Associated fauna at one site of Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten.,
(Compositae: Cynareae)
B. MICHAUX
Zoology Department, Auckland University, Private Bag, Auckland, N e w Zealand
ABSTRACT
The fauna associated with C. uulgare were collected from rosettes, flowers, and
seed heads at Kaukapakapa, 40 km north-west of Auckland. This fauna can be
characterised as non-specific, non-damaging, and impoverished with respect to
Diptera and Coleoptera when compared with European and Asiatic faunas collected
from either C. uulgare or other Cirsium spp. Possible control agents discussed in the
literature are detailed.
Keywords: Cirsium uulgare, associated fauna, biological control, New Zealand.
INTRODUCTION
Documenting the fauna associated with a prospective target weed in its country of
introduction is an initial requirement when assessing the feasibility of biological weed
control. Such knowledge allows the selection of exotic control candidates that will damage
parts of the plant only lightly damaged in the country of introduction (Harris 1971), or
may reveal accidentally introduced insects, eliminating them from future study (Batra
et al. 1981).
There are a number of ways of interfering with the life cycle of C. uulgare and other
fecund, short-lived plant species. These include destroying seedlings, rosettes, mature
plants, flowers, seeds, or interfering with seed germination. For reasons detailed in
Michaux (1984), it was not thought probable that suitable control candidates could be
found to destroy mature plants before seed could be set. The effort associated with
collecting the fauna was concentrated on rosettes, flowers, and seed heads, because the
destruction of immature plants and reproductive stages appeared to offer the best chance
of exerting biological pressure on this weed.
METHODS
Rosettes were collected from a n area of high thistle density at approximately monthly
intervals while they were present from April to October 1982 at Kaukapakapa. Each
month 20 rosettes up to 20 cm in diameter were cut just below ground level and placed
in 28 cm x 20 cm paper bags. Each bag was then fitted with a glass vial and hung close
to a window. As specimens appeared in the glass vial they were removed and preserved
in 70% alcohol. The contents of the bags were also examined regularly until the rosettes
had dried out.
N e w Zealand Entomologist, 1989, Vol. 12
14
Twenty flowers and 20 seed heads were collected monthly while they were present
(October 1982 to March 1983) from various sites around Kaukapakapa and bagged as
described earlier. Flowers and seed heads were retained for up to a month to ensure that
a complete collection of faunal parasites was obtained. Specimens were preserved in 70%
alcohol prior to identification.
RESULTS
Fauna associated with thistle rosettes
The fauna associated with C. vulgare rosettes is summarised in Table 1. Tebenna bradleyi
Clarke (Lepidoptera: Chorentidae) larvae were found on rosettes throughout the growing
season and fed on the leaves. Numbers of this species were never large. Various
Thysanoptera are ubiquitous on rosettes throughout the growing period, often being
common enough to be observed on flowers and the underside of rosette leaves. Large
numbers of aphids, particularly Capitophorus elaeapni. (Del Guer.) over-winter on the rosettes.
A hymenopteran parasite of aphids, Aphidius sp. has also been recorded from rosettes.
Both thrips and aphids are small, sap-feeding insects that are unlikely to inflict any more
than minor damage. Pseudococcus longispinus (Targ.) Tozz (Homoptera: Pseudococidae),
which penetrates surface tissue and then feeds from the sap, was observed occasionally.
The taproots of some larger rosettes were rotten and inhabited by a number of
Collembola and the bulb mite Rhizog&hus robini Claparede. However, it was clear that
these organisms were living within the damaged roots rather than causing the damage.
A rust, identified as Puccinia cnici Mart., was found on a small number of rosettes.
Infrequent outbreaks of rust are said by local farmers to affect Cirsium vulgare.
Table 1:
Fauna associated with thistle rosettes
Fungivorous
or saprophagous
Pradaceous
or parasitic
Phytophagous
COLEOPTERA
Anisomeristes sp.
Antheta sp.
Microcryptorhy ncus
perpusillus
COLEOPTERA
Stethorus bijidus
LEPIDOPTERA
Tebenna bradleyi
DIPTERA
chironomid larvae
psychodid larvae
ACARI
various phytoseiid,
parasitid and laelapid mites
ACARI
Tydeus sp.
Rhizoglyphus robini
oribatids
COLLEMBOLA
unidentified
HYMENOPTERA
Basus seminulum
Stephanodes ?sirnilis
Aphidius sp.
Diapriidae
COLLEMBOLA
unidentified
HEMIPTERA
Pseudococcus lon,@spinus
Capitophorus elaeagni
Aulacorthum solani
Myzus ornatus
M . persicae
Brachycaudus helichrysi
pentatomid eggs and nymphs
(Dictyotus caenosus and Nezara
viridula?)
THYSANOPTERA
Thrips nigropilosus
Apterothrips secticornis
Chirothrips manicatus
Streptothrips tuberculatus
Frankliniella occidentalis
N e w Zealand Entomologist, 1989, Val. 12
15
Fauna associated with thistle flowers and seed heads
These results are summarised in Table 2. Phytophagous insects associated with this
species utilized the plant in a number of ways. Thysanoptera were found within the flower
head, reaching their highest density in December. The occurrence of larvae indicated
that at least some thrip species oviposited within the capitulum of C. vulgare. Thrips have
a variety of feeding habits but the majority are likely to be blossom feeders, although
larvae of Thrips tabaci may also be predaceous on mites (Mound & Walker 1982). Thrip
damage in flowers was limited to small numbers of individual florets within the capitulum.
Table 2:
Fauna associated with flowers and seed heads
Fungivorous
or saprophagous
Predaceous
or parasitic
Phytophagous
COLEOPTERA
COLEOPTERA
LEPIDOPTERA
Cortinicara hirtalis
Anistomeristes sp.
Cyphon sp.
Anthrenocerus australis
Coccinella undeci impunctata
Chloroclystis laticostatus
C. testulatus
Heliothis anniger confertus
Tebenna bradleyi
DIPTERA
ACARI
Lonchoptera furcata
Amblyseius cucumeris
Ololaelaps paratasmanicus
Gelechioidea
phoridae larvae
psychodid larvae
Erythraeidae
PSOCOPTERA
unidentified
HEMIPTERA
HEMIPTERA
Oechalia schellembergii
COLLEMBOLA
unidentified
HYMENOPTERA
Teleonomus sp.
Trichogramma sp.
Trissolcus sp.
Aphidius sp.
Capitophorus elaeagni
Aulacorthum solani
Bmchycaudus helichysi
Nysius huttoni
Dictyotus caenosus
Nezara viridula
Rhypodes clavicornis
Aphelinus humilis
Chyrsocharis pubicorni~
Dacnusa areolaris
Diglyphus sp.
Anacharis zealandica
Dinocampus coccinellae
THYSANOPTERA
Thrips obscuratus
T. tabaci
Anaphothrips dubius
Apterothrips secticornis
Haplothrips niger
Frankiniella occidentalis
Hemiptera were found externally on buds, flowers, and seed heads, and aphids were
seen moving between individual florets. It is likely that Hemiptera fed at the base of
the involucre bracts, although the larger pentatomids may pierce the receptacle. Any
damage to the seeds would be indirect, a consequence of stress resulting from factors
such as nutrient deficiency. The Lygaeidae (Hemiptera), which feed directly on seed,
were represented by N y s i m huttoni White.
The most pronounced visual damage was caused by lepidopteran larvae feeding on
florets. During the summer months it was quite usual to see a number of flower heads
in which all the individual florets were destroyed. A number of these damaged flower
heads were collected in order to estimate the viability of the seeds they contained. These
heads were bagged and examined a week later when it was found that the floral tissue
had regrown. It seems likely that in the field larvae would leave a flower head after
consuming all the floral tissue, either to pupate or to move on to other flowers, leaving
the flower head to restore itself. No data exist on the magnitude of the damage that these
insects cause, but considering that randomly sampled seed collections consistently gave
viability results in excess of 80%, this damage is unlikely to be significant.
A number of fungi were also observed growing on seeds during germination trials.
16
New Zealand Entomologist, 1989, Vol. 12
These fungi were largely restricted to hollow seeds and probably represented seed coat
flora. They include: Epicoccum sy., Phoma sp., Cladosporum sp., Botrytis sp., Fusarium sp.,
Diaporthe perniciosa and Alternuria sp. Apart from Alternaria sp., which may be weakly
pathogenic, all are saprophytes and are typically transferred by wind or water splash.
In comparing the fauna associated with the rosettes, flowers, and seed heads of C. vulgare
in the Auckland areas with those lists published for the United Kingdom (Redfern 1968),
Europe (Zwolfer 1965), and AsidJapan (Zwolfer 1973), it is apparent that the fauna in
this area is deficient in Diptera and Coleoptera (particularly the family Curculionidae)
some of which are known to cause significant damage to this species in its native range.
DISCUSSION
Apart from slugs, that were observed to feed on seedlings, none of the fauna associated
with (2. vulgare in this area of New Zealand causes significant damage. Although the
associated fauna at other sites may be different, these results indicate that the fauna is
entirely incidental. The rapid increase in population size of this weed, documented by
Michaux (1984), must in part be the result of the absence of any significant biotic pressure
on this species in New Zealand. When this weed was introduced from Europe, where
it is of minor importance as a weed, it was without the complex of species usually associated
with it. Any regulatory effect that some of these species may have on the weed is missing.
It is, therefore, highly probable that control candidates can be found that will slow down
the rate of population growth and, in conjunction with other control strategies, eventually
control the weed.
Information concerning possible control agents is available from the literature. Urophora
stylata Fabricus (Diptera: Trypetidae), a gall forming fly, destroys seeds and has already
been released in Canada (Batra et al. 1981; Harris & Wilkinson unpublished). A related
species, U . cardui, has been released in New Zealand against C. arvense (DSIR unpublished
internal report 1982). Larinus turbinatus Gyll., L. sturnus Schall., and L. carlinae 01.
(Coleoptera: Curculionidae) have been reported by Zwolfer et al. (1971) to also feed on
flower heads of various thistle species.
Ostrina kasmirica Moore (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae mine the stems of C. wallichii
which may have affinities with C. vukare (Zwolfer 1973). Porphyrinia spp. (Lepidoptera:
Noctuidae) larvae enter shoots below terminal flower buds destroying them. Porphyrinia
cochylionides Guenke is common in Japan on Cirsium spp. (Zwolfer 1973) and may be closely
related to the rarer European P. purpurina Hb. which is recorded from C. vulgare (Zwolfer
1965). Finally, leaf feeding Cassida spp. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) are described in
Zwolfer & Eichorn (1966). The biology of C. rubiginosa Miill. is detailed in Ward &
Pienkowski (1978a) and effects of parasitism on this species in North America by Ward
& Pienkowski (1978b).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was carried out in partial fulfilment for the degree of MPhil at Auckland
University. My thanks to Professor E. C . Young and Dr J. Ogden for discussion and
comments on the manuscript. Insect identification was carried out at DSIR Entomology
Division, Mt Albert. Fungi were identified by Professor F. Newhook and Dr B. P. Segedin
at Auckland University. L. Michaux typed the manuscript.
REFERENCES
Batra, S. W. T.; Coulson, P. H.; Dunn, P. H . ; Boldt, P. E., 1981: Insects and fungi associated
with Carduus thistles (Compositae). United States Department of Agriculture technical bulletin, No. 1616.
Harris, P., 1971: Current approaches to biological control of weeds. Commonwealth Institute oJ
Biological Control, technical communication No. 4: 67-76.
Michaux, B., 1984: Biological control of Sco'tch thistle (Cirsium uulgare). Unpublished M.Phi1.
thesis, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Mound, L. A , ; Walker, A. K., 1982: Terebrantia (Insecta: Thysanoptera), Fauna o f N e w Zealand
No. I . Scientific Information Division, DSIR, Wellington.
Redfern, M . , 1968: The natural history of the spear thistle. Field studies 2: 669-717.
N e w Zealand Entomologist, 1989, Vol. 12
17
Ward, R. H.; Pienkowski, R. L., 1978a: Biology of Cassida rubiginosa, a thistle-feeding shield
beetle. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 71: 585-591.
-, 1918b: Mortality and parasitism of Cassida rubiginosa, a thistle-feeding shield
beetle accidently introduced into North America. Environmental entomology 7: 536-540.
Zwolfer, H., 1965: Preliminary checklist of phytophagous insects attacking wild Cynareae
(Compositae) species in Europe. Commonwealth Institute for Biological Control, technical bulletin
6: 81-156.
, 1973: A survey of weed insects in Japan, Iran, and Pakistan. Commonwealth Institute for
Biological Control, progress report 30.
, Eichorn, O., 1966: The host range of Cassida spp. (Col.: Chrysomelidae) attacking
Cynareae (Compositae) in Europe. Zeitschrift fuer Angewandte Entomologie, 58: 384-397.
, Frick, K. E. ; Andres, L. A,, 1981: A study of the host plant relationships of European
members of the genus Larinus (Col. : Curculionidae). Commonwealth Institute for Biological Control,
technical bulletin 14: 97-143.