Skip the header
Open access
Technical Factsheet
Basic
9 October 2023

Euscepes postfasciatus (West Indian sweet potato weevil)

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Euscepes postfasciatus (Fairmaire, 1849)
Preferred Common Name
West Indian sweet potato weevil
Other Scientific Names
Batatarhynchus destructor Hustache, 1933
Cryptorhynchus batatae Waterhouse, 1850
Cryptorhynchus postfasciatus Fairmaire, 1849
Euscepes batatae (Waterhouse, 1850)
Hyperomorpha squamosa Blackburn, 1885
International Common Names
English
scarabee weevil
small sweet potato weevil
Spanish
broca del camote
gorgojo de la batata
picudo de la batata de las Indias Occidentales
French
charançon de la patate douce
Portuguese
broca do tuberculo da batata-doce
Local Common Names
Japan
imozo-mushi
EPPO code
CRYPBA (Euscepes batatae)
EPPO code
EUSPPO (Euscepes postfasciatus)

Pictures

E. postfasciatus; larva
Tsuguo Kohama
Juliana Cardona-Duque, University of Puerto Rico, bugwood.org
Euscepes postfasciatus
Juliana Cardona-Duque, University of Puerto Rico, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Juliana Cardona-Duque, University of Puerto Rico, bugwood.org
Euscepes postfasciatus
Juliana Cardona-Duque, University of Puerto Rico, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Euscepes postfasciatus
Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Euscepes postfasciatus
Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Euscepes postfasciatus
Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Euscepes postfasciatus
Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Euscepes postfasciatus
Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Euscepes postfasciatus
Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Euscepes postfasciatus
Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html

Distribution

This content is currently unavailable.

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

HostHost statusReferences
Daucus carota (carrot)Unknown
Muruvanda et al. (1986)
Ipomoea (morning glory)Other 
Ipomoea acuminataWild host 
Ipomoea aquatica (swamp morning-glory)Other 
Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Main
Follett (2006)
Kohama and Sugiyama (2000)
Maeto and Uesato (2007)
Nakamoto and Kuba (2004)
Reddy et al. (2012)
Sato et al. (2010)
Fatiaki et al. (2017)
Santos et al. (2021)
Ipomoea indica (ocean blue morning-glory)Unknown
Sato et al. (2010)
Ipomoea pes-caprae (beach morning glory)Unknown
Sato et al. (2010)
Pharbitis nil (Japanese morning glory)Main 
Raphanus sativus (radish)Unknown
Muruvanda et al. (1986)

Symptoms

Under heavy infestation, the entire root is riddled and filled with faecal matter. It becomes dark in colour, light in weight and spongy in appearance (Sherman and Tamashiro, 1954). An unpleasant smell is characteristic of this damage and the affected roots taste bitter (Alleyne, 1982a). Larval damage is similar to that of Cylas formicarius and both cause the roots to produce furano-terpenoids and coumarins, making them unpalatable (Uritani et al., 1975). Larvae bore into the root just below the epidermis; the feeding tunnels are defined as sunken areas on the surface of the sweet potato (Sherman and Tamashiro, 1954). Heavily infested vines become enlarged, malformed and cracked (Sherman and Tamashiro, 1954). Adults emerge by chewing exit holes, so emergence holes are visible on the surface of roots or stems (Raman and Alleyne, 1991).

List of Symptoms/Signs

Symptom or signLife stagesSign or diagnosis
Plants/Roots/internal feeding  
Plants/Stems/internal feeding  

Prevention and Control

Cultural Control and Sanitary Methods

Historically, weevil management has relied on cultural control measures such as the use of non-infested planting material, crop rotation, removal of volunteer plants and crop debris, prompt harvesting, removal of alternate wild hosts, planting away from weevil-infested fields, banking or planting in light soils that do not crack, and sufficient irrigation to reduce soil cracking (Sherman and Tamashiro, 1954; Chalfant et al., 1990).

Host-Plant Resistance

Host resistance to E. postfasciatus has only recently been studied. Field screening tests have been conducted in Tonga (Pole, 1988; Raman and Alleyne, 1991), Peru (Raman and Alleyne, 1991) and Barbados (Alleyne, 1982b).At the moment, no breeding programmes are being conducted to incorporate resistance to this weevil (Raman and Alleyne, 1991).

Biological Control

Very little information is available on biological control for E. postfasciatus. Raman and Alleyne (1991) assessed the potential of Beauveria sp. as a biocontrol agent and several parasites have been reported (Parasram, 1970).

Chemical Control

Yasuda (1991) showed that spot treatment of granulated carbosulfan on the ground around the stem was more effective at reducing infestation levels in the roots and stems than the conventional practice of spraying uniformly throughout the field.

Economic Threshold Levels

Yasuda (1997b) calculated the regression equation to express the relationship between the proportion of damaged sweet potato storage roots at harvest and the percentage of injured stems on day 75 after planting. Based on this equation, the threshold level of stems injured during the growing period for a tolerable damage level (13.6% of roots damaged at harvest) was estimated to be 5%. Insecticide application for this control threshold was as effective as the conventional application and required two rather than three applications.Sterile Insect Technique (SIT)An experimental eradication project for E. postfasciatus with SIT is currently in progress on Kume Island, Okinawa, Japan (Moriya, 1995; Kuba et al., 2000; Yamagishi and Shimoji, 2000).

Impact

E. postfasciatus is a major pest of sweet potato in the Pacific, Caribbean basin and some countries of South America (Raman and Alleyne, 1991). Even low-level infestations of this weevil reduce marketable yield because sweet potato roots produce furano-terpenoids in response to weevil feeding that make even slightly damaged roots unpalatable (Uritani et al., 1975). In the Caribbean, the weevil has caused extensive damage to roots both in the field and in storage for as long as sweet potato has been grown (Tucker, 1937; Parasram, 1970; Alleyne, 1982b).In Japan, the weevil is the most serious pest of sweet potato in the Ryukyu Islands (Kohama, 1990). Japanese phytosanitary regulations prohibit the transport of sweet potatoes from these islands to markets in mainland Japan.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 9 October 2023

Language

English

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation