary side, we can ask which groups<br />
have persisted through major environmental<br />
changes, either because their hosts survived or<br />
because the parasites successfully switched to<br />
alternative hosts. We might predict increasing<br />
host switching as hosts or host groups go extinct,<br />
i.e., the extinction of certain hosts might<br />
accelerate the emergence of pathogens and diseases<br />
rather than simply eliminating disease organisms.<br />
Mechanisms for emergence have been well<br />
documented and generally are linked in some<br />
way to the breakdown of isolating barriers<br />
(Rausch, 1972; Dobson and May, 1986a, 1986b;<br />
Hoberg, 1997b). Factors that contribute to disease<br />
emergence include the following: (1) translocation,<br />
introduction, and dissemination of<br />
pathogens; (2) faunal disruption and ecological<br />
release (new hosts or new ecological situations);<br />
(3) increasing host population density (stress and<br />
reduced abilities for adaptation); and (4) amplification<br />
of parasite populations linked to environmental<br />
change, such as global warming.<br />
When dealing with complex systems, however,<br />
cause and effect are often difficult to distinguish.<br />
Limb deformities and mortality in anurans have<br />
been linked to infections by a species of Ribeiroia,<br />
a psilostomid digenean, which may be indicative<br />
of environmental pollution and its effect<br />
on populations of the snail intermediate hosts<br />
(Johnson et al., 1999). The ongoing reduction in<br />
anuran populations may further indicate the pervasive<br />
nature of emergence and the continued<br />
translocation and introduction of wildlife parasites<br />
on a global scale (Morell, 1999).<br />
Introduction of parasites and pathogens with<br />
either wild or domesticated hosts is a major<br />
source of disease emergence. Establishment of<br />
introduced parasites has been documented for<br />
the following: (1) nematode faunas in ruminants<br />
across the Holarctic (Hoberg and Lichtenfels,<br />
1994; Hoberg et al., 1999; Hoberg, Kocan, and<br />
Rickard, <strong>2000</strong>); (2) parasites in freshwater and<br />
marine fishes (Kennedy, 1993; Scholz and Cappellaro,<br />
1993; Barse and Secor, 1999); and (3)<br />
helminths in some avian hosts such as ratites<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
8 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
(Hoberg, Lloyd, and Omar, 1995). Many local<br />
parasite faunas are now mosaics of endemic and<br />
introduced species. A principal role for taxonomic<br />
inventories in such situations is to provide<br />
baseline information on the patterns of distribution<br />
for hosts, parasites, and pathogens as<br />
the foundation for prediction and prevention.<br />
Knowledge of the diversity and distribution of<br />
pathogens and parasites is important in limiting<br />
economic, societal, and biotic impacts and liability<br />
in management of endemic or exotic organisms<br />
(Hoberg, 1997b).<br />
International Initiatives in Systematics and<br />
Biodiversity: Getting <strong>Parasitology</strong> Involved<br />
The Convention on Biological Diversity<br />
(CBD) (Glowka et al., 1994) designated ecosystems<br />
management and sustainable development<br />
as the fundamental organizing principles for<br />
managing global biodiversity. Biologists and<br />
managers quickly realized that the current inventory<br />
of the world's species was far too limited<br />
to implement the mandate properly and that<br />
a critical shortage of trained taxonomists contributed<br />
directly to the problem. The United Nations<br />
Environment Program in biodiversity,<br />
called DIVERSITAS, coined the term the taxonornic<br />
impediment to refer to this critical lack of<br />
global taxonomic expertise, which prevents initiation<br />
and completion of biodiversity research<br />
programs (SA<strong>2000</strong>, 1994; Hoagland, 1996;<br />
Blackmore, 1996; PCAST, 1998). In North<br />
America, this concern led to Systematics Agenda<br />
<strong>2000</strong> (SA<strong>2000</strong>), an intensive professional inventory<br />
of the value of taxonomic expertise to<br />
this planet, and a set of recommendations for<br />
revitalizing the taxasphere and justifying the allocation<br />
of resources necessary to carry out such<br />
a revitalization (SA<strong>2000</strong>, 1994). In 1998, the<br />
Conference of the Parties to the CBD endorsed<br />
a Global Taxonomy Initiative (GTI) to improve<br />
taxonomic knowledge and capacity to further<br />
country needs and activities for the conservation,<br />
sustainable use, and equitable sharing of<br />
benefits and knowledge of biodiversity (GTI,<br />
1999; http : //research . amnh . org/biodiversity /<br />
acrobat/gti2.pdf). It appears that the solution to<br />
removing the taxonomic impediment in biodiversity<br />
planning is the revitalization of the taxasphere,<br />
and the rationale for revitalizing the<br />
taxasphere is the potential of taxonomic contributions<br />
for managing the biodiversity crisis. A<br />
foundation for development of taxonomic ex-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
pertise and knowledge is the GTI and its 3 components:<br />
(1) systematic inventory, (2) predictive<br />
classifications, and (3) systematic knowledge bases,<br />
including collections.<br />
GTI Component 1: Systematic Inventory—<br />
Discovering and Naming the World's Species.<br />
Assessments by DIVERSITAS indicate<br />
that there are no more than 2,000 full-time professional<br />
taxonomists and perhaps an additional<br />
5,000 people with some degree of taxonomic expertise<br />
on the planet. Furthermore, that population<br />
has a median age of 55 years. Concurrently,<br />
less than 10% of the terrestrial species and perhaps<br />
1% of the world's marine species have<br />
been discovered and named. These factors act<br />
synergistically as the foundation of the taxonomic<br />
impediment (SA<strong>2000</strong>, 1994). Biodiversity inventories,<br />
as envisioned by the CBD, are biodiversity<br />
development and conservation projects,<br />
a means for restoring global taxonomic capacity,<br />
and opportunities to study the health,<br />
reproductive, and nutritional requirements and<br />
the ecology and evolution of a large number of<br />
wild species in natural, yet protected, environments.<br />
What information should inventories provide?<br />
For each species, the following should be provided:<br />
(1) what is it (and how to distinguish it<br />
from others); (2) where does it occur; (3) what<br />
is its natural history; and (4) how do you get it<br />
when desired?<br />
To what purposes should this information be<br />
put? (1) Monitoring global environmental<br />
health; (2) promoting socioeconomic development<br />
through sustainable use and equitable sharing<br />
of benefits and knowledge derived from diverse<br />
biological resources, including forestry,<br />
fisheries, and some components of agriculture;<br />
(3) developing of new products and ecotourism;<br />
and (4) providing risk assessment about the impact<br />
of introduced species and the source and<br />
impact of emergent diseases. Potential user<br />
groups for the information gathered include ecotourism,<br />
agricultural, pharmaceutical, and biotechnology<br />
prospecting companies; educational<br />
and scientific institutions; human, veterinary,<br />
and agricultural health experts; environmental<br />
monitoring and restoration programs; economists;<br />
and development agencies.<br />
What general criteria do we follow in choosing<br />
particular inventory projects? They should<br />
(1) have high public visibility and approval in-
ternationally and locally; (2) be international in<br />
scope; (3) have high scientific value in both basic<br />
and applied terms; and (4) encourage group<br />
cohesion and cooperation, leading to the engagement<br />
of as many stakeholders as possible.<br />
The CBD has mandated that each country embark<br />
on some form of national biodiversity inventory.<br />
National socioeconomic planners will<br />
determine the form of such an inventory. Once<br />
such a decision has been made, an immediate<br />
concern will be coordinating efforts. Every<br />
country in the world is now a debtor nation with<br />
respect to taxonomic expertise. As mentioned<br />
herein, the taxasphere sees the removal of the<br />
taxonomic impediment as an opportunity for the<br />
survival of the taxasphere and the biosphere. But<br />
because the taxasphere today consists of a relatively<br />
small, generally poorly funded and globally<br />
dispersed population of scientists, any national<br />
inventory project will require a multinational<br />
effort. Furthermore, most members of the<br />
taxasphere work in academia or museums,<br />
which represents an additional layer of cultural<br />
distinction. Academic and museum naturalists<br />
have a long history of self-motivated and selfdirected,<br />
essentially solitary pursuit of knowledge.<br />
Specialists on the same groups of organisms<br />
may see each other as professional competitors<br />
rather than collaborators. Encouraging<br />
such people, representing different institutions<br />
and different countries, each with different personal<br />
career agendas, to collaborate is difficult<br />
but not impossible (Janzen and Hallwachs,<br />
1994; Hoberg, Gardner, and Campbell, 1997). A<br />
1993 National Science Foundation-sponsored conference<br />
in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.,<br />
brought leading taxonomists together to consider<br />
the feasibility of their cooperating to document<br />
those species useful to humans before they become<br />
extinct and to stave off the loss of a science<br />
of specialists who could identify them and<br />
learn about their natural histories. Faced with the<br />
immediacy of the crisis, the taxonomists present<br />
were able to cooperate strategically, even though<br />
there were and still are differences of opinion<br />
about tactics, primarily in the realm of inventory<br />
projects (Janzen and Hallwachs, 1994). Inventories<br />
can represent synoptic examinations of<br />
complex ecosystems or well-circumscribed,<br />
problem-driven projects. Synoptic examinations<br />
include the concept of the ATBI, documenting<br />
all species in a large conserved wildland site<br />
(Janzen, 1993; Janzen et al., 1993).<br />
BROOKS AND HOBHRG—PARASITE BIODIVERSITY<br />
The ATBI concept was originally conceived<br />
to serve 2 functions. First, the most biodiverse<br />
terrestrial ecosystems in the world occur in tropical<br />
developing countries. Great diversity, many<br />
unknown species, and generally untapped biodiversity<br />
resources characterize tropical ecosystems.<br />
In such situations, recognizing that biodiversity<br />
programs may be simultaneously biodiversity<br />
development and conservation projects is<br />
critical. They can create a mechanism to preserve<br />
wildlands, build scientific infrastructure,<br />
and promote sustainable use of environmental<br />
resources. Socioeconomic development stemming<br />
from an ATBI is achieved by giving the<br />
neighbors of a conservation area a stake in preserving<br />
the local diversity; the more species that<br />
can be shown to be valuable, the more such opportunities<br />
exist, and the more species will be<br />
conserved.<br />
Second, each site where an ATBI is carried<br />
out becomes a gigantic mine canary, where the<br />
effects of global environmental change could be<br />
monitored across significant numbers of species<br />
and large sectors of integrated ecosystems, giving<br />
us a true picture of the overall large-scale<br />
effects of such phenomena as global warming,<br />
biotic invasions, and habitat perturbation (Janzen,<br />
1996, 1997; Janzen and Hallwachs, 1994).<br />
The information generated by an ATBI could be<br />
valuable for conservationists and land use planners,<br />
where conserved wildland choice is critical<br />
in the following ways: (1) Observing that a conserved<br />
wildland can be useful and used, national<br />
policy makers will be able to consider conserving<br />
wildland as an appropriate form of land use,<br />
on a par with agricultural and urban landscapes.<br />
Conservationists and economic development<br />
programs will become partners rather than adversaries.<br />
(2) An ATBI will aid conservationists<br />
who make site choices elsewhere, because it will<br />
generate a complete picture of a biodiverse landscape,<br />
a "known universe," by which biodiversity<br />
and ecosystem sampling schemes can be<br />
calibrated. (3) The data from an ATBI may enable<br />
us to answer difficult conservation questions<br />
based on correlations between the diversity<br />
of 2 or more taxa in a site or habitat array. (4)<br />
By accomplishing a project with high social approval,<br />
the taxasphere and biodiversity managers<br />
will feel more confident in making new partnerships<br />
with conservationists. (5) An ATBI will be<br />
a campus for people representing many stakeholders<br />
in biodiversity, many of those involved<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
10 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
directly in conservation site selection and biodiversity<br />
development in other places.<br />
Inventories conducted to facilitate the use of<br />
wildland biodiversity by societies simultaneously<br />
benefit the taxasphere and those who desperately<br />
need food, shelter, education, and health<br />
care. The ATBI approach is not the only model<br />
for undertaking inventories, and many members<br />
of the taxasphere do not believe it represents the<br />
best use of limited taxonomic resources. The<br />
major selling points of an ATBI are the immediate<br />
socioeconomic benefits to local residents<br />
of a conserved wildland and the exciting<br />
"moonshot" nature of such a large-scale project.<br />
In addition, although there is currently a lack of<br />
funds for any ATBI, such a project could become<br />
important in the future.<br />
Some doubt, given the state of the taxasphere,<br />
that it is in our best interests to concentrate a<br />
disproportionate amount of effort on a single<br />
site. They argue that the best way to revitalize<br />
the taxasphere globally is to initiate multiple inventory<br />
projects simultaneously throughout the<br />
world using available expertise. This emphasizes<br />
the concept of working locally and thinking<br />
globally. Furthermore, given that the goal of an<br />
ATBI may be national socioeconomic development,<br />
how can the taxasphere, especially<br />
through a GTI, give preference to one country's<br />
socioeconomic aspirations over another's?<br />
Wouldn't it be preferable to give individual<br />
countries a means of prioritizing their limited<br />
human and economic resources to make national<br />
inventories of priority taxa?<br />
Critics of the more disseminated inventory<br />
approach suggest that it tends to reinforce taxonomic<br />
expertise in taxa for which there are already<br />
many taxonomists, and risks excluding interested<br />
taxonomists who do not happen to study<br />
one of the priority groups in one of the priority<br />
places. Advocates of the ATBI concept argue<br />
that the choice of which country to prefer will<br />
simply be a first-come, first-served phenomenon<br />
and that the expertise generated from the first<br />
ATBI will permit the second and succeeding<br />
ATBIs to be done faster and more cost-effectively.<br />
They also argue that, in contrast to an<br />
ATBI, which is focused within a single country,<br />
targeted inventories of selected taxa over wide<br />
geographic ranges will involve international and<br />
intranational planning and cooperation, something<br />
that is not guaranteed to happen in all parts<br />
of the world at any given time.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Clearly, there are good points made by people<br />
of goodwill on both sides of this issue. All agree<br />
that taxonomic inventories are fundamental to<br />
the future of biodiversity preservation and development<br />
(GTI, 1999), and that if we had unlimited<br />
funds, complete inventories of all targeted<br />
areas throughout the world would be ideal.<br />
This is what we refer to as strategic agreement.<br />
The realities of the situation, however, are that<br />
there will be only limited amounts of money<br />
available for national inventories and for revitalizing<br />
the taxasphere, even if the taxonomic<br />
impediment is regarded as a critical national priority<br />
or imperative such as that recently outlined<br />
for the United <strong>State</strong>s (PCAST, 1998). We urge<br />
all parties to listen to each other, learn from each<br />
other, work together as much as possible, and<br />
take proactive stances that are environmentally,<br />
scientifically, and politically relevant.<br />
PARASITES IN BIODIVERSITY SURVEYS AND IN-<br />
VENTORIES: It is clear from the variety of research<br />
programs supported by parasitological<br />
studies that parasites represent significant components<br />
of global biodiversity. Continued survey<br />
and inventory of the world's parasite faunas remain<br />
requisite for understanding basic issues in<br />
evolutionary biology, ecology, and biogeography.<br />
Documentation of parasite biodiversity is<br />
significant in an "applied" sense for elucidating<br />
solutions to ecological problems, examining<br />
emergence and re-emergence of pathogens, understanding<br />
interactions at the interface of ecosystems,<br />
and recognizing the impacts of global<br />
change. We will examine later 2 models for pursuing<br />
studies of parasite diversity in tropical and<br />
high-latitude boreal and arctic systems. Different<br />
strategies for acquiring biodiversity knowledge<br />
are dictated by prevailing social and economic<br />
situations.<br />
Those who argue for inventories that focus on<br />
priority taxa suggest the following selection criteria:<br />
taxa should (1) be intrinsically important<br />
to humans, such as insect groups known to include<br />
important pollinators, biocontrol agents, or<br />
disease vectors; (2) be intrinsically important to<br />
ecosystems that humans want to preserve; (3)<br />
provide efficient means of learning something of<br />
importance; (4) be geographically widespread;<br />
and (5) provide opportunities for international<br />
networking of professionals, collaborative research,<br />
and training. In our opinion, it is easy to
justify the inclusion of parasites in any inventory<br />
project under all these guidelines.<br />
Taxa should be intrinsically important to humans:<br />
Parasites are agents of disease in humans,<br />
livestock, and wildlife, with attendant socioeconomic<br />
significance. Parasites are significant<br />
components for assessing the risk of loss of<br />
biocontainment by introduced species, whether<br />
because of parasites of introduced species moving<br />
into the agricultural landscape or wildlands<br />
and switching to native hosts or because of parasites<br />
of native species moving out of the agricultural<br />
landscape or wildlands and infecting introduced,<br />
economically important host species.<br />
A special case involves the possibility of local<br />
residents and tourists sharing parasites and parasitic<br />
diseases between themselves and between<br />
humans and nonhuman hosts. Some parasite<br />
species may provide revenue as model systems<br />
for pharmaceutical companies or as biocontrol<br />
agents. Additionally, we must understand parasite<br />
biodiversity within the context of global<br />
change (Dobson and Carper, 1992; Hoberg,<br />
1997b; Brooks et al., <strong>2000</strong>; Brooks, Leon-Regagnon,<br />
and G. Perez-Ponce de Leon, <strong>2000</strong>;<br />
Hoberg, Kocan, and Rickard, <strong>2000</strong>).<br />
Taxa should be intrinsically important to ecosystems<br />
that humans want to preserve: Parasites<br />
are significant regulators of host populations<br />
(Scott, 1988; Gulland, 1995) and are potent<br />
agents that maintain ecosystems' integrity and<br />
stability (Minchella and Scott, 1991; Dobson<br />
and Hudson, 1986; Hudson et al., 1998). Complex<br />
feedback loops that involve parasites, herbivores,<br />
and habitat structure in ruminant grazing<br />
systems further indicate the significance of<br />
parasites as determinants of community structure<br />
(Grenfell, 1992). Parasites can also be important<br />
mediators of host behavior (Holmes and<br />
Bethel, 1972). Introduced parasites may have<br />
unpredictable and deleterious impacts on native<br />
species of hosts (Dobson and May, 1986a,<br />
1986b; Woodford and Rossiter, 1994; Vitousek<br />
et al., 1996). It is, therefore, important to be able<br />
to quickly distinguish native from introduced<br />
parasite species (Hoberg, 1997b; Brooks, Leon-<br />
Regagnon, and Perez-Ponce de Leon, <strong>2000</strong>;<br />
Hoberg et al., 1999; Hoberg, Kocan, and Rickard,<br />
<strong>2000</strong>).<br />
Taxa should provide efficient means of learning<br />
something of importance: Parasites, espe-<br />
BROOKS AND HOBERG—PARASITE BIODIVERSITY<br />
cially those having complex life cycles involving<br />
more than 1 obligate host, are indicators of<br />
stable trophic structure in ecosystems (Marcogliese<br />
and Cone, 1997). This is because all the<br />
biotic components necessary for completion of<br />
the life cycle must co-occur regularly to maintain<br />
any given parasite species. Knowing the<br />
complement of parasite species inhabiting any<br />
given host thus provides a means of rapid assessment<br />
of the breadth and form of trophic interactions<br />
of host species.<br />
Taxa should be geographically widespread:<br />
Many parasite taxa are widespread geographically.<br />
At the same time, they are highly localized<br />
with respect to infecting particular hosts, which<br />
themselves may be the focus of particular inventory<br />
activities.<br />
Taxa should provide opportunity for international<br />
networking of professionals, collaborative<br />
research, and training: Parasite systematics is<br />
in serious trouble worldwide. Laboratory closures<br />
in the United Kingdom and elsewhere<br />
have eroded the infrastructure for taxonomy and<br />
systematics at a critical time. New survey opportunities<br />
and recognition of the importance of<br />
parasites may stimulate international collaboration<br />
and revitalization.<br />
Parasites, therefore, fit a set of extrinsic criteria,<br />
indicating the importance of their inclusion<br />
as basic elements of surveys and inventories.<br />
Parasites are critically important as (1) ecological-trophic<br />
indicators (Marcogliese and Cone,<br />
1997; Overstreet, 1997); (2) historical indicators<br />
of phylogeny, ecology, and biogeography<br />
(Brooks, 1985a; Brooks and McLennan, 1993a,<br />
and references therein; Perez-Ponce de Leon,<br />
1997; Perez-Ponce de Leon, Leon-Regagnon,<br />
and Garcia-Prieto, 1997; Brooks et al., <strong>2000</strong>;<br />
Brooks, Leon-Regagnon, and Perez-Ponce de<br />
Leon, <strong>2000</strong>); (3) contemporary and historical<br />
probes for biodiversity research (Brooks et al.,<br />
1992; Brooks et al., <strong>2000</strong>; Brooks, Leon-Regagnon,<br />
and Perez-Ponce de Leon, <strong>2000</strong>; Gardner<br />
and Campbell, 1992; Hoberg, 1996, 1997a, and<br />
references therein; Perez-Ponce de Leon, 1997;<br />
Perez-Ponce de Leon, Leon-Regagnon, and Garcia-Prieto,<br />
1997); and (4) model systems to explore<br />
theoretical issues and generalities in evolutionary<br />
biology, ecosystem and community<br />
structure, biogeography, adaptation and radiation,<br />
modes of speciation, and life history within<br />
a comparative framework (Price, 1980, 1986;<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
12 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY. <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Esch, Bush, and Aho, 1990; Esch, Shostak et al.,<br />
1990; Brooks and McLennan, 1991, 1993a,<br />
1993b, 1993c; Brooks et al., <strong>2000</strong>; Brooks,<br />
Leon-Regagnon, and Perez-Ponce de Leon,<br />
<strong>2000</strong>; Ewald, 1995; Huxham et al., 1995; Poulin,<br />
1995a, 1995b, 1997a, 1997b; Perez-Ponce<br />
de Leon, 1997; Perez-Ponce de Leon, Leon-Regagnon,<br />
and Garcia-Prieto, 1997). Substantial<br />
contributions by parasitological research to biodiversity<br />
inventories extend from the accretion<br />
of novel information from standard surveys established<br />
during the past 200 years to sophisticated<br />
research programs for systematics, ecology,<br />
biogeography, and evolutionary biology<br />
based on organismal and molecular approaches.<br />
The ultimate value and comparability of these<br />
often disparate areas of research will be increased<br />
by standardized protocols and methods<br />
of collection, documentation, and reporting of<br />
information (Walther et al., 1995; Bush et al.,<br />
1997; Doster and Goater, 1997; Clayton and<br />
Walther, 1997; Hoberg, Kocan, and Rickard,<br />
<strong>2000</strong>). Standardization will also emphasize the<br />
interdisciplinary linkages of parasitology within<br />
the biological sciences.<br />
TROPICAL AND ARCTIC PARASITOLOGY—THE<br />
POWER OF INTEGRATED PARASITOLOGICAL RE-<br />
SEARCH:<br />
The ATBI Model in the Tropics: The Area<br />
de Conservacion Guanacaste (ACG) in northwestern<br />
Costa Rica (http://acguanacaste.ac.cr) is<br />
a biodiversity development area. Its purpose is<br />
to provide information about preserving species<br />
living within Costa Rica through sustainable use<br />
of at least some of them, while simultaneously<br />
representing a significant portion of national preserved<br />
wildlands (Janzen, 1992, 1993; Janzen et<br />
al., 1993). The ACG provides economic opportunity,<br />
involving local employment and training<br />
through various biodiversity-related activities,<br />
including taxonomic inventories. Equally, national<br />
and international socioeconomic development<br />
results from the findings of such inventories.<br />
The valuation of sustained use of biodiversity<br />
requires that the best technical and scientific<br />
knowledge be brought to bear on such<br />
inventories to make the findings of the inventory<br />
itself useful to as wide a range of stakeholders<br />
as possible. Moreover, local taxonomists must<br />
be trained for Costa Rica to be as self-sustaining<br />
as possible with respect to taxonomic expertise.<br />
An inventory of eukaryotic parasites inhabiting<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
the 940 species of vertebrates living in the ACG<br />
began in 1997 (Brooks et al., 1999; Desser,<br />
1997; Hoberg et al., 1998; Marques et al., 1997;<br />
Monks et al., 1997; Perez-Ponce de Leon et al.,<br />
1998).<br />
An ATBI assesses biotic resources synoptically<br />
and exhaustively. Strategically focused inventories,<br />
such as the one discussed next, are<br />
better for addressing specific environmental issues.<br />
The Arctic Consortium Model: Large mammals,<br />
particularly ruminants, including muskoxen<br />
(Ovibos moschatus), caribou, and reindeer<br />
(Rangifer tarandus), represent keystone species<br />
for subsistence and maintenance of remote communities<br />
across the Holarctic. Parasite faunas,<br />
largely nematodes, of these ruminants had been<br />
considered to be well known. Since 1995, however,<br />
a new genus and 2 new species have been<br />
described from the central Canadian Arctic<br />
(Hoberg, Lloyd, and Omar, 1995; Hoberg et al.,<br />
1999). These projects highlight the importance<br />
of molecular data in the recognition of cryptic<br />
species (Anderson et al., 1998) but also demonstrate<br />
our poor level of knowledge about these<br />
systems, which is insufficient to understand the<br />
ecological control mechanisms for dissemination<br />
and host range. Additionally, poor documentation<br />
of faunal diversity, host distribution, and<br />
geographic range hinders development of predictions<br />
about impacts of global climate change<br />
and management practices, such as translocation<br />
and linkages to emergence of parasites (Hoberg,<br />
Kocan, and Rickard, <strong>2000</strong>).<br />
An initial step in the process of defining the<br />
fauna involved consolidating information in the<br />
form of comprehensive checklists and inventory<br />
for parasites in Holarctic Bovidae and Cervidae<br />
(Neilsen and Neiland, 1974; Hoberg, Kocan, and<br />
Rickard, <strong>2000</strong>). These form the basis for strategic<br />
survey and inventory or targeted projects<br />
to examine the distribution of parasites and to<br />
assess the potential for parasitic disease emergence.<br />
Comprehensive collections from specific<br />
hosts or geographic localities during the past 20<br />
to 30 years, such as those for Dall's sheep (Ovis<br />
dalli) (Neilsen and Neiland, 1974) and other<br />
northern ruminants, are baselines for comparison<br />
with contemporary surveys to document alteration<br />
in parasite distribution and abundance on<br />
local and regional scales. In this process, the<br />
utility of systematics and historical biogeogra-
phy to understand faunal structure is evident<br />
(Hoberg et al., 1999).<br />
Studies of parasite diversity among large ruminants<br />
in the Arctic are consequential, because<br />
environmental perturbations attributable to global<br />
warming may be pronounced in that region.<br />
Synoptic data for parasite distribution in conjunction<br />
with studies of the intricacies of parasite<br />
biology contribute to the development of<br />
model systems to predict the biotic responses to<br />
ameliorating climatic conditions in the Arctic<br />
(Kutz et al., <strong>2000</strong>).<br />
The need to understand even relatively simple<br />
Arctic systems has led to development of a partnership<br />
for discovery that seeks to build a synergistic,<br />
complementary, and interdisciplinary<br />
linkage for parasitology, wildlife biology, and<br />
the dynamics of wildlife diseases with systematics<br />
and biogeography. An informal consortium<br />
links the University of Saskatchewan, the Department<br />
of Wildlife, Resources and Economic<br />
Development (Government of the Northwest<br />
Territories), the University of Alaska, and the<br />
Biosystematics and National Parasite Collection<br />
Unit of the Agricultural Research Service, U.S.<br />
Department of Agriculture, in studies of Arcticparasite<br />
biodiversity. Success of this approach<br />
depends on substantial input and approval from<br />
local communities in the North. The consortium<br />
is a powerful model for involvement and collaboration<br />
among academic scientists, government<br />
agencies, and native Inuit in the Arctic and also<br />
represents a general means of integrating the efforts<br />
of ecologists and systematists to treat a specific<br />
problem.<br />
GTI Component 2: Predictive Classifications—What's<br />
in a Name? A crucial element<br />
in preserving biodiversity within the context of<br />
the CBD is managing information about the 1.7<br />
million species currently known and the millions<br />
yet to be discovered and described. The framework<br />
for such information systems must include<br />
the capability of making predictions about the<br />
characteristics of species based on what we<br />
know about the biology of close relatives. Making<br />
such predictions requires knowledge of phylogenetic<br />
relationships. Phylogenetic classification<br />
systems are the most effective framework<br />
for predictive information systems about organisms<br />
and their place in the biosphere (Erwin,<br />
1991; Brooks and McLennan, 1991, 1993a;<br />
SA<strong>2000</strong>, 1994; Humphries et al., 1995; Simpson<br />
BROOKS AND HOBKRG—PARASITE BIODIVKRSITY<br />
and Cracraft, 1995; Brooks et al., <strong>2000</strong>; Brooks,<br />
Leon-Regagnon, and Perez-Ponce de Leon,<br />
<strong>2000</strong>). Although systematists have made major<br />
strides in understanding the interrelationships of<br />
life, corroborated phylogenetic hypotheses are<br />
still lacking for many groups. DIVERSITAS and<br />
SA<strong>2000</strong> propose to coordinate international research<br />
to achieve a phylogenetic framework for<br />
all life, resolved to the family level, by the year<br />
2010.<br />
The past decade has seen the integration of<br />
phylogenetic information in virtually all areas of<br />
evolutionary research (Brooks and McLennan,<br />
1991; Harvey and Pagel, 1991), including historical<br />
ecology (Brooks, 1985a). Historical ecology<br />
is an interesting and important component<br />
of basic research in evolutionary biology and<br />
may also provide a means for placing a variety<br />
of important biodiversity information in a predictive<br />
framework. As a framework within<br />
which information from systematics and ecology<br />
can be integrated, historical ecology represents<br />
common ground that can serve the professional<br />
agendas of taxonomists and ecologists involved<br />
in biodiversity initiatives, while providing relevant<br />
data to conservation managers. For example,<br />
when plant taxonomists suggested that the<br />
sister species of the American yew tree might<br />
well have a compound similar to taxol, Taxotene<br />
was discovered. The interface of systematics and<br />
biodiversity has also been vital for the successful<br />
development of agriculture in this century<br />
(Miller and Rossman, 1995). The advent of such<br />
predictive applications for integrative data from<br />
systematics clearly drives the development of efficient<br />
and accessible systems for the storage,<br />
maintenance, and retrieval of such information.<br />
PARASITKS—A MAJOR COMPONENT OF BIO-COM-<br />
PLHXITY: Since the advent of modern phylogenetic<br />
studies of parasites (Brooks, 1977), examination<br />
of these complex systems has included<br />
an assessment of the degree of congruence<br />
between host and parasite phylogeny as an indication<br />
of the form and duration of historical<br />
association between the host and parasite group.<br />
Interpretation of the current database (Brooks<br />
and McLennan, 1993a) suggests that about 50%<br />
of the host—parasite associations examined have<br />
resulted from cospeciation (Brooks, 1979), in<br />
which the ancestors of the host and the parasite<br />
were associated and have inherited (metaphorically<br />
speaking) their present ecological associa-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
14 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
tion. The remainder can be attributed to speciation<br />
by host switching or colonization (Brooks,<br />
1979). Significantly, in these systems, whether<br />
they were derived through cospeciation or colonization,<br />
there is no correlation between the degree<br />
of host specificity with definitive hosts and<br />
the age of coevolutionary associations (Brooks,<br />
1979, 1981; Hoberg, 1986; Poulin, 1992; Brooks<br />
and McLennan, 1991, 1993a, 1993b, 1993c).<br />
These studies have emphasized that for parasitic<br />
helminths and their hosts, cospeciation is not a<br />
universal driving force behind diversification<br />
(Brooks and McLennan, 1993a and references<br />
therein; Perez-Ponce de Leon and Brooks,<br />
1995a, 1995b; Leon-Regagnon, 1998; Leon-Regagnon<br />
et al., 1996, 1998; Boeger and Kritsky,<br />
1997; Hoberg, Brooks, and Siegel-Causey,<br />
1997; Perez-Ponce de Leon, Leon-Regagnon,<br />
and Mendoza-Garfias, 1997). Entire faunas have<br />
apparently originated by host switching and subsequent<br />
coevolution, e.g., the tetrabothriidean<br />
tapeworms among seabirds and marine mammals<br />
(Hoberg, 1997; Hoberg, Gardner, and<br />
Campbell, 1999; Hoberg, Jones, and Bray,<br />
1999), and major taxa of eucestodes among terrestrial<br />
and aquatic vertebrates (Hoberg, Gardner,<br />
and Campbell, 1999; Hoberg, Jones, and<br />
Bray, 1999), the mazocraeidean monogenoideans<br />
among primary marine fishes (Boeger<br />
and Kritsky, 1997), and the absence of members<br />
of the Oligonchoinea (monogenoideans) in<br />
freshwater fishes (Boeger and Kritsky, 1997).<br />
Indeed, the importance of host switching has recently<br />
been emphasized in hypotheses for multiple<br />
origins of parasitism among the nematodes<br />
(Blaxter et al., 1998).<br />
The discovery that there are no general patterns<br />
of host specificity correlated with patterns<br />
of speciation in parasitic groups supports the hypothesis<br />
that speciation and adaptation are always<br />
phylogenetically correlated, but neither is<br />
causally dependent on the other. This conclusion<br />
was also reached using studies of free-living organisms<br />
(Brooks and McLennan, 1991). The degree<br />
of host specificity shows no macroevolutionary<br />
regularities, i.e., one cannot estimate the<br />
degree of phylogenetic congruence between host<br />
and parasite phylogenies or the length of time<br />
hosts and parasites have been associated from<br />
observations of host specificity. Similar conclusions<br />
have been derived from investigations on<br />
the interaction of herbivores and plants in tropical<br />
systems (Janzen, 1973, 1980, 1985).<br />
Phylogenetic approaches are thus requisite for<br />
elucidation of the complex histories of host-parasite<br />
assemblages and evaluation of a range of<br />
alternative hypotheses and predictions in the<br />
evolution of complex systems (Brooks et al.,<br />
<strong>2000</strong>; Brooks, Leon-Regagnon, and Perez-Ponce<br />
de Leon, <strong>2000</strong>). A diversity of model systems is<br />
necessary to resolve the intricacies of processes<br />
associated with cospeciation, particularly processes<br />
associated with host switching (Hoberg,<br />
Brooks, and Siegel-Causey, 1997, and references<br />
therein). In the future, we may be able to<br />
compare macroevolutionary patterns of association<br />
and search for generalities between hostparasite<br />
and other coevolutionary associations,<br />
such as phytophagous insects and their host<br />
plants or pollinators and their host plants. <strong>Comparative</strong><br />
phylogenetic approaches are also a<br />
foundation for detailed studies in evolution and<br />
community structure. Next, we briefly review<br />
applications of parasitological data to these<br />
broader areas of biology.<br />
PARASITES AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY:<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Parasites are excellent systems for macroevolutionary<br />
studies of character evolution: Parasites<br />
are neither unusually simplified nor unusually<br />
adaptively plastic in their morphological<br />
traits (Brooks and McLennan, 1993a; Perez-<br />
Ponce de Leon and Brooks, 1995a, 1995b;<br />
Perez-Ponce de Leon, Leon-Regagnon, and<br />
Mendoza-Garfias, 1997; Leon-Regagnon, 1998;<br />
Leon-Regagnon et al., 1996, 1998). Parasite<br />
evolution has not been characterized by widespread<br />
loss of traits that would indicate that parasites<br />
have given up much evolutionary independence<br />
to their hosts or by widespread homoplasy,<br />
indicating that parasites are so simplified<br />
that their options for morphological<br />
innovation are limited evolutionarily.<br />
Parasites are not degenerate, overspecialized,<br />
host-dependent creatures on the periphery of<br />
evolution (Brooks and McLennan, 1993a; Poulin,<br />
1995b). They are successful, innovative<br />
creatures, many of which have persisted for a<br />
long time on this planet. This contention is supported<br />
by phylogenetically based estimates for<br />
the origins and age of the major groups of parasitic<br />
platyhelminths. Divergence of the common<br />
ancestor of the Aspidobothriidea and the<br />
Digenea, of the major lineages of monogenoideans,<br />
and of the common ancestor of the Gyrocotylidea<br />
and the Cestoidea (Amphilinidea +
Eucestoda) coincided with the divergence of the<br />
common ancestor of the Chondrichthyes and the<br />
common ancestor of the rest of the gnathostomous<br />
vertebrates (Brooks, 1985b). Complementary<br />
independent assessments within the eucestodes<br />
(Hoberg, Gardner, and Campbell, 1999;<br />
Hoberg, Jones, and Bray, 1999; Hoberg, Mariaux,<br />
and Brooks, <strong>2000</strong>) and monogenoideans<br />
(Boeger and Kritsky, 1997) suggest origins extending<br />
to the Devonian from 350 million to 420<br />
million or more years ago.<br />
Other studies (Brooks et al., 1985, 1989) indicated<br />
that parasite ontogenies evolve as coherent<br />
units and that larval and adult morphological<br />
traits are phylogenetically congruent.<br />
The degree of adaptive response by each life cycle<br />
stage is thus constrained by common evolutionary<br />
history. Finally, although molecular<br />
systematics is in its infancy within parasitology,<br />
studies to date show that there is a high degree<br />
of concordance between phylogenies based on<br />
molecular and morphological traits, when proper<br />
phylogenetic methods are used and careful character<br />
analysis is performed (e.g., for ordinal-level<br />
relationships among the eucestodes, Hoberg<br />
et al., 1997; Hoberg, Mariaux, and Brooks,<br />
<strong>2000</strong>; Mariaux, 1998). The merits of studies<br />
based on "total evidence" that combine morphological<br />
and molecular databases (Kluge,<br />
1989, 1997, 1998a, 1998b; de Queiroz et al.,<br />
1995; Huelsenbeck et al., 1996; Sanderson et al.,<br />
1998) are also apparent (Hoberg, Mariaux, and<br />
Brooks, <strong>2000</strong>). Leon-Regagnon et al. (1999)<br />
have recently emphasized this point, showing<br />
that a combination of molecular and morphological<br />
data could help resolve outstanding specieslevel<br />
taxonomic problems within a group of frog<br />
digeneans.<br />
Parasites and the evolution of life history<br />
traits: The extent to which the individual components<br />
of reproductive biology, development,<br />
and ecology, as well as their complex interactions,<br />
can be highlighted and examined in parasite-host<br />
systems is impressive. Phylogenetic<br />
analysis also allows us to examine phylogenetically<br />
associated changes in reproductive and<br />
nonreproductive male and female characters. We<br />
can then ask questions, such as what are the<br />
costs and benefits of different reproductive strategies?<br />
Do male and female characters covary in<br />
either their origin or their loss (digeneans, monogenoideans)?<br />
What is the relationship between<br />
BROOKS AND HOBERG—PARASITE BIODIVERSITY 15<br />
reproductive conservatism and reproductive<br />
flexibility in male or female characters (digeneans,<br />
monogenoideans)? What is the relationship<br />
between sexual reproduction and the appearance<br />
of character novelty (eucestodes)? And if asexual<br />
reproduction is good and sex is better, is sex<br />
combined with asexual reproduction the best (digeneans)?<br />
How does dioecy evolve in monoecious<br />
lineages (Platt and Brooks, 1997)? Recent<br />
studies (Morand, 1996a, 1996b; Poulin, 1992,<br />
1995a, 1995b, 1997a, 1997b; Sasal et al., 1997,<br />
1998; Sasal and Morand, 1998) confirm the suitability<br />
of parasite systems for studies of the evolution<br />
of life history strategies. Their results<br />
confirmed the assertion by Brooks and Mc-<br />
Lennan (1993a) that parasites show the same<br />
kinds of life history evolution as their closest<br />
free-living relatives.<br />
Parasites as model systems for studying adaptive<br />
radiations: Parasites have not experienced<br />
unusually high degrees of adaptive radiation but<br />
do show interesting patterns. Within the parasitic<br />
flatworms, the monogenoideans appear to have<br />
undergone adaptive radiation, whereas the digeneans<br />
and the eucestodes appear to have experienced<br />
evolutionary radiation that may or<br />
may not have been adaptive (Brooks and Mc-<br />
Lennan, 1993b, 1993c). It is important to realize,<br />
however, that a relatively species-poor sister<br />
group balances each species-rich group, so it is<br />
inaccurate to speak of parasites in general as<br />
having experienced high levels of adaptive radiations.<br />
The question of the relative extent of<br />
parasite adaptive radiations cannot be answered<br />
until we have comparable databases for free-living<br />
groups. At the moment, we can say that the<br />
monogenoideans, digeneans, and eucestodes, not<br />
unlike ostariophysan and percomorph fishes and<br />
passerine birds, provide a wealth of information<br />
about radiations, adaptive or not. This information,<br />
in turn, supports the hypothesis that such<br />
radiations were primarily a function of diversification<br />
of life cycle components. For example,<br />
4 putative key innovations were identified during<br />
examination of the database for the parasitic<br />
flatworms (Brooks and McLennan, 1993a,<br />
1993c): (1) the evolution of a direct life cycle (a<br />
developmental change, possibly caused by peramoiphosis,<br />
with an ecological outcome); (2)<br />
the appearance of additional larval stages (a developmental<br />
change); (3) the appearance of<br />
asexual amplification of larval stages (a devel-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
16 COMPARATIVH PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
opmental change); and (4) the appearance of<br />
sexual amplification of reproductive output<br />
(again, a developmental change, this time involving<br />
the repetitious production of segments).<br />
The success of these key innovations was based<br />
on an interaction between the environment and<br />
populations, tempered by a background of substantial<br />
inherited constraints. Since both parasites<br />
and hosts have evolutionary tendencies and<br />
capabilities, parasite evolution will be historically<br />
correlated in some way with host evolution<br />
but will not necessarily be caused by it. Adaptive<br />
radiations, therefore, result from active interaction<br />
between parasite and environmental<br />
(host) characteristics rather than just from evolutionarily<br />
passive parasite responses to host<br />
characteristics.<br />
The evolution of life cycles is the key element<br />
in the phylogenetic diversification and adaptive<br />
radiation of parasites. Life cycle patterns show<br />
a rich mosaic of diversification in reproductive,<br />
developmental, and ecological characteristics in<br />
a strongly phylogenetic context. Evolutionary<br />
radiations of parasite groups appear to involve,<br />
first, ontogenetic innovations, second, changes<br />
in adult reproductive structures, and third, ecological<br />
components of life cycles. The evolution<br />
of changes in the biology of the parasites dictates<br />
the changes in life cycle patterns, including<br />
patterns of host utilization, rather than the reverse.<br />
Species richness, therefore, is correlated<br />
with different phenomena in different groups of<br />
parasites. These phenomena include changes in<br />
ecological components of life cycles, production<br />
or amplification of dispersing larval or juvenile<br />
stages, and amplification of sexual reproductive<br />
output.<br />
Parasites as systems for examining the modes<br />
of speciation: Price (1980) proposed that the<br />
evolution of many new parasite-host relationships<br />
occurred through colonization of new<br />
hosts. He interpreted this as an example of sympatric<br />
speciation, because the hosts had to overlap<br />
geographically for the switch to occur. This<br />
host-biased perspective changes when we view<br />
the speciation process from the perspective of<br />
the organism that is actually speciating. Brooks<br />
and McLennan (1993a) suggested that if one<br />
takes a worm's-eye view, different host species<br />
are like different island archipelagos, and speciation<br />
by host switching is better explained as<br />
a form of peripheral isolates, i.e., allopatric spe-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
ciation, than as sympatric speciation. Recently,<br />
Funk (1998) has shown that if we consider speciation<br />
by host switching in the manner suggested<br />
by Brooks and McLennan (1993a), it is<br />
easier to understand how natural selection can<br />
play a role in producing isolating mechanisms<br />
in the populations living on or in different hosts.<br />
By this logic, true sympatric speciation in parasitic<br />
platyhelminths can be identified by finding<br />
sister species restricted to different parts of the<br />
same host. Rohde (1979) used similar reasoning<br />
to suggest that natural selection might play a<br />
role in determining the high degree of site specificity<br />
exhibited by many parasites.<br />
The evidence collected to date suggests that<br />
vicariant and peripheral isolates speciation via<br />
host switching have played the dominant roles<br />
in the speciation of parasitic platyhelminths, including<br />
crocodilians and their digeneans, freshwater<br />
stingrays and their eucestodes, frogs and<br />
their digeneans, freshwater and marine turtles<br />
and their digeneans, marine fish and their digeneans<br />
and monogenoideans, and seabirds and<br />
pinnipeds and their eucestodes (see refs. in<br />
Brooks and McLennan, 1993a; also Hoberg,<br />
1992, 1995; Hoberg and Adams, 1992; Perez-<br />
Ponce de Leon and Brooks, 1995a, 1995b; Boeger<br />
and Kritsky, 1997; Leon-Regagnon, 1998;<br />
Leon-Regagnon et al., 1996, 1998). Tantalizing<br />
possibilities of sympatric speciation suggested<br />
by, for instance, ochetosomatid digeneans in<br />
snakes, some monogenoideans, and many oxyurid<br />
nematodes remain to be investigated phylogenetically.<br />
Host isolation, and particularly isolation for<br />
definitive hosts, therefore drives speciation. Current<br />
evidence suggests that intermediate hosts<br />
are evolutionarily neutral. This seems to be a<br />
general pattern, emerging from phylogenetic<br />
studies of cestodes in avian and mammalian<br />
hosts in either terrestrial or marine environments<br />
(Hoberg, 1986, 1992, 1995; Hoberg and Adams,<br />
1992; Hoberg et al., <strong>2000</strong>). For example, among<br />
tapeworms of the genus Taenia (a group where<br />
detailed information is available for the life cycles<br />
of most species), speciation appears to be<br />
driven by host switching among definitive hosts<br />
exploiting prey within guild associations. A prediction<br />
that might follow from these findings<br />
suggests that ecological continuity and predictability<br />
are limited by transmission dynamics<br />
linked to intermediate hosts but that diversification<br />
is driven by predator—prey associations
(Hoberg et al., <strong>2000</strong>). These studies indicate the<br />
necessity for having detailed phylogenetic and<br />
ecological data as the basis for examining patterns<br />
and process in speciation for hosts and parasites<br />
and at a higher level for evaluation of faunal<br />
and community history.<br />
Parasites—paradigm systems for studies of<br />
community structure and evolution:<br />
One major advantage of parasite communities<br />
over others is that the habitat they live in, the<br />
host, has such a well defined structure. . .The host<br />
microcosm is replicated through time and space<br />
much more so than habitats for most other organisms.<br />
Therefore, the study of comparative<br />
community structure is very powerful. (Price,<br />
1986)<br />
There is, as yet, little overlap between parasite<br />
groups for which we have extensive community<br />
ecological information and groups for which we<br />
have extensive phylogenetic information (Poulin,<br />
1995a, 1997b). In addition, differences in<br />
understanding between systematists and ecologists<br />
about the use of phylogenetic methods and<br />
the possible forms of phylogenetic components<br />
in community structure have led to unproductive<br />
and inappropriate polarization of perspectives<br />
(Bush et al., 1990). Perspectives on the primacy<br />
of ecological versus phylogenetic-historical determinants<br />
of faunal structure are changing,<br />
however, as researchers begin to recognize that<br />
communities are mosaics of species that evolved<br />
elsewhere and dispersed into the area (colonizers)<br />
and species that evolved in situ (residents<br />
or endemics) (Aho and Bush, 1993). Each parasite<br />
community represents a historically unique<br />
combination of colonizers and endemic species,<br />
in terms of both geographic dispersal and host<br />
switching (Brooks and McLennan, 1991, 1993a,<br />
1993b, 1993c; Hoberg, 1997a). Because parasite<br />
communities are so well defined and so easily<br />
studied, parasitologists have an opportunity to<br />
assume a leadership role in the study of community<br />
evolution.<br />
Parasites are developmentally and ecologically<br />
complex organisms subject to and constrained<br />
by the same rules that govern the evolution of<br />
all biological systems (Poulin, 1995b). This is<br />
the key to their value in predictive studies. Ernst<br />
Mayr (1957) recognized nearly half a century<br />
ago that the study of parasites "is not only valuable<br />
for the parasitologist, but is also a potential<br />
gold-mine for the evolutionist and general biologist."<br />
BROOKS AND HOBERG—PARASITE BIODIVERSITY 17<br />
Here at the end of the twentieth century, and<br />
in the midst of the biodiversity crisis, those sentiments<br />
are truer than ever. The ability to distinguish<br />
evolutionary colonizers from residents<br />
will permit us to recognize introduced species<br />
and to assess the risk that they may cause emergent<br />
diseases. The ability to distinguish evolutionary<br />
generalists from specialists will enable<br />
us to assess more fully the extent of biocontainment<br />
for any parasite being used as a biocontrol<br />
agent. Finally, the ability to distinguish the old<br />
from the recent components of ecosystem structure<br />
will help us assess what species are likely<br />
to respond to anthropogenic changes, in what<br />
order, in what ways, and to what extent.<br />
GTI Component 3—Management of Systematic<br />
Knowledge Bases: Getting the Information<br />
to Those Who Can Use it Effectively.<br />
DIVERSITAS estimates that within 5 years<br />
electronic data handling and interlinked knowledge<br />
systems will become the principal medium<br />
for all activities associated with applying systematic<br />
information to biodiversity studies and<br />
policies. These efforts will require large databases<br />
on taxonomic information, specimens, and<br />
data in collections.<br />
The taxasphere can contribute substantially in<br />
this area by developing 2 types of home pages:<br />
(1) phylogenetic home pages, providing the<br />
most up-to-date phylogenetic trees for all groups<br />
of parasites, interconnected in such a way that<br />
anyone can move from one taxonomic level to<br />
another (this will provide the predictive framework<br />
within which a variety of specialists can<br />
operate), and (2) species home pages, providing<br />
the following information for each targeted species:<br />
(i) what is it (and how to distinguish it from<br />
others), (ii) where is it, and (iii) what is its natural<br />
history. This process has been termed the<br />
creation of a biodiversity Yellow Pages for the<br />
Internet (Janzen and Hallwachs, 1994). These<br />
home pages will include electronic images,<br />
which can be used for other purposes, such as<br />
taxonomic descriptions and revisions or identification<br />
guides. These home pages would also<br />
include information about the known natural history<br />
of each species. Species home pages should<br />
be cross-linked to phylogenetics home pages so<br />
that we will eventually have a complete listing<br />
of the phylogenetic relationships of all species<br />
linked to their natural histories. Biodiversity information,<br />
irrespective of format, must eventu-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
18 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
ally be linked back to a specimen-based reference<br />
system or biological collection.<br />
GTI AND COLLECTIONS AS FUNDAMENTAL<br />
FOUNDATIONS FOR BIODIVERSITY: Biological<br />
collections are essential elements in the development<br />
of biodiversity information (Davis,<br />
1996; GTI, 1999). Collections developed from<br />
inventory activities represent "a permanent,<br />
documentable record of specimen-based information"<br />
(GTI, 1999) that provides historical,<br />
contemporary, and predictive baselines for understanding<br />
the patterns and distribution of organisms<br />
in the biosphere. Collections are vital<br />
in defining the continuity of ecosystem or community<br />
structure and integrity. Collections allow<br />
detailed examination of spatial and temporal<br />
variation from local to global scales, directly<br />
linked to specimens and data for populations and<br />
species, and such biologically significant parameters<br />
as reproductive phenology, ecology, behavior,<br />
biogeography, and host associations. Biological<br />
collections are the context for developing<br />
and applying biodiversity information efficiently<br />
and effectively. Thus, the infrastructure for collections<br />
must be regarded as an integral facet of<br />
any developing programs for survey, inventory,<br />
and documentation of global biodiversity resources<br />
(GTI, 1999).<br />
Conclusions<br />
Both the taxasphere and the biosphere may<br />
be facing imminent extinction. We have insufficient<br />
taxonomic expertise across all components<br />
of diversity to address global needs for<br />
survey and inventory in a timely manner. Survival<br />
of the taxasphere depends in large part on<br />
making the cultural change from seeing ourselves<br />
in the traditional mode of collectors of<br />
things to being managers of information. It is no<br />
longer important, or even relevant, to have more<br />
specimens of a particular species in a collection<br />
than are found in any other collection; rather, it<br />
is important to know how much information is<br />
available about each species. Just as society is<br />
no longer willing to invest huge sums of money<br />
in classic set-aside conservation projects, neither<br />
is it willing to invest in ever-expanding museum<br />
collections that serve only as repositories of material<br />
accessible to an ever-decreasing number of<br />
specialists (Davis, 1996). Neither is society willing<br />
to invest enormous amounts of money in a<br />
taxasphere whose only concern is esoteric research.<br />
The ongoing internal conflict among sys-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
tematic biologists about whether we should be<br />
seen as a service discipline or as an independent<br />
research discipline threatens to weaken the taxasphere<br />
in its efforts to make a significant contribution<br />
to society and thereby ensure its own<br />
survival.<br />
Already too many ecologists and biodiversity<br />
managers believe that systematists are good only<br />
for providing names; at the same time, too many<br />
systematists believe that their only function<br />
should be generating phylogenies and cuttingedge<br />
comparative evolutionary studies. We must<br />
fully internalize the belief that the fundamental<br />
importance of systematic biology stems from its<br />
being both an essential service profession and<br />
an essential element of evolutionary biology.<br />
Ecologists have successfully grappled with similar<br />
issues (Lubchenco et al., 1991)<br />
The call for more inventory work in biodiversity<br />
thus represents a tremendous opportunity<br />
and challenge for the taxasphere. Members of<br />
the taxasphere must understand that biodiversity<br />
preservation is based on such issues as economic<br />
development, conservation, solving major environmental<br />
challenges, and limiting the impacts<br />
of emerging pathogens and parasites. Inventories<br />
that seek to identity the critical components of<br />
biodiversity are necessary to achieve these<br />
goals, which are mutually beneficial and can be<br />
synergistic for the scientific community and the<br />
general population. They are an essential part of<br />
helping to save the biosphere by helping improve<br />
the socioeconomic status of as many people<br />
as possible.<br />
The taxasphere has long assumed the responsibility<br />
of naming and classifying the species on<br />
this planet, and modern phylogenetic methods<br />
have produced maximally efficient modes of<br />
storing and transmitting information through<br />
classifications. The Internet gives us a powerful<br />
mechanism for disseminating enormous amounts<br />
of information quickly and widely. All those interested<br />
in preserving, managing, and sustainably<br />
using biodiversity should have a vested interest<br />
in supporting a strong taxasphere. Within<br />
the scientific community, however, taxonomists<br />
do not have a history of close and cordial interactions<br />
with other specialists. There are many<br />
reasons for this, some of which have been discussed<br />
(Brooks and McLennan, 1991), but we<br />
must overcome the historical constraints of sectarian<br />
competition for academic positions and<br />
prestige. The scientific community can help pre-
serve biodiversity effectively if each participant<br />
can give up something of his or her own immediate<br />
personal agenda to help achieve a greater<br />
good.<br />
We return to the analogy of the taxasphere as<br />
a triage team, the biosphere as a "battlefield,"<br />
and the "war" as human activities that degrade<br />
global biotic resources. The triage teams survey<br />
parts of the battlefield as completely as possible<br />
looking for "wounded" participants. All possible<br />
participants and the degree to which each has<br />
been affected must be recognized, and the taxasphere<br />
has the role of passing that information<br />
on to the decision makers who are responsible<br />
for the optimal deployment of resources. Names<br />
and critical life history and ecological information<br />
provided by taxonomists constitute the<br />
foundation for bringing a broad array of stakeholders<br />
in the national and international arena to<br />
understand the value of biodiversity.<br />
DIVERSITAS has designated 2001 as the International<br />
Biodiversity Observation Year, which<br />
will, among other things, focus attention on the<br />
value of the taxasphere and promote a successful<br />
launch of the GTI. With an emphasis on involving<br />
local people in a variety of initiatives associated<br />
with this observation, the International<br />
Biodiversity Observation Year is an excellent<br />
opportunity for coalitions of international, national,<br />
and local political, social development,<br />
and environmental agencies to join together to<br />
provide a fuller inventory of the species on this<br />
planet.<br />
One should never change a winning game and<br />
always change a losing game. So far we have<br />
been playing a losing game. On a global basis,<br />
people's lives are not improving, and we continue<br />
to lose large parts of the planet's biota. The<br />
3-pronged action plan of the GTI represents a<br />
bold and assertive effort to change a losing game<br />
into a winning one. The comparative parasitelogical<br />
perspective using historical, ecological,<br />
and biogeographic information offers the potential<br />
for contributions toward recognizing, defining,<br />
and solving challenges to global biodiversity.<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
We would like to express our deepest thanks<br />
to all those who participated in planning efforts<br />
for the ATBI in the ACG, in particular, ACG<br />
administrative and scientific personnel: Sigifrcdo<br />
Marin, Roger Blanco, Alejandro Masis, Guil-<br />
BROOKS AND HOBERG—PARASITE BIODIVERSITY 19<br />
lermo Jimenez, Maria Marta Chavarria, and Felipe<br />
Chavarria; parataxonomists: Calixto Moraga,<br />
Carolina Cano, Elda Araya, Fredy Quesada,<br />
Dunia Garcia, Roberto Espinoza, Elba Lopez,<br />
and Petrona Rios; scientific advisers: Dan Janzen<br />
and Winnie Hallwachs; and international<br />
collaborators: Sherwin Desser, Anindo Choudhury,<br />
Derek Zelmer, Odd Sandlund, Rita Hartvigsen-Daverdin,<br />
Tom Platt, Greg Klassen, Ramon<br />
Carreno, Fernando Marques, Scott Monks,<br />
and Gerardo Perez-Ponce de Leon. We also<br />
thank members of the developing consortium for<br />
research on Arctic parasites: Susan Kutz and<br />
Lydden Polley of the University of Saskatchewan;<br />
Anne Gunn, Alasdair Veitch, and Brett<br />
Elkin of the Department of Wildlife, Resources<br />
and Economic Development, Government of the<br />
Northwest Territories. Daniel R. Brooks has<br />
been supported in these efforts by operating<br />
grant A7696 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering<br />
Research Council of Canada.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Aho, J. M., and A. O. Bush. 1993. Community richness<br />
in parasites of some freshwater fishes from<br />
North America. Pages 185-193 in R. E. Ricklefs<br />
and D. Schluter, eds. Species Diversity in Ecological<br />
Communities: Historical and Geographical<br />
Perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago,<br />
Illinois.<br />
Anderson, T. J. C., M. S. Blouin, and R. N. Beech.<br />
1998. Population biology of parasitic nematodes:<br />
applications of genetic markers. Advances in <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
41:219-283.<br />
Balbuena, J. A., and J. A. Raga. 1994. Intestinal helminths<br />
as indicators of segregation and social<br />
structure of pods of long-finned pilot whales<br />
(Globicephala melas) off the Faeroe Islands. Canadian<br />
Journal of Zoology 72:443-448.<br />
, F. J. Aznar, M. Fernandez, and J. A. Raga.<br />
1995. Parasites as indicators of social structure<br />
and stock identity of marine mammals. Pages<br />
133-139 in A. S. Blix, L. Walloe, and O. Ultang,<br />
eds. Developments in Marine Biology, Vol. 4.,<br />
Whales, Seals, Fish and Man. Elsevier, New York.<br />
Barrowclough, G. F. 1992. Systematics, biodiversity<br />
and conservation biology. Pages 121-143 in N.<br />
Eldredge, ed. Systematics, Ecology and the Biodiversity<br />
Crisis. Columbia University Press, New<br />
York.<br />
Barse, A. M., and D. H. Secor. 1999. An exotic nematode<br />
parasite of the American eel. Fisheries 24:<br />
6-10.<br />
Bartoli, P. 1989. Digenetic trematodes as bio-indicators<br />
for yellow-legged gulls in Corsica (western<br />
Mediterranean). Pages 251-259 in J. S. Aguilar,<br />
X. Monbailliu, and A. M. Paterson, eds. Status<br />
and Conservation of Seabird Ecogeography and<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
20<br />
COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Mediterranean Action Plan. Society of Spanish<br />
Ornithology, Madrid.<br />
Belogurov, O. I. 1966. Spetsifichnost' gel'mintov v<br />
otnoshenni defmitivnykh khoziaev vzaimosiaz'<br />
gel'mintofauna zhivotnykh razlichnykh otriadov.<br />
Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 45:1449-1454.<br />
Blackmore, S. 1996. Knowing the Earth's biodiversity:<br />
challenges for the infrastructure of systematic<br />
biology. Science 274:63-64.<br />
Blaxter, M. L., P. De Ley, J. R. Garey, L. X. Liu,<br />
P. Scheldman, A. Vierstraete, J. R. Vanfleteren,<br />
L. Y. Mackey, M. Dorris, L. M. Frisse, J. T.<br />
Vida, and W. Kelley Thomas. 1998. A molecular<br />
evolutionary framework for the phylum Nematoda.<br />
Nature 392:71-75.<br />
Boeger, W., and D. Kritsky. 1997. Cocvolution of<br />
the Monogenoidea (Platyhelminthes) based on a<br />
revised hypothesis of parasite phylogeny. International<br />
Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong> 27:1495-1511.<br />
Brooks, D. R. 1977. Evolutionary history of some plagiorchoid<br />
trematodes of anurans. Systematic Zoology<br />
26: 277-289.<br />
. 1979. Testing the context and extent of hostparasite<br />
coevolution. Systematic Zoology 28:<br />
299-307.<br />
. 1981. Hennig's parasitological method: a proposed<br />
solution. Systematic Zoology 30:229-249.<br />
. 1985a. Historical ecology: a new approach to<br />
studying the evolution of ecological associations.<br />
Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 72:660-<br />
680.<br />
. 1985b. Phylogenetics and the future of helminth<br />
systematics. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 71:<br />
719-727.<br />
. 1990. Parsimony analysis in historical biogeography<br />
and coevolution: methodological and theoretical<br />
update. Systematic Zoology 39:14—30.<br />
. 1998. Triage for the biosphere. Pages 71-80<br />
in G. B. Softing, G. Benneh, K. Hindar, and A.<br />
Wijkman, cds. The Brundtland Commission's Report—10<br />
Years. Scandinavian University Press,<br />
Oslo.<br />
, S. M. Bandoni, C. A. MacDonald, and R.<br />
T. O'Grady. 1989. Aspects of the phylogeny of<br />
the Trematoda Rudolphi 1808 (Platyhelminthes:<br />
Cercomeria). Canadian Journal of Zoology <strong>67</strong>:<br />
2609-2624.<br />
, E. P. Hoberg, V. Leon-Regagnon, G. Perez-<br />
Ponce de Leon, W. Boeger, D. Kritsky, and G.<br />
Klassen. <strong>2000</strong>. Putting the phylogenetic database<br />
to work. In D. T. J. Littlewood and R. A. Bray,<br />
eds. The Interrelationships of the Platyhelminthes.<br />
Taylor and Francis, London, U.K. (In press.)<br />
, V. Leon-Regagnon, and G. Perez-Ponce de<br />
Leon. <strong>2000</strong>. Parasites y la biodiversidad. In M.<br />
H. Hernandez, A. N. Garcia, M. Ulloa, and F. Alvarez,<br />
eds. Enfoques Contemporaneos para el Estudio<br />
de la Biodiversidad. Universidad Nacional<br />
Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City. (In press.)<br />
, R. L. Mayden, and D. A. McLennan. 1992.<br />
Phylogeny and biodiversity: conserving our evolutionary<br />
legacy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution<br />
7:55-59.<br />
, and D. A. McLennan. 1991. Phylogeny,<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Ecology and Behavior: A Research Program in<br />
<strong>Comparative</strong> Biology. University of Chicago<br />
Press, Chicago, Illinois. 434 pp.<br />
, and . 1993a. Parascript: Parasites and<br />
the Language of Evolution. Smithsonian Institution<br />
Press, Washington, D.C. 430 pp.<br />
, and . 1993b. Historical ecology as a<br />
research program in macroevolution. Pages 76—<br />
113 in R. L. Mayden, ed. Systematics, Historical<br />
Ecology and North American Freshwater Fishes,<br />
Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.<br />
, and . 1993c. Historical ecology: examining<br />
phylogenetic components of community<br />
evolution. Pages 2<strong>67</strong>-280 in R. Ricklefs and D.<br />
Schulter, eds. Species Diversity in Ecological<br />
Communities, University of Chicago Press, Chicago,<br />
Illinois.<br />
-, J. M. Carpenter, S. G. Weller, and<br />
J. A. Coddington. 1995. Systematics, ecology<br />
and behavior. Bioscience 45:687-695.<br />
, R. T. O'Grady, and D. R. Glen. 1985 Phylogenetic<br />
analysis of the Digenea (Platyhelminthes:<br />
Cercomeria) with comments on their adaptive<br />
radiation. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63:<br />
411-443.<br />
Brooks, D. R., L. Prieto, and G. Perez-Ponce de<br />
Leon. 1999. Two new species of Oochoristica in<br />
Ctenosaura spp. from Costa Rica and Mexico.<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 85:893-897.<br />
, T. B. Thorson, and M. A. Mayes. 1981.<br />
Freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygonidae) and<br />
their helminth parasites: testing hypotheses of<br />
evolution and coevolution. Pages 147—175 in V.<br />
A. Funk and D. R. Brooks, eds. Advances in Cladistics,<br />
New York Botanical Garden, New York.<br />
Bush, A. O. 1990. Helminth communities in avian<br />
hosts: determinants of pattern. Pages 197—232 in<br />
G.W. Esch, A. O. Bush, and J. M. Aho, eds. Parasite<br />
Communities: Patterns and Processes. Chapman<br />
and Hall, London, U.K.<br />
, J. M. Aho, and C. R. Kennedy. 1990. Eco<br />
logical versus phylogenetic determinants of helminth<br />
community richness. Evolutionary Ecology<br />
4:1-20.<br />
, and C. R. Kennedy. 1994. Host fragmentation<br />
and helminth parasites: hedging your bets<br />
against extinction. International Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
24:1333-1343.<br />
, K. D. Lafferty, J. M. Lotz, and A. W. Shostak.<br />
1997. <strong>Parasitology</strong> meets ecology on its own<br />
terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
83:575-583.<br />
Bustnes, J. O., and K. Galaktionov. 1999. Anthropogenic<br />
influences on the infestation of intertidal<br />
gastropods by seabird trematode larvae on the<br />
southern Barents Sea coast. Marine Biology 133:<br />
449-453.<br />
Caballero y Rodriguez, G., C. Del Rio-Estrada, L.<br />
Rodriguez-Alvarez, and G. C. Tello-Sandoval.<br />
1992. Trematodes as pollution level indicators by<br />
hydrogen sulphide in the Gulf of Mexico, and this<br />
acid's impact on public health. Annales del Institute<br />
de Ciencias del Mar y Limnologfa 19:151 —<br />
161.
Clayton, D. H., and B. A. Walther. 1997. Collection<br />
and quantification of arthropod parasites of birds.<br />
Pages 419-440 in D. H. Clayton and J. Moore,<br />
eds. Host-Parasite Evolution: General Principles<br />
and Avian Models. Oxford University Press, Oxford,<br />
U.K.<br />
Cone, D. K., D. J. Marcogliese, and W. D. Watt.<br />
1993. Metazoan parasite communities of yellow<br />
eels (Angnilla rostratci) in acidic and limed rivers<br />
of Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71:<br />
177-184.<br />
Dailey, M., and W. K. Vogelbein. 1991. Parasite fauna<br />
of three species of Antarctic whales with reference<br />
to their use as potential stock indicators.<br />
Fisheries Bulletin 89:355-365.<br />
Davis, G. 1995. Systematics and public health. Bioscience<br />
45:705-714.<br />
. 1996. Collections of biological specimens essential<br />
for science and society. Association of Systematics<br />
Collections Newsletter 24:77-78, 88-90.<br />
Desser, S. S. 1997. Blood parasites of the iguanid lizard,<br />
Ctenosaura similis from Costa Rica, with a<br />
description of a new species, Hcpatoz.oon gamez.i.<br />
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 44:162-1<strong>67</strong>.<br />
Dobson, A. P. 1988. Restoring island ecosystems: the<br />
potential of parasites to control introduced animals.<br />
Conservation Biology 2:31-39.<br />
, and R. Carper. 1992. Global warming and<br />
potential changes in host-parasite and disease-vector<br />
relationships. Pages 201-217 in R. L. Peters<br />
and T. E. Lovejoy, cds. Global Warming and Biological<br />
Diversity. Yale University Press, New<br />
Haven, Connecticut.<br />
, and P. J. Hudson. 1986. Parasites, disease<br />
and the structure of ecological communities.<br />
Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1:1 1-15.<br />
, and R. M. May. 1986a. Disease and conservation.<br />
Pages 345-365 in M. E. Soule, ed. Conservation<br />
Biology: The Science of Scarcity and<br />
Diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.<br />
, and . 1986b. Patterns of invasions by<br />
pathogens and parasites. Pages 58-76 /// H. A.<br />
Moore and J. A. Drake, eds. Ecology of Biological<br />
Invasions of North America and Hawaii, Ecological<br />
Studies Vol. 58. Springer-Verlag, New<br />
York.<br />
Dogiel, V. A. 1961. Ecology of the parasites of freshwater<br />
fishes. Pages 1-47 in V. A. Dogiel, G. K.<br />
Petruvshevski, and Y. I. Polyanski, eds. <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
of Fishes. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, U.K.<br />
Doster, G. L., and C. P. Goater. 1997. Collection and<br />
quantification of avian helminths and Protozoa.<br />
Pages 396-418 in D. H. Clayton and J. Moore,<br />
eds. Host-parasite Evolution: General Principles<br />
and Avian Models. Oxford University Press, Oxford,<br />
U.K.<br />
Durden, L. A., and J. E. Keirans. 1996. Host-parasite<br />
coextinction and the plight of tick conservation.<br />
American Entomologist 42:87-91.<br />
Ehrlich, P. R., and E. O. Wilson. 1991. Biodiversity<br />
studies: science and policy. Science 253: 758—762.<br />
Eldredge, N. 1992. Where the twain meet: causal intersections<br />
and the genealogical and ecological<br />
BROOKS AND HOBERG—PARASITE BIODIVERSITY 21<br />
realms. Pages 1-14 in N. Eldredge, ed. Systeinatics,<br />
Ecology and the Biodiversity Crisis. Columbia<br />
University Press, New York.<br />
Epstein, P. R. 1997. Climate, ecology and human<br />
health. Consequences 3:3—19.<br />
. 1999. Climate and health. Science 285:347-<br />
348.<br />
Erwin, T. L. 1991. An evolutionary basis for conservation<br />
strategies. Science 253:750-752.<br />
Esch, G. W., A. O. Bush, and J. M. Aho. 1990. Par<br />
asite Communities: Patterns and Processes. Chapman<br />
and Hall, London, U.K. 335 pp.<br />
, A. W. Shostak, D. J. Marcogliese, and T.<br />
M. Goater. 1990. Patterns and processes in helminth<br />
parasite communities: an overview. Pages<br />
1-19 in G. W. Esch, A. O. Bush, and J. M. Aho,<br />
eds. Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes.<br />
Chapman and Hall, London, U.K.<br />
Evvald, P. W. 1995. The evolution of virulence: a unifying<br />
link between parasitology and ecology.<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 81:659-669.<br />
Funk, D. J. 1998. Isolating a role for natural selection<br />
in speciation: host adaptation and sexual isolation<br />
in Neochlanrisus bchbianae leaf beetles. Evolution<br />
52:1744-1759.<br />
Gardner, S. L., and M. Campbell. 1992. Parasites as<br />
probes for biodiversity. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
78:596-600.<br />
Glowka, L., F. Burhenne-Guilmin, H. Synge, J. A.<br />
McNeely, and L. Giindling. 1994. A Guide to<br />
the Convention on Biological Diversity. International<br />
Union CN, Gland, Switzerland.<br />
Grenfell, B. T. 1992. Parasitism and the dynamics of<br />
ungulate grazing systems. American Naturalist<br />
139:907-929.<br />
GTI (Global Taxonomy Initiative). 1999. Using systematic<br />
inventories to meet country and regional<br />
needs. A Report of the DIVERSITAS/ Systematics<br />
Agenda <strong>2000</strong> International Workshop, September<br />
17—19, 1998, American Museum of Natural<br />
History. The Center for Biodiversity and Conservation,<br />
American Museum of Natural History,<br />
New York. 34 pp.<br />
Gulland, F. M. D. 1995. The impact of infectious diseases<br />
on wild animal populations—a review. Pages<br />
20-51 in B. T. Grenfell and A. P. Dobson, eds.<br />
Ecology of Infectious Diseases in Natural Populations.<br />
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,<br />
U.K.<br />
Handeland, K., and T. Slettbakk. 1994. Outbreaks<br />
of cerebrospinal elaphostrongylosis in reindeer<br />
(Rangifer tarandu.s tarandiis) in Finnmark, Norway,<br />
and their relation to climatic conditions.<br />
Journal of Veterinary Medicine 41:407-410.<br />
Harvey, P. H., and M. Pagel. 1991. The <strong>Comparative</strong><br />
Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University<br />
Press, Oxford, U.K.<br />
Hawksworth, D. L. 1995. The resource base for biodiversity<br />
assessment. Pages 551-605 in V. H.<br />
Heywood and R. T. Watson, eds. Global Biodiversity<br />
Assessment. Cambridge University Press,<br />
Cambridge, U.K. 239 pp.<br />
Hoagland, K. E. 1996. The taxonomic impediment<br />
and the Convention on Biodiversity. Association<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
22 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
of Systematics Collections Newsletter 24: 61-62,<br />
66-<strong>67</strong>.<br />
Hoberg, E. P. 1986. Evolution and historical biogeography<br />
of a parasite-host assemblage: Alcataenia<br />
spp. (Cyclophyllidea: Dilepididae) in Alcidae<br />
(Charadriiformes). Canadian Journal of Zoology<br />
64:2576-2589.<br />
. 1992. Congruent and synchronic patterns in<br />
biogeography and speciation among seabirds, pinnipeds<br />
and cestodes. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 78:<br />
601-615.<br />
. 1995. Historical biogeography and modes of<br />
speciation across high latitude seas of the Holarctic:<br />
concepts for host-parasite coevolution among<br />
the Phocini (Phocidae) and Tetrabothriidae (Eucestoda).<br />
Canadian Journal of Zoology 73:45-57.<br />
. 1996. Faunal diversity among avian parasite<br />
assemblages: the interaction of history, ecology,<br />
and biogeography in marine systems. Bulletin of<br />
the Scandinavian Society of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 6:65-89.<br />
. 1997a. Phylogeny and historical reconstruction:<br />
host-parasite systems as keystones in biogeography<br />
and ecology. Pages 243-261 in M. L.<br />
Reaka-Kudla, D. E. Wilson, and E. O. Wilson,<br />
eds. Biodiversity II: Understanding and Protecting<br />
Our Biological Resources. Joseph Henry Press,<br />
Washington, D.C.<br />
. 1997b. Parasite biodiversity and emerging<br />
pathogens: a role for systematics in limiting impacts<br />
on genetic resources. Pages 71-83 in K. E.<br />
Hoagland and A. Y. Rossman, eds. Global Genetic<br />
Resources: Access, Ownership and Intellectual<br />
Property Rights. Association of Systematics Collections,<br />
Washington, D.C.<br />
, and A. M. Adams. 1992. Phylogeny, historical<br />
biogeography and ecology of Anophryocephalus<br />
spp. (Eucestoda: Tetrabothriidae) among<br />
pinnipeds of the Holarctic during the late Tertiary<br />
and Pleistocene. Canadian Journal of Zoology 70:<br />
703-719.<br />
, D. R. Brooks, H. Molina-Urena, and E.<br />
Erbe. 1998. Echinocephalus janzeni n. sp. (Ncmatoda:<br />
Gnathostomatidae) in Himanturo pacifica<br />
(Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from the Pacific<br />
coast of Costa Rica and Mexico, with historical<br />
biogeographic analysis of the genus. Journal<br />
of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 84:571-581.<br />
-, and D. Siegel-Causey. 1997. Host-<br />
parasite co-speciation: history, principles and<br />
prospects. Pages 212-235 in D. H. Clayton and J.<br />
Moore, eds. Host-parasite Evolution: General<br />
Principles and Avian Models. Oxford University<br />
Press, Oxford, U.K.<br />
, S. L. Gardner, and R. A. Campbell. 1997.<br />
Paradigm shifts and tapeworm systematics. <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
Today 13:161-162.<br />
, , and . 1999. Systematics of<br />
the Eucestoda: advances toward a new phylogenetic<br />
paradigm, and observations on the early diversification<br />
of tapeworms and vertebrates. Systematic<br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong> 42:1-12.<br />
, A. Jones, and R. Bray. 1999. Phylogenetic<br />
analysis among the families of the Cyclophyllidea<br />
(Eucestoda) based on comparative morphology,<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
with new hypotheses for co-evolution in vertebrates.<br />
Systematic <strong>Parasitology</strong> 42:51-73.<br />
-, R. L. Rausch, K. S. Eom, and S. L.<br />
Gardner. <strong>2000</strong>. A phylogenetic hypothesis for<br />
species of the genus Taenia (Eucestoda: Cyclophyllidea).<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 86: In press.<br />
, A. A. Kocan, and L. G. Rickard. <strong>2000</strong>. Gastrointestinal<br />
strongyles in wild ruminants from<br />
North America. In W. Samuel, M. Pybus, and A.<br />
A. Kocan, eds. Parasitic Diseases of Wild Mammals.<br />
Iowa <strong>State</strong> University Press, Ames. (In<br />
press.)<br />
, and J. R. Lichtenfels. 1994. Phylogenetic<br />
systematic analysis of the Trichostrongylidae<br />
(Nematoda) with an initial assessment of coevolution<br />
and biogeography. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
80:976-996.<br />
, S. Lloyd, and H. Omar. 1995. Libyostrongylus<br />
dentatus n. sp. (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae)<br />
from ostriches in North America, with comments<br />
on the genera Ubyostrongylus and Paralibyostrongylus.<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 81:85-93.<br />
, J. Mariaux, J.-L. Justine, D. R. Brooks, and<br />
P. J. Weekes. 1997. Phylogeny of the orders of<br />
the Eucestoda (Cercomeromorphae) based on<br />
comparative morphology: historical perspectives<br />
and a new working hypothesis. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
83:1128-1147.<br />
-, and D. R. Brooks. <strong>2000</strong>. Phylogeny<br />
among orders of the Eucestoda (Cercomeromorphae):<br />
integrating morphology, molecules and total<br />
evidence. In D.T. J. Littlewood and R. A. Bray,<br />
eds. Interrelationships of the Platyhelminthes.<br />
Taylor and Francis, London, U.K. (In press.)<br />
, and S. G. McGee. 1982. Helminth parasitism<br />
in raccoons, Procyon lotor hirtus Nelson and<br />
Goldman, in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of<br />
Zoology 60:53-57.<br />
, K. Monsen, S. J. Kutz, and M. Blouin.<br />
1999. Structure, biodiversity and historical biogeography<br />
of nematode faunas in Holarctic ruminants:<br />
morphological and molecular diagnoses<br />
for Teladorsagia boreoarcticus n. sp. (Nematoda:<br />
Ostertagiinae), a dimorphic cryptic species in<br />
muskoxen (Ovibos inoschatiis). Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
85:910-934.<br />
-, L. Policy, A. Gunn, and J. S. Nishi. 1995.<br />
Umingmakstrongylus pallikuukensis gen. nov. et<br />
sp. nov. (Nematoda: Protostrongylidae) from<br />
muskoxen, Ovibos moschatus, in the central Canadian<br />
Arctic, with comments on biology and biogeography.<br />
Canadian Journal of Zoology 73:<br />
2266-2282.<br />
Holmes, J. C. 1996. Parasites as threats to biodiversity<br />
in shrinking ecosystems. Biodiversity and Conservation<br />
5:975-983.<br />
, and W. M. Bethel. 1972. Modification of intermediate<br />
host behavior by parasites. Zoological<br />
Journal of the Linnean Society 1 (supplement):<br />
123-149.<br />
Hudson, P. J., A. P. Dobson, and D. Newborn. 1998.<br />
Prevention of population cycles by parasite removal.<br />
Science 282:2256-2258.<br />
Huelsenbeck, J. P., J. P. Bull, and C. W. Cunning-
ham. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis.<br />
Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:152-<br />
158.<br />
Humphries, C. J., P. H. Williams, and R. I. Vane-<br />
Wright. 1995. Measuring biodiversity value for<br />
conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics<br />
26:93-111.<br />
Huxham, M., D. Raffaelli, and A. Pike. 1995. Parasites<br />
and foodweb patterns. Journal of Animal<br />
Ecology 64:168-176.<br />
Jablonski, D. 1991. Extinctions: a paleontological perspective.<br />
Science 253:754-757.<br />
Janzen, D. H. 1973. Comments on host-specificity of<br />
tropical herbivores and its relevance to species<br />
richness. Pages 201-211 in V. H. Heywood, ed.<br />
Taxonomy and Ecology. Academic Press, New<br />
York.<br />
. 1980. When is it coevolution? Evolution 34:<br />
611-612.<br />
. 1985. On ecological fitting. Oikos 45:308-<br />
310.<br />
. 1992. A south-north perspective on science in<br />
the management, use, and economic development<br />
of biodiversity. Pages 27-52 in O. T. Sandlund,<br />
K. Hindar, and A. H. D. Brown, eds. Conservation<br />
of Biodiversity for Sustainable Development.<br />
Scandinavian University Press, Oslo.<br />
. 1993. Taxonomy: universal and essential infrastructure<br />
for development and management of<br />
tropical wildland biodiversity. Pages 100-113 in<br />
O. T. Sandlund and P. J. Schei, eds. Proceedings<br />
of the Norway/UNEP Expert Conference on Biodiversity.<br />
NINA, Trondheim.<br />
. 1996. On the importance of systematic biology<br />
in biodiversity development. Association of<br />
Systematics Collections Newsletter 24:17, 23-28.<br />
. 1997. Wildland biodiversity management in<br />
the tropics. Pages 411-434 in M. L. Reaka-Kudla,<br />
D. E. Wilson, and E. O. Wilson, eds. Biodiversity<br />
II: Understanding and Protecting Our Biological<br />
Resources. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, D.C.<br />
, and W. Hallwachs. 1994. All Taxa Biodiversity<br />
Inventory (ATBI) of terrestrial systems: a<br />
generic protocol for preparing wildland biodiversity<br />
for non-damaging use. Report of a National<br />
Science Foundation Workshop, 16-18 April 1993,<br />
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 132 pp.<br />
-, J. Jimenez, and R. Gamez. 1993.<br />
The role of the parataxonomists, inventory managers<br />
and taxonomists in Costa Rica's national<br />
biodiversity inventory. Pages 223-254 in W. V.<br />
Reid et al., eds. Biodiversity Prospecting. World<br />
Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.<br />
Johnson, P. T. J., K. B. Lunde, E. G. Ritchie, and<br />
A. E. Launer. 1999. The effect of trematode infection<br />
on amphibian limb development and survivorship.<br />
Science 284:802-804.<br />
Kennedy, C. R. 1993. Introductions, spread and colonization<br />
of new localities by fish helminth and<br />
crustacean parasites in the British Isles: a perspective<br />
and appraisal. Journal of Fish Biology<br />
43:287-301.<br />
Klassen, G. J. 1992. Phylogeny and biogeography of<br />
ostracin boxfishes (Tetraodontiformes: Ostraci-<br />
BROOKS AND HOBERG—PARASITE BIODIVERSITY 23<br />
idae) and their gill parasitic Haliotrema sp.<br />
(Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae): a study in hostparasite<br />
coevolution. Ph.D. Dissertation, University<br />
of Toronto, Canada. 366 pp.<br />
, and M. Beverley-Burton. 1987. Phylogenetic<br />
relationships of Ligictaluridus spp. (Monogenea:<br />
Ancyrocephalidae) and their ictalurid (Siluriformes)<br />
hosts: an hypothesis. Proceedings of the Helminthological<br />
Society of Washington 54:84-90.<br />
, and . 1988. North American freshwater<br />
ancyrocephalids (Monogenea) with articulating<br />
haptorial bars: host-parasite coevolution.<br />
Systematic Zoology 37:179-189.<br />
Kluge, A. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic<br />
hypothesis of relationships among Epicartes<br />
(Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology<br />
38:7-25.<br />
. 1997. Testability and the refutation and corroboration<br />
of cladistic hypotheses. Cladistics 13:<br />
81-96.<br />
. 1998a. Total evidence or taxonomic congruence:<br />
cladistics or consensus classification. Cladistics<br />
14:151-158.<br />
. 1998b. Sophisticated falsification and research<br />
cycles: consequences for differential character<br />
weighting in phylogenetic systematics. Zoologica<br />
Scripta 26:349-360.<br />
Kritsky, D., E. P. Hoberg, and K. B. Aubry. 1993.<br />
Ltigarocotyle salamandrae n. gen. n. sp. (Monogenoidea,<br />
Polyonchoinea, Lagarocotylidea n. ord.)<br />
from the cloaca of Rhyacotriton cascadae Good<br />
and Wake (Caudata, Rhyacotritonidae) in Washington<br />
<strong>State</strong>. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 79:322-330.<br />
Kutz, S. J., E. P. Hoberg, and L. Policy. <strong>2000</strong>. Experimental<br />
infections of muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus)<br />
and domestic sheep with Umingmakstrongylus<br />
pallikuukensis (Nematoda: Protostrongylidae):<br />
parasite development, population structure<br />
and pathology. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78:<br />
(In press.)<br />
Lankester, M. W., and D. Fong. 1989. Distribution<br />
of elaphostrongyline nematodes (Metastrongyloidea:<br />
Protostrongylidae) in Cervidae and possible<br />
effects of moving Rangifer spp. into and within<br />
North America. Alces 25:133-145.<br />
Leon-Regagnon, V. 1998. Machidatrema n. gen. (Digenea:<br />
Hemiuridae: Bunocotylinae) and phylogenetic<br />
analysis of its species. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
84:140-146.<br />
, D. R. Brooks, and G. Perez-Ponce de Leon.<br />
1999. Differentiation of Mexican species of Haeinatoloechus<br />
Looss, 1899 (Digenea: Plagiorchiformes):<br />
combining molecular and morphological evidence.<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 85:935-946.<br />
, G. Perez-Ponce de Leon, and D. R. Brooks.<br />
1996. Phylogenetic analysis of Opisthadena (Digenea:<br />
Hemiuridae). Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 82:<br />
1005-1010.<br />
, , and . 1998. Phylogenetic<br />
analysis of the Bunocotylinae Dollfus, 1950 (Digenea:<br />
Hemiuridae). Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 84:<br />
147-152.<br />
Lubchenco, J., A. M. Olson, L. B. Brubaker, S. R.<br />
Carpenter, M. M. Holland, S. P. Hubbell, S. A.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
24 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Levin, J. A. MacMahon, P. A. Matson, J. M.<br />
Melillo, H. A. Mooney, C. H. Peterson, H. R.<br />
Pulliam, L. A. Real, P. Regal, and P. G. Risser.<br />
1991. The sustainable biosphere initiative: an ecological<br />
research agenda. Ecology 72:371-412.<br />
Lyles, A. M., and A. P. Dobson. 1993. Infectious disease<br />
and intensive management: population dynamics,<br />
threatened hosts, and their parasites. Journal<br />
of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 24:315-326.<br />
Manter, H. 1966. Parasites of fishes as biological indicators<br />
of recent and ancient conditions. Pages<br />
59-71 in J. E. McCauley, ed. Host Parasite Relationships.<br />
Oregon <strong>State</strong> University Press, Corvallis,<br />
Oregon.<br />
Marcogliese, D. J. 1995. The role of zooplankton in<br />
the transmission of helminth parasites to fish. Reviews<br />
in Fish Biology and Fisheries 5:336-371.<br />
, F. Boily, and M. O. Hammill. 1996. Distribution<br />
and abundance of stomach nematodes (Anisakidae)<br />
among grey seals (Halichoems grypus)<br />
and harp seals (Phoca groenlandica) in the Gulf<br />
of St. Lawrence. Canadian Journal of Fisheries<br />
and Aquatic Sciences 53:2829-2836.<br />
, and D. K. Cone. 1996. On the distribution<br />
and abundance of eel parasites in Nova Scotia:<br />
influence of pH. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 82:389-<br />
399.<br />
, and . 1997. Food webs: a plea for parasites.<br />
Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:320-<br />
325.<br />
-, and J. Price. 1997. The paradox of parasites.<br />
Global Biodiversity 7:7-15.<br />
Mariaux, J. 1998. A molecular phylogeny of the Eucestoda.<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 84:114-125.<br />
Marques, F., R. Centritto, and S. A. Stewart. 1997.<br />
Two new species of Acanthobothrium in Narcine<br />
entemedor (Rajiformes: Narcinidae) from the<br />
northwest coast of Guanacaste Peninsula, Costa<br />
Rica. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 83:927-931.<br />
Mayr, E. 1957. Evolutionary aspects of host specificity<br />
among parasites of vertebrates. Pages 7-14 in<br />
J.G. Baer, ed. Premier Symposium sur la Specificite<br />
Parasitaire des Parasites de Vertebres. International<br />
Union of Biological Sciences and Universite<br />
Neuchatel, Paul Attinger, S.A., Neuchatel,<br />
Switzerland.<br />
Miller, D. R., and A. Y. Rossman. 1995. Systematics,<br />
biodiversity, and agriculture. BioScience 45:680—<br />
686.<br />
Minchella, D., and M. E. Scott. 1991. Parasitism: a<br />
cryptic determinant of animal community structure.<br />
Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:250-254.<br />
Monks, S., F. Marques, V. Leon-Regagnon, and G.<br />
Perez-Ponce de Leon. 1997. Koronacantha pectinarius<br />
comb. n. (Acanthocephala: Illiosentidae)<br />
from Microlepidotus brevipinnis (Haemulidae)<br />
and redescription of Tegorhynchus brevis. Journal<br />
of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 83:485-494.<br />
Morand, S. 1996a. Life history traits in parasitic nematodes:<br />
a comparative approach for the search of<br />
invariants. Functional Ecology 10:210-218.<br />
. 1996b. Biodiversity of parasites in relation to<br />
their lifecycles. Pages 243-260 in M. E. Hochberg,<br />
J. Clobert, and R. Barbault, eds. Aspects of<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Genesis and Maintenance of Biological Diversity.<br />
Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.<br />
Morell, V. 1999. Are pathogens felling frogs? Science<br />
284:728-731.<br />
Neilsen, C., and K. A. Neiland. 1974. Sheep Disease<br />
Report. Volume 14. Alaska Department of Fish<br />
and Game, Juneau, Alaska. 104 pp.<br />
Overstreet, R. M. 1997. Parasitological data as monitors<br />
of environmental health. Parassitologia 39:<br />
169-175.<br />
, W. E. Hawkins, and T. L. Deardorff. 1996.<br />
The western mosquitofish as an environmental<br />
sentinel: parasites and histological lesions. Pages<br />
495-508 in M. R. Servos, K. R. Munkittrick, J.<br />
H. Carey, and G. J. Van der Kraak, eds. Environmental<br />
Fate and Effects of Pulp and Paper Mill<br />
Effluents. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, Florida.<br />
Parma, A. M. 1998. What can adaptive management<br />
do for our fish, forests, food, and biodiversity. Integrative<br />
Biology 1:17-26.<br />
PCAST (President's Committee of Advisors on Science<br />
and Technology). 1998. Teaming With Life:<br />
Investing in Science to Understand and Use<br />
America's Living Capital. PCAST Panel on Biodiversity<br />
and Ecosystems, Washington, D.C. 86<br />
pp.<br />
Perez-Ponce de Leon, G. 1997. La taxonomia en<br />
Mexico: el papel de la sistematica filogenetica.<br />
Ciencia 48:33-39.<br />
, and D. R. Brooks. 1995a. Phylogenetic relationships<br />
of the genera of the Pronocephalidae<br />
Looss, 1902 (Digenea: Paramphistomiformes).<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 81:2<strong>67</strong>-277.<br />
, and . 1995b. Phylogenetic relationships<br />
of Pyelosomum Looss, 1899 (Digenea: Pronocephalidae).<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 81:278-280.<br />
, V. Leon-Regagnon, and L. Garcia-Prieto.<br />
1997. Que es la sistematica filogenetica. Ciencia<br />
y Desarollo 135:61-65.<br />
, , and B. Mendoza-Garfias. 1997. Analisis<br />
filogenetico de la familia Pterinotrematidae<br />
Bychowsky y Nagibina, 1959 (Platyhelminthes:<br />
Cercomerida: Monogenea). Annales del Institute<br />
de Biologia de la Universidad Nacional Autonoma<br />
de Mexico, Serie Zoologia 68:193-205.<br />
, , and S. Monks. 1998. Theletmm lamothei<br />
sp. nov. (Digenea) parasite of Echidna<br />
nocturna from Cuajiniquil, Guanacaste, and other<br />
digenes of marine fishes from Costa Rica. Revista<br />
de Biologia Tropical 46:159-168.<br />
Peterson, M. J. 1996. The endangered Attwater's prairie<br />
chicken and an analysis of prairie grouse helminthic<br />
parasitism. Ecogeography 19:424—431.<br />
Pimentel, D., C. Wilson, C. McCuIIum, R. Huang,<br />
P. Owen, J. Flack, Q. Tran, T. Saltman, and B.<br />
Cliff. 1997. Economic and environmental benefits<br />
of biodiversity. Bioscience 47: 747—756.<br />
Platt, T. R. 1984. Evolution of the Elaphostrongylinae<br />
(Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea: Protostrongylidae)<br />
parasites of cervids (Mammalia). Proceedings<br />
of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
51:196-204.<br />
, and D. R. Brooks. 1997. Evolution of the
schistosomes. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 83: 1035-<br />
1044.<br />
Poulin, R. 1992. Determinants of host specificity in<br />
parasites of freshwater fish. International Journal<br />
of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 22:753-758.<br />
. 1995a. Phylogeny, ecology, and richness of<br />
parasite communities in vertebrates. Ecological<br />
Monographs 65:283-302.<br />
. 1995b. Evolution of parasite life history traits:<br />
myths and reality. <strong>Parasitology</strong> Today 1 1: 342-<br />
345.<br />
. 1997a. Species richness of parasite assemblages:<br />
evolution and patterns. Annual Review of<br />
Ecology and Systematics 28:341-358.<br />
1997b. Evolutionary Ecology of Parasites.<br />
Chapman and Hall, New York. 212 pp.<br />
Price, P. W. 1980. Evolutionary Biology of Parasites.<br />
Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.<br />
237 pp.<br />
. 1986. Evolution in parasite communities. International<br />
Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong> 17:209-214.<br />
Queiroz, A. de, M. J. Donoghue, and J. Kim. 1995.<br />
Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic<br />
evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics<br />
26:657-681.<br />
Rausch, R. L. 1972. Tropical problems in the Arctic:<br />
infectious and parasitic diseases, a common denominator.<br />
Industry and Tropical Health 7:63-70.<br />
Ricklefs, R. E. 1987. Community diversity: relative<br />
roles of local and regional processes. Science 235:<br />
1<strong>67</strong>-171.<br />
Rohde, K. 1979. A critical evaluation of intrinsic and<br />
extrinsic factors responsible for niche restriction<br />
in parasites. American Naturalist 114:648-<strong>67</strong>1.<br />
Rozsa, L. 1992. Endangered parasite species. International<br />
Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong> 22:265-266.<br />
SA<strong>2000</strong> (Systematics Agenda <strong>2000</strong>). 1994. Systematics<br />
Agenda <strong>2000</strong>: Charting the Biosphere. Technical<br />
Report. American Museum of Natural History,<br />
New York. 34 pp.<br />
Samuel, W. M., M. J. Pybus, D. A. Welch, and C.<br />
J. Wilke. 1992. Elk as a potential host for meningeal<br />
worm: implications for translocation. Journal<br />
of Wildlife Management 56:629-639.<br />
Sanderson, M. J., A. Purvis, and C. Henze. 1998.<br />
Phylogenetic supertrees: assembling the trees of<br />
life. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:105-<br />
109.<br />
Sasal, P., Y. Desdevuises, and S. Morand. 1998.<br />
Host-specialization and species diversity in fish<br />
parasites: phyiogenetic conservatism? Ecography<br />
21:639-643.<br />
, and S. Morand. 1998. <strong>Comparative</strong> analysis:<br />
a tool for studying Monogenean ecology and evolution.<br />
International Journal for <strong>Parasitology</strong> 28:<br />
1637-1644.<br />
BROOKS AND HOBERG—PARASITE BIODIVERSITY 25<br />
, , and J.-F. Guegan. 1997. Parasite<br />
species richness for fish of the Mediterranean Sea.<br />
Marine Ecology Progress Series 149:61-71.<br />
Savage, J. M. 1995. Systematics and the biodiversity<br />
crisis. BioScience 45:<strong>67</strong>3—<strong>67</strong>9.<br />
Scholz, T., and II. Cappellaro. 1993. The first record<br />
of Corallobothrium parafanbiratum Befus et Freeman,<br />
1973 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea), a parasite<br />
of North American catfishes (Ictalurus spp.), in<br />
Europe. Folia Parasitologica 40:105-108.<br />
Scott, M. E. 1988. The impact of infection and disease<br />
on animal populations: implications for conservation<br />
biology. Conservation Biology 2:40-56.<br />
Simpson, B. B., and J. Cracraft. 1995. Systematics:<br />
the science of biodiversity. BioScience 45: <strong>67</strong>0-<br />
<strong>67</strong>2.<br />
Smith, F. D. M., R. M. May, R. Pellew, Y. H. Johnson,<br />
and K. R. Walker. 1993. How much do we<br />
know about the current extinction rate. Trends in<br />
Ecology and Evolution 8:375-378.<br />
Soule, M. E. 1991. Conservation: tactics for a constant<br />
crisis. Science 253:744-750.<br />
Takacs, D. 1996. The Idea of Biodiversity, Philosophies<br />
of Paradise. Johns Hopkins University Press,<br />
Baltimore, Maryland. 393 pp.<br />
Vitousek, P. M., C. M. D'Antonio, L. L. Loope, and<br />
R. Westbrooks. 1996. Biological invasions as<br />
global environmental change. American Scientist<br />
84:468-478.<br />
Walther, B. A., P. Cotgreave, R. D. Price, R. D.<br />
Gregory, and D. H. Clayton. 1995. Sampling effort<br />
and parasite species richness. <strong>Parasitology</strong> Today<br />
11:306-310.<br />
Williams, H. H., K. MacKenzie, and A. M. McCarthy.<br />
1992. Parasites as biological indicators of the<br />
population biology, migrations, diet and phylogenetics<br />
of fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and<br />
Fisheries 2:144-176.<br />
Wilson, E. O. 1984. Biophilia. Harvard University<br />
Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 176 pp.<br />
. 1988. The current state of biological diversity.<br />
Pages 1-18 in E. O. Wilson, ed. Biodiversity. National<br />
Academy Press, Washington, D. C.<br />
-. 1992. The Diversity of Life. Harvard University<br />
Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 424 pp.<br />
Windsor, D. A. 1995. Equal rights for parasites. Conservation<br />
Biology 9:1-2.<br />
. 1996. Stand up for parasites. Trends in Ecology<br />
and Evolution 12:32.<br />
Woodford, M. H., and P. B. Rossiter. 1994. Disease<br />
risks associated with wildlife translocation projects.<br />
Pages 178-200 in P. J. S. Olncy, G. M.<br />
Mace, and A. T. C. Feistner, eds. Creative Conservation:<br />
Interactive Management of Wild and<br />
Captive Animals. Chapman and Hall, London,<br />
U.K.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 26-31<br />
Natural Occurrence of Diplostomum sp. (Digenea: Diplostomatidae)<br />
in Adult Mudpuppies and Bullfrog Tadpoles from the<br />
St. Lawrence River, Quebec<br />
DAVID J. MARCOGLiESE,1'4 JEAN RooRiGUE,2 MARTIN OuELLET,3 AND LOUISE CHAMPOUX2<br />
1 St. Lawrence Centre, Environment Canada, 105 McGill Street, 7th Floor, Montreal, Quebec,<br />
Canada H2Y 2E7 (e-mail: david.marcogliese@ec.gc.ca),<br />
2 Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Quebec Region, 1141 Route de LEglise, P.O. Box 10100,<br />
Ste. Foy, Quebec, Canada G1V 4H5 (e-mail: jean.rodrigue@ec.gc.ca; louise.champoux@ec.gc.ca), and<br />
3 Redpath Museum, McGill University, 859 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2K6<br />
(e-mail: mouell9@po-box.mcgill.ca)<br />
ABSTRACT: Adult mudpuppies (Necturus maculosus) and bullfrog tadpoles (Rana catesbeiana) infected with<br />
the eyefluke Diplostomum sp. in the lenses were collected from the St. Lawrence River, Quebec, Canada.<br />
Respective prevalence and mean abundance of Diplostomum sp. were 100% and 3.1 ± 1.7 in Lake St. Franfois,<br />
58.3% and 1.5 ± 1.8 in Lake St. Louis, and 53.8% and 0.7 ± 0.8 in Lake St. Pierre. No eyeflukes were observed<br />
in mudpuppies from the Richelieu River. Prevalence and mean abundance of Diplostomum sp. were significantly<br />
higher in mudpuppies from Lake St. Fran£ois than in those from other sites. The high prevalence and abundance<br />
in Lake St. Frangois may be because the regulated water levels may enhance snail intermediate host habitats.<br />
There was a significant negative correlation between mudpuppy length and number of eyeflukes per host when<br />
samples were pooled from the 3 sites where Diplostomum sp. was found. Mean length of infected mudpuppies<br />
from those 3 sites was significantly smaller than uninfected ones. Twenty-four (28%) of 86 mudpuppies had<br />
cataracts associated with infections of eyeflukes. Prevalence and mean abundance of Diplostomum sp. in bullfrog<br />
tadpoles collected from Lake St. Pierre were 14.3% and 0.1 ± 0.4 parasite per animal, much lower than observed<br />
for mudpuppies from the same lake. Higher occurrence of eyeflukes in mudpuppies compared with tadpoles is<br />
attributed to the greater age and more sedentary benthic nature of mudpuppies. This is the first report of<br />
amphibians naturally infected with Diplostomum sp. and only the second with eyeflukes in general.<br />
KEY WORDS: Diplostomum sp., eyefluke, Necturus maculosus, mudpuppy, Rana catesbeiana, tadpole, amphibians,<br />
prevalence, abundance, St. Lawrence River, Canada.<br />
The eyefluke Diplostomum spathaceum (Ru- worms from frogs were administered to chicks<br />
dolphi, 1819) (Digenea: Diplostomatidae) is (Ferguson, 1943), indicating that amphibians<br />
among the most common parasites of freshwater and reptiles may be able to function as interfishes<br />
worldwide (Chappell et al., 1994) and in- mediate hosts. Sweeting (1974) successfully esfects<br />
more than 100 species of fish belonging to tablished infections of D. spathaceum in the Afdiverse<br />
taxa (Chappell, 1995). Diplostome meta- rican clawed frog, Xenopus laevis (Daudin,<br />
cercariae are the most important pathogens of 1802), and observed what appeared to be normal<br />
the eyes of fish, cause blindness, and lead to development of metacercariae.<br />
poor growth, emaciation, and death (Williams The occurrence of D. spathaceum in natural<br />
and Jones, 1994; Chappell, 1995). amphibian populations is not known. However,<br />
While the host spectrum of D. spathaceum is in Mountain Lake, Virginia, U.S.A., the redwithout<br />
question diverse, its actual extent be- spotted newt Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafyond<br />
fishes is not clear. For example, Ferguson inesque; 1820), is naturally infected with the fish<br />
(1943) successfully infected tadpoles and adults<br />
of the northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens<br />
eyefluke Tyiodeiphys scheuringl (Hughes, 1929)<br />
in it§ humors (Etg£S 1961) NQ frogs Qr Qther<br />
Schreber, 1782, in addition to painted turtles salamanders were found infected5 and experi_<br />
(Chrysemys picta (Schneider, 1783)), with meta- mental infections of tadpoles and adult frogs<br />
cercariae of D. spathaceum. Morphologically, ,, , /rr. io^i\ l °<br />
worms appeared normal in these "abnormal'<br />
_ , , , , , ,<br />
hosts. Development to adulthood occurred when<br />
T ,. . , , ,, ,. , . , „ .<br />
Infection levels of diplostomatid eyeflukes in<br />
- . -. , O T r.- "Li- j<br />
fish from the St. Lawrence River are believed to<br />
be high, given the frequency of cataracts and<br />
4 Corresponding author. blindness in fish from the river (Fournier et al.,<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
26
MARCOGLIESE ET AL.—DIPLOSTOMUM SP. IN MUDPUPPIES AND BULLFROGS 27<br />
Figure 1. Map of the St. Lawrence River, Quebec, Canada, depicting sampling localities and areas<br />
mentioned in the text. Adult mudpuppies (Necturus maculosus) were collected from Port Lewis, lies de la<br />
Paix, Sainte-Anne-de-Sorel, and the Richelieu River during winter 1998. Bullfrog tadpoles (Rana catesbeiana)<br />
were collected from lie aux Ours in August 1998. Insert: Location of the sampling region is<br />
indicated on the map of Canada by a rectangle encompassing Montreal and the St. Lawrence River.<br />
1996; Lair and Martineau, 1997; Mikaelian and<br />
Martineau, 1997). During a population study of<br />
mudpuppies, Necturus maculosus (Rafinesque,<br />
1818), from the St. Lawrence River, we observed<br />
an individual with cataracts, and subsequently,<br />
an infection of Diplostomum sp. We<br />
then examined adult mudpuppies from 4 areas<br />
in the St. Lawrence River and 1 of its tributaries<br />
for eyeflukes. The mudpuppy is a long-lived,<br />
bottom-feeding, and strictly aquatic salamander,<br />
studied as a bioindicator of the St. Lawrence<br />
River (Bonin et al., 1995; Gendron et al., 1997).<br />
In addition, a single sample of bullfrog tadpoles<br />
(Rana catesbeiana Shaw, 1802) was collected<br />
from an area of high diplostome intensity (Marcogliese<br />
and Compagna, 1999) and examined<br />
for eyeflukes.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Mudpuppies were collected during a live trapping<br />
program with a small hoop net baited with dead fish<br />
placed at a depth of 1.5-2.5 m (Bonin et al., 1994)<br />
between the end of January and March 1998 from Port<br />
Lewis in Lake St. Francois (45°10'N; 74°17'W), lies<br />
de la Paix in Lake St. Louis (45°20'N; 73°50'W),<br />
Sainte-Anne-de-Sorel in Lake St. Pierre (46°04'N;<br />
73°03'W), and the Richelieu River (45°53'N;<br />
73°09'W). The 3 lakes are formed from expansions of<br />
the St. Lawrence River, and the Richelieu River composes<br />
1 of its tributaries (Fig. 1). Animals collected<br />
from Lake St. Francois (N = 36), Lake St. Louis (N<br />
= 27), and the Richelieu River (N = 23) were examined<br />
live for cataracts. Subsamples from these collections<br />
were examined directly for eyefllukes as follows.<br />
Animals from Lake St. Francois (N = 13) and the Richelieu<br />
River (N = 10) were transported live to the<br />
laboratory, where they were euthanized by cervical<br />
dislocation. The eyes were removed from the freshly<br />
killed animals, dissected, and examined with a stereomicroscope<br />
for parasites. Animals from Lake St. Louis<br />
(N = 12) were euthanized by cervical dislocation,<br />
fixed, and stored in 10% neutral buffered formalin, and<br />
their eyes removed, dissected, and examined with a<br />
stereomicroscope for parasites. No animals from Lake<br />
St. Pierre were examined for cataracts, but a sample<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
28 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Table 1. Number (N), prevalence (P), and mean abundance (A ± SE) of Diplostomum sp. in the lenses<br />
of adult mudpuppies (Necturus maculosus) and bullfrog tadpoles (Rana catcsheiana) collected from localities<br />
in the St. Lawrence River and 1 of its tributaries in 1998.<br />
Necturus macula sus<br />
Lake St. Francois<br />
N P (
MARCOGLIESE HT f^L.—DIPLOSTOMUM SP. IN MUDPUPPIHS AND BULLFROGS 29<br />
0.0003). Mean total length of infected hosts<br />
(246.0 ±11.3 mm) was smaller than that of uninfected<br />
ones (306.2 ± 17.8 mm) (x2 = 6.88; df<br />
= 1; P — 0.0087) when mudpuppies were<br />
pooled from the same 3 sites.<br />
Five of 35 bullfrog tadpoles from Lake St.<br />
Pierre were infected, each with a single worm,<br />
giving a mean abundance of 0.1 ± 0.4 and a<br />
prevalence of 14.3% (Table 1).<br />
Discussion<br />
This is only the second report of amphibians<br />
from North American waters naturally infected<br />
with eyeflukes. Previously, red-spotted newts<br />
from Mountain Lake, Virginia, were found infected<br />
with Tylodelphys scheuringi at a prevalence<br />
of 100% (Etges, 1961). Adult mudpuppies<br />
and bullfrog tadpoles were infected with Diplostomum<br />
sp. at various localities in the St.<br />
Lawrence River. Mudpuppies were infected to a<br />
much greater degree than were tadpoles, probably<br />
due to their more sedentary benthic nature<br />
and their greater age. All mudpuppies collected<br />
were reproductive, making them at least 5 yr of<br />
age for males and 6 yr for females (Bonin et al.,<br />
1994). Among fishes, benthic species tend to be<br />
more heavily infected than pelagic ones. Cataracts<br />
are more prevalent in benthic fishes in the<br />
St. Lawrence River compared with pelagic foragers<br />
(Lair and Martineau, 1997). In addition,<br />
D. spathaceum metacercariae accumulate from<br />
year to year in hosts (Chappell et al., 1994), so<br />
older hosts tend to be more heavily infected.<br />
Benthic fish in the St. Lawrence River are more<br />
heavily infected than mudpuppies. Mean abundance<br />
of Diplostomum sp. in the white sucker<br />
(Catostomus commersoni (Lacepede, 1803))<br />
aged 2-6 yr was 69.5 in Lake St. Louis and 22.0<br />
in Lake St. Pierre, whereas in fish aged 7 yr or<br />
older, it was 1<strong>67</strong>.0 and 62.9 in the 2 lakes, respectively<br />
(Marcogliese, unpubl.).<br />
There is little information on geographic variation<br />
in infection levels within the St. Lawrence<br />
River system. In a survey of young-of-the-year<br />
fishes, no significant differences were found<br />
among sites (Marcogliese and Compagna,<br />
1999), but among older fishes, infection levels<br />
were much higher in those from Lake St. Louis<br />
compared with Lake St. Pierre and near Quebec<br />
City (Marcogliese, unpubl.). Data presented<br />
herein demonstrate that infection levels in mudpuppies<br />
from Lake St. Francois were significantly<br />
higher than in lakes St. Louis and St.<br />
Pierre. Moreover, there is a gradient in abundance<br />
declining downstream from west to east<br />
in the river. This cannot be directly correlated to<br />
the distribution of the definitive hosts, gulls and<br />
terns, as a large colony of ring-billed gulls consisting<br />
of 6156 pairs in 1997 is located near the<br />
sampling site in Lake St. Louis, but 3 larger colonies<br />
of ring-billed gulls, each consisting of<br />
more than 10,000 pairs, are situated downstream<br />
east of Lake St. Louis (P. Brousseau, Canadian<br />
Wildlife Service, pers. comm.). In addition,<br />
small colonies of common terns (Sterna hirundo<br />
Linnaeus, 1758), totaling 85 pairs in 1989, 108<br />
pairs in 1997, and 138 pairs in 1997, as well as<br />
colonies of black terns (Chlidonias niger (Linnaeus,<br />
1758)) occur in Lake St. Francois, Lake<br />
St. Louis, and Lake St. Pierre, respectively<br />
(Chapdelaine et al., 1999). Habitat in Lake St.<br />
Francois may be more suitable for the first intermediate<br />
hosts, lymnaeid snails. One important<br />
difference between Lake St. Francois and the<br />
other lakes is that water levels in this lake are<br />
heavily regulated, and do not fluctuate as much<br />
as in the other lakes. This stability may enhance<br />
snail populations and productivity. No worms<br />
were found in mudpuppies from the Richelieu<br />
River, although 1 mudpuppy was observed with<br />
cataracts. There is no information available on<br />
whether fish are infected with Diplostomum sp.<br />
in that river, Characteristics of that river may<br />
make it particularly unsuitable for the completion<br />
of the parasite's life cycle, in that definitive<br />
hosts or snail intermediate hosts are rare. There<br />
are no colonies of gulls or terns located on the<br />
river.<br />
There was no relationship between body<br />
length and number of parasites among mudpuppies<br />
at any of the sites. When data were pooled<br />
from the 3 sites where Diplostomum sp. was<br />
found, there was a significant negative correlation<br />
between mudpuppy length and the number<br />
of parasites per host. Moreover, mean length of<br />
uninfected mudpuppies from those 3 sites was<br />
significantly greater than that of infected ones.<br />
These observations suggest that infections with<br />
Diplostomum sp. may be detrimental to mudpuppy<br />
growth, as was observed with infections<br />
in fish (Williams and Jones, 1994; Chappell,<br />
1995). However, this conclusion may be premature.<br />
Our sample sizes are small. In addition,<br />
size of mudpuppies may be affected by pollution<br />
levels. For example, concentration of contaminants<br />
in mudpuppies varies with location in the<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
30 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
St. Lawrence River watershed (Bonin et al.,<br />
1995). Differences in mudpuppy size also could<br />
reflect some other aspect of habitat quality or<br />
age differences among the populations.<br />
Prevalence of cataracts was high in Lake St.<br />
Frangois, but extremely low in Lake St. Louis<br />
and the Richelieu River. This can be attributed<br />
to the higher prevalence and abundance of Diplostotnum<br />
sp. in Lake St. FranQois compared<br />
with the other sites. Yet, in both Lake St. Fran-<br />
Qois and Lake St. Louis, the prevalence of cataracts<br />
was much lower than the prevalence of<br />
eyeflukes. Thus, the presence of cataracts is not<br />
a reliable indicator of infection with eyeflukes,<br />
at least in mudpuppies. It is not known if the<br />
single mudpuppy possessing cataracts in the Richelieu<br />
River was infected with eyeflukes, or<br />
whether the cataracts resulted from another<br />
cause. Cataracts are caused by metacercariae, by<br />
dietary deficiency or excess, or by excessive exposure<br />
to sunlight, cold, or injury (Ferguson,<br />
1989). In any case, the possibility of the presence<br />
of Diplostomum sp. in the Richelieu River<br />
cannot be dismissed.<br />
The results demonstrate that animals other<br />
than fish become infected with metacercariae of<br />
Diplostomum sp. Given that amphibians develop<br />
cataracts (Ferguson, 1943; this study), concern<br />
for the health of aquatic fauna susceptible to<br />
blindness resulting from infection with eyeflukes<br />
must be extended beyond fish to include amphibians,<br />
especially in areas where Diplostomum<br />
sp. levels are high.<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
We thank Sacha Compagna, Emmanuelle Bergeron,<br />
Michel Arseneau, Paul Messier, and Robert<br />
Angers for technical assistance. Thanks go to<br />
Francois Boudreault for preparing the figure.<br />
Drs. Don McAlpine and Tim Goater provided<br />
keys and assistance for the identification of the<br />
tadpoles. Dr. J. D. McLaughlin is gratefully acknowledged<br />
for sharing his unpublished information<br />
on experimental infections of gulls with<br />
Diplostomum spp. metacercariae from the St.<br />
Lawrence River.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bonin, J., J.-L. DesGranges, C. A. Bishop, J. Rodrigue,<br />
A. Gendron, and J. E. Elliott. 1995.<br />
<strong>Comparative</strong> study of contaminants in the mudpuppy<br />
(Amphibia) and the common snapping turtle<br />
(Reptilia), St. Lawrence River, Canada. Ar-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
chives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology<br />
28:184-194.<br />
J. Rodrigue, and A. Gendron.<br />
1994. Evaluation des possibilites d'utilisation du<br />
Necture tachete (Necturus maculosus) comme<br />
bioindicateur de la pollution du fleuve Saint-Laurent.<br />
Serie de rapports techniques no. 190. Service<br />
canadien de la faune, region du Quebec. 58 pp.<br />
Bush, A. O., K. D. Lafferty, J. M. Lotz, and A. W.<br />
Shostak. 1997. <strong>Parasitology</strong> meets ecology on its<br />
own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of<br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong> 83:575-583.<br />
Chapdelaine, G., P. Brousseau, and J. F. Rail. 1999.<br />
Banque informatisee des oiseaux marins du Quebec<br />
(BIOMQ). Service canadien de la faune, region<br />
du Quebec, Environnement Canada.<br />
Chappell, L. H. 1995. The biology of diplostomatid<br />
eyeflukes of fishes. Journal of Helminthology 69:<br />
97-101.<br />
, L. J. Hardie, and C. J. Secombes. 1994.<br />
Diplostomiasis: the disease and host-parasite interactions.<br />
Pages 59-86 in A. W. Pike and J. W.<br />
Lewis, eds. Parasitic Diseases of Fish. Samara<br />
Publishing Ltd., Samara House, Tresaith, Dyfed,<br />
Great Britain.<br />
Etges, F. J. 1961. Contributions to the life history of<br />
the brain fluke of newts and fish, Diplostomiilum<br />
scheuringi Hughes, 1929 (Trematoda: Diplostomatidae).<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 47:453-458.<br />
Ferguson, H. W. 1989. Systematic Pathology of Fish.<br />
Iowa <strong>State</strong> University Press, Ames. 263 pp.<br />
Ferguson, M. S. 1943. Development of eye flukes in<br />
the lenses of frogs, turtles, birds, and mammals.<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 29:136-142.<br />
Field, J. S., and S. W. B. Irwin. 1995. Life-cycle<br />
description and comparison of Diplostomum spathaceum<br />
(Rudolphi, 1819) and D. pseudobaeri<br />
(Razmaskin & Andrejak, 1978) from rainbow<br />
trout (Oncorhynchus mvkiss Walbaum) maintained<br />
in identical hosts. <strong>Parasitology</strong> Research 81:505-<br />
517.<br />
Fournier, D., F. Cotton, Y. Mailhot, D. Bourbeau,<br />
J. Leclerc, and P. Dumont. 1996. Rapport<br />
d'operation du reseau de suivi ichtyologique du<br />
fleuve Saint-Laurent: echantillonnage des communautes<br />
ichtyologiques des habitats lentiques du<br />
lac Saint-Pierre et de son archipel en 1995. Ministere<br />
de 1'environnement et de la faune, Direction<br />
de la faune et des habitats, Direction regionale de<br />
la Mauricie-Bois-Francs, Direction regionale de la<br />
Monteregie. 59 pp.<br />
Gendron, A. D., C. A. Bishop, R. Fortin, and A.<br />
Hontela. 1997. In vivo testing of the functional<br />
integrity of the corticosterone-producing axis in<br />
mudpuppy (Amphibia) exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbons<br />
in the wild. Environmental Toxicology<br />
and Chemistry 16:1694-1706.<br />
Gibson, D. I. 1996. Guide to the Parasites of Fishes<br />
of Canada. Part IV. Trematoda. in L. Margolis and<br />
Z. Kabata, eds. NRC Research Press, Canadian<br />
Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences<br />
No. 124, Ottawa. 373 pp.<br />
Graczyk, T. 1991. Variability of metacercariae of Diplostomum<br />
spathaceum (Rudolphi, 1819) (Trema-
MARCOGLIESE ET AL.—DIPLOSTOMUM SP. IN MUDPUPP1ES AND BULLFROGS 31<br />
toda, Diplostomidae). Acta Parasitologica Polonica<br />
36:135-139.<br />
Lair, S., and D. Martineau. 1997. Inventaire des conditions<br />
pathologiques chez les poissons du Saint-<br />
Laurent au site de Saint-Nicolas en 1994. Environnement<br />
Canada-Region du Quebec, Conservation<br />
de 1'environnement, Centre Saint-Laurent,<br />
Rapport scientifique et technique ST-140, Montreal.<br />
72 pp.<br />
Marcogliese, D. J., and S. Compagna. 1999. Diplostomatid<br />
eyeflukes in young-of-the-year and forage<br />
fishes in the St. Lawrence River, Quebec.<br />
Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 11:275-282.<br />
Margolis, L., and J. R. Arthur. 1979. Synopsis of<br />
the parasites of fishes of Canada. Bulletin of the<br />
Fisheries Research Board of Canada No. 199, Ottawa.<br />
269 pp.<br />
Mikaelian, I., and D. Martineau. 1997. Inventaire<br />
Obituary Notice<br />
Everett Lyle Schiller<br />
August 31, 1917 - May 17, 1999<br />
Elected to Regular Membership, 1950<br />
Recording Secretary, 1964<br />
Editorial Board Member, 1976<br />
des conditions pathologiques chez les poissons du<br />
Saint-Laurent au site de Saint-Nicolas en 1995.<br />
Environnement Canada-Region du Quebec, Conservation<br />
de 1'Environnement, Centre Saint-Laurent,<br />
Rapport scientifique et technique ST-141,<br />
Montreal. 57 pp.<br />
Niewiadomska, K. 1987. Diplostomum paracaudum<br />
(lies, 1959) Shigin, 1977 (Digenea, Diplostomidae)<br />
and its larval stages—a new record from Poland.<br />
Acta Parasitologica Polonica 31:199-210.<br />
SAS Institute. 1997. JMP® Statistical Discovery Software,<br />
Version 3.2.1. Cary, North Carolina.<br />
Sweeting, R. A. 1974. Investigations into natural and<br />
experimental infections of freshwater fish by the<br />
common eye-fluke Diplostomum spathaceum<br />
Rud. <strong>Parasitology</strong> 69:291-300.<br />
Williams, H., and A. Jones. 1994. Parasitic Worms<br />
of Fish. Taylor & Francis Ltd., London. 593 pp.<br />
Executive Committee Member at Large, 1977-1979<br />
Anniversary Award Recipient, 1987<br />
Elected Life Member, 1991<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 32-39<br />
Assessment of Parenteral Plagiorhynchus cylindraceus (Acanthocephala)<br />
Infections in Shrews<br />
NATHANIEL R. COADY' AND BRENT B. NiCKOL2<br />
School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0118, U.S.A.<br />
(e-mail: bnickol@unlinfo.unl.edu)<br />
ABSTRACT: Plagiorhynchus cylindraceus, a common acanthocephalan parasite of passerine birds, does not require<br />
a paratenic host for completion of the life cycle, but extraintestinal (parenteral) infections do occur in<br />
short-tailed shrews (Blarina brevicauda). Examination of wild mammals trapped at 13 sites in and around<br />
Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.A., revealed infections in short-tailed shrews and a masked shrew (Sorex cinereus) but<br />
not in any other species of mammals collected. Laboratory exposures of B. brevicauda and 5 other mammalian<br />
species that co-occur with short-tailed shrews at sites where shrews harbor extraintestinal P. cylindraceus infections<br />
resulted in infections only in short-tailed shrews and a single deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatiis). A<br />
cystacanth obtained from the mesentery of 1 of these shrews was infective when fed to a robin (Turdus migratorius),<br />
the usual definitive host. Intestinal histology and susceptibility of P. maniculatiis to laboratory infections<br />
suggest that the absence of parenteral infections in mammals other than shrews is due to ecological<br />
circumstances rather than physiological or anatomical constraints. Laboratory exposures of 3 species of isopods<br />
and a survey of isopods collected from a site where infected shrews occur failed to reveal any species susceptible<br />
to P. cylindraceus other than the only known intermediate host, the terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare.<br />
An analysis of the literature regarding diets and the fact that deer mice did not prey on A. vulgare in laboratory<br />
feeding trials suggest that other mammals co-occurring with shrews are unlikely to consume the intermediate<br />
host of P. cylindraceus.<br />
KEY WORDS: Plagiorhynchus cylindraceus, Acanthocephala, cystacanths, shrews, Blarina brevicauda, extraintestinal<br />
infection, experimental infection, robin, Turdus migratorius, Nebraska, U.S.A.<br />
As adults, acanthocephalans occur in the intestinal<br />
lumen of vertebrate definitive hosts; larvae<br />
develop in the hemocoel of arthropod intermediate<br />
hosts. Ingestion of the infected intermediate<br />
host by the definitive host completes the<br />
life cycle. Larval acanthocephalans of many<br />
species also occur as parenteral (extraintestinal)<br />
infections in the viscera of vertebrate hosts, but<br />
sexual maturity is not attained in these paratenic<br />
hosts. Paratenic hosts facilitate distribution<br />
across gaps in trophic levels between the intermediate<br />
host and predatory definitive hosts high<br />
in the food chain. Ewald et al. (1991) implicated<br />
2 species of Sorex in the life cycle of Centrorhynchus<br />
aluconis (Miiller, 1780) Luhe, 1911,<br />
which attains maturity in owls. Elkins and Nickol<br />
(1983) demonstrated that infection of raccoons,<br />
Procyon lotor (Linnaeus, 1758) Storr,<br />
1780, with Macracanthorhynchus ingens (Linstow,<br />
1789) Meyer, 1932, can be accomplished<br />
by ingestion of cystacanths occurring in mesenteries<br />
of green water snakes, Nerodia cyclo-<br />
1 Present address: Department of Zoology, Michigan<br />
<strong>State</strong> University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824,<br />
U.S.A.<br />
2 Corresponding author.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
32<br />
pion (Dumeril, Bibron, and Dumeril, 1854)<br />
Rossman and Eberle, 1977. Several instances of<br />
paratenic hosts being incorporated into life cycles<br />
of acanthocephalans that infect piscivorous<br />
fish have been documented (Hasan and Qasim,<br />
1960; Paperna and Zwerner, 1976).<br />
Although it is clear that paratenic hosts play<br />
an important role in transmission of many acanthocephalans,<br />
the role of parenteral infections<br />
often is not explained easily by predator-prey<br />
relationships. Cystacanths frequently occur in<br />
hosts from which transmission is unlikely or impossible.<br />
For example, M. ingens occurs extraintestinally<br />
in armadillos (Radomski et al., 1991),<br />
in addition to water snakes, and Mediorhynchus<br />
grandis Van Cleave, 1916, a parasite of nonpredatory<br />
birds (usually icterids), can occur parenterally<br />
in shrews (Collins, 1971).<br />
Adults of the acanthocephalan species Plagiorhynchus<br />
cylindraceus (Goeze, 1782) Schmidt<br />
and Kuntz, 1966, occur in passerine birds, especially<br />
robins (Turdus migratorius Linnaeus,<br />
1766) and starlings (Sturnus vulgaris Linnaeus,<br />
1758). Isopods are infected by ingesting parasite<br />
eggs passed from birds, and infective larvae develop<br />
in the hemocoel of Armadillidium vulgare
(Latreille, 1804) Brandt and Ratzeburg, 1831, a<br />
terrestrial isopod (Schmidt and Olsen, 1964;<br />
Nickol and Dappen, 1982). Cystacanths of this<br />
acanthocephalan species also have been reported<br />
(Nickol and Oetinger, 1968) from the mesenteries<br />
of short-tailed shrews, Blarina brevicauda<br />
(Say, 1823) Baird, 1858, in New York state.<br />
When cystacanths of P. cylindraceus were<br />
discovered in the viscera of short-tailed shrews<br />
of eastern Nebraska, a study to assess the significance<br />
of these parenteral forms was undertaken.<br />
The distribution of extra-intestinal forms<br />
among shrews and other co-occurring mammals<br />
was determined, infectivity of isopod-borne cystacanths<br />
to shrews and other co-occurring mammals<br />
was studied, and infectivity of mammalborne<br />
cystacanths to robins was tested.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Acquisition and maintenance of P. cylindraceus<br />
Gravid female worms obtained from robins and starlings<br />
in Lancaster County, Nebraska, were stored a<br />
maximum of 3 mo in tap water at 4 C. To infect isopods,<br />
egg suspensions were prepared by pulverizing<br />
stored worms in tap water. Each suspension was examined<br />
microscopically to ensure the presence of fully<br />
developed eggs.<br />
A laboratory colony of isopods (A. vulgare) was<br />
maintained in covered plastic containers (32.5 X 17.5<br />
X 9.0 cm) provided with 2 to 3 cm of soil, pieces of<br />
broken clay pots for shelter, a sponge moistened regularly<br />
to maintain humidity, and potato slices for food.<br />
Large pieces of potato were used to maintain humidity<br />
in some containers in place of the moistened sponge.<br />
These pieces of potato were allowed to sprout, and<br />
isopods were observed feeding regularly on the shoots<br />
as well as the potato itself.<br />
To obtain laboratory-reared cystacanths, isopods<br />
less than 9.5 mm long (see Nickol and Dappen, 1982)<br />
were removed from the colony and held without food<br />
for 36 hr, after which they were allowed to feed on<br />
potato slices over which a suspension of P. cylindraceus<br />
eggs in water had been spread. Exposure was in<br />
covered wells (3.5 cm diameter X 1.() cm deep) imprinted<br />
on a plastic plate. Fresh egg suspension was<br />
added to the potato slices after 24 hr. Except to add<br />
egg suspension, isopods were left undisturbed in the<br />
dark. After 36 to 48 hr of exposure, isopods were removed<br />
and isolated in a separate culture. Before use,<br />
cystacanths were allowed to develop at least 70 days<br />
in the isopods to ensure infectivity (Schmidt and Olsen,<br />
1964).<br />
Survey of mammals<br />
Mammals at 13 sites located within 4 townships<br />
(North Bluff, Oak, West Lincoln, and Yankee Hill) in<br />
and around Lincoln, Nebraska, were surveyed to determine<br />
locations at which parenteral infections occur<br />
and to determine which species harbor cystacanths in<br />
nature. Mammals were trapped with medium-sized<br />
COADY AND NICKOL—PLAGIORHYNCHUS CYLINDRACEUS IN SHREWS 33<br />
Sherman live traps baited with a mixture of peanut<br />
butter and oats, and all mammals caught were examined<br />
for P. cylindraceus cystacanths.<br />
Laboratory exposure of mammals<br />
To determine susceptibility to P. cylindraceus cystacanths,<br />
mammals of 6 species, collected at sites from<br />
which P. cylindraceus was absent in previous surveys,<br />
were administered cystacanths orally. The mammal<br />
species exposed were short-tailed shrews; European<br />
mice, Mus musculus Linnaeus, 1758; hispid pocket<br />
mice, Perognathus hispidus Baird, 1858; wood mice,<br />
Peromyscus leucopus (Rafinesque, 1818) Thomas,<br />
1895; deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus (Wagner,<br />
1845) Bangs, 1898; and 13-lined ground squirrels,<br />
Spermophilus tridecemlineatus Mitchill, 1821.<br />
To expose mammals, laboratory-reared cystacanths<br />
were pipetted to the back of the throat of lightly anesthetized<br />
(methoxyflurane) animals. Following exposure,<br />
each animal was placed into a receptacle lined<br />
with clean, Ian-colored paper toweling for observation<br />
and recovery. After the animal recovered from anesthesia,<br />
it was returned to its normal housing. The recovery<br />
receptacle then was examined for cystacanths<br />
that were not ingested by the animal. The white cystacanths<br />
were highly visible on the paper towels, making<br />
possible an accurate determination of the number<br />
administered.<br />
Mammals were housed in standard mouse cages fitted<br />
with wire tops, water bottles, paper towels for nesting<br />
and shelter, and wood shavings. All nonsoricids<br />
were fed commercial hamster and gerbil food and observed<br />
to ensure that they were eating. Short-tailed<br />
shrews were provided additionally with a block of untreated<br />
wood (5 X 10 X 15-25 mm) and a small clay<br />
flower pot. The wood absorbed excess oil from the<br />
shrew's fur and provided shelter. The shrews deposited<br />
feces regularly within the flower pots, which were removed<br />
easily and cleaned. Shrews were fed 5 adult<br />
cockroaches, Periplaneta americana (Linnaeus, 1758)<br />
Burmeister, 1838, from a laboratory colony at each of<br />
3 daily feedings.<br />
Survey and susceptibility of isopods<br />
A survey was conducted to determine what isopod<br />
species inhabit sites from which the infection was determined<br />
to be present in shrews. Isopods were collected<br />
by hand for 1 hr at night by flashlight, identified,<br />
and examined for cystacanths.<br />
To investigate the extent of intermediate host specificity,<br />
isopods of 3 terrestrial species (Armadillidium<br />
nasatuin Budde-Lund, 1885, A. vulgare, and Metoponorthus<br />
pruinosus (Brandt, 1833) Budde-Lund, 1879)<br />
were exposed to eggs of P. cylindraceus. All of these<br />
isopods were collected within Lancaster County, Nebraska.<br />
Peromyscus feeding trials<br />
Deer mice (P. maniculatus) were offered isopods (A.<br />
vulgare) as prey to determine the likelihood of their<br />
consuming an intermediate host in nature. After having<br />
food withheld for 4 hr, each of 6 deer mice was presented<br />
20 isopods of assorted sizes for a period of 2<br />
hr in 10-gallon aquaria. The bottom of each aquarium<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
34 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Table 1. Number (N) of wild-caught mammals examined and prevalence (percentage infected [% Inf])<br />
and mean intensity (Mean int)* of parenteral infections by Plagiorhynchus cylindraceus.<br />
Species examined<br />
Lipotyphyla<br />
Blarina brevicauda<br />
Sorex cinercus<br />
Rodentia<br />
Microtus ochrogaster<br />
Microtus pennsylvanicus<br />
Mus musculus<br />
Perognathus flavescens<br />
Peromyscus leucopus<br />
Perotnyscus maniculatus<br />
Reithrodontomys rnegalotis<br />
Spermophilus tridecemlineatus<br />
Carnivora<br />
Mustela nivalis<br />
N<br />
27<br />
9<br />
16<br />
48<br />
25<br />
3<br />
72<br />
55<br />
10<br />
4<br />
* Number of worms/number of infected shrews.<br />
6<br />
All sites<br />
surveyed<br />
was covered by heavy paper with all edges taped down<br />
to prevent isopods from hiding. Water was available<br />
to the mice for the duration of the trial. The room<br />
housing the aquaria was left undisturbed in the dark<br />
for 2 hr, after which the deer mice were removed and<br />
the remaining isopods counted.<br />
% Inf<br />
Measurements of external muscularis<br />
To determine whether thickness of intestinal muscle<br />
could account for differences in susceptibility, the duodenum<br />
of each of 3 short-tailed shrews, meadow<br />
voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus (Ord, 1815) Rhoads,<br />
1895), and deer mice was removed and fixed in neutral<br />
buffered 10% formalin. Tissues were imbedded in paraffin,<br />
cut in 6-(jim cross-sections, stained with hematoxylin<br />
and eosin, and examined with light microscopy.<br />
The thickness of the external muscularis was measured<br />
in micrometers at 4 points along the intestine,<br />
with 2 measurements taken directly opposite on the<br />
cross-section at each point. Differences in thickness<br />
among species were sought by 1-way analysis of variance<br />
(ANOVA) of the resulting 24 measurements for<br />
each species.<br />
Infectivity of mammal-borne cystacanths<br />
The infectivity of mammal-borne cystacanths was<br />
tested with laboratory exposures to robins. Robins<br />
were collected with mist nets (U.S. permit PRT-<br />
694828 and Nebraska permit 96-2) and housed in the<br />
laboratory where they were given food (Blankespoor,<br />
1970) and water ad libitum. The robins were held for<br />
3 wk for acclimation to captivity and to ensure that<br />
any worms naturally present would be old enough to<br />
distinguish from those fed in the trial. Cystacanths obtained<br />
from extraintestinal sites in mammals were pipetted<br />
directly into the esophagus of each bird to be<br />
exposed.<br />
37<br />
11<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
Infection-free<br />
sites<br />
N<br />
10<br />
4<br />
8<br />
10<br />
4<br />
3<br />
40<br />
34<br />
6<br />
3<br />
3<br />
N<br />
17<br />
5<br />
8<br />
38<br />
21<br />
0<br />
32<br />
21<br />
4<br />
1<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
3<br />
Results<br />
Infection-present<br />
sites<br />
% Inf Mean int<br />
59 3.8<br />
20 2.0<br />
0 —<br />
0<br />
0<br />
— —<br />
0 —<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0 —<br />
Two hundred seventy-five mammals were collected<br />
at the 13 sites surveyed. Parenteral infections<br />
of P. cylindraceus occurred in 11 animals<br />
of 2 species. All infected animals were collected<br />
at either of 2 sites. Ten mammalian species were<br />
examined from these 2 sites, but P. cylindraceus<br />
was present only in short-tailed shrews and a<br />
masked shrew (Table 1). Ten of 17 short-tailed<br />
shrews were infected with 1 to 11 (mean intensity<br />
3.8) extraintestinal cystacanths. The cystacanths<br />
were not found consistently in any specific<br />
location within the abdominal cavity; however,<br />
several had migrated through the peritoneal<br />
cavity and had extended their proboscides into<br />
abdominal muscle tissue. Some of these worms<br />
appeared vital and little changed from infective<br />
cystacanths found in isopods. Others were<br />
heavily encapsulated and appeared moribund.<br />
One of 5 masked shrews harbored 2 cystacanths,<br />
1 encysted in the mesentery of the small intestine<br />
and the other unattached in the lumen of the<br />
small intestine.<br />
Each of 27 mammals of 6 species was fed 5<br />
to 16 cystacanths in the laboratory. Of the 12<br />
short-tailed shrews fed, 7 cystacanths were recovered<br />
from the viscera of 3 (Fig. 1); 1 cystacanth<br />
was recovered from 1 of 7 deer mice (Fig.<br />
2); and no other animal became infected (Table<br />
2).
COADY AND N]CKOL—PLAGIORHYNCHUS CYLINDRACEUS IN SHREWS<br />
1<br />
Figures 1, 2. Photographs of Plagiorhynchiis cylindraceus<br />
cystacanths in viscera of laboratory-infected<br />
mammals. 1. Cystacanth (arrow) 3 days after<br />
infection in a short-tailed shrew, Blarina brevicauda.<br />
2. Cystacanth (arrow) 14 days after infection in<br />
a deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus.<br />
Two species of terrestrial isopods, Trachelipus<br />
rathkei (Brandt, 1833) Buddie-Lund, 1908<br />
(n = 62) and A. vulgare (n = 2), were collected<br />
at a site from which infected shrews were obtained.<br />
None of the isopods was infected. To<br />
learn more about the susceptibility of isopods, 3<br />
species of terrestrial isopod were exposed to P.<br />
cylindraceus eggs in the laboratory. Eighty percent<br />
of the exposed A. vulgare became infected<br />
(mean intensity = 2.98), but cystacanths were<br />
absent from all isopods of the other 2 species<br />
(Table 3). None of the isopods (A. vulgare) offered<br />
to 6 deer mice as food was consumed.<br />
Measurement of the external muscularis of the<br />
duodenum revealed a mean thickness of 80 u,m<br />
for short-tailed shrews, 72 u,m for meadow<br />
voles, and 42 u,m for deer mice (Table 4).<br />
Two days after exposure, 1 of 3 robins that<br />
were fed cystacanths (4, 2, and 1 cystacanths)<br />
obtained from parenteral sites in laboratory-infected<br />
shrews harbored a 6-mm-long P. cylindraceus<br />
cystacanth. The other birds were uninfected.<br />
Discussion<br />
Presence at only 2 of 13 sites surveyed suggests<br />
that distribution of parenteral P. cylindraceus<br />
infections in mammals is highly localized<br />
within a broader geographical range of occurrence.<br />
The type of habitat does not appear to be<br />
the restricting factor, as the locations at which<br />
infections were present resembled infection-free<br />
sites more closely than each other. One of the<br />
infection sites is dry with thin cover and a flat<br />
terrain. The second infection site has moist soil<br />
with a thick cover of lush vegetation and a steep<br />
grade. The infection was absent from other sites<br />
surveyed that were similar to the infection sites.<br />
In addition to having localized occurrence,<br />
parenteral P. cylindraceus infections appear to<br />
be restricted to certain individuals of the susceptible<br />
species. The laboratory infection of a deer<br />
mouse suggests that mammals other than shrews<br />
are susceptible. However, natural infections<br />
were found only in shrews even though mammals<br />
of other species, including deer mice, at the<br />
infection sites were examined. The thickness of<br />
the intestinal wall to be penetrated by a cystacanth<br />
for establishment of an extraintestinal infection<br />
does not seem to explain the restriction<br />
of hosts. Our measurements contained considerable<br />
variation and were from wild-caught animals,<br />
leaving several unaccountable variables,<br />
e.g., age and distention with chyme. Nevertheless,<br />
the 8 measurements from each of 3 animals<br />
of each of 3 species form a consistent pattern<br />
and ANOVA revealed a significant difference (P<br />
< 0.01) among the species. If our measurements<br />
are properly representative, short-tailed shrews<br />
possess a thicker external muscularis than do<br />
some uninfected species, e.g., deer mice and<br />
meadow voles.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
36 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Table 2. Occurrence of Plagiorhynchus cylindraceus in laboratory-exposed mammals.<br />
Species exposed<br />
Lipotyphla<br />
Blarina brevicauda<br />
Rodentia<br />
Mus muscidus<br />
Perognathus hispidus<br />
Peromyscus leucopus<br />
Perornyscus maniculatiis<br />
Spermaphilus tridecemlineatus<br />
* Number of animals receiving the dose.<br />
Number of cystacanths<br />
administered<br />
16<br />
11<br />
9<br />
7<br />
5<br />
10<br />
10<br />
10<br />
7<br />
10<br />
The restriction of infections to certain individuals<br />
is more likely because of interactions<br />
among birds, isopods, and these mammals than<br />
to inherent susceptibility or anatomical obstacles.<br />
Voles rarely use arthropods as prey (Rose<br />
and Birney, 1985). Deer mice and wood mice<br />
do so slightly more frequently (Hamilton, 1941;<br />
Whitaker and Ferraro, 1963). Because of the inclusion<br />
of arthropods, albeit rarely, in the diet of<br />
these animals, an occasional infection might be<br />
expected. Shrews, however, consume arthropods<br />
more commonly (Table 5) and, therefore, probably<br />
are exposed to infective cystacanths more<br />
frequently.<br />
Interspecific differences among mammals that<br />
consume isopods might play a role in further<br />
limiting the distribution of P. cylindraceus. Apparently,<br />
A. vulgare is the only intermediate host<br />
for P. cylindraceus. It is the only species of iso-<br />
1<br />
4<br />
1<br />
4<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
6<br />
3<br />
2<br />
Number of cystacanths<br />
recovered<br />
0<br />
0, 0, 0, 5<br />
0<br />
0, 0, 0, 1<br />
o, 1<br />
0, 0. 0<br />
0<br />
0 0, 0, 0, 0, 0<br />
0, 0, 1<br />
0, 0<br />
pod known to be infected in nature (Schmidt and<br />
Olsen, 1964), and examination of 62 T. rathkei<br />
collected from a site at which shrews were infected<br />
revealed no infection. Laboratory exposures<br />
of isopods of 2 additional local species (A.<br />
nasatum and M. pruinosus) failed to produce<br />
any cystacanths, whereas isopods of the species<br />
A. vulgare were infected readily. Porcellionid<br />
isopods are soft bodied and, according to Sutton<br />
(1980), cannot roll into a protective ball, whereas<br />
the exoskeleton of isopods belonging to the<br />
family Armadillidiidae is harder, and according<br />
to Sutton (1980), these isopods do roll up into a<br />
protective ball. Even after having food withheld<br />
for 2 hr, deer mice did not eat isopods (A. vulgare)<br />
offered in the laboratory feeding trial. This<br />
suggests that the isopod materials identified in<br />
dietary studies (Table 5) were not remains of<br />
infected isopods.<br />
Table 3. Occurrence of Plagiorhynchus cylindaceus cystacanths in laboratory-exposed isopods.<br />
Species exposed<br />
Armadillidium vulgarac<br />
Trial 1<br />
Trial 2<br />
Combined<br />
A nnadillidium nasatum<br />
Trial 1<br />
Trial 2<br />
Combined<br />
Metoponorthus pruinosus<br />
Trial 1<br />
Trial 2<br />
Combined<br />
Number examined<br />
50<br />
20<br />
70<br />
22<br />
16<br />
38<br />
7<br />
10<br />
17<br />
Number (%) infected Mean<br />
38 (76) 3.03<br />
18 (90) 2.89<br />
56 (80) 2.98<br />
0 —<br />
0 —<br />
0<br />
0 —<br />
o<br />
0 —<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Intensity<br />
Maximum<br />
10<br />
7<br />
10<br />
—<br />
—<br />
—<br />
—<br />
—<br />
—
COADY AND NICKOL—PLAGIORHYNCHUS CYLJNDRACEUS IN SHREWS 37<br />
Table 4. Thickness (micrometers) of external muscularis of 3 mammalian species.*<br />
Species<br />
Microtus pennsylvanicus<br />
Peromyscus maniculatus<br />
.<br />
1<br />
89 37<br />
66.13<br />
38.10<br />
Animal<br />
2<br />
58 12<br />
59.06<br />
32.50<br />
3<br />
92 50<br />
91.94<br />
54.00<br />
Mean (SD)<br />
xn no 1 1 7 xn*)<br />
72.38 (17.30)<br />
41.53 (11.15)<br />
* Measurements were made for 3 animals of each species. For each animal, the thickness given is the mean of 8 measurements<br />
(2 measurements directly opposite each other at 4 points along the duodenum). Differences among species were significant (P<br />
< 0.01) by 1-way analysis of variance of the 24 individual measurements for each species.<br />
The establishment in the intestine of a robin<br />
by a cystacanth removed from the viscera of a<br />
laboratory-exposed shrew demonstrates that parenteral<br />
cystacanths from mammals can be infective<br />
to definitive hosts. An infective cystacanth<br />
from an intermediate host is 3.0 to 4.4 mm long<br />
(Schmidt and Olsen, 1964), and parenteral cystacanths<br />
from our laboratory-infected shrews<br />
were 3.5 to 4.2 mm long. The worm recovered<br />
from the laboratory-infected robin measured 6.0<br />
mm in length. Such growth during 2 days in the<br />
bird's intestine indicates successful establishment.<br />
Despite the infectivity of extraintestinal cystacanths<br />
and occasional reports of passerine<br />
birds eating shrews and other small mammals<br />
(Powers, 1973; Penny and Knapton, 1977) we<br />
conclude that paratenic hosts are not important<br />
to P. cylindraceus populations. Comprehensive<br />
studies fail to identify small mammals as an important,<br />
or even minor, part of these birds' diets<br />
(Paszkowski, 1982; Wheelwright, 1986). Likewise,<br />
there is little evidence that paratenic hosts<br />
have played any meaningful role in facilitating<br />
wider host distribution for P. cylindraceus.<br />
There is little question that raptors and other<br />
flesh-eating birds could consume P. cylindraceus<br />
cystacanths (see Audubon, 1937, Plate<br />
374). Dollfus and Golvan (1961) listed Buteo<br />
buteo Linnaeus, 1758, as a host for P. cylindraceus,<br />
and Ewald and Crompton (1993) found it<br />
in Strix aluco Linnaeus, 1758. Neither report,<br />
however, gives an indication of whether the<br />
worms reach maturity and produce eggs in those<br />
birds. Additionally, P. cylindraceus has been reported<br />
from several species of Corvidae. Rutkowska<br />
(1973) described eggs from females harbored<br />
by 1 of 500 jackdaws, Coloeus monedula<br />
= Corvus monedula Linnaeus, 1758, examined<br />
in Poland, but the other 8 records from corvids<br />
(Jones, 1928; Pemberton, 1961; Williams, 1961;<br />
Threlfall, 1965; Todd et al., 19<strong>67</strong>; Hendricks et<br />
Table 5. Inclusion of isopods as prey by mammals that co-occurred at collection sites where Plagiorhynchus<br />
cylindraceus was present.<br />
Species<br />
Lipotyphyla<br />
Blarina brevicauda<br />
Cryptolis parva<br />
Sorex cinereus<br />
Rodentia<br />
Microtus ochrogastor<br />
Microtus pennsylvanicus<br />
Mas musculus<br />
Peromyscus leucopus<br />
Peromyscus maniculatus<br />
Frequency*<br />
3.7<br />
6.7<br />
1.6<br />
2.8<br />
4.0<br />
().()<br />
().()<br />
().()<br />
1.6<br />
0.0<br />
2.0<br />
0.0<br />
Percentage of animals with isopods present in diet.<br />
Volume of diet (%)<br />
No report<br />
1.4<br />
1.6<br />
1.9<br />
2.1<br />
—<br />
—<br />
—<br />
1.7<br />
—<br />
No report<br />
—<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Reference<br />
Hamilton, 1941<br />
Whitaker and Ferraro, 1963<br />
Whitaker and Mumford, 1972<br />
Whitaker and Mumford, 1972<br />
Whitaker and Mumford, 1972<br />
Zimmerman, 1965<br />
Zimmerman, 1965<br />
Whitaker, 1966<br />
Whitaker and Ferraro, 1963<br />
Whitaker, 1966<br />
Hamilton, 1941<br />
Whitaker, 1966
38 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
al., 1969; Andrews and Threlfall, 1975; Lisitsyna,<br />
1993) either report juveniles or give no<br />
indication of maturity.<br />
Acanthocephalans belonging to all taxonomic<br />
classes and 6 of the 8 orders of the phylum have<br />
been reported as extraintestinal infections in vertebrates.<br />
Such parenteral infections are results of<br />
either specific adaptations serving to enhance<br />
transmission or historical events not currently<br />
maintained by natural selection. It is probable<br />
that this trait in P. cylindraceus, and perhaps in<br />
other species that occur parenterally in hosts<br />
from which transmission to a definitive host is<br />
impossible or unlikely, is a result of inheritance<br />
from an ancestor in which it might have had a<br />
selective advantage, rather than being an adaptation<br />
shaped by current selective forces.<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
Russell A. Benedict, School of Biological Sciences,<br />
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, assisted<br />
with trapping of mammals, and Patricia W. Freeman,<br />
curator of zoology, University of Nebraska<br />
<strong>State</strong> Museum, loaned traps. The study was supported,<br />
in part, by an Ashton C. Cuckler Fellowship<br />
(to N.R.C.).<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Andrews, S. E., and W. Threlfall. 1975. Parasites of<br />
the common crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos<br />
Brehm, 1822) in insular Newfoundland. Proceedings<br />
of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
42:24-28.<br />
Audubon, J. J. 1937. The Birds of America. Macmillan<br />
Co., New York, New York, Plate 373.<br />
Blankespoor, H. D. 1970. Host-parasite relationships<br />
of an avian trematode Plagiorchis noblei (Park,<br />
1934). Ph.D. Thesis. Iowa <strong>State</strong> University, Ames,<br />
180 pp.<br />
Collins, G. D. 1971. Mediorhynchus grandis in a<br />
short-tailed shrew, Blarina brevicauda, from<br />
South Dakota. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 57:1038.<br />
Dollfus, R. P., and Y. Golvan. 1961. Station Experimentale<br />
de Parasitologie de Richelieu (Indre-et-<br />
Loire). Contribution a la fauna parasitaire regionale.<br />
G. Acanthocephales. Annales de Parasitologie<br />
36-314-322.<br />
Elkins, C. A., and B. B. Nickol. 1983. The epizootiology<br />
of Macracanthorhynchus ingens in Louisiana.<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 69:951—956.<br />
Ewald, J. A., and D. W. T. Crompton. 1993. Centrorhynchus<br />
aluconis (Acanthocephala) and other<br />
helminth species in tawny owls (Strix allied) in<br />
Great Britain. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 79:952-954.<br />
, , I. Johnson, and R. C. Stoddart.<br />
1991. The occurrence of Centrorhynchus (Acanthocephala)<br />
in shrews (Sorex araneus and Sorex<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
minutus) in the United Kingdom. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
77:485-487.<br />
Hamilton, W. J. 1941. The food of small forest mammals<br />
in eastern United <strong>State</strong>s. Journal of Mammalogy<br />
21:250-263.<br />
Hasan, R., and S. Z. Qasim. 1960. The occurrence<br />
of Pallisentis basiri Farooqi (Acanthocephala) in<br />
the liver of Trichogaster chuna (Ham.). Zeitschrift<br />
fur Parasitenkunde 20:152-156.<br />
Hendricks, L. D., R. Harkema, and G. C. Miller.<br />
1969. Helminths of the crow, Corvus brachyrhynchos<br />
Brehm, 1822, in North Carolina. Proceedings<br />
of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
36:150-152.<br />
Jones, M. 1928. An acanthocephalid, Plagiorhynchus<br />
formosus, from the chicken and the robin. Journal<br />
of Agricultural Research 36:773-775.<br />
Lisitsyna, O. I. 1993. Life cycle of Prosthorhynchus<br />
cylindraceus (Acanthocephala, Plagiorhynchidae).<br />
Vestnik Zoologii 1993:43-48. (In Russian.)<br />
Nickol, B. B., and G. E. Dappen. 1982. Armadillidium<br />
vulgare (Isopoda) as an intermediate host of<br />
Plagiorhynchus cylindraceus (Acanthocephala)<br />
and isopod response to infection. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
68:570-575.<br />
, and D. F. Oetinger. 1968. Prosthorhynchus<br />
formosus from the short-tailed shrew (Blarina<br />
brevicauda) in New York state. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
54:456.<br />
Paperna, I., and D. E. Zwerner. 1976. Parasites and<br />
diseases of striped bass, Morone saxatilis (Walbaum),<br />
from the lower Chesapeake Bay. Journal<br />
of Fish Biology 9:2<strong>67</strong>-287.<br />
Paszkowski, C. A. 1982. Vegetation, ground, and frugivorous<br />
foraging of the American robin. Auk 99:<br />
701-709.<br />
Pemberton, R. T. 1961. Helminth parasites of some<br />
British birds. Annals and Magazine of Natural<br />
History (Series 13) 3:455-463.<br />
Penny, C., and R. W. Knapton. 1977. Record of an<br />
American robin killing a shrew. Canadian Field<br />
Naturalist 91:393.<br />
Powers, L. R. 1973. Record of a robin feeding shrews<br />
to its nestlings. Condor 75:248.<br />
Radomski, A. A., D. A. Osborn, D. B. Pence, M. I.<br />
Nelson, and R. J. Warren. 1991. Visceral helminths<br />
from an expanding insular population of<br />
the long-nosed armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus).<br />
Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
58:1-6.<br />
Rose, R. K., and E. C. Birney. 1985. Community<br />
ecology. Pages 310-339 in R. H. Tamarin, ed. Biology<br />
of New World Microtus. American Society<br />
of Mammalogists, Shippinsburg, Pennsylvania.<br />
Rutkowska, M. A. 1973. A study of the helminth fauna<br />
of Corvidae in Poland. Acta Parasitologica Polonica<br />
21:183-237.<br />
Schmidt, G. D., and O. W. Olsen. 1964. Life cycle<br />
and development of Prosthorhynchus formosus<br />
(Van Cleave, 1918) Travassos, 1926, an acanthocephalan<br />
parasite of birds. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
50:721-730.<br />
Sutton, S. L. 1980. Woodlice. Pergamon Press, Oxford,<br />
United Kingdom, 144 pp.
Threlfall, W. 1965. Helminth parasites and possible<br />
causes of death of some birds. Ibis 107:545—548.<br />
Todd, K. S., J. V. Ernst, and D. M. Hammond.<br />
19<strong>67</strong>. Parasites of the black-billed magpie, Pica<br />
pica hudsonia (Sabine, 1823) from northern Utah.<br />
Bulletin of the Wildlife Disease Association 3:<br />
112-113.<br />
Wheelwright, N. T. 1986. The diet of American robins.<br />
An analysis of U.S. Biological Survey records.<br />
Auk 103:710-725.<br />
Whitaker, J. O., Jr. 1966. Food of Mm musculus,<br />
Peromyscus rnaniculatus bairdi and Peromyscus<br />
leucopus in Vigo County, Indiana. Journal of<br />
Mammalogy 47:473-486.<br />
COADY AND NICKOL—PLAGIORHYNCHUS CYLINDRACEUS IN SHREWS 39<br />
Diagnostic <strong>Parasitology</strong> Course<br />
, and M. G. Ferraro. 1963. Summer food of<br />
220 short-tailed shrews from Ithaca, New York.<br />
Journal of Mammalogy 44:419.<br />
, and R. E. Mumford. 1972. Food and ectoparasites<br />
of Indiana shrews. Journal of Mammalogy<br />
53:329-335.<br />
Williams, I. C. 1961. A list of parasitic worms, including<br />
twenty-five new records from British<br />
birds. Annals and Magazine of Natural History<br />
(Series 13) 4:4<strong>67</strong>-480.<br />
Zimmerman, E. G. 1965. A comparison of habitat<br />
and food of two species of Microtus. Journal of<br />
Mammalogy 46:605-612.<br />
The "Diagnostic <strong>Parasitology</strong> Course" is being offered July 31-August 11, <strong>2000</strong> at the Uniformed<br />
Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4799. This course<br />
will consist of a series of lectures and hands-on laboratory sessions covering the diagnosis of<br />
parasitic infections of humans. In addition to the examination of specimens, participants will be<br />
able to practice various methods used in the diagnosis of intestinal, blood, and tissue parasitic<br />
infections. Parasitic diseases encountered throughout the world will be included. Slide presentations<br />
and videotapes will be available for study. The course will be held at the University's campus,<br />
utilizing up-to-date lecture rooms and laboratory facilities. Microscopes will be available on a loan<br />
basis and laboratory supplies will be provided. Certain reference specimens will also be available<br />
for personal use.<br />
The registration fee for the 2-week course is US$1,000 (This does not include lodging and meals).<br />
Enrollment is limited, so those interested should register as soon as possible. Previous laboratory<br />
experience is recommended.<br />
For further information contact Dr. John H. Cross, (301) 295-3139 (e-mail: jcross@usuhs.mil) or<br />
Ms. Ellen Goldman, (301) 295-3129 (email: egoldman@usuhs.mil).<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 40-50<br />
Revision of the Genus Pallisentis (Acanthocephala: Quadrigyridae)<br />
with the Erection of Three New Subgenera, the Description of<br />
Pallisentis (Brevitritospinus} vietnamensis subgen. et sp. n., a Key to<br />
Species of Pallisentis, and the Description of a New Quadrigyrid<br />
Genus, Pararaosentis gen. n.<br />
OMAR M. AivnN,1-4 RICHARD A. HecKMANN,2 NGUYEN VAN HA,3 PHAM VAN Luc,3 AND<br />
PHAM NGOC DoANH3<br />
1 Institute of Parasitic Diseases, P.O. Box 28372, Tempe, Arizona 85285, U.S.A., and Department of Zoology,<br />
Arizona <strong>State</strong> University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, U.S.A. (e-mail: omaramin@aol.com),<br />
2 Department of Zoology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, U.S.A.<br />
(e-mail: richard_heckmann@email.byu.edu), and<br />
3 Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Nghiado, Caugiay, Hanoi, Vietnam<br />
ABSTRACT: The genus Pallisentis is revised. Golvan's 3 subgenera (Farzandia, Neosentis, Pallisentis) were<br />
distinguished solely by the number of hooks in proboscis hook circles, which proved to be a variable trait. Three<br />
new subgenera are erected based on the relative size of hooks in subsequent circles, the size of cement glands,<br />
and the number of their giant nuclei. A new species of Pallisentis is described from the snake head mullet,<br />
Ophicephalus maculatus, in Vietnam. A key to all 26 species of the genus Pallisentis accepted as valid and<br />
following our classification is included. A new quadrigyrid genus Pararaosentis is erected.<br />
KEY WORDS: revision of Pallisentis; Acanthocephala, Quadrigyridae, new taxa, Pallisentis (Brevitritospinus)<br />
vietnamensis subgen. et sp. n., taxonomic key, Pararaosentis gen. n., snake head mullet, Vietnam.<br />
The discovery of new species of the genus<br />
Pallisentis Van Cleave, 1928, from a Vietnamese<br />
mullet, Ophicephalus maculatus (Lacepede,<br />
1802) (Channidae) necessitated the review of the<br />
current status of the genus and its component<br />
species. The confused taxonomic state was compounded<br />
by Golvan's (1959, 1994) subgeneric<br />
designations and assignments based on the variable<br />
character of the number of hooks in proboscis<br />
hook circles. Other problems of omissions,<br />
inconsistent assignments, and improper<br />
generic relegations necessitated the revision of<br />
the entire group, the creation of 3 new subgenera<br />
based on naturally consistent characters, and the<br />
creation of a key to all 26 species of Pallisentis.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Fifteen snake head mullets, O. maculatus, measuring<br />
26-48 (mean, 36) cm in total length were examined<br />
for parasit.es. The fish were collected from waters<br />
around Hanoi, Vietnam, and purchased alive in a Hanoi<br />
fish market on 25 May 1998. Two fish were infected<br />
with about 20 worms, of which 9 were made<br />
available and described in this paper as a new species.<br />
These thin cylindrical worms were easily located in<br />
the pathologically enlarged upper intestine because of<br />
the apparent reddish inflammation at attachment sites.<br />
4 Corresponding author.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
40<br />
The worms were removed, extended in water, and<br />
fixed and shipped in 70% ethanol. Worms were stained<br />
in Mayer's acid carmine, dehydrated in ascending concentrations<br />
of ethanol, and whole-mounted in Canada<br />
balsam. Measurements are in micrometers unless otherwise<br />
stated. The range is followed by mean values<br />
(in parentheses). Width measurements refer to maximum<br />
width. Body ( = trunk) length does not include<br />
neck, proboscis, or male bursa. Specimens have been<br />
deposited in the United <strong>State</strong>s National Parasite Collection<br />
(USNPC), Beltsville, Maryland, U.S.A.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
The Genus Pallisentis Van Cleave, 1928<br />
Van Cleave (1928) created the genus Pallisentis<br />
in his new family Pallisentidae to accommodate<br />
Pallisentis umbellatus Van Cleave,<br />
1928. Baylis (1933) synonymized the genera<br />
Farzandia Thapar, 1930, and Neosentis Van<br />
Cleave, 1928, despite Meyer's (1932) retention<br />
of Farzandia as an independent genus in a different<br />
family, Acanthogyridae. Petrochenko<br />
(1956) followed Meyer (1932). Baylis' (1933)<br />
synonymies were accepted by Harada (1935)<br />
and Yamaguti (1963) and currently remain valid;<br />
the genus Pallisentis was recognized in the family<br />
Quadrigyridae Van Cleave 1920, subfamily<br />
Pallisentinae Van Cleave, 1928.<br />
In his generic diagnosis, Van Cleave used re-
strictive traits that were basically descriptive of<br />
specific features of P. umbellatus. These included<br />
the number of proboscis hooks, collar and<br />
trunk spines, and giant nuclei of the cement<br />
gland, as well as the extent of distribution of the<br />
trunk spines, and the position of the testes.<br />
These same traits were used by subsequent<br />
workers, e.g., Petrochenko (1956) and Yamaguti<br />
(1963), despite the addition of more species adding<br />
more variability to the diagnostic criteria of<br />
the genus over the years. A new diagnosis of the<br />
genus Pallisentis is provided below.<br />
Pallisentis Van Cleave, 1928, sensu lato<br />
DIAGNOSIS: Quadrigyridae, Pallisentinae.<br />
Trunk slender, small-medium in length, with an<br />
anterior set of collar spines and a posterior set<br />
of trunk spines separated by region lacking<br />
spines. Collar spines arranged in a few closely<br />
set circles; circles of trunk spines more widely<br />
spaced and may extend to posterior end of males<br />
or females. Giant hypodermal nuclei may be<br />
present. Proboscis short, cylindroid-spheroid<br />
with 4 circles of 6-12 hooks each. Proboscis receptacle<br />
single-walled, with large cerebral ganglion<br />
near its base. Lemnisci long, cylindrical,<br />
equal or unequal. Testes ovoid-cylindrical, contiguous.<br />
Cement gland syncytial, medium-long,<br />
with few to many giant nuclei. Cement reservoir<br />
present. Saefftigen's pouch present or absent.<br />
Parasites of freshwater fishes in Asia.<br />
The Subgenera of Pallisentis<br />
Based on the number of hooks in each of the<br />
proboscis hook circles, Golvan (1959) erected 3<br />
subgenera of Pallisentis: Farzandia Thapar,<br />
1931, with 10 hooks per circle, Neosentis Van<br />
Cleave, 1928, with 8 hooks per circle, and Pallisentis<br />
Van Cleave, 1928, with 6 hooks per circle.<br />
Some species were not assigned to a subgenus,<br />
and others could be relegated to more<br />
than 1 subgenus or not to any. By 1994 a greater<br />
number of species had been described and the<br />
number of nonassignments and exceptions increased<br />
disproportionately. Golvan (1994) additionally<br />
did not include 4 other species described<br />
earlier (footnote, Table 1). The character (number<br />
of hooks per circle) used by Golvan (1959)<br />
is inconsistent and showed variations even within<br />
the same species and, thus, should not be used<br />
for subgeneric assignment of species. Yamaguti<br />
(1963), Tadros (1966), Gupta and Verma (1980),<br />
Soota and Bhattacharya (1982), Gupta and Fat-<br />
AMIN ET AL.—REVISION OF THE GENUS PALLISENTIS 41<br />
ma (1986), and Chowhan et al. (1987) also rejected<br />
Golvan's (1959) system. Tadros (1966)<br />
and Soota and Bhattacharya (1982) also agreed<br />
with the above authors and evaluated other taxonomic<br />
characters of Pallisentis. We found the<br />
most consistent character to be the difference in<br />
the size of proboscis hooks in subsequent circles.<br />
Other characters of considerable consistency<br />
included the size of the cement gland and the<br />
number of its giant nuclei, the shape and distribution<br />
of trunk spines, and the presence or absence<br />
of Saefftigen's pouch. Based on the first 3<br />
characters listed above, we designate herein 3<br />
new subgenera. All characters (above) are used<br />
to construct the subsequent key to species.<br />
Demidueterospinus subgen. n.<br />
DIAGNOSIS: With the characters of the genus<br />
Pallisentis provided herein. Proboscis hooks in<br />
circle 2 about half as long as hooks in circle 1.<br />
Cement gland usually small, with few giant nuclei.<br />
Taxonomic summary<br />
TYPE SPECIES: Pallisentis (D.) ophiocephali<br />
(Thapar, 1931) Baylis, 1933.<br />
OTHER SPECIES: Pallisentis (£>.) basiri Farooqi,<br />
1958; Pallisentis (£>.) panadei Rai, 19<strong>67</strong>.<br />
Remarks<br />
Pallisentis basiri and P. panadei were synonymized<br />
with Pallisentis colisai Sarkar, 1954,<br />
by Soota and Bhattacharya (1982). We consider<br />
these species to be valid. These and other synonymies<br />
made by Soota and Bhattacharya<br />
(1982) did not acknowledge the species-specific<br />
differences that we outline in our key. Further,<br />
their tabulated data often did not match the narrative<br />
and were occasionally misplaced. These<br />
synonymies were also not accepted by Khan and<br />
Bilqees (1987) and were not followed by other<br />
workers. The redescription of P. basiri by Gupta<br />
and Fatma (1986) is inconsistent with the characteristics<br />
of that species and appears to be of<br />
another species. Pallisentis ophiocephali of Moravec<br />
and Sey (1989) from Vietnam is conspecific<br />
with our material from the same location<br />
and is described herein as a new species.<br />
Brevitritospinus subgen. n.<br />
DIAGNOSIS: With the characters of the genus<br />
Pallisentis provided herein. Proboscis hooks in<br />
circle 3 about half as long as hooks in circle 2.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Table 1. Present status of the subgenera and species of the genus Pallisentis according to Golvan (1959)<br />
number of proboscis hooks per circle in species assigned to each subgenus.<br />
No. of proboscis<br />
hooks/circle<br />
Species and subgenera''<br />
Thapar (1931) established genus<br />
(=Echinorhynchus gaboes MacC<br />
(1963), and Yamaguti (1954)<br />
Synonymized with P. ophioceph<br />
Kennedy 1989<br />
Baylis (1933) Synonymized the<br />
Type species of Neosentis', redes<br />
P. ophiocephali of Moravec and<br />
Nominal subgenus of genus Pal<br />
Synonymized with P. ophioceph<br />
and Gupta (1979)<br />
Needs a new subgenus (Tadros,<br />
charya (1982)<br />
Improper assignment; included i<br />
with P. colisai by Soota and<br />
Gupta (1979)<br />
Also agrees with subgenera Far<br />
Improper assignment; fits subge<br />
Also fits subgenera Farzandia a<br />
Not a species of the genus Palli<br />
Improper assignment; fits subge<br />
Improper assignment; Synonymi<br />
Improper assignment; Synonymi<br />
Improper assignment; Synonymi<br />
Improper assignment; Synonymi<br />
Originally described as P. golva<br />
Type species of Pallisentis Van<br />
As per Golvan (1959, 1994)<br />
Originally reported as Farzandia<br />
Belongs in the genus Acanthocep<br />
( = Devendrosentis garuai Sahay<br />
Agrees with subgenus Neosentis<br />
Agrees with subgenus Farzandia<br />
Agrees with subgenus Farzandia<br />
Synonymized with P. ophioceph<br />
Agrees with subgenus Neosentis<br />
Subgenus Farzandia Thapar, 1931 (10)<br />
P. (F.) gaboes (MacCallum, 1918) Van Cleave, 1928 (10)<br />
P. (F.) nagpurensis (Bhalerao, 1931) Baylis, 1933 (8-10)<br />
Subgenus Neosentis Van Cleave, 1928 (8)<br />
P. (N.) celatus (Van Cleave, 1928) Baylis, 1933 (8)<br />
P. (N.) ophiocephali (Thapar, 1931) Baylis, 1933 (8-10)<br />
Subgenus Pallisentis Van Cleave, 1928 (6)<br />
P. {P.) allahabadi Agarwal, 1958 8-10<br />
P. (P.) basiri Farooqi, 1958 9<br />
P. (P.) buckleyi Tadros, 1966 10<br />
P. (P.) cavasii Gupta and Verma, 1980 6-10<br />
P. (P.) colisai Sarkar, 1954 (10-12)<br />
P. (P.)fasciata Gupta and Verma, 1980 6-10<br />
P. (P.) golvani Troncy and Vassiliades, 1973 6<br />
P. (P.) gomtii Gupta and Verma, 1980 8-10<br />
P. (P.) guntei Sahay, Nath, and Sinha, 19<strong>67</strong> 8-10<br />
P. (P.) magnum Saeed and Bilqees, 1971 8-10<br />
P. (P.) nandai Sarkar, 1953 8-10<br />
P. (P.) panadei Rai, 19<strong>67</strong> 10<br />
P. (P.) tetraodonlae Troncy, 1978 6<br />
P. (P.) umbellatus Van Cleave, 1928 (6)<br />
Subgenus not assigned 6-12<br />
Pallisentis sp. Pearse, 1933 10<br />
P. cholodkowskyi (Kostylew, 1928) Amin, 1985 3<br />
P. gamai (Sahay, Sinha, and Ghosh, 1971) Jain and Gupta, 1979 6<br />
P. guptai Gupta and Fatma, 1986 8<br />
P. kalriai Khan and Bilqees, 1985 10<br />
P. mehrai Gupta and Fatma, 1986 10-12<br />
P. nandai Sarkar, 1953 (8-10)<br />
P. sindensis Khan and Bilqees, 1987 8<br />
* Golvan (1994) did not include P. chipei Gupta and Gupta 1979 (8 hooks per circle), P. croftoni Mital and Lai, 1981 (10),<br />
and Ip, 1989 (10). He correctly reassigned "P. (?) ussuriensis" (Kostylew, 1941) Golvan, 1959 (= Acanthocephalorhynchoides<br />
Meyer, 1932.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Cement gland usually small with few giant nuclei.<br />
Taxonomic summary<br />
TYPE SPECIES: Pallisentis (B.) allahabadi<br />
Agarwal, 1958.<br />
OTHER SPECIES: Pallisentis (B.) cavasii Gupta<br />
and Verma, 1980; Pallisentis (B.) croftoni Mital<br />
and Lai, 1981; Pallisentis (B.)fasciata Gupta<br />
and Verma, 1980; Pallisentis (B.) guntei Sahay,<br />
Nath, Sinha, 19<strong>67</strong>; Pallisentis (B.) indica Mital<br />
and Lai, 1981; Pallisentis (B.) tnehrai Gupta and<br />
Fatma, 1986; Pallisentis (B.) vietnamensis sp. n.<br />
(this report).<br />
Remarks<br />
Pallisentis allahabadi and P. guntei were synonymized<br />
with P. ophiocephala and P. colisai,<br />
respectively, by Soota and Bhattacharya (1982).<br />
These synonymies did not acknowledge speciesspecific<br />
differences outlined in our key. The redescription<br />
of P. allahabadi by Jain and Gupta<br />
(1979) and their synonymization of P. buckleyi<br />
Tadros, 1966, with it are considered sound and<br />
are accepted; the key taxonomic characters are<br />
in agreement.<br />
Pallisentis subgen. n. Van Cleave, 1928,<br />
sensu stricto<br />
DIAGNOSIS: With the characters of the genus<br />
Pallisentis provided herein. Proboscis hooks<br />
gradually declining in size posteriorly; cement<br />
glands usually long with many giant nuclei.<br />
Taxonomic summary<br />
TYPE SPECIES: Pallisentis (P.) umbellatus<br />
van Cleave, 1928.<br />
OTHER SPECIES: Pallisentis (P.) celatus (Van<br />
Cleave, 1928) Baylis, 1933; Pallisentis (P.) colisai<br />
Sarkar, 1954; Pallisentis (P.) clupei Gupta<br />
and Gupta, 1979; Pallisentis (P.) gaboes<br />
(MacCallum, 1918) Van Cleave, 1928; Pallisentis<br />
(P.) garuei (Sahay, Sinha, and Ghosh, 1971)<br />
Jain and Gupta, 1979; Pallisentis (P.) gomtii<br />
Gupta and Verma, 1980; Pallisentis (P.) guptai<br />
Gupta and Fatma, 1986; Pallisentis (P.) kalriai<br />
Khan and Bilqees, 1985; Pallisentis (P.) magnum<br />
Saeed and Bilqees, 1971; Pallisentis (P.)<br />
nandai Sarkar, 1953; Pallisentis (P.) nagpurensis<br />
(Bhalero, 1931) Baylis, 1931; Pallisentis (P.)<br />
pesteri (Tadros, 1966) Chowhan, Gupta, and<br />
Khera, 1987; Pallisentis (P.) sindensis Khan and<br />
AMIN ET AL.—REVISION OF THE GENUS PALLISENTIS 43<br />
Bilqees, 1987; Pallisentis (P.) singaporensis<br />
Khan and Ip, 1989.<br />
Remarks<br />
Pallisentis celatus was redescribed by Moravec<br />
and Sey (1989) from Vietnamese specimens.<br />
Pallisentis gaboes was provisionally and incompletely<br />
redescribed by Yamaguti (1954) and<br />
briefly referenced by Fernando and Furtado<br />
(1963). Khan and Ip (1988) referred to the proboscis<br />
armature of P. gaboes as similar to that<br />
of P. singaporensis. The synonymization of the<br />
genus Devendrosentis Sahay, Sinha, and Ghosh,<br />
1971, with the genus Pallisentis and the assignment<br />
of D. garuai Sahay, Sinha, and Gosh,<br />
1971, to the genus Pallisentis are accepted; the<br />
descriptions of the new genera are identical.<br />
Since none of their accounts was sufficiently<br />
similar to the original description, the incomplete<br />
redescription of P. nagpurensis by Jain and<br />
Gupta (1979) is considered questionable, that of<br />
Chowhan et al. (1987) uncertain, and that of<br />
Kennedy (1981) not of the same species. Based<br />
on comparability of cement gland structure, we<br />
accept the synonymy of the genus Saccosentis<br />
Tadros, 1966, with Pallisentis as proposed by<br />
Chowhan et al. (1987), and Saccosentis pesteri<br />
Tadros, 1966, is assigned to the genus Pallisentis.<br />
The synonymization of P. magnum, P. nandai,<br />
and P. nagpurensis with P. ophiocephali by<br />
Soota and Bhattacharya (1982) is not accepted,<br />
since these synonymies did not acknowledge the<br />
species-specific differences outlined in our key.<br />
Other Taxonomic Assignments<br />
Pallisentis cholodkowskyi (Kostylew, 1928)<br />
Amin, 1985 ( = Quadrigyrus cholodkowskyi Kostylew,<br />
1928) is assigned to the genus Acanthocephalorhynchoides<br />
Kostylew, 1941, based on<br />
proboscis and trunk spination patterns (see Williams<br />
et al. [1980] for additional information).<br />
Golvan (1994) made a similar assignment regarding<br />
Acanthocephalorhynchoides ussuriensis<br />
Kostylew, 1941.<br />
Pallisentis tetraodontae Troncy, 1978, was<br />
described by Troncy (1978) as a subspecies of<br />
Pallisentis golvani Troncy and Vassiliadis, 1973.<br />
Golvan (1994) elevated it to species rank without<br />
justification. We have determined that P.<br />
golvani does not belong to the genus Pallisentis<br />
or any other known genus of the family Quadrigyridae<br />
Van Cleave, 1920 (see remarks). A<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
44 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
new genus is described below to accommodate<br />
P. golvani.<br />
Pararaosentis n. gen.<br />
DIAGNOSIS: Quadrigyridae, Pallisentinae.<br />
Trunk short with hypodermal nuclei and anterior<br />
constriction containing 1 set of minute spines<br />
arranged in a few complete circles, most anteriorly.<br />
Proboscis short, with 4 circles of small<br />
hooks gradually decreasing in length posteriorly.<br />
Proboscis receptacle single-walled, with large<br />
cerebral ganglion at its base. Male reproductive<br />
system compacted in posterior region. Testes<br />
short, robust, contiguous. Cement gland syncytial,<br />
small with few giant nuclei. Cement reservoir<br />
and Saefftigen's pouch present. Parasites of<br />
freshwater fishes in Africa.<br />
Taxonomic summary<br />
TYPE SPECIES: Pararaosentis golvani (Troncy<br />
and Vassiliades, 1973) n. comb. (=Pallisentis<br />
golvani Troncy and Vassiliades, 1973; Pallisentis<br />
tetraodontae Troncy, 1978).<br />
Remarks<br />
The type species does not belong in the genus<br />
Pallisentis because of its anterior trunk constriction,<br />
the presence of only 1 set of spines anteriorly,<br />
the noncylindrical form of its testes and<br />
cement gland, and its occurrence in African, not<br />
Asian, fishes. Furthermore, the trunk is short and<br />
lacks the anterior swelling of the long slender<br />
specimens of Pallisentis. The new genus is closest<br />
to the genus Raosentis Datta, 1947. In Raosentis,<br />
however, the trunk is not constricted anteriorly,<br />
and the proboscis hooks in the anterior<br />
2 circles are longer and stouter than the hooks<br />
in posterior 2 circles and are separated from<br />
them by an unarmed area.<br />
The characters on which Troncy (1978) based<br />
his assignment of P. tetraodontae as a subspecies<br />
of P. golvani are not significant enough to<br />
justify a subspecific status, and P. tetraodontae<br />
is herein relegated to a synonym of P. golvani.<br />
Pallisentis (Brevitritospinus) vietnamensis sp. n.<br />
(Figs. 1-9)<br />
Description<br />
GENERAL: Shared characters (proboscis and<br />
hooks, proboscis receptable, trunk, and lemnisci)<br />
larger in females than in males (see Table 2 for<br />
measurements). Trunk curved ventrad, medium<br />
in length, slender, cylindrical with anterior<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
swelling (Figs. 1, 5) and 83-137 long X 21-62<br />
wide hypodermic nuclei in anterior half of trunk<br />
(0—5), posterior half (1—4), and in apical organ<br />
of proboscis (3). Proboscis truncated, wider than<br />
long, with conspicuous apical organ (Fig. 3).<br />
Proboscis hooks with shallow pluglike roots, in<br />
4 circles of 10 hooks each. Hooks in first circle<br />
largest, hooks in second circle slightly smaller,<br />
hooks in third circle about half as long as hooks<br />
in second circle, hooks in fourth circle smallest<br />
(Figs. 3, 4). Neck very short (Figs. 3, 5, 9). Proboscis<br />
receptacle 5-6 times as long as proboscis,<br />
single-walled, with cerebral ganglion near its<br />
base (Figs. 1, 5). Lemnisci long, tubular, unequal,<br />
and with 1 giant nucleus each (Figs. 1,<br />
5). Collar spines triangular, in 18—22 closely<br />
spaced circles beginning just behind a spineless<br />
area on anterior trunk (often interpreted as the<br />
neck) and overlapping and extending slightly<br />
posterior to the posterior half of the proboscis<br />
receptacle (Figs. 1, 5). Trunk spines triangular<br />
(Figs. 7, 8), in considerably more widely spaced<br />
circles extending to posterior end of females and<br />
to testes in males. Anterior trunk swelling covered<br />
by 17-20 circles of trunk spines. An unspined<br />
area separating trunk spines from collar<br />
spines (Figs. 1, 5). Unspined areas often occurring<br />
in posterior 2-3 circles of collar spines, and<br />
up to 5 or 6 times involving 2-6 circles of trunk<br />
spines throughout (Figs. 1, 5). Number of trunk<br />
spines decreasing to 1 or 2 in posteriormost circles<br />
where their size slightly decreases.<br />
MALE: Based on 4 specimens. Reproductive<br />
system at posterior end of trunk. Testes oblong,<br />
contiguous; anterior testis larger than posterior.<br />
Cement gland rectangular, syncytial with 7-8 giant<br />
nuclei. Cement reservoir branching posteriorly<br />
into 2 ducts (Figs. 1, 2).<br />
FEMALE: Based on 5 specimens. Reproductive<br />
system short, robust with the vaginal complex,<br />
uterus, and uterine bell of almost equal<br />
length; gonopore subterminal (Fig. 6). Eggs<br />
ovoid with concentric shells.<br />
Taxonomic summary<br />
TYPE HOST: Snake head fish (mullet), Ophiocephalus<br />
maculatus (Lacepede, 1802) (Channidae).<br />
OTHER HOST: ca the be (Vietnamese name)<br />
Acanthorhodeus fortunensis (Cyprinidae) (only<br />
1 juvenile found by Moravec and Sey, 1989).<br />
SITE OF INFECTION: Upper intestine.
AMIN ET AL.—REVISION OF THE GENUS PALLISENTIS 45<br />
Figures 1-8. Pallisentis vietnamensis sp. n. 1. Holotype male (note gaps in distribution of trunk spines).<br />
2. Reproductive system of holotype male. 3. Proboscis of a paratype female (note 3 giant nuclei in apical<br />
organ). 4. One row of proboscis hooks from proboscis in Fig. 3. 5. Anterior end of a paratype female<br />
(note gaps in the distribution of collar and trunk spines). 6. Reproductive system of allotype female (note<br />
balloon-shaped vaginal gland and unripe egg). 7-8. Side and en face views of trunk spines from paratype<br />
in Fig. 5.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
46 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Figure 9. Pallisentis vietnamensis sp. n. Anterior<br />
end of trunk of paratype female in Fig. 5, showing<br />
clear line of demarcation between the naked anterior<br />
end of the trunk and the very short neck at the<br />
base of the proboscis.<br />
TYPE LOCALITY: Lakes and Red River near<br />
Hanoi, Vietnam.<br />
SPECIMENS DEPOSITED: USNPC No. 88635<br />
(holotype male); No. 88636 (allotype female);<br />
No. 88637 (paratypes).<br />
ETYMOLOGY: The new species is named for<br />
its geographical location in Vietnam.<br />
Remarks<br />
The identification of P. vietnamensis sp. n. as<br />
P. ophiocephali by Moravec and Sey (1989)<br />
overlooked the difference in proboscis hook size<br />
(these species belong to 2 different subgenera)<br />
and the fact that trunk spines of the latter species<br />
extend to the posterior ends of individuals of<br />
both sexes. Specimens believed to be conspecific<br />
with the new species by Moravec and Sey<br />
(1989) were previously reported by Ha (1969)<br />
from O. maculatus.<br />
Of the 26 species of Pallisentis recognized as<br />
valid, P. vietnamensis sp. n. has the largest number<br />
of trunk spine circles in males (57-88) and<br />
females (120-149). The largest number of trunk<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
spine circles in other species are 52 in P. ophiocephali<br />
males, 30-66 in P. nagpurensis males<br />
and females, and 28-32 and 36-76 in P. garuei<br />
males and females, repectively. The new species<br />
also has giant nuclei in the apical organ of the<br />
proboscis, a feature not reported in any other<br />
species of Pallisentis (Fig. 3). The female reproductive<br />
system is similar to that of P. colisai<br />
except that the uterus in the latter species is considerably<br />
longer.<br />
The reference to Pallisentis sp. from threadfin<br />
shad, Dorosoma petenense (Giinther, 18<strong>67</strong>), in<br />
Louisiana, U.S.A. by Arnold et al. (1968) is<br />
clearly in error, since Pallisentis occurs only in<br />
Asia.<br />
Further differentiation between P. vietnamensis<br />
and the other 25 species of the genus Pallisentis<br />
is presented in the following key.<br />
Key to Species of the Genus Pallisentis<br />
sensu lato<br />
1. Proboscis hooks in second or third circle<br />
declining abruptly in size; cement gland<br />
usually small, with few giant nuclei ... 2<br />
Proboscis hooks gradually declining in<br />
size posteriorly; cement glands usually<br />
long, with many giant nuclei<br />
Subgenus Pallisentis subgen. n. 12<br />
2. Proboscis hooks in second circle about half<br />
as long as hooks in first circle<br />
.. Subgenus Demidueterospinus subgen. n. 3<br />
Proboscis hooks in third circle about half<br />
as long as hooks in second circle<br />
Subgenus Brevitritospinus subgen. n. 5<br />
3. Trunk spines conical and extending to posterior<br />
end of males and females; Saefftigen's<br />
pouch absent Pallisentis (D.)<br />
ophiocephali (Thapar, 1931) Baylis, 1933<br />
Trunk spines Y-shaped not extending to<br />
posterior end of males; Saefftigen's<br />
pouch present 4<br />
4. Proboscis hooks in first circle 70-80<br />
long; hook roots recurved, simple; lemnisci<br />
equal; testes equatorial, 580-620<br />
(anterior) and 510-560 (posterior)<br />
long; cement gland 470—630 long;<br />
Saefftigen's pouch 320-390 long; female<br />
gonopore terminal<br />
Pallisentis (D.) panadei Rai, 19<strong>67</strong><br />
Proboscis hooks in first circle 100 long;<br />
hook roots stubby knobs; lemnisci unequal;<br />
testes pre-equatorial, 950 (ante-
AMIN ET AL.—REVISION OF THE GENUS PALL1SENTIS 47<br />
Table 2. Morphometric characteristics of Pallisentis (B.) vietnamensis (measurements are in micrometers<br />
unless otherwise noted).<br />
Males<br />
Trunk (mm)<br />
Hypodermal/nuclei<br />
Proboscis<br />
First circle hooks<br />
Second circle hooks<br />
Third circle hooks<br />
Fourth circle hooks<br />
Neck<br />
Proboscis receptacle<br />
Brain<br />
Anterior spineless area<br />
Lemniscus<br />
Long (mm)<br />
Short (mm)<br />
Collar spines<br />
Circles/no, per circle<br />
Length<br />
Trunk spines<br />
Circles/no, per circle<br />
Length<br />
Anterior testis<br />
Posterior testis<br />
Cement gland<br />
No. nuclei<br />
Cement reservoir<br />
Cement duct<br />
Bursa<br />
Females<br />
Trunk (mm)<br />
Subcuticular nuclei<br />
Proboscis<br />
First circle hooks<br />
Second circle hooks<br />
Third circle hooks<br />
Fourth circle hooks<br />
Neck<br />
Proboscis receptacle<br />
Brain<br />
Anterior spineless area<br />
Lemniscus<br />
Long (mm)<br />
Short (mm)<br />
Collar spines<br />
Circles/no, per circle<br />
Length<br />
Trunk spines<br />
Circles/no, per circle<br />
Length<br />
Reproductive system<br />
Gonopore<br />
Eggs<br />
* NG = not given.<br />
t Range (mean).<br />
Moravec and Sey (1989)<br />
(9 males, 5 females)<br />
6.74-14.6 X 0.408-0.503<br />
NG*<br />
163-177 X 204-245<br />
81-84<br />
72-75<br />
36-42<br />
30<br />
NG<br />
340-517 X NG<br />
NG<br />
272-3<strong>67</strong> X 177-204 (called neck)<br />
1.06-1.90 X NG<br />
Only 1 measurement given<br />
18-21/20-22<br />
27-30<br />
Extend to testes<br />
57-86/NG<br />
21-30<br />
449_7<strong>67</strong> X 218-313<br />
449-721 X 218-313<br />
NG (550 X 180, Fig. 2C)<br />
8<br />
NG (370 X 180, Fig. 2C)<br />
NG (400, Fig. 2C)<br />
NG X 258<br />
14.42-20.54 X 0.54-0.57<br />
NG<br />
177_204 X 218-258<br />
87-99<br />
75-94<br />
39<br />
30<br />
NG<br />
NG<br />
NG<br />
258-422 X 190-218 (called "neck")<br />
NG<br />
NG<br />
21/22-24<br />
24-30<br />
Extend to posterior end<br />
120/NG<br />
24-30<br />
NG (Fig. 21 of another species)<br />
Subterminal<br />
75-84 X 30-33 (ripe)<br />
50 X 25 (Fig. 2J)<br />
Present paper<br />
(4 males, 5 females)<br />
7.04-14.20 (9.03) X 0.29-0.42 (0.37)t<br />
3 (apical organ), 0-5 (anterior), 3-4 (posterior)<br />
130-145 (135) X 1<strong>67</strong>-187 (178)<br />
80-88 (85)<br />
75 (75)<br />
32-38 (35)<br />
25-28 (26)<br />
22-32 (29) X 112-135 (123)<br />
458-728 (855) X 146-156 (152)<br />
100-137 (120) X 50-75 (64)<br />
187-312 (236) X 135-156 (146)<br />
2.49 X 0.04-0.06<br />
1.87 X 0.03-0.05<br />
20-21/10-22<br />
17-25 (21) (anterior), 20-32 (26) (posterior)<br />
Extend to testes<br />
75-88 (82)/l-16<br />
30-57 (37) (anterior), 35-65 (44) (posterior)<br />
406-988 (616) X 146-198 (161)<br />
333-551 (424) X 125-166 (148)<br />
395-728 (504) X 94-156 (119)<br />
7-8 (usually 8)<br />
187-499 (304) X 83-187 (117)<br />
364-572 (455)<br />
238 X 135 (n = 1)<br />
11.02-19.40 (15.81) X 0.32-0.47 (0.38)<br />
3 (apical organ), 0-2 (anterior), 1-3 (posterior)<br />
142-175 (156) X 177-210 (197)<br />
75-95 (85)<br />
70-87 (77)<br />
33-45 (38)<br />
25-32 (28)<br />
25-32 (28) X 130-145 (135)<br />
655-728 (699) X 135-187 (168)<br />
125-150 (135) X 45-80 (61)<br />
228-260 (239) X 146-187 (169)<br />
2.08-2.<strong>67</strong>(2.50) X 0.04-0.07 (0.05)<br />
1.56-2.50 (2.13) X 0.04-0.06 (0.05)<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
19-22/6-23<br />
20-25 (23) (anterior), 23-27 (25) (posterior)<br />
Extend to posterior end<br />
125-149 (138)/1-17<br />
32-38 (36) (anterior), 33-43 (37) (posterior)<br />
364-458 (410)<br />
Subterminal<br />
42-57 (50) X 18-22 (20) (unripe)
48 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
rior) and 700 (posterior) long; cement<br />
gland 900 long; Saefftigen's pouch 770<br />
long; female gonopore subterminal<br />
Pallisentis (D.) basiri Farooqi, 1958<br />
5. Trunk spines conical 6<br />
Trunk spines Y-shaped 9<br />
6. Trunk spines in many circles, 57-88 in<br />
males and 120-149 in females; Saefftigen's<br />
pouch absent Pallisentis<br />
(B.) vietnamensis sp. n.<br />
Trunk spines in fewer circles, up to 27 in<br />
males and 36 in females; Saefftigen's<br />
pouch present 7<br />
7. Trunk small, up to 2.0 mm long in males<br />
and 4.5 mm long in females; proboscis<br />
hooks in anterior 2 circles similar in size;<br />
trunk with 14-18 circles of spines each<br />
with 17—24 spines; cement gland less<br />
than 200 long Pallisentis (B.) guntei<br />
Sahay, Nath, and Sinha 19<strong>67</strong><br />
Trunk larger, 3.4-6.9 mm long in males<br />
and 7.3—15.6 mm long in females; proboscis<br />
hooks in second circle slightly<br />
smaller that hooks in first circle; trunk<br />
with 20-27 circles of spines each with<br />
up to 12 spines; cement gland 400-973<br />
long 8<br />
8. Female gonopore terminal; length of testes<br />
733-910 (anterior), 785-925 (posterior);<br />
cement gland 863-973, and cement reservoir<br />
580-816 Pallisentis (B.)<br />
croftoni Mital and Lai, 1981<br />
Female gonopore subterminal; length of<br />
testes 475 (anterior), 437 (posterior),<br />
cement gland 400, and cement reservoir<br />
361 Pallisentis (B.) allahabadi<br />
Agarwal, 1958<br />
9. Trunk spines extending to posterior end<br />
of males and females; proboscis hooks<br />
10—12 per circle; hooks in anterior circle<br />
larger than 100 Pallisentis (B.)<br />
mehrai Gupta and Fatma, 1986<br />
Trunk spines not extending to posterior<br />
end of males or females; proboscis<br />
hooks 6-10 per circle; hooks in anterior<br />
circle shorter than 100 10<br />
10. Females less than 4.0 mm long; lemnisci<br />
ending well above anterior testis, testis<br />
small, up to 225 (anterior) and 200<br />
(posterior) long; cement gland small,<br />
200-230 long, with 6-8 giant nuclei<br />
Pallisentis (B.) cavasii Gupta and<br />
Verma, 1980<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Females longer than 4.0 mm long; lemnisci<br />
may reach anterior testis; testes<br />
between 200 and 910 long; cement<br />
glands between 172 and 926 long, with<br />
10—18 giant nuclei each 11<br />
11. Proboscis hooks 10 per circle; female proboscis<br />
receptacle more than 700 mm<br />
long; lemnisci ending well above anterior<br />
testis Pallisentis (B.) indica<br />
Mital and Lai, 1981<br />
Proboscis hooks 6-10 per circle; female<br />
proboscis receptacle less than 400 long;<br />
lemnisci extending to mid-anterior testis<br />
Pallisentis (B.) fasciata<br />
Gupta and Verma, 1980<br />
12. Trunk spines conical or Y-shaped, extending<br />
to posterior end of at least 1<br />
sex 13<br />
Trunk spines only conical, not extending<br />
to posterior end of either sex 16<br />
13. Trunk spines conical, extending to posterior<br />
end in females only; testes postequatorial<br />
14<br />
Trunk spines conical or Y-shaped, extending<br />
to posterior end of both males<br />
and females; testes equatorial 15<br />
14. Proboscis hooks in first circle less than<br />
100 long; proboscis receptacle less than<br />
500 long; cement gland with 20—30 giant<br />
nuclei; female gonopore subterminal<br />
Pallisentis (P.) nagpurensis<br />
(Bhalero, 1931) Baylis, 1933<br />
Proboscis hooks in first circle 100 or<br />
more long; proboscis receptacle more<br />
than 800 long; cement gland with 9-16<br />
giant nuclei; female gonopore terminal<br />
Pallisentis (P.) clupei<br />
Gupta and Gupta, 1979<br />
15. Trunk spines conical, in 28-32 circles in<br />
males and 36-76 circles in females;<br />
neck separated from proboscis by transverse<br />
circular muscle band; cement<br />
gland longer than 1.6 mm Pallisentis<br />
(P.) garuei (Sahay, Sinha and Ghosh,<br />
1971) Jain and Gupta, 1979<br />
Trunk spines Y-shaped, in 16-20 circles<br />
in males and 25-30 circles in females;<br />
no muscle band between neck and proboscis;<br />
cement gland less than 0.6 mm<br />
long Pallisentis (P.) guptai<br />
Gupta and Fatma, 1986<br />
16. Males with Saefftigen's pouch 17<br />
Males lacking Saefftigen's pouch 21
17. Trunk spines appearing continuous with<br />
collar spines Pallisentis (P.) magnum<br />
Saeed and Bilqees, 1971<br />
Trunk spines well separated from collar<br />
spines 18<br />
18. Proboscis hooks 10 per circle, each embedded<br />
in thickened cuticular rim;<br />
trunk spines with cuticular comblike<br />
thickening; males with additional circles<br />
of posttesticular trunk spines; testes<br />
preequatorial Pallisentis<br />
(P.) kalriai Khan and Bilqees, 1985<br />
Proboscis hooks 8-10 per circle; no cuticular<br />
thickening at base of proboscis<br />
hooks or trunk spines; no posttesticular<br />
trunk spines; testes not preequatorial 19<br />
19. Female trunk spines in 36-73 circles, extending<br />
to just anterior to posterior end;<br />
lemnisci unequal; testes small, less<br />
than 0.5 mm long Pallisentis<br />
(P.) gomtii Gupta and Verma, 1980<br />
Female trunk spines in 10-20 circles, extending<br />
only to anterior third of trunk;<br />
lemnisci equal; testes large, more than<br />
1.0 mm long 20<br />
20. Proboscis hooks 8 per circle; testes equatorial;<br />
cement gland 2.2-3.0 mm long<br />
Pallisentis (P.) sindensis Khan and<br />
Bilqees, 1987<br />
Proboscis hooks 10 per circle; testes<br />
postequatorial; cement gland short,<br />
0.7—1.6 long Pallisentis (P.) gaboes<br />
(MacCallum, 1918) Van Cleave, 1928<br />
21. Proboscis hooks 6-7 per circle 22<br />
Proboscis hooks 8-12 per circle 23<br />
22. Proboscis hooks 6 per circle; anterior<br />
hooks 89-119 long; cement gland with<br />
16 giant nuclei Pallisentis<br />
(P.) umbellatus Van Cleave, 1928<br />
Proboscis hooks 7 per circle; anterior<br />
hooks 60-70 long; cement gland with<br />
10—12 nuclei Pallisentis pesteri<br />
(Tadros, 1966) Showhan, Gupta,<br />
and Khera, 1987<br />
23. Cement gland with 12-14 giant nuclei;<br />
lemnisci equal 24<br />
Cement gland with 23-25 giant nuclei;<br />
lemnisci unequal 25<br />
24. Proboscis hooks 8 per circle; collar<br />
spines in 6-7 circles each with 29—40<br />
spines; trunk spines in 8—13 circles<br />
each with 30—41 spines with sclerotized,<br />
large, variably shaped beds; tes-<br />
AMIN ET AL.—REVISION OF THE GENUS PALLISENTIS 49<br />
tes longer than 0.7 mm Pallisentis<br />
(P.) celatus Van Cleave, 1928<br />
Proboscis hooks 10—12 per circle; collar<br />
spines in 15-17 circles each with 18-<br />
20 spines; trunk spines in 21-22<br />
(males), <strong>67</strong> (females) circles each with<br />
16-20 simple triangular spines; testes<br />
0.28-0.42 long<br />
- Pallisentis (P.) colisai Sakkar, 1954<br />
25. Proboscis hooks 93, 80, 60, 33 long<br />
(from anterior); trunk spines in 44-55<br />
circles, each with 16-20 spines; female<br />
gonopore posteroventral<br />
Pallisentis (P.) nandai Sarkar, 1953<br />
Proboscis hooks 62-64, 49-54, 36-46,<br />
24-28 long (from anterior); trunk<br />
spines in 25-26 circles, each with 10<br />
spines; female gonopore terminal<br />
Pallisentis (P.) singaporensis Khan<br />
and Ip, 1988<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Arnold, J. G., Jr., H. E. Schafer, and R. L. Vulliet.<br />
1968 The parasites of the freshwater fishes of<br />
Louisiana. Proceedings of the Southeastern Association<br />
of Game and Fish Commission Annual<br />
Conference 21:531-543.<br />
Baylis, M. A. 1933. On some parasitic worms from<br />
Java, with remarks on the acanthocephalan genus<br />
Pallisentis. Annals and Magazine of Natural History,<br />
Series 10 12:443-449.<br />
Chowhan, J. S., N. K. Gupta, and S. Khera. 1987.<br />
On two species of the genus Pallisentis Van<br />
Cleave, 1928 from fishes of Gobindsagar Lake<br />
and synonymy of the genus Saccosentis Tadros,<br />
1966. Research Bulletin of the Panjab University,<br />
Science 38:21-26.<br />
Farooqi, H. U. 1958. A new species of the genus Pallisentis<br />
from a fresh-water eel. Zeitschrift fur Parasitenkunde<br />
18:457-464.<br />
Fernando, C. H., and J. I. Furtado. 1963. A study<br />
of some helminth parasites of freshwater fishes in<br />
Ceylon. Zeitschrift fur Parasitenkunde 23:141-<br />
163.<br />
Golvan, Y. J. 1959. Le phylum de Acanthocephala.<br />
Deuxieme note. La classe de Eoacanthocephala<br />
(Van Cleave, 1936). Annales de Parasitologie Humaine<br />
et Comparee 34:5-52.<br />
. 1994. Nomenclature of the Acanthocephala.<br />
Research and Reviews in <strong>Parasitology</strong> 54:135-<br />
205.<br />
Gupta, S. P., and S. L. Verma. 1980. On three new<br />
Acanthocephala parasites of the genus Pallisentis<br />
Van Cleave, 1928 from freshwater fishes of Lucknow.<br />
Helminthologia 17:269-282.<br />
Gupta, V., and S. Fatma. 1986. On some acanthocephalan<br />
parasites (Family Quadrigyridae Van<br />
Cleave, 1920) from fishes of Uttar Pradesh and<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
50 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Helminthology 37:<br />
149-180.<br />
Ha, K. 1969. Parasite fauna of some freshwater fishes<br />
in North Vietnam and measures against the most<br />
important fish diseases. Avtoreferat Kanditatska<br />
Dissertasia Zoologia Institut AN S.S.S.R., Leningrad,<br />
18 pp. (In Russian.)<br />
Harada, I. 1935. Zur Acanthocephalenfauna von Japan.<br />
Memoirs of the Faculty of Science and Agriculture,<br />
Taihoku Imperial University of Formosa,<br />
Japan 14:7-23.<br />
Jain, M., and N. K. Gupta. 1979. On two already<br />
known species of the genus Pallisentis Van<br />
Cleave, 1928 (Acanthocephala) and discussion on<br />
the validity of Pallisentis buckleyi Tadros, 1966<br />
and genus Devendrosentis Sahay, Sinha et<br />
Ghosgh, 1971. Helminthologia 16:173-183.<br />
Kennedy, M. J. 1981. Pallisentis nagpurensis (Bhalerao,<br />
1931) (Acanthocephala: Quadrigyridae)<br />
from the gabus, Ophiocephalus striatus, from Depok,<br />
Indonesia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 59:<br />
1847-1851.<br />
Khan, A., and F. M. Bilqees. 1987. Two new Acanthocephala<br />
species from freshwater fishes of Kalri<br />
Lake. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 19:263-271.<br />
Khan, M. M., and Y. K. Ip. 1988. Pallisentis singaporensis<br />
new species (Acanthocephala: Quadrigyridae)<br />
from the mudskipper, Periophthalmodon<br />
schlosseri in Singapore. Journal of the Singapore<br />
National Academy of Science 17:24-27.<br />
Meyer, A. 1932. Acanthocephala. Dr. H. G. Bronns,<br />
Klassen und Ordnungen des Tier-Reichs, Leipzig<br />
4:1-332.<br />
Moravec, F., and O. Sey. 1989. Acanthocephalans of<br />
freshwater fishes from North Vietnam. Vestnik<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Ceskoslovenske Spolecnosti Zoologicke 53:89-<br />
106.<br />
Pearse, A. S. 1933. Parasites of Siamese fishes and<br />
crustaceans. Journal of the Siamese Society of<br />
Natural History (Suppl. 9):179-191 (+ 30 figs.)<br />
Petrochenko, V. I. 1956. Acanthocephala of domestic<br />
and wild animals. Vol. 1. Izdatel'stvo Academii<br />
Nauk S.S.S.R., Moscow. (English translation by<br />
Israel Program for Scientific Translations Ltd.,<br />
1971, 465 pp.)<br />
Soota, T. D., and S. B. Bhattacharya. 1982. On the<br />
validity of the species of the genus Pallisentis Van<br />
Cleave, 1928 (Acanthocephala: Pallisentidae)<br />
from the Indian subcontinent. Records of the Zoological<br />
Survey of India 80:157-1<strong>67</strong>.<br />
Tadros, G. 1966. On three new Acanthocephala of the<br />
genera Pallisentis Van Cleave, Saccosentis gen.<br />
nov. and Acanthocephalus Koelreuther, from fish.<br />
Journal of Helminthology 40:155-180.<br />
Troncy, P. M. 1978. Nouvelles observations sur les<br />
parasites de poissons du bassin tchadien. Bulletin<br />
de 1'Institut Fondamental d'Afrique Noire 40:<br />
528-552.<br />
Van Cleave, H. J. 1928. Acanthocephala from China.<br />
I. New species and new genera from Chinese fishes.<br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong> 20:1-9.<br />
Williams, J. S., D. I. Gibson, and A. Sadighian.<br />
1980. Some helminth-parasites of Iranian freshwater<br />
fishes. Journal of Natural History 14:685-<br />
699.<br />
Yamaguti, S. 1954. Parasitic worms from Celebes.<br />
Part 8. Acanthocephala. Acta Medicinae Okayama<br />
8:406-413.<br />
. 1963. Systema Helminthum. Vol. V. Acanthocephala.<br />
Interscience Publishers, New York, 423<br />
pp.
