Next Article in Journal
Experimental Study on Gas–Liquid–Solid Interaction Characteristics in the Launch Tube
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Fractional-Order PID Controller of a PMSM-Based Wave Compensation System for Offshore Ship Cranes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preliminary Evidence about the Colonisation Process of Kyphosus Species (Perciformes: Kyphosidae) in the Subtropical–Temperate Northeast Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea

by
Rafael Bañón
1,2,* and
Alejandro de Carlos
3
1
Servizo de Planificación, Consellería do Mar, Xunta de Galicia, Rúa dos Irmandiños s/n, 15701 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
2
Grupo de Estudos do Medio Mariño (GEMM), Edif. Club Naútico Bajo, 15960 Ribeira, Spain
3
Departamento de Bioquímica, Xenética e Inmunoloxía, Facultade de Bioloxía, Universidade de Vigo, Rúa Fonte das Abelleiras s/n, 36310 Vigo, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10(9), 1237; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10091237
Submission received: 18 August 2022 / Revised: 29 August 2022 / Accepted: 31 August 2022 / Published: 3 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Biology)

Abstract

:
A review of the non-native Kyphosus species historically recorded in Galician waters (north-western Spain) based on morphological and molecular characteristics is carried out. The list is composed of 15 specimens recorded from 2002 to 2022, showing a clearly unbalanced ratio in favour of K. vaigiensis with respect to K. sectatrix (6.5:1). A similar analysis was performed by consulting ichthyological literature on the Kyphosus species reported in the subtropical–temperate Northeast Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. The results seem to reflect a more recent and conspicuous appearance of K. vaigiensis in the Northeast Atlantic–Mediterranean area, suggesting a higher invasive capacity than that of its congener K. sectatrix, perhaps related to its greater mobility. DNA barcoding supports the morphological identification of K. vaigiensis from Galicia and confirms the Atlantic–Mediterranean and Indo–Pacific distribution of the species. In addition, the main distinctive morphological characters found in the ichthyological literature have been revised and the taxonomic status of one published record has been changed. The results indicate the need to monitor non-indigenous marine species in the current global warming scenario of the Anthropocene era.

1. Introduction

There is good evidence that climate change has affected the distribution and composition of marine fish communities. The rise in the sea temperature might be at the basis of the geographical spread and shifts in abundance and distribution of fishes of southern origin to more temperate waters, a process often termed “tropicalization” [1].
The family Kyphosidae contains 12 species classified in two genera, inhabiting the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific Oceans. The genus Kyphosus Lacepède 1801 consists of approximately 11 species worldwide distributed in warm waters [2]. The sea chubs Kyphosus species typically inhabit shallow waters over sandy, rocky or grassy bottoms around coral reefs, and juveniles are commonly found among floating algae or below flotsam [3].
The taxonomy of the genus Kyphosus is problematic. Two taxonomic revisions with different Atlantic–Mediterranean species proposals have been published in the last decade [2,4]. The subsequent results strongly support the species arrangement proposed by Knudsen and Clements [5], which is the one most followed in subsequent works, including the present research.
In this context, two species of Kyphosus have been reported so far in the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean: The Bermuda sea chub Kyphosus sectatrix (Linnaeus 1758), reported also as Kyphosus saltatrix (Linnaeus, 1758) or Kyphosus sectator (Linnaeus, 1758), and the brassy chub Kyphosus vaigiensis (Quoy & Gaimard 1825), reported in many cases as Kyphosus incisor (Cuvier 1831). A third species, Kyphosus bigibbus Lacepède, 1801, is also noted as probable by Knudsen and Clements [2], although no records are available.
Delimiting the different species of Kyphosus is difficult and currently based on the examination of a combination of morphological traits, such as the number of anal and dorsal soft fin rays, the scale row and gill rakers counts, colour patterns, relative body proportions and relative size and placement of fins [2]. Molecular taxonomy has been successfully implemented with the traditional morphological analysis in the systematic study of Kyphosus species in the context of an integrative taxonomy. A variety of mitochondrial markers such as COI and 16S [6], Cyt b, 12S and 16S [7], COI, Cyt b, 12S-16S [8] or COI [1,9,10,11] have been employed in the identification of the Atlantic–Mediterranean Kyphosus species.
In recent decades, the number of observations of Kyphosus species has increased in both the Mediterranean Sea and the north-eastern Atlantic Ocean, probably denoting a natural expansion of their range and an increased abundance related to climate change and warming of waters [9].
The aim of this research was to establish the identity of the specimens of the genus Kyphosus that most frequently arrive on the north-western coasts of the Iberian Peninsula. To this end, an integrative approach to taxonomy has been used, complementing morphological and molecular identifications. With the same purpose, a review of published records from the northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean areas has been carried out.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and DNA Extraction

The area studied covers the northern range of the distribution of Kyphosus species in the NE Atlantic, from Morocco to France, including the Mediterranean Sea, and with special attention to Galician waters (NW Spain). The Macaronesia region is excluded from this analysis because, although these species are presumably more frequent on these islands than on the mainland, little information is available.
Fish sampling was opportunistic, based on the report of non-directed catches made by artisanal fisheries or spear fishermen at different locations along the Galician coasts. The only criterion for the sampling method is that samples are available and willing to be donated to researchers. In the laboratory, specimens were identified at the species level following Knudsen and Clements [2]. An extensive literature search for records of the species occurring in the remaining study area was also carried out, including the main morphological distinctive characters. In this aspect, the number of dorsal and anal fin rays reported by Ligas et al. [12] is dubious (see the Discussion section) and was not considered.
Voucher specimens were deposited in the Museo de Historia Natural da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (MHN USC, Santiago de Compostela, Spain) under reference codes MHN USC-25201-1 to MHN USC-25201-5. DNA was extracted from 30 mg of muscular tissue, using the E.Z.N.A. Tissue DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, employing 100 µL of elution buffer in the final recovery step.
Abbreviations as follow: total length (TL), standard length (SL), dorsal fin rays (D), anal fin rays (A), gill rakers (GR).

2.2. Mitochondrial Sequence Data

The mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was amplified using the primer set C_FishF1t1-C_FishR1t1 [13], combined with the Phire Green Hot Start II PCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific) and 2 µL of template DNA, in a final reaction volume of 20 µL. PCR products were purified by treatment with ExoSAP-IT (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and subjected to sequencing reactions using the BigDye 3.1 cycle sequencing kit and primers M13F (-21) and M13R (-27) [14], whose products were resolved in a SeqStudio Genetic Analyzer. All information regarding these specimens including DNA barcodes, images, coordinates of capture and other complementary data are available at the Barcoding of Life Database (BOLD, www.boldsystem.org, accessed on 29 June 2022) as Process IDs FIGAL045-22 to FIGAL049-22. The COI sequences were also deposited in the GenBank repository with accession numbers ON774729 to ON774733.
The COI sequences were used, on the one hand, to validate the morphological identification of self-sampled specimens by DNA barcoding and, on the other hand, to test the possible genetic structure across individuals from different sampling sites, taking advantage of the sequences deposited in the BOLD and GenBank databases. For this purpose, a haplotype network was created by a median-joining network analysis [15] with relationships among haplotypes visualised in PopART 1.7 [16], with ε = 0, to examine genetic distances between haplotypes and their prevalence in different geographic areas. The sequences were collapsed into haplotypes using the online version of FaBox [17]. The figure was edited using the free software Inkscape (www.inkscape.org, accessed on 29 June 2022).

3. Results

The historical records of Kyphosus specimens caught in the Galician waters are shown in Table 1. A total of 15 specimens was recorded from 2002 to 2022, of which 10 are reported for the first time. Among them, only two specimens were identified as K. sectatrix, of 271 and 450 mm TL, while 13 specimens were recognised as K. vaigiensis (Figure 1), the latter ranging from 285 to 580 mm TL, and recorded from 2007 onwards. The distinctive meristic counts were D: XI + 11–12, A: III + 12 and GR: 24 and 26 for K. sectatrix and D: XI + 13–14, A: III + 12–13 and GR: 25–32 for K. vaigiensis.
Nine COI sequences from K. vaigiensis individuals caught in waters off Galicia (NW of Spain) were aligned with others retrieved from BOLD and GenBank to generate a set of 42 sequences, which were represented by 10 haplotypes. The median-joining network based on 616 nucleotide fragments does not suggest separation between the sampling sites (Figure 2). The most frequent haplotype (N = 27 sequences) is common to all geographical locations, including the north-western waters of the Iberian Peninsula, with the exception of Haiti and Malta, whose two sequences are associated with the second most common haplotype (N = 6 sequences).
The remaining historical records for the area of study are compiled in Table 2 according to the ichthyological literature. This dataset includes 26 records, of which 21 are from the Mediterranean. By species, 11 specimens of K. sectatrix and 10 of K. vaigiensis were reported in the Mediterranean area by only four and one, respectively, in the Atlantic. Sizes ranged from 195 to 610 mm TL for K. sectatrix and from 157 to 531 mm TL for K. vaigiensis. The distinctive meristic counts were D: X–XI + 11–13, A: III + 10–12 and GR: 23–27 for K. sectatrix and D: XI + 13–14, A: III + 12–13 and GR: 21–30 for K. vaigiensis.
Based on the distinctive characters reported by Knudsen and Clements [2], the record of K. sectatrix from Moroccan waters [19], with counts of D: XI + 14 and A: III + 13, should be reassigned to K. vaigiensis.
Figure 3 represents the chronology of K. vaigiensis detection in the northern Atlantic–Mediterranean range (see also Table 1 and Table 2 for details).
Table 2. Historical records of Kyphosus specimens in NE Atlantic–Mediterranean area, excluding Galician records, with its morphological characterization. TL in mm, Atl. = Atlantic Ocean, Medit. = Mediterranean Sea, K.s. = Kyphosus sectatrix, K.v. = Kyphosus vaigiensis. (*) Originally misidentifications.
Table 2. Historical records of Kyphosus specimens in NE Atlantic–Mediterranean area, excluding Galician records, with its morphological characterization. TL in mm, Atl. = Atlantic Ocean, Medit. = Mediterranean Sea, K.s. = Kyphosus sectatrix, K.v. = Kyphosus vaigiensis. (*) Originally misidentifications.
AreaYearSourceTLDAGRSpecies
Medit.1846[20]195XI + 12III + 11+ 17K.s.
Medit.1883[21]K.s.
Medit.1903[22]K.s.
Atl.2004[23]523XI + 12III + 1127K.s.
Atl.1968[19]290XI + 14III + 13 K.v. *
Atl.1993[24]610K.s.
Medit.1996[25]216XI + 12III + 1124K.s.
Medit.1998[26]310XI + 14III + 1229K.v.
Medit.2003[27]485XI + 12III + 12K.s.
Medit.2005[28]415XI + 11III + 11K.s.
Medit.2006[29]489XI + 13III + 1125K.s.
Atl.2006[24]275K.s.
Atl.2008[24]480 (SL)K.s.
Medit.2009[30]480XI + 13III + 1329K.v.
Medit.2009[12]495XI + 12?III + 11?28K.v. *
Medit.2010[31]200–250K.s.
Medit.2010[32]475XI + 12III + 1124K.s.
Medit.2011[7]265XI + 11III + 1025K.s.
Medit.2013[33]460K.v.
Medit.2013[6]475XI + 13III + 1130K.v.
Medit.2013[34]415XI + 13III + 1229K.v.
Medit.2015[8]157XI + 13III + 12K.v.
Medit.2016[10]505XI + 13III + 1221K.v.
Medit.2016[35]272XI + 14III + 1329K.v.
Medit.2018[11]531XI + 13III + 1327K.v.
Medit.2021[36]485X + 13III + 1123K.s.

