558649
HOL0010.1177/0959683614558649The HoloceneKahn et al.
research-article2014
Research paper
Mid- to late Holocene landscape change and
anthropogenic transformations on Mo‘orea,
Society Islands: A multi-proxy approach
The Holocene
2015, Vol. 25(2) 333–347
© The Author(s) 2014
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0959683614558649
hol.sagepub.com
Jennifer G Kahn,1 Cordelia Nickelsen,2 Janelle Stevenson,3 Nick
Porch,4 Emilie Dotte-Sarout,5 Carl C Christensen,6 Lauren May,7
J Stephen Athens8 and Patrick V Kirch9
Abstract
Archaeology’s ability to generate long-term datasets of natural and human landscape change positions the discipline as an inter-disciplinary bridge between
the social and natural sciences. Using a multi-proxy approach combining archaeological data with palaeoenvironmental indicators embedded in coastal
sediments, we outline millennial timescales of lowland landscape evolution in the Society Islands. Geomorphic and cultural histories for four coastal zones
on Mo‘orea are reconstructed based on stratigraphic records, sedimentology, pollen analysis, and radiocarbon determinations from mid- to late Holocene
contexts. Prehuman records of the island’s flora and fauna are described utilizing landsnail, insect, and botanical data, providing a palaeo-backdrop for later
anthropogenic change. Several environmental processes, including sea level change, island subsidence, and anthropogenic alterations, leading to changes in
sedimentary budget have operated on Mo‘orea coastlines from c. 4600 to 200 BP. We document significant transformation of littoral and lowland zones
which obscured earlier human activities and created significant changes in vegetation and other biota. Beginning as early as 440 BP (1416–1490 cal. AD),
a major phase of sedimentary deposition commenced which can only be attributed to anthropogenic effects. At several sites, between 1.8 and 3.0 m of
terrigenous sediments accumulated within a span of two to three centuries due to active slope erosion and deposition on the coastal flats. This phase
correlates with the period of major inland expansion of Polynesian occupation and intensive agriculture on the island, indicated by the presence of
charcoal throughout the sediments, including wood charcoal from several economically important tree species.
Keywords
charcoal, Eastern Polynesia, geomorphology, human-induced landscape change, landsnails, multi-proxy, plant macrofossils, pollen, Society Islands,
subfossil insects
Received 19 May 2014; revised manuscript accepted 9 September 2014
Introduction
Environmental archaeology plays a key role in understanding
long-term human-ecological impacts. Archaeology’s increasing
ability to provide long-term datasets of natural and human landscape change has positioned the discipline as an inter-disciplinary
bridge between the social and natural sciences (Kirch, 2005; Sandweiss and Kelley, 2012; Van der Leeuw and Redman, 2002). By
utilizing multiple lines of proxy indicators of past environmental
conditions and social processes embedded within archaeological
sediments, archaeological studies have revealed decadal and millennial timescales of landscape system behavior (Cremaschi et al.,
2014; Dearing, 2008; Lubos et al., 2013). Extending temporal timescales through palaeoenvironmental analyses provides a strong
context within which to analyze long-term trends and temporal
scales of climatic, landscape, and social change and to parse out
causality, whether natural or anthropogenic (Dearing et al., 2012;
Kelley, 2014; Kirch et al., 2004; Rosen and Rivera-Collazo, 2012;
Van der Leeuw, 1998; Varien et al., 2007; Wilkinson et al., 2007).
Furthermore, there is increased recognition that understanding
environmental and climatic change in the present can benefit from
analyses of past human–environment interactions (Fisher, 2005;
Fisher and Feinman, 2005; Ford and Nigh, 2009).
Here, we present an array of multi-proxy data for Mo‘orea
Island in the Society Islands to outline its mid- to late Holocene
environmental history over a period that spans prehuman and
post-colonization phases. (Polynesian arrival is estimated to be no
later than c. 950 BP.) Limited prior palaeoenvironmental and
archaeological research on Mo‘orea suggests that stratified evidence for early Polynesian land use would be found within recent
1Department
2Oceanic
of Anthropology, College of William & Mary, USA
Archaeology Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley,
USA
3SCHL,
College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University,
Australia
4School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Australia
5School of Social Sciences, University of Western Australia, Australia
6Department of Natural Sciences, Bishop Museum, USA
7Cultural Surveys Hawai’i, USA
8International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc., USA
9Departments of Anthropology and Integrative Biology, University of
California, Berkeley, USA
Corresponding author:
Jennifer G Kahn, Department of Anthropology, College of William &
Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23185, USA.
Email: jgkahn01@wm.edu
334
The Holocene 25(2)
(b)
(a)
Reef
C
B
Pihaena Point
D
342
Mo’orea
50 m
tre
am
N
Va
iom
aS
341
0
3
0
1
Kilometers
Kilometers
150
(d)
50
ef
(c)
Re
’Opunohu
Bay
m
50
m
m
ea
Str
hu
no
pu
’O
50
343
0
15
0
250
m
0.5
0
0
25
Kilometers
346
0
15
0.5
Kilometers
Figure 1. (a) Map of Mo’orea, with context of main research sites and transects, (b) close-up of site context and transects for ScMo-341, 342,
(c) close-up of site context and transect for ScMo-343, (d) ScMo-346 trench.
coastal alluvial and colluvial deposits (Green et al., 1967; Hamilton and Kahn, 2007; Kahn, 2012; Lepofsky, 1995; Lepofsky
et al., 1992, 1996; Pirazzoli et al., 1985). Lepofsky et al. (1992)
demonstrated significant effects of Polynesian land use in the
‘Opunohu Valley, including forest clearance and erosion deriving
from intensive inland cultivation.
In 2011, we sampled subsurface depositional contexts at four
localities around the lowlands of Mo‘orea. Our overarching goal
was to integrate diverse lines of proxy data to provide evidence
for geomorphological transformations of the island’s littoral and
lowland zones from c. 4600 to 200 BP, including changes in vegetation and other biota, which we outline in a four-phase sequence.
The early palaeo-sequence combines geomorphological data with
analyses of insects, landsnails, and botanical specimens to reconstruct the mid- to late Holocene environment encountered by
colonizing Polynesian populations c. 1000 BP. The post 1000 BP
portion of our sequence focuses on anthropogenic contributions
to sedimentation as well as biotic changes because of animal and
plant translocation and human landscape use, most notably, slash
and burn agriculture. Comparison of palaeo-period and Polynesian period data indicate a history of over 4000 years of landscape
change, both natural and anthropogenic, with the anthropogenic
(Polynesian settlement) period associated with greatly accelerated patterns of change.
Mo‘orea Island: Environmental
setting
Mo‘orea, along with Tahiti, forms part of the Windward group of
the Society Islands, a linear, age-progressive, volcanic chain
(Figure 1). The island’s shield volcano emerged between 1.51
and 1.72 Ma; volcanic activity ceased c. 1.36 Ma (Maury et al.,
2000). Subsequent faulting, caldera collapse, and subaerial erosion led to the dissected topography evident today. The two largest amphitheatre-headed valleys, ‘Opunohu and Paopao, have
permanent streams emptying into deep bays formed by drowned
valleys which were down-cut during late Pleistocene periods of
lower sea level.
An extensive system of fringing and barrier reefs surrounds
Mo‘orea, with deep passes at the heads of ‘Opunohu and Paopao
(Cook’s) Bays. The formation of coastal lowlands with calcareous
sediments derived from these reefs is dependent upon interactions
between eustatic sea level fluctuations, local tectonics, and changing local sediment budgets including the effects of human land
use. Across the central Pacific, a variety of geomorphological
indicators and radiometric dating supports an inferred peak high
stand of c. +1 m between 4 and 6000 years ago. Model predictions
for the Windward Society Islands put the mid-Holocene hydroisostatic emergence at 2.3–2.7 m, while observed palaeo-shoreline indicators suggest an actual high stand of 0.5 m (Dickinson,
2001: Table 1). Dickinson projects a thermal subsidence rate of
0.026–0.029 mm/yr or less (Dickinson, 2001: Section 5.2.3 Table
2) for the archipelago, a rate that would affect coastal archaeological sites. Thermal isostatic subsidence after the mid-Holocene
peak would have increased the quantity of calcareous, reefderived sediments available to be transported across the reef flats,
increasing the sediment budget for the island’s littoral zone.
Relative sea level in the Society Islands may also have been
influenced by subsidence. Subsidence of Tahiti and Mo‘orea is
dominated by isostatic point loading at the active hotspot volcano
335
Kahn et al.
Table 1. AMS radiocarbon dates.
Beta-#
Site
Unit
Layer
Depth (cmbs)
Material
Conventional Age
δ C13
337215
341
TP1
V
254
Cocos nucifera endocarp
3210 ± 30 BP
−24.4
308005
341
TP1
VI
270
Pandanus drupe
2430 ± 30 BP
−25.8
308007
341
TP1
VII
300
Cocos nucifera endocarp
4640 ± 30 BP
−25.7
308006
341
TP1
VII
309
Pandanus drupe
4650 ± 30 BP
−27.1
321016
342
TP1
II
47–52
Hibiscus tiliaceus wood
60 ± 30 BP
−27.0
321018
342
TP2
IV
275
Pandanus drupe
3740 ± 30 BP
−28.7
321017
308008
342
342
TP2
TP1
V
V
230–250
270
Cocos nucifera endocarp
Pandanus drupe
310 ± 30 BP
3030 ± 30 BP
−23.0
−23.9
309302
342
TP1
V
272
Aleurites moluccana endocarp
440 ± 30 BP
−22.4
308009
308010
342
343
TP1
TP2
V
IIIa
275
125
Cocos nucifera endocarp
Aleurites moluccana endocarp
3120 ± 30 BP
250 ± 30 BP
−25.7
−22.6
308011
343
TP2
IV
128–130
Pandanus drupe
4610 ± 30 BP
−28.2
312349
346
BH1
Peat deposit
190–200
Persicaria sp. seeds
140 ± 30 BP
−27.8
308012
348
TP1
II
78
Aleurites moluccana endocarp
120 ± 30 BP
−22.9
321534
349
TP2
II
65
Unidentified nutshell
126.2 ± 0.5 pMC
−25.6
of Mehetia (Dickinson, 2001). Excavations along the northern
coast of Mo‘orea at Papetoa’i (Figure 1) exposed submerged
archaeological deposits 0.25–.30 m below sea level which were
dated to the 13th–15th centuries (Green et al., 1967: 182).