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 51-59<br />
Two New Species of Popovastrongylus Mawson, 1977 (Nematoda:<br />
Cloacinidae) from Macropodid Marsupials in Australia<br />
L. R. SMALES<br />
School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton,<br />
Queensland 4702, Australia (e-mail: l.warner@cqu.edu.au)<br />
ABSTRACT: The cephalic anatomy of Popovastrongylus wallabiae (Johnson and Mawson) is described, giving<br />
additional morphological details. New species of Popovastrongylus (Nematoda: Cloacinidae: Cloacininae) are<br />
described. Popovastrongylus tasmaniensis sp. n. from Thylogale billardierii (Desmarest) from Tasmania, Australia,<br />
has an oval mouth opening and buccal capsule, and the intestinal wall extends anteriorly to surround the<br />
esophageal bulb. Popovastrongylus pluteus sp. n. from Macropus robust us Gould from New South Wales,<br />
Australia, is similar to Popovastrongylus pearsoni (Johnson and Mawson) in having, among other characters, a<br />
shelf-like projection in the buccal capsule. It differs from P. pearsoni in having a circular mouth opening and<br />
buccal capsule rather than a quadrangular mouth opening and slightly oval buccal capsule. Species of Popovastrongylus<br />
infect mainly pademelons, Thylogale spp., and the smaller wallabies, Macropus rufogriseus Desmarest,<br />
Macropus irma (Desmarest), and Macropus eugenii (Desmarest). It also occurs in the larger kangaroos,<br />
Macropus rufus (Desmarest), Macropus giganteus Shaw, and M. robustus, in northern Australia where it is<br />
uncommon. In southern Australia the only kangaroo hosts known are Macropus fuliginosus (Desmarest) on<br />
Kangaroo Island, off the shore of South Australia, M. robustus in New South Wales, and an accidental infection<br />
of M. robustus in the Australian Capital Territory.<br />
KEY WORDS: Nematoda, marsupials, macropodids, Popovastrongylus wallabiae, Popovastrongylus tasmaniensis<br />
sp. n., Popovastrongylus pluteus sp. n., Macropus robustus, Thylogale billardierii, taxonomy, Australia.<br />
More than 40 genera of the strongylid family<br />
Cloacinidae (Stossich, 1899) are found in the<br />
large herbivorous marsupials, kangaroos, wallabies,<br />
and wombats of Australia, Irian Jaya, and<br />
Papua New Guinea (Beveridge, 1987). Popovastrongylus<br />
Mawson, 1977, was erected to contain<br />
those species occurring in the stomachs of<br />
macropodid marsupials (kangaroos and wallabies)<br />
that had, among other characters, 4 submedian<br />
papillae and 2 amphids borne on a cephalic<br />
collar, a circular to oval mouth opening,<br />
and a cylindrical to oval buccal capsule with a<br />
thick transparent inner layer that may form a<br />
shelf-like structure in the lumen. Mawson<br />
(1977) included 3 species, Popovastrongylus<br />
wallabiae (Johnston and Mawson, 1939), the<br />
type species, Popovastrongylus pearsoni (Johnston<br />
and Mawson, 1940), and Popovastrongylus<br />
irma Mawson, 1977, in the new genus. Subsequently<br />
Beveridge (1986) revised the group, expanding<br />
the generic definition to encompass a<br />
quadrilateral, triangular, or small and triradiate<br />
mouth opening and to include a labial collar, internal<br />
to the cephalic collar, the buccal capsule<br />
sclerotized, often with annular thickening, and<br />
the lining inflated and/or forming a shelf. He<br />
redescribed P. pearsoni, indicating additional<br />
features not given in the earlier descriptions by<br />
51<br />
Johnston and Mawson (1939) and Mawson<br />
(1971, 1977) and described 2 new species, Popovastrongylus<br />
macropodis Beveridge, 1986,<br />
and Popovastrongylus thylogale Beveridge,<br />
1986.<br />
Known hosts for species of Popovastrongylus<br />
are Macropus rufogriseus (Desmarest, 1817)<br />
(the red-necked wallaby); Macropus fuliginosus<br />
(Desmarest, 1817) (the western grey kangaroo);<br />
Macropus eugenii (Desmarest, 1817) (the tammar<br />
wallaby); Macropus irma (Jourdan, 1837)<br />
(the western brush wallaby); Macropus rufus<br />
(Desmarest, 1822) (the red kangaroo); Macropus<br />
giganteus Shaw, 1790 (the eastern grey kangaroo);<br />
Macropus robustus Gould, 1841 (the common<br />
wallaroo); Thylogale stigmatica Gould,<br />
1860 (the red-legged pademelon); Thylogale<br />
brunii (Schreber, 1778) (the dusky pademelon);<br />
Thylogale thetis (Lesson, 1827) (the red-necked<br />
pademelon); and Petrogale persephone Maynes,<br />
1982 (the Proserpine rock-wallaby).<br />
Collections of material from M. robustus and<br />
Thylogale billardierii (Desmarest, 1822) in the<br />
South Australian Museum, Adelaide (SAMA),<br />
were found to have 2 new species of Popovastrongylus,<br />
which are described in this paper.<br />
The cephalic anatomy of P. wallabiae, examined<br />
for comparative puiposes, is also described in<br />
greater detail than previously given.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
52 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Materials and Methods<br />
No details of hosts, beyond those given below, are<br />
known, and there is no record of host bodies having<br />
been deposited in any museum. All the parasite material<br />
studied had been deposited in the SAMA. Its<br />
preservation history is not known, but probably it was<br />
fixed in 5%—10% formalin before being stored in 70%<br />
ethanol. Specimens were cleared for study in temporary<br />
wet mounts in lactophcnol prior to examination<br />
with the aid of interference contrast light microscopy.<br />
Measurements were made with the aid of an ocular<br />
micrometer or drawing tube and map measurer. Unless<br />
otherwise stated, measurements are given in micrometers<br />
as a range followed by the mean in parentheses.<br />
Drawings were prepared with the aid of a drawing<br />
tube. Terminology used follows that of Beveridge<br />
(1986).<br />
Results<br />
Popovastrongylus wallabiae (Johnston and<br />
Mawson, 1939) Mawson, 1977<br />
(Figs. 1-6)<br />
SYNONYMS: Macropostrongylus wallabiae<br />
Johnson and Mawson, 1939; Gelanostrongylus<br />
wallabiae Popova, 1952.<br />
GENERAL: Cloacinidae: Cloacininae. With<br />
characters of the genus Popovastrongylus as described<br />
by Johnston and Mawson (1939) and<br />
Mawson (1977) and redefined by Beveridge<br />
(1986). <strong>Comparative</strong> measurements of specimens<br />
from New South Wales and Tasmania are<br />
given in Table 1.<br />
DESCRIPTION OF CEPHALIC END: Mouth opening<br />
quadrangular in apical view, surrounded by<br />
elevated, finely striated labial collar, indented at<br />
corners on external margin by submedian papillae;<br />
amphids on lateral projections external to<br />
labial collar; submedian papillae each with 2<br />
short, medially directed setae; cephalic collar<br />
present posterior to labial collar, bearing papillae<br />
and amphids. Buccal capsule approximately cylindrical,<br />
longer than wide, thickened anteriorly;<br />
internal lining of buccal capsule thick, transparent,<br />
almost occluding lumen anteriorly but not<br />
forming shelf-like projection; outer wall of buccal<br />
capsule sclerotized, refractile, thickened in<br />
mid region, nonstriated; buccal capsule circular<br />
in cross section.<br />
TYPE SPECIMENS: Holotype male, allotype female,<br />
SAMA AHC V2832.<br />
TYPE HOST: Macropus rufogriseus (Desmarest,<br />
1817).<br />
SITE OF INFECTION: Stomach.<br />
LOCALITY: Bathurst District, New South<br />
Wales.<br />
SPECIMENS STUDIED: Types from M. rufogriseus:<br />
Southern Queensland: 3 female, 1 male, no<br />
other collection data, SAMA AHC 6004; from<br />
Tasmania: 3 male, 2 female from Launceston, 18<br />
April 1973, SAMA AHC 6006; 3 male, 1 female<br />
from Pipers River, collector D. Obendorf 26 January<br />
1982, SAMA AHC 16410.<br />
REMARKS: This species was clearly differentiated<br />
from P. pearsoni, the other species of<br />
Popovastrongylus occurring in M. rufogriseus,<br />
by Mawson (1977). Furthermore, Beveridge<br />
(1986, pp. 263-264, Fig. 3A, B), in his redescription<br />
of the cephalic end of P. pearsoni, noted<br />
and figured a shelf-like projection of the inner<br />
lining of the buccal capsule. Mawson (1977) described<br />
a narrow shelf toward the anterior end<br />
of the buccal capsule of the type, but not other<br />
specimens of P. wallabiae. Careful examination<br />
of specimens of P. wallabiae in this study has<br />
shown that a shelf-like projection is not present,<br />
but the inner lining of the buccal capsule is<br />
thickest at the anterior end.<br />
Mawson (1977) listed Macropostrongylus<br />
wallabiae Johnston and Mawson, 1939 p. 526<br />
from Wallabia bicolor Desmarest, 1804, as a<br />
synonym of P. wallabiae. This is in error, as M.<br />
wallabiae was described by Johnston and Mawson<br />
(1939) from Macropus ruficollis (=M. rufogriseus).<br />
The material from Macropus ualabatus<br />
( = W. bicolor), originally described as Macropostrongylus<br />
dissimilis Johnston and Mawson,<br />
1939, was subsequently identified as<br />
Arundelia dissimilis (Johnston and Mawson,<br />
1939) by Mawson (1977). Wallabia bicolor<br />
therefore is not a host for P. wallabiae.<br />
Popovastrongylus tasmaniensis sp. n.<br />
(Figs. 7-21)<br />
Description<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Small worms, body<br />
covered with numerous fine transverse striations;<br />
mouth opening oval; surrounded by elevated,<br />
finely striated collar, indented on external margin;<br />
cephalic collar present, posterior to labial<br />
collar, bearing 2 amphids and 4 cephalic papillae,<br />
each with 2 prominent setae. Buccal capsule<br />
cylindrical, oval in cross-section, slightly longer<br />
than wide; walls sclerotized, refractile internal<br />
lining thick, transparent, expanded anteriorly.<br />
Esophageal corpus long, cylindrical; isthmus<br />
short; bulb ovoid; deirids anterior to nerve ring,<br />
excretory pore in mid-esophageal position, pos-
SMALES—POPOVASTRONGYLUS FROM MARSUPIALS 53<br />
Figures 1-8. Popovastrongylus wallabiae from Macropus rufogriseus. 1. Cephalic end, optical section<br />
(ventral view). 2. Cephalic end, optical section (lateral view). 3. Cephalic collar (lateral view). 4. Cephalic<br />
collar (ventral view). 5. Mouth opening (apical view). 6. Buccal capsule, optical transverse section showing<br />
thickened internal lining. 7, 8. Popovastrongylus tasmaniensis sp. n. from Thylogale billardierii. 1. Ovejector<br />
(lateral view). 8. Female tail (lateral view). Scale bars: Figures 1-4 = 25 urn; Figures 5, 6 = 10 u.m;<br />
Figure 7 = 50 (xm; Figure 8 = 200 u.m.<br />
terior to nerve ring. Intestinal wall extending anteriorly,<br />
surrounding esophageal bulb.<br />
MALES (measurements of 10 specimens):<br />
Length 6.5-9.0 (7.5) mm; width 310-460 (385);<br />
buccal capsule 50-60 (53) long by 23-43 (38)<br />
wide; esophagus 1.04-1.75 (1.61) mm long;<br />
nerve ring 535-740 (655), deirids 210-300<br />
(265), excretory pore 690-920 (800) from anterior<br />
end; spicules 1.16-1.45 (1.33) mm. Dorsal<br />
and lateral lobes of bursa about equal in length;<br />
ventral lobes shorter. Ventral rays apposed,<br />
reaching margin of bursa; externolateral ray divergent,<br />
shorter, almost reaching margin of bursa;<br />
mediolateral and posterolateral rays apposed,<br />
reaching margin of bursa; externodorsal ray arising<br />
close to lateral trunk, not reaching margin of<br />
bursa; dorsal ray long, slender at origin, dividing<br />
at midlength into 2 arcuate branches that reach<br />
margin of bursa; lateral branchlets short, arising<br />
soon after bifurcation, terminating in small ele-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Table 1. <strong>Comparative</strong> measurements (mm) of Popovastrongylus wallabiae from Macropus rufogiseus<br />
Mawson, 1939), and from Launceston and Pipers River, Tasmania.<br />
New South Wales<br />
Female<br />
Male<br />
(« = 5)<br />
6.0-9.5 (7.7)<br />
0.22-0.40 (0.33)<br />
Male<br />
11.4<br />
—<br />
8.4<br />
—<br />
0.025-0.045<br />
0.80<br />
Popovastrongylus tasmaniensis sp. n. is readily<br />
distinguished from its congeners by its oval<br />
mouth opening and buccal capsule, in having the<br />
intestinal wall extending anteriorly to surround<br />
the esophageal bulb, and spicules longer than<br />
1150 (Jim. Popovastrongylus pearsoni, which<br />
also occurs in M. rufogriseus from Tasmania<br />
(Mawson, 1977), has a distinct shelf-like projec-<br />
0.025-0.03 (0.025) X 0.048-0<br />
1.00-1.09 (1.04)<br />
0.23-0.33 (0.27)<br />
0.40-0.48 (0.44)<br />
0.48-0.64 (0.56)<br />
0.84-0.97 (0.92)<br />
—<br />
—<br />
—<br />
—<br />
—<br />
—<br />
—<br />
—<br />
—<br />
0.80<br />
0.30<br />
—<br />
0.25<br />
—<br />
—<br />
0.80<br />
—<br />
—<br />
—<br />
Remarks<br />
TYPE SPECIMENS: Holotype male SAMA<br />
AHC 31310; allotype female SAMA AHC<br />
31311; paratypes 5 male, 10 female SAMA<br />
AHC 19844.<br />
TYPE HOST: Thylogale billardierii (Desmarest,<br />
1822).<br />
TYPE LOCALITY: Launceston, Tasmania.<br />
SITE OF INFECTION: Stomach.<br />
SPECIMENS STUDIED: Types from T. billardierii,<br />
from Tasmania; 10 male, 14 female from<br />
Launceston, collectors D. Obendorf, I. B everidge,<br />
20 February 1990, 18 November 1991,<br />
SAMA AHC 19844, AHC 19791, AHC 26578;<br />
3 male, 4 female from Piper's River, collector<br />
D. Obendorf, 26 January 1983, SAMA AHC<br />
16373, AHC 31312; 1 female from Georgetown,<br />
collector D. Obendorf, 28 June 1982, SAMA<br />
AHC 16398; 2 female from Golconda, collector<br />
I. Beveridge, April 1977, SAMA AHC 13925.<br />
ETYMOLOGY: The name of the new species<br />
refers to its type locality.<br />
— 0.13 X 0.07 —<br />
Length<br />
Width<br />
Buccal capsule:<br />
Width X depth<br />
Esophagus<br />
Deirids<br />
Nerve ring<br />
Excretory pore (from anterior end)<br />
Spicules<br />
Vulva to posterior<br />
Tail<br />
Vagina<br />
Eggs<br />
I t!J j<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
vations on internal surface of bursa. Anterior lip
tion in a circular buccal capsule. The nerve ring<br />
is in the mid-esophageal position in P. tasmaniensis<br />
but is posterior and surrounds the isthmus<br />
in P. pearsoni. Popovastrongylus wallabiae, the<br />
other species occuring in Tasmania (Mawson,<br />
1977), has a quadrangular mouth opening and a<br />
buccal capsule circular in cross-section. The<br />
submedian papillae of P. wallabiae are short,<br />
and the setae are not easily seen at low magnifications,<br />
while P. tasmaniensis has prominent<br />
papillae and setae. The dorsal lobe of the bursa<br />
of P. tasmaniensis is shorter (about the same<br />
length as the lateral lobes), not longer than the<br />
lateral lobes as in P. wallabiae. Additional characters<br />
that distinguish P. tasmaniensis from P.<br />
irma are not having the base of the buccal capsule<br />
thickened by an outer sclerotized ring and<br />
having the nerve ring in a mid-esophageal, not<br />
posterior, position surrounding the isthmus. The<br />
shape of the posterior end of the female of P.<br />
irma, constricted between vulva and anus and<br />
markedly swollen in the vaginal region, is<br />
unique to P. irma.<br />
Popovastrongylus thylogale, also occurring in<br />
pademelons, can be further distinguished from<br />
P. tasmaniensis by an annular thickening around<br />
the middle of the buccal capsule, the posterior<br />
position of the nerve ring, and the dorsal lobe<br />
longer than the lateral lobes of the bursa.<br />
Popovastrongylus tasmaniensis differs further<br />
from P. macropodis in having a relatively thinner<br />
inflation of the lining of the buccal capsule,<br />
which is expanded anteriorly but does not almost<br />
occlude the lumen as in P. macropodis.<br />
Popovastrongylus pluteus sp. n.<br />
(Figs. 22-31)<br />
Description<br />
GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Small worms; body<br />
covered with numerous fine transverse striations;<br />
mouth opening circular, surrounded by elevated,<br />
finely striated collar indented on external margin;<br />
cephalic collar present, posterior to lateral<br />
collar bearing 2 amphids and 4 cephalic papillae<br />
each with 2 setae. Buccal capsule cylindrical,<br />
circular in cross-section, longer than wide; walls<br />
sclerotized, refractile, thickened in posterior<br />
part; inner lining thick, transparent, folded in<br />
mid-region to produce irregular shelf-like projection,<br />
almost occluding lumen. Esophageal<br />
corpus long, isthmus not distinct, bulb ovoid.<br />
MALES (measurements of 2 specimens):<br />
SMALES—POPOVASTRONGYLUS FROM MARSUPIALS 55<br />
Length 5, 6 mm; width 240, 290; buccal capsule<br />
33, 46 long by 26, 26 wide; esophagus 0.985,<br />
1.01 mm long; nerve ring to anterior end 402,<br />
402; deirids to anterior end 135, excretory pore<br />
to anterior end 470, 455. Spicules 950. Dorsal<br />
and lateral lobes of bursa about equal in length,<br />
ventral lobes shorter. Ventral rays apposed,<br />
reaching margin of bursa; externolateral ray divergent,<br />
almost reaching margin of bursa; mediolateral<br />
and posterolateral rays apposed, reaching<br />
margin of bursa; externodorsal ray arising<br />
close to lateral trunk, almost reaching margin of<br />
bursa; dorsal ray dividing at midlength into 2<br />
arcuate branches that reach margin of bursa, lateral<br />
branchlets short, arising close to bifurcation;<br />
terminating in small elevations on internal surface<br />
of bursa. Anterior lip of genital cone large<br />
and conical, with single apical papilla; posterior<br />
lip smaller, with 2 bilobed appendages. Spicules<br />
elongate, alate, tips not seen. Gubernaculum absent.<br />
FEMALES (measurements of 10 specimens):<br />
Length 7-8 (7.4) mm; width 255-375 (305);<br />
buccal capsule 35-50 (40) long by 22-30 (26)<br />
wide; esophagus 1.02-1.14 (1.08) mm long;<br />
nerve ring 345-390 (370), deirids 105-140<br />
(125), excretory pore 400-475 (435) from anterior<br />
end; tail 470-585 (530) long, vulva to<br />
posterior end 705-885 (790); vagina 400-595<br />
(505); eggs 95-105 (100) by 42-52 (45). Tail<br />
long, slender with conical tip; vulva immediately<br />
anterior to anus; vagina short, broad at anterior<br />
end, ovejector with vestibule and sphincters<br />
about same length, infundibula shorter; eggs ellipsoidal.<br />
Taxonomic Summary<br />
TYPE SPECIMENS: Holotype male SAM A AHC<br />
31253, allotype female AHC 31324, paratypes 3<br />
female, 1 male AHC 14546.<br />
TYPE HOST: Macropus robustus Gould, 1841.<br />
TYPE LOCALITY: Rivertree, New South Wales.<br />
SITE OF INFECTION: Stomach.<br />
SPECIMENS STUDIED: Types from M. robustus,<br />
New South Wales; 17 female from Rivertree,<br />
28 August 1975, SAMA AHC 31252.<br />
ETYMOLOGY: The specific name refers to the<br />
shelf-like projection in the buccal capsule.<br />
Remarks<br />
Popovastrongylus pluteus sp. n. is 1 of 2 species<br />
with a shelf-like projection in the buccal<br />
capsule, the other being P. pearsoni. Popova-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
56 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
strongylus pluteus differs from P. pearsoni in<br />
the shape of the mouth opening, circular not<br />
quadrangular in apical view; the buccal capsule<br />
circular in cross section rather than slightly oval;<br />
and the amphids not on extremely prominent lateral<br />
projections. The nerve ring and excretory<br />
pore of P. pearsoni are more posterior (Mawson,<br />
1977, Fig. 31, p. 57), with the nerve ring surrounding<br />
the junction of the isthmus and corpus<br />
of the esophagus, than in P. pluteus, which has<br />
the nerve ring and excretory pore in the midesophageal<br />
region. The branchlets of the dorsal<br />
ray of P. pluteus arise closer to its bifurcation<br />
than do those of P. pearsoni.<br />
Popovastrongylus pluteus is similar in general<br />
features to P. wallabiae but differs in the features<br />
of the cephalic end, particularly in the form<br />
of the inner lining of the buccal capsule. Popovastrongylus<br />
wallabiae does not have an internal<br />
shelf, and the shape of the mouth opening is<br />
circular, not quadrangular. The deirids, nerve<br />
ring, and excretory pore of P. pluteus, although<br />
located in the mid-region of the esophagus, are<br />
each more anterior than their counterparts on P.<br />
wallabiae (135, 402, and 463 compared with<br />
270, 440, and 560, respectively, for males). The<br />
dorsal lobe of the bursa of P. pluteus is about<br />
the same length as the lateral lobes, but in P.<br />
wallabiae it is longer. The vagina of P. wallabiae<br />
(370-400) is shorter and its eggs (95-105<br />
by 42-52) are smaller (135 by 70) than in P.<br />
pluteus.<br />
Popovastrongylus pluteus can be distinguished<br />
from P. macropodis, which also occurs<br />
in M. robustus, by the presence of a shelf in the<br />
buccal capsule and in having a circular, not triangular<br />
mouth opening. The buccal capsule is<br />
more slender than that of P. macopodis (40 X<br />
26 compared with 37 X 30), and the inner lining<br />
is not as inflated as that of P. macropodis. The<br />
vagina is longer (400-595) in P. pluteus, compared<br />
with 360—400 in P. macropodis.<br />
SMALES—POPOVASTRONCYLUS FROM MARSUPIALS 57<br />
Discussion<br />
This study has increased the number of<br />
known hosts of Popovastrongylus to include T.<br />
billardierii and extended the known distribution<br />
of the genus to include New South Wales. Of<br />
the 2 new species, P. tasmaniensis has been<br />
found only in T. billardierii, the Tasmanian pademelon,<br />
from Tasmanian localities, and P. pluteus<br />
only in M. robustus, the common wallaroo<br />
from New South Wales.<br />
Of the previously known species, P. macropodis<br />
is found in wallaroos as well as the other<br />
large kangaroos, M. rufus and M. giganteus, the<br />
red and eastern grey kangaroos, but only in<br />
northern Queensland (Beveridge, 1986; Arundel<br />
et al., 1979, 1990). Popovastrongylus thylogale,<br />
also found in pademelons, has a distribution limited<br />
to T. stigmatica, the red-legged pademelon,<br />
and T. thetis, the red-necked pademelon in<br />
Queensland. There is a single report of an accidental<br />
infection of P. thylogale from a captive<br />
agile wallaby, Macropus agilis (Gould, 1842)<br />
(Spratt et al., 1991). Popovastrongylus thylogale<br />
does not, however, occur in free-ranging agile<br />
wallabies (Speare et al., 1983). Other northern<br />
hosts of this parasite are P. persephone, the<br />
Proserpine rock-wallaby, a host that harbors several<br />
nematode species that normally occur in pademelons<br />
and are not normally found in other<br />
species of rock-wallaby (Begg et al., 1995; Beveridge,<br />
1986), and T. brunii, the dusky pademelon,<br />
found only in Papua New Guinea. This<br />
latter occurrence emphasizes the northern distribution<br />
of P. thylogale as it has been found in<br />
neither the red-legged pademelon nor the rednecked<br />
pademelon in New South Wales (Beveridge,<br />
1986; Smales, 1997).<br />
Popovastrongylus wallabiae occurs only in<br />
the red-necked wallaby, M. rufogriseus, and is<br />
the most widely distributed species of the genus,<br />
being found in southern Queensland and Tasmania<br />
(Mawson, 1977). It has not been reported<br />
Figures 9-21. Popovastrongylus tasmaniensis sp. n. from Thylogale billardierii. 9. Anterior end (ventral<br />
view). 10. Cephalic end, optical section (lateral view). 11. Cephalic end, optical section (ventral view). 12.<br />
Buccal capsule, transverse optical section, at mid-level. 13. Spicule, anterior end (lateral view). 14. Spicule<br />
tip (lateral view). 15. Cephalic collar (lateral view). 16. Cephalic end (dorsal view). 17. Buccal capsule,<br />
transverse optical section at posterior level. 18. Genital cone (dorsal view). 19. Mouth opening (en face<br />
view). 20. Bursa (apical view). 21. Bursa (lateral view). Scale bars: Figure 9 = 200 u.m; Figures 10, 11,<br />
13-16, 18 = 25 jjim; Figures 12, 17, 19 = 10 |xm; Figures 20, 21 = 50 u.m.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
58 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Figures 22—31. Popovastrongylus pluteus sp. n. from Macropus robustus. 22. Anterior end (lateral view).<br />
23. Cephalic end, optical section (lateral view). 24. Mouth opening (en face view). 25. Cephalic end, optical<br />
section (ventral view). 26. Cephalic collar (lateral view). 27. Buccal capsule, transverse optical section at<br />
level of shelf. 28. Bursa (ventral view). 29. Bursa (lateral view). 30. Ovejector (lateral view). 31. Female<br />
posterior end (lateral view). Scale bars: Figures 22, 31 = 200 urn; Figures 23, 25, 26 = 25 |xm; Figures<br />
24, 27 = 10 urn; Figures 28, 29 = 50 (mm; Figure 30 = 100 |xm.<br />
in red-necked wallabies from New South Wales,<br />
Victoria, or South Australia. This may be because<br />
of either a lack of sampling effort (the<br />
parasite being present but not detected) or a disjunct<br />
distribution of the parasite. Popovastrongylus<br />
pearsoni also occurs in red-necked wallabies<br />
from the same localities in Tasmania as<br />
P. wallabiae and has only been found on con-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
tinental Australia in a common wallaroo in the<br />
Tidbinbilla Nature Reserve in the Australian<br />
Capital Territory. Since the macropod population<br />
on the reserve includes red-necked wallabies,<br />
tammars, and species of rock-wallaby, it is<br />
reasonable to suppose that this record was an<br />
accidental infection. It does, however, occur in<br />
3 other hosts, the tammar and western grey kan-
garoo from Kangaroo Island (Smales and Mawson,<br />
1978; Beveridge, 1986) and Petrogale lateralis<br />
Gould, 1842, the black-footed wallaby<br />
from Pearson Island (Johnston and Mawson,<br />
1940; Mawson, 1971; Beveridge, 1986), both<br />
southern localities offshore from South Australia.<br />
Popovastrongylus irma is found only in the<br />
western brush wallaby in southwestern Australia<br />
(Mawson, 1977), but in contrast to P. pearsoni<br />
it has not been reported from sympatric hosts in<br />
the region.<br />
In general, species of Popovastrongylus infect<br />
mainly pademelons and the small wallabies, M.<br />
irma, M. eugenii, and M. rufogriseus. The genus<br />
is not common in the larger kangaroos from<br />
northern Queensland, with only 1 or 2 nematodes<br />
present in each individual host (Beveridge,<br />
1986) and does not normally occur in kangaroos<br />
in the southern states (Beveridge and Arundel,<br />
1979; Arundel et al., 1979, 1990). Neither is the<br />
genus found in Wallabia bicolor, the swamp<br />
wallaby (Beveridge et al., 1985), nor the macropodid<br />
genera Hypsiprymnodon, Aepyprymnus,<br />
Onychogalea, Lagorchestes, or Dendrolagus<br />
(Beveridge et al., 1992).<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
My thanks go to Ms. J. Forrest from the South<br />
Australian Museum for making material available<br />
and to Dr. I. Beveridge for his unfailing<br />
help and generosity.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Arundel, J. H., I. Beveridge, and P. J. Presidente.<br />
1979. Parasites and pathological findings in enclosed<br />
and free-ranging populations of Macropus<br />
rufiis (Desmarest) (Marsupialia) at Menindee,<br />
New South Wales. Australian Wildlife Research<br />
6:361-379.<br />
, K. J. Dempster, K. E. Harrigan, and R.<br />
Black. 1990. Epidemiological observations on the<br />
helminth parasites of Macropus giganteus Shaw<br />
in Victoria. Australian Wildlife Research 17:39-<br />
51.<br />
Begg, M., I. Beveridge, N. B. Chilton, P. M. Johnson,<br />
and M. G. O'Callaghan. 1995. Parasites of<br />
the Proserpine rock wallaby, Petrogale persepho-<br />
SMALES—POPOVASTRONGYLUS FROM MARSUPIALS 59<br />
ne (Marsupialia: Macropodidae). Australian Mammalogy<br />
18:45-53.<br />
Beveridge, I. 1986. New species and new records of<br />
Popovastrongylus Mawson, 1977 (Nematoda:<br />
Cloacininae) from Australian marsupials. Bulletin<br />
du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 4th Series<br />
8:257-265.<br />
. 1987. The systematic status of Australian<br />
Strongyloidea. Bulletin du Museum National<br />
d'Histoire Naturelle, 4th Series 9:107-126.<br />
, and J. H. Arundel. 1979. Helminth parasites<br />
of grey kangaroos, Macropus giganteus Shaw and<br />
M. fuliginosus (Desmarest) in Eastern Australia.<br />
Australian Wildlife Research 6:69-77.<br />
, P. J. A. Presidente, and R. Speare. 1985.<br />
Parasites and associated pathology of the swamp<br />
wallaby, Wallabia bicolor (Marsupialia). Journal<br />
of Wildlife Diseases 21:377-385.<br />
-, R. Speare, P. M. Johnson, and D. M.<br />
Spratt. 1992. Helminth parasite communities of<br />
macropodoid marsupials of the genera Hypsiprymnodon,<br />
Aepyprymnus, Thylogale, Onychogalea,<br />
Lagorchestes and Dendrolagus from Queensland.<br />
Wildlife Research 19:359-376.<br />
Johnston, T. H., and P. M. Mawson. 1939. Strongylate<br />
nematodes from marsupials in New South<br />
Wales. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of<br />
New South Wales 64:513-536.<br />
, and . 1940. Nematodes from South<br />
Australia marsupials. Transactions of the Royal<br />
Society of South Australia 64:95-100.<br />
Mawson, P. M. 1971. Pearson Island Expedition<br />
1969. 8. Helminths. Transactions of the Royal Society<br />
of South Australia 95:169-183.<br />
. 1977. Revision of the genus Macropostrongylus<br />
and descriptions of three new genera: Popovastrongylus,<br />
Dorcopsinema andArundelia (Nematoda:<br />
Trichonematidae). Transactions of the Royal<br />
Society of South Australia 101:51-62.<br />
Smales, L. R. 1997. The status of Cyclostrongylus medioannulatus<br />
Johnston and Mawson, 1940. Transactions<br />
of the Royal Society of South Australia<br />
121:165.<br />
, and P. M. Mawson. 1978. Nematode parasites<br />
of the Kangaroo Island Wallaby, Macropus<br />
eugenii (Desmarest). 1. Seasonal and geographic<br />
distribution. Transactions of the Royal Society of<br />
South Australia 102:9-16.<br />
Speare, R., I. Beveridge, P. M. Johnson, and L. A.<br />
Corner. 1983. Parasites of the agile wallaby Macropus<br />
agilis (Marsupialia). Australian Wildlife Research<br />
10:89-96.<br />
Spratt, D. M., I. Beveridge, and E. L. Walter. 1991.<br />
A catalogue of Australasian monotremes and marsupials<br />
and their recorded helminth parasites. Records<br />
of the South Australian Museum, Monograph<br />
Series 1:1-105.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 60-65<br />
Angiostoma onychodactyla sp. n. (Nematoda: Angiostoniatidae) and<br />
Other Intestinal Helminths of the Japanese Clawed Salamander,<br />
Onychodactylus japonicus (Caudata: Hynobiidae), from Japan<br />
CHARLES R. BURSEY u AND STEPHEN R. GOLDBERG2<br />
1 Department of Biology, Pennsylvania <strong>State</strong> University, Shenango Campus, 147 Shenango Avenue, Sharon,<br />
Pennsylvania 16146, U.S.A. (e-mail: cxbl3@psu.edu) and<br />
2 Department of Biology, Whittier <strong>College</strong>, Whittier, California 90608, U.S.A.<br />
(e-mail: sgoldberg@mail.whittier.edu)<br />
ABSTRACT: Angiostoma onychodactyla sp. n. from the intestines of the Japanese clawed salamander, Onychodactylus<br />
japonicus, is described and illustrated. Angiostoma onychodactyla is most similar to Angiostoma plethodontis<br />
in that lateral alae are absent, and there is a bulb without valves. The major difference between these 2<br />
species is in the number and position of the caudal papillae. In addition, this sample of O. japonicus harbored<br />
3 species of trematodes, Cephalouterina leoi, Mesocoelium brevicaecum, and Pseudopolystoma dendriticiun, 1<br />
species of nematode, Parapharyngodon japonicus, and 1 acanthocephalan species (cystacanth stage).<br />
KEY WORDS: Angiostoma onychodactyla sp. n., Angiostoniatidae, Japanese clawed salamander, Onychodactylus<br />
japonicus, Hynobiidae, Japan.<br />
Onychodactylus japonicus (Houttuyn, 1782),<br />
the Japanese clawed salamander, is restricted to<br />
forested mountainous areas of Honshu and Shikoku<br />
Islands, Japan (Kuzmin, 1995). Previously<br />
reported helminths of Onychodactylus japonicus<br />
include the monogenetic trematode Pseudopolystoma<br />
dendriticum (Ozaki, 1948), the digenetic<br />
trematodes Cephalouterina leoi Uchida, Uchida,<br />
and Kamei, 1986, and Mesocoelium brevicaecum<br />
Ochi, 1930, the cestode Cylindrotaenia sp.<br />
(=Baerietta sp., larvae only), and the nematodes<br />
Amphibiocapillaria tritonispunctati (Diesing,<br />
1851) ( = Capillaria filiformis (Linstow, 1881)),<br />
Parapharyngodon japonicus Bursey and Goldberg,<br />
1999; Pseudoxyascaris japonicus Uchida<br />
and Itagaki, 1979, Pharyngodon sp., and Rhabditis<br />
sp. (Wilkie, 1930; Pearse, 1932; Ozaki,<br />
1948; Uchida and Itagaki, 1979; Uchida et al.,<br />
1986; Bursey and Goldberg, 1999).<br />
Further study of the sample of Onychodactylus<br />
japonicus examined by Bursey and Goldberg<br />
(1999) revealed 43 females and 17 males of an<br />
undescribed species of Angiostoma. To our<br />
knowledge, there are no reports of species of<br />
Angiostoma from Japanese salamanders, although<br />
Wilkie (1930) reported unidentified rhabditids<br />
from Hynobius retardatus Dunn, 1923, the<br />
Hokkaido salamander, and O. japonicus collected<br />
in Yumoto, Fukushima Prefecture. The purpose<br />
of this paper is to describe a new species<br />
-1 Corresponding author.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
60<br />
of nematode, Angiostoma onychodactyla, from<br />
the salamander Onychodactylus japonicus from<br />
Japan and to provide a current parasite list for<br />
this host.<br />
Material and Methods<br />
Sixty-eight Onychodactylus japonicus were examined<br />
(collection data given in Bursey and Goldberg,<br />
1999). All had been captured by hand and fixed in<br />
neutral buffered 10% formalin, then preserved in 70%<br />
alcohol. The body cavity was opened by a longitudinal<br />
incision from vent to throat, and the gastrointestinal<br />
tract was removed and opened longitudinally. Nematodes<br />
were placed in undiluted glycerol, allowed to<br />
clear, and examined under a light microscope. Trematodes<br />
were stained in hematoxylin and mounted in<br />
balsam for study. Measurements are given in micrometers.<br />
Results<br />
In addition to the previously described Parapharyngodon<br />
japonicus and Angiostoma onychodactyla<br />
described below, 3 species of trematodes<br />
(Cephalouterina leoi, Mesocoelium brevicaecum,<br />
Pseudopolystoma dendriticum) and 1<br />
species of acanthocephalan (unidentified cystacanth)<br />
were also found. Forty (59%) of 68 salamanders<br />
were infected with helminths. Prevalence,<br />
mean intensity, and mean abundance for<br />
each helminth species are presented in Table 1.<br />
Angiostoma onychodactyla sp. n.<br />
(Figs. 1-9)<br />
Description<br />
GENERAL: Transparent nematodes lacking<br />
lateral alae. Cuticle thin, nonstriated. Sexual di-
BURSEY AND GOLDBERG~-/l/VG7aSTOAM ONYCHODACTYLA SP. N. 61<br />
Table 1. Prevalence, intensity, and abundance of helminths collected from 68 Onychodactylus japonicus.<br />
Helminth<br />
Trematoda<br />
Cephnlouterina leoi<br />
Mesocoelium brc vicaecum<br />
Pseudopolystoma dendriticum<br />
Nematoda<br />
Angiostoma onychodactyla sp. n.<br />
Parapharyngodon japonicus<br />
Acanthocephala<br />
Unidentified cystacanlhs*<br />
* New host record.<br />
Prevalence Mean Mean<br />
(%) intensity ± SD abundance ± SD Site<br />
3<br />
5<br />
1<br />
24<br />
38<br />
morphism not prominent. Oral opening with 3<br />
lips. Esophagus with corpus, isthmus, and pseudobulb,<br />
nerve ring at level of anterior isthmus.<br />
Excretory pore anterior to the esophagointestinal<br />
junction.<br />
MALE (holotype and 9 paratypes; mean and<br />
range): Length 3.36 (2.60-3.90) mm. Maximum<br />
width 103 (89-128). Buccal cavity 9 (6-<br />
11) deep. Length of esophagus 297 (251-319),<br />
corpus 160 (145-175), isthmus 76 (66-88), bulb<br />
60 (55-68). Nerve ring 192 (188-285) and excretory<br />
pore 236 (188-285) from anterior end.<br />
Spicules equal, 128 (120-143), well chitinized,<br />
arcuate. Gubernaculum well chitinized, 44 (37—<br />
48). Testis single and reflexed. Caudal alae welldeveloped,<br />
supported by 8 pairs of postcloacal<br />
pedunculate papillae that do not reach the ala<br />
edge. Tail spike extends approximately 20 beyond<br />
bursa. Subventral cloacal sensilla absent.<br />
Phasmids lateral, immediately posterior to terminal<br />
pair of postcloacal papillae.<br />
FEMALE (allotype and 9 paratypes; mean and<br />
range): Length 4.21 (3.25-5.07) mm. Width at<br />
level of vulva 117 (89-153). Buccal cavity 9 (6-<br />
11) deep. Esophagus 301 (274-342), corpus 162<br />
(149-170), isthmus 78 (68-86), bulb 60 (57-<br />
63). Nerve ring 202 (171-274), excretory pore<br />
228 (200-268) from anterior end, respectively.<br />
Vulva 2.06 (1.53-2.40) mm from anterior end,<br />
slightly pre-equatorial. Tail elongated, 189 (171-<br />
239). Amphidelphic; uteri divergent; anterior<br />
uterus directed anteriorly, posterior uterus directed<br />
posteriorly; ovaries reflexed. Uteri containing<br />
numerous elliptical eggs, 56 (51—58) X<br />
48 (46-57), larvae absent.<br />
Taxonomic Summary<br />
TYPE HOST: Onychodactylus japonicus<br />
(Houttuyn, 1782), Japanese clawed salamander.<br />
1<br />
1 0.03 ± 0.17<br />
5.0 ± 2.0 0.22 ± 1.09<br />
1 0.02 ±0.12<br />
3.8 ± 3.8 0.88 ± 2.41<br />
4.8 ± 5.6 1.82 ± 4.13<br />
1 0.02 ± 0.12<br />
Small intestine<br />
Small intestine<br />
Bladder<br />
Small intestine<br />
Large intestine<br />
Coelom<br />
TYPE LOCALITY: Hineomata, Fukushima Prefecture,<br />
Honshu, Japan, 37°01'N, 139°23'E.<br />
SITE OF INFECTION: Small intestine.<br />
TYPE SPECIMENS: Holotype: male, United<br />
<strong>State</strong>s National Parasite Collection (USNPC),<br />
Beltsville, Maryland, USNPC 88645; allotype,<br />
female, USNPC 88646; paratypes (9 males, 9<br />
females) USNPC 88647.<br />
ETYMOLOGY: The new species is named in<br />
reference to the genus of the host.<br />
Remarks<br />
The genus Angiostoma now consists of 10<br />
species in the monogeneric family Angiostomatidae<br />
(order Rhabditida); 8 species infect terrestrial<br />
gastropods and 2 species are from salamanders.<br />
The type species, Angiostoma limacis<br />
Dujardin, 1845, has been collected from arionid<br />
gastropods in western Europe (Morand and Spiridonov,<br />
1989). Six additional species are known<br />
from terrestrial gastropods in the Palaearctic<br />
Realm: Angiostoma asamati Spiridonov, 1985,<br />
from a gigantolimacid (Spiridonov, 1985); Angiostoma<br />
aspersae Morand, 1986, from helicids<br />
(Morand, 1986); Angiostoma dentifera (Mengert,<br />
1953) from limacids (Morand and Spiridonov,<br />
1989); Angiostoma kimmeriensis Korol<br />
and Spiridonov, 1991, from a zonitid (Korol and<br />
Spiridonov, 1991); Angiostoma spiridonovi<br />
Morand, 1992, and Angiostoma stamrneri (Mengert,<br />
1953) from limacids (Mengert, 1953; Morand,<br />
1992). Angiostoma schizoglossae Morand<br />
and Barker, 1995, was described from a specimen<br />
taken from a rhytidid gastropod endemic to<br />
New Zealand, Australian Realm (Morand and<br />
Barker, 1995). Angiostoma plethodontis Chitwood,<br />
1933, was described from the northern<br />
redback salamander, Plethodon cine re us (Green,<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
62 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Figures 1-9. Angiostoma onychodactyla sp. n. 1. Female, entire, lateral view. 2. Male, entire, lateral<br />
view. 3. Female, anterior end. 4. Female, en face view of anterior end. 5. Male, esophageal region. 6.<br />
Spicule, gubernaculum. 7. Egg. 8. Male, posterior end, lateral view. 9. Male, posterior end, ventral view.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Table 2. Parasite list for Onychodactylus japonicus.<br />
BURSEY AND GOLDBERG—ANGIOSTOMA ONYCHODACTYLA SP. N. 63<br />
Helminth Prevalence Reference<br />
Trematoda<br />
Pseiidopolystoma dendriticum<br />
Mesocoeliurn brevicaecum<br />
Cephalouterina leoi<br />
Cestoda<br />
Cylinclrotaenia sp. (immature)<br />
Nematoda<br />
Amphibiocapillaria tritonispunctati<br />
Angiostoma onychodactyla sp. n.<br />
Parapharyngodon japonicus<br />
Pseudoxyascaris japonicus<br />
Rhabditis sp.<br />
Unidentified nematode<br />
Unidentified oxyurids<br />
Acanthocephala<br />
Unidentified cystacanths<br />
Not given<br />
Not given<br />
1% (1/68)<br />
Not given<br />
4% (3/68)<br />
Not given<br />
3% (2/68)<br />
Not given<br />
5% (1/20)<br />
24% (16/68)<br />
38% (26/68)<br />
Not given<br />
Not given<br />
Not given<br />
Not given<br />
45% (9/20)<br />
1% (1/68)<br />
1818), a Nearctic salamander (Chitwood, 1933).<br />
Angiostoma onychodactyla is the second species<br />
to be described from salamanders, albeit a Palaearctic<br />
salamander.<br />
Discussion<br />
A key to the known species of Angiostoma<br />
was published by Morand and Barker (1995). Of<br />
these 8 species, Angiostoma onychodactyla is<br />
more similar to A. limacis and A. plethodontis<br />
in that lateral alae are absent, and there is a bulb<br />
without valves. In A. limacis, the tip of the tail<br />
has denticles, while in A. onychodactyla and A.<br />
plethodontis, the tail is elongated and without<br />
denticles. The major difference between A. onychodactyla<br />
and A. plethodontis is in the number<br />
and position of the caudal papillae, A. onychodactyla<br />
with 8 pairs (all postcloacal) compared<br />
with A. plethodontis with 9 pairs (2 precloacal<br />
pairs and 7 postcloacal). Other differences include<br />
length of spicules (128 in A. onychodactyla<br />
compared with 60) and length of gubernaculum<br />
(44 compared with 25). Adamson (1986)<br />
suggested that salamander hosts acquired infection<br />
by ingesting parasitized molluscs, but more<br />
work will be required to test this hypothesis.<br />
Onychodactylus japonicus also harbored 3<br />
species of trematodes: 2 individuals of Cephalouterina<br />
leoi, 12 of Mesocoeliwn brevicaecum,<br />
Ozaki, 1948<br />
Uchida and Itagaki,<br />
This study<br />
Uchida et al., 1986<br />
This study<br />
Uchida et al., 1986<br />
This study<br />
Uchida et al., 1986<br />
1979<br />
Pearse, 1932<br />
This study<br />
Bursey and Goldberg, 1999<br />
Uchida and Itagaki, 1979<br />
Wilkie, 1930<br />
Uchida et al., 1986<br />
Wilkie, 1930<br />
Pearse, 1932<br />
This study<br />
and 1 of Pseiidopolystoma dendriticum.', 1 species<br />
of nematode, 124 individuals of Parapharyngodon<br />
japonicus; and 1 cystacanth of an unidentified<br />
species of acanthocephalan. These<br />
species have been previously reported from O.<br />
japonicus.<br />
Cephalouterina leoi was described from 3<br />
specimens found by Uchida et al. (1986) during<br />
examination of the small intestines of 900 O.<br />
japonicus. This is the second report of C. leoi;<br />
the only known host is O. japonicus. Mesocoeliurn<br />
brevicaecum, originally described by Goto<br />
and Ozaki (1929a) from the intestine of the Japanese<br />
common toad, Bufo japonicus Schlegel,<br />
1838, is often found in the small intestine of<br />
other Japanese amphibians, namely, the Kajika<br />
frog, Buergeria buergeri (Temminck and Schlegel,<br />
1838), the wrinkled frog, Rana rugosa Temminck<br />
and Schlegel, 1838, the Mitsjama salamander,<br />
Hynobius nebulosus (Schlegel, 1838),<br />
the Stejneger's oriental salamander, H. stejnegeri<br />
Dunn, 1923, and the Japanese newt, Triturus<br />
pyrrhogaster (Boie, 1826) (Goto and Ozaki,<br />
1929a, b). Nasir and Diaz (1971) referred all<br />
Japanese species of Mesocoelium to M. brevicaecum.<br />
Pearse (1932) was the first to report M.<br />
brevicaecum from O. japonicus and this is the<br />
second report of M. brevicaecum in this host.<br />
Pseudopolystoma dendriticum was originally de-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
64 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
scribed as Polystoma dendriticum by Ozaki<br />
(1948) from individuals taken from the urinary<br />
bladder of O. japonicus. Yamaguti (1963) revised<br />
the taxonomy. Uchida and Itagaki (1979)<br />
reported it from the same host. This is the third<br />
report of P. dendriticum; the only known host is<br />
O. japonicus.<br />
In addition to these trematodes, 111 females<br />
and 13 males of Parapharyngodon japonicus<br />
were harbored by 26 (38%) O. japonicus, the<br />
only known host. To our knowledge, there are no<br />
other reports of Parapharyngodon from Japanese<br />
salamanders; however, Hasegawa (1988) reported<br />
an unidentified but different species of Parapharyngodon<br />
from a lizard, the Japanese ateuchosaurus,<br />
Ateuchosaurus pellopleurus (Hallowell,<br />
1860), from Okinawa, Japan.<br />
The single acanthocephalan was too immature<br />
to identify. Van Cleave (1925) described Acanthocephalus<br />
nanus from the intestine of Triturus<br />
(=Diemictylus) pyrrhogaster and Rana rugosa<br />
from Japan and Pearse (1932) reported A. nanus<br />
as well as unidentified encysted acanthocephalans<br />
from T. pyrrhogaster and the giant salamander,<br />
Megalobatrachus japonicus (Temminck,<br />
1837), collected near Tokyo. This is the<br />
first report of acanthocephalan cystacanths in O.<br />
japonicus.<br />
All helminths were deposited in the United<br />
<strong>State</strong>s National Parasite Collection, Beltsville,<br />
Maryland: Cephalouterina leoi, USNPC 88648;<br />
Mesocoelium brevicaecum, USNPC 88649;<br />
Pseudopolystoma dendriticum, USNPC 88650;<br />
Parapharyngodon japonicus, USNPC 88651;<br />
acanthocephalan cystacanth, USNPC 88652. A<br />
list of the known parasites of O. japonicus is<br />
given in Table 2. More work will be required to<br />
determine the distribution patterns and the variety<br />
of hosts of the helminths found in this<br />
study.<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
We thank Tatsuo Ishihara (Hakone Woodland<br />
Museum, Hakone, Japan) for the sample of Onychodactylus<br />
japonicus, Peggy Firth for the illustrations<br />
constituting Figures 1—9, and Hay<br />
Cheam for assistance with dissections.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Adamson, M. L. 1986. Modes of transmission and<br />
evolution of life histories in zooparasitic nematodes.<br />
Canadian Journal of Zoology 64:1375-<br />
1384.<br />
Bursey, C. R., and S. R. Goldberg. 1999. Paraphar-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
yngodon japonicus sp. n. (Nematoda: Pharyngodonidae)<br />
from the Japanese clawed salamander,<br />
Onychodactylus japonicus (Caudata: Hynobiidae)<br />
from Japan. Journal of the Helminthological Society<br />
of Washington 66:180-186.<br />
Chitwood, B. G. 1933. On some nematodes of the<br />
superfamily Rhabditoidea and their status as parasites<br />
of reptiles and amphibians. Journal of the<br />
Washington Academy of Science 23:508-520.<br />
Goto, S., and Y. Ozaki. 1929a. Brief notes on new<br />
trematodes I. Japanese Journal of Zoology 2:213—<br />
217.<br />
, and . 1929b. Brief notes on new trematodes<br />
III. Japanese Journal of Zoology 3:73-82.<br />
Hasegawa, H. 1988. Parapharyngodon sp. (Nematoda:<br />
Pharyngodonidae) collected from the lizard,<br />
Ateuchosaurus pellopleurus (Sauria: Scincidae)<br />
on Okinawajima Island, Japan. Akamata 5:11-14.<br />
Korol, E. N., and S. E. Spiridonov. 1991. Angiostoma<br />
kimmeriensis sp. n. and Agfa tauricus sp. n.—<br />
parasitic Rhabditida (Nematoda) from Crimean<br />
terrestrial molluscs. Helminthologica 28:179-182.<br />
Kuzmin, S. L. 1995. The Clawed Salamanders of<br />
Asia. Genus Onychodactylus. Biology, Distribution,<br />
and Conservation. Westarp Wissenschaften,<br />
Magdeburg, Germany, 108 pp.<br />
Mengert, H. 1953. Nematoden und Schnecken. Zeitschrift<br />
fur Morphologic und Okologie der Tiere<br />
41:311-349.<br />
Morand, S. 1986. Angiostoma aspersae n. sp. (Nematoda,<br />
Angiostomatidae) parasite de Helix aspersa<br />
Miiller (Gastropoda, Helicidae). Bulletin du Museum<br />
National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 8:111-<br />
115.<br />
. 1992. Angiostoma spiridonovi sp. n. (Nematoda:<br />
Angiostomatidae) from Limax flavus (Gastropoda:<br />
Limacidae). Journal of the Helminthological<br />
Society of Washington 59:212-217.<br />
, and G. M. Barker. 1995. Angiostoma scliizoglossae<br />
n. sp. (Nematoda: Angiostomatidae)<br />
from the New Zealand endemic slug Schizoglossa<br />
novoseelandica (Gastropoda: Rhytididae). Journal<br />
of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 81:94-98.<br />
-, and S. Spiridonov. 1989. Redescription de<br />
trois especes d'Angiostomatidae (Nematoda,<br />
Rhabditida), parasites de gastropodes pulmones<br />
stylommatophores, et description du cycle evolutif<br />
de deux d'entre elles. Bulletin du Museum National<br />
d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 11:3<strong>67</strong>-385.<br />
Nasir, P., and M. T. Diaz. 1971. A redescription of<br />
Mesocoelium monas (Rudolphi, 1819) Freitas,<br />
1958, and specific determination in genus Mesocoelium<br />
Odhner, 1910 (Trematoda, Digenea). Rivista<br />
di Parassitologia 32:149-158.<br />
Ozaki, Y. 1948. A new trematode, Polystoma dendriticum<br />
from the urinary bladder of Onychodactylus<br />
japonicus in Shikoku. Biosphaera 2:33—37.<br />
Pearse, A. S. 1932. Parasites of Japanese salamanders.<br />
Ecology 13:135-152.<br />
Spiridonov, S. E. 1985. Angiostoma asamati sp. n.<br />
(Angiostomatidae: Rhabditida)—new species of<br />
nematodes from slugs (Mollusca). Helminthologia<br />
22:253-261.<br />
Uchida, A., and H. Itagaki. 1979. Studies on the am-
phibian helminths in Japan. VI. Pseudoxyascaris<br />
japonicus n. g. and n. sp. (Oxyascarididae; Nematoda)<br />
and Pseudopolystoma dendriticum (Monogenea;<br />
Trematoda) from a salamander. Japanese<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 28:43-50.<br />
, K. Uchida, and A. Kamei. 1986. Studies on<br />
the amphibian helminth in Japan. IX. A new digenetic<br />
trematode, Cephalouterina leoi n. sp.,<br />
from salamanders, Onychodactylus japonicus and<br />
the new host record of the digenetic trematode,<br />
January 19, <strong>2000</strong><br />
March 22, <strong>2000</strong><br />
May 6, <strong>2000</strong><br />
October, <strong>2000</strong><br />
November, <strong>2000</strong><br />
BURSEY AND GOLDBERG—ANGIOSTOMA ONYCHODACTYU*. SP. N. 65<br />
Mesocoelium brevicaecum. Bulletin of the Azabu<br />
University of Veterinary Medicine 7:97-101.<br />
Van Cleave, H. J. 1925. Acanthocephala from Japan.<br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong> 17:149-156.<br />
Wilkie, J. S. 1930. Some parasitic nematodes from<br />
Japanese Amphibia. Annals and Magazine of Natural<br />
History, Series 10, 6:606-614.<br />
Yamaguti, S. 1963. Systema Helminthum. Volume IV.<br />
Monogenea and Aspidocotylea. Interscience Publishers,<br />
New York. 699 pp.<br />
<strong>2000</strong> Meeting Schedule of the<br />
Helmiiithological Society of Washington<br />
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Washington,<br />
DC, 7:30 pm (Contact person: Bill Moser, 202-357-2473).<br />
Johns Hopkins Montgomery County Center (Provisional), Rockville, MD,<br />
7:30 pm (Contact person: Tom Simpson (JHU), 410-366-8814, or Louis<br />
Miller (NIH), 301-496-2183).<br />
Joint Meeting with the New Jersey Society for <strong>Parasitology</strong>, at the New<br />
Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA, 2:00 pm<br />
(Contact person: Jay Parrell, 215-898-8561).<br />
Date, time, and place to be announced.<br />
Anniversary Dinner Meeting. Date, time, and place to be announced<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 66-70<br />
Carolinensis tuffi sp. n. (Nematoda: Trichostrongylina:<br />
Heligmosomoidea) from the White-Ankled Mouse, Peromyscus<br />
pectoralis Osgood (Rodentia: Cricetidae) from Texas, U.S.A.<br />
M.-CL. DURETTE-DESSET1'3 AND A. SANTOS III2<br />
1 Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire de Biologic Parasitaire Associe au Centre National de le<br />
Recherche Scientifique, 61 rue de Buffon, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France (e-mail: mcdd@cimrsl.mnhn.fr), and<br />
2 Department of Biology, Southwest Texas <strong>State</strong> University, San Marcos, Texas 78666, U.S.A.<br />
(e-mail: alberto3@flash.net)<br />
ABSTRACT: Carolinensis tuffi sp. n. (Nematoda: Trichostrongylina: Heligmosomoidea) from the small intestine<br />
of the white-ankled mouse, Peromyscus pectoralis Osgood (Rodentia: Cricetidae), from Texas, U.S.A., is described<br />
and illustrated. The new species is closest to Carolinensis carolinensis in its synlophe and to Carolinensis<br />
dalrymplei and Carolinensis kinsellai in the pattern of the caudal bursa. Carolinensis romerolagi (Gibbons and<br />
Kumar, 1980) is transferred to the genus Paraheligmonella and becomes Paraheligmonella romerolagi (Gibbons<br />
and Kumar, 1980) comb. n.<br />
KEY WORDS: Nematoda, Trichostrongylina, Heligmosomoidea, Carolinensis tuffi sp. n., Peromyscus pectoralis,<br />
white-ankled mouse, Rodentia, Cricetidae, Texas, U.S.A.<br />
The Nippostrongylinae, parasites of rodents of<br />
the families Arvicolidae and Cricetidae, may<br />
have arisen in the Palearctic Region (with the<br />
genus Carolinensis (Travassos, 1937)) and may<br />
have evolved from North America (with the genus<br />
Hassalstrongylus Durette-Desset, 1971) to<br />
South America (with the genus Stilestrongylus<br />
Freitas, Lent, and Almeida, 1937) (Durette-Desset,<br />
1971, 1985). In the small intestine of a Nearctic<br />
cricetid, the white-ankled mouse Peromyscus<br />
pectoralis Osgood, 1904, we found a<br />
new species described below of particular interest,<br />
since it is a morphologic intermediary between<br />
the genera Carolinensis and Hassalstrongylus.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Hosts were live-trapped in Sherman traps by one of<br />
us (A.S.) in 1995 and 1996 under Texas Parks and<br />
Wildlife Permit SPR-0890-234, killed, and the whole<br />
carcasses were frozen for later examination. Nematodes<br />
were fixed and stored in 70% ethanol with 5%<br />
glycerine, studied in temporary wet mounts in water,<br />
and, when necessary, cleared in lactophenol. En face<br />
views and sections were mounted and studied in lactophenol.<br />
Measurements are given in micrometers unless<br />
otherwise stated; those relating to the holotype and<br />
allotype are in parentheses.<br />
The nomenclature used for the family group is that<br />
of Durette-Desset and Chabaud (1993). The synlophe<br />
was studied following the method of Durette-Desset<br />
(1985), and the nomenclature used for the study of the<br />
caudal bursa is that of Durette-Desset and Chabaud<br />
3 Corresponding author.<br />
(1981). Type specimens were deposited in the Helminthological<br />
Collections of the Museum National<br />
d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France (MNHN). Voucher<br />
specimens from the type locality were also deposited<br />
in the United <strong>State</strong>s National Parasite Collection,<br />
Beltsville, Maryland, accession No. 88849.<br />
Results<br />
Carolinensis tuffi sp. n.<br />
(Figs. 1-8)<br />
Description<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
66<br />
Small nematodes, coiled to varying degrees<br />
along ventral side. Position of excretory pore in<br />
relation to length of esophagus very variable,<br />
mainly within second third of esophagus between<br />
45% and 71% in male, 42% to 66% in<br />
female. Deirids, when visible, at same level but<br />
not visible in all specimens.<br />
HEAD (based on 2 specimens): Cephalic vesicle<br />
present; buccal aperture triangular; 4 externolabial<br />
papillae, 2 amphids and 4 cephalic papillae;<br />
dorsoesophageal gland visible (Fig. 2).<br />
SYNLOPHE (studied in transverse sections of<br />
body in 1 male and 1 female): In both sexes,<br />
cuticle surface bears continuous ridges with chitinous<br />
reinforcement, beginning at different levels<br />
between cephalic vesicle and nerve ring and<br />
ending immediately anterior to caudal bursa in<br />
male, at vulvar level in female (Fig. 3). Number<br />
of ridges 20 in male and 19 in female at mid<br />
body. Axis of orientation of ridges passing<br />
though ventral right and dorsal left quadrant, inclined<br />
about 60° on sagittal axis in ventral left
quadrant and 70° in male, 75° in female in dorsal<br />
left quadrant. Ridges of equivalent size, except<br />
ventral right ones and ventral ridge adjacent to<br />
left ridge, all of which are smaller (Figs. 5, 6).<br />
MALES (based on 5 specimens): Length<br />
3.75-6.3 mm (6.4 mm) and width 90-100 (100)<br />
at mid body. Cephalic vesicle 50X40-60X40<br />
(60X45). Nerve ring 120-170 (160), excretory<br />
pore 160—250 (230) from cephalic apex, respectively.<br />
Esophagus 350-380 (380) long (Fig. 1).<br />
Caudal bursa subsymmetric, very elongated laterally,<br />
of type 2-2-1 (Fig. 8). Rays 2 and 3 longer<br />
than ray 4; rays 4 and 5 divergent at their<br />
extremities; ray 8 arising perpendicularly at the<br />
root of the dorsal ray and not reaching edge of<br />
bursa; dorsal ray divided into 2 branches in distal<br />
third, each branch divided again into 2 unequal<br />
branches; externals (ray 9) being longer<br />
than the internal (ray 10), and almost reaching<br />
edge of caudal bursa. Spicules very thin, alate,<br />
380-500 (460) long, ending in a sharp tip (Fig.<br />
8). Gubernaculum absent. Genital cone triangular<br />
in ventral view, bearing a small papilla 0 on<br />
its ventral lip (Fig. 7). Papilla 7 not observed.<br />
Presence of membrane situated between genital<br />
cone and dorsal ray (Fig. 8).<br />
FEMALES (based on 10 specimens): Length<br />
7.3-8.8 mm (7.3 mm) and width 110-150 (150)<br />
at mid body. Cephalic vesicle 50X40-80X60<br />
(60X50). Nerve ring 130-220 (160), excretory<br />
pore 175—320 (210) from cephalic apex, respectively.<br />
Esophagus 420-480 (450) long. Monodelphic,<br />
vulva at 110-160 (100) from caudal extremity.<br />
Vagina vera 30—50 (40) long. Vestibule<br />
80—110 (70) long, with median constriction and<br />
posterior diverticulum, sphincter 40X30-50X40<br />
(50X40). Infundibulum with proximal section<br />
curving in and out (twisting) 90-130 (120) (Fig.<br />
4). Uterus 1.2—1.8 mm (1.7 mm) long, containing<br />
30-36 (25) eggs. Eggs 65X40-80X60<br />
(85X50) at morula stage. In 1 female, eggs in<br />
distal section of uterus embryonated. Tail conical,<br />
with round tip (Fig. 4).<br />
Taxonomic Summary<br />
TYPE HOST: White-ankled mouse, Peromyscus<br />
pectoralis Osgood, 1904.<br />
TYPE LOCALITY: Colorado Bend <strong>State</strong> Park,<br />
San Saba County, Texas (31°05'N, 98°30'W),<br />
U.S.A.<br />
SITE: Small intestine.<br />
PREVALENCE AND INTENSITY: 57 of 189 hosts<br />
DURETTE-DESSET AND SANTOS—CAROL1NENSIS TUFFI SF'. N. <strong>67</strong><br />
(30%) infected with 11.2 ± 3.3 SD nematodes;<br />
range, 1—175.<br />
DEPOSITED SPECIMENS: Holotype male and<br />
allotype female MNHN 447 KXa; paratypes (4<br />
males, 9 females) MNHN 447 KXb.<br />
ETYMOLOGY: The species is named in honor<br />
of Dr. Donald W. Tuff of Southwest Texas <strong>State</strong><br />
University.<br />
Discussion<br />
The specimens from P. pectoralis possess the<br />
main characters of the subgenus Carolinensis<br />
(Heligmonellidae: Nippostrongylinae), which<br />
was raised to the level of genus by Durette-Desset<br />
(1983): the caudal bursa is of type 2-2-1,<br />
the genital cone is poorly developed, and the left<br />
cuticular dilatation is absent. Species of this genus<br />
are mainly parasitic in Holarctic Arvicolidae<br />
and Cricetidae. Among the species described,<br />
the above specimens closely resemble Carolinensis<br />
carolinensis (Dikmans, 1935), a parasite<br />
of Peromyscus maniculatus (Wagner, 1845) and<br />
Microtus ochrogaster (Wagner, 1842) in the<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s in the characters of the synlophe;<br />
the left lateral ridges are no more developed than<br />
the other ridges, the inclination of the axis of<br />
orientation is the same, and the number of cuticular<br />
ridges is relatively high. The new species<br />
differs by the pattern of the caudal bursa, the<br />
shape of the tips of the spicules, and 19-20 ridges<br />
versus 16 in C. carolinensis (Durette-Desset,<br />
1974). It closely resembles Carolinensis dalrymplei<br />
(Dikmans, 1935), a parasite of Ondatra zibethica<br />
(Linnaeus, 1766) and Microtus pennsylvanicus<br />
(Ord, 1815) in the United <strong>State</strong>s and<br />
Carolinensis kinsellai (Durette-Desset, 1969), a<br />
parasite of Neofiber alleni True, 1884, in the<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s, in the pattern of the caudal bursa<br />
and, as in C. kinsellai, by the presence of a small<br />
ventral ridge adjacent to the left ridge. It differs<br />
from these species by the arising of ray 8 at the<br />
root of the dorsal ray, by the presence of a membrane<br />
between the genital cone and the dorsal<br />
ray, by the proximal twisting of the infundibulum,<br />
and by the high number of cuticular ridges<br />
(13 in C. kinsellai, not known in C. dalrymplei)<br />
(Durette-Desset, 1969).<br />
According to Durette-Desset (1971), the genera<br />
Carolinensis, Hassalstrongylus, arid Stilestrongylus<br />
belong to the same evolutionary line.<br />
The line may have arisen in the Palearctic Region<br />
and may have evolved from North America to<br />
South America with the following elements: (1)<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
68 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
increase in the number of cuticular ridges, (2) rotation<br />
of the axis of orientation, and (3) lengthening<br />
of the genital cone. This line was divided<br />
into 3 genera: Carolinensis in the Palearctic Region,<br />
Hassalstrongylus in the Nearctic Region,<br />
and Stilestrongylus in the Neotropical Region.<br />
But evolution being gradual, the generic separations<br />
are necessarily arbitrary, and the geographic<br />
localities overlap in the Americas. Carolinensis is<br />
also present in North America, and Hassalstrongylus<br />
is present in South America.<br />
The phyletic position of the new species is<br />
interesting since it possesses some characteristics<br />
of the genus Hassalstrongylus: a high number<br />
of cuticular ridges (13-16 in Carolinensis vs<br />
19-25 in Hassalstrongylus), disappearance of<br />
the gradient of size of the cuticular ridges, which<br />
tends to an equalization of their size and the appearance<br />
of a new symmetry in relation to the<br />
axis of orientation, and a relatively developed<br />
genital cone. According to Durette-Desset<br />
(1974), Hassalstrongylus musculi (Dikmans,<br />
1935) was an example of an intermediary species<br />
between the genera Hassalstrongylus and<br />
Stile strongylus. Carolinensis tuffi seems to be an<br />
intermediary between the genera Carolinensis<br />
and Hassalstrongylus.<br />
The species Boreostrongylus romerolagi Gibbons<br />
and Kumar (1980) was described from a<br />
Mexican lagomorph, Romerolagus diazi (Ferrari<br />
Arez, 1893), and was automatically transferred<br />
to the genus Carolinensis, since Boreostrongylus<br />
was considered a synonym of Carolinensis by<br />
Durette-Desset (1983). However, this species is<br />
very different from the other species of the genus<br />
and can be classified in the genus Paraheligmonella<br />
Durette-Desset, 1971, particularly<br />
because of its synlophe: the left and right ridges<br />
are hypertrophied; a lateromedial gradient in the<br />
size of the ridges is present; and the axis of orientation<br />
is inclined 45° to the sagittal axis (Gibbons<br />
and Kumar, 1980). We thus propose a new<br />
combination: Paraheligmonella romerolagi<br />
(Gibbons and Kumar, 1980) comb. n. (=Boreostrongylus<br />
romerolagi Gibbons and Kumar,<br />
DURETTE-DESSET AND SANTOS—CAROLINENSIS TUFF/ SP. N. 69<br />
1980; = Carolinensis romerolagi (Gibbons and<br />
Kumar, 1980), Durette-Desset, 1982).<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
We wish to thank Drs. D.W. Tuff, J.T. Baccus,<br />
and J.M. Kinsella for their advice during the<br />
course of this study and comments on the manuscript.<br />
Additional thanks are due to Dr. Baccus<br />
for obtaining permission from the Texas Parks<br />
and Wildlife Department for use of the study<br />
site, obtaining the scientific collecting permit,<br />
and securing funding for the collection of the<br />
specimens. Thanks are due to Kevin Schwausch,<br />
T Wayne Schwertner, and Todd Pilcik for assistance<br />
in trapping and handling rodents and to<br />
the staff of Colorado Bend <strong>State</strong> Park, especially<br />
Robert Basse.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Dikmans, G. 1935. New nematodes of the genus Longistriata<br />
in rodents. Journal of Parasilology 25:<br />
72-81.<br />
Durette-Desset, M. C. 1969. Etude du systeme des<br />
aretes cuticulaires de trois Nematodes Heligmosomes:<br />
Longistriata kinsellai n.sp., L. seurati Travassos<br />
et Darriba, 1929, L. hokkaidensis Chabaud,<br />
Rausch, et Desset, 1963, parasites de Rongeurs.<br />
Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparee<br />
44:617-624.<br />
. 1971. Essai de classification des Nematodes<br />
Heligmosomes. Correlations avec la paleobiogeographie<br />
des holes. Memoires du Museum National<br />
d'Histoire Naturelle, Nouvelle serie, Serie A,<br />
Zoologie 69:1-126<br />
. 1974. Nippostrongylinae (Nematoda: Heligmosomidae)<br />
nearctiques. Annales de Parasitologie<br />
Humaine et Comparee 49:435-450.<br />
. 1983. Keys to Genera of the Super-Family<br />
Trichostrongyloidea. CIH Keys to the Nematode<br />
Parasites of Vertebrates, No. 10, R.C. Anderson,<br />
and A.G. Chabaud, eds. Commonwealth Agricultural<br />
Bureau, Farnham Royal, Buckinghamshire,<br />
England, 1-86.<br />
. 1985. Trichostrongyloid nematodes and their<br />
vertebrate hosts. Reconstruction of the phylogeny<br />
of a parasitic group. Advances in <strong>Parasitology</strong> 24:<br />
239-306.<br />
, and A. G. Chabaud. 1981. Nouvel essai de<br />
Figures 1-8. Carolinensis tuffi sp. n. in Peromyscus pectoralis from Texas, drawings based on paratypes.<br />
1. Male, anterior extremity, right lateral view. 2. Female, head, apical view. 3. Female tail, disappearance<br />
of cuticular ridges. 4. Female, posterior extremity, left lateral view. 5. Male synlophe at mid body. 6.<br />
Female synlophe at mid body. 7. Male, genital cone and membrane, ventral view. 8. Male, caudal bursa,<br />
ventral view. V = ventral side; R = right side. Scales in micrometers.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
70 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
classification des Nematodes Trichostrongyloidea. Gibbons, L., and V. Kumar. 1980. Boreostrongylus<br />
Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparee romerolagi n.sp. (Nematoda: Heligmonellidae)<br />
56:297-312. from a Mexican volcano rabbit, Romerolagus dia-<br />
, and . 1993. Note sur la Nomenclature zi. Systematic <strong>Parasitology</strong> 1:117-122.<br />
des Strongylida au-dessus du groupe famille. An- Travassos, L. 1937. Revisao da famflia Trichostronnales<br />
de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparee 68: gylidae Leiper, 1912. Monographias do Institute<br />
111-112. Oswaldo Cruz 1:1-512.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 71-75<br />
An Unusual Case of Anisakiasis in California, U.S.A.<br />
OMAR M. AMIN,M WILLIAM S. EiDELMAN,2 WILLIAM DoMKE,3 JONATHAN BAILEY,3 AND<br />
GEOFFREY PFEiFER2<br />
1 Institute of Parasitic Diseases, P. O. Box 28372, Tempe, Arizona 85285-8372, and Department of Zoology,<br />
Arizona <strong>State</strong> University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1501, U.S.A. (e-mail: omaramin@aol.com),<br />
2 The Natural Medicine Center, 1434 East Ojai Avenue, Ojai, California 93023, U.S.A. and<br />
3 634V2 Rose Avenue, Venice, California 90291, U.S.A. (e-mail: colonichydrotherapy@USA.NET)<br />
ABSTRACT. In the first case of its kind, anisakiasis is documented in a 44-yr-old California male whose neck<br />
was penetrated transesophageally by 1 third-stage larva of Pseudoterranova decipiens. The larva subsequently<br />
emerged from the neck region through an ulcerating sore. The larva showed some evidence of development and<br />
is described. The clinical history of the patient is reviewed. The patient subsequently died of causes unrelated<br />
to the anisakiasis infection.<br />
KEY WORDS: anisakiasis, Pseudoterranova decipiens, third-stage larva, human infection, morphology, case<br />
history, California, U.S.A.<br />
Of the many genera of ascaroid (Anisakidae)<br />
nematodes causing anisakiasis in vertebrates<br />
(Myers, 1975), only 2 species cause human infections<br />
in North America (McKerrow and<br />
Deardorff, 1988; U.S. Food and Drug Administration/Center<br />
for Food Safety and Applied<br />
Nutrition [FDA/CFSAN], 1992). The cod worm,<br />
Pseudoterranova decipiens (Krabbe, 1878) Gibson<br />
and Colin, 1981, infects marine mammals,<br />
most importantly seals, in the North Atlantic and<br />
North and South Pacific; the herring worm, Anisakis<br />
simplex (Rudolphi, 1809) Baylis, 1920,<br />
infects marine mammals, particularly whales in<br />
the eastern Pacific and elsewhere in the world<br />
(see Myers [1959, 1975] and Gibson [1983] for<br />
synonymies). Despite the high incidence of<br />
worms of the genus Anisakis in fishes (Myers,<br />
1979) and whales in the western Pacific, human<br />
cases in North America involving larvae of Anisakis<br />
are rare. The higher incidence of human<br />
infection with larvae of the genus Pseudoterranova<br />
(Lichtenfels and Brancato, 1976; Kliks,<br />
1983), particularly in the northern Atlantic coast,<br />
appears to be related to the large seal populations<br />
there (Myers, 1976).<br />
Two patterns of disease describe the clinical<br />
symptomology of anisakiasis in North America.<br />
The asymptomatic luminal condition described<br />
for larvae of Pseudoterranova does not involve<br />
tissue penetration, and worms are expelled by<br />
coughing, vomiting, or defecating. In infections<br />
with larvae of Anisakis, however, penetration of<br />
Corresponding author.<br />
71<br />
the gut wall is reported by many observers<br />
(Kates et al., 1973; Lichtenfels and Brancato,<br />
1976; Myers, 1976; Margolis, 1977; Ishikura et<br />
al., 1993). These cases are easily misdiagnosed<br />
as appendicitis, Crohn's disease, gastric ulcer, or<br />
gastrointestinal cancer (McKerrow and Deardorff,<br />
1988; FDA/CFSAN, 1992; Alonso et al.,<br />
1997). Documentation of our present case, however,<br />
demonstrates that larvae of Pseudoterranova<br />
can be as invasive as has traditionally been<br />
described in infections with Anisakis in Holland<br />
and Japan (Oshima, 1972, 1987; Yoshimura et<br />
al., 1979; Ishikura et al., 1993).<br />
In North America, the public health impact of<br />
anisakiasis is limited to consumers of such foods<br />
as sushi and sashimi. Approximately 50 cases<br />
were documented in the United <strong>State</strong>s up to<br />
1988, and fewer than 10 cases have been documented<br />
annually (FDA/CFSAN, 1992) since<br />
the first North American cases in the United<br />
<strong>State</strong>s were documented in the early 1970's (Little<br />
and Most, 1973; Pinkus et al., 1975). The<br />
first confirmed human case of anisakiasis was<br />
reported in Holland in 1960 (Van Theil et al.,<br />
1960), and Holland remains the most important<br />
anisakiasis-endemic region of the world. By<br />
1990, 292 of the 559 European cases were reported<br />
in Holland, whereas 12,586 cases were<br />
reported in Japan. The Japanese cases included<br />
11,629 gastric, 5<strong>67</strong> intestinal, and 45 extragastrointestinal<br />
cases of infection by Anisakis and<br />
only 335 cases of gastric infection by Pseudoterranova<br />
(Ishikura et al., 1993). This report<br />
documents worm morphology and the clinical<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
72 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
picture and compares our results with related<br />
findings in other cases.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
One 70% ethanol-preserved nematode extracted by<br />
J.B. and W.D. from the neck of a 44-yr-old Venice,<br />
California, Caucasian male patient on 12 April 1998<br />
was received by O.M.A. on 18 April 1998 for identification.<br />
The worm was first examined externally, then<br />
stained in Mayer's acid carmine overnight, destained<br />
in 4% HC1 in 70% ethanol, dehydrated in ascending<br />
concentrations of ethanol, cleared in graded terpineol-<br />
100% ethanol, and prepared as a whole mount in Canada<br />
balsam. Figures were made with the aid of photoprojection.<br />
All measurements are in millimeters unless<br />
otherwise indicated. Width measurements refer to<br />
maximum width. The specimen is deposited in the<br />
U.S. National Parasite Collection (USNPC), Beltsville,<br />
Maryland.<br />
Results<br />
The patient (T.S.) was a 44-yr-old Caucasian<br />
male with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS),<br />
a degenerative neuromuscular disorder. He was<br />
completely healthy until 1992, when he was diagnosed<br />
(spinal tap) with Lyme disease after<br />
suffering flu-like symptoms and joint pains. He<br />
received 2 courses of antibiotics, including ampicillin,<br />
bioxin, doxycycline, and vancomycin,<br />
before he felt cured. In 1994, he was further diagnosed<br />
with ALS at 2 major medical centers in<br />
South Carolina and New York and was told that<br />
he had 6 mo to live. Muscle biopsies showed<br />
cell death consistent with ALS. The patient<br />
sought help at The Natural Medicine Center in<br />
1996 as his condition continued to deteriorate.<br />
All his laboratory tests were normal (including<br />
explorations of possible neurotoxins) except for<br />
a spinal tap that showed Lyme disease in the<br />
central nervous system. He was treated with<br />
heavy doses of antibiotics but without favorable<br />
results.<br />
During April 1998, he received a series of co-<br />
Ionic irrigations, during which time "parasites"<br />
were claimed to have been observed. These presumed<br />
"parasites" were not collected by the junior<br />
authors nor observed by O.M.A. However,<br />
a worm was actually extracted from a neck sore<br />
and sent to O.M.A. for identification. Upon external<br />
examination, the worm was initially identified<br />
as an anisakid nematode. After processing<br />
(see above), the identity of the nematode was<br />
determined to be a third-stage larva of P. decipiens.<br />
At that time, T.S. indicated on the Requisition<br />
Form that he was experiencing "severe<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
weakness, neuromuscular damage, severe<br />
weight loss, loss of balance, and speech impairment."<br />
He also indicated no travel history but a<br />
history of diet often including sushi and sashimi<br />
over the previous few years. After the worm diagnosis,<br />
T.S. was treated with pharmaceutical<br />
anti-parasitic medications (albendazole and<br />
praziquantel) in large doses. Subsequently, his<br />
symptoms of malaise disappeared and his red<br />
blood cell count dramatically increased to 4.30<br />
from a pretreatment low of 2.74 on 11 March<br />
1998. After repeat treatment with praziquantel,<br />
T.S. felt better though his muscular condition remained<br />
unchanged. For the past few years, T.S.<br />
had always felt ill and experienced loss of function.<br />
He recently weighed 105 Ib, down from a<br />
pre-illness weight of 160 Ib. Before his death in<br />
April 1999, T.S. was unable to use his hands and<br />
could barely ambulate, with help. He could talk<br />
only with difficulty and breathed adequately but<br />
not enough to blow his nose.<br />
Description of the third-stage larva of<br />
Pseudoterranova decipiens (Figs. 1-3)<br />
Body 42.12 long by 0.85 wide near middle.<br />
Cuticle wrinkled at regular intervals, about<br />
0.025 thick but thinner toward both ends. One<br />
dorsal, 2 subventral large fleshy lips each with<br />
2 rounded lobes, anterior dentigenous ridges,<br />
and large papilla (Fig. 1). Prominent boring<br />
tooth (spine) anteriorly. Excretory pore ventral<br />
at base of lips. Nerve ring prominent, 0.42 from<br />
anterior tip. Esophagus 2.03 long by 0.24 wide<br />
at base. Cecum extends anteriorly and about as<br />
long as ventriculus, 1.02 long by 0.18 wide (Fig.<br />
2). Ventricular appendage and alae absent. Reproductive<br />
structures not observed. Tail (anus to<br />
posterior end) 0.16 long. Anal glands prominent,<br />
each with a single darkly stained nucleus. Conically<br />
shaped fine-pointed mucron (caudal spine)<br />
0.025 long (Fig. 3). Evidence of development<br />
(molting) noted as the larva appeared trapped in<br />
the cuticle of the previous stage at various<br />
points.<br />
Taxonomic summary<br />
HOST: Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758.<br />
LOCALITY: California, U.S.A.<br />
SITE OF INFECTION: Neck.<br />
SPECIMEN DEPOSITED: USNPC No. 88504.<br />
Remarks<br />
The specimen was identified as P. decipens<br />
primarily because it possessed a cecum and no
Figures 1-3. Pseudoterranova decipiens third-stage<br />
larva extracted from a neck lesion of a patient in<br />
California. 1. Anterior tip of body showing details<br />
of lips and boring spine (BS). 2. Anterior portion<br />
of body showing anteriorly projecting intestinal cecum<br />
(C) overlapping the ventriculus (V), esophagus<br />
(E), intestine (I), and nerve ring (NR). 3. Posterior<br />
end of worm showing anal glands (AG), anus (A),<br />
tail (T), and tail spine (TS). Scale bar (200 u-m)<br />
applies to Figs. 1 and 3.<br />
ventricular appendage and its excretory pore<br />
opened at the base of the lips. The cecum was<br />
about as long as the ventriculus. Additional significant<br />
features include prominent boring and<br />
caudal spines and the structure of lips as well as<br />
measurements of the described organs and trunk<br />
(above).<br />
Discussion<br />
The morphological features of the described<br />
larva were similar to those reported for other<br />
larvae of P. decipiens (reported as Phocanemd)<br />
recovered from North American patients by<br />
AMIN ET AL.—PSEUDOTERRANOVA IN MAN 73<br />
Kates et al. (1973), Kliks (1983), Little and Most<br />
(1973), and Lichtenfels and Brancato (1976).<br />
There are minor differences in measurements,<br />
and none of the above authors reported anal<br />
glands; Kates et al. (1973) did not observe a<br />
boring tooth; Little and Most (1973) noted a female<br />
reproductive system but no caudal spine;<br />
Lichtenfels and Brancato (1976) noted cervical<br />
papillae and excretory gland about one-third the<br />
body length. Clearly, the morphological variations<br />
in human anisakids need to be documented<br />
to ascertain their identity and to determine the<br />
correct correlations with geographic distribution<br />
and histopathologic changes.<br />
In contrast with the considerably greater<br />
prevalence of human infections with the highly<br />
invasive A. simplex in Europe and Japan<br />
compared with the noninvasive P. decipiens,<br />
most anisakiasis cases in North America involve<br />
P. decipiens (Kates et al., 1973; Jackson,<br />
1975; Lichtenfels and Brancato, 1976;<br />
Myers, 1976; Margolis, 1977; Deardorff et al.,<br />
1986; Oshima, 1987; Ishikura et al., 1993;<br />
Alonso et al., 1997). The pattern of differential<br />
pathogenicity has been documented in<br />
Holland (Yoshimura et al., 1979), the United<br />
<strong>State</strong>s (Jackson, 1975; Lichtenfels and Brancato,<br />
1976; McKerrow and Deardorff, 1988),<br />
and Japan (Oshima, 1972, 1987; Ishikura et<br />
al., 1993) and was reviewed by Margolis<br />
(1977). Findings from our study, however, disagree<br />
with the above "pathogenic capacity"<br />
picture (Margolis, 1977) and document severe<br />
invasiveness of the larva of P. decipiens. Evidence<br />
of the invasiveness of the larvae of<br />
Pseudoterranova is extremely rare. When<br />
such cases occur (Little and MacPhail, 1972),<br />
as is usual in larvae of Anisakis (Hayasaka et<br />
al., 1971; Pinkus et al., 1975; Yoshimura et al.,<br />
1979; Deardorff et al., 1986; Oshima, 1987;<br />
McKerrow and Deardorff, 1988; Ishikura et<br />
al., 1993), the larvae usually invade the gut<br />
wall lower at gastric or intestinal sites. In a<br />
very rare case of invasive Pseudoterranova,<br />
the larva was recovered from the abdominal<br />
cavity of a male from Massachusetts (Little<br />
and MacPhail, 1972). All other cases of human<br />
infection with Pseudoterranova in North<br />
America were detected when larvae were<br />
eliminated by the mouth (Lichtenfels and<br />
Brancato, 1976; McKerrow and Deardorff,<br />
1988). A larva was identified as "Anisakis"<br />
from histological sections in the tonsils of a<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
74 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
6-yr-old Indian girl from Oman, Arabian Peninsula<br />
(Bhargava et al., 1996), and extragastrointestinal<br />
"anisakidosis" has been reported<br />
in the mucous membrane of pharynx and<br />
esophagus in Japan (Ishikura et al., 1993); the<br />
identity of these worms was not elaborated<br />
further.<br />
We attribute the upper gastrointestinal invasiveness<br />
of the larva of P. decipiens through the<br />
unusual esophageal site to the immune depression<br />
of the patient or weakness from ALS. The<br />
continued penetration of the worm through the<br />
neck tissue and the exiting through the neck sore<br />
represent an extreme case of invasiveness that,<br />
to the best of our knowledge, has not been previously<br />
reported in larvae of either Anisakis or<br />
Pseudoterranova.<br />
We believe that the state of the patient could<br />
have been related to 1 or more of the following<br />
3 factors: ALS, Lyme disease, or anisakid(s).<br />
Symptoms of anisakiasis may persist after worm<br />
death because some lesions have been found<br />
upon surgical removal that contain only nematode<br />
remnants. Stenosis of the pyloric sphincter<br />
was observed in a case where exploratory laparotomy<br />
had revealed a worm that was not removed<br />
(FDA/CSFAN, 1992). Simultaneous<br />
multiple infections with as many as 10 anisakid<br />
worms have been reported in Japan (Ishikura et<br />
al., 1993). Although acute necrotizing eosinophilic<br />
granulomatous inflammation involving the<br />
intestine has been documented in cases of invasive<br />
anisakiasis, hypersensitivity, sensitization,<br />
and a chronic form of the disease lasting<br />
about 2 yr have also been documented (Pinkus<br />
et al., 1975; Alonso et al., 1997).<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Alonso, A., A. Daschner, and A. Moreno-Ancillo.<br />
1997. Anaphylaxis with Anisakis simplex in the<br />
gastric mucosa. New England Journal of Medicine<br />
337:350-352.<br />
Bhargava, D., R. Raman, M. Z. El Azzouni, K.<br />
Bhargava, and B. Bhusnurmath. 1996. Anisakiasis<br />
of the tonsils. Journal of Laryngology and<br />
Otology 110:387-388.<br />
Deardorff, T. L., T. Fukumura, and R. B. Raybourne.<br />
1986. Invasive anisakiasis. A case report<br />
from Hawaii. Gastroenterology 90:1047—<br />
1050.<br />
Gibson, D. 1983. The systematics of ascaridoid nematodes:<br />
a current assessment. Pages 321-338 in A.<br />
F. Stone, H. M. Platt, and L. Khalil, eds. Nematode<br />
Systematics Association. Special Vol. 22.<br />
Academic Press, London.<br />
Hayasaka, H., H. Ishikura, and T. Takayama. 1971.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Acute regional illeitis due to Anisakis larvae. International<br />
Surgery 55:8-14.<br />
Ishikura, H., K. Kikuchi, K. Nagasawa, T. Ooiwa,<br />
H. Takamiya, N. Sato, and K. Sugane. 1993.<br />
Anisakidae and anisakidosis. Progress in Clinical<br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong> 3:43-102.<br />
Jackson, G. J. 1975. The "new disease" status of human<br />
anisakiasis and North American cases: a review.<br />
Journal of Milk and Food Technology 38:<br />
769-773.<br />
Kates, S., K. A. Wright, and R. Wright. 1973. A<br />
case of human infection with the cod nematode<br />
Pseudoterranova sp. American Journal of Tropical<br />
Medicine and Hygiene 22:606-608.<br />
Kliks, M. M. 1983. Anisakiasis in the western United<br />
<strong>State</strong>s. Four new case reports from California.<br />
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene<br />
32:526-532.<br />
Lichtenfels, J. R., and F. P. Brancato. 1976. Anisakid<br />
larva from the throat of an Alaskan Eskimo.<br />
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene<br />
25:691-693.<br />
Little, M. D., and J. C. MacPhail. 1972. Large nematode<br />
larva from the abdominal cavity of a man<br />
in Massachusetts. American Journal of Tropical<br />
Medicine and Hygiene 21:948-950.<br />
, and H. Most. 1973. Anisakid larva from the<br />
throat of a woman in New York. American Journal<br />
of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 22:609—<br />
612.<br />
Margolis, L. 1977. Public health aspects of "codworm"<br />
infections: a review. Journal of Fisheries<br />
Research Board of Canada 34:887-898.<br />
McKerrow, J. H., and T. L. Deardorff. 1988. Anisakiasis:<br />
revenge of the sushi parasite (letter).<br />
New England Journal of Medicine 319:1228-<br />
1229.<br />
Myers, B. J. 1959. Phocanema, a new genus for the<br />
anisakid nematode of seals. Canadian Journal of<br />
Zoology 37:459-465.<br />
. 1975. The nematodes that cause anisakiasis.<br />
Journal of Milk and Food Technology 38:774-<br />
782.<br />
. 1976. Research then and now on the Anisakidae<br />
nematodes. Transactions of the American Microscopical<br />
Society 95:137—142.<br />
. 1979. Anisakine nematodes in fresh commercial<br />
fish from waters along the Washington,<br />
Oregon and California coasts. Journal of Food<br />
Protection 42:380-384.<br />
Oshinia T. 1972. Anisakis and anisakiasis in Japan and<br />
adjacent area(s). Pages 301-393 in K. Morishita,<br />
Y. Komiya, and H. Matsubayashi, eds. Progress of<br />
Medical <strong>Parasitology</strong> in Japan. Vol. 4. Meguro<br />
Parasitological Museum, Tokyo.<br />
. 1987. Anisakiasis—is the sushi bar guilty.<br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong> Today 3:44-48.<br />
Pinkus, G. S., C. Coolidge, and M. D. Little. 1975.<br />
Intestinal anisakiasis. First case report from North<br />
America. American Journal of Medicine 59:114—<br />
120.<br />
U.S. Food and Drug Administration/Center for<br />
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. 1992. Bad<br />
bug book. Anisakis simplex and related worms.
AMIN ET M^.—PSEUDOTERRANOVA IN MAN 75<br />
Pages 1-3 in Foodborne Pathogenic Microorgan- Yoshimura, H., N. Akao, K. Kondo, and Y. Ohnishi.<br />
isms and Natural Toxins Handbook. World Wide 1979. Clinicopathological studies on larval ani-<br />
Web, http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~mow/chap25.html sakiasis, with special reference to the report of<br />
Van Theil, P. H., F. C. Kuipers, and R. T. Roskani. extra-gastrointestinal anisakiasis. Japanese Journal<br />
1960. A nematode parasitic to herring causing ab- of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 28:347-354.<br />
dominal syndromes in man. Tropical and Geographical<br />
Medicine 12:97-115.<br />
Book Available<br />
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Fourth Edition). International commission on<br />
Zoological Nomenclature, adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences, and published<br />
by the International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, U.K. 1999. 306 pp. ISBN 0-85301-<br />
006-4. 7" X 9%" hardcover.<br />
The newly revised fourth edition of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature has<br />
been published and is now available for purchase. The new Code took effect on January 1, <strong>2000</strong>.<br />
North American sales are being handled by the American Association for Zoological Nomenclature<br />
(AAZN). Retail price is US$65.00, but any member of a recognized scientific society is eligible<br />
for a 25% discount, or US$48.00, on single copies for personal use; provide name and address of<br />
the society membership when ordering. Graduate and undergraduate students are also eligible for<br />
the US$48.00 discount price on single copies for personal use; provide names of college or university<br />
and academic advisor or major professor when ordering. Agencies and institutions; purchasing<br />
5 or more copies are also eligible for the US$48.00 per copy discount price. Individual members<br />
of the American Association for Zoological Nomenclature are granted a 40% discount, or US$39.00,<br />
for single copies for personal use. All prices include surface postage. To order, send a check or<br />
money order for the correct amount (no credit cards), payable to the AAZN, to David G. Smith,<br />
Treasurer AAZN, MRC-159, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20560-0159<br />
(e-mail: smithd@nmnh.si.edu).<br />
Alternatively, orders may be placed directly with the International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature,<br />
c/o The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, U.K. (e-mail:<br />
iczn@nhm.ac.uk). Corresponding prices are £40 (retail price) or £30 (discount price for students<br />
and/or society members). The Trust, unlike the AAZN, will accept credit cards. Purchasers outside<br />
North America are encouraged to order from the Trust in London.<br />
Readers can learn more information about the revised Code by examining the ICZN web site at<br />
http://www.iczn.org/code.htm.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 76-84<br />
Neotropical Monogenoidea. 36. Dactylogyrids from the Gills of<br />
Rhamdia guatemalensis (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) from Cenotes of<br />
the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, with Proposal of Ameloblastella<br />
gen. n. and Aphanoblastetta gen. n. (Dactylogyridae:<br />
Ancyrocephalinae)<br />
DELANE C. KRiTSKY,1-4 EDGAR F. MENDOZA-FRANCO,2 AND TOMAS ScHOLZ2'3<br />
1 Department of Health and Nutrition Sciences, Box 8090, Idaho <strong>State</strong> University, Pocatello, Idaho 83209,<br />
U.S.A. (e-mail: kritdela@isu.edu),<br />
2 Center for Investigation and Advanced Studies, National Polytechnic Institute (CINVESTAV-IPN),<br />
University of Merida, Carretera Antigua a Progreso Km 6, A.P. 73 "Cordemex," C. P. 97310 Merida,<br />
Yucatan, Mexico (e-mail: mfranco@kin.cieamer.conacyt.mx), and<br />
3 Institute of <strong>Parasitology</strong>, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Branisovska 31,<br />
370 05 80 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic (e-mail: tscholz@paru.cas.cz)<br />
ABSTRACT: Ameloblastella gen. n. and Aphanoblastella gen. n. are proposed for dactylogyrids from the gills of<br />
pimelodid catfishes (Siluriformes) in the Neotropical Biogeographical Region. Species of Ameloblastella and<br />
Aphanoblastella are characterized on the bases of gonadal position, hook shank morphology, presence/absence<br />
of eyes and eye granules, and morphology of the male reproductive system. Two species of Urocleidoides (sensu<br />
lato) and 1 of Vancleaveus are transferred to Ameloblastella as A. chavarriai (Price, 1938) comb. n. (type<br />
species), A. mamaevi (Kritsky and Thatcher, 1976) comb, n., and A. platensis (Suriano and Incorvaia, 1995)<br />
comb, n., respectively. Three species of Urocleidoides (sensu lato) from pimelodid catfishes are transferred to<br />
Aphanoblastella as A. travassosi (Price, 1938) comb. n. (type species), A. robiistus (Mizelle and Kritsky, 1969)<br />
comb, n., and A. mastigatus (Suriano, 1986) comb. n.<br />
KEY WORDS: Monogenoidea, Dactylogyridae, Ameloblastella, Aphanoblastella, Ameloblastella chavarriai<br />
comb, n., Ameloblastella mamaevi comb, n., Ameloblastella platensis comb, n., Aphanoblastella travassosi comb,<br />
n., Aphanoblastella mastigatus comb, n., Aphanoblastella robiistus comb, n., catfish, Siluriformes, Pimelodidae,<br />
Rhamdia guatemalensis, cenotes, Mexico.<br />
Price (1938) described the dactylogyrids,<br />
Cleidodiscus chavarriai and Clcidodiscus travassosi,<br />
from the gills of the pimelodid catfish,<br />
Rhamdia rogersi (Regan, 1907) (a junior synonym<br />
of Rhamdia laticauda (Kner, 1857) according<br />
to Silfvergrip, 1996) in Costa Rica. Molnar<br />
et al. (1974) transferred the 2 species to Urocleidoides<br />
Mizelle and Price, 1964, based on the<br />
emended diagnosis of the genus provided by<br />
Mizelle et al. (1968). The diagnosis in Mizelle<br />
et al. (1968) greatly expanded the generic<br />
bounds of Urocleidoides, and within 5 years,<br />
species of the genus had been described from<br />
fishes of 5 orders: Atheriniformes, Characiformes,<br />
Gymnotiformes, Perciformes, and Siluriformes.<br />
Kritsky et al. (1986) restricted Urocleidoides<br />
to species having a sinistral vaginal sclerite,<br />
transferred several species from the genus to<br />
Gussevia Kohn and Paperna, 1964, and consid-<br />
Corresponding author.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
76<br />
ered 22 described species incertae sedis, the latter<br />
group including U. chavarriai and U. travassosi.<br />
The puipose of this investigation was to<br />
determine the generic placement of several previously<br />
described species of Urocleidoides sensu<br />
lato described from pimelodid catfishes in the<br />
Neotropical Biogeographical Region. The study<br />
is based on new collections of U. chavarriai and<br />
U. travassosi on Rhamdia guatemalensis (Giinther,<br />
1864) (a junior synonym of Rhamdia quelen<br />
(Quoy and Gaimard, 1824) according to<br />
Silfvergrip, 1996) from cenotes (sinkholes) in<br />
the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Fish hosts, R. guatemalensis, were collected by hook<br />
and line or casting nets from cenotes on the Yucatan<br />
Peninsula, Mexico, during 1993-1998 (see Scholz et<br />
al., 1995). Gill baskets were removed from fish, placed<br />
in petri dishes with tap water, and examined with a<br />
dissection microscope. Methods of collection, preservation,<br />
mounting, and illustration of helminths were<br />
those described by Kritsky et al. (1986), except that
the gill baskets of some hosts were fixed in hot<br />
(~90°C) 4% formalin according to methods presented<br />
by Scholz and Hanzelova (1998); specimens fixed in<br />
hot formalin had extended or relaxed peduncles, while<br />
those fixed in ambient formalin (=30°C) had contracted<br />
peduncles. Measurements, all in micrometers, were<br />
made with a filar micrometer according to procedures<br />
of Mizelle and Klucka (1953), except that length of<br />
the inale copulatory organ is an approximation of total<br />
length obtained by using a calibrated Minerva curvimeter<br />
on camera lucida drawings; average measurements<br />
are followed by ranges and the number (n) of<br />
specimens measured in parentheses; unstained flattened<br />
specimens mounted in Hoyer's or Malmberg's<br />
media were used to obtain measurements of hooks,<br />
anchors, and the copulatory complex; all other measurements<br />
were obtained from unflattened specimens<br />
stained with Gomori's trichrome or Mayer's carmine<br />
and mounted in Canada balsam. Voucher specimens of<br />
helminths collected during this study were deposited<br />
in the United <strong>State</strong>s National Parasite Collection<br />
(USNPC), Beltsville, Maryland, U.S.A., and the helminth<br />
collections of the University of Nebraska <strong>State</strong><br />
Museum (HWML), Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.A.; the Institute<br />
dc Biologfa, Universidad Nacional Autonoma<br />
de Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico; the <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
Laboratory, Center for Investigation and Advanced<br />
Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute<br />
(CINVESTAV-IPN) (CHCM), Mcrida, Mexico, and<br />
the Institute of <strong>Parasitology</strong>, Academy of Sciences of<br />
the Czech Republic (IPCAS), Ceske Budejovice,<br />
Czech Republic, as indicated in the following redescriptions.<br />
For comparative purposes, the following<br />
specimens were examined: 2 voucher specimens of U.<br />
chavarriai (USNPC 73178) and 3 voucher specimens<br />
of U. travassosi (USNPC 73179), both lots deposited<br />
by Molnar et al. (1974); holotype and 9 paratypes of<br />
Urocleidoides robustus Mizelle and Kritsky, 1969<br />
(USNPC 71009, 73565, HWML 22941); and a voucher<br />
specimen of Philocorydoras sp. (probably =U. margolisi<br />
Molnar, Hanek, and Fernando, 1974) (USNPC<br />
88965).<br />
Results<br />
Class Monogenoidea Bychowsky, 1937<br />
Order Dactylogyridea Bychowsky, 1937<br />
Dactylogyridae Bychowsky, 1933<br />
Ameloblastella gen. n.<br />
DIAGNOSIS: Body fusiform, slightly flattened<br />
dorsoventrally, comprising cephalic region,<br />
trunk, peduncle, haptor. Tegument smooth. Two<br />
terminal, 2 bilateral cephalic lobes; 3 bilateral<br />
pairs of head organs; cephalic glands unicellular,<br />
lateral or posterolateral to pharynx. Eyes absent;<br />
accessory eye granules subspherical. Mouth subterminal,<br />
midventral, anterior to pharynx; pharynx<br />
muscular, glandular; esophagus present; 2<br />
intestinal ceca confluent posterior to gonads,<br />
lacking diverticula. Genital pore midventral near<br />
level of intestinal bifurcation. Gonads intercecal,<br />
KRITSKY BT AL.—DACTYLOGYRIDS FROM MEXICAN CENOTES 77<br />
overlapping; testis dorsal to germarium. Vas deferens<br />
looping left intestinal cecum; seminal vesicle<br />
a dilation of vas deferens. Copulatory complex<br />
comprising basally articulated male copulatory<br />
organ, accessory piece. Male copulatory<br />
organ tubular, coiled; coil with counterclockwise<br />
rings (see Kritsky et al., 1985). Accessory piece<br />
with complex distal region serving as guide for<br />
male copulatory organ, articulation piece extending<br />
within rings to base of male copulatory<br />
organ. Seminal receptacle pregermarial; vaginal<br />
aperture sinistral; vitellaria coextensive with intestine.<br />
Haptor globose to subhexagonal, armed<br />
with dorsal, ventral anchor/bar complexes, 7<br />
pairs of similar hooks; hook distribution ancyrocephaline<br />
(Mizelle, 1936; see Mizelle and<br />
Price, 1963). Ventral bar with posteromedial<br />
projection. Hook with shank comprising 2 subunits;<br />
proximal subunit expanded. Parasites of<br />
the gills of neotropical pimelodid catfishes (Siluriformes).<br />
TYPE SPECIES: Ameloblastella chavarriai<br />
(Price, 1938) comb. n. ( = Cleidodiscus chavarriai<br />
Price, 1938) from R. rogersi (Regan), R.<br />
guatemalensis (Giinther), Rhamdia sebae (Valenciennes,<br />
1840), and R. quelen (Quoy and Gaimard)<br />
in Costa Rica, Mexico, and Trinidad, respectively.<br />
OTHER SPECIES: Ameloblastella tnamaevi<br />
(Kritsky and Thatcher, 1976) comb. n. (= Urocleidoides<br />
mamaevi Kritsky and Thatcher,<br />
1976) from Cephalosilurus zungaro (Humboldt,<br />
1833) in Colombia, South America.<br />
Ameloblastella platensis (Suriano and Incorvaia,<br />
1995) comb. n. ( — Vancleaveus platensis<br />
Suriano and Incorvaia, 1995) from Pirnelodus<br />
clarias maculatus (Lacepede, 1803) in Argentina,<br />
South America.<br />
ETYMOLOGY: The generic name is from<br />
Greek (amel/o — neglected + blast/o = germ,<br />
branch) appended to the diminutive ending<br />
(-ella), and refers to the long period before recognition<br />
of generic placement of its members.<br />
REMARKS: Ameloblastella gen. n. is primarily<br />
characterized by dactylogyrids with 1) overlapping<br />
gonads (testis dorsal to germarium); 2)<br />
subspherical accessory eye granules; 3) a basally<br />
articulated male copulatory organ and accessory<br />
piece; 4) a coiled male copulatory organ with<br />
counterclockwise rings; 5) a ventral bar with a<br />
medial process; 6) a seminal vesicle formed by<br />
a simple dilation of the vas deferens; 7) inflated<br />
hook shanks, each composed of 2 subunits<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
78 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
(proximal subunit expanded); 8) a sinistral vaginal<br />
aperture; and 9) absence of eyes. Of dactylogyrid<br />
genera with members infecting freshwater<br />
siluriforms in the Neotropics, characters<br />
defining Ameloblastella suggest a relationship<br />
with Vancleaveus Kritsky, Thatcher, and Boeger,<br />
1986, and Philocorydoras Suriano, 1986. Members<br />
of these 3 genera share the characteristics<br />
of possessing overlapping gonads (testis dorsal<br />
to germarium), a ventral bar with a medial process,<br />
hook shanks comprised of 2 subunits<br />
(proximal subunit expanded), subspherical eye<br />
granules, and a dilation of the vas deferens to<br />
form the seminal vesicle. Ameloblastella differs<br />
from both Vancleaveus and Philocotydoras by<br />
the position of the vaginal aperture (ventral in<br />
Vancleaveus and Philocorydoras). It further differs<br />
from Philocorydoras by lacking eyes and<br />
having a coiled male copulatory organ (male<br />
copulatory organ an arced tube in Philocorydoras)',<br />
and from Vancleaveus by the absence of a<br />
basal fold on the superficial root of the dorsal<br />
anchor and an expanded distal subunit of the<br />
hook shank (both present in Vancleaveus) (see<br />
Kritsky et al., 1986; Suriano, 1986b).<br />
Of the 22 species of Urocleidoides considered<br />
incertae sedis by Kritsky et al. (1986), 2 of them<br />
are transferred to Ameloblastella as A. chavarriai<br />
(Price, 1938) comb. n. and A. mamaevi<br />
(Kritsky and Thatcher, 1976) comb. n. While A.<br />
chavarriai is the type species of Ameloblastella<br />
and defines the genus, A. mamaevi possesses all<br />
diagnostic features of Ameloblastella (see Kritsky<br />
and Thatcher, 1976).<br />
Suriano and Incorvaia (1995) described Vancleaveus<br />
platensis from the gills of the pimelodid,<br />
P. c. maculatus. This helminth is not a member<br />
of Vancleaveus because of the absence of<br />
basal folds on the superficial root of the dorsal<br />
anchor and the presence of a sinistral vaginal<br />
aperture (vaginal pore ventral in Vancleaveus<br />
spp.). The original description of the species indicates<br />
that it possesses all of the diagnostic features<br />
of Ameloblastella, except for the presence<br />
of a nonarticulated male copulatory organ and<br />
accessory piece. However, specimens of this<br />
species in the senior author's collection and collected<br />
from Pimelodus clarias (Lacepede) from<br />
the Rio de la Plata, Argentina, show a delicate<br />
articulation process attaching the base of the<br />
male copulatory organ to the accessory piece.<br />
The latter finding supports the transfer of V. platensis<br />
to Ameloblastella.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Ameloblastella chavarriai (Price, 1938)<br />
comb. n.<br />
(Figs. 1-9)<br />
REDESCRIPTION: Body 596 (408-742; n =<br />
30) long; greatest width 113 (92-134; n = 33)<br />
usually in posterior trunk. Cephalic lobes poorly<br />
to moderately developed. Accessory eye granules<br />
in cephalic, anterior trunk regions. Pharynx<br />
ovate, 27 (24-30; n = 33) in greatest width;<br />
esophagus short to moderately long. Peduncle<br />
contracted, broad (ambient temperature formalin<br />
fixation) or elongate, narrow (hot formalin fixation);<br />
haptor subhexagonal, 84 (69-108; n =<br />
28) wide, 72 (60-88; n = 29) long. Ventral anchor<br />
33 (30-36; n = 22) long, with elongate<br />
superficial root, short deep root, slightly curved<br />
shaft, straight point; base 19 (16-21; n = 16)<br />
wide. Dorsal anchor 27 (23—31; n = 16) long,<br />
with well-developed roots, slightly curved shaft,<br />
elongate straight point; deep root protruding<br />
posteriorly from anchor base; anchor base 18<br />
(17-20; n = 10) wide. Ventral bar 33 (29-37;<br />
n = 22) long, yoke-shaped, with posteromedial<br />
process usually bent anteriorly dorsal to bar.<br />
Dorsal bar 30 (26-34; n = 20) long, broadly Vshaped,<br />
with slightly enlarged ends. Hook with<br />
protruding truncate thumb, delicate point; hook<br />
24 (20-27; n = 36) long; filamentous booklet<br />
(FH) loop extending to level of union of shank<br />
subunits. Male copulatory organ 141 (128-158;<br />
n = 8) long, a coil of about 2.5 rings; diameter<br />
of proximal ring 17 (15-20; n = 20); base of<br />
male copulatory organ with small sclerotized<br />
plate. Accessory piece 32 (27—38; n = 26) long,<br />
25 (22—32; n — 22) wide, comprising 2 subunits;<br />
dextral subunit terminally acute, subtriangular,<br />
with expanded lateral margins; sinistral subunit<br />
L-shaped with flared termination, serving as<br />
guide for male copulatory organ. Testis elongate,<br />
fusiform (lateral margins indistinct); seminal<br />
vesicle large, fusiform, lying diagonally in median<br />
field of anterior trunk posterior to male copulatory<br />
organ; prostatic reservoir lying to right<br />
of seminal vesicle and body midline, posterior<br />
to male copulatory organ. Germarium an inverted<br />
elongate cone, 119 (84-166; n = 20) long,<br />
35 (27—53; n = 21) wide; oviduct, ootype not<br />
observed; uterus delicate, infrequently with single<br />
egg; vagina a sclerotized tube; vaginal aperture<br />
on sclerotized papilla lying in small indentation<br />
of body margin; seminal receptacle
KRITSKY ET AL.—DACTYLOGYRIDS FROM MEXICAN CENOTES 79<br />
Figures 1-9. Ameloblastella chavarriai (Price, 1938) comb. n. 1. Whole mount (composite, ventral). 2.<br />
Vagina. 3. Hook. 4. Copulatory complex (ventral). 5. Whole mount (fixed in hot formalin). 6. Ventral<br />
anchor. 7. Ventral bar. 8. Dorsal bar. 9. Dorsal anchor. All figures are to the 25-|j,m scale except Figures<br />
1 and 5 (200-n.m scales).<br />
large, subovate. Egg 63 (n — 1) long, 30 (n =<br />
1) wide, ovate, with short proximal filament.<br />
SYNONYMS: Cleidodiscm chavarriai Price,<br />
1938; Urocleidoides chavarriai (Price, 1938)<br />
Molnar, Hanek, and Fernando, 1974.<br />
HOST AND LOCALITY: Gills of Rhamdia guatemalensis<br />
(Giinther); Ixin-ha Cenote, Yucatan,<br />
Mexico (20°37'14"N; 89°06'40"W) (11 July<br />
1994; 11 May 1997; 26 October 1998).<br />
PREVIOUS RECORDS: Rhamdia rogersi (Regan)<br />
(type host), San Pedro Monies de Oca, Costa<br />
Rica (Price, 1938); R. quelen (Quoy and Gai-<br />
mard) and R. sebae (Valenciennes), Cumuto<br />
River near Coryal, Trinidad (Molnar et al.,<br />
1974).<br />
SPECIMENS STUDIED: 57 vouchers, USNPC<br />
88963, HWML 15015, UNAM 3710, IPCAS M-<br />
354, CHCM 313; 2 vouchers deposited by Molnar<br />
et al. (1974), USNPC 73178.<br />
REMARKS: Ameloblastella chavarriai (Price,<br />
1938) comb. n. is the type species of the genus.<br />
Although the morphometrics of present specimens<br />
differ from those reported in the original<br />
description by Price (1938), our specimens pos-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
sess the diagnostic morphological features of the<br />
species. Measurements of the body (247 (Jim<br />
long, 80 (Jim wide), haptor (45 u-m long, 70 (xm<br />
wide), and pharynx (20 [Am wide) reported by<br />
Price (1938) are noticeably smaller than those<br />
presented herein, suggesting that the type specimens<br />
were strongly contracted as a result of fixation.<br />
We do not consider these differences sufficient<br />
to warrant description of a new species<br />
for the helminths in our collection, since the<br />
method of fixation greatly influences the morphometrics<br />
of soft body parts. Fixation of our<br />
material in hot formalin resulted in extended<br />
specimens (Fig. 5), while ambient temperature<br />
formalin fixation (the method most likely used<br />
by Price, 1938) resulted in contracted specimens<br />
with a body length of about half that of those<br />
fixed in hot formalin. Haptoral sclerites and the<br />
copulatory complex in our specimens correspond<br />
morphometrically to respective values<br />
provided by Price (1938). Measurements by<br />
Molnar et al. (1974) generally fall within the<br />
ranges of the combined measurements of Price<br />
(1938) and those presented herein, respectively.<br />
Although numerous collections of R. guatemalensis<br />
were made from cenotes throughout<br />
the Yucatan Peninsula (see Scholz et al., 1995),<br />
A. chavarriai was found only in Ixin-ha Cenote.<br />
This suggests an apparent limited distribution of<br />
the species in the Yucatan Peninsula. However,<br />
individual collections from Ixin-ha Cenote conducted<br />
at different periods of 1997-1998<br />
showed intensity levels of A. chavarriai relative<br />
to the other dactylogyrid species (Aphanoblastella<br />
travossosi) on this host to vary from being<br />
predominant (^95%) to nearly insignificant<br />
(
er, and Boeger, 1986, and Amphocleithrium<br />
Price and Gonzalez-Romero, 1969, by having<br />
tandem gonads, nondilated hook shanks each<br />
with 1 subunit, counterclockwise rings in the<br />
male copulatory organ, a seminal vesicle formed<br />
by a simple dilation of the vas deferens, a sinistral<br />
vaginal pore, and a nonsclerotized vagina. It<br />
differs from Cosmetocleithrum by lacking 2 submedial<br />
projections on the dorsal bar and by having<br />
well-developed eyes (Kritsky et al., 1986).<br />
Aphanoblastella differs from Amphocleithrium<br />
by possessing 2 pairs of eyes and a nonarticulated<br />
male copulatory organ and accessory piece<br />
(Suriano and Incorvaia, 1995).<br />
The internal anatomy of species of Aphanoblastella<br />
is also identical to that of Demidospermus<br />
Suriano, 1983, as emended by Kritsky<br />
and Gutierrez (1998). Aphanoblastella differs<br />
from Demidospermus spp. by possessing short<br />
ventral bars with a medial process (ventral bars<br />
elongate, V- or W-shaped, lacking a medial process<br />
in Demidospermus}. Thumbs of hook pairs<br />
5 and 6 are modified in species of Demidospermus<br />
(see Kritsky and Gutierrez, 1998), whereas<br />
all hooks are similar and unmodified in Aphanoblastella<br />
spp.<br />
Three previously described species of Urocleidoides<br />
(sensu lato) from Rhamdia spp., U.<br />
travassosi (Price, 1938), U. robustus Mizelle<br />
and Kritsky, 1969, and U. mastigatus Suriano,<br />
1986, are transferred to Aphanoblastella as A.<br />
travassosi (Price, 1938) comb, n., A. robustus<br />
(Mizelle and Kritsky, 1969) comb, n., and A.<br />
mastigatus (Suriano, 1986) comb, n., respectively.<br />
Aphanoblastella travassosi comb. n. is the<br />
type species and therefore defines the new genus.<br />
Aphanoblastella mastigatus comb. n. also<br />
is clearly a member of the genus based on the<br />
original description (compare figures and description<br />
in Suriano, 1986a). Aphanoblastella<br />
mastigatus appears to be the sister species of A.<br />
travassosi.<br />
The original description of U. robustus by<br />
Mizelle and Kritsky (1969) was based on unstained<br />
and cleared specimens mounted in Gray<br />
and Wess' medium. Mizelle and Kritsky (1969)<br />
described the gonads to be tandem or overlapping,<br />
suggesting that the germarium is anterior<br />
to the testis with which it may overlap; the type<br />
specimens of U. robustus available to us were<br />
not useful in confirming gonadal position. Thus,<br />
our transfer of this species to Aphanoblastella is<br />
based on the original statements by Mizelle and<br />
KRITSKY ET AL.—DACTYLOGYRIDS FROM MEXICAN CENOTES 81<br />
Kritsky (1969) concerning gonadal position and<br />
on the similar position and morphology of sclerotized<br />
haptoral and copulatory structures to<br />
those of A. travassosi.<br />
Aphanoblastella travassosi (Price, 1938)<br />
comb. n.<br />
(Figs. 10-18)<br />
REDESCRIPTION: Body 282 (204-364; n =<br />
34) long; greatest width 104 (77-127; n = 32)<br />
in posterior trunk. Cephalic lobes poorly to moderately<br />
developed. Eyes equidistant, posterior<br />
pair larger; accessory granules usually uncommon<br />
in cephalic region. Pharynx subspherical,<br />
28 (21-33; n = 23) in diameter; esophagus<br />
short. Peduncle broad; haptor 55 (45-63; n =<br />
31) wide, 40 (33-50; n = 32) long. Ventral anchor<br />
22 (21-24; n = 13) long, with elongate<br />
superficial root, short deep root, straight shaft,<br />
curved elongate point; base 16 (14-17; n = 11)<br />
wide, variable. Dorsal anchor 24 (21-27; n =<br />
11) long, with well-developed roots, straight<br />
shaft, elongate curved point; base 16 (14-18;<br />
n = 12) wide. Ventral bar 32 (29-37; n = 10)<br />
long, delicate, broadly V-shaped, with posteromedial<br />
process directed posteriorly; dorsal bar<br />
37 (31-44; n = 9) long, broadly V-shaped, with<br />
narrowed bulbous ends. Hook 13 (12—14; n =<br />
23) long, with protruding thumb, delicate point,<br />
fine shank; FH loop about two-thirds shank<br />
length. Male copulatory organ 41 (38-45; n =<br />
5) long, a coil of about 2 rings, base of male<br />
copulatory organ with small sclerotized plate;<br />
diameter of proximal ring 5 (4-6; n = 6). Accessory<br />
piece 31 (28-36; n = 4) long, rodshaped,<br />
with broad terminal acute tip. Testis<br />
ovate, 51 (40-59; n = 19) long, 35 (25-46;<br />
n = 18) wide; seminal vesicle indistinct, fusiform,<br />
lying to left of male copulatory organ;<br />
prostatic reservoir not observed. Germarium 28<br />
(20-44; n = 23) long, 22 (18-25; n = 23) wide,<br />
pyriform, comprising comparatively few cells;<br />
oviduct, ootype not observed; uterus delicate;<br />
vagina a diagonal tube extending to left body<br />
margin, vaginal aperture simple; seminal receptacle<br />
small.<br />
SYNONYMS: Cleidodiscus travassosi Price,<br />
1938; Urocleidoides travassosi (Price, 1938)<br />
Molnar, Hanek, and Fernando, 1974.<br />
HOST AND LOCALITY: Gills of Rhamdia guatemalensis<br />
(Giinther); Ixin-ha Cenote, Yucatan,<br />
Mexico (20°37'14"N; 89°06'40"W) (13 June<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
82 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Figures 10-18. Aphanoblastella travassosi (Price, 1938) comb. n. 10. Whole mount (composite, ventral).<br />
11. Ventral bar. 12. Dorsal bar. 13. Copulatory complex (ventral). 14. Hook. 15. Dorsal anchor. 16-18.<br />
Ventral anchors. All drawings are to the 25-fjum scale except Figure 10 (100-fjim scale).<br />
1994; 11 July 1994; 11 May 1997; 26 October<br />
1998).<br />
OTHER RECORDS (specimens not used in this<br />
study): R. guatemalensis: Hubiku Cenote<br />
(20°49'79"N; 88°01'21"W) (18 April 1994); cenote<br />
in village of Hunucma (21°00'03"N;<br />
89°52'06"W) (8 November 1993); Scan-Yui Cenote<br />
(20°40'20"N; 88°32'51"W) (25 January<br />
1994); Tixkanka Cenote (21°14'55"N;<br />
88°58'45"W) (23 May 1994); Xcanganchen Ce-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
note (20°36'43"N; 89°05'32"W) (16 November<br />
1993); Homun Cenote (20°44'19"N; 89°17'49"W)<br />
(3 November 1993); Xmucuy Cenote<br />
(20°33'63"N; 88°59'50"W) (16 November 1993)<br />
(Mendoza-Franco et al., 1999).<br />
PREVIOUS RECORDS: Rhamdia rogersi (Regan),<br />
type host, San Pedro Monies de Oca, Costa<br />
Rica (Price, 1938); R. quelen (Quoy and Gaimard)<br />
and R. sebae (Valenciennes), Cumuto<br />
River near Coryal, Trinidad (Molnar et al.,
1974); P. laticeps Eigenmann, Laguna de Chascomus,<br />
Buenos Aires, Argentina (Suriano,<br />
1986a).<br />
SPECIMENS STUDIED: 49 vouchers, USNPC<br />
88964, HWML 15016, UN AM 3711, IPCAS M-<br />
353, CHCM 314; 3 vouchers deposited by Molnar<br />
et al. (1974), USNPC 73179.<br />
REMARKS: Aphanoblastella travassosi is<br />
widely distributed in cenotes of the Yucatan<br />
Peninsula. All available specimens were slightly<br />
to strongly contracted as a result of fixation in<br />
ambient 4% formalin; however, our measurements<br />
correspond fairly closely to respective<br />
values reported by Price (1938), Molnar et al.<br />
(1974), and Suriano (1986a). Price (1938) did<br />
not describe or draw the accessory piece of the<br />
copulatory complex of this species but indicated<br />
that one was present; the drawing of the copulatory<br />
complex by Molnar et al. (1974) corresponds<br />
to our Figure 13, while that provided by<br />
Suriano (1986a) is apparently distorted.<br />
Discussion<br />
Of the 22 species of Urocleidoides from the<br />
Neotropical Region that were considered incertae<br />
sedis by Kritsky et al. (1986), 17 remain to<br />
be reassigned at the generic level: Urocleidoides<br />
affinis Mizelle, Kritsky, and Crane, 1968, from<br />
Characidae (Characiformes); Urocleidoides<br />
amazonensis Mizelle and Kritsky, 1969, from<br />
Pimelodidae (Siluriformes); Urocleidoides carapus<br />
Mizelle, Kritsky, and Crane, 1968, from<br />
Gymnotidae (Gymnotiformes); Urocleidoides<br />
catus Mizelle and Kritsky, 1969, from Pimelodidae<br />
(Siluriformes); Urocleidoides corydori<br />
Molnar, Hanek, and Fernando, 1974, from Callichthyidae<br />
(Siluriformes); Urocleidoides costaricensis<br />
(Price and Bussing, 19<strong>67</strong>) Kritsky and<br />
Leiby, 1972, from Characidae (Characiformes);<br />
Urocleidoides gymnotus Mizelle, Kritsky, and<br />
Crane, 1968, from Gymnotidae (Gymnotiformes);<br />
Urocleidoides heteroancistrium (Price and<br />
Bussing, 1968) Kritsky and Leiby, 1972, from<br />
Characidae (Characiformes); Urocleidoides kabatai<br />
Molnar, Hanek, and Fernando, 1974, from<br />
Characidae (Characiformes); Urocleidoides lebedevi<br />
Kritsky and Thatcher, 1976, from Pimelodidae<br />
(Siluriformes); Urocleidoides margolisi<br />
Molnar, Hanek, and Fernando, 1974, from Callichthyidae<br />
(Siluriformes); Urocleidoides megorchis<br />
Mizelle and Kritsky, 1969, from Pimelodidae<br />
(Siluriformes); Urocleidoides microstomus<br />
Mizelle, Kritsky, and Crane, 1968, from<br />
KRITSKY ET AL.—DACTYLOGYRIDS FROM MEXICAN CENOTES<br />
Characidae (Characiformes); Urocleidoides stictus<br />
Mizelle, Kritsky, and Crane, 1968, from<br />
Characidae (Characiformes); Urocleidoides<br />
strombicirrus (Price and Bussing, 19<strong>67</strong>) Kritsky<br />
and Thatcher, 1974, from Characidae (Characiformes);<br />
Urocleidoides trinidadensis Molnar,<br />
Hanek, and Fernando, 1974, from Characidae<br />
(Characiformes); and Urocleidoides virescens<br />
Mizelle, Kritsky, and Crane, 1968, from Gymnotidae<br />
(Gymnotiformes). Previously, Kritsky et<br />
al. (1989) transferred Urocleidoides variabilis<br />
Mizelle and Kritsky, 1969, a parasite of neotropical<br />
Cichlidae (Perciformes), to Sciadicleithrum<br />
Kritsky, Thatcher, and Boeger, 1989. In the<br />
present study, 5 species of Urocleidoides (sensu<br />
lato) from pimelodids (1 described subsequent<br />
to the emended diagnosis of Urocleidoides by<br />
Kritsky et al., 1986) are reassigned to Ameloblastella<br />
gen. n. or Aphanoblastella gen. n.<br />
Six of the Urocleidoides spp. remaining as incertae<br />
sedis occur on siluriform catfishes in the<br />
Neotropical Biogeographical Region. Based on<br />
the comparative morphology of the copulatory<br />
complexes of U. corydori, U. margolisi, and<br />
Philocorydoras platensis Suriano, 1986, the former<br />
2 species should probably be transferred to<br />
Philocorydoras (see Suriano, 1986b; Molnar et<br />
al., 1974). We have not formally made this transfer<br />
because details of the internal anatomy, particularly<br />
those of the reproductive systems, are<br />
lacking.<br />
A new genus for U. amazonensis, U. catus,<br />
U. megorchis, and perhaps U. lebedevi is probably<br />
justified based in part on presence of modified<br />
hook pairs 5 and 6 (slender hook shank,<br />
degenerate thumb, and straight point). While<br />
these species lack other generic characters of<br />
Demidospermus (as emended by Kritsky and<br />
Gutierrez, 1998) and therefore cannot be accommodated<br />
in it, species of Demidospermus also<br />
have modified hook pairs 5 and 6, suggesting a<br />
phylogenetic relationship between these species<br />
and Demidospermus spp. Mizelle and Kritsky's<br />
(1969) use of "gut normal" in their descriptions<br />
of U. amazonensis, U. catus, and U. megorchis<br />
is presumed to mean that the gut consists of a<br />
bifurcated esophagus and 2 ceca confluent posterior<br />
to the gonads. However, U. lebedevi was<br />
reported to have 2 blind ceca posterior to the<br />
gonads (Kritsky and Thatcher, 1976). Features<br />
of the digestive system in all of these species<br />
must be verified before formal proposals for generic<br />
placement can be made.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
84 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The authors are indebted to Joaquin Vargas-<br />
Vasquez, Clara Vivas-Rodriguez, Raul Sima-Alvarez,<br />
Jorge Guemez-Ricalde, Gregory Arjona-<br />
TOITCS, Victor Ceja-Moreno, and Miguel Hen-era-Rodriguez,<br />
all of CINVESTAV-IPN, Merida,<br />
for field assistance. Dr. Victor Vidal-Martfnez,<br />
CINVESTAV-IPN, Merida, provided valuable<br />
advice on the species reported herein. Dr. J.<br />
Ralph Lichtenfels, USNPC, allowed us to examine<br />
type and voucher specimens in his care.<br />
Host identification was provided by Esperanza<br />
Perez-Diaz and Mirella Hernandez de Santillana,<br />
both of CINVESTAV-IPN, Merida. This study<br />
was supported by a grant (PO99) from the Comision<br />
Nacional para el Uso y Conocimiento de<br />
la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), Mexico.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Kritsky, D. C., W. A. Boeger, and V. E. Thatcher.<br />
1985. Neotropical Monogenea. 7. Parasites of the<br />
pirarucu, Arapaima gigas (Cuvier), with descriptions<br />
of two new species and redescription of<br />
Dawestrema cycloancistrium Price and Nowlin.<br />
19<strong>67</strong> (Dactylogyridae: Ancyrocephalinae). Proceedings<br />
of the Biological Society of Washington<br />
98:321-331.<br />
, and P. A. Gutierrez. 1998. Neotropical Monogenoidea.<br />
34. Species of Demidospermus (Dactylogyridae,<br />
Ancyrocephalinae) from the gills of<br />
pimelodids (Teleostei, Siluriformes) in Argentina<br />
Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
65:147-159.<br />
, and V.E. Thatcher. 1976. New monogenetic<br />
trematodes from freshwater fishes of western Colombia<br />
with the proposal of Anacanthoroides gen.<br />
n. (Dactylogyridae). Proceedings of the Helmin<br />
thological Society of Washington 43:129-134.<br />
-, and W. A. Boeger. 1986. Neotropical<br />
Monogenea. 8. Revision of Urocleidoidet;<br />
(Dactylogyridae, Ancyrocephalinae). Proceedings<br />
of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
53:1-37.<br />
-, and . 1989. Neotropical<br />
Monogenea. 15. Dactylogyrids from the gills of<br />
Brazilian Cichlidae with proposal of Sciadicleithrum<br />
gen. n. (Dactylogyridae). Proceedings of the<br />
Helminthological Society of Washington 56:128-<br />
\40.<br />
Mendoza-Franco, E. F., T. Scholz, C. Vivas-Rodriguez,<br />
and J. Vargas-Vazquez. 1999. Monogeneans<br />
of freshwater fishes from cenotes ( = sinkholes)<br />
of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Folia<br />
Parasitologica 46:2<strong>67</strong>-273.<br />
Mizelle, J. D. 1936. New species of trematodes from<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
the gills of Illinois fishes. American Midland Naturalist<br />
17:785-806.<br />
, and A. R. Klucka. 1953. Studies on monogenetic<br />
trematodes. XIV. Dactylogyridae from<br />
Wisconsin fishes. American Midland Naturalist<br />
49:720-733.<br />
, and D. C. Kritsky. 1969. Studies on monogenetic<br />
trematodes. XXXIX. Exotic species of<br />
Monopisthocotylea with the proposal of Archidiplectanum<br />
gen. n. and Longihaptor gen. n. American<br />
Midland Naturalist 81:370-386.<br />
, , and J. W. Crane. 1968. Studies on<br />
monogenetic trematodes. XXXVIII. Ancyrocephalinae<br />
from South America with the proposal of<br />
Jainus gen. n. American Midland Naturalist 80:<br />
186-198.<br />
, and C. E. Price. 1963. Additional haptoral<br />
hooks in the genus Dactylogyrus. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
49:1028-1029.<br />
Molnar, K., G. Hanek, and C. H. Fernando. 1974.<br />
Ancyrocephalids (Monogenea) from freshwater<br />
fishes of Trinidad. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 60:<br />
914-920.<br />
Price, E. W. 1938. The monogenetic trematodes of<br />
Latin America. Livro Jubilar Professor Travassos,<br />
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 3:407-413.<br />
Scholz, T., and V. Hanzelova. 1998. Tapeworms of<br />
the Genus Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858 (Cestoda:<br />
Proteocephalidae), Parasites of Fishes in Europe.<br />
Academia, Publishing House of the Academy<br />
of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague.<br />
No. 2, 1998, 119 pp.<br />
, J. Vargas-Vasquez, F. Moravec, C. Vivas-<br />
Rodriquez, and E. Mendoza-Franco. 1995. Cenotes<br />
(sinkholes) of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico,<br />
as a habitat of adult trematodes of fish. Folia<br />
Parasitologica 42:173-192.<br />
Silfvergrip, A. M. C. 1996. A systematic revision of<br />
the neotropical catfish genus Rhamdia (Teleostei,<br />
Pimelodidae). Stockholm University, Stockholm,<br />
Sweden. 156 pp. + 8 pits.<br />
Suriano, D. M. 1986a. El genero Urocleidoides Mizelle<br />
y Price, 1964 (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae).<br />
Anatomia y posicion sistematica. Urocleidoides<br />
mastigatus sp. nov. y U. travassosi (Price,<br />
1934) Molnar, Hanek y Fernando, 1974 parasitas<br />
de Rhamdia sapo (Valenciennes, 1840) Eigenmann<br />
y Eigenmann, 1888 y Pimelodella laticeps<br />
Eigenmann, 1917 (Pisces: Siluriformes) de la Laguna<br />
de Chascomus, Republica Argentina. Physis<br />
(Buenos Aires), Sec. B, 44 (107):73-80.<br />
. 1986b. Philocorydoras platensis gen. n. et sp.<br />
n. (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) from Corydoras<br />
paleatus (Jenyns) (Pisces: Callichthyidae)<br />
in Laguna Chascomus-Republica Argentina. Helminthologia<br />
23:249-256.<br />
, and I. S. Incorvaia. 1995. Ancyrocephalid<br />
(Monogenea) parasites from siluriform fishes from<br />
the Paranean-Platean ichthyogeographical province<br />
in Argentina. Acta Parasitologica 40:113-<br />
124.
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 85-91<br />
Species of Sciadicleithrum (Dactylogyridae: Ancyrocephalinae) of<br />
Cichlid Fishes from Southeastern Mexico and Guatemala: New<br />
Morphological Data and Host and Geographical Records<br />
EDGAR MENDOZA-FRANCO, '-3 VICTOR VIDAL-MARTINEZ,' LEOPOLDINA AGUIRRE-MACEDO,'<br />
ROSSANNA RODRIGUEZ-CANUL,1 AND TOMAS SCHOLZ1'2<br />
1 Laboratory of <strong>Parasitology</strong>, Center for Research and Advanced Studies, National Polytechnic Institute<br />
(CINVESTAV-IPN), Carretera Antigua a Progreso Km. 6, A.P. 73 "Cordemex", C.P. 97310 Merida, Yucatan,<br />
Mexico (e-mail: mfranco@kin.cieamer.conacyt.mx), and<br />
2 Institute of <strong>Parasitology</strong>, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Branisovska 31,<br />
370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic<br />
ABSTRACT: A survey of species of Sciadicleithrum (Monogenca: Dactylogyridae) from the gills of cichlid fishes<br />
from the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico and neighboring regions is provided. Sciadicleithrum mexicanwn Kritsky,<br />
Vidal-Martfnez, and Rodrfguez-Canul is reported from Cichlasoma urophthalmus (type host), Cichlasoma aureum,<br />
and Petenia splendida (new host records) from Mexico, and Cichlasoma trimaculatum from Guatemala<br />
(new host and geographical record); Sciadicleithrum bravohollisae Kritsky, Vidal-Martfnez, and Rodrfguez-Canul<br />
from Cichlasoma geddesi, Cichlasoma lentiginosum, Cichlasoma managuense, Cichlasoma salvini, and Cichlasoma<br />
sp. (all new host records); Sciadicleithrum splendidae Kritsky, Vidal-Martfnez, and Rodrfguez-Canul<br />
from Cichlasoma friedrichstahli and C. managuense (new host records); and Sciadicleithrum rneekii Mendoza-<br />
Franco, Scholz, and Vidal-Martfnez from Cichlasoma callolepis, Cichlasoma helleri, and C. managuense (new<br />
host records) from Mexico. Data on morphological and biometrical variability of individual species from different<br />
hosts are provided. Species of Sciadicleithrum from Mexico and Guatemala exhibit wide host specificity. The<br />
present records expand distributional areas of all of the species of Sciadicleithrum studied.<br />
KKY WORDS: Sciadicleithrum, Monogenea, Dactylogyridae, Cichlidae, host specificity, zoogeography, Mexico,<br />
Guatemala.<br />
Sciadicleithrum was proposed by Kritsky et<br />
al. (1989) to accommodate 9 species of Ancyrocephalinae<br />
(Monogenea: Dactylogyridae)<br />
from cichlid fishes from South America. Since<br />
then, 4 other species have been described from<br />
cichlids of the Peninsula of Yucatan, Mexico,<br />
namely Sciadicleithrum mexicanwn Kritsky, Vidal-Martfnez,<br />
and Rodrfguez-Canul, 1994, from<br />
Cichlasoma urophthalmus (Gunther, 1862);<br />
Sciadicleithrum bravohollisae Kritsky. Vidal-<br />
Martfnez, and Rodrfguez-Canul, 1994, from<br />
Cichlasoma pearsei (Hubbs, 1936), Cichlasoma<br />
synspilum Hubbs, 1935, and Petenia splendida<br />
Gunther, 1862; Sciadicleithrum splendidae Kritsky,<br />
Vidal-Martfnez, and Rodrfguez-Canul,<br />
1994, from Petenia splendida; and Sciadicleithrum<br />
meekii Mendoza-Franco, Scholz, and Vidal-<br />
Martfnez, 1997, from Cichlasoma meeki (Brind,<br />
1918) (Kritsky et al., 1994; Mendoza-Franco et<br />
al., 1997).<br />
During a recent helminthological study on<br />
cichlid fishes from southeastern Mexico, monogeneans<br />
assigned to Sciadicleithrum were found<br />
-' Corresponding author.<br />
on the gills of several species of Cichlidae, including<br />
hosts not reported previously. This new<br />
material allowed us to supplement the original<br />
descriptions (sometimes based on a limited number<br />
of specimens) by morphological and biometrical<br />
data on intraspecific variability of individual<br />
species from different fish hosts. Numerous<br />
new host and geographical records also<br />
made it possible to evaluate the specificity of<br />
species of Sciadicleithrum from the Yucatan<br />
Peninsula.<br />
Material and Methods<br />
Cichlids were collected by line and hook, throw<br />
nets, or electrofishing from the following localities<br />
in southeastern Mexico and Guatemala: Mexico.<br />
<strong>State</strong> of Chiapas: Cedros River (16°45'21"N;<br />
91°09'30"W) and Lacanja River (16°46'21"N;<br />
91°04'21"W). <strong>State</strong> of Tabasco: Santa Anita Lagoon<br />
(18°22'15"N; 92°53'10"W); El Yucateco Lagoon<br />
(18°11'33"N<br />
(18°25'35"N<br />
(17°59'46"N<br />
(18°14'57"N<br />
(18°00'37"N<br />
94°00'35"W); Parafso River<br />
93°12'00"W); Ilusiones Lagoon<br />
92°56'17"W); Horizonte Lagoon<br />
92°49'59"W); Yumka Lake<br />
92°48'12"W); Puyacatengo River<br />
(17°34'58"N; 92°53'22"W). <strong>State</strong> of Campeche: Palizada<br />
River (18°17'16"N; 91°56'52"W); Silvituc La-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
86 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
goon (18°37'50"N; 90°16'50"W); La Pera Lagoon<br />
(18°16'57"N; 91°56'21"W); Terminos Lagoon, Santa<br />
Gertrudis station (18°26'51"N; 91°48'59"W); Rancho<br />
II station (18°20'30"N; 91°42'30"W); El Viento<br />
station (18°26'01"N; 91°49'48"W). <strong>State</strong> of Yucatan:<br />
Dzaptiin Cenote (20°51'19"N; 90°14'09"W); Chaamac<br />
Cenote (20°51'53"N; 90°09'18"W); Petentuche<br />
Cenote (21°33'90"N; 88°04'44"W); Dzonot Cervera<br />
Cenote (21°22'36"N; 88°49'59"W); Ojo de Agua ( =<br />
water spring), Celestun Lagoon (20°52'37"N;<br />
90°21'18"W). <strong>State</strong> of Quintana Roo: Mahahual<br />
(18°58'17"N; 87°57'30"W); Cenote Azul (Bacalar)<br />
(18°38'11"N; 88°24'46"W); Raudales Lagoon<br />
(18°42'27"N; 88°15'22"W); Hondo River (18°17'N;<br />
88°38'W); Valle Hermoso Lagoon (19°10'N;<br />
88°31'W); Rancho Don Milo (18°37'43"N;<br />
88°01'15"W). Guatemala: Champerico River, Department<br />
of Retalhuleu, near the border with El Salvador<br />
(14°20'N; 91°54'W).<br />
Sampling dates and parameters of infection are provided<br />
for each species in the results section. Fishes<br />
were transported alive to the laboratory and dissected<br />
using standard parasitological procedures. Monogeneans<br />
found on the gills were isolated and fixed with a<br />
glycerin-ammonium picrate mixture and then remounted<br />
in Canada balsam (Ergens, 1969). However,<br />
in most cases this technique was modified using Berland's<br />
solution before applying a glycerin—ammonium<br />
picrate mixture (Berland, 1961). A worm was placed<br />
in a small droplet of water on a slide, a small amount<br />
of Berland's solution was added using a fine brush, and<br />
the worm was covered with a coverslip. Excessive solution<br />
was removed with filter paper. Each corner of<br />
the coverslip was sealed with Du-Noyer sealant (Ergens<br />
and Gelnar, 1992) and glycerin-ammonium picrate<br />
solution was added to the edge of the coverslip.<br />
Processed worms were remounted in Canada balsam<br />
according to Ergens (1969).<br />
In addition, some worms, fixed in 4% formalin,<br />
were stained with Gomori's trichrome to study the<br />
morphology of internal organs; others were mounted<br />
unstained in glycerin jelly. All measurements are given<br />
in micrometers; the mean is followed by the range and<br />
number of specimens measured in parentheses. The<br />
number of fishes infected of the total examined is followed<br />
by the mean and the minimum and maximum<br />
in parentheses. Drawings were made with the aid of<br />
an Olympus drawing tube.<br />
Specimens were deposited in the National Helminthological<br />
Collection of Mexico, Institute of Biology,<br />
National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM),<br />
Mexico (CNHE); the United <strong>State</strong>s National Parasite<br />
Collection, Beltsville, Maryland, U.S.A. (USNPC); the<br />
Institute of <strong>Parasitology</strong>, Academy of Sciences of the<br />
Czech Republic, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic<br />
(IPCAS); the Natural History Museum, London, United<br />
Kingdom (BMNH); and the Laboratory of <strong>Parasitology</strong>,<br />
Center for Research and Advanced Studies of<br />
the National Polytechnic Institute (CINVESTAV-IPN),<br />
Merida, Yucatan, Mexico (CHCM).<br />
Results<br />
Sciadicleithrum bravohollisae Kritsky,<br />
Vidal-Martinez, and Rodriguez-Canul, 1994<br />
MEASUREMENTS (based on 10 specimens from<br />
Cichlasoma salvini (Giinther 1862)): Haptor<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
142 (120-190; n = 5) wide, 77 (62-105; n =<br />
6) long. Pharynx spherical, 47 (39=65; n = 4)<br />
in diameter. Ventral hamuli 29 (27-32; n = 18)<br />
long; base width 17 (16-18; n = 18). Dorsal<br />
hamuli 33 (31-34; n = 15) long; base width 15<br />
(13-16; n = 15). Ventral bar 35 (29-45; n = 7)<br />
long; dorsal bar 36 (31-44; n — 6) long. Hooks<br />
15 (13-15; n — 20) long. Male copulatory organ<br />
31 (25—36; n = 4) long. Accessory piece 20<br />
(18-22; n = 6) long.<br />
HOSTS, LOCALITIES, SAMPLING DATES, AND PA-<br />
RAMETERS OF INFECTION: Cichlasoma geddesi<br />
Regan, 1905, Horizonte Lagoon (17 November<br />
1998), 1 fish infected of 1 examined; mean intensity<br />
of infection 12 specimens; Cichlasoma<br />
lentiginosum (Steindachner, 1864), Lacanja River<br />
(21 May 1998), 2/3, 3 (minimum intensity 3,<br />
maximum intensity 4); Cichlasoma managuense<br />
(Gunther, 1869), Santa Gertrudis (17 March<br />
1998), 1/1, 2; C. pearsei, Santa Gertrudis (17<br />
March 1998), 1/7, 2; Lacanja River (21 May<br />
1998), 2/3, (3-6); Palizada River (15 June<br />
1998), 1/1, 4; C. salvini, Dzaptun Cenote (21<br />
August 1996; 1 October 1997), 3/4, 2 (3-5), 51<br />
5 (4-5); Lacanja River (21 May 1998), 1/1, 2;<br />
Ilusiones Lagoon (16 November 1998), 5/10, 2<br />
(1-3); Horizonte Lagoon (17 November 1998),<br />
1/1, 19; Yumka Lake (18 November 1998), 1/3,<br />
1; Puyacatengo River (19 November 1998), 21<br />
10, 3 (1—6); C. synspilum, Cenote Azul (2 March<br />
1998), 1/1, 6; Rancho II (17 March 1998), 1/6,<br />
1; Raudales Lagoon (8 May 1998), 2/16, 14 (8-<br />
21); Palizada River (15 June 1998), 1/6, 5; Cichlasoma<br />
sp., Paraiso River (20 March 1998), 1/1, 5.<br />
SPECIMENS DEPOSITED: Voucher specimens<br />
from C. pearsei and C. synspilum in CHCM<br />
(Nos. 215 and 214), from C. salvini in CNHE<br />
(Nos. 3132 and 3133), IPCAS (No. M-348),<br />
USNPC (Nos. 88946 and 88950), and CHCM<br />
(Nos. 229 and 231).<br />
REMARKS: Specimens found in C. salvini do<br />
not differ from those of S. bravohollisae, as described<br />
from C. pearsei, C. synspilum, and P.<br />
splendida by Kritsky et al. (1994). The present<br />
material enabled us to add some new data on the<br />
morphology of the copulatory complex and the<br />
vaginal aperture. Kritsky et al. (1994) reported<br />
the length of the accessory piece to be 31—45<br />
and 26-37 in specimens from C. pearsei and C.<br />
synspilum, respectively. The present specimens<br />
have the accessory piece considerably shorter,<br />
measuring only 18—22.<br />
The shape of the vaginal aperture is similar to
MENDOZA-FRANCO ET SCIADICLEITHRUM FROM MEXICO AND GUATEMALA 87<br />
Table 1. Measurements (in micrometers; mean with range in parentheses; n = number of measurements)<br />
of Sciadicleithrum mexicanum Kritsky, Vidal-Martinez, and Rodriguez-Canul, 1994, from 4 species of<br />
cichlid fishes from the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico and Guatemala.<br />
Body length<br />
Pharynx width<br />
Ventral hamuli length<br />
Ventral hamuli width<br />
Dorsal hamuli length<br />
Dorsal hamuli width<br />
Ventral bar length<br />
Dorsal bar length<br />
Hooks<br />
MCO:j: length<br />
Accessory piece<br />
Cichlasoma<br />
urophthalmus*<br />
320 (245-398)<br />
18 (15-20)<br />
33 (29-35)<br />
16 (15-17)<br />
39 (35-41)<br />
14 (13-16)<br />
34 (30-37)<br />
31 (29-33)<br />
15 (14-17)<br />
62 (53-68)<br />
45 (37-52)<br />
n<br />
24<br />
20<br />
22<br />
17<br />
19<br />
16<br />
21<br />
21<br />
71<br />
17<br />
12<br />
Cichlasoma<br />
trimaculatum^<br />
302 (249-319)<br />
22 (19-26)<br />
33 (32-35)<br />
15 (14-16)<br />
39 (35-41)<br />
16 (14-19)<br />
38 (31-44)<br />
34 (32-37)<br />
15 (15-16)<br />
42 (35-45)<br />
—<br />
* Original descriptions of S. mexicanum by Kritsky et al. (1994).<br />
t Champerico River, Guatemala.<br />
$ Male copulatory organ.<br />
the original description in the presence of 2 opposing<br />
funnel-shaped distal sclerites. Comparison<br />
of specimens from C. salvini and C. synspilum<br />
showed that this structure was smaller<br />
(length 10-11) and more delicate in the former<br />
fish host than in worms from C. synspilum<br />
(length 19-23). Measurements of the haptor of<br />
the currently studied specimens are also noticeably<br />
greater than those of this species reported<br />
from C. pearsei, C. synspilum, and P. splendida<br />
(Kritsky et al., 1994). It is possible that the specimens<br />
studied are more strongly extended, as a<br />
result of fixation with Berland's solution and a<br />
glycerin—ammonium picrate mixture, since the<br />
method of fixation greatly influences size in soft<br />
body parts. Specimens found on C. geddesi, C.<br />
lentiginosum, C. managuense, C. salvini, and<br />
Cichlasoma sp. represent new host records and<br />
expand the distributional area of S. bravohollisae<br />
to the Mexican states of Campeche, Chiapas,<br />
and Tabasco.<br />
Sciadicleithrum meekii Mendoza-Franco,<br />
Scholz, and Vidal-Martinez, 1997<br />
MEASUREMENTS (based on 8 specimens from<br />
C. meeki}: Haptor 74 (63-80; n = 3) wide.<br />
Pharynx spherical, 15 (13-15; n = 5) in diameter.<br />
Ventral hamuli 19 (16-23; n = 4) long;<br />
base width 12(ll-13;n = 4). Dorsal hamuli 33<br />
(32-34; n = 2) long; base width 11. Ventral bar<br />
19 (16-23; n = 4) long; dorsal bar 29 (27-30;<br />
n = 4) long. Hooks 13 (12-13; n = 14) long.<br />
HOSTS, LOCALITIES, SAMPLING DATES, AND PA-<br />
n<br />
4<br />
3<br />
14<br />
14<br />
12<br />
11<br />
7<br />
7<br />
8<br />
4<br />
0<br />
Cichlasoma<br />
aureum<br />
—<br />
25 (16-32)<br />
30 (29-32)<br />
14 (13-15)<br />
36 (35-37)<br />
13 (13-15)<br />
38 (32-43)<br />
34 (29-39)<br />
15 (14-17)<br />
39 (32-44)<br />
48 (42-52)<br />
n<br />
0<br />
11<br />
22<br />
22<br />
18<br />
18<br />
11<br />
11<br />
31<br />
11<br />
11<br />
Petenia<br />
splendida<br />
— 28<br />
32 (31-33)<br />
15 (14-17)<br />
37 (34-39)<br />
12 (11-15)<br />
36 (35-40)<br />
34 (31-42)<br />
17 (15-18)<br />
45 (42-51)<br />
47<br />
n<br />
0<br />
1<br />
10<br />
10<br />
10<br />
10<br />
5<br />
5<br />
12<br />
5<br />
1<br />
RAMETERS OF INFECTION: Cichlasoma callolepis<br />
(Regan, 1904), Lacanja River (19 May 1998), I/<br />
3, 9; Cichlasoma helleri (Steindachner, 1864),<br />
Ilusiones Lagoon (16 November), 2/10, 2 (1-3);<br />
Horizonte Lagoon (17 November 1998), 1/10, 1;<br />
Yumka Lake (18 November 1998), 1/10, 3; C.<br />
meeki, Mahahual (8 December 1997), 2/10 (2-<br />
12); Mahahual (2 March 1998), 2/2, 4 (3-5);<br />
Chaamac Cenote (16 April 1998), 2/6, 7 (2-12);<br />
C. managuense, El Viento (17 March 1998), II<br />
1, 2; Santa Anita Lagoon (24 April 1998), 1/1,<br />
3; Hondo River (11 May 1998), 1/4, 3.<br />
SPECIMENS DEPOSITED: Voucher specimens<br />
from C. helleri in CNHE (No. 3722), CHCM<br />
(No. 227) and USNPC (No. 88947).<br />
REMARKS: Findings of S. meekii, originally<br />
described from C. meeki, in 3 other cichlid species<br />
demonstrate that this parasite is not restricted<br />
to the type host, C. meeki.<br />
Sciadicleithrum mexicanum Kritsky,<br />
Vidal-Martinez, and Rodriguez-Canvil, 1994<br />
MEASUREMENTS: Measurements of 28 specimens<br />
studied from different hosts are given in<br />
Table 1.<br />
HOSTS, LOCALITIES, SAMPLING DATES, AND PA-<br />
RAMETERS OF INFECTION: Cichlasoma aureum<br />
(Gunther, 1862), Petentuche Cenote (10 October<br />
1997), 2/2, 54 (32-76); Ojo de Agua in Celestun<br />
Lagoon (15 August 1997), 1/2, 13; Chaamac Cenote<br />
(16 April 1998), 1/1, 75; Dzonot Cervera<br />
Cenote (15 April 1998), 1/1, 5; Cichlasoma<br />
friedrichstahli (Heckel, 1840), Dzonot Cervera<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Cenote (15 April 1998), 1/1, 20; Cichlasoma octofasciatum<br />
(Regan, 1903), Cedros River (19<br />
May 1998), 4/4, 4 (1-7); Cichlasoma trimaculatum<br />
(Giinther, 1869), Champerico River (16<br />
December 1995), 3/3, 34 (14-37); C. urophthalmus,<br />
El Yucateco Lagoon (30 January 1998), 7/<br />
8, 65 (2-284); Cenote Azul (2 March 1998), I/<br />
3; 4, Mahahual (2 March 1998), 3/3, 16 (4-16);<br />
Dzonot Cervera Cenote (15 April 1998), 1/3, 1;<br />
Rancho Don Milo (8 May 1998), 1/3, 12; La<br />
Pera Lagoon (15 June 1998), 1/8, 50; Petentuche<br />
Cenote (10 October 1997), 1/1, 52; P. splendida,<br />
Dzaptun Cenote (21 August 1996), 1/1, 18; Silvituc<br />
Lagoon (15 July 1997), 1/1, 7; Valle Hermoso<br />
Lagoon (2 March 1998), 1/1, 15; Palizada<br />
River (15 June 1998), 1/2, 12; Santa Anita Lagoon<br />
(24 April 1998), 1/1.<br />
SPECIMENS DEPOSITED: Voucher specimens<br />
from C. aureum and C. friedrichstahli in<br />
USNPC (Nos. 88943 and 88945); from C. tri<br />
maculatum in CNHE (No. 3136), USNPC (No.<br />
88944), BMNH (No. 1999.7.13.25), and CHCM<br />
(Nos. 224 and 225); from P. splendida in CNHE<br />
(Nos. 3135 and 3136), IPCAS (No. M-343),<br />
USNPC (No. 87303), and CHCM (No. 220).<br />
REMARKS: The morphology and measurements<br />
of the specimens found in the different<br />
hosts correspond well to the description of S.<br />
mexicanum from C. urophthalmus by Kritsky et<br />
al. (1994). Cichlasoma aureum, C. trimaculatum,<br />
and P. splendida represent new host records.<br />
The finding of S. mexicanum in Guatemala<br />
is the first record of this parasite in Central<br />
America. The present data, together with those<br />
of Mendoza-Franco et al. (1999), who reported<br />
S. mexicanum from C. friedrichstahli, C. octofasciatum,<br />
and C. synspilum, demonstrate a wide<br />
host specificity of 5. mexicanum.<br />
Sciadicleithrum splendidae Kritsky,<br />
Vidal-Martmez, and Rodriguez-Canul, 1994<br />
(Figs. 1-11)<br />
MEASUREMENTS: Measurements of 41 specimens<br />
studied from different hosts and localities<br />
are given in Table 2.<br />
HOSTS, LOCALITIES, SAMPLING DATES, AND PA-<br />
RAMETERS OF INFECTION: C. friedrichstahli,<br />
Dzaptun Cenote (1 August 1997), 1/1, 9; Mahahual<br />
(2 March 1998), 2/2, 9 (7-11); Cedros River<br />
(19 May 1998), 8/15, 10 (1-18); C. managuense,<br />
Santa Gertrudis (17 March 1998), 1/1, 4.<br />
SPECIMENS DEPOSITED: Voucher specimens<br />
from C. friedrichstahli in CNHE (Nos. 3720 and<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
3721), CHCM (No. 218), USNPC (Nos. 88948<br />
and 88949), and BMNH (No. 1999.7.13.26).<br />
REMARKS: Both species of Cichlasoma studied<br />
are new hosts of S. splendidae. Specimens<br />
obtained from C. friedrichstahli closely resemble<br />
in their morphology those of S. splendidae<br />
from P. splendida previously described by Kritsky<br />
et al. (1994). All possess hamuli relatively<br />
similar in size and shape, the base of the copulatory<br />
organ with bilobed proximal branch, and<br />
a vagina comprising a sclerotized tube looping<br />
anteriorly on the dextromedial half of the trunk.<br />
However, there are slight differences between<br />
the present material and that of S. splendidae in<br />
the number of coils of the male copulatory organ<br />
(1.5 rings in the specimens studied versus more<br />
than 2 in S. splendidae) and the size of the accessory<br />
piece, 38 (30—45) in worms from C.<br />
friedrichstahli and 22 in specimens from the<br />
type host. Similarly to S. bravohollisae, the differences<br />
in the measurements of sclerotized and<br />
soft body parts of specimens from C. friedrichstahli<br />
might be related to the size of the worms<br />
and the method of fixation (see Fig. 6). A similar<br />
phenomenon has previously been observed<br />
among individual specimens of Sciadicleithrum<br />
umbilicum Kritsky, Thatcher, and Boeger, 1989,<br />
from South America (Kritsky et al., 1989).<br />
The original description of S. splendidae was<br />
based on only 2 specimens (Kritsky et al., 1994).<br />
The additional material from this study evidences<br />
that the shape and number of coils of the male<br />
copulatory organ vary among specimens from<br />
the same hosts (Figs. 2-4) and that this species<br />
possesses a seminal vesicle (see Fig. 1) that<br />
lacks a thickened wall, as is present in congeneric<br />
species of Sciadicleithrum from Yucatan<br />
(Kritsky et al., 1994; Mendoza-Franco et al.,<br />
1997). As for S. bravohollisae, S. splendidae occurs<br />
in members of 2 genera of cichlid fishes,<br />
Cichlasoma and Petenia.<br />
Discussion<br />
Species of Sciadicleithrum were first reported<br />
from cichlids from South America (Kritsky et<br />
al., 1989) and subsequently from cichlid fishes<br />
from southeastern Mexico (Kritsky et al., 1994;<br />
Mendoza-Franco et al., 1997, 1999). The present<br />
study confirmed previous observations by the<br />
latter authors that the fauna of monogeneans assigned<br />
to Sciadicleithrum from the Yucatan Peninsula<br />
of Mexico and neighboring areas is depauperate<br />
in the number of species.