4. Discussion

The colonisation of new fish species is a slow process that can take several decades; during this period, their presence in the area of arrival is scarce and sampling is opportunistic, making it difficult to obtain a large number of specimens for study. In spite of this, the observation of new species in a new area represents the first, and sometimes the only opportunity to follow and study the dynamics of colonisation; monitoring the spread is crucial to understanding how a new species arrives, tracking its movements and developments and recognising the impact that it may have [37].
The morphology of K. vaigiensis and K. sectatrix is similar, so that they are indistinguishable in the field, but can be easily identified by the dorsal and anal soft ray counts, and the number of gill rakers [38]. Following Knudsen and Clements [2], K. vaigiensis has D: X–XI + 13–15, A: III + 12–14 and GR: 21–33, while K. sectatrix has D: X–XI + 11–12, A: III + 10–12 and GR: 19–26. The counts reported in this study agree in general terms with these ranges with some exception. The 13 soft rays in the dorsal [29] and 27 gill rakers [23] for K. sectatrix, and the 11 soft rays in the anal for K. vaigiensis [6] are slightly out of range.
Misidentifications or dubious identifications are also not uncommon. The K. sectatrix specimen reported by Ligas et al. [12] should be re-identified as K. vaigiensis, based on the molecular sequences, the gill rakers re-count and the photo image obtained from this specimen [2]. However, the number of dorsal and anal fin rays of this specimen has not been re-counted, as the counts given in the original manuscript by Ligas et al. [12] correspond to a K. sectatrix species. Doubts also exists in the identification of a K. sectatrix specimen by Canas et al. [23], which resembles a K. bigibbus one [2]. The specimen of K. sectatrix (reported as K. saltatrix) off Benghazi (Libya) reported by Elbaraasi et al. [32] looks rather like K. vaigiensis [10], but morphological data do not support this change, since the reported counts (D: XI + 12; A: II + 11; GR: 24) are well in range established for K. sectatrix by Knudsen and Clements [2].
The chronology of the findings of the two species of Kyphosus in the Mediterranean Sea shows that the oldest species that inhabited it is K. sectatrix, recorded for the first time in 1846 [20], more than a century ago, while the presence of K. vaigiensis seems to be a recent and perhaps invasive phenomenon [39]. In this sense, the first record of K. vaigiensis in the Mediterranean Sea occurred in 1998 [26], and since then and until 2016, four more records of K. vaigiensis were reported from across the Mediterranean [10], increasing up to 10 specimens if records are extended to the present, according to our revision.
Due to the scarcity of individual Kyphosus records, the chronology in the Atlantic area is unclear. Dessouter [40] reported K. sectatrix from the south of Morocco to the Gulf of Guinea, whereas K. vaigiensis was only recorded in Angola and Sao Tiago Island. More recently, Sakai and Nakabo [41] reported a similar distribution range for both species, although with different taxonomic names, from Morocco, throughout Madeira, the Canary Islands and Cape Verde Islands, including Ascension and southwards of Angola, adding also the Ascension and St Helena Islands for K. sectatrix. However, contrary to this range, K. vaigiensis, for example, is not recorded in the Canary Islands [42].
The haplotype network compiled from COI sequences of K. vaigiensis specimens captured in the Atlantic waters of the Iberian Peninsula, and publicly available sequences in databases, confirm the cosmopolitan character previously established for this species [2], with two haplotypes common to almost 80% of the individuals sampled worldwide, including specimens from the Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea.
The molecular results support and validate the distinctive morphological characters reported by Knudsen and Clements [2] for K. vaigiensis. Therefore, the misidentified Moroccan record of this species in 1968 [15] would be its earliest record at the northernmost range, probably signalling the initial colonisation process, in chronological agreement with the first subsequent occurrences in Mediterranean in 1998 [26] and in Atlantic European waters in 2007.
Considering the chronology of occurrence of the species and the fact that the K. vaigiensis records have outnumbered the ones from K. sectatrix in the last decades, a more recent and rapid colonisation of K. vaigiensis in its northern range seems plausible.
The fact that tropically derived taxa such as K. sectatrix and K. vaigiensis can be found in temperate macroalgal-dominated habitats supports arguments that tropical species have maintained a capacity for geographically extensive dispersal and an ability to colonize highly variable environments [43]. Regarding this, differences in mobility behaviour between the two species could be behind the ability to colonise new habitats. Mobility of fishes defines the distribution and abundance of their populations and occurs on a range of spatial and temporal scales [44]. Kyphosus sectatrix is a sedentary species, with a minimal activity space largely restricted to reef habitats [45]. In contrast, K. vaigiensis shows expansive movements along inshore habitats that do not seem to be influenced by habitat contiguity or limited by habitat breaks [46].
One of the predicted effects of global warming has to do with increased variability in the abundance and distribution of living beings, although for the observation of these patterns, information at the temporal and geographical scales is often not available [46]. The design of future natural scenarios will depend to a large extent on the ability to identify the species involved in these redistribution processes and the speed at which they are occurring [37]. This information is also essential for the development of new biogeographical patterns to replace the current ones [47].

Author Contributions

Sampling: R.B.; Conceptualization, R.B. and A.d.C.; methodology, R.B. and A.d.C.; formal analysis, R.B. and A.d.C.; writing—original draft preparation, R.B. and A.d.C.; writing—review and editing, R.B. and A.d.C.; funding acquisition, A.d.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Aejandro de Carlos is partially funded by the GRC programme of the Xunta de Galicia (ED431C 2019/28).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank to all the collaborators, fishermen, technical assistants and spearfishes for their kind donation of the Kyphosus specimens.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bañón, R.; Caballero-Huertas, M.; Alonso-Fernández, A.; Barros-García, D.; Otero, J.; de Carlos, A. Signals of changes in the ichthyofauna composition of Galician waters (NW Iberian Peninsula). Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2020, 39, 101435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Knudsen, S.W.; Clements, K.D. Revision of the fish family Kyphosidae (Teleostei: Perciformes). Zootaxa 2013, 3751, 1–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tortonese, E. Kyphosidae. In Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean; Whitehead, P.J.P., Bauchot, M.-L., Hureau, J.-C., Nielsen, J., Tortonese, E., Eds.; UNESCO: Paris, France, 1986; Volume 2, pp. 883–907. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sakai, K.; Nakabo, T. Taxonomic review of Kyphosus (Pisces: Kyphosidae) in the Atlantic and Eastern Pacific Oceans. Ichthyol. Res. 2014, 61, 265–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gilbert, C.R. Designation of a neotype for the kyphosid fish Kyphosus sectatrix (Linnaeus, 1758). Zootaxa 2015, 3999, 295–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mannino, A.M.; Balistreri, P.; Iaciofano, D.; Galil, B.S.; Brutto, S.L. An additional record of Kyphosus vaigiensis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1825) (Osteichthyes, Kyphosidae) from Sicily clarifies the confused situation of the Mediterranean kyphosids. Zootaxa 2015, 3963, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kiparissis, S.; Loukovitis, D.; Batargias, C. First record of the Bermuda sea chub Kyphosus saltatrix (Pisces: Kyphosidae) in Greek waters. Mar. Biodivers. Rec. 2012, 5, e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vella, N.; Vella, A.; Agius, D.S. The first record of the lowfin chub Kyphosus vaigiensis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1825) from Malta. J. Black Sea Medit. Environ. 2016, 22, 175–181. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bañón, R.; Barros-García, D.; de Carlos, A. Integrative taxonomy supports the presence of two species of Kyphosus (Perciformes: Kyphosidae) in Atlantic European waters. Sci. Mar. 2017, 81, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goren, M.; Galil, B.S.; Gevili, R.; Stern, N. First record of the Brassy Chub Kyphosus vaigiensis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1825) in the Eastern Mediterranean (Osteichthyes: Perciformes: Kyphosidae). Zool. Middle East 2016, 62, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kiyağa, V.B.; Mavruk, S.; Özyurt, C.E.; Akamca, E.; Coşkun, C. Range extension of Kyphosus vaigiensis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1825) in the northeastern Mediterranean, İskenderun Bay, Turkey. Turk. J. Zool. 2019, 43, 644–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ligas, A.; Sartor, P.; Sbrana, M.; de Ranieri, S. A new record of Kyphosus saltatrix (Pisces: Kyphosidae) along the Italian coasts (north-western Mediterranean). Mar. Biodivers. Rec. 2011, 4, e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ivanova, N.V.; Zemlak, T.S.; Hanner, R.H.; Hebert, P.D.N. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2007, 7, 544–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Messing, J. New M13 vectors for cloning. Meth. Enzimol. 1983, 101, 20–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bandelt, H.; Forster, P.; Röhl, A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Leigh, J.W.; Bryant, D. PopART: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015, 6, 1110–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Villesen, P. FaBox: An online toolbox for fasta sequences. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2007, 7, 965–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bañón, R. New records of two southern fish in Galician waters (NW Spain). Cybium 2004, 28, 367–368. [Google Scholar]
  19. Collignon, J. Kyphosus sectatrix, poisson nouveau pour le faune marrocaine. Bull. Inst. Pech. Marit. Maroc 1971, 18, 71–75. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dulcic, J.; Ahnelt, H. On validity of the record of the Bermuda sea chub Kyphosus sectator (Kyphosidae) from the Adriatic sea. Period. Biol. 2006, 108, 231–233. [Google Scholar]
  21. Doderlein, P. Rinvenimento di un pesce dell’esotico Genere Pimelepterus, Lac. nelle acque del Golfo di Palermo. Nat. Sicil. 1884, 3, 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ariola, V. Pesci nuovi o rari per il golfo di Genova. Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Giacomo Doria 1904, 3, 153–168. [Google Scholar]
  23. Canas, A.; Vasconcelos, P.; Lino, P.G.; Santos, M.N. Northernmost record of Kyphosus sectator (Osteichthyes: Perciformes: Kyphosidae) in the north-eastern Atlantic. J. Mar. Biolog. Assoc. U. K. 2005, 85, 1535–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Quéro, J.C.; Spitz, J.; Vayne, J.J.; Auby, I.; de Casamajor, M.N.; Leaute, J.P.; Marie, F.; Monhurel, L.; Quinquis, J. Observations ichtyologiques effectuées en 2008. Ann. Soc. Sci. Nat. Charente Marit. 2009, 9, 932–940. [Google Scholar]
  25. Merella, P.; Massutí, E.; Deudero, S. On the occurrence of Kyphosus sectator (Osteichthyes, Kyphosidae) in the western Mediterranean. J. Mar. Biolog. Assoc. U. K. 1998, 78, 687–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Azzurro, E.; Peñas-Rivas, L.; Lloris, D.; Bariche, M. First documented occurrence of Kyphosus incisor in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Biodivers. Rec. 2013, 6, e98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hemida, F.; Kanoun, N.; Golani, D.; Ben Souissi, J.; Guelorget, O.; Capapé, C. Records of the Bermuda sea chub, Kyphosus sectator (Linnaeus, 1758) (Osteichthyes: Kyphosidae) from the coastal waters of Algeria (southern Mediterranean). Ann. Ser. Hist. Nat. 2004, 14, 49–52. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hattour, A. Premiére observation de la calicagère blanche Kyphosus sectatrix (Linnaeus, 1758) sur les côtes tunisienes. Bull. Inst. Natl. Sci. Tech. Oceanogr. Peche Salammbo 2006, 33, 123–125. [Google Scholar]
  29. Francour, P.; Mouine, N. First record of Kyphosus sectator (Kyphosidae) along the French Mediterranean coast. Cybium 2008, 32, 275–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Orsi Relini, L.; Rosa Costa, M.; Relini, M. First record of the yellow sea chub Kyphosus incisor in the Mediterranean. Mar. Biodivers. Rec. 2010, 3, e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lelong, P. A new record of Bermuda sea chub, Kyphosus saltatrix (Linnaeus, 1758) (Osteichthyes, Kyphosidae) from Galite Islands (Tunisia, southern Mediterranean). Mar. Life 2012, 18, 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  32. Elbaraasi, H.; Bograra, O.; Elsilini, O.; Bojwari, J. First record of the bermuda sea chub, Kyphosus saltatrix (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Kyphosidae), in the coastal waters of Libya. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 2013, 43, 251–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Peña-Rivas, L.; Azzurro, E.; Bilecenoglu, M.; Alfaya, J.E.F.; Baldacconi, R.; Boyaci, Y.Ö.; Circosta, V.; Compagno, L.J.V.; Coppola, F.; Deidun, A.; et al. A new record of Kyphosus incisor for the Mediterranean Sea. In New Mediterranean Marine Biodiversity records (December 2013). Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2013, 14, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Groud, L.L.; Chaoui, L.; Kara, M.H. A new record of the brassy chub, Kyphosus vaigiensis (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Kyphosidae), from the Mediterranean Sea. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 2021, 51, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Michailidis, N.; Rousou, M.; Gerovasileiou, V.; Akel, E.; Akyol, O.; Alongi, G.; Azevedo, F.; Babali, N.; Bakiu, R.; Bariche, M.; et al. First record of the brassy chub Kyphosus vaigiensis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1825) from Cyprus. In New Mediterranean Biodiversity Records (July 2017). Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2017, 18, 373–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pey, A.; Ventura, P.; Manunza, B.; Marcos, C.; Mavrič, B.; Mavruk, S.; Mutlu, E.; Özvarol, Y.; Papadimitriou, E.; Pešić, A.; et al. New record of the genus Kyphosus along the French Mediterranean coast. In New records of rare species in the Mediterranean Sea (May 2022). Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2022, 23, 422–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Azzurro, E. Unusual occurrences of fish in the Mediterranean Sea: An insight into early detection. In Fish Invasions of the Mediterranean Sea: Change and Renewal; Golani, D., Appelbaum-Golani, B., Eds.; Pensoft Publishers: Sofia, Bulgaria; Moscow, Russia, 2010; pp. 99–126. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nemeth, R.S.; Kadison, E. Temporal patterns and behavioral characteristics of aggregation formation and spawning in the Bermuda chub (Kyphosus sectatrix). Coral Reefs 2013, 32, 1067–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lo Brutto, S. The Case of a Rudderfish Highlights the Role of Natural History Museums as Sentinels of Bio-invasions. Zootaxa 2017, 4254, 382–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Desoutter, M. Kyphosidae. In Checklist of the Fishes of the Eastern Tropical Atlantic; Quéro, J.C., Hureau, J.C., Karrer, C., Post, A., Saldanha, L., Eds.; UNESCO: Paris, France, 1990; Volume 2, pp. 831–833. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sakai, K.; Nakabo, T. Kyphosidae. In The Living Marine Resources of the Eastern Central Atlantic; Carpenter, K.E., De Angelis, N., Eds.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2016; Volume 4, pp. 2680–2685. [Google Scholar]
  42. Báez, C.; Rodríguez-Cabello, C.; Bañón, R.; Brito, A.; Falcón, J.M.; Maño, T.; Baro, J.; Macías, D.; Meléndez, M.J.; Camiñas, J.A.; et al. Updating the national checklist of marine fishes in Spanish waters: An approach to priority hotspots and lessons for conservation. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2019, 20, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Knudsen, S.W.; Choat, J.H.; Clements, K.D. The herbivorous fish family Kyphosidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) represents a recent radiation from higher latitudes. J. Biogeogr. 2019, 46, 2067–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Currey, L.M.; Heupel, M.R.; Simpfendorfer, C.A.; Williams, A.J. Sedentary or mobile? Variability in space and depth use of an exploited coral reef fish. Mar. Biol. 2014, 161, 2155–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Eristhee, N.; Oxenford, H.A. Home range size and use of space by Bermuda chub Kyphosus sectatrix (L.) in two marine reserves in the Soufriere Marine Management Area, St Lucia, West Indies. J. Fish Biol. 2001, 59, 129–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sakihara, T.S.; Nishiura, L.K.; Shimoda, T.E.; Shindo, T.T.; Nishimoto, R.T. Brassy chubs Kyphosus vaigiensis display unexpected trans-island movement along inshore habitats. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2015, 98, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pajuelo, J.G.; González, J.A.; Triay-Portella, R.; Martín, J.A.; Ruiz-Díaz, R.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Luque, A. Introduction of non-native marine fish species to the Canary Islands waters through oil platforms as vectors. J. Mar. Syst. 2016, 163, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Kyphosus vaigiensis MHN USC-25201-4, 580 mm TL caught in Galician waters.
Figure 1. Kyphosus vaigiensis MHN USC-25201-4, 580 mm TL caught in Galician waters.
Jmse 10 01237 g001
Figure 2. Haplotype network of COI sequences of Kyphosus vaigiensis (N = 42). Median-joining network (ε = 0) created in PopART v1.7. Each circle represents a haplotype; the size of circles corresponds to the number of individuals with the haplotype. Colours indicate sampling sites. Bars indicate the number of mutations between two haplotypes. The samples from Spain are of Atlantic origin (Galicia), and those from the United States come from Hawaii.
Figure 2. Haplotype network of COI sequences of Kyphosus vaigiensis (N = 42). Median-joining network (ε = 0) created in PopART v1.7. Each circle represents a haplotype; the size of circles corresponds to the number of individuals with the haplotype. Colours indicate sampling sites. Bars indicate the number of mutations between two haplotypes. The samples from Spain are of Atlantic origin (Galicia), and those from the United States come from Hawaii.
Jmse 10 01237 g002
Figure 3. Distribution map of Kyphosus vaigiensis showing the chronology of detection from subtropical to temperate Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea.
Figure 3. Distribution map of Kyphosus vaigiensis showing the chronology of detection from subtropical to temperate Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea.
Jmse 10 01237 g003
Table 1. Historical records of Kyphosus specimens in Galician waters (NW Spain) with its morphological and molecular characterization. TL in mm, K.s. = Kyphosus sectatrix, K.v. = Kyphosus vaigiensis.
Table 1. Historical records of Kyphosus specimens in Galician waters (NW Spain) with its morphological and molecular characterization. TL in mm, K.s. = Kyphosus sectatrix, K.v. = Kyphosus vaigiensis.
YearSourceTLDAGRGenBankSpecies
2002[18]271XI + 12III + 1226K.s.
2007This manuscript285XI + 13III + 1328K.v.
2007This manuscript314XI + 14III + 1328K.v.
2010This manuscript311XI + 13III + 1328K.v.
2011This manuscript320XI + 13III + 1231K. v.
2013[9]450XI + 11III + 1224KT780867K. s.
2014[9]482XI + 14III + 1332KP116934K. v.
2014[9]280XI + 14III + 1332KP116935K. v.
2018[1]450XI + 14III + 1328MH980022K. v.
2019This manuscript519XI + 13III + 1229K. v.
2021This manuscript518XI + 14III + 1225ON774733K. v.
2021This manuscript485XI + 13III + 1228ON774731K. v.
2021This manuscript505XI + 13III + 1330ON774730K. v.
2022This manuscript580XI + 14III + 1329ON774732K. v.
2022This manuscript486XI + 14III + 1326ON774729K. v.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bañón, R.; de Carlos, A. Preliminary Evidence about the Colonisation Process of Kyphosus Species (Perciformes: Kyphosidae) in the Subtropical–Temperate Northeast Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10091237

AMA Style

Bañón R, de Carlos A. Preliminary Evidence about the Colonisation Process of Kyphosus Species (Perciformes: Kyphosidae) in the Subtropical–Temperate Northeast Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022; 10(9):1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10091237

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bañón, Rafael, and Alejandro de Carlos. 2022. "Preliminary Evidence about the Colonisation Process of Kyphosus Species (Perciformes: Kyphosidae) in the Subtropical–Temperate Northeast Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10, no. 9: 1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10091237

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop