Skip to main content
Log in

How granivorous Coreus marginatus (Heteroptera: Coreidae) recognises its food

  • Original Article
  • Published:
acta ethologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phytophagous insects select their host plant using multiple sensory modalities including vision, olfaction, gustation and mechanoreception. In the laboratory, we investigated the role of vision, olfaction and gustatory sense in the perception of cues released by seeds of different plant species in granivorous Coreus marginatus (Heteroptera: Coreidae). Juvenile insects were put in a choice arena and offered with different seeds on which they feed naturally (Polygonum, Rumex) and seeds which are not their natural food (Stellaria). Individual bugs were manipulated in one of three ways: 1. blackened compound eyes, 2. coated sensillae on antennae, 3. coated tip of labial pouch. Control individuals were not manipulated. The behaviour of each bug was observed for 12 h. Control bugs fed for a significantly longer time than manipulated ones. Individuals with any senses impaired fed on Stellaria, whereas, the control individuals ignored it. The results suggested that seed selection requires information from all three sensory organs: compound eyes, antennae and sensillae on labial pouch. Further research is required to unravel the importance of each sense for the seed selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrose DP, Samuel M, Sahayaraj K (1991) Impact of antennectomy, eye blinding and fossula spongiosa coating on the predatory behaviour of Acathaspis siva Distant (Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Acathaspidinae). J Adv Zool 12(1):37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Awan MS, Wilson LT, Hoffmann MP (1989) Prey location by Oechalia schellembergii. Entomol Exp Appl 51:225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce TJA, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM (2005) Insect host location: a volatile situation. Trends Plant Sci 10(6):269–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carver M, Gross GF, Woodward TE (1991) Hemiptera. In: CSIRO Staff (eds) The Insects of Australia, vol I, 2nd edn. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp 429–509

  • Chapman RF (2003) Contact chemoreception in feeding by phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 48:455–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chinta S, Dickens JC, Aldrich JR (1994) Olfactory reception of potential pheromones and plant odors by tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris (Hemiptera: Miridae). J Chem Ecol 20(12):3251–3267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook CA, Neal JJ (1999) Plant finding and acceptance behaviors of Anasa tristis (DeGeer). J Insect Behav 12(6):781–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2002) Statistical computing. An introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Drukker B, Sabelis MW (1990) Anthocorid bugs respond to odour emanating from Psylla infested pear trees. Proceedings of the Experimental & Applied Entomology, N.E.V. Amsterdam 1:88–89

  • Evans H (1984) Insect biology: a textbook of entomology. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud RL, Olmstead KL (2000) Role of vision and antennal olfaction in habitat and prey location by three predatory heteropterans. Environ Entomol 29(4):721–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrušková M, Honěk A (2001) Development of Coreus marginatus (Heteroptera: Coreidae) fed on seeds of Rumex obtusifolius. Acta Soc Zool Bohem 65:189–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrušková M, Honìk A, Pekár S (2005) Coreus marginatus (Heteroptera: Coreidae) as a natural enemy of Rumex obtusifolius (Polygonaceae). Acta Oecol 28(3):281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huignard J, Dupont P, Tran B (1990) Coevolutionary relations between bruchids and their host plants: the influence on the physiology of the insects. In: Fujii K, Gatehouse AMR, Johnson CD, Mitchell R, Yoshida T (eds) Bruchids and legumes: economics, ecology and coevolution.d Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 171–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE, Benkman CW (2002) Granivory. In: Herrera CM, Pellmyr O (eds) Plant–animal interaction. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 132–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Korcz A (2001) Heteroptera occurring on Achillea milefolium L. J Plant Prot Res 41(4):378–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutov VV, Sinitsina EE (1995) Development of artificially induced food preferences in the bug Podizus maculiventris Say. Moscow Univ Biol Sci Bull 50(4):36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas E, Alomar O (2002) Impact of the presence of Dicyphus tamaninii Wagner (Heteroptera: Miridae) on whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) predation by Macrolophus caliginosus (Wagner) (Heteroptera: Miridae). Biol Control 25(2):123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson WJ (1986) Competition for food between two principal cone insects of red pine, Pinus recinosa. Environ Entomol 15:88–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Putshkov VG (1962) Krajoviki. Fauna Ukrajini 21. Vydavnictvo AN Ukrainskoi RSR. Kiev. Vip. 2. (in Ukrainian)

  • R Development Core Team (2004) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org

  • Rani PU, Madhavendra SS (1995) Role of sensory receptors in the prey selection behaviour of Eocanthecona furcellata Wolf (Heteroptera-Pentatomidae): a predator of phytophagous insects. Phytophaga 7:147–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards AM, Filewood LW (1990) Feeding behavior and food preference of the pest species comprising the Epilachna vigintioctopunctata (F.) (Coleoptera, Coccinelidae). J Appl Entomol 110(5):501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sant’Ana J, da Silva RFP, Dickens JC (1999) Olfactory reception of conspecific aggregation pheromone and plant odors by nymphs of the predator, Podisus maculiventris. J Chem Ecol 25(8):1813–1826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schooley RL, Wiens JA (2003) Finding habitat patches and directional connectivity. Oikos 102(3):559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scutareanu P, Drukker B, Bruin J, Posthumus MA, Sabelis MW (1997) Volatiles from Psylla-infested pear trees and their involvement in attraction of athocorid predators. J Chem Ecol 23(10):2241–2260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinitsina EE, Krutov VV (1996) Antennal and labial sense organs in a bug Podizus maculiventris (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae). Zoologitcheskij Zhurnal 75(8):1167–1173 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinitsina EE, Chaika SY (1998) Sensory apparatus of antennae in terrestrial bugs (Heteroptera). Zool Zh 77(11):1273–1284 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tol van RWHM, Visser JH (2002) Olfactory antennal responses of the vine weevil Otiorhynchus sulcatus to plant volatiles. Entomol Exp Appl 102(1):49–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres M, Cardenas E, Perez S, Morales A (2000) Haematophagy and cleptohaematophagy of Clerada apicicornis (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae), a potential biological control agent of Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 95(1):131–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura MU, Montalván R, Panizzi AR (2000) Feeding preferences and related types of behaviour of Neomegalotomus parvus. Entomol Exp Appl 97:309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

SP was supported by project no. 0002700601 provided by the Ministry of Agriculture, Czech Republic and MH was supported by grant no. 524/05/4536 of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Pekár.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: R. Oliveira

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pekár, S., Hrušková, M. How granivorous Coreus marginatus (Heteroptera: Coreidae) recognises its food. acta ethol 9, 26–30 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-006-0011-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-006-0011-9

Keywords

Navigation