Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Trunk disease fungal pathogens reduce olive production globally by causing cankers, dieback, and other decline-related symptoms on olive trees. Very few fungi have been reported in association with olive dieback and decline in South Africa. Many of the fungal species reported from symptomatic olive trees in other countries have broad host ranges and are known to occur on other woody host plants in the Western Cape province, the main olive production region of South Africa. This survey investigated the diversity of fungi and symptoms associated with olive dieback and decline in South Africa. Isolations were made from internal wood symptoms of 145 European and 42 wild olive trees sampled in 10 and 9 districts, respectively. A total of 99 taxa were identified among 440 fungal isolates using combinations of morphological and molecular techniques. A new species of Pseudophaeomoniella, P. globosa, had the highest incidence, being recovered from 42.8 % of European and 54.8 % of wild olive samples. This species was recovered from 9 of the 10 districts where European olive trees were sampled and from all districts where wild olive trees were sampled. Members of the Phaeomoniellales (mainly P. globosa) were the most prevalent fungi in five of the seven symptom types considered, the only exceptions being twig dieback, where members of the Botryosphaeriaceae were more common, and soft/white rot where only Basidiomycota were recovered. Several of the species identified are known as pathogens of olives or other woody crops either in South Africa or elsewhere in the world, including species of Neofusicoccum, Phaeoacremonium, and Pleurostoma richardsiae. However, 81 of the 99 taxa identified have not previously been recorded on olive trees and have unknown interactions with this host. These taxa include one new genus and several putative new species, of which four are formally described as Celerioriella umnquma sp. nov., Pseudophaeomoniella globosa sp. nov., Vredendaliella oleae gen. & sp. nov., and Xenocylindrosporium margaritarum sp. nov.

Free full text 


Logo of persooniaLink to Publisher's site
Persoonia. 2020 Dec; 45: 196–220.
Published online 2020 Oct 29. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2020.45.08
PMCID: PMC8375345
PMID: 34456377

Dieback and decline pathogens of olive trees in South Africa

Abstract

Trunk disease fungal pathogens reduce olive production globally by causing cankers, dieback, and other decline-related symptoms on olive trees. Very few fungi have been reported in association with olive dieback and decline in South Africa. Many of the fungal species reported from symptomatic olive trees in other countries have broad host ranges and are known to occur on other woody host plants in the Western Cape province, the main olive production region of South Africa. This survey investigated the diversity of fungi and symptoms associated with olive dieback and decline in South Africa. Isolations were made from internal wood symptoms of 145 European and 42 wild olive trees sampled in 10 and 9 districts, respectively. A total of 99 taxa were identified among 440 fungal isolates using combinations of morphological and molecular techniques. A new species of Pseudophaeomoniella, P. globosa, had the highest incidence, being recovered from 42.8 % of European and 54.8 % of wild olive samples. This species was recovered from 9 of the 10 districts where European olive trees were sampled and from all districts where wild olive trees were sampled. Members of the Phaeomoniellales (mainly P. globosa) were the most prevalent fungi in five of the seven symptom types considered, the only exceptions being twig dieback, where members of the Botryosphaeriaceae were more common, and soft/white rot where only Basidiomycota were recovered. Several of the species identified are known as pathogens of olives or other woody crops either in South Africa or elsewhere in the world, including species of Neofusicoccum, Phaeoacremonium, and Pleurostoma richardsiae. However, 81 of the 99 taxa identified have not previously been recorded on olive trees and have unknown interactions with this host. These taxa include one new genus and several putative new species, of which four are formally described as Celerioriella umnquma sp. nov., Pseudophaeomoniella globosa sp. nov., Vredendaliella oleae gen. & sp. nov., and Xenocylindrosporium margaritarum sp. nov.

Keywords: Celerioriella, five new taxa, Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata, Olea europaea subsp. europaea, phylogenetics, Pseudophaeomoniella, taxonomy, Vredendaliella, Xenocylindrosporium

INTRODUCTION

The first record of European olive (Olea europaea subsp. europaea) in South Africa dates back to Jan van Riebeeck in 1661. The first commercial olive farm was established in Paarl in 1925; however, initial expansion of the olive industry only occurred in the 1970s (Costa 1998). Although the olive industry in South Africa is still relatively small, a rapid expansion occurred during the last 11 yr with a 135 % increase in the area planted to the current 3 190 ha. Frantoio is the most frequently planted oil cultivar, accounting for 849 ha of the production area, while Mission is the most frequently planted dual cultivar (oil and table olives; 643 ha of the production area). Due to the recent growth in the olive industry, most of the olive trees in South Africa are relatively young, with 59 % of the trees aged 11–25 yr and only 6 % older than 25 yr. The main olive production region in South Africa is the Western Cape province (92 % of total plantings), where viticulture is the main agricultural enterprise (Viljoen 2020). This region has a Mediterranean climate with warm, dry summers and cool, wet winters. The indigenous wild olive (O. europaea subsp. cuspidata = O. europaea subsp. africana), a close relative of the European olive, commonly occurs in this region, often in close proximity to European olive orchards.

Research on decline diseases of olive trees has previously been dominated by investigations on Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae (Jiménez-Díaz et al. 2012), and olive quick decline syndrome caused by the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa (Martelli et al. 2016). The latter pathogen has thus far only been associated with decline of olive trees in Argentina, Brazil, Italy, and the USA (Saponari et al. 2013, Krugner et al. 2014, Haelterman et al. 2015, Coletta-Filho et al. 2016). On the other hand, Verticillium wilt of olive has been reported in various countries in Europe, North Africa, and Central Asia, as well as in the USA (California) and Australia (Jiménez-Díaz et al. 2012). Neither of these olive tree diseases has been reported in South Africa.

In addition to the above-mentioned pathogens, species of Basidiomycota, Botryosphaeriaceae, Cytospora, Diaporthe, Diatrypaceae, Phaeoacremonium, Phaeomoniellales, and some other fungi such as Comoclathris incompta (= Phoma incompta), and Pleurostoma richardsiae, have also been associated with various decline-related symptoms of olive trees in Croatia, Greece, Italy, New Zealand, Spain, and the USA (Rumbos 1988, 1993, Taylor et al. 2001, Carlucci et al. 2008, 2013, 2015, Moral et al. 2010, 2017, Kaliterna et al. 2012, Nigro et al. 2013, Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013, 2020, Lawrence et al. 2018). Úrbez-Torres et al. (2013) identified 18 fungal species in a survey of fungi causing olive twig and branch dieback in California (USA), of which the Botryosphaeriaceae were found to be the most prevalent, followed by species of Diaporthe and the Diatrypaceae. When inoculated onto olive trees, all of these species caused lesions of various sizes, with the largest being produced by Neofusicoccum mediterraneum, followed by Diplodia mutila (Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013). Moral et al. (2010) also found N. mediterraneum to be an aggressive pathogen when inoculated on olive branches. More recent studies have also associated Cytospora oleicola, C. olivarum, C. plurivora, and C. sorbicola with branch cankers and dieback of olive trees in the USA (Lawrence et al. 2018, Úrbez-Torres et al. 2020). In some counties of California, Úrbez-Torres et al. (2020) recovered Cytospora spp. from almost 30 % of twig dieback and canker samples. Pathogenicity trials illustrated the ability of C. oleicola and C. olivarum to cause lesions when inoculated on olive branches (Úrbez-Torres et al. 2020); however, the reported lesion size was considerably smaller than that reported for some species of Botryosphaeriaceae by Úrbez-Torres et al. (2013). In Italy, Pleurostoma richardsiae, Phaeoacremonium spp., and members of the Botryosphaeriaceae have been identified as the most prevalent fungi associated with olive decline (Carlucci et al. 2013, 2015, Nigro et al. 2013). Carlucci et al. (2013) found Pleurostoma richardsiae to be more aggressive than Neofusicoccum parvum and Phaeoacremonium minimum. In a further study identifying Phaeoacremonium species as the most prevalent fungi on olive trees in Italy, Carlucci et al. (2015) found Phaeoacremonium sicilianum, Pc. minimum, and Pc. italicum to be more virulent than Pc. alvesii, Pc. parasiticum, and Pc. scolyti, although all six species caused significant lesions. Species of the Phaeomoniellales were identified from olive trees and reported to be pathogenic to this host in California and Italy (Carlucci et al. 2008, 2013, 2015, Saponari et al. 2013, Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013, Crous et al. 2015). Carlucci et al. (2008, 2013, 2015) initially reported isolates of Pseudophaeomoniella spp. from olive trees in Italy as Lecythophora lignicola (A. Carlucci pers. comm.). The genus Pseudophaeomoniella currently contains two species (P. oleae and P. oleicola) that were recovered from and shown to be pathogenic to olive trees in Italy (Crous et al. 2015). Úrbez-Torres et al. (2013) recovered Phaeomoniella chlamydospora at low incidences from olives in California, and found it to be weakly pathogenic.

Some other fungi have been recorded at lower incidences or only in incidental reports, but have been shown to cause dieback and decline related symptoms on olive trees. These include Diaporthe foeniculina (reported as Phomopsis sp. groups 1 and 2 by Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013 and as Diaporthe sp. by Moral et al. 2017), Diaporthe rudis, Diatrype oregonensis, Diatrype stigma, Eutypa lata, Ilyonectria destructans, Comoclathris incompta (reported as Phoma incompta), and members of the Basidiomycota, such as Fomitiporia mediterranea, Schizophyllum commune, and Trametes versicolor (Rumbos 1988, 1993, Ivic et al. 2010, Carlucci et al. 2013, Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013, Moral et al. 2017).

No formal survey of European olive dieback pathogens in South Africa has been published to date; however, there are some reports of fungi from decline-related symptoms on the closely related wild olive. Crous et al. (2000) lists three basidiomycete species (Ganoderma lucidum, Phellinus linteus = Fomes yucatanensis, and Phellinus robiniae) in association with wood rot, and Hysterographium fraxini var. oleastri in association with dieback of wild olives in South Africa. Furthermore, Adams et al. (2006) reported the Cytospora pruinosa species complex (= Valsa cypri species complex) on dead twigs of the same host in South Africa. In a recent survey of Phaeoacremonium species in South Africa, Spies et al. (2018) reported Phaeoacremonium africanum, Pc. minimum, Pc. parasiticum, and Pc. scolyti on European olives, and Pc. oleae, Pc. prunicola, Pc. scolyti and Pc. spadicum on wild olives. With the exception of Pc. minimum, Pc. parasiticum, and Pc. scolyti, none of the fungi reported in association with olive decline diseases in other countries had been recorded on Olea europaea in South Africa before. Several of these fungi have, however, been associated with cankers, dieback, and other decline related symptoms of grapevines and fruit trees in the Western Cape province of South Africa. These include Diplodia seriata, Neofusicoccum australe, N. luteum, N. parvum, N. vitifusiforme, Diaporthe foeniculina, Eutypa lata, Ilyonectria destructans, Phaeoacremonium alvesii, Pc. rubrigenum, Pc. sicilianum, Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, Pleurostoma richardsiae, and Schizophyllum commune (Crous et al. 2000, Van Niekerk et al. 2004, Damm et al. 2007, 2008a, Cloete et al. 2011, White et al. 2011a, Moyo et al. 2016, 2018a, b). The occurrence of these fungi on such crops, that are often grown in close proximity to European and wild olive trees, suggests that such pathogens could also contribute to olive dieback and decline in South Africa.

Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the incidence and distribution of fungi associated with dieback and decline diseases of European and wild olive trees in the Western Cape province of South Africa. Furthermore, the association of some of the higher-level taxa with the internal wood symptoms was investigated, and novel taxa within the Phaeomoniellales were described.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling and collection of fungal isolates

Symptomatic wood samples of 145 European olive trees (Olea europaea subsp. europaea) were collected from 10 districts (defined according to the Wine of Origin scheme, see http://www.sawis.co.za/cert/download/Districts_-_Jan_2014.pdf) in the Western Cape province of South Africa (Appendix 1). Sampled material consisted of cankerous branches or trunks, twigs showing dieback, and old wounds from pruning or other mechanical damage. Samples were collected in larger commercially producing orchards, as well as non-commercial, abandoned or neglected orchards, and trees in domestic gardens. Additional samples with similar symptoms were collected from 42 wild olive trees in nine districts (Appendix 1). Samples were processed as described by Moyo et al. (2016). In short, samples were cut to reveal internal symptoms that were photographed and marked prior to surface sterilisation (30 s in 70 % ethanol, 2 min in 3 % NaOCl, 30 s in 70 % ethanol) and plating of wood pieces from each marked symptom onto potato dextrose agar (PDA, Biolab, South Africa) containing 250 mg/L chloromycetin. Plates were incubated at 24 °C for 4 wk and inspected every 1–3 d. Emerging hyphae of possible fungal pathogens were transferred to fresh PDA plates to obtain pure isolates for identification. Isolates were stored as colonised agar plugs in sterile water at 4 °C and as colonised agar plugs in sterile 10 % glycerol at -84 °C.

Symptoms from which isolations were made, were classified in seven different types in order to investigate if certain fungi were associated with specific symptoms. Samples of European and wild olives were pooled for this aspect of the investigation. The seven symptom types are depicted in Fig. 1 and included twig dieback (n = 126), dark brown to black discolouration (n = 346), light brown to pink discolouration (n = 280), internal black lines (n = 149), the dark brown or black margin between healthy and discoloured tissue (n = 549), streaking (n = 100) and soft or white rot (n = 6). The recovery of isolates of specific fungi from the different symptom types was recorded and expressed as the percentage of symptoms of each type infected by the Basidiomycota, Botryosphaeriaceae, Cytospora, Diaporthe, Diatrypaceae, Phaeoacremonium, Phaeomoniellales, and Pleurostoma, respectively. Fungi not belonging to these genera, families, orders or classes were treated as a single group (‘Other’ fungi), and symptoms from which no fungi were obtained were also recorded.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-2020-45-8-g001.jpg

Seven types of internal wood symptoms from which fungi were isolated during this study. a. Streaking; b. twig dieback; c. dark brown to black margin (m) and light brown to pink discolouration (p); d. dark brown to black discolouration; e. soft and white rot (s); f. internal black lines.