MENDOZA-FRANCO ET AL.—SCIADICLEITHRUM FROM MEXICO AND GUATEMALA 89<br />
Figures 1-11. Sciadicleithrum splendidae. 1. Total view (ventral). 2—4. Copulatory complexes (2, 3.<br />
ventral view; 4. dorsal view). 5. Vagina. 6. Whole mount (fixed with Berland's solution and a glycerinammonium<br />
picrate mixture). 7. Ventral bar. 8. Dorsal bar. 9. Ventral hamulus. 10. Hook. 11. Dorsal<br />
hamulus. Scale bars = 50 |xm (Fig. 1), 30 fxm (Figs. 2, 7-11), 40 urn (Figs. 3-5), and 200 (xm (Fig. 6). sv<br />
= seminal vesicle; f = filament.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
90 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Table 2. Measurements (in micrometers; mean with range in parentheses; n = number of structures<br />
measured) of Sciadicleithrum splendidae Kritsky, Vidal-Martinez, and Rodriguez-Canul, 1994, from 3<br />
species of cichlid fishes from 4 localities (Chiapas, Tabasco, Yucatan, and Quintana Roo) from southeastern<br />
Mexico.<br />
Body length<br />
Pharynx width<br />
Ventral hamuli length<br />
Ventral hamuli width<br />
Dorsal hamuli length<br />
Dorsal hamuli width<br />
Ventral bar length<br />
Dorsal bar length<br />
Hooks<br />
MCOI length<br />
Accessory piece length<br />
Petenia<br />
splendida*<br />
250<br />
20<br />
32<br />
17<br />
40<br />
14<br />
39<br />
37<br />
(15-16)<br />
31 (27-35)<br />
22<br />
n<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
6<br />
2<br />
1<br />
Cichlasoma<br />
friedrichstahlrf<br />
621 (406-690)<br />
35 (24-43)<br />
38 (36-38)<br />
16 (15-18)<br />
42 (39-44)<br />
12 (10-14)<br />
50 (42-53)<br />
41 (37-48)<br />
15 (15-16)<br />
44 (42-50)<br />
38 (30-45)<br />
n<br />
8<br />
8<br />
16<br />
16<br />
16<br />
15<br />
8<br />
8<br />
8<br />
9<br />
8<br />
* Original descriptions of S. splendidae by Kritsky et al. (1994).<br />
t Dzaptiin Cenote, Yucatan.<br />
t Cedros River, Chiapas.<br />
§ Mahahual, Quintana Roo.<br />
|| Santa Gertrudis, Tabasco.<br />
1 Male copulatory organ.<br />
In addition, this study expanded the spectrum<br />
of fish hosts of individual Sciadicleithrum taxa<br />
found in southeastern Mexico and Guatemala by<br />
13 new host records. Each of the 4 species of<br />
Sciadicleithrum found in this area exhibits relatively<br />
wide host specificity in the same family,<br />
since they occur in as many as 8 cichlid species<br />
(5. bravohollisae in C. geddesi, C. lentiginosum,<br />
C. managuense, C. pearsei, C. salvini, C. synspilum,<br />
P. splendida, and Cichlasoma sp.).<br />
Three species of Sciadicleithrum found in Yucatan<br />
occur even in members of 2 closely related<br />
genera, Cichlasoma and Petenia. It is also noteworthy<br />
that both P. splendida and C. managuense<br />
from southeastern Mexico harbor as<br />
many as 3 species of Sciadicleithrum, namely,<br />
S. bravohollisae, S. mexicanum, and S. splendi<br />
dae\d S. bravohollisae, S. splendidae, and S<br />
meekii, respectively. In the Terminos Lagoon<br />
(stations El Viento and Santa Gertrudis), 3 species<br />
of Sciadicleithrum (S. bravohollisae, S.<br />
meekii, and S. splendidae) occurred, and all<br />
these species are found on C. managuense. It<br />
can be assumed that horizontal transmission of<br />
these monogeneans to this cichlid occurred in<br />
this locality, with C. helleri probably serving as<br />
a source of S. meeki, and C. pearsei of S. bravohollisae.<br />
Sciadicleithrum splendidae was<br />
Cichlasoma<br />
friedrichstahlij.<br />
—<br />
19 (17-24)<br />
31 (29-34)<br />
14 (12-16)<br />
37 (33-39)<br />
12 (12-14)<br />
38 (36-43)<br />
30 (26-35)<br />
15 (15-16)<br />
40 (31-49)<br />
34 (29-36)<br />
Cichlasoma<br />
friedrichstahn<br />
//§<br />
0<br />
2<br />
22<br />
20<br />
16<br />
10<br />
15<br />
14<br />
26<br />
20<br />
12<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
19 (17-20)<br />
29 (22-31)<br />
12 (12-13)<br />
36 (36-37)<br />
13<br />
41 (40-41)<br />
32 (30-33)<br />
16 (15-17)<br />
36 (29-39)<br />
29 (20-39)<br />
n<br />
0<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
4<br />
2<br />
3<br />
3<br />
13<br />
7<br />
6<br />
Cichlasoma<br />
motaguense\\1<br />
(18-24)<br />
31 (30-32)<br />
16<br />
38 (33-41)<br />
14 (14-15)<br />
43 (40-46)<br />
32 (31-32)<br />
16 (15-17)<br />
38 (27-51)<br />
32 (24-47)<br />
found only on C. managuense at this locality<br />
and may represent the original host of S. splendidae.<br />
This study has also provided new data on intraspecific<br />
variability of Sciadicleithrum species<br />
from a wide spectrum of fish hosts and geographical<br />
regions. It is obvious that the knowledge<br />
of intraspecific morphological and biometrical<br />
variation is necessary to prevent descriptions<br />
of new taxa based only on slight morphological<br />
differences. This is important if the<br />
original descriptions were based on limited numbers<br />
of specimens, as in the case of S. splendidae<br />
(Kritsky et al., 1994).<br />
A species of Sciadicleithrum, S. mexicanum,<br />
is reported from Guatemala for the first time in<br />
this study. However, the occurrence of other<br />
Sciadicleithrum taxa in Guatemala is highly<br />
probable, and we suggest that more studies on<br />
the helminth parasites of freshwater in that<br />
country and Central America in general be carried<br />
out. Investigations into fish helminths, including<br />
gill monogeneans, are therefore needed<br />
for a better understanding of the evolution of<br />
these parasites and their hosts in the transient<br />
area between the Nearctic and Neotropical zoogeographical<br />
regions.<br />
n<br />
0<br />
4<br />
3<br />
1<br />
4<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
6<br />
4<br />
3
MENDOZA-FRANCO ET M^.—SCIADICLEITHRUM FROM MEXICO AND GUATEMALA 91<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
The authors are indebted to Clara Vivas-Rodriguez,<br />
Ana Sanchez-Manzanilla, David Gonzalez-Solfs,<br />
and Isabel Jimenez-Garcfa for their excellent<br />
assistance in collecting and examining<br />
fishes, and to Dr. Frantisek Moravec, Institute of<br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong>, Academy of Sciences of the Czech<br />
Republic, Ceske Budejovice, for valuable suggestions<br />
on an early draft of the manuscript.<br />
This study was supported by grant No. M-135<br />
of the Comision Nacional para el Uso y Conocimiento<br />
de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO),<br />
Mexico.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Berland, B. 1961. Use of glacial acetic acid for killing<br />
parasitic nematodes for collection purposes. Nature,<br />
London 191:1320-1321.<br />
Ergens, R. 1969. The suitability of ammonium picrate-glycerin<br />
in preparing slides of lower Monogenoidea.<br />
Folia Parasitologica 16:320.<br />
, and M. Gelnar. 1992. Monogenea and other<br />
ectoparasitic metazoans. Pages 4-32 /// Methods<br />
Meeting Announcement<br />
of Investigating Metazoan Parasites. Training<br />
course on fish parasites. Ceske Budejovice, March<br />
10-23. Institute of <strong>Parasitology</strong>, Czechoslovak<br />
Academy of Sciences.<br />
Kritsky, D. C., V. E. Thatcher, and W. A. Boeger.<br />
1989. Neotropical Monogenea. 15. Dactylogyrids<br />
from the gills of Brazilian Cichlidae with proposal<br />
of Sciadicleithrum gen. n. (Dactylogyridae). Proceedings<br />
of the Helminthological Society of<br />
Washington 56:128-140.<br />
, V. M. Vidal-Martfnez, and R. Rodriguez-<br />
Canul. 1994. Neotropical Monogenoidea. 19.<br />
Dactylogyridae of cichlids (Perciformes) from the<br />
Yucatan Peninsula, with descriptions of three new<br />
species of Sciadicleithrum Kritsky, Thatcher and<br />
Boeger, 1989. Journal of the Helminthological Society<br />
of Washington 61:26-33.<br />
Mendoza-Franco, E. F., T. Scholz, and V. M. Vidal-<br />
Martinez. 1997. Sciadicleithrum meekii sp. n.<br />
(Monogenea: Ancyrocephalinae) from the gills of<br />
Cichlasoma mceki (Pisces: Cichlidae) from cenotes<br />
(=sinkholes) of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico.<br />
Folia Parasitologica 44:205-208.<br />
, , C. Vivas-Rodriguez, and J. Vargas-<br />
Vazquez. 1999. Monogeneans of freshwater fishes<br />
from cenotes ( = sinkholes) in the Yucatan Peninsula,<br />
Mexico. Folia Parasitologica 46:2<strong>67</strong>-273.<br />
The Third Seminar on Food- and Water-Borne Parasitic Zoonoses in the 21st Century will<br />
be held December 6-8, <strong>2000</strong> at the Royal River Hotel in Bangkok, Thailand. The meeting is jointly<br />
organized by the Faculty of Tropical Medicine of Mahidol University, the <strong>Parasitology</strong> and Tropical<br />
Medicine Association of Thailand, the TROPMED Alumni Association, and the SEAMEO TROP-<br />
MED Network. For further information contact: Dr. Suvanee Supavej, Secretary of the 3rd FBPZ<br />
Organizing Committee, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, 420/6 Rajvithi Road;<br />
Bangkok 10400, Thailand; phone (622) 2460321 or (662) 2469000-13, Fax (662) 2468340 or (662)<br />
2469006, e-mail: tmssp@mahidol.ac.th.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 92-106<br />
Digenean Fauna of Amphibians from Central Mexico: Nearctic and<br />
Neotropical Influences<br />
G. PEREZ-PONCE DE LEON,' V. LEON-REGAGNON, L. GARCIA-PRIETO, U. RAZO-MENDIVIL,<br />
AND A. SANCHEZ-ALVAREZ<br />
Laboratorio de Helmintologia, Institute de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, A.P. 70-153,<br />
C.P. 04510, Mexico D.F., Mexico (e-mail: ppdleon@servidor.unam.mx: vleon@mail.ibiologia.unam.mx)<br />
ABSTRACT: Specimens from 20 amphibian species from central Mexico were examined for helminths. We found<br />
21 digenean species; 4 of them are recorded for the first time in Mexico. Twenty-two new host and 21 new<br />
locality reports are added. Previous reports of these helminth species are summarized, and biogeographical<br />
aspects of hosts and parasites are discussed.<br />
KEY WORDS: Digenea, taxonomy, amphibians, Mexico, biogeography.<br />
Mexico possesses one of the highest amphibian<br />
species richnesses in the world, with 285<br />
species recorded so far, and an unusual level of<br />
endemism (60.7%) (Flores-Villela, 1993, 1998).<br />
In spite of this richness and the importance of<br />
this group of vertebrates in ecosystems, only<br />
10% of the species in Mexico have been studied<br />
for helminth parasites.<br />
We recently conducted a study of helminth<br />
parasites of amphibians in selected aquatic ecosystems<br />
in Mexico. We surveyed helminths of<br />
frogs, toads, and salamanders from several lakes<br />
of the Mexican plateau (Mesa Central), a tropical<br />
rain forest (Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz <strong>State</strong>), and<br />
a tropical dry deciduous and semideciduous forest<br />
(Chamela, Jalisco <strong>State</strong>). In this paper, we<br />
present a list of the digenetic trematodes of 20<br />
species of amphibians that we analyzed during<br />
the last 3 yr. We also provide information about<br />
previous records of each helminth species in<br />
Mexico and discuss biogeographical aspects of<br />
parasites and hosts.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Between July 1996 and May 1998, we examined<br />
647 specimens of amphibians belonging to 20 species<br />
and 8 genera (Table 1). We sampled in 12 localities: 8<br />
from the Mesa Central, 1 from the Pacific coast, and<br />
3 from the coast of the Gulf of Mexico (Map 1). However,<br />
digeneans were found only in frogs and salamanders<br />
of the following localities: Cienaga de Lerma, Estado<br />
de Mexico (19°17'N, 99°30'W); Lago de Chapala,<br />
Jalisco (20°17'N, 103°11'W); Lago de Cuitzeo, Michoacan<br />
(19°53'N, 100°50'W); Lago de Patzcuaro, Michoacan<br />
(19°30'N, 101°36'W); Lago de Zacapu, Michoacan<br />
(19°49'N, 101°47'W); Manantiales de Cointzio,<br />
Michoacan (19°35'N, 101°14'W); Los Tuxtlas,<br />
Corresponding author.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
92<br />
Veracruz (Laguna El Zacatal, Laguna Escondida, and<br />
Los Tuxtlas Field Station; 20°37'N, 98°12'W); Estero<br />
Chamela, Jalisco (19°30'N, 105°6'W).<br />
Hosts were collected by hand or with seine nets and<br />
were kept alive before parasitological analysis, which<br />
was carried out within 24 hr after capture. Hosts were<br />
killed with an overdose of anesthetic (sodium pentobarbitol)<br />
and examined by standard procedures.<br />
Digeneans were relaxed with hot tap water, fixed in<br />
Bouin's fluid for 8 hr under coverglass pressure, and<br />
then placed in vials containing 70% alcohol; later, they<br />
were stained with Mayer's paracarmin, Delafield's hematoxylin,<br />
or Gomori's trichrome and mounted in permanent<br />
slides with Canada balsam. Drawings were<br />
made with the aid of a drawing tube. Voucher specimens<br />
of collected worms were deposited at the Coleccion<br />
Nacional de Helmintos (CNHE), Biology Institute,<br />
Mexico City.<br />
Hosts were fixed following standard procedures<br />
(Simmons, 1985) and deposited at the Coleccion Nacional<br />
de Anfibios y Reptiles (CNAR), Biology Institute,<br />
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico<br />
(UNAM), and in the Coleccion Herpetologica del Museo<br />
de Zoologfa (Faculty of Sciences, UNAM).<br />
Results<br />
We identified 21 digenean species (Figs. 1-<br />
20) of 11 genera and 10 families collected in 10<br />
of the 20 species of frogs and salamanders analyzed<br />
(Table 2). Four of these represent new<br />
records in Mexico, Catadiscus rodriguezi, Glypthelmins<br />
parva, Glypthelmins sp., and Fibricola<br />
sp. metacercariae. We also add 22 new host records<br />
and 21 new locality records. The frog<br />
Rana brownorurn, the salamanders Ambystoma<br />
dumerilii, Ambystoma mexicanum, and Ambystoma<br />
tigrinum, the toads Bufo marinus and Bufo<br />
valliceps, the hylids Hyla arenicolor, Hyla exirnia,<br />
and Pachymedusa dachnicolor, and the leptodactylid<br />
Eleutherodactylus rhodopis were free<br />
from digenean infections.
PEREZ-PONCE DE LEON ET AL.—DIGENEANS OF MEXICAN AMPHIBIANS 93<br />
Table 1. Hosts, localities, and numbers of hosts examined in Mexico.<br />
Anura<br />
Bufo marinux Linnaeus, 1758<br />
Host Locality<br />
Bufo valliceps Weigmann. 1833<br />
Eleutherodactylus rhodopis Cope, 18<strong>67</strong><br />
Hyla arcnicolor Cope, 1886<br />
Hyla cximia Baird, 1854<br />
Leptodactylus melanonotus Hallowell, 1861<br />
Pachymedusa dachnicolor Cope, 1864<br />
Rana brownorum Sanders, 1973<br />
Rana dunni Zweifel, 1957<br />
Rana forreri Boulenger, 1883<br />
Rana megapoda Taylor, 1942<br />
Rana montezumae Baird, 1854<br />
Rana neovolcanica Hillis and Frost, 1985<br />
Rana vaillanti Brocchi. 1877<br />
Smilisca buudinii Dumeril and Bibron, 1841<br />
Urodela<br />
Ainb\stoma andersoni Krehs and Brandon, 1984<br />
Ambystoma dutnerilii Duges, 1870<br />
Anibvxtoma lermaensis (adults) Taylor, 1940<br />
Ambystoma lermaensis (larvae)<br />
Ambystoma mexicanum Shaw, 1789<br />
Ambvstoina tigrinum Green, 1825<br />
Discussion<br />
Three clearly distinguishable groups are in<br />
this list, not considering Fibricola sp. and Haematoloechus<br />
sp. (Map 1). The first group is composed<br />
of species with nearctic distribution, such<br />
as Cephalogonimus americanus, Glypthelmins<br />
californiensis, Glypthelmins quieta, Gorgoderina<br />
attenuata, Megalodiscus americanus, Halipegus<br />
occidualis, Haematoloechus complexus,<br />
Haematoloechits coloradensis, Haematoloechus<br />
longiplexus, and Haematoloechus medioplexus,<br />
which have been previously recorded in Mexico<br />
and other parts of North America (see Brooks<br />
[1984] and references therein). The second<br />
group of species, including C. rodriguezi, Glypthelmins<br />
facioi, G. parva, Loxogenes (Langeronia)<br />
macrocirra, and Mesocoelium monas, has<br />
been recorded in South and Central America<br />
(Prudhoe and Bray, 1982). Finally, the third<br />
group is composed of endemic species: Haematoloechus<br />
illimis, Haematoloechus pulcher,<br />
and Glypthelmins sp.<br />
Presa Miguel de la Madrid, Tuxtepec, Oaxaca<br />
Chamela, Jalisco<br />
Laguna Escondida, Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz<br />
Laguna El Zacatal, Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz<br />
Manantiales de Cointzio, Michoacan<br />
Manantiales de Cointzio, Michoacan<br />
Laguna Escondida, Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz<br />
Chamela, Jalisco<br />
Laguna El Zacatal, Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz<br />
Lago de Patzcuaro, Michoacan<br />
Lago de Zacapu, Michoacan<br />
Estero Chamela, Chamela, Jalisco<br />
Manantiales de Cointzio, Michoacan<br />
Lago de Chapala, Jalisco<br />
Cienaga de Lcrma, Estado de Mexico<br />
Lago de Cuitzeo, Michoacan<br />
Manantiales de Cointzio, Michoacan<br />
Laguna Escondida, Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz<br />
Laguna Escondida, Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz<br />
Lago de Zacapu, Michoacan<br />
Lago de Patzcuaro, Michoacan<br />
Cienaga de Lerma, Estado de Mexico<br />
Cienaga de Lerma, Estado de Mexico<br />
Lago de Xochimilco, Mexico City<br />
Lago La Mina Preciosa, Puchla<br />
Total<br />
Total<br />
Sample<br />
si/.e<br />
18<br />
I<br />
4<br />
1<br />
11<br />
19<br />
4<br />
2<br />
14<br />
74<br />
18<br />
12<br />
27<br />
4<br />
46<br />
84<br />
41<br />
31<br />
5<br />
416<br />
48<br />
89<br />
16<br />
42<br />
34<br />
2<br />
231<br />
The digenean fauna of the endemic amphibians<br />
(A. andersoni, A. lermaense, A. dumerilii, R.<br />
montezumae, R. dunni, R. neovolcanica, and R.<br />
megapoda) in the Transverse Volcanic Axis<br />
clearly has a Nearctic origin because none of the<br />
neotropical species of digeneans was found in<br />
this region, and the trematode fauna is formed<br />
of nearctic and endemic species of digeneans.<br />
On the other hand, the digenean fauna of the<br />
nonendemic host species Leptodactylus melanonotus,<br />
Rana vaillanti, and Smilisca baudinii, all<br />
collected in the Los Tuxtlas region in the tropical<br />
lowlands of the Gulf of Mexico, has a strong<br />
neotropical influence. Five of the 9 species reported<br />
from that region show a neotropical distribution.<br />
In both cases, the parasite fauna reflects the<br />
biogeographic and phylogenetic links of the<br />
hosts. The endemic species of frogs in the Transverse<br />
Volcanic Axis, which represents the<br />
boundary between the nearctic and neotropical<br />
biogeographic zones, are members of the "Rana<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
94 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>( 1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
A = Nearctic helminth species<br />
• = Neotropical helminth species<br />
• = Endemic helminth species<br />
Map 1. Map of Mexico showing collecting sites; and limits of nearctic and neotropical regions (dotted<br />
line). 1 = Presa Miguel de la Madrid, Tuxtepec, Oaxaca; 2 = Laguna Escondida, Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz;<br />
3 = Laguna El Zacatal, Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz; 4 = Lago La Mina Preciosa, Puebla; 5 = Cienaga de<br />
Lerma, Estado de Mexico; 6 = Lago de Xochimilco, Mexico City; 7 = Manantiales de Cointzio, Michoacan;<br />
8 = Lago de Patzcuaro, Michoacan; 9 = Lago de Zacapu, Michoacan; 10 = Lago de Cuitzeo,<br />
Michoacan; 11 = Lago de Chapala, Jalisco; 12 = Chamela, Jalisco.<br />
pipiens complex," widely distributed from central<br />
Mexico to Canada (Hillis et al., 1983). Apparently,<br />
this group of frogs harbors a relatively<br />
homogeneous digenean fauna throughout its<br />
range to the volcanic axis. Little is known about<br />
the parasitic fauna of this group of frogs in the<br />
lowlands of Mexico. In some cases, as in the<br />
N<br />
A<br />
93°W<br />
21°N<br />
genus Haematoloechus, where an enormous diversity<br />
of species has been recorded, several<br />
speciation events have occurred in the endemic<br />
amphibians of this biogeographical area. This is<br />
the case for H. pulcher, probably derived from<br />
H. complexus, and Haematoloechus illimis,<br />
whose sister taxon is not clearly distinguished<br />
Figures 1-5. Ventral views. 1. Cephalogonimus americanus (Stafford, 1902) Stafford, 1905. 2. Gorgoderina<br />
attenuata (Stafford, 1902) Stafford, 1905. 3. Megalodiscus americanus Chandler, 1923. 4. Catadiscus<br />
rodriguezi Caballero, 1955. 5. Haematoloechus coloradensis (Cort, 1915) Ingles, 1932. Scales in millimeters.<br />
Figures 6-10. Ventral views. 6. Haematoloechus complexus (Seely, 1906) Krull, 1933. 7. Haematoloechus<br />
illimis Caballero, 1942. 8. Haematoloechus longiplexus Stafford, 1902. 9. Haematoloechus medioplexus<br />
Stafford, 1902. 10. Haematoloechus pulcher Bravo, 1943. Scales in millimeters.<br />
Figures 11-15. Ventral views. 11. Glypthelmins parva Travassos, 1934. 12. Glypthelmins sp. 13. Glypthelmins<br />
calif orniensis (Cort, 1919) Miller, 1930. 14. Glypthelmins quieta (Stafford, 1900) Stafford, 1905.<br />
15. Glypthelmins facioi Brenes, Arroyo, Jimenez, and Delgado, 1959. Scales in millimeters.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
PEREZ-PONCE DE LEON ET AL.—DIGENEANS OF MEXICAN AMPHIBIANS 95<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
96 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
PEREZ-PONCE DE LEON ET AL.—DIGENEANS OF MEXICAN AMPHIBIANS 97<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
(Leon-Regagnon et al., 1999). Species of Haematoloechus<br />
apparently have experienced a diversification<br />
in frogs and salamanders in central<br />
Mexico, representing the group with the highest<br />
species richness (6) in our samples. Glypthelmins,<br />
parasitic mainly in frogs of the new world,<br />
also shows high species richness. However, the<br />
presence at least of 4 species is mainly the result<br />
of independent host capture events, either from<br />
the neotropical or nearctic zones.<br />
The distribution of the nonendemic frogs from<br />
the lowlands ranges from Ecuador and Colombia<br />
to Veracruz, Mexico (R. vaillanti), to Sonora,<br />
northwestern Mexico (L. melanonotus), and Texas<br />
(S. baudinii). Their digenean fauna in Veracruz<br />
is composed of a combination of neotropical<br />
and nearctic species. Only 2 digenean species,<br />
Glypthelmins sp. and M. monas, were recovered<br />
from L. melanonotus and S. baudinii,<br />
respectively. The former probably represents an<br />
undescribed species, and M. monas has been reported<br />
in numerous host genera in South America<br />
and Africa (Prudhoe and Bray, 1982). Seven<br />
digenean species were collected from R. vaillanti,<br />
and 3 of them show a neotropical distribution:<br />
C. rodriguezi in Panama (Caballero, 1955) and<br />
G. parva in Brazil (Prudhoe and Bray, 1982),<br />
both described from Leptodactylus ocellatus,<br />
and G. facioi in Costa Rica (Brenes et al., 1959)<br />
and Veracruz, Mexico (Razo-Mendivil et al.,<br />
1999), from Rana palmipes Spix, 1824, and R.<br />
vaillanti, respectively. The presence of these<br />
neotropical digeneans in Los Tuxtlas reflects the<br />
geographic distribution of the host genus Leptodactylus<br />
and the "Rana palmipes complex"<br />
(Frost, 1985; Hillis and De Sa, 1988). One species<br />
is endemic, L. (L.) macrocirra, and the 3<br />
remaining species parasitizing R. vaillanti have<br />
a nearctic distribution; 2 of these species (G. attenuata<br />
and C. americanus) are also present in<br />
the endemic frogs of the Transverse Volcanic<br />
Axis, and the third species (H. medioplexus) has<br />
been recorded in several species of frogs from<br />
the United <strong>State</strong>s and Canada, most commonly<br />
in members of the "Rana pipiens complex."<br />
The 3 species have a low host specificity and<br />
have been able to colonize several host groups,<br />
thus expanding their distribution range.<br />
Apparently, a mixture of neotropical and<br />
nearctic species of parasites is taking effect in<br />
the lowlands of the Gulf of Mexico, with a series<br />
of very interesting phenomena of colonization of<br />
new hosts and habitats. Little is known about the<br />
amphibian parasite fauna of the tropical lowlands<br />
of the Pacific slope of Mexico or the<br />
southeastern part of the country. Those areas<br />
will undoubtedly be a source of extensive phylogenetic<br />
and biogeographic information on parasites<br />
and hosts in the future.<br />
Contemporary ecological conditions are also<br />
important determinants of the parasitic fauna of<br />
a host species. Several authors have demonstrated<br />
a marked correlation between the relative<br />
amount of time spent in association with aquatic<br />
habitats and the number of species of platyhelminths<br />
hosted by frogs (Brandt, 1936; Prokopic<br />
and Krivanec, 1975; Brooks, 1976, 1984; Guillen,<br />
1992). Our data clearly demonstrate that<br />
frogs and salamanders harbor the richer digenean<br />
fauna compared with the less water-dependent<br />
hylids or toads, where digeneans were almost<br />
or absolutely absent (the small sample size<br />
in leptodactylids precludes any discussion about<br />
their helminth fauna). Within frogs and salamanders,<br />
diet is the factor that most determines the<br />
richness of the digenean communities. Frogs become<br />
infected when they prey upon insects or<br />
copepods (which is the case in species of Haematoloechus<br />
and Halipegus, respectively), when<br />
they swallow their own skin bearing encysted<br />
metacercariae during ecdysis, or when they feed<br />
upon infected tadpoles (species of Catadiscus,<br />
Cephalogonimus, Glypthelmins, Gorgoderina,<br />
and Megalodiscus) (Yamaguti, 1975; Prudhoe<br />
and Bray, 1982). Salamanders of the genus Ambystoma<br />
Tschudi, 1838, hosted fewer digenean<br />
species than frogs. Garcia-Altamirano et al.<br />
(1993) reported that A. dumerilii in Lake Patzcuaro<br />
feeds mainly on crayfish and fish. As evidenced<br />
by the presence of C. americanus, G.<br />
attenuata, and Haematoloechus spp. in salamanders<br />
of our samples, it is possible that they oc-<br />
Figures 16-20. Ventral views. 16. Loxogenes (I^angeronia) macrocirra (Caballero y Bravo, 1949) Yamaguti,<br />
1971. 17. Mesocoelium monas (Rudolphi, 1819) Teixeira de Freitas, 1958. 18. Halipegus occidualis<br />
Stafford, 1905. 19. Fibricola sp. (inetacercaria). 20. Ochetosoma sp. (metacercaria). Scales in millimeters.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
PEREZ-PONCE DE LEON ET AL.—DIGENEANS OF MEXICAN AMPHIBIANS 99<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
20
Table 2. Digenetic trematodes of some amphibians in Mexico.<br />
Locali<br />
(CNHE acce<br />
Host<br />
Infection<br />
Helminth site<br />
LZAt (3409, 34<br />
LPA<br />
CLEt (3411)<br />
EZA<br />
LZA (3357, 335<br />
LPA (3408)<br />
LPA<br />
CLE (3359, 336<br />
LXO<br />
Ambystoma andersontf<br />
Ambystoma dumerlii<br />
Ambystoma lermaensis']'<br />
Rana berlandieri<br />
Rana dunni<br />
Family Cephalogonimidae (Looss, 1899) Nicoll, 1914<br />
Cephalogonimus americanus (Stafford, 1902) Intestine<br />
Stafford, 1905 (Fig. 1)<br />
Rana montezumae<br />
MCOt (3370)<br />
LXO<br />
Rana neovolcanica'f<br />
Rana pipiens'f<br />
LES (3425)<br />
LES<br />
SAL<br />
TUX, LES<br />
Rana vaillanti<br />
Rhyacosiredon altamirani<br />
Bufo marinus<br />
LZAt (3412, 34<br />
CLE (3414, 341<br />
LXO, CLE<br />
LZA (3402), LP<br />
LPA<br />
MCOt (3403, 3<br />
CLE (3401)<br />
CLE<br />
Unspecified loca<br />
Mexico<br />
LXO, LTE<br />
MCOt (3403, 3<br />
CLE<br />
LES (3428)<br />
LES<br />
Family Gorgoderidae Looss, 1901<br />
Gorgoderina attenuata (Stafford, 1902) (Fig. 2) Urinary bladder Ambystoma andersontf<br />
Ambystoma lermaensis^<br />
Ambystoma tigrinum<br />
Rana dunni<br />
Rana megapodaj<br />
Rana montezumae<br />
Rana neovolcanica'f<br />
Rana pipiens\ vaillanti<br />
Remarks: Pigulevsky (1953) stated that the material of Sokoloff and Caballero (1933) belonged to a new species, G. sk<br />
testes. We consider this difference to be a result of intraspecific variation.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Table 2. Continued.<br />
Locality*<br />
(CNHE accessi<br />
Infection<br />
site Host<br />
Helminth<br />
Intestine Rana during<br />
Rana megapoda^<br />
Family Paramphistomidae Fischoeder, 1901<br />
Megalodiscus americanus Chandler, 1923 (Fig. 3)<br />
LZAt (3353)<br />
LCUt (3351, 335<br />
MCOt (3356)<br />
CLE (3347-3350)<br />
LXO, CLE<br />
MCO (3354, 3355<br />
LMO<br />
Rana montezumae<br />
Rana neovolcanica^<br />
Rana pipiens^<br />
Catadiscus rodriguezi Caballero, 1955 (Fig. 4)<br />
Intestine Rana vaillanti'r<br />
LESt (3308)<br />
Remarks: This species was originally described of Leptodactylus pentadactylus from Valle de Ant6n in Panama (Caballero<br />
LZAt (3395, 3396<br />
LPA<br />
Lungs Rana dunni<br />
Family Haematoloechidae Odening, 1964<br />
Haematoloechus coloradensis (Cort, 1915)<br />
Ingles, 1931 (Fig. 5)<br />
CLE (3397)<br />
CLE<br />
Rana montezumae<br />
Leon-Regagnon et a<br />
Remarks: Kennedy (1981) considered H. coloradensis to be a junior synonym of H. complexus, but<br />
basis of molecular and morphological evidence.<br />
CLE (3417)<br />
CLE<br />
LXO, LTE<br />
MCOt (3380, 337<br />
CLE (3374-3378)<br />
CLE<br />
Lungs Ambystorna lermaensis<br />
Haematoloechus complexus (Seely, 1906)<br />
Krull, 1933 (Fig. 6)<br />
Rana megapodaj<br />
Rana montezumae<br />
MCOt (3380, 337<br />
RPE, PLB<br />
Rana neovolcanica^<br />
Rana pipiens±<br />
CLE (3381-3383)<br />
CLE<br />
Remarks: Originally recorded as Ostiolum complexum by Martinez (1969).<br />
Haematoloechus illimis Caballero, 1942 (Rg. 7) Eustachian tubes, Rana montezumae<br />
lungs<br />
CLE (3394)<br />
CLB<br />
CLE<br />
LTE<br />
Lungs Rana montezumae<br />
Haematoloechus longiplexus Stafford, 1902<br />
(Fig. 8)<br />
Rana pipiensi<br />
Remarks: Originally recorded as Haematoloechus macrorchis Caballero, 1941, this species was declared junior synonym o<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Table 2. Continued.<br />
Locality *<br />
(CNHE accession<br />
Host<br />
Infection<br />
Helminth site<br />
EZA<br />
CLE, LXO<br />
CLE, LXO<br />
LES (3424)<br />
LES<br />
LES<br />
LES<br />
TUX<br />
CLE (3418)<br />
CLE<br />
CLE (3398-3400)<br />
Rana berlandieri<br />
Rana monteziimae<br />
Rana pipiensi<br />
Rana vaillanti<br />
Haematoloechus medioplexus Stafford, 1902 Lungs<br />
(Fig. 9)<br />
Bufo valliceps<br />
Bufo marinus<br />
Ambystoma lermaensis^<br />
Arnbystoma tigrinum<br />
Rana montezumaef<br />
Haematoloechus pulcher Bravo-Hollis, 1943 Lungs<br />
(Fig. 10)<br />
Haematoloechus sp. Lungs Rana forreri'f<br />
ECHt<br />
Remarks: Specimens belong to a different species from those mentioned above, but their poor preservation condition preclu<br />
LPA (3280)<br />
LZAt (3281, 3283,<br />
LZA<br />
LPA<br />
MCO<br />
CLE (3282)<br />
CLE<br />
LXO<br />
Kana dunni<br />
Family Macroderoididae Goodman, 1 952<br />
Glypthelmins californiensis (Cort, 1919) Intestine<br />
Miller, 1930 (Fig. 13)<br />
Rana megapoda<br />
Rana monteziimae<br />
MCO<br />
Rana neovolcanica<br />
Remarks: Records of this species by Leon-Regagnon (1992) and Guillen (1992) belong to G. quieta and G. facial, respectiv<br />
LPA (3273), LZA (<br />
LPA<br />
LZA<br />
LCUt (3346), MCO<br />
LCHt (3406)<br />
MCO<br />
CLE (3271, 3275-3<br />
CLE<br />
Intestine Rana dunni<br />
Glypthelmins quieta (Stafford, 1900)<br />
Stafford, 1905 (Fig. 14)<br />
Rana megapoda<br />
Rana monteziimae<br />
LXO, LTE<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Table 2. Continued.<br />
Locality<br />
(CNHE accessi<br />
Host<br />
Infection<br />
site<br />
Helminth<br />
MCO (3272)<br />
MCO<br />
Rana neovolcanica<br />
reported as G. californi<br />
of Pulido (1994) were orginally<br />
specimen<br />
Remarks: Specimens of Leon-Regagnon (1992) and 1<br />
(1999).<br />
EZA<br />
LES (3285)<br />
LES<br />
Rana berlandieri<br />
Rana vaillanti<br />
Intestine<br />
Glypthelmins facioi Brenes, Arroyo, Jimenez, and<br />
Delgado, 1959 (Fig. 15)<br />
Remarks: Specimens of Guillen (1992) were originally reported as G. californiensis and transferred to G. facioi by Razo-M<br />
Glypthelmis parva Travassos, 1934 (Fig. 11)<br />
Intestine Rana vaillanti'f<br />
LESt (3391)<br />
Remarks: This species was originally described in Leptodactylus ocellatus from Brazil (Travassos, 1924). This is the first<br />
Glypthelmins sp. (Fig. 12) Intestine Leptodactylus melanonotusj\t (3392)<br />
Remarks: These specimens represent a new species (Razo-Mend vil, unpubl. data)<br />
LCA, TUX<br />
Bufo marinus<br />
Intestine<br />
Family Lecithodendriidae Odhner, 1910<br />
Loxogenes (Langeronia) macrocirra (Caballero<br />
and Bravo-Hollis, 1949) Yamaguti, 1971<br />
(Fig. 16)<br />
EZA<br />
Rana berlandieri<br />
PLB<br />
Undetermined loc<br />
Mexico<br />
LES (3307)<br />
LES, TUX<br />
Rana pipiensi<br />
Rana vaillanti<br />
Remarks: Originally described as Langeronia macrocirra Caballero and Bravo-Hollis, 1949.<br />
LCA<br />
Intestine Bufo marinus<br />
Family Brachycoeliidae Johnston, 1912<br />
Mesocoelium monas (Rudolphi, 1819)<br />
Teixeira de Freitas, 1958 (Fig. 17)<br />
TI TV<br />
LESt (3309)<br />
EZA<br />
Smilisca baudini<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Table 2. Continued.<br />
Locality*<br />
(CNHE accession<br />
Host<br />
Infection<br />
site<br />
Helminth<br />
MCO (3272)<br />
Rana neovolcanica<br />
Rana montezumae<br />
Eustachian tubes<br />
Family Hemiuridae Looss, 1907<br />
Halipegus occidualis Stafford, 1905 (Fig. 18)<br />
CLE (3361, 3362)<br />
LXO<br />
CLE<br />
LTE<br />
Rana pipiens± CLE<br />
Remarks: Caballero (1941) described H. lennensis, declared a junior synonym of//, occidualis by Rankin (1944). Caballero<br />
Rana montezumae from LXO, but after reexamination of specimens, McAlpine and Burt (1998) considered them to be H. o<br />
Family Diplostomidae Poirier, 1886<br />
Fibricola sp. (metacercariae) (Fig. 19) Urinary bladder Rana montezumae^ CLEf (3365, 3369)<br />
Remarks: Identification of this material is based on its comparison with the description of Fibricola texensis Chandler, 1942<br />
caballeroi Zerecero, 1943, in mammals from Mexico City (Zerecero, 1943).<br />
Family Plagiorchiidae (Liihe, 1901) Ward, 1917<br />
CLE (3363, 3371)<br />
LZAt (3364)<br />
MCOt (3372, 3373<br />
MCOt (3372, 3373<br />
LPA<br />
LPA<br />
LPA<br />
Rana montezumae^<br />
Rana dunni<br />
Rana megapodaj\ neovolcanica']'<br />
Ochetosoma sp. (metacercariae) (Fig. 20) Intestine wall and<br />
liver<br />
Ambystoma dumerilii<br />
Goodea atripinnis<br />
Neoophorus diazi<br />
From fishes<br />
* CLE = Cienaga de Lerma; ECH = Estero Chamela; EZA = Laguna El Zacatal; LCA = Lago de Catemaco, Veracruz; LC<br />
Laguna Escondida; LMO = Laguna Montford, Nuevo Leon; LPA = Lago de Patzcuaro; LTE = Lago de Texcoco, Estado de M<br />
Cointzio; PLB = Presa La Boca, Nuevo Leon; RPE = Ri'o Pesquen'a, Nuevo Leon; SAL = Salazar, Estado de Mexico; TUX =<br />
t First host or locality record.<br />
4: Host record made before the species of the "Rana pipiens complex" were differentiated. The geographic range of R. pipiens<br />
1983; Frost, 1985; Flores-Villela, 1993).<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
casionally prey on tadpoles and insect larvae<br />
also.<br />
Only 30 (10.5%) of the total number of species<br />
of amphibians reported in Mexico (285)<br />
(Flores-Villela, 1998) have been surveyed for<br />
helminth parasites so far. Seventy-three helminth<br />
species have been recorded. Interestingly<br />
enough, 25 of the 73 (34%) are endemic species<br />
found only in Mexico (see Baker [1987] and Lamothe<br />
et al. [1997]). However, our knowledge<br />
about helminth parasites of amphibians in Mexico<br />
is still far from complete. Parasitic organisms<br />
are becoming an important part of the body<br />
of knowledge about the natural history of their<br />
hosts, and this information can be easily used as<br />
a powerful and predictive tool to support biodiversity<br />
studies and conservation initiatives, as<br />
has been shown by Hoberg (1996, 1997). We<br />
plan to continue collecting data on the parasite<br />
fauna of amphibians in Mexico and, in this way,<br />
contribute to the understanding of their biology<br />
and their role in biodiversification and as monitors<br />
of climatic change.<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
We gratefully acknowledge Agustin Jimenez,<br />
Berenit Mendoza, and Coral Rosas for their assistance<br />
in field trips and Dr. T. Scholz for his<br />
comments on an early version of the manuscript.<br />
Identification of hosts by Adrian Nieto and Edmundo<br />
Perez (Museo de Zoologia, Facultad de<br />
Ciencias) is greatly appreciated. This study was<br />
funded by Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de<br />
Investigacion e Innovacion Tecnologica, Universidad<br />
Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (PA-<br />
PIIT-UNAM IN201396), and Consejo Nacional<br />
de Ciencia y Tecnologfa (CONACYT 2<strong>67</strong>6PN)<br />
to G.P.P.L., PAPIIT-UNAM IN219198 to<br />
G.P.P.L. and V.L.R., and CONACYT J27985-N<br />
to V.L.R.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Baker, M. R. 1987. Synopsis of the Nematoda parasitic<br />
in amphibians and reptiles. Memorial University<br />
of Newfoundland Occasional Papers in Biology<br />
11:1-325.<br />
Brandt, B. B. 1936. Parasites of certain North Carolina<br />
Salientia. Ecological Monographs 6:491-532.<br />
Bravo-Hollis, M. 1941. Revision de los generos Diplodiscus<br />
Diesing, 1836 y Megalodiscus Chandler,<br />
1923 (Trematoda: Paramphistomoidea). II. Anales<br />
del Institute de Biologia, Universidad Nacional<br />
Autonoma de Mexico 12:643—661.<br />
. 1943. Estudio sistematico de los trematodos<br />
parasites de los "ajolotes" de Mexico I. Anales<br />
PEREZ-PONCE DE LEON ET AL.—DIGENEANS OF MEXICAN AMPHIBIANS 105<br />
del Institute de Biologia, Universidad Nacional<br />
Autonoma de Mexico 14:141-159.<br />
Brenes, M. R., G. S. Arroyo, O. Jimenez-Quiroz,<br />
and E. Delgado-Flores. 1959. Algunos trematodos<br />
de Rana pipiens. Descripcion de Glypthelmins<br />
facial n. sp. Revista de Biologia Tropical 72:191-<br />
197.<br />
Brooks, R. D. 1976. Parasites of amphibians of the<br />
Great Plains. Part 2. Platyhelminths of amphibians<br />
in Nebraska. Bulletin of the University of Nebraska<br />
<strong>State</strong> Museum 10:65-92.<br />
. 1984. Platyhelminthes. Pages 247-258 in G.<br />
L. Hoff, F. L. Frye, and E. R. Jacobson, eds. Diseases<br />
of Amphibians and Reptiles. Plenum Publishing<br />
Corporation, New York.<br />
Caballero, C. E. 1941. Trematodos de la Cienaga de<br />
Lerma, Mex. Anales del Institute de Biologia,<br />
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico 12:<br />
623-641.<br />
. 1942a. Trematodos de las ranas de la Cienaga<br />
de Lerma, Estado de Mexico. II. Descripcion de<br />
una nueva especie de Haematoloechus. Revista<br />
Brasileira de Biologia 2:155-158.<br />
. 1942b. Trematodos de las ranas de la Cienaga<br />
de Lerma, Estado de Mexico. III. Redescripcion<br />
de una forma norteamericana de Haematoloechus<br />
y algunas consideraciones sobre Glypthelmins calif<br />
orniensis (Cort, 1919). Anales del Institute de<br />
Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de<br />
Mexico 13:71-79.<br />
. 1942c. Trematodos de las ranas de la Cienaga<br />
de Lerma, Estado de Mexico. IV. Anales del Institute<br />
de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma<br />
de Mexico 13:635-640.<br />
. 1947. Sexta contribucion al conocimiento de<br />
la parasitologia de Rana montezumae. Redescripcion<br />
de Halipegus amherstensis Rankin, 1944.<br />
Anales del Institute de Biologia, Universidad Nacional<br />
Autonoma de Mexico 18:473-477.<br />
. 1955. Helmintos de la Repiiblica cle Panama<br />
XIII. Una nueva especie de Catadiscus Cohn,<br />
1904 (Trematoda: Digenea). Revista Iberica de<br />
Parasitologia Tome Extra:23—26.<br />
, and M. Bravo-Hollis. 1949. Description d'un<br />
nouveau genre de Pleurogeninae (Trematoda: Lecithodendriidae)<br />
de grenouilles du Mexique Langeronia<br />
macrocirra n.g. n.sp. Annales de Parasitologie<br />
Humaine et Comparee 24:193-199.<br />
Chandler, A. C. 1942. The morphology and life cycle<br />
of a new strigeid, Fihricola texensis, piarasitic in<br />
raccoons. Transactions of the American Microscopical<br />
Society 56:156-1<strong>67</strong>.<br />
Flores-Villela, O. 1993. Herpetofauna Mexicana. Carnegie<br />
Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh,<br />
Special Publication 17:1-73.<br />
. 1998. Herpetofauna de Mexico: distribucion<br />
y endemismo. Pages 251-278 in T Ramamoorthy,<br />
R. Bye, A. Lot, and J. Fa, eds. Diversidad Biologica<br />
de Mexico. Orfgenes y Distribucion. Institute<br />
de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma<br />
de Mexico, Mexico, D.F.<br />
Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian Species of the World,<br />
a Taxonomic and Geographical Reference. Asso-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
106 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
elation of Systematics Collections, Lawrence,<br />
Kansas. 732 pp.<br />
Garcia-Altamirano, I., G. Perez-Ponce de Leon,<br />
and L. Garcia-Prieto. 1993. Contribucion al conocimiento<br />
de la comunidad de helmintos de dos<br />
especies de anfibios endemicos del lago de Patzcuaro,<br />
Michoacan: Rana dunni y Ambystoma dumerilii.<br />
Cuadernos Mexicanos de Zoologia 1:73-<br />
80.<br />
Guillen, H. S. 1992. Comunidades de helmintos de<br />
algunos anuros de "Los Tuxtlas", Veracruz. M.Sc.<br />
Thesis, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Nacional<br />
Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico, D.F. 90 pp.<br />
Hillis, D. M., and R. De Sa. 1988. Phylogeny and<br />
taxonomy of the Rana palmipes group (Salientia:<br />
Ranidae). Herpetological Monographs 2:1-26.<br />
, J. S. Frost, and D. A. Wright. 1983. Phylogeny<br />
and biogeography of the Rana pipiens<br />
complex: a biochemical evaluation. Systematic<br />
Zoology 32:132-143.<br />
Hoberg, P. E. 1996. Faunal diversity among avian<br />
parasite assemblages: the interaction of history,<br />
ecology, and biogeography in marine systems.<br />
Bulletin of the Scandinavian Society of Parasitologists<br />
6:65-89.<br />
. 1997. Phylogeny and historical reconstruction:<br />
host-parasite systems as keystones in biogeography<br />
and ecology. Pages 243-261 in M.<br />
Reaka-Kudla, D. O. Wilson, and E. O. Wilson,<br />
eds. Biodiversity II. Joseph Henry Press, Washington,<br />
D.C.<br />
Kennedy, M. J. 1981. A revision of species of Haematoloechus<br />
Looss, 1899 (Trematoda: Haematoloechidae)<br />
from Canada and the United <strong>State</strong>s.<br />
Canadian Journal of Zoology 59:1836-1846.<br />
Lamothe, A. R. 1964. Trematodos de los anfibios de<br />
Mexico III. Redescripcion de Cephalogonimus<br />
americanus Stafford, 1902, clave para las especies<br />
del genero y registro de un nuevo hospedero. Anales<br />
del Instituto de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional<br />
Autonoma de Mexico 35:115-121.<br />
, L. Garcia-Prieto, D. Osorio-Sarabia, and<br />
G. Perez-Ponce de Leon. 1997. Catalogo de la<br />
Coleccion Nacional de Helmintos. Publicacion<br />
Especial. Instituto de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional<br />
Autonoma de Mexico—Comision Nacional<br />
para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad,<br />
Mexico, D.F. 211 pp.<br />
Leon-Regagnon, V. 1992. Fauna helmintologica de<br />
algunos vertebrados acuaticos de la Cienaga de<br />
Lerma, Estado de Mexico. Anales del Instituto de<br />
Biologfa, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de<br />
Mexico 63:151-153.<br />
, D. R. Brooks, and G. Perez-Ponce de Leon.<br />
1999. Differentiation of Mexican species of Haematoloechus<br />
Looss, 1899 (Digenea: Plagiorchiformes)<br />
combining molecular and morphological evidence.<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 85:935-946.<br />
Martinez, V. J. M. 1969. Parasites de algunos anfibios<br />
colectados en diferentes areas de los municipios<br />
de Escobedo, Pesquerfa y Santiago, Nuevo<br />
Leon, Mexico. B.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Biological<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Sciences, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon,<br />
Mexico. 51 pp.<br />
McAlpine, F. D., and M. D. B. Burt. 1998. Taxonomic<br />
status of Halipegus spp. (Digenea: Derogenidae)<br />
parasitic in the mouth and eustachian<br />
tubes of North American and Mexican amphibians.<br />
Journal of the Helminthological Society of<br />
Washington 65:10-15.<br />
Perez-Ponce de Leon, G., L. Garcia-Prieto, D. Osorio-Sarabia,<br />
and V. Leon-Regagnon. 1996. Helmintos<br />
Parasites de Peces de Aguas Continentales<br />
de Mexico. Serie Listados Faunfsticos de Mexico.<br />
VI. Instituto de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional<br />
Autonoma de Mexico. Mexico, D.F. 100 pp.<br />
Pigulevsky, S. V. 1953. Family Gorgoderidae Looss,<br />
1901 (Subfamily Phyllodistomatinae Pigulevsky,<br />
1952 and Plesiochorinae Pigulevsky, 1952). Pages<br />
253-615 in K. I. Skrjabin, ed. Trematodes of Animals<br />
and Man. Vol. VIII. Izdatel'stvo Akademii<br />
Nauk S.S.S.R., Moscow. (In Russian.)<br />
Prokopic, J., and K. Krivanec. 1975. Helminths of<br />
amphibians, their interaction and host-parasite relationships.<br />
Acta Scientarium Naturalium Brno 9:<br />
1-48.<br />
Prudhoe, S., and R. A. Bray. 1982. Platyhelminth<br />
Parasites of the Amphibia. Oxford University<br />
Press, Oxford, England. 217 pp.<br />
Pulido, F. G. 1994. Helmintos de Rana dunni especie<br />
endemica del Lago de Patzcuaro, Michoacan,<br />
Mexico. Anales del Instituto de Biologfa, Universidad<br />
Nacional Autonoma de Mexico 65:205-<br />
207.<br />
Rankin, J. S. 1944. A review of the trematode genus<br />
Halipegus Looss, 1899, with an account of the life<br />
history of //. amherstensis n. sp. Transactions of<br />
the American Microscopical Society 63:149-164.<br />
Razo-Mendivil, U., J. P. Laclette, and G. Perez-<br />
Ponce de Leon. 1999. New host and locality records<br />
for three species of Glypthelmins (Digenea:<br />
Macroderoididae) in anurans of Mexico. Journal<br />
of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
66:197-201.<br />
Simmons, J. E. 1985. Herpetological Collecting and<br />
Collections Management. Society for the Study of<br />
Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular<br />
16. The University of Texas, Tyler, Texas. 57 pp.<br />
Sokoloff, D., and E. C. Caballero. 1933. Primera<br />
contribucion al conocimiento de los parasites de<br />
Rana montezumae. Anales del Instituto de Biologfa,<br />
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico<br />
4:15-21.<br />
Travassos, L. 1924. Contribu9oes para o conhecimento<br />
da fauna helmintologica dos batraquios do<br />
Brasil. Sciencia Medica 2:746-748.<br />
Yamaguti, S. 1975. A Synoptical Review of Life Histories<br />
of Digenetic Trematodes of Vertebrates with<br />
Special Reference to the Morphology of Their<br />
Larval Forms. Keigaku Publishing Co., Tokyo, Japan.<br />
590 pp.<br />
Zerecero, M. C. 1943. Algunos Trematodos de las<br />
ratas domesticas de la Ciudad de Mexico. Anales<br />
del Instituto de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional<br />
Autonoma de Mexico 14:507-526.
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 107-108<br />
Research Note<br />
New Host and Distribution Record of Gordius difficilis<br />
(Nematomorpha: Gordioidea) from a Vivid Metallic Ground Beetle,<br />
Chlaenius prasinus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from<br />
Western Nebraska, U.S.A.<br />
BEN HANELT' AND JOHN JANOVY, JR.<br />
School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0118, U.S.A.<br />
(e-mail: bhanelt@unlserve.unl.edu; jjanovy@unlserve.unl.edu)<br />
ABSTRACT: Gordius difficilis (Montgomery, 1898)<br />
Smith, 1994 is recorded from a creek in a juniper forest<br />
in western Nebraska. Subsequent pitfall data shows<br />
Chlaenius prasinus Dejean, 1826 to be the definitive<br />
host. This represents the first report of G. difficilis from<br />
the American Midwest, of C. prasinus as a host of<br />
nematomorphs, and as a host for G. difficilis.<br />
KEY WORDS: Gordius difficilis, Chlaenius prasinus,<br />
vivid metallic ground beetles, Nematomorpha, Nebraska,<br />
U.S.A.<br />
Nematomorphs are a well-recognized, widely<br />
distributed but poorly studied phylum (Chandler,<br />
1985). Sometimes referred to as horsehair or<br />
gordian worms, freshwater nematomorphs are<br />
obligate parasites as larvae but free-living as<br />
adults.<br />
Gordius aquaticus difficilis Montgomery,<br />
1898 was originally described from a single<br />
male specimen. Although Montgomery (1898)<br />
recognized 5 structural differences between G.<br />
aquaticus difficilis and Gordius aquaticus robustus<br />
Montgomery, 1898, he assigned G. aquaticus<br />
difficilis as a subspecies rather than a distinct<br />
species. Based on this early description,<br />
Miralles (1975) synonymized G. aquaticus difficilis<br />
with G. robustus Leidy, 1851, but Chandler<br />
(1985) synonymized G. aquaticus difficilis<br />
with Gordius paraensis Camerano, 1892.<br />
More recently, Smith (1994) used scanning<br />
electron microscopy to show that G. aquaticus<br />
difficilis is distinct enough to warrant considering<br />
it as a separate species, G. difficilis. This<br />
determination was based on the presence of a<br />
parabolic line of hairlike structures anterior to<br />
the cloacal opening, as well as the presence of<br />
distinct areoles in the midbody of the female.<br />
In mid-June 1998, G. difficilis was found in<br />
1 Corresponding author.<br />
107<br />
White Gate Creek, Keith County, Nebraska<br />
(41°12'20.5"N, 101°39'86.3"W). This site consists<br />
of a first-order, spring-fed creek suirounded<br />
by juniper trees (Juniperus scopulorum Sargent,<br />
1897) and various deciduous vegetation. The<br />
creek has a sandy bottom and often contains algal<br />
blooms because of the use of the creek by<br />
cattle. Nineteen free-living individuals were collected<br />
from the creek between late June and late<br />
July, 10 males ranging in size from 68-307 mm<br />
and 9 females ranging in size from 89-208 mm.<br />
Individuals were often found entangled in the<br />
algae or attached to sticks or rocks on the banks<br />
of the creek.<br />
In late June 1998, 4 lines of 10 pitfall traps<br />
were set adjacent to White Gate Creek. Of 6<br />
trapped Chlaenius prasinus Dejean, 1826, 2<br />
were infected with 3 worms each. None of the<br />
other invertebrates trapped contained nematomorphs.<br />
One host contained 2 female worms and<br />
1 male worm; the other host contained 3 female<br />
worms. The males ranged in size from 103-297<br />
mm, and the females ranged in size from 185-<br />
203 mm. The hosts were void of gonads, fatbodies,<br />
and intestines but appeared to behave<br />
normally.<br />
Worms were killed in 70% EtOH and brought<br />
up to 100% glycerine prior to examination. All<br />
specimens were temporarily mounted in glycerine<br />
for observation. Worms were as described<br />
by Montgomery (1898) and Smith (1994). Briefly,<br />
the male posterior is bifurcated with a subterminal<br />
ventral cloacal opening (Fig. 1). A line<br />
of hairlike structures curves around the anterior<br />
end of the cloacal opening. Posterior to the cloaca<br />
is a postcloacal crescent, extending about<br />
one-fourth the length of the lobed ends. Females<br />
have entire posteriors. Cuticular areoles are<br />
more prominent in females compared with males<br />
when viewed with light microscopy.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
108 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Figure 1. Gordius difficilis, posterior end of a male. Scale bar = 35 fxm. Note cloacal opening (C),<br />
precloacal line of hairlike structure (H), and postcloacal ridge (R).<br />
Gordians have been recorded from one individual<br />
of Chlaenius sericeus Forster, 1771, but<br />
the worm could be identified only as Gordius<br />
sp. because of the immaturity of the specimen<br />
(Leffler, 1984). The only other record of the genus<br />
Chlaenius as a host for a "nematoid parasite"<br />
was from Chlaenius tomentosus Say, 1830<br />
In that report, insect parts and the worm were;<br />
located in the stomach of the beetle (Forbes,<br />
1880). However, nematomorphs are usually<br />
found outside the host's gut. Thus, it is likely<br />
that the worm was ingested while inside another<br />
insect and was not a parasite of the beetle.<br />
Gordius difficilis has only been reported from<br />
Roan Mountain, western North Carolina (Mont<br />
gomery, 1898) and from Franklin County, Massachusetts<br />
(Smith, 1994). This report extends the<br />
known range of G. difficilis and for the first time<br />
provides information of a host for this species.<br />
We would like to thank Myrna Gainsforth for<br />
providing access to White Gate Creek and the<br />
Cedar Point Biological Station for providing facilities.<br />
This project was partially funded by the<br />
Center for Great Plains Studies Research erants-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
in-aid for graduate students (University of Nebraska-Lincoln,<br />
fall 1998).<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Chandler, C. M. 1985. Horsehair worms (Nematomorpha,<br />
Gordioidea) from Tennessee, with a review<br />
of taxonomy and distribution in the United<br />
<strong>State</strong>s. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Sciences<br />
60:59-62.<br />
Forbes, S. A. 1880. Notes on insectivorous Coleoptera.<br />
Bulletin of the Illinois Laboratory of Natural<br />
History 1:1<strong>67</strong>-176.<br />
Leffler, S. R. 1984. Record of a horsehair worm<br />
(Nematomorpha: Gordiidae) parasitizing Chlaenius<br />
sericeus Forster (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in<br />
Washington. Coleopterists Bulletin 38:130.<br />
Miralles, D. A. B. 1975. Nuevo aporte al conocimiento<br />
de la Gordiofauna Argentina. Neotropica 21:<br />
99-103.<br />
Montgomery, T. H. J. 1898. The Gordiacea of certain<br />
American collections with particular reference to<br />
the North American fauna. Bulletin of the Museum<br />
of <strong>Comparative</strong> Zoology, Harvard 32:23-59.<br />
Smith, D. G. 1994. A reevaluation of Gordius aquaticus<br />
difficilis Montgomery 1898 (Nematomorpha,<br />
Gordioidea, Gordiidae). Proceedings of the Academy<br />
of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 145:29-<br />
34.
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 109-114<br />
Research Note<br />
Intestinal Helminths of Seven Species of Agamid Lizards from<br />
Australia<br />
STEPHEN R. GOLDBERG,'-3 CHARLES R. BURSEY," AND CYNTHIA M. WALSER'<br />
1 Department of Biology, Whittier <strong>College</strong>, Whittier, California 90608, U.S.A. (e-mail:<br />
sgoldberg@whittier.edu) and<br />
2 Department of Biology, Pennsylvania <strong>State</strong> University, Shenango Campus, Sharon, Pennsylvania 16146,<br />
U.S.A. (e-mail: cxbl3@psu.edu)<br />
ABSTRACT: The intestinal tracts of 243 lizards representing<br />
7 species of Agamidae from Australia (Ctenophorus<br />
caudicinctus, Ctenophorus fordi, Ctenophorus<br />
isolepis, Ctenophorus reticulatus, Ctenophorus scutulatus,<br />
Lophognathus longirostris, and Pogona minor)<br />
were examined for helminths. One cestode species,<br />
Oochoristica piankai, and 8 nematode species, Abhreviata<br />
anomala, Kreisiella chrysocampa, Kreisiella<br />
lesueurii, Maxvachonia brygooi, Parapharyngodon<br />
fitzroyi, Skrjabinoptera gallardi, Skrjabinoptera goldmanae,<br />
and Wanaristrongylus ctenoti, were found.<br />
Larvae of Abbreviate* sp. were also present. Twelve<br />
new host records are reported.<br />
KEY WORDS: Sauria, lizards, Agamidae, survey,<br />
Cestoda, Oochoristica piankai, Nematoda, Abbreviata<br />
anomala, Kreisiella chrysocampa, Kreisiella lesueurii,<br />
Maxvachonia brygooi, Parapharyngodon fitzroyi,<br />
Skrjabinoptera gallardi, Skrjabinoptera goldmanae,<br />
Wanaristrongylus ctenoti, Abbreviata sp., Australia.<br />
The family Agamidae is well represented in<br />
Australia and about 60 species are known (Cogger,<br />
1992). Helminth records exist for 17 species<br />
(Baker, 1987; Jones, 1995a; Bursey et al., 1996).<br />
The puipose of this paper is to present the initial<br />
report of helminths harbored by Ctenophorus<br />
caudicinctus (Giinther, 1875) (the ring-tailed<br />
dragon), Ctenophorus fordi (Storr, 1965) (the<br />
mallee dragon), and Ctenophorus scutulatus<br />
(Stirling and Zietz, 1893) (the lozenge-marked<br />
dragon), and additional helminth data for 4 previously<br />
examined species: Ctenophorus isolepis<br />
(Fischer, 1881) (the military dragon), Ctenophorus<br />
reticulatus (Gray, 1845) (the western netted<br />
dragon), Lophognathus longirostris Boulenger,<br />
1883 (the Australian water dragon), and Pogona<br />
minor (Sternfeld, 1919) (the dwarf bearded<br />
dragon). In addition, patterns of infection for<br />
helminths of Australian agamids, were examined.<br />
3 Corresponding author.<br />
109<br />
The 7 species examined in this study range<br />
through much of Australia but overlap in Western<br />
Australia (Table 1). Ctenophorus caudicinctus<br />
is known from western Queensland through<br />
the Northern Territory and northern South Australia<br />
to most of Western Australia; C. fordi is<br />
widely distributed through southeastern Western<br />
Australia and southern South Australia with outlying<br />
populations in western Victoria and western<br />
New South Wales; C. isolepis is found in<br />
Western Australia, Northern Territory, northern<br />
South Australia, and western Queensland; C. reticulatus<br />
occurs throughout most of the southern<br />
half of Western Australia and northern South<br />
Australia; C. scutulatus is known from southern<br />
Western Australia and northwestern South Australia;<br />
L. longirostris occurs from the coast of<br />
Western Australia through central Australia to<br />
western Queensland; P. minor ranges 1'rom the<br />
central coast of Western Australia through central<br />
Australia and South Australia (Cogger,<br />
1992).<br />
Two hundred forty-three lizards were borrowed<br />
from the herpetology collection of the<br />
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles. County<br />
(LACM), Los Angeles, California, U.S.A., and<br />
examined for intestinal helminths. These specimens<br />
had been collected in 1966-1968 for a series<br />
of ecological studies by Eric R. Piarika (The<br />
University of Texas at Austin, U.S.A.). The<br />
stomach of each lizard had been removed, examined<br />
for food contents, and deposited in the<br />
Western Australian Museum, Perth, Western<br />
Australia; the carcasses with livers and intact intestines<br />
were deposited in LACM. Numbers of<br />
individuals, mean snout-vent length (SVL), year<br />
of collection, and museum accession number of<br />
host species are as follows: Ctenophorus caudicinctus<br />
(N = 25, SVL = 63 mm ± 4 SD, range<br />
= 55-71 mm), Collected 1968, Western Austra-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
110 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Table 1. Prevalence (%), mean intensity ± SD (x ± SD), and range (r) for intestinal helminths from<br />
Australian agamid lizards.<br />
Helminth<br />
Cestoda<br />
Oochoristica piankai<br />
Nematoda<br />
Abbreviata anomala<br />
Kreisiella chrysocampa<br />
Kreisiella lesueurii<br />
Maxvachonia brygooi<br />
Parapharyngodon fitzroyi<br />
Skrjabinoptera gallardi<br />
Skrjabinoptera goldmanae<br />
Wanaristrongylus ctenoti<br />
Abbreviata sp. (larvae)<br />
Ctenophorus caudicinctus<br />
% x ± SD r<br />
Host<br />
Ctenophorus fordi Ctenophorus isolepis<br />
% x ± SD % x ± SD<br />
— — — 23* 2.2 ± 1.2 1-4<br />
20* 1.0 —<br />
lia. LACM 55115, 55117-55119, 55123-55125,<br />
55127, 55128, 55130-55133, 55139, 55141-<br />
55143, 55145, 55152, 55154, 55156, 55163.,<br />
55164, 55166, 551<strong>67</strong>; Ctenophorus fordi (N =<br />
26, SVL = 50 mm ± 3 SD, range = 46-58 mm).<br />
Collected 19<strong>67</strong>, Western Australia. LACM<br />
59240, 59245, 59246, 59251, 59259, 59262,<br />
59268, 59271, 59272, 59274, 59275, 59279,<br />
59290, 59296, 59299, 59300, 59304, 59306-<br />
59308, 59312, 59316, 59319, 59321-59322,<br />
59324; Ctenophorus isolepis (N = 127, SVL =<br />
55 mm ± 5 SD, range = 35-<strong>67</strong> mm). Collected<br />
19<strong>67</strong>-1968, Western Australia. LACM 54575-<br />
54599, 54650-54<strong>67</strong>6, 54<strong>67</strong>8-54699, 54775-<br />
54799, 54825-54848, 54850-54853. Collected<br />
1966-19<strong>67</strong>, Northern Territory. LACM 54694-<br />
54699; Ctenophorus reticulatus (N = 5, SVL =<br />
76 mm ± 5 SD, range = 72-83 mm). Collected<br />
19<strong>67</strong>, Western Australia. LACM 55051, 55054,<br />
55055, 55062, 55063; Ctenophorus scutulatus<br />
(N = 25, SVL = 87 mm ± 11 SD, range = 71-<br />
107 mm). Collected 1966-19<strong>67</strong>, Western Australia.<br />
LACM 54933-54936, 54940, 54942,<br />
54946, 54949, 54952, 54956-54958, 54960,<br />
54962, 54963, 54970, 54975, 54982, 54993,<br />
54996, 54998, 54999, 55004, 55005, 55012; Lophognathus<br />
longirostris (N = 10, SVL = 74 mm<br />
± 19 SD, range = 48-98 mm). Collected 1966-<br />
1968, Western Australia. LACM 55334, 55335,<br />
55342, 55345, 55354, 55355, 55357, 55366,<br />
55373, 55377; Pogona minor (N = 25, SVL =<br />
111 mm ± 11 SD, range = 88-129 mm). Collected<br />
19<strong>67</strong>, Western Australia. LACM 54854-<br />
54857, 54859, 54862, 54864-54866, 54868,<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
4* 1.0 — 18* 2.3 ± 1.6 1-8<br />
4 2.0 ± 1.4 1-4<br />
2* 1.0 —<br />
2.0<br />
1.0<br />
54869, 54872, 54873, 54875-54880, 54882,<br />
54884, 54890, 54892, 54896, 54899.<br />
The intestines, body cavity, and liver of each<br />
lizard were examined for adult helminths and<br />
helminth larvae (such as cystacanths, pleurocercoids,<br />
and tetrathyridia) using a dissecting<br />
microscope. Stomachs from these specimens<br />
were unavailable for our examination; however,<br />
Jones (1987) reported helminths from stomachs<br />
of C. isolepis, L. longirostris, and P. minor<br />
from the Pianka Collection in the Western Australian<br />
Museum, which are listed in Table 2.<br />
Helminths were placed on a glass slide in a<br />
drop of undiluted glycerol for study under a<br />
compound microscope. Nematodes were identified<br />
from these preparations; selected cestodes<br />
were stained with hematoxylin and mounted in<br />
balsam for identification. Nematodes in vials of<br />
70% ethanol, and permanent stained mounts of<br />
cestodes were deposited in the United <strong>State</strong>s<br />
National Parasite Collection (USNPC), Beltsville,<br />
Maryland.<br />
One species of Cestoda, Oochoristica piankai<br />
Bursey, Goldberg, and Woolery, 1996 (USNPC<br />
88548, 88550, 88555) and 8 species of Nematoda,<br />
Abbreviata anomala Jones, 1986 (USNPC<br />
88559), Kreisiella chrysocampa Jones, 1985<br />
(USNPC 88551, 88560), Kreisiella lesueurii<br />
Jones, 1986 (USNPC 88549, 88561), Maxvachonia<br />
brygooi Mawson, 1972 (USNPC 88552,<br />
88556, 88562), Parapharyngodon fitzroyi Jones,<br />
1992 (USNPC 88563), Skrjabinoptera goldmanae<br />
Mawson, 1970 (USNPC 88557, 88564),<br />
Skrjabinoptera gallardi (Johnston and Mawson,
Table 1. Extended.<br />
Ctenophorus reticulatus<br />
% x ± SD r<br />
60* 7.0 ± 3.5 5-11<br />
* New host record.<br />
Ctenophorus<br />
scutulatus<br />
% x ± SD r<br />
4.1 ±4.1 1-13<br />
1.1 ± 0.4 1-2<br />
1.0 —<br />
1942) (USNPC 88547), and Wanaristrongylus<br />
ctenoti Jones, 1987 (USNPC 88553), were<br />
found. Larvae of Abbreviata sp. (USNPC 88554,<br />
88558, 88565) were also present. All of these<br />
helminths were found in the lumen of the intestines,<br />
with the exception of larval Abbreviata sp.<br />
which were found in cysts in the intestinal wall.<br />
No cystacanths, pleurocercoids, or tetrathyridia<br />
were found in the body cavity or attached to the<br />
viscera.<br />
Prevalences, mean intensity ± SD, and range<br />
are presented in Table 1. None of the helminths<br />
found in this study is host specific. Recorded<br />
helminths of agamid lizards from Australia are<br />
listed in Table 2. Of these, Pseudothamugadia<br />
physignathi Lopez-Neyra, 1956, Oswaldofilaria<br />
innisfailensis (Mackerras, 1962), Oswaldofilaria<br />
pflugfelderi (Frank, 1964) and Oswaldofilaria<br />
samfordensis Manzanell, 1982, all filarioids,<br />
have been found to infect a single host species<br />
and, surprisingly, the same host species, Physignathus<br />
lesueurii (Gray, 1831) (the eastern water<br />
dragon). Abbreviata anomala, Abbreviata pilbarensis<br />
Jones, 1986, Oswaldofilaria chlamydosauri<br />
(Breinl, 1913), 5. gallardi, Strongyluris<br />
paronai (Stossich, 1902), and Wanaristrongylus<br />
pogonae Jones, 1987 are known only from<br />
agamid hosts. The remaining helminths have<br />
been reported from agarnids as well as other lizard<br />
families: O. piankai from Gekkonidae; Abbreviata<br />
antarctica (Linstow, 1899), Scincidae,<br />
Varanidae; Abbreviata confusa (Johnston and<br />
Mawson, 1942), Varanidae, as well as several<br />
Host<br />
GOLDBERG ET AL.—RESEARCH NOTES 111<br />
Lophognathus<br />
longirostris<br />
% x ± SD r<br />
10* 1.0<br />
10 1.0<br />
Pogona minor<br />
% x ± SD r<br />
12 2.0 ± 1.0<br />
28 6.7 ± 5.6<br />
20* 1.2 ± 0.5<br />
1-3<br />
1-13<br />
1-2<br />
snake species; Abbreviata tumidocapitis Jones,<br />
1983, Gekkonidae, Varanidae; K. chrysocatnpa,<br />
Scincidae; K. lesueurii, Scincidae; M. brygooi,<br />
Scincidae, Varanidae; P. fitzroyi, Scincidae; Parapharyngodon<br />
kartana (Johnston and Mawson,<br />
1941), Gekkonidae, Scincidae; Physalopteroides<br />
filicauda Jones, 1985, Gekkonidae, Pygopodidae,<br />
Scincidae, Varanidae; Pseudorictularia dipsarilis<br />
(Irwin-Smith, 1922), Scincidae; S. goldmanae,<br />
Gekkonidae, Scincidae, Varanidae; W.<br />
ctenoti, Gekkonidae, Scincidae, Varanidae.<br />
Physalopterid larvae are widely distributed in<br />
Australia and have been reported from agamid,<br />
gekkonid, scincid, and varanid lizards as well as<br />
several species of snakes (Jones, 1995b). This is<br />
the first report of larvae of Abbreviata sp. from<br />
C. isolepis and C. scutulatus; however, Jones<br />
(1995b) reported physalopteran larvae from C.<br />
isolepis. Currently, species of Physaloptera are<br />
not known to occur in Australian reptiles. Physaloptera<br />
gallardi Johnston and Mawson, 1942,<br />
from Pogona barbata (Cuvier, 1829) (the bearded<br />
dragon) was reassigned to Skrjabinoptera by<br />
Chabaud (1956), and Physaloptera bancrofti Irwin-Smith,<br />
1922 from Phyllurus platurus<br />
(White, 1790) (the southern leaf-tailed gecko)<br />
was reassigned to Abbreviata by Schuh; (1927).<br />
Physalopterid larvae found in Australian lizards<br />
are most likely species of either Abbreviata or<br />
Skrjabinoptera.<br />
The data presented here suggest that Australian<br />
agamid lizards are infected by helminth<br />
generalists. Bush et al. (1997) presented a hier-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
112 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Table 2. Helminths of agamid lizards from Australia.<br />
Helminth species<br />
•5 CJ C3 !3 3-2<br />
o "S ^ "3 ^ § ^ § ^ SJ<br />
Lizard species ^C^. ^!
Table 2. Extended.<br />
3 '£<br />
Oswaldofilal<br />
chlamydosai<br />
xt<br />
xt<br />
a<br />
Oswaldofilal<br />
innisfailensi.<br />
—<br />
— xtt<br />
xt —<br />
a<br />
Oswaldofilal<br />
pflugfelderi<br />
a<br />
Oswaldofilal<br />
samfordensi.<br />
"a<br />
Parapharyn}.<br />
fitzroyi<br />
—<br />
1<br />
Parapharyn}<br />
kartana<br />
—<br />
—<br />
Helminth species<br />
1<br />
Physalopten<br />
filicauda<br />
—<br />
xt<br />
.2<br />
Pseudorictlll<br />
dipsarilis<br />
GOLDBERG ET AL.—RESEARCH NOTES<br />
Pseudothamc<br />
-5<br />
2<br />
•£f<br />
P<br />
ft.<br />
a<br />
Skrjabinopte<br />
gallardi<br />
Xt<br />
•S<br />
•S<br />
•gl<br />
sgoldmanae Strongyluris<br />
paronai<br />
xt<br />
BO<br />
Wanaris stro<br />
ctenoti<br />
—<br />
="c<br />
Wanaris stro<br />
pogonae<br />
- - - xt xt - -<br />
— — — x§<br />
— — X# X# — X§<br />
— — — — X# — — — x#<br />
V" A-H. -I" •" A-1..J. V 4- -4- — — — — A "V -i- i<br />
— — x§§ x§§ —<br />
— x§ x§§ —<br />
— — — — x§§ — —<br />
archy of parasite community terms, including infracommunity<br />
(helminths in a single host), component<br />
community (helminths of a host species),<br />
and supracommunity (helminths in sympatric<br />
hosts). Table 2 represents the contribution of<br />
agamid lizards to the Australian helminth supracommunity.<br />
Mean number of helminth species<br />
harbored per host species was 3.50 ± 0.58 SE<br />
(range, 1-9). Aho (1990) compiled distributional<br />
x§ - —<br />
patterns for lizards in general and reported the<br />
mean total number of helminth species per host<br />
species to be 2.06 ± 0.13 SE (range, 1-4).<br />
Whether this greater number of helminth species<br />
per host species is a local Australian phenomenon<br />
or the result of insufficient data on the helminths<br />
of this diverse fauna must await further<br />
studies of Australian lizard helminths.<br />
We thank Robert L. Bezy, Natural History<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
—
114 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Museum of Los Angeles County, for the opportunity<br />
to examine the lizard specimens.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Aho, J. M. 1990. Helminth communities of amphibians<br />
and reptiles: comparative approaches to understanding<br />
patterns and processes. Pages 157-<br />
195 in G. W. Esch, A. O. Bush, and J. M. Aho,<br />
eds. Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes.<br />
Chapman and Hall, London.<br />
Baker, M. R. 1987. Synopsis of the Nematoda parasitic<br />
in amphibians and reptiles. Occasional Papers<br />
in Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland<br />
11:1-325.<br />
Bursey, C. R., S. R. Goldberg, and D. N. Woolery.<br />
1996. Oochoristica piankai sp. n. (Cestoda: Linstowiidae)<br />
and other helminths of Moloch horridus<br />
(Sauria: Agamidae) from Australia. Journal of<br />
the Helminthological Society of Washington 63:<br />
215-221.<br />
Bush, A.O., K. D. Lafferty, J. M. Lotz, and A. W.<br />
Shostak. 1997. <strong>Parasitology</strong> meets ecology on its<br />
own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of<br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong> 83:575-583.<br />
Chabaud, A. G. 1956. Essai de revision des physalopteres<br />
parasites de reptiles. Annales de Parasitologie<br />
Humaine et Comparee 31:29-52.<br />
Cogger, H. G. 1992. Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia,<br />
5th ed., Reed Books, Chatswood, New<br />
South Wales, Australia. 775 pp.<br />
Johnston, T. H., and P. M. Mawson. 1942. The Gallard<br />
collection of parasitic nematodes in the Australian<br />
Museum. Records of the Australian Museum<br />
21:110-115.<br />
, and . 1943. Remarks on some nematodes<br />
from Australian reptiles. Transactions of the<br />
Royal Society of South Australia <strong>67</strong>:183-186.<br />
Jones, H. I. 1986. Gastrointestinal nematodes in the<br />
lizard genus Pogona Storr (Agamidae) in Western<br />
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 114-117<br />
Research Note<br />
Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 34:689-<br />
705.<br />
. 1987. Wanaristrongylus gen. n. (Nematoda:<br />
Trichostrongyloidea) from Australian lizards, with<br />
descriptions of three new species. Proceedings of<br />
the Helminthological Society of Washington 54:<br />
40-47.<br />
. 1994. Gastrointestinal nematodes of the frillneck<br />
lizard, Chlamydosaurus kingii (Agamidae),<br />
with particular reference to Skrjabinoptera goldmanae<br />
(Spirurida: Physalopteridae). Australian<br />
Journal of Zoology 42:371-377.<br />
. 1995a. Gastric nematode communities in lizards<br />
from the Great Victoria Desert, and an hypothesis<br />
for their evolution. Australian Journal of<br />
Zoology 43:141-164.<br />
-. 1995b. Pathology associated with physalopterid<br />
larvae (Nematoda: Spirurida) in the gastric<br />
tissues of Australian reptiles. Journal of Wildlife<br />
Diseases 31:299-306.<br />
Mackerras, M. J. 1962. Filarial parasites (Nematoda:<br />
Filarioidea) of Australian animals. Australian<br />
Journal of Zoology 10:400-457.<br />
Manzanell, R. 1982. Oswaldofilaria spp. (Filarioidea,<br />
Nematoda) in Australian agamid lizards with a description<br />
of a new species and a redescription of<br />
O. chlamydosauri (Breinl). Annales de Parasitologie<br />
Humaine et Comparee 57:127—143.<br />
Mawson, P. M. 1971. Pearson Island Expedition<br />
1969.—8. Helminths. Transactions of the Royal<br />
Society of South Australia 95:169-183.<br />
. 1972. The nematode genus Maxvachonia (Oxyurata:<br />
Cosmocercidae) in Australian reptiles and<br />
frogs. Transactions of the Royal Society of South<br />
Australia 96:101-108.<br />
Schulz, R. E. 1927. Die Familie Physalopteridae Leiper,<br />
1908 (Nematodes) und die Prinzipien ihrer<br />
Klassifikation. Pages 287-312 in Sammlung Helmintologischer<br />
Arbeiten Prof. K. I. Skrjabin Gewidmet.<br />
Moscow.<br />
Descriptions of Cystacanths of Mediorhynchus orientalis and<br />
Mediorhynchus wardi (Acanthocephala: Gigantorhynchidae)<br />
DAVID P. BOLETTE<br />
University of Pittsburgh, Division of Laboratory Animal Resources, S1040 Biomedical Science Tower,<br />
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, U.S.A. (e-mail: dbolette@vms.cis.pitt.edu)<br />
ABSTRACT: Cystacanths of Mediorhynchus orientalis<br />
Belopol'skaya and 1 cystacanth of Mediorhynchus<br />
wardi Schmidt and Canaris were collected from opportunistically<br />
infected Surinam cockroaches, Pycnoscelis<br />
surinamensis (Linnaeus), at the National Aviary<br />
in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. Morphological<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
measurements and descriptions of Cystacanths of M.<br />
orientalis and M. wardi are provided for the first time.<br />
KEY WORDS: Mediorhynchus orientalis, Mediorhynchus<br />
wardi, Acanthocephala, Gigantorhynchidae,<br />
Cystacanths, Surinam cockroach, aviary, description,<br />
Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Mediorhynchus orientalis Belopol'skaya,<br />
1953 was originally described from juvenile<br />
specimens collected from a little ringed plover,<br />
Charadrius duhius curonicm Gmelin, 1789, in<br />
Russia. Schmidt and Kuntz (1977) subsequently<br />
redescribed the species from numerous adults<br />
and juveniles collected from 10 species of passeriform<br />
birds and a Pacific golden plover, Pluvialis<br />
fulva (Gmelin, 1789); (as Charadrius<br />
dominions fulvus), from Taiwan, Borneo, and<br />
Hawaii. Mediorhynchus wardi Schmidt and<br />
Canaris, 19<strong>67</strong> was described from numerous<br />
adult specimens collected from 4 species of passeriform<br />
birds in Njoro, Kenya.<br />
Forty-five species of Mediorhynchus were recorded<br />
as valid in Amin's (1985) list of Acanthocephala.<br />
Two additional species not included<br />
in Amin's list were apparently described during<br />
its preparation (George and Nadakal, 1984).<br />
Five of these have the cystacanths described.<br />
Cystacanths of Mediorhynchus petrochenkoi<br />
Gvosdev and Soboleva, 1966, were described by<br />
Lisitsina and Tkach (1994); of Mediorhynchus<br />
centurorum Nickol, 1969 by Nickol (1977); and<br />
of Mediorhynchus grandis Van Cleave, 1916 by<br />
Moore (1962). Brief descriptions of the cystacanth<br />
stage of Mediorhynchus papillosus Van<br />
Cleave, 1916, were provided by Ivashkin and<br />
Shmitova (1969) and Gafurov (1975), and of<br />
Mediorhynchus micracanthus (Rudolphi, 1819)<br />
Meyer, 1933 by Rizhikov and Dizer (1954).<br />
Cystacanths of Mediorhynchus orientalis<br />
were reported from opportunistically infected<br />
Surinam cockroaches, Pycnoscelis surinamensis<br />
(Linnaeus, 1758) (Blaberidae) at the National<br />
Aviary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.<br />
(Bolette, 1990). These cockroaches occurred<br />
within a free-flight exhibit that housed a variety<br />
of birds originating from various geographical<br />
localities. This method of housing most likely<br />
contributed to the accidental introduction of M.<br />
orientalis into the enclosure. The following description<br />
of M. orientalis cystacanths is based on<br />
9 everted specimens, 1 male and 8 females, collected<br />
from the coelomic cavities of infected P.<br />
surinamensis from the previous report (Bolette,<br />
1990). Additionally, while reexamining the cystacanths<br />
previously recovered from Surinam<br />
cockroaches (Bolette, 1990), 1 specimen was determined<br />
to be M. wardi. The following description<br />
of M. wardi is based on this single everted<br />
female cystacanth. This report represents the<br />
BOLETTE—RESEARCH NOTES 115<br />
first description of M. orientalis and M. wardi<br />
cystacanths.<br />
The cockroaches were killed with ethyl acetate.<br />
Cystacanths were mechanically excysted,<br />
placed in refrigerated tap water to elicit proboscis<br />
evagination, killed and preserved in AFA fixative,<br />
and later transferred to 70% ethyl alcohol.<br />
Selected specimens were stained in borax-carmine,<br />
dehydrated in ascending concentrations of<br />
ethyl alcohol, cleared in ascending concentrations<br />
of xylene, and mounted in Permount®<br />
(Fisher Scientific, Fairlawn, New Jersey,<br />
U.S.A.). Voucher specimens were deposited in<br />
the United <strong>State</strong>s National Parasite Collection,<br />
Beltsville, Maryland (USNPC No. 88032). Measurements<br />
are in jxm unless stated otherwise,<br />
with means in parentheses. Trunk measurements<br />
do not include the neck. Hook and spine measurements<br />
were determined in complete profile.<br />
Mediorhynchus orientalis Belopol'skaya,<br />
1953<br />
GENERAL (CYSTACANTH): Trunk short, oblong,<br />
slightly tapered at distal end. Proboscis<br />
truncate, conical (Fig. 1). Proboscis armature<br />
similar in both sexes. 19-24 (usually 20-21)<br />
nearly longitudinal rows of 4-6 (usually 5)<br />
hooks each. Anterior 2—3 hooks 37.5—50.0<br />
(47.3); middle 2-3 hooks 37.5-45.0 (40.7); posterior<br />
1-2 hooks 20.0-40.0 (29.2). Rootless<br />
spines arranged in 34—38 rows of 3-6 (usually<br />
4-5) spines each; 27.5-45.0 (36.75) long. Lemnisci<br />
long, slender, usually folded, and partly retained<br />
in neck region and anterior part of trunk.<br />
FEMALE CYSTACANTHS (based on 8 specimens):<br />
Trunk 1.49-1.89 (1.66) mm long, 0.48-0.73<br />
(0.58) mm wide at widest point. Proboscis 637—<br />
726 (695) long. Anterior proboscis 398-458<br />
(428) long, 308-338 (318) wide at base. Posterior<br />
proboscis 199-348 (272) long, 289-398<br />
(350) wide at base. Neck 131-192 (158) long,<br />
364-455 (391) wide at base. Sensory pit 27.5-<br />
30.0 (24.0) long, 27.5-45.0 (35.0) wide, located<br />
22.5-140 (87.0) distal to posteriormost spine.<br />
MALE CYSTACANTH (1 specimen): Trunk 1.59<br />
mm long, 0.62 mm wide at widest point. Proboscis<br />
662 long. Anterior proboscis 384 long,<br />
283 wide at base. Posterior proboscis 278 long,<br />
318 wide at base. Neck 1<strong>67</strong> long, 333 wide at<br />
base. Sensory pit 22.5 long, 30.0 wide, located<br />
17.5 distal to posteriormost spine.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
116 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Figures 1, 2. Everted cystacanths of Mediorhynchus recovered from Surinam cockroaches, Pycnoscelis<br />
surinamensis. 1. Proboscis of M. orientalis', bar == 200 jmm. AP, anterior proboscis; BPPN, borderline<br />
between posterior proboscis and neck; N, neck; PP, posterior proboscis; RAPP, ridge between anterior<br />
and posterior proboscis. 2. Female M. wardi; bar = 250 jjim. GP, gonopore; L, lemniscus; LS, ligament<br />
strand; SP, sensory pit, U, uterus; V, vagina.<br />
Mediorhynchus wardi Schmidt and Canaris,<br />
19<strong>67</strong><br />
FEMALE CYSTACANTH (1 specimen): Trunk<br />
short, subglobose, rounded at distal end (Fig. 2),<br />
1.89 mm long, 0.63 mm wide at widest point.<br />
proboscis 468 long, 402 wide at base. Posterior<br />
proboscis 250 long, 409 wide at base. 25 nearly<br />
longitudinal rows of 7-8 hooks each. Anterior<br />
2-3 hooks 32.5-37.5 (36.3); middle 2-3 hooks<br />
27.5-30.0 (29.6); posterior 2 hooks 22.5-30.0<br />
Proboscis truncate, conical, 718 long. Anterior (25.6). Rootless spines arranged in 40 rows of<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
4-5 spines each: 25.0-35.0 (31.4). Neck 202<br />
long, 343 wide at base. Sensory pit 25.0 long,<br />
32.5 wide, located 125 distal to most posterior<br />
spine. Lemnisci long, slender, partly folded, extended<br />
far into trunk.<br />
The proboscis armature arrangement of M. orientalis<br />
cystacanths is identical to that of adults<br />
of this species as redescribed by Schmidt and<br />
Kuntz (1977). However, the proboscis armature<br />
and neck measurements of the cystacanths examined<br />
differed from those of adults in the following<br />
respects. The lengths of the middle 2-3<br />
and posterior 1-2 hooks of cystacanths were<br />
37.5-45.0 and 20.0-40.0, respectively, while<br />
those listed for adults were 34-42 and 30-44<br />
(Schmidt and Kuntz, 1977). The neck length and<br />
width of female cystacanths and the neck width<br />
of the male measured 131—192 by 364-455 and<br />
333, respectively; the measurements of adult females<br />
and males were reported as 216—240 by<br />
530-600 and 500-535, respectively. The proboscis<br />
of the male cystacanth was slightly longer<br />
at 662, while the proboscides of adult males<br />
were 500-600 long.<br />
The proboscis hook and spine length measurements<br />
of the cystacanth of M. wardi differed<br />
slightly from those given for adults of this species<br />
by Schmidt and Canaris (19<strong>67</strong>). Cystacanth<br />
hook and spine length measurements ranged<br />
from 22.5-37.5 and 25.0-35.0, respectively,<br />
while those listed for adult M. wardi were 31.0—<br />
36.0 and 21.0-28.0. The proboscis width of the<br />
cystacanth was slightly narrower than in adults;<br />
anterior and posterior proboscis width for the<br />
cystacanth measured 402 and 409, respectively,<br />
while the corresponding measurements reported<br />
for adults were 425 and 515-545. Neck length<br />
of the cystacanth was slightly longer than adults,<br />
measuring 202, while the reported adult neck<br />
length was 165. Additionally, the cystacanth did<br />
not show any evidence of an anterior trunk<br />
BOLETTE—RESEARCH NOTES 117<br />
swelling, as described for adults. However, because<br />
the armature arrangement and all other<br />
proboscis measurements are consistent with<br />
those described by Schmidt and Canaris (19<strong>67</strong>)<br />
for adult M. wardi, the single female specimen<br />
was assigned to this species.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Amin, O. M. 1985. Classification. Pages 27-72 in D.<br />
W. T. Crompton and B. B. Nickol, eds. Biology<br />
of the Acanthocephala. Cambridge University<br />
Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.<br />
Bolette, D. P. 1990. Intermediate host of Mediorhynchus<br />
orientalis (Acanthocephala: Gigantorhynchidae).<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 76:575-577.<br />
Gafurov, A. K. 1975. New intermediate hosts of the<br />
acanthocephalan Mediorhynchus papillosus Van<br />
Cleave, 1916. Zoologicheskii Sbornik 2:103-104.<br />
(In Russian).<br />
George, P. V., and A. M. Nadakal. 1984. Three new<br />
species of Acanthocephala (Gigantorhynchidea)<br />
from birds of Kerala. Acta Parasitologica Polonica<br />
29:97-106.<br />
Ivashkin, V. M., and G. Y. Shmitova. 1969. The life<br />
cycle of Mediorhynchus papillosus. Trudy<br />
Gel'mintologicheskoi Laboratorii 20:62-63.<br />
Lisitsina, O. I., and V. V. Tkach. 1994. Morphology<br />
of cystacanths of some acanthocephalans from<br />
aquatic and terrestrial intermediate hosts in the<br />
Ukraine. Helminthologia 31:83-90.<br />
Moore, D. V. 1962. Morphology, life history, and development<br />
of the acanthocephalan Mediorhynchus<br />
grandis Van Cleave, 1916. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
48:76-86.<br />
Nickol, B. B. 1977. Life history and host specificity<br />
of Mediorhynchus centurorum Nickol 1969<br />
(Acanthocephala: Gigantorhynchidae). Journal of<br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong> 63:104-111.<br />
Rizhikov, K. M., and Y. B. Dizer. 1954. Biology of<br />
Macracanthorhynchus catulinus and Mediorhynchus<br />
micracanthus. Doklady Akademii Nauk<br />
SSSR 95:13<strong>67</strong>-1369.<br />
Schmidt, G. D., and A. G. Canaris. 19<strong>67</strong>. Acanthocephala<br />
from Kenya with descriptions of two new<br />
species. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 53:634-637.<br />
, and R. E. Kuntz. 1977. Revision of Mediorhynchus<br />
Van Cleave 1916 (Acanthocephala) with<br />
a key to species. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 63:500-<br />
507.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 118-121<br />
Research Note<br />
Gastrointestinal Helminths of Four Lizard Species from<br />
Moorea, French Polynesia<br />
STEPHEN R. GOLDBERG, u CHARLES R. BuRSEY,2 AND HAY CHEAM'<br />
1 Department of Biology, Whittier <strong>College</strong>, Whittier, California 90608, U.S.A.<br />
(e-mail: sgoldberg@whitticr.edu) and<br />
2 Department of Biology, Pennsylvania <strong>State</strong> University, Shenango Campus, Sharon, Pennsylvania 16146,<br />
U.S.A. (e-mail: cxbl3@psu.edu)<br />
ABSTRACT: The gastrointestinal tracts of 82 lizards<br />
comprising 2 gekkonids, Gehyra oceanica (N = 20)<br />
and Lepidodactylus lugubris (N =31), and 2 scincids,<br />
Cryptoblepharus poecilopleurus (N = 4) and Emoia<br />
cyanura (N = 27), from Moorea, French Polynesia,<br />
were examined for helminths. One species of cestode,<br />
Cylindrotaenia decidua, 5 species of nematodes, Maxvachonia<br />
chabaudi, Pharyngodon oceanicus, Spauligodon<br />
gehyrae, Skrjabinoptera sp. (larvae), and an unidentified<br />
oxyurid were found. Eleven new host records<br />
and 11 new locality records are reported.<br />
KEY WORDS: lizard, Cryptoblepharus poecilopleurus,<br />
Emoia cyanura, Gehyra oceanica, Lepidodactylus<br />
lugubris, Cestoda, Nematoda, Moorea, French Poly-<br />
Eight species of lizards—the snake-eyed<br />
skink, Cryptoblepharus poecilopleurus (Wiegmann,<br />
1834); the moth skink, Lipinia noctua<br />
(Lesson, 1830); the copper-tailed skink, Emoia<br />
cyanura (Lesson, 1830); the stump-toed gecko,<br />
Gehyra mutilata (Wiegmann, 1834); the oceanic<br />
gecko, Gehyra oceanica (Lesson, 1830); the<br />
Indo-Pacific gecko, Hemidactylus garnotii Dumeril<br />
and Bibron, 1836; the Indo-Pacific tree<br />
gecko, Hemiphyllodactylus typus Bleeker, 1860;<br />
and the mourning gecko, Lepidodactylus lugubris<br />
(Dumeril and Bibron, 1836)—occur on Moorea,<br />
French Polynesia (Ineich and Blanc, 1988).<br />
These species are widely distributed in the Pacific<br />
Islands (Burt and Burt, 1932). Helminths<br />
have been reported from G. oceanica, H. garnotii,<br />
and L. lugubris (Table 1), but to our<br />
knowledge, there are no published reports of<br />
helminths from the other 5 lizard species. The<br />
purpose of this note is to report helminths for C.<br />
poecilopleurus, E. cyanura, G. oceanica, and L.<br />
lugubris from Moorea, French Polynesia, and to<br />
list 11 new host and 11 new locality records for<br />
these helminths.<br />
3 Corresponding author.<br />
118<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Of the 8 species of lizards on Moorea, 82 individuals<br />
representing 4 species were collected by<br />
hand by one of us (S.R.G.) in April 1992: 4 C.<br />
poecilopleurus, 7 E. cyanura, 3 G. oceanica at<br />
Marae Titiroa, 2 km below Belvedere Viewpoint,<br />
ca. 457 m elevation, Opunohu Valley (17°33'S,<br />
149°50'W); 20 E. cyanura, 12 G. oceanica, 11 L.<br />
lugubris at the Richard B. Gump South Pacific<br />
Biological Research Station, ca. 60 m elevation,<br />
ca. 3 km west of Paopao (17°31'S, 149°49'W); 5<br />
G. oceanica, 20 L. lugubris at Paopao, ca. 20 m<br />
elevation (17°31'S, 149°51'W). These were the<br />
only lizard species observed at the time of collection.<br />
Lizards were fixed in 10% formalin for 24<br />
hours and preserved in 70% ethanol. The abdominal<br />
cavity was opened, and the esophagus,<br />
stomach, and small and large intestines were removed,<br />
slit longitudinally, and examined under<br />
a dissecting microscope. All lizards were deposited<br />
in the herpetology collection of the Natural<br />
History Museum of Los Angeles County<br />
(LACM), Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.: C.<br />
poecilopleurus: LACM 141065-141068; E. cyanura:<br />
LACM 141038-141064; G. oceanica:<br />
LACM 141009-141028; L. lugubris: LACM<br />
140976-141006.<br />
Each nematode was cleared on a glass slide<br />
in undiluted glycerol. Cestodes were stained<br />
with hematoxylin and mounted in balsam. Identifications<br />
were made from these preparations<br />
with use of a compound microscope. Number of<br />
helminths, prevalence, mean intensity, and range<br />
of infection are given in Table 2. Terminology<br />
is in accordance with Bush et al. (1997).<br />
One species of cestode, Cylindrotaenia decidua<br />
(Ainsworth, 1985), and 5 species of nematodes,<br />
Maxvachonia chabaudi Mawson, 1972;<br />
Pharyngodon oceanicus Bursey and Goldberg,<br />
1999; Spauligodon gehyrae Bursey and Gold-
Table 1. Previous helminth records for Gehyra oceanica, Hemidactylus garnotii, and Lepidodactylus lug<br />
Host<br />
Helminth Locality<br />
Guam<br />
Moorea, Rarotonga, Tahiti<br />
Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia, Fiji,<br />
Marquesas, Moorea, Rota, Tuamotu<br />
Guam, Rota<br />
Gehyra oceanica (Lesson, Lesson, 1830)<br />
Oochoristica javaensis zensis Kennedy Kennedy, Killick, and Beverley-Burton, 1982<br />
Pharyngodon oceanicus Bursey and Goldberg, 1999<br />
Spauligodon gehyrae Bursey and Goldberg, 1996<br />
Hemidactylus garnotii Dumeril and Bibron, 1836<br />
Platynosomum fastosum Kossack, 1910<br />
Island of Oahu, Hawaii<br />
Island of Oahu, Hawaii<br />
Leyte, Luzon<br />
Island of Oahu, Hawaii<br />
Skrjabinodon dossae (Caballero, 1968)<br />
Unidentified oxyurids<br />
Guam<br />
Rota<br />
Lepidodactylus lugubris (Dumeril and Bibron, 1836)<br />
Allopharynx macallisten Dailey, Goldberg, and Bursey, 1998<br />
Islands of Hawaii, Oahu<br />
Rota<br />
Islands of Hawaii, Oahu<br />
Islands of Hawaii, Oahu<br />
Guam, Rota<br />
Island of Oahu, Hawaii<br />
Island of Oahu, Hawaii<br />
Island of Oahu, Hawaii<br />
Island of Oahu, Hawaii<br />
Cyiindrotaenia allisonae (Schmidt, 1980)<br />
Pharyngodon lepidodactylus Bursey and Goldberg, 1996<br />
Skrjabinelazia machidai Hasegawa, 1984<br />
Unidentified oxyurids<br />
Raillietiella frenatus AH, Riley, and Self, 1981<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
120 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
a<br />
C<br />
§<br />
*5i<br />
a,<br />
S<br />
a,<br />
ft<br />
C<br />
o<br />
1:<br />
13<br />
JS<br />
1<br />
c<br />
of infecti<br />
Polynesij<br />
^ JS<br />
^ £<br />
"£<br />
*" ef<br />
S 1<br />
tn €C<br />
+l U<br />
X y<br />
£>~<br />
'S w<br />
•w C<br />
if « "~»<br />
51<br />
41 "Q<br />
OJD O<br />
s '!•<br />
M<br />
yj rt<br />
Is G B<br />
Jg Q<br />
C3 ^<br />
> o<br />
L!^ &><br />
? ^
hyrae from a collection of lizards. Gehyra<br />
oceanica is the only known host.<br />
Cryptoblepharus poecilopleurus, E. cyanura,<br />
and L. lugubris are new host records for larvae<br />
of Skrjabinoptera sp.; Moorea is a new locality<br />
record. Oxyurids have not been previously reported<br />
in C. poecilopleurus; however, once identified,<br />
this species would be a new host and locality<br />
record. Identification of oxyurids requires<br />
male specimens, thus, a description cannot be<br />
done at this time.<br />
Further examinations of lizards from additional<br />
localities will be needed before the helminth<br />
fauna of Pacific Island lizards can be known.<br />
Lizards were collected under permit 4186/<br />
BCO issued to S.R.G. by the Haut-Commissariat<br />
de la Republique en Polynesie Francaise.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Ainsworth, R. 1985. Baerietta decidua n. sp. (Cestoda:<br />
Nematotaeniidae) from the New Zealand skink<br />
Leiolopisina nigriplantare maccani Hardy, 1977.<br />
New Zealand Journal of Zoology 12:131-135.<br />
Brown, S. G., S. Kwan, and S. Shero. 1995. The<br />
parasitic theory of sexual reproduction: parasitism<br />
in unisexual and bisexual geckos. Proceedings of<br />
the Royal Society of London B 260:317-320.<br />
Bursey, C. R., and S. R. Goldberg. 1996a. Spauligodon<br />
gehyrae n. sp. (Nematoda: Pharyngodonidae)<br />
from Gehyra oceanica (Sauria: Gekkonidae)<br />
from Guam, Mariana Islands, Micronesia. Journal<br />
of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 82:962-964.<br />
, and . 19965. Pharyngodon lepidodactylus<br />
sp. n. (Nematoda: Pharyngodonidae) from<br />
the mourning gecko, Lepidodactylus lugubris<br />
(Lacertilia: Gekkonidae), from Hawaii. Journal of<br />
the Helminthological Society of Washington 63:<br />
51-55.<br />
-, and . 1999. Pharyngodon oceanicus<br />
sp. n. (Nematoda: Pharyngodonidae) from the<br />
oceanic gecko, Gehyra oceanica (Sauria: Gekkonidae)<br />
of the Pacific Islands. Journal of the Helminthological<br />
Society of Washington 66:37-40.<br />
Burt, C. E., and M. D. Burt. 1932. Herpetological<br />
results of the Whitney South Sea Expedition. VI.<br />
Pacific Island amphibians and reptiles in the collection<br />
of the American Museum of Natural History.<br />
Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural<br />
History 63:461-597.<br />
GOLDBERG ET AL.—RESEARCH NOTES 121<br />
Bush, A. O., K. D. Lafferty, J. M. Lotz, and A. W.<br />
Shostak. 1997. <strong>Parasitology</strong> meets ecology on its<br />
own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of<br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong> 83:575-583.<br />
Dailey, M. D., S. R. Goldberg, and C. R. Bursey.<br />
1998. Allopharynx macallisteri sp. n. (Trematoda:<br />
Plagiorchiidae) from the mourning gecko, Lepidodactylus<br />
lugubris, from Guam, Mariana Islands,<br />
Micronesia, with a key to the species of the genus<br />
Allopharynx. Journal of the Helminthological Society<br />
of Washington 65:16-20.<br />
Goldberg, S. R., and C. R. Bursey. 1995. Gastrointestinal<br />
nematodes of two Australian skinks, Ctenotus<br />
regius and Ctenotus schomburgkii. Journal of<br />
the Helminthological Society of Washington 62:<br />
237-238.<br />
, and . 1997. New helminth records for<br />
the mourning gecko, Lepidodactylus lugubris<br />
(Gekkonidae) from Hawaii. Bishop Museum Occasional<br />
Papers. Records of the Hawaii Biological<br />
Survey for 1996. Part 2: Notes, 49:54-56.<br />
, , and H. Cheam. 1998. Gastrointestinal<br />
helminths of four gekkonid lizards, Gehyra<br />
mutilata, Gehyra oceanica, Hemidactylus frenatus<br />
and Lepidodactylus lugubris from the Mariana Islands,<br />
Micronesia. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 84:<br />
1295-1298.<br />
, , and S. Hernandez. 1999. Nematodes<br />
of two skinks, Ctenotus leonhardii and Ctenotus<br />
quattuordecimlineatus (Sauria: Scincidae), from<br />
Western Australia. Journal of the Helminthological<br />
Society of Washington 66:89-92.<br />
Ineich, I., and C. P. Blanc. 1988. Distribution des<br />
reptiles terrestres en Polynesie oriental. Atoll Research<br />
Bulletin 318:1-75.<br />
Jones, H. I. 1988. Nematodes from nine species of<br />
Varamts (Reptilia) from tropical northern Australia,<br />
with particular reference to the genus Abbreviata<br />
(Physalopteridae). Australian Journal of Zoology<br />
36:691-708.<br />
Jones, M. K. 1987. A taxonomic revision of the Nematotaeniidae<br />
Liihe, 1910 (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea).<br />
Systematic <strong>Parasitology</strong> 10:165-245.<br />
Loo, B. 1971. The gecko as a new intermediate host<br />
for the cat liver fluke, Platynosomum fastosum, in<br />
Hawaii. Honors thesis, University of Hawaii, 34<br />
pp.<br />
Mawson, P. M. 1972. The nematode genus Maxvachonia<br />
(Oxyurata: Cosmocercidae) in Australian<br />
reptiles and frogs. Transactions of the Royal Society<br />
of South Australia 96:101-108.<br />
Schmidt, G. D., and R. E. Kuntz. 1972. Nematode<br />
parasites of Oceanica. XIX. Report on a collection<br />
from Philippine reptiles. Transactions of the<br />
American Microscopical Society 91:63—66.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 122-124<br />
Research Note<br />
New Records of Endohelminths of the Alligator Snapping Turtle<br />
(Macroclemys temminckii} from Arkansas and Louisiana, U.S.A.<br />
MICHELLE WEST,' TIMOTHY P. SCOTT,'-3 STEVE R. SIMCIK,' AND RUTH M. ELSEY2<br />
1 Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, <strong>College</strong> Station, Texas 77843-3258, U.S.A.<br />
(e-mail: tims@mail.bio.tamu.edu) and<br />
2 Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge, Grand Chenier,<br />
Louisiana 70643, U.S.A. (e-mail: Elsey_RM@wlf.state.la.us)<br />
ABSTRACT: Viscera were collected from alligator<br />
snapping turtles, Macroclemys temminckii (Harlan),<br />
caught by commercial trappers in Arkansas and Louisiana.<br />
A total of 1,708 parasites were recovered from<br />
44 turtles. Endohelminths identified were 4 species of<br />
nematodes {Brevimulticaecum tenuicolle Rudolphi,<br />
Falcaustra chelydrae Harwood, Falcaustra wardi<br />
Mackin, and Serpinema trispinosus Leidy) and 3 species<br />
of acanthocephalans (Neoechinorhynchus chrysemydis<br />
Cable and Hopp, Neoechinorhynchus emydis<br />
Leidy, and Neoechinorhynchus pseudemydis Cable and<br />
Hopp). All but F. chelydrae are new records for Macroclemys<br />
temminckii.<br />
KEY WORDS: acanthocephalan, alligator snapping<br />
turtle, endohelminth, Macroclemys temminckii, nematode,<br />
parasite, Arkansas, Louisiana, U.S.A.<br />
The alligator snapping turtle, Macroclemys<br />
temminckii Harlan, 1835, is a large freshwater<br />
chelydrid found along the Gulf Coastal Plains<br />
and the Mississippi River Valley, U.S.A. (Lovich,<br />
1993). Although some endohelminths are<br />
known to be harbored by this turtle, this study<br />
documents several endohelminths not previously<br />
reported. The most recent parasite work of M.<br />
temminckii was conducted by McAllister et al.<br />
(1995). In their report, 2 alligator snapping turtles<br />
were found to harbor 3 different forms of<br />
hemogregarines and the nematode Falcaustra<br />
chelydrae Harwood, 1932. Additional parasites<br />
recovered from M. temminckii include the trematode<br />
Lophotaspis interiora Ward and Hopkins,<br />
1931, and a new species of Eimeria Upton et al.,<br />
1992. Here, we provide further details on the<br />
variation of the endohelminth fauna of M. temminckii.<br />
Alligator snapping turtles were caught by<br />
commercial trappers in southeastern Arkansas<br />
and Louisiana, U.S.A., in the spring and summer<br />
of 1993 and 1994. Turtles were generally caught<br />
3 Corresponding author.<br />
122<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
in hoop nets or on baited hooks. Often a number<br />
of turtles were delivered to a processor in Louisiana<br />
and held in a storage tank for several days<br />
until there was a sufficient quantity to process.<br />
Viscera were collected and frozen for later analysis.<br />
Samples were collected as part of another<br />
study on the food habits of M. temminckii (Elsey,<br />
unpubl.). Viscera were thawed, and stomachs<br />
and intestinal tracts were examined for endohelminths.<br />
If present, grossly visible parasites<br />
were counted and preserved in 70% ethanol for<br />
later identification. When required, nematodes<br />
were cleared using lactophenol. Temporary<br />
mounts of the specimens were made using glycerin<br />
jelly. Once identified, the nematodes were<br />
returned to 70% ethanol. The acanthocephalans<br />
were stained with Semichon's acetocarmine for<br />
24 hours and destained with acid alcohol. Destaining<br />
was arrested using 0.1% sodium bicarbonate.<br />
Specimens were dehydrated in ethanol,<br />
cleared using methyl salicylate, and mounted in<br />
Kleermount®. Identifications of nematodes were<br />
made using descriptions provided by Baker<br />
(1979, 1986) and Sprent (1979). Use of ecological<br />
terms follow suggestions of Margolis et al.<br />
(1982).<br />
Seven species of helminths were recovered<br />
from 44 alligator snapping turtles (Table 1). The<br />
parasites include 4 species of nematodes and 3<br />
species of 1 genus of acanthocephalan. In this<br />
study, F. chelydrae was the only endohelminth<br />
found that has been previously documented as a<br />
parasite of this turtle. To our knowledge, this is<br />
the first record of the nematodes Brevimulticaecum<br />
tenuicolle Rudolphi, 1819, Falcaustra wardi<br />
Mackin, 1936, Serpinema trispinosus Leidy,<br />
1852, and the acanthocephalans Neoechinorhynchus<br />
chrysemydis Cable and Hopp, 1954,<br />
Neoechinorhynchus emydis Leidy, 1851, and<br />
Neoechinorhynchus pseudemydis Cable and
WEST ET AL.—RESEARCH NOTES 123<br />
Table 1. Parasites recovered from Macroclemys temminckii in southeastern Arkansas and Louisiana.<br />
Parasite Prevalence* Mean intensity ± SDf Range Abundance ± SDi<br />
Acanthocephala<br />
Neoechinarhynchus chrysemydis<br />
(USNPC 88658)<br />
Neoechinorhynchus emydis<br />
(USNPC 88659)<br />
Neoechinarhynchus pseudemydis<br />
(USNPC 88660)<br />
Nematoda<br />
Brevimultlcaecum tenuicolle<br />
(USNPC 88661)<br />
Falcaustra die/yd rat-<br />
(USNPC 88663)<br />
Falcaustra wardi<br />
(USNPC 88662)<br />
Serpinema trispinosus<br />
(USNPC 88664)<br />
9%<br />
2%<br />
2%<br />
9%<br />
98%<br />
14%<br />
84%<br />
2%<br />
16%<br />
26.0 ± 44.1<br />
21.0<br />
51.0<br />
8.0 ± 8.3<br />
37.3 ± 56.4<br />
5.2 ± 9.7<br />
41.4 ± 59.5<br />
1.0<br />
5.9 ± 5.8<br />
1-51<br />
—<br />
—<br />
1-20<br />
1-319<br />
1-25<br />
1-319<br />
—<br />
1-14<br />
2.4 ± 13.9<br />
0.5 ± 3.2<br />
1.2 ± 7.7<br />
0.7 ± 3.2<br />
36.5 ± 56.0<br />
1.0 ± 4.1<br />
34.8 ± 56.6<br />
0.0 ± 0.2<br />
0.9 ± 3.1<br />
* Prevalence = number of individuals of a host species infected with a particular parasite species -=- number of hosts examined.<br />
t Abundance = total number of individuals of a particular parasite species in a sample of hosts -^ total number of individuals<br />
of the host species in the sample.<br />
$ Mean intensity = total number of individuals of a particular parasite species in a sample of a host species •*• number of<br />
infected individuals of the host species in the sample.<br />
Hopp, 1954, from the alligator snapping turtle.<br />
Individual turtles harbored up to 4 species of<br />
parasites. Thirty-five turtles (79.5%) contained 1<br />
species, 7 turtles (15.9%) had 2 species, and 2<br />
(4.6%) had 4 species. A total of 1,708 parasite<br />
specimens were identified. Infected hosts held<br />
from 1 to 319 parasites.<br />
Species of Falcaustra are commonly reported<br />
parasites of aquatic turtles (Conboy et al., 1993).<br />
In this study, F. chelydrae accounted for 89.6%<br />
(1,531) of the total parasites identified and was<br />
harbored by 84.1% (37) of the turtles studied.<br />
Falcaustra wardi accounted for less than 1.0%<br />
(1) of the total number of parasites and was detected<br />
in only 1 turtle (2.3%).<br />
Serpinema trispinosus is another nematode<br />
common in aquatic turtles (Conboy et al., 1993).<br />
However, this is the first account of M. temminckii<br />
harboring this parasite. Serpinema trispinosus<br />
accounted for 2.4% (41) of the total<br />
number of parasites recovered and was found in<br />
15.9% (7) of the turtles.<br />
Brevimulticaecum tenuicolle has been found<br />
only in the American alligator, Alligator mississippiensis<br />
Daudin, 1803 (Sprent, 1979). This<br />
nematode can be differentiated from other species<br />
based on lobulated, teat-shaped ventricular<br />
appendices (Sprent, 1979). In this study 1.8%<br />
(31) of the total parasites were B. tenuicolle. Of<br />
the turtles studied, 13.6% (6) harbored this par-<br />
asite. This is the first record of this species of<br />
helminth in the alligator snapping turtle.<br />
Acanthocephalans of the genus Neoechinorhynchus<br />
are common endohelminths of aquatic<br />
turtles (Petrochenko, 1971). Prior to this report,<br />
none has been observed in M. temminckii. Species<br />
of Neoechinorhynchus represented 6.1%<br />
(104) of the parasites in this study (1.2% TV.<br />
chrysemydis, 3.0% N. emydis, and 1.9% N. pseudemydis),<br />
and parasitized 9.1% (4) of the turtles.<br />
In summary, this research added 6 new species<br />
to the helminth fauna of the alligator snapping<br />
turtle. Future natural history and endohelminth<br />
surveys of M. temminckii could contribute<br />
to a better overall understanding of the parasitic<br />
life cycle, parasite diversity, and host-parasite<br />
relationship.<br />
Thanks are extended to Ms. Came Kilgore for<br />
assistance in laboratory identification of endohelminths,<br />
to Mr. Lee Caubarreaux and Mr.<br />
James Manning of the Louisiana Department of<br />
Wildlife and Fisheries (L.D.W.F.) for administrative<br />
support, and to several L.D.W.F. specialists<br />
and in-service students for assistance with field<br />
collections and necropsies. Much appreciation<br />
also goes to the Department of Biology at Texas<br />
A&M University for the use of its facilities.<br />
Thanks are extended to Dr. J. R. Lichtenfels,<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s National Parasite Collection, Ag-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
124 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
ricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland<br />
for lending specimens for comparative purposes.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Baker, M. R. 1979. Serpinema species (Nematoda:<br />
Camallanidae) from turtles of North America and<br />
Europe. Canadian Journal of Zoology 57:934-<br />
939.<br />
. 1986. Falcaustra species (Nematoda: Kathlaniidae)<br />
parasitic in turtles and frogs in Ontario.<br />
Canadian Journal of Zoology 64:228-237.<br />
Conboy, G. A., J. R. Laursen, G. A. Averbeck, and<br />
B. E. Stromberg. 1993. Diagnostic guide to some<br />
of the helminth parasites of aquatic turtles. The<br />
Compendium 15:1217-1224.<br />
Lovich, J. E. 1993. Macroclemys, M. te/nminckii. Pages<br />
562.1-562.4 in C. H. Ernst, ed. Catalogue of<br />
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 124-128<br />
Research Note<br />
American Amphibians and Reptiles. Society for<br />
the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, New York.<br />
Margolis, L., G. W. Esch, J. C. Holmes, A. M.<br />
Kuaris, and G. A Schad. 1982. The use of ecological<br />
terms in parasitology (report of an ad hoc<br />
committee of the American Society of Parasitologists).<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 68:131-133.<br />
McAllister, C. T., S. J. Upton, and S. E. Trauth.<br />
1995. Hemogregarines (Apicomplexa) and Falcaustra<br />
chelydrae (Nematoda) in an alligator<br />
snapping turtle, Macroclemys temminckii (Reptilia:<br />
Testudines), from Arkansas. Journal of the<br />
Helminthological Society of Washington 62:74-<br />
77.<br />
Petrochenko, V. I. 1971. Acanthocephala of Domestic<br />
and Wild Animals. Keter Press Binding: Winer<br />
Bindery Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel. 465 pp.<br />
Sprent, J. F. A. 1979. Ascaridoid nematodes of amphibians<br />
and reptiles: Multicaecum and Brevimulticaecum.<br />
Journal of Helminthology 53:91-116.<br />
Parasites of Eastern Indigo Snakes (Drymarchon corais couperi} from<br />
Florida, U.S.A.<br />
GARRY W. FOSTER,' PAUL E. MoLER,2 JOHN M. KINSELLA,' SCOTT P. TERRELL,' AND<br />
DONALD J. FORRESTER'-3<br />
1 Department of Pathobiology, <strong>College</strong> of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville,<br />
Florida 32611, U.S.A. (e-mail: FosterG@mail.vetmed.ufl.edu; wormdwb@aol.com;<br />
TerrellS@mail.vetmed.ufl.edu; ForresterD@mail.vetmed.ufl.edu); and<br />
2 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Gainesville, Florida 32601, U.S.A.<br />
(e-mail: molerp@gfc.state.fl.us)<br />
ABSTRACT: Nineteen species of parasites (2 trematodes,<br />
3 cestodes, 10 nematodes, 2 acanthocephalans.<br />
1 pentastomid, and 1 tick) were identified from 21<br />
eastern indigo snakes (Drymarchon corais couperi<br />
Holbrook, 1842) collected in Florida, U.S.A., between<br />
19<strong>67</strong> and 1999. For the 12 indigo snakes from which<br />
quantitative data were obtained, the most prevalent<br />
parasites were the nematodes Kalicephalus inermis corone<br />
llae Ortlepp, 1923, and Kalicephalus appendiculatus<br />
Molin, 1861, each occurring in 10 snakes, and<br />
cystacanths of Macracanthorhynchus ingens (Listow,<br />
1C79), which were present in all 12 snakes. The tick<br />
Arnblyomma dissimile Koch, 1844, infested indigo<br />
snakes from Brevard County. Twelve new host records;<br />
are presented.<br />
KEY WORDS: eastern indigo snake, Drymarchon<br />
corais couperi, parasites, trematodes, cestodes, nematodes,<br />
acanthocephalans, pentastomids, cystacanths,<br />
Florida, U.S.A.<br />
The eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais<br />
couperi Holbrook, 1842) occurs throughout<br />
Florida and much of southern Georgia, U.S.A.,<br />
although the populations located in Georgia and<br />
the Florida panhandle may be very localized<br />
(Moler, 1992). It was first protected by the state<br />
of Florida in 1972 (Florida Game and Fresh Water<br />
Fish Commission, 1972) and was federally<br />
listed as threatened in 1978 (U.S. Fish and Wildlife<br />
Service, 1978). This project was undertaken<br />
to identify the possible impact parasites have on<br />
the threatened indigo snake in Florida.<br />
Nine road-killed indigo snakes were necropsied<br />
at the Archbold Biological Station (ABS),<br />
Highlands County, Florida, between 19<strong>67</strong> and<br />
-1 Corresponding author.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
1987, and from these only a sample of parasites<br />
that were seen grossly was collected. Twelve additional<br />
eastern indigo snakes were quantitatively<br />
examined for parasites between 1992 and<br />
1999. Snakes were collected as roadkills in the<br />
following counties in Florida: Alachua (n =1),<br />
Brevard (n = 4), Charlotte (n = 1), Indian River<br />
(n = 1), Levy (n = 1), Monroe (n = 2), Okaloosa<br />
(n = 1), and Osceola (n — 1). Most snakes<br />
were frozen until necropsy, when they were examined<br />
following the methods of Kinsella and<br />
Forrester (1972). Because of small sample size<br />
and the lack of comparable sampling techniques,<br />
no statistical analysis was attempted. All indigo<br />
snake specimens were deposited in the Florida<br />
Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, Florida.<br />
Snakes were collected under state and federal<br />
collection and salvage permits. Cestodes<br />
and trematodes were preserved in Roudabush's<br />
AFA and nematodes in 70% ethanol with glycerin.<br />
Cestodes and trematodes were stained with<br />
either Hams' hematoxylin or Semichon's acetocarmine<br />
and mounted in neutral Canada balsam.<br />
Nematodes were cleared and mounted in<br />
lactophenol. Tissues for histological examination<br />
were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin,<br />
routinely processed, paraffin-embedded, sectioned<br />
at 5 (Am, and stained with hematoxylin<br />
and eosin. Terminology used follows Bush et al.<br />
(1997). Voucher specimens of helminths were<br />
deposited in the United <strong>State</strong>s National Parasite<br />
Collection, Beltsville, Maryland (accession<br />
numbers 88619-88632, 88642-88643), and<br />
ticks were deposited in the National Tick Collection,<br />
<strong>State</strong>sboro, Georgia, U.S.A. (accession<br />
numbers RML122786, RML122787).<br />
A total of 17 species of helminths (2 trematodes,<br />
3 cestodes, 10 nematodes, 2 acanthocephalans),<br />
1 pentastomid, and 1 tick was collected<br />
from the 21 indigo snakes (Table 1). All helminths,<br />
except for the 3 species of Kalicephalus,<br />
are new host records.<br />
From the 9 ABS snakes, the following were<br />
identified: Kalicephalus rectiphilus, Kiricephalus<br />
coarctatus, and cystacanths of Macracanthorhynchus<br />
ingens. These samples were not included<br />
in Table 1 and will not be discussed further,<br />
but are presented here as Highlands County<br />
records only.<br />
Prevalences and intensities of parasites for the<br />
12 quantitatively examined snakes are listed in<br />
Table 1. Three species of Kalicephalus (K. inermis<br />
coronellae, K. appendiculatus, and K. rec-<br />
FOSTER ET AL.—RESEARCH NOTES 125<br />
tiphilus) were collected; 6 indigo snakes had all<br />
3 species present, and the other 6 indigo snakes<br />
had 2 species. Schad (1962) reported that, as<br />
adults, Kalicephalus localize themselves in the<br />
gut without overlapping in their distribution in<br />
the host. This seems to be true for the 3 species<br />
of Kalicephalus in the indigo snakes we examined.<br />
There was some overlapping in distribution<br />
of the 3 species (Table 1), but this might<br />
have been because of postmortem migration or<br />
passive displacement of gut contents when the<br />
snakes were killed.<br />
Cystacanths of M. ingens were encysted in the<br />
mesenteries, mainly on the serosal surface of the<br />
small intestine. In histological sections, the cystacanths<br />
were located predominantly within the<br />
expanded intestinal serosa, with fewer present in<br />
the muscular tunics, and were rarely found within<br />
the mucosal lamina propria. The intact cystacanths<br />
were surrounded by 1—3 layers of fibrous<br />
connective tissue with no discernible inflammatory<br />
response. Many of the cystacanths<br />
were degenerated as characterized by the loss of<br />
histological anatomic detail. In these cases, the<br />
celomic cavities of the cystacanths were replaced<br />
by necrotic cellular debris and fragments<br />
of mineralized debris. This accumulation of debris<br />
was surrounded by a rim of degenerated heterophils<br />
and macrophages, which in turn was<br />
surrounded by 1-3 layers of fibrous connective<br />
tissue. Cystacanths present within the mucosal<br />
lamina propria had been replaced entirely by<br />
dense infiltrates of degenerated leucocytes surrounded<br />
by multiple layers of fibrous connective<br />
tissue. Inflammatory cells were not present outside<br />
the fibrous capsule surrounding the degenerated<br />
cystacanths. The presence of an inflammatory<br />
reaction and degenerated cys.tacanths<br />
was not reported by Goldberg et al. (1998) with<br />
the oligacanthorhynchid cystacanths in the longnose<br />
snakes (Rhinocheilus lecontei Baird & Girard,<br />
1853) that they surveyed.<br />
Elkins and Nickol (1983) reported 7 species<br />
of Louisiana snakes that were infected with cystacanths<br />
of M. ingens. They indicated also that<br />
snakes may be a significant epizootiological factor<br />
in the life cycle of M. ingens. The indigo<br />
snake should be considered a paratenic host for<br />
these acanthocephalans. They probably become<br />
infected with cystacanths by several routes. Being<br />
vertebrate generalists in their food habits,<br />
indigo snakes in Florida prey on several species<br />
of snakes, fishes, frogs, toads, lizards, small tur-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
126 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Table 1. Parasites from 12 eastern indigo snakes collected in Florida, U.S.A.<br />
Species of parasite Location in host*<br />
Trematoda<br />
Ochetosoma kansense±<br />
(Crow, 1913)<br />
Ochetosoma elongation^<br />
(Pratt, 1903)<br />
Cestoda<br />
Proteocephalus sp.t<br />
Larval cestode (tetrathyridium):]:<br />
Larval cestode (sparganum):t<br />
Nematoda<br />
Kalicephalus inennis coronellae<br />
Ortlepp, 1923<br />
Kalicephalus appendiculatus<br />
Molin, 1861<br />
Kalicephalus rectiphilus<br />
Harwood, 1932<br />
Physaloptera obtussima^-<br />
Molin, 1860<br />
Terranova caballerotf.<br />
Barus and Coy Otero, 1966<br />
Strongyloides sp.<br />
Eustrongylides larvae:]:<br />
Gnathostoma larvaet<br />
Physaloptera larvae^:<br />
Larval nematodes<br />
Acanthocephalan (cystacanths)<br />
Centrorhynchus spinosusi<br />
(Kaiser, 1893)<br />
Macracanthorhynchus ingens%<br />
(Listow, 1879)<br />
Pentastoma<br />
Kiricephalus coarctatus<br />
(Diesing, 1850)<br />
Acari<br />
Amblyomma dissimile<br />
Koch, 1844<br />
ES, OC, ST<br />
BC, ES, SI, LI, LN<br />
SI<br />
ME<br />
ME<br />
ES, ST<br />
ST, SI<br />
SI, LI<br />
ES<br />
ST<br />
SI, LI<br />
ST<br />
ME<br />
ST<br />
SI<br />
ME<br />
ME<br />
BC, LN<br />
SK<br />
Number of<br />
snakes<br />
infected<br />
7<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
10<br />
10<br />
9<br />
1<br />
1<br />
3<br />
1<br />
1<br />
6<br />
5<br />
3<br />
12<br />
Intensity<br />
Mean Range Counties!<br />
15<br />
337<br />
2<br />
7<br />
3<br />
37<br />
27<br />
17<br />
1<br />
1<br />
3<br />
2<br />
2<br />
16<br />
5<br />
18<br />
151<br />
3-34 B, C, I, L, O<br />
35-541 B<br />
3-10<br />
2-3<br />
2-128<br />
5-50<br />
1-77<br />
1-5<br />
1-80<br />
1-9<br />
3-30<br />
1-515<br />
1-7<br />
2-10<br />
B<br />
O<br />
I, K<br />
A, B, C, K, L, M, O<br />
B, C, I, L, M, O,<br />
A, B, C, K, L, M, O<br />
K<br />
K<br />
B, C, I<br />
B<br />
M<br />
A, B, I, M, O<br />
B, I, O<br />
B, K<br />
A, B, C, I, K, L, M, O<br />
B, C, I, K, L, M, O<br />
* BC = body cavity; ES = esophagus; LI = large intestine; LN = lungs; ME = mesenteries; OC = oral cavity; SI = small<br />
intestine; SK = skin; ST = stomach.<br />
t County where parasite was found: A = Alachua; B = Brevard; C = Charlotte; I = Indian River; K = Okaloosa; L = Levy;<br />
M = Monroe; O = Osceola.<br />
£ New host records.<br />
ties, birds, and small mammals (Moler, 1992).,<br />
which may also be paratenic hosts for M. ingens.<br />
Larval stages have been identified from Florida<br />
mice (Podomys floridanus (Chapman, 1889))<br />
and cotton mice (Peromyscus gossypinus (Le<br />
Conte, 1853)) in Florida (Forrester, 1992). In<br />
Florida, adults of M. ingens have been reported<br />
mainly from raccoons (Procyon lotor (Linnaeus,<br />
1758)) (Forrester, 1992) and black bears (Ursus<br />
americanus floridanus (Merriam, 1896)) (Conti<br />
et al., 1983). Cystacanths of Centrorhynchus<br />
spinosus also were encysted in the mesenteries.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
They encysted mainly on the serosal surface of<br />
the small intestine, intermixed with the cystacanths<br />
of M. ingens, but in much lower intensities<br />
(Table 1). The definitive hosts for C. spinosus<br />
are several species of birds, primarily<br />
owls (Nickol, 1983). In Florida we have unpublished<br />
records of them in barred owls, Strix varia<br />
Barton, 1799, eastern screech-owls, Otus asio<br />
Linnaeus, 1758, and great horned owls, Bubo<br />
virginianus (Gmelin, 1788). Raccoons and raptors<br />
in Florida could acquire these acanthocephalan<br />
infections from indigo snakes if these
snakes are part of their diet. The indigo snake<br />
has not been reported as a food item of black<br />
bears in Florida (Maehr and DeFazio, 1985).<br />
The encysted cystacanths did not seem to have<br />
any obvious detrimental effect on any of the indigo<br />
snakes necropsied. One road-killed female<br />
indigo snake with 515 M. ingens encysted in<br />
mesenteries around the small intestines had a<br />
large amount of visceral fat present and 11 eggs<br />
in utero.<br />
Only 1 indigo snake (Okaloosa County) was<br />
infected with a single Terranova caballeroi.<br />
This ascarid is a common parasite of water<br />
snakes (Nerodia spp.) and cottonmouths (Agkistrodon<br />
piscivorus Lacepede, 1789) in the southeastern<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s (Fontenot and Font, 1996).<br />
Fourth-stage larvae of a species of Eustrongylides<br />
were found in the stomach wall of 1<br />
snake from Brevard County. These were most<br />
likely the larvae of Eustrongylides ignotus,<br />
adults of which are parasitic in birds, most commonly<br />
Ciconiiformes (Spalding et al., 1993).<br />
The most important intermediate host for E. ignotis<br />
in Florida is the small mosquitofish (Gambusia<br />
holbrooki Girard, 1859), with some amphibians<br />
and reptiles serving as paratenic hosts<br />
(Coyner, 1998). This would be considered an accidental<br />
infection of a snake with a bird parasite.<br />
In this study, Amblyomma dissimile infested<br />
indigo snakes only from Merritt Island in Brevard<br />
County. The ticks seemed to aggregate to<br />
a small localized area of about 5 cm in diameter.<br />
The skin in the areas of tick attachment was<br />
swollen, with some of the scales malformed.<br />
Histologically, the areas of tick attachment were<br />
marked by a pustular dermatitis that was acute,<br />
multifocal, and severe, with intralesional bacterial<br />
and fungal colonization. At the junctions between<br />
numerous scales were multifocal, locally<br />
extensive subcorneal pustules that contained degenerate<br />
heterophils intermixed with numerous<br />
gram-positive bacterial cocci. At several of the<br />
scale junctions the subcorneal aggregate of degenerate<br />
heterophils extended through the epidermis<br />
into the dermis. Durden et al. (1993) reported<br />
A. dissimile from an eastern indigo snake<br />
and a cotton mouse (P. gossypinus) from Merritt<br />
Island in 1990. Most indigo snakes seen on Merritt<br />
Island by one of us (P.E.M.) have been infested<br />
with A. dissimile, and Durden et al. (1993)<br />
suggested that a viable population of this tick<br />
species occurs there. Amblyomma dissimile has<br />
been reported infesting these additional hosts in<br />
FOSTER ET AL.—RESEARCH NOTES 127<br />
Florida: pygmy rattlesnake (Sistrurus miliarius<br />
Linnaeus, 1766), yellow rat snake (E lap he obsoleta<br />
quadrivittata Holbrook, 1836), Florida<br />
kingsnake (Lampropeltis getula floridana Blanchard,<br />
1919), common kingsnake (Lampropeltis<br />
getula Linnaeus, 1766), eastern diamond rattlesnake<br />
(Crotalus adamanteus Palisot de Beauvois,<br />
1799), pine snake (Pituophis melanoleucus<br />
Daudin, 1803), cottonmouth (A. piscivorus), gopher<br />
tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus Daudin,<br />
1802), and giant toad (Bufo marinus Linnaeus,<br />
1855), and reported in the following counties:<br />
Broward, Collier, Dade, Indian River, Lee, Martin,<br />
Palm Beach, and St. Lucie (Bequaert, 1932;<br />
Bequaert, 1945; Wilson and Kale, 1972; unpublished<br />
computer and manual searches of the data<br />
records of the Florida <strong>State</strong> Collection of Arthropods,<br />
Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A., and the<br />
National Tick Collection, <strong>State</strong>sboro, Georgia,<br />
U.S.A., 1999). From these records A. dissimile<br />
seems to be well established in southern peninsular<br />
Florida.<br />
Because most of the indigo snakes we examined<br />
were in good flesh and had deposits of<br />
visceral fat and several of the females had a normal<br />
number of eggs in utero, it is our assessment<br />
that the general health of the snakes, did not<br />
seem to be compromised by the parasite intensities<br />
we report here. The attachment sites of A.<br />
dissimile may allow a pathway for secondary<br />
bacterial infections to infiltrate to deeper tissues.<br />
However, in the indigo snakes we examined, the<br />
bacterial infections were very localized.<br />
We thank Stephen S. Curran and Robin M.<br />
Overstreet for their help with identifying the<br />
pentastomids. We also thank Omar M. Amin for<br />
his opinion on the acanthocephalan identifications,<br />
and Sandra A. Allan for our tick identifications.<br />
Ellis C. Greiner and Donald F. Coyner<br />
reviewed an early draft of the manuscript and<br />
gave helpful suggestions for improvement. Marie-Joelle<br />
Thatcher was kind enough to translate<br />
the French literature. Rebecca Smith helped in<br />
procuring road-killed specimens from the Kennedy<br />
Space Center, Merritt Island, and the following<br />
people also collected specimens for us:<br />
K. Dryden, J. Duquesnal, M. Folk, B. Hagedorn,<br />
S. Klett, M. Legare, R. Lowes, T. Miller, C. Petrick,<br />
and S. Quintana. James N. Layne of the<br />
Archbold Biological Station provided us with<br />
samples from his parasite collection. We also appreciated<br />
the comments of the 2 anonymous reviewers.<br />
This research was supported in part by<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
128 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
contracts from the Florida Game and Fresh Water<br />
Fish Commission and is a contribution of<br />
Federal Aid to Wildlife Restoration, Florida Pittman-Robertson<br />
Project W-41. This is Florida<br />
Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series<br />
No. R-06872.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bequaert, J. 1932. Amblyomma dissimile Koch, a tick<br />
indigenous to the United <strong>State</strong>s (Acarina: Ixodidae).<br />
Psyche 39:45-47.<br />
. 1945. Further records of the snake tick, Amblyomma<br />
dissimile Koch, in Florida. Bulletin of<br />
the Brooklyn Entomological Society 40:129.<br />
Bush, A. O., K. D. Lafferty, J. M. Lotz, and A. W.<br />
Shostak. 1997. <strong>Parasitology</strong> meets ecology on its<br />
own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of<br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong> 83:575-583.<br />
Conti, J. A., D. J. Forrester, and J. R. Brady. 1983.<br />
Helminths of black bears in Florida. Proceedings<br />
of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
50:252-256.<br />
Coyner, D. F. 1998. The epizootiology and transmission<br />
of Eustrongylides ignotus (Dioctophymatoidea)<br />
in intermediate hosts in Florida. Ph.D. Dissertation,<br />
University of Florida, Gainesville. 245<br />
pp.<br />
Durden, L. A., J. S. H. Klompen, and J. E. Keirans.<br />
1993. Parasitic arthropods of sympatric opossums,<br />
cotton rats, and cotton mice from Merritt Island,<br />
Florida. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 79:283—286.<br />
Elkins, C. A., and B. B. Nickol. 1983. The epizootiology<br />
of Macracanthorhynchus ingens in Louisiana.<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 69:951-956.<br />
Fontenot, L. W., and W. F. Font. 1996. Helminth<br />
parasites of four species of aquatic snakes from<br />
two habitats in southeastern Louisiana. Journal of<br />
the Helminthological Society of Washington 63:<br />
66-75.<br />
Forrester, D. J. 1992. Parasites and Diseases of Wild<br />
Mammals in Florida. University Press of Florida,<br />
Gainesville. 459 pp.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission.<br />
1972. Wildlife Code of the <strong>State</strong> of Florida. Chapter<br />
16-E, Rules 16-E-3.00 and 16-E-4.02, pages<br />
86-92. Effective date July 1972. Florida Game<br />
and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee,<br />
Florida.<br />
Goldberg, S. R., C. H. Bursey, and H. J. Holshuh.<br />
1998. Prevalence and distribution of cystacanths<br />
of an oligacanthorhynchid acanthocephalan from<br />
the longnose snake, Rhinocheilus lecontei (Colubridae),<br />
in southwestern North America. Journal<br />
of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
65:262-265.<br />
Kinsella, J. M., and D. J. Forrester. 1972. Helminths<br />
of the Florida duck, Anas platyrhynchos fulvigula.<br />
Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of<br />
Washington 39:173-176.<br />
Maehr, D. S., and J. T. DeFazio, Jr. 1985. Foods of<br />
black bears in Florida. Florida Field Naturalist 13:<br />
8-12.<br />
Moler, P. E. 1992. Eastern indigo snake. Pages 181-<br />
186 in P. E. Moler, ed. Rare and Endangered Biota<br />
of Florida. Volume III: Amphibians and Reptiles.<br />
University Press of Florida, Gainesville.<br />
Nickol, B. B. 1983. Centrorhynchm kuntzi from the<br />
USA with description of the male and redescription<br />
of C. spinosus (Acanthocephala: Centrorhynchidae).<br />
Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong> 69:221-225.<br />
Schad, G. A. 1962. Studies on the genus Kalicephalus<br />
(Nematoda: Diaphanocephalidae). II. A taxonomic<br />
revision of the genus Kalicephalus Molin, 1861.<br />
Canadian Journal of Zoology 40:1035-1165.<br />
Spalding, M. G., G. T. Bancroft, and D. J. Forrester.<br />
1993. The epizootiology of eustrongylidosis<br />
in wading birds. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 29:<br />
237-249.<br />
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1978. Part 17. En<br />
dangered and threatened wildlife and plants. Listing<br />
of the eastern indigo snake as a threatened<br />
species. Federal Register 43:4026-4028.<br />
Wilson, N., and H. W. Kale III. 1972. Ticks collected<br />
from Indian River County, Florida (Acari: Metastigmata:<br />
Ixodidae). Florida Entomologist 55:53-<br />
57.
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 129-133<br />
Research Note<br />
Helminths of Two Sympatric Toad Species, Bufo marinus (Linnaeus)<br />
and Bufo marmoreus Wiegmann, 1833 (Anura: Bufonidae) from<br />
Chamela, Jalisco, Mexico<br />
SOL GALICIA-GUERRERO,1 CHARLES R. BURSEY,2 STEPHEN R. GOLDBERG,3 AND<br />
GUILLERMO SALGADO-MALDONADO1'4<br />
1 Institute de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Apartado Postal 70-153,<br />
Mexico 04510 D.F.,<br />
2 Department of Biology, Pennsylvania <strong>State</strong> University, Shenango Campus, 147 Shenango Avenue, Sharon,<br />
Pennsylvania 16146, U.S.A. (e-mail: cxbl3@psu.edu), and<br />
1 Department of Biology, Whittier <strong>College</strong>, Whittier, California 90608, U.S.A.<br />
(e-mail: sgoldberg@whittier.edu)<br />
ABSTRACT: Helminths of sympatric Bufo marinus<br />
(Linnaeus) (N = 49) and Bufo marmoreus Wiegmann<br />
(TV = 19) from the Pacific coast of Jalisco, Mexico,<br />
are reported. Bufo marinus harbored Ochoterenella<br />
digiticauda Caballero y Caballero, Rhabdias fuelleborni<br />
Travassos, Physaloptera sp. (larvae), an unidentified<br />
species of nematode, and cystacanths of Centrorhynchus<br />
sp. Bufo marinus is a new host and Jalisco<br />
a new locality record for R. fuelleborni and Physaloptera<br />
sp. Bufo marmoreus harbored Aplectana incerta<br />
Caballero y Caballero, R. fuelleborni, Physocephalus<br />
sp. (larvae), and cystacanths of Centrorhynchus sp.<br />
Bufo marmoreus is a new host record for each of these<br />
helminths.<br />
KEY WORDS: Bufo marinus, Bufo marmoreus, nematodes,<br />
Aplectana incerta, Ochoterenella digiticauda,<br />
Rhabdias fuelleborni, Physaloptera sp., Physocephalus<br />
sp., Centrorhynchus sp., cystacanth, Jalisco, Mexico.<br />
Twenty-five species of Bufo have been reported<br />
from various regions of Mexico; 8 species<br />
are endemic (Flores-Villela, 1993). During<br />
September 1995, individuals of 2 species, Bufo<br />
marinus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Bufo marmoreus<br />
Wiegmann, 1833, from the Pacific coast of Jalisco<br />
<strong>State</strong>, Mexico, became available for examination<br />
for parasites. The cane toad, B. marinus,<br />
originally ranged from southern Texas to central<br />
Brazil but now has worldwide distribution (Zug<br />
and Zug, 1979). The marbled toad, B. marmoreus,<br />
is endemic to Mexico, occurring from the<br />
Transverse Volcanic Axis, Sierra Madre del Sur,<br />
and highlands of northern Oaxaca <strong>State</strong> eastward<br />
to the Gulf of Mexico coastal plain and Yucatan<br />
Peninsula, westward to the Pacific coast, and<br />
4 Corresponding author (e-mail:<br />
ibiologia.unam.mx).<br />
gsalgado@mail.<br />
129<br />
south to the Rio Balsas basin and the; central<br />
depression of Chiapas <strong>State</strong> (Flores-Villela,<br />
1993). There are several reports of helminths<br />
from B. marinus (Caballero y Caballero, 1949,<br />
1954; Kloss, 1971; Goldberg and Bursey, 1992;<br />
Goldberg et al., 1995; Barton, 1997; Linzey et<br />
al., 1998), but to our knowlege there are no reports<br />
of helminths from B. marmoreus. The purpose<br />
of this note is to report helminths of B.<br />
marinus and B. marmoreus from Jalisco, Mexico.<br />
Forty-nine Bufo marinus (mean snout-vent<br />
length, SVL = 129 mm ± 30 mm SD; range,<br />
75-190 mm) and 19 B. marmoreus (SVL = 76<br />
mm ± 5 mm SD; range, 65-83 mm) were examined.<br />
The toads had been collected by hand<br />
from Emiliano Zapata Village (19°24'N,<br />
104°59'W) about 30 km south of the Chamela<br />
Biological Station, Institute de Biologfa, Universidad<br />
Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (IB UN-<br />
AM), Jalisco, Mexico, and were deposited in the<br />
Coleccion Nacional de Anfibios y Reptiles,<br />
IBUNAM. The toads were killed by freezing,<br />
the body cavity was opened by a longitudinal<br />
incision from vent to throat, and the gastrointestinal<br />
tract was excised by cutting across the<br />
esophagus and the rectum. Stomachs and intestines<br />
were opened longitudinally and examined<br />
under a stereomicroscope. Helminths were removed<br />
and counted. Acanthocephalans and<br />
nematodes were fixed using 4% saline-formalin.<br />
Acanthocephalans were stained with Meyer's<br />
paracarmine, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series,<br />
cleared in methyl salicylate, and mounted<br />
in Canada balsam. Nematodes were dehydrated<br />
to 70% ethanol, cleared in glycerol, and exam-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
130 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Table 1. Number, prevalence, mean intensity, range, and abundance for helminths collected from Bufo<br />
marinus and Bufo marmoreus from Chamela, Jalisco, Mexico.<br />
Toad species<br />
Helminth species<br />
Bufo marinus (N = 49)<br />
Ochoterenella digiticauda<br />
Rhabdias fuelleborni*<br />
Physaloptera sp. (larvae)*<br />
Unidentified nematode<br />
Centrorhynchus sp. cystacanths<br />
Bufo marmoreus (N = 19)<br />
Aplectana incerta*<br />
Rhabdias fuelleborni*<br />
Physocephalus sp. (encysted larvae)*<br />
Centrorhynchus sp. cystacanths*<br />
New host record.<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
helminths<br />
24<br />
145<br />
184<br />
6<br />
12<br />
848<br />
17<br />
7<br />
1<br />
Site<br />
Codom<br />
Lungs<br />
Stomach<br />
Intestine<br />
Coelom<br />
Intestine<br />
Lung<br />
Coelom<br />
Coelom<br />
ined as temporary wet mounts. Voucher specimens<br />
were deposited in the Coleccion Nacional<br />
de Helmintos (CNHE), IBUNAM, B. marinus:<br />
Ochoterenella digiticauda Caballero y Caballero,<br />
1944 (3775); Rhabdias fuelleborni Travassos,<br />
1926 (3776); Physaloptera sp. (3774), Centrorhynchus<br />
sp. (3777); B. marmoreus: Aplectana<br />
incerta Caballero y Caballero, 1949 (3772), R.<br />
fuelleborni (3771), Physocephalus sp. (3773),<br />
Centrorhynchus sp. (3778). Terminology is in<br />
accordance with Bush et al. (1997).<br />
Four species of nematodes and 1 species of<br />
acanthocephalan were found in B. marinus; 3<br />
species of nematodes and 1 species of acanthocephalan<br />
were found in B. marmoreus. Numbers<br />
of parasites, prevalence, abundance, and sites of<br />
infection are given in Table 1. Bufo marinus harbored<br />
371 helminths. Rhabdias fuelleborni had<br />
the highest prevalence (37%); Physaloptera sp.<br />
(larvae) had the greatest mean intensity (12.3).<br />
Mean number of helminth species per host was<br />
1.0 ± 0.8 SD, mean intensity per host was 8.1<br />
± 15.3 SD. Twelve toads had no parasites, 23<br />
were parasitized by 1 species, 13 had 2 or more<br />
helminth species. Bufo marmoreus harbored 873<br />
helminths. The helminth species with highest<br />
prevalence (63%) and greatest mean intensity<br />
(45) was A. incerta. Mean number of helminth<br />
species per host was 0.9 ± 0.7 SD; mean intensity<br />
per host was 46.0 ± <strong>67</strong>.0 SD. Six toads had<br />
no helminths, 9 were parasitized by 1 species,<br />
and 4 had 2 or more species. In B. marinus,<br />
species richness and mean abundance for the<br />
helminth fauna fell within the ranges reported<br />
by Aho (1990) for amphibians in general, i.e., a<br />
Prevalence Mean intensity ± SD<br />
(%) (range)<br />
8<br />
37<br />
31<br />
6<br />
22<br />
63<br />
16<br />
5<br />
5<br />
6.0 ± 6.0<br />
5.4 ± 1.2<br />
12.3<br />
2.0 ± 7.4<br />
1.1 ± 0.3<br />
70.7<br />
5.7<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
(3-16)<br />
d-38)<br />
± 18.0 (1-59)<br />
± 42<br />
± 6.4<br />
7<br />
1<br />
(1-4)<br />
(1-2)<br />
(1-250)<br />
(2-13)<br />
Mean<br />
abundance ± SD<br />
0.5 ± 2.4<br />
3.0 ± 6.0<br />
3.8 ± 11.3<br />
0.1 ± 0.6<br />
0.2 ± 0.5<br />
4.47 ± 66.4<br />
0.9 ± 13.0<br />
0.36<br />
0.05<br />
mean species richness per host individual of<br />
0.98 ± 0.07 SE, and a mean abundance of 11.55<br />
± 1.86 SE. However, for B. marmoreus, mean<br />
abundance was much greater, in part because of<br />
the large number of individuals of A. incerta<br />
harbored by a few hosts.<br />
The known helminth fauna for B. marinus in<br />
Mexico is presented in Table 2. This list includes<br />
5 species of trematodes, 1 species of cestode, at<br />
least 13 species of nematodes, and 1 species of<br />
acanthocephalan. Bufo marinus is a new host<br />
and locality record for Rhabdias fuelleborni and<br />
Physaloptera sp. Bufo marmoreus is a new host<br />
and locality record for A. incerta, R. fuelleborni,<br />
Physocephalus sp., and cystacanths of Centrorhynchus<br />
sp.<br />
None of the parasites found in this study was<br />
unique to B. marinus or B. marmoreus; all are<br />
shared with other amphibian or reptile species<br />
(Baker, 1987). However, 3 of these species, A.<br />
incerta, O. digiticauda, and R. fuelleborni, are<br />
typically found in toads. Aplectana incerta was<br />
originally described by Caballero y Caballero<br />
(1949) from B. marinus collected in Chiapas<br />
<strong>State</strong>, Mexico, and was subsequently reported<br />
from Bufo debilis Girard, 1854, Bufo retifonnis<br />
Sanders and Smith, 1951, Scaphiopus couchii<br />
Baird, 1854, and Spea multiplicata Cope, 1863,<br />
from Arizona and New Mexico, U.S.A. (Goldberg<br />
and Bursey, 1991; Goldberg et al., 1995;<br />
Goldberg et al., 1996). Ochoterenella digiticauda<br />
is a common parasite of B. marinus in Costa<br />
Rica, Guatemala, Mexico, and Jamaica (Brenes<br />
and Bravo-Hollis, 1959; Wong and Bundy,<br />
1985). Rhabdias fuelleborni is a neotropical spe-
Table 2. Published records of helminths from Bufo marinus from Mexico.<br />
Species<br />
Digenea<br />
Clinostomum atlenuatum<br />
Clypthelmiiis intermedia<br />
Gorgoderina megalorchis<br />
Langeronia macrocirra<br />
Mesocoelium monas<br />
Cestoda<br />
Distoichometra huftmix<br />
Nematoda<br />
Aplectana hoffmani*<br />
Aplcctana incerta<br />
Aplectana itzoccinensix<br />
Aplectana sp.<br />
Cruzia morleyi<br />
Cosmocerca sp.<br />
Ochoterenella cabal leroi<br />
Ochoterenella chiapensis<br />
Ochoterenella digiticauda<br />
Ochoterenella figueroai<br />
Ochoterenella lamothei<br />
Ochoterenella nanolarvate<br />
Ochoterenella sp.<br />
Oswaldocruzia subauricularix<br />
Oswaldocruzia pipiens<br />
Oswaldocruzia sp.<br />
Rhabdias fuelleborni<br />
Rhabdias sphaerocephala^<br />
Physaloptera sp. (larvae)<br />
Acanthoccphala<br />
Centrorhynchus sp.<br />
Centrorhynchus sp.<br />
Locality<br />
Not given<br />
Chiapas<br />
Oaxaca<br />
Oaxaca<br />
Veracruz<br />
Veracruz<br />
Nuevo Leon<br />
Puebla<br />
Chiapas<br />
Veracruz<br />
Veracruz<br />
Veracruz<br />
Veracruz<br />
Chiapas<br />
Chiapas<br />
Chiapas<br />
Jalisco<br />
Chiapas<br />
Chiapas<br />
Chiapas<br />
Veracruz<br />
Chiapas<br />
Nuevo Leon<br />
Veracruz<br />
Jalisco<br />
Chiapas<br />
Veracruz<br />
Veracruz<br />
Nuevo Leon<br />
Veracruz<br />
Jalisco<br />
Veracruz<br />
Jalisco<br />
* Junior homonym of Aplectana incerta per Baker (1985).<br />
t Considered a Palaearactic species only by Baker (1987).<br />
cies previously reported from B. marinus from<br />
Brazil, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Bermuda<br />
(Brenes and Bravo-Hollis, 1959; Caballero y<br />
Caballero, 1954; Kloss, 1971; Goldberg et al.,<br />
1995; Linzey et al., 1998) as well as Bufo arenarum<br />
Hansel, 18<strong>67</strong>, Bufo ictericus Spix, 1824,<br />
Bufo paracnemis Lutz, 1925, and Thoropa miliaris<br />
(Spix, 1824), from Brazil, Uruguay, and<br />
Paraguay (Kloss, 1974; Masi-Pallares and Maciel,<br />
1974).<br />
The remaining helminths found in this study<br />
were juveniles of species requiring intermediate<br />
hosts to complete their life cycles. Larvae of<br />
Physaloptera sp. and Physocephalus sp. and<br />
cystacanths of Centrorhynchus sp. have fre-<br />
GALICIA-GUERRERO ET AL.—RESEARCH NOTES 131<br />
Reference<br />
Etges, 1991<br />
Caballero y Caballero ct al., 1944<br />
Bravo-Hollis, 1948<br />
Bravo-Hollis, 1948<br />
Guillen-Hernandez, 1992<br />
Guillen-Hernandez, 1992<br />
Martinez, 1969<br />
Bravo-Hollis, 1943<br />
Caballero y Caballero, 1949, 1954<br />
Caballero-Deloya, 1974<br />
Guillen-Hernandez, 1992<br />
Caballero-Deloya, 1974<br />
Guillen-Hernandez, 1992<br />
Esslinger, 1987b<br />
Esslinger, 1988b<br />
Esslinger, 1987a<br />
This study<br />
Esslinger, 1988a<br />
Esslinger, 1988a<br />
Esslinger, 1987b<br />
Guillen-Hernandez, 1992<br />
Caballero y Caballero, 1949, 1954<br />
Martinez, 1969<br />
Guillen-Hernandez, 1 992<br />
This study<br />
Caballero y Caballero, 1949, 1954<br />
Caballero-Deloya, 1974<br />
Bravo-Hollis and Caballero y Caballero, 1940<br />
Martinez, 1969<br />
Guillen-Hernandez, 1992<br />
This study<br />
Guillen-Hernandez, 1992<br />
This study<br />
quently been reported from amphibians as well<br />
as from mammals, birds, and reptiles that habitually<br />
feed on insects (Goldberg et al., 1993).<br />
Larvae of Physaloptera sp. were found in the<br />
lumen of the stomach; larvae of Physocephalus<br />
sp. and the cystacanths were encysted in the<br />
peritoneum. The presence of larvae of Physaloptera<br />
sp. may reflect host diet preferences<br />
rather than host-parasite interactions, because<br />
encystment would be expected in paratenism.<br />
However, the number of cysts containing Physocephalus<br />
sp. and the cystacanths was too low<br />
to conclude that B. marinus is a paratenic host<br />
for these helminth species; rather, incidental infection<br />
is more likely.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
132 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Too few studies have been undertaken to draw<br />
conclusions about helminth communities in species<br />
of toads from Mexico. The data in Table 2<br />
suggest that helminth species composition in<br />
Bufo marinus is variable from population to<br />
population. However, 3 features characterize<br />
these faunas: nematode species predominate;<br />
they are depauperate; and they are dominated by<br />
a single species.<br />
We thank Guillermina Cabanas-Carranza,<br />
Elizabeth Mayen-Pena, Nancy Lopez, Cristina<br />
Caneda, and Rafael Baez-Vale for assistance in<br />
collecting toads. Thanks are also due to anonymous<br />
referees who made valuable comments on<br />
the manuscript. This work was supported by<br />
grant SI37 from the Comision Nacional para el<br />
Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CON-<br />
ABIO), Mexico.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Aho, J. M. 1990. Helminth communities of amphibians<br />
and reptiles: comparative approaches to understanding<br />
patterns and processes. Pages 157—<br />
195 in G. W. Esch, A. O. Bush, and J. M. Aho,<br />
eds. Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes.<br />
Chapman and Hall, New York.<br />
Baker, M. R. 1985. Redescription of Aplcctana itzocanensis<br />
and A. incerta (Nematoda: Cosmocercidae)<br />
from amphibians. Transactions of the American<br />
Microscopical Society 104:272—277.<br />
. 1987. Synopsis of the Nematoda parasitic in<br />
amphibians and reptiles. Memorial University of<br />
Newfoundland, Occasional Papers in Biology 1 1:<br />
1-325.<br />
Barton, D. P. 1997. Introduced animals and their parasites:<br />
the cane toad, Bufo marinus, in Australia.<br />
Australian Journal of Ecology 22:316-324.<br />
Bravo-Hollis, M. 1943. Dos nuevos nematodos parasitos<br />
de anuros del sur de Puebla. Anales del Institute<br />
de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional Autonoma<br />
de Mexico 14:69-78.<br />
. 1948. Descripcion de dos especies de trematodos<br />
parasitos de Bufo marinus L. procedentes de<br />
Tuxtepec, Oaxaca. Anales del Institute de Biologia,<br />
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico<br />
19:153-161.<br />
-, and E. Caballero y Caballero. 1940. Nematodos<br />
parasitos de los batracios de Mexico. IV.<br />
Anales del Institute de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional<br />
Autonoma de Mexico 11:239-247.<br />
Brenes, R. R., and M. Bravo-Hollis. 1959. Helmintos<br />
de la Repiiblica de Costa Rica VIII. Nematoda. 2.<br />
Algunos nematodos de Bufo marinus (L) y algunas<br />
consideraciones sobre los generos Oxysomatium<br />
y Aplectana. Revista de Biologfa Tropical 7:<br />
35-55.<br />
Bush, A. O., K. D. Lafferty, J. M. Lotz, and A. W.<br />
Shostak. 1997. <strong>Parasitology</strong> meets ecology on its<br />
own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of<br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong> 83:575-583.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Caballero y Caballero, E. 1949. Estudios helmintologicos<br />
de la region oncocercosa de Mexico y de<br />
la Repiiblica de Guatemala. Nematoda. Parte 5.<br />
Anales del Institute de Biologfa, Universidad Nacional<br />
Autonoma de Mexico 20:279-292.<br />
. 1954. Estudios helmintologicos de la region<br />
oncocercosa de Mexico y de la Repiiblica de Guatemala.<br />
Nematoda. Parte 8. Anales del Institute de<br />
Biologfa, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de<br />
Mexico 25:259-274.<br />
, M. Bravo-Hollis, and M. C. Cerecero. 1944.<br />
Estudios helmintologicos de la region oncocercosa<br />
de Mexico y de la Repiiblica de Guatemala. Trematoda.<br />
1. Anales del Institute de Biologfa, Universidad<br />
Nacional Autonoma de Mexico 15:59-72.<br />
Caballero-Deloya, J. 1974. Estudios helmintologicos<br />
de los animales silvestres de la Estacion de Biologfa<br />
Tropical "Los Tuxtlas," Veracruz. Nematoda.<br />
1. Algunos nematodos parasitos de Bufo horribilis<br />
Weigmann, 1833. Anales del Institute dc<br />
Biologfa, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de<br />
Mexico 45:45-50.<br />
Esslinger, J. H. 1987a. Redescription of Ochoterenella<br />
digiticauda Caballero, 1944 (Nematoda: Filarioidea)<br />
from the toad Bufo marinus, with a redefinition<br />
of the genus Ochoterenella Caballero,<br />
1944. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society<br />
of Washington 53:210-217.<br />
. 1987b. Ochoterenella caballeroi sp. n. and O.<br />
nanolarvata sp. n. (Nematoda: Filarioidea) from<br />
the toad Bufo marinus. Proceedings of the Helminthological<br />
Society of Washington 54:126-132.<br />
. 1988a. Ochoterenella figueroai sp. n. and O.<br />
lamothei sp. n. (Nematoda: Filarioidea) from the<br />
toad Bufo marinus. Proceedings of the Helminthological<br />
Society of Washington 55:146-154.<br />
. 1988b. Ochoterenella chiapanaensis sp. n.<br />
(Nematoda: Filarioidea) from the toad Bufo marinns<br />
in Mexico and Guatemala. Transactions of<br />
the American Microscopical Society 107:203-<br />
208.<br />
Etges, J. F. 1991. Clinostomum attenuatum (Digenea)<br />
from the eye of Bufo marinus. Journal of <strong>Parasitology</strong><br />
77:634-635.<br />
Flores-Villela, O. 1993. Herpetofauna Mexicana. Annotated<br />
list of the species of amphibians and reptiles<br />
of Mexico, recent taxonomic changes, and<br />
new species. Carnegie Museum of Natural History,<br />
Special Publication 17:1—73.<br />
Goldberg, S. R., and C. R. Bursey. 1991. Helminths<br />
of three toads, Bufo alvarius, Bufo cognatus (Bufonidae)<br />
and Scaphiopus couchi (Pelobatidae)<br />
from southern Arizona. Journal of the Helminthological<br />
Society of Washington 58:142-146.<br />
, and . 1992. Helminths of the marine<br />
toad, Bufo marinus (Anura: Bufonidae) from<br />
American Samoa. Journal of the Helminthological<br />
Society of Washington 59:131-133.<br />
, , and I. Ramos. 1995. The component<br />
helminth community of three sympatric toad species,<br />
Bufo cognatus, Bufo dehilis (Bufonidae), and<br />
Spea multiplicata (Pelobatidae) from New Mexico.<br />
Journal of the Helminthological Society of<br />
Washington 62:57-61.
, , B. K. Sullivan, and Q. A. Truong.<br />
1996. Helminths of the Sonoran green toad, Bufo<br />
retiformis (Bufonidae), from southern Arizona.<br />
Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
63:120-122.<br />
-, and R. Tawil. 1993. Gastrointestinal<br />
helminths of the western bush lizard, Urosaurus<br />
graciosus graciosus (Phrynosomatidae). Bulletin<br />
of the Southern California Academy of Science<br />
92:43-51.<br />
, , and . 1995. Helminths of an<br />
introduced population of the giant toad, Bufo marinus<br />
(Anura: Bufonidae), from Bermuda. Journal<br />
of the Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
62:64-<strong>67</strong>.<br />
Guillen-Hernandez, S. 1992. Comunidades de helmintos<br />
de algunos anuros de "Los Tuxtlas," Veracruz.<br />
Tesis de Maestiia. Facultad de Ciencias,<br />
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.<br />
90pp.<br />
Kloss, G. R. 1971. Alguns Rhahdias (Nematoda) de<br />
Bufo no Brasil. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia 24:1-<br />
52.<br />
. 1974. Rhabdias (Nematoda: Rhabditoidea)<br />
from the marinus group of Bufo. A study of sibling<br />
species. Arquivos de Zoologia 25:61—120.<br />
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 133-135<br />
Research Note<br />
EMERY AND JOY—RESEARCH NOTES 133<br />
Linzey, D. W., C. R. Bursey, and J. B. Linzey. 1998.<br />
Seasonal occurrence of helminths of the giant<br />
toad, Bufo marinus (Amphibia, Bufonidae), in<br />
Bermuda. Journal of the Helminthological Society<br />
of Washington 65:25 1-258.<br />
Martinez, V. J. M. 1969. Parasitos de algunos anfibios<br />
colectados en diferentes areas de los Municipios<br />
de Escobedo, Pesqueria y Santiago, Nuevo<br />
Leon, Mexico. Tesis Licenciatura. Facultad de<br />
Ciencias Biologicas, Universidad Autonoma de<br />
Nuevo Leon, Monterrey. 51 pp.<br />
Masi-Pallares, R., and S. Maciel. 1974. Helminthes<br />
en batracios del Paraguay (Parte 1), con descripcion<br />
de una nueva especie, Aplectana pudenda<br />
(Oxyuridae: Cosmocercinae). Revista Paraguaya<br />
de Microbiologfa 9:55—60.<br />
Wong, M. S., and D. A. P. Bundy. 1985. Population<br />
distribution of Ochoterenella digiticauda (Nematoda:<br />
Onchocercidae) and Mesocoelium monas<br />
(Digenea: Brachycoeliidae) in naturally infected<br />
Bufo marinus (Amphibia: Bufonidae) from Jamaica.<br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong> 90:457-461.<br />
Zug, G. R., and P. B. Zug. 1979. The marine toad,<br />
Bufo marinus: a natural history resume of native<br />
populations. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology<br />
284:1-58.<br />
Endohelminths of the Ravine Salamander, Plethodon richmondi, from<br />
Southwestern West Virginia, U.S.A.<br />
MATTHEW B. EMERY AND JAMES E. JOY'<br />
Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 25755, U.S.A.<br />
(e-mail: joy@marshall.edu)<br />
ABSTRACT: Four species of endohelminths were found<br />
in 51 ravine salamanders, Plethodon richmondi, from<br />
southwestern West Virginia in February, March, April,<br />
October, and November 1996, and February 1997. The<br />
nematode Angiostoma plethodontis had the highest<br />
prevalence (29.4%), and the trematode Brachycoelium<br />
storeriae had the highest mean intensity (2.3). Larvae<br />
of Batracholandros salamandrac were present in both<br />
the small and large intestines of 5 hosts. An unidentified<br />
acanthocephalan cystacanth was found encapsulated<br />
in the mesentery of a single host. Plethodon richmondi<br />
represents new host records for Angiostoma<br />
plethodontis and Brachycoelium storeriae, and West<br />
Virginia is a new locality record for all of the helminth<br />
species identified.<br />
KEY WORDS: Angiostoma plethodontis, Batracholandros<br />
salamandrae, Brachycoelium storeriae, Pleth-<br />
Corresponding author.<br />
odon richmondi, ravine salamander, West Virginia,<br />
U.S.A.<br />
The ravine salamander, Plethodon richmondi<br />
Netting and Mittleman, 1938, is a small, slender<br />
terrestrial plethodontid species inhabiting the<br />
wooded slopes of valleys and ravines from western<br />
Pennsylvania south to northeastern Tennessee<br />
and northwestern North Carolina and west<br />
to southeastern Indiana (Green and Pauley,<br />
1987). In a parasite survey of plethodontid salamanders<br />
in Tennessee, Dunbar and Moore<br />
(1979) reported 2 species of helminths from P.<br />
richmondi\e tapeworm Cylindrotaenia americana<br />
Trowbridge and Hefley, 1934, and the<br />
nematode Batracholandros salamandrae (Schad,<br />
1960) Fetter and Quentin, 1976. Fifteen P. rich-<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
134 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Table 1. Prevalence and mean intensity of helminth parasites found in 51 Plethodon richmondi from<br />
southwestern West Virginia.<br />
Parasite species<br />
Brachycoelium storeriae<br />
Angiostoma plethodontis<br />
Batracholandros salamandrae<br />
Acanthocephalan cystacanth (unidentified)<br />
* Number (%) infected.<br />
Prevalence* Mean intensity ± 1 SD (range)<br />
10 (19.6)<br />
15 (29.4)<br />
5 (9.8)<br />
1 (2.0)<br />
mondi individuals were included in that survey,<br />
and prevalences were 6.7% and 20.0% for C.<br />
americana and B. salamandrae, respectively.<br />
These are the only reported helminths from this<br />
salamander host to date. Accordingly, this report<br />
presents new information on helminths of this<br />
plethodontid species, including prevalences and<br />
intensities of infection.<br />
A total of 51 ravine salamanders (28 females<br />
and 23 males) was collected in Cabell and<br />
Wayne counties of West Virginia in February-<br />
April, October, and November 1996 and in February<br />
1997. Salamanders were captured by hand<br />
in mature forests of beech, maple, and oak trees<br />
on cool rainy evenings. Hosts were placed in<br />
plastic bags with damp leaf litter and returned<br />
to the laboratory where they were maintained in<br />
a refrigerator at approximately 4°C. All salamanders<br />
were necropsied within 18 hr of capture.<br />
Immediately prior to necropsy, each salamander<br />
was measured for snout-vent length<br />
(SVL) to the nearest mm with vernier calipers,<br />
and weighed to the nearest 0.1 g on a Mettler<br />
Model BB300® electronic balance. Mean SVL<br />
of 50 mm (±SE =1.5 mm) for females did not<br />
differ significantly from the mean SVL of 47<br />
mm (±SE = 1.3 mm) for males (f0.o5,49 = 1-471;<br />
P > 0.05). Mean weight of 1.53 g (±SE = 0.11<br />
g) for females did not differ significantly from<br />
the mean of 1.28 g (±SE = 0.77) for males<br />
(*o.o5,49 = 1-852; P > 0.05). Since neither mean<br />
snout-vent lengths nor total body weights for female<br />
versus male P. richmondi were statistically<br />
significant, data were pooled for both host sexes<br />
to determine the prevalences and mean intensities<br />
of infection for the various helminth species.<br />
Salamanders were killed by decapitation. The<br />
sex of each individual was determined. At time<br />
of necropsy, the gastrointestinal tract was removed,<br />
and the small and large intestines were<br />
examined with a dissecting microscope for helminths.<br />
Nematodes were initially studied in tem-<br />
2.3 ± 1.70 (1-7)<br />
1.5 ± 0.64 (1-3)<br />
1.2 ± 0.45 (1-2)<br />
1.0 — (1)<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Site of infection<br />
Small intestine<br />
Small intestine<br />
Small, large intestine<br />
Mesentery<br />
porary lactophenol mounts and then stored in<br />
70% ethanol. Voucher specimens representing<br />
each helminth species were stained in Semichon's<br />
acetic carmine, dehydrated in an ethanol<br />
series, cleared in xylene, and mounted in Permount®.<br />
The terms prevalence and mean intensity<br />
follow the definitions of Bush et al. (1997).<br />
In the study, 4 helminth species were found<br />
in P. richmondi individuals (Table 1). The trematode<br />
appears to be Brachycoelium storeriae<br />
Harwood, 1932, a diagnosis based, in part, on<br />
the morphological similarity of specimens in this<br />
study with the description provided by Cheng<br />
(1958), who argued convincingly for the separation<br />
of this trematode species from Brachycoelium<br />
salamandrae (Frolich, 1789). The diagnosis<br />
of B. storeriae from the terrestrial P.<br />
richmondi in West Virginia can be supported on<br />
an ecological basis as well. For example, Parker<br />
(1941) identified trematodes of this species from<br />
Opheodrys aestivus (Linnaeus, 1766) and Ambystoma<br />
opacum (Gravenhorst, 1807), both terrestrial<br />
hosts. Cheng (1958) also collected B. storeriae<br />
individuals from Plethodon cinereus<br />
(Green, 1818), another terrestrial host species.<br />
Brachycoelium storeriae has also been reported<br />
from Pseudotriton ruber (Sonnini, 1802) (Parker,<br />
1941; Dunbar and Moore, 1979), a salamander<br />
species considered semiaquatic to semiterrestrial<br />
by the latter authors.<br />
The nematode Angiostoma plethodontis Chitwood,<br />
1933 found in the present study clearly<br />
conforms to its original description (Chitwood,<br />
1933). A total of 22 A. plethodontis (13 females<br />
and 9 males) was collected from 15 P. richmondi<br />
(Table 1). This female:male ratio of 1.44:1.00<br />
did not deviate significantly from the expected<br />
1.00:1.00 ratio (x2 = 0.752; df = 1; 0.5 > P ><br />
0.1).<br />
The identification of B. salamandrae from P.<br />
richmondi may not be definitive, because all 6<br />
individuals of this nematode species collected
were larvae. Still, we have concluded that the<br />
oxyuroid species found in this study is most<br />
likely B. salamandrae (Schad, 1960) Fetter and<br />
Quentin, 1976 rather than B. magnavulvaris<br />
(Rankin, 1937) Fetter and Quentin, 1976, because<br />
Dunbar and Moore (1979) argued that the<br />
latter species is not found in terrestrial hosts,<br />
such as P. richmondi.<br />
Since only 1 acanthocephalan was found and<br />
it was in an encapsulated cystacanth stage, we<br />
offer no species or generic diagnoses.<br />
This is the first report of B. storeriae and A.<br />
plethodontis from P. richmondi, and West Virginia<br />
is a new locality record for all helminth<br />
species collected. Voucher material is deposited<br />
in the United <strong>State</strong>s National Parasite Collection,<br />
Beltsville, Maryland 20705, under accession<br />
numbers USNPC 88638 (Angiostoma plethodontis<br />
female and male); USNPC 88639 (Batracholandros<br />
salamandrae); USNPC 88640 (Brachycoelium<br />
storeriae); and USNPC 88641<br />
(acanthocephalan cystacanth).<br />
This work was done to partially fulfill a Marshall<br />
University Yeager Thesis requirement by<br />
the senior author. Thanks are extended to Yeager<br />
Thesis Committee member Martha Woodard for<br />
review of the manuscript. Our appreciation is<br />
also extended to Robert Tucker for his help with<br />
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 135-137<br />
Research Note<br />
RESEARCH NOTES 135<br />
host collections and to Charles Bursey for the<br />
identification of A. plethodontis. Specimens of<br />
P. richmondi were collected under a permit issued<br />
by the West Virginia Division of Natural<br />
Resources.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bush, A. O., K. D. Lafferty, J. M. Lotz, and A. W.<br />
Shostak. 1997. <strong>Parasitology</strong> meets ecology on its<br />
own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of<br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong> 83:575-583.<br />
Cheng, T. C. 1958. Studies on the trematode family<br />
Dicrocoeliidae. I. The genus Brachycoeiium (Dujardin,<br />
1845) and Leptophallus Liihe, 1909 (Brachycoeliinae).<br />
American Midland Naturalist 59:<br />
<strong>67</strong>-81.<br />
Chitwood, B. G. 1933. On some nematodes of the<br />
superfamily Rhabditoidea and their status as parasites<br />
of reptiles and amphibians. Journal of the<br />
Washington Academy of Sciences 23:508-520.<br />
Dunbar, J. R., and J. D. Moore. 1979. Correlations<br />
of host specificity with host habitat in helminths<br />
parasitizing the plethodontids of Washington<br />
County, Tennessee. Journal of the Tennessee<br />
Academy of Science 54:106-109.<br />
Green, N. B., and T. K. Pauley. 1987. Amphibians<br />
and Reptiles in West Virginia. University of Pittsburgh<br />
Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 241 pp.<br />
Parker, M. V. 1941. The trematode parasites from a<br />
collection of amphibians and reptiles. Report of<br />
the Reelfoot Lake Biological Station, 5. Journal<br />
of the Tennessee Academy of Science 16:27-44.<br />
Abomasal Parasites in Southern Mule Deer (Odocoileus hemionus<br />
fuliginatus} from Coastal San Diego County, California, U.S.A.<br />
STEPHEN LADD-WILSON,' SLADER BucK,2 AND RICHARD G. BoTZLER1-3<br />
1 Department of Wildlife, Humboldt <strong>State</strong> University, Arcata, California 95521, U.S.A. (S.L.W. e-mail:<br />
ladwil@teleport.com; R.G.B. e-mail: rgb2@humboldt.edu), and<br />
2 Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California 92055, U.S.A. (e-mail:<br />
bucksl@pendleton.usmc.mil)<br />
ABSTRACT: Trichostrongylid nematodes were collected<br />
from the abomasa of 15 (6.6%) of 227 southern mule<br />
deer (Odocoileus hemionus fuliginatus) from Camp Pendleton<br />
Marine Corps Base, San Diego County, California<br />
(U.S.A.). Three species of nematodes were found: Haemonchus<br />
contoitus, Teladorsagia circumcincta, and Nem-<br />
3 Corresponding author.<br />
atodirus odocoilei. Mean (±1 SD) intensity was 11.5 ±<br />
24.6 nematodes per infected deer. All 15 infected deer<br />
were among the 184 animals shot during 2 controlled<br />
hunts in November 1990 and November 1991; no parasites<br />
were found in an additional 43 abomasa collected<br />
during 2 additional hunts in March 1991 arid March<br />
1992. This is the first known published report of abomasal<br />
nematodes from southern mule deer.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
136 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
Table 1. Abomasal parasites collected from 227 southern mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus fulginatus) at<br />
Camp Pendleton, San Diego County, California. All deer were collected in the November 1990 and 1991<br />
hunts. No abomasal parasites were observed among the 43 deer sampled in the March 1991 and 1992<br />
hunts.<br />
Parasite species<br />
Haemonchus contortus<br />
Teladorsagia circumcincta<br />
Nematodirus odocoilei<br />
Unknown*<br />
Totals<br />
infected<br />
5<br />
2<br />
5<br />
4<br />
15t<br />
(%)<br />
2.2<br />
0.9<br />
2.2<br />
1.8<br />
6.6<br />
* Unidentifiable worm fragments were found in 4 additional deer.<br />
t One deer was infected with both H. contortus and T. circumcincta.<br />
KEY WORDS: southern mule deer, Odocoileus hemionus<br />
fuliginatus, abomasal nematodes, Haemonchus<br />
contortus, Teladorsagia circumcincta, Nematodirus<br />
odocoilei, California, U.S.A.<br />
A number of studies have been published of<br />
abomasal parasites among mule deer (Odocoileus<br />
hemionus Rafinesque, 1817) of North<br />
America, and some controversy exists on the<br />
management value of using abomasal parasites<br />
as indicators of the physical condition and habitat<br />
relationships of these deer (Moore and Garner,<br />
1980; Waid et al., 1985; Stubblefield et al.,<br />
1987). Among southern mule deer (Odocoileus<br />
hemionus fuliginatus Cowan, 1933) no published<br />
reports are known of abomasal parasites;<br />
on the basis of a single unpublished anonymous<br />
1955 report of the California Department of Fish<br />
and Game, Nematodirus filicollis (Rudolphi,<br />
1802) Ransom, 1907, was purportedly observed<br />
in 1 of 17 southern mule deer from Camp Pendleton<br />
Marine Corps Base, San Diego County,<br />
California (33°20'N, 117°20"W). Our objective<br />
was to identify the prevalence and intensity of<br />
abomasal parasites infecting the southern mule<br />
deer subspecies on Camp Pendleton.<br />
Camp Pendleton comprises a 50,588-ha area,<br />
with riparian and oak woodlands, coastal sage<br />
scrub, grassland, and chaparral, in the northwestern<br />
corner of San Diego County. We collected<br />
184 abomasa from 225 southern mule<br />
deer shot during 2 either-sex hunts in November<br />
1990 and November 1991. An additional 43 abomasa<br />
were collected from 45 animals killed<br />
during 2 antlerless hunts in March 1991 and<br />
March 1992. At hunter-check stations, each abomasum<br />
was removed after ligation and frozen<br />
Mean<br />
20.8<br />
12.0<br />
5.6<br />
4.0<br />
11.5<br />
No. parasites/deer<br />
SD<br />
37.6<br />
0.0<br />
3.6<br />
0.0<br />
24.6<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Range<br />
4-88<br />
12<br />
4-12<br />
4<br />
4-100<br />
Total no.<br />
parasites<br />
collected<br />
104<br />
24<br />
28<br />
16<br />
172<br />
at — 10°C prior to transportation to the laboratory.<br />
Abomasa were thawed at 18-20°C. Abomasal<br />
contents first were rinsed through a 1.9-mm<br />
mesh to remove coarse material and then rinsed<br />
through a 150-u.m mesh. Parasites and other material<br />
remaining on the 150-u,m mesh were diluted<br />
with tap water and examined in 10-ml aliquots<br />
until 25% of the total volume for each<br />
abomasum was evaluated. From this 25% sample,<br />
the total number of each abomasal parasite<br />
species was estimated for each deer. Helminths<br />
collected were stored in 70% ethanol, mounted<br />
on slides in glycerin, and identified to species<br />
according to Skrjabin (1952), Durette-Desset<br />
(1974), and Levine (1980). Representative samples<br />
of all helminths were deposited into the<br />
U.S. National Parasite Collection, Beltsville,<br />
Maryland (Accession Numbers 84382-84387).<br />
Of the 227 abomasa examined, 212 (93%) had<br />
no detectable helminths, 12 (5.2%) had an estimated<br />
total of 4 helminths, 2 (0.9%) had an estimated<br />
12 helminths, and 1 (
and their habitats. These low parasite levels may<br />
have been influenced by several factors. A semiarid<br />
climate has been associated with low helminth<br />
prevalences (Waid et al., 1985; Stubblefield<br />
et al., 1987); at 3 weather stations on Camp<br />
Pendleton, annual rainfall ranged from 225 to<br />
483 mm over the 2 yr of the study. Also, in an<br />
earlier study, Pious (1989) found that grasses<br />
comprised only 9% of the diet for deer at Camp<br />
Pendleton; low level of grass intake may reduce<br />
the likelihood of deer ingesting infective nematode<br />
larvae. Another factor is that during the unavoidable<br />
time lapse between killing the deer<br />
and collecting the abomasa, some abomasal parasites<br />
may have migrated out of the abomasum<br />
or some parasites (e.g., Nematodirus odocoilei}<br />
may have migrated into the abomasum. In addition,<br />
basing prevalence on the number of parasites<br />
found in only 25% of each abomasum<br />
could have resulted in overlooking very low intensities.<br />
Further, use of the 150-u,m mesh for<br />
collecting parasites may have resulted in loss of<br />
small parasites, especially larvae. Finally, the<br />
frequent fires from incendiary devices on Camp<br />
Pendleton could serve to reduce the abundance<br />
of infective larvae on vegetation. Thus, the parasite<br />
prevalences and intensities we observed<br />
probably should be considered minimum values<br />
for this southern mule deer population.<br />
The apparent absence of abomasal parasites<br />
from the 43 deer killed in the 2 March hunts is<br />
interesting. This phenomenon may be related to<br />
the development of a seasonal host immunity<br />
against intestinal parasites (Soulsby, 1966).<br />
Haemonchus conforms and T. circumcincta<br />
both are common parasites of sheep. Camp Pendleton<br />
has had a history of grazing by sheep,<br />
cattle, and bison.<br />
Although all of these parasites have been reported<br />
from other subspecies of mule deer, this<br />
is the first published report for the southern rnule<br />
deer subspecies. The unpublished anonymous<br />
1955 California Department of Fish and Game<br />
report of N. filicollis in 1 (6%) of 17 abomasa<br />
evaluated at Camp Pendleton reported a prevalence<br />
of abomasal parasites comparable with<br />
that found in our study (Table 1). Walker and<br />
Becklund (1970) noted that they examined many<br />
specimens of N. filicollis collected from deer and<br />
in every case reidentified them as N. odocoilei;<br />
thus, the original unpublished report probably<br />
also was of N. odocoilei. Finding parasite spe-<br />
RESEARCH NOTES 137<br />
cies characteristic of other mule deer subspecies<br />
(Walker and Becklund, 1970) among O. hemionus<br />
fuliginatus supports the notion that these abomasal<br />
parasites exercise little selectivity among<br />
mule deer subspecies. No clinical pathological<br />
lesions were associated with any of the infected<br />
deer in this study.<br />
We greatly appreciate the assistance of Dr. Archie<br />
Mossman and Ms. Denise Bradley for help<br />
in several phases of this study and of Dr. John<br />
DeMartini and Dr. J. Ralph Lichtenfels for assistance<br />
in identifying the parasites.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
E>urette-Desset, M. 1974. Keys to the genera of the<br />
superfamily Trichostrongyloidea. In R. C. Anderson<br />
and A. G. Chabaud, eds. Commonwealth Institute<br />
of Helminthology Number 10. Commonwealth<br />
Institute of Helminthology, The White<br />
House, St. Albans, England. 86 pp.<br />
Levine, N. D. 1980. Nematode Parasites of Domestic<br />
Animals and of Man, 2nd ed. Burgess Publishing<br />
Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 477 pp.<br />
Moore, G. M., and G. N. Garner. 1980. The relationship<br />
of abomasal parasite counts to physical<br />
condition of mule deer in southwestern Texas.<br />
Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies<br />
60:593-600.<br />
Pious, M. 1989. Forage composition and physical condition<br />
of southern mule deer in San Diego County,<br />
California. M.S. Thesis, Humboldt <strong>State</strong> University,<br />
Arcata, California. 61 pp.<br />
Skrjabin, K. I. 1952. Key to the Parasitic Nematodes.<br />
Volume III: Strongylata. Academy of the Sciences<br />
of the U.S.S.R. Translated from Russian for the<br />
National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.,<br />
and the U.S. Department of Agriculture by the<br />
Israel Program for Scientific Translations, The Office<br />
of Technical Services. 1961. U.S. Department<br />
of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 434 pp.<br />
Soulsby, E. J. L. 1966. The mechanisms of immunity<br />
to gastro-intestinal nematodes. Pages 255-276 in<br />
E. J. L. Soulsby, ed. Biology of Parasites. Academic<br />
Press, New York. 354 pp.<br />
Stubblefield, S. S., D. B. Pence, and R. J. Warren.<br />
1987. Visceral helminth communities of s.ympatric<br />
mule deer and white-tailed deer from the Davis<br />
Mountains of Texas. Journal of Wildlife Diseases<br />
23:113-120.<br />
Waid, D. D., D. B. Pence, and R. J. Warren. 1985.<br />
Effects of season and physical condition on the<br />
gastrointestinal helminth community of whitetailed<br />
deer from the Texas Edwards Plateau. Journal<br />
of Wildlife Diseases 21:264-273.<br />
Walker, M. L., and W. W. Becklund. 1970. Checklist<br />
of the internal and external parasites of deer,<br />
Odocoileus hemionus and O. virginianus in the<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s and Canada. Index-Catalogue of<br />
Medical and Veterinary Zoology, Special Publication<br />
No. 1. U.S. Department of Agriculture,<br />
Washington, D.C. 45 pp.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
Comp. Parasitol.<br />
<strong>67</strong>(1), <strong>2000</strong> pp. 138-142<br />
THE HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON<br />
CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS<br />
The name of the Society shall be the Helminthological<br />
Society of Washington.<br />
The object of the Society shall be to provide<br />
for the association of persons interested in parasitology<br />
and related sciences for the presentation<br />
and discussion of items of interest pertaining to<br />
those sciences.<br />
BY-LAWS<br />
ARTICLE 1<br />
Membership<br />
Section 1. There shall be four classes of members,<br />
namely regular, life, honorary, and emeritus.<br />
Section 2. Any person interested in parasitology<br />
or related sciences may be elected to regular<br />
membership in the Society. The privileges<br />
and responsibilities of regular members include<br />
eligibility to hold office, to vote, and to receive<br />
Society publications. Spouses of regular members<br />
may apply for election to regular membership<br />
with all the privileges and responsibilities<br />
except that they will not receive the Society publications<br />
and will pay annual dues at a reduced<br />
rate.<br />
Section 3. Any person who has rendered conspicuous<br />
and continuous service as a member of<br />
the Society for a period of not less than 15 years,<br />
and has reached the age of retirement, may be<br />
elected to life membership. Life members shall<br />
have all of the privileges of regular members but<br />
shall be exempted from payment of dues. The<br />
number of life members shall not exceed five<br />
percent of the membership at the time of election.<br />
Section 4. Any person who has attained eminent<br />
distinction in parasitology or related sciences<br />
may be elected to honorary membership.<br />
An honorary member shall have all the privileges<br />
of membership except voting, holding office,<br />
or having any interest in the real or personal<br />
property of the Society, and shall be exempted<br />
from the payment of dues. The number of honorary<br />
members shall not exceed 10 at any one<br />
time, and not more than one honorary member<br />
shall be elected in any one year.<br />
Section 5. Any person who has been a member<br />
in good standing for not less than 10 years,<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
and who has retired from active professional<br />
life, may upon application in writing to the Corresponding<br />
Secretary-Treasurer have the membership<br />
status changed to emeritus. An emeritus<br />
member shall be exempt from payment of dues<br />
and, with exception of receiving the Society's<br />
publications shall enjoy all privileges of membership.<br />
An emeritus member, upon payment of<br />
75 percent of the current dues, may elect to receive<br />
the Society's publications.<br />
Section 6. Candidates for election to regular<br />
membership may be sponsored and proposed<br />
only by members in good standing. The candidate<br />
shall submit a duly executed and signed application<br />
to the Recording Secretary, who in turn<br />
shall submit the application to the Executive<br />
Committee. The Executive Committee shall review<br />
the application, vote upon its acceptance,<br />
and report its actions at the next scheduled business<br />
meeting. Voting may be by voice or by ballot.<br />
In the event that there is no scheduled Executive<br />
Committee meeting within 60 days of<br />
receipt of the application, voting may be conducted<br />
by mail or by other expeditious means of<br />
communication. The Corresponding Secretary-<br />
Treasurer shall inform the applicant of the action<br />
of the Committee.<br />
Section 7. Payment of dues shall be considered<br />
as evidence of acceptance of membership<br />
in the Society. Election to membership shall be<br />
void if the person elected does not pay dues<br />
within 3 months after the date of notification of<br />
election.<br />
Section 8. Nominations for honorary and life<br />
membership, approved by the Executive Committee,<br />
shall be submitted to the membership for<br />
election at a regular meeting.<br />
ARTICLE 2<br />
Officers<br />
Section 1. The officers of the Society shall be<br />
a President, a Vice-President, a Recording Secretary,<br />
u Corresponding Secretary-Treasurer, and<br />
such other officers as the Society may deem necessary.<br />
The four named officers shall also be the<br />
Directors of the Society. Only members in good<br />
standing and whose dues are not in arrears shall
e eligible for election to office. Terms of office<br />
shall be for 1 year.<br />
Section 2. The President shall preside over all<br />
meetings, appoint all committees except the Executive<br />
Committee, and perform such other duties<br />
as may properly devolve upon a presiding<br />
officer. The President may appoint an Archivist,<br />
a Librarian, a Custodian of Back Issues, and an<br />
Assistant Corresponding Secretary-Treasurer, as<br />
needed.<br />
Section 3. The Vice-President shall preside in<br />
the absence of the President and, when so acting,<br />
shall perform such duties as would otherwise<br />
devolve upon the President. The Vice-President<br />
shall serve as Program Officer.<br />
Section 4. In the absence of both President<br />
and Vice-President, the member, among those<br />
present, who last held the office of President<br />
shall be the presiding officer. Under other circumstances,<br />
members may elect a presiding officer<br />
but business action taken shall be reviewed<br />
by the Executive Committee.<br />
Section 5. The Recording Secretary shall record<br />
the proceedings of all meetings and shall<br />
present at each meeting a written report of the<br />
transactions of the preceding meeting, shall keep<br />
an accurate and complete record of the business<br />
transacted by the Society in its meetings, and<br />
shall notify the Corresponding Secretary-Treasurer<br />
of the election of new members. The Recording<br />
Secretary shall prepare for publication<br />
in the Society's publications an annual digest of<br />
scientific meetings and business transacted, including<br />
elections of officers and new members.<br />
Section 6. The Corresponding Secretary-Treasurer<br />
shall be responsible for all funds, collections,<br />
payment of bills, and maintenance of financial<br />
records. At the beginning of each year,<br />
the Corresponding Secretary-Treasurer shall present<br />
to the Society an itemized statement of receipts<br />
and expenditures of the previous year; this<br />
statement shall be audited by at least two members<br />
of the Society.<br />
ARTICLE 3<br />
Executive Committee<br />
Section 1. There shall be an Executive Committee<br />
that shall be the administrative body of<br />
the Society.<br />
Section 2. The Executive Committee shall<br />
consist of 10 members in good standing as follows:<br />
the President, Vice-President, Recording<br />
Secretary, Corresponding Secretary-Treasurer,<br />
CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS 139<br />
Editor, Immediate Past President, and four Members-at-Large.<br />
The Committee shall represent to<br />
the fullest practicable degree the varied scientific<br />
interests of the Society's membership and the<br />
local distribution of its members.<br />
Section 3. The President shall serve as chairperson<br />
of the Executive Committee.<br />
Section 4. Members-at-Large shall serve for a<br />
term of 2 years. Two Members-at Large shall be<br />
appointed each year in November by the President-elect<br />
for the prescribed term of 2 years.<br />
Section 5. Vacancies occurring on the Executive<br />
Committee for any reason shall be filled<br />
by appointment by the President, and except as<br />
otherwise provided, the appointee shall serve for<br />
the remainder of the unexpired term.<br />
Section 6. The Executive Committee shall<br />
carry out the provisions of the Constitution and<br />
By-Laws and shall make decisions on all matters<br />
of general and financial policy not otherwise set<br />
forth in the Constitution and By-Law:; and shall<br />
report its action to the Society annually at the<br />
last regular meeting.<br />
Section 7. The Executive Committee shall approve<br />
the selection of a depository for the current<br />
funds, direct the investment of the permanent<br />
funds, and act as the administrative body<br />
of the Society on all matters involving finance.<br />
It shall prepare and present to the Society at the<br />
beginning of each calendar year a budget based<br />
on the estimated receipts and expenditures of the<br />
coming year with such recommendations as may<br />
be desirable.<br />
Section 8. With the presentation of the annual<br />
budget, the Executive Committee shall present<br />
to the Society, if feasible, the estimated cost for<br />
publication to be charged to contributors to the<br />
Society's publications for that year.<br />
Section 9. Costs of publication, in excess of<br />
amounts borne by the Society, shall be borne by<br />
the authors in accordance with guidelines established<br />
by the Executive Committee.<br />
Section 10. The Executive Committee shall<br />
pass on all applications for membership and on<br />
the reinstatement of delinquent members, except<br />
as otherwise provided, and shall report its actions<br />
to the Society.<br />
ARTICLE 4<br />
Nomination and Election of Officers<br />
Section 1. The Executive Committee, acting<br />
as the Nominating Committee of the Society,<br />
shall prepare a slate of officers and present this<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
140 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
to the Society at the Anniversary meeting of<br />
each year. Independent nominations may be<br />
made in writing by any five members. In order<br />
to receive consideration, such nominations must<br />
be in the hands of the Recording Secretary at<br />
the time of the Anniversary meeting. The election<br />
will be held at the next regular meeting of<br />
the Society.<br />
Section 2. The election of officers shall be<br />
held prior to the presentation of notes and papers<br />
at the last regular meeting of the calendar year.<br />
Voting may be either by voice or by ballot.<br />
Section 3. The last order of business at the<br />
last meeting of the calendar year shall be the<br />
installation of officers, the naming of officers,<br />
and the naming of necessary appointees.<br />
ARTICLE 5<br />
Awards Committee<br />
Section 1. There shall be an Awards Committee<br />
to select individuals for special commendation.<br />
The Committee shall consist of three<br />
members.<br />
Section 2. Members shall serve for a term of<br />
3 years with appointments staggered so that one<br />
new member is added each year. The senior<br />
member of the Committee shall serve as chairperson.<br />
Section 3. The Awards Committee shall be<br />
charged with the duty of recommending candidates<br />
for the Anniversary Award, which may be<br />
given annually or less frequently at the discretion<br />
of the Committee.<br />
Section 4. The recipient of the Anniversary<br />
Award shall be, or have been, a Society member<br />
who is honored for one or more achievements<br />
of the following nature: (a) outstanding contributions<br />
to parasitology or related sciences that<br />
bring honor and credit to the Society, (b) an exceptional<br />
paper read at a meeting of the Society<br />
or published in <strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Parasitology</strong>, (c)<br />
outstanding service to the Society, and (d) other<br />
achievement or contribution of distinction that<br />
warrants highest and special recognition by the<br />
Society.<br />
Section 5. The individual recommended for<br />
the Anniversary Award shall be subject to approval<br />
by the Executive Committee.<br />
ARTICLE 6<br />
Editorial Board<br />
Section 1. There shall be an Editorial Board<br />
for the Society's publications, which shall include<br />
<strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Parasitology</strong>.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
Section 2. The Editorial Board shall consist of<br />
an Editor and other members in good standing,<br />
representing to the fullest practicable degree the<br />
varied scientific interests and the employmentgroup<br />
affiliations of the Society's membership.<br />
Section 3. The Editor shall be elected by the<br />
Society, on the nomination by the Executive<br />
Committee, for a term of 3 to 5 years.<br />
Section 4. Other members of the Editorial<br />
Board shall be appointed for terms of 3 years.<br />
Section 5. The Editor, after consulting with<br />
the Editorial Board, shall appoint new members,<br />
formulate publication policies, and make all decisions<br />
with respect to format and content of the<br />
Society's publications. The Editor shall operate<br />
within financial limitations determined by the<br />
Executive Committee.<br />
ARTICLE 7<br />
Publications<br />
The publications of the Society shall be issued<br />
at such times and in such form as the Society,<br />
through its Editorial Board, may determine.<br />
ARTICLE 8<br />
Meetings<br />
Section 1. Meetings of the Society shall be<br />
held as often as deemed desirable by the Executive<br />
Committee.<br />
Section 2. The November meeting of the Society<br />
shall be known as the Anniversary meeting,<br />
and the Anniversary Award, when made,<br />
ordinarily shall be presented at this meeting.<br />
Section 3. Notice of the time and place of<br />
meetings shall be given by the Recording Secretary<br />
at least 10 days before the date of the<br />
meeting.<br />
ARTICLE 9<br />
Procedure<br />
The rules contained in Robert's Rules of Order,<br />
Revised, shall govern the Society in all cases<br />
to which they are applicable and in which<br />
they are not inconsistent with the By-Laws or<br />
the special rules of order of the Society.<br />
ARTICLE 10<br />
Order of Business<br />
Call to order.<br />
Reading of minutes of the previous meeting.<br />
Announcement of new members.<br />
Reports of committees.<br />
Unfinished business.
New business.<br />
Presentation of notes and papers.<br />
Installation of new officers.<br />
Adjournment.<br />
ARTICLE 11<br />
Quorum<br />
The members in attendance at any regular<br />
meeting shall constitute a quorum.<br />
ARTICLE 12<br />
Dues and Debts Owed to the Society<br />
Section 1. Annual dues for regular and spouse<br />
members shall be fixed by the Executive Committee,<br />
subject to ratification by the Society.<br />
Spouse members shall pay dues at a reduced<br />
rate.<br />
Section 2. The fiscal year for payment of dues<br />
and for all other business purposes shall be the<br />
same as the calendar year, that is, from 1 January<br />
to 31 December, and dues shall be payable<br />
on or before 1 January. The dues of a newly<br />
elected member paid prior to 1 July of the year<br />
of the new member's election shall be credited<br />
to that year; if paid after 1 July, they shall be<br />
credited either to the current fiscal year or to the<br />
following one, at the option of the new member.<br />
The dues shall include subscription to the Society's<br />
publications; only those members whose<br />
dues are paid shall receive the publication(s).<br />
Section 3. All other obligations owed to the<br />
CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS 141<br />
Society by members or nonmembers shall be<br />
due and payable 30 days after bills an; rendered;<br />
the further extension of credit to those whose<br />
obligations are in arrears shall be a matter for<br />
decision by the Executive Committee.<br />
ARTICLE 13<br />
Suspension and Reinstatement<br />
Any member whose dues are in arrears for 2<br />
years shall be dropped from membership. Members<br />
who have been dropped for nonpayment of<br />
dues may be reinstated automatically upon payment<br />
of the dues in arrears and dues for the current<br />
year or may be otherwise reinstated by action<br />
of the Executive Committee.<br />
ARTICLE 14<br />
Provision for Dissolution of Funds<br />
In the event the Society is disbanded, all monies<br />
shall be presented to the Trustees of the<br />
Brayton Howard Ransom Memorial Trust Fund<br />
to be used for such purposes as that continuing<br />
body may deem advisable.<br />
ARTICLE 15<br />
Amendments to the By-Laws<br />
Any amendment to these By-Laws shall be<br />
presented in writing at a regular meeting. It shall<br />
not be acted upon until the following meeting.<br />
A two-thirds vote of the members in attendance<br />
shall be required for adoption.<br />
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION<br />
OF<br />
THE HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON, INC.<br />
(A Non-stock Corporation)<br />
FIRST: I the undersigned, Charles A. Dukes,<br />
Jr., whose post office address in 300 Landover<br />
Mall West, Landover, Maryland 20785, being at<br />
least twenty-one years of age, do hereby form a<br />
corporation under and by virtue of the General<br />
Laws of the <strong>State</strong> of Maryland.<br />
SECOND: The name of the corporation<br />
(which is hereinafter called the Corporation) is<br />
The Helminthological Society of Washington,<br />
Inc.<br />
THIRD: The puiposes for which the Corporation<br />
is formed are as follows:<br />
(a) To provide for the association of persons<br />
interested in parasitology and related sciences<br />
for the presentation and discussion of items of<br />
interest pertaining to these sciences;<br />
(b) To advance the science of parasitology, in<br />
both its fundamental and its economise aspects;<br />
to act as an agency for the exchange of information;<br />
to hold regular meetings and to promote<br />
and extend knowledge in all phases of parasitology;<br />
(c) And to generally carry out any other business<br />
in connection therewith not contrary to the<br />
laws of the <strong>State</strong> of Maryland, and with all the<br />
powers conferred upon non-profit corporations<br />
which are contained in the General Laws of the<br />
<strong>State</strong> of Maryland.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
142 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
FOURTH: The post office address of the principal<br />
office of the Corporation in this state is<br />
9110 Drake Place, <strong>College</strong> Park, Maryland<br />
20740. The name and post office address of the<br />
resident agent of the Corporation in this state is<br />
A. Morgan Golden, 9110 Drake Place, <strong>College</strong><br />
Park, Maryland 20740. Said resident agent is a<br />
citizen of the <strong>State</strong> of Maryland and actually resides<br />
therein.<br />
FIFTH: The Corporation is not authorized to<br />
issue capital stock.<br />
SIXTH: The number of directors of the Corporation<br />
shall be four, which number may be<br />
increased or decreased pursuant to the By-Laws<br />
of the Corporation, but shall never be less than<br />
three; and the names of the directors who shall<br />
act until their successors are duly chosen and<br />
qualified are Nancy D. Pacheco, Louis S. Diamond,<br />
Sherman S. Hendrix, and Milford N.<br />
Lunde.<br />
SEVENTH: The duration of the Coiporation<br />
shall be perpetual.<br />
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed<br />
these Articles of Incorporation on the 3rd day<br />
November, 1981. I acknowledge these Articles<br />
and this signature to by my act.<br />
WITNESS:<br />
[signed]<br />
Gary Greenwald<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
[signed]<br />
Charles A. Dukes, Jr.
Name:<br />
MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION 143<br />
APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP<br />
in the<br />
HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON<br />
Mailing Address:<br />
Present Position and Name of Institution:<br />
(Please Type or Print Legibly)<br />
Phone: FAX:<br />
E-Mail:<br />
Highest Degree Earned and the Year Received:<br />
Are You a Student? If so, for what degree and where?<br />
Fields of Interest:<br />
If you are experienced in your field, would you consent to be a reviewer for manuscripts<br />
submitted for publication in the Society's journal, <strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Parasitology</strong>l If so, what<br />
specific subject area(s) do you feel most qualified to review?<br />
Signature of Applicant Date<br />
Signature of Sponsor (a member) Date<br />
Mail the completed application along with a check (on a U.S. bank) or money order (in<br />
U.S. currency) for the first year's dues (US$25 for domestic active members ami US$28<br />
for foreign active members) to the Corresponding Secretary-Treasurer, Nancy D. Pacheco,<br />
9708 DePaul Drive, Bethesda, MD, U.S.A. 20817<br />
Helminthological Society of Washington Home Page: http://www.gettysburg.edU/~shendrix/helms:oc.html<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
144 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>67</strong>(1), JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
THE HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON<br />
MISSION AND VISION STATEMENTS<br />
May 7, 1999<br />
THE MISSION<br />
The Helminthological Society of Washington, the prototype scientific organization for parasitological<br />
research in North America, was founded in 1910 by a devoted group of parasitologists in<br />
Washington, D.C. Forging a niche in national and international parasitology over the past century,<br />
the Society focuses on comparative research, emphasizing taxonomy, systematics, ecology, biogeography,<br />
and faunal survey and inventory within a morphological and molecular foundation. Interdisciplinary<br />
and crosscutting, comparative parasitology links contemporary biodiversity studies with<br />
historical approaches to biogeography, ecology, and coevolution within a cohesive framework.<br />
Through its 5 meetings in the Washington area annually, and via the peer reviewed <strong>Comparative</strong><br />
<strong>Parasitology</strong> (continuing the Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington in its <strong>67</strong>th<br />
Volume), the Society actively supports and builds recognition for modern parasitological research.<br />
Taxonomic diversity represented in the pages of the Society's journal treats the rich helminth faunas<br />
in terrestrial and aquatic plants, invertebrates, arid vertebrates, as well as parasitic protozoans and<br />
arthropods. <strong>Parasitology</strong>, among the most integrative of the biological sciences, provides data critical<br />
to elucidation of general patterns of global biodiversity.<br />
THE VISION<br />
The Helminthological Society of Washington celebrates a century of tradition and excellence<br />
in global parasitology, solving challenges and responding to opportunities for the future of society<br />
and the environment.<br />
Members of the Helminthological Society of Washington contribute to understanding and protecting<br />
human health, agriculture, and the biosphere through comparative research emphasizing<br />
taxonomy, systematics, ecology, biogeography, and biodiversity assessment of all parasites. The<br />
Society projects the exceptional relevance of its programs to broader research and education in<br />
global biodiversity and conservation biology through the activities of its members and its journal,<br />
<strong>Comparative</strong> <strong>Parasitology</strong>.<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington
*Edna M. Buhrer<br />
*Mildred A. Doss<br />
*Allen Mclntosh<br />
•Jesse R. Christie<br />
^Gilbert F. Otto<br />
*George R. LaRue<br />
•William W. Cort<br />
•Gerard Dikmans<br />
•Benjamin Schwartz<br />
*Willard H. Wright<br />
*Aurel O. Foster<br />
*Carlton M. Herman<br />
*May Belle Chitwood<br />
•ElvioH. Sadun<br />
E. J. Lawson Soulsby<br />
David R. Lincicome<br />
Margaret A. Stirewalt<br />
*Leo A- Jachowski, Jr.<br />
•Horace W. Stunkard<br />
•Kenneth C. Kates<br />
•Everett E. Wehr<br />
•George R. LaRue<br />
•Vladimir S. Ershov<br />
•Norman R. Stoll<br />
•Horace W. Stunkard<br />
•Justus F. 'Mueller<br />
John F. A. Sprent<br />
Bernard Bezubik<br />
Hugh M. Gordon<br />
•W. E. Chambers<br />
•Nathan A. Cobb<br />
•Howard Crawley ,<br />
* Winthrop D. Foster<br />
•"Maurice C. Hall ,<br />
•Albert Hassall<br />
•Charles W. Stiles ,<br />
•PaulJBartsch<br />
* Henry =E. Ewing<br />
•William W. Cort '<br />
•Gerard Dikmans<br />
•Jesse R/Christie<br />
'•Gotthold Steiner<br />
•EmmettW. Price<br />
•Eloise B. Cram<br />
•Gerald Thorne<br />
•Allen Mclntosh<br />
,*Edna M::Buhrer<br />
•Benjamin G. Chitwood<br />
•Aurel O. Foster -<br />
•Gilbert F. Otto<br />
•Theodor von Brand<br />
•May Belle Chitwood<br />
•Carlton M. Herman<br />
Lloyd E/Rozeboom<br />
•Albert L. Taylor<br />
David R. Lincicome<br />
Margaret A. Stirewalt<br />
•Willard H: Wright<br />
•Benjamin Schwartz '<br />
•Mildred A. Doss.<br />
•Deceased.<br />
1960<br />
1961<br />
1962<br />
1964<br />
1965<br />
1966<br />
1966<br />
19<strong>67</strong><br />
1969<br />
1969<br />
1970<br />
1971<br />
1972<br />
1973<br />
1974<br />
1975<br />
1975<br />
1976<br />
1977<br />
1978<br />
1979<br />
*O. Wilford Olsen<br />
•Frank D. Enzie<br />
Lloyd E. Rozeboom<br />
•Leon Jacobs<br />
Harley G. Sheffield<br />
A. Morgan Golden<br />
Louis S. Diamond<br />
•Everett L. Schiller<br />
MilfordN. Lunde<br />
J. Ralph Lichtenfels<br />
A. James Haley<br />
•Francis G. Tromba<br />
Thomas K. Sawyer<br />
Ralph P. Eckerlin<br />
Willis A. Reid, Jr.<br />
Gerhard A. Schad<br />
Franklin A. Neva<br />
Burton Y. Endo<br />
Sherman S. Hendrix<br />
Frank W. Douvres -<br />
E. J. Lawson Soulsby<br />
/ Roy C. Anderson<br />
Louis Euze^<br />
John C. Holmes<br />
Purnomo<br />
NaftaleKatz<br />
^Robert Traub _<br />
* Alan F. Bird<br />
CHARTER MEMBERS 1910<br />
•*. Philip E. Garrison<br />
•Joseph Goldberger<br />
•Henry W. Graybill<br />
LIFE MEMBERS<br />
1931<br />
1931<br />
1931<br />
1937<br />
1945<br />
1952^<br />
1953<br />
1956<br />
1956<br />
1956<br />
1956<br />
1961<br />
1963<br />
1963<br />
1968<br />
.1972<br />
1972<br />
1975<br />
1975<br />
1975<br />
1975<br />
1975<br />
1976<br />
1976<br />
1976<br />
1976<br />
1977<br />
•Maurice C. Hall<br />
•Albert Hassall ,<br />
•George F. Leonard<br />
;:*Evereft E. Wehr<br />
.Marion M. Farr<br />
•JohnTXucker, Jr.<br />
cGebrge W. Luttermoser<br />
•John's. Andrews<br />
•Leo A. Jachowski, Jrc<br />
•Kenneth C. Kates<br />
•Francis G. Tromba<br />
A; James Haley<br />
•Leon Jacobs<br />
•Paul C. Beaver<br />
"•Raymond M. Cable<br />
Harry Herlieh<br />
Glenn L. Hoffman<br />
Robert E. Kuntz ; :<br />
Raymond V Rebois<br />
Frank W. Douvres<br />
A. Morgan Golden<br />
Thomas'K. Sawyer<br />
•J. Allen Scott<br />
Judith H.Shaw<br />
Milford N, Lunde<br />
•Everett L. Schiller<br />
Harley G. Sheffield<br />
Louis S. Diamond<br />
Mary Hanson Pritchard<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
1980<br />
1981<br />
1982<br />
1983<br />
1984<br />
1985<br />
1986<br />
1987<br />
1988<br />
1989<br />
1990<br />
1991<br />
1992<br />
1993<br />
1994<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
'1990<br />
1991<br />
1992<br />
1993<br />
1994<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
•Charles A. Pfender<br />
•Brayton H. Ransom<br />
•Charles W. Stiles<br />
1977<br />
1979<br />
1979<br />
1979<br />
1980<br />
1981<br />
1981<br />
1983<br />
1984<br />
1985<br />
1986<br />
1986<br />
1987<br />
_ 1988<br />
1988<br />
1988<br />
1989<br />
1989<br />
1989<br />
1990<br />
1990<br />
1991<br />
1991<br />
1991<br />
1994<br />
1994
JANUARY <strong>2000</strong><br />
CONTENTS<br />
(Continuedfrom Front Cover)<br />
NUMBER 1<br />
PEREZ-PONCE DE LEON, G., V. LEON-REGAGNON, L. GARGIA-PRIETO, U. RAZO-MENDIVEL, AND A. SANCHEZ- ;<br />
ALVAREZ. Digenean Fauna of Amphibians from Central Mexico: Nearctic and Neotropical<br />
y Influences ; . . — : '. •. i 92<br />
; , 'RESEARCH NOTES<br />
'••HANELT, B., AND J. JANOVY, JR. New Host and Distribution Record ofGordius difficilis (Nematomorpha:<br />
Gordioidea) fromua Vivid Metallic Ground Beetle, Chlaenius prasinus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from<br />
Western Nebraska, U.S.A „_____ * - : ,___ =. 107<br />
GOLDBERG, S. R., C. R. BURSEY, AND C. M. WALSER. Intestinal Helminths of Seven Species of Agamid<br />
Lizards from Australia ___ 1<br />
'.<br />
BOLETTE, D. P. Descriptions of Cystacanths of Mediorhynchus orienialis and Mediorhynchus wardi<br />
(Acanthocephala: Gigantorhynchidae) ...... . : _ :—.— _ _ 114<br />
GOLDBERG, S. R., C. R, BURSEY, AND H. CHEAM. Gastrointestinal Helminths of Four Lizard Species from<br />
•Moorea; French Polynesia _, —„_! '.—. .-—-~ _ 118<br />
WEST, M.,T.'P. SCOTT, S. R. SIMCQC, AND R. M. ELSEY. New Records of Endohelminths of the Alligator<br />
Snapping Turtle (Mdcroclemys temmincTdi) from Arkansas and Louisiana, U.S.A. ;__ .<br />
122<br />
FOSTER, G. W., P. E. MOLER,7. M. KINSELLA, S. P. TERRELL, AND D. J. FORRESTER. Parasites of Eastern<br />
Indigo Snakes (Drymarchon corais couperi) from Florida, U.S.A. , '. ~<br />
124<br />
' G ALICIA-GUERRERO, S., C. R.~BURSEY, S. R. GOLDBERG, G. SALGADO-MALDONABO. Helminths of Two<br />
Sympatric Toad Species^ JBufo marinus (Linnaeus) and Bufo marmoreus Wiegmann, 1833 (Anura:<br />
Bufonidae) from Chamela, Jalisco, Mexico ._ . . .. .". —: . 129<br />
EMERY, M. B., AND J. E. ,JOY. Endohehninths of the Ravine Salamander, Plethodon richmondi, from<br />
Southwestern West Virginia,JLJ.S.A. ._.__>. i._ .—. ,— =—. 133<br />
LADD-WILSON, S., Si BUCK, AND R. G. BOTZLER. Abomasal Parasites m Southern Mule Deer (Odocoileus<br />
hemionus fitliginatus) from Coastal San Diego County, California, U.S.A. ..__ 135<br />
ANNOUNCEMENTS<br />
OBITUARY NOTICE __„_ '. __u___: L_<br />
DIAGNOSTIC PARASITOLOGY COURSE , . ^ —<br />
-MEETING SCHEDULE OF THE HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON __.. __<br />
INTERNATIONAL CODE OF ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE (FOURTH EDITION) :„_;_.,<br />
MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT ._„/: , ,—.—.