An additional factor contributing to late Holocene sediment
budgets on Mo‘orea would have been the nature of the island’s
vegetation. Today, native forest dominated by endemic and
indigenous taxa is confined to the higher ridges and peaks. The
valley interiors and lower slopes are covered in a secondary
growth mixture of Polynesian and European-introduced species,
while the coastal vegetation is dominated by economic and
ornamental plants (e.g. Cocos nucifera, Artocarpus altilis, and
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis) along with widespread Pacific littoral
taxa (e.g. Cordia subcordata, Calophyllum inophyllum, and
Heliotropium foertherianum). In contrast, during the pre-contact
period, particularly during the 17th–18th centuries, at the height
of Polynesian occupation and land use, much of the island’s
interior was under intensive cultivation, as demonstrated by
archaeological and palaeobotanical studies of the ‘Opunohu
Valley (Kahn et al., 2014; Lepofsky, 2003; Lepofsky et al.,
1996). One objective of our study was to obtain evidence for
changes in littoral zone and lowland vegetation from the period
prior to human settlement up to European contact in the late
18th century.
Calibrated Age
1594–1588 BC (0.9%)
1532–1418 BC (94.5%)
730–691 BC (7.4%)
660–650 BC (1.4%)
544–398 BC (86.6%)
3516–3396 BC (77.9%)
3386–3358 BC (17.5%)
3517–3396 BC (80.9%)
3386–3362 BC (14.5%)
AD 1692–1728 (23.1%)
AD 1811–1920 (72.3%)
2274–2256 BC (3.3%)
2209–2035 BC (92.1%)
AD 1485–1650 (95.4%)
1396–1195 BC (94.9%)
1139–1134 BC (0.5%)
AD 1416–1490 (94.0%)
AD 1602–1610 (1.4%)
1450–1291 BC (95.4%)
AD 1521–1575 (14.6%)
AD 1585–1590 (0.4%)
AD 1626–1679 (55.2%)
AD 1764–1800 (21.3%)
1938– … (4.0%)
3510–3426 BC (57.9%)
3382–3339 BC (36.8%)
3204–3196 BC (0.7%)
AD 1669–1780 (43.1%)
AD 1798–1891 (36.8%)
AD 1908–1944 (15.5%)
AD 1678–1764 (32.6%)
AD 1800–1940 (62.8%)
AD 1686–1698 (11.4%)
AD 1726–1733 (4.1%)
AD 1806–1815 (8.4%)
AD 1834–1879 (52.8%)
AD 1916–1929 (18.7%)
The timing of Polynesian arrival in the Society Islands has
been a matter of debate (Allen, 2014; Anderson and Sinoto,
2002; Kahn, 2012; Kirch, 1986; Mulrooney et al., 2011;
Wilmshurst et al., 2011). A recent synthesis (Lepofsky and
Kahn, 2011) posits initial settlement of the Society archipelago
c. AD 1050–1150 BP, while strict chronometric analyses have
proposed a later settlement date c. 830–925 BP (Wilmshurst
et al., 2011). In either scenario, initial settlement is likely to
have been restricted to the coastal lowlands. Inland expansion
intensified after 700 BP, when agricultural terrace complexes
were constructed (Lepofsky, 1994). By 550 BP, there is substantial archaeological evidence for well-developed communities in
interior valleys such as the ‘Opunohu (Green, 1996; Kahn,
2005a, 2007; Kahn and Kirch, 2013). Peak population, marked
by chiefly control of surplus production and elaborate temples,
occurred after 350 BP (Kahn, 2011, 2013; Kahn and Kirch,
2011; Sharp et al., 2010).
The ‘Opunohu Valley has the most robust dataset in the Society archipelago relating to human land use and settlement patterns
(Emory, 1933, Green et al., 1967; Kahn, 2005b, 2006, 2011; Kahn
and Kirch, 2011, 2013; Lepofsky, 1994; Lepofsky et al., 1992,
1996; Lepofsky and Kahn, 2011; Sharp et al., 2010). Based on
stratigraphic and palaeoethnobotanical evidence, Lepofsky et al.
(1996) argued that vegetation clearance and burning associated
336
with shifting cultivation in the ‘Opunohu uplands led to massive
erosion and deposition of sediments on the valley floor. Direct
evidence for initial anthropogenic use of the ‘Opunohu Valley
alluvial flat (charcoal from a hearth) was dated to 750–950 BP.
Parkes (1997) analyzed sediment cores from Lake Temae and
dated changes thought to represent initial colonization to 960–
1260 BP. Our project is analyzing and dating newly taken cores
from Lake Temae which also suggest initial anthropogenic impact
on sedimentation and vegetation after 1250 BP. Additional evidence for early Polynesian settlement comes from excavations at
the GS-1 site near Pihaena point opposite the pass into Paopao
Bay (Kahn, 2012). A sample of Hibiscus tiliaceus wood in the
lowest cultural deposit at GS-1 was AMS dated to 870–950 BP.
Materials and methods
Coastal transects, coring, and test excavations
Four localities (sites ScMo-341, ScMo-342, ScMo-343, and
ScMo-346) were selected for transect coring and test excavations,
three along the northern shore on the headlands between ‘Opunohu Bay and Paopao (Cook’s) Bay, and one in the alluvial bottomlands of the ‘Opunohu Valley (Figure 1). These locales
represent two contrastive depositional environments, the first
across from barrier reefs and major passes where there was likely
to be major input of calcareous sediments of marine origin, the
second at the base of the island’s largest valley where the main
sedimentary input was inland terrigenous sources.
Transects were laid out at ScMo-341, ScMo-342, and ScMo343 from the base of the colluvial slopes to the lagoon shore. Coring with a bucket auger proceeded at 10- to 20-m intervals along
each transect. Sediments were screened through 1/8 and 1/16 inch
mesh; all artifacts and faunal materials were quantified on standardized forms. Bulk sediment samples were retained for extraction of landsnails and for archival purposes. Based on the augering
data, we developed predictions of areas with the densest subsurface cultural deposits, which were then opened up for detailed
investigation by excavation of 1 m × 1 m test pits or by larger
block excavations and trenches via backhoe excavation. These
test pits and backhoe trenches allowed us to view broader stratigraphic profiles and to conduct additional pollen and sediment
sampling.
Stratigraphy and radiocarbon dating
After cleaning, stratigraphic profiles of each excavation unit were
drawn to scale (Figure 2). Observations were made of lithology,
color, and texture for each stratum. Systematic sediment samples
were collected for laboratory analysis.
A total of 15 samples of wood charcoal and macrobotanical
remains were collected from the archaeological deposits, identified to species by Emilie Dotte-Sarout, and submitted to Beta
Analytic for AMS dating (Table 1). Where possible, fast-maturing
reproductive parts, such as fruits, nuts, and seeds, were chosen for
dating, in order to eliminate the ‘old wood’ problem of inbuilt age
(Allen and Huebert, 2014; Rieth and Athens, 2013). Calibration
of 14C ages was carried out with OxCal program 4.2 (Bronk
Ramsey, 2009).
Wood charcoal identification
Wood charcoal fragments from screened deposits and subsurface
features at ScMo-341 and ScMo-342 were collected for taxonomic identification. Anatomical features were described after
Wheeler et al. (1989), using Dotte-Sarout’s (2010) Pacific Wood
Anatomy Database and reference collection. Sampling and interpretations refer to anthracology principles (Théry-Parisot et al.,
2010). Some assemblages were of limited size: ScMo-341 TP1
The Holocene 25(2)
samples were relatively rich with 101 and 112 identifiable fragments for Layers II and III; ScMo-342 TP1 samples yielded only
39 and 32 identifiable fragments for Layers III and IV, with lower
layers presenting less than 10 fragments each.
Sediment analyses
Sediment columns with 10-cm sampling intervals were taken at
ScMo-341, ScMo-342, and ScMo-343; samples did not cross
natural stratigraphic boundaries. Sediment samples were weighed
and subsamples removed for microfossil analysis. Munsell color
was recorded (dry) and pH was determined. Organic content was
measured by the loss-on-ignition procedure (Dean, 1974), after
heating the samples in a muffle furnace at 560°C for 1 h. Grain
size distributions were determined by wet sieving samples
through nested geological screens with mesh sizes ranging from
−4Φ to 3Φ (Wentworth scale), and weighing the dried screen contents with a digital scale. Microscope slides were prepared from
the 0Φ (1 mm, very coarse sand) fraction and examined under a
stereo microscope for lithology.
Pollen and plant macrofossils
Nine samples from ScMo-341 and ScMo-342 were processed
for pollen using standard techniques (Bennett and Willis,
2001). Approximately 23,000 exotic Lycopodium spores were
added to each sample to calculate pollen and charcoal concentrations. Only black, opaque angular particles greater than
10 µm were counted as charcoal. Anaerobically preserved
plant macrofossils from ScMo-341, ScMo-342, and ScMo-343
recovered by wet screening in the field were identified using
botanical reference materials in the Herbarium of the Bishop
Museum (Honolulu).
Insect and arachnid remains
Waterlogged, organic, clay-rich sediments at the base of ScMo341 (TP1), ScMo-342 (TP2), and ScMo-346 were sampled after
removing 10 cm from excavation walls. Field processing involved
manual disaggregation of sediments in water and density separation of organic materials. Repeated washing with water decantation of the lighter waterborne fraction of the sediment resulted in
the separation of organics which were bagged separately; remaining clastic materials were discarded. Organic fractions were
sieved through nested sieves from 2 to 0.25 mm. Coarser fractions
(>0.5 mm) were sorted in water under a binocular microscope.
Plant macrofossils, insect remains, and other remains (e.g. termite
‘coprolites’) were sorted from the sample. Fine fractions (0.25–
0.5 mm) were processed using kerosene flotation with the previously sorted coarser material in order to recover any remaining
insect material. Insect and other arthropod remains were identified by comparison with Porch’s (2008) reference material.
Landsnails
Nonmarine mollusk shells were encountered in certain excavation
units, particularly at ScMo-343. Specimens were recovered from
sediment samples by flotation or by examination of sieve fractions of 1.00 mm mesh size or larger. Identifications were made
by Christensen using reference collections in the Malacology
Department at the Bishop Museum.
Results
ScMo-341 and ScMo-342,Vaioma Valley region
Our first two transects are situated on the northwestern headland
of Paopao Bay, on a broad coastal plain at the mouth of the
337
Kahn et al.
Figure 2. Stratigraphic profiles of sections at (a) ScMo-341, (b) ScMo-342, and (c) ScMo-343.
Vaioma Valley (Figure 1). Here, the coastal plain consists primarily of an alluvial fan emanating from the Vaioma Valley, which we
call the Pihaena fan.
ScMo-341. This site is located on the grounds of the Richard
Gump Research Station, where Kahn (2012) had previously
excavated stratified deposits pre-dating 600 BP. The ScMo-341
transect ran from near the base of a steep ridge (140 m) across the
gently sloping coastal plain to the shoreline, a total distance of
100 m. Three 1 m × 1 m test pits were excavated along this transect. TP1 was the most inland, c. 50 m inland of the circle-island
road and had the deepest stratification, as seen in the profile of the
unit’s western face (Figure 2a). Seven depositional units were
encountered:
338
Layer I (0–50 cm). Dark brown (10 YR 4/3) massive deposit
of sandy clay loam, well sorted with occasional angular to
subangular volcanic clasts and occasional charcoal flecks.
Layer II (50–65 cm). Dark brown (10 YR 4/3) deposit of fluvially transported sand and gravel incorporating larger subrounded to rounded volcanic clasts (0.5–11 cm size range).
This most likely represents a flood event from the nearby
intermittent stream. Infrequent animal bone was recovered
which was too fragmented to identify to species.
Layer III (65–145 cm). Dark grayish brown (10 YR 4/3-2)
deposit of massive, structureless, well-sorted, highly compact
silty clay. Occasional subangular volcanic clasts and charcoal
flecks.
Layer IV (145–150 cm). Dark grayish brown (10 YR4/3-2)
lens of silt and sand with rounded and subrounded volcanic
clasts (1–5 cm size range), representing a single fluvial depositional event.
Layer V (150–273 cm). Dark brown (7.5 YR 4/2) massive deposit of silty clay largely devoid of volcanic clasts.
Layer VI (273–282 cm). Dark gray (N4/) gleyed, very compact, sticky clay, entirely lacking volcanic clasts. During excavation, a thin (c. 1 cm thick) lens of compressed peat was
noted and sampled at the upper limit of this deposit. Infrequent animal bone was recovered, but it was too fragmentary
to identify to species.
Layer VII (282–322 cm). Light gray (10 YR 5-6/2) calcareous marine sand incorporating marine gastropods, becoming increasingly coarse-grained with depth and including
water-rolled pieces of Acropora branch coral. Water table
appears at c. 294 cm below surface. The lower deposit is
currently waterlogged and includes anaerobically preserved
Pandanus drupes (sections of the female fruit) and other
plant macrofossils.
High frequencies of historic and modern artifacts (>40 years
old), including metal, ceramics, tiles, and glass, were recovered
from the upper 50 cm of sediments across the coastal flat (see
Kahn, 2012). Layer I represents modern and historic fill. Layers
II–V represent alternating episodes of low- and high-energy fluvial deposition of terrigenous sediments whose source was the
adjacent volcanic ridge and the small, intermittent stream at its
base. These deposits had infrequent animal bone and basalt artifacts (including flakes, a bifacial tool, and a polished adze flake)
and moderate amounts of charcoal; each decreased with increasing depth. Layer VI is an organically enriched layer of gleyed clay
and peat with frequent shell. Layer VII, incorporating coral,
marine fauna, and anaerobically preserved plant remains, is permanently waterlogged.
Results of laboratory analysis of the sedimentary sequence
in TP1 are presented in Figure 3. The sediments are dominated
by silt- to clay-sized fractions, except for the basal Layer VII
which consists largely of medium- to coarse-grained sands.
There is a shift from calcareous to terrigenous sediments at
260 cm, indicative of a major change in the source of sediment
input. While silt- and clay-sized materials dominate the upper
terrigenous sediments, there are four distinct pulses when larger
pebble and gravel-sized grains are evident. These most likely
represent short-term high-energy erosional events, possibly
associated with tropical cyclones. Unlike at site ScMo-342 (see
below), microscopic charcoal was not observed in the ScMo341 sediments.
Four radiocarbon dates were obtained on samples from Layers
V, VI, and VII (Table 1). Two samples from Layer VII (Beta308006 and Beta-308007) on preserved coconut endocarp and a
Pandanus drupe have nearly identical ages of 4650 and 4640 ± 30
BP. A Pandanus drupe from overlying Layer VI returned an age
The Holocene 25(2)
of 2430 ± 30 BP, while a coconut endocarp from Layer V dated to
3210 ± 30 BP. This stratigraphic inversion of the dates from Layers VI and V suggests that there may have been mixing of materials during deposition of the Layer V fluvial event. In aggregate,
dates from the base of TP1 indicate that the waterlogged deposits
below 2.5 m depth substantially pre-date Polynesian occupation
of the island. Earlier work at the same site, but at its southern
extent, dated the upper part of the fluvial deposit (presumably the
same as our LII), to between c. 250 and 100 BP (Kahn, 2012). A
cultural deposit underlying this fluvial deposit (and apparently
not extending to the northern portion of the site) was dated c.
750–950 BP.
Botanical samples from the fluvially transported sediments
(LII–LV) were dominated by charred fragments of Aleurites
moluccana and Cocos nucifera nuts. Both have varied subsistence and economic uses. In total, 22 taxa were recorded from the
wood charcoal assemblages of LII–LV. Hibiscus tiliaceus, an
indigenous species known to thrive in anthropogenically disturbed environments (Florence, 2004), was recovered at moderately high frequencies (1/4–1/6 of the assemblages). Other
Polynesian introductions found with low frequency include
Cordyline fruticosa, Artocarpus altilis, and an Anacardiaceae
identified as cf. Spondias dulcis. Indigenous species represented
at low frequency include Barringtonia asiatica, Thespesia populnea, several Rubiaceae and Cunoniaceae, Myrtaceae cf. Metrosideros, Euphorbiaceae cf. Phyllanthus, and Mimosaceae cf.
Serianthus myriadena (Butaud et al., 2008; Florence, 1997,
2004). The wood charcoal data demonstrate that Layers III–V
date to the Polynesian period. The mix of endemic and introduced
or cultivated species suggests an anthropogenic landscape dominated by tree crops and secondary species, albeit with remnants of
native forest.
Plant macrofossils from Layers VI and VII exhibited less
diversity. All of the represented species were indigenous taxa
including Pandanus, Cocos, Barringtonia asiatica, Cordia subcordata, and Hibiscus tiliaceus.
ScMo-342. This transect is situated 500 m west of ScMo-341,
near the western edge of an alluvial fan that emanates from the
mouth of Vaioma Valley. The N-S oriented transect ran 300 m
from the shore across the gently sloping coastal flat to the intermittent Vaioma Stream channel (Figure 1). The stream channel
parallels the transect about 40 m to the west, and provided the
main source of sediment input to the coastal flat. Two 1 m × 1 m
test units were excavated, in addition to a 4 m × 3 m block excavation (Figure 4).
Stratigraphy was similar to that encountered at ScMo-341
(Figure 2b). The stratigraphic sequence at TP1 is approximately
mid-way along the coastal flat 150 m from the shoreline and
170 m away from the inland stream.
Layer I (0–38 cm). Dark reddish gray (5 YR 3-4/2). Blocky
ped structure; upper 15 cm is the A horizon. Occasional scattered volcanic clasts and scattered charcoal flecks. Contact
with II diffuse.
Layer II (38–62 cm). Reddish brown (5 YR 4/3), highly compact, sandy clay loam. Considerable quantity of rounded to
subrounded volcanic clasts and charcoal flecking. In the
southwestern part of the unit, large basalt cobbles forming a
pavement were associated with dense charcoal concentrations
in a hearth, indicating the presence of a former occupation and
possibly a cookhouse.
Layer III (62–184 cm). Dark brown (7.5 YR 4/4) massive,
structureless, silty-clay loam with occasional charcoal flecking, the lowest 15 cm becoming strongly mottled (10YR 6/6
brownish yellow).
339
n(
%)
pH
cro
Sh Ma
ell rin
s(
%) e
Lo
ss
on
I gn
itio
Mi
Or
ga
Pa nic
rti
cle
s(
%)
Ca
lc
Se areo
dim us
en
t (%
)
Te
rri
Se geno
dim u
en s
t (%
)
Cla
y(
>4
)
Sil
t
Ve
ry
an
d
Co
ars
e
De
pt
h(
cm
Str
)
ati
gra
ph
y
14
CD
ate
sB
.P.
Pe
bb
les
(-4
)
Sa
nd
(0
)
Kahn et al.
0-
50 -
100 -
150 -
200 -
250 2430 +/- 30
4640 +/- 30
4650 +/- 30
300 0
20
40
0
20
0
20
40
60
80
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80
0
5
10
0
5 10
0
5 10
0
5
10
Figure 3. Sedimentary profile, ScMo-341.
Figure 4. Backhoe trench block excavations at ScMo-342 with
Layer VII (peat) outlined in white and Layer VIII (calcareous sand) at
the basal limit; the latter was rich in macrobotanical remains.
Layer IV (184–200 cm). Dark gray, gleyed (N4/), very compact, structureless, well-sorted clay, containing some fibrous
plant material.
Layer V (200–240 cm). Gray (5 YR 5/1) calcareous
marine sand, fine to medium grained, with fragments of
marine shell. Anaerobically preserved plant remains are
abundant.
Analysis of sediment samples from the column taken from
the face of TP1 illustrate a shift from calcareous to terrigenous
sediments in the basal part of the section. Layer IV in TP1 is
remarkable for its acidic pH (mean value 3.15) and corresponding high degree of organic matter including anaerobically
preserved organic particles (wood, fiber) in the 0Φ size fraction.
The upper terrigenous sediments, mostly dominated by silt and
clay-sized particles, show two pulses with larger sized clasts, as
at ScMo-341, presumably marking high-energy erosional events.
Charcoal particles were present in appreciable quantities in the
0Φ size fraction samples from Layer IV and from higher up in
the section (above 100 cm depth).
As at ScMo-341, the fluvial deposits in Layer III at ScMo-342
had infrequent faunal remains (including a fish dentary) as well as
charcoal. The underlying Layer IV and V deposits appear to be
somewhat mixed, with evidence for infrequent bird bone and faunal materials (including rat bone) which likely derived from
Layer III in addition to frequent organic materials and marine
fauna. The basal Layer V deposit had frequent anaerobically preserved plant macrofossils, including Pandanus tectorius drupes,
coconut endocarps, Terminalia sp., and Cordia subcordata seeds
(Figure 5).
TP2 at ScMo-342 was opened farther inland, 220 m from the
shoreline and 100 m to the point where the intermittent stream
debouches from Vaioma Valley. The overall depositional sequence
in TP2 was similar to that of TP1, but with some important
differences:
Layer I (0–40 cm). Dark reddish brown (5 YR 3-4/2) silty-clay
loam with a few scattered subrounded volcanic clasts (2–3 cm
size range).
Layer II (40–75 cm). Dark reddish brown (5 YR 3/2) sandy
clay loam with occasional cobbles to 20 cm size indicative of
a higher energy fluvial environment.
Layer III (75–139 cm). Dark brown (7.5 YR 3-4/2) massive,
structureless deposit of silty-clay loam with scattered charcoal
flecks.
Layer IV (139–145 cm). Dark reddish brown (5 YR 3/3) lens
of gravel and small cobbles in a matrix of sandy clay loam;
high frequency of subrounded volcanic clasts (1–5 cm size
range) representing a higher energy fluvial event.
Layer V (145–264 cm). Dark brown (7.5 YR 3-4/2) massive,
structureless deposit of silty-clay loam with occasional subrounded volcanic clasts (1–5 cm size range).
Layer VI (264–291 cm). Very dark gray (5 YR 3/1) with mot-
340
The Holocene 25(2)
Figure 5. Macrobotanicals identified in the ScMo-342 site excavations, including (a) Pandanus tectorius drupes, (b) Cordia subcordata seeds, (c)
Terminalia sp. seeds, and (d) Cocos endocarp.
tlings of reddish brown (5 YR 4/4); densely compacted gravel
and cobbles; clasts well rounded with the majority in the 5–
10 cm size range, but occasional cobbles up to 35 cm diameter.
This represents a major, high-energy fluvial event, presumably
a flood from the Vaioma Stream. Water table was hit during
this layer at c. 264 cm below surface.
Layer VII (291–296 cm). Black (2.5 YR N2.5/), compact deposit of peat with anaerobically preserved organic matter.
Layer VIII (296–332 cm). Very dark gray (5 YR 3/1) medium- to coarse-grained calcareous sand with marine shells and
course organic material.
Analysis of the sediment column from TP2 is presented in
Figure 6. The sequence is similar to that at TP1, although in this case
terrigenous sediments are present throughout with the basal Layer
VIII having an admixture of calcareous and terrigenous grains. This
dominance of terrigenous grains even in the basal deposits likely
reflects the location of TP2 closer to the mouth of Vaioma Stream.
Layers VI and VIII again are strongly acidic (pH 2.82–3.02) with
significant quantities of anaerobically preserved plant materials. As
in TP1, charcoal first appears just above the peat deposit (in the bottom of Layer V), and may reflect initial human land clearance with
burning in the vicinity. Charcoal is then relatively abundant again
near the top of the depositional sequence. Periodic high-energy fluvial events are represented by three major pulses of large-sized
clasts, again presumably associated with major flood events from
the Vaioma Stream, possibly induced by cyclones.
Six AMS radiocarbon dates were obtained for ScMo-342, four
from TP1 and two from TP2 (Table 1). Three of these samples
from anaerobically preserved plant macrofossils (coconut endocarp and Pandanus drupes) from the basal, waterlogged sediments
(Layer V in TP1 and Layer VII in TP2) yielded ages of 3030 ± 30,
3120 ± 30, and 3740 ± 30 BP (Beta-308008, Beta-308009, Beta321018). These dates are consistent with those from the basal
deposits at site ScMo-341, indicating that the marine sands and
peat deposits that underlie the Pihaena alluvial fan are pre-Polynesian in age, dating to between 4600 and 2400 BP.
The remaining three dates from ScMo-342 are from higher
stratigraphic contexts associated with Polynesian land use. Sample Beta-309302 with an age of 440 ± 30 BP, although recorded as
coming from a depth of 220–240 cm, Layer V in TP1, is the Polynesian-introduced candlenut (Aleurites moluccana) and most
likely became mixed into the top of Layer IV in an initial highenergy fluvial event after Polynesian colonization of the island.
This date suggests that the thick terrigenous deposits making up
the Pihaena alluvial fan did not begin to accumulate until after c.
cal. 460–534 BP. A second sample (Beta-321017) from Layer V
in TP2 dates to 310 ± 30 BP, also confirming that the alluvium
from the Vaioma Stream accumulated in this area after c. cal.
300–465 BP. A third sample (Beta-321016) from the dense charcoal associated with a probable cookhouse feature in Layer II of
TP1 dated to 60 ± 30 BP, with a most likely calendar age of cal.
222–258 BP.
Plant macrofossils and wood charcoal. In total, 15 taxa were
found in the wood charcoal assemblage from the Layer II
hearth and oven rake out. The assemblage is dominated by
Hibiscus tiliaceus (55% of all identifiable fragments) and Syzgium malaccense (13%). A suite of other Polynesian introductions are present in low frequencies (<5%), including
Inocarpus fagifer, Artocarpus altilis, and Cordyline (stem).
Also recovered in low frequencies are indigenous species,
including several Rubiaceae, a Euphorbiaceae, Cordia cf.
subcordata, and Thespesia populnea. Cocos nucifera is represented by two stem fragments and numerous nut fragments.
These data illustrate the presence of a mosaic-type vegetation
(arboricultural lands, disturbed areas, remnant native woodlands) where Polynesians were collecting firewood during the
late pre-contact and early historic periods. The Layer III fluvial deposits have a similar makeup but have a higher taxonomic diversity (23 taxa). In addition to those listed for Layer
II, Polynesian introductions include Aleurites moluccana,
possibly the tiare and noni trees (Gardenia cf. taitensis,
Morinda cf. citrifolia), and tuber remains tentatively identified as Colocasia. Indigenous species are more frequent, with
Calophyllum inophyllum, Ficus sp., Fagraea berteroana, a
Myrtaceae, an Apocynaceae, and two Rubiaceae occurring in
addition to taxa found above. The Layer III wood charcoal
assemblage represents both burning of the inland native forest
as well as transformation to a cultivated landscape.
341
Mi
pH
cro
Sh M a
ell rin
s(
%) e
Lo
ss
o
Ign n
i ti o
n(
%)
lca
Se reou
di m s
en
t (%
)
Ch
arc
oa
l (%
Or
)
ga
Pa nic
r ti
cle
s(
%)
Ca
Te
rri
g
Se e n o
di m u s
en
t (%
)
(>4
)
Ve
ry
Sa Coar
nd se
(0)
S il
ta
nd
C la
y
De
pt
h(
cm
Str
)
ati
gra
ph
y
14
CD
at e
sB
.P.
Pe
bb
les
(-4
)
Kahn et al.
0 -
50 -
100 -
150 -
200 -
250 -
3740 +/- 30
300 -
310 +/- 30
320 0
10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10
0
10 20 30 40 50 60
0
20 40 60 80 100 0
20 40 60
0 2.5 0
5
10
15 0 2.5
0
5 10
0
5
10
Figure 6. Sedimentary profile, ScMo-342.
Significant numbers of anaerobically preserved macrobotanical remains were recovered from the waterlogged basal layers at ScMo-341 and ScMo-342 (Figure 4). The most abundant
remains were of Pandanus tectorius, an indigenous species that
is widely distributed across the central and eastern Pacific (Figure 4a). A total of 578 drupes were recovered – evidence that
Pandanus tectorius was a major component of the coastal forests of Mo‘orea in the mid-Holocene. Also present were endocarps of two other indigenous trees commonly found in the
littoral zones of Polynesian islands: Cordia subcordata and Terminalia sp. (Figure 4b and c).
More surprising and of considerable note was the occurrence
of numerous examples of well-preserved endocarps of a small,
presumably wild (i.e. non-domesticated) form of coconut, Cocos
nucifera (Figure 4d). The small overall mean length and width
of the endocarps, 8.5 cm × 7.0 cm (sd. 0.6 length, 0.7 width) and
their oblong shape conforms to the size patterns described for
Lepofsky et al. (1992). Two samples were directly dated by 14C
to 3210 ± 30 and 3120 ± 30 BP (Beta-337215 and Beta-308009
respectively), confirming that wild coconut was present in the
coastal zone of Mo‘orea in the pre-Polynesian era.
Pollen assemblages. Nine samples were taken from deposits at
ScMo-341 and ScMo-342 for pollen analysis. In all, 25 different
pollen types were recorded. The pollen concentration is extremely
low in the basal samples from ScMo-342 TP2 and from ScMo341 TP1. The assemblages across all three sites are dominated by
fern spores (Figure 7).
The three pollen samples from waterlogged Layer VII at
ScMo-341, while dominated by fern spores, reveal a decrease in
the frequency of Pandanus, and a corresponding increase in
sedges (Cyperaceae) and grasses in the upper two samples. This
suggests changes in the coastal vegetation from a closed moist
lowland forest to a more diverse lowland forest environment, possibly incorporating open sedge/grassland. There is also over a
10-fold increase in pollen concentration from the lowest to uppermost sample, with the uppermost sample being the most diverse
in pollen content and where Casuarina and palm pollen appear
for the first time. Charcoal is absent from all of the ScMo-341
samples.
In TP1 at ScMo-342, the pollen assemblage from lower Layer
V is composed of fern spores, Pandanus pollen, and Ficus pollen.
Ficus decreases in the central sample from Layer V, with the
inclusion of small amounts of Rutaceae pollen (allocated to the
other category) and the first appearance of charcoal, possibly
derived from anthropogenic burning. The uppermost sample from
Layer V is more diverse palynologically. Grass pollen appears for
the first time, Ficus expands, and Hibiscus pollen constitutes the
‘other’ category. While the pollen concentration is constant across
all three layers, the charcoal concentration is much higher in the
uppermost sample from Layer V, suggestive of human presence in
the adjacent landscape.
In TP2 at ScMo-342, samples were analyzed from the peat
deposit (Layer VII, 372–384 cm) and from the basal Layer VIII
(at 384–390 and 390–401 cm). TP2 differs from TP1 in several
respects. First, there is almost a 10-fold increase in pollen concentration from lowermost sample to uppermost sample. Second,
charcoal values are much lower overall in TP2 compared with
TP1 and decrease up the sequence. While ferns, Pandanus, and
Ficus continue to dominate, the ‘other’ category is composed of
two types in 390–401 cm, three Types in 384–390 cm, and eleven
types in 372–384 cm. Glochidion is present in all three levels.
Overall, the sequences show the development of closed lowland
forest to a more open and diverse forest at site ScMo-342.
342
The Holocene 25(2)
341 TP1 Layer V
342 TP1 Layer IV
342 TP2 Layer VII
Ferns
Poaceae
Pandanus
Ficus
Cyperaceae
Other
Dam/Crumpled 13%
Dam/Crumpled 3%
Dam/Crumpled 7%
341 TP1 Layer VI
342 TP1 Layer V (upper)
342 TP2 Layer VIII (upper)
Dam/Crumpled 9%
Dam/Crumpled 3%
Dam/Crumpled 9%
341 TP1 Layer VII
342 TP1 Layer V (lower)
342 TP2 Layer VIII (lower)
Dam/Crumpled 13%
Dam/Crumpled 0%
Dam/Crumpled 0%
Figure 7. Pie charts representing pollen concentrations at ScMo-341 and ScMo-342.
Insect and arachnid remains. Insect subfossils are diverse and
moderately rich in ScMo-342 TP2 and less abundant and less well
preserved in ScMo-341 TP1; in the discussion below, we focus on
the ScMo-342 assemblage. Both insect assemblages are dominated by a range of taxa that are considered part of the indigenous
fauna of the Society Islands and Eastern Polynesia generally.
However, many of these taxa are today absent from lowland contexts or high islands or absent from low islands altogether. They
are commonly restricted to mid–high altitude forests where
human impact is less pervasive.
Evidence that the ScMo-342 assemblage was deposited in a
shallow wetland habitat includes the presence of the tachyine
ground beetle Paratachys sexguttatus, a species widespread in
wetland habitats in Eastern Polynesia today (Figure 8). Likewise,
the occurrence of the water beetle genera Paracymus, Enochrus,
and Copelatus, the latter a new record for French Polynesia, signals a wetland habitat. The presence of a black fly, Simulium
(Inselellium) sp., suggests occasional flowing water contribution
to the fauna (Craig and Porch, 2013). The beetle fauna is otherwise dominated by saproxylic (dead wood) taxa like cossonine
weevils (many species in multiple genera), cryptorhynchine weevils (Ampagia and several unidentified genera), the eastern Polynesian endemic genus Proterhinus (multiple species), and
zopherids (Zopheridae). These are well represented with several
Pycnomerus and Bitoma species, and a new species each of Antilissus and Epistanus (first records of these genera for the Society
Islands). Both the Zopheridae and cossonine weevils are far
more diverse and abundant in the prehuman record than they are
today in eastern Polynesian environments, implying significant
extinction or massive under-collection. Other saproxylic taxa
include several genera of osoriine staphylinids, Dorcatomiella
(Ptinidae), and Aprostomis, a genus which is widespread in the
Pacific and known from fern fronds and similar microhabitats
(Lawrence et al., 1999).
Phytophagous taxa include the weevils Miocalles and probably Rhycogonus, present today at moderate to high elevations, a
tiny jewel beetle (cf. Maoraxia), and bark beetles (Scolytinae)
represented by at least several species of Xyleborus and Hypothenemus. A range of other taxa common in forest habitats are present,
including the species of the beetle families Ciidae, Nitidulidae,
Ptiliidae, and Histeridae.
Taxa other than beetles include numerous genera of oribatid
mites and several spiders including a thomisid, most likely Misumenops melloleitaoi, a species that is today limited to medium to
high altitudes in Tahiti and Mo‘orea (Garb, 2006). Ants are infrequent but include several specimens of Strumigenys and an
unidentified ponerine genus. As an assemblage, the ScMo-342
fauna imply an intact native rainforest with abundant decaying
wood. A closed forest canopy is implied by the insect assemblage
and plant macrofossil assemblages associated with the insect
samples.
ScMo-343,Vaipahu coastal flats
ScMo-343 is situated near the eastern headland of ‘Opunohu Bay
(Vaipahu Point; Figure 1). The coastal plain is approximately 170 m
wide, terminating at the base of a steep ridge that ascends to an elevation of 250 m. Auger holes at 10-m intervals revealed exclusively
calcareous sediments over most of the 170-m-long transect, with
some input of terrigenous sediments in the last two auger holes closest to the volcanic slope. We excavated two 1-m test pits in this area,
which today consists of swampy ground with dense Hibiscus tiliaceus vegetation (Figure 1). Four stratigraphic deposits were exposed
in the TP1 and TP2 (Figure 2c) excavations:
Layer I (0–6 cm). Dark reddish brown (5 YR 3-4/2) silty-clay
loam with a few scattered subrounded volcanic clasts (2–3 cm
size range).
Layer II (9–96 cm). Dark brown (7.5 YR 3-4/2) massive,
structureless deposit of silty-clay loam with scattered charcoal
flecks and a few scattered subrounded volcanic clasts (2–3 cm
size range). Diffuse basal boundary.
Layer IIIA (96–c. 140 cm). Dark gray, gleyed (N4/), very compact, structureless, well-sorted clay, containing some fibrous
plant material. Highly irregular but distinct basal boundary.
Basal limit has a notably high concentration of landsnails.
Layer IIIB (c. 140–190 cm). Lens of dark gray, gleyed (N4/),
very compact, structureless, well-sorted clay, containing some
343
Kahn et al.
Figure 8. Beetle (Coleoptera – (a)–(k), (m)–(o)), ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae – (l)) and spider (Aranae: Thomisidae – (p)) subfossils
from ScMo-342, TP2 excavation. (a) Bitoma sp.1 pronotum (Zopheridae); (b) Pycnomerus sp.2 pronotum (Zopheridae); (c) Proterhinus sp.1
(Belidae); (d) and (e), (i) and (k) Cossoninae genus indet. pronota (Curculionidae); (f) Nitidulidae genus indet. sp.1 elytron; (g) Ampagia sp.1
head (Curculionidae); (h) Antilissus sp. ‘Moorea’ pronotum (Zopheridae); (l) Strumigenys sp. head (Formicidae); (m) Miocalles sp.2 pronotum
(Curculionidae); (n) Osoriinae gen. indet. head (Staphylinidae); (o) Staphylinidae genus indet. head (Staphylinidae); and (p) Misumenops cf.
melloleitaoi carapace (Thomisidae). Scale (1) is 0.5 mm and applies to all images.
fibrous plant material found within Layer IV. Highly irregular
distinct basal boundaries.
Layer IV (140–200 cm). Very dark gray (5 YR 3/1) mediumto coarse-grained calcareous sand and marine shells. Partially
below the water table, with anaerobic preservation of Cocos
nucifera endocarp and Canarium seeds. High marine shell and
coral content (including boulder-sized Porites heads).
Results of sediment analysis of the TP2 column are summarized
in Figure 9. There is a major shift in the depositional regime at 1 m
below surface. Below this depth the sediments are dominated by
calcareous sands, containing significant quantities of micro-marine
mollusks. This represents a period when the main source of sediment would have been the adjacent reef flat, with only minor input
of terrigenous sediments from the steep ridge. Above 1 m in the
profile, terrigenous sediments dominate (although some calcareous
grains continue to be present), indicating that the main source of
sediment input was now the volcanic ridge. This shift is accompanied by an increase in organic content and an increase in the silt- to
clay-sized fractions. A single high-energy depositional event is suggested by the sample from 70–80 cm, which has a high frequency
of larger sized clasts. Of particular note is the increase in organic
particles (anaerobically preserved pieces of wood and fiber) present
in the samples higher than 120 cm depth. This is suggestive of a
transition from an open beach depositional environment to a
swampy back-beach environment.
Radiocarbon dates. Two samples from TP2 at site ScMo-343
were submitted for AMS radiocarbon dating. An anaerobically
preserved Pandanus drupe from Layer IV (Beta-308011) yielded
an age of 4610 ± 30 BP. From the base of Layer II, a preserved
endocarp of Aleurites moluccana or candlenut (Beta-308010) was
dated to 250 ± 30 BP (highest probability intercept of cal. 271–
324 BP). The date on this Polynesian-introduced tree indicates
that the major shift in depositional regime marked by an increase
in terrigenous sediments occurred about 300 years ago, slightly
later than at TP2 at site ScMo-342.
Landsnail remains. Layer IIIA, which post-dates 250 BP, had abundant landsnails. Several of the recovered species inhabit aquatic
(Clithon) or shoreline and strandline environments (Laemodonta
monilifera, Melampus sp., probably also Assiminea parvula,
although the last-named species may also occur in inland locations). Five terrestrial species that were identified are endemic to
Mo‘orea (Libera dubiosa, Libera jacquinoti, Libera new species,
Minidonta new species, Sinployea modicella), but three are native
to Mo‘orea, while three also occur on other nearby island groups
(Georissa striata, Taheitia pallida, Lamellidea micropleura).
The status of several recovered taxa (Sturanya sp., Nesopupa
sp. cf. tantilla, Hiona sp. cf. verticillata, Hiona sp., Sinployea sp.)
is unclear because of uncertainties as to their specific identity, but
they are undoubtedly native to Mo‘orea and perhaps occur on
other nearby islands (Christensen et al., unpublished; Garrett,
1884). A number of commensal terrestrial species were present,
introduced into the islands of Oceania either prehistorically (Gastrocopta pediculus, Pupisoma dioscoricola, Allopeas gracile) or
since the advent of European commerce (Gastrocopta servilis,
Leptinaria unilamellata, Opeas hannense, Paropeas achatinaceum, Subulina octona). Additional commensal species (Lamellidea oblonga, Lamellidea pusilla, perhaps Elasmias sp., and
Tornatellides oblongus) were transported within Oceania prehistorically, but their point of origin within that region is unknown
(Christensen and Weisler, 2013). One aquatic species, Melanoides
tuberculata, is cryptogenic in status; although it is a global invasive, the duration of its presence in Remote Oceania is uncertain.
The prehistoric introduction of alien commensal species signals the start of the Polynesian period of anthropogenic change.
Ecological change is likewise documented with the gradual
extinction of certain endemic landsnail species. Of the species
endemic to Mo‘orea that are recorded here, Libera new species
344
%)
pH
Lo
ss
o
I gn n
itio
n(
Mi
Or
ga
Pa nic
rti
cle
s
(%
)
cro
Sh Ma
ell rin
s(
%) e
)
Ca
lca
Se reou
dim s
en
t (%
Te
rri
g
Se eno
dim us
en
t (%
)
Sil
ta
nd
Cla
y(
Ve
ry
Sa Coar
nd se
(0)
De
pt
h
Str (cm)
ati
gra
ph
y
14
CD
ate
sB
.P.
Pe
bb
les
(-4
)
>4
)
The Holocene 25(2)
0-
50 -
100 -
250 +/- 30
4610 +/- 30
150 -
180 0
20
40
0
20
0
40
60
80
0
20
40
0
20
40
0
5
10
15
0
5
10 0
5
10 0
5
10
Figure 9. Sedimentary profile, ScMo-343.
and Minidonta new species are known only from the present
archaeological excavations; they apparently became extinct prior
to European contact (1767) or early in the historic era. Libera
jacquinoti was collected in 1839 but has not been observed since
– it may be presumed to have become extinct prior to the 1880s.
Libera dubiosa was collected by Garrett (1884) and others in the
late 1800s but has not been seen subsequently; it probably went
extinct before 1934.
ScMo-346, ‘Opunohu Valley floor
This site is located on the alluvial floodplain of the ‘Opunohu Valley, approximately 60 m from the present stream channel, and
600 m inland of the modern shoreline where the stream enters into
the bay. This site was investigated by excavating a 3-m-long
backhoe trench to a depth of 2 m at which a massive deposit of
river gravel and cobbles was encountered:
Layer I (0–60 cm). Reddish brown to dark reddish brown (5
YR 3-4/4) massive, structureless deposit of silty-clay loam;
some charcoal flecking noted throughout.
Layer II (60–130 cm). Reddish brown to dark reddish brown
(5 YR 3-4/4) deposit, very similar to Layer I but with higher
clay content. Some oxidation mottling appears just above the
contact with Layer III. Within Layer II, there is a distinct lens
of coarse-grained volcanic sand between 75 and 80 cm, representing a higher energy flood event.
Layer III (130–200 cm). Dark gray (5 Y 4/1), massive, structureless deposit of gleyed clay with very little silt content.
Below 150 cm, this deposit incorporates substantial quantities
of anaerobically preserved, fibrous plant material. The water
table was reached at 190 cm.
Analysis of the sediment column from site ScMo-346 shows
the sediments to be dominated throughout by silt- to clay-sized
particles (>−4Φ), although Layer II is slightly less well sorted.
The sediments are entirely terrigenous in origin, with no calcareous input. Layer III is fairly acidic (pH 4.4–4.5), whereas Layers
I and II have pH values in the range of 5.4–6.5. Loss-on-ignition
values are slightly higher for Layer III (9.9–10%) than for Layer
II (7–9%). Charcoal grains were present throughout the 0Φ fraction that was microscopically examined.
Radiocarbon date. A single sample (Beta-312349) of anaerobically
preserved Persicaria sp. seeds from 190–200 cm depth within
Layer III was dated to 120 ± 30 BP. This date has five possible calibrated age ranges between 280 and 0 BP but most likely pre-dates
European arrival. Persicaria glabra is regarded as a Polynesian
introduction to the Society Islands (Florence, 2004, vol. 2).
Plant and insect remains. Twelve litres of organic sandy silt with
abundant coarse plant remains were sampled from the base of the
–346 trench at a depth of 190–200 cm. Of the several thousand
seeds recovered from the sample, most belong to several species
of Cyperus sedges (Cyperaceae) with fewer of Fimbristylis, Eleusine indica, Solanum americanum, Persicaria, Amaranthaceae,
Brassicaceae, Cucumis, and another unidentified Cucurbit. Many
of these taxa are probable Polynesian introductions (Prebble,
2008). The insect fauna is dominated by taxa most likely introduced prehistorically, but includes, in smaller numbers, indigenous and/or endemic terrestrial and freshwater species like the
endemic Insellielum black flies (Craig, 1987). The species present in the ScMo-346 samples are yet to be identified; however, it
is worth noting that elsewhere in Polynesia, human impact has
resulted in the extinction of lowland black fly species (Craig and
Porch, 2013). Examples of the likely human introductions
include the earwig Euborellia annulipes, the bug Geotomus pygmaeus, the beetles Saprosites pygmaeus and Litargus balteatus,
and many ants.
Although the calibrated range of the radiocarbon determination on Persicaria seeds could be as young as mid-20th century,
we believe it is likely the sample dates to the late prehistoric or
earliest post-contact periods. This is based on the absence of a
range of key taxa that, elsewhere in eastern Polynesia, occur ubiquitously in post-contact samples, combined with the depth of the
sample in an apparently stable 20th-century landscape. The ant
fauna of this sample, for example, contains a mix of taxa that is
characteristic of Polynesian aged sediments from elsewhere in
eastern Polynesia (Porch, unpublished) and lacks ants like Pheidole fervens, Cardiocondya sp., and Strumigenys rogeri that are
characteristic of the post-European contact period. The absence of
the herb/shrub Ludwigia octivalvis is similarly indicative of Polynesian aged sediments.
Discussion
The stratigraphic and palaeoenvironmental investigation of four
localities revealed consistent evidence for the geomorphological
evolution of the littoral and lowland zones of Mo‘orea Island
from c. 4600 to 200 BP, including changes in the vegetation and
345
Kahn et al.
other biota of those zones. Here, we synthesize this information as
a series of four successive stages.
Stage 1 (4600 to ~3000 BP)
This phase is evidenced by the basal deposits at sites ScMo-341,
ScMo-342, and ScMo-343, all of which consist of calcareous
sands and reef detritus (branch coral fingers, marine mollusks)
derived from the offshore fringing and barrier reefs. This phase
correlates with a widely evidenced mid-Holocene sea level high
stand which on Mo‘orea has been estimated at between 0.5 and
1 m higher than the modern level. Because of the increase in reefderived sediment occasioned by this high stand, narrow coastal
beaches are formed at the base of the steep volcanic slopes around
the headlands between ‘Opunohu and Paopao Bays. The presence
of larger clasts (coral cobbles, branch coral fingers) suggests a
higher energy shoreline in the vicinity of ScMo-341, ScMo-342,
and ScMo-343 than is the case today.
Plant macro- and microfossils incorporated within these
basal sediments provide an indication of Mo‘orean coastal
vegetation at this time. Of significance is the presence of a
wild form of coconut with a small endocarp volume. It was
previously unknown whether coconut had naturally dispersed
as far east as the Society Islands, although Parkes (1997: 197)
had reported Cocos pollen from Atiu Island in the Southern
Cook group dated to 8600–7600 BP and pre-Polynesian Cocos
pollen from the Lake Temae core on Mo‘orea (p. 192). That
Cocos had naturally dispersed as far as Mo‘orea by at least
4600 BP suggests that it will likely appear in other fossil
assemblages throughout central Eastern Polynesia. This discovery casts doubt as to whether coconuts reported by Lepofsky et al. (1992) from basal deposits in the ‘Opunohu Valley
are evidence of Polynesian occupation.
In addition to the coconuts, plant assemblages at ScMo-341,
ScMo-342, and ScMo-343 are dominated by Pandanus tectorius
drupes and Cordia subcordata and Terminalia cf. samoense endocarps. Wood charcoal analysis adds Hibiscus tiliaceus and Barringtonia asiatica to the list of taxa, while the pollen samples from
ScMo-341 add Ficus and Phyllanthus in the immediate coastal
zone. Ficus tinctoria is a common indigenous species in central
Polynesia, while two species of Phyllanthus (formerly Glochidion), Phyllanthus manono and P. taitensis, are known from the
Society Islands, frequently occurring in lowland habitats (Butaud
et al., 2008: 124). All of these taxa indicate the presence of a welldeveloped native coastal forest on Mo‘orea during Stage 1.
wood charcoal data) hint at human presence on the landscape,
but the exact timing of this is difficult to ascertain given the
lack of good stratification. Beginning as early as 440 BP (cal.
460–534 BP) at ScMo-342, however, and soon thereafter at
ScMo-341 and ScMo-343, a major new phase of sedimentary
deposition commenced which can only be attributed to anthropogenic effects. This phase is especially evident at ScMo-341
and ScMo-342, where between 1.8 and 3.0 m of terrigenous
sediments accumulated within a span of two to three centuries.
The source of this sediment was the valley and ridge slopes
immediately inland of the sites, especially the Vaioma Valley
in the case of ScMo-341 and ScMo-342. This phase of active
slope erosion and deposition on the coastal flats correlates
with the period of major inland expansion of Polynesian occupation and intensive agriculture on the island, previously documented in particular for the ‘Opunohu Valley, but doubtless
an island-wide phenomenon. The presence of scattered charcoal throughout the thick alluvial and colluvial sediments indicates the use of fire on the inland slopes. The widespread
recovery of wood charcoal from numerous economically
important tree species indicates the presence of anthropogenically transformed landscapes. The fact that these assemblages
are largely dominated by successional forest species and Polynesian cultigens indicates both shifting cultivation and the creation of arboricultural gardens on the interior slopes of the
island.
The stratigraphic sequence at ScMo-346, in the alluvial
floodplain of the ‘Opunohu Valley, relates to this stage, reinforcing the conclusions of Lepofsky et al. (1996) that intensive
land use in the valley led to massive alluvial in-filling of what
had formerly been a more extensive embayment and swampy
zone. The basal deposit at ScMo-346, dating to the period
immediately prior to European contact, evinces a swampy environment some 600 m inland of the modern shoreline, which
then became buried under nearly 2 m of alluvium, before stabilizing sometime in the modern period.
Stage 4 (300–150 BP)
During this final period, the coastal flats became stabilized, possibly because of an increased emphasis on arboriculture and a
decline in the use of shifting cultivation. Furthermore, after initial
European contact at the end of the 18th century, massive population declines led to abandonment of inland settlements and significant secondary forest regrowth on the interior slopes, further
decreasing erosion of terrigenous sediments.
Stage 2 (~3000–2400 BP)
This stage saw the draw-down of sea level from the mid-Holocene high stand to its present level, accompanied by the formation of low energy silty deposits in swampy depressions
presumably behind low beach ridges. These back-beach
swamps were traps where organic matter accumulated, forming
the anaerobic, organic peat-like deposits found at ScMo-341,
ScMo-342, and ScMo-343. The insect fauna is consistent with
this interpretation and suggests a closed canopy coastal forest
surrounding these swamps, continuing to be dominated by such
trees as Pandanus, Ficus, and Phyllanthus, but also with Hibiscus tiliaceus.
Stage 3 (550–300 BP)
The coastal zones stabilized after about 2400 BP, without
much active sediment accumulation other than organic materials in the back-beach swamps. As a result, the period from c.
2400 to 550 BP is attested primarily by a gap in deposition. A
few scattered indications of human-introduced biota (microscopic pollen influxes at ScMo-341 and ScMo-342 and the
Conclusion
Multiple lines of evidence support a model of natural and anthropogenic change over a 4600 year sequence in the Society Islands.
Changing sedimentary records and macrobotanical and insect
remains record shifts in geomorphology and the environment in
the pre-Polynesian period linked to sea level changes. Variation in
pre-Polynesian to Polynesian period macrobotanical and pollen
sequences illustrates the removal of local forests and management
of anthropogenic landscapes associated with shifting cultivation
and arboriculture. At the same time, sedimentary records demonstrate massive slope erosion and accumulation of the coastal
plain, in effect, creating a new landscape for residential and agricultural activities in the last c. 500 years. Anthropogenic activities
had far reaching consequences, including the introduction of
Polynesian landsnails and insects and the eventual extinction of
endemic species.
The Mo‘orea record illustrates the range of significant environmental changes, both natural and anthropogenic, operating on
Society Island coastlines for the last four millennia. These processes have significantly obscured traces of early Polynesian
346
settlement of the island. In order to better understand the early
colonization sequence in the Windward Society Islands, it will be
necessary to seek out buried coastal contexts or, alternatively,
protected landscapes where early settlement deposits may be
preserved.
Acknowledgements
Kahn and Kirch co-directed the fieldwork and drafted the
manuscript. Laboratory analysis of sediment were supervised
by Kirch and Nickelsen, analysis of pollen by Stevenson, of
wood charcoal by Dotte, of faunal remains by Kahn, of macrobotanical remains by Kahn and May, and of insect remains by
Porch (supported by an Australian Research Council DECRA
Fellowship (DE130101453). We express our appreciation to the
following individuals who assisted or facilitated our research:
Chantal Tahiata, Ministèrè de la Culture, de l’Artisanat, et de
la Famille; Teddy Tehei, Chef de Service, Service de la Culture
et du Patrimoine; Priscille Frogier, Chef de Service, Délégation
à la Recherche de la Polynésie Française; M. Van Bastolaer, le
Maire de Mo‘orea-Maiao; and Neil Davies, Director, Gump Research Station. Bellona Mou and Tamara Maric of the Service
de la Culture et du Patrimoine facilitated the permit process. Hinano Murphy helped with Tahitian translations, discussions with
property owners, and import regulations. Diana Izdebski drafted
the figures. We thank the following property owners for permission to work on their lands: the Wilder family, Mari Mari Kellum, Eric de Bovis, Aimata Teariki, Nathalie Terai Richmond,
and Adolphe Frogier. Permission to work in ‘Opunohu Valley
was granted by Louis Sandford, Director, Domaine d’Opunohu.
Funding
This project was funded by National Science Foundation
collaborative grants BCS-1029765 to Kahn and BCS-1030049
to Kirch.
References
Allen MS (2014) Marquesan colonisation chronologies and
post-colonisation interaction: Implications for Hawaiian origins and the ‘Marquesan Homeland’ hypothesis. Journal of
Pacific Archaeology 5(2): 1–17.
Allen MS and Huebert JM (2014) Short-lived plant materials,
long-lived trees, and Polynesian 14C dating: Considerations
for 14C sample selection and documentation. Radiocarbon
56(1): 257–276.
Anderson A and Sinoto YH (2002) New radiocarbon ages of
colonization sites in East Polynesia. Asian Perspectives 41:
242–257.
Bronk Ramsey C (2009) Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates.
Radiocarbon 51(1): 337–360.
Butaud J-F, Gérard J and Guibal D (2008) Guides des arbres
de Polynésie française: Bois et utilisations. Tahiti: Au Vent
Des Iles.
Christensen CC and Weisler MI (2013) Land snails from archaeological sites in the Marshall Islands, with remarks on prehistoric
translocations in tropical oceania. Pacific Science 67: 81–104.
Craig DA (1987) A taxonomic account of the Black Flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) of the Society Islands – Tahiti, Moorea and
Raiatea. Quaestiones Entomologicae 23: 372–429.
Craig DA and Porch N (2013) Subfossils of extinct and extant
species of Simuliidae (Diptera) from Austral and Cook
Islands (Polynesia): Anthrogenic extirpation of an aquatic
insect? Zootaxa 3641(4): 448–462.
Cremaschi M, Zerboni A, Mercuri AM et al. (2014) Takarkori
rock shelter (SW Libya): An archive of Holocene climate and
environmental changes in the central Sahara. Quaternary Science Reviews 101: 36–60.
The Holocene 25(2)
Dean WE Jr (1974) Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on
ignition: Comparison with other methods. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 44: 242–248.
Dearing JA (2008) Landscape change and resilience theory: A
palaeoenvironmental assessment from Yunnan, SW China.
The Holocene 18(1): 117–127.
Dearing JA, Yang X, Dong X et al. (2012) Extending the timescale
and range of ecosystem services through paleoenvironmental
analyses, exemplified in the lower Yangtze Basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States
of America 109(18): E1111–E1120.
Dickinson WR (2001) Paleoshoreline record of relative Holocene sea
levels on Pacific islands. Earth-Science Reviews 55(3): 191–234.
Dotte-Sarout E (2010) ‘The Ancestor Wood’ (Trees, Forests and
Precolonial Kanak Settlement on New Caledonia Grande
Terre, 3 volumes including Wood Atlas). Unpublished PhD
Thesis, Université Paris I Sorbonne, The Australian National
University.
Emory KP (1933) Stone Remains in the Society Islands: Bernice
P. Bishop Museum Bulletin, vol. 119. Honolulu, HI: Bernice
P. Bishop Museum.
Fisher CT (2005) Demographic and landscape change in the Lake
P´atzcuaro Basin, Mexico: Abandoning the garden. American
Anthropologist 107(1): 87–95.
Fisher CT and Feinman G (2005) Introduction to ‘Landscapes
over Time’. American Anthropologist 107(1): 62–69.
Florence J (1997) Flore de la Polynésie Française, vol. 1. Paris:
IRD Editions, publications scientifiques du Museum.
Florence J (2004) Flore de la Polynésie Française, vol. 2. Paris:
IRD Editions, publications scientifiques du Museum.
Ford A and Nigh R (2009) Origins of the Maya Forest garden:
May resource management. Journal of Ethnobiology 29(2):
213–236.
Garb J (2006) A new species of thomisid spider (Araneae,
Thomisidae) from the Society Islands with a description of
the male of Misumenops melloleitaoi. Journal of Arachnology 34: 357–367.
Garrett A (1884) The terrestrial Mollusca inhabiting the Society
Islands. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 2(9): 17–114, 2–3.
Green RC (1996) Settlement patterns and complex society in the
windward Society Islands: Retrospective commentary from
the ’Opunohu Valley, Mo’orea. In: Julien M, Orliac M and
Orliac C (eds) Mémoire de Pierre, Mémoire d’Homme: Tradition et Archéologie en Océanie. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, pp. 209–228.
Green RC, Green K, Rappaport RA et al. (1967) Archeology on
the island of Mo’orea, French Polynesia. Anthropological
Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 51(2):
111–230.
Hamilton B and Kahn J (2007) Pre-contact population in the
’Opunohu Valley, Mo’orea: An integrated archaeological and
ethnohistorical approach. In: Kirch PV and Rallu J-L (eds)
The Growth and Collapse of Pacific Island Societies: Archaeological and Demographic Perspectives. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 129–159.
Kahn JG (2005a) Household and community organization in the
late prehistoric Society Islands (French Polynesia). PhD Dissertation, Anthropology, University of California; University
Microfilms.
Kahn JG (2005b) An archaeological survey of the upper Amehiti sector, ‘Opunohu Valley, Mo’orea, Society Islands. In:
Marchesi H (ed.) Bilan de la recherche archéologique en
Polynésie française 2003–2004. Punaauia: Service de la Culture et du Patrimoine, Dossier d’Archeologie polynésienne,
vol. 4, pp. 33–40.
Kahn et al.
Kahn JG (2006) Society Islands (Central Eastern Polynesia) chronology: 11 radiocarbon dates for the late prehistoric expansion
and proto-historic periods in the ’Opunohu Valley, Mo’orea.
Radiocarbon 48(3): 409–419.
Kahn JG (2007) Power and precedence in ancient house societies:
A case study from the Society Island chiefdoms (French Polynesia). In: Beck R (ed.) The Durable House: House Society
Models in Archaeology (Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper No. 35). Carbondale, IL:
Southern Illinois University, pp. 198–223.
Kahn JG (2011) Multi-phase construction sequences and aggregate site complexes of the prehistoric windward Society
Islands (French Polynesia). Journal of Island and Coastal
Archaeology 6: 24–50.
Kahn JG (2012) Coastal occupation at the GS-1 Site, Cook’s Bay,
Mo’orea, Society Islands. Journal of Pacific Archaeology
3(2): 1–10.
Kahn JG (2013) Temple renovations, aggregate Marae, and ritual
centers: The ScMo-15 Complex, Lower Amehiti District,
’Opunohu Valley, Mo’orea (Society Islands). Rapa Nui Journal 27(2): 33–49.
Kahn JG and Kirch PV (2011) Monumentality and the materialization of ideology in Central Eastern Polynesia. Archaeology
in Oceania 46: 93–104.
Kahn JG and Kirch PV (2013) Residential landscapes and house
societies of the late prehistoric Society Islands (French Polynesia). Journal of Pacific Archaeology 4(1): 50–72.
Kahn JG, Horrocks M and Nieuwoudt M (2014) Agriculture,
domestic production, and site function: Micro-fossil analyses
and late prehistoric landscapes of the Society Islands. Economic Botany 68: 246–263.
Kelley AR (2014) The archaeological record as a paleoclimate
and paleoenvironmental archive. Paper presented at 2014
Geological Science Meeting, Vancouver, 19–22 October.
Kirch PV (1986) Rethinking East Polynesian prehistory. Journal
of the Polynesian Society 95: 9–40.
Kirch PV (2005) Archaeology and global change: The Holocene
record. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 30: 409–440.
Kirch PV, Hartshorn A, Chadwick O et al. (2004) Environment,
agriculture, and settlement patterns in a marginal Polynesian
Landscape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
of the United States of America 101: 9936–9941.
Lawrence JF, Hastings AM, Dallawitz MJ et al. (1999) Beetles of the World, Ver. 1.0. Canberra: SIRO Division of
Entomology.
Lepofsky D (1994) Prehistoric agricultural intensification in
Society Islands, French Polynesia. PhD Dissertation, Anthropology, University of California; University Microfilms.
Lepofsky D (2003) The ethnobotany of cultivated plants of the
Maohi of the Society Islands. Economic Botany 57(1): 73–92.
Lepofsky D and Kahn JG (2011) Cultivating an ecological and
social balance: Elite demands and commoner knowledge
in ancient Ma’ohi agriculture, Society Islands. American
Anthropologist 113(2): 319–335.
Lepofsky D, Harries HC and Kellum M (1992) Early coconuts on
Mo’orea Island, French Polynesia. Journal of the Polynesian
Society 101: 299–308.
Lepofsky D, Kirch PV and Lertzman K (1996) Stratigraphic and
paleobotanical evidence for prehistoric human-induced environmental disturbance on Mo’orea, French Polynesia. Pacific
Science (50)3: 253–273.
Lubos CCM, Dreibrodt S, Robin V et al. (2013) Settlement and
environmental history of a multilayered settlement mound in
Niederröblingen (central Germany): A multi-proxy approach.
Journal of Archaeological Science 40: 79–98.
Maury R-C, Le Dez A and Guillou H (2000) Notice Explicative,
Carte Ggéol. France (1/25 000), Feuille Moorea, Polynésie
Française. Orléans: BRGM.
347
Mulrooney MA, Bickler SH, Allen MS et al. (2011) High-precision dating of colonization and settlement in East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America 108: E192–E194.
Parkes A (1997) Environmental change and the impact of Polynesian colonization: Sedimentary records from central Polynesia. In: Kirch PV and Hunt TL (eds) Historical Ecology
in the Pacific Islands: Prehistoric Environmental and Landscape Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp.
166–199.
Pirazzoli PA, Montaggioni LF and Faure G (1985) late Holocene
sea-level changes in the Society Islands and in the Northwest
Tuamotu atolls. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Reef
Congress, Tahiti, 27 May–1 June.
Porch N (2008) Invertebrates in landscape archaeology. In: David
B and Thomas J (eds) Handbook of Landscape Archaeology (World Archaeological Congress, Research Handbook
Series). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, pp. 457–467.
Prebble M (2008) No fruit on that beautiful shore: What plants
were introduced to the subtropical Polynesian islands prior
to European contact? In: Clark G, Leach F and O’Connor
S (eds) Islands of Inquiry: Colonisation, Seafaring and the
Archaeology of Maritime Landscapes (Terra Australis 29).
Canberra: ANU E Press, pp. 227–251.
Rieth T and Athens JS (2013) Suggested best practices for the
application of radiocarbon dating to Hawaiian archaeology.
Hawaiian Archaeology 13: 3–29.
Rosen AM and Rivera-Collazo I (2012) Climate change, adaptive cycles, and the persistence of foraging economies during the late Pleistocene/Holocene transition in the Levant.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(10):
3640–3645.
Sandweiss DH and Kelley AR (2012) Archaeological Contributions to Climate Change Research: The Archaeological
Record as a Paleoclimatic and Paleoenvironmental Archive.
Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 371–391.
Sharp WD, Kahn JG, Polita CM et al. (2010) Rapid evolution of ritual architecture in central Polynesia indicated by precise 230Th/U
coral dating. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
of the United States of America 107(30): 13234–13239.
Théry-Parisot I, Chabal L and Chrzavzez J (2010) Anthracology
and taphonomy, from wood gathering to charcoal analysis.
A review of the taphonomic processes modifying charcoal
assemblages, in archaeological contexts. Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 291: 142–153.
Van der Leeuw S (1998) The Archaeomedes Project: Understanding the natural and anthropogenic causes of land degradation
and desertification in the Mediterranean Basin. Luxembourg:
Office for the Official Publications of the European Union.
Van der Leeuw S and Redman CL (2002) Placing archaeology at
the center of socio-natural studies. American Antiquity 67(4):
597–605.
Varien MD, Ortman SA, Kohler TA et al. (2007) Historical ecology in the Mesa Verde region: Results from the village ecodynamics project. American Antiquity 72: 273–299.
Wheeler E, Baas P and Gasson P (1989) IAWA list of microscopic
features for hardwood identification. IAWA Journal 10: 219–332.
Wilkinson TJ, McGuire G, Christiansen J et al. (2007) Modeling
Settlement Systems in a Dynamic Environment: Case Studies from Mesopotamia. In: Kohler TA and van der Leeuw
S (eds) The Model-Based Archaeology of Socionatural
Systems. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research,
pp.166–199.
Wilmshurst JM, Hunt TL, Lipo CP et al. (2011) High-precision
radiocarbon dating shows recent and rapid initial human
colonization of East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(5):
1815–1820.
Copyright of Holocene is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be
copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's
express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for
individual use.