Identification of isolates

Isolates were classified in morphological groups based on colony morphology and, in some cases, limited microscopic observations. Cultures morphologically identified as Alternaria, Aspergillus, Aureobasidium, Cladosporium, Epicoccum, Fusarium, Penicillium, and Trichoderma, that are generally not considered as dieback and decline pathogens, were discarded. Of the remaining isolates, representatives from all sampling sites and morphological groups were selected for sequencing of the translation elongation factor 1 alpha (TEF1α) region for the Botryosphaeriaceae, beta-tubulin (TUB2) for Phaeoacremonium, and the internal transcribed spacers ITS1 and ITS2 with the enclosed 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene for all remaining isolates (ITS). DNA was extracted using a CTAB-based protocol as described by Damm et al. (2008a). DNA samples were quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA), and diluted to a range of 5–15 ng/μL. PCR amplifications were performed in 10 μL reactions (15 μL for TEF1α) containing 1× KAPA Taq Ready Mix (KAPA Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa), 0.08 μM of each primer (ITS: ITS5 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990); TEF1α: EF1-728F and EF1-986R (Carbone & Kohn 1999); TUB2: T1 (O’Donnell & Cigelnik 1997) and Bt2b (Glass & Donaldson 1995), and 1 μL DNA. Cycling conditions consisted of 5 min at 94 °C, 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s (ITS: 55 °C; TEF1α: 54.5 °C; TUB2: 58 °C), extension at 72 °C for 30 s, and final extension for 7 min at 72 °C. Successful amplifications were verified by gel electrophoresis and sequenced directly in one direction using the BigDye Terminator v. 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (PE Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The sequencing product was analysed on an ABI PRISM 3130XL DNA sequencer (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA) at the Central Analytical Facilities of Stellenbosch University. Trimming and editing of sequences were done with Geneious v. 9.1.7 (http://www.geneious.com, Kearse et al. 2012). Preliminary species identities were obtained by BLAST analyses of sequences against the nucleotide database of GenBank for ITS and TEF1α sequences, and against a custom Phaeoacremonium database containing only reference TUB2 sequences from Gramaje et al. (2015), Ariyawansa et al. (2015), Crous et al. (2016), Da Silva et al. (2017) and Spies et al. (2018). BLAST results were further confirmed through alignment of sequences with relevant reference sequences from GenBank using the MAFFT plugin in Geneious (Katoh & Standley 2013) and phylogenetic analyses. The best fit substitution model for each alignment was estimated under the Akaike information criterion using jModeltest 2 (Darriba et al. 2012). Maximum likelihood analyses were performed using PhyML-MPI (Guindon et al. 2010) with support calculated from 100 bootstrap replicates. Phylogenies were viewed in FigTree v. 1.4.2 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). For a limited number of isolates, species were identified using species-specific PCR (Diaporthe foeniculina according to Lesuthu et al. 2019 and the new species of Pseudophaeomoniella according to Van Dyk 2020), DNA fingerprinting (Botryosphaeriaceae according to the protocols of Alves et al. 2007), or the morphology was compared to isolates that had been identified using molecular techniques. Representatives of all recovered species were included in phylogenetic analyses to confirm the inferred identities. All phylogenies are available on TreeBASE (study S26669 and S26950).

Phylogenetic analyses of the Phaeomoniellales

A multi-gene phylogeny was generated for isolates in the Phaeomoniellales in an attempt to resolve the taxonomy of species in this order. Double strand consensus sequences of the actin (ACT), beta-tubulin (TUB2) and translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1α) regions, as well as a fragment of the nuclear ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes including ITS and the D1–D3 regions of the 28S ribosomal RNA gene (LSU), were generated for selected isolates in the Phaeomoniellales. The ACT, TEF1α and TUB2 regions were amplified using the primers ACT-512F and ACT-783R (Carbone & Kohn 1999), EF1-728F and EF1-986R (Carbone & Kohn 1999), and Bt2a and Bt1b (Glass & Donaldson 1995), respectively. Cycling conditions were as described above, but annealing at 52 °C for ACT and TEF1α and 58 °C for TUB2. For some isolates, ACT was amplified using a touch-down protocol with annealing temperatures decreasing from 66–58 °C in decrements of 2 °C every 5 cycles, followed by 20 cycles of annealing at 55 °C. The nuclear ribosomal RNA regions were amplified as a single fragment using the primers ITS5 (White et al. 1990) and LR7 (Vilgalys & Hester 1990) with cycling conditions as described above, but annealing at 50 °C and extending for 1 minute during every cycle. The ITS-LSU fragment was sequenced using the primers ITS3, ITS4, ITS5, LR0R, LR3, LR6 and LR7 (Vilgalys & Hester 1990, White et al. 1990). The ACT, TEF1α, and TUB2 regions were sequenced using primers used for amplification. Sequences were assembled and edited using Geneious v. 9.1.7 (http://www.geneious.com, Kearse et al. 2012). Relevant reference sequences were obtained from GenBank and aligned with de novo generated data as described above (Table 1). The ITS, 28S, ACT, TEF1α and TUB2 regions were aligned separately and concatenated in Geneious v. 9.1.7 (http://www.geneious.com, Kearse et al. 2012). Maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses of the concatenated and LSU only datasets were conducted in PhyML-MPI (Guindon et al. 2010) and PhyloBayes-MPI v. 1.8 (Lartillot et al. 2013), respectively. The GTR+I+G model was estimated as either the best fit model or one of the top three performing models for the different individual datasets using the Akaike Information Criterion in jModeltest 2 (Darriba et al. 2012). This model was consequently used for maximum likelihood analysis of the concatenated dataset, as well as the LSU dataset (best fit model), with support calculated from 1 000 bootstrap replicates. Bayesian analyses were performed under the CAT-GTR model. For each analysis, two chains were run for 10 000 (concatenated dataset) or 5 000 iterations (LSU dataset) of which the first 1 800 (concatenated dataset) or 800 (LSU dataset) were discarded as burn-in before assessing convergence using the bpcomp and tracecomp commands. The minimum effective sizes after running these commands were larger than 300 and maxdiff values were less than 0.1, indicating sufficient convergence as per the guidelines set out in the PhyloBayes-MPI manual. All phylogenies are available on TreeBASE (studies S26669 and S26950).

Table 1

GenBank accession numbers of isolates from the Phaeomoniellales included in the multi-gene phylogeny. Sequences generated in this study are indicated in bold.

SpeciesStrain1CountryHostGenBank accession numbers
ITS28S TEF1α ACT TUB2
Aequabiliella effusa CBS 120883T = STE-U 6121South Africa Prunus persica NR_132005GQ154618MN861676n/a2KR260451
A. palatina CBS 145018T = JKI-Ap36Germanyspore trap attached to grapevine shootMH999506MH999529n/an/aMK070469
Celerioriella dura CBS 120882T = STE-U 6122South Africa Prunus salicina NR_132004GQ154617MN861677 MT787367 MW017331
Ce. petrophiles CBS 142115T = CPC 29256Australia Petrophile teretifolia KY173394KY173487n/an/an/a
Ce. prunicola CBS 120876T = STE-U 6118South Africa Prunus salicina NR_132003GQ154614n/a MT787368 KR260453
Ce. umnquma STE-U 8442 = CSN801South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. cuspidata MT791052 MT797851 MT787395 MT787370 n/a
CBS 146756T = STE-U 7966 = CSN1091South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791051 MT797850 MT787394 MT787369 n/a
Celothelium cinchonarum F 17105 fCosta Rican/an/aDQ329020n/an/an/a
Dolabra nepheliae CBS 123297Puerto Rico Litchi chinensis GU345749GU332515n/an/an/a
Minutiella pruni-avium CBS 145513T Germany Prunus avium MN232957MN232925n/an/aMN232985
M. simplex CBS 145008T = JKI-Jn27Germanyspore trap attached to grapevine shootMH999508MH999531n/an/aMK070471
M. tardicola CBS 121757T = STE-U 6123South Africa Prunus armeniaca GQ154599GQ154619MN861680 MT787371 KR260454
Moristroma germanicum CBS 145012T = JKI-Feb06Germanyspore trap attached to grapevine shootMH999512MH999535n/an/aMK070475
Mo. japonicum BN1674T JapanQuercus mongolica var. grossoserrataAY254052AY254052n/an/an/a
Mo. palatinum CBS 145010T = JKI-Feb17Germanyspore trap attached to grapevine shootMH999510MH999533n/an/aMK070473
Mo. quercinum BN1678T Sweden Quercus robur AY254051AY254051n/an/an/a
Neophaeomoniella constricta CBS 145015T = JKI-Mz35Germanyspore trap attached to grapevine shootMH999516MH999539n/an/aMK070479
Np. corymbiae CBS 145092T Australia Corymbia citriodora MK047457MK047507n/an/an/a
Np. eucalypti CBS 139919T USA Eucalyptus globulus NR_138001KR476782n/an/an/a
Np. eucalyptigena CBS 145093T Australia Eucalyptus pilularis NR_161148MK047508MK047569n/aMK047584
Np. niveniae CBS 131316T South Africa Nivenia stokoei JQ044435JQ044454MN861682n/an/a
STE-U 7959 = CSN742South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. cuspidata MT791053 n/a MT787396 n/an/a
Np. ossiformis CBS 145013T = JKI-May03Germanyspore trap attached to grapevine shootMH999514MH999537n/an/aMK070477
Np. zymoides CBS 114904T = AW304Korea Pinus densiflora DQ270242DQ270253n/an/aKR260455
CBS 121168South Africa Prunus salicina GQ154600GQ154620MN861679n/a MW017332
STE-U 7960 = CSN743South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. cuspidata MT791054 n/a MT787397 n/an/a
Paraphaeoisaria alabamensis CBS 110.77AUSACronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiformeMH861028MH872801n/an/an/a
CBS 110.77BT USACronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiformeMH861029n/an/an/an/a
Paraphaeomoniella capensis CBS 123535T South Africa Encephalartos altensteinii NR_137711FJ372408MN861681 MT787372 KR260449
Phaeomoniella chlamydospora CBS 229.95T Italy Vitis vinifera NR_155612NG_066265n/an/aAF253968
CBS 117179South Africa Vitis vinifera KF764544n/aKF764636n/aKF764683
STE-U 7536South Africa Vitis vinifera MT791061 MT797852 MT787398 MT787373 n/a
‘Phaeomoniella’ pinifoliorum CBS 114903T Korea Pinus densiflora DQ270240MN861685MN861678n/aKR260452
Pseudophaeomoniella globosa STE-U 7946 = CSN18South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. cuspidata MT791062 n/a MT787403 MT787378 MW017333
CBS 146758 = STE-U 7947 = CSN41South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. cuspidata MT791066 n/a MT787400 MT787375 MW017335
STE-U 7950 = CSN183South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. cuspidata MT791055 n/a MT787404 MT787379 n/a
CBS 146755T = STE-U 7951 = CSN185South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791056 MT797853 MT787399 MT787374 MW017337
STE-U 7952 = CSN186South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791067 n/a MT787405 MT787380 n/a
CBS 146759 = STE-U 7953 = CSN329South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. cuspidata MT791069 n/a MT787401 MT787376 n/a
STE-U 7954 = CSN334South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. cuspidata MT791068 n/a MT787406 MT787381 n/a
STE-U 7955 = CSN349South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791063 n/a MT787407 MT787382 n/a
STE-U 7956 = CSN386South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. cuspidata MT791057 n/a MT787408 MT787383 n/a
STE-U 7957 = CSN435South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791064 n/a MT787409 MT787384 n/a
STE-U 7958 = CSN451South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791058 n/a MT787410 MT787385 n/a
STE-U 7962 = CSN806South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. cuspidata MT791059 n/a MT787411 MT787386 n/a
STE-U 7963 = CSN808South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791070 n/a MT787412 MT787387 n/a
STE-U 7964 = CSN824South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791065 n/a MT787413 MT787388 n/a
STE-U 7965 = CSN960South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791071 n/a MT787414 MT787389 n/a
STE-U 7968 = PMM1192South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791060 n/a MT787415 MT787390 MW017338
PMM2484South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. cuspidata MT791072 n/a MT787402 MT787377 n/a
P. oleae CBS 139191T = FV84ItalyOlea europaea subsp. europaeaNR_137966KP635971KP635968KP635974n/a
P. oleicola CBS 139192T = M24ItalyOlea europaea subsp. europaeaNR_137965KP635970KP411802KP411805n/a
STE-U 7933 = Ph58ItalyOlea europaea subsp. europaea MW008603 n/a MW017340 MW017339 MW017336
Rhynchostoma proteae CBS 112051T South Africa Protea laurifolia NR_132824MN861683n/a MT787391 n/a
Strelitziana cliviae CBS 133577T = CPC 19822South Africa Clivia miniata NR_111823NG_042750n/an/an/a
S. malaysiana CBS 139902T = CPC 24874Malaysia Acacia mangium KR476731KR476766n/an/an/a
Vredendaliella oleae CBS 146757T = STE-U 7969 = PMM1193South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791073 MT797854 MT787416 n/a MW017334
Xenocylindrosporium kirstenboschense CBS 125545T South Africa Encephalartos friderici-guilielmi NR_132841GU229891n/an/an/a
X. margaritarum CBS 146848T = STE-U 9059 = CSN1179South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791074 MT797855 MT787418 MT787393 n/a
CBS 146849 = STE-U 8437 = CSN1216South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791075 n/a MT787417 n/an/a
CBS 146850 = STE-U 8440 = CSN1917South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. cuspidata MT791076 n/an/a MT787392 n/a
X. sp. CFJS-2015cCSN1180South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791077 MT797849 n/an/an/a
STE-U 8441 = CSN1184South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791078 MT797848 MT787420 n/an/a
STE-U 8436 = CSN1203South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791080 n/a MT787419 n/an/a
X. sp. CFJS-2015eSTE-U 8438 = CSN1222South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791079 MT797847 MT787421 n/an/a
X. sp. CFJS-2015fSTE-U 8435 = CSN1191South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791082 MT797856 MT787422 n/an/a
X. sp. CFJS-2015gSTE-U 8446 = CSN1174South AfricaOlea europaea subsp. europaea MT791081 MT797846 n/an/an/a

1CBS: Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; CPC: Culture collection of Pedro Crous, housed at CBS; CSN: collection of Chris Spies at ARC-Nietvoorbij, Stellenbosch, South Africa; PMM: collection of Providence Moyo at the University of Stellenbosch, Department of Plant Pathology, Stellenbosch, South Africa; STE-U: fungal collection of the University of Stellenbosch, Department of Plant Pathology; T Ex-type strains.

2Not available.

Morphological characterisation of putative new species in the Phaeomoniellales

Representative isolates of putative new species in the Phaeomoniellales were selected for characterisation of micromorphological structures using a slide culture technique similar to that of Arzanlou et al. (2007). Colonised agar plugs (5–10 × 5–10 mm) were taken from 2-wk-old PDA cultures, placed on autoclaved microscope slides in Petri dishes containing two 90 mm filter paper disks moistened with 1.5 mL sterile deionised water, covered with autoclaved cover slips, and incubated at 25 °C for 10 d. Colonised microscope slides and cover slips were mounted separately in 70 % lactic acid, pressed for several hours to overnight under stacks of heavy books, and sealed with nail polish. Fungal growth on slides was inspected using a Nikon Eclipse Ni light microscope. Isolates were also grown on synthetic nutrient-poor agar (SNA) with autoclaved pine needles (Nirenberg 1976) for the production of conidiomata. Isolates of species that failed to produce conidia under these conditions were also cultured on SNA with autoclaved olive leaves and twigs in an attempt to induce sporulation. Images of vegetative hyphae, conidia, conidiogenous cells, collarettes, and conidiophores were captured at 1 000× and pycnidia at 11.25× magnification using a Nikon DS-Ri2 camera on a Nikon Eclipse Ni light microscope and a Nikon SMZ1500 stereo microscope, respectively. Ten pycnidia and thirty individual structures of each type were viewed and measured using the NIS-Elements Viewer software (Nikon Instruments Inc.).

Colony morphology was evaluated on malt extract agar (MEA, Biolab), oatmeal agar (OA, Biolab) and PDA. Plates of the different media were inoculated with 4 mm diam plugs taken from actively growing PDA cultures and incubated at 25 °C in the dark for 21 d. In some cases, 4 mm diam plugs could not be used due to small colony sizes. For these species 1–2 mm diam colonies were picked from streaked cultures on PDA and transferred to the different media. Colony colours were evaluated using the colour charts of Rayner (1970).

Cardinal temperatures for growth were determined by incubating PDA plates at 25 °C in the dark for 2 d before marking colony margins on the bottom of each plate and incubating them at temperatures ranging from 5–40 °C at intervals of 5 °C in the dark. Each isolate was plated in triplicate for each temperature. Colony margins were marked on the bottom of each plate after 2, 3, and 4 wk. Plates that did not exhibit growth after 4 wk were incubated at 25 °C for an additional 7 d to establish viability of the cultures.

RESULTS

Sampling and collection of fungal isolates

Despite the presence of internal wood discolouration and other symptoms suggesting infection by pathogens in all samples, 43 European olive (30 %) and 12 wild olive (29 %) samples yielded no cultures of the fungi targeted in this survey. Some of these samples yielded putative saprophytes or endophytes that were not recorded; however, more often such samples yielded no fungi. Of the cultures recovered from the remaining samples, 440 representative isolates were identified to species level using sequencing and phylogenetic analyses (389 isolates), sequencing and BLAST (three isolates), DNA fingerprinting (six isolates), species-specific primers (seven isolates) or based on their morphological similarity to other sequenced isolates (25 isolates) (Appendix 2).

The incidence of fungi varied between the different symptom types, with twig dieback showing the highest incidence (63 % infection) while the lowest incidence was recorded for light brown or pink discolouration (21 % infection) (Table 2). All higher-level fungal taxa considered were recovered from all symptom types, except for streaking (no Botryosphaeriaceae, Cytospora, or Diaporthe), twig dieback (no Basidiomycetes, Diatrypaceae, or Pleurostoma) and soft and white rot (only Basidiomycetes recovered). For each symptom type the incidence of symptoms yielding no fungi was higher than the incidence of any of the fungal taxa taken into consideration. The only exception to this was soft and white rot, where only six symptoms were considered of which half yielded no fungi, and the other half yielded Basidiomycota. The Phaeomoniellales had the highest incidence of all higher-level fungal taxa in all symptom types except for soft and white rot, where only Basidiomycota were recovered and twig dieback, where the Botryosphaeriaceae and ‘Other’ fungi had higher incidences (24 % and 27 %, respectively vs 17 % for the Phaeomoniellales). The highest incidence of the Phaeomoniellales was recorded for internal black lines (41 %), followed by streaking (33 %), dark brown or black discolouration (29 %), dark brown or black margins (25 %), twig dieback (17 %), and light brown or pink discolouration (14 %) (Table 2). Twig dieback yielded the highest incidences of Botryosphaeriaceae (23.8 %), Diaporthe (7.1 %), Phaeoacremonium (10.3 %), and ‘Other’ fungi (27.0 %).

Table 2

Fungal incidence in each of seven different symptom types in European and wild olive wood. Numbers represent the number of symptoms from which the respective fungi were recovered, followed by the percentage in parentheses. Symptom types are depicted in Fig. 1.

Fungal groupStreaking (n=100)Twig dieback (n=126)Soft/white rot (n=6)Dark brown or black margin (n=549)Internal black lines (n=149)Light brown or pink discolouration (n=280)Dark brown or black discolouration (n=346)
Basidiomycota 2(2.0 %)3(50.0 %)10(1.8 %)6(4.0 %)3(1.1 %)17(4.9 %)
Botryosphaeriaceae 30(23.8 %)15(2.7 %)8(5.4 %)8(2.9 %)9(2.6 %)
Cytospora 1(0.8 %)12(2.2 %)3(2.0 %)2(0.7 %)7(2.0 %)
Diaporthe 9(7.1 %)5(0.9 %)2(1.3 %)2(0.7 %)8(2.3 %)
Diatrypaceae 1(1.0 %)10(1.8 %)3(2.0 %)2(0.7 %)2(0.6 %)
Phaeoacremonium 2(2.0 %)13(10.3 %)14(2.6 %)3(2.0 %)6(2.1 %)6(1.7 %)
Phaeomoniellales 33(33.0 %)22(17.5 %)137(25.0 %)61(40.9 %)38(13.6 %)102(29.5 %)
Pleurostoma 3(3.0 %)10(1.8 %)6(4.0 %)2(0.7 %)9(2.6 %)
Other4(4.0 %)34(27.0 %)47(8.6 %)12(8.1 %)8(2.9 %)36(10.4 %)
No fungi60(60.0 %)47(37.3 %)3(50.0 %)341(62.1 %)73(49.0 %)220(78.6 %)190(54.9 %)

Identification of isolates

The list of isolates identified to species level is summarised in Appendix 2 and maximum likelihood phylogenies supporting these identifications are available on TreeBASE (study S26669). A total of 99 different fungal taxa were identified during this study, of which 85 were recovered from European olive trees, 33 from wild olive trees and 23 from both hosts (Table 3, Appendix 2). Forty-two of the recovered species belonged to higher level fungal taxa often associated with trunk disease or dieback of various hosts. These included the class Basidiomycota (six spp.), the families Botryosphaeriaceae (eight spp.) and Diatrypaceae (two spp.), the order Phaeomoniellales (10 spp.), and the genera Biscogniauxia (one sp.), Cytospora (two spp.), Diaporthe (two spp.), Didymosphaeria (two spp.), Geosmithia (one sp.), Phaeoacremonium (seven spp.), and Pleurostoma (one sp.) (Table 3). All species recovered at incidences of more than 5 % were among the classes, orders, families, or genera mentioned above, except for Coniothyrium ferrarisianum (phylogenetically a species of Didymocyrtis, TreeBASE study S26669 tree Tr125042) that was present on 7.6 % (n = 11) of the European olive trees sampled (Table 3). Based on the percentage of infected samples, the most prevalent fungal species infecting both European and wild olives in the Western Cape province of South Africa is a new species of Pseudophaeomoniella (Table 3). This fungus was isolated from 42.8 % (n = 62) and 54.8 % (n = 23) of the European olive and wild olive samples, respectively. Other fungi from these higher-level taxa that occurred in more than 5 % of the European olive samples were Neofusicoccum cryptoaustrale/stellenboschiana (11.7 %), Diaporthe foeniculina (10.3 %), Neofusicoccum australe (9 %), Phaeoacremonium scolyti (7.6 %), Pleurostoma richardsiae (6.9 %), and Eutypa lata (6.2 %) (Table 3). With the exception of Neofusicoccum australe and Coniothyrium ferrarisianum, all these fungi were also recovered from wild olives, although not always at incidences of 5 % or more. In wild olive samples, the most prevalent fungi after the new Pseudophaeomoniella sp. were Phaeoacremonium oleae (19.1 %), Diaporthe foeniculina (9.5 %), Eutypa lata (9.5 %), Biscogniauxia rosacearum (7.1 %), Neophaeomoniella niveniae (7.1 %), and Pleurostoma richardsiae (7.1 %) (Table 3). With the exception of Phaeoacremonium oleae all these fungi were also recovered from European olives, although not necessarily at incidences of 5 % or more. Several other fungi from fungal groups often associated with trunk disease and dieback in various crops were also recovered from either European or wild olives. These included fungi from the Basidiomycota (Fomitiporella viticola, Peniophora lycii, Phlebia acerina, T. versicolor), the Botryosphaeriaceae (Diplodia seriata, N. vitifusiforme, and four undescribed species), Cytospora (C. sp. WVJ-2015a), Diaporthe (D. ambigua), the Diatrypaceae (Cryptovalsa ampelina), Didymosphaeria (Dy. rubi-ulmifolii and Dy. variabile), Phaeoacremonium (Pc. africanum, Pc. minimum, Pc. parasiticum, Pc. prunicola, and Pc. spadicum) and the Phaeomoniellales (Neophaeomoniella zymoides and six undescribed species) (Table 3).

Table 3

Incidence and distribution of 43 fungal taxa identified from 145 European and 42 wild olive trees in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Only taxa from fungal groups often associated with dieback or decline diseases, and other taxa recovered at incidences of 5 % or more, are included here. Fifty-five additional fungal taxa that are not commonly considered as pathogens contributing to dieback and decline diseases, and that had incidences of less than 5 %, are included in Appendix 2.

Fungal groupSpeciesIncidence1
Number of districts2
European olive (n=145)Wild olive (n=42)European olive (n=10)Wild olive (n=9)
Basidiomycota Fomitiporella sp. (Taxon 1)6(4.1 %)3
Peniophora lycii 2(1.4 %)1
Phlebia acerina 1(0.7 %)1
Punctularia atropurpurascens 2(4.8 %)2
Schizophyllum commune 4(2.8 %)3
Trametes versicolor 2(1.4 %)2
Biscogniauxia Biscogniauxia rosacearum 2(1.4 %)3(7.1 %)12
Botryosphaeriaceae Diplodia seriata 3(2.1 %)3
Neofusicoccum australe 13(9.0 %)4
Neofusicoccum cryptoaustrale/stellenboschiana 17(11.7 %)1(2.4 %)31
Neofusicoccum sp. 41(0.7 %)1
Neofusicoccum sp. 82(1.4 %)1
Neofusicoccum sp. PMM-2014a1(0.7 %)1
Neofusicoccum sp. WvJ-2015a4(2.8 %)1(2.4 %)41
Neofusicoccum vitifusiforme 1(0.7 %)1(2.4 %)11
Coniothyrium s.lat. Coniothyrium ferrarisianum 3 11(7.6 %)3
Cytospora Cytospora pruinosa 6(4.1 %)1(2.4 %)31
Cytospora sp. WvJ-2015a6(4.1 %)3
Diaporthe Diaporthe ambigua 1(0.7 %)1
Diaporthe foeniculina 15(10.3 %)4(9.5 %)63
Diatrypaceae Cryptovalsa ampelina 1(0.7 %)1
Eutypa lata 9(6.2 %)4(9.5 %)42
Didymosphaeria Didymosphaeria rubi-ulmifolii 1(0.7 %)1(2.4 %)11
Didymosphaeria variabile 2(1.4 %)2
Geosmithia Geosmithia sp. CFJS-2015a2(1.4 %)1(2.4 %)21
Phaeoacremonium Phaeoacremonium africanum 1(0.7 %)1
Phaeoacremonium minimum 1(0.7 %)1
Phaeoacremonium oleae 8(19 %)6
Phaeoacremonium parasiticum 3(2.1 %)2
Phaeoacremonium prunicola 1(2.4 %)1
Phaeoacremonium scolyti 11(7.6 %)1(2.4 %)31
Phaeoacremonium spadicum 1(2.4 %)1
Phaeomoniellales Celerioriella umnquma 5(3.4 %)1(2.4 %)31
Neophaeomoniella niveniae 1(0.7 %)3(7.1 %)12
Neophaeomoniella zymoides 2(1.4 %)1(2.4 %)21
Pseudophaeomoniella globosa 62(42.8 %)23(54.8 %)99
Vredendaliella oleae 1(0.7 %)1
Xenocylindrosporium margaritarum 2(1.4 %)1(2.4 %)21
Xenocylindrosporium sp. CFJS-2015c3(2.1 %)3
Xenocylindrosporium sp. CFJS-2015e1(0.7 %)1
Xenocylindrosporium sp. CFJS-2015f1(0.7 %)1
Xenocylindrosporium sp. CFJS-2015g1(0.7 %)1
Pleurostoma Pleurostoma richardsiae 10(6.9 %)3(7.1 %)53

1Incidence values represent numbers of infected trees followed by percentages in parentheses.

2Districts sampled include Calitzdorp, Ceres Plateau, Franschhoek (wild olives only), Lutzville Valley, Paarl, Robertson, Stellenbosch Swartland (European olives only), Tygerberg, Walker Bay (European olives only), Wellington (wild olives only), and Worcester (European olives only). The numbers of samples collected in each district are indicated in Appendix 1.

3Phylogenetically this species groups within the genus Didymocyrtis (see TreeBASE study S26669, tree Tr125042).

Most of the remaining fungal species not belonging to the higher-level taxa mentioned above occurred at incidences lower than 3 %. Exceptions include Mycocalicium victoriae (3.4 % on European olives, not recovered from wild olives) and Teichospora sp. CFJS-2015a (4.8 % on wild olives, not recovered from European olives) (Appendix 2).

Phylogenetic analyses of the Phaeomoniellales

Phylogenetic analyses of the LSU region of the Phaeomoniellales provided good support (≥ 96 % bootstrap support, ≥ 0.97 posterior probability) for most genera included, the only exceptions being Celerioriella that had low support (< 60 % bootstrap support, < 0.6 posterior probability) and Xenocylindrosporium that only had moderate support in the maximum likelihood analysis (71 %), but good support in Bayesian analysis (0.98 posterior probability) (Fig. 2). Strain PMM1193 grouped with Celothelium cinchonarum with strong support in Bayesian analysis (0.99 posterior probability); however, this relationship only had low bootstrap support in maximum likelihood analysis (61 %), and Ct. cinchonarum was positioned on a long branch, indicating considerable phylogenetic distance between PMM1193 and that species (Fig. 2). The concatenated ITS-LSU-ACT-TEF1α-TUB2 phylogeny supported the initial identification of Phaeomoniellales strains collected during this survey based on ITS (TreeBASE study S26669, tree Tr125034). Most strains of the Phaeomoniellales collected in this study and included in the multi-gene phylogeny grouped in six well-supported clades, with four strains occupying unique positions (Fig. 3). Seventeen strains formed a strongly supported clade (98 % bootstrap support, 1.00 posterior probability) that did not include any reference sequences, but was related to Pseudophaeomoniella oleae and Pseudophaeomoniella oleicola. Strains CSN801 and CSN1091 formed a clade with good support (85 % bootstrap support, 0.98 posterior probability) that was related to, but distinct from Celerioriella petrophiles. Strains CSN743 and CSN742, respectively, grouped in clades containing the type strains of Neophaeomoniella zymoides (100 % bootstrap support, 1.00 posterior probability) and Neophaeomoniella niveniae (98 % bootstrap support, 1.00 posterior probability). Nine strains collected in this study formed a diverse clade with weak support (67 % bootstrap support, 0.73 posterior probability) that did not include any reference sequences, but was related to Xenocylindrosporium kirstenboschense. Within this clade, six isolates formed two clades of three isolates each that had complete support (100 % bootstrap support, 1.00 posterior probability). The remaining three isolates in this clade (CSN1174, CSN1191, and CSN1222) occupied unique positions. As with the LSU phylogeny, strain PMM1193 grouped on its own in a position related to, but distinct from, Celothelium cinchonarum.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-2020-45-8-g002.jpg

Generic classification of the Phaeomoniellales based on maximum likelihood analysis of the LSU gene. Bootstrap support and Bayesian posterior probability values higher than 60 % and 0.6, respectively, are indicated.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-2020-45-8-g003.jpg

Maximum likelihood phylogeny of the Phaeomoniellales based on the concatenated LSU, ITS, ACT, TEF1α and TUB2 regions. Bootstrap support and Bayesian posterior probability values higher than 60 % and 0.6, respectively, are indicated. Novel taxa described in this study are indicated in bold. Type strains are indicated with T.

TAXONOMY

Celerioriella umnquma C.F.J. Spies, van Jaarsveld, L. Mostert & Halleen, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB836257; Fig. 4

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-2020-45-8-g004.jpg

Celerioriella umnquma. a–c. Colony morphology on a. MEA; b. PDA; c. OA; d–e. adelophialides; f–g. conidiophores with slimy heads of conidia. — Scale bars: d, g = 10 μm, d applies to e–f.

Etymology. Referring to the Xhosa word for the host, olive, umnquma.

Typus. South Africa, Western Cape, Somerset-West, necrotic wood of European olive (Olea europaea subsp. europaea), 10 Mar. 2015, C.F.J. Spies (holotype CBS H-24370, culture ex-type CBS 146756 = STE-U 7966 = CSN1091).

Mycelium smooth-walled to verruculose, hyaline, 1–1.5(–2) (av. 2) μm diam. Pycnidia not observed. Conidia on hyphae borne in slimy heads on intercalary adelophialides and on terminal or lateral phialides. Terminal and lateral phialides smooth-walled, hyaline to pale brown, mainly slender elongate ampulliform to navicular, (8–)8.5–17.5(–19.5) × 1.5–2(–2.5) (av. 13.5 × 2) μm. Adelophialides abundant, mainly cylindrical, sometimes conical or cylindrical with an inflated base, 1–8(–9.5) × 1–2(–3.5) (av. 2.5 × 1.5) μm. Collarettes cylindrical, 0.5–1 × 0.5–1(–1.5) (av. 1 × 1) μm (only 23 measured). Conidia smooth-walled, hyaline, subcylindrical to oblong ellipsoidal, ovoid, obovoid, 2.5–4(–4.5) × 1–2 (av. 3.5 × 1.5) μm. Conidiophores branched or unbranched, up to 4 septa, 15.5–37.5 × 2–2.5 (av. 22.5 × 2) μm (only 12 measured).

Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA spreading, reaching 20, 31 and 42 mm diam in 2, 3 and 4 wk, respectively; surface smooth, flat, with some central folds, without aerial mycelium, with entire edge, after 3 wk pale rosy buff above and in reverse. On MEA flat, surface smooth with central folds, without aerial mycelium, with entire margin, after 3 wk pale rosy vinaceous above, rosy buff in reverse. On OA flat, with felty aerial mycelia, white with pale hazel sections near the centre and margins of the colony.

Notes — Despite the fact that none of the phylogenies presented provides good support for the Celerioriella clade including Ce. umnquma, this species is included in Celerioriella based on morphological similarities to this genus (e.g., the abundance of adelophialides) and differences to the phylogenetically closely related genera Pseudophaeomoniella that develops a yeast-like synasexual morph in culture (Crous et al. 2015) and Dolabra that has long, fusiform conidia (Rossman et al. 2010). Celerioriella umnquma is phylogenetically related to, but distinct from, Ce. petrophiles. Morphologically, these species can be distinguished based on the thinner hyphae of Ce. umnquma and colony pigmentation on PDA and MEA. The pycnidial conidiomata reported for Ce. petrophiles and other Celerioriella spp. have not been observed in Ce. umnquma. A BLAST search of the ITS region of Ce. umnquma against the Nucleotide database of GenBank revealed probable conspecificity (98–99 % similarity over 419 and 454 bases) with two strains of an unidentified ‘Phaeomoniella’ species recovered from olive twigs in Portugal (KT804064 and KU325017; Gomes et al. 2019). In the current investigation this species was recovered from both European and wild olives, but at low incidences (< 4 %).

Pseudophaeomoniella globosa C.F.J. Spies, Carlucci, Moyo, van Jaarsveld, Halleen & L. Mostert, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB836258; Fig. 5

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-2020-45-8-g005.jpg

Pseudophaeomoniella globosa. a–c. Colony morphology on a. MEA; b. PDA; c. OA; d–i. conidia and conidiogenous cells on hyphal growth; d. adelophialides; e. subcylindrical phialide; f. microcyclic conidiation; g. slimy heads of conidia on adelophialides; h. endoconidia produced within empty hyphae; i. conidiophores; j–l. pycnidia produced on pine needles on SNA; j. empty pycnidium; k–l. pycnidia oozing clear conidial suspension; m–n. conidiogenous cells produced within pycnidia; m. globose conidiogenous cell; n. sub-cylindrical to sub-globose conidiogenous cells on pycnidial wall. — Scale bars: d, n = 10 μm, d applies to e–i and m; j = 100 μm, applies to k–l.

Etymology. Referring to the globose conidiogenous cells observed in pycnidia produced on olive wood.

Typus. South Africa, Western Cape, Robertson, necrotic wood of European olive (Olea europaea subsp. europaea), 2 Nov. 2014, P. Moyo (holotype CBS H-24369, culture ex-type CBS 146755 = STE-U 7951 = CSN185).

Mycelium smooth-walled to finely verruculose, hyaline, (1–)1.5–2.5 (av. 2) μm diam. Yeast-like growth observed occasionally. Conidia forming on hyphal cells and in pycnidia. Pycnidia produced on pine needles on SNA after incubation for 3–4 wk, (66.5–)67.5–149.5(–151) μm diam, dark brown to black, seemingly opening by irregular rupture, exuding clear conidial suspension, wall of 1–4 layers of brown textura angularis; conidiogenous cells mainly ampulliform, sometimes subcylindrical, navicular, globose to sub-globose, lageniform, pyriform, or irregular shaped, 3.5–9(–10) × 2–4.5 (av. 6 × 3) μm; collarettes inconspicuous, short, cylindrical, 0.5–1.5 × 1–1.5 (av. 1 × 1) μm (only five characterised); conidia smooth-walled, hyaline, subcylindrical to oblong ellipsoidal, 2.5–3 × 1–1.5 (av. 3 × 1) μm. Conidia on hyphae borne in slimy heads on intercalary adelophialides and terminal or lateral phialides, or in rows within empty hyphae (endoconidia). Terminal and lateral phialides mainly elongate ampulliform to subcylindrical with tapering apex, occasionally navicular to ovoid, obovoid or with irregular shape, 4–16.5 × (1–)1.5–3 (av. 8.5 × 2) μm. Adelophialides mainly conical, sometimes subcylindrical or elongate ampulliform, 1–3.5(–4) × 1–3 (av. 2 × 2) μm. Phialides and adelophialides often constricted at the collarette. Collarettes cylindrical, 0.5–1.5 × 0.5–2 (av. 1 × 1) μm (only 18 measured). Conidia smooth-walled, hyaline, subcylindrical to oblong ellipsoidal to obovoid, (2–)2.5–3.5(–4) × 1–2 (av. 3 × 1.5) μm. Endoconidia subcylindrical to oblong ellipsoidal, 2–3.5 × 1–1.5 (av. 3 × 1.5) μm. Conidiophores uncommon, branched or unbranched, up to 3 septa, 7.5–21 × 2–2.5 (av. 13.5 × 2.5) μm (only 4 measured).

Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA spreading, reaching 25, 37 and 47 mm diam in 2, 3 and 4 wk, respectively; surface smooth, flat, without aerial mycelium, with entire edge, after 3 wk pale buff above and buff to pale honey in reverse. On MEA smooth, flat with some folds in the centre, without aerial mycelium, with entire edge, after 3 wk white above, pale buff with pale honey centre in reverse. On OA smooth with woolly aerial mycelium in the centre, with entire edge, after 3 wk white with greenish olivaceous centre.

Additional materials examined. South Africa, Western Cape, Strand, internal wood necrosis of wild olive (Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata), 25 Sept. 2014, P. Moyo, cultures CBS 146758 = STE-U 7947 = CSN41; Western Cape, Stellenbosch, Jonkershoek, internal wood necrosis of wild olive (Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata), 12 Feb. 2015, C.F.J. Spies, cultures CBS 146759 = STE-U 7953 = CSN329.

Notes — Pseudophaeomoniella globosa is widespread and occurs frequently on European and wild olives in the Western Cape province of South Africa. Phylogenetically, this species is very closely related to P. oleae and P. oleicola. This was also confirmed by a BLAST search using the ITS region. Of the four gene regions used here for phylogenetic analyses, TEF1α provides the highest support for the distinction between the species. Morphologically, P. globosa can be distinguished by the production of endoconidia, which has not been reported for the other species of Pseudophaeomoniella. Strains CSN41 and CSN329 produced phialides and adelophialides with more diverse and irregular shapes than the type strain, e.g., some phialides were sub-globose, ovoid or obovoid. This is reflected in the slightly shorter and wider dimensions recorded for these two strains: 3.5–10.5(–11.5) × (1.5–)2–3(–3.5) (av. 6.5 × 2.5) μm and (3–)3.5–9.5(–10.5) × 2–3(–3.5) (av. 6 × 2.5) μm for strains CSN41 and CSN329, respectively. Hyphae of strain CSN329 sometimes had pale to golden brown pigmentation and individual hyphal segments were sometimes inflated and irregular shaped. Pale brown pigmentation of some phialides was also observed in this strain. Three additional strains were included in studies of culture morphology, but not micromorphology. Strain CSN808 on PDA after 3 wk was pale buff with a pale rosy buff centre and pale vinaceous buff to fawn concentric rings. Pale primrose pigmentation was observed on the PDA colony of CSN960. Some strains had radial folds on PDA and/or MEA. CSN824 on MEA after 3 wk with pale olivaceous buff centre. Strain CSN960 on MEA after 3 wk with concentric folds. Central pigmentation on OA varying from none to sulphur yellow, citrine green, grey olivaceous, pale olivaceous grey, or greenish black.

Vredendaliella C.F.J. Spies, Moyo, Halleen & L. Mostert, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB836261

Etymology. In reference to the location where this genus was first recovered.

Type species. Vredendaliella oleae C.F.J. Spies, Moyo, Halleen & L. Mostert.

Mycelium consisting of hyaline to dark brown septate hyphae. Conidia formed on hyphae and in pycnidia. Conidiogenous cells on hyphae mostly reduced to adelophialides. Conidia borne on slimy heads on conidiogenous cells, aseptate, hyaline, smooth-walled, subcylindrical, oblong-ellipsoidal to obovoid. Conidiomata pycnidial, dark brown to black, semi-immersed or superficial, sub-globose or irregularly shaped. Conidiogenous cells brown, smooth-walled, ellipsoidal to broadly ellipsoidal. Conidia smooth-walled, hyaline, subcylindrical to oblong-ellipsoidal to obovoid.

Vredendaliella oleae C.F.J. Spies, Moyo, Halleen & L. Mostert, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB836263; Fig. 6

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-2020-45-8-g006.jpg

Vredendaliella oleae. a–c. Colony morphology on a. MEA; b. PDA; c. OA; d–g. pigmented conidiogenous cells in pycnidia; d–f. lens-shaped to ovoid conidiogenous cells with bib-like collars (indicated by arrowheads); g. sub-cylindrical conidiogenous cell; h–i. pycnidia on pine needles on SNA oozing clear conidial suspension; j–p. hyphal growth on pine needles on SNA; j, m, n. phialides; k, l. conidiophores; o. conidia; p. hyphae with irregular swollen segments. — Scale bars: d, p = 10 μm, d applies to e–g and j–o; i = 100 μm, applies to h.

Etymology. Referring to the host from which this species was recovered.

Mycelium smooth-walled, forming irregularly swollen hyphal cells on PDA, hyaline, sometimes dark brown, 1–2.5 (av. 1.5) μm. Conidia forming on hyphal cells and in pycnidia. Pycnidia forming on pine needles on SNA after 4 wk, globose to irregularly globose (50–)60.5–160.5(–170.5) (av. 106.5) μm. Seemingly opening by irregular rupture to exude clear conidial suspension. Conidiogenous cells in pycnidia usually dark brown, ellipsoidal to broadly ellipsoidal, oval or lens-shaped, sometimes ampulliform, fusiform or cylindrical, often with bib-like collar, (4.5–)5–11(–12.5) × 2–5 (av. 7.5 × 4) μm; collarettes inconspicuous, cylindrical, 0.5–1.5 × 0.5–1.5 (av. 0.5 × 1) μm (only 11 characterised); conidia smooth-walled, hyaline, ellipsoidal to oblong-ellipsoidal or subcylindrical, 2.5–4.5(–5) × 1.5–2 (av. 3 × 1.5) μm. Conidia on hyphae borne in slimy heads on intercalary adelophialides and terminal or lateral phialides. Terminal and lateral phialides mainly subcylindrical to navicular, (4–)6–12(–14) × 1–3(–3.5) (av. 9 × 2) μm (only 29 measured). Adelophialides mainly subcylindrical, sometimes conical, 1–8 × 1–2.5 (av. 3.5 × 1.5) μm. Collarettes cylindrical, 0.5–1.5 × 1–2 (av. 1 × 1.5) μm (only 9 measured). Conidia smooth-walled, hyaline, subcylindrical to oblong-ellipsoidal to obovoid, 2.5–3.5 × 1–2 (av. 3 × 1.5) μm. Conidiophores uncommon, branched or unbranched, usually brown, up to 1 septum, 8–17 × 1–3.5 (av. 15 × 2.5) μm (only 5 measured).

Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA slow growing, without aerial mycelium, creased, with undulate margin, after 3 wk white, pale buff in reverse. On MEA restricted, without aerial mycelium, creased, with undulate margin, after 3 wk white above, pale buff in reverse. On OA smooth with sparse woolly mycelium in the centre, with entire margin, after 3 wk white.

Specimens examined. South Africa, Western Cape, Vredendal, necrotic wood of European olive (Olea europaea subsp. europaea), 13 Aug. 2013, P. Moyo (holotype CBS H-24371, culture ex-type CBS 146757 = STE-U 7969 = PMM1193).

Notes — Vredendaliella oleae is currently known only from the ex-type strain reported here. An ITS BLAST search on the Nucleotide database of GenBank revealed that the closest match to this species only had 95 % sequence identity over 483 bases (KP992094), suggesting that there are currently no other records of the ITS region of Vredendaliella oleae on GenBank. The closest BLAST match (KP992094) is of an unclassified Eurotiomycetes species from Juniperus deppeana in the USA (Huang et al. 2016). The LSU phylogeny presented here suggests that Vredendaliella is related to Celothelium as represented by Ct. cinchonarum, although bootstrap support for this relationship is not very strong (61 % bootstrap support, 0.99 posterior probability) and long branch lengths suggests considerable evolutionary distance between the two taxa. Unfortunately, the only sequenced Celothelium species (Ct. aciculiferum and Ct. cinchonarum) are only known from their ascomata (no data are available on conidiomata) and Vredendaliella oleae is currently only known from its conidiomata, since no ascomata were observed in this study. This complicates morphological comparisons between these species. Conidiomata in other Celothelium species are described as pycnidial or stromatic with thin-walled, lageniform conidiogenous cells, and multi-septate, filiform macroconidia, but no microconidia (Aguirre-Hudson 1991). Vredendaliella oleae differs from them in the shape of the conidiogenous cells, absence of macroconidia and presence of microconidia.

Xenocylindrosporium margaritarum C.F.J. Spies, van Jaarsveld, Halleen & L. Mostert, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB836260; Fig. 7

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-2020-45-8-g007.jpg

Xenocylindrosporium margaritarum. a–c. Colony morphology on a. MEA; b. PDA; c. OA; d–l. hyphae, conidia and conidiogenous cells on hyphal growth; d. conidia; e, f, h–j. phialides; g. verruculose hyphal segments; k–l. chains of swollen hyphal segments. — Scale bars: d, f, l = 10 μm, f applies to e and g–k.

Etymology. Latin, meaning ‘of pearls’, a dual reference to the chains of globose vegetative hyphal cells that resemble strings of pearls, and the location from which the type strain was recovered (Paarl, meaning ‘pearl’).

Typus. South Africa, Western Cape, Paarl, necrotic wood of European olive (Olea europaea subsp. europaea), 4 Feb. 2015, C.F.J. Spies (holotype CBS H-24372, culture ex-type CBS 146848 = STE-U 9059 = CSN1179).

Mycelium on PDA after 4 wk consisting mainly of branched chains of hyaline, smooth-walled, globose to irregular cylindrical hyphal cells, individual hyphal cells sometimes include inflated and non-inflated sections (4.5–)5.5–15.5(–18.5) × (2.5–)3–10(–11) (av. 10 × 5) μm. Hyaline to dark green hyphae consisting of smooth-walled to verruculose cylindrical cells were occasionally observed. Conidia produced on vegetative hyphae. Conidiogenous cells monophialidic, smooth-walled, hyaline, similar in shape and size to vegetative hyphal cells, globose, ampulliform to cylindrical, sometimes with a narrow elongated cylindrical neck, (6–)6.5–14.5(–16.5) × 3–8.5 (av. 10 × 5) μm. Collarettes rarely observed, cylindrical, 0.5–1 × 1–2 (av. 1 ×1.5) μm (only 7 characterised). Conidia solitary, smooth-walled, hyaline, single-celled, curved, tapering to rounded apex and truncate base, (10.5–)12–20(–20.5) × 2–3(–3.5) (av. 16 × 2.5) μm. Swollen conidia becoming septate and differentiating to become vegetative hyphal or conidiogenous cells.

Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA very slow growing. On MEA without prominent aerial mycelium, irregularly raised, with undulate margin, after 3 wk white and leaden grey above, white and olivaceous grey in reverse. On PDA uneven, irregularly raised, smooth surface, with some felty aerial mycelium, with undulate margin, after 3 wk white and grey olivaceous to iron grey above, white in reverse. On OA raised, felty to woolly aerial mycelium, with entire edge, after 3 wk buff, a clear exudate is produced around the colony.

Notes — This species was recovered from both European and wild olives in this study, but at low incidences (< 3 %). An ITS BLAST on the Nucleotide database of GenBank suggests that there are no other ITS representatives of X. margaritarum on GenBank (closest match < 91.5 % sequence identity over ~ 600 bases). Although generic concepts within the Phaeomoniellales have not been resolved, phylogenetic analyses of the LSU gene region groups X. margaritarum with X. kirstenboschense (type species of Xenocylindrosporium; 71 % bootstrap support, 0.98 posterior probability). Conidiogenous cells and conidia of X. margaritarum also conform to the generic description provided by Crous et al. (2009). Unfortunately, the ex-type strain of X. margaritarum did not produce acervuloid conidiomata typical of the genus when cultured on MEA, PDA, SNA with autoclaved pine needles, SNA with autoclaved olive twigs and leaves, or OA. Alternative culturing methods might be required to induce these structures. Sporulation of the ex-type strain was only observed on PDA after 4 wk. Two additional strains of X. margaritarum (CSN1216 and CSN1917) produced pale buff to pale rosy buff colonies on OA, but exhibited colony morphologies similar to that of the type strain on MEA and PDA. These strains did not sporulate on MEA, PDA, or OA and were not characterised with regards to other micromorphological characteristics.

DISCUSSION

This survey has revealed a unique community of fungi associated with dieback and decline related symptoms on European and wild olive trees in South Africa. On European olive trees, species of the Phaeomoniellales were the most prevalent, being isolated from 48 % of the samples, followed by species of Botryosphaeriaceae (19 %), while all other higher-level fungal taxa including Phaeoacremonium and the Diatrypaceae occurred at incidences of 11 % or less. Similar surveys of fungi associated with wilt, dieback and cankers on European olive trees in Europe and the USA found the dominant fungi to be the Botryosphaeriaceae in Spain and the USA (Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013, Moral et al. 2017) and Phaeoacremonium or the Botryosphaeriaceae in Italy (Carlucci et al. 2013, 2015). Recently published data further suggest that species of Cytospora are also important contributors to cankers and dieback of olive trees in the USA (Úrbez-Torres et al. 2020). There are several possible reasons why the fungi associated with olive dieback and decline in South Africa are so different to those reported in the countries mentioned above. The age of the olive industry and the olive trees planted is likely to be an important contributing factor, since Carlucci et al. (2013, 2015) found higher incidences of some pathogens such as the Botryosphaeriaceae and Phaeoacremonium in older trees (25–35 yr in Carlucci et al. (2013) and > 50 yr in Carlucci et al. (2015)), whereas most South African olive trees are younger than 25 yr. Úrbez-Torres et al. (2020) suggested that climatological conditions and the availability of susceptible hosts may have influenced the distribution of Cytospora species across olive producing counties in California. Similarly, environmental differences between South Africa, the USA and Europe may have contributed to differences in the profiles of fungal species associated with olive decline and dieback. The fact that P. globosa was recovered frequently from both European and indigenous wild olive trees in South Africa, has a wide distribution within the Western Cape province, and has not been reported from any other host or country, suggests that this species might be indigenous to South Africa, with the native wild olive trees as its primary host. However, it is also possible that this species was introduced from abroad along with the European olive host, and has since adopted the indigenous wild olive as a new host. Further studies are required to confirm this.

A surprisingly high number of novel taxa in the Phaeomoniellales were discovered during the current survey. The order Phaeomoniellales was recently introduced by Chen et al. (2015) to accommodate the genera Celothelium, Dolabra, Moristroma, Phaeomoniella, and Xenocylindrosporium. Crous et al. (2015) further split the genus Phaeomoniella into six different genera (Aequabiliella, Celerioriella, Minutiella, Neophaeomoniella, Paraphaeomoniella, and Phaeomoniella), and also introduced Pseudophaeomoniella as a new genus. Phylogenetic relationships among the genera within the Phaeomoniellales have not been resolved (Chen et al. 2015), which complicates the generic classification within this order. None of the gene regions used in our analyses resolved all genus-level relationships with good support. However, phylogenetic analyses of the D1–D3 regions of the LSU region provided moderate to good support for almost all genera in the Phaeomoniellales for which data were included from more than one species, i.e., Moristroma, Neophaeomoniella, Pseudophaeomoniella, and Xenocylindrosporium. The only exception was Celerioriella (Ce. dura, Ce. petrophiles, Ce. prunicola, and Ce. umnquma) that had low support in maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses. The fact that most genera with more than one species in the Phaeomoniellales were well-supported in phylogenetic analyses of the LSU region suggests that this region is currently adequate for the delineation of genera in the Phaeomoniellales. Kraus et al. (2020) recently described six new species of known genera in the Phaeomoniellales collected in German vineyards. Such collections and descriptions broaden the available knowledge on genera in the Phaeomoniellales and help to consolidate generic concepts within this order. The future discovery and description of taxa in the Phaeomoniellales will no doubt further improve the resolution of evolutionary relationships and generic boundaries among taxa within this order.

Members of the Phaeomoniellales are generally associated with plants as endophytes, saprophytes or plant pathogens (Chen et al. 2015). Species that have been associated with vascular discolouration and other trunk disease or decline symptoms in various hosts include Phaeomoniella chlamydospora (one of the causal agents of Petri disease and esca in grapevines), Aequabiliella effusa, Celerioriella dura, Celerioriella prunicola, Minutiella tardicola, Neophaeomoniella zymoides, Pseudophaeomoniella oleae, and Pseudophaeomoniella oleicola (Larignon & Dubos 1997, Damm et al. 2010, Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013, Crous et al. 2015). Symptom associations in the current survey indicated a high incidence of Phaeomoniellales (mainly Pseudophaeomoniella globosa) in streaking symptoms of European and wild olives (33 % incidence) while all other fungi occurred at low incidences (≤ 4 %) in this symptom type. Similarly, vascular streaking of grapevines and olives have been associated with infections by Phaeomoniella chlamydospora (Mugnai et al. 1999, White et al. 2011b, Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013). The Phaeomoniellales also had high incidences in other symptoms of branches and trunks of European and wild olives where black or dark brown discolouration of the wood was observed (25–41 %). The recently described Pseudophaeomoniella oleae and Pseudophaeomoniella oleicola were both recovered from European olive trees in Italy and reported to cause extensive wood discolouration (Crous et al. 2015). Carlucci et al. (2008) reported the development of brown streaking, chlorosis, loss of leaves and shoot dieback in European olive trees six years after inoculation with a species of Pseudophaeomoniella that had incorrectly been identified as Lecythophora lignicola at the time (Carlucci pers. comm.). Pseudophaeomoniella globosa, the dominant species recovered in the current survey, is closely related to the other two species in this genus. This close evolutionary relationship, together with the wide distribution, high incidence and strong association of P. globosa with internal wood symptoms of olives as observed in the current survey, implicates this species as an important role player in olive dieback and decline in South Africa. Other members of the Phaeomoniellales were recovered at much lower incidences, and only two of the eight species are known (Neophaeomoniella niveniae and Np. zymoides). The only previous record of Np. niveniae is that of the type, which was collected from leaves of Nivenia stokoei, also in the Western Cape Province of South Africa (Crous et al. 2011). The pathogenic ability of this species is unknown. Neophaeomoniella zymoides, although initially reported as an endophyte of pine needles in Korea (Lee et al. 2006), was later associated with necrotic wood of plum trees in South Africa (Limpopo Province), and shown to cause significant lesions when inoculated on peach shoots, but not on plum (Damm et al. 2010). More recently this species was also recovered from spore traps in German vineyards, but found to be non-pathogenic to grapevine (Kraus et al. 2020). Of the remaining Phaeomoniellales species collected from olive trees in this study, one is a new genus here described as Vredendaliella, and five are previously undescribed species of Xenocylindrosporium. Formal descriptions of four of the undescribed species of Xenocylindrosporium were not possible in this study due to a failure of isolates to sporulate on a variety of media. Prior to this study, Xenocylindrosporium was only known from the collection and description of the type species, X. kirstenboschense, from leaf spots of Encephalartos friderici-guilielmi (Crous et al. 2009). Although the culturing techniques and media are not clearly outlined in that study, the production of acervuloid conidiomata was reported on the host material and on MEA. In the current investigation, sporulation of Xenocylindrosporium was successfully induced only on PDA and only in one strain of X. margaritarum. Furthermore, all Xenocylindrosporium isolates exhibited slow to very slow growth on agar media. This suggests alternative culturing techniques or media would probably more ideal for investigating these fungi.

Species of the Botryosphaeriaceae were reported as the most common pathogens associated with olive dieback in the USA (Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013) and Spain (Moral et al. 2017). Species that have been reported from dieback and decline symptoms of European olives in these countries, Croatia, Italy, and New Zealand include Botryosphaeria dothidea, Diplodia mutila, Di. seriata, Dothiorella iberica, Lasiodiplodia theobromae, Neofusicoccum luteum, N. mediterraneum, N. parvum, N. ribis, and N. vitifusiforme (Taylor et al. 2001, Romero et al. 2005, Lazzizera et al. 2008, Moral et al. 2010, 2017, Kaliterna et al. 2012, Carlucci et al. 2013, 2015, Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013). Of these species only Di. seriata and N. vitifusiforme were recovered from olive trees in the current survey, and at very low incidences (1–2 %). Nevertheless, the pathogenicity of both these species to olive trees has been shown (Carlucci et al. 2013, Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013). Neofusicoccum cryptoaustrale/stellenboschiana and N. australe were the most common species of the Botryosphaeriaceae on European olives in this survey. Neofusicoccum australe has been associated with trunk diseases of grapevines, Japanese persimmons and stone fruit in South Africa (Van Niekerk et al. 2004, Damm et al. 2007, Moyo et al. 2016). This species was also reported as one of the causal agents of drupe rot of olives in Italy by Lazzizera et al. (2008). However, a re-examination of some of the isolates revealed them to be N. cryptoaustrale and N. stellenboschiana (Yang et al. 2017). In the current investigation, these two species could not be distinguished using ITS, TEF1α, and TUB2 sequence data alone or in combination. Neofusicoccum cryptoaustrale was originally isolated from Eucalyptus leaves (Crous et al. 2013) and shown to be pathogenic to this host by Pavlic-Zupanc et al. (2017). Neofusicoccum stellenboschiana was described by Yang et al. (2017) using a strain originally isolated from, and shown to be pathogenic to grapevines in South Africa by Van Niekerk et al. (2004). Four undescribed Neofusicoccum species were also recovered during the current survey, but at low incidences. Two of these, Neofusicoccum sp. 4 and Neofusicoccum sp. 8 have, respectively, previously been reported from grapevines and Proteaceae in South Africa (Van Niekerk et al. 2004, Marincowitz et al. 2008, Yang et al. 2017). The Botryosphaeriaceae were the most common fungi isolated from twig dieback symptoms in this survey. This is also in agreement with the results of Úrbez-Torres et al. (2013) who found a considerably higher incidence of Botryosphaeriaceae compared to other fungi in olive twig dieback samples in the USA. However, these authors also found a higher incidence of Botryosphaeriaceae in perennial cankers than in twig dieback samples. In our survey perennial cankers were not assessed as a single symptom type, but isolates of the Botryosphaeriaceae were also recovered from various internal wood symptoms that could have been associated with perennial cankers, although at very low incidences (≤ 5 %).

Diaporthe species have been associated with dieback and decline symptoms of European olives in Italy, Spain, and the USA (Carlucci et al. 2013, Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013, Moral et al. 2017). Aside from D. rudis (reported as D. viticola by Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013), isolates of Diaporthe reported in those surveys were not conclusively identified to the species-level. Both Moral et al. (2017) and Úrbez-Torres et al. (2013) identified some isolates as Diaporthe sp. or Phomopsis sp. groups 1 and 2. However, inclusion of the ITS sequences of those isolates in our Diaporthe phylogeny suggests that these are in fact D. foeniculina. In the current survey, this species was the most prevalent Diaporthe species and the third most prevalent fungus overall on European olives. It was also recovered from three wild olive trees. Úrbez-Torres et al. (2013) found that both D. foeniculina (reported as Phomopsis sp. groups 1 and 2) and D. rudis caused significant lesions on olive branches, but these were considerably smaller than those caused by N. mediterraneum and D. mutila. Moral et al. (2017) on the other hand, reported asymptomatic infections by inoculated D. foeniculina isolates. Diaporthe ambigua has not been reported on olives globally, but has been associated with trunk disease and decline-related symptoms in apple, Japanese persimmon, grapevine, pear and plum trees and grapevines in South Africa (Smit et al. 1996, Van Niekerk et al. 2005, White et al. 2011a, Moyo et al. 2016). This species was only recovered from a single European olive tree during the current survey and its pathogenicity to this host is currently unknown.

All Phaeoacremonium species recorded on European and wild olive trees during this survey were previously reported on these hosts by Spies et al. (2018). Elsewhere in the world, Phaeoacremonium species have been implicated in olive dieback and decline in Italy and the USA (Carlucci et al. 2008, 2013, 2015, Nigro et al. 2013, Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013). Species reported from these countries include Pc. alvesii, Pc. italicum, Pc. minimum, Pc. parasiticum, Pc. rubrigenum, Pc. scolyti, and Pc. sicilianum. In South Africa, Pc. minimum, Pc. parasiticum and Pc. scolyti have also been recovered from European olives (Spies et al. 2018; this study). With the exception of Pc. rubrigenum, all Phaeoacremonium species reported on European olives globally also occur on various woody hosts in South Africa (Mostert et al. 2006, Damm et al. 2008a, Cloete et al. 2011, White et al. 2011a, Moyo et al. 2016, Spies et al. 2018) and the aggressiveness of all species except Pc. rubrigenum has been confirmed on European olive trees (Carlucci et al. 2013, 2015, Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013). The only additional species on European olive in South Africa that have not been reported elsewhere in the world is Pc. africanum (Spies et al. 2018). Prior to that study, Pc. africanum had only been reported from apricot and was shown to be pathogenic to this host as well as to plum (Damm et al. 2008a). In Italy, Carlucci et al. (2013) reported the recovery of Phaeoacremonium (only Pc. minimum) mainly from olive trees older than 25 yr during a survey that included trees aged 18–35 yr. The incidence was not reported as the number of infected trees, but the overall percentage of tissue segments infected by Pc. minimum was low (2.1 %). Two years later, Carlucci et al. (2015) reported high incidences of Phaeoacremonium spp. in olive trees both younger and older than 50 yr (respectively 73 % and 100 % of plants infected) in Italy. Compared to the latter study, the incidences of Phaeoacremonium in European olive trees in South Africa and the USA are quite low (11 % and < 1.8 %, respectively; this study, Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013). One possible explanation for this difference could be the age of the trees, since the majority of European olive trees sampled in the current survey were younger than 25 yr. This could also be a contributing factor to the higher incidence of Phaeoacremonium observed in the wild olive trees during this study, since, although the exact ages are not known, many of these trees appeared to be very old. However, the species of Phaeoacremonium most frequently recovered from wild olives was P. oleae, a species that is not known to occur on European olives, even though these two hosts are often found in close proximity in South Africa.

A wide range of additional fungi were recovered at lower incidences from European and wild olives during the current survey. These include some species reported as olive trunk pathogens elsewhere in the world, such as Cytospora pruinosa complex, Eutypa lata, Pleurostoma richardsiae, Schizophyllum commune, and Trametes versicolor (Rumbos 1993, Carlucci et al. 2008, 2013, 2015, Moral et al. 2010, 2017, Kaliterna et al. 2012, Úrbez-Torres et al. 2013). Several of the remaining fungi, however, have not previously been reported in association with dieback or decline of European olive trees, but are known as dieback or canker pathogens of other woody hosts. Examples of these include Biscogniauxia rosacearum (Raimondo et al. 2016), Cryptovalsa ampelina (Moyo et al. 2018a, b), Didymosphaeria rubi-ulmifolii and Didymosphaeria variabile (Damm et al. 2008b, Cloete et al. 2011). The pathogenicity of these and other fungi recovered in the current survey need to be confirmed on European olive trees in a South African context.

A total of 81 of the 99 fungal taxa identified during this survey had not previously been isolated from olive or wild olive trees globally (Yang et al. 2017, Farr & Rossman continuously updated). Some of these species are known or suspected trunk disease, dieback or decline pathogens of other crops; however, their pathogenicity to olive trees need to be established in order to determine the potential threat these species pose to the olive industry in South Africa. Based on the incidence and distribution of fungi recorded in this survey, P. globosa is likely to be of major concern, if it is shown to be pathogenic.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Palesa Lebenya, Danie Marais, Julia Marais, Bongiwe Sokwaliwa, and Carine Vermeulen for assistance with sampling and isolations. We are also extremely grateful to Maria Luisa Raimondo (University of Foggia, Italy) for providing reference material and sequence data of Pseudophaeomoniella oleicola Ph58. CFJS was supported financially by the Department of Science and Technology (DST) and National Research Foundation (NRF).

Appendix 1 Numbers of European and wild olive samples collected from different districts in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Districts are defined according to the Wine of Origin scheme, see http://www.sawis.co.za/cert/download/Districts_-_Jan_2014.pdf.

European oliveWild olive
Calitzdorp22
Ceres Plateau34
Franschhoek02
Lutzville Valley2410
Paarl211
Robertson21
Stellenbosch2716
Swartland120
Tygerberg144
Walker Bay390
Wellington02
Worcester10
TOTAL 14542

Appendix 2 Species identities, host and location information for 440 fungal strains identified during this survey.

SpeciesStrain1LocationHostGenBankBasis for identification2
Anteaglonium sp. CFJS-2015aCSN641StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813895TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125025
CSN649StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813897TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125025
Anteaglonium sp. CFJS-2015bCSN642StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813896TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125025
Biscogniauxia rosacearum CSN1052StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813910TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125028
CSN1054WellingtonWild oliveMT813911TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125028
CSN1055WellingtonWild oliveMT813912TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125028
CSN1056StellenboschWild oliveMT813913TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125028
PMM2071StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813997TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125028
Calosphaeria africana CSN33RobertsonEuropean oliveMT813858TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125029
Capronia sp. CFJS-2015bCSN1167PaarlEuropean oliveMT813953TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125030
CSN1168PaarlEuropean oliveMT813954TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125030
CSN1171StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableMorphological similarity to CSN1172
CSN1172StellenboschEuropean oliveMT814032TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125030
Celerioriella umnquma CSN801DurbanvilleWild oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN1091Somerset WestEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN1092Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN1901PiketbergEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN1918VredendalEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN1922StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
Clonostachys byssicola CSN1133DurbanvilleWild oliveMT813941TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125032
Colletotrichum acutatum CSN1066DurbanvilleEuropean oliveMT813920TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125033
Coniochaeta decumbens CSN654DurbanvilleWild oliveMT813899TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125035
Coniochaeta mutabilis PMM2016PaarlEuropean oliveMT813987TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125035
Coniochaeta velutina PMM2036StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813993TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125035
Coniothyrium ferrarisianum CSN587PaarlEuropean oliveMT813876TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
CSN588PaarlEuropean oliveMT813877TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
CSN590PaarlEuropean oliveMT813878TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
CSN632StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813893TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
CSN1063Somerset WestEuropean oliveMT813917TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
CSN1064Somerset WestEuropean oliveMT813918TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
CSN1067Somerset WestEuropean oliveMT813921TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
CSN1069Somerset WestEuropean oliveMT813922TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
CSN1070Somerset WestEuropean oliveMT813923TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
CSN1071DurbanvilleEuropean oliveMT813924TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
CSN1072Somerset WestEuropean oliveMT813925TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
CSN1073Somerset WestEuropean oliveMT813926TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
PMM2039StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813995TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
Cosmospora sp. CFJS-2015aCSN1162StellenboschWild oliveMT813948TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125036
Cryptovalsa ampelina CSN1924VredendalEuropean oliveMT813973TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125046
Cytospora pruinosa complexCSN577StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813875TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
CSN623Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveMT814030TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
ID0203CeresWild oliveMT813983TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
PMM2025StellenboschEuropean oliveMT814036TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
PMM2026StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813988TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
PMM2029PaarlEuropean oliveMT813989TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
PMM2030PaarlEuropean oliveMT813990TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
PMM2033StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813992TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
PMM2077StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813999TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
Cytospora sp. WvJ-2015aCSN619StellenboschEuropean oliveMT814028TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
CSN620StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813885TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
CSN621DurbanvilleEuropean oliveMT814029TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
CSN622StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813886TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
CSN625StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813887TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
CSN627StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813889TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
CSN1153HermanusEuropean oliveMT813944TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125037
Diaporthe ambigua PMM2078StellenboschEuropean oliveMT814000TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
Diaporthe foeniculina CSN223CalitzdorpEuropean oliveMT814020TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
CSN224FranschhoekWild oliveMT814021TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
CSN225FranschhoekWild oliveMT814022TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
CSN296DurbanvilleEuropean oliveMT813863TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
CSN297DurbanvilleEuropean oliveMT813864TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
CSN301DurbanvilleEuropean oliveMT814023TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
CSN306DurbanvilleEuropean oliveMT814024TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
CSN307StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813865TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
CSN321Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveMT814025TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
CSN338StellenboschWild oliveNot availableSpecies specific PCR, assay of Lesuthu et al. (2019)
CSN343StellenboschWild oliveMT813866TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
CSN348PaarlEuropean oliveMT813867TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
CSN549Somerset WestEuropean oliveMT814026TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
CSN550Somerset WestEuropean oliveMT814027TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
CSN867HermanusEuropean oliveMT813903TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
CSN866HermanusEuropean oliveMT813902TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
PMM2076StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813998TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
PMM2079StellenboschEuropean oliveMT814001TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
PMM2080StellenboschEuropean oliveMT814002TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
PMM2081PaarlEuropean oliveMT814003TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
PMM2083StellenboschEuropean oliveMT814004TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
PMM2161BonnievaleWild oliveMT814011TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125044
Didymocyrtis banksiae CSN1049HermanusEuropean oliveMT813909TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
CSN1050HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableMorphological similarity to CSN1049
CSN1065WellingtonWild oliveMT813919TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125042
Didymosphaeria rubi-ulmifolii CSN634Somerset WestEuropean oliveMT813894TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125047
CSN1150PaarlWild oliveMT813942TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125047
Didymosphaeria variabile CSN618Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveMT813884TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125047
CSN1932VredendalEuropean oliveMT813980TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125047
Diplodia seriata ID0683HermanusEuropean oliveMT813193 (EF), MT813986 (ITS)TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125045
PMM2093PaarlEuropean oliveMT814037TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125045
Eutypa lata ID0305CeresEuropean oliveNot availableMorphologically similar to ID0318
ID0318CeresWild oliveMT813985TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125046
ID0319CeresWild oliveNot availableMorphologically similar to ID0318
PMM2905Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveMT814012TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125046
PMM2907DurbanvilleWild oliveNot availableMorphologically similar to PMM2905
PMM3064StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableMorphologically similar to PMM3071
PMM3066StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableMorphologically similar to PMM3071
PMM3067StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableMorphologically similar to PMM3071
PMM3068HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableMorphologically similar to PMM3071
PMM3069HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableMorphologically similar to PMM3071
PMM3070HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableMorphologically similar to PMM3071
PMM3071HermanusEuropean oliveMT814013TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125046
Exophiala sideris CSN1190HermanusEuropean oliveMT813960TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125030
Exophiala sp. CFJS-2015aCSN1170PaarlEuropean oliveMT814031TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125030
Exophiala sp. CFJS-2015bCSN995HermanusEuropean oliveMT813908TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125030
Exophiala xenobiotica CSN1930VredendalEuropean oliveMT813978TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125030
Fomitiporella sp. (Taxon 1)CSN503PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableMorphologically similar to PMM2086
CSN505PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableMorphologically similar to PMM2086
CSN518PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableMorphologically similar to PMM2086
CSN944HermanusEuropean oliveMT813904TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125048
CSN1936VredendalEuropean oliveMT813982TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125048
PMM2086PaarlEuropean oliveMT814042TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125048
Geosmithia sp. CFJS-2015aCSN158CalitzdorpWild oliveMT813861TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125049
CSN159CalitzdorpEuropean oliveMT813862TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125049
PMM2037PaarlEuropean oliveMT813994TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125049
Helminthosporium asterinum CSN1166StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813952BLAST – 97.13 %) ITS identity to Ellisembia asterinum CBS 203.35 AF073918 (98 %) coverage. No suitable reference sequences available for phylogenetic analysis.
Herpotrichiellaceae sp. CFJS-2015aCSN1211DurbanvilleWild oliveMT813965TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125030
Heterophoma sp.CSN1929VredendalEuropean oliveMT813977TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125050
Hysterium sp. CFJS-2015aCSN1227HermanusEuropean oliveMT813971TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125038
Hysterium sp. CFJS-2015bCSN1108PaarlWild oliveMT813937TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125038
Jattaea sp. CFJS-2015aCSN1152StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813943TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125029
Kirschsteiniothelia sp. CFJS-2015aCSN602PaarlEuropean oliveMT813880TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125039
CSN604WellingtonWild oliveMT813881TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125039
CSN605PaarlEuropean oliveMT813882TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125039
Lembosiniella sp. CFJS-2015aCSN1210HermanusEuropean oliveMT813964TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125040
CSN1225HermanusEuropean oliveMT813970TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125040
Leptosillia sp. CFJS-2015aPMM2101PaarlEuropean oliveMT814010TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125041
Lophiostoma cynaroidis CSN1107WellingtonWild oliveMT813936TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125051
CSN1178PaarlEuropean oliveMT813958TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125051
Meyerozyma guilliermondii CSN1219HermanusEuropean oliveMT813966TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125052
CSN1223HermanusEuropean oliveMT813968TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125052
Mycocalicium victoriae CSN1128HermanusEuropean oliveMT813939TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125053
CSN1129Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableMorphological similarity to CSN1128
CSN1130HermanusEuropean oliveMT813940TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125053
CSN1131HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableMorphological similarity to CSN1128
CSN1194HermanusEuropean oliveMT813961TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125053
Neocucurbitaria cava/juglandicola CSN631StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813892TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125054
Neocucurbitaria unguis-hominis CSN629PaarlEuropean oliveMT813890TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125054
Neodevriesia fraserae CSN1169Somerset WestEuropean oliveMT813955TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125055
Neofusicoccum australe ID0395Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveMT274485, MT295262TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0403StellenboschEuropean oliveMT274487, MT295264TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0493DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0498DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0499DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0500DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0507DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0508DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableDNA fingerprinting, protocol of Alves et al. (2007)
ID0656DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0663HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0671HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableDNA fingerprinting, protocol of Alves et al. (2007)
ID0672HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableDNA fingerprinting, protocol of Alves et al. (2007)
ID0677HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableDNA fingerprinting, protocol of Alves et al. (2007)
ID0678HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableDNA fingerprinting, protocol of Alves et al. (2007)
ID0681HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
PMM2094StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
PMM2095StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
Neofusicoccum cryptoaustrale/stellenboschiana 3 CSN179StrandWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0416StellenboschEuropean oliveMT274489, MT295266TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0489DurbanvilleEuropean oliveMT274491, MT295268TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0490DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0491DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0492DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0494DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0496DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0658HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0661HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0664HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0665HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableDNA fingerprinting, protocol of Alves et al. (2007)
ID0666HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0668HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0669HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0673HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0674HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0680HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0744Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0837HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
PMM2089StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
PMM2096StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
Neofusicoccum sp. 4ID0660HermanusEuropean oliveMT274493, MT295270TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
Neofusicoccum sp. 8ID0828HermanusEuropean oliveMT274494, MT295271TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0847HermanusEuropean oliveMT274495, MT295272TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
Neofusicoccum sp. PMM-2014aPMM2097PaarlEuropean oliveMT814007TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
PMM2098PaarlEuropean oliveMT814008TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
PMM2100PaarlEuropean oliveMT814009TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
Neofusicoccum sp. WvJ-2015aCSN180FranschhoekWild oliveMT274479, MT295256TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0396Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0402StellenboschEuropean oliveMT274486, MT295263TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0417StellenboschEuropean oliveMT274490, MT295267TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0495DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
PMM2090PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
PMM2091PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
PMM2092PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
PMM2099PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
Neofusicoccum vitifusiforme CSN182FranschhoekWild oliveMT274497, MT295274TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
ID0827HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125056
Neophaeomoniella niveniae CSN742StellenboschWild oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN985HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN1916KlawerWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN1919KlawerWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
Neophaeomoniella zymoides CSN743StellenboschWild oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN986HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN1913StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
Nigrograna sp. CFJS-2015aCSN591StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813879TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125057
Nigrospora zimmermanii CSN1157Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveMT813945TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125058
Parapyrenochaeta protearum CSN1911StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813972TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125059
Peniophora lycii CSN371StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813868TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125061
CSN509StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableMorphologically similar to CSN371
Phaeoacremonium africanum CSN946DurbanvilleEuropean oliveKY906773TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062; Spies et al. 2018
Phaeoacremonium minimum PMM2073StellenboschEuropean oliveKY906895TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062; Spies et al. 2018
Phaeoacremonium oleae CSN403PaarlWild oliveKY906719TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062; Spies et al. 2018
CSN413WellingtonWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN703StellenboschWild oliveKY906751TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062; Spies et al. 2018
CSN720WellingtonWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN721WellingtonWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN945DurbanvilleWild oliveKY906771TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062; Spies et al. 2018
CSN1154DurbanvilleWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
ID0231CeresWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
PMM1980StellenboschWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
PMM1981StellenboschWild oliveKY906891TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062; Spies et al. 2018
PMM2440BonnievaleWild oliveKY906937TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062; Spies et al. 2018
Phaeoacremonium parasiticum CSN418PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN476PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN624DurbanvilleEuropean oliveKY906731TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062; Spies et al. 2018
Phaeoacremonium prunicola ID0230CeresWild oliveKY906817TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062; Spies et al. 2018
Phaeoacremonium scolyti CSN676PaarlEuropean oliveKY906743TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062; Spies et al. 2018
CSN1193HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN1196HermanusEuropean oliveKY906779TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062; Spies et al. 2018
CSN1199HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN1200HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN1201HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN1205HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN1206HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN1208Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN1212StellenboschWild oliveKY906781TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062; Spies et al. 2018
CSN1213PaarlEuropean oliveKY906783TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062; Spies et al. 2018
CSN1214HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN1215HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN1217Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
CSN1218HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062
Phaeoacremonium spadicum ID0208CeresWild oliveKY906815TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125062; Spies et al. 2018
Phaeoannellomyces elegans CSN1921KlawerWild oliveMT814034TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125030
Phialemoniopsis cornearis CSN1175Somerset WestEuropean oliveMT813956TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125063
Phialemoniopsis ocularis CSN1177Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveMT813957TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125063
CSN1183DurbanvilleWild oliveMT814033TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125063
CSN1224HermanusEuropean oliveMT813969TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125063
Phialocephala oblonga CSN630StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813891TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125064
Phialocephala sp. CFJS-2015bCSN1185StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813959TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125064
Phlebia acerina PMM2070StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813996TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125065
Pleosporineae sp. CFJS-2015aCSN650Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveMT813898TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125059
CSN1923StellenboschEuropean oliveMT814035TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125059
Pleurostoma richardsiae CSN144RobertsonEuropean oliveMT813859TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125029
CSN145RobertsonEuropean oliveMT813860TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125029
CSN493PaarlEuropean oliveMT813870TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125029
CSN495PaarlWild oliveNot availableMorphological characteristics
CSN496PaarlEuropean oliveMT813871TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125029
CSN500DurbanvilleEuropean oliveMT813872TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125029
CSN501BotrivierEuropean oliveMT813873TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125029
CSN514PaarlEuropean oliveMT813874TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125029
CSN515StellenboschWild oliveNot availableMorphological characteristics
CSN947HermanusEuropean oliveMT813905TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125029
CSN1101HermanusEuropean oliveMT813934TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125029
CSN1161HermanusEuropean oliveMT813947TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125029
CSN1925KlawerWild oliveMT813974TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125029
PMM2011StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableMorphological characteristics
PMM2012PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableMorphological characteristics
PMM2013PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableMorphological characteristics
Preussia africana CSN626Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveMT813888TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125066
Preussia minima CSN1111Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveMT813938TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125066
Pseudocamarosporium africanum CSN1104PaarlWild oliveMT813935TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125067
Pseudolophiostoma sp. CFJS-2015aCSN1198HermanusEuropean oliveMT813962TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125051
Pseudophaeomoniella globosa CSN18FranschhoekWild oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN19FranschhoekWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN41StrandWild oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN183CalitzdorpWild oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN185RobertsonEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN186CalitzdorpEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN294PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN299PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN304PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN305PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN310PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN314PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN315PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN319StellenboschWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN325StellenboschWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN329StellenboschWild oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN334PaarlWild oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN339PaarlWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN344StellenboschWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN349PaarlEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN375StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN377Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN381WellingtonWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN382Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN385StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN386WellingtonWild oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN390StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN391WellingtonWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN395StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN396StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN397Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveNot availableSpecies specific PCR (Van Dyk 2020)
CSN400StellenboschWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN401WellingtonWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN405PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN409PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN410Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN412Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN424StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN427PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN435Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN441StellenboschWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN446StellenboschWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN448StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN451StellenboschEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN463StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN726Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN727PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN728Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN729PaarlWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN730StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN731StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN733StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN735Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN736PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN737Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN738PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN739PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN746PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN750PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN751WellingtonWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN752PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN753StellenboschWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN754StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN755PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN756PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN757StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN759PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN765WellingtonWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN766WellingtonWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN769PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN771PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN788Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN791Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN792Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN799Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN800Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN802Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN803Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN804PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN806DurbanvilleWild oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN808DurbanvilleEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN816StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN818DurbanvilleWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN824Somerset WestEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN825Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN831Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN834DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN835DurbanvilleEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN838Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN950Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN952Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN954PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN955WellingtonWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN956WellingtonWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN960HermanusEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN961HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN962HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN965HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN966HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableSpecies specific PCR (Van Dyk 2020)
CSN968HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN971HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN972Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN973Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN976PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN979Somerset WestEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN982HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN991HermanusEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN1900PiketbergEuropean oliveNot availableSpecies specific PCR (Van Dyk 2020)
CSN1914KlawerWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
CSN1915KlawerWild oliveNot availableSpecies specific PCR (Van Dyk 2020)
CSN1920LutzvilleWild oliveNot availableSpecies specific PCR (Van Dyk 2020)
ID0250CeresWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
ID0251CeresEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
ID0253CeresEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
ID0255CeresWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
ID0256CeresEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
ID0258CeresEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
ID0263CeresWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
ID0264CeresEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
PMM1192VredendalEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
PMM2017StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
PMM2018PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
PMM2044StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
PMM2047PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableMorphological similarity to PMM2044
PMM2052PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableMorphological similarity to PMM2044
PMM2057StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
PMM2060StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
PMM2061StellenboschEuropean oliveNot availableSpecies specific PCR (Van Dyk 2020)
PMM2484BonnievaleWild oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
PMM2485BonnievaleWild oliveNot availableTreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125034
Punctularia atropurpurascens CSN1060DurbanvilleWild oliveMT813915TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125068
CSN1061WellingtonWild oliveMT813916TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125068
Sarocladium strictum CSN1202HermanusEuropean oliveMT813963TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125069
CSN1220HermanusEuropean oliveMT813967TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125069
Schizophyllum commune CSN336PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableMorphological similarity to PMM2088.
CSN528PaarlEuropean oliveNot availableMorphological similarity to PMM2088.
CSN1160HermanusEuropean oliveMT813946TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125070
PMM2087StellenboschEuropean oliveMT814005TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125070
PMM2088PaarlEuropean oliveMT814006TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125070
Symbiotaphrina microtheca CSN615StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813883TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125071
CSN1163HermanusEuropean oliveMT813949TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125071
CSN1164HermanusEuropean oliveMT813950TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125071
CSN1165HermanusEuropean oliveMT813951TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125071
Teichospora sp. CFJS-2015aCSN953DurbanvilleWild oliveMT813906TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125051
CSN1083StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813927TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125051
CSN1084DurbanvilleWild oliveMT813928TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125051
CSN1085StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813929TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125051
CSN1086PaarlEuropean oliveMT813930TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125051
CSN1087PaarlWild oliveMT813931TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125051
CSN1088PaarlEuropean oliveMT813932TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125051
Torula ficus PMM2032StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813991TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125072
Trametes versicolor CSN1058StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813914TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125073
ID0244CeresEuropean oliveMT813984TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125073
Tympanis sp. CFJS-2015aCSN1093HermanusEuropean oliveMT813933TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125074
Unknown – aff. Anthopsis catenataCSN406PaarlEuropean oliveMT813869BLAST – 81.89 % ITS identity to Anthopsis catenata CBS 492.81 NR_159623 (87 % coverage).
Unknown – aff. PhaeomoniellalesCSN783Riebeek-KasteelEuropean oliveMT813672 (18S), MT814041 (ITS)Partial 18S BLAST (404bp) – 94.43 % identity to Pseudophaeomoniella oleicola CBS 139192 KP411807 (88 % coverage). ITS BLAST – No significant similarity found.
Unknown – Pleosporales sp.CSN1927VredendalEuropean oliveMT813976TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125075
Unknown – Pleosporales sp.CSN1933VredendalEuropean oliveMT813981TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125075
Unknown – Pleosporales sp.CSN1926VredendalEuropean oliveMT813975TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125075
Unknown – putative Bezerromycetales sp.CSN1931KlawerWild oliveMT813979TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125076
Unknown – putative Debaryomycetaceae sp.CSN781StellenboschEuropean oliveMT813901TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125052
Unknown – putative Verrucariaceae sp.CSN741PaarlEuropean oliveMT813900TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125060
Vredendaliella oleae PMM1193VredendalEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
Xenocylindrosporium margaritarum CSN1179PaarlEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN1216Somerset WestEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN1917KlawerWild oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
Xenocylindrosporium sp. CFJS-2015cCSN1180PaarlEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN1184StellenboschEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
CSN1203HermanusEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
Xenocylindrosporium sp. CFJS-2015eCSN1222HermanusEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
Xenocylindrosporium sp. CFJS-2015fCSN1191HermanusEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
Xenocylindrosporium sp. CFJS-2015gCSN1174Somerset-WestEuropean oliveSee Table 1 Fig. 3
Xylonomycetes sp. CFJS-2015aCSN958HermanusEuropean oliveMT813907TreeBASE S26669, tree Tr125071

1CSN: collection of Chris Spies at ARC-Nietvoorbij, Stellenbosch, South Africa; ID: collection of Ihan du Plessis at ARC-Nietvoorbij, Stellenbosch, South Africa; PMM: collection of Providence Moyo at the University of Stellenbosch, Department of Plant Pathology, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

2Phylogenies are referred to by figure reference or TreeBASE accession numbers. Details of other methods of identification are provided.

3In the current investigation, these two species could not be distinguished using ITS, TEF1α, and TUB2 sequence data alone or in combination.

REFERENCES

  • Adams GC, Roux J, Wingfield MJ. 2006. Cytospora species (Ascomycota, Diaporthales, Valsaceae): introduced and native pathogens of trees in South Africa. Australasian Plant Pathology 35: 521–548. [Google Scholar]
  • Aguirre-Hudson B. 1991. A taxonomic study of the species referred to the ascomycete genus Leptorhaphis. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) 21: 85–192. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/19389 [accessed 27 July 2019]. [Google Scholar]
  • Alves A, Phillips AJL, Henriques I, et al. . 2007. Rapid differentiation of species of Botryosphaeriaceae by PCR fingerprinting. Research in Microbiology 158: 112–121. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Ariyawansa HA, Hyde KD, Jayasiri SC, et al. . 2015. Fungal diversity notes 111–252: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 75: 27–274. [Google Scholar]
  • Arzanlou M, Groenewald JZ, Gams W, et al. . 2007. Phylogenetic and morphotaxonomic revision of Ramichloridium and allied genera. Studies in Mycology 58: 57–93. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Carbone I, Kohn LM. 1999. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91: 553–556. [Google Scholar]
  • Carlucci A, Lops F, Cibelli F, et al. . 2015. Phaeoacremonium species associated with olive wilt and decline in southern Italy. European Journal of Plant Pathology 141: 717–729. 10.1007/s10658-014-0573-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carlucci A, Lops F, Raimondo ML, et al. . 2008. Comportamento patogenetico di alcuni isolati fungini associati a striature brune del legno di olivo. Petria 18: 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Carlucci A, Raimondo ML, Cibelli F, et al. . 2013. Pleurostomophora richardsiae, Neofusicoccum parvum and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum associated with a decline of olives in southern Italy. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 52: 517–527. [Google Scholar]
  • Chen K-H, Miadlikowska J, Molnár K, et al. . 2015. Phylogenetic analyses of eurotiomycetous endophytes reveal their close affinities to Chaetothyriales, Eurotiales, and a new order – Phaeomoniellales. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 85: 117–130. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Cloete M, Fourie PH, Damm U, et al. . 2011. Fungi associated with die-back symptoms of apple and pear trees, a possible inoculum source of grapevine trunk disease pathogens. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 50: 176–190. [Google Scholar]
  • Coletta-Filho HD, Francisco CS, Lopes JRS, et al. . 2016. First report of olive leaf scorch in Brazil, associated with Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 55: 130–135. [Google Scholar]
  • Costa C. 1998. Olive production in South Africa. Agricultural Research Council, Stellenbosch, South Africa. [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Phillips AJL, Baxter AP. 2000. Phytopathogenic fungi from South Africa. University of Stellenbosch, Department of Plant Pathology Press, South Africa. [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Summerell BA, Shivas RG, et al. . 2011. Fungal Planet description sheets: 92–106. Persoonia 27: 130–162. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Verkley GJM, Groenewald JZ. 2009. Xenocylindrosporium kirstenboschense. Fungal Planet 44, Persoonia 23: 200–201. [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Burgess TI, et al. . 2016. Fungal Planet description sheets: 469–557. Persoonia 37: 218–403. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Guarro J, et al. . 2013. Fungal Planet description sheets: 154–213. Persoonia 31: 188–296. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Guarro J, et al. . 2015. Fungal Planet description sheets: 320–370. Persoonia 34: 167–266. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Da Silva MA, Correia KC, Barbosa MAG, et al. . 2017. Characterization of Phaeoacremonium isolates associated with Petri disease of table grape in Northeastern Brazil, with description of Phaeoacremonium nordesticola sp. nov. European Journal of Plant Pathology 149, 3: 695–709. [Google Scholar]
  • Damm U, Crous PW, Fourie PH. 2007. Botryosphaeriaceae as potential pathogens of Prunus species in South Africa, with descriptions of Diplodia africana and Lasiodiplodia plurivora spp. nov. Mycologia 99: 664–680. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Damm U, Fourie PH, Crous PW. 2010. Coniochaeta (Lecythophora), Collophora gen. nov. and Phaeomoniella species associated with wood necroses of Prunus trees. Persoonia 24: 60–80. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Damm U, Mostert L, Crous PW, et al. . 2008a. Novel Phaeoacremonium species associated with necrotic wood of Prunus trees. Persoonia 20: 87–102. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Damm U, Verkley GJM, Crous PW, et al. . 2008b. Paraconiothyrium species on stone fruit trees and other woody hosts, including P. variabile and P. africanum spp. nov. Persoonia 20: 9–17. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, et al. . 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Farr DF, Rossman AY. Continuously updated. Fungal databases, U.S. National Fungus Collections, ARS, USDA. https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/ [retrieved 21 May 2020]. [Google Scholar]
  • Glass NL, Donaldson GC. 1995. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61: 1323–1330. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Gomes T, Pereira JA, Lino-Neto T, et al. . 2019. Bacterial disease induced changes in fungal communities of olive tree twigs depend on host genotype. Scientific Reports 9: 5882. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Gramaje D, Mostert L, Groenewald JZ, et al. . 2015. Phaeoacremonium: from esca disease to phaeohyphomycosis. Fungal Biology 9: 759–783. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, et al. . 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59: 307–321. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Haelterman RM, Tolocka PA, Roca ME, et al. . 2015. First presumptive diagnosis of Xylella fastidiosa causing olive scorch in Argentina. Journal of Plant Pathology 97: 393. [Google Scholar]
  • Huang Y-L, Devan MMN, U’Ren JM, et al. . 2016. Pervasive effects of wildfire on foliar endophyte communities in montane forest trees. Microbial Ecology 71: 452–468. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Ivic D, Ivanovic A, Milicevic T, et al. . 2010. Shoot necrosis of olive caused by Phoma incompta, a new disease of olive in Croatia. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 49: 414–416. [Google Scholar]
  • Jiménez-Díaz RM, Cirulli M, Bubici G, et al. . 2012. Verticillium wilt, a major threat to olive production: current status and future prospects for its management. Plant Disease 96: 304–329. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kaliterna J, Milicevic T, Ivic D, et al. . 2012. First report of Diplodia seriata as causal agent of olive dieback in Croatia. Plant Disease 96: 290. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, et al. . 2012. Geneious basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647–1649. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kraus C, Damm U, Bien S, et al. . 2020. New species of Phaeomoniellales from a German vineyard and their potential threat to grapevine (Vitis vinifera) health. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 6: 139–155. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Krugner R, Sisterson MS, Chen J, et al. . 2014. Evaluation of olive as a host of Xylella fastidiosa and associated sharpshooter vectors. Plant Disease 98: 1186–1193. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Larignon P, Dubos B. 1997. Fungi associated with esca disease in grapevine. European Journal of Plant Pathology 103: 147–157. [Google Scholar]
  • Lartillot N, Rodrigue N, Stubbs D, et al. . 2013. PhyloBayes MPI: phylogenetic reconstruction with infinite mixtures of profiles in a parallel environment. Systematic Biology 62: 611–615. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lawrence DP, Holland LA, Nouri MT, et al. . 2018. Molecular phylogeny of Cytospora species associated with canker diseases of fruit and nut crops in California, with the descriptions of ten new species and one new combination. IMA Fungus 9: 333–370. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lazzizera C, Frisullo S, Alves A, et al. . 2008. Morphology, phylogeny and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeria and Neofusicoccum species associated with drupe rot of olives in southern Italy. Plant Pathology 57: 948–956. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee HB, Park JY, Jung HS, et al. . 2006. Phaeomoniella zymoides and Phaeomoniella pinifoliorum spp. nov., new acid-tolerant epiphytic fungi isolated from pine needles in Korea. Mycologia 98: 598–611. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lesuthu P, Mostert L, Spies CFJ, et al. . 2019. Diaporthe nebulae sp. nov. and first report of D. cynaroidis, D. novem, and D. serafiniae on grapevines in South Africa. Plant Disease 103: 808–817. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Marincowitz S, Groenewald JZ, Wingfield MJ, et al. . 2008. Species of Botryosphaeriaceae occurring on Proteaceae. Persoonia 21: 111–118. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Martelli GP, Boscia D, Porcelli F, et al. . 2016. The olive quick decline syndrome in south-east Italy: a threatening phytosanitary emergency. European Journal of Plant Pathology 144: 235–243. [Google Scholar]
  • Moral J, Agustí-Brisach C, Pérez-Rodríguez M, et al. . 2017. Identification of fungal species associated with branch dieback of olive and resistance of table cultivars to Neofusicoccum mediterraneum and Botryosphaeria dothidea. Plant Disease 101: 306–316. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Moral J, Muñoz-Díez C, González N, et al. . 2010. Characterization and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae species collected from olive and other hosts in Spain and California. Phytopathology 100: 1340–1351. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Mostert L, Groenewald JZ, Summerbell RC, et al. . 2006. Taxonomy and pathology of Togninia (Diaporthales) and its Phaeoacremonium anamorphs. Studies in Mycology 54: 1–115. [Google Scholar]
  • Moyo P, Damm U, Mostert L, et al. . 2018a. Eutypa, Eutypella, and Cryptovalsa species (Diatrypaceae) associated with Prunus species in South Africa. Plant Disease 102: 1402–1409. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Moyo P, Mostert L, Bester M, et al. . 2016. Trunk disease fungi associated with Diospyros kaki in South Africa. Plant Disease 100: 2383–2393. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Moyo P, Mostert L, Spies CFJ, et al. . 20018b. Diversity of Diatrypaceae species associated with dieback of grapevines in South Africa, with the description of Eutypa cremea sp. nov. Plant Disease 102: 220–230. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Mugnai L, Graniti A, Surico G. 1999. Esca (black measles) and brown wood-streaking: two old and elusive diseases of grapevines. Plant Disease 83: 404–418. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Nigro F, Boscia D, Antelmi I, et al. . 2013. Fungal species associated with a severe decline of olive in Southern Italy. Journal of Plant Pathology 95: 668. [Google Scholar]
  • Nirenberg HI. 1976. Untersuchungen über die morphologische und biologische Differenzierung in der Fusarium-Sektion Liseola. Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Budesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft Berlin-Dahlem 169: 1–117. [Google Scholar]
  • O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E. 1997. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7: 103–116. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Pavlic-Zupanc D, Maleme HM, Piškur B, et al. . 2017. Diversity, phylogeny and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae on non-native Eucalyptus grown in an urban environment: A case study. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 26: 139–148. [Google Scholar]
  • Raimondo ML, Lops F, Carlucci A. 2016. Charcoal canker of pear, plum, and quince trees caused by Biscogniauxia rosacearum sp. nov. in southern Italy. Plant Disease 100: 1813–1822. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rayner RW. 1970. A mycological colour chart. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Romero MA, Sánchez ME, Trapero A. 2005. First report of Botryosphaeria ribis as a branch dieback pathogen of olive trees in Spain. Plant Disease 89: 208. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rossman AY, Schoch CL, Farr DF, et al. . 2010. Dolabra nepheliae on rambutan and lychee represents a novel lineage of phytopathogenic Eurotiomycetes. Mycoscience 51: 300–309. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rumbos IC. 1988. Cytospora oleina causing canker and dieback of olive in Greece. Plant Pathology 37: 441–444. [Google Scholar]
  • Rumbos IC. 1993. Dieback symptoms on olive trees caused by the fungus Eutypa lata. EPPO Bulletin 23: 441–445. [Google Scholar]
  • Saponari M, Boscia D, Nigro F, et al. . 2013. Identification of DNA sequences related to Xylella fastidiosa in oleander, almond and olive trees exhibiting leaf scorch symptoms in Apulia (southern Italy). Journal of Plant Pathology 95: 668. [Google Scholar]
  • Smit WA, Viljoen CD, Wingfield BD, et al. . 1996. A new canker disease of apple, pear, and plum rootstocks caused by Diaporthe ambigua in South Africa. Plant Disease 80: 1331–1335. [Google Scholar]
  • Spies CFJ, Moyo P, Halleen F, et al. . 2018. Phaeoacremonium species diversity on woody hosts in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Persoonia 40: 26–62. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor RK, Hale CN, Hartill WFT. 2001. A stem canker disease of olive (Olea europaea) in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 29: 219–228. [Google Scholar]
  • Úrbez-Torres JR, Lawrence DP, Peduto F, et al. . 2020. Olive twig and branch dieback in California caused by Cytospora oleicola and the newly described species Cytospora olivarum sp. nov. Plant Disease 104: 1908–1917. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Úrbez-Torres JR, Peduto F, Vossen PM, et al. . 2013. Olive twig and branch dieback: etiology, incidence and distribution in California. Plant Disease 97: 231–244. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Dyk M. 2020. Characterisation, epidemiology and management of olive trunk pathogens in South Africa. PhD thesis, Department of Plant Pathology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Niekerk JM, Crous PW, Groenewald JZE, et al. . 2004. DNA phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeria species on grapevines. Mycologia 96: 781–798. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Niekerk JM, Groenewald JZ, Farr DF, et al. . 2005. Reassessment of Phomopsis species on grapevines. Australasian Plant Pathology 34: 27–39. [Google Scholar]
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Viljoen N. 2020. Industry statistics, SA olive annual general meeting, 23 January 2020. Presentation by Nina Viljoen (Hortgro). [Google Scholar]
  • White C-L, Halleen F, Fischer M, et al. . 2011a. Characterisation of the fungi associated with esca diseased grapevines in South Africa. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 50: 204–223. [Google Scholar]
  • White C-L, Halleen F, Mostert L. 2011b. Symptoms and fungi associated with esca in South African vineyards. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 50: S236–S246. [Google Scholar]
  • White TJ, Burns S, Lee S, et al. . 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis N, Gelfand D, Sninsky J, et al.. (eds), PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications: 315–322. Academic Press, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Yang T, Groenewald JZ, Cheewangkoon R, et al. . 2017. Families, genera, and species of Botryosphaeriales. Fungal Biology 121: 322–346. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Persoonia : Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi are provided here courtesy of Naturalis Biodiversity Center & Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/155970023
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/155970023

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.3767/persoonia.2020.45.08

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
1
9
0

Article citations


Go to all (6) article citations

